Pre-Construction Environmental Management Plan€¦ · 03/01/2014 · A construction soil management plan will be included within the CEMP with a view to protecting soils, managing

Pre-Construction Environmental Management Plan

Document: CTRAEB/730/DOC200

South Bristol Link

Bristol City Council & North Somerset Council

2 April 2013

Halcrow Group Limited

Burderop Park, Swindon, Wiltshire SN4 0QD

tel 01793 812479 fax 01793 812089

halcrow.com

Halcrow Group Limited is a CH2M HILL company

Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with

the instructions of client North Somerset Council for the client’s sole and specific use.

Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk.

© Halcrow Group Limited 2013


South Bristol Link


2 April 2013


Document history


South Bristol Link


This document has been issued and amended as follows:

Version Date Description Created by Verified by Approved by

0.0 2/04/13 Draft Kofi Nyarko Philip Paterson Philip Paterson

1.0 29/05/13 For planning application Kofi Nyarko Philip Paterson Philip Paterson

2.0 7/06/13 For planning application

minor revisions and Appendix

A added

Kofi Nyarko Gary Hodge Philip Paterson

Contents page

1 Pre-Construction Environmental Management Plan 3

1.1 Introduction 3

1.2 Framework for this document 3

1.3 Scope of the CEMP 4

2 Aims and objectives 5

2.1 Introduction 5

2.2 Supporting documents 5

2.2.1 Site Waste Management Plan 5

2.2.2 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) 6

2.2.3 Archaeological Management Plan 6

2.2.4 Contract and Landscape and Ecology Management Plans 6

2.2.5 Construction Soil Management Plan 6

2.2.6 Environmental Policies 6

2.2.7 Traffic Management Plan 6

3 Roles and Responsibilities 8

4 Legislation and Obligations 9

4.1 Environmental Legislations and Obligations 9

5 Scheme Description 11

5.1 Introduction 11

5.2 Site Specific Issues 11

5.2.1 Location of site compounds 11

5.2.2 Noise and Vibration 12

5.2.3 Water Pollution and Management 12

5.2.4 Ecology and Tree Protection Measures 13

5.2.5 Air Quality 15

5.2.6 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 16

5.2.7 Visual Impact 16

5.2.8 Contaminated Land 17

5.2.9 Protection of Existing Services (Utilities) 17

5.2.10 Management and protection of ecological resources 17

5.2.11 Community Responsibility 17

Appendices 18

Appendix A – SWMP Template 18


3

1 Pre-Construction Environmental Management Plan

1.1 Introduction

This Pre-Construction Environmental Management Plan (PCEMP) for the South

Bristol Link (SBL) scheme sets out and provides the management framework

required for the planning process and subsequent implementation of construction

activities in accordance with environmental commitments and any requirements of

planning conditions.

This report has been developed with the aim of reducing the risk of adverse impacts

of construction on sensitive environmental resources and to minimise disturbance to

local residents. The PCEMP is a live document and should be developed into a full

CEMP during the course of the construction period. The CEMP should describe to the

Client how the Principal Contractor (PC) intends to identify, monitor, manage and

ensure the construction works are being undertaken in accordance with planning

conditions and all relevant legislation.

It is the responsibility of the Client to ensure that the PC complies with the actions

and measures set out in this document.

1.2 Framework for this document

The PCEMP at this pre planning stage should identify problems and include some

measures that will be implemented to control and monitor environmental impacts

that may otherwise occur. These could include impacts on air quality, implications to

residents in the vicinity of the construction works such as traffic, negative effects on

water resources such as pollution and detrimental effects on ecology. The problems

listed in these early stages are not exhaustive and the PC should ensure that all issues

or problems are captured accordingly in the full CEMP.

The PC will be required to include in the full CEMP a detailed description of the

planned works and the general site arrangements. A sound understanding of

construction methods to be used within the scheme will identify the areas of generic

best practice for construction.

The document should make reference to all the relevant environmental requirements

and documents produced for the SBL scheme such as the Environmental Impact

Assessment (EIA), Environmental Statement (ES) and Site Waste Management Plan

(SWMP).


4

1.3 Scope of the CEMP

The CEMP will likely follow the structure set out below:

Chapter 2 sets the main aims and objectives for the CEMP and the supporting

documents required to develop the PCEMP into a full CEMP.

Chapter 3 lists the main roles and responsibilities of the parties involved - The Client,

the Principal Contractor (PC) and relevant third parties.

Chapter 4 lists the main Environmental Legislation, Policies drivers and best practice

to be implemented on the scheme by the PC.

Chapter 5 provides a brief description of the scheme and identifies and addresses

some of the issues associated with the PCEMP. The list is not exhaustive and the PC

must include specific issues where applicable.


5

2 Aims and objectives

2.1 Introduction

The main aims and objectives of the CEMP for the SBL will be to manage the

construction phase in an environmentally acceptable and sustainable way. The CEMP

should consider all the construction and environmental implications associated with

the SBL scheme during the preconstruction stage, construction phase and completion

of the scheme.

Below is a breakdown of the objectives:

1. Reduce the risk of any adverse impacts of the construction works on the environment

and ecology.

2. Reduce any nuisance created by construction to the nearby receptors such as

neighbouring communities.

3. Maintain communication between the Client, the Project Manager and relevant third

parties, with assignment of any specific and/ or statutory reporting duties to third

parties to the PC.

2.2 Supporting documents

A CEMP requires the PC to develop and identify specific method statements for

activities associated with managing site and construction activities. The contract

specification and detailed design drawings should be referenced when undertaking

specific activities identified within the CEMP.

The ongoing maintenance of the Scheme will become part of the North Somerset

Council and Bristol City Council Term Maintenance arrangements and a detailed

Handover Construction Environmental Management Plan (HCEMP) will be

developed by the PC as part of any handover information following the completion

of the scheme.

The following supporting documents will need to be developed by the PC as part of

the CEMP or as stand-alone documents.

2.2.1 Site Waste Management Plan

A Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP) has been produced with the aim of

reducing/reusing/recycling and managing the disposal of the anticipated waste safely

on the scheme. The SWMP is a legal requirement for the SBL under the Site Waste

Management Plan Regulations 2008 and is required for construction or demolition

projects exceeding £300,000. As the scheme is in its pre-planning stage, only the

initial sections of the document have been completed. The SWMP is a live document

that will require monitoring, review and updating by the PC during the course of the


6

construction phase to be effective. The PC must keep the plan for two years after the

completion of the project at their place of business or at the project site.

A Materials Management Plan (MMP) (as per the CL:AIRE Development Industry

Code of Practice) will detail the re-use of soils within the scheme, and will be

included as an appendix of this SWMP. It is not recommended to prepare the MMP

at this stage but wait until more details are available relating to the volumes and

quality of soils likely to be available for re-use.

A copy of the initial draft SWMP template has been included in Appendix A.

2.2.2 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

The PCEMP and CEMP will be developed to address the key environmental aspects

identified within the Environmental Statement that is to be submitted in support of

the planning application.

2.2.3 Archaeological Management Plan

An Archaeological Management Plan will need to be produced and appropriate

measures are to be in place before excavation works begin on site. This will aim to

safeguard and ensure the appropriate protection and investigation of archaeological

remains in advance of and during construction works in the event that important

archaeological remnants are discovered.

2.2.4 Contract and Landscape and Ecology Management Plans

The CEMP should also contain a maintenance schedule that will be produced to

cover the transfer of specific environmental information to the local authority. The

maintenance schedule should include details about the long term maintenance of the

road network and landscaping and ecology after completion of the construction

works.

2.2.5 Construction Soil Management Plan

A construction soil management plan will be included within the CEMP with a view

to protecting soils, managing and reducing the risk of soil erosion happening as a

result of the construction activities.

2.2.6 Environmental Policies

Environmental policies for North Somerset Council and Bristol City Council should

be included in the CEMP to demonstrate their commitment to the environmental and

sustainable management of the works.

2.2.7 Traffic Management Plan


7

A Traffic Management Plan (TMP) will be produced by the PC in advance of the

construction activities. This should in detail provide information about traffic and

pedestrian management as well as proposed diversion and access routes. The PC in

advance of the construction works should coordinate with the local authority,

emergency services, public and transport organisations to minimise any negative

impacts that may rise as a result of the construction activities.

In addition to this, the PC should develop a Green Travel Plan (GTP) to ensure a

sustainable travel approach to the site is implemented. These measures include how

workers travel to/ from site by the use of car sharing/ public transport and how

deliveries and removal of materials and equipment to site are managed. The benefits

of the GTP include a reduction in travel cost, a reduction in traffic/ car parking issues

near the site and an improvement in the sustainability and marketability of the SBL

scheme for both the PC and Client.


8

3 Roles and Responsibilities

The persons responsible for different elements of the Scheme during construction are

as follows:

• Client/Employer: North Somerset Council

• Site Project Manager: To be appointed

• Supervisor: To be appointed

• CDM Co-ordinator: To be appointed

• Contractor: To be appointed

• Environmental Clerk of Works (ECW)

- including Ecological Clerk of Works role (ECoW): To be appointed

• Specialist Archaeological Advisor (AA): To be appointed

• Contaminated Land Specialist (CLS): To be appointed

The ECW, AA and CLS will liaise with and report on a daily basis whilst on site to

the PC. All parties will ultimately report and be responsible to the Client/ Project

Manager.

