1
printed by www.postersession.com Joint assimilation of in-situ and remotely sensed surface soil Joint assimilation of in-situ and remotely sensed surface soil Why Land Surface Models are needed? They provide an explanation of surface processes Their estimations are used for meteorologist and climatologist as lower boundary conditions for NWP models. Provide an estimation of the surface variables (Temperature, moisture, vegetation volume, etc.) Why assimilate observations of the surface soil moisture and LAI? They can be estimated from remote sensing observations, at local scale and relative good temporal-spatial resolutions. Physically related to key surface variables: the root-zone soil moisture and the Potential improvement of the up-welling water and energy fluxes, as input for NWP models. 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 22 3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333 444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 5555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555 6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666 77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA VBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ASSIMILATION APPROACH : Based on the results of Muñoz Sabater et al. (2007a), the Simplified 1D-VAR (Balsamo et al., 2004) method was applied. The LSM was reinitialized by optimally combining the information provided by observations and the LSM. The Simplified 1D-VAR minimizes the cost function J: [1] Linear Tangent Hypothesis: Linearization of the non- linear observation operator H by perturbation of the initial value of the state variables (w 2 and vegetation biomass). Under the linear tangent hypothesis (where H is assumed to be linear) and with errors (background B and observations R matrices) following a normal distribution, it is not necessary to derive an adjoint or linear tangent model to compute the minimum of J. The equations to update the state of the system for the two state variables (w 2 and vegetation biomass) are: [2] The data set was assimilated into the ISBA-A-gs LSM (Calvet et al., 1998) using the simplified 1D-VAR scheme. The assimilation window length was of 10 days, Balsamo G., Bouyssel F., and Noilhan J., 2004: A simplified bi- dimensional variational analysis of soil moisture from screen-level observations in a mesoscale numerical weather-prediction model. Q. J. R. Met. Soc., 130A, 895-915. Calvet, J.C., Noilhan J., Roujean J.-L., Bessemoulin P., Cabelguenne M., Olioso A., Wigneron J.-P., 1998: An interactive vegetation SVAT model tested against data from six contrasting sites. Agric. For. Meteor., 92, 73- 95. De Rosnay, P.,and coauthors, 2006: SMOSREX: A long term field campaign experiment for soil moisture and land surface processes remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ., 102, 377-389. Muñoz Sabater, J., L. Jarlan, J.-C. Calvet, F. Bouyssel and P. De Rosnay, 2007a: From near surface to root zone soil moisture using different assimilation techniques. Journal of Hydromet., 8, 194-206. , , In general, good w 2 analysis. However the vegetation biomass needs to be improved. Evidence of the need to determine improved observational and model state errors as a function of time. Further, our study demonstrated that the analysis of the analysis of the the wilting point could be necessary during dry periods for one-layer surface models (Muñoz Sabater et al., 2007b). The analyses are degraded if an atmospheric forcing of less quality is introduced (for instance, without information about precipitation), but the assimilation still provides valuable information about the state variables. in a complete 2D operational configuration. SMOSREX (De Rosney; 2006): Field scale experience situated at the South-West of France (43º23’N, 1º17’E, 188 m altitude). Manual and automated measurements: • Atmospheric forcing (downwelling short wave and long wave radiation, air temperature and specific humidity, precipitation, atmospheric pressure, wind speed, vapor pressure). Soil temperature and soil moisture profiles. • Vegetation and soil parameters (LAI, canopy height, mesophyll conductance, sand and clay content, soil root depth, wilting point, field capacity, critical extractable soil