Upload
jamar-decoursey
View
222
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie CookThe University of West Alabama
Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics.All rights reserved.
Class #3Class #3MGMT 300MGMT 300Sections E Sections E and Fand F
10–2Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Agenda and AnnouncementsAgenda and Announcements
• Agenda– Teams and Team Leadership Open Discussion – Review Chapter 10– Review “The Team That Wasn’t” Case– Open Questions and Discussion
• Announcements:– Everyone Registered?– Web Problems Status– Information Page and Picture Upload– Homework and Grading– Developing Teams on Thursday…
10–3Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Establishing Teams - ThursdayEstablishing Teams - Thursday
• Max 8 Teams in the Class (4-6 people per team)• Avoid Existing Friend Groups• Meeting Time Best Team Selection?
– M/W Afternoons– T/TH Afternoons– Weekday Evenings– Before Class– After Class– Weekends– Flexible
• Other Team Selection Processes?
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie CookThe University of West Alabama
Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics.All rights reserved.
Chapter 10Chapter 10
Team Team LeadershipLeadership
10–5Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Lesson of the GeeseLesson of the Geese
• As each bird flaps its wings, it creates uplift for the bird following. By flying in a V formation, the flock’s flying range is 71 percent greater than if each bird flew on its own.
– Lesson: Teams can get where they are going quicker and easier. Diversity of ideas, different experiences and brainstorming all are more creative processes that result in better outcomes – creativity, quality, speed.
• Whenever a goose falls out of formation, it suddenly is affected by the drag and resistance of trying to go it alone and quickly gets back into formation to take advantage of the lifting power of the bird immediately in front.
– Lesson: A common goal provides strength, power, and safety in numbers.• When the lead goose gets tired, it falls back into the formation and
another goose flies point.– Lesson: It pays to take turns doing the hard jobs.
• The geese toward the back honk to encourage those up front to keep up their speed.
– Lesson: We all need to be encouraged with active support and praise.• When a goose gets sick or is wounded and falls out, two geese fall out of
formation and follow the first one down. They stay with the downed goose until the crisis resolves, and then they launch out on their own to catch up with their group or join another formation.
– Lesson: We must stand by each other in times of need.
10–6Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Group and Teams and PerformanceGroup and Teams and Performance
• Group– Two or more members with a clear leader who
perform independent jobs with individual accountability, evaluation, and rewards. Author defines as a “formal” organization.
• Team– A small number of members with shared
leadership who perform interdependent jobs with both individual and group accountability, evaluation, and rewards.
Don’t Get Hung Up on Group vs. Team
No One Else Does
10–7Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Groups versus TeamsGroups versus Teams
Exhibit 10–1
TEAMS CAN ALSO HAVE SPONSORS, STEERING GROUPS, BOARDS, etc. THAT THEY ARE ACCOUNTABLE TO FOR RESULTS.
SELF MANAGED GROUP“SPONSORED” TEAM
10–8Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Group & Team Performance ModelGroup & Team Performance Model
Exhibit 10–2
KEY ITEMS ARE: ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT (ORG. CONTEXT) TEAM MEMBER TIME AVAILABILITY (PROCESS) TEAM LEADER SKILLS AND RESPECT (PROCESS) TEAM SELF-SATISFACTION & ENTHUSIASM (PROCESS)
10–9Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Group and Team TypesGroup and Team Types
• Formal Groups/Teams– Recognized (and established) by the
organization.
• Informal Groups/Teams– Self-formed, not officially recognized by the
organization. An example is….
• Functional Groups/Teams– Members from a limited organizational area.
• Cross-Functional Groups/Teams– Members from different organizational areas
and/or levels.
SOME EXAMPLES ARE:
10–10Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Functional and Cross-Functional GroupsFunctional and Cross-Functional Groups
Exhibit 10–3
“TASK FORCE” SHOWS THE VARIOUS MEMBERS
10–11Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Group/Team Size, Structure, Composition, and LeadershipGroup/Team Size, Structure, Composition, and Leadership
Groups tend to be larger than teams
Teams tend to have few members
Groups are more formal and tend toward autocratic
leadership???????