A suitably qualified Environmental Clerk of Works (ECW) will be appointed to

supervise implementation of all aspects of the CEMP for the Scheme, monitoring

construction activities and undertaking the post-construction monitoring. The ECW

will also supervise implementation of any method statements in relation to protected

species, will identify the need for and liaise with specialists such as an

Arboriculturist, as required. The ECW will also be a competent ecologist capable of

acting as Ecological Clerk of Works (ECoW) or will appoint and oversee such a

person to implement any ecological mitigation measures. The ECW will be the main

point of contact for any ecological issues, which arise as the Scheme progresses. The

ECoW will ensure that a suitably licensed person is consulted/ used when required to

implement mitigation for great crested newts or bats. The ECW will provide briefing

to site workers in the form of “toolbox talks” where required.

A specialist archaeological advisor (AA) will also be appointed to supervise and

monitor works in certain specified locations and a contaminated land specialist (CLS)

will be appointed to inspect the excavations and advise on contamination issues.


9

4 Legislation and Obligations

4.1 Environmental Legislations and Obligations

The table below provides a list of legislation that the SBL scheme construction will be

required to comply with. The list is not exhaustive, and will be updated as part of the

ongoing CEMP development.

Legislation

Environmental Protection Act 1990

Section 79(1)(d) of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (Ref 6) defines a ‘statutory nuisance’ as “any dust, steam,

smell or other effluvia arising on industrial, trade or business premises and being prejudicial to health or a

nuisance”. Where a Local Authority is satisfied that a statutory nuisance exists, or is likely to occur or recur, it must

serve an abatement notice. Failure to comply with an abatement notice is an offence. However, it is a defence if an

operator employs the best practicable means to prevent or to counteract the effects of the nuisance.

Control of Pollution Act (COPA) 1974

Section 60 is an Abatement Notice that is served by the Local Authority to the person responsible for the noise,

requiring specific controls to be put into place to minimise noise and vibration.

A Section 61 is a formal agreement between the Contractor and the Local Authority. This agreement has to be

applied before work commences and allows the Contractor and Local Authority to set noise levels and hours of

work and protects the Contractor from Local Authority action under Section 60.

Clean Air Act 1993

Environmental Permitting Regulations 2007

Site Waste Management Regulations (England) 2008

List of Waste Regulations 2005

Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC which has repealed Directives 75/442/EC as amended (91/689/EEC) and

2006/12/EC

The Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2011

The Air Quality Standards Regulations 2007

The Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland published in January 2007

Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999 (Schedule

2 Development)

Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990

Hazardous Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2005

Environment Act 1995

Traffic Signs Regulations 2002

Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000

Natural and Rural Communities Act 2006

Water Act 2003

Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended)

The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 (the Habitat Regulations)

Badgers Act 1992 (amended)

The Weeds Act 1959


10

Policies, Strategies and Best Practice

BS 5228: Noise Control on Construction and Open Sites should be adhered to.

Construction Industry Research and Information Association: Booklet C692 Environmental Good practice ‘site guide’

Third Edition 2010

Protection of buildings from physical damage – BS 7385 Evaluation and Measurement for Vibration in Buildings

Institute of Lighting Engineers (ILE) Safety during the installation and removal of lighting columns and similar

street furniture in proximity to High Voltage Overhead Lines, 1995 (Supplement to G39/1)

Environment Agency’s Pollution Prevention Guidance (PPG) Numbered 1 to 24 - All applicable to the SBL Scheme

Planning Policy Statement (PPS) 10: Planning for Sustainable Waste Management, 2005 ISBN: 978011753950 1

National Joint Utilities Group’s Guidelines for the Planning, Installation, and Maintenance Utility Apparatus in

Proximity to Trees – (November 2007)

Technical Guidance WM2 Hazardous Waste Interpretation of the definition and classification of hazardous waste

www.environment-agency.gov.uk (Version 2.3, updated April 2011)

ILE Guidance notes for the reduction of obtrusive light 2005

ILE Bats and Lighting In the UK Bats and the Built Environment Series Version 3 2009. ISBN: 978011753950 1

The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Regulations 2006 (as amended)

The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002, (as amended) Codes of Practice and Guidance

Traffic Signs Manual Chapters 1 to 8

Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions Manual 2002 (and subsequent as amendment 2012)

Health and Safety Executive’s (HSE) Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007 (CDM)

Contaminated Land Applications in Real Environments (CL:AIRE)

Badgers and Development – A Guide to Best Practice and Licensing. Natural England IN75.

Water Voles – The law in practice. Guidance for planners and developers. Natural England, 2008. ISBN 978-1-84754-

054-6

Dormouse Conservation Handbook (Second Edition) Bright et al, 2006. ISBN 857162196 (Natural England

Publication)

GCN Mitigation Guidelines, Natural England, August 2001 ISBN 1 857165683

Bat Mitigation Guidelines, A.J Mitchell-Jones, 2004. ISBN 1 857167813 (Natural England Publication)

Reptiles: guidelines for developers. Natural England, 2004. ISBN 1-85716 8070

Managing Japanese knotweed on development sites - the knotweed code of practice. Environment Agency

NJUG Guidelines of the positioning and colour coding of underground utilities apparatus. Issue 6, January 2012

Table 4.1: List of Applicable Legislation


11

5 Scheme Description

5.1 Introduction

The proposed South Bristol Link (SBL) will provide a 4.5km transport link between

the A370 Long Ashton bypass within North Somerset and Hengrove Park within the

Hartcliffe area of south Bristol. This will incorporate new and upgraded highway

between the A370, the A38 and the Cater Road roundabout, including a continuous

shared cycleway and footway along the route corridor.

The SBL is one of a package of transport schemes that together will create a rapid

transit network across the sub-region, linking key employment, housing and leisure

areas. The objective for the scheme is to facilitate regeneration and growth in south

Bristol (whilst reducing congestion on surrounding roads), to improve accessibility

from residential and employment areas in south Bristol to the city centre and to the

strategic transport network, including Bristol Airport.

The project falls within the administrative boundaries of both North Somerset

Council (NSC) and Bristol City Council (BCC). The Councils consulted widely on the

principles of the scheme and options for the alignment of the route corridor, in 2008

and 2009. This process culminated in the submission of a Programme Entry Major

Scheme Business Case (MSBC) to the Department for Transport (DfT) in March 2010.

Following the Comprehensive Spending Review of Autumn 2010, the authorities

presented a ‘Revised Central Case’, which was submitted in an Expression of Interest

to the DfT in December 2010. The revised scheme was included in the Development

Pool of Local Major Transport Schemes, announced by the Minister on 4th February

2011, and a Best and Final Funding Bid (BAFB) submitted to the DfT on the 9th

September 2011. Funding for the scheme was confirmed by the Chancellor, George

Osborne, on the 29th November 2011 in the Government Autumn Statement, with a

successful Programme Entry announced by the DfT on 8th December 2011.

Regular consultation has been held with key statutory organisations (Environment

Agency, English Heritage and Natural England), local interest groups and residents

which has informed the development of the proposals. A pre-application public

consultation exercise was held in May and June 2012, requesting comments on the

draft route alignment, largely based on the BAFB scheme. The responses prompted a

thorough design review process from July 2012 to March 2013, informed by ongoing

stakeholder engagement, with further options appraised to determine the final

proposed alignment and scheme design which form the basis of the current

application.

5.2 Site Specific Issues

The following sub-sections set out a number of project specific issues to be addressed

by the CEMP.

5.2.1 Location of site compounds

The main site compound is likely to be located near the existing Great Western rail

bridge near the Viridor Waste Management site. This would enable the northern

section of the SBL to be constructed. A second site compound may be set up closer to


12

the urban areas during the road refurbishment / construction works. The following

are issues that will need to be addressed and developed in the CEMP with particular

respect to the site compound(s).

a) Traffic management, including permissible vehicle routes for construction traffic.

b) Noise and air quality.

c) Security.

d) Risk of pollution and spills when refuelling in site compounds.

e) Runoff from wheel and vehicle cleaning that may pollute water courses in the

vicinity.

5.2.2 Noise and Vibration

A third of the SBL lies within residential and built up areas and thus noise levels and

vibration in these areas will need to be monitored and controlled during the road

construction works in order to meet planning requirements. The Contractor will

monitor the noise and vibration levels on a regular basis particularly in the vicinity of

Highridge Road, King Georges Road and Queens Road. Noise levels within the

reserved corridor and Whitchurch Lane will also require monitoring to ensure that

the noise levels set out in the planning requirements are adhered to. In addition to

this, procedures for dealing with complaints received should also be in place.

The following are anticipated activities that may contribute to noise and vibration:

a) Use of disc cutting equipment and pneumatic machinery.

b) Noise and vibration generated from mixing materials such as concrete.

c) Excavation works.

d) Transportation of new and waste materials in trailers or dumper trucks on public

roads.

e) Demolition of existing weighbridge structure.

5.2.3 Water Pollution and Management

The following are a list of water sources that are at risk of pollution due to the SBL

construction works:

1. Colliter’s Brook - sections to be channelised, new retaining wall and a number of

culverts to be constructed.

2. Longmoor Brook - overbridge culvert construction.

3. Viridor ponds - two ponds, one to be relocated.

4. Pond at CH.1350 - to be relocated.

5. Pond at CH.1530 - to be filled.

6. Ordinary watercourses between the A38 junction and Highridge junction.


13

These proposed construction works pose a risk of pollution to the watercourses and

could disturb aquatic wildlife within the local catchment. In addition, the surface

water flows could be impeded during the construction works.

It is important that the Environmental Agency’s Pollution Prevention Guidelines are

complied with in order to manage and reduce the risk of flooding.

The CEMP will have to set out how the water courses will be protected.

