• Home

  • Documents

  • POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS %...
32
★ 35 BOWL DOUBLE ISSUE! ★ BOWL ISSUE 65-30 68% LAST 3 YEARS!!! NFL SELECTIONS FOR WK 15 & 16 INSIDE! POWER SWEEP Volume 28 Issue 16 & 17 Dec. 16, 2010 - Jan. 10, 2011 1-800-654-3448 playing 7 gms vs teams with winning records but played our #65 toughest schedule including games against 2-9 Eastern Illinois, 4-8 Ball St and 3-9 Minnesota. Per the NCAA, Kentucky faced the #103 toughest schedule with an opp W/L % of 45.9% facing 4 teams with winning records but took on our #57 schedule facing 6-6 Louisville, 6-6 Georgia, 4-8 Mississippi and 6-6 Tennessee that were all better than their records indicate. Washington had the toughest slate among bowl teams and Middle Tenn had the easiest. The 2010 bowl teams are in boldface. NORTHCOAST SPORTS SERVICE P.O. BOX 450829 CLEVELAND, OHIO 44145 $ 25 00 www.ncsports.com © 2010 Northcoast Sports Service ELEVEN NFL POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 (ALL ★’S WINNING) NEWS AND NOTES DOUBLE BOWL ISSUE This issue of Power Sweep is a special double issue which has 35 bowl game forecasts plus the 15th & 16th weeks of the NFL. This action-packed double issue traditionally does exceptionally well, with a 22 year record of 64% on the ★ basis. This is our biggest and best bowl issue ever, as it contains many Key Selections for the bowls and is 32 FULL pages!!!! Let’s go over this super Double Bowl Issue so you can utilize it to the fullest. All of the Bowl Selections are rated from 1★ to 4★ with 4★’s being the highest. 3★ & 4★ Selections are considered Key Selections. 2★’s are considered Other Selections. The 1★ plays are very light selections and are to be played nowhere near as strong as the Key Selections. We have a half page dedicated to EVERY bowl game which should provide every piece of information that you will need. Read each bowl write-up and we think you will find them to be the most in-depth write-ups available. We supply much more information than just our selections for this year’s bowl games. Included in this issue are our exclusive Power Plays forecasts for each game. Power Plays takes into account things like: strength of opponents faced, and is adjusted after games for weather, garbage yards, injuries, etc. It is the most accurate set of power ratings in the country. These forecasts give you a projected box score for each game so you can see a possible outcome for the game. The forecasts include yards rushing, yards passing, turnovers, special teams edges and, of course, a score based on the Power Plays ratings. They also list the average opponent power rating of the teams that they faced this year. Keep in mind these projections are based solely on the Power Plays statistical formulas. Our Power Sweep projected winner at the bottom of each bowl takes into account ALL factors, including the Power Plays numbers, emotion, bowl experience, talent matchups, turf edge, momentum, special teams, coaching, etc. Many times the intangibles in bowls outweigh the pure statistical forecasts. We supply the projected forecasts at the top of the page to give you some solid statistical information. On page 32 of this newsletter you’ll find the Computer Corner Power Ratings forecasts for the bowls. The Computer Corner Plays are rated in different categories and, of course, the higher the difference between the Computer Forecast and the actual Vegas Line, the stronger the play is. They are strictly the computer’s forecast & do not take into account all the intangibles that our overall write-ups do. These projections have done very well through the years. The bowl checklists included with each bowl write-up are invaluable as every stat and ranking is analyzed with checks going to the better unit. Each check represents approximately one point. Page 28 will be our Pro Selections for Week 16 in the NFL. These selections will be made on Sunday (Dec 12th) two weeks before the games are played. The Week 15 results will be unknown. This is not easy to do as the Week 15 results will determine the next week’s selections as well as playoff chances. Due to that uncertainty we will not have an NFL 4★ for that week, but we will have ★ rated Key Selections. Last year we forecasted the NFL Week 17 two weeks in advance and went 3-0 on the Key Selections (8-0 on ★’s) and 2-0 on the 3★ Totals!! We do put a lot of work into the advance forecasts and they have done well throughout the years. The staff here at Northcoast Sports would like to wish you & your family Happy Holidays & a prosperous New Year. As always, thank you for reading Power Sweep. We hope to hear from you in our questionnaire which will be coming in the next couple of issues. Who Faced the Toughest Schedule in 2010? What makes our Toughest Opponents Faced rank- ings far superior to the NCAA method is that ours takes into account 9 sets of power ratings, combines them and factors in every team’s schedule this year. We did this not only for the bowl teams, but for all the NCAA teams & found out which teams played the toughest schedules this year. Iowa ranked #34 in the NCAA rankings with an opp W/L % of 57.3% 27 Years Above ratings are based on overall strength of schedule. Now take a look at the toughest schedules of opponents units faced: Rush Offenses - Here are the teams that took on the 10 toughest slates of rushing offenses: 1.) Oregon St, 2.) Duke, 3.) Notre Dame, 4.) California, 5.) Minnesota, 6.) Washington, 7.) Miami, Fl, 8.) Arizona St, 9.) South Carolina, 10.) Tennessee Pass Offenses - Here are the teams that took on the 10 toughest slates of passing offenses: 1.) Texas A&M, 2.) Texas Tech, 3.) Oklahoma St, 4.) Rice, 5.) Oklahoma, 6.) Colorado, 7.) New Mexico St, 8.) Utah St, 9.) Texas, 10.) Baylor Rush Defenses - Here are the teams that took on the 10 toughest slates of rush defenses: 1.) Oregon St, 2.) Washington, 3.) Washington St, 4.) UCLA, 5.) Notre Dame, 6.) Auburn, 7.) California, 8.) Vanderbilt, 9.) South Carolina, 10.) USC Pass Defenses - Here are the teams that took on the 10 toughest slates of pass defenses: 1.) Wyoming, 2.) Iowa St, 3.) Colorado St, 4.) Auburn, 5.) Oregon St, 6.) Baylor, 7.) New Mexico, 8.) Mississippi, 9.) Duke, 10.) Florida St Total Offenses - Here are the teams that took on the 10 toughest slates of scoring offenses: 1.) Oregon St, 2.) South Carolina, 3.) Arizona, 4.) UCLA, 5.) Washington, 6.) Oklahoma, 7.) Mississippi St, 8.) Arizona St, 9.) California, 10.) Notre Dame Total Defenses - Here are the teams that took on the 10 toughest slates of scoring defenses: 1.) Washington, 2.) Florida St, 3.) Florida, 4.) Oregon St, 5.) Washington St, 6.) Duke, 7.) North Carolina, 8.) Auburn, 9.) Miami, Fl, 10.) Michigan 1 Oregon St 2 Washington St 3 Washington 4 UCLA 5 South Carolina 6 USC 7 Colorado 8 Iowa St 9 Arizona St 10 Stanford 11 Vanderbilt 12 Auburn 13 California 14 Florida St 15 Miami, Fl 16 Mississippi St 17 Florida 18 Oklahoma 19 Minnesota 20 Duke 21 Arizona 22 Texas A&M 23 UNLV 24 North Carolina 25 Notre Dame 26 LSU 27 Michigan 28 Pittsburgh 29 Arkansas 30 Tennessee 31 Baylor 32 Alabama 33 Illinois 34 Wake Forest 35 Oklahoma St 36 Mississippi 37 Clemson 38 Missouri 39 NC State 40 Purdue 41 Texas Tech 42 San Jose St 43 Georgia 44 Cincinnati 45 Kansas 46 Texas 47 Kansas St 48 Georgia Tech 49 New Mexico 50 Nebraska 51 Wyoming 52 Penn St 53 Oregon 54 Boston College 55 Maryland 56 Memphis 57 Kentucky 58 East Carolina 59 Colorado St 60 Indiana 61 BYU 62 Northwestern 63 USF 64 Virginia Tech 65 Iowa 66 Utah St 67 Virginia 68 Michigan St 69 SMU 70 New Mexico St 71 Ohio St 72 Rice 73 Syracuse 74 West Virginia 75 Rutgers 76 Louisiana Tech 77 Louisville 78 Connecticut 79 E Michigan 80 Fresno St 81 Marshall 82 Navy 83 Air Force 84 Tulane 85 Utah 86 UAB 87 Louisiana 88 Wisconsin 89 Idaho 90 Bowling Green 91 WKU 92 Toledo 93 Florida Atlantic 94 Houston 95 Boise St 96 ULM 97 Nevada 98 Miami, Oh 99 Tulsa 100 Arkansas St 101 San Diego St 102 FIU 103 Temple 104 Akron 105 TCU 106 Kent St 107 C Michigan 108 Buffalo 109 North Texas 110 Hawaii 111 Southern Miss 112 Army 113 Troy 114 UCF 115 Ball St 116 Ohio 117 UTEP 118 W Michigan 119 N Illinois 120 Middle Tennessee

POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

★ 35 BOWL DOUBLE ISSUE! ★BOWL ISSUE 65-30 68% LAST 3 YEARS!!!NFL SELECTIONS FOR WK 15 & 16 INSIDE!

POWER SWEEP

Volume 28 Issue 16 & 17 Dec. 16, 2010 - Jan. 10, 2011 1-800-654-3448

playing 7 gms vs teams with winning records but played our #65 toughest schedule including games against 2-9 Eastern Illinois, 4-8 Ball St and 3-9 Minnesota. Per the NCAA, Kentucky faced the #103 toughest schedule with an opp W/L % of 45.9% facing 4 teams with winning records but took on our #57 schedule facing 6-6 Louisville, 6-6 Georgia, 4-8 Mississippi and 6-6 Tennessee that were all better than their records indicate. Washington had the toughest slate among bowl teams and Middle Tenn had the easiest. The 2010 bowl teams are in boldface.

NORTHCOAST SPORTS SERVICE P.O. BOX 450829 CLEVELAND, OHIO 44145

$2500www.ncsports.com

© 2010 Northcoast Sports Service

ELEVEN NFLPOWER SWEEPS 2007-’10

(ALL ★’S WINNING)

NEWS AND NOTES DOUBLE BOWL ISSUE This issue of Power Sweep is a special double issue which has 35 bowl game forecasts plus the 15th & 16th weeks of the NFL. This action-packed double issue traditionally does exceptionally well, with a 22 year record of 64% on the ★ basis. This is our biggest and best bowl issue ever, as it contains many Key Selections for the bowls and is 32 FULL pages!!!! Let’s go over this super Double Bowl Issue so you can utilize it to the fullest. All of the Bowl Selections are rated from 1★ to 4★ with 4★’s being the highest. 3★ & 4★ Selections are considered Key Selections. 2★’s are considered Other Selections. The 1★ plays are very light selections and are to be played nowhere near as strong as the Key Selections. We have a half page dedicated to EVERY bowl game which should provide every piece of information that you will need. Read each bowl write-up and we think you will find them to be the most in-depth write-ups available. We supply much more information than just our selections for this year’s bowl games. Included in this issue are our exclusive Power Plays forecasts for each game. Power Plays takes into account things like: strength of opponents faced, and is adjusted after games for weather, garbage yards, injuries, etc. It is the most accurate set of power ratings in the country. These forecasts give you a projected box score for each game so you can see a possible outcome for the game. The forecasts include yards rushing, yards passing, turnovers, special teams edges and, of course, a score based on the Power Plays ratings. They also list the average opponent power rating of the teams that they faced this year. Keep in mind these projections are based solely on the Power Plays statistical formulas. Our Power Sweep projected winner at the bottom of each bowl takes into account ALL factors, including the Power Plays numbers, emotion, bowl experience, talent matchups, turf edge, momentum, special teams, coaching, etc. Many times the intangibles in bowls outweigh the pure statistical forecasts. We supply the projected forecasts at the top of the page to give you some solid statistical information. On page 32 of this newsletter you’ll find the Computer Corner Power Ratings forecasts for the bowls. The Computer Corner Plays are rated in different categories and, of course, the higher the difference between the Computer Forecast and the actual Vegas Line, the stronger the play is. They are strictly the computer’s forecast & do not take into account all the intangibles that our overall write-ups do. These projections have done very well through the years. The bowl checklists included with each bowl write-up are invaluable as every stat and ranking is analyzed with checks going to the better unit. Each check represents approximately one point. Page 28 will be our Pro Selections for Week 16 in the NFL. These selections will be made on Sunday (Dec 12th) two weeks before the games are played. The Week 15 results will be unknown. This is not easy to do as the Week 15 results will determine the next week’s selections as well as playoff chances. Due to that uncertainty we will not have an NFL 4★ for that week, but we will have ★ rated Key Selections. Last year we forecasted the NFL Week 17 two weeks in advance and went 3-0 on the Key Selections (8-0 on ★’s) and 2-0 on the 3★ Totals!! We do put a lot of work into the advance forecasts and they have done well throughout the years. The staff here at Northcoast Sports would like to wish you & your family Happy Holidays & a prosperous New Year. As always, thank you for reading Power Sweep. We hope to hear from you in our questionnaire which will be coming in the next couple of issues.

