Upload
ghada11
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
1/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 1
Social Distance in Russian Public Relations Students
Perceptions of Ethical Issues
A perfect storm of unethical practices in public relations recently produced another
round of high profile media coverage of the profession in the U.S. (Phair, 2005). These incidents,
ranging from VNR controversies, to PR agency payments to city officials, to failing to disclose
payments for advocacy, underscore the importance of ethics to public relations scholars,
practitioners and educators, as well as the general public.
In recent years, scholars and practitioners have paid increasing attention to ethical
frameworks in decision making and to codifying ethics in practice. Yet, few studies have
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
2/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 2
examined perceptions of ethics on the part of public relations students, especially outside of the
U.S. This study explores this important topic through the perceptions of Russian public relations
students and within the theoretical perspective of social distance (Perloff, 1993).
Compared to the United States, public relations in Russia is a relatively new occupation,
not yet 20 years old. Though influenced by Western approaches, Russian public relations
practice has distinct features based on the countrys historical, cultural, and political background.
In this regard, the present study might be considered an investigation of how two schools of
public relationsWestern and Russianare intertwined and are being absorbed by Russian
public relations students. The authors argue that the perception of ethics by future professionals
is crucial in understanding how they will position themselves in the public relations profession.
Overall, this study found that Russian public relations students acknowledged the
importance of ethics in their school curricula, which supports the idea that studying ethics in
college may lead to better ethics in professional practice (Gale & Bunton, 2005). The participants
also agreed that public relations leadership and ethics are inseparable. However, compared to
perceptions of themselves, the participants' views of the ethicality of "other Russian PR students"
and "American PR students" were less favorable, thought strikingly similar to each other. This
finding suggests that the third person effect is a robust phenomenon that challenges the notion of
social and cultural connectedness which presumably exists between the participants and other
Russian PR students.
Scholarship on Ethics and Public Relations
Public relations scholars have suggested a variety of ethical frameworks and models to
bring ethical criteria to strategic decision-making processes in organizations. Edgett (2002)
proposed 10 criteria for ethical advocacy. David (2004) outlined a framework by which to
evaluate professional values in public relations. Bowen suggested models for ethical issues
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
3/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 3
management (2004) and for ethical decision-making (2005a). These and other theorists (e.g.,
Grunig, Grunig, & Dozier, 2002) contend that ethical practices help organizations do the right
things in society, build trust with stakeholders, and strengthen the profession.
Ethical frameworks are often divided into two broad categories: teleological and
deontological. A teleological framework is one in which ethical actions are those that result in
the greatest good (Curtin & Boynton, 2001, p. 411). Utilitarianism or consequentialist theory
are forms of teleology. Utilitarianism takes a societal view, suggesting that ethical decisions are
those that have the greatest impact on society at large (Bowen, 2005a). Philosophy and ethics
scholar Sissela Bok (1989) wrote, For utilitarians, an act is more or less justifiable according to
the goodness or badness of its consequences (p. 48).
Consequentialism is a broader perspective that asks us to predict the possible outcomes
of our decisions and perform a cost-benefit calculation among potential outcomes. The ethical
outcome is that which generally has the most positive consequences and the least negative
consequences (Bowen, 2005a, p. 296).
Deontological frameworks are rules-based. Deontologists subscribe to the idea that there
are universal moral principles that must be followed. Professional codes of ethics such as those
by the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) or the International Association of Business
Communicators (IABC) are examples of deontological frameworks.
However, practitioners are not always seen to play important roles in ethical decision
making. Fitzpatrick (1996) found that public relations remains a relatively untapped resource in
ethics programs (p. 249). The highest percentage of ethics officers in U.S. companies she
surveyed cited law as their primary field of responsibility (27.9% of respondents), and only 6.7%
cited public relations as their primary field. Of those companies that had established ethics
committees, only 11.5% of those committees included public relations representatives. In
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
4/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 4
addition, public relations counsel was cited as least important when ethics officers were asked to
rate the importance of various sources in helping them reach ethical decisions (p. 253).
The Profession
Professional public relations associations have long emphasized the need for ethical
practice through codes, accreditation measures, training programs and other means, and such
efforts appear to have accelerated. The most recent PRSA Code of Ethics, for example, is
introduced with this statement: Ethical practice is the most important obligation of a PRSA
member (PRSA Member Code of Ethics, p. 5). The PRSA code is founded on professional
values of advocacy, honesty, expertise, independence, loyalty and fairness, and the document
concludes by asking professionals to work constantly to strengthen the publics trust in the
profession (p. 13).
Many researchers and practitioners have pointed to well-known shortcomings of existing
codes of ethics, including the general nature of their provisions, lack of enforcement measures
and cultural differences. Nevertheless, at least one recent development suggests such codes are
expanding globally. The Global Alliance for Public Relations and Communication Management,
founded in 2000, consists of more than 60 member organizations that represent more than
150,000 practitioners internationally (Molleda, 2004). One of the alliances first initiatives was
development of a protocol to standardize the various codes of ethics in the profession
(Worldwide standard, 2003).