5.2.4 Ecology and Tree Protection Measures

Ecology

Several ecological surveys and a tree survey have been conducted on the site to

identify the ecological value and implications of the construction works. A number of

sites within the vicinity of the SBL have been identified as Sites of Nature

Conservation Interest (SNCI) and thus will need to be protected. These are:

1. Colliter’s Brook SNCI

2. Hanging Hill Wood Woodland Site (WS)

3. Highridge Common SNCI

These areas of importance will need to be protected to avoid any detrimental impact

to them as a result of the construction works. In addition to these sites, North

Somerset Council and Bristol City Council have also confirmed the presence of Tree

Preservation Orders (TPO) within their boundaries.

Tree Protection Measures

The following are measures to be undertaken to avoid and reduce the negative

impacts on trees within the SBL project area.

Root Protection Areas

The Root Protection Area (RPA) for each tree is the minimum area which should be

left undisturbed during construction and is approximately equivalent to a radius 12

times the stem diameter of the tree at 1.5m above ground level or the extent of canopy

spread - which ever is the greater. This is designed to prevent any significant long

term damage to the tree by protecting the root plate and to some extent the lower

branches of the tree. The RPA should become an exclusion zone during construction

works and for any development and thus no works shall be undertaken within this

zone. It should be fenced off and protected in accordance with BS5837:2012 or

suitably agreed alternative in lower priority areas. The canopy is likewise susceptible

to damage during construction works and requires similar protection. No activities

that result in excavations, changes in level or soil compaction should take place

within the RPA of any retained trees, especially older mature trees. This would

include:

1. The storage of materials,

2. Any construction work,


14

3. Trafficking by vehicles or even excessive trafficking by pedestrians.

Due to the setting of some of the mature trees, the retention of the existing

topography should be carefully considered during any site planning exercises. If

some form of works has to take place within the RPA, then certain measures need to

be adopted to avoid disturbance or damage to the roots and to maintain moisture

infiltration and gaseous diffusion into the soil.

Planning & Development

Services likewise should be routed outside the existing or potential root zone of trees.

Where it is unavoidable, then certain measures should be employed to avoid damage

to the trees’ larger roots. The location and siting of the scheme near trees should

consider the potential impact on and conflict with both tree roots and canopy. This

should take into account the ultimate size of existing young and middle-aged trees at

maturity. Conversely the impact of the tree on the activities should also be considered

with regard to obstruction, shading, leaf fall and root action. These are problems that

can be managed if sufficient space is provided.

In certain areas of the site informal ‘footfall’ has lead to the heavy compaction of soft

landscaped areas within the crown spread of mature trees. Any site planning

exercises should seek to accommodate these desire line routes elsewhere, and should

look to restore (decompact) the soil into a free draining, permeable medium.

New tree planting opportunities should be included as part of any redevelopment

proposals, these designs should allow sufficient space for the ultimate height and

crown spread of the trees at maturity. Species should be selected which are suitable

for rural or urban areas, respectively. New tree planting should also be afforded

adequate access to viable soil volumes below ground, as trees planted in constrained

urban environments will not establish into healthy specimens in limited soil

conditions. All protective fencing and other measures should be on site and in place

before site preparation or construction work commences.

Existing Canopy Spreads

Where the Root Protection Areas for retained trees do not extend to the edge of

existing canopy spreads it is possible that those parts of the trees extending beyond

the RPA fencing may sustain damage during construction. Where this occurs there

are two primary options available to manage and minimise the potential for damage

to tree canopies to occur during development and these may be used singularly or in

combination. The first option is to create a Construction Exclusion Zone (CEZ), by the

erection of protective fencing, around the full extent of the trees. The second is to

undertake pre-development pruning works to the trees to reduce the potential for

branch damage to occur.

Construction Exclusion Zone

The Construction Exclusion Zone (CEZ) as defined by the protective fence line shall


15

be regarded as sacrosanct, and the protective fencing shall not be moved or taken

down at any time. Within the Construction Exclusion Zone there must be:

1. No mechanical digging or scraping,

2. No alteration to existing ground levels including soil stripping

3. No earthworks

4. No handling or discharge of any chemical substance, concrete washings or of

any fuels.

Furthermore vehicular or pedestrian access and the storage of any materials is

prohibited within the Construction Exclusion Zone.

Additionally no materials that may contaminate the soil such as concrete mixings,

diesel oil and vehicle washings shall be discharged within 10m of the stem of any tree

and no fires shall be lit within 10m of the maximum extent of a tree’s crown.

Site Compounds and Materials Stores

Activities related to the establishment of a temporary site compound have the

potential to impact upon retained trees by various means. In particular the storage

and mixing of chemicals and materials such as concrete can have a damaging effect

on tree health if precautions are not taken. To prevent harm occurring to trees

provision for materials storage, site offices, deliveries and other related activities

should be made available in areas away from retained trees. Due to the nature of the

existing site there are numerous areas where a site compound could be established

without it impacting upon the trees.

Monitoring

Following erection of the protective fencing and prior to commencement of the

development an inspection of the site, by either the Council’s Tree Officer or the

Arboricultural Consultant, should be arranged to confirm fencing has been installed

in accordance with the Tree Protection Plan and any relevant conditions that may be

attached to a grant of planning consent for the development.

Further monitoring visits shall be carried out following implementation of the works

on site, ideally on at least a monthly basis.

5.2.5 Air Quality

The SBL runs predominantly through rural areas with only a third of the link in

urban areas. The majority of the excavation and earthworks takes place within the

rural areas which have few residents in the immediate vicinity, with the exception of

Castle Farm and Yew Tree Farm which lie approximately 20m and 200m respectively

from the site boundary.

The construction works within the urban section of the link will affect the residents of

Highridge, Periwig and Conifer cottages. Residents on King Georges Road will also

be affected by the works. It is envisaged that the road construction works in these

areas will not produce significant dust particles. However, it is likely that the


16

proposed landscaping works within the reserved corridor, Hareclive Road junction

and Whitchurch Lane may generate dust particles and affect the air quality within

these areas. Vehicular/ traffic movements during disposal of surplus materials can

lead to excess dust particles being generated. The Contractor will be expected to

implement measures required as a condition of the planning application process to

take appropriate measures such as having robust method statements for activities

which generate dust particles. The following are typical measures that can be taken to

reduce air pollution:

a) Dust suppression systems to be in place at all times during works that can release

dust.

b) Earthworks and landscaping works are to be vegetated as soon as possible to

prevent dust particles being generated.

c) Topsoil stored on site for reuse should be covered to prevent it being blown

away.

d) The site is to be regularly inspected and site boundaries checked for dust and

local roads are to be checked and cleaned regularly to minimise dust generation.

e) There should be no burning on site.

5.2.6 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage

A ground investigation /archaeological study was conducted in November 2011

(Ground Investigation – Archaeological Watching Brief) to determine if the site had

potential for archaeological remnants within the vicinity of the SBL. The study has

revealed that there is potential for archaeological findings of all periods with the area

of the trial pitting. Furthermore, historical records also indicate the presence of a coal

mining/old quarry site near the railway bridge.

There is a site of cultural heritage adjacent to the A38 Bridgwater Road which is to be

retained and protected during the construction of the roundabout junction. The site

consists of post medieval triple conjoined lime kilns. The kilns are believed to be the

only triple conjoined lime kilns in the country and thus have to be protected during

the construction. The limekilns were recorded by the Ordnance Survey first edition

1:2500 plan (Somerset Sheet VI.09) published in 1885 as an "Old Limekiln".

An Archaeological Management Plan will need to be in place before construction

works begin and appropriate measures are to be in place before excavation works

begin.

5.2.7 Visual Impact

Visual impact has been addressed during the development of the designs, with

particular regard to the impact of the scheme on Ashton Court. The CEMP will need

to set out how requirements set out within the Works Information will be addressed.


17

5.2.8 Contaminated Land

The CEMP will need to describe in detail how works adjacent to or within the landfill

sites are to be managed during construction works and maintained following

completion of the contract.

5.2.9 Protection of Existing Services (Utilities)

Several underground and overhead utilities within the SBL corridor have been

identified and will require diversionary works before or during works on site. The PC

should contact affected companies and liaise with them to safely divert the services

and reduce the risk of power loss, water leaks and disruptions to telecommunication

that will affect residents.

5.2.10 Management and protection of ecological resources

This section should reference specific measures to be taken.

5.2.11 Community Responsibility

This section should reference specific measures to be taken.


18

Appendices

Appendix A – SWMP Template

Site Waste Management Plan

2.41

SWMP Section

1 Enter Basic Details

2 Record Waste Prevention Actions

Forecast Waste Non Compliances: 4 / 11

3 Review >

Record Waste Reduction Actions

Specify Waste Carriers

4 Plan Waste Destinations

Record Waste Management and Recovery Actions

Status:

5 Enter Actual Waste Movements

Non Compliances: 16 / 16

Review >

KPI's

Status:

6 Reporting

Non Compliances: 2 / 2

Sign DeclarationReview >

Standard, Good and Best Practice Levels

Standard, Good and Best Practice Levels

Section 3.0 : Detailed Design

Section 4.0 : Pre-construction

Section 5.0 : Construction

Section 6.0 : Post Completion & Use

Project Stage

Section 2.0

Section 3.0

Guidance

Not compliant

Compliance

Section 1.0

Construction

Post Completion

Status:

Not compliant

Pre- Construction

Section 2.0 : Preparation & Concept Design

Section 4.0

Section 5.0

Section 6.0

Section 1.0 : Policy

Not compliant

0

1

2

3

1.1 Policy / target

setting

1.2 Responsibilities

2.1 Designing

out waste

3.1 Estimate

waste arisings

3.2 Target waste

reductions

4.1 Forecast

residual waste

4.2 Management

of waste 4.3 Training

5.1 Responsibilities

5.2 Site design,

storage and logistics

5.3 Monitoring

5.4 Reporting

6.1 On-site project

review

6.2 Corporate

level review

Policy and setup

Preparation and concept design

Detailed design

Construction

Pre-construction

Post completion and use

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013

Basic Details

Client name :

Principal contractor :

Owner of document :

Project title :

Project Reference :

Project location :

Project postcode :

Construction value :

Type of construction :

Activity :

MetricsPlease select metrics applicable to your project. These metrics are then used in the KPI sheet to track your progress.

