Upload
baldwin-powell
View
229
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Principals’ Conference
CFN 204 Diane Foley, Network LeaderMary Barton, SATIFOctober 12, 2012
1
Agenda for today’s session• Welcome/Updates
• Data Action Planning
• Introduction to Teacher Effectiveness Work for 2012-13
• Break
• The Observation Cycle
• A word from our sponsor—Scholastic
• Lunch is on your own. 1 hour
• Principals’ Performance Review
2
Data Action Planning
Please take out the white sheets found on the right hand side of your folder.
3
Progress Report Results
How do we use the PR results to organize ourselves and align our work to our efforts to increase student achievement?
4
Three Components
Understanding the Data
Communication Plan
Action Plan
5
Understanding the Data Sheet
• Can be used during Charlie’s presentation to your school
• Can be used with a grade level Teacher Team
• Can be used to begin to develop school wide goals or goals for teams
6
Communication Plan
• Next step after completing “Understanding the Data” sheet
• Interpreting what the data said
• What story did it tell?
• Who will share the story and how will it be shared and who will be the intended audience.
7
Action Plan
• Next Steps
• The who what when and how!
• Monitoring and reflection
8
Teacher Effectiveness
Overview for 2012-13
Norming and Calibration
9
Session Objectives
• To understand the work of teacher effectiveness, why it matters and what will be expected for the 2012-13 school year
• To deepen the understanding of Danielson’s Framework for Teaching and the calibration process to more accurately rate teacher practice
10
Overview
This session will introduce participants to the process of calibration, and the teacher effectiveness work they are expected to engage in this year. The process of making accurate observations based on low-inference data will be broken down so participants examine what good evidence is, how it should be used, and how to collect it.
11
Guiding Questions for today’s session
• Why is teacher effectiveness work important?
• How is the observation and rating process made more accurate when we gather low-inference evidence and sort it before we interpret it?
• What is the process for coming to a rating using Danielson’s Framework for Teaching?
12
What is the Teacher Effectiveness Initiative?
13
The Teacher Effectiveness Program is a NYC DOE initiative designed to support a common goal:
An effective teacher in every classroom for every student.
2010-2011Teacher
Effectiveness Pilot20 schools
700+ teachers
2011-2012Talent Management
Pilot106 schools
4.000+ teachers
2012-2013Teacher
Effectiveness Program
≈ 250 schools
This year’s initiative builds on two years of experience and feedback from thousands of school
leaders and teachers.
Our Vision: An Effective Teacher in Every Classroom for Every Student
14
Teacher Effectiveness (Student Outcomes, Instructional Practice)
Boost effectiveness of all teachers
Improve or exit persistently less effective educators
Retain and leverage the most effective educators
GOAL
To achieve this vision, we must have an accurate understanding of which teachers are in which
performance group.
Connecting the TE Theory of Change to Your Goals
1. My Students - I believe that all children can achieve, no matter their life circumstances.
2. My Teachers - I believe that my teachers are the key levers in influencing the achievement of my students.
3. Myself - I believe that I have the power to lead the change necessary to implement effective talent management practices in my school.
15
• What do you hope to achieve through the TE initiative work this year?
• To what extent do the Core Beliefs of the TE initiative (below) resonate with your past experience?
Reflect & Discuss
New York State Education Law 3012c
1616
Passed in 2010, New York State Education Law 3012c introduced
significant changes to the current Annual Professional Performance
Review for teachers.
The law is intended to foster clearer expectations for teaching practice
aligned to improvements in student achievement.
New York State Education Law 3012c
1717
Summary of State Policy on Teacher Evaluation
•Teachers will be evaluated annually on a 4-point rating scale (Highly Effective, Effective, Developing, Ineffective)
•20 to 40% of a teacher’s evaluation will be based on an assessment of student growth
•All classroom teachers will be evaluated against uniform qualitative rating criteria through use of a state-approved research-based rubric of teacher practice
•Teachers will receive timely and constructive feedback, including use of improvement plans for tenured teachers who receive a Developing or Ineffective End-of-Year rating
Why Teacher Evaluation Matters
18
According to a 2011 study of Cincinnati Public Schools’ Teacher Evaluation System, • Classroom observation-based evaluation improves
teacher performance, as evidenced by student math achievement growth
• Improvement in teacher performance is lasting• Frequent, thoughtful feedback strengthens
performance – with least effective teachers benefitting most
• Teachers who see improvement are less likely to leave the system
Taylor and Tyler, 2011
Research on Teacher Evaluation (Cont.)
*Survey respondents who “somewhat agree,” “agree,” or “strongly agree.”
of pilot school leaders net agree* that
implementing the pilot model increased student achievement outcomes for all of their teachers.
of pilot teachers net agree* that, if
implemented well, the new evaluation and
development system will enable them to develop in areas most needed to
impact student achievement.
75%84%
In pilot year 2011-2012, we saw firsthand how evaluation encourages schools and teachers to increase focus on student
achievement.
