Preliminary & Detailed Site Investigation Report

Preliminary & Detailed Site Investigation Report

45-65 Greenacre Drive,

Tahmoor, NSW, 2573.

Lot 11 DP825465

Project Ref. P31191.1_R01

10th August 2017

Brinsley Properties Pty Ltd

C/-

North Western Surveys Pty. Ltd.

Shane Harding

P.O. Box 1045,

Blacktown NSW 2148

Report Approved by:

David Spasojevic

General Manager

ABN: 39 089 302 009

18/24 Garling Road, Kings Park NSW 2148

Tel: (02) 9671 4443

1


45-65 Greenacre Drive, Tahmoor, NSW, 2573 P31191.1_R01

ABN: 39 089 302 009

18/24 Garling Road, Kings Park NSW 2148

P (02) 9671 4443 F (02) 9671 4343

E [email protected]

10th August 2017

Brinsley Properties Pty Ltd

C/-

North Western Surveys. Pty Ltd

Shane Harding,

PO Box 1045,

Blacktown, NSW 2148.

Covering Letter for Preliminary & Detailed Site Investigation Report; 45-65 Greenacre Drive, Tahmoor NSW.

Dear Shane,

Please find enclosed the Preliminary & Detailed Site Investigation report prepared by Geotest Services for the property at 45-65

Greenacre Drive, Tahmoor NSW. Should you have any queries regarding the report and its contents please do not hesitate to

be in contact with the undersigned.

We look forward assisting North Western Surveys and your clients in future development and project works across greater

Sydney.

Regards,

Alan Halpin

Environmental Operations Manager

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

2



EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the results of a combined Preliminary and Detailed Site Investigation undertaken by Geotest Services Pty

Ltd (Geotest) at the Site. This report was commissioned by North Western Services Pty Ltd on behalf of their client Brinsley

Properties Pty Ltd to address development and planning requirements for the proposed metropolitan style low density residential

subdivision at the Site. The Site comprises Lot 11 in DP825465, also identified as 45-65 Greenacre Drive, Tahmoor, NSW, 2573.

The site is generally rectangular in shape and occupies an area of approximately 2.30 ha.

The objective of this investigation was to assess for the likelihood of contamination to exist on the Site. The objective of this

investigation was to identify any areas requiring remediation based on the representative sampling. The objective was also to

determine whether the Site would be suitable for the proposed future low density residential land use.

To achieve the objectives, Geotest undertook the following scope of works; review of available geology, hydrogeology and

topographical maps; review of historical aerial photographs; land title ownership record searches; NSW OEH contaminated land

register search; NSW Office of Water registered groundwater bore search (500m radius of the site); Obtain and review Section

149 (2) planning certificate; Site inspection and walkover to observe current site conditions and surrounding landuses; review of

preliminary findings; preparation of site sampling plan - targeting areas of environmental concern; site works including test pit

excavation and soil sampling; NATA accredited laboratory analysis; and interpretation of data and reporting.

A review of the available historical data and observations made during the Site walkover indicate a number of potential areas of

environmental concern (AEC) and associated contaminants of potential concern (COPC). These included former grazing,

regional market gardening and localised contouring to facilitate construction of the site dam.

A total of 21 sampling points were established and included; test-pits undertaken for environmental and geotechnical

investigations; sample collection and sample compositing for laboratory analysis; and selected test-pits undertaken for visual

inspection across the entire site to ensure geology and substrate consistency.

The results of the laboratory analysis indicate that the concentrations of the contaminants of potential concern in soils at the

sampling locations were all less than the adopted human health assessment criteria – Table 1 (a) Column HIL A (NEPM 2013).

There were no areas of aesthetically unsuitable materials identified. There were no ecological exceedances identified and

Geotest considered that no further human or environmental health investigation or remediation is warranted.

Geotest concluded that; based on the desktop investigation, site inspections, observations collected during site works and the

interpretation of laboratory data that the Site is considered suitable for future residential land-uses from a contamination

perspective.

Geotest make the following general recommendations regarding the site preparation for civil re-development -

• Lawful disposal of any generated debris, rubble and waste to licensed facility and provision of dockets; and

• A waste classification should be prepared for any soil materials being disposed off-site in accordance with NSW EPA 2014

Waste Classification Guidelines Part 1.

Further, in the event that any contaminating materials or un-expected finds (ie. animal carcasses, burial pits) are identified during

re-development, an appropriately experienced consultant should be engaged to attend site. The works should cease immediately

in the area of the discovery.

This executive summary should be read in conjunction with the remainder of its report.

3



TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2

1 INTRODUCTION 5

1.1 Objectives 5

1.2 Scope of Works 5

2 REGIONAL GROUND SETTING 6

2.1 Regional Geology 6

2.2 Regional Topography and Drainage 6

2.3 Regional Hydrogeology 6

2.4 Acid Sulfate Soils 6

3 SITE HISTORY 7

3.1 Land Titles 7

3.2 Section 149 Certificate 7

3.3 NSW Office of Environment NSW Office of Environment and Heritage Contaminated Land Record 7

3.4 NSW EPA POEO Public Register Search 7

3.5 SafeWork NSW Dangerous Goods Search 8

3.6 Aerial Photography 8

4 SITE WALKOVER 9

4.1 Site Comments & Anecdotal Information 9

4.2 Site Activities 9

4.3 Chemical Spills and Losses 9

4.4 Underground and Aboveground Storage Tanks 9

4.5 Waste Management 9

4.6 Discoloured Soils & Odours 9

4.7 Phytotoxicity 9

4.8 Hazardous Materials 9

4.9 Fill Material 9

4.10 Complaint & Incident History 10

4.11 Surrounding Land Use 10

5 DATA RELIABILITY 11

6 AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN AND CONTAMINANTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN 12

7 SITE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 13

7.1 Soils 13

8 FIELDWORK 15

8.1 Sampling Density & Activity 15

8.2 Areas not investigated 15

8.3 Laboratory Analysis 15

4



9 FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA RELIABILITY 16

9.1 Fieldwork 16

9.1.1 Sampling 16

9.1.2 Field Duplicates 16

9.1.3 Wash Blanks 16

9.1.4 Sample Preservation and Storage 16

9.2 Laboratory Reported Data 17

9.3 Reported Data Quality Conclusion 17

10 RESULTS 18

10.1 Site Specific Geology 18

10.2 Visual and Olfactory Observations 18

10.3 Inaccessible Areas 18

10.4 Reported Laboratory Results 18

10.4.1 Metals 18

10.4.2 OCP/ OPP 18

10.4.3 PAHs 18

10.4.4 TRH & BTEX 18

11 DISCUSSION 19

11.1 Soils – Human Health 19

11.2 Soils – Aesthetics 19

11.3 Soils – Ecological Health 19

12 CONCLUSIONS 20

13 REFERENCES 21

14 YOUR GEOTEST SERVICES DOCUMENT LIMITATIONS 22

Laboratory Table 1 – Soil Results & Site Assessment Criteria Laboratory Table 2 – Field Data Quality Assessment Figure 1 – Site Locality Figure 2 – Site Layout & Areas of Environmental Concern Figure 3 – Site Sampling Locations

Appendix A – Historical Land Information

Appendix B – Field Test-pit Summary Logs

Appendix C – Laboratory Analytical Reports and Chain of Custody Documentation

Appendix D – Site Photographs

5



1 INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of a combined Preliminary and Detailed Site Investigation undertaken by Geotest Services Pty

Ltd (Geotest) at the Site. This report was commissioned by North Western Services Pty Ltd on behalf of their client Brinsley

Properties Pty Ltd to address development and planning requirements for the proposed metropolitan style low-density residential

subdivision at the Site. The Site comprises of Lot 11 in DP825465, also identified as 45-65 Greenacre Drive, Tahmoor, NSW,

2573.

The site has a street frontage to Greenacre Drive, a minor road. The site is generally rectangular in shape and occupies an area

of approximately 2.30 ha. Taken from a central location within the site, the following geographical coordinates were obtained (as

measured on the NSW Department of Lands): -34.22556S, 150.600582E.

The locality of the Site is presented in Figure 1 and a detailed layout of Site and its areas of environmental concern are included

in Figure 2.

1.1 Objectives

The objective of this investigation was to assess for the likelihood of contamination to exist on the Site. The objective of this

investigation was to identify any areas requiring remediation based on the representative sampling. The objective was also to

determine whether the Site would be suitable for the proposed future low density residential land use.

1.2 Scope of Works

To achieve the objectives, Geotest undertook the following scope of works;

• review of available geology, hydrogeology and topographical maps;

• review of historical aerial photographs;

• land title ownership record searches;

• NSW OEH contaminated land register search

• NSW Office of Water registered groundwater bore search (500m radius of the site);

• Obtain and review the Section 149 (2) planning certificate from Wollondilly Shire Council;

• Site inspection and walkover to observe current site conditions and surrounding land uses;

• review of preliminary findings;

• preparation of site sampling plan - targeting areas of environmental concern;

• site works including test pit excavation and soil sampling;

• NATA accredited laboratory analysis; and

• Interpretation of data and reporting.

6



2 REGIONAL GROUND SETTING

2.1 Regional Geology

The 1:100,000 Wollongong – Port Hacking Geological Series Sheet 9029-9129 (Geological Survey of New South Wales, Edition

1, 1985) indicates that the Site locality is underlain by Middle Triassic Ashfield Shale.

The 1:100,000 Wollongong – Port Hacking Geological Series Sheet 9029-9129 (Geological Survey of New South Wales, Edition

1, 1985, indicates that the Site is located on the Blacktown Group soils. The Wollongong- Port Hacking soil groups are described

as shallow to moderately deep (<100cm) hardsetting mottled texture contrast soils, red and brown podzolic soils (Dr3.21, Dr3.31,

Db2.11, Db2.21) on crests grading to yellow podzolic soils on lower slopes and in drainage lines. The limitations associated with

this soil landscape are localised seasonal waterlogging, localised water erosion hazard, moderately reactive highly plastic subsoil,

localised surface movement potential.

2.2 Regional Topography and Drainage

The NSW Department of Lands Spatial Information Exchange (http://imagery.maps.nsw.gov.au) indicates that the Site lies at an

elevation of approximately 260-290 metres Australian Height Datum (AHD).

It is expected that Site surface waters would either percolate into sub-surface soils (where permeability allows) or become run-

off and drain off-site to the south-east.

A review of nearby surface water bodies and the surrounding topography indicates that surface run-off drainage will likely flow to

the south into Bargo River, a tributary of the Hawkesbury Nepean River catchment system.

2.3 Regional Hydrogeology

A search for registered groundwater monitoring bores within a 500m radius of the Site was undertaken using the NSW Office of

Water Groundwater Bore map data (http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/water.stm) on 31st July 2017. No registered or

discontinued groundwater monitoring bores were identified during the search, therefore there was insufficient data available to

make an assessment for the likely depth to groundwater or the expected groundwater yield on the Site

2.4 Acid Sulfate Soils

The site is located outside the area mapped by the Department of Land and Water Conservation (DLWC) for Acid Sulfate Soil

(ASS) Risk. Geotest searched the National Acid Sulfate Soils Atlas develop by the Australian government (in conjunction with

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation CSIRO - http://www.asris.csiro.au/). The site is situated in an

area where there is a low probability of ASS and no known occurrence. Land management activities at the site are not likely to

be affected by ASS.

The site is situated at an approximate elevation of 260-290 AHD, while the presence of acid sulphate soils is generally limited to

elevations less than 10m AHD. Is it considered that ASS or potential ASS is unlikely to be present at the Site.

http://imagery.maps.nsw.gov.au/

http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/water.stm

http://www.google.com/

7



3 SITE HISTORY

3.1 Land Titles

A search of historical land title ownership records search was carried out for the Site. A review of these records provided a source

of information which may relate to potential or likely historical land use on the site. A summary of the ownership record is

presented below:

Lot 11 DP825465

1901 – 1927 Individual, occupation unknown

1927 – 1969 Individual, occupation unknown

1969 – 1992 joint tenants, occupation unknown



2001 – Present multiple companies, occupation unknown

Based on this information the Site appears to have been held primarily individuals with unknown occupations. This information

will be used to support interpretation of areas of environmental concern (AECs) that may be present.

3.2 Section 149 Certificate

A planning certificate was issued by Wollondilly Shire Council on the 10th July 2017, certificate reference 20171166. The certificate

was provided pursuant to Section 149(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. With respect to matters

arising under the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 and Contaminated Land Management Amendment Act 2008, the

certificate advises that the lots/ lands to which the certificate relates (at the date when the certificate was issued):

• has not been declared to be significantly contaminated land;

• is not subject to a management order;

• is not the subject of an approved voluntary management proposal;

• is not subject to an ongoing maintenance order; and

• is not the subject of a site audit statement

The certificate also reports - Section 2A (A) that the land is zoned as:

• Zone R2 – Low Density Residential

3.3 NSW Office of Environment NSW Office of Environment and Heritage

Contaminated Land Record

Geotest conducted a search NSW Office of Environment (OEH) contaminated land record information 31st July 2017. The search

did not identify any contaminated land record for the Site or for the properties located adjacent to the Site.

A copy of the search record is presented in Appendix A.

3.4 NSW EPA POEO Public Register Search

Geotest conducted a search of POEO records for Environment Protection licences, applications, notices, audits or pollution

studies and reduction programs within vicinity of the site on 31st July 2017. No records within vicinity of the site were recorded. A

copy of the search record is presented in Appendix A.

8



3.5 SafeWork NSW Dangerous Goods Search

During our historical investigations, we have not identified any former use of the site for purposes that might suggest the presence

or storage of dangerous goods at the property. Typical uses indicating hazardous or dangerous goods storage generally include;

petroleum service stations, repair centres or workshops, automotive dealers, light industrial and selected commercial properties.

For this reason, we have not undertaken a search of SafeWork NSW Stored Chemical Information Database for the presence of

any licensed storage of dangerous goods at this time.

3.6 Aerial Photography

Geotest reviewed a selection of historical aerial photographs for the site during the preliminary investigation works and makes

the following comments regarding land use at the site and surrounding the site.

• In the 1955 image (first available), the site appears to consist vacant pastoral lands. The land use surrounding the site

appears to consist primarily vacant pastoral lands and rural styled residential occupancy.

• In the 1966 image, the site appears to remain generally unchanged. The land use surrounding the site appears to remain

generally unchanged.