Amount Unit

4,500 m

Project targetsPlease select project targets applicable to your project

Phase Target Unit

All

All

All

All

Schedule

Start date : dd/mm/yy

Completion date : dd/mm/yy

Others (not legally required)

01-Jan-15

Client

Yet to be appointed

Both (new build and refurb)

BS13

£25,000,000.00

Highways

South Bristol Link

CTRAEB/730

Carriageway or pipeline length

Waste recovery

Waste arisings

Kofi Nyarko

31-Dec-16

Contact DetailsName

Material reused on site

Bristol CC and North Somerset Council in partnership

Tell me

about this

sheet

Metric

KPI

Waste to landfill

Bristol & North Somerset (between the A370 Long Ashton bypass and Hengrove Park)



Client WM Representative (if

applicable)

Persons legally required to be identified (SWMP Regulations 2008 Section 6 (1))

Karuna Tharmananthar

To be confirmed Principal Contractor

Yet to be appointed

Halcrow a CH2MHill CompanySite Waste Management Plan

Drafter

Project Manager

Design Coordinator

Position

Waste Management

Coordinator/Champion

Document Controller / Secretary

Enter Basic Details Forecast Waste Specify Waste

Carriers Plan Waste Destinations

Enter Actual Waste Sign Declaration

Actions Actions

Actions

?

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013

Signed by:

Organisation:

Position:

Date:

Signed by:

Organisation:

Position:

Date:

Explanation of any deviation from the plan

(Required for projects over £500,000)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Where relevant, drawing on any lessons learnt, an action plan to address these for the next project

(Required for projects over £500,000)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Confirmation that the plan has been monitored on a regular basis to ensure that work is progressing

according to the plan and that the plan was updated in accordance with the SWMP Regulations

(2008). Required for all projects

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013


Yet to be appointed

South Bristol Link

CTRAEB/730

I have :

Yes

Waste Actions Enter actions in the next available row below

Number Type of Waste Action Action Taken Action owner Reference to

project

document /

Waste stream Material type Estimated

Cost Saving

(£)

Date for

completion

(dd/mm/yyyy)

Status

(m3) (tonnes)

1 Waste Prevention Action Optimisation of alignments to be carried

out during detailed design to optimise

cut and fill volumes

Contractor Inert - Soil & stones soil and stones (inert) other than

those mentioned in 17 05 03

Incomplete

2 Waste Prevention Action Route alignment (Ch 1400 to 1700)

follows an existing track to minimise

impact on undisturbed ground.

Alignment to be finalised



Incomplete

3 Waste Prevention Action The alignment has been chosen to limit

impact on landfill sites. Final design to

optimise

Contractor Non Haz (Non Inert) - Soil & stones solid wastes from soil remediation

containing dangerous substances

Incomplete

4 Waste Reduction Action The design has been altered to allow a

retaining wall is to be installed between

Ch.1400 and Ch.1700 to reduce the

volume of fill required for the

embankment in this region.



Incomplete

5 Waste Reduction Action Uncontaminated excavated materials

that are suitable will be reused as fill for

road embankments

Contractor Non Haz (Non Inert) - Soil & stones soil and stones (inert) other than


Incomplete

6 Waste Reduction Action Existing lighting columns on A370, A38

and King Georges Road to be

recycled/reused where possible.

Contractor Metals iron and steel Incomplete

7 Waste Reduction Action Existing pavement on Highridge Green

and King Georges Road to be

recycled/reused where possible.

Contractor Other C&D segregated waste bituminous mixtures other than


Incomplete

8 Waste Reduction Action All excavated topsoil to be re-used on

site.

Contractor Non Haz (Non Inert) - Soil & stones Topsoil (non inert) Incomplete

9 Waste Reduction Action Existing concrete kerbs to be broken

down and reused as aggregate for

concrete haunch works etc where

appropriate.

Contractor Inert - mixture of concrete, bricks,

tiles etc.

concrete Incomplete

10 Waste Prevention Action Alignment at A38 redesigned to allow

for existing lime kilns to be preserved

and avoid demolition. Final design to

optimise

Contractor Inert - mixture of concrete, bricks,

tiles etc.

mixtures of concrete, bricks, tiles

and ceramics other than those

mentioned in 17 01 06

Incomplete

11 Waste Reduction Action Excavated material from drainage ponds

to be used as fill in highway

embankments where suitable.



Incomplete

12 Waste Prevention Action Where possible, drainage detention

basins to be designed to include

enbankments to limit depth of

excavation and volume of spoil

generated.



Incomplete

13 Waste Prevention Action Drainage detention basins and tanks

have been located in areas where the

topography allows the least excavation.

Final design to optimise



Incomplete

Waste reduced

recorded any decisions taken before the Site Wate Management Plan was drafted, on the nature of the project construction method or materials employed in order to minimise the quantity of waste

produced on site

Tell me about:

2 Waste Prevention Actions

3 Waste Reduction Actions

4 Waste Management and Recovery Actions

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013


Yet to be appointed

South Bristol Link

CTRAEB/730

I have :

Yes

Waste Actions Enter actions in the next available row below

Number Type of Waste Action Action Taken Action owner Reference to

project

document /

Waste stream Material type Estimated

Cost Saving

(£)

Date for

completion

(dd/mm/yyyy)

Status

(m3) (tonnes)

Waste reduced

recorded any decisions taken before the Site Wate Management Plan was drafted, on the nature of the project construction method or materials employed in order to minimise the quantity of waste

produced on site

Tell me about:

2 Waste Prevention Actions

3 Waste Reduction Actions

4 Waste Management and Recovery Actions

14 Waste Reduction Action Existing drainage gullies and gratings

within King Georges Road and

Whitchurch Lane to be desilted and

reused where possible.

Contractor Metals iron and steel Incomplete

15 Waste Reduction Action Excavation for SBL Compensation Flood

Storage Area, if suitable to be used in

surrounding road embankments



Incomplete

16 Waste Reduction Action Top soil to be stripped in various areas

that have different characteristics due

to the seedbank contained within. The

topsoil will be stored and translocated

to specific sites in order to provide

suitable growing medium of local

provenance

Contractor Non Haz (Non Inert) - Soil & stones Topsoil (non inert) Incomplete

17 Waste Prevention Action The South Bristol Link alignment has

evolved through the design process to

minimise the loss of trees and retain the

highest quality specimens where

possible. Final design to optimise

Contractor Other C&D segregated waste biodegradable waste Incomplete

18 Waste Reduction Action Chipped brash generated from the

arisings of felled vegetation if suitable

to be used as hibernacula to create new

habitats for amphibians, reptiles and

invertebrates.

Contractor Other C&D segregated waste biodegradable waste Incomplete

19 Waste Reduction Action Large sections of lumber felled as part

of the vegetation clearances could be

stacked (in discreet locations away from

vandals) as deadwood habitats which

would also provide habitat opportunities

for amphibians, reptiles and

invertebrates.

Contractor Wood wood Incomplete

20 Waste Reduction Action Opportunity to recycled/reuse

aggregates/steel from demolition of

structures.



Incomplete

21

22

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013

Bristol CC and North Somerset Council in partnershipYet to be appointed

South Bristol Link

CTRAEB/730

I have :

described each waste type expected to be produced in the course of the project: Yes

Forecast Waste

C, D or E Activity Waste Stream Material TypeFurther description of

waste - optional

Suggested

LOW CodeWaste or Re-Use (m

3) (tonnes) (m

3) (tonnes)

Forecast

provided byExcavation Packaging plastic packaging plastic packaging 15 02 02 Off-site destination ### ### ### ### A.N Other

Excavation

Non Haz (Non Inert) - Soil &

stonesSoil and stones (inert) other than


General excavation including

contaminated landfill materail classfied

as not harzadous 17 05 04 Off-site mixed 0.00 0.00

Excavation Mixed C&D waste (17 09 04)

Mixed construction and demolition

wastes other than those mentioned in

17 09 01, 17 09 02 and 17 09 03 Existing road construction 17 09 04 On-site recovery 0.00 0.00

Excavation

Inert - mixture of concrete,

bricks, tiles etc. concrete

Excavated concrete kerbs to be

recycled and reused as aggregates 17 01 01 On-site re-use 0.00 0.00

Excavation Inert - Soil & stonessoil and stones (inert) other than those


This is the material excavated during

the river channelisation over a 50m

length. The material excavated will be

used to fill the old river channel. 17 05 04 On-site re-use 0.00 0.00

Excavation Metals iron and steel Gullies and gully gratings 17 04 05 On-site re-use 0.00 0.00

Demolition Metals Iron and steel Existing lighting columns 17 04 05 On-site re-use 0.00 0.00

Demolition Metals mixed metals

Weigh bridge to be demolished near

CH.1850 17 04 07 0.00 0.00



Excavation to construct drainage

basins for storm water collection 17 05 04 On-site re-use 0.00 0.00



Excavation for SBL Compensation

Flood Storage Area to go somewhere.

