19
Preparing students for the 4 th Industrial Revolution Implications for science education Andreas Schleicher Director for Education and Skills

Preparing students for the 4th Industrial Revolution · Preparing students for the 4th Industrial Revolution Implications for science education Andreas Schleicher Director for Education

  • Upload
    lethien

  • View
    228

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Preparing students for the

4th Industrial Revolution Implications for science education

Andreas SchleicherDirector for Education and Skills

PISA 2015

OECD

Partners

“the ability to engage with science-

related issues, and with the ideas of

science, as a reflective citizen”

Science in PISA

Trends in science performance (PISA)

2006 2009 2012 2015

OECD

450

470

490

510

530

550

570

OECD average

Stu

de

nt

pe

rfo

rma

nc

e

Trends in science performance (PISA)

450

470

490

510

530

550

570

2006 2009 2012 2015

OECD average

Poverty is not destiny - Science performanceby international deciles of the PISA index of economic, social and cultural status (ESCS)

280

330

380

430

480

530

580

630D

om

inic

an R

ep

ub

lic 4

0A

lge

ria 5

2K

oso

vo

10

Qa

tar

3F

YR

OM

13

Tu

nis

ia 3

9M

on

ten

eg

ro 1

1Jord

an 2

1U

nite

d A

rab

Em

ira

tes 3

Ge

org

ia 1

9L

eb

an

on

27

Indo

nesia

74

Me

xic

o 5

3P

eru

50

Co

sta

Ric

a 3

8B

razil

43

Tu

rke

y 5

9M

old

ova 2

8T

haila

nd

55

Co

lom

bia

43

Ice

lan

d 1

Trin

idad

and

Tob

ago

14

Rom

an

ia 2

0Is

rae

l 6

Bu

lga

ria

13

Gre

ece

13

Russia

5U

rug

ua

y 3

9C

hile

27

Latv

ia 2

5L

ith

uan

ia 1

2S

lova

k R

ep

ub

lic 8

Italy

15

Norw

ay 1

Sp

ain

31

Hu

nga

ry 1

6C

roa

tia

10

De

nm

ark

3O

EC

D a

vera

ge

12

Sw

ed

en

3M

alta 1

3U

nite

d S

tate

s 1

1M

acao

(C

hin

a)

22

Ire

lan

d 5

Au

str

ia 5

Po

rtug

al 2

8L

uxe

mb

ourg

14

Hon

g K

on

g (

Ch

ina

) 2

6C

zech

Rep

ublic

9P

ola

nd

16

Au

str

alia

4U

nite

d K

ing

do

m 5

Can

ad

a 2

Fra

nce 9

Ko

rea

6N

ew

Zea

land

5S

witze

rlan

d 8

Neth

erl

an

ds 4

Slo

ve

nia

5B

elg

ium

7F

inla

nd

2E

sto

nia

5V

iet

Nam

76

Ge

rma

ny 7

Jap

an 8

Chin

ese

Ta

ipe

i 1

2B

-S-J

-G (

Chin

a)

52

Sin

ga

pore

11

Score

poin

ts

Bottom decile Second decile Middle decile Ninth decile Top decile

Figure I.6.7

% of students

in the bottom

international

deciles of

ESCS

OECD median student

Students expecting a career in scienceFigure I.3.2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Do

min

ican

Rep

. 1

2C

osta

Ric

a 1

1Jord

an

6

Un

ite

d A

rab E

m.

11

Me

xic

o

6C

olo

mbia

8Le

ban

on

15

Bra

zil

19

Peru

7Q

ata

r 19

Un

ite

d S

tate

s

13

Ch

ile 1

8T

un

isia

1

9C

anad

a 2

1S

loven

ia 1

6T

urk

ey 6

Austr

alia

1

5U

nite

d K

ing

dom

1

7M

ala

ysia

4

Kazakhsta

n

14

Spain

1

1N

orw

ay

21

Uru

guay 1

7S

ing

apo

re 1

4T

rin

ida

d a

nd T

. 13

Isra

el 2

5C

AB

A (

Arg

.)

