38
Present Status and Future Direction of BSIM SOI Model Present Status and Future Direction of BSIM SOI Model for High Performance/Low-Power/RF Application for High Performance/Low-Power/RF Application Samuel K. H. Fung, *Pin Su, *Wan Hui, *Chenming Hu Samuel K. H. Fung, *Pin Su, *Wan Hui, *Chenming Hu IBM Microelectronics, Semiconductor Research and Development Center (SRDC) (Industrial Advisor, EECS, University of California at Berkeley) *EECS, University of California at Berkeley, California

Present Status and Future Direction of BSIM SOI Model for …€¦ ·  · 2010-03-19Present Status and Future Direction of BSIM SOI Model for High Performance/Low-Power/RF Application

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Present Status and Future Direction of BSIM SOI ModelPresent Status and Future Direction of BSIM SOI Model

for High Performance/Low-Power/RF Applicationfor High Performance/Low-Power/RF Application

Samuel K. H. Fung, *Pin Su, *Wan Hui, *Chenming HuSamuel K. H. Fung, *Pin Su, *Wan Hui, *Chenming Hu

IBM Microelectronics, Semiconductor Research and Development Center (SRDC)

(Industrial Advisor, EECS, University of California at Berkeley)

*EECS, University of California at Berkeley, California

Agenda

•• Race between Technology and Compact ModelRace between Technology and Compact Model

•• SOI Application SpaceSOI Application Space

•• SOI Model ClassificationSOI Model Classification

•• Status of PD-SOI ModelStatus of PD-SOI Model

•• Status of FD/DD-SOI ModelStatus of FD/DD-SOI Model

•• ConclusionConclusion

Agenda

Race betweenRace between

Technology & Compact ModelTechnology & Compact Model

SOI Thickness Scaling Trend

20

30

40

5060708090

100

200

1st 0.10µm

2nd 0.13µm

0.18µm

1st 0.13µm

IBM Historic Trend

S

OI T

hick

ness

• Minimize junction capacitancewhile channel doping isincreasing with scaling

• Improve short channel control

SOI Thickness Uniformity

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

-100-50

050

100

-100

-50

0

50

100-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

X (mm)

Mean=630.5A, std.dev.= 3A

Y (mm)

Tsi

- m

ean

(A)

Oxide Thickness and Leakage Scaling Trend

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

EO

T (A

)

Technology Generation1E-8

1E-7

1E-6

1E-5

Gat

e Le

akag

e @

Vdd

(A/u

m2)

• Do we understand enough on gate tunneling current?• Are compact model/characterization good enough?

Compact Model Dilemma

•• Compact Model Development requires QualifiedCompact Model Development requires QualifiedTechnology for Ultimate Verification of NewTechnology for Ultimate Verification of NewPhysicsPhysics

•• Technology with New Device Structure need GoodTechnology with New Device Structure need GoodCompact Model for Early Circuit DesignCompact Model for Early Circuit Design

Compact Model Dilemma

•• Standardized Compact Model is usually developedStandardized Compact Model is usually developedby universities.by universities.

•• It is not easy for universities to access most advancedIt is not easy for universities to access most advancedtechnology from semiconductor companiestechnology from semiconductor companies

Technology vs Compact Model

•• 0.35um0.35um

•• 0.250.25

•• 0.180.18

•• 0.130.13

•• 0.100.10

•• 0.070.07

•• 0.050.05

Technology Release(1st Product)

BSIM BulkModel

BSIM-SOI Model

•• BSIM2BSIM2–– BasicBasic

•• BSIM3BSIM3–– Poly depletionPoly depletion–– Psuedo-2D DIBL on Threshold/Psuedo-2D DIBL on Threshold/

Rout/ Subthreshold SlopeRout/ Subthreshold Slope–– HALO dopingHALO doping–– Narrow width effectNarrow width effect–– Charge partitioningCharge partitioning–– Noise modelNoise model

•• BSIM4BSIM4–– Gate tunnelingGate tunneling–– RF (Gate intrinsicRF (Gate intrinsic

resistance/substrate networkresistance/substrate network–– Asymetric S/DAsymetric S/D–– Charge Thickness ModelCharge Thickness Model

Technology vs Compact Model

•• 0.35um0.35um

•• 0.250.25

•• 0.180.18

•• 0.130.13

•• 0.100.10

•• 0.070.07

•• 0.050.05

Technology Release(1st Product)

BSIM BulkModel

BSIM-SOI Model

•• BSIM2BSIM2–– BasicBasic

•• BSIM3BSIM3–– Poly depletionPoly depletion–– Psuedo-2D DIBL on Threshold/Psuedo-2D DIBL on Threshold/

Rout/ Subthreshold SlopeRout/ Subthreshold Slope–– HALO dopingHALO doping–– Narrow width effectNarrow width effect–– Charge partitioningCharge partitioning–– Noise modelNoise model

