18
Prairie Hollow Consulting 1 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

1

1

Project Finance Guidebook

April 2009

Page 2: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

2

2

Project Finance Handbook - Objective

• Looks to enable clear and consistent communication of financial procedures for all parties

• Helps in making proper capital/expense decisions, decreasing potential audit risk to individual projects and the company as a whole

• Enables accurate and consistent reporting across the entire portfolio of projects by providing structure and organization to the tracking process

• The document contains the components that are needed to provide this support - by removing one step or process, the overall effectiveness of the financial governance program is reduced

• At a high level, these components are:– Project Organizational Structure– Workplans– Cost/Benefit Analysis– Cost Reporting

• These will be discussed in further detail in the remainder of the document

The objective of this Project Finance Handbook is to ensure that projects have the proper financial governance in place to provide effective cost and risk management

Page 3: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

3

3

Project Finance Handbook – Planning: Workplan

• A detailed workplan needs to be part of the overall planning process– Must include task duration, resources, and dependencies needed to complete a specific project– Allows for clear determination of capital tasks and resources– Each team would have tasks identified by their project number and project phase– For additional information on workplan development, please refer to your PMP manuals

The first step to successful budgeting is to identify the effort needed to complete the selected tasks

Page 4: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

4

4

Project Finance Handbook – Planning: Cost Template

• Provides the template to estimate resources, equipment, and overall costs

• Allows for capital and expense allocations to be input

• Enables user to see monthly cost estimates and forecast accurately from a phase and timing perspective

• Totals resources by functional area (IT, Business, PMO)

• Data can feed directly into the Project Financial Control Tool

Budget SummaryProject Name

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun TOTALResource Type Resource Name Description Rate 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006

Hours Per MonthPMO (External) Joe Project Lead 200$ 160 160 160 160 160 160 960Business (Internal) Kate Project Lead 200$ 160 160 160 160 160 160 960HR (Internal) Bob Team Member 200$ 10 10 10 10 10 10 60Marketing (Internal) Jane Analyst 200$ 22 20 100 100 100 100 442TSG (External) Scott Programmer 100$ 160 160 160 160 160 160 960TSG (Internal) Sam Programmer 100$ 160 160 160 160 160 160 960TOTAL HOURS 672 670 750 750 750 750 4342

Capital Input %PMO (External) Joe Project Lead 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Business (Internal) Kate Project Lead 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

HR (Internal) Bob Team Member 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Marketing (Internal) Jane Analyst 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

TSG (External) Scott Programmer 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

TSG (Internal) Sam Programmer 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Capital HoursPMO (External) Joe Project Lead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Business (Internal) Kate Project Lead 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HR (Internal) Bob Team Member 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Marketing (Internal) Jane Analyst 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TSG (External) Scott Programmer 160 160 160 160 160 160 960

TSG (Internal) Sam Programmer 160 160 160 160 160 160 960

TOTAL CAPITAL HOURS 320 320 320 320 320 320 1920

Expense HoursPMO (External) Joe Project Lead 160 160 160 160 160 160 960

Business (Internal) Kate Project Lead 160 160 160 160 160 160 960

HR (Internal) Bob Team Member 10 10 10 10 10 10 60

Marketing (Internal) Jane Analyst 22 20 100 100 100 100 442

TSG (External) Scott Programmer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TSG (Internal) Sam Programmer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

TOTAL EXPENSE HOURS 352 350 430 430 430 430 2422

Capital DollarsPMO (External) Joe Project Lead -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Business (Internal) Kate Project Lead -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

HR (Internal) Bob Team Member -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Marketing (Internal) Jane Analyst -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

TSG (External) Scott Programmer 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 96,000$

TSG (Internal) Sam Programmer 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 96,000$

TOTAL CAPITAL DOLLARS 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 192,000$

Expense DollarsPMO (External) Joe Project Lead 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 192,000$

Business (Internal) Kate Project Lead 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 192,000$

HR (Internal) Bob Team Member 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 12,000$

Marketing (Internal) Jane Analyst 4,400$ 4,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 88,400$

TSG (External) Scott Programmer -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