19

Port

ug

al 18

Bulg

aria

2

5Ir

ela

nd

1

3K

osovo

7A

lge

ria

12

Ma

lta

1

1G

reece

12

Ne

w Z

eala

nd 2

4A

lba

nia

2

9E

sto

nia

1

5O

EC

D a

vera

ge 1

9B

elg

ium

1

6C

roa

tia

1

7F

YR

OM

2

0Lithu

ania

2

1Ic

ela

nd

2

2R

ussia

1

9H

KG

(C

hin

a)

2

0R

om

an

ia

20

Ita

ly 1

7A

ustr

ia

23

Mo

ldova

7La

tvia

1

9M

onte

neg

ro 1

8F

rance

21

Lu

xe

mbo

urg

1

8P

ola

nd

1

3M

aca

o (

Ch

ina

) 10

Ch

ine

se

Taip

ei 2

1S

wede

n 2

1T

ha

iland

2

7V

iet

Nam

1

3S

witzerl

and

2

2K

ore

a

7

Hu

nga

ry 2

2S

lovak R

epub

lic

24

Japa

n 1

8F

inla

nd

24

Geo

rgia

2

7C

zech R

epu

blic

2

2B

-S-J

-G (

Chin

a)

31

Ne

therl

and

s

19

Germ

any 3

3In

don

esia

1

9D

enm

ark

4

8

%Percentage of students who expect to work in science-related professional and technical occupations when they are 30

Science-related technicians and associate professionals

Information and communication technology professionals

Health professionals

Science and engineering professionals

% o

f st

ud

ents

wit

hva

gu

e o

r m

issi

ng

exp

ecta

tio

ns

0

10

20

30

40

50

300 400 500 600 700

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of

stu

de

nts

ex

pe

cti

ng

a

ca

ree

r in

sc

ien

ce

Score points in science

Low enjoyment of science

High enjoyment of science

Students expecting a career in scienceby performance and enjoyment of learning

Figure I.3.17

9 Looking forward to…Better anticipate the evolution of the demand for 21st century skills and better integrate the world of

work and learning

Leverage the potential of all learners

Find more innovative solutions to what we learn, how we learn, when

we learn and where we learn

Advance from an industrial towards a professional work organisation

Building learning systems that…

The kind of things that are easy to teach are

now easy to automate, digitize or outsource

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2006 2009

Routine manual

Nonroutine manual

Routine cognitive

Nonroutine analytic

Nonroutine interpersonal

Mean task input in percentiles of 1960 task

Robotics

The Auto-auto>1m km,

one minor accident,

occasional human intervention

Augmented Reality

Education in the past

Education now

External forces

exerting pressure and

influence inward on

an occupation

Internal motivation and

efforts of the members

of the profession itself

15 Professionalism

Professionalism is the level of autonomy and internal regulation exercised by members of an

occupation in providing services to society

Policy levers to teacher professionalism

Knowledge base for teaching (initial education and incentives for professional development)

Autonomy: Teachers’ decision-making power over their work (teaching content, course offerings, discipline practices)

Peer networks: Opportunities for exchange and support needed to maintain high standards of teaching (participation in induction,

mentoring, networks, feedback from direct observations)

Teacher

professionalism

Teacher professionalism

Knowledge base for teaching (initial education and incentives for professional development)

Autonomy: Teachers’ decision-making power over their work (teaching content, course offerings, discipline practices)

Peer networks: Opportunities for exchange and support needed to maintain high standards of teaching (participation in induction,

mentoring, networks, feedback from direct observations)

Technology can amplify innovative teaching

• As tools for inquiry-

based pedagogies

with learners as

active participants

• Make it faster

and more granular

• Collaborative platforms

for teachers to share and

enrich teaching materials

• Well beyond textbooks, in

multiple formats, with little

time and space constraints

Expand

access to

content

Collaboration

for

knowledge

creation

Support

new

pedagogies

Feedback

1919Lessons f

rom

hig

h p

erf

orm

ers

19

19 Thank you

Find out more about our work at www.oecd.org– All publications

– The complete micro-level database

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: SchleicherEDU

and remember:

Without data, you are just another person with an opinion