Who Faced the Toughest Schedule in 2010?What makes our Toughest Opponents Faced rank-ings far superior to the NCAA method is that ours takes into account 9 sets of power ratings, combines them and factors in every team’s schedule this year. We did this not only for the bowl teams, but for all the NCAA teams & found out which teams played the toughest schedules this year. Iowa ranked #34 in the NCAA rankings with an opp W/L % of 57.3%

27Years

Above ratings are based on overall strength of schedule. Now take a look at the toughest schedules of opponents units faced:Rush Offenses - Here are the teams that took on the 10 toughest slates of rushing offenses: 1.) Oregon St, 2.) Duke, 3.) Notre Dame, 4.) California, 5.) Minnesota, 6.) Washington,

7.) Miami, Fl, 8.) Arizona St, 9.) South Carolina, 10.) Tennessee Pass Offenses - Here are the teams that took on the 10 toughest slates of passing offenses: 1.) Texas A&M, 2.) Texas Tech, 3.) Oklahoma St, 4.) Rice, 5.) Oklahoma, 6.) Colorado,

7.) New Mexico St, 8.) Utah St, 9.) Texas, 10.) Baylor Rush Defenses - Here are the teams that took on the 10 toughest slates of rush defenses: 1.) Oregon St, 2.) Washington, 3.) Washington St, 4.) UCLA, 5.) Notre Dame, 6.) Auburn,

7.) California, 8.) Vanderbilt, 9.) South Carolina, 10.) USC Pass Defenses - Here are the teams that took on the 10 toughest slates of pass defenses: 1.) Wyoming, 2.) Iowa St, 3.) Colorado St, 4.) Auburn, 5.) Oregon St, 6.) Baylor, 7.) New

Mexico, 8.) Mississippi, 9.) Duke, 10.) Florida StTotal Offenses - Here are the teams that took on the 10 toughest slates of scoring offenses: 1.) Oregon St, 2.) South Carolina, 3.) Arizona, 4.) UCLA, 5.) Washington, 6.) Oklahoma,

7.) Mississippi St, 8.) Arizona St, 9.) California, 10.) Notre Dame Total Defenses - Here are the teams that took on the 10 toughest slates of scoring defenses: 1.) Washington, 2.) Florida St, 3.) Florida, 4.) Oregon St, 5.) Washington St, 6.) Duke,

7.) North Carolina, 8.) Auburn, 9.) Miami, Fl, 10.) Michigan

1 Oregon St2 Washington St3 Washington4 UCLA5 South Carolina6 USC7 Colorado8 Iowa St9 Arizona St10 Stanford11 Vanderbilt12 Auburn13 California14 Florida St15 Miami, Fl16 Mississippi St17 Florida18 Oklahoma 19 Minnesota20 Duke21 Arizona22 Texas A&M23 UNLV24 North Carolina25 Notre Dame26 LSU27 Michigan28 Pittsburgh29 Arkansas30 Tennessee

31 Baylor32 Alabama33 Illinois34 Wake Forest35 Oklahoma St36 Mississippi37 Clemson38 Missouri39 NC State40 Purdue41 Texas Tech42 San Jose St43 Georgia44 Cincinnati45 Kansas46 Texas47 Kansas St48 Georgia Tech49 New Mexico50 Nebraska51 Wyoming52 Penn St53 Oregon54 Boston College55 Maryland56 Memphis57 Kentucky58 East Carolina59 Colorado St60 Indiana

61 BYU62 Northwestern63 USF64 Virginia Tech65 Iowa66 Utah St67 Virginia68 Michigan St69 SMU70 New Mexico St71 Ohio St72 Rice73 Syracuse74 West Virginia75 Rutgers76 Louisiana Tech77 Louisville78 Connecticut79 E Michigan80 Fresno St81 Marshall82 Navy83 Air Force84 Tulane85 Utah86 UAB87 Louisiana88 Wisconsin89 Idaho90 Bowling Green

91 WKU92 Toledo93 Florida Atlantic94 Houston95 Boise St96 ULM97 Nevada98 Miami, Oh99 Tulsa100 Arkansas St101 San Diego St102 FIU103 Temple104 Akron105 TCU106 Kent St107 C Michigan108 Buffalo109 North Texas110 Hawaii111 Southern Miss112 Army113 Troy114 UCF115 Ball St116 Ohio117 UTEP118 W Michigan119 N Illinois120 Middle Tennessee

Page 2: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

BCS Harris Poll USA Today Computer Rankings TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW %

1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.0002 Oregon .9720 2 2773 .9730 1 1450 .9831 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 .9603 TCU .9102 3 2613 .9168 3 1348 .9139 3 3 3 4 4 7 3 .9004 Stanford .8365 5 2421 .8495 5 1239 .8400 5 8 7 5 5 4 5 .8205 Wisconsin .8041 4 2443 .8572 4 1276 .8651 8 5 4 12 10 12 8 .6906 Ohio State .7660 6 2293 .8046 6 1200 .8136 9 6 6 7 13 16 10 .6807 Oklahoma .7297 9 1926 .6758 8 1008 .6834 4 4 11 3 6 5 6 .8308 Arkansas .7274 8 1992 .6989 8 1008 .6834 6 9 8 11 3 3 4 .8009 Michigan St .6922 7 2104 .7382 7 1104 .7485 11 7 12 8 15 14 11 .59010 Boise State .6137 10 1800 .6316 10 914 .6197 11 13 5 9 14 15 9 .59011 LSU .6134 11 1625 .5702 12 826 .5600 7 11 9 10 7 6 7 .71012 Missouri .5276 13 1368 .4800 14 712 .4827 10 10 18 6 11 9 12 .62013 Virginia Tech .5032 12 1623 .5695 11 900 .6102 18 18 16 16 21 20 17 .33014 Oklahoma St .4897 15 1232 .4323 13 718 .4868 13 12 13 13 9 11 15 .55015 Nevada .4336 14 1302 .4568 15 640 .4339 16 17 14 15 17 18 14 .41016 Alabama .4328 16 1155 .4053 18 521 .3532 14 15 10 18 12 8 13 .54017 Texas A&M .4151 18 1077 .3779 17 542 .3675 15 14 19 14 8 10 16 .50018 Nebraska .3967 17 1136 .3986 16 607 .4115 17 16 17 17 16 13 18 .38019 Utah .2549 19 685 .2404 19 375 .2542 19 20 15 19 19 21 19 .27020 S Carolina .2418 20 631 .2214 20 345 .2339 19 19 20 20 18 17 20 .27021 Mississippi St .1828 22 500 .1754 22 255 .1729 21 22 21 25 20 19 21 .20022 W Virginia .1330 21 519 .1821 21 261 .1769 24 24 0 23 0 0 24 .04023 Florida St .1140 23 274 .0961 23 156 .1058 22 21 22 21 24 24 23 .14024 Hawaii .0778 24 191 .0670 25 98 .0664 23 23 24 22 25 0 22 .10025 UCF .0545 25 190 .0667 24 143 .0969 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000