• In the 1975 image, the site appears to remain generally unchanged. The land use surrounding the site consist primarily

vacant pastoral lands and rural styled residential occupancy with an increase in poultry farming and market gardening

activities.

• In the 1984 image, the site appears to remain generally unchanged. The land use surrounding the site consist primarily

vacant pastoral with an increase in rural residential style development.

• A series of images from 2002-2016 show the site to remain generally vacant lands with an increase of vegetation until 2016

where clearing of all mature vegetation is observed. Mature vegetation has been stockpiled in multiple locations across the

site. The land use surrounding the site to the north and west appears to have increased in low density residential while the

south and east consists of vacant pastoral lands and rural style residential living.

9



4 SITE WALKOVER

A site walkover was conducted on 7th July 2017 by an Environmental Scientist of Geotest Services. At the time of the walkover,

the weather was clear. Observations made during the walkover are presented in Sections 4.1 to 4.11.

4.1 Site Comments & Anecdotal Information

Observations made at the time of the Site walkover are presented below.

• The site was well fenced at all boundaries;

• The site was not used for any purpose at the time of inspection;

• The site consisted of predominantly vegetated lands with evidence of mature foliage clearing and stockpiling;

• A dam including dam fill wall was located in the south-eastern portion of the site;

• The site generally sloped from the north-western portion of the site towards the south and eastern boundary to the location

of the small dam;

• All grassed paddocks and vegetation appeared to be in a healthy condition with no obvious signs of significant die back.

4.2 Site Activities

At the time of inspection, the site was generally not used for any purpose.

4.3 Chemical Spills and Losses

No evidence of significant chemical spills, losses or staining was observed across the Site. No anecdotal information or historical

information regarding historical spills at the Site was revealed.

4.4 Underground and Aboveground Storage Tanks

No above ground or underground storage tanks were observed at the property, historic or active. During the inspection, Geotest

did not observe any structures suggesting their former installation at the site. Further the presence for petroleum storage tanks

(discontinued nor in-use) at the site is unlikely based on historical information and interpreted land uses.

4.5 Waste Management

There was no evidence of significant or large scale commercial or agricultural wastes present at the site.

4.6 Discoloured Soils & Odours

Geotest did not observe significant discolouration of soils or odours observed at the Site during the walkover.

4.7 Phytotoxicity

No evidence of wide spread phytotoxic impact (e.g. stress or dieback) on vegetation was observed on the Site. Generally,

vegetation was observed to be in a healthy condition.

4.8 Hazardous Materials

Geotest did not identify the presence of any hazardous materials at the site. Any unexpected finds containing hazardous materials

which may be present at the property should be appropriately identified prior to demolition activities, if present.

4.9 Fill Material

During the inspection, Geotest identified one site dam in the south-eastern portion of the site. The dam was retained by a fill bund

wall on the eastern and southern sides of the dam. It is expected these fill bund walls are the result of a cut to fill of the dam

during construction.

10



4.10 Complaint & Incident History

No evidence of complaints or environmental incidents regarding the site was discovered.

4.11 Surrounding Land Use

During the Site walkover, it was observed that the general land use surrounding the site is rural residential, open paddocks and

market gardening activity.

Boundary Land Use

East Greenacre Drive, Vacant pastoral lands and rural residential occupancy.

South Vacant pastoral lands.

West Vacant pastoral lands and rural residential occupancy.

North Vacant pastoral lands and rural residential occupancy.

11



5 DATA RELIABILITY

During the preliminary investigation conducted at the site Geotest sought information from the following sources:

• Land History Search;

• Department of Land and Property Information (LPI);

• DNR / DPI Acid Sulfate Maps;

• Wollondilly Shire Council;

• Map Sales;

• NSW Office of Water, ‘All Groundwater Map’

• NSW EPA, ‘NSW POEO Search’

• NSW OEH; and

• Observations made in the field during the Site walkover.

Geotest considers that the data is generally representative of past and present site conditions and observations made personally

by us.

12



6 AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN AND CONTAMINANTS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN

A review of the available historical data and observations made during the Site walkover indicate a number of potential areas of environmental concern (AEC). The possible contaminants of concern

are also included below along with mitigation strategies and Geotest comments:

Item AEC Location on-site COPC Mitigation Strategy Geotest Comment

1 Historical grazing

Site Very Low Risk Not required -

2 Offsite up gradient former market

gardening.

Regional Metals (8), OCP, OPP Target with intrusive investigation -

3 Recontouring and cut to fill of dam

wall bunds

Dam location at the South-

Eastern portion of the site

Metals (8), PAH, TRH, BTEX,

OCP and OPP

Target with intrusive investigation During site stripping, additional care

should be taken to identify any areas

where uncontrolled fill materials

containing foreign materials may have

been buried and covered.

13



7 SITE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

To assist with further assessment and post-remediation validation works, site criteria have been adopted. These criteria were

adopted based on the following published guidance documents:

• NEPM ‘National Environmental Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999 (April 2013), EPHC 2013,

Canberra, incorporating CRC Care 2012.

• NSW DEC 2005, Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for Assessing Former Orchards and Market Gardens’, ISBN 1 74137 019

1, Department of Environment and Conservations NSW.

• NSW DEC 2006, 'Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme (2nd edition)' ISBN 1 74137 859 1,

Department of Environment and Conservation NSW.

• NSW EPA 1995, 'Contaminated Sites: Sampling Design Guidelines', ISBN 0 7310 3756 1.

• NSW OEH 2011, 'Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites', ISBN 0 7310 3892 4,

NSW Office of Environment and Heritage.

• Western Australian Department of Health 2009, ‘Guidelines for the Assessment, Remediation and Management of

Asbestos-Contaminated Sites in Western Australia, dated May 2009.

A discussion on the adoption of criteria is presented in the following sections.

7.1 Soils

Given the intended future use of the site is residential land use, the health-based investigation levels (HIL) for residential with

accessible gardens and soil land uses were selected (Column A in Table 1A (1) NEPM 2013). The extracted table below

provides a summary of concentrations adopted for the various land-use types. Not all site-specific investigation levels (SILs) are

necessarily listed in this table.

NSW DEC (2005) provides guidance on assessing laboratory analytical results of composite samples, against ‘adjusted’ SILs.

As information on background concentrations was not available for this assessment, a more conservative approach should be

adopted when assessing composite sample results, against the SILs published in NEPM 2013 (supersedes NSW DEC 2005).

Subsequently, Procedure 2b in NSW DEC (2005) has been used to adjust 2013 SILs for assessment of composite samples.

Source: NEPM 2013

14



Further, the following soil aesthetic considerations must be made:

• Chemically discoloured soils or large quantities of inert refuse, particularly unsightly, may cause ongoing concern to site

users.

• Depth of materials, including chemical residues, in relation to the final surface of the site.

• The need for and practicality of, any long-term management of foreign material.

Additional caution must be exercised when assessing sensitive land uses.

The NEPM 2013 provides expected ranges for EILs for a range of soil characteristics – opposed to a single type. This provision

range should be considered on a site-specific basis. For the purposes of this assessment Geotest has adopted Column 2 of the

extracted table below from the NEPM 2013 Schedule B5a – Ecological Risk Assessment. Column 2 assumes a standard

protection level of 80% -

Source: NEPM 2013

15



8 FIELDWORK

8.1 Sampling Density & Activity

NSW EPA (1995) and NSW DEC (2005) provides guidance with regard to sampling densities for site characterisation. NSW EPA

(1995) also recommends the site is interpreted based on geological and geographical features, nature of contamination, former

usage patterns and the intended future use of the site. Based on the site history and current site features it was considered that

both a grid and target based sampling pattern would be appropriate to assess the AECs identified for this site.

A total of 21 sampling points was established and included;

• Test-pits undertaken for environmental investigations;

• Sample collection and sample compositing for laboratory analysis; and

• Selected test-pits undertaken for visual inspection across the entire site to ensure geology and substrate consistency. This

further improves the hot-spot confidence.

Sampling was carried out on 7th July 2017 by a suitably experienced environmental scientist from Geotest Services.

Test pits were undertaken using the general-purpose bucket of a 5-tonne excavator. Samples were collected from within the

excavator bucket or from natural soils in the test-pit profile where possible. Test pits were logged by a suitably experienced

environmental scientist.

Test pits were terminated following confirmation of investigation, discovery of natural soils or refusal onto bedrock.

Soil samples were placed into laboratory supplied glass jars, with Teflon lined seals to limit volatile loss and placed into an ice

chilled cooler. The samples were dispatched to NATA accredited laboratories under chain of custody protocols. Copies of the

chain of custody are provided in Appendix C.

8.2 Areas not investigated

Selected areas were not able to be investigated during the intrusive test pit program. These are presented in Figure 2/3 which is

attached to this report. It is unlikely that these areas will significantly impact the contamination status or accuracy of this

investigation. The areas that could not be investigated are as follows:

• Into selected areas within the dam wall bunds due to potential for water breach;

• Within south-eastern portion of site where dense vegetation limited access; and

• Beneath stored stockpiles of vegetation;

8.3 Laboratory Analysis

Samples were submitted to Eurofins MGT Lane Cove, # 544186 (primary) and Envirolab Chatswood, # 171359 (secondary) for

laboratory analysis for the relevant contaminants of potential concern.

16



9 FIELD AND LABORATORY DATA RELIABILITY

9.1 Fieldwork

9.1.1 Sampling

Sampling was undertaken in general accordance with Geotest procedures, which are based on industry practice. During the

works, any re-usable sampling tools were decontaminated between every sampling location using phosphorus free Decon 90

and potable town water. Geotest procedures mean disposable sampling equipment is preferred, eliminating the risk for cross

contamination.

9.1.2 Field Duplicates

Selected samples were split in the field and placed in separate sets of sample containers. The primary and duplicate samples

were sent to the primary laboratory. The analysis of field duplicate samples provides an assessment of the precision of the

sampling and laboratory analytical procedures.

The following field duplicates were taken:

Parent Sample ID Duplicate ID intra / inter

TP9 0.0-0.1 DUP1 / DUP1a

Of the samples scheduled for analysis, no samples reported relative percentage difference (RPD) between the parent samples

duplicates and triplicates analysed for soils outside the accepted 50% limit:

9.1.3 Wash Blanks

Wash blanks were not part of the scope for this investigation. Generally, only disposable consumables were used eliminating the

potential for cross contamination.

9.1.4 Sample Preservation and Storage

Sample storage and preservation is presented in the table below:

Analyte Sample Volume and Container Preservative Storage

Organics/

inorganics (soil) 250ml glass & Teflon lined lid Nil Insulated container with ice

Asbestos Sealed plastic zip lock bag Nil With the samples above

The sample containers were transported to the NATA accredited analytical laboratory with the Chain of Custody (COC) form,

recording the following information:

• project reference;

• date of sampling;

• sample identification;

• matrix and container details

• preservation method;

• name of sampler;

• required analysis;

• turnaround times required; and

• signatures of sender and receiving laboratory.

17



A copy of the COC was kept in the project file (refer Appendix B). Samples were transported to the laboratory with sufficient time

to perform analysis within the applicable holding period.

9.2 Laboratory Reported Data

An assessment of laboratory data quality was undertaken.

The following laboratory reports were prepared for this project:

Eurofins MGT

• # 554184

The results of this assessment indicated the following:

• laboratory analysis of samples was undertaken by NATA accredited environmental testing laboratories;

• samples were extracted and analysed within holding times;

• the laboratory QAQC data was reviewed and is satisfactory for the investigation;

• the laboratory limits of reporting (LOR) were below the adopted assessment criteria.

9.3 Reported Data Quality Conclusion

Based on our data quality evaluation including: third-party historical data, field data and laboratory data, we consider the data to

be suitable for the purposes of this investigation.

The data was analysed to be satisfactory.

Envirolab

• # 171359

18



10 RESULTS

10.1 Site Specific Geology

The residual clay profile generally encountered in a number of test pit locations across the site can be broadly described as:

0.0-0.3 Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, dry, soft

0.3-0.7 Shaley CLAY, brown, moist, stiff

0.7-1.2 SHALE, grey, distinctly weathered

Field borehole summary logs are presented in Appendix B. Test pit locations are shown in Figure 3, presented as an attachment

to this report.

10.2 Visual and Olfactory Observations

The site was free of significant offensive visual or olfactory contamination indicators. Some uncontrolled fill materials were

identified retaining the site dam and in the form of a fill bund wall, intrusive inspection of the materials resulted no identified

anthropogenic materials nor contamination indicators.

During civil re-development if any areas of un-suitable soils (natural or fill) are identified in addition to the areas identified in this

report, investigation and remediation validation should be undertaken.

10.3 Inaccessible Areas

The areas that were not able to be accessed during the site works are presented in Section 8.2 of this report.

10.4 Reported Laboratory Results

The laboratory results table; Table LT1 was prepared to a summary of laboratory analytical data and the corresponding site

contamination criteria. The table is attached to this report.

10.4.1 Metals

The results were all less than the adopted HIL-A site criteria and within or below expected background ranges.

10.4.2 OCP/ OPP

The concentrations of aldrin, dieldrin, DDT, DDD, DDE and heptachlor in the samples analysed were all below the laboratory

Limit of Reporting (LOR). OPP concentrations were also less than the laboratory LOR.

10.4.3 PAHs

The sample’s analysed for PAHs all reported concentrations below the laboratory LOR.

10.4.4 TRH & BTEX

The sample’s analysed for TRH and BTEX reported concentrations below the laboratory LOR. All results were below the adopted

site threshold criteria.

19



11 DISCUSSION

11.1 Soils – Human Health

The results of the laboratory analysis indicate that the concentrations of the contaminants of potential concern in soils at the

sampling locations are less than the adopted human health assessment criteria – Table 1 (a) Column HIL A (NEPM 2013).

Geotest considers that further human risk investigations, management or remediation of these soils is not warranted.

11.2 Soils – Aesthetics

The site was free of material considered aesthetically un-suitable. Should any soils be identified during civil construction work

that are not characteristic with descriptions in this report, are discoloured or odourous, include asbestos or other anthropogenic

materials should be segregated for further assessment and characterisation by an appropriately experienced environmental

consultant. Attention should be paid to burial pits of domestic, construction and building wastes.

11.3 Soils – Ecological Health

The laboratory results indicated that the metal concentrations were below the ‘aged’ criteria for urban residential land uses.