Another issue is differences among practitioners regarding professional ethics. In a study
funded by IABC, Bowen (2005b) found significant differences between men and women
regarding ethics training, ethical issues and preferred styles of moral discussion. Kim and Choi
(2003) concluded from their survey of practitioners that ethical standards appeared to change
with age and ideology. Wright (1985) found that the level of ethical standards increased with age
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
5/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 5
among PR practitioners and business professionals.
Individual professionals also may see themselves as more ethical than other PR
practitionersa type of third-person effect. Sallot, Cameron, and Lariscy (1998) found that
practitioners hold their peers in comparatively low esteem, seeing them as unprofessional and
unenlightened compared to the way they view themselves. Practitioners see themselves
individually as having higher status, being more accountable, and having more professional skills
in strategic planning and research than their peers (p. 14). Berger and Reber (2005) found that
15 of 65 practitioners they interviewed admitted to having leaked information to external publics,
planted rumors in the grapevine, or used similar tactics that may blur ethical boundaries.
However, nearly twice as many (29) of those interviewed said they thought other practitioners
used such techniques.
Education
Increasing attention has been devoted to the importance of teaching professional ethics in
education, and to what ought to be taught (Gale & Bunton, 2005). Harrison (1990) surveyed
public relations and advertising professors and found nearly all of the educators believed that
studying ethics was important for their students.
The report of the 1999 Commission on Public Relations Education outlined areas of
knowledge that graduates of PR programs should understand, and ethical issues was one of them
(Commission on Public Relations Education, 1999). The Commission also recommended that
students be competent in many skill areas: research, management of information and
communication, written and oral communication, problem solving, strategic planning, issues
management, audience segmentation, technology and visual literacy, managing people and
resources and ethical decision-making (p. 20).
VanSlyke Turk (1989) surveyed practitioners regarding public relations curricula and
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
6/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 6
found that they believed the top five skills for success as a manager in public relations were
planning and organizing, problem solving and decision making, goal setting and prioritizing,
time management, and ethical and legal issues. Toth (1999) reported that educators and
practitioners agreed that ethics and codes of practice were one of a number of important areas of
study in public relations.
One recent study examined the impact of ethics instruction (Gale & Bunton, 2005). The
researchers surveyed 242 alumni with majors in public relations or advertising and found that
graduates who had completed a media ethics course were more likely than those who had not to
value ethics more highly, better identify ethical issues, and deem ethical issues to be important in
their professional work.
Despite increasing research into ethics in public relations, we still know relatively little
about ethics pedagogies or practices in the classroom in the U.S. or any country. We know even
less about students knowledge or perceptions of professional ethics. This study contributes to
the literature by exploring perceptions of Russian public relations students regarding their own
understanding of ethics versus those of other Russian and American students.
Public Relations Education in Russia
Since the mid 1990sin Russia, the occupation of public relations manager turned from
being very popular and profitable (Tsetsura, 1999) to prestigious and fashionable (Sovetnik,
2005a). Today, the competition among Russian high school graduates to be accepted into a
university public relations program is intense, often with five applicants or more for each
opening. A public relations career is as desirable now as the traditionally attractive occupations
of economist and lawyer. As one Russian practitioner noted, Weve done too much PR for PR
(Fedorova & Ogar, 2002).
However, this growth in public relations education has been accompanied by some
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
7/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 7
difficulties. Fedorova and Ogar (2002) found in their survey of 537 public relations students and
professionals that, as a rule, a Russian university had only one or two qualified public relations
teachers, and only 3% of the faculty had any experience in the public relations field. In addition,
nearly half of the surveyed students said that they were not satisfied with the quality of teaching
in their departments, and about two-thirds noted a lack of good textbooks. The researchers also
found that 70% of public relations students surveyed held full- or part time jobs, and working
students appeared to be motivated more by the desire to acquire professional experience than to
earn money. Interestingly, 44% of survey participants considered public relations a social
science discipline, and 96% wanted to continue raising their level of education after graduation.
A more recent study (Sovetnik, 2005b) found that the majority of Russian public relations
practitioners they surveyed consider the opportunity for self-realization in a creative manner to
be the most attractive trait of their occupation. This finding indicates that despite the fact that
teachers actively use foreign sources in the educational process (Fedorova & Ogar, 2002), public
relations in Russia is viewed as an activity with an artistic spirit rather than simply a job with a
strong technological component, which may be more the perception in the U.S. and Western
Europe. Russian practitioners said their practice is based on intuition, whereas the Western
practice is based more on methodology (Sovetnik, 2004).
However, at least quarter of Russian practitioners said they did not possess sufficient
skills in the use of PR technologies (Sovetnik, 2005b). In another study (Sovetnik, 2004), about
one-third of the student participants wanted to learn more about public relations practice in the
United States, which they consider the founder of public relations and the leader of PR
practice. In the same survey, 28% of participants indicated they were willing to go to the United
States for an internship. As for students of public relations departments of Russian universities,
many of them spend summers participating in the Work and Travel USA program, where they
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
8/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 8
become familiar with American culture.
