Upload
marcia-gibson
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PRIN 2005 PRIN 2005 WOMEN ProjectWOMEN ProjectResearch unit: Università degli Studi di Research unit: Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico IINapoli Federico II
55thth Meeting of Meeting ofWOMEN ProjectWOMEN ProjectTrento, February 12, 2008Trento, February 12, 2008
Fabio SterleFabio Sterle
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Outline IQ imbalance in RF systems
Blind estimation of the receiver IQ imbalance parameters IQ imbalance in DVB-T systems
MIMO systems Multistage DF MMSE equalizer synthesis
Dynamic addressing-based routing scalable protocols for MANET Tree-based routing protocol
1. D.Mattera, F.Sterle, “ML estimation of reciever IQ imbalance parameters,” Third International Waveform Diversity & Design Conference, Pisa (Italy), 4-8 June 2007.
2. M. Lipardi, D.Mattera, F.Sterle, “MMSE Equalization in Presence of Transmitter and Receiver IQ Imbaclance,” Third International Waveform Diversity & Design Conference, Pisa (Italy), 4-8 June 2007.
3. D. Mattera, L. Paura, and F. Sterle, “MMSE WL equalizer in presence of receiver IQ imbalance,” to be published on Trans. Signal Process., April 2008.
4. M. Caleffi, G. Ferraiuolo, L. Paura, “Augmented Tree-based Routing Protocol for Scalable Ad Hoc Networks,” IEEE Internatonal Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems (MASS '07), Pisa (Italy), 8-11 October, 2007.
5. M. Caleffi, G. Ferraiuolo, L. Paura, “On Reliability of Dynamic Addressing Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks,” Proc. of Wireless Rural and Emergency Communications Conference (WRECOM '07), Roma (Italy), October 2007.
6. M. Caleffi, G. Ferraiuolo, and L.Paura, “A Reliability-based Framework for Multi-path Routing Analysis in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks,” to appear on International Journal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems.
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
IQ imbalance in RF systemsIQ imbalance in RF systems
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Direct-frequency conversion
The imperfections in the analog stage are due to low-cost fabrication technologies.
(received signal)
( ) ( )(1 )cos( 2) (1 )sin( 2)
( ) ( )(1 )sin( 2) (1 )cos( 2)c c
s s
y t r t
y t r t
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )c sr t r t jr t
x t n t
useful signal noise
Low-pass equivalent modelLow-pass equivalent modelLPF
LPF
A/D
A/D
Digital S
ignal Processor
(1 )cos 2 2LOf
(1 )sin 2 2LOf
( )RFr t
1
2
amplitude imbalance
phase imbalance
*( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
cos / 2 sin / 2
cos / 2 sin / 2
c sy t y t jy t r t r t
j
j
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Direct-frequency conversion
The imperfections in the analog stage are due to low-cost fabrication technologies.
(received signal)
( ) ( )(1 )cos( 2) (1 )sin( 2)
( ) ( )(1 )sin( 2) (1 )cos( 2)c c
s s
y t r t
y t r t
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )c sr t r t jr t
x t n t
useful signal noise
Low-pass equivalent modelLow-pass equivalent model
y(t)= yc(t)+j ys(t) coincides with r(t) only when =0 and =0.
the receiver IQ imbalance can be compensated if and are known.