BO

WL

MA

TC

HU

PS

AN

D L

INE

S FA

V is

Und

erlin

edDate Bowl Game Time (ET) TV TEAM VS TEAM NC LINE TTLDec. 18 New Mexico Bowl 2:00 pm ESPN BYU vs UTEP 10 11' 50Dec. 18 Humanitarian Bowl 5:30 pm ESPN N Illinois vs Fresno St F-6 1 59Dec. 18 New Orleans Bowl 9:00 pm ESPN Ohio vs Troy O-1' 1' 58Dec. 21 Beef O'Brady's Bowl 8:00 pm ESPN Southern Miss vs Louisville 3 3 57Dec. 22 Las Vegas Bowl 8:00 pm ESPN Utah vs Boise St 7 17 60'Dec. 23 Poinsettia Bowl 8:00 pm ESPN Navy vs San Diego St 7 5' 60'Dec. 24 Hawaii Bowl 8:00 pm ESPN Hawaii vs Tulsa 4 10' 73Dec. 26 Little Caesars Pizza Bowl 8:30 pm ESPN FIU vs Toledo F-3 1' 56Dec. 27 Independence Bowl 5:00 pm espn2 Air Force vs Georgia Tech 4 3 56Dec. 28 Champs Sports 6:30 pm ESPN NC State vs West Virginia 7 3 48'Dec. 28 Insight Bowl 10:00 pm ESPN Missouri vs Iowa I-5 1 47Dec. 29 Military Bowl 2:30 pm ESPN East Carolina vs Maryland 4 7 68Dec. 29 Texas Bowl 6:00 pm ESPN Illinois vs Baylor 2 2 62'Dec. 29 Alamo Bowl 9:15 pm ESPN Arizona vs Oklahoma St 3 6 65'Dec. 30 Armed Forces Bowl Noon ESPN Army vs SMU 13 8 52Dec. 30 Pinstripe Bowl 3:30 pm ESPN Kansas St vs Syracuse S-3 1 47'Dec. 30 Music City Bowl 6:30 pm ESPN North Carolina vs Tennessee T-3 2 50Dec. 30 Holiday Bowl 10:00 pm ESPN Washington vs Nebraska 10 13' 52'Dec. 31 Car Care Bowl Noon ESPN USF vs Clemson 7 4' 40'Dec. 31 Sun Bowl 2:00 pm CBS Miami vs Notre Dame 3 3 47Dec. 31 Liberty Bowl 3:30 pm ESPN Georgia vs UCF 10 6' 55'Dec. 31 Chick-fil-A Bowl 7:30 pm ESPN South Carolina vs Florida St 4 3 54'Jan. 1 TicketCity Bowl Noon ESPN Northwestern vs Texas Tech 6 9' 60'Jan. 1 Outback Bowl 1:00 pm ABC Florida vs Penn St 7 7 48Jan. 1 Capital One Bowl 1:00 pm ESPN Michigan St vs Alabama 15 10 52Jan. 1 Gator Bowl 1:30 pm espn2 Mississippi St vs Michigan 5 5 59'Jan. 1 Rose Bowl 5:00 pm ESPN TCU vs Wisconsin 3 2' 58'Jan. 1 Fiesta Bowl 8:30 pm ESPN Connecticut vs Oklahoma 21 17 55Jan. 3 Orange Bowl 8:30 pm ESPN Virginia Tech vs Stanford 3 3 57'Jan. 4 Sugar Bowl 8:30 pm ESPN Arkansas vs Ohio St 6 3' 57'Jan. 6 GoDaddy.com Bowl 8:00 pm ESPN Middle Tenn vs Miami, Oh MT-4 1' 48'Jan. 7 Cotton Bowl 8:00 pm FOX Texas A&M vs LSU 4' 1 49Jan. 8 Compass Bowl Noon ESPN Pittsburgh vs Kentucky 7 3 53Jan. 9 Fight Hunger Bowl 9:00 pm ESPN Nevada vs Boston College 4' 9' 55Jan. 10 National Championship 8:30 pm ESPN Auburn vs Oregon 3 3 74

BCS STANDINGS

HOW TO USE THE STATS IN EACH WRITEUP: In all bowl game stats Bold/Capital = 1st Tm All-Conference • Bold only = 2nd Tm All-Conf • Bold/Capital/Underline = All-American • Italics = out for the game.

College Wins College Win % NFL Wins NFL Win % Combined Wins Combined Win %Power Plays 77-59-2 +18 Sports Reporter 58.2% Playbook 46-29-4 +17 Playbook 61.3% Playbook 64-49-5 +15 Playbook 56.6%Sports Reporter 32-23-1 +9 Power Plays 56.6% Winning Points 29-24-2 +5 Gold Sheet 54.8% Power Plays 86-75-3 +11 Winning Points 53.8%Pointwise 56-48-3 +8 Pointwise 53.8% Gold Sheet 23-19 +4 Winning Points 54.7% Winning Points 70-60-5 +10 Power Plays 53.4%Winning Points 41-36-3 +5 Winning Points 53.2% Power Sweep 14-14 0 Power Sweep 50.0% Pointwise 89-83-5 +6 Sports Reporter 52.4%Playbook 18-20-1 -2 Playbook 47.4% Pointwise 33-35-2 -2 Pointwise 48.5% Sports Reporter 43-39-1 +4 Pointwise 51.7%Power Sweep 25-30 -5 Power Sweep 45.5% Sports Reporter 11-16 -5 Sports Reporter 40.7% Power Sweep 39-44 -5 Power Sweep 47.0%Gold Sheet 21-31-2 -10 Gold Sheet 40.4% Power Plays 9-16-1 -7 Power Plays 36.0% Gold Sheet 44-50-2 -6 Gold Sheet 46.8%

The Newsletter ContestWe welcome back the Newsletter contest for the 2010 football season. We are happy to provide you with the records and standings from the Power Sweep, Gold Sheet, Power Plays, the Sports Reporter, Winning Points, Pointwise and Playbook. The newslet-ters are graded from the lines in USA Today. There will be 6 categories in all. Net winners in College, NFL, and combined as well as the win percentage in College, NFL and combined. An (*) indicates that a Sunday or Monday night game is pending.

“Big ★ Rated Plays” for 2010 Season:Top Preseason Game HOU (-3’) 23 DAL 7 covered by 12’Sept Totals GOM Over 63’ Troy(38) Okl St (41) covered by 15’NFL September GOM ATL (-6’) 41 ARZ 7 covered by 27’Sept College GOM BC (+4) 0 VT 19 lossOctober Totals GOM Under 44 LSU (16) Tenn (14) covered by 14October College GOM Miss St (-5) 47 Houston 24 covered by 18NFL October GOM CHI (-5’) 20 SEA 23 loss 5★ Top Weekly Side Play Georgia (-4) 44 Kentucky 31 covered by 92010 Totals GOY Over 59 Arkansas (41) S Carolina (20) covered by 24'★ Top Weekly Side Play Florida (-14) 55 Vanderbilt 14 covered by 275★ College Game of the Year Kentucky (-15) 38 Vanderbilt 20 covered by 3 NFL November GOM BAL (-11’) 37 CAR 13 covered by 12'5★ 2010 NFL GOY NEW ORLEANS (-9) 31 St Louis 13 covered by 9

11-2 85% This Season!!Avg cover by 13.6 points !!!

‘07-10 REG SSN GAMES OF MONTH (Y)27-10 73%!