Perceptions of Public Relations Ethics in Russia
Public relations practice consists of a range of acts and actions that presumably lead to
establishing mutually beneficial relations between a company and public. Yet, as Bakhtin (1993)
noted, [T]he irreproachable technical correctness of a performed act does not yet decide the
matter of its moral value (p. 4). Another Russian scholar (Bodalev, 1995) pointed out that moral
development is determined not only by knowledge of ethical norms but also spiritual beliefs, the
personal values, attitudes, and any corresponding behaviors. Discussing public relations ethics,
Russian scholars think that modern public relations is practical philosophy of morality of
modern Russian business (Sinepol & Shkolnikov, 2002). In other words, the public relations
sphere reflects the complexity of nascent capitalistic relations in the country.
Importantly, the market-driven economy with its derivative a developed PR system
might conflict the Russian mass consciousness because, according to Tulchnsky (2001), PR
does not fit well the Russian Orthodox experience. To focus on enhancing an organizations
image, for example, might be seen by Russians as an effort to hide a real face, or to put on a
mask. Moreover, because of cynical manipulation and political propaganda performed at the
initial stage of development of public relations in the 1990s, PR in Russia has become associated
with black PR, which refers to dirty tricks towards opponents and various forms of deception.
Perhaps as a result of this negative connotation for public relations, there is a tendency in Russia
today to rename academic departments frompublic relations departments to departments of
communication management.
Third-Person Effect and Social Distance
Acknowledging the importance of ethics in public relations practice, the present study
investigates Russian public relations students perceptions of ethical issues through the third-
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
9/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 9
person effect (TPE). This phenomenonpeople generally perceive others to be more susceptible
to media influence than they arewas first defined and investigated by Davison (1983). Since
then, much research has born out Davidsons (1983) statement that in the view of those trying
to evaluate the effects of communication, its greatest impact will not be on me or you, but on
themthe third persons (p. 3). Although me and you are put in one category, it is
implied that some degree of distance exists between self and such close others as friends and
lovers (Tsfati & Cohen, 2004). More explicit remoteness exists between me and you as a
single unit and them, or others.
The notion of social distance was first introduced by the sociologist Emory Bogardus
(1925), who referred to it as the degrees and grades of understanding and feeling that persons
experience regarding each other (p. 299). Considering the social distance phenomenon as an
aspect of Davisons (1983) third-person perception, Perloff (1993) articulated the notion of
psychological distance as a complex variable including perceived similarity, familiarity, and
identification and pointed out two different ways to conceptualize psychological distance.
First, social distance falls along a continuum going from just like me to not at all like
me (p. 175). Second, social distance reflects the heterogeneity and size of the audience or
group (pp. 175-176). Perloff (1993) noted that researchers studying the social distance
phenomenon have not made explicit the fact that social distance can be conceptualized and
measured in different ways. Nevertheless, Perloff (1993), reviewing 16 studies of the third-
person effect, acknowledged that the TPE is magnified when the hypothetical others are defined
in broad and global terms (p. 176). Thus, in Perloffs (2002) terms, a social distance corollary is
the notion that self-other disparities grow in magnitude with increases in perceived distance
between self and comparison others (p. 497).
To measure estimates of effect on self and others, Brosius and Engel (1996) constructed a
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
10/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 10
questionnaire with three independent variables: 1) first person, 2) third person, close distance,
and 3) third person, remote distance. In varying the psychological distance, the researchers found
that perceived effects were greater for remote others. They also found that third-person
effects are found to be most strong among people of higher age and education (p. 160).
Cohen, Mutz, Price, and Gunther (1988) found that Stanford students perceived media
effects to be less on themselves than on other Stanford students; also, other Californians were
considered to be more susceptible to media impact than other Stanford students (p. 169). A
similar study (Gunther, 1991) was done at the University of Minnesota, and the social distance
phenomenon was supported. As groups became more broadly defined (other University of
Minnesota students, other Minnesota residents), participants perception of media effects on the
groups increased. Other studies yielded similar findings (e.g., Duck, Hogg, & Terry, 1995;
Gibbon & Durkin, 1995; White, 1997).
Investigating the third-person effect in regard to political identification, Duck et al.
(1995) found that perception of self-other differences in media vulnerability are influenced by
the subjectively salient social relationship between self and other, and are governed by
motivational needs, such as self-esteem, social-identity, and differentiation from others (p.195).
Other researchers (e.g., Burger, 1981; Schlenker & Miller, 1977) suggested that because of self-
serving biases, a person considers close friends and relatives an extension of self, whereas such a
vague category as other might evoke stereotypes in the mind (Perloff & Fetzer, 1986).
After several studies, the notion of social distance was enshrined as the social distance
corollary (Meirick, 2005). According to Perloffs (1999) review, of the 11 studies that have
tested the social-distance notion, nine confirmed it, articulating this phenomenon as another
factor on which the strength of the third-person effect hinges (p. 364).
