Principles of Design for Laminated Tooling

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Principles of Design for Laminated Tooling

    1/9

    Principles of design for laminated tooling

    P. M. DICK ENS

    Th e emergence of ra pid pr ot otyping over the last 7 8 years ha s ha d a revolu-tiona ry eect in man y companies undert aking new product design. Curr ently, t heemphasis ha s moved from rapid pr ototyping to rapid tooling. U se of laminated

    to oling for sheet met al wor kin g ha s already been pr oved and som e wor k ha s alsobeen undertaken to build laminated tooling for moulding plastics. Laminated

    to oling is relat ively ra re at th e mo men t and as more tools are built usin g thistechnique th e ben ets and limit at ions will beco me more clear .

    1. Background

    Th e emergence of rap id pro to typing over the last 78 years has had a revolu-

    tionary eect in many companies undertaking new product design (Hinzmann 1995).

    All these techniques manufactur e models by adding th in layers of materia l on top ofeach other, rather than using traditional techniques of material removal or material

    forming (Dickens 1995). Companies are now investigating how this additive layer

    technique can be used furth er do wn the develop men t rou te for the produ ction of

    to olin g or even produ ction parts (Tromans and Wimpenn y 1995).Curr ently, the emphasis has moved from rapid protot yping to rapid tooling. It hasbeen recognized that there are even greater potential cost and time savings in the

    to olin g area. A pro totype may cost a few tho usa nd poun ds an d take a few weeks to

    manufacture. However, a tool will often cost ten or a hundred times as much and may

    ta ke ten times as long to make. F or an y new prod uct, the manu factur e of prototype or

    produ ction tooling is denitely on the critical pa th. If companies can make similar

    cost and savings for tooling as they have already made for prototypes, then the eectwill be enormous.

    2. Horizontal and vertical clamping

    To ols has been manu factured for some time by adding layers of sheet steel an d

    th en xing them to gether (Yokoi et al. 1984, Vouzelaud and Bagchi 1992). ProfessorNak agawa at the University of Tok yo ha s made sheet metal stamping and forming

    to ols by stacking th e sheet pro les hor izontally (F ig. 1). One Japan ese company

    regularly manufactures meta l forming too ls this way and so far has made 10 000 tools

    (Naka gawa 1995). The laminations can be bolted together or clamped within a frame.

    This technique works well for blanking tools (Schreiber and Clyens 1993) but can belimiting for forming tools. It can be very dicult to x islands within a tool cavity

    without producing witness marks on products (Fig. 2). In this situation it is more

    no rmal to x sheets with rivets.

    Other workers (Glozer and Brevick 1992, Walczyk and Hardt 1994) have stacked

    sheets vertically. It is often much easier to then clamp them together, particularly for

    00207543/97 $12.00 1997 Taylor & Francis Ltd.

    INT. J. PROD. RES., 1997, VOL. 35, N O. 5, 13491357

    R eceived January 1996.Department of Manufacturing Engineering & Operations Management, University of

    Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK. Tel. (0115) 9514063; Fax (0115)9514000.

  • 7/30/2019 Principles of Design for Laminated Tooling

    2/9

    cavities (Fig. 3). The clamping arrangement may be internal as shown in Fig. 3 orexternal with a frame.

    Th e distance between tie rods depends o n the size of the tool, but for mediu m size

    to ols of abou t 1 m squ are a typical distance is 50 mm. This distan ce will depend also

    on the geometry of the t ool. The clamping arrangements shown in F igs 2 and 3 areclassed as Level 1. It may be necessary to use a second-level clamping system where a

    1350 P. M . Dickens

    F igur e 1. La minated tooling for sheet met al blanking.

    F igur e 2. F ixing of sheets with rivets around the per iph ery and on islands.

    F igur e 3. Cla mping of vertical sheets.

  • 7/30/2019 Principles of Design for Laminated Tooling

    3/9

    group of sheets need assembling as a un it. This may be required where design changes

    are anticipated and would allow a replacement section without separating all the

    sheets. A third-level clampin g system may be required for clamping sheets that have ata ll prot rusion (F ig. 4) or where shu t-o faces are poorly supported.