Excavated material if suitable is to be

used as fill in surrounding road

embankments 17 05 04 On-site re-use 0.00 0.00

Excavation Segregated Haz - Soil & stonesSludges from soil remediation

containing dangerous substances

Identify contaminated

groundwater/leachate during

construction, and consideration given

to minimising disposal post

construction. 19 13 03* Off-site segregated 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

Forecast Quantities

Calculated

Quantities

(Converting

between m3 and t)

Tell me about this

sheet




Actions Actions

Actions

?

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013


Yet to be appointed

South Bristol Link

CTRAEB/730

I have :No All waste carriers identifiedNo

No

No

Specify Waste Carriers Specify Waste Management FacilitiesName Contact

Details

Date checked

with

Environment

Agency

(dd/mm/yyyy)

Registration

Number

Expiry Date

(dd/mm/yyyy

)

#### Name Type of facility %

reused if

known

%

recycled

if known

%

energy

recovery

if known

%

total all

forms of

recovery

Overall

diverted

from

landfill /

recovery

Date checked

with

Environment

Agency

(dd/mm/yyyy)

Licence /

Exemptio

n Number

Location of

relevant

documentation,

e.g. WTN

C, D or E Activity (Leave blank if same facility &

recovery rate are used for different

waste streams)

Waste Stream Expected

percentage of

Waste Stream

sent to

Facility

£/m3 £/t

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Tell me about this sheet

Identified that the sites that the waste is being taken to and whether the operators of those sites hold a permit under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales)

Regulations 2007 or are registered under those Regulations as a waste operation exempt from the need for such a permit.

Identified all persons removing the waste.

Identified all waste carriers and registration numbers.

A copy of, or reference to, the written description of the waste required by section 34 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

?




Actions Actions

Actions

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 16:36


South Bristol LinkCTRAEB/730

I have identified :

NoTotal

(m3)

Total

(t)

I have ensured that :0.00 0.00

No 0.00 0.00

materials will be handled efficiently and waste managed appropriately No

Plan Waste DestinationsConstruction

Demolition

Excavation

ConstructionForecast

Waste sent offsite

Estimate

d

Volume

(m3)

Estimated

Weight

(t)

Proposed Destination

%

Diverted

from

landfill

£/m3 £/t

Cost

Forecast

Gypsum 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Metals 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Wood 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Packaging 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Inert - Building rubble 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Inert - Glass 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Mixed Hazardous - C&D waste 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Mixed C&D waste 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Segregated Haz Waste 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Other C&D segregated waste 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

0.00 0.00 £0.00

Forecast

Retained on site

Estimate

d

Volume

(m3)

Estimated

Weight

(t)

Reused on site 0.00 0.00

Recovered on site 0.00 0.00

Recycled on site 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

DemolitionForecast

Waste sent offsite

Estimate

d

Volume

(m3)

Estimated

Weight

(t)


%

Diverted

from

landfill

£/m3 £/t

Cost

Forecast

Gypsum 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Metals 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Wood 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Packaging 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Inert - Building rubble 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Inert - Glass 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Mixed Hazardous - C&D waste 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Mixed C&D waste 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Segregated Haz Waste 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

Other C&D segregated waste 0.00 0.00 0% FALSE

0.00 0.00 £0.00

Forecast

Retained on site

Estimate

d

Volume

(m3)

Estimated

Weight

(t)




0.00 0.00


the waste management action proposed for each different waste type, including re-using, recycling,

recovery and disposal.

all waste from the site is dealt with in accordance with the waste duty of care in section 34 of the

Environmental Protection Act 1990(3) and the Environmental Protection (Duty of Care) Regulations

1991(4); and

Total from Waste Streams

Total Reused on site

Cost of waste disposal

Comments


Comments

?



Enter Actual Waste Movements Sign Declaration

Actions Actions

Actions

Sign declaration (Print sheet and sign declaration or copy electronic signature)

Signed By: Signed By: __________________________________

Organisation: Organisation: ________________________________

Position: Position: _____________ _

Date: _______________________________ Date:




I have identified :

NoTotal

(m3)

Total

(t)

I have ensured that :0.00 0.00

No 0.00 0.00

materials will be handled efficiently and waste managed appropriately No

Plan Waste DestinationsConstruction

Demolition

Excavation


the waste management action proposed for each different waste type, including re-using, recycling,


all waste from the site is dealt with in accordance with the waste duty of care in section 34 of the

Environmental Protection Act 1990(3) and the Environmental Protection (Duty of Care) Regulations

1991(4); and

Total from Waste Streams

Total Reused on site

?



Enter Actual Waste Movements Sign Declaration

Actions Actions

Actions

Sign declaration (Print sheet and sign declaration or copy electronic signature)

Signed By: Signed By: __________________________________

Organisation: Organisation: ________________________________

Position: Position: _____________ _

Date: _______________________________ Date:

ExcavationForecast

Waste sent offsite

Estimate

d

Volume

(m3)

Estimated

Weight

(t)


%

Diverted

from

landfill

£/m3 £/t

Cost

Forecast

Inert - Soil & stones 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

Hazardous - Soil & stones 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

Non Haz (Non Inert) - Dredgings 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

Segregated Haz - Soil & stones 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

Gypsum 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

Metals 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

Wood 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

Packaging 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

Inert - Building rubble 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

Inert - Glass 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

Mixed Hazardous - C&D waste 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

Mixed C&D waste 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

Segregated Haz Waste 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

Other C&D segregated waste 0.00 0.00 0%FALSE

0.00 0.00 £0.00

Forecast

Retained on site

Estimate

d

Volume

(m3)

Estimated

Weight

(t)




0.00 0.00

Comments





Waste Totals

Waste StreamTotal waste arising

(Tonnes)

Total material

retained on site

(Tonnes)

Total waste

sent offsite

(Tonnes)

Total waste to

landfill

(Tonnes)

Total waste

recovered offsite

(Tonnes)

Cost of waste

disposal

Tonnes Inert - Soil & stones £0.00Hazardous - Soil & stones £0.00Non Haz (Non Inert) - Dredgings £0.00Segregated Haz - Soil & stones £0.00Gypsum £0.00Metals £0.00Wood £0.00Packaging £0.00Inert - Building rubble £0.00Inert - Glass £0.00Mixed Hazardous - C&D waste £0.00Mixed C&D waste £0.00Segregated Haz Waste £0.00Other C&D segregated waste £0.00Total £0.00

Actual Waste Movements Waste Totals

Movemen

t

Number

C, D or E

ActivityWaste Stream Material Type

Further description

of waste - optional

LOW Code

used

On or off-site

destinationOff-site carrier

Off- site

destination

Overide

facility

recovery

rate for

individual

skip

Overall

diversion

from

landfill /

recovery

(further

Date of

Movement(s)

(dd/mm/yyyy)(m

3) (tonnes) Actual Cost £/m

3 £/t

1 100%

2 100%

3 100%

4 100%

5 100%

6 100%

7 100%

8 100%

9 100%

10 100%

11 100%

12 100%

13 100%

14 100%

15 100%

16 100%

17 100%

18 100%

19 100%

20 100%

21 100%

22 100%

23 100%

24 100%

25 100%

26 100%

27 100%

28 100%

29 100%

30 100%

31 100%

32 100%

33 100%

34 100%

35 100%

36 100%

37 100%

38 100%

39 100%

40 100%

41 100%

42 100%

43 100%

44 100%

45 100%

46 100%

47 100%

48 100%

49 100%

50 100%

51 100%

52 100%

53 100%

54 100%

55 100%

56 100%

57 100%

58 100%

59 100%

60 100%

61 100%

62 100%

63 100%

64 100%

65 100%

66 100%

67 100%

68 100%

69 100%

70 100%

71 100%

72 100%

73 100%

74 100%

75 100%

76 100%

77 100%

78 100%

79 100%

80 100%

81 100%

82 100%

83 100%

84 100%

85 100%

86 100%

87 100%

88 100%

89 100%

90 100%

91 100%

92 100%

93 100%

94 100%

95 100%

96 100%

97 100%

98 100%

99 100%

100 100%

101 100%

102 100%

103 100%

104 100%

105 100%

106 100%

107 100%

108 100%

109 100%

110 100%

111 100%

112 100%

113 100%

114 100%

115 100%

116 100%

117 100%

118 100%

119 100%

120 100%

Display summary as:

Tell me about this

sheet

?




Actions Actions

Actions

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013


Yet to be appointed

South Bristol Link

CTRAEB/730

1.0 Policy

Step 1.1 ExplanationPractice

LevelHow to achieve Guidance available to help

Practice level targeted

(please select)

Action

(use to record more detail if you

wish)

Standard

Set high level qualitative aspirational

policy goals for company

performance on reducing waste

arisings and increasing waste

recovery.

Good

Insert quantified company wide

targets for reducing waste arisings

and increasing waste recovery into

company policy documents.

Best

Process to insert quantified project

specific waste reduction targets

based on industry Best Practice

benchmarks or previous project

experience for reducing waste

arisings and increasing waste

recovery into company policy

documents.




(please select)

Action (use to record more

detail if you wish)

Standard

Meet requirements for identifying the

client, principal contractor and

person drafting the Site Waste

Management Plan.

Good

Involve all members of the project

team and ensure everyone knows

about SWMP and how it affects

them.

Best

Include SWMP responsibilities as an

agenda item at project team

meetings, ensuring all team

members are involved and contribute

to project waste reduction and

recovery actions.

None

Policy / target

setting

WRAP have produced a number of Model Procurement

clauses which can be incorporated into procurement

documents to help meet these requirements. The model

wording relates to policy documents, invitation to tender

documents, pre-qualification questionnaires or contractual

appointment documents.