Within this theoretical framework, this study examines social distance as it is reflected in
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
11/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 11
the perceived ethicality between (a) Russian PR student survey respondents and generalized
other Russian PR students; (b) survey respondents and generalized American PR students; and
(c) generalized other Russian PR students and generalized American PR students. Eveland,
Nathanson, Detenber and McLeod (1999) noted, There is a common tendency for individuals to
express a self-serving out-group biasthat is, to evaluate ones own group more favorably than
the out-group, which might be explained by the need for ego enhancement (p. 277). Also,
Gunther and Thorson (1992) found that when people consider media content positive, they
perceive the effects as being greater on themselves than on others. Accordingly, for this study, a
growing concern about unethical public relations practice of some firms and individuals might
prevent respondents from acknowledging their true degree of ethical awareness.
Hypotheses
Based on the TPE theory and previous research on the social distance corollary, the
following three hypotheses were developed:
H1: Survey respondents will perceive themselves as more ethical than other Russian PR students.
H2: Survey respondents will perceive themselves as more ethical than American PR students.
H3: Survey respondents will perceive generalized other Russian PR students as more ethical than
American PR students.
Method
Participants
Participants in the study were 206 public relations students in two Russian universities,
with 480 and 250 public relations majors respectively. One hundred and twenty five students (19
males and 106 females) were surveyed in the first university, located in a city of 500,000
inhabitants, and 81 students (14 males and 67 females) were surveyed in the second university,
which is located in a city with a population of about one million. Both cities are located in
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
12/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 12
Central Russia, and the universities were selected for practical reasons. The first city is the
hometown of one of the researchers, which facilitated access to University students, while the
second university was chosen because the head of the PR program there had participated in a
previous research project and agreed to undertake another initiative. Thus, the sample was a
convenience sample that included all students in selected PR classes where access was granted.
Participant ages ranged from 17 to 26, with a mean of 19 years old (SD=1.53). The
majority of participants (117/206) were 18 and 19 years old. The sample consisted of 55
freshmen, 63 sophomores, 40 juniors, 35 seniors, and 13 fifth year students (higher education in
the Russian Federation requires completion of five years). The fact that only 16 percent of the
overall participants in two studies were males reflects the general situation in the public relations
field in Russia, where the majority of practitioners are women (Tsetsura, 2005). In addition,
statistical data from the universities in which the surveys took place indicate that 21 percent of
all students in the first university were male, and 15 percent of all students in the second
university were male.
Procedures and Questionnaire
The survey required about 20 minutes to complete and was administered in university
classrooms near the end of the spring semester, 2006. Thus, even first year students, who had not
had an ethics course, had some awareness about aspects of public relations ethics after one year
of study. Although various courses at both universities include discussions of ethics, a specially
designed ethics course is mandatory for public relations majors in their third year of study.
Most questions in the survey were used or adapted from the questionnaire developed by
Gale and Bunton (2005) for their study of advertising and public relations graduates in the
United States. Their research examined relationships between ethical awareness and ethical
leadership for graduates who had completed a course in ethics versus those who had not. The
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
13/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 13
researchers found that graduates who had completed such a course were more likely to value
ethics highly and to discuss ethical issues with colleagues.
The questionnaire included two parts. The first one consisted of 10 sets of questions (three
questions in each), and the wording was identical except for the first (self), second (other
Russian PR students), or third-person (American PR students) connotation. For example, in the
first set, the question about self was phrased, To me, ethics is a very important topic for
discussion in public relations courses. The other Russians question stated, To other Russian
PR students, ethics is a very important topic for discussion in public relations courses. The third
question in the set was phrased, To American PR students, ethics is a very important topic for
discussion in public relations courses.
On a 5-point, Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree),
respondents were asked to report their perceptions about various aspects of public relations
ethics, as well as their perceptions about how other Russian PR students and American PR
students might perceive these issues. The third-person effect was thus explored in this way.
In addition to the survey questions based on Gale and Bunton (2005), the second part of
the questionnaire included three open-ended questions to provide participants with an
opportunity to express their thoughts about ethics in public relations leadership. Qualitative
assessment of these questions will be included in a subsequent paper.
Though the majority of the participants spoke English, the questionnaire was translated
into Russian by one of the researchers to enhance understanding of the questions. Two Russian
professional journalists then examined the text independently and offered several suggestions for
improvements, which were incorporated into the final survey instrument.
Results
A one-way ANOVA test with self, other Russian PR students, and American PR students
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
14/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 14
as three levels of the independent variable, was used to determine the significance of the effects
between comparison groups. A total of 10 tests were conducted; the significance level
established for all tests was .05.
Hypothesis 1 predicted that in regard to ethical issues, the perceived effects on self would
be more than the perceived effects on other Russian PR students. This hypothesis was supported.