Further, general observations made on site did not indicate evidence of wide-spread phytotoxic impact. Geotest considers that

further ecological health assessment, management or remediation of these soils is not warranted.

20



12 CONCLUSIONS

Geotest concludes that; based on the desktop investigation, site inspections, observations collected during site works and the

interpretation of laboratory data that the Site is considered suitable for future residential land-uses from a contamination

perspective.

Geotest make the following general recommendations regarding the site preparation for civil re-development -

• Lawful disposal of any generated debris, rubble and waste to licensed facility and provision of dockets; and

• A waste classification should be prepared for any soil materials being disposed off-site in accordance with NSW EPA 2014

Waste Classification Guidelines Part 1.

Further, in the event that any contaminating materials or un-expected finds (ie. animal carcasses, burial pits) are identified during

re-development, an appropriately experienced consultant should be engaged to attend site. The works should cease immediately

in the area of the discovery.

This report should be read in conjunction with its limitations presented in Section 14 of this report.

21



13 REFERENCES

• NEPC 2013, ‘National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Amendment Measure 2013 No. 1’

Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2013L00768.

• NSW DEC 2005, Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for Assessing Former Orchards and Market Gardens’, ISBN 1 74137 019

1, Department of Environment and Conservations NSW.

• NSW DEC 2006, 'Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme (2nd edition)' ISBN 1 74137 859 1,

Department of Environment and Conservation NSW.

• NSW EPA 1994, 'Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for Assessing Service Station Sites', ISBN 07310 3712 X, NSW

Environment Protection Authority.

• NSW EPA 1995, 'Contaminated Sites: Sampling Design Guidelines', ISBN 0 7310 3756 1.

• NSW OEH 2011, 'Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites', ISBN 0 7310 3892 4,

NSW Office of Environment and Heritage.

22



14 YOUR GEOTEST SERVICES DOCUMENT LIMITATIONS

It is critical you grasp your Geotest Services document as a whole as it has been prepared on the basis of a specific objective

and scope as interpreted by Geotest Services and applies only to the site or nominated area assessed.

The scope of works and report was prepared in response to specific instructions from the Geotest Service’s client whom the

report is addressed to. The scope, analysis, evaluations, conclusions and opinions presented in the report are based on these

instructions from the client and information available and collected during our assessment.

The subsurface and ground conditions of the questioned property are subject to change over time from both natural and

anthropogenic factors. The report presented has been prepared on the ground conditions observed at this time. Decisions should

not be made on the basis of this report if it has been impacted by time.

The report has been prepared to accurately determine site conditions whilst working within the budgetary and scope of work

constraints given to Geotest. This may include physical, occupant or any other constraint at the site preventing access for

investigation. Ground conditions may differ from those encountered in the report. No report can practically qualify the exact sub-

conditions present across the entire site at any given time.

The conclusions above are based on the selective sampling programme which is targeted to be representative of the site and

conditions of the immediate area if reported. The document is set out using relevant regulatory authority guidelines and industry

accepted practices. The document conclusions do not provide a guarantee that the ground conditions between those sampling

points investigated are indifferent to those assessed.

The document Geotest Services has prepared for you should not be used for any other purpose than that originally specified in

the report and at the time of commissioning.

The report and its appendices, supporting documents should be read in completeness and certainly not separated. The report

will not be conclusive if a single section is interpreted without the support of the remaining components.

To prevent any mis-interpretations of the report, Geotest Services recommends the client or end user contact them with any mis-

understood or environmental queries relating to this report.

P31191.1 TABLE LT1 1 of 1

Table LT1 S17-Jl15905 S17-Jl15906 S17-Jl15907 S17-Jl15908 S17-Jl15909 S17-Jl15910 S17-Jl15911 S17-Jl15912 S17-Jl15913 S17-Jl15914

45-65 Greenacre Drive Tahmoor TP1_0.0-0.1 TP3_0.0-0.1 TP5_0.0-0.1 TP7_0.0-0.1 TP8_0.0-0.1 TP9_0.0-0.1 TP16_0.0-0.1 TP17_0.0-0.1 TP20_0.0-0.1 DUP1

Soil Results & Adopted Site Criteria 7/07/2017 7/07/2017 7/07/2017 7/07/2017 7/07/2017 7/07/2017 7/07/2017 7/07/2017 7/07/2017 7/07/2017

P31191.1 Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil

Group Analyte Units PQLNEPM EIL (2013)

fresh / aged (Column 2)

NEPM HIL A (2013) DATASET MINIMUM

DATASET MAXIMUM

Metals Arsenic mg/kg <3 50 / 100 100 5 7 5.6 5.2 5.9 5.5 7 5.9 6.6 5.6 6.4 5Cadmium mg/kg <0.3 - 20 0 0 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4Chromium mg/kg <0.3 160 / 400 100 11 19 15 13 19 14 11 14 18 14 18 14Copper mg/kg <0.5 120 / 230 6000 19 31 28 23 31 29 30 19 26 26 24 23Lead mg/kg <1 270 / 1100 300 19 37 20 22 28 37 19 23 28 22 23 22Mercury mg/kg <0.5 - 40 0 0 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1Nickel mg/kg <0.5 170 / 560 400 8.9 16 14 15 13 16 12 15 15 8.9 9.8 10Zinc mg/kg <0.05 500 / 1300 7400 29 68 66 35 40 68 56 54 54 45 29 34

OCP 4.4'-DDD mg/kg <0.1 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.054.4'-DDE mg/kg <0.1 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.054.4'-DDT mg/kg <0.1 180 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05a-BHC mg/kg <0.1 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05Aldrin mg/kg <0.1 3 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05b-BHC mg/kg <0.1 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05Chlordanes - Total mg/kg <0.1 0 0 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1d-BHC mg/kg <0.1 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05Dieldrin mg/kg <0.1 3 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05Endosulfan I mg/kg <0.1 270 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05Endosulfan II mg/kg <0.1 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg <0.1 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05Endrin mg/kg <0.1 10 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05Endrin aldehyde mg/kg <0.1 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05Endrin ketone mg/kg <0.1 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05g-BHC (Lindane) mg/kg <0.1 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05Heptachlor mg/kg <0.1 6 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg <0.1 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05Hexachlorobenzene mg/kg <0.1 10 0 0 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05Methoxychlor mg/kg <0.1 300 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Toxaphene mg/kg <0.1 20 0 0 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 1

OPP Chlorpyrifos mg/kg < 0.5 160 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Coumaphos mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Demeton (total) mg/kg < 1.0 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Diazinon mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Dichlorvos mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Dimethoate mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 2Disulfoton mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Ethoprop mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Fenitrothion mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Fensulfothion mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Fenthion mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Malathion mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Methyl azinphos mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Methyl parathion mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Mevinphos mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Monocrotophos mg/kg < 10 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Parathion mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Phorate mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Profenofos mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Prothiofos mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Ronnel mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Stirophos mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Trichloronate mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2Benzene mg/kg 0.1 0.7 0 0 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.1 NL 0 0 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1o-Xylene mg/kg 0.1 110 0 0 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1Toluene mg/kg 0.1 480 0 0 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1Xylenes - Total mg/kg 0.1 0 0 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3Naphthalene mg/kg <0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg <50 0 0 < 50 < 50 < 50TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2) mg/kg <50 0 0 < 50 < 50 < 50TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg <100 0 0 < 100 < 100 < 100TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg <100 0 0 < 100 < 100 < 100TRH C6-C10 mg/kg <20 0 0 < 20 < 20 < 20TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1) mg/kg <20 0 0 < 20 < 20 < 20

PAH Acenaphthene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Acenaphthylene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound)* mg/kg <0.6 3 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound)* mg/kg <0.5 3 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound)* mg/kg <0.5 3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Chrysene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Fluorene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 170 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Phenanthrene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Total PAH mg/kg < 0.5 300 0 0 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5

NEPM Ecological Investigation Levels 2013NEPM Table 1A (1) Column A Standard Residential Land Uses 2013

TPH/BTEX

240 (combined limit)

ReferenceSample ID

Date Sampled

Sample Matrix

P31191.1 TABLE LT2 1 of 1

Table LT2 Reference S17-Jl15906 S17-Jl15914 169516

45-65 Greenacre Drive Tahmoor Sample ID TP5_0.0-0.1 DUP1 RPD % DUP1A RPD % Soil Results & Adopted Site Criteria Date Sampled 7/07/2017 7/07/2017 7/07/2017

P31191.1 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil

Group AnalyteMetals Arsenic 5.9 5.0 16.5 4.0 -38.4

Cadmium < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0 <0.4 0.0Chromium 19.0 14.0 30.3 15.0 -23.5Copper 31.0 23.0 29.6 23.0 -29.6Lead 28.0 22.0 24.0 19.0 -38.3Mercury < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0 <0.1 0.0Nickel 13.0 10.0 26.1 9.0 0.0Zinc 40.0 34.0 16.2 30.0 -28.6

OCP 4.4'-DDD < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.04.4'-DDE < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.04.4'-DDT < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0a-BHC < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0Aldrin < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0b-BHC < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0Chlordanes - Total < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0 < 0.1 0.0d-BHC < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0Dieldrin < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0Endosulfan I < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0Endosulfan II < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0Endosulfan sulphate < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0Endrin < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0Endrin aldehyde < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0Endrin ketone < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0g-BHC (Lindane) < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0Heptachlor < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0Heptachlor epoxide < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0Hexachlorobenzene < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0 < 0.05 0.0Methoxychlor < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Toxaphene < 1 < 1 0.0 < 1 0.0

OPP Azinphos-methyl < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Bolstar < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Chlorfenvinphos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Chlorpyrifos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Chlorpyrifos-methyl < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Coumaphos < 2 < 2 0.0 < 2 0.0Demeton-O < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Demeton-S < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Diazinon < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Dichlorvos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Dimethoate < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Disulfoton < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0EPN < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Ethion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Ethoprop < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Ethyl parathion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Fenitrothion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Fensulfothion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Fenthion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Malathion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Merphos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Methyl parathion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Mevinphos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Monocrotophos < 2 < 2 0.0 < 2 0.0Naled < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Omethoate < 2 < 2 0.0 < 2 0.0Phorate < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Pirimiphos-methyl < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Pyrazophos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Ronnel < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Terbufos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Tetrachlorvinphos < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Tokuthion < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0Trichloronate < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0 < 0.2 0.0

Limit Of Reporting (LOR) may differ between inter/intra labarotories. In the case that the two samples are less than the LOR, Geotest assumes a value of 0.0 for the purpose of the RPD calculation.

Title:

Site Locality Figure:

Figure 1 Project No:

P31191.1_R01

1.

Image source SIXMap 2017

Project: Preliminary & Detailed Site Investigation

Scale: Not to Scale

Location: 45-65 Greenacre Drive, Tahmoor NSW

Date: 10/08/2017

Client: North Western Surveys Pty Ltd

Drawn: JB

Title:

Site Layout and Areas of Environmental Concern Figure:


P31191.1_R01

1. Project:

Preliminary & Detailed Site Investigation Scale: Not to Scale

Location: 45-65 Greenacre Drive, Tahmoor NSW

Date: 10/08/2017


Drawn: JB

Title:

Site Sampling Plan & Areas of Remediation Figure:


P31191.1_R01

1. Project:

Preliminary & Detailed Site Investigation Scale: Not to Scale

Location: 45-65 Greenacre Drive, Tahmoor

Date: 10/08/2017


Drawn: JB



APPENDIX A

Phase 1 Historical Land Information

• Historical Titles Search

• S149 Search

• NSW OEH Contaminated Land Report

• NSW Office of Water Search Results

• POEO Search Results

Page 1

Land History Search ABN: 29 890 020 153 PO Box 344 Rozelle NSW 2039 [email protected]

JOB REFERENCE No. LHS170736

DATE: 7th AUGUST 2017

GEOTEST SERVICES PTY LTD 18/24 GARLING ROAD KINGS PARK NSW 2148 ATT: ALAN HALPIN

RE: LOT 11 DP 825465, 45-65 GREENACRE DRIVE, TAHMOOR NSW GEOTEST REFERENCE. P31191

CURRENT TITLE SEARCH

FOLIO IDENTIFIER 11/825465

DEPOSITED PLAN DP 825465

SEARCH DATE 26TH JULY 2017

REGISTERED PROPRIETOR/S BRINSLEY PROPERTIES PTY LIMITED

TITLE TREE


CERTIFICATE OF TITLE VOLUME 11108 FOLIO 137

CERTIFICATE OF TITLE VOLUME 4025 FOLIO 82 (Part of)



LHS

Page 2

HISTORY SUMMARY OF PROPRIETORS


2017 – TO DATE BRINSLEY PROPERTIES PTY LIMITED

2002 – 2017 CYMBRON PTY LIMITED

2001 – 2002 VIVAH PTY LIMITED

1995 – 2001 PETER WILLIAM ARNOLD ANDA ASTRA ARNOLD (JOINT TENNANTS)

1992 – 1995 CECIL JOSEPH KINGSLEY TICKLE JESSIE MOLYNEAUX TICKLE (JOINT TENNANTS)

CT VOLUME 11108 FOLIO 137 (Part of)

1969 – 1992 CECIL JOSEPH KINGSLEY TICKLE JESSIE MOLYNEAUX TICKLE (JOINT TENNANTS)

1969 – 1969 ALICE HAZEL KELLY SPINSTER






1901 – 1927 EMILY O’DONOHUE

The information presented within this report is understood to be accurate and true based on received third party search information. LHS will not be held liable for miss-information provided by NSW Government Land and Property Information services or the interpretation of these which are fully relied upon in preparation of this report.

InfoTrackAn Approved LPI NSW

Information BrokerTitle Search

LAND AND PROPERTY INFORMATION NEW SOUTH WALES - TITLE SEARCH ------------------------------------------------------------

FOLIO: 11/825465 ------

SEARCH DATE TIME EDITION NO DATE ----------- ---- ---------- ---- 26/7/2017 8:08 PM 7 17/7/2017

LAND ---- LOT 11 IN DEPOSITED PLAN 825465 AT TAHMOOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA WOLLONDILLY PARISH OF COURIDJAH COUNTY OF CAMDEN TITLE DIAGRAM DP825465

FIRST SCHEDULE -------------- BRINSLEY PROPERTIES PTY LIMITED (T AM567334)

SECOND SCHEDULE (2 NOTIFICATIONS) --------------- 1 RESERVATIONS AND CONDITIONS IN THE CROWN GRANT(S) 2 B478469 RIGHT OF WAY APPURTENANT TO THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AFFECTING THE LAND SHOWN SO BURDENED IN DP316992 (SUBJECT TO PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN B222877)

NOTATIONS ---------

UNREGISTERED DEALINGS: NIL

*** END OF SEARCH ***

LHS170736 PRINTED ON 26/7/2017

* Any entries preceded by an asterisk do not appear on the current edition of the Certificate of Title. Warning: the information appearing undernotations has not been formally recorded in the Register. InfoTrack an approved NSW Information Broker hereby certifies that the informationcontained in this document has been provided electronically by the Registrar General in accordance with Section 96B(2) of the Real PropertyAct 1900.

