34
Preparing for Effective Argumentation

Preparing for E ffective Argumentation

  • Upload
    fritz

  • View
    49

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Preparing for E ffective Argumentation. What’s the connection?. Emotional Appeals are often employed in propaganda Logical Fallacies are often present in those appeals Positive or negative connotation? TECHNIQUE. Aristotle’s Appeals . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Preparing for Effective Argumentation

Page 2: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

What’s the connection?• Emotional Appeals are often

employed in propaganda• Logical Fallacies are often present in

those appeals• Positive or negative connotation?– TECHNIQUE

Page 3: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Aristotle’s Appeals • The goal of argumentative writing is

to persuade your audience that your ideas are valid, or more valid than someone else's.

• The Greek philosopher Aristotle divided the means of persuasion, appeals, into three categories--Ethos, Pathos, Logos.

Page 4: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Rhetoric• Rhetoric (n) - the art of speaking or

writing effectively (Webster's Definition).

• According to Aristotle, rhetoric is "the ability, in each particular case, to see the available means of persuasion." He described three main forms of rhetoric: Ethos, Logos, and Pathos.

Page 5: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Ethos• Refers to the trustworthiness or

credibility of the writer or speaker. • Greek for “character”• The impact of ethos is often called

the argument's 'ethical appeal' or the 'appeal from credibility.'

Page 6: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Pathos• Greek for 'suffering' or 'experience' • often associated with emotional

appeal • 'appeal to the audience's sympathies

and imagination.' • An appeal to pathos causes an

audience not just to respond emotionally but to identify with the writer's point of view--to feel what the writer feels.

Page 7: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Logos• Greek for 'word' • Refers to the internal consistency of

the message--the clarity of the claim, the logic of its reasons, and the effectiveness of its supporting evidence.

• The impact of logos on an audience is sometimes called the argument's logical appeal.

Page 8: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Logical Fallacy• Fallacies are common errors in reasoning that

will undermine the logic of your argument. • Fallacies can be either illegitimate arguments

or irrelevant points, and are often identified because they lack evidence that supports their claim.

• Avoid these common fallacies in your own arguments and watch for them in the arguments of others.

• *from Purdue OWL

Page 9: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Red Herring• Red Herring: This is a diversionary

tactic that avoids the key issues, often by avoiding opposing arguments rather than addressing them.

• Example: The level of mercury in seafood may be unsafe, but what will fishers do to support their families?

Page 10: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Ad hominem • Ad hominem: This is an attack on the

character of a person rather than her/his opinions or arguments.

• Example: Green Peace's strategies aren't effective because they are all dirty, lazy hippies.

Page 11: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Post hoc ergo propter hoc• Post hoc ergo propter hoc: This is a

conclusion that assumes that if 'A' occurred after 'B' then 'B' must have caused 'A.'

• Example: I drank bottled water and now I am sick, so the water must have made me sick.

Page 12: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Ad misericordiam (appeal to pity)

• Assent or dissent to a statement or an argument is sought on the basis of an irrelevant appeal to pity. In other words, pity, or the related emotion is not the subject or the conclusion of the argument.

• Example: Oh, Officer, There's no reason to give me a traffic ticket for going too fast because I was just on my way to the hospital to see my wife who is in serious condition to tell her I just lost my job and the car will be repossessed.– Person L argues statement p or argument A.– L deserves pity because of circumstance y.– Circumstance y is irrelevant to p or A.– Statement p is true or argument A is good.

Page 13: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Dicto simpliciter• A fallacy in which a general rule is

treated as universally true regardless of the circumstances: a sweeping generalization.

• Example: Exercise is good; therefore, everyone should exercise

Page 14: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Circular Reasoning• Circular Argument: This restates the

argument rather than actually proving it.

• Example: Barak Obama is a good communicator because he speaks effectively.

Page 15: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Which of the following is NOT circular reasoning?

• 1. Mike was the best candidate for president, because he was totally better than any of the others.

• 2. Parent: “It’s bed time, go to bed.”Child: “Why?”Parent: “Because I said so.”

• 3. If such actions were not illegal, then they would not be prohibited by the law.4. They signed Jackie Chan to play the lead, because Hollywood cannot make an action movie without a big star.