The means in Table 1 present a strong pattern in the perception of self as more ethical than
generalized Russian counterparts. There were statistically significant differences in each test with
self versus other Russian PR students.
The second hypothesis predicted that respondents would perceive themselves as more
ethical than American PR students. The means on Table 1 indicates a pattern that generally
supports hypothesis 2: nine of ten tests were statistically significant. The test that did not yield a
statistically significant difference concerned perceptions of personal and professional ethics as an
indistinguishable phenomenon (set of questions #6), F(2,62) = 78.68,p < .05.
Hypothesis 3 predicted that respondents would perceive other Russian PR students as
more ethical than American PR students. This hypothesis was not supported. Only one of 10
tests was statistically significant, and, as indicated by Table 1, six of the nine non significant
tests were in the predicted direction. Thus, surveyed Russian PR students did not distinguish
between generalized other Russian PR students and American PR students.
T-tests did not indicate significant differences based on respondent demographics such as
age, level of education and completion of a course in ethics. In addition, answers did not differ
significantly between students at the two Russian universities. However, several significant
differences were found by gender. For example, more females than males said that ethics were
not cut and dried when participants evaluated other Russian PR students perceptions of this
issue, t=2.10,p
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
15/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 15
PR students in general think that business ethics and personal ethics are two different things,
t=2.03,p
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
16/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 16
be concerned with the social
impact of its actions. 4.5 0.6 4.1 0.7 3.9 0.8 39.54
8. In business if it is legal,
its OK (ethical). 2.4 1.1 2.8 0.8 3.2 0.8 35.26
9. A PR-leader needs to be ethical
in all relations with personnel
and clients. 4.4 0.8 3.8 0.9 3.7 0.8 41.82
10. A PR-leader who obeys ethical
rules will have greater professional
success. 4.0 1.0 3.6 0.8 3.5 0.8 18.88
____________________________________________________________________________Note. Responses were measured on a 5-point scale. Higher score means higher degree of ethicality.
Discussion
Brosius andEngel (1996) stated that the third-person effect is not dependent on whether
there are media effects or not. It is a perceptual phenomenon (p. 143). It might be implied that
while assessing vulnerability of others, people are unconsciously revealing their own
susceptibility, which they do not admit if the question is self phrased. In this study, students
agreed with positive statements designed to measure their perception of ethics and disagreed
with the same statements related to others people, particularly, to Russian PR students in general.
This is important because the two universities students served as virtual other Russians for
each other while filling out the questionnaire.
According to Brosius and Engel (1996), perception of similarity between oneself and a
friend as an in-group member positively influences estimation of media effects. Although
Russian counterparts cannot be taken as such psychologically close people as friends, there was
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
17/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 17
an assumption that participants would distinguish them more clearly from such psychologically
distant others as American PR students. The reason for this assumption was that besides reading
professional magazines about students life within the country, participants of the study
communicate with other Russians while attending national public relations conferences and
seminars and participating in student competitions. Thus, they have an opportunity to know
Russian counterparts better and, presumably, develop the feeling of belonginess to one group
of professionals.
At the same time, participants demonstrated what Brosius and Engels (1996) called
unrealistic optimism (p. 145), which is related to ego enhancement. According to Duck et al.
(1995), the tendency to perceive self as invulnerable even in comparison with in-group members
is consistent with the egocentric categorization model, which states that the cognitive
differentiation between oneself and other people is much clearer than the cognitive
differentiation between different others (p. 211). Consistent with this statement, participants of
this study showed only a slight difference in perceived ethicality of other Russian and American
public relations students. However, even though this result is consistent with the egocentric
categorization model, there is still the need for a more in depth investigation of the situation from
a cultural standpoint.
For example, is it possible that a popular United States scale like the Likert-type, 5-point
scale is too narrow for Russian students? Would it be more appropriate to use a 7- or even 10-
point scale? Also, some differences in teaching public relations courses might explain why
participants distanced themselves from both groups of studentsRussian and American. For
example,some PR instructors in Russia focus on theoretical aspects of ethics, believing that
public relations professionals should be familiar with ethics of Socrates, Epicure, Kant, and other
great thinkers. Other instructors concentrate on applied ethics, or how ethics are incorporated in
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
18/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 18
the everyday activities of professionals. In addition to course content differences, teachers also
use a variety of pedagogies, which may affect student perceptions, attitudes, and understanding.
Brosius and Engel (1996) suggested further that it is important to find out how the third-
person effect connects with other identified self-other phenomena. They suggested that the
false uniqueness effect should be considered as being related to third-person effect (p. 159-
160). This phenomenon is also known as false distinctiveness (Valins & Nisbett, 1972) and
the uniqueness bias (Goethals, Messick, & Allison, 1991). According to Goethals et al. (1991),
uniqueness bias is the tendency for people to underestimate the proportion of people who can or
will perform desirable actions (p. 149). As a consequence, people in general perceive their own
behaviors as either uniquely or uncommonly good.
