View
218
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Probing many-body systems of ultracold atoms
E. Altman (Weizmann), A. Aspect (CNRS, Paris), M. Greiner (Harvard), V. Gritsev (Freiburg), S. Hofferberth (Harvard), A. Imambekov (Yale), T. Kitagawa (Harvard), M. Lukin (Harvard), S. Manz (Vienna), I. Mazets (Vienna), D. Petrov (CNRS, Paris), T. Schumm (Vienna), J. Schmiedmayer (Vienna)
Eugene Demler Harvard University
Collaboration with experimental group of I. Bloch
Outline
Density ripples in expanding low-dimensional condensates
Review of earlier workAnalysis of density ripples spectrum1d systems2d systems
Phase sensitive measurements of order parametersin many body system of ultra-cold atoms
Phase sensitive experiments in unconventional superconductorsNoise correlations in TOF experimentsFrom noise correlations to phase sensitive measurements
Fluctuations in 1d BEC
Thermal fluctuations
Thermally energy of the superflow velocity
Quantum fluctuations
Density fluctuations in 1D condensates
In-situ observation of density fluctuations is difficult.Density fluctuations in confined clouds are suppressed by interactions.Spatial resolution is also a problem.
When a cloud expands, interactions are suppressed anddensity fluctuations get amplified.
Phase fluctuations are converted into density ripples
Density ripples in expanding anisotropic 3d condensates Dettmer et al. PRL 2001
Hydrodynamics expansion is dominated by collisions Complicated relation between original fluctuations and final density ripples.
Fluctuations in 1D condensates and density ripples
New generation of low dimensional condensates. Tight transverse confinement leads to essentially collision-lessexpansion.
Assuming ballistic expansion we can find direct relationbetween density ripples and fluctuations before expansion.
A pair of 1d condensates on a microchip.J. Schmiedmayer et al.
1d tubes created withoptical lattice potentialsI. Bloch et al.
Density ripples: Bogoliubov theory
Expansion during time t
Density after expansion
Densitycorrelations
Density ripples: Bogoliubov theory
Maxima at
Minima at
The amplitude of the spectrum is dependent on temperatureand interactions
Non-monotonic dependence on momentum.Matter-wave near field diffraction: Talbot effect
Concern: Bogoliubov theory is not applicable to low dimensional condensates. Need extensions beyond mean-field theory
Density ripples: general formalism
Free expansion of atoms. Expansion in different directions factorize
We are interested in the motion along the original trap. For 1d systems
Quasicondensates • One dimensional systems with
• Two dimensional systems below BKT transition
Factorization of higher order correlation functions
One dimensional quasicondensate, Mora and Castin (2003)
Density ripples in 1D for weakly interacting Bose gas
Thermal correlation length
T/ =1, 0.67, 0.3, 0
Different timesof flight. T/=0.67
A single peak in the spectrum after
Density ripples in expanding cloud:Time-evolution of g2(x,t)
Sufficient spatial resolution required toresolve oscillations in g2
Density ripples in expanding cloud:Time-evolution of g2(x,t) for hard core bosons
T=0. Expansion times
T/
“Antibunching” at short distances is rapidly suppressed during expansion
Finite temperature
Density ripples in 2D
Quasicondensates in 2D below BKT transition
For weakly interacting Bose gas
is a universal dimensionless function
Below Berezinsky-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition at c=1/4
Density ripples in 2D
Expansion times
Fixed time of flight.Different temperatures
87Rb
t = 4, 8, 12 ms
= 0.1, 0.15, 0.25
Applications of density ripples Thermometry at low temperatures
T/ =1, 0.67, 0.3, 0
Probe of roton softening
Analysis of non-equilibrium states?
d-wave pairing
Fermionic Hubbard model
Possible phase diagram of the Hubbard modelD.J.Scalapino Phys. Rep. 250:329 (1995)
Non-phase sensitive probes of d-wave pairing:
dispersion of quasiparticles
++-
-Quasiparticle energies
Superconducting gap
Normal state dispersion of quasiparticles
Low energy quasiparticles correspond to four Dirac nodes
Observed in:
• Photoemission• Raman spectroscopy• T-dependence of thermodynamic
and transport properties, cV, , L
• STM• and many other probes
Phase sensitive probe of d-wave pairing in high Tc superconductors
Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID)
Van Harlingen, Leggett et al, PRL 71:2134 (93)
Second order coherence in the insulating state of bosons.Hanburry-Brown-Twiss experiment
Experiment: Folling et al., Nature 434:481 (2005)Theory: Altman et al., PRA 70:13603 (2004)
Second order coherence in the insulating state of fermions.Hanburry-Brown-Twiss experiment
Experiment: Tom et al. Nature 444:733 (2006)
Second order interference from the BCS superfluid
)'()()',( rrrr nnn
n(r)
n(r’)
n(k)
k
0),( BCSn rr
BCS
BEC
kF
Theory: Altman et al., PRA 70:13603 (2004)
Fermion pairing in an optical lattice
Second Order InterferenceIn the TOF images
Normal State
Superfluid State
Measures the absolute value of theCooper pair wavefunction.Not a phase sensitive probe
P-wave molecules
How to measure the non-trivial symmetry of (p)?
We want to measure the relative phase between components of the molecule at different wavevectors
Two particle interferenceBeam splitters perform Rabi rotation
Coincidence count
Coincidence count is sensitive to the relative phase between different components of themolecule wavefunction
Questions: How to make atomic beam splitters and mirrors? Phase difference includes phase accumulated during free expansion. How to control it?
Bragg + Noise
Gk
-k
p
-p
G
Bragg pulse is applied in the beginning of expansion
Coincidence count
Assuming mixing between k and p states only
Common mode propagation after the pulse. We do not need to worry about thephase accumulated during the expansion.
Gk
-k
p
-p
G
Many-body BCS stateBCS wavefunction
Strong Bragg pulse: mixing of many momentum eigenstates
Noise correlations
Interference term is sensitive to the phase difference between k and p parts of the Cooper pair wavefunction and to the phases of Bragg pulses
Systems with particle-hole correlations
D-density wave state
Suggested as a competing order in high Tc cuprates
Phase sensitive probe of DDWorder parameter
G k
-k
p
-p
G
SummaryDensity ripples in expanding low-dimensional condensates
Phase sensitive measurements of order parametersin many body systems of ultra-cold atoms
T/ =1, 0.67, 0.3, 0
Different timesof flight. T/=0.67
Detection of spin superexchange interactions and antiferromagnetic
statesSpin noise analysis
Bruun, Andersen, Demler, Sorensen, PRL (2009)
Spin shot noise as a probe of AF orderMeasure net spin in a part of the system.Laser beam passes through the sample. Photons experience phaseshift determined by the net spin.Use homodyne to measure phase shift
Average magnetization zero
Shot to shot magnetization fluctuations reflect spin correlations
Spin shot noise as a probe of AF order
High temperatures. Every spin fluctuates independently
Low temperatures. Formation of antiferromagnetic correlations
Suppression of spin fluctuations dueto spin superexchange interactions can beobserved at temperatures well above theNeel ordering transition