InfoTrackAn Approved LPI NSW

Information Broker

HistoricalTitle

LAND AND PROPERTY INFORMATION NEW SOUTH WALES - HISTORICAL SEARCH -----------------------------------------------------------------

SEARCH DATE ----------- 26/7/2017 8:09PM

FOLIO: 11/825465 ------

First Title(s): OLD SYSTEM Prior Title(s): VOL 11108 FOL 137

Recorded Number Type of Instrument C.T. Issue -------- ------ ------------------ ---------- 24/9/1992 DP825465 DEPOSITED PLAN FOLIO CREATED EDITION 1

13/2/1995 O12722 TRANSFER 13/2/1995 O12723 MORTGAGE 13/2/1995 O12724 MORTGAGE EDITION 2

3/4/1998 3899335 NOTICE OF DEATH 3/4/1998 3899336 DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE EDITION 3

26/9/2001 7976554 DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE 26/9/2001 7976555 TRANSFER EDITION 4

29/1/2002 8306839 TRANSFER 29/1/2002 8306840 MORTGAGE EDITION 5

23/10/2006 AC689839 DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE 23/10/2006 AC689840 MORTGAGE EDITION 6

17/7/2017 AM567333 DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE 17/7/2017 AM567334 TRANSFER EDITION 7

*** END OF SEARCH ***

LHS170736 PRINTED ON 26/7/2017

InfoTrack an approved NSW Information Broker hereby certifies that the information contained in this document has been providedelectronically by the Registrar General in accordance with Section 96B(2) of the Real Property Act 1900.

Req:R088806 /Doc:CT 04025-082 CT /Rev:06-Aug-2012 /Sts:OK.OK /Prt:26-Jul-2017 20:22 /Seq:1 of 2Ref:LHS170636 /Src:M




PLANNING CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 149(2) ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & ASSESSMENT ACT, 1979

Planning Certificate No.: 20171166

Receipt No.: 906232

Issue Date: 10 July 2017

Applicant’s Reference: P31191

Property No.: 14458

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

Address: 45-65 Greenacre Drive TAHMOOR 2573

Land Description: Lot: 11 DP: 825465 Notes: The following prescribed matters may apply to the land to which this certificate relates. Where this certificate refers to a specific allotment (or allotments) within a strata plan, the certificate is issued for the whole of the land within the strata plan, not just the specific allotment(s) referred to, and any information contained in the certificate may relate to the whole, or any part, of the strata plan. The following information is provided pursuant to Section 149(2) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as prescribed by Schedule 4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 and is applicable as at the date of this certificate. Information provided in this certificate should be interpreted in conjunction with the relevant plans, policies and documents held at Council. In order to obtain copies of these documents you may purchase them from Council’s Administration Centre at 62-64 Menangle Street, Picton or view free of charge on Council’s Website www.wollondilly.nsw.gov.au.

APPLICANT: Geotest Services Pty Ltd

jacob.geotestservices.com.au

Page 2 of 17

1. NAMES OF RELEVANT PLANNING INSTRUMENTS AND DCPS

(1) The name of each environmental planning instrument that applies to the carrying out of development on the land.

(2) The name of each proposed environmental planning instrument that will apply

to the carrying out of development on the land and that is or has been the subject of community consultation or on public exhibition under the Act (unless the Director-General has notified the council that the making of the proposed instrument has been deferred indefinitely or has not been approved).

(3) The name of each development control plan that applies to the carrying out of

development on the land. (4) In this clause, proposed environmental planning instrument includes a

planning proposal for a LEP or a draft environmental planning instrument.

ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING INSTRUMENTS Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011. Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 20 - Hawkesbury-Nepean River (No 2 - 1997) Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 9 Extractive Industries (No 2 - 1995) State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 State Environmental Planning Policy No 21 - Caravan Parks State Environmental Planning Policy No 30 - Intensive Agriculture State Environmental Planning Policy No 33 - Hazardous and Offensive Development State Environmental Planning Policy No 44 - Koala Habitat Protection (Note: Excludes land dedicated or reserved as National Park) State Environmental Planning Policy No 50 - Canal Estate Development State Environmental Planning Policy No 55 - Remediation of Land State Environmental Planning Policy No 64 - Advertising and Signage State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 - Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development State Environmental Planning Policy (Miscellaneous Consent Provisions) 2007 State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007

Page 3 of 17

State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 State Environmental Planning Policy No 62 - Sustainable Aquaculture State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011 State Environmental Planning Policy (Mining, Petroleum Production and Extractive Industries) 2007 State Environmental Planning Policy (State Significant Precincts) 2005

PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING INSTRUMENTS Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Boundary Adjustment and Minimum Lot Size for Community Title Land) Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Dual Occupancies in Rural Zones and Disposal and Management of Sewerage) Draft State Environmental Planning Policy (Competition) 2010 Draft State Environmental Planning Policy (Educational Establishments and Child Care Facilities) 2017

DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLANS Wollondilly Development Control Plan 2016

2. ZONING AND LAND USE UNDER RELEVANT LEPS

For each environmental planning instrument or proposed instrument referred to in clause 1 (other than a SEPP or proposed SEPP) that includes the land in any zone (however described):

WOLLONDILLY LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN 2011 (a) the identity of the zone, whether by reference to a name (such as “Residential Zone” or “Heritage Area”) or by reference to a number (such as “Zone No 2 (a)”), Zone R2 Low Density Residential (b) the purposes for which the instrument provides that development may be carried out within the zone without the need for development consent: Home occupations and development listed in Schedule 2 of Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 provided it meets the criteria in that schedule

Page 4 of 17

(c) the purposes for which the instrument provides that development may not be carried out within the zone except with development consent, Bed and breakfast accommodation; Boarding houses; Cemeteries; Child care centres; Community facilities; Dwelling houses; Educational establishments; Emergency services facilities; Environmental facilities; Environmental protection works; Exhibition homes; Exhibition villages; Flood mitigation works; Group homes; Health consulting rooms; Home-based child care; Home businesses; Home industries; Home occupations (sex services); Neighbourhood shops; Places of public worship; Recreation areas; Residential accommodation; Respite day care centres; Roads; Sewerage systems; Signage; Veterinary hospitals; Water supply systems (d) the purposes for which the instrument provides that development is prohibited within the zone, Attached dwellings; Multi dwelling housing; Residential flat buildings; Rural workers’ dwellings; Shop top housing; Water treatment facilities; Any other development not specified in item (b) or (c) (e) whether any development standards applying to the land fix minimum land

dimensions for the erection of a dwelling house on the land and, if so, the minimum land dimensions so fixed,

Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 does not contain any development standards that fix minimum land dimensions for the erection of a dwelling house on the land. (f) whether the land includes or comprises critical habitat, None known (g) whether the land is in a conservation area (however described), The land is not located within a Heritage Conservation Area as provided by clause 5.10 and Schedule 5 of Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011. (h) whether an item of environmental heritage (however described) is situated on

the land. The land does not contain an item of environmental heritage as provided by clause 5.10 and Schedule 5 of Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011.

Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Dual

Occupancies in Rural Zones and Disposal and Management of Sewerage)

(a) the identity of the zone, whether by reference to a name (such as “Residential Zone” or “Heritage Area”) or by reference to a number (such as “Zone No 2 (a)”), Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Dual Occupancies in Rural Zones and Disposal and Management of Sewerage) does not

Page 5 of 17

propose any changes to the existing zone under Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011. (b) the purposes for which the instrument provides that development may be carried out within the zone without the need for development consent: Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Dual Occupancies in Rural Zones and Disposal and Management of Sewerage) does not propose any changes to the existing zone under Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011. (c) the purposes for which the instrument provides that development may not be carried out within the zone except with development consent, Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Dual Occupancies in Rural Zones and Disposal and Management of Sewerage) proposes to include Dual Occupancies (attached) as permissible with consent in rural zones. (d) the purposes for which the instrument provides that development is prohibited within the zone, Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Dual Occupancies in Rural Zones and Disposal and Management of Sewerage) does not propose any changes to the existing zone under Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011. (e) whether any development standards applying to the land fix minimum land dimensions for the erection of a dwelling house on the land and, if so, the minimum land dimensions so fixed, Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Dual Occupancies in Rural Zones and Disposal and Management of Sewerage) 2011 does not propose any changes to the existing zone under Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011. (f) whether the land includes or comprises critical habitat, None known (g) whether the land is in a conservation area (however described), Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Dual Occupancies in Rural Zones and Disposal and Management of Sewerage) does not propose any changes to the existing Heritage Conservation Areas under Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011. (h) whether an item of environmental heritage (however described) is situated on the land. Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Dual Occupancies in Rural Zones and Disposal and Management of Sewerage) does not propose any changes to any items of environmental heritage (however described) under Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011.

Page 6 of 17

Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Boundary

Adjustment and Minimum Lot Size for Community Title Land)

(a) the identity of the zone, whether by reference to a name (such as “Residential Zone” or “Heritage Area”) or by reference to a number (such as “Zone No 2 (a)”), Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Boundary Adjustment and Minimum Lot Size for Community Title Land) does not propose any changes to the existing zone under Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011. (b) the purposes for which the instrument provides that development may be carried out within the zone without the need for development consent: Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Boundary Adjustment and Minimum Lot Size for Community Title Land) does not propose any changes to the existing zone under Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011. (c) the purposes for which the instrument provides that development may not be carried out within the zone except with development consent, Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Boundary Adjustment and Minimum Lot Size for Community Title Land) does not propose any changes to the existing zone under Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011. (d) the purposes for which the instrument provides that development is prohibited within the zone, Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Boundary Adjustment and Minimum Lot Size for Community Title Land) does not propose any changes to the existing zone under Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011. (e) whether any development standards applying to the land fix minimum land dimensions for the erection of a dwelling house on the land and, if so, the minimum land dimensions so fixed, Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Boundary Adjustment and Minimum Lot Size for Community Title Land) does not propose any changes to the existing zone under Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011. (f) whether the land includes or comprises critical habitat, None known (g) whether the land is in a conservation area (however described), Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 (Boundary Adjustment and Minimum Lot Size for Community Title Land) does not propose any changes to the existing Heritage Conservation Areas under Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011. (h) whether an item of environmental heritage (however described) is situated on

Page 7 of 17

the land. Planning Proposal - Draft Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan (Boundary Adjustment and Minimum Lot Size for Community Title Land) does not propose any changes to any items of environmental heritage (however described) under Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011.

2A. ZONING AND LAND USE UNDER STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING

POLICY (SYDNEY REGION GROWTH CENTRES) 2006

Whether the land is within any zone (however described) under: (a) Part 3 of the State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth

Centres) 2006 (the 2006 SEPP), or

(b) a Precinct Plan (within the meaning of the 2006 SEPP), or

(c) a proposed Precinct Plan that is or has been the subject of community consultation or on public exhibition under the Act, the particulars referred to in clause 2 (a)–(h) in relation to that land (with a reference to “the instrument” in any of those paragraphs being read as a reference to Part 3 of the 2006 SEPP, or the Precinct Plan or proposed Precinct Plan, as the case requires).

The land is not within a Growth Centre.

COMPLYING DEVELOPMENT (1) Whether or not the land is land on which complying development may be

carried out under each of the codes for complying development because of the provisions of clauses 1.17A (1) (c) to (e), (2), (3) and (4), 1.18 (1) (c3) and 1.19 of State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008.

(2) If complying development may not be carried out on that land because of the

provisions of clauses 1.17A 1) (c) to (e), (2), (3) and (4), 1.18 (1) (c3) and 1.19 of that Policy, the reasons why it may not be carried out under that clause.

(3) If the council does not have sufficient information to ascertain the extent to

which complying development may or may not be carried out on the land, a statement that a restriction applies to the land, but it may not apply to all of the land, and that council does not have sufficient information to ascertain the extent to which complying development may or may not be carried out on the land.

THE GENERAL HOUSING CODE Complying development under the General Housing Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is partly within an environmentally sensitive area being land identified in an environmental planning instrument as being of high Aboriginal cultural significance or high biodiversity significance.

Page 8 of 17

Complying development under the General Housing Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is excluded land being land identified by an environmental planning instrument as being partly within an ecologically sensitive area. Complying development under the General Housing Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is excluded land being land identified by an environmental planning instrument as being partly within an area of environmentally sensitive land. Complying development under the General Housing Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 identifies this land as being partly within an odour buffer area.

THE RURAL HOUSING CODE Complying development under the Rural Housing Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is partly within an environmentally sensitive area being land identified in an environmental planning instrument as being of high Aboriginal cultural significance or high biodiversity significance. Note: The land is a lot to which the Rural Housing Code applies, complying development may be carried out on the part of the lot to which this clause does not apply. Complying development under the Rural Housing Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is excluded land being land identified by an environmental planning instrument as being partly within an ecologically sensitive area. Note: The land is a lot to which the Rural Housing Code applies, complying development may be carried out on the part of the lot to which this clause does not apply. Complying development under the Rural Housing Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is excluded land being land identified by an environmental planning instrument as being partly within an area of environmentally sensitive land. Note: The land is a lot to which the Rural Housing Code applies, complying development may be carried out on the part of the lot to which this clause does not apply. Complying development under the Rural Housing Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 identifies this land as being partly within an odour buffer area. Note: The land is a lot to which the Rural Housing Code applies, complying development may be carried out on the part of the lot to which this clause does not apply.

Page 9 of 17

THE HOUSING ALTERATIONS CODE Complying development under the Housing Alterations Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is partly within an environmentally sensitive area being land identified in an environmental planning instrument as being of high Aboriginal cultural significance or high biodiversity significance.

THE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CODE Complying development under the General Development Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is partly within an environmentally sensitive area being land identified in an environmental planning instrument as being of high Aboriginal cultural significance or high biodiversity significance.