Actions 1A, 1B and 1C contain model wording that helps

clients and principal contractors to set corporate, high

level and project specific targets for achieving resource

efficiency in construction projects. The guidance can be

found here:

http://www.wrap.org.uk/construction/achieving_resource_

efficiency/model_procurement_requirements/index.html

At this early stage it is

advisable that high level

targets are set which will

govern and inform

company strategy.

These targets will then be

incorporated into each

construction project as

they progress along the

project lifecycle (and

through the RIBA stages).

NoneResponsibilities

(for the SWMP)

There are a number of

required responsibilities for

early stage coordination of

the Site Waste

Management Plan (SWMP).

Responsibilities for the

operation of the SWMP are

listed below in section 5.1.


Requirements to help incorporate these requirements into

prequalification questionnaires and invitation to tender

documents

The guidance can be found here:




http://www.wrap.org.uk/construction/achieving_resource_efficiency/model_procurement_requirements/index.html


? Enter Basic Details Forecast Waste

Specify Waste Carriers

Plan Waste Destinations


Actions Actions

Actions

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013



http://www.wrap.org.uk/construction/tools_and_guidance/regeneration.html

http://www.wrap.org.uk/designingoutwaste

http://nwtool.wrap.org.uk/


http://www.wrap.org.uk/construction/how_do_i_reduce_waste/logistics.html





http://www.bremap.co.uk/

http://www.wrap.org.uk/construction/tools_and_guidance/index.html

http://www.wrap.org.uk/document.rm?id=6667



http://www.wrap.org.uk/construction/tools_and_guidance/reporting_portal.html




2.0 Preparation and Concept design




(please select)


detail if you wish)

Standard

Capture decisions made that may

have an impact on waste. These

decisions may not have been taken

with waste reduction in mind, but

may have an effect on project waste

arisings nonetheless.

Good

Discuss with the project team at an

early design stage how it might be

best to reduce waste arisings

through making changes to the

design.

Best

Systematically identify, prioritise and

implement waste reduction actions

at the design stage. Consider cost,

programme and waste reduction

potential.

WRAP provide regeneration and demolition guidance that

can be found here:

http://www.wrap.org.uk/construction/construction_waste_

minimisation_and_management/regeneration.html

WRAP provide guidance on Designing Out Waste, which

can be found here:

http://www.wrap.org.uk/constrution/design

It is advisable that early on in the design process waste planning is included in the agenda of client and design team meetings. The design guidance document,

Designing out Waste, identifies the process that can be applied to further achieve this aim:

Designing Out

Waste

There are numerous

opportunities to reduce

waste during the design

process. Designing out

waste before it arises is

one of the most efficient

ways to reduce project

waste arisings.

However, as such decisions

need to be taken early,

engagement with the

design team early on in the

life of a project is key.

None



SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013





















3.0 Detailed Design




(please select)


detail if you wish)

Standard

Standard practice is to estimate

waste arisings at the pre-

construction stage.

Good

Forecast waste arisings for each

component using industry data.

Best

Forecast waste arisings for each

component using modified wastage

rates based on past company

experience.




(please select)


detail if you wish)

Standard

Identify waste management action

for each of the different waste types

forecast to arise on the construction

project, including re-using, recycling,


Good

Target waste arisings for each

construction component using

industry standard actions

Best

Target waste arisings for each

construction component. As an

example these actions could be to

target accurate ordering (accurate

material requirements, realistic

wastage rates), logistics planning

(delivery strategy, adequate storage,

efficient movement of materials to

the workface) or installation

elements (efficient working and

installation and storage of offcuts for

reuse).

WRAPs freely available Net Waste Tool allows you to enter

simple project details and forecast likely waste arisings,

together with suggesting waste reduction and segregation

opportunities and recycled content material substitutions.

The Net Waste Tool can be accessed here:








WRAP also provide guidance on logistics planning that can

be found here:Target waste

reductions

This Step involves

identifying and recording

waste reduction methods

to reduce the quantity of

waste estimated in Step

3.2.

None

Estimate waste

arisings

Estimating waste arisings

involves identifying and

recording the amount and

destination of each waste

stream that will be

generated on site. The

earlier in the project

lifecycle that waste

streams are estimated, the

more opportunity there will

be to prevent their

creation.

None




SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013





















4.0 Pre-construction




(please select)


detail if you wish)

Standard

Forecast waste according to general

estimates, fulfilling requirement to

identify each waste type expected to

be produced in the course of the

project.

Good

Good practice relates to forecasting

waste arisings at the detailed design

stage. Refer to Step 3.1. Good

practice for Step 4.1 relates to

forecasting residual waste arisings in

conjunction with the principal

contractor and agreeing the waste

reduction and recovery standards to

be achieved on the project.

Best

Building on Good Practice, hold talks

with the rest of the supply chain

(waste management contractors,

sub-contractors) to determine waste

reduction and recovery actions for

the project.









prequalification questionnaires invitation to tender

documents, and appointment contracts.




Forecast residual

waste

In addition to designing out

waste at (Step 2.1), and

estimating outline waste

arisings (Step 3.1), it is

required to forecast

residual waste arisings

before going to site.

This final residual waste

forecast is the last and

most detailed waste

forecast that is done

before site mobilisation.

Once this final waste

forecast is completed,

waste management and

recovery options can be

implemented to ensure the

waste is recycled, reused

or recovered.

None



SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013
























(please select)


detail if you wish)

Standard

Identify waste management action

for each waste stream

Good

Identify recycling and recovery

options for each waste stream for

which recycling and recovery is

viable

Best

Maximise opportunities for resource

efficiency through following the

waste hierarchy (prevention,

minimisation, reuse, recycling,

recovery, disposal)




(please select)


detail if you wish)

Standard

The principal contractor should

provide training to every

construction worker needed for the

particular work to be carried out

within the terms of the site waste

management plan. This can be in the

form of toolbox talks.

Good

Building on standard practice,

provide bespoke training to all

subcontractors and identify waste

reduction actions where they can

contribute.

Best

Building on good practice and share

experience from previous projects or

sites. Use the training exercise to

inform continual improvement.

Management of

Waste

This step relates to the

efficient management of

waste once it has been

created on site.

Step 4.2 which deals with

the management of waste

on site should be

implemented in line with

any targets identified in

sections 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0

above. As noted above in

Step 2.1, off-cuts should

be stored safely on site for

reuse.

It is a requirement that all

site workers are trained on

the Site Waste

Management Plan,

providing information on

how it affects them.

Training prospects should

be seen as opportunities to

engage with the supply

chain and gain buy-in from

them – as it will be the

supply chain who will be

able to significantly

contribute to any project

resource efficiency targets.

WRAP provide a wealth of background information on

waste reduction and recovery, including guidance

documents, case studies and best practice guides.

General WRAP construction guidance can be found here:

http://www.wrap.org.uk/construction/tools_and_guidance

/index.html

WRAP also provide a short guidance note for small and

medium sized contractors on reducing construction waste.

It can be downloaded here:

http://www.wrap.org.uk/downloads/Reducing_your_const

ruction_waste_-

_a_pocket_guide_for_SME_contractors.e5bf6111.6667.pd

f

None

None







WRAP also provide guidance on developing and

implementing a material logistics plan.

The logistics plan guidance can be found here:

http://www.wrap.org.uk/construction/construction_waste_

minimisation_and_management/logistics.html

The Building Research Establishment’s BREMAP online tool

allows you to enter the postcode of your site and pin

point waste management facilities and materials/products

suppliers within a region or radius of your chosen

distance. It can be found here

http://www.bremap.co.uk/bremap/about.jsp

Training






SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013





















5.0 Construction




(please select)


detail if you wish)

Standard

Meet requirements for identifying the

client, principal contractor and

person drafting the Site Waste

Management Plan.

GoodWaste champion is appointed for the

whole site.

Best

Building on Good Practice,

individuals and sub contractors

should be made responsible for

specific waste streams, with the

waste champion holding these

project members to account.




(please select)


detail if you wish)

Standard

Meet requirement that all waste from

the site is dealt with in accordance

with the Environmental Protection

Act and Environmental Protection

(Duty of Care) Regulations.

Good

Before work starts on site consider

layout and skip locations. Use

segregated containers at the

workface.

Best

Ensure separate containers are

provided for Hazardous Waste,

material storage areas are clearly

located and signed or arrange for

just in time delivery and prevent

double handling.

Space permitting, key

waste streams should be

segregated. The

segregation scheme should

include appropriate

training, monitoring and

enforcement with clear

signage and using the

National Colour Coding

Scheme.




documents




Responsibilities

(on site) None

None




documents




Site design,

storage and

logistics

Once the Once the SWMP

has been developed it must

be implemented on site.

This Step outlines how to

assign responsibility for

ensuring the SWMP is

delivered. http://www.wrap.org.uk/construction/achieving_resource_efficiency/model_procurement_requirements/index.html


SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013
























(please select)


detail if you wish)

Standard

Monitor and update the Site Waste

Management Plan not less than

every six months

Good

Principal contractor to review the

construction schedule and set

appropriate project review and

monitoring dates with the client.

Best

Building on Good Practice, review

site progress against the Site Waste

Management Plan and implement

changes to revise site activities

based on performance where

necessary.




(please select)


detail if you wish)

Standard

Ensure the Site Waste Management

Plan is kept at the site, and that the

Plan is available for two years after

completion of the construction

project.

Good

Report waste generation, recovery

and disposal arising by construction

phase (construction, demolition and

excavation).

Best

Report lessons learnt through the

project, including the good and best

practice levels achieved.

None

Reporting

Reporting is an integral

part of the Site Waste

Management Plan process.

Good and best practice

relate to recording and

reporting waste arisings in

increasing levels of detail.