•• BSIM4BSIM4–– Gate tunnelingGate tunneling–– RF (Gate intrinsicRF (Gate intrinsic

resistance/substrate networkresistance/substrate network–– Asymetric S/DAsymetric S/D–– Charge Thickness ModelCharge Thickness Model

•• BSIMPD2.2BSIMPD2.2–– Diode/BJT with TAT and LDiode/BJT with TAT and L

dependencedependence–– Igb, Self-heatingIgb, Self-heating–– High Vbs MOS I-V/C-VHigh Vbs MOS I-V/C-V–– Accurate Impact IonizationAccurate Impact Ionization–– Body Contact MOSFETBody Contact MOSFET–– Noise modelingNoise modeling

•• BSIMSOI (FD/DD/PD)BSIMSOI (FD/DD/PD)–– Barrier Lowering DiodeBarrier Lowering Diode–– EtcEtc

Catch-up

Catch-up

Agenda

SOI Application SpaceSOI Application Space

SOI Application Space (1/3)

-1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.20.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

Vg=1.2, 1.0, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4, 0.2V

NFET ALgate=33nm

Ioff@1V=430nA/µm

PFETLgate=33nm

Ioff@1V=200nA/µm

Dra

in C

urre

nt (m

A/µ

m)

Drain Voltage (V)

uuWork-horse forWork-horse for

High-PerformanceHigh-Performance

MicroprocessorMicroprocessor

uuHigh Ion/Good SCEHigh Ion/Good SCE

SOI Application Space (2/3)

uu Low voltageLow voltage

consumer productconsumer product

uuGood subthresholdGood subthreshold

modelmodel

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.610

1

102

103

stag

e d

elay

(p

s)

Lpoly = 70 nm

inverter, FO=1 3-way NAND, FO=1 3-way NOR, FO=1 wire-loaded inv., FO=1inverter, FO=3 3-way NOR, FO=3

Vdd (V)

SOI Application Space (3/3)

uMixed Signal RF

customer product

u Instrinsic gate

resistance, noise

model, layout

dependence

Id (mA/um)

SOI Application Space

•• Work-horse for High Performance micro-processorWork-horse for High Performance micro-processor

•• Emerging for low-voltage/low-power applicationEmerging for low-voltage/low-power application

•• CMOS RF applicationCMOS RF application

Agenda

SOI Model ClassificationSOI Model Classification

Classification of SOI ModelModel class Partially Depleted

(PD) BSIMPD2.2Ideal Fully

Depleted (FD)Dynamic Depletion

(DD)Progress Industrial quality, widely

adopted in industry,Standardized by CMC

on Dec 9th, 2001

Work in progress Work in progress

Devices characteristics Never get into fulldepletion

At least fullydepleted at Vg=0V

At least fully depleted atVg=Vdd

Number of nodes G, D, S, B4

G, D, S, E4

G, D, S, B, E5

Diode leakage& Gate-to-body tunnelingcurrent

Very critical Not needed Less criticalHard to formulate and

calibrateDiode capacitance& Body-to-Gate/Channelcapacitance

Very critical Not needed Less criticalHard to formulate and

calibrateSimulation Time Good Faster SlowerConvergency Demonstrated Even better Not know yetCompatibility with bulkmodel (BSIM3/BSIM4)

Essential Not necessary Essential

Agenda

Status of PD-SOI ModelStatus of PD-SOI Model

Status of PD-SOI

•• BSIMPD v2.2.1 (9/1999)BSIMPD v2.2.1 (9/1999)–– Separate BSIMPD from BSIMSOI for ease of modelSeparate BSIMPD from BSIMSOI for ease of model

implementationimplementation–– Igb model addedIgb model added–– Bug fixBug fix

•• BSIMPD v2.2.2 (2/2000) ---- Standardized by CMC 12/9/2001BSIMPD v2.2.2 (2/2000) ---- Standardized by CMC 12/9/2001–– Igb temperature dependence fixIgb temperature dependence fix–– FRBODY for layout dependent distributed RC body effectFRBODY for layout dependent distributed RC body effect–– Bug fixBug fix

•• BSIMPD v2.2.3 (2/2002)BSIMPD v2.2.3 (2/2002)–– Fix in Igb residue problemFix in Igb residue problem–– Adding dtoxcv in capMod=3 for flexibilityAdding dtoxcv in capMod=3 for flexibility–– Bug fixBug fix

BSIMPD Model Formulation

Challenges : Predict the floating body effect in DC and TransientChallenges : Predict the floating body effect in DC and Transient

BSIMPD Model Formulation

•• Extending I-V equation to Vbs close to 2*PhibExtending I-V equation to Vbs close to 2*Phib–– Vth vs VbsVth vs Vbs–– Experimental FD and DD models are included using ddModExperimental FD and DD models are included using ddMod

Body to source voltage (V)-1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

Lin

ear

Th

resh

old

Vo

ltag

e (V

)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Temperature = 23, 85, 140C

NFETLdesign = 0.15um

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.82.4m

2.6m

2.8m

3.0m

3.2m

3.4m

3.6m

3.8m

4.0m

T=140C

T=85C

ideal BC non-ideal model measurement data

Idsa

t (A

)

Vbs (V)

BSIMPD Model Formulation

•• Impact ionization current need to be very accurateImpact ionization current need to be very accurate–– In bulk, Iii model is only for reliability understanding.In bulk, Iii model is only for reliability understanding.