Page 16: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Appeal to Authority• When a well-known figure is used as

supporting evidence for a statement’s validity, the hope is that merely by association with the person's name, the idea will be accepted. The strategy is a fallacious argument because the person may not be an expert on the subject in question or there is no evidence that shows that the well-known figure is in support of the proposed statement.

• Example: Tim Tebow takes additional vitamin C tablets, which he swears keeps him healthy.

Page 17: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Slippery Slope• This is a conclusion based on the premise

that if A happens, then eventually through a series of small steps, through B, C,..., X, Y, Z will happen, too, basically equating A and Z. So, if we don't want Z to occur, A must not be allowed to occur either.

• Example: If we ban Hummers because they are bad for the environment eventually the government will ban all cars, so we should not ban Hummers.

Page 18: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Appeal to Force• Appeal to force is committed when

the arguer threatens (even implicitly) that some harm will come to the persuadee unless the persuadee accepts the conclusion. It is a fallacy if the harmful circumstances are not related to the topic of the conclusion of argument.

Page 19: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Propaganda•  Dissemination of information—facts,

arguments, rumors, half-truths, or lies—to influence public opinion.

• The systematic effort to manipulate other people’s beliefs, attitudes, or actions by means of symbols (words, gestures, banners, monuments, music, clothing, insignia, hairstyles, designs on coins and postage stamps, and so forth).

Page 20: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

• In The Fine Art of Propaganda, the IPA stated that "It is essential in a democratic society that young people and adults learn how to think, learn how to make up their minds. They must learn how to think independently, and they must learn how to think together. They must come to conclusions, but at the same time they must recognize the right of other men to come to opposite conclusions. So far as individuals are concerned, the art of democracy is the art of thinking and discussing independently together."

Page 21: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Logical Fallacies Part I: Do you follow?

Page 22: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Logical Fallacies Part II: Still following?

Page 23: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Plain Folks• By using the plain-folks technique,

speakers attempt to convince their audience that they, and their ideas, are "of the people." The device is used by advertisers and politicians alike.

Page 24: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Bandwagon• This type of propaganda is used

to pacify us—it makes

something sound less threatening

than it should. • Example: “All veterans are voting for

our candidate!”

Page 25: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Scare Tactics• This technique gets people to

act out of fear rather than

logical thinking. • Example: “My opponent will cut

jobs!”

Page 26: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Innuendo• This technique hints bad things

about somebody (or a group)

but doesn’t explain or provide

any proof.

Page 27: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Appeal to Science• This technique suggests that

something is good because it is

more scientifically advanced.

Page 28: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Snob Appeal• This technique makes people

think they are better that

others if they act a certain way.

Page 29: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Name-Calling• The name-calling technique links a

person, or idea, to a negative symbol. The propagandist who uses this technique hopes that the audience will reject the person or the idea on the basis of the negative symbol, instead of looking at the available evidence.

• Example: Hitler did this when he said, “Jews are swine.”

Page 30: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Glittering Generality• The Glittering Generality is, in short, Name

Calling in reverse. While Name Calling seeks to make us form a judgment to reject and condemn without examining the evidence, the Glittering Generality device seeks to make us approve and accept without examining the evidence.

• We believe in, fight for, live by virtue words about which we have deep-set ideas. Such words include civilization, good, right, democracy, patriotism, motherhood, fatherhood, science, medicine, health, and love.

Page 31: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Euphemisms• This type of propaganda is used

to pacify us—it makes

something sound less

threatening than it should. • Often used in the military…

Page 32: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

George Carlin on euphemisms…

Page 33: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Testimonial• Using a famous person to try to make

you buy or support something or someone

• Similar to “Transfer”—certain people, words, pictures act as symbols when they are paired with products, ideas, etc.

• Example: Tiger Woods wears Nike, Jessica Simpson recommends Proactive.

Page 34: Preparing for  E ffective Argumentation

Humor• Giving the audience a reason to laugh

or to be entertained by clever use of visuals or language.

• Examples: Geico commercials (so easy, a caveman can do it…NOT the gecko…let’s be honest, he’s NOT funny…in fact, I’d like to motion that he be removed from their commercials…he makes me want to buy Geico LESS….)