WRAP provide a method

note that defines the

standard by which the

construction industry has

agreed to record and

report waste arisings. The

link to this guidance is

listed in the ‘guidance’

WRAPs Reporting Portal has been developed to allow the

construction industry to report on its progress in

implementing Site Waste Management Plans and record

actual site achievements. It can be found here:

Monitoring

Monitoring progress

against the actions in the

site waste management

plan more often that every

six months can inform

ongoing site achievement

of the planned waste

reduction and recovery

actions. It can be part on

the live review process and

inform continual

improvement.

Once data is collected, it

will form a baseline against

which clients can evaluate

and improve on resource

efficiency performance.

Step 5.3 should therefore

be linked with Step 6.2.

WRAP provide guidance on measurement and reporting on

construction projects. It can be found here:

None



SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013





















6.0 Post-completion




(please select)


detail if you wish)

Standard

Meet requirements to compare Site

Waste Management Plan forecast

versus actual performance, and

record any deviations from the Plan.

Good

Building on Standard Practice, review

the Site Waste Management Plan to

identify any improvements that could

have been made (e.g. to improve

waste reduction or recovery, or the

accuracy of the forecast).

Best

Building on Good Practice, hold a

post completion project team

meeting to debrief and learn lessons

from the Site Waste Management

Plan process that can be used to

inform future practice.




(please select)


detail if you wish)

Standard

Meet requirements to compare Site

Waste Management Plan forecast

versus actual performance, and

record any deviations from the Plan.

Good

Record project performance in the

following areas: cost savings

achieved, total waste arisings, total

waste to landfill, total waste

reductions achieved and recycled

content used.

Best

Use data collected in Step 6.1

standard practice to benchmark

performance across your portfolio of

projects, using the data to inform

continual improvement.

Using the data gathered and lessons

learnt, set company policy on

expected metrics (cost savings,

waste arisings, waste reductions,

total waste to landfill) for similar

project types going forward.

Integrate lessons learnt into

corporate construction procedures.

The corporate level review

uses the SWMPs produced

on individual sites to

compare construction

projects against company

baseline performance. If a

baseline does not exist,

then the first project will

become the baseline

against which performance

in future projects will be

measured against.

WRAPs Reporting Portal has been developed to allow the

construction industry to report on its progress in



None

The on-site project review

is an opportunity for the

site project team to review

their progress post

completion.

Good and best practice

items relate to the process

of continuous review and

learning.

WRAPs National Reporting Portal has been developed to

allow the construction industry to report on its progress in



None

On-site project

review

Corporate level

review



SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013























"The Client and Principal Contractor Shall :

▪

▪ the SWMP shall identify: Compliance

▪ the Client; Client identifed Yes Review

▪ the principal Contractor; and Principal contractor identified Yes Review

▪ the person who drafted it. Draftee identified Yes Review

▪ the SWMP must describe the construction work proposed, including: Compliance

▪ the location of the site; and Location of site defined Yes Review

▪ the estimated cost of the project. Cost of project estimated Yes Review

▪ Decisions taken before SWMP completed have

been recordedYes

Review

▪ the SWMP must: Compliance

▪ describe each waste type expected to be produced in the course of the project; All waste types identified Yes Review

▪ estimate the quantity of each different waste type expected to be produced; and and quanties estimated No Review

▪ identify the waste management action proposed for each different waste type, including re-

using, recycling, recovery and disposal. Waste management actions identifiedNo

Review

▪Compliance

▪ all waste from the site is dealt with in accordance with the waste duty of care in section 34

of the Environmental Protection Act 1990(3) and the Environmental Protection (Duty of

Care) Regulations 1991(4); and

All waste from site is dealt with in

accordance with relevant guidelinesNo

Review

▪ materials will be handled efficiently and waste managed appropriately Materials handling identified No Review

▪ update the SWMP when any waste is removed from site and state: Compliance

▪ the identity of the person removing the waste; Construction All waste carriers identified No Review

▪ the waste carrier registration number of the carrier; Waste carrier registration numbers indentified No Review

▪ a copy of, or reference to, the written description of the waste required by section 34 of

the Environmental Protection Act 1990; and Written description of the waste as required

by section 34 of the Environmental Protection

Act 1990 identified

No

Review

▪ the site that the waste is being taken to and whether the operator of that site holds a

permit under the Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2007 or is

registered under those Regulations as a waste operation exempt from the need for such a

permit.

All sites and relevant permits acquired and

confirmation of site registrations acquiredNo

Review

Comments Please Enter Compliance

▪

▪▪▪

▪ re-used (and whether this was on or off site);

▪ recycled (and whether this was on or off site);

▪ sent for another form of recovery (and whether this was on or off site);

▪ sent to landfill; or

▪ otherwise disposed of; and

▪ update the Plan to reflect the progress of the project.

▪ add the following to the SWMP within 3 months of the Works being completed: Comments Please Enter Compliance

▪ confirmation that the Plan has been monitored on a regular basis to ensure that work

progressed according to the plan and that the plan was updated in accordance with the

Regulations;

Post-

Construction

▪ a comparison of the estimated quantities of each waste type against the actual quantities

of each waste type;

▪ an explanation of any deviation from the Plan; and

▪ an estimate of the cost savings that have been achieved by completing and implementing

the Plan.

▪ ensure that the SWMP is kept: Comments Please Enter Compliance

▪ at the site office, or Construction No

▪ if there is no site office, at the site;


▪ No


▪ Post-

ConstructionNo


▪ ConstructionNo


▪

▪ suitable site induction; and

▪ any further information and training needed for the particular work to be carried out within

the terms of the SWMP;


▪

No


▪ No


▪ No


▪ No

No

No

No

Develop and implement a Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP) in compliance with the

Site Waste Management Plans Regulations 2008 No.314 and containing not less than

the following information:

the SWMP must record any decision taken before the Plan was drafted on the nature of the

project, its design, construction method or materials employed in order to minimise the

quantity of waste produced on site.

Pre-

Construction


ensure that every contractor knows where it is kept, and make it available to any

contractor carrying out work described in the Plan;

review, revise and refine the SWMP as necessary, to ensure that any changes in roles

and responsibilities are clearly communicated to those affected."

make and maintain arrangements that will enable the principal Contractor and the

workers engaged in the construction work to co-operate effectively in promoting and

developing measures to ensure that any waste arising on site is managed within the

terms of the SWMP and in checking the effectiveness of such measures;

ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that waste produced during construction is

re-used, recycled or recovered;

take all reasonable steps to ensure that sufficient site security measures are in place to

prevent the illegal disposal of waste from the site; and

the SWMP must contain a declaration that the Client and the principal Contractor will take all

reasonable steps to ensure that:

as often as necessary to ensure that the Plan accurately reflects the progress of the

project, and in any event not less than every six months:

review the Plan;

record the types and quantities of waste produced;

record the types and quantities of waste that have been:

ensure co-ordination of the work and co-operation among contractors at work during

the construction phase;

keep the SWMP for two years after the completion of the project at the principal

Contractor's principal place of business or at the site of the project;

ensure so far as is reasonably practicable that every worker carrying out the

construction work is provided with:

?




Actions Actions

Actions

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013

Additional Duties


Additional duties on the principal contractor Construction

▪ The principal contractor must, so far as is reasonably practicable, ensure co-ordination

of the work and co-operation among contractors at work during the construction phase.

▪ The principal contractor must ensure so far as is reasonably practicable that every worker

carrying out the construction work is provided with-

(a) suitable site induction; and

(b) any further information and training needed for the particular work to be carried out

within the terms of the site waste management plan.

▪ The principal contractor must make and maintain arrangements that will enable the principal

contractor and the workers engaged in the construction work to co-operate effectively in

promoting and developing measures to ensure that any waste arising on site is managed within the

terms of the site waste management plan and in checking the effectiveness of such measures.

▪ The principal contractor must ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that waste produced

during construction is re-used, recycled or recovered.

▪ Failure to comply with this paragraph is an offence. Comments Please Enter Compliance

Additional duties on the client

▪ The client must give reasonable directions to any contractor so far as is necessary to

enable the principal contractor to comply with these Regulations.

Failure to comply with this paragraph is an offence. Comments Please Enter Compliance

Additional duties on both the client and the principal contractor

▪ Both the client and the principal contractor must review, revise and refine the site waste

management plan as necessary, to ensure that any changes in respective roles and responsibilities

are clearly communicated to those affected.

▪ Both the client and the principal contractor must take reasonable steps to ensure that

sufficient site security measures are in place to prevent the illegal disposal of waste from the site.

▪ Failure to comply with this paragraph is an offence.

The Regulations are enforced by the Environment Agency and the local authority.

Breach of the Regulations is an offence punishable-

(a) on summary conviction, by a fine not exceeding £50,000, or

(b) on conviction on indictment, by a fine.

No

No

No

These Regulations require any person intending to carry out a construction project with an

estimated cost greater than £300,000 to prepare a site waste management plan.

An impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business and the

voluntary sector is available on the Defra website.

The plan must be updated in accordance with the Regulations, with different requirements

depending on whether the cost of the project is greater than £500,000.

