Upload
marilynn-crawford
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
************ Event ID 38 CSC ID 9 CSC type 0 Cathode Tracking: Number of Tracks 1 Track 0 Plane 0 Hits 0 y dy dif used Plane 1 Hits 0 y dy dif not used Plane 2 Hits 0 y dy dif used Plane 3 Hits 0 y dy dif used Plane 4 Hits 0 y dy dif used Plane 5 Hits 0 y dy dif used Cathode Track Fit (4 DOF) for track 0: Slope Intercept Chisqr Typical Track – Evt 38 CSCID 9 Far Side
Citation preview
Preliminary Slice Test Track Fitting S. Durkin Sept. 8, 2005
Analyze RunNum1007Evs0to49999.bin using /AnalysisUtilities
• look for tracks in two separate CSC’s• trigger very loose, 9291/50000 such events found• single overall cross talk and noise constants used• events typically very well fit (see next two pages)• analyze data with CSC5 and CSC9 hit.
CSCID Chamber Type 4 ME2/1 16 no data 5 ME2/2 31 7 ME2/2 32 8 ME3/1 16 no data 9 ME3/2 31 10 ME3/2 32
CSCID1 CSCID2 Events 5 7 636 5 9 3129 5 10 1423 7 9 994 7 10 2326 9 10 670
Red Events chamber overlap.
************ Event ID 38 CSC ID 5 CSC type 0 Cathode Tracking: Number of Tracks 1
Track 0 Plane 0 Hits 0 y 61.8693 dy 0.07552 dif -0.0715 used Plane 1 Hits 0 y 61.2128 dy 0.02231 dif 0.0251 used Plane 2 Hits 0 y 60.6817 dy 0.00702 dif -0.0037 used Plane 3 Hits 0 y 60.1169 dy 0.01132 dif 0.0012 used Plane 4 Hits 1 y 59.5459 dy 0.01219 dif 0.0123 used Plane 5 Hits 0 y 59.0460 dy 0.03158 dif -0.0477 used
Cathode Track Fit (4 DOF) for track 0: Slope -0.55990 Intercept 61.7978 Chisqr 5.752332
Typical Track – Evt 38 CSCID 5 (Near Side)
Distance from track in Strips.Typically < 200m
************ Event ID 38 CSC ID 9 CSC type 0 Cathode Tracking: Number of Tracks 1
Track 0 Plane 0 Hits 0 y 36.5085 dy 0.00424 dif 0.0006 used Plane 1 Hits 0 y 36.0551 dy 0.00995 dif -0.0662 not used Plane 2 Hits 0 y 35.4979 dy 0.01635 dif -0.0292 used Plane 3 Hits 0 y 34.9292 dy 0.01200 dif 0.0194 used Plane 4 Hits 0 y 34.4546 dy 0.01630 dif -0.0261 used Plane 5 Hits 0 y 33.8762 dy 0.02779 dif 0.0321 used
Cathode Track Fit (4 DOF) for track 0: Slope -0.52015 Intercept 36.5090 Chisqr 9.727195
Typical Track – Evt 38 CSCID 9 Far Side
Cathode Strip Angle Matching
Black Curve – CSC5 Red Curve – (CSC5 minus CSC9 )
• Compare track angles• Ignore any geometry corrections
CSC9 (degrees)
CSC
5 (
degr
ees)
Num
ber
of E
vent
s
(degrees)
~ 4 degrees
Cathode Strip Intercept Matching• Extrapolate track intercept• Ignore any geometry corrections except for Z position• Note: CSC5 and CSC9 are back to back (mirror images)
CSC
5 pl
us C
SC9
Inte
rcep
t (st
rips
)
CSC5 Slope
Black Curve – CSC5 InterceptRed Curve – CSC5 and CSC9 Corrected Intercept difference
Num
ber
of E
vent
s
Intercept (strips)
~ 2.5 strips
Best Fit DistanceBetween Chambers 101cm
Cathode Strip Expected Resolution
• covariance matrix from the least-squares fits to the track can be used to estimate angular error and extrapolation error• using PDG notation
D/222 2
111211112 )/100(//1 Dposition
edextrapolat
• from the data- angular error 0.15 degrees extrapolated position 0.6 strips
Cosmic ray spectrum is very hardat 75 degrees. Something else is going on !
Anode Wire Angle and Intercept Matching
• Anode tracks (units of wire groups) • Ignore any geometry corrections except for Z position
CSC
9
(deg
rees
)
CSC5 (degrees)
CSC
5 m
inus
CSC
9 In
terc
ept (
wir
e gr
oup)
CSC5 Slope
Where to go from here…
Num
ber
of E
vent
s
Num
ber
of E
vent
s
Difference in Slopes Difference in Slopes
Cathode:Black = csc5-csc9Red = csc5 –csc7 (overlap)
Cathode:Black = csc5-csc7 all anglesRed = csc5-csc7 slope5 <0.1
• Strip width variation must be added• Something else is going on, See the two plots below.• Probably best to start with overlap events for simplicity.