THE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ALTERATIONS CODE Complying development under the Commercial and Industrial Alterations Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is partly within an environmentally sensitive area being land identified in an environmental planning instrument as being of high Aboriginal cultural significance or high biodiversity significance.

THE COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL (NEW BUILDINGS AND ADDITIONS) CODE Complying development under the Commercial and Industrial (New Buildings and Additions) Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is partly within an environmentally sensitive area being land identified in an environmental planning instrument as being of high Aboriginal cultural significance or high biodiversity significance. Complying development under the Commercial and Industrial (New Buildings and Additions) Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is partly in an environmentally sensitive area being land reserved under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 or land to which Part 11 of that Act applies. Complying development under the Commercial and Industrial (New Buildings and Additions) Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is excluded land being land identified by an environmental planning instrument as being partly within an ecologically sensitive area. Complying development under the Commercial and Industrial (New Buildings and Additions) Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is

Page 10 of 17

excluded land being land identified by an environmental planning instrument as being partly within an area of environmentally sensitive land.

THE SUBDIVISIONS CODE Complying development under the Subdivisions Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is partly within an environmentally sensitive area being land identified in an environmental planning instrument as being of high Aboriginal cultural significance or high biodiversity significance.

THE DEMOLITION CODE Complying development under the Demolition Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is partly within an environmentally sensitive area being land identified in an environmental planning instrument as being of high Aboriginal cultural significance or high biodiversity significance.

THE FIRE SAFETY CODE Complying development under the Fire Safety Code in State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008 MAY NOT be carried out on part of the land. The land is partly within an environmentally sensitive area being land identified in an environmental planning instrument as being of high Aboriginal cultural significance or high biodiversity significance.

4. COASTAL PROTECTION Whether or not the land is affected by the operation of section 38 or 39 of the Coastal Protection Act 1979, but only to the extent that the council has been notified by the Department of Services, Technology and Administration. No

4A. CERTAIN INFORMATION RELATING TO BEACHES AND COASTS

This clause is not applicable to the Wollondilly Local Government Area.

4B. ANNUAL CHARGES UNDER LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1993 FOR

COASTAL PROTECTION SERVICES THAT RELATE TO EXISTING

COASTAL PROTECTION WORKS

This clause is not applicable to the Wollondilly Local Government Area.

5. MINE SUBSIDENCE

Whether or not the land is proclaimed to be a mine subsidence district within the meaning of section 15 of the Mine Subsidence Compensation Act 1961.

Page 11 of 17

The land is within a proclaimed Mine Subsidence District under the Mine Subsidence Compensation Act 1961. The approval of the Mine Subsidence Board is required for all subdivision and building, except for certain minor structures. Surface development controls are in place to prevent damage from old, current or future mining. It is strongly recommended prospective purchasers consult with the Mine Subsidence Board regarding mine subsidence and any surface development guidelines. The Board can assist with information about mine subsidence and advise whether existing structures comply with the requirements of the Act

6. ROAD WIDENING AND ROAD REALIGNMENT

Whether or not the land is affected by any road widening or road realignment under: (a) Division 2 or Part 3 of the Roads Act 1993, or (b) Any environmental planning instrument, or (c) Any resolution of the council. No

7. COUNCIL AND OTHER PUBLIC AUTHORITY POLICIES ON HAZARD RISK

RESTRICTIONS Whether or not the land is affected by a policy: (a) Adopted by the council, or (b) Adopted by any other public authority and notified to the council for the

express purpose of its adoption by that authority being referred to in planning certificates issued by the council,

that restricts the development of the land because of the likelihood of land slip, bushfire, tidal inundation, subsidence, acid sulphate soils or any other risk (other than flooding). No

7A. FLOOD RELATED DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS INFORMATION

(1) Whether or not development on that land or part of the land for the purposes of dwelling houses, dual occupancies, multi dwelling housing or residential flat buildings (not including development for the purposes of group homes or seniors housing) is subject to flood related development controls.

No (2) Whether or not development on that land or part of the land for any other

purpose is subject to flood related development controls.

No

Page 12 of 17

(3) Words and expressions in this clause have the same meanings as in the

standard instrument set out in the Standard Instrument (Local Environmental Plans) Order 2006.

8. LAND RESERVED FOR ACQUISITION Whether or not any environmental planning instrument or proposed environmental planning instrument referred to in clause 1 makes provision in relation to the acquisition of the land by a public authority, as referred to in section 27 of the Act. Wollondilly Local Environmental Plan 2011 does not provide for the acquisition of the subject land by a public authority as referred to in section 27 of the Act.

9. CONTRIBUTIONS PLANS The name of each contributions plan applying to the land. Wollondilly Development Contribution Plan 2011 applies to the land.

9A. BIODIVERSITY CERTIFIED LAND If the land is biodiversity certified land (within the meaning of Part 7AA of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995), a statement to that effect. The land is not biodiversity certified land (within the meaning of Part 7AA of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995).

10. BIOBANKING AGREEMENTS If the land is land to which a biobanking agreement under Part 7A of the Threatened

Species Conservation Act 1995 relates, a statement to that effect (but only if the council has been notified of the existence of the agreement by the Director-General of the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water).

Council has not been notified by the Director-General of the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water of any biobanking agreement approved under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 for this land.

11. BUSH FIRE PRONE LAND If any of the land is bush fire prone land (as defined in the Act), a statement that all or as the case may be, some of the land is bush fire prone land. If none of the land is bush fire prone land, a statement to that effect. The land is partially bush fire prone land as shown in Council’s records. Further details of any applicable restrictions on development of the land may be obtained on application to Council.

Page 13 of 17

12. PROPERTY VEGETATION PLANS Whether or not the land is land to which a property vegetation plan under the Native Vegetation Act 2003 applies, a statement to that effect (but only if the council has been notified of the existence of the plan by the person or body that approved the plan under the Act). Council has not been notified of any such plan that affects this land.

13. ORDER UNDER TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS) ACT 2006 Whether an order has been made under the Trees (Disputes between Neighbours) Act 2006 to carry out work in relation to a tree on the land (but only if the council has been notified of the order). No

14. DIRECTIONS UNDER PART 3A

If there is a direction by the Minister in force under section 75P (2) (c1) of the Act that a provision of an environmental planning instrument prohibiting or restricting the carrying out of a project or a stage of a project on the land under Part 4 of the Act does not have effect, a statement to that effect identifying the provision that does not have effect.

No

15. SITE COMPATIBILITY CERTIFICATES AND CONDITIONS FOR SENIORS

HOUSING

If the land is land to which State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing for Seniors or People with a Disability) 2004 applies: (a) a statement of whether there is a current site compatibility certificate (seniors

housing), of which the council is aware, in respect of proposed development on the land and, if there is a certificate, the statement is to include:

(i) the period for which the certificate is current, and (ii) that a copy may be obtained from the head office of the Department of

Planning, and

There is not a current site compatibility certificate (seniors housing) as described that applies to this land. (b) a statement setting out any terms of a kind referred to in clause 18 (2) of that

Policy that have been imposed as a condition of consent to a development application granted after 11 October 2007 in respect of the land.

Page 14 of 17

There are currently no conditions of consent relating to a development application for seniors housing that apply to the land.

16. SITE COMPATIBILITY CERTIFICATES FOR INFRASTRUCTURE

A statement of whether there is a valid site compatibility certificate (infrastructure), of which the Council is aware, in respect of proposed development on the land and, if there is a certificate, that statement is to include: (a) the period for which the certificate is valid, and (b) that a copy may be obtained from the head office of the Department of

Planning.

There is not a valid site compatibility certificate (infrastructure) as described that applies to this land.

17. SITE COMPATIBILITY CERTIFICATES AND CONDITIONS FOR

AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING

(1) A statement of whether there is a current site compatibility certificate (affordable rental housing), of which the Council is aware, in respect of proposed development on the land and, if there is a certificate, that statement is to include:

(a) the period for which the certificate is current, and (b) that a copy may be obtained from the head office of the Department of

Planning There is not a current site compatibility certificate (affordable rental housing) as described that applies to this land. (2) A statement setting out any terms of a kind referred to in clause 17 (1) or 37

(1) of State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 that have been imposed as a condition of consent to a development application in respect of the land.

There are currently no conditions of consent relating to a development application for affordable rental housing that apply to the land.

18. PAPER SUBDIVISION INFORMATION

(1) The name of any development plan adopted by a relevant authority that applies to the land or that is proposed to be subject to a consent ballot.

None (2) The date of any subdivision order that applies to the land. None

Page 15 of 17

(3) Words and expressions used in this clause have the same meaning as they have in Part 16C of this Regulation.

19. SITE VERIFICATION CERTIFICATES

A statement of whether there is a current site verification certificate, of which the council is aware, in respect of the land and, if there is a certificate, the statement is to include: (a) the matter certified by the certificate, and

NOTE. A site verification certificate sets out the Director-General’s opinion as to whether the land concerned is or is not biophysical strategic agricultural land or critical industry cluster land – see Division 3 of Part 4AA of State Environmental Planning Policy (Mining, Petroleum Production and Extractive Industries) 2007. (b) the date on which the certificate ceases to be current (if any), and

(c) that a copy may be obtained from the head office of the Department of Planning and Infrastructure.

There is no current Site Verification Certificate as described that applies to this land.

20. LOOSE-FILL ASBESTOS INSULATION

If the land includes any residential premises (within the meaning of Division 1A of Part 8 of the Home Building Act 1989) that are listed on the register that is required to be maintained under that Division, a statement to that effect. Council has not been notified by NSW Fair Trading of any residential premises on this land being identified in the Loose-Fill Asbestos Insulation Register.

NOTE. The following matters are prescribed by section 59(2) of the Contaminated Land

Management Act 1997 as additional matters to be specified in a planning certificate: (a) that the land to which the certificate relates is significantly contaminated land

within the meaning of that Act – if the land (or part of the land) is significantly contaminated land at the date when the certificate is issued,

No. (b) that the land to which the certificate relates is subject to a management order

within the meaning of that Act – if it is subject to such an order at the date when the certificate is issued,

No. (c) that the land to which the certificate relates is the subject of an approved

voluntary management proposal within the meaning of that Act – if it is the subject of such an approved proposal at the date when the certificate is issued,

Page 16 of 17

No. (d) that the land to which the certificate relates is subject to an ongoing

maintenance order within the meaning of that Act – if it is subject to such an order at the date when the certificate is issued,

No. (e) that the land to which the certificate relates is the subject of a site audit

statement within the meaning of that Act – if a copy of such a statement has been provided at any time to the local authority issuing the certificate.

No. In respect of matters beyond the control and/or responsibility of Council, information provided is provided only to the extent that Council has been so notified by the relevant Authorities or Departments, which have responsibility for the administration of the particular status referred to.

L Johnson

GENERAL MANAGER Any request for further information in connection with the above should be directed to Council’s Duty Planner, Monday to Friday between the hours of 8am and 12pm, by telephoning (02) 4677 1100.

Page 17 of 17

NOTICE TO PURCHASERS OF RURAL LAND Wollondilly Shire Council supports the rights of persons in rural areas of the Shire to undertake and pursue agricultural production activities that are consistent with land capability and use reasonable and practical measures to avoid environmental harm and minimise impact to adjoining land users.

Intending purchasers are advised that agricultural production can include the following activities that may have implications for occupiers and prospective purchasers of rural land: Use of agricultural machinery (tractors, chainsaws, motorbikes) Use of bird-scare devices Intensive livestock production (cattle feedlots, poultry farms, piggeries, restricted dairies) Operation of rural industries (packing sheds, abattoirs, stock and sale yards, sawmills) Vegetation clearing Grazing of livestock Crop and fodder production Soil cultivation Crop harvesting Use of firearms Bushfire hazard reduction burning Construction of firebreaks Earthworks (construction of dams, drains, contour banks, access roads and tracks) Fencing Pumping and irrigation Use of pesticides and herbicides Spreading of manure, compost and treated effluent Fertiliser usage Slashing and mowing of grass Production of silage Re-vegetation activities (planting trees and shrubs) Agroforestry Livestock droving on roads

This is not an exhaustive list and intending purchasers of rural land should assess surrounding agricultural land uses and the impact these activities may have when being pursued in close proximity their proposed purchase. If you think these types of activities will affect your ability to live in a rural locality then intending purchasers are advised to reconsider their purchase and seek independent advice. This notice is not intended to affect the rights of individuals to take action under the common law or legislation and is provided for information purposes only.

31/07/2017 DECCW | Search results

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prclmapp/searchresults.aspx?&LGA=147&Suburb=&Notice=&Name=&Text=&DateFrom=&DateTo= 1/1

Connect Feedback

Web supportPublic consultation

Contact

Contact usOfficesReport pollution

Government

NSW Governmentjobs.nsw

About

AccessibilityDisclaimerPrivacyCopyright

Healthy Environment, Healthy Community, Healthy Business

Home Contaminated land Record of notices

Search resultsYour search for:LGA: Wollondilly Shire Council Matched 1 notice relating

to 1 site.Search Again Refine Search

Suburb Address Site Name Noticesrelated tothis site

MALDON Lot 2 Wilton ParkROAD

Maldon Works 1 current

Page 1 of 1

31 July 2017

https://twitter.com/NSW_EPA

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/feedback/

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/consult/

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/contact

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/contact/locations.htm

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/pollution

http://www.nsw.gov.au/

http://www.jobs.nsw.gov.au/

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/help/index.htm

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/help/disclaimer.htm

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/help/privacy.htm

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/help/copyright.htm

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/clm/

http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/prclmapp/aboutregister.aspx

javascript:__doPostBack('dgSearchResults$ctl03$Linkbutton1','')

31/07/2017 Groundwater data

http://allwaterdata.water.nsw.gov.au/water.stm 1/2

home · help · login · contact · customise

All Groundwaterfind a site

All Groundwater Map

bandwidth high low

glossary and metadata

bookmark this page

Scale = 1 : 3385 150.597, -34.225 278651, 6210284, 56

All Groundwater

All Groundwater MapAll data times are Eastern Standard Time

Map Info

There are no sites within 500 metres of the selected point.