2007 Sept GOM's5★ FAU (+7) 42 Minnesota 39 WIN4★ Atlanta (+3) 26 Houston 16 WIN2007 Oct GOM's5★ Texas A&M (+3) 11 Kansas 19 loss4★ Over 45 Cleveland (27)/STL (20) WIN2007 Nov GOM's5★ USF (-16’) 41 Syracuse 10 WIN4★ OVER 60 UAB 9/Memphis 25 loss4★ Tampa Bay (-3) 31 Atlanta 7 WIN2007 NFL GOY!!5★ Tennessee (-3) 26 KC 17 WIN2008 Sept GOM's4★ Atlanta (-6) 38 KC 14 WIN5★ Florida St (-5') 39 Colo 21 WIN2008 October GOM's4★ NY Giants (+3) 21 PIT 14 WIN4'★ OVER 59’ UNLV (35) BYU (45) GOY WIN4’★ UNDER 54’ Texas 38 Colorado 14 GOM WIN5★ Ohio St (-3) 45 Mich St 7 WIN2008 November GOM's5★ Ohio St (-11) 45 N’western 10 GOY WIN4★ Atlanta (-6') 20 Denver 24 loss2008 NFL GOY5★ Green Bay (-6) 21 Houston 24 loss2009 Sept GOM’s4★ Oakland (+2) 3 Denver 23 loss4★ OVER 52' Mid Tenn (21)/N Texas(37) WIN5★ Clemson (-7) 25 Boston Coll 7 WIN2009 OCT GOM'S 4★ Indianapolis (-14) 42 St Louis 6 WIN4★ UNDER 51 Arizona (27)/UCLA (13) WIN5★ SMU (+7) 35 Navy 38 (OT) WIN2009 NOV GOM'S5★ Wisconsin (-11) 31 Indiana 28 GOY loss4'★ UNDER 50' Wisc (31)/N'wstrn (33) GOY loss4★ NY Giants (-7) 34 Atlanta 31 OT loss2009 DEC GOM5★ Indianapolis (-6’) 28 Denver 16 GOY WIN2010 Sept GOM’s4★ OVER 63' Oklahoma St (41)/Troy(38) WIN4★ Atlanta (-6') 41 Arizona 7 WIN5★ Boston College (+4) 0 Virg Tech 19 loss2010 OCT GOM’s4★ UNDER 44 LSU (16)/Tennessee (14) WIN5★ Mississippi St (-5) 47 Houston 24 WIN4★ Chicago (-5') 20 Seattle 23 loss2010 NOV GOM’s4'★ OVER 59 Arkansas (41)/S Carolina (20) GOY WIN5★ Kentucky (-15) 38 Vanderbilt 20 GOY WIN4★ Baltimore (-11’) 37 Carolina 13 WIN2010 NFL GOY5★ New Orleans (-9) 31 St Louis 13 WIN

BUTTON #963-28-1 69%S/Sept 12

• FREE PLAYS DAILY! • LINE, WEATHER & INJURY UPDATES THE MOST COMPLETE COMP PHONE IN THE COUNTRY!1-347-677-1700

DOUBLE BOWL ISSUE AND HOW TO USE IT We have been hard at work putting together our jam-packed Double Bowl Issue of Power Sweep as this is our biggest and best issue of the season. The Double Bowl Issue is 32 full pages loaded with the most information available on the bowls, including selections. We have complete write-ups on all 35 bowl games. The key to the right shows how we coded the Individual Player stats. This issue provides our exclusive Power Plays forecasts for each game. Power Plays takes into account things like: strength of opponents played, weather, garbage yards, injuries, etc. It is the most accurate set of Power Ratings in the country. These forecasts give you a projected box score for each game so you can get an idea of how it will be played. The forecasts include yards rushing, yards passing, turnovers, special teams edges and, of course, a score based on the Power Plays Ratings. They also list the Average Opponent Power Rating that they faced this year. These projections are based solely on the Power Plays statistical formulas. Our Power Sweep selections at the bottom of each bowl takes into account ALL factors, including the Power Plays numbers, emotion, bowl experience, talent matchups, turf edge, momentum, special teams, coaching, etc. Many times the intangibles in bowls outweigh the pure statistical forecasts. We supply the Power Plays projected forecast at the top of the page to give you some solid statistical information. We have not provided a score as we had done in the past (always right at the number) because we did not want to commit to the Over or Under on Dec 12th (press time for this issue) and we want to have yet another huge winning year with the Private Play Hotline Triple Totals Plays (45-27 63% on units last 9 years!). The bowl checklists are invaluable as every stat and ranking is analyzed with checks going to the better unit. Each check represents approximately one point. Our next Power Sweep will be available December 28th so don't call next week looking for the next issue. You are all set as in addition to Week 15 of the NFL, Week 16 is also included in this issue.

BOWL ISSUE 65-30 68% L3Y 154-75 67% on ★'s!!! We look forward to the outcome of this year's Double Bowl Issue! The last 3 years anyone who purchased the Double Bowl Issue has enjoyed a record of 65-30 68% winners and on the ★ basis 154-75 67% with the 4★'s the last 2 years going 7-3 70%! As mentioned above, we have included both NFL Week 15 and Week 16 in this issue. There will NOT be a Power Sweep sent out next week and there will be no changes to the Power Sweep Issue for the NFL Week 16. If you have not renewed your subscription to Power Sweep for the 2011 season, time to save is running out. Sign up now for 2011 as you will be paying just $79 to renew for download (add $40 for mail delivery) and when you become a 2011 subscriber, you will be offered special pricing on all of the 2010 season Late Phone Packages! On 1/1/11 there will be a price increase so make sure to renew before year's end! All bonus offers are included, just see page 32 for details!

5★ NFL GAME OF THE YEAR ON NEW ORLEANS WINS!!!SUNDAY LATE PHONES GO 3-0 100%!!TRIPLE BOWL TOTALS PLAYS 45-27 63% L/9Y!

POST SEASON LATE PHONES S/'07 38-19 67%!!! Last week we told you that Sunday was the strongest card for the entire NFL season. That is why we picked it for the release of the 2010 NFL GOY. We released a 5★ on New Orleans (-9) over St Louis, an easy 31-13 winner. That brings our Big Play record for the year to 11-2 85% (see left). The last 21 5★ Plays that we have released, have a record of 15-6 71%!!!! There are still two more Games of the Year to be released. On the day our NFL Late Phones went a perfect 3-0 and we also released a 4★ Small College Play on E Washington on Saturday, taking our IAA Playoff record on LPS to 4-0 100% this year. Over the last 3 Post Seasons, our Late Phone Selections have produced 38-19 67% winners!!!! We have Bowl and NFL Playoff Plays of the Year still to come. Remember, our Bowl Play of the Year is the ONLY Play of the Year that is NOT

announced to the public. You must be signed up for the Bowl Package or the Post Season Package to make sure that you receive our highest rated Late Phone Selection for the 2010-'11 Bowl Season (see last pg). Also, Northcoast will release a Bowl Total on every bowl. They will be available on the Private Play Hotline through the Northcoast Debit Card System for $9 per play. Our PPH rates the Post Season Totals as Single, Double and Triple Plays. Over the last 9 years our Totals Plays released as TRIPLE Plays have gone 45-27 63%!!! You will not want to miss out on any bowl totals releases this post season. Make sure that you sign up for the Post Season Package, which not only will give you every LPS released on the bowls, but also every PPH Bowl Total! Our College Totals for the reg season rated 3'★ and higher are 31-15 67% since 2007 and the College Totals rated as 4★ releases are 20-8 71% the last 28!!