    3. Cavity size versus sheet thickness

    One main problem of designing a laminated tool is choosing the sheet thickness.Generally, thin sheets are required for small cavities. This is because the stair stepping

    eect of layered sheets is much more obvious o n surfaces with small radii and thick

    sheets (Fig. 5). It is possible to use ve-axis prole cutting to eliminate some stair

    stepping, but there is a limit to the angle of cut possible (Fig. 6). It is not alwaysnecessar y to remove th e stair steps. F or example, vacuum forming of sheet does no t

    1351Principles of design for laminated tooling

    F igur e 4. Third-level clampin g for tall pr ot rusions.

    F igur e 5. Comp arison of pr ole with 4 and 1 thickness sheets.

    F igur e 6. F ive-axis cut pr oles with 4 thickness sheets.

  • 7/30/2019 Principles of Design for Laminated Tooling

    4/9

    tran sfer all th e detail from the to ol to the part. Similarly, in produ cing hidden pa rts,

    such as automot ive under-the-bonnet components, it may n ot be necessary to have a

    good nish.

    Th e th ickness tolerance of sheets, as stated by rolling mills, is propo rtionally verylarge ( 0.1 mm for 1 mm thick sheet). The cumulative eect of this on a tool with

    1000 sheets could obviously be very large. In practice the actual tolerance is verymuch smaller. It is more sensible to measure the sheet thickness variation before the

    CAD slicing is undertaken. The easiest solution is to slice the tool with the minimum

    sheet thickness. This will then produce slightly more sheets than required. When the

    to ol is th en assembled, it is necessary to simply leave ou t some sheets.

    4. Sheet prole production

    Th e main techniq ue for prod ucing the sheet proles is laser cutting, which can be

    used for most materials and is reasonably fast. There may be a problem with edge

    quality when using lasers due to o xidation and burring or because of the heat-aectedzone. In this situation it may be necessary to use water jet or abrasive water jet cutting.

    These ar e slower tha n using a laser an d usua lly more expensive. Each prole must

    ha ve a un ique identication number. Th is can become dicult when large tools with

    several thousand sheets are involved. Th e numbering system should be logical so th at

    one end of the tool begins with prole 1 and continues sequentially. Usually, eachprole is sent to the laser cutter as a separate dxf. le.

    5. Conformable cooling channelsA major benet of using laminated tooling is the possibility of having much more

    complicated cooling channels. In conventional tooling, the cooling channels are

    usually drilled in a straight line. However, the cavity may be highly complex andcurved. In this situation some parts of t he cooling system may be much further away

    from the cavity than other parts. It is possible to have slightly more complicated

    cooling systems where cooling pipes are cast into aluminium tools. However, these are

    still limited by the minimum bend radius of the pipework and their inability to follow

    th e contou rs of the cavity. An example of th is is sho wn in F ig. 7. With conformablecooling channels (Fig. 8) it is possible to have variable cooling in dierent parts of the

    to ol. This could give variable mechanical properties and could also be used to contro l

    1352 P. M . Dickens

    F igure 7. Co nventiona l machined coo ling cha nnels.

    F igur e 8. Co nfo rma ble coo ling cha nnels.

  • 7/30/2019 Principles of Design for Laminated Tooling

    5/9

    solidication directions. Conventional cooling channels are normally of a round

    cross-section. With conformable cooling channels in laminated tooling the channels

    can be of any cross-section. It is also possible to change the cross-section along the

    length of the channel. However, cooling channels in laminated tooling present aproblem for watertight sealing. It is dicult to clamp sheets together so that no leaks

    occur. Therefore, it is necessary to either seal the internal cooling channels or theoutside surfaces of the tool. Internal channels can be sealed with various resins but

    th is reduces their therma l con ductivity. The outsid e of steel tools may be sealed with a

    solder paste or brazing operation but th is then provides a problem if the tool needs to

    be disassembled. It is possible to use high-temperat ure adhesives between each sheet,but again this can cause problems if disassembly of t he tool is required.