TSG (Internal) Sam Programmer -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

TOTAL EXPENSE DOLLARS 70,400$ 70,000$ 86,000$ 86,000$ 86,000$ 86,000$ 484,400$

Travel ChargesTravel 15% of total 8,160$ 8,100$ 10,500$ 10,500$ 10,500$ 10,500$ 58,260$

Travel 15% of total 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 7,200$ 43,200$

TRAVEL TOTALS 15,360$ 15,300$ 17,700$ 17,700$ 17,700$ 17,700$ 101,460$

HW/SW Charges2 Sun 500 Series Servers 500,000$ 500,000$ 1,000,000$

Business Objects Software Licenses 50,000$ 50,000$

HW/SW TOTALS 550,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,050,000$

ONGOING/ADDITIONAL COSTS (materials, maintenance)Training Materials -$

ONGOING COST TOTALS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Resource Dollars By TypeBusiness 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 192,000$

TSG 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 96,000$

HR 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 12,000$

Finance -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

CPS -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Marketing 4,400$ 4,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 88,400$

PMO -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Other -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Internal Totals 54,400$ 54,000$ 70,000$ 70,000$ 70,000$ 70,000$ 388,400$

TSG 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 16,000$ 96,000$

HR -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Finance -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Marketing -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

PMO 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 32,000$ 192,000$

Other -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

External Totals 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 288,000$

In order to accurately collect the overall costs of the project, the workplan should have a direct link to the Accounting Cost Template, or something similar, as shown

Page 5: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

5

5

People• What type of internal resources does the project need?

– All internal resources performing work on the project (including IT, Business Resources, HR/Training, Legal, Finance, Marketing) need to be included

• Does the project need external resources? – Consultants, Contractors, Temps – ensure we receive a Statement of Work from the vendor– Note if you would need external help to backfill for business line positions and include this cost

• Include Travel and Incidental Costs such as mobile phones and fees• Use 130% of salary as a fully loaded rate, which includes incentives and benefits• $50/hour is an average rate that can be used in lieu of actual salaries• If there will be a need for severance as a direct result of your project, these costs must be included in

the overall project costs• Ongoing FTE costs such as compensation or external FTE costs that will continue after project

completion

Process• Training costs

– Include materials (documents, flip charts, projectors), room rentals, meals, travel

• Policy and procedure documentation (binders, job aids, forms)• Marketing brochures and materials• Off-site meetings (rooms, virtual meetings)

It is helpful to capture costs using a framework to ensure we account for all necessary items. As a general rule, project costs should be viewed from an “all-up” view – that is, what the cost to the entire organization would be.

Project Finance Handbook – Planning: Types of Costs

Page 6: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

6

6

Technology

• New Hardware purchases such as Servers, Infrastructure-related items– Note that it is not an incremental project cost if you are leasing equipment such as PC’s or monitors to replace

existing equipment

• Software purchases

• Licenses

• Ongoing maintenance

Infrastructure

• Space: existing or is there a build-out required? Your Facilities Team will provide these estimates– These costs could include: build-out, restacks, moving costs, equipment purchases, lease terminations, asset

write-offs

• Are there any remote team members that require any additional infrastructure to participate in activities

It is helpful to capture costs using a framework to ensure we account for all necessary items. As a general rule, project costs should be viewed from an “all-up” view – that is, what the cost to the organization as a whole would be.

Project Finance Handbook – Planning: Types of Costs

Page 7: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

7

7

Project Finance Handbook – Planning: Capital Costs

• What This Really Means– Capitalizing technology costs allows the entity to more accurately reflect expenses in the appropriate time

period by spreading out the initial cost of the hardware/software over the useful life of the asset the project creates

– This ultimately improves earnings in the current period– However, the flipside is that we ultimately depreciate the costs after the project is complete, so while the current

income statement looks great, we will see these costs after the project goes in-service

• How Do We Know What To Capitalize?– The estimated useful life is more than one year, and the costs > $2,000,– Increased functionality (e.g., relates to upgrades or enhancements) or new functionality,– Software is developed or modified solely to meet the entity’s internal needs,– No substantive plan exists or is being developed to market the software externally, – The costs are incurred during the Application Development Stage, which only include:

• External direct costs of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining internal-use computer software;

• Payroll and payroll related costs (e.g., benefits) for employees who are directly associated with and devote time to the software project, including time spent installing, programming, configuring, coding, and testing the software;

• Costs to obtain or develop software to convert old data to the new system;– Authorization from appropriate level of management is obtained– Probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended.