Page 3: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL 4 -

DL - 4

LB - 1/2

DB 1/2 -

HUMANITARIANBOWL

Fresno HC Pat Hill has been to 10 bowl gms while Northern has an interim. Not only did the Bulldogs travel here TY, but the WAC fans will treat them as their own.The offenses are close, the defenses are close and the OL and DL’s cancel each other out.Hill is 4-0 SU as a bowl dog and the dog is 7-0 ATS in Fresno bowls.

CCH - 441/2

Turf/ - 44

MTCH - -

INT - 4

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGRobbie Rouse #338 10/9 191 1135 38 1097 8 5.7AJ Ellis #191 7/2 75 306 25 281 3 3.7Tracy Slocum #47 10/1 37 175 12 163 2 4.4Michael Harris #158 11/0 26 112 12 100 2 3.8Ryan Colburn #136 12/12 86 326 229 97 3 1.1PASSING PS # GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTRyan Colburn #136 12/12 322 199 61.8 2529 21 9RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJamel Hamler #485 11/9 47 725 15.4 5 41Jalen Saunders #276 12/1 27 441 16.3 3 78Rashad Evans #148 10/4 33 391 11.8 3 59Matt Lindsay #406 9/0 14 208 14.9 0 44AJ Johnson #360 11/5 17 197 11.6 1 26Isaiah Burse #207 12/0 12 179 14.9 2 58Robbie Rouse #338 10/9 14 117 8.4 2 20PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Andrew Shapiro #77 12 56 2117 37.8 25 35.6 0 20KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGKEVIN GOESSLING #36 12 40-42 3-3 8-8 7-10 2-3 20-24 52POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB BEN JACOBS #470 12/12 80 1 2 1 0LB Kyle Knox #500 11/11 74 1 5.5 1 0LB Travis Brown #45 12/12 73 2 7 2 1SS Lorne Bell #340 12/12 70 0 2.5 2 1FS Phillip Thomas #337 11/12 61 0 3.5 8 3CB Desia Dunn #1663 11/11 56 0 1 4 2DE CHRIS CARTER #154 12/12 55 11 5.5 0 0DT LOGAN HARRELL #201 12/12 41 10.5 3.5 3 0CB Isaiah Green #470 11/4 31 0 0 8 0SS Derron Smith #139 12/0 28 0 1 0 0LB Shawn Plummer #1288 12/1 27 0 0.5 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDRashad Evans 23 198 8.6 0 Jalen Saunders 32 743 23.2 0Jalen Saunders 6 69 11.5 0 Isaiah Burse 17 447 26.3 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGCHAD SPANN #451 13/13 243 1330 37 1293 20 5.3Chandler Harnish #98 12/12 127 874 110 764 5 6.0Jordan Lynch #93 9/0 31 372 10 362 3 11.7Jasmin Hopkins #106 12/0 37 335 4 331 2 8.9Cameron Bell #176 8/0 39 237 9 228 0 5.8Ricky Crider #209 13/0 37 225 0 225 2 6.1PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTCHANDLER HARNISH #98 12/12 266 172 64.7 2230 20 5DeMarcus Grady #100 4/1 29 14 48.3 93 0 3RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGWillie Clark #190 13/3 38 514 13.5 7 39Nathan Palmer #215 13/7 27 492 18.2 6 58Martel Moore #465 13/10 36 437 12.1 4 69Landon Cox #406 13/11 31 395 12.7 3 32Perez Ashford #151 13/0 18 188 10.4 0 35Jason Schepler #464 13/9 7 83 11.9 0 20Jack Marks #303 13/2 8 75 9.4 0 22PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Josh Wilber #166 13 38 1512 39.8 15 33.7 1 12KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGMichael Cklamovski #287 13 51-56 8-10 3-5 4-9 0-1 15-25 48POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Alex Kube #177 13/13 77 1 4 0 0LB Devon Butler #398 13/12 71 3 2.5 5 1FS Tommy Davis #391 13/13 69 0 0.5 2 1LB Tyrone Clark #368 13/13 66 1.5 1 1 4CB CHRIS SMITH #207 12/12 63 0 3.5 9 3DE JAKE COFFMAN #1283 13/13 40 6.5 5.5 1 1SS Mike Sobol #237 13/10 39 0.5 0 1 0DE SEAN PROGAR #346 13/13 37 3.5 6 1 0CB Rashaan Melvin #1663 13/2 37 0 1 3 2PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDTommy Davis 18 142 7.9 0 Tommy Davis 20 473 23.6 1Perez Ashford 6 65 10.8 0 Jasmin Hopkins 12 224 18.7 0

