15
Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann http://cs.gmu.edu/~pammann/ SWE 432 Design and Implementation of Software for the Web

Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

Prioritizing Web UsabilityNielsen and Loranger

Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings

Paul Ammann

http://cs.gmu.edu/~pammann/

SWE 432

Design and Implementation of Software for the Web

Page 2: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 2

Overview

• Eight Problems that Haven’t Changed

• Technological Change: Its Impact on Usability

• Adaptation: How Users Have Influenced Usability

• Restraint: How Designers Have Alleviated Usability Problems

34 Usability Problems:

Improved vs. Irrelevant vs. More Important Than Ever

Page 3: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 3

Eight Problems That Haven’t Changed

• Links That Don’t Change Color When Visited• Breaking the Back Button• Opening New Browser Windows• Pop-Up Windows• Design Elements That Look Like Advertising• Violating Web-Wide Conventions• Vaporous Content and Empty Hype• Dense Content and Unscannable Text

Why Do We Still Do These Things?

Page 4: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 4

1: Links That Don’t Change Color When Visited

• Users Need to Understand– Where They Have Been

– Where They Are

– Where They Can Go

• Users Go in Circles If They Lose The Past• 74% of Sites Comply With Guideline

– 26% Are Still Deficient!

• Exception: Command Oriented Functionality– If Users Want To Repeat Actions, Links Can Stay The Same

Color

Support User’s Need To Be Oriented

Page 5: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 © Offutt, 2001-2007 5

2: Breaking The Back Button• “Undo” Support Is a Basic Usability Requirement• Repeated “Back” vs. Pull Down History List• Second Most Used Feature in Web Browsing• Benefits:

– Back is Always Available

– Recognition is Better than Recall

– The Back Button is a Large (and Fast) Target

• Ways to Break the Back Button– Hiding the “Chrome”

– Opening a New Brower Window

– Redirects Embedded in Web Pages

“Back” is the User’s Lifeline

Page 6: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 © Offutt, 2001-2007 6

3: Opening New Browser Windows• Opening A New Window Breaks the Back Button

– But Doesn’t Effectively Trap Users On Your Site

• Multiple Windows Present Multiple Usability Problems– Disrupts Expected User Experience

– Pollutes User’s Work Space

– Hampers Ability To Return To Visited Pages

– Obscures Window User Is Working In

– Can Make User Believe Links Are Inactive

• Users Can Always Right Click For A New Window• Exception

– PDF and Similar Documents

Leave New Windows Up to the User

Page 7: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 7

4: Pop-Up Windows

• Consider Pop-Up Blockers– A Clear Indication That Users Hate Pop-Ups

• Many Users Close Pop-Ups Before Seeing the Content• Closing a Pop-Up Invariably Requires The Mouse• Evil Pop-Ups Form The Vast Majority• Pop-Ups Are Especially Hard For Certain Users• Theoretical Legitimate Use For Pop-Ups

– Provide Supplementary Info While Keeping Workspace Clear

Don’t Use Them

Page 8: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 8

5: Design Elements That Look Like Advertisements

• Users Automatically Filter Out Anything That Looks Like An Ad– Basic Self-Defense Mechanism

– Includes Anything Shaped Like A Banner

– Anything Flashing

– Anything That is Too Big

• Users Usually Look For Text– Because That’s Where Most Links Are

User Behavior Evolves As The Environment Changes

Page 9: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 9

6: Violating Web-Wide Conventions

• Users Spend Most Time On Other Web Sites– Expectations For Your Site Set By Other Sites

• Example: Zinc Bistro– Things That Look Clickable Should be Clickable

– Don’t Hide Links in Weird Places

User’s Don’t Care About You; They Want Your Data

Page 10: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 10

7: Vaporous Content and Empty Hype

• Basic Marketing– Sell The Benefits, Not the Features

• Search Engine Optimization– Concrete Text Leads To Better Rankings

• Example: Mont Blanc

Fluffy Language Drives Users Away AND Hides Your Site

Page 11: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 11

8: Dense Content and Unscannable Text

• Unpacking Dense Text is Hard Work– Users are Lazy

• Government Sites Are Prime Offenders– Example: Social Security Answer Desk

• Web Text Should be Short, Scannable, and Approachable– Write Half (or a Quarter) as Many Words For Web as for Print

This is Really Hard to Do, But it’s Important

Page 12: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 12

Technological Change: Its Impact on Usability

• Slow Download Time• Frames• Flash• Low-Relevancy Search Listings• MultiMedia and Long Videos• Frozen Layouts• Cross Platform Incompatibility

Less Important Today Because of Better Browsers, More Bandwidth, or Other Internet Technology

Page 13: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 13

Adaptation: How Users Have Influenced Usability

• Uncertain Clickability• Links that Aren’t Blue• Scrolling• Registration• Complex URLs• Pull-Down and Cascading Menus

Less Important Today Because Users Know More

Page 14: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 14

Restraint: How Designers Have Alleviated Usability Problems

• Plug-Ins and Bleeding Edge Technologies• 3D User Interfaces• Bloated Design• Splash Pages• Moving Graphics and Scrolling Text• Custom GUI Widgets• Not Disclosing Who’s Behind Information

Web Designers Are Getting Smarter

Page 15: Prioritizing Web Usability Nielsen and Loranger Chapter 3: Revisiting Early Web Usability Findings Paul Ammann pammann/ SWE 432 Design

04/20/23 15

Restraint: How Designers Have Alleviated Usability Problems (2)

• Made-Up Words• Outdated Content• Inconsistency Within a Web Site• Premature Requests for Personal Information• Multiple Sites• Orphan Pages

Web Designers Are Getting Smarter