“Capitalizing future benefits as assets and amortizing the usefulness over time matches economic benefits realized with the periods in which an entity realizes those benefits” (FDIC, Capitalization of Internal-Use Software Development Costs, 3/02)

Page 8: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

8

8

Project Finance Handbook – Planning: Non-Capital Costs

• What Not To Capitalize– Preliminary Project Stage – The decision making stage in which the conceptual formulation and evaluation

of alternatives, determination of existence of needed technology, and final selection of alternatives are performed. This includes both internal and external resources used in the process.

– Post Implementation/Operational Stage – Normal operating costs of software, including training and application maintenance costs.

– Costs that are not usually capitalized for the development of computer software are:• General and administrative costs as well as overhead costs • Project Management Costs; unless during Execute stage• Manual Data Conversion/Recoding• Training • Application maintenance• Licenses, other than the initial license

Page 9: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

9

9

• Cost Reduction– Action that results in a direct and easily identifiable cost reduction to the Bank– Examples would be: FTE reductions, Contractor/Temp Help reductions, Occupancy, System

Replacement/Obsolescence, Printing/Supplies usage reduction

• Efficiency Improvements/Other Improvements– Action that results in a “soft save” that is not a direct cost reduction– Examples include: increased capacity to handle call/loan volumes, overtime avoidance, increased customer

satisfaction

• Cost Avoidance– Action that results in a “soft save” that is not being incurred currently, but has the potential to be incurred if

the project does not take place– Examples include: FTE that “would not have to be hired”, regulatory fines, decreased capacity to handle

call/loan volumes, increased fees

• Data Needs– Average Comp and Benefits per FTE– Number of FTE affected – Efficiency % gained – Occupancy – Costs by vendor – Fees/Fines/Supplies

Expense reduction benefits are the easiest to capture and track as data is readily available and can be directly tied back to a cost center expense statement. Note that any benefit besides the Cost Reduction benefits do not count in calculating the NPV, IRR, and Payback on the CBA as they are not hard dollar savings.

Project Finance Handbook – Planning: Types of Benefits

Page 10: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

10

10

• Revenue Enhancements– Increased volumes as a result of a market share growth or new market project– Increased fees as a result of new business opportunity– Gain on sale of loans as a result of more efficient process– Hedge savings as a result of a more efficient process

• Data Needs and Source– Volumes – Revenue Per Loan – Profit Per Loan – Gain on Sales – Fees

Revenue benefits are the hardest and most complicated to track as the variables of rate and market, coupled with the sheer volume of loans, affect the revenue component much more than our expenses

Project Finance Handbook – Planning: Types of Benefits

Page 11: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

11

11

Project Finance Handbook – Planning: Project Financial Control Tool / Cost-Benefit Analysis

• It’s now time to analyze the financial merits of the project by using the Project Financial Control Tool (PFCT)

• The output of the tool will be a robust Cost-Benefit Analysis that will provide the Bank-standard metrics to properly gauge the financial risk of the project

• This section will not attempt to provide detailed training on the PFCT, it will simply highlight some key areas of focus that have not been discussed earlier in this document

– Assumptions• Showing the detail behind the numbers used in the analysis of the project

– “Big 3” Metrics• Net Present Value• Internal Rate of Return • Payback Period

• Last, we will describe the types of questions one should be prepared for when reviewing the financial analysis with Executive Management

So, what do we do now with all of this wonderful data we’ve gathered?