Gate Voltage (V)0.5 1.0 1.5

Imp

act

Ion

izat

ion

Eff

icie

ncy

(Isu

b/Id

)

1e-5

1e-4

1e-3

1e-2

Ldesign= 0.137, 0.152, 0.172, 0.191, 0.243 µm

NFET, 85C, Vds = 1.8V

Vds (V)

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2

Dra

in C

urr

ent

(mA

/µm

)

1e-11

1e-10

1e-9

1e-8

1e-7

1e-6

1e-5

1e-4

1e-3

Ldesign = 0.14NFET, 85C

Vgs = 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1V

BSIMPD Model Formulation

•• Igb at accumulation and inversionIgb at accumulation and inversion

-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.51E-12

1E-11

1E-10

1E-9

1E-8

1E-7

1E-6

Vbs

=0V

NFET Tox = 1.45nm

-0.4V 0V Vbs

=0.4V

IgbI

gg

Igg

=Igb

Gat

e cu

rren

t (A

/µm

2 )

Vgs

(V)0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

H-gate BodyContact Device

Floating Device

Ids

(µA

/µm

)

Vgs (V)

PFET Ldesign=0.125µm

Vds = 0.05V

BSIMPD Model Formulation

•• Non-ideal Body Contact SupportNon-ideal Body Contact Support–– N-segment for distributed body resistance networkN-segment for distributed body resistance network–– Parasitic diode and gate capacitanceParasitic diode and gate capacitance

Bod

y-C

onta

ct

Gate

Ext

ende

d-G

ate Drain

Source

PLC

PWC

PWB

L

W

PLD

PLS

GateGate

BC

B

B

B

BSIMPD Model Formulation

•• Floating body induced Low-Floating body induced Low-frequency Noisefrequency Noise

Dra

in C

urre

nt N

oise

Sid

(A2 /H

z)

10-21

10-20

10-19

10-18

10-17

10-16

10-15

10-14

Frequency (Hz)100 101 102 103 104 105

Out

put I

mpe

danc

e (k

Ω)

1

10

Vds=1.1V, 1.2V, 1.3V, 1.4V

W/L = 20/0.5µmTox = 8.5nmTsi = 180nmVgs = 1V

fc3 fc4fc2fc1

2 0

5Vds=1.1VVds=1.2VVds=1.3VVds=1.4V

W/L = 20/0.5µmTox = 8.5nmTsi = 180nmVgs = 1V

B: noise band width=2qI B,iii

2 =2qI B ibs2

bsii

Ground

ceq req

Body

ibs2

i2ii

(a)

Front Gate

Back Gate

Source Drainjdc

becrjs

jsc bbc

bbc : body to channel depletion cap.js/jdc : body to S/D junction cap.

ceq bb=c js+cbe+c jd+creq js=r ,(b)

jsr : body to source resistanceAC

BSIMPD Model Formulation

•• SPICE implementation allow variable nodesSPICE implementation allow variable nodes

Mname <D-node> <G-node> <S-node> <E-node> [P-node] [B-node] [T-node] <model>[TNODEOUT]

FB MOSFET ----------------------------------

BC MOSFET ----------------------------------

BC MOSFET with internal B-node available -------

FB MOSFET with temp node ------- ------------------

BC MOSFET with temp node -------------------------

BC MOSFET with internal B-node & Temp node ---

M1 (D, G, S, E)

M1 (D, G, S, E, P)

M1 (D, G, S, E, P, B)

M1 (D, G, S, E, T) TNODEOUT=1

M1 (D, G, S, E, P, T) TNODEOUT=1

M1 (D, G, S, E, P, B, T) TNODEOUT=1

Agenda

Status of FD/DD-SOI ModelStatus of FD/DD-SOI Model

Status of FD/DD-SOI

•• BSIMSOI v1.3 (1998)BSIMSOI v1.3 (1998)–– Experimental, including three models (PD/FD/DD)Experimental, including three models (PD/FD/DD)

•• BSIMFD v2.0 (9/1999)BSIMFD v2.0 (9/1999)–– Experimental, Derivative of ddMod=2 from BSIM3SOI v1.3Experimental, Derivative of ddMod=2 from BSIM3SOI v1.3