The series is tied 2-2 SU (1-1 ATS). In the last meeting, the Bulldogs won 55-7 (-22) in Fresno in ‘91. This is the Huskies’ 6th bowl appearance (2-3 SU and 1-3 ATS) and their 3rd in 3 yrs. However, NI is 0-3 SU and ATS in bowls S/’06 incl a mark of 0-2 SU/ATS under HC Kill who left after the MAC Champ to take the HC position at Minnesota. LB cch Matukewicz will serve as the Huskies’ interim HC for the bowl and he was on Kill’s staff for the bowls in ‘08 and ‘09. FSU is 10-9 SU and 6-7 ATS in bowl gms (4-6 SU and 5-5 ATS under HC Hill). The Bulldogs are appearing in their 11th bowl gm in the L/12Y (none in ‘06) and 7 of those gms were decided by one score or less (5 ppg avg) with FSU going 2-5 SU/3-4 ATS in those gms. Fresno is looking to shake off B2B bowl losses by a comb 12 pts despite being the fav in both. The Bulldogs are playing their 2nd gm in Boise TY as they were destroyed by BSU here on Nov. 19. FSU has played on “The Blue” every other yr S/’02 in addition to two bowl gms in Bronco Stadium in ‘04 (won 37-34 vs UVA in OT, +5) and ‘07 (won 40-28 vs GT, +6). The Huskies are coming off their 2nd last-min loss in as many trips to the MAC Title gm. After al-lowing a gm-winning TD to Akron with :10 left in ‘05 (lost 31-30, -13) they all’d Miami to score with :33 left in this year’s Title game and fell, 26-21 (-17’). However, unlike being left at home for the postssn in ‘05, the Huskies get a chance to go bowling this time around. Kill preached to his tm about keeping an even keel all ssn long so despite the loss, they should be ready to go here. Kill sat QB Harnish in the opener to teach him that he had to earn the starting job and not to just expect it. Harnish responded and finished the reg ssn #1 in the MAC in pass eff, #3 in ttl off and #6 in rushing despite sitting many 2H’s after building big leads. The #31 off also had just 14 TO’s TY. RB Spann was named the MAC POY as he led in rushing and scoring (20 TD). While Harnish spread the ball around, NI’s top 4 WR’s accounted for 78% of the rec yds and 20 of the 22 rec TD’s. The OL avg 6’4” 309 (0 Sr) and started 94% of the gms together while paving the way for the MAC’s #1 rush off with 265 ypg (6.2 ypc) and all’g just 13 sks (surrendered 3 in the MAC Champ). The Huskies’ D (7 Sr st’rs) finished the reg ssn #1 in the MAC in scoring def, #3 in ttl def and #57 overall in our rankings. The DL avg 6’3” 265 (3 Sr) and is led by DE Coffman with a tm-best 6.5 sks. NI all’d just 131 ypg rush (4.0) with 24 sks. The Huskies have our #42 pass eff def all’g 202 ypg (57%) with a solid 13-16 ratio and our #51 ST unit. While NI had just a net P avg of 33.7, they blocked 4 punts and returned 2 for TD’s. It’s no secret the Bulldogs play a physical style of football up front and want to run the ball under Pat Hill. FSU finished #8 in the NCAA in rushing LY (229 ypg) and diminutive soph RB Rouse (5’7” 185) entered the ssn as the feature back but there were questions about his durability. Rouse was sidelined in Wk 2 with an inj but as the ssn wore on, he not only proved Hill correct, but also made his mark in the FSU record books by becoming the 1st FSU RB ever to rush for 200 yds in B2B gms (286 vs LT, 217 vs UN) en route to topping 1,000 yds. FSU’s OL avg 6’5” 312 (3 Sr) but its top two OL (RG Jackson and C Bernardi) where both bitten by the injury bug (saw limited action) which is part of the reason why the Bulldogs 4.1 ypc was their lowest S/’02. FSU’s DL avg 6’3” 278 (2 Sr) and features arguably the nation’s top DE/DT duo in sks in DE Carter and DT Harrell. Carter leads the WAC (#7 NCAA) with 11 sks, while Harrell is 2nd in the WAC (#10 NCAA) with 10.5 sks. As a tm, Fresno has 37 sks (#6 NCAA) to more than triple the output from LY when the unit managed just 11! FSU has our #54 pass eff def but the int ttl has been minimal. Over a 5 yr span (‘06-’10), FSU has just 30 int (6 per yr) with TY’s mark of 8 equalling a ssn-high during that time frame. FSU is #65 in our ST rankings. S/‘02, Fresno leads the nation with 56 blk’d kicks and two-time Groza semi-finalist K Goessling is 81% for his career (50-62) incl 21-28 from 40+ and 5-7 from 50+. FSU has all’d 2 KR and 1 PR for TD’s TY. NI cruised thru the MAC regular season going 8-0 SU and 7-1 ATS but after losing in the MAC Champ, as a 17’ pt fav, got shipped out west. They are also dealing with the departure of HC Kill and now are prepped by an interim. Fresno had a pair of BCS wins TY vs Cincy and IL and also had a late lead vs Nevada. As you see in our “Intangibles” the dog in Fresno bowls is 7-0 ATS with Fresno pulling the upset 4 times. Surprised that they’re a dog here and we’ll certainly take the points.FORECAST: Fresno St by 10 RATING: 3★ FRESNO ST

Crowd

QB 1/2 -

HUSKIES ATS: 9-4 O/U: 7-6

NI FSU NI FSU NI FSU

RB 4 - WR - 4

ST 1/2 - SCH - 44

OVERALL -

NI avg 6-4 309, 0 Sr, 13 sk all’d (4.3%), 6.2 ypc.FSU avg 6-5 312, 3 Sr, 30 sk all’d (9.2%), 4.1 ypc.NI avg 6-3 265, 3 Sr, 17 of tm 24 sk, 4.0 ypc.FSU avg 6-3 278, 2 Sr, 32 of tm 37 sk, 4.4 ypc.Kube #1 tkl’r w/77, 5 tfl, Butler #2, 5.5 tfl.Jacobs #1 tkl’r w/80, 3 tfl, Knox #2, 6.5 tfl.NI #42 pass eff D, 202 ypg (57%), 13-16 ratio. FSU #54 pass eff D, 201 ypg (58%), 18-8 ratio.

FRESNO ST

by 6' 4’s

N ILLINOIS (10-3)

FRESNO ST (8-4)

NI FSU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 18, 2010 • 5:30 pm ESPN • Bronco Stadium • Boise, IDPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.N ILLINOIS 223 138 32 1.0 4 89.7FRESNO ST 138 213 27 2.0 – 96.7

NI FSU

BULLDOGS ATS: 5-7 O/U: 4-6-2

NEW MEXICOBOWL

OL - -

DL - 4

LB - 4

DB - 1/2

UTEP’s Price has not been to a bowl in 4Y while Mendenhall has been to 5 straight.BYU will travel but UTEP is driving distance away and the NM Bowl wanted them here.Both QB’s around 55% and UTEP wants to run but BYU can stop them.UTEP excited to be in any bowl and is a DD dog.