Page 12: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

12

12

Project Finance Handbook – Planning: Project Financial Control Tool / Cost-Benefit Analysis

• Assumptions– The roadmap of the Cost-Benefit Analysis, but often not documented clearly– Clearly documenting the cost and benefit assumptions allows all users of the PFCT, at any time, to

understand the rationale behind the numbers that make up the analysis– A simple example is shown below, but the essential elements to document are the data source, description

and the steps of the calculation– Supporting schedules should be inserted in worksheets within the PFCT file and linked to the appropriate

cell within the PFCT.

– Please also document “soft” or non-tangible costs as well as non-financial assumptions such as timing and dependencies to help fully understand all risk associated with the project

• An example of soft benefits would be “a 3rd Party vendor can fulfill these loans more efficiently than Bank A, leading to increased customer satisfaction”

• An example of a timing/dependency would be “dependent on the successful integration of the sales platform before pilot stage”

Description Data Sourcea) Total FTE Impacted 50 Business Ownerb) Annual Fully Loaded Comp/Benefits $65,000 Finance

(130% of salary)

c) Annualized Cost Reduction $3,250,000 Calculation

Page 13: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

13

13

Project Finance Handbook – Planning: Project Financial Control Tool / Cost-Benefit Analysis

• The Big Three: Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Payback– These three metrics, always taken collectively, allow a quick and consistent barometer of a project’s

potential financial worth to the organization– These metrics are also the only visibility that senior management has into a program/project– The metrics have to be taken collectively as each metric alone has limitations that are mitigated by

reviewing them as a group

– Net Present Value (Target = positive $)• Defined as the sum of the present value of cash inflows subtracted by the present value of cash

outflows, while adjusting for inflation and cost of capital• Used to measure the profitability of a project, it essentially tells us the value of a dollar today versus

the value of that same dollar in the future, after taking inflation and return (discount rate) into account • If the NPV is greater than zero than the project should be accepted, and less than zero, the project

should be rejected – Internal Rate of Return (Target = 20%)

• Defined simply as the true interest yield expected from a project, similar to how you would view the performance of one of your personal investments

• Also will hear a term called “Hurdle Rate” in conjunction with IRR– Hurdle Rate is the minimum return on investment that the entitiy will accept on a project, hence, we want ours to be

above this level (current hurdle rate is 13.6%)

– Payback Period (Target = 1.5 years)• Defined as the amount of time it takes to recover the initial cash outlay of a project

Page 14: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

14

14

Project Finance Handbook – Planning: Executive Review Meetings

In order to help facilitate the review of your CBA and ultimately keep the approval process moving, below are some high-level things to think about when preparing your project financials

• Read the project documentation to fully understand the scope of the project to assess whether appropriate costs and benefits are included in the Financial Control Tool.

– People, Process, Technology, and Infrastructure costs have been identified

• Is supporting documentation present for costs or benefits

• Ensure your inputs are sourced and documented

• Have benefits been signed off by the Business Owner and Sponsor

• Do identified benefits reflect a partial year in first year, based on go live date

• Are the costs and benefits included in the plan or forecast

Page 15: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

15

15

Project Finance Handbook - Control: Cost Reporting

So now the project is humming along, on track and on target to solve all of the world’s problems. Then someone asks how much money has been spent. Ut-oh. Good news is there is an answer!

– Line items are the key subgroups of the project budget and can be modified depending on the project– The report compares current month, year-to-date and project-to-date actuals with their respective budgets– Trend graphs provide a quick visual snapshot of a project’s financial status– Monthly g/l and line item details are provided as backup to the summary presented here– Resource time data is included separately to isolate any resource variances

The sample report shown on the next page is an example of a report that was used in a variety of $100M capital projects.

Page 16: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

16

16

July 2007 July 2007 B / (W) July 2007 B / (W) YTD YTD B / (W) PTD PTD B / (W)