moisture, etc.) Multispectral radiometric measurements: Brightness temperatures (T B ) at L-band (1.4 GHz) over fallow and bare soil. • Reflectances over fallow at 450, 549, 648, 837 and 1640 nm. MOTIVATION EXPERIMENTAL SITE METHODOLOGY RESULTS - II CONCLUSIONS BIBLIOGRAPHY B: Bio’ init = Bio init + Bio init y (i) = y T (i) – y T’ (i) y (observed Variable) t=0 1 2 p T Ty (1) y (p) )) ( y ( )) ( y ( 2 1 ) ( ) ( 2 1 ) ( 1 1 x H x H x x x x x J T b T b R B A: w 2nit B: w’ 2nit = w 2nit + w 2init OBJECTIVES Joint assimilation of remotely sensed LAI and surface soil moisture observations (w g ) in a simplified variational method. Update of the root-zone soil moisture and the vegetation biomass. Study of the impact of a joint assimilation of observed LAI and surface soil moisture on the retrieved variables. BACK J OBS J x: state variable x b : background or first guess y: vector of observations H: observation operator B, R: background and observation error covariance matrices A: Bio init A A A A B B B B Why Land Surface Models (LSM) are needed? LSM simulate the temporal and spatial evolution of surface variables (temperature, soil moisture, biomass, etc.). Such predictions are required in meteorology and climatology as lower boundary conditions for NWP and GCMs. Why to assimilate observations of surface soil moisture and LAI? These observations are physically related to key surface variables, such as root-zone soil moisture (w 2 ) and vegetation biomass. They have the potential to be retrieved at a global scale through remote sensing at adequate temporal and spatial resolutions. The assimilation can improve the up-welling water and energy fluxes, as input for NWP models. Joint assimilation of surface soil moisture and LAI observations with a simplified 1D-VAR assimilation scheme J. Muñoz Sabater (1) , C. Rüdiger (2) , J.-C. Calvet (2) , L. Jarlan (3) , S. Massart (1) (1) CERFACS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Meteo-France, Toulouse (3) CESBIO, Toulouse, France Fig 5.- Joint assimilation of in-situ Fig 5.- Joint assimilation of in-situ LAI LAI and and w g observations. The temporal assimilation window observations. The temporal assimilation window is of 10 days is of 10 days init p init T x y x y ) ( ) 1 ( H ) H ( ] H H [ H 1 b bio OBS LAI T bio bio bio T bio bio b a Bio LAI Bio Bio R B B ) H ( ] H [H H 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 b w OBS g w T w w w T w w b a w w w w g R B B Fig.1- Radiometers at SMOSREX Fig.1- Radiometers at SMOSREX Fig.2- Fig.2- Schematic figure of the linearization of the observation Schematic figure of the linearization of the observation operator operator H Fig 3.- Same as in fig. 2 Fig 3.- Same as in fig. 2, but with precipitation set to zero. This test was undertaken in but with precipitation set to zero. This test was undertaken in order to study the response of the assimilation scheme to strong errors in the atmospheric forcing. order to study the response of the assimilation scheme to strong errors in the atmospheric forcing. RESULTS - I Fig 2.- Joint assimilation of in-situ Fig 2.- Joint assimilation of in-situ LAI LAI and and w g observations. The temporal assimilation observations. The temporal assimilation window is of 10 days window is of 10 days Table 1.-Global RMSE and mean bias (mb) Table 1.-Global RMSE and mean bias (mb) for the root zone-soil moisture (in m3 m- for the root zone-soil moisture (in m3 m- 3), the above-ground vegetation biomass 3), the above-ground vegetation biomass (in kg m-2), and the LAI (in m2 m-2) (in kg m-2), and the LAI (in m2 m-2) between the analyses and the control between the analyses and the control simulation. The efficiency E (Nash simulation. The efficiency E (Nash criteria) is also indicated. criteria) is also indicated. PERSPECTIVES Assimilation of the real remote sensing data provided by the radiometers of SMOSREX (Fig. 1). Extension of the assimilation scheme to a complete 2D configuration at the South-West of France. Integration of the air temperature and humidity observations within the complete 2D assimilation scheme. L-band L-band radiometer radiometer Third International Workshop on Catchment-scale Hydrological Modeling and Data Assimilation, 9-11 Jan 2008, Melbourne, Australia