Our Research: Feedback Impacts Performance
10
0%20%40%60%80%
100%
22% 25% 22%
40% 33% 37%
21% 18% 17%
Teacher Perception of Impact of Feedback
Somewhat Agree Agree Strongly Agree
83% Net Agree77% Net Agree76% Net Agree
Midyear data from the 2011-2012 Talent Management Pilot suggests a connection between feedback from school leaders and improvements to
teacher practice and student learning.
12
2012-13 Teacher Effectiveness Initiative Approach
Our goal: An effective teacher in every classroom for every
student
How do we get there? Apply six strategies to better understand teachers’
practice and its effects on student outcomesNorm to
excellence
Conduct frequent
observations
Deliver quality feedback and
informed professional
development
Incorporate student voice via surveys
Review and discuss student
outcomes and use to improve teaching
Use outcome measures to
evaluate teaching where applicable
Focus on Teacher Practice
13
Norm to Excellence
School Leaders will…• Develop a shared anchor of what effective practice looks
like• Work to refine their ability to accurately rate instructional
performance by:• Co-observations in classrooms with Principal and
Assistant Principal(s)• Participating in professional development through the
year• Completing baseline and follow-up norming
assessments
Focus on Teacher Practice (continued)
14
Deliver Quality Feedback and Informed Professional Development
School Leaders will…•Give teachers direct, actionable feedback; at a minimum:
•Written and verbal feedback after every observation
•Communicate evidence to teachers•Engage in reflective dialogue with teachers and agree on next steps
•Direct teachers to aligned PD•Create PD resources and plans responsive to teachers’ needs
Focus on Student Outcomes
15
Review and Discuss Student Outcomes and Use to Improve Teaching
School Leaders will… •Develop a shared understanding of instructional excellence
•Review student work as part of formal classroom observations
•Discuss student work and learning outcomes with teachers regularly as part of feedback dialogue
•Develop strategies for targeted improvement
Conferences and Ongoing Dialogue
16
MayBeginning-of-Year Launch with All Staff
Review rubric and plan PD
Ongoing learning in professional communities, supported by teacher leaders
Develo
pm
en
tEvalu
ati
on
Targeted development activities
Progress checks and full-period and partial-period classroom observations
Midyear Conference:
Progress Evaluation
Self-assess and discuss progress,
revise focus areas for PD
End-of-Year Conference: Summative Evaluation
Self-assess and discuss next year’s professional focus areas
Feedback conversations; student data review
2012-13 Teacher Effectiveness Initiative Roles
NETWORKSSCHOOL LEADERS
TEACHERS
Teachers are the most critical factor
in improving student outcomes.
All teachers will have a deep understanding of
what great student work looks like and how they
can strengthen their own practice to achieve better
student outcomes.
School leaders are best-positioned to
evaluate and manage their staff.
All school leaders will be committed to observing teachers and providing
feedback that helps teachers improve. They
will be responsible for the quality of their staff and
the identification of future leaders.
Networks are in a key position to support
program implementation in
schools.
All networks will provide ongoing professional
development for teachers and school leaders.
20
Supports for School Leaders
21
• Resources to support implementation• Shared best practices and exemplars from
other schools• Common Core Library (Teacher Effectiveness)
• ARIS Learn TEP-focused Online Learning Resources PD opportunities for teachers and school
leaders Data collection and sharing
Alignment to Other Initiatives
22
The Teacher Effectiveness Initiative aligns to other DOE initiatives, including:
• Citywide Instructional Expectations (CIE)
• Common Core Learning Standards (CCLS) Implementation
• Quality Review
How Are These Initiatives Aligned?
23
Quality Review RubricDefines the school practices that result in college
and career readiness for all students
Instructional Core
Structures for Improvement School Culture
The Danielson Framework defines the “How” (Pedagogy): the teaching practices that drive college and career readiness for all
students.Common Core Learning Standards define the “What” (Curriculum): the skills and knowledge students need to acquire in literacy and math
to be college- and career-ready.
Common Core Shifts and the Danielson Framework
24
Danielson Component 1e, “Designing Coherent Instruction”:
Coordination of content knowledge, intended outcomes, student needs and resources to create learning activities that engage students in high-level cognitive activity. Includes planning for differentiation, cognitive challenge, structure, groupings, and alignment of objectives, activities and assessments.
Shift Relevant Indicator
Example
Focus Lessons support instructional outcomes and reflect important concepts
The 4th grade math operations unit plan focuses on using the four operations with whole numbers to solve problems
Coherence Instructional maps indicate relationships to prior learning
Teacher teams have created curriculum maps that organize the 6th grade Common Core Standards into a coherent, spiraling curriculum
Break – 15 Minutes
31
Activity 1
Observation Cycle
32
Thank you for your
participation and
professionalism!!!
33
Lunch—1 hour
Lunch is on your own.
Avail yourselves of local eateries or you may dine in room 407.
34
Principals’ Performance Review
Welcome and thank you to:
Superintendent Madelene Chan, District 24
Superintendent Danielle DiMango, District 25
35