LPF
LPF
A/D
A/D
Digital S
ignal Processor
(1 )cos 2 2LOf
(1 )sin 2 2LOf
( )RFr t
1
2
amplitude imbalance
phase imbalance
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
IQ imbalance in multicarrier system
IFF
T
P/S
1
N
s
s
s s S/P
FF
T
DirectDown-Conversion
(IQ imbalance)y
kh
0 1
0 1
0 1
2 0 1
1 1 0
L
L
cL
L
L L
h h h
h h h
h h h
h h h h
h h h h
H
2
,
1,1 2,2 ,
1with , 0,1, , 1
c
c H
j ik
Ni k
HN N
F e i k NN
N
r H s n
H F ΛF
hF
0
The OFDM system:
The input signal of the DDC stage is:
kykr * y r ry
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
IQ imbalance in multicarrier system
The OFDM system:
IFF
T
P/S
1
N
s
s
s s S/P
FF
T
DirectDown-Conversion
(IQ imbalance)y
kh
*
*
y r r
y Fr Fr
*1 1
*2
*/ 2 * @/ 2 2
*/ 2 1 / 2 1
*/ 2 2 / 2
*2
N
N N
N N
N N
N
r r
r r
r r
r r
r r
r r
Fr r Fr r
* y r r ky ykr
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
IQ imbalance in multicarrier system
The OFDM system:
IFF
T
P/S
1
N
s
s
s s S/P
FF
T
DirectDown-Conversion
(IQ imbalance)y
kh
*
*
y r r
y Fr Fr
* y r r
*1 1
*2
*/ 2 / 2 2
*/ 2 1 / 2 1
*/ 2 2 / 2
*2
N
N N
N N
N N
N
r r
r r
r ry
r r
r r
r r
ky ykr
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
IQ imbalance in multicarrier system
The OFDM system:
IFF
T
P/S
1
N
s
s
s s S/P
FF
T
DirectDown-Conversion
(IQ imbalance)y
kh
*
*
y r r
y Fr Fr
@ @ y Λs Λ s w
* *, ,
* *, 2, 2 2
1, / 2 1k k k k k k k k
k k k k N k N k N k k
y s s w k N
y s s w
IQ distorsion or interference
* y r r ky ykr
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
IQ imbalance compensation
The IQ imbalance at the receiver can be compensated provided that the IQ imbalance level is known:
In fact, it is easy verified that:
1 2 2w
*
2 2 2w
* * *1 2k k kw y w y r
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
ML Estimation of the IQ parameters
The IQ imbalance parameters are blindly estimated according to the maximum-likelihood (ML) criterion.
Assumptions:
1) The transmitted signal is circularly symmetric.
2) The noise is zero-mean white Gaussian circularly symmetric.
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
MLE for Gaussian signal
The transmitted signal is modeled as a Gaussian process.
( ) , (0,1/ 2)k k k k kx x kT a jb with a b N
Likelihood function for unknown α and θ (N received samples):
2 1 21/ 2
21
2 2
1 1ˆ ˆˆ ˆˆ ˆ( , , , ) exp ( , , )2ˆˆ ˆ2 ( , , )
ˆ ˆˆ ˆˆ ˆ( , , ) (1 ) ( , )
NT
n k g n kk
g n
g n n
y y C yC
C C
2 2
1
2 2 2 2
{ } { } { } { }ˆˆ sin
{ } { } { } { }
k k k kk k k
k k k kk k k k
y y y y
y y y y
2 2 2 21 1CRLB( ) cos ( )(1 ) CRLB( ) cos ( )
4N N
Cramèr-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB)
1) low computational complexity2) robustness
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Numerical results: estimation
Parameter setting:• K is the number of received samples• SNR 1/σn
2=25dB• 64-QAM• AWGN and Frequency Selective Channel (FCS)
very near tothe CRLBs
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Numerical results: SER vs. K
Parameter setting:• IQ mismatch α=0.1 (10%), θ=π/18 (10°)• K is the number of received samples• 64-QAM• SNR 1/σn
2=25dB
Existing method:
22 2 *1, 1 1, 2,
22 2 *2, 1 2, 1,
1 1
1 1
k k k k k
k k k k k
w y w y w
w y w y w
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Numerical results: IIR vs. K
Parameter setting:• K is the number of received samples• SNR 1/σn
2=25dB• 64-QAM
Image Rejection Ratio (IIR):2
2IIR
( ) 0.1, 10
( ) 0.04, 4
a
b
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
DVB-T system
Matlab Simulink to create a DVB-T environment.