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013

My targets

KPI Target

Waste to landfill (All)

Waste arisings (All)

Waste recovery (All)Material reused on site (All)

KPI Report

Select Metric :

Select Phase :

Forecast Actualm

3Tonnes m

3 Tonnes

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

#N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A #N/A

% Waste diverted from landfill #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

% Material reused on site #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

#N/A #N/A

All

#N/A #N/A

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Forecast Actual

To

nn

es

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Forecast Actual

m3

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Forecast Actual

To

nn

es

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Forecast Actual

m3

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013

Bristol CC and North Somerset Council in partnership : Client nameYet to be appointed : Principal Contractor

South Bristol Link : Project titleCTRAEB/730 : Project reference

View data in: tonnes Forecast Actual

m3

Tonnes m3

Tonnes

Reporting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Combined stages C,D and E 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Construction #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Demolition #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Excavation

F A F A F A F A F A F A F A F A F A F A F A F Atonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes £ £ tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes

Total

Non Haz (Inert)HazNon Haz (Non Inert)Inert - Soil & stonesNon Haz (Non Inert) - Soil & stones Non Haz (Non Inert) - DredgingsSegregated Haz - Soil & stonesGypsum MetalsWoodPackagingInert - Building rubble

Inert - GlassMixed Hazardous - C&D wasteMixed C&D wasteSegregated Haz Waste Other C&D segregated waste

08 01 11*08 01 1208 01 13*08 01 1408 01 1808 03 1813 01 12*13 01 13*13 05 01*13 05 03*13 05 06*13 07 01*14 06 01*14 06 02*14 06 03*14 06 04*14 06 05*

15 01 0115 01 0215 01 0315 01 0415 01 0515 01 0615 01 0715 01 0915 01 10*15 01 11*15 02 02*15 02 0316 01 0316 01 07*16 02 09*16 06 01*16 06 02*16 06 03*16 06 0416 07 08*16 10 01*17 01 0117 01 0217 01 0317 01 06*

17 01 0717 02 0117 02 0217 02 0317 02 04*17 03 01*17 03 0217 03 03*17 04 0117 04 0217 04 0317 04 0417 04 0517 04 0617 04 07

17 04 09*17 04 10*17 04 1117 05 03*17 05 0417 05 05*17 05 0617 05 07*17 05 0817 06 01*17 06 03*17 06 0417 06 05*17 08 01*17 08 0217 09 01*17 09 02*17 09 03*17 09 0419 13 01*20 01 0120 01 0820 01 1120 01 21*20 01 23*20 01 2520 01 35*20 01 3620 01 9920 02 0120 03 0120 03 0320 03 0420 03 0620 03 0708 01 1913 01 11*13 02 08*16 05 07*10 11 0320 01 02

20 01 39

Waste sent

offsite

Waste and

material arisings

Materials kept

onsite

Total Waste

Total Waste to landfill

% Waste diverted from landfill

% Materials reused on site

Forecast/Actual

Assigned Waste Stream

List of Waste (LOW)

Code

Unit

Combined stages C, D and E

Class

Cost of waste

disposal

(offsite)

Tell me about this

sheet

Sent to landfill Diverted from

landfill

off-site on-site off-site

Recovery of materials and wastes

Re-used Recycled on-site

Energy recovery off-siteon-site

?




Actions Actions

Actions

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013

Forecast/Actual F A F A F A F A F A F A F A F A F A F A F A F Atonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes £ £ tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes tonnes

Total

Non Haz (Inert)HazNon Haz (Non Inert)Inert - Soil & stonesNon Haz (Non Inert) - Soil & stones Non Haz (Non Inert) - DredgingsSegregated Haz - Soil & stonesGypsum FALSE Metals FALSE Wood FALSE Packaging FALSE Inert - Building rubble FALSE Inert - Glass FALSE Mixed Hazardous - C&D waste FALSE Mixed C&D waste FALSE Segregated Haz Waste FALSE Other C&D segregated waste FALSE 08 01 11*08 01 12

08 01 13*08 01 1408 01 1808 03 1813 01 12*13 01 13*13 05 01*13 05 03*13 05 06*13 07 01*14 06 01*14 06 02*14 06 03*14 06 04*14 06 05*15 01 0115 01 0215 01 0315 01 0415 01 0515 01 0615 01 0715 01 0915 01 10*15 01 11*15 02 02*15 02 0316 01 0316 01 07*16 02 09*16 06 01*16 06 02*16 06 03*16 06 0416 07 08*16 10 01*17 01 0117 01 0217 01 0317 01 06*

17 01 0717 02 0117 02 0217 02 0317 02 04*17 03 01*17 03 0217 03 03*17 04 0117 04 0217 04 0317 04 0417 04 0517 04 0617 04 0717 04 09*17 04 10*17 04 1117 05 03*17 05 0417 05 05*17 05 0617 05 07*17 05 0817 06 01*17 06 03*17 06 0417 06 05*17 08 01*17 08 0217 09 01*17 09 02*17 09 03*17 09 0419 13 01*20 01 0120 01 0820 01 1120 01 21*20 01 23*20 01 25

20 01 35*20 01 3620 01 9920 02 0120 03 0120 03 0320 03 0420 03 0620 03 0708 01 1913 01 11*13 02 08*16 05 07*10 11 0320 01 0220 01 39

Waste sent

offsite

Materials kept

onsite

Class

Unit

Cost of waste

disposal

(offsite)

Sent to landfillConstruction


Diverted from

landfill

Waste and

material arisings

on-siteoff-siteon-siteoff-site off-site


Energy recovery Recycled Re-used

List of Waste (LOW)

Code

on-site

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013


Total

Non Haz (Inert)HazNon Haz (Non Inert)Inert - Soil & stonesNo Haz (Non Inert) - Soil & stones Non Haz (Non Inert) - DredgingsSegregated Haz - Soil & stonesGypsum FALSE Metals FALSE Wood FALSE Packaging FALSE Inert - Building rubble FALSE Inert - Glass FALSE Mixed Hazardous - C&D waste FALSE Mixed C&D waste FALSE Segregated Haz Waste FALSE Other C&D segregated waste FALSE 08 01 11*

08 01 1208 01 13*08 01 1408 01 1808 03 1813 01 12*13 01 13*13 05 01*13 05 03*13 05 06*13 07 01*14 06 01*14 06 02*14 06 03*14 06 04*14 06 05*15 01 0115 01 0215 01 0315 01 0415 01 0515 01 0615 01 0715 01 0915 01 10*15 01 11*15 02 02*15 02 0316 01 0316 01 07*16 02 09*16 06 01*16 06 02*16 06 03*16 06 0416 07 08*16 10 01*17 01 0117 01 0217 01 0317 01 06*

17 01 0717 02 0117 02 0217 02 0317 02 04*17 03 01*17 03 0217 03 03*17 04 0117 04 0217 04 0317 04 0417 04 0517 04 0617 04 0717 04 09*17 04 10*17 04 1117 05 03*17 05 0417 05 05*17 05 0617 05 07*17 05 0817 06 01*17 06 03*17 06 0417 06 05*17 08 01*17 08 0217 09 01*17 09 02*17 09 03*17 09 0419 13 01*20 01 0120 01 0820 01 1120 01 21*

20 01 23*20 01 2520 01 35*20 01 3620 01 9920 02 0120 03 0120 03 0320 03 0420 03 0620 03 0708 01 1913 01 11*13 02 08*16 05 07*10 11 0320 01 0220 01 39

Unit

Class


Waste sent

offsite

Diverted from

landfill

Cost of waste

disposal

(offsite)

Materials kept

onsite

Sent to landfillDemolition Waste and

material arisings

on-siteoff-siteRe-used

off-site on-site

List of Waste (LOW)

Code

Recycled on-site


Energy recovery off-site

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013


Total

Non Haz (Inert)HazNon Haz (Non Inert)Inert - Soil & stones FALSE Non Haz (Non Inert) - Soil & stones FALSE Non Haz (Non Inert) - Dredgings FALSE Segregated Haz - Soil & stones FALSE Gypsum FALSE Metals FALSE Wood FALSE Packaging FALSE Inert - Building rubble FALSE Inert - Glass FALSE Mixed Hazardous - C&D waste FALSE Mixed C&D waste FALSE Segregated Haz Waste FALSE Other C&D segregated waste FALSE 08 01 11*

08 01 1208 01 13*08 01 1408 01 1808 03 1813 01 12*13 01 13*13 05 01*13 05 03*13 05 06*13 07 01*14 06 01*14 06 02*14 06 03*14 06 04*14 06 05*15 01 0115 01 0215 01 0315 01 0415 01 0515 01 0615 01 0715 01 0915 01 10*15 01 11*15 02 02*15 02 0316 01 0316 01 07*16 02 09*16 06 01*16 06 02*16 06 03*16 06 0416 07 08*16 10 01*17 01 0117 01 0217 01 0317 01 06*

17 01 0717 02 0117 02 0217 02 0317 02 04*17 03 01*17 03 0217 03 03*17 04 0117 04 0217 04 0317 04 0417 04 0517 04 0617 04 0717 04 09*17 04 10*17 04 1117 05 03*17 05 0417 05 05*17 05 0617 05 07*17 05 0817 06 01*17 06 03*17 06 0417 06 05*17 08 01*17 08 0217 09 01*17 09 02*17 09 03*17 09 0419 13 01*20 01 0120 01 0820 01 1120 01 21*

20 01 23*20 01 2520 01 35*20 01 3620 01 9920 02 0120 03 0120 03 0320 03 0420 03 0620 03 0708 01 1913 01 11*13 02 08*16 05 07*10 11 0320 01 0220 01 39

List of Waste (LOW)

Code

Class

Excavation


Unit

Waste sent

offsite

Materials kept

onsite

Cost of waste

disposal

(offsite)

Diverted from

landfill

Sent to landfill

Energy recovery Re-used


off-site on-siteoff-site on-siteRecycled

Waste and

material arisings

off-siteon-site

SBL_SWMP_130607.xls 07/06/2013

For details of your nearest Halcrow office, visit our website halcrow.com

Documents

Pre-Construction Environmental Management Plan€¦ · 03/01/2014 · A construction soil management plan will be included within the CEMP with a view to protecting soils, managing