    6. Avoiding distortion in laminated tooling

    Laminated tooling needs to be designed carefully otherwise distortion can be a

    serious prob lem. The individual sheets form a block which is very similar to a pack o fcards. They can therefore twist in several directions unless restrained. There are

    various forms of distortion as follows:

    6.1. V ertical distortion

    Vert ical distortion is caused by uneven t ightenin g and lack o f rigidity of clampingrod s. The distortion shown in F ig. 9 is caused by overtightening of th e top set of rods.

    6.2. Horizontal distortionHorizontal distortion (shown in Fig. 10) is due to too much play between the tie

    rods and the individual sheets and/or alignment during assembly.

    6.3. Twist

    Twist (shown in F ig. 11) is due to incorrect alignmen t du ring assembly an d uneven

    tightening of tie rods.

    1353Principles of design for laminated tooling

    F igure 9. Vertical dist or tion.

    F igure 10. Hor izont al dist or tion.

  • 7/30/2019 Principles of Design for Laminated Tooling

    6/9

    Th e variou s types of distortion may be reduced or eliminated with registratio n

    grooves as shown in Fig. 12. These should run the length of the tool along the slicingdirectio n on three sides and may be dovetailed or simply rectangular .

    7. Design of shut-ofaces

    Th e shut-ofaces are particularly important in tooling as it is these that constrain

    th e par t being produ ced. They are the areas where th e two halves of th e tool to uch . It

    is important to design them so that they are not liable to damage or cause other

    problems in th e operation of the to ol. A problem that can occur is th e use of sharp-

    edged shut-o

    faces as in Fig. 13. The outside sheets in this situation can easily be bentand damaged. Ideally the shut-o faces should be at.

    1354 P. M . Dickens

    F igur e 11. Twist.

    F igur e 12. R egistr ation gro oves to eliminate dist or tion.

    F igur e 13. Angled and at shut-o faces.

  • 7/30/2019 Principles of Design for Laminated Tooling

    7/9

    Another problem that may occur is shown in Fig. 14. This is where shut-o faces

    occur above a cooling manifold. In this situation the primary clamping system mayno t rigidly hold the proles t ogether an d vertical movement of the sheets can occur.

    This will mea n that th e shut-ofaces are not pressed against each other with sucient

    pressure to seal the cavity.

    8. General alignment and location features

    A substantial baseplate should be used to clamp the tool to the press (Fig. 15). Theto ol sho uld be bo lted to the base plat e with the aid of solid th readed inserts. Helicoil

    inserts should be avoided as they will become dislodged more easily if the sheets are

    loosened. It is obviously possible to use a base plate with a machined groove for a

    registration bar. The pins and bushes to align the two halves of the tool need to be

    rigid and there are several methods that can be used to accomplish this. The simplest

    technique is to drill holes into th e matin g faces of th e too l to locate the pins an ddowels. An alterna tive is to u se solid inserts which slot into place when t he sheets are

    1355Principles of design for laminated tooling

    F igure 14. U nsupp orted shu t-o face.

    F igur e 15. Basepla te for loca ting to ol.

  • 7/30/2019 Principles of Design for Laminated Tooling

    8/9

    being assembled. These solid inserts can then be drilled to accept pins and bushes.More detailed use of inserts is given in the following section.

    9. Use of solid inserts

    Th ere may be ot her situations where it is vita l to use solid inserts:

    (1) When there are tall protrusions it may be dicult to x some sheets together(see Fig. 16).

    (2) Some features may be prone to damage and so replaceable inserts could

    extend the life of the tool.

    (3) Inserts are used in conventional tooling where the same part is made for

    dierent customers. In this situation the insert could simply have a dierentlogo or part name.

    (4) Inserts are also used where regular design changes are anticipated .

    Th e insert sho uld be designed as an integra l pa rt of the to ol an d located accurately

    and rigidly.