CCH - 4

Turf/ 1/2 -

MTCH - -

INT 4 -

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGJJ Di Luigi #94 12/9 158 849 30 819 7 5.2Bryan Kariya #260 12/9 131 532 13 519 5 4.0Joshua Quezada #100 12/0 84 415 11 404 4 4.8Riley Nelson #65 3/3 31 163 15 148 1 4.8Jake Heaps #2 12/9 34 78 178 -100 1 -2.9 PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTJake Heaps #2 12/9 349 194 55.6 2052 11 8Riley Nelson #65 3/3 40 20 50.0 205 2 1 RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJJ DiLuigi #94 12/9 42 422 10.0 1 48Cody Hoffman #581 12/9 34 390 11.5 4 37McKay Jacobson #38 12/10 33 378 11.5 1 36Luke Ashworth #160 12/2 31 359 11.6 6 62Marcus Mathews #131 8/0 8 136 17.0 0 32Bryan Kariya #260 12/12 21 122 5.8 0 14Devin Mahina #32 11/5 9 98 10.9 0 22PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Riley Stephenson #14 12 49 2022 41.3 6 35.8 0 19 KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGMitch Payne #73 12 30-32 10-11 2-2 4-7 0-0 16-20 48POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTDB ANDREW RICH #134JC 12/12 106 0 6.5 7 3LB Shane Hunter #478JC 12/12 81 0 3.5 5 2DB Brian Logan #149JC 12/11 49 0 1 6 2LB Brandon Ogletree #119 10/7 47 0.5 4.5 3 1DL VIC SO’OTO #28 12/12 44 4 6.5 1 1LB Austin Jorgensen #198 12/3 43 1 1 0 0DB Travis Uale #510 11/8 41 0 0 0 0LB Jordan Pendleton #88 6/5 38 2 1.5 1 0DB Brandon Bradley #262 12/12 37 0 2 4 1LB Jadon Wagner – 11/8 35 1 5 1 0LB Kyle Van Noy #38 12/2 33 2 4.5 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJD Falslev 13 94 7.2 0 O’Neil Chambers 15 316 21.1 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGJoe Banyard #221 12/5 107 627 15 612 8 5.7Donald Buckram #419 7/6 75 340 15 325 1 4.3Vernon Frazier #299 11/0 38 244 13 231 2 6.1Leilyon Myers #183JC 12/0 50 218 5 213 6 4.3James Thomas II #209 12/4 37 221 20 201 0 5.4Trevor Vittatoe #164 12/12 47 247 106 141 0 3.0PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTTrevor Vittatoe #164 12/12 378 206 54.5 2511 19 10James Thomas II #209 12/4 12 6 50.0 135 1 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGKris Adams #306 12/12 44 917 20.8 11 73Marlon McClure #628 11/3 26 305 11.7 1 30Evan Davis #373 11/5 24 292 12.2 3 33Pierce Hunter #233 12/3 17 253 14.9 2 48Donavon Kemp #340 7/7 18 181 10.1 2 24Joe Banyard #221 12/5 17 107 6.3 0 17James Thomas II #209 12/4 11 101 9.2 0 28PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Ian Campbell #625JC 12 45 1986 44.1 7 36.5 0 15 KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGDakota Warren #232JC 12 39-39 7-8 1-2 1-5 2-4 11-19 57POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTS Wiston Jeune #337JC 12/5 79 0 1.5 4 0LB Jamie Irving #313 12/12 78 0 4.5 0 1CB Travaun Nixon #101JC 11/8 69 0 2 8 3LB Isaiah Carter #245 10/7 67 0 2.5 3 1LB Royzell Smith #239 11/8 67 1 2 2 1S DeShawn Grayson #175 12/10 64 0 0 5 0LB Anthony Morrow #560 11/4 58 0 1 3 0CB Antwon Blake #408 12/12 56 0 2 10 0CB Drew Thomas #699 12/4 41 0 3 5 1DL Greg Watkins #322 12/1 35 3 0 0 1PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDMarlon McClure 13 182 14.0 0 Marlon McClure 27 805 29.8 2

UTEP HC Price said that TY’s squad was the most snakebitten, inj-plagued tm that he had been a part of but many inj’d players participated in gms that he thought was extremely unlikely. This is the 3rd bowl for Price at UTEP (0-2 SU/ATS) and 8th overall as he went 3-2 SU and 2-3 ATS with WSU. BYU was revived after the USU loss when DC Hill was fired and HC Mendenhall took over DC duties (DC here before HC). The “Band of Brothers” t-shirts returned to the sidelines and BYU pulled the upset of SDSt. After an expected loss to TCU, BYU reeled off 4 str wins and landed here. After 5 str appearances in the LV Bowl, many would expect BYU to be disappointed here, but the young Cougs must feel a sense of accomplishment after the dismal start to the ssn. The Miners have 12 Sr st’rs among their 18 upperclassmen while BYU has 6 Sr’s and 15 upperclassmen. UTEP has ply’d 3 bowl caliber tms going 1-2 SU (2-1 ATS) and being outscored 34-26 and outgained 493-346 while the Cougars took on 7 going 2-5 SU (4-3 ATS) being outscored 26-15 and outgained 383-297. The Miners are playing in Albuquerque for the 2nd time TY (beat NM Oct 2nd). The senior-laden UTEP off (10 Sr st’rs) ranks #83 as they avg’d 26 ppg and 371 ypg. QB Vittatoe set the schl’s all-time pass record mid-ssn but inj’s to his shldr and most notably his ankle hampered him in the 2H of the yr as he threw for career-lows in att, comp, yds and comp %. In fact over his L/2Y Vittatoe had a 36-23 ratio vs a 58-16 mark over his 1st 2. RB Buckram was the #1 rusher in CUSA LY but a slew of inj’s kept him out of 5 full gms and parts of others. TCU trans Banyard took the bulk of the carries early on with Buckram out. WR Adams was Vittatoe’s go-to-guy almost the entire ssn as he leads the tm in rec, yds, ypc and TD rec and has 3 more TD rec than the rest of the tm comb! The OL consists of 5 Sr st’rs and avg a large 6’5” 307. The group paved the way for 150 ypg (4.6) while all’g just 14 sks (3.5%). The def (#102) all’d 25 ppg and 404 ypg. The tm all’d just 300 ypg in their 6 wins but gave up an amazing 508 ypg in their 6 defeats. The DL avg 6’2” 273 (1 Sr) and all’d 181 ypg rush (4.9) while recording 12 of the tm’s 14 sks (86%). The LB unit was led by the trio of Irving, Carter and Smith. S Braxton Amy was granted a 6th yr by the NCAA bolstering the unit but he suffered a career-ending leg inj in wk 2 giving Jeune the starting gig (led tm in tkls). UTEP has our #64 pass D rating all’g 223 ypg (61%) with a 20-9 ratio. They brought in 2 JC’s to handle the tm’s kicking duties while McClure handled both the return duties with 2 TD’s. The coverage units all’d 22.3 on KR and 11.6 on PR (#16 overall ST rating). BYU began the season using dual-QB’s after the loss of 4x 3,000 yd passer Max Hall. After a ssn opening win, BYU lost the next 2 with the QB combo of Heaps and Nelson avg just 155 ypg (50%) with a 1-2 ratio. Nelson was ruled OFY (shoulder) in the 3rd gm and the off was handed to true Fr Heaps. Heaps threw for 499 yds (52%) but had an 0-2 ratio in the next two losses. The top rusher/rec is Di Luigi and while he will set no records, he has done a nice job of filling in for 3x 1,000 yd rusher Unga. The OL avg 6’5” 314 with 1 Sr st’r and is paving the way for 164 ypg (4.2) rush. They’ve started every gm together and have all’d 21 sks (5.4%) although 8 of those came in the loss to Fla St. Overall, the Coug offense ranks #78. The DL is anchored by emotional leader So’oto who tops the team with 10.5 tfl. The DL has recorded 10 of the tm’s 20 sks TY and all’s 4.1 ypc. The Cougs have our #46 rated D. The secondary is led by S Andrew Rich who is the tm’s top tkl’r while diminutive CB Logan (5’6”) ranks #3. BYU ranks #24 in our pass eff D rankings all’g 188 ypg (54%) with a 17-13 ratio. The ST’s unit ranks #61 behind record setting PK Payne. The Cougs have not had a KR TD in 155 gms (dating back to ‘98) and suffered with the midseason susp and subsequent dismissal of KR/PR Chambers. The return units allow 5.8 ypr on PR and 22.7 on KR. UTEP is thrilled to be back in a bowl after a 4 year hiatus and HC Price called this a snake-bit season with inj’s. They are led by RB Buckram who LY had 1,600 yds and should now be healthy. BYU finished the season winning 4 of 5 gms and covering the final 4 with the defense excelling after Mendenhall took over and in fact had shutout the L/4 opps at the half. Always look to take a DD dog in a non-NYD bowl and you have to feel that the Miners will be prepared and are healthier