Capital Actual Fcst Fcst Plan Plan Actual Plan Plan Actual Plan

End User Impact Licenses $224,196 $0 ($224,196) $0 ($224,196) $3,300,453 $7,005,000 $3,704,547 $3,839,971 $7,210,000 $3,370,029Professional Services - Palisades $0 $827,628 $827,628 $953,349 $953,349 $3,281,588 $7,453,444 $4,171,857 $7,829,488 $12,541,042 $4,711,555All Environments (HW and SW) $285,425 $166,667 ($118,759) $100,000 ($185,425) $9,827,419 $9,411,640 ($415,779) $11,812,608 $15,628,114 $3,815,506UAT - Business $358,801 $859,146 $500,345 $100,000 ($258,801) $4,767,320 $3,433,998 ($1,333,322) $6,765,395 $8,982,180 $2,216,785TSG Resources - Internal $137,766 $260,157 $122,391 $567,010 $429,244 $983,672 $4,930,539 $3,946,867 $2,326,484 $6,695,206 $4,368,722TSG Resources - External $946,506 $846,676 ($99,830) $212,351 ($734,156) $4,643,288 $2,979,883 ($1,663,405) $6,042,315 $6,847,441 $805,126Vendor Integration $0 $0 $0 $42,657 $42,657 $0 $338,600 $338,600 $0 $548,600 $548,600LOS Program Costs (Resources) $0 $0 $0 $190,336 $190,336 $0 $1,332,350 $1,332,350 $0 $1,332,350 $1,332,350

Total Program Capital $1,952,694 $2,960,274 $1,007,580 $2,165,702 $213,008 $26,803,739 $36,885,454 $10,081,714 $38,616,260 $59,784,934 $21,168,673

Non-Capital

Professional Services - Palisades $670,021 $292,543 ($377,478) $193,960 ($476,060) $2,644,413 $1,491,791 ($1,152,622) $4,017,455 $1,979,834 ($2,037,622)Vendor Integration $0 $0 $0 $4,714 $4,714 $591,076 $63,000 ($528,076) $591,076 $70,000 ($521,076)TSG Resources - Internal $360,047 $641,185 $281,138 $243,991 ($116,056) $2,547,203 $2,958,691 $411,488 $4,624,594 $5,157,928 $533,334TSG Resources - External $821,630 $418,756 ($402,874) $238,810 ($582,819) $7,505,577 $3,427,640 ($4,077,936) $13,218,618 $8,218,061 ($5,000,557)UAT ($232,778) $0 $232,778 $0 $232,778 $894,681 $0 ($894,681) $894,681 $0 ($894,681)TSG IBM Resources and Training $0 $111,680 $111,680 $111,680 $111,680 $0 $781,760 $781,760 $0 $1,144,044 $1,144,044LOS and POS Program Costs $876,620 $751,006 ($125,614) $774,857 ($101,763) $5,699,079 $6,098,268 $399,189 $12,233,839 $12,596,658 $362,819Travel $48,014 $137,960 $89,946 $116,357 $68,343 $409,039 $931,574 $522,535 $1,684,146 $2,305,645 $621,499Training $63,318 $81,289 $17,971 $39,286 ($24,032) $299,892 $1,829,685 $1,529,793 $403,259 $2,465,980 $2,062,721Retail POS Wireless Broadband $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Retail POS Optis Decommissioning $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,192,000 $1,192,000 $0 $0 $0

Total Program Non-Capital $2,606,871 $2,434,417 ($172,453) $1,723,655 ($883,216) $20,590,960 $18,774,409 ($1,816,551) $37,667,668 $33,938,149 ($3,729,519)

Grand Total Project Costs $4,559,565 $5,394,692 $835,127 $3,889,357 ($670,208) $47,394,700 $51,770,506 $8,265,163 $76,283,928 $93,723,082 $17,439,154

Severance-STeP Retail, Whls, CD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $575,155 $575,155 $0 $575,155 $575,155

Grand Total Project Costs w/ Severance $4,559,565 $5,394,692 $835,127 $3,889,357 ($670,208) $47,394,700 $52,345,661 $8,840,319 $76,283,928 $94,298,238 $18,014,310

Project Finance Handbook - Control: Cost Reporting Example

Page 17: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

17

17

May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 Aug 2007 Sept 2007 Oct 2007Capital Actual Actual Actual Fcst Fcst Fcst