+−

100 m200 ft

Greenacre Drive, Tahmoor, Wollondilly, NSW, 2573, Australia

Home About us Water Management Water Licensing Urban Water Real-time data

javascript: trees[0].toggle(1)

javascript:go('WEB_GW_MENU','gw',3)

https://maps.google.com/maps?ll=-34.225581,150.601187&z=17&t=k&hl=en-GB&gl=US&mapclient=apiv3

http://www.water.nsw.gov.au/Home/default.aspx

http://www.water.nsw.gov.au/About-Us/default.aspx

http://www.water.nsw.gov.au/Water-Management/default.aspx

http://www.water.nsw.gov.au/Water-Licensing/default.aspx

http://www.water.nsw.gov.au/Urban-Water/default.aspx

http://www.water.nsw.gov.au/realtime-data/default.aspx



APPENDIX B

Field Test-pit Summary Logs

Field logs Register

Field Logs Register 45-65 Greenacre Drive, Tahmoor

P31191.1

P31191.1_R01 North Western Surveys Pty. Ltd. 45-65 Greenacre Drive, Tahmoor

TP1

Depth (m) Sample Description Additional Observations

0.0-0.2 0.2-0.4

0.0-0.1 Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm Silty CLAY, brown, moist, stiff

Test Pit Terminated @ 0.4m bgl

TP2


0.0-0.1 0.1-0.2 0.2-0.3

Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm Silty CLAY, brown, moist, stiff Shale, brown, grey, distinctly weathered, stiff


TP3


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.7 0.7-1.2

0.0-0.1 Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm Shaley CLAY, brown, moist, stiff Shale, grey, extremely weathered, moist, firm


TP4


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5

Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm Silty, Gravelly CLAY, brown, moist, stiff


TP5


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5

0.0-0.1 Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm Silty, Gravelly CLAY, brown, moist, stiff


TP6


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.5

Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm Silty, Gravelly CLAY, brown, moist, stiff


TP7


0.0-0.1 0.1-0.3 0.3-0.4

0.0-0.1 Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm Silty CLAY, brown, moist, firm Shale, grey, extremely weathered


Field logs Register


P31191.1

TP8


0.0-1.5 1.5-1.7 1.7-1.8

0.0-0.1 FILL: Shaley Clay, brown grey Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm Shaley CLAY, grey, moist, weathered


TP9


0.0-1.6 1.6-1.8

0.0-0.1 FILL: Shaley Clay, brown grey Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm


TP10


0.0-1.5 1.5-1.7

0.0-0.1 FILL: Shaley Clay, brown grey Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm


TP11


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.7 0.7-1.2

Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm Shaley CLAY, brown, moist, stiff Shale, grey, extremely weathered, moist, firm


TP12


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.7 0.7-1.2

Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm Shaley CLAY, brown, moist, stiff Shale, grey, extremely weathered, moist, firm


TP13


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.9 0.9-1.2

Topsoil: Sandy Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm Shaley CLAY, brown, grey, moist, stiff Shale, grey, distinctly weathered, hard


TP14


0.0-0.2 0.2-0.3

Topsoil; Sandy, Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist firm Shale, grey, distinctly weathered, hard


TP15


0.0-0.1 0.1-0.2 0.2-0.3

Topsoil; Sandy, Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist firm Shaley CLAY, grey, moist, firm Shale, grey, distinctly weathered, hard


Field logs Register


P31191.1

TP16


0.0-0.2 0.2-0.4 0.4-0.5

0.0-0.1 Topsoil; Sandy, Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist firm Shaley CLAY, grey, moist, firm Shale, grey, distinctly weathered, hard


TP17


0.0-0.1 0.1-0.4 0.4-0.5

0.0-0.1 Topsoil; Sandy, Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist firm Shaley CLAY, grey, moist, firm Shale, grey, distinctly weathered


TP18


0.0-0.1 0.1-0.3 0.3-0.4

Topsoil; Sandy, Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist firm Shaley CLAY, brown, grey, moist, firm Shale, grey, distinctly weathered, hard


TP19


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.4 0.4-0.5

Topsoil; Sandy, Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist, firm Shaley CLAY, brown, grey, moist, stiff Shale, grey, distinctly weathered, hard


TP20


0.0-0.3 0.3-0.4 0.4-0.5

0.0-0.1 Topsoil; Sandy, Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist firm Shaley CLAY, brown, grey, moist, stiff Shale, grey, distinctly weathered, hard


TP21


0.0-0.2 0.2-0.3 0.3-0.4

Topsoil; Sandy, Silty CLAY; low plasticity, brown to dark brown, moist firm Silty CLAY, brown, red, moist, stiff Shale, grey, distinctly weathered, hard




APPENDIX C Laboratory Analytical Reports and Chain of Custody Documentation

Certificate of Analysis

Geotest Services

Unit 18/24 Garling Rd

Kings Park

NSW 2148

Attention: Alan Halpin CC Results/SRA/Invoices

Report 554184-S

Project name 45-65 GREENACRE DRIVE TAHMOOR

Project ID P31191.1_R01

Received Date Jul 13, 2017

Client Sample ID TP1_0.0-0.1 TP3_0.0-0.1 TP5_0.0-0.1 TP7_0.0-0.1

Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. S17-Jl15905 S17-Jl15906 S17-Jl15907 S17-Jl15908

Date Sampled Jul 07, 2017 Jul 07, 2017 Jul 07, 2017 Jul 07, 2017

Test/Reference LOR Unit

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions

TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg - < 20 - -

TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg - < 20 - -

TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg - < 50 - -

TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg - < 50 - -

TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg - < 50 - -

BTEX

Benzene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 - -

Toluene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 - -

Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 - -

m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 - -

o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 - -

Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg - < 0.3 - -

4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % - 57 - -


NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg - < 20 - -

TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg - < 20 - -

TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg - < 50 - -

TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg - < 50 - -

TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg - < 100 - -

TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg - < 100 - -

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - 0.6 - -

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg - 1.2 - -

Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Date Reported: Jul 20, 2017

Eurofins | mgt Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066

ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 1 of 19

Report Number: 554184-S

NATA AccreditedAccreditation Number 1261Site Number 18217

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 – TestingThe results of the tests, calibrations and/ormeasurements included in this document are traceableto Australian/national standards.







Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 - -

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % - 89 - -

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % - 100 - -

Organochlorine Pesticides

Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - < 0.1 < 0.1

4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 - < 0.05 < 0.05

Methoxychlor 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 - < 1 < 1

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 99 - 97 124

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 99 - 97 93

Organophosphorus Pesticides

Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Coumaphos 2 mg/kg < 2 - < 2 < 2

Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

EPN 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 2 of 19








Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Malathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg < 2 - < 2 < 2

Naled 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Omethoate 2 mg/kg < 2 - < 2 < 2

Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - < 0.2 < 0.2

Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 98 - 50 55

Heavy Metals

Arsenic 2 mg/kg 5.6 5.2 5.9 5.5

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4

Chromium 5 mg/kg 15 13 19 14

Copper 5 mg/kg 28 23 31 29

Lead 5 mg/kg 20 22 28 37

Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Nickel 5 mg/kg 14 15 13 16

Zinc 5 mg/kg 66 35 40 68

% Moisture 1 % 17 21 18 9.8







TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 - - < 20

TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 - - < 20

TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 - - < 50

TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 - - < 50

TRH C10-36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 - - < 50

BTEX

Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - < 0.1

Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - < 0.1

Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - < 0.1

m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 - - < 0.2



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 3 of 19







BTEX

o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - - < 0.1

Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 - - < 0.3

4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 59 - - 58


NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 - - < 20

TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 - - < 20

TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 - - < 50

TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 - - < 50

TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 - - < 100

TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 - - < 100


Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (lower bound) * 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (medium bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 - - 0.6

Benzo(a)pyrene TEQ (upper bound) * 0.5 mg/kg 1.2 - - 1.2

Acenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Benzo(b&j)fluorantheneN07 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

Total PAH* 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - - < 0.5

2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 129 - - 92

p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 140 - - 99


Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 < 0.1 -

4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Endrin 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 4 of 19








Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg - < 0.05 < 0.05 -

Methoxychlor 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Toxaphene 1 mg/kg - < 1 < 1 -

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % - 88 92 -

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % - 109 107 -


Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Coumaphos 2 mg/kg - < 2 < 2 -

Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

EPN 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Ethion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Malathion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Merphos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg - < 2 < 2 -

Naled 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Omethoate 2 mg/kg - < 2 < 2 -

Phorate 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg - < 0.2 < 0.2 -

Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % - 108 104 -



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 5 of 19







Heavy Metals

Arsenic 2 mg/kg 7.0 5.9 6.6 5.6

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4

Chromium 5 mg/kg 11 14 18 14

Copper 5 mg/kg 30 19 26 26

Lead 5 mg/kg 19 23 28 22

Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1

Nickel 5 mg/kg 12 15 15 8.9

Zinc 5 mg/kg 56 54 54 45

% Moisture 1 % 9.0 17 18 15

Client Sample ID TP20_0.0-0.1 DUP1

Sample Matrix Soil Soil

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. S17-Jl15913 S17-Jl15914

Date Sampled Jul 07, 2017 Jul 07, 2017



Chlordanes - Total 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1

4.4'-DDD 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

4.4'-DDE 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

4.4'-DDT 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

a-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

Aldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

b-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

d-BHC 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

Dieldrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

Endosulfan I 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

Endosulfan II 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

Endosulfan sulphate 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

Endrin 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

Endrin aldehyde 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

Endrin ketone 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

g-BHC (Lindane) 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

Heptachlor 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

Heptachlor epoxide 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05

Methoxychlor 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Toxaphene 1 mg/kg < 1 < 1

Dibutylchlorendate (surr.) 1 % 96 101

Tetrachloro-m-xylene (surr.) 1 % 107 96


Azinphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Bolstar 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Chlorfenvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Chlorpyrifos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Chlorpyrifos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Coumaphos 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2

Demeton-S 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 6 of 19


Client Sample ID TP20_0.0-0.1 DUP1

Sample Matrix Soil Soil

Eurofins | mgt Sample No. S17-Jl15913 S17-Jl15914

Date Sampled Jul 07, 2017 Jul 07, 2017



Demeton-O 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Diazinon 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Dichlorvos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Dimethoate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Disulfoton 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

EPN 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Ethion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Ethoprop 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Ethyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Fenitrothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Fensulfothion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Fenthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Malathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Merphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Methyl parathion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Mevinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Monocrotophos 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2

Naled 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Omethoate 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2

Phorate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Pirimiphos-methyl 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Pyrazophos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Ronnel 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Terbufos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Tetrachlorvinphos 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Tokuthion 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Trichloronate 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2

Triphenylphosphate (surr.) 1 % 120 108

Heavy Metals

Arsenic 2 mg/kg 6.4 5.0

Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4

Chromium 5 mg/kg 18 14

Copper 5 mg/kg 24 23

Lead 5 mg/kg 23 22

Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1

Nickel 5 mg/kg 9.8 10

Zinc 5 mg/kg 29 34

% Moisture 1 % 20 17



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 7 of 19


Sample HistoryWhere samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported.A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However,no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results (regarding both quality and NATA accreditation).

If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.

Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Sydney Jul 18, 2017 14 Day

- Method: TRH C6-C36 - LTM-ORG-2010

BTEX Sydney Jul 18, 2017 14 Day






Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Sydney Jul 18, 2017 14 Days

- Method: LTM-ORG-2140 PAH and Phenols in Soils by GCMS

Metals M8 Sydney Jul 18, 2017 28 Day

- Method: LTM-MET-3040_R0 TOTAL AND DISSOLVED METALS AND MERCURY IN WATERS BY ICP-MS

Eurofins | mgt Suite B14

Organochlorine Pesticides Sydney Jul 18, 2017 14 Day

- Method: LTM-ORG-2220 OCP & PCB in Soil and Water

Organophosphorus Pesticides Sydney Jul 18, 2017 14 Day

- Method: LTM-ORG-2200 Organophosphorus Pesticides by GC-MS

% Moisture Sydney Jul 13, 2017 14 Day

- Method: LTM-GEN-7080 Moisture



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 8 of 19


.Company Name: Geotest Services Order No.: Received: Jul 13, 2017 3:56 PMAddress: Unit 18/24 Garling Rd Report #: 554184 Due: Jul 20, 2017

Kings Park Phone: 02 9671 4443 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2148 Fax: 02 9671 4343 Contact Name: Alan Halpin CC

Project Name: 45-65 GREENACRE DRIVE TAHMOORProject ID: P31191.1_R01

Eurofins | mgt Analytical Services Manager : Andrew Black

Sample Detail

Metals M

8

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

14

Moisture S

et

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7

Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271

Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X

Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794

Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217

External Laboratory

No Sample ID Sample Date SamplingTime

Matrix LAB ID

1 TP1_0.0-0.1 Jul 07, 2017 Soil S17-Jl15905 X X X

2 TP3_0.0-0.1 Jul 07, 2017 Soil S17-Jl15906 X X



5 TP8_0.0-0.1 Jul 07, 2017 Soil S17-Jl15909 X X



8 TP17_0.0-0.1 Jul 07, 2017 Soil S17-Jl15912 X X


ABN– 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au

MelbourneMelbourneMelbourneMelbourne2-5 Kingston Town CloseOakleigh VIC 3166Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271

SydneySydneySydneySydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217

BrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794

PerthPerthPerthPerth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 18217

Date Reported:Jul 20, 2017


ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 9 of 19


Company Name: Geotest Services Order No.: Received: Jul 13, 2017 3:56 PMAddress: Unit 18/24 Garling Rd Report #: 554184 Due: Jul 20, 2017




Sample Detail

Metals M

8

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

14

Moisture S

et

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7





10 DUP1 Jul 07, 2017 Soil S17-Jl15914 X X X

Test Counts 7 7 10 3






Page 10 of 19


Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary

General

Holding Times

Units

Terms

QC - Acceptance Criteria

QC Data General Comments

1. Laboratory QC results for Method Blanks, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, and Laboratory Control Samples are included in this QC report where applicable. Additional QC data may be available on

request.

2. All soil results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated.

3. All biota results are reported on a wet weight basis on the edible portion, unless otherwise stated.

4. Actual LORs are matrix dependant. Quoted LORs may be raised where sample extracts are diluted due to interferences.

5. Results are uncorrected for matrix spikes or surrogate recoveries except for PFAS compounds.

6. SVOC analysis on waters are performed on homogenised, unfiltered samples, unless noted otherwise.

7. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis.

8. This report replaces any interim results previously issued.

Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001).

For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the Sample

Receipt Advice.

If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported.

Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control.