•• BSIMDD v2.0 (9/1999)BSIMDD v2.0 (9/1999)–– Experimental, Derivative of ddMod=1 from BSIM3SOI v1.3Experimental, Derivative of ddMod=1 from BSIM3SOI v1.3

•• BSIMSOI v3.0 (Mid 2002)BSIMSOI v3.0 (Mid 2002)–– Another attempt to combine PD/FD/DD modelAnother attempt to combine PD/FD/DD model–– Take advantage of CMC standardized BSIMPD2.2.3 codeTake advantage of CMC standardized BSIMPD2.2.3 code–– Fully compatible with BSIMPD2.2.3 (soimod=0)Fully compatible with BSIMPD2.2.3 (soimod=0)–– Fine tuning the concept of barrier loweringFine tuning the concept of barrier lowering–– Robust implementationRobust implementation

“Degree” of Fully Depletion

Potential at SOI bottom(Vbs0)

Tsi0PD

Assuming FD

“Degree” of FD can be measured byPotential at SOI bottom @Vg=Vth, Vd=Vs=0V assuming FD

Floating vs Not Floating (DC)

Case : We need to keep B-node for DD-SOI model

Problem : How to emulate “not floating” with floating body?

Key Concept :Key Concept :Diode with Barrier LoweringDiode with Barrier Lowering

What it means :Vbs does not change during charging/discharging.

Diode with Barrier Lowering (1/2)

H

HH

HHHHHH

H

•• Injected hole will accumulateInjected hole will accumulate

at the SOI bottomat the SOI bottom

•• The accumulation isThe accumulation is

extremely thin such that Vextremely thin such that Vbs0bs0

is still controlled by Vfg/Vbgis still controlled by Vfg/Vbg

couplingcoupling

•• The diode can sink a range ofThe diode can sink a range of

hole current with littlehole current with little

potential raisepotential raise

Diode with Barrier Lowering (2/2)

Vbs (V)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

I bs (

A)

1e-15

1e-14

1e-13

1e-12

1e-11

1e-10

1e-9

1e-8

1e-7

1e-6

50nm

80nm

100nm130nm

200nm

Symbol Medici simulation Calculated by B3SOI

Tox = 10nmTbox = 400nmNch = 5e16

Vbs0

Vbs0 as a measure of the

“degree” of channel depletion

wrt SOI thickness

DD Characteristic

Vgs (V)

0.0 0.5 1.0

ds

1e-13

1e-12

1e-11

1e-10

1e-9

1e-8

1e-7

1e-6

1e-5

1e-4

MeasurementSimulated by B3SOIsymbol

Technology BLeff = 0.75µm

Ves = -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2V

S = 66mV/dec

S = 85mV/dec

Varying backgate bias is

the most effective way to

extract barrier lowering

effect

DD Characteristics

Vds (V)

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0

I ds (m

A)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Vgs = 1V

NMOSFETW/L = 20/0.26Tsi = 50nmTbox = 85nm

Symbol Measurement Model

Vbg = -3V,

2V

3V

0V,

Varying backgate bias is

the most effective way to

extract barrier lowering

effect

Zero-field Body Potential

SOI BOX

E-field

Potential

Φs

VbsVbseff

0

Vbs definition for coupled and

decoupled case are consistent if

zero-field Vbseff is used

Range of Body Potential

Iterating Vbs (V)

-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Vb

seff a

nd

Vbs

_dio

(V

)

-0.2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Vbs_dio

Vbseff

Vbs0

TSI = 50nmTBOX = 100nmNCH = 2e17VBG = -3V

2φf

Vbs0t

Vbs0

(for Diode & BJT)(for MOS IV)

DecoupledCoupled

uDecoupledØNeutral body

exist

uCoupledØNo neutral body

ØVertical E-fieldnot terminated

Agenda

ConclusionConclusion

Conclusion

•• SOI is becoming mainstream for high-performance micro-processorSOI is becoming mainstream for high-performance micro-processor

application and is emerging for low-voltage/low-power/RF SOC applicationapplication and is emerging for low-voltage/low-power/RF SOC application

•• SOI compact model is catching up heavily at 100/70nm technology node.SOI compact model is catching up heavily at 100/70nm technology node.

•• SOI model can be classified as PD, FD and DD.SOI model can be classified as PD, FD and DD.

•• BSIMPD v2.2.3 is widely adopted in industry. Almost of all important physicsBSIMPD v2.2.3 is widely adopted in industry. Almost of all important physics

are covered already.are covered already.

•• FD/DD model is currently under development. Barrier lowering concept is theFD/DD model is currently under development. Barrier lowering concept is the

key to model the FD/DD behavior.key to model the FD/DD behavior.