Printed by Joint assimilation of in-situ and remotely sensed surface soil moisture and LAI observations in a simplified variational

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Printed by  Joint assimilation of in-situ and remotely sensed surface soil moisture and LAI observations in a simplified variational

printed by

www.postersession.com

Joint assimilation of in-situ and remotely sensed surface soil moisture and LAI observations in a simplified variational scheme

J.Muñoz Sabater (1), J-C. Calvet (1) , L. Jarlan (2)

(1) CNRM Meteo-France, (2) ECMWF

Joint assimilation of in-situ and remotely sensed surface soil moisture and LAI observations in a simplified variational scheme

J.Muñoz Sabater (1), J-C. Calvet (1) , L. Jarlan (2)

(1) CNRM Meteo-France, (2) ECMWF

Why Land Surface Models are needed?

They provide an explanation of surface processes Their estimations are used for meteorologist and climatologist as

lower boundary conditions for NWP models. Provide an estimation of the surface variables (Temperature,

moisture, vegetation volume, etc.)

Why assimilate observations of the surface soil moisture and LAI? They can be estimated from remote sensing observations, at local

scale and relative good temporal-spatial resolutions. Physically related to key surface variables: the root-zone soil

moisture and the vegetation biomass. Potential improvement of the up-welling water and energy fluxes,

as input for NWP models.

111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111112222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222233333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333334444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444445555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666677777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAVBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

ASSIMILATION APPROACH: Based on the results of Muñoz Sabater et al. (2007a), the Simplified 1D-VAR (Balsamo et al., 2004) method was applied. The LSM was reinitialized by optimally combining the information provided by observations and the LSM. The Simplified 1D-VAR minimizes the cost function J:

[1]

Linear Tangent Hypothesis: Linearization of the non-linear observation operator H by perturbation of the initialvalue of the state variables (w2 and vegetation biomass).

Under the linear tangent hypothesis (where H is assumed to be linear) and with errors (background B and observations R matrices) following a normal distribution, it is not necessary to derive an adjoint or linear tangent model to compute the minimum of J. The equations to update the state of the system for the two state variables (w2 and vegetation biomass) are:

[2]

The data set was assimilated into the ISBA-A-gs LSM (Calvet et al., 1998) using the simplified 1D-VAR scheme. The assimilation window length was of 10 days, where 1 LAI and 4 wg observations were available.

Balsamo G., Bouyssel F., and Noilhan J., 2004: A simplified bi-dimensional variational analysis of soil moisture from screen-level observations in a mesoscale numerical weather-prediction model. Q. J. R. Met. Soc., 130A, 895-915.

Calvet, J.C., Noilhan J., Roujean J.-L., Bessemoulin P., Cabelguenne M., Olioso A., Wigneron J.-P., 1998: An interactive vegetation SVAT model tested against data from six contrasting sites. Agric. For. Meteor., 92, 73-95.

De Rosnay, P.,and coauthors, 2006: SMOSREX: A long term field campaign experiment for soil moisture and land surface processes remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ., 102, 377-389.

Muñoz Sabater, J., L. Jarlan, J.-C. Calvet, F. Bouyssel and P. De Rosnay, 2007a: From near surface to root zone soil moisture using different assimilation techniques. Journal of Hydromet., 8, 194-206.

Muñoz Sabater, J., C. Rüdiger, J.-C. Calvet, N.Fritz, L. Jarlan and Y. Kerrand Y. Kerr, 2007b: Joint assimilation of surface soil moisture and LAI observations in a Land Surface Model. Accepted for .Agric. For. Meteor.

In general, good w2 analysis. However the vegetation biomass needs to be improved. Evidence of the need to determine improved observational and model state errors as

a function of time. Further, our study demonstrated that the analysis of the the analysis of the wilting point could be

necessary during dry periods for one-layer surface models (Muñoz Sabater et al., 2007b).

The analyses are degraded if an atmospheric forcing of less quality is introduced (for instance, without information about precipitation), but the assimilation still provides valuable information about the state variables.

Potential use of the simplified 1D-VAR to be implemented in a complete 2D operational configuration.

SMOSREX (De Rosney; 2006): Field scale experience situated at the South-West of France (43º23’N, 1º17’E, 188 m altitude).

Manual and automated measurements:• Atmospheric forcing (downwelling short wave and long wave radiation,

air temperature and specific humidity, precipitation, atmospheric pressure, wind speed, vapor pressure).

• Soil temperature and soil moisture profiles.• Vegetation and soil parameters (LAI, canopy height, mesophyll

conductance, sand and clay content, soil root depth, wilting point, field capacity, critical extractable soil moisture, etc.)

Multispectral radiometric measurements:• Brightness temperatures (TB) at L-band (1.4 GHz) over fallow and bare

soil.• Reflectances over fallow at 450, 549, 648, 837 and 1640 nm.