End User Impact Licenses $1,003,658 $0 $224,196 $257,146 $1,065,721 $0Professional Services - Palisades $0 $934,564 $0 $1,291,159 $752,628 $610,000All Environments (HW and SW) $17,804 $80,608 $285,425 $0 $1,601,825 $0UAT - Business $173,212 $759,606 $358,801 $1,063,755 $171,212 $171,212TSG Resources - Internal $123,984 $140,484 $137,766 $218,547 $172,684 $177,808TSG Resources - External $145,911 $1,753,359 $946,506 $3,038,746 $770,621 $858,965Vendor Integration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0LOS Program Costs (Resources) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Total Program Capital $1,464,569 $3,668,621 $1,952,694 $5,869,353 $4,534,691 $1,817,985

Non-CapitalProfessional Services - Palisades $1,176,502 ($481,369) $670,021 $267,543 $242,543 $203,333Vendor Integration $90,200 ($69,990) $0 $250,000 $0 $0TSG Resources - Internal $304,594 $323,313 $360,047 $598,305 $536,445 $528,445TSG Resources - External $740,341 $586,389 $821,630 ($1,835,392) $298,609 $332,372UAT $298,699 $380,756 ($232,778) ($892,543) $0 $0TSG IBM Resources and Training $0 $0 $0 $111,680 $111,680 $0LOS and POS Program Costs $718,572 $755,164 $876,620 $755,786 $774,032 $814,218Travel $96,168 $52,911 $48,014 $139,932 $139,932 $139,932Training $39,440 $45,326 $63,318 $81,289 $783,089 $91,667

Total Program Non-Capital $3,464,515 $1,592,501 $1,576,803 ($523,400) $2,886,329 $2,109,967

Grand Total Project Costs $4,929,085 $5,261,122 $6,107,426 $5,345,953 $7,421,020 $3,927,953

Project Finance Handbook - Control: Cost Reporting Example

Page 18: Prairie Hollow Consulting 1111 Project Finance Guidebook April 2009

Prairie Hollow Consulting

18

18

Note: Plan is used from 1/06 thru 5/07, Forecast 6/07 thru 12/08

= Budget/Forecast

= Actuals

Actual Fcst B/(W) Plan B/(W) Actual Fcst B/(W) Plan B/(W)Current Month $1,952,694 $2,960,274 $1,007,580 $2,165,702 $213,008 Current Month $2,606,871 $2,434,417 ($172,453) $1,723,655 ($883,216)YTD $26,803,739 $28,183,809 $1,380,070 $36,885,454 $10,081,714 YTD $20,590,960 $21,154,407 $563,447 $18,774,409 ($1,816,551)PTD $38,616,260 $40,307,506 $1,691,246 $59,784,934 $21,168,673 PTD $37,667,668 $38,961,601 $1,293,933 $33,938,149 ($3,729,519)

Actual Fcst B/(W) Plan B/(W) Actual Fcst B/(W) Plan B/(W)Current Month $360,047 $641,185 $281,138 $243,991 ($116,056) Current Month $137,766 $260,157 $122,391 $567,010 $429,244YTD $2,547,203 $2,754,029 $206,826 $2,958,691 $411,488 YTD $983,672 $1,095,157 $111,485 $4,930,539 $3,946,867PTD $4,624,594 $4,871,919 $247,326 $5,157,928 $533,334 PTD $2,326,484 $2,437,970 $111,485 $6,695,206 $4,368,722

Actual Fcst B/(W) Plan B/(W) Actual Fcst B/(W) Plan B/(W)Current Month $821,630 $418,756 ($402,874) $238,810 ($582,819) Current Month $946,506 $846,676 ($99,830) $212,351 ($734,156)YTD $7,505,577 $7,217,452 ($288,124) $3,427,640 ($4,077,936) YTD $4,643,288 $4,543,458 ($99,830) $2,979,883 ($1,663,405)PTD $13,218,618 $12,683,843 ($534,774) $8,218,061 ($5,000,557) PTD $6,042,315 $5,942,486 ($99,830) $6,847,441 $805,126