Teams are informal and tend to have participative
leadership
Members should be diverse and have
complementary skills
Diverse teams outperform homogeneous groups
LeadershipLeadershipand Structureand Structure
Group Group CompositionComposition
Number in Number in GroupGroup
Groups have broadly-defined (organizational)
objectives
Teams or their sponsors develop their own
objectives
Leadership Leadership andand
ObjectivesObjectives
Project & Cross-Functional Teams: “Supervised” Work Groups:
10–12Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Dimensions of Group & Team StructureDimensions of Group & Team Structure
Exhibit 10–4
10–13Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Group & Team Performance ModelGroup & Team Performance Model
Exhibit 10–2
KEY ITEMS ARE: ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT (ORG. CONTEXT) TEAM MEMBER TIME AVAILABILITY (PROCESS) TEAM LEADER SKILLS AND RESPECT (PROCESS) TEAM SELF-SATISFACTION & ENTHUSIASM (PROCESS)
10–14Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Group and Team ProcessGroup and Team Process
• Group Process– The patterns of interactions that emerge as
members perform their jobs.
• Group Process Dimensions– Include roles, norms, cohesiveness, status,
decision making, and conflict resolution.
10–15Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Group and Team Process (cont’d)Group and Team Process (cont’d)
• Group Roles– Task roles
• Members who do and say things that directly aid the accomplishment of the group’s objectives.
– Maintenance roles• Members who do and say things to develop and
sustain the group process.
– Self-interest roles• Members who do and say things to hurt the group
and help the themselves.
10–16Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Dimensions of Group and Team ProcessDimensions of Group and Team Process
Exhibit 10–5
10–18Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Group Process (cont’d)Group Process (cont’d)
• Group Norms
– The group’s shared expectations of its members’ behavior.
– Norms develop spontaneously through the interactions of group members.
– Compliance with norms is enforced by the group.
– Leaders should work toward maintaining and developing positive norms.
WHAT ARE OUR CLASSROOM GROUP NORMS? – CREATE LIST
10–19Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Group Process (cont’d)Group Process (cont’d)
• Group Cohesiveness– The extent to which members stick together.– Factors positively influencing cohesiveness:
• Agreement with and commitment to objectives
• Small size
• Homogeneity among group members
• Equal level of member participation
• Focus on external competition
• A successful group
“Team Together – Team Apart”
10–20Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Group Process (cont’d)Group Process (cont’d)
• Status within the Group– Status is the perceived ranking of one member
relative to other members in the group.• Based on performance, job title, wage or salary,
seniority, knowledge or expertise, interpersonal skills, etc.
– High status members have a strong influence on the group and its performance.
10–22Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Stages of Group AND TEAM Development and Styles of Leadership
Stages of Group AND TEAM Development and Styles of Leadership
1.OrientationAutocratic leadership
1.OrientationAutocratic leadership
2.DissatisfactionConsultative leadership
2.DissatisfactionConsultative leadership
3.ResolutionParticipative leadership
3.ResolutionParticipative leadership
4.ProductionEmpowerment leadership
4.ProductionEmpowerment leadership
5.Termination5.Termination
10–23Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Stages of Group Development and Leadership StylesStages of Group Development and Leadership Styles
Exhibit 10–6Source: Adapted from D. Carew, E. Carew, and K. Blanchard, “Group Development and Situational Leadership,” Training & Development ( June 1986), p. 48.
Stages of Group Development
Leadership Styles
(forming) (storming) (norming) (performing)
10–24Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Developing INDIVIDUALS INTO Groups AND Teams
Developing INDIVIDUALS INTO Groups AND Teams
• Training– Train the group in group process skills.
• The Management Functions– Planning: empower members to set objectives, develop
plans, and make decisions. PROVIDE BOUNDARIES
– Organizing and Staffing: have members participate in selecting, evaluating, and rewarding members.
– Leading: develop team leaders who can change leadership styles as the group develops.
– Controlling: have members monitor progress, take corrective action, and perform quality control.
10–25Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Leadership Skills for MeetingsLeadership Skills for Meetings
• Planning Meetings– Objectives
– Participants and Assignments
– Agenda
– Date, Place and Time
– Leadership
– Technology
– Project Plan & Project Plan & StatusStatus
• Conducting Meetings– Three Parts of
Meetings• Identify Objectives
• Cover agenda items
• Summarize and review assignments
– “PAL”
• Purpose
• Agenda
• Length
10–26Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
Leadership Skills for Meetings (cont’d)Leadership Skills for Meetings (cont’d)
• Handling Problem Members– Silent Type
– Talker
– Wanderer
– Bored Member
– Arguer
10–28Copyright © 2006 Thomson Business and Economics. All rights reserved.
The Team That Wasn’tThe Team That Wasn’t
1. What Elements of Organizational Context Influenced the Team?
2. What Elements of Group Structure Influenced the Team?
3. What Elements of Group Process Influenced the Team?
4. What stage is this Group in?
5. If you were Eric, what 2-3 things would you do now?
6. What are the risks and rewards of your actions from # 5?
7. If you were Ray, Maureen or Carl, what could you do differently?
8. What could Jack have done differently?