Prior to the passing of the Transfer of Property Act

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 Prior to the passing of the Transfer of Property Act

    1/5

    PROPERTY LAW PROJECT

    ORAL TRANSFER (SECTION 9 OFTRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT)

    BY DEBMITA MONDAL

    BA LLB, 3RD YEAR

    KIIT LAW SCHOOL

    BHUBNESWAR

  • 8/7/2019 Prior to the passing of the Transfer of Property Act

    2/5

    INTRODUCTION

    Oral transfer- A transfer of property may be made without writing in every

    case in which a writing is not expressly required by law.

    Prior to the passing of the Transfer of Property Act, no writing was necessary for such transfer.

    After passing of the act certain specified transactions are required to be in writing. For instance

    title to the land cannot pass by mere admission when a statute requires a deed.

    Section 9 says that a transfer of property may be made without writing in every case in which

    writing is not expressly required by law. In Sarandaya Pillai v. Sankarlinga Pilai , Justice

    Ramaswami of Madras High court Observed the test, therefore, in this country to determine

    whether a transaction (be it a transfer or not) can be made without writing is to see if it is

    expressly required by law to be in writing. If on the other hand, the transaction is not a transfer of

    property and there is no express provision of law requiring it to be in writing, the general

    principle referred to above will enable it to be validly made without writing. Section 9

    underlines the general principle that everything is to be taken permissible unless there is a

    prohibition against it and has been inserted in the statute ex abundant cautela.

    DELIVERY OF POSSESSION

    Generally movable properties may be transferred by delivered of possession. Month to month

    tenancy, mortgage by deposit of title deeds, exchange of immovable property valuing less than

    rupees one hundred, etc. can also transferred orally.

    WRITING NECESSARY

    The act requires transactions specified in sections 54, 58, (except mortgage by deposit of title

    deeds), 105,118, 122, and 130 to be in writing. So also under Section 5 of the Trust Act, II of

    1882, transfer which parties desire to register must be in writing. Gift of immovable property at

    the time of marriage must be in writing and must also be registered. Section 9 of the Transfer of

    Property Act would not apply to a case of transfer of immovable property made at the time of

    marriage by a Hindu.

  • 8/7/2019 Prior to the passing of the Transfer of Property Act

    3/5

    A petition to collector admitting a transfer or recitals in another deed or mutation of names or

    delivery of possession will not affect a transfer, if the Transfer of Property Act requires a

    registered deed. A transfer of title requires a conveyance and this cannot be given effect by a

    mere agreement.1

    WRITING NOT NECESSARY

    Transfer of property clearly recognizes oral transfers as rule unless there is law which expressly

    requires that it should be in writing. A relinquishment by the mother of her interest in the joint

    family property, even when the property consists of immovable property and the value of the

    share therein exceeds Rs. 100, can be made without writing and registered instrument is not

    required. Sale of property worth less than Rs.100 may be made either by a registered instrument

    or orally by delivery of possession.

    Alienation needs no written instrument. It is sufficient if the person entitled to the property does

    an act which necessarily results in its transfer. An award relating to immovable property need

    not be writing. A comprise of disputes resulting in transfer of immovable property, a partition of

    immovable property, a transfer by possession followed by a deed of gift incomplete owing to

    absence of registration and a transfer of land by husband to his wife during her lifetime in

    discharge of future maintenance may be made without writing, and so a surrender of lease.

    In Imperial Bank of India v. Bengal National Bank2, CJ Rankin said that partition, release

    and surrender are all forms of transfer but that so far as the Transfer of Property is concerned,

    they come under no restriction. A right to recover a share of immovable property may be

    relinquished orally and without an instrument in writing.3

    REGISTRATION

    Transfer which are not expressly required by law to be in writing, if made in writing, are subject

    to be requirement of registration if they purport or operate to declare, assign , limit or extinguish

    a right, title or interest to or in immovable property of the value of Rs. 100 and upwards. Section

    1G C Bharuka, Mulla The transfer of Property Act, 10

    thEdition, Lexis Nexis Butterworths Wadhwa Nagpur, p.143

    2(1931) ILR 58 Cal 136

    3Lal Singh v. Chotey Beti (1934) All LJ 107

  • 8/7/2019 Prior to the passing of the Transfer of Property Act

    4/5

    9 of Transfer of Property Act would not apply to a case of transfer of immovable property made

    at the time of marriage by a Hindu.

    ORAL MORTGAGE

    Where the sum secured is more than one hundred rupees, an oral mortgage is not valid, and no

    evidence can be adduced to prove such mortgage. Where a mortgage has not been affected in

    accordance with law, it cannot be proved by any other evidence.

    DEED OF RELINQUISHMENT

    A deed of relinquishment is in the nature of deed of gift, where the various properties dealt with

    are always separable, and the invalidly of the deed of gift in respect of one item cannot affect its

    validity in respect of another. Where the deed of relinquishment, was in respect of the individual

    interest of the three brothers in the assets of the partnership firm in favor of the Trust, and

    consequently, did not require registration, even though the assets of the partnership firm included

    immovable property, and was valid without registration.

    PARTITION

    A partition between co-owners it may perhaps be said to involve a transfer of property because in

    the specific properties allotted to a particular co-owner the interest which the others co-owners

    had previous to the partition is given up and to that extent in may be said to be a property . But

    the Transfer of Property Act itself does not expressly require such a partition to be in writing and

    there is no other provision of law requiring such a partition to be evidenced by writing. Thus

    partition of a joint family may be made orally and also a release by a mother of her interest in

    joint family property.

    To enable the parties to come to an agreement, namely, to treat a sale as a mortgage by a

    subsequent agreement, no writing need be executed by and between the parties. There are

    various instances of oral transfer.

  • 8/7/2019 Prior to the passing of the Transfer of Property Act

    5/5

    ORAL PARTITION

    A partition may be effected orally, but if subsequently reduced to the form of a document and

    that document purports by itself to effect a division and embodies all terms of a bargain, it will

    be necessary to register it.

    EXCEPTION

    The English doctrine of part-performance extended by Privy Council to this country in Mahomed

    Musas case which subsequently found into Section 53A of the Amending Act, 20 of 1929,

    violates the rule in this section under circumstances mentioned therein. The doctrine is an

    encroachment on the rule that when the Act prescribes the mode of transfer , the transfer may not

    be made in any other way.