Studying high school students, Goethals et al. (1991), found that uniqueness bias was
greater for advanced placement students than for students in regular classes. Since the public
relations occupation is a prestigious one in Russia, it seems likely that participants in the present
study would experience the same feeling of pride and uniqueness as the advanced placement
students in Goethals et al. (1991) study did. Therefore, a perceived psychological distance
between the participants and two groups of Russian and American students might be taken as a
reflection of the special status of the public relations profession in the country.
It is logical to ask, why didnt study participants include other Russians in the
exceptional category when it came to evaluating their ethicality? One possible explanation stems
from the negative perception of public relations in Russian society. Indeed, PR in Russia is a
twofold phenomenon: it is highly desirable in spite of its questionable credibility. Public
professionals still practice three types of PR: black, grey, and white. Black practice
refers to unethical technologies, or as Bobrov (2005) put it, to manipulative forms of
communication that presumes goals of agitation, whereas grey PR follows the rule, If it is not
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
19/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 19
prohibited by the law, it is permitted. Professionals, who practice white PR, are dedicated to
professional norms that are based on ethics. It might be presumed that distinguishing themselves
so obviously from generalized Russian PR students, the participants of the study distanced
themselves from those who practice black and grey PR.
Findings here also suggest the need to explore relations between the third-person effect and
the Russian collectivist culture. According to Stephan and Stephan (1996),
Collectivist cultures emphasize group over individual goals and regulate behavior
through ingroup rather than individual norms. Collectivists are more likely than
individualists to behave differently to ingroup than to outgroup members, regulate the
behavior of ingroup members, and define the self in terms of the ingroup (p. 119).
In the present study, the surveyed students demonstrated a reverse effect, showing that I
is more important than we, which is routinely taken as a sign of individualistic cultures.
However, even if a culture is distinguished as collectivistic, there still is room for varying
degrees of individualism in self-perceptions (Markus & Kitayama, 1991). In the case under
consideration, individualistic traits seem to be challenging such a fundamental dimension of
collectivist cultures as connectedness. Future research is needed to determine if this effect is due
to robustness and persuasiveness of the third person effect, or other factors, e.g., a negative
shadow of PR-practice in the country may have made the participants distance themselves from
other Russians.
In regard to American PR students, perceived psychological distance might be explained
by physical distance. In spite of the prevalence of American textbooks in school curricula,
Russian students are being taught to be careful in applying foreign experiences to Russian
practice (Bobrov, personal communication, September 17, 2006). Importantly, this process is
going on against a country-wide background that emphasizes the national uniqueness of Russia,
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
20/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 20
which is explained by the need for an idea that will unite and strengthen the nation in the difficult
period of political, economic, and social turbulence.
The question that yielded the highest score in this study (M=4.5; SD=0.6) was positively
phrased and asked the participants if the management of a company should be concerned with
the social impact of its actions. The lowest score (M=2.0; SD=0.7) was received on a question
that was negatively phrased was, Ethics is cut and dry, not situation specific. Importantly, both
these scores were demonstrated in self-phrased tests. It appears that for the participants, it was
less problematic to assess their own perceptions of the issues than to evaluate insights of others.
This was evident during the administration of the survey, when some students articulated their
uncertainty about others attitude toward ethics in public relations profession. Doubts were
reduced by telling the participants that this survey was not so much about their concrete
knowledge as about their perceptions.
The only test that did not yield a statistically significant difference in perception of social
distance between the participants and generalized American PR students concerned personal and
professional ethics as an indistinguishable phenomenon (set of questions #6). Presumably,
demonstrating less distance between themselves and Americans, the participants discriminated
themselves from other Russians, who might have been associated with black PR.
On the other hand, the only test that yielded a statistically significant difference in the
pair, other Russians versus generalized Americans was phrased, In business if it is legal,
its OK (ethical). Bobrov (personal communication, September 17, 2006), commenting on this
result, suggested that Russian participants may have expressed a stereotyped perception of
Americans as money and business oriented people.
Consistent with previous research (Bowen, 2005b), this study found differences in the
perceptions of ethics on the basis of gender. First, evaluating their own views, more female
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
21/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 21
participants than males said that professional success in PR leadership depends on adherence to
ethical rules. Second, females revealed more favorable attitudes while assessing other Russian
PR students perceptions of ethical issues in such sets of questions as Ethics is cut and dry, not
situation specific, Business ethics and personal ethics are two different things, and A PR-
leader who obeys ethical rules will have greater professional success. No gender differences
were found with regard to participants insights about generalized American PR students.
Conclusion
This study investigated whether Russian public relations students perceived themselves
as different from other Russian public relations students and American public relations students
with respect to professional ethics. The study shows that students perceived themselves as more
ethical than the two other groups. The results also indicated a perceived social distance between
the two pairs: surveyed studentsgeneral Russian students and surveyed studentsAmerican
peers. However, there were no a substantial difference between these pairs.
