Upload
stephanie-d-saunderson
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Problem Set No. 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/problem-set-no-1 1/2
8/9/2019 Problem Set No. 1
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/problem-set-no-1 2/2
1. ,@#51- 8 111#56 = .,562
!. ro"th 7ate Anal%sis
i. nternal: 07OA F b 01(7OAFb
1. b=1−11126
39510=0.718
2. 0.1-6F.1<801(.1-6F.1< = .1,@6
ii. Sustainable: 07OE F b 01 ( 7OEFb
1. 0.,562F.1<801(.,562F.1< = .,61iii. nterpretation:
1. nternal: Apple an $ro" a ma+imum o! 1,.@6G "ithout usin$ an% *ind o! E?N.
2. Sustainable: Apple an $ro" a ma+imum o! ,6.1G "ithout e+ternal e4uit%
!inanin$ and at its urrent debt(e4uit% ratio.
5. C 0(1+ rm )
m
→3500(1+ .104 )7∗4
=$ 6987.73
;. FV =C [ (1+r )T −1
r ]→5000[ (1+.08)10−1
.08 ]=$72432.81
.
a. Option A: PV = C
r−g=
5000
.08−.02=$83,333.33→
83333.33
(1+.08)5 =$56715.26
b. Option B: PV =C [ 1−(1+r )T
r ]→10000[ 1−( 1
(1+0.1)5)
.10 ]=$37907.87
. "ould hoose Option A beause it has a hi$her Present 3alue.
<. See attahed
@..07 (120000 )
1−(1+ .07 )−10=$17085.30
1-..12 (1,200,000 )
1−(1+.12)− x =$ 150,000
a. + = 2<.6-, %ears H 2< %ears 6.5 months
11. D
12. See Attahed
1,. See Attahed
16. See Attahed
15. &oth the P and NP3 onsider the initial in'estment o! the proIet# the present o! 'alue o! all ash
!lo"s# as "ell as the interest rate. The pro!itabilit% inde+# ho"e'er# is a ratio that ompares the ost to
the P3 o! !uture ash !lo"s# "hereas NP3 simpl% sho"s the net return on the proIet in present 'alue
terms. P does not re!let the sale o! the in'estment# but is a better indiator o! the better proIet i! both
are mutuall% e+lusi'e. Jo"e'er# in most ases NP3 is a better tool beause it uses all o! the ash !lo"s
o! the proIet and disounts them properl%.