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
IQ level estimation in DVB-T system
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
MIMO system model
Input-output equation of the LTI MIMO system:
No
ky
1kn
1kx
2kx
iNkx
1ky
2ky
1,1kh
1, oNkh
1,2kh 2
kn
oNkn
,i oN Nkh
2,2kh
,1iNkh
,
,0
max i jk m k m k i j
m
y H x n
1,1,1 1,2
2,1 2,2 2,1
,1 ,2 ,
i
o o o i
Nk k k
k k kk
N N N Nk k k
h h h
h h h
h h h
H
k k k y Hx n non-dispersive channel
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
The linear DF MMSE equalizer
The MIMO DF equalizer output:
*
* *
1,2
1, 1,
0 0 0
0
0
0i i i
H
N N N
b
b b
B
H H H H H z W y B x W Hx W n B x
Feedforward-based equalizer:
0 i iN NB 0Successive-cancellations:
1,1,1 1,2
2,1 2,2 2,1
,1 ,2 ,
i
i i i i
N
H
N N N N
g g g
g g g
g g g
G W H
(1)z (1)x̂
(2)z (2)x̂
(3)x̂(3)z
( , ) ( , )*k i i kg b
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
The linear DF MMSE equalizer
The MIMO DF equalizer output:
H H H H H z W y B x W Hx W n B x
Feedforward-based equalizer:
0 0i iN NB
Multistage equalizer:
1,1,1 1,2
2,1 2,2 2,1
,1 ,2 ,
i
i i i i
N
H
N N N N
g g g
g g g
g g g
G W H
(1)z (1)x̂
(2)z (2)x̂
(3)x̂(3)z
( , ) 0k kb
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Fast synthesis of DF equalizers
The DF equalizer optimization reduces to a least-square problem under the assumption of uncorrelated input and noise:
2min
xAx c
Multistage equalizer:
Successive-cancellations:
Feedforward-based equalizer:
o
T
n N
HA c e
I
1 2 1 |o
T
n N
HA e e e c e
I
is the unit vectore
1 1 1 |i
o
T
Nn N
HA e e e e c e
I
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Fr d̂
estimandum
observation vector
d
r
11 12
21 22
ˆ
ˆ
T T
T T
d F F r
rF Fd
widely linear processing
ˆ
ˆ
T T
T T
d F F r
rF Fd
linear processing
ˆ Hd F r
T T T Tj F r F r F r F r
ˆ d ˆ d
Widely linear processing (WL)
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
*
*
[ ]
[ ]
T
dd
T
rr
E
E
R dd 0
R rr 0
Widely linear processing (WL)
Question: When does the WL processing allow one to achieve a performance gain over the conventional linear processing?
WLF
LF optimum
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
The WL DF MMSE equalizer
The WL DF equalizer employs both a WL feedforward filter and a WL feedback filter to exploit the non-circular properties of the signals to be processed.
(1: ,1: ) (1: , 1: ) (1: , 1: )
1:(1: ,1: ) (1: , 1: ) (1: , 1: )o r o r i o r i
r io r o r i o r i
N n N n N N n N
n NN n N n N N n N
y nxH
xy H H H n
xy H H H n
By assuming that nr (0≤nr≤Ni) components of x are real-valued, the MIMO channel input-output equation can be rewritten as follows:
The WL DF equalization is defined as the DF equalization operating on the new channel model.
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Multistage equalizers
The following multistage equalizer structures have been considered:
feedforward-basedequalizer
(FFB)
successive-cancellationsequalizer
(SC)
successive-cancellationsBLAST equalizer
(BLAST)
multistage equalizer (MS)MS-SC
multistage equalizer (MS)
MS-BLAST
multistage equalizer (MS)
MS-PARALLEL
x̂
x̂
x̂
ˆ ( .)iterx
ˆ ( .)iterx
ˆ ( .)iterx
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Numerical results: SER vs. iter.
2
60, =60 (4-PAM)
60
116dB
i r
o
n
N n
N
SNR
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Dynamic addressing-based routing scalable Dynamic addressing-based routing scalable protocols for MANETprotocols for MANET
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Presentation of the activity
Scope:
To single out scalable routing protocols able to face with the dynamic topology of MANET.
Approach:
Dynamic Addressing.
Goal:
To sepatate the unique terminal identifier, with no location information in a mobile network, from the routing address, which embeds a topological information.
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Implementation Address Allocation: distributed mechanism able to assign to
nodes an address which reflects the node relative position, without resorting to flooding.
Routing: proactive hierarchical multi-path protocol, able to explore multiple paths towards a destination with a limited overhead.
Address lookup: distribuited hash-based service (DHT) for providing the mapping between node identifier and routing address.
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Results
Normalized packet delivery ratio versus the number of nodes.
5th Meeting of WOMEN Project – Research unit of Napoli Febr. 12, 2008
Conclusions
IQ imbalance in RF systems:• The blind estimation of the receiver IQ parameters has been
addressed.• The effects of IQ imapairments in DVB-T systems has been
presented.
MIMO systems:• The DF equalizer design has been re-examined in terms of the
conventional least-square problem.• The WL processing has been combined with the DF strategy to
exploit the properties of rotationally variant signals.• Three multistage DF equalizer structures have been compared.
Routing protocols for MANET:• An augmented tree-based routing protocol has been proposed to
handle scalable ad-hoc networks.