It might be assumed that in this research, two opposite phenomenagenerally negative
perception of PR practice in the country and a high prestige of PR occupation, which results in
the feeling of uniqueness of those who are study PRmagnify the third person effect by making
the participants distance themselves substantially from others. Overall, the study found some
evidence of the existence of the perceived social distance among Russian public relations
students. Yet, the findings of this study cannot be generalized to the rest of the population
because of the convenience sample. This research also examined perceptual variables rather than
any actual measured ethicality.
Nevertheless, it is useful to know how Russian students perceive themselves in regard to
ethicality today, when concern about the lack of ethical behavior among many public relations
practitioners in Russia is a contested issue. In addition, the study underscores the need for more
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
22/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 22
research focused on ethics instructioncourse content, effective pedagogies and outcomesin
public relations educational programs if such programs do, in fact, favorably influence
professional ethics.
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Berger, B. K., & Reber, B. H. (2006). Gaining Influence in Public Relations: The Role of
Resistance in Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bobrov, V. A. (2005). Psikhologia i PR. [Psychology and PR]. InAktualnue problemu svyazei s
obshestvennostyu v sovremennom rossiskom obshestve (pp. 31-33). Penza: Izdatelstvo
PGU.
Bodalev, A. A. (1995).Lichnost I obshenie. [An individual and communication]. Moscow:
Mezhdunarodnaya Pedagogicjeskaya Akademiya.
Bogardus, E. S. (1925). Measuring social distances.Journal of Applied Sociology, 9, 299-308.
Bok, S. (1989).Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York:
Vintage Books.
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
23/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 23
Bowen, S. A. (2004). Expansion of ethics as the tenth generic principle of public relations
excellence: A Kantian theory and model for managing ethical issues. Journal of Public
Relations Research, 16, 65-92.
Bowen, S. A. (2005a). A practical model for ethical decision making in issues management and
public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17, 191-216.
Bowen, S. A. (2005b, June). Schism in Public Relations Ethics: Overview of Grant Research
Findings. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Association of Business
Communicators, Washington, DC.
Brosius, H-B., & Engel, D. (1996). The causes of third-person effects: Unrealistic optimism,
impersonal impact, or generalized negative attitudes toward media influence?
International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 142-162.
Burger, J. M. (1981). Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A
meta-analysis of the defensive-attribution hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 496-
512.
Cohen, J., Mutz, D., Price, V., & Gunther, A. (1988). Perceived impact of defamation. An
experiment on third-person effect. Public Opinion Quarterly, 52, 161-173.
Commission on Public Relations Education. (1999). Public Relations Education for the
21st Century: A Port of Entry. New York: Public Relations Society of America.
Curtin, P. A. & Boynton, L. A. (2001). Ethics in public relations: Theory and practice. In R. L.
Heath (Ed.),Handbook of public relations (pp. 411-421). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
David, P. (2004). Extending symmetry: Toward a convergence of professionalism, practice, and
pragmatics in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 16, 185-211.
Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47,
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
24/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 24
1-15.
Duck, J. M., Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (1995). Me, us, and them: Political identification and
the third person effect in the 1993 Australian federal election.European Journal of
Social Psychology, 25, 195-215.
Edgett, R. (2002). Toward an ethical framework for advocacy in public relations.
Journal of Public Relations Research, 14, 1-26.
Eveland, W. P., Jr., Nathanson, A. T., Detenber, B. H., & McLeod, D. M. (1999). Rethinking the
social distance corollary. Perceived likelihood of exposure and the third-person
perception. Communication Research, 26, 275-302.
Fedorova, L., & Ogar, I. (2002). Uroven podgotovki v rossiiskix vuzax budushix praktikov v
sfere svyazei s obshestvennostyu. [The level of preparation of future PR practitioners in
Russian universities]. Retrieved from August 29, 2006 from
http://www.sovetnik.ru/research/?id=891 .
Fitzpatrick, K. R. (1996). The role of public relations in the institutionalization of ethics.
Public Relations Review, 22, 249-258.
Gale, K., & Bunton, K. (2005). Assessing the impact of ethics instruction on advertising and
public relations graduates.Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 60, 272-285.
Gibbon, P., & Durkin, K. (1995). The third person effect: Social distance and perceived media
bias.European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 597-602.
Goethals, G. R., Messick, D. M., & Allison, S. T. (1991). The uniqueness bias: Studies of
constructive social comparison. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison:
Contemporary theory and research (pp. 149-176). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Dozier, D. M. (2002).Excellent public relations
and effective organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
http://www.sovetnik.ru/research/?id=891http://www.sovetnik.ru/research/?id=8918/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
25/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 25
Gunther, A. C. (1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the third person
effect. Communication Research, 18, 355-372.
Gunther, A. C., & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and
public service announcement: The third-person effects in new domains. Communication
Research, 19, 574-596.
Harrison, S. L. (1990). Pedagogical ethics for public relations and advertising. Journal of Mass
Media Ethics, 5, 256-262.
Kim, Y., & Choi, Y. (2003). Ethical standards appear to change with age and ideology: A
survey of practitioners. Public Relations Review, 29, 79-89.