**NOTE: pH duplicates are reported as a range NOT as RPD

mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram mg/L: milligrams per litre

ug/L: micrograms per litre ppm: Parts per million

ppb: Parts per billion %: Percentage

org/100mL: Organisms per 100 millilitres NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity Units

MPN/100mL: Most Probable Number of organisms per 100 millilitres

Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis.

LOR Limit of Reporting.

SPIKE Addition of the analyte to the sample and reported as percentage recovery.

RPD Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate pieces of analysis.

LCS Laboratory Control Sample - reported as percent recovery.

CRM Certified Reference Material - reported as percent recovery.

Method Blank In the case of solid samples these are performed on laboratory certified clean sands and in the case of water samples these are performed on de-ionised water.

Surr - Surrogate The addition of a like compound to the analyte target and reported as percentage recovery.

Duplicate A second piece of analysis from the same sample and reported in the same units as the result to show comparison.

USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

APHA American Public Health Association

TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure

COC Chain of Custody

SRA Sample Receipt Advice

QSM Quality Systems Manual ver 5.1 US Department of Defense

CP Client Parent - QC was performed on samples pertaining to this report

NCP Non-Client Parent - QC performed on samples not pertaining to this report, QC is representative of the sequence or batch that client samples were analysed within.

TEQ Toxic Equivalency Quotient

RPD Duplicates: Global RPD Duplicates Acceptance Criteria is 30% however the following acceptance guidelines are equally applicable:

Results <10 times the LOR : No Limit

Results between 10-20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-50%

Results >20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-30%

Surrogate Recoveries: Recoveries must lie between 50-150%-Phenols & PFASs

PFAS field samples that contain surrogate recoveries in excess of the QC limit designated in QSM 5.1 where no positive PFAS results have been reported have been reviewed and no data was

affected.

1. Where a result is reported as a less than (<), higher than the nominated LOR, this is due to either matrix interference, extract dilution required due to interferences or contaminant levels within

the sample, high moisture content or insufficient sample provided.

2. Duplicate data shown within this report that states the word "BATCH" is a Batch Duplicate from outside of your sample batch, but within the laboratory sample batch at a 1:10 ratio. The Parent

and Duplicate data shown is not data from your samples.

3. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting LCS data, Toxaphene & Chlordane are not added to the LCS.

4. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting Spike data, Toxaphene is not added to the Spike.

5. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - where reporting Spike & LCS data, a single spike of commercial Hydrocarbon products in the range of C12-C30 is added and it's Total Recovery is reported

in the C10-C14 cell of the Report.

6. pH and Free Chlorine analysed in the laboratory - Analysis on this test must begin within 30 minutes of sampling.Therefore laboratory analysis is unlikely to be completed within holding time.

Analysis will begin as soon as possible after sample receipt.

7. Recovery Data (Spikes & Surrogates) - where chromatographic interference does not allow the determination of Recovery the term "INT" appears against that analyte.

8. Polychlorinated Biphenyls are spiked only using Aroclor 1260 in Matrix Spikes and LCS.

9. For Matrix Spikes and LCS results a dash " -" in the report means that the specific analyte was not added to the QC sample.

10. Duplicate RPDs are calculated from raw analytical data thus it is possible to have two sets of data.



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 11 of 19


Quality Control Results

Test Units Result 1 AcceptanceLimits

PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Method Blank


TRH C6-C9 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass




Method Blank

BTEX

Benzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Toluene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Ethylbenzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

m&p-Xylenes mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

o-Xylene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

Xylenes - Total mg/kg < 0.3 0.3 Pass

Method Blank


Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass


TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass

TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass

TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass

Method Blank


Acenaphthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Acenaphthylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Chrysene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Fluorene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Phenanthrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass

Method Blank


Chlordanes - Total mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass

4.4'-DDD mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

4.4'-DDE mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

4.4'-DDT mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

a-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Aldrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

b-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

d-BHC mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Dieldrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endosulfan I mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endosulfan II mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 12 of 19



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Endosulfan sulphate mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endrin mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endrin aldehyde mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Endrin ketone mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Heptachlor mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Heptachlor epoxide mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Hexachlorobenzene mg/kg < 0.05 0.05 Pass

Methoxychlor mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Toxaphene mg/kg < 1 1 Pass

Method Blank


Azinphos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Bolstar mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Chlorfenvinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Chlorpyrifos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Chlorpyrifos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Coumaphos mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Demeton-S mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Demeton-O mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Diazinon mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Dichlorvos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Dimethoate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Disulfoton mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

EPN mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ethion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ethoprop mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ethyl parathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Fenitrothion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Fensulfothion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Fenthion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Malathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Merphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Methyl parathion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Mevinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Monocrotophos mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Naled mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Omethoate mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Phorate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Pirimiphos-methyl mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Pyrazophos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Ronnel mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Terbufos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Tetrachlorvinphos mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Tokuthion mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Trichloronate mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass

Method Blank

Heavy Metals

Arsenic mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

Cadmium mg/kg < 0.4 0.4 Pass

Chromium mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Copper mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Lead mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Mercury mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 13 of 19



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

Nickel mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

Zinc mg/kg < 5 5 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


TRH C6-C9 % 108 70-130 Pass

TRH C10-C14 % 110 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery

BTEX

Benzene % 106 70-130 Pass

Toluene % 112 70-130 Pass

Ethylbenzene % 112 70-130 Pass

m&p-Xylenes % 114 70-130 Pass

o-Xylene % 114 70-130 Pass

Xylenes - Total % 114 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Naphthalene % 115 70-130 Pass

TRH C6-C10 % 103 70-130 Pass

TRH >C10-C16 % 117 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Acenaphthene % 108 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene % 95 70-130 Pass

Anthracene % 95 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene % 86 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene % 95 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene % 91 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene % 115 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene % 99 70-130 Pass

Chrysene % 111 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene % 99 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene % 97 70-130 Pass

Fluorene % 101 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene % 109 70-130 Pass

Naphthalene % 98 70-130 Pass

Phenanthrene % 99 70-130 Pass

Pyrene % 97 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Chlordanes - Total % 78 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDD % 72 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDE % 73 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDT % 94 70-130 Pass

a-BHC % 83 70-130 Pass

Aldrin % 81 70-130 Pass

b-BHC % 81 70-130 Pass

d-BHC % 89 70-130 Pass

Dieldrin % 78 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan I % 80 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan II % 75 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan sulphate % 79 70-130 Pass

Endrin % 83 70-130 Pass

Endrin aldehyde % 71 70-130 Pass

Endrin ketone % 71 70-130 Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 14 of 19



PassLimits

QualifyingCode

g-BHC (Lindane) % 84 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor % 85 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor epoxide % 80 70-130 Pass

Hexachlorobenzene % 84 70-130 Pass

Methoxychlor % 74 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery


Dimethoate % 78 70-130 Pass

Ethion % 120 70-130 Pass

Fenitrothion % 74 70-130 Pass

LCS - % Recovery

Heavy Metals

Arsenic % 95 70-130 Pass

Cadmium % 100 70-130 Pass

Chromium % 99 70-130 Pass

Copper % 105 70-130 Pass

Lead % 102 70-130 Pass

Mercury % 104 70-130 Pass

Nickel % 104 70-130 Pass

Zinc % 103 70-130 Pass

Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance

LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Spike - % Recovery

Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1

Chlordanes - Total S17-Jl15895 NCP % 83 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDD S17-Jl15895 NCP % 96 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDE S17-Jl15895 NCP % 81 70-130 Pass

4.4'-DDT S17-Jl15772 NCP % 71 70-130 Pass

a-BHC S17-Jl15895 NCP % 88 70-130 Pass

Aldrin S17-Jl15895 NCP % 92 70-130 Pass

b-BHC S17-Jl15895 NCP % 84 70-130 Pass

d-BHC S17-Jl15895 NCP % 95 70-130 Pass

Dieldrin S17-Jl15895 NCP % 89 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan I S17-Jl15895 NCP % 86 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan II S17-Jl15895 NCP % 75 70-130 Pass

Endosulfan sulphate S17-Jl15895 NCP % 80 70-130 Pass

Endrin S17-Jl15895 NCP % 76 70-130 Pass

Endrin aldehyde S17-Jl15895 NCP % 76 70-130 Pass

Endrin ketone S17-Jl15895 NCP % 75 70-130 Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) S17-Jl15895 NCP % 86 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor S17-Jl15895 NCP % 86 70-130 Pass

Heptachlor epoxide S17-Jl15895 NCP % 87 70-130 Pass

Hexachlorobenzene S17-Jl15895 NCP % 90 70-130 Pass

Methoxychlor S17-Jl15895 NCP % 71 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1

Ethion S17-Jl14087 NCP % 118 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Heavy Metals Result 1

Arsenic S17-Jl15892 NCP % 98 70-130 Pass

Cadmium S17-Jl15892 NCP % 100 70-130 Pass

Chromium S17-Jl15892 NCP % 89 70-130 Pass

Copper S17-Jl15892 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass

Lead S17-Jl15892 NCP % 95 70-130 Pass

Mercury S17-Jl15892 NCP % 101 70-130 Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 15 of 19



LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Nickel S17-Jl15892 NCP % 92 70-130 Pass

Zinc S17-Jl15892 NCP % 130 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1

TRH C10-C14 S17-Jl15845 NCP % 109 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


TRH >C10-C16 S17-Jl15845 NCP % 115 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1

Acenaphthene S17-Jl21131 NCP % 100 70-130 Pass

Acenaphthylene S17-Jl21131 NCP % 86 70-130 Pass

Anthracene S17-Jl21131 NCP % 84 70-130 Pass

Benz(a)anthracene S17-Jl21131 NCP % 75 70-130 Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene S17-Jl21131 NCP % 106 70-130 Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene S17-Jl21131 NCP % 102 70-130 Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene S17-Jl16295 NCP % 126 70-130 Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene S17-Jl16295 NCP % 107 70-130 Pass

Chrysene S17-Jl21131 NCP % 103 70-130 Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene S17-Jl16295 NCP % 121 70-130 Pass

Fluoranthene S17-Jl21131 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass

Fluorene S17-Jl21131 NCP % 93 70-130 Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene S17-Jl16295 NCP % 124 70-130 Pass

Naphthalene S17-Jl21131 NCP % 91 70-130 Pass

Phenanthrene S17-Jl21131 NCP % 87 70-130 Pass

Pyrene S17-Jl21131 NCP % 90 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


TRH C6-C9 S17-Jl15912 CP % 102 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

BTEX Result 1

Benzene S17-Jl15912 CP % 102 70-130 Pass

Toluene S17-Jl15912 CP % 108 70-130 Pass

Ethylbenzene S17-Jl15912 CP % 107 70-130 Pass

m&p-Xylenes S17-Jl15912 CP % 110 70-130 Pass

o-Xylene S17-Jl15912 CP % 107 70-130 Pass

Xylenes - Total S17-Jl15912 CP % 109 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery


Naphthalene S17-Jl15912 CP % 93 70-130 Pass

TRH C6-C10 S17-Jl15912 CP % 99 70-130 Pass

Spike - % Recovery

Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1

Dimethoate S17-Jl15913 CP % 95 70-130 Pass

Fenitrothion S17-Jl15913 CP % 80 70-130 Pass


LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Duplicate

Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Chlordanes - Total S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDD S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDE S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

4.4'-DDT S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

a-BHC S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Aldrin S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 16 of 19



LimitsPass

LimitsQualifying

Code

Duplicate

Organochlorine Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD

b-BHC S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

d-BHC S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Dieldrin S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan I S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan II S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endosulfan sulphate S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin aldehyde S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Endrin ketone S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

g-BHC (Lindane) S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Heptachlor S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Heptachlor epoxide S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Hexachlorobenzene S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.05 < 0.05 <1 30% Pass

Methoxychlor S17-Jl15894 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Organophosphorus Pesticides Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Azinphos-methyl S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Bolstar S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Chlorfenvinphos S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Chlorpyrifos S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Chlorpyrifos-methyl S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Coumaphos S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Demeton-S S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Demeton-O S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Diazinon S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Dichlorvos S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Dimethoate S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Disulfoton S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

EPN S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ethion S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ethoprop S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ethyl parathion S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Fenitrothion S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Fensulfothion S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Fenthion S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Malathion S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Merphos S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Methyl parathion S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Mevinphos S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Monocrotophos S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Naled S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Omethoate S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass

Phorate S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Pirimiphos-methyl S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Pyrazophos S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Ronnel S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Terbufos S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Tetrachlorvinphos S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Tokuthion S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

Trichloronate S17-Jl15834 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 17 of 19


Duplicate

Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD

TRH C10-C14 S17-Jl20941 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass

TRH C15-C28 S17-Jl20941 NCP mg/kg < 50 58 110 30% Fail Q15

TRH C29-C36 S17-Jl20941 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


TRH >C10-C16 S17-Jl20941 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass



Duplicate

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Acenaphthene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Acenaphthylene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Anthracene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benz(a)anthracene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(a)pyrene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(b&j)fluoranthene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Benzo(k)fluoranthene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Chrysene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Fluoranthene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Fluorene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Naphthalene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Phenanthrene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Pyrene S17-Jl15900 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

Result 1 Result 2 RPD

% Moisture S17-Jl15906 CP % 21 20 9.0 30% Pass

Duplicate

Heavy Metals Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Arsenic S17-Jl15908 CP mg/kg 5.5 5.3 4.0 30% Pass

Cadmium S17-Jl15908 CP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass

Chromium S17-Jl15908 CP mg/kg 14 15 9.0 30% Pass

Copper S17-Jl15908 CP mg/kg 29 29 1.0 30% Pass

Lead S17-Jl15908 CP mg/kg 37 36 1.0 30% Pass

Mercury S17-Jl15908 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Nickel S17-Jl15908 CP mg/kg 16 17 9.0 30% Pass

Zinc S17-Jl15908 CP mg/kg 68 66 2.0 30% Pass

Duplicate


TRH C6-C9 S17-Jl15909 CP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate

BTEX Result 1 Result 2 RPD

Benzene S17-Jl15909 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Toluene S17-Jl15909 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Ethylbenzene S17-Jl15909 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

m&p-Xylenes S17-Jl15909 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass

o-Xylene S17-Jl15909 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass

Xylenes - Total S17-Jl15909 CP mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 <1 30% Pass

Duplicate


Naphthalene S17-Jl15909 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass

TRH C6-C10 S17-Jl15909 CP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 18 of 19


Comments

Sample IntegrityCustody Seals Intact (if used) N/A

Attempt to Chill was evident Yes

Sample correctly preserved Yes

Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes

Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes

Samples received within HoldingTime Yes

Some samples have been subcontracted No

Qualifier Codes/Comments

Code Description

N01F2 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "naphthalene" value from the ">C10-C16" value. The naphthalene value used in this calculation is obtained from volatiles(Purge & Trap analysis).