    10. Model slicing techniques

    Th e techniques of horizontal and vertical clampin g were discussed earlier and this

    largely relates to the direction of slicing. However, it is important to consider the

    slicing direction when considering the surface roughness of the cavity. The surface

    roughness of the assembled sheets is largely dependent on th e orientation of the cavitysurface to the slicing direction . As the cavity orientation approaches that o f the slicing

    direction then the stair stepping eect of building parts by layers becomes more

    prono unced.

    It may be necessary to design a tool with parts being sliced in dierent directions(Fig. 17). The tool would then resemble a complex wire cut tool where parts are

    assembled from dierent directions. However, it may then become more dicult tomatch cooling channels with dierent sections of a tool.

    11. Conclusions

    U se of laminated toolin g for sheet meta l working ha s alread y been proved an d

    some work has also been undertaken to b uild laminated tooling for moulding plastics.

    This needs furt her invest igation to determine the economic an d techn ical benets.There is also th e possibility of using laminated to oling in other ap plication s such as

    1356 P. M . Dickens

    F igur e 16. Solid insert for ta ll pr otru sions.

  • 7/30/2019 Principles of Design for Laminated Tooling

    9/9

    die casting and forging. Laminated tooling is relatively rare at the moment and as

    more tools are built using this technique, the benets and limitations will become

    more clear .

    ReferencesD ICKENS, P. M., 1995, Research developments in rapid prototyping. Proceedings of the

    Institution of M echanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering M anufacture, 209,261266.

    G LOZER, G. R . and BR EVIC K, J. R., 1992, Laminate tooling for injection moulding. Proceedingsof t he Institution of M echanical Engineers, P art B: Journal of Engineering M anuf acture,207, 915.

    H INZMANN, B., 1995, Does RP make sense for industrial design. Sixth International Conferenceon Rapid Prototyping, June 47, 1995, edited by R. P. Chartfo and A. J. Lightman(Sponsored by The Rapid Prototype Development Laboratory, The ManagementD evelopment Centre, Th e U niversity of D ayton), pp . 195200.

    NAKAGAWA, T., 1995, R apid pr ototyping techniques in Japan . Proceedings of the 4th EuropeanConference on Rapid Prototyping, 45 October 1995, Paris, France (Andresy, France:

    R emark S.A.).SCHREIBER, M. P. and C LYENS, S., 1993, Blanking tools manufactured by laminated laser cut

    steel sheets. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on R apid P rototyping andM anufacturing, Nottingham, 1516 July 1993, edited by P. M. Dickens (Nottingham:

    U niver sity of N ot tingha m), pp . 167176.TROM AN S, G. and WIMPENNY, D ., 1995, Ra pid ma nufacturing. Proceedings of the 4th European

    Conference on R apid Prototyping and M anufacturing, Belgirate, Italy, 1315 June 1995,edited by P. M. Dickens (Nottingham: University of Nottingham), pp. 2740.

    VOUZELAUD, F. A. and BAGCHI, A., 1992, Adaptive laminated machining for prototyping of diesand molds. Proceedings of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, Texas, 35August 1992, edited by H. L. Marcus, J. J. Beaman, J. W. Barlow, D. L. Bourell and

    R . H . Cr awfor d (Au stin, TX : U niversity of Texa s at Austin), pp . 291 300.

    WALCYZK, D. F. and H ARDT, D. E., 1994, A new rapid cooling method for sheet metal formingdies. Fifth International Conference on Rapid Prototyping, June 1215 1994, edited by

    R . P. Ch art o, A. J. Lightman and J. A. Schenk (Sponsored by The Rapid PrototypeDevelopment Laboratory, The Management Development Centre, The University ofD ayton), pp . 275 289.

    YOKOI, H., SUZ U K I, T., SU ZU K I, K. and NAKAGAWA, T., 1984, Manufacturing of blanking tooland its die-set by laminating steel sheet. Proceedings of the 12th N orth A mericanM etalwork ing R esearch Conference, Houghton, MI, USA, 30 May1 June 1984, Journalof M anuf acturing Engineering T ransactions. pp. 372378.

    1357Principles of design for laminated tooling

    F igur e 17. Slicing op tions.