External TSG Resources - Non-Capital

$-

$400,000

$800,000

$1,200,000

$1,600,000

$2,000,000

$2,400,000

$2,800,000

Jan

'06

Fe

b '0

6

Ma

r '06

Ap

r '06

Ma

y '06

Jun

'06

Jul '0

6

Au

g '0

6

Se

p '0

6

Oct '0

6

No

v '06

De

c '06

Jan

'07

Fe

b '0

7

Ma

r '07

Ap

r '07

Ma

y '07

Jun

'07

Jul '0

7

Au

g '0

7

Se

p '0

7

Oct '0

7

No

v '07

De

c '07

Jan

'08

Fe

b '0

8

Ma

r '08

Ap

r '08

Ma

y '08

Jun

'08

Jul '0

8

Au

g '0

8

Se

p '0

8

Oct '0

8

No

v '08

De

c '08

Internal TSG Resources - Non-Capital

$-

$100,000

$200,000

$300,000

$400,000

$500,000

$600,000

$700,000

Jan

'06

Fe

b '0

6

Ma

r '06

Ap

r '06

Ma

y '06

Jun

'06

Jul '0

6

Au

g '0

6

Se

p '0

6

Oct '0

6

No

v '06

De

c '06

Jan

'07

Fe

b '0

7

Ma

r '07

Ap

r '07

Ma

y '07

Jun

'07

Jul '0

7

Au

g '0

7

Se

p '0

7

Oct '0

7

No

v '07

De

c '07

Jan

'08

Fe

b '0

8

Ma

r '08

Ap

r '08

Ma

y '08

Jun

'08

Jul '0

8

Au

g '0

8

Se

p '0

8

Oct '0

8

No

v '08

De

c '08

Internal TSG Resources - Capital

$-

$200,000

$400,000

$600,000

$800,000

Jan

'06

Fe

b '0

6

Ma

r '06

Ap

r '06

Ma

y '06

Jun

'06

Jul '0

6

Au

g '0

6

Se

p '0

6

Oct '0

6

No

v '06

De

c '06

Jan

'07

Fe

b '0

7

Ma

r '07

Ap

r '07

Ma

y '07

Jun

'07

Jul '0

7

Au

g '0

7

Se

p '0

7

Oct '0

7

No

v '07

De

c '07

Jan

'08

Fe

b '0

8

Ma

r '08

Ap

r '08

Ma

y '08

Jun

'08

Jul '0

8

Au

g '0

8

Se

p '0

8

Oct '0

8

No

v '08

De

c '08

External TSG Resources - Capital

$-

$200,000

$400,000

$600,000

$800,000

$1,000,000

$1,200,000

$1,400,000

$1,600,000

$1,800,000

$2,000,000

Jan

'06

Fe

b '0

6

Ma

r '06

Ap

r '06

Ma

y '06

Jun

'06

Jul '0

6

Au

g '0

6

Se

p '0

6

Oct '0

6

No

v '06

De

c '06

Jan

'07

Fe

b '0

7

Ma

r '07

Ap

r '07

Ma

y '07

Jun

'07

Jul '0

7

Au

g '0

7

Se

p '0

7

Oct '0

7

No

v '07

De

c '07

Jan

'08

Fe

b '0

8

Ma

r '08

Ap

r '08

Ma

y '08

Jun

'08

Jul '0

8

Au

g '0

8

Se

p '0

8

Oct '0

8

No

v '08

De

c '08

Total Capital Actuals vs Forecast - 2007 and 2008

$-

$2,000,000

$4,000,000

$6,000,000

$8,000,000

$10,000,000

$12,000,000

Jan

'07

Ma

r '07

Ma

y '07

Jul '0

7

Se

p '0

7

No

v '07

Jan

'08

Ma

r '08

Ma

y '08

Jul '0

8

Se

p '0

8

No

v '08

Total Non-Capital Actuals vs Forecast - 2007 and 2008

$-

$1,000,000

$2,000,000

$3,000,000

$4,000,000

$5,000,000

Jan

'07

Ma

r '07

Ma

y '07

Jul '0

7

Se

p '0

7

No

v '07

Jan

'08

Ma

r '08

Ma

y '08

Jul '0

8

Se

p '0

8

No

v '08

Project Finance Handbook - Control: Cost Reporting Example