N02

Where we have reported both volatile (P&T GCMS) and semivolatile (GCMS) naphthalene data, results may not be identical. Provided correct sample handling protocols havebeen followed, any observed differences in results are likely to be due to procedural differences within each methodology. Results determined by both techniques have passedall QAQC acceptance criteria, and are entirely technically valid.

N04F1 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "Total BTEX" value from the "C6-C10" value. The "Total BTEX" value is obtained by summing the concentrations of BTEXanalytes. The "C6-C10" value is obtained by quantitating against a standard of mixed aromatic/aliphatic analytes.

N07Please note:- These two PAH isomers closely co-elute using the most contemporary analytical methods and both the reported concentration (and the TEQ) apply specifically tothe total of the two co-eluting PAHs

Q15 The RPD reported passes Eurofins | mgt's QC - Acceptance Criteria as defined in the Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary page of this report.

Authorised By

Andrew Black Analytical Services Manager

Glenn Jackson

National Operations Manager

- Indicates Not Requested

* Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service

Measurement uncertainty of test data is available on request or please click here.Eurofins | mgt shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins | mgt be liable for consequential damages including, but notlimited to, lost profits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.



ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400

Page 19 of 19


http://www.eurofins.com.au/media/311687/reporting-measurement-uncertainty-of-chemical-and-microbiology-test-results.pdf

ABN – 50 005 085 521 e.mail : [email protected] web : www.eurofins.com.au

MelbourneMelbourneMelbourneMelbourne3-5 Kingston Town CloseOakleigh Vic 3166Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271



PerthPerthPerthPerth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261 Site # 18217

Environmental LaboratoryAir AnalysisWater AnalysisSoil Contamination Analysis

NATA AccreditationStack Emission Sampling & AnalysisTrade Waste Sampling & AnalysisGroundwater Sampling & Analysis

38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience38 Years of Environmental Analysis & Experience

Sample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt Advice

Company name: Geotest ServicesGeotest ServicesGeotest ServicesGeotest Services

Contact name: Alan Halpin CC Results/SRA/Invoices

Project name: 45-65 GREENACRE DRIVE TAHMOOR

Project ID: P31191.1_R01

COC number: Not provided

Turn around time: 5 Day

Date/Time received: Jul 13, 2017 3:56 PM

Eurofins | mgt reference: 554184554184554184554184

Sample informationSample informationSample informationSample information

☑ A detailed list of analytes logged into our LIMS, is included in the attached summary table.

☑ Sample Temperature of a random sample selected from the batch as recorded by Eurofins | mgtSample Receipt : 3.5 degrees Celsius.

☑ All samples have been received as described on the above COC.

☑ COC has been completed correctly.

☑ Attempt to chill was evident.

☑ Appropriately preserved sample containers have been used.

☑ All samples were received in good condition.

☑ Samples have been provided with adequate time to commence analysis in accordance with therelevant holding times.

☑ Appropriate sample containers have been used.

☒ Some samples have been subcontracted.

N/A Custody Seals intact (if used).

Contact notesContact notesContact notesContact notes

If you have any questions with respect to these samples please contact:

Andrew Black on Phone : (+61) 2 9900 8490 or by e.mail: [email protected]

Results will be delivered electronically via e.mail to Alan Halpin CC Results/SRA/Invoices [email protected].

Note: A copy of these results will also be delivered to the general Geotest Services email address.

.Company Name: Geotest Services Order No.: Received: Jul 13, 2017 3:56 PMAddress: Unit 18/24 Garling Rd Report #: 554184 Due: Jul 20, 2017




Sample Detail

Metals M

8

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

14

Moisture S

et

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7





External Laboratory

No Sample ID Sample Date SamplingTime

Matrix LAB ID


2 TP3_0.0-0.1 Jul 07, 2017 Soil S17-Jl15906 X X



5 TP8_0.0-0.1 Jul 07, 2017 Soil S17-Jl15909 X X



8 TP17_0.0-0.1 Jul 07, 2017 Soil S17-Jl15912 X X







Company Name: Geotest Services Order No.: Received: Jul 13, 2017 3:56 PMAddress: Unit 18/24 Garling Rd Report #: 554184 Due: Jul 20, 2017




Sample Detail

Metals M

8

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

14

Moisture S

et

Eurofins | m

gt Suite B

7





10 DUP1 Jul 07, 2017 Soil S17-Jl15914 X X X

Test Counts 7 7 10 3






CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 171359

Client:

Geotest Services Pty Ltd

18/24 Garling Road

Kings Park

NSW 2148

Attention: Alan Halpin

Sample log in details:

Your Reference: P31191.1_R01, 45-65 Greenacre Drive, Tahmoor

No. of samples: 1 Soil

Date samples received / completed instructions received 14/07/17 / 14/07/17

Analysis Details:

Please refer to the following pages for results, methodology summary and quality control data.

Samples were analysed as received from the client. Results relate specifically to the samples as received.

Results are reported on a dry weight basis for solids and on an as received basis for other matrices.

Please refer to the last page of this report for any comments relating to the results.

Report Details:

Date results requested by: / Issue Date: 21/07/17 / 19/07/17

Date of Preliminary Report: Not Issued

NATA accreditation number 2901. This document shall not be reproduced except in full.

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing Tests not covered by NATA are denoted with *.

Results Approved By:

Page 1 of 10Envirolab Reference: 171359

Revision No: R 00

Client Reference: P31191.1_R01, 45-65 Greenacre Drive, Tahmoor

Organochlorine Pesticides in soil

Our Reference: UNITS 171359-1

Your Reference ------------

-

DUP1A

Date Sampled ------------ 7/07/2017

Type of sample Soil

Date extracted - 17/07/2017

Date analysed - 17/07/2017

HCB mg/kg <0.1

alpha-BHC mg/kg <0.1

gamma-BHC mg/kg <0.1

beta-BHC mg/kg <0.1

Heptachlor mg/kg <0.1

delta-BHC mg/kg <0.1

Aldrin mg/kg <0.1

Heptachlor Epoxide mg/kg <0.1

gamma-Chlordane mg/kg <0.1

alpha-chlordane mg/kg <0.1

Endosulfan I mg/kg <0.1

pp-DDE mg/kg <0.1

Dieldrin mg/kg <0.1

Endrin mg/kg <0.1

pp-DDD mg/kg <0.1

Endosulfan II mg/kg <0.1

pp-DDT mg/kg <0.1

Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg <0.1

Endosulfan Sulphate mg/kg <0.1

Methoxychlor mg/kg <0.1

Total +ve DDT+DDD+DDE mg/kg <0.1

Surrogate TCMX % 90


Revision No: R 00





-

DUP1A

Date Sampled ------------ 7/07/2017

Type of sample Soil



Azinphos-methyl (Guthion) mg/kg <0.1

Bromophos-ethyl mg/kg <0.1

Chlorpyriphos mg/kg <0.1

Chlorpyriphos-methyl mg/kg <0.1

Diazinon mg/kg <0.1

Dichlorvos mg/kg <0.1

Dimethoate mg/kg <0.1

Ethion mg/kg <0.1

Fenitrothion mg/kg <0.1

Malathion mg/kg <0.1

Parathion mg/kg <0.1

Ronnel mg/kg <0.1

Surrogate TCMX % 90


Revision No: R 00


Acid Extractable metals in soil



-

DUP1A

Date Sampled ------------ 7/07/2017

Type of sample Soil

Date prepared - 17/07/2017


Arsenic mg/kg 4

Cadmium mg/kg <0.4

Chromium mg/kg 15

Copper mg/kg 23

Lead mg/kg 19

Mercury mg/kg <0.1

Nickel mg/kg 9

Zinc mg/kg 30


Revision No: R 00


Moisture



-

DUP1A

Date Sampled ------------ 7/07/2017

Type of sample Soil



Moisture % 18


Revision No: R 00


Method ID Methodology Summary

Org-005 Soil samples are extracted with dichloromethane/acetone and waters with dichloromethane and analysed by

GC with dual ECD's.


GC with dual ECD's.

Note, the Total +ve reported DDD+DDE+DDT PQL is reflective of the lowest individual PQL and is therefore

simply a sum of the positive individually report DDD+DDE+DDT.


GC with dual ECD's.

Metals-020 Determination of various metals by ICP-AES.

Metals-021 Determination of Mercury by Cold Vapour AAS.

Inorg-008 Moisture content determined by heating at 105+/-5 °C for a minimum of 12 hours.


Revision No: R 00


QUALITY CONTROL UNITS PQL METHOD Blank Duplicate

Sm#

Duplicate results Spike Sm# Spike %

Recovery

Organochlorine

Pesticides in soil

Base ll Duplicate ll %RPD


017

[NT] [NT] LCS-8 17/07/2017


017

[NT] [NT] LCS-8 17/07/2017

HCB mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

alpha-BHC mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 78%

gamma-BHC mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

beta-BHC mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 94%

Heptachlor mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 77%

delta-BHC mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Aldrin mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 99%

Heptachlor Epoxide mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 100%

gamma-Chlordane mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

alpha-chlordane mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Endosulfan I mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

pp-DDE mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 106%

Dieldrin mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 112%

Endrin mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 98%

pp-DDD mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 103%

Endosulfan II mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

pp-DDT mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Endrin Aldehyde mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Endosulfan Sulphate mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 76%

Methoxychlor mg/kg 0.1 Org-005 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Surrogate TCMX % Org-005 95 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 113%


Revision No: R 00



Sm#


Recovery

Organophosphorus

Pesticides



017

[NT] [NT] LCS-8 17/07/2017


017

[NT] [NT] LCS-8 17/07/2017

Azinphos-methyl

(Guthion)

mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Bromophos-ethyl mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Chlorpyriphos mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 91%

Chlorpyriphos-methyl mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Diazinon mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Dichlorvos mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 81%

Dimethoate mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 [NT] [NT] [NR] [NR]

Ethion mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 106%

Fenitrothion mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 110%

Malathion mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 76%

Parathion mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 100%

Ronnel mg/kg 0.1 Org-008 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 98%

Surrogate TCMX % Org-008 95 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 90%


Sm#


Recovery

Acid Extractable metals

in soil



017

[NT] [NT] LCS-8 17/07/2017


017

[NT] [NT] LCS-8 17/07/2017

Arsenic mg/kg 4 Metals-020 <4 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 101%

Cadmium mg/kg 0.4 Metals-020 <0.4 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 97%

Chromium mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 103%

Copper mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 101%

Lead mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 93%

Mercury mg/kg 0.1 Metals-021 <0.1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 91%

Nickel mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 95%

Zinc mg/kg 1 Metals-020 <1 [NT] [NT] LCS-8 96%


Revision No: R 00


Report Comments:

Asbestos ID was analysed by Approved Identifier: Not applicable for this job

Asbestos ID was authorised by Approved Signatory: Not applicable for this job

INS: Insufficient sample for this test PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit NT: Not tested

NR: Test not required RPD: Relative Percent Difference NA: Test not required

<: Less than >: Greater than LCS: Laboratory Control Sample


Revision No: R 00


Quality Control Definitions

Blank: This is the component of the analytical signal which is not derived from the sample but from reagents,

glassware etc, can be determined by processing solvents and reagents in exactly the same manner as for samples.

Duplicate : This is the complete duplicate analysis of a sample from the process batch. If possible, the sample

selected should be one where the analyte concentration is easily measurable.

Matrix Spike : A portion of the sample is spiked with a known concentration of target analyte. The purpose of the matrix

spike is to monitor the performance of the analytical method used and to determine whether matrix interferences exist.

LCS (Laboratory Control Sample) : This comprises either a standard reference material or a control matrix (such as a blank

sand or water) fortified with analytes representative of the analyte class. It is simply a check sample.

Surrogate Spike: Surrogates are known additions to each sample, blank, matrix spike and LCS in a batch, of compounds

which are similar to the analyte of interest, however are not expected to be found in real samples.

Laboratory Acceptance Criteria

Duplicate sample and matrix spike recoveries may not be reported on smaller jobs, however, were analysed at a frequency

to meet or exceed NEPM requirements. All samples are tested in batches of 20. The duplicate sample RPD and matrix

spike recoveries for the batch were within the laboratory acceptance criteria.

Filters, swabs, wipes, tubes and badges will not have duplicate data as the whole sample is generally extracted

during sample extraction.

Spikes for Physical and Aggregate Tests are not applicable.

For VOCs in water samples, three vials are required for duplicate or spike analysis.

Duplicates: <5xPQL - any RPD is acceptable; >5xPQL - 0-50% RPD is acceptable.

Matrix Spikes, LCS and Surrogate recoveries: Generally 70-130% for inorganics/metals; 60-140%

for organics (+/-50% surrogates) and 10-140% for labile SVOCs (including labile surrogates), ultra trace organics

and speciated phenols is acceptable.

In circumstances where no duplicate and/or sample spike has been reported at 1 in 10 and/or 1 in 20 samples

respectively, the sample volume submitted was insufficient in order to satisfy laboratory QA/QC protocols.

When samples are received where certain analytes are outside of recommended technical holding times (THTs),

the analysis has proceeded. Where analytes are on the verge of breaching THTs, every effort will be made to analyse

within the THT or as soon as practicable.

Where sampling dates are not provided, Envirolab are not in a position to comment on the validity

of the analysis where recommended technical holding times may have been breached.

Measurement Uncertainty estimates are available for most tests upon request.


Revision No: R 00



APPENDIX D

Site Photographs



Showing typical example of site condition consisting vacant lands, image from SW corner facing NE

Showing typical example of site condition consisting vacant lands, image from S boundary facing NW



Showing typical example of site condition consisting vacant lands. Image from centre of site facing S

Image showing example of dense vegetation present at the site.



Typical example of residual geological profile encountered at the site

Showing dam located in the south-eastern corner of the property, image facing NW, showing the site’s paddocks (structures within image not included within property boundary)



Image showing example of uncontrolled fill soils encountered at the site.

Documents

Preliminary & Detailed Site Investigation Report