MOTIVATION

EXPERIMENTAL SITE

METHODOLOGY RESULTS - II

CONCLUSIONS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

B: Bio’init= Bioinit + Bioinit

y (i) = yT (i) – yT’ (i)

y (observedVariable)

t=0 1 2 … p

T

T’

y (1)

y (p)

))(y())(y(2

1)()(

2

1)( 11 xHxHxxxxxJ TbTb RB

A: w2nit

B: w’2nit= w2nit + w2initOBJECTIVES

Joint assimilation of remotely sensed LAI and surface soil moisture observations (wg) in a simplified variational method.

Update of the root-zone soil moisture and the vegetation biomass. Study of the impact of a joint assimilation of observed LAI and

surface soil moisture on the retrieved variables.

BACKJ OBSJ

x: state variablexb: background or first guess y: vector of observationsH: observation operator

B, R: background and observation error covariance matrices

A: Bioinit

AA

AA

BB

BB

Why Land Surface Models (LSM) are needed? LSM simulate the temporal and spatial evolution of surface variables

(temperature, soil moisture, biomass, etc.). Such predictions are required in meteorology and climatology as

lower boundary conditions for NWP and GCMs.

Why to assimilate observations of surface soil moisture and LAI? These observations are physically related to key surface variables,

such as root-zone soil moisture (w2) and vegetation biomass. They have the potential to be retrieved at a global scale through

remote sensing at adequate temporal and spatial resolutions. The assimilation can improve the up-welling water and energy

fluxes, as input for NWP models.

Joint assimilation of surface soil moisture and LAI observations with a simplified 1D-VAR assimilation scheme

J. Muñoz Sabater (1), C. Rüdiger (2) , J.-C. Calvet (2), L. Jarlan (3), S. Massart (1)

(1) CERFACS, Toulouse, France (2) CNRM, Meteo-France, Toulouse (3) CESBIO, Toulouse, France

Fig 5.- Joint assimilation of in-situ Fig 5.- Joint assimilation of in-situ LAILAI and and wwgg observations. The temporal assimilation window is of 10 observations. The temporal assimilation window is of 10

daysdays

init

p

init

T

x

y

x

y

)(

)1(

H

)H(]HH[H 1 bbio

OBSLAI

Tbiobiobio

Tbiobio

ba BioLAIBioBio RBB

)H(]H[HH 21

22 222222

bw

OBSgw

Twww

Tww

ba wwwwg

RBB

Fig.1- Radiometers at SMOSREXFig.1- Radiometers at SMOSREX

Fig.2- Fig.2- Schematic figure of the linearization of the observation Schematic figure of the linearization of the observation operator operator HH

Fig 3.- Same as in fig. 2Fig 3.- Same as in fig. 2, but with precipitation set to zero. This test was undertaken in order to study but with precipitation set to zero. This test was undertaken in order to study the response of the assimilation scheme to strong errors in the atmospheric forcing.the response of the assimilation scheme to strong errors in the atmospheric forcing.

RESULTS - I

Fig 2.- Joint assimilation of in-situ Fig 2.- Joint assimilation of in-situ LAILAI and and wwgg observations. The temporal assimilation window is observations. The temporal assimilation window is

of 10 daysof 10 days

Table 1.-Global RMSE and mean bias (mb) Table 1.-Global RMSE and mean bias (mb) for the root zone-soil moisture (in m3 m-3), for the root zone-soil moisture (in m3 m-3), the above-ground vegetation biomass (in the above-ground vegetation biomass (in kg m-2), and the LAI (in m2 m-2) between kg m-2), and the LAI (in m2 m-2) between the analyses and the control simulation. the analyses and the control simulation. The efficiency E (Nash criteria) is also The efficiency E (Nash criteria) is also indicated.indicated.

PERSPECTIVES Assimilation of the real remote sensing data provided by the radiometers of

SMOSREX (Fig. 1). Extension of the assimilation scheme to a complete 2D configuration at the

South-West of France. Integration of the air temperature and humidity observations within the complete

2D assimilation scheme.

L-band radiometerL-band radiometer

Thi

rd I

nter

nati

onal

Wor

ksho

p on

Cat

chm

ent-

scal

e H

ydro

logi

cal M

odel

ing

and

Dat

a A

ssim

ilat

ion,

9-1

1 Ja

n 20

08, M

elbo

urne

, Aus

tral

ia