Markus H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implication for cognition, emotion, and
motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
Meirick, P. C. (2005). Rethinking the target corollary: The effect of social distance, perceived
exposure, and perceived predispositions on first-person and third-person perception.
Communication Research, 32, 822-843.
Molleda, J. C. (2004). Partners in an alliance with a global reach. Public Relations Strategist, 10,
48-51.
Phair, J. T. (2005, March). Regaining and retaining credibility amid changes and challenges to
the profession. Public Relations Tactics, 12, 22.
Perloff, R. M. (2002). The third-person effect. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.),Media Effects.
Advances in Theory and Research. (2nd ed., pp. 489-506). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Perloff, R. M. (1999). The third-person effect research: A critical review and synthesis. Media
Psychology, 1, 353-378.
Perloff, R. M. (1993). Third-person effect research 1983-1992: A review and synthesis.
8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
26/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 26
International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167-184.
Perloff, L. S., & Fetzer, B. K. (1986). Self-other judgments and perceived vulnerability to
victimization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 502-510.
PRSA Member Code of Ethics (October 2002). Retrieved May 3, 2005 from:
http://www.prsa.org/_About/ethics/pdf/codeofethics.pdf?indent=eth10.
Sallot, L. M., Cameron, G. T., & Weaver-Lariscy, R. A. (1998). PR educators and practitioners
identify professional standards,Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 53, 19-30.
Schlenker, B. R., & Miller, R. S. (1977). Egocentrism in groups: self-serving biases or logical
information processing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 755-764.
Sinepol, E., & Shkolnikov, Y. (2002). Chto takoe khorosho I chto takoe plokho v public
relations. [What is good and what is bad in public relations]. PRpro. Retrieved August 29,
2006 from http://www.prpro.spb.ru/about_stud.php?what=publikacii&publik_id=6 .
Sovetnik, 2005a. Struktura sprosa I predlozhenii na runke truda PR-specialistov za 2004-2005
goda. [The structure of demand and offer in PR employment in 2004 and 2005].
Sovetnik. Retrieved August 29, 2006 from http://www.sovetnik.ru/research/?id=15330 .
Sovetnik, 2005b. Sovremennui rossiiskii PR-specialist: uroven kvalifikacii. [The modern Russian
PR-professional: the level of qualification]. Retrieved August 29, 2006 from
http://www.sovetnik.ru/research/?id=11954 .
Sovetnik, 2004. Sxodstva I razlichiya otechestvennux I zarubezhnux PR-kompanii. [Similarities
and differences between Russian and foreign PR firms]. Retrieved August 29, 2006 from
http://www.sovetnik.ru/research/?id=8482 .
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1996).Intergroup relations. Boulder, Colorado: Westview
Press.
http://www.prpro.spb.ru/about_stud.php?what=publikacii&publik_id=6http://www.sovetnik.ru/research/?id=15330http://www.sovetnik.ru/research/?id=11954http://www.sovetnik.ru/research/?id=8482http://www.prpro.spb.ru/about_stud.php?what=publikacii&publik_id=6http://www.sovetnik.ru/research/?id=15330http://www.sovetnik.ru/research/?id=11954http://www.sovetnik.ru/research/?id=84828/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
27/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 27
Toth, E. L. (1999). Models for instruction and curriculum, Public Relations Review, 25, 45-53.
Tsetsura, K. (2005). Is public relations a real job? Constructing public relations as gendered
profession. Conference paper submitted to the International Communication Association
meeting in New York.
Tsetsura, K. (1999). The role of female public relations practitioners in the development of
public relations in Russia. Women and Language, 22, 50.
Tsfati, Y., & Coneh, J. (2004). Object-subject distance and the third person effect. Media
Psychology, 6, 353-361.
Tulchinsky, G. (2001). PR I etika sovremennogo rossiskogo biznesa: osobennosti I perspektivy.
PR and ethics of modern Russian business: Particularities and perspectives. PR News,
#10. Retrieved December 15, 2005 from
http://www.pr-news.spb.ru/publicat/n10/10_2.htm .
VanSlyke Turk, J. (1989). Management skills need to be taught in public relations.
Public Relations Review, 15, 38-52.
Valins, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). Attribution processes in the development and treatment of
emotional disorders. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins,
& B. B. Weiner (Eds.),Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior(pp. 17-150).
Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
White, H. A. (1997). Considering interacting factors in the third-person effect: Argument
strength and social distance.Journalism and Mass communication Quarterly, 74, 557-
564.
Worldwide standard is in the works for PR ethics. (2003, Spring). The Public Relations
Strategist, 12, 3.
Wright, D. K. (1985). Age and the Moral Values of Practitioners. Public Relations Review, 11,
http://www.pr-news.spb.ru/publicat/n10/10_2.htmhttp://www.pr-news.spb.ru/publicat/n10/10_2.htm8/3/2019 Pr Ethics in Russia (Back Up)
28/28
PR ETHICS IN RUSSIA 28
51-60.