Upload
dustin-lee
View
220
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
22
Topics What has been done
Formed a new eSMR user group and project team
Re-evaluated system and its requirements
Proposed a new design (deploy system in phases/levels)
Provided screens, reports, and special tools mockups
Developed a formal usability test plan
Developed an implementation plan for Level 2
33
Topics What is next
System programming
Conduct usability testing
Outreach and training planning
System alpha and beta testing, user acceptance
System rollout
Post system implementation evaluation
Looking ahead for next requirement (level 2.5) – data flow to EPA system
44
eSMR user group and project team
Paul YaoOracle DBA
John GinnApplication Tester
Rueen- Fang WangData Modeler
James MiersOracle DBA
Rassam ZarghamiSWRCB SME
Mike PaulucciDischarger SME
Russ ColbyRB4 SME
Jack PriceRB4 SME
Alex CarlosRB4 SME
John CarmonaRB7 SME
David LaCaroRB3 SME
Susan BremserDischarger SME
Akin BabatolaDischarger SME
Joy CastaingDischarger SME
Patrick IngramDischarger SME
Dan PierceDischarger SME
Kay YamamotoDischarger SME
Rachel Van ExelDischarger SME
Edward FilodolflaDischarger SME
Valerie HouselDischarger SME
Mike TrouchonDischarger SME
Jason SinklerDischarger SME
Dan JacksonDischarger SME
Imam MohammedDischarger SME
Larry KerriganDischarger SME
Amy TongTechnical Sponsor
Darrin PolhemusProject Program Sponsor
Don SwidenSWRCB SME
Jon BishopProject Executive Sponsor
Francisco ChiangeSMR
Application Developer
Hoang NguyeneSMR
Application Developer
Ron RobinetteProject Manager
Discharger Steering Committee
Sandy CheekRB3 SME
Diane O’DonohueDischarger SME
55
Re-evaluate System Requirements
Re-analyzed permit submittal process and business flow - walk through a life of a eSMR permit
Reviewed existing system
Mapped existing system to process
66
Re-evaluate System Requirementscont’d
Identified system/process issues and “bottle neck”, and evaluated levels of submittals Automatic Violation creation
Error Check
Permit Coding
77
A new design – phased approach Leveraged SWIM II design, combined with
current requirements Phased approach:
Level 1 - Report Verification: Receive report electronically Level 2* - Usable Data: Complete data upload in an
usable format with report timeliness check Level 3 – Sampling Advisory Compliance Checking:
Report contents are logically compared to monitoring requirements (primarily effluent and receiving water monitoring)
Level 4 – Complete Advisory Compliance Checking: Report contents are logically compared to preset thresholds to determine compliance
88
A new design – phased approach (cont’d)
Proposed Level 2 design with an implementation date of July 2008 Discharger submits monitoring data in
usable* format (raw data and calculated summary data)
Dischargers self enters violations What they entered is what shows on report Reports and Analytical tools for data
viewing and querying for both Dischargers and RB case workers
*Usable=able to be analyzed by State and Regional Board staff
99
Pros of Level 2 No system generated Violations No barrier for data submission due to
system inaccuracy (Error check issues) No barrier to start data submission due to
lack of resource to code permit (Permit coding by RB)
What discharger entered is what shows on public report
Analytical Tools for data analysis and data extraction after data submission
1010
Cons of Level 2 Discharger has to enter the Violations
according to cover letter RB case worker has to manually review
Violation entries The system does not do compliance check so
Discharger and RBs have to do compliance check manually
Have to wait for Level 3 and 4 in order to have limited and complete compliance check capability
1111
Schedule Level 2 – Usable data submission - July 2008 Level 2.5 – to address DMR dataflow to EPA system –
Fall to Winter 2008 (EPA system is not ready until Fall of 2008)
Level 3 - Sampling Advisory Compliance Checking monitoring data – pending funding availability
Level 4 – Complete Advisory Compliance Checking with complete permit coding – pending funding availability
Current eSMR system will continue to function in maintenance mode
1212
Screens, Reports, and Analytical Tools mock ups – Level 2
Map screens and data to requirements Solicit comments on mock ups Document comments on Issue Tracker
and evaluation sheets Evaluate other systems to get ideas Develop usability testing plan
1313
eSMR2 Project Schedule
Begin Re-evaluation of
system
De
ce
mb
er
20
07
Design Begins
Fe
bru
ary
20
08 Ju
ly 2
00
8
Complete Design
Completed Tasks
Planned Tasks
No
ve
mb
er
20
07
Fe
bru
ary
20
08
Fe
bru
ary
20
08
ProductionRoll-out
Alpha Testing (Prototype)
Beta Testing
Ma
y 2
00
8
Decision on proposed approach Develop usability
testing plan
Ap
ril
20
08
Ja
nu
ary
20
08
Ma
rch
20
08
Formed eSMR UserGroup Team Provide screen
mockups
Develop implementation plan for Level 2
Ma
rch
20
08
Ma
rch
20
08
System ProgrammingBegins
1414
Next Step Level 2 implementation
System programming
Conduct usability testing Schedule and Resources Communication, Outreach, and Training System alpha and beta testing and acceptance System/requirements cross reference (on-going):
• data, data quality, functionality, and data outputs System roll out and post implement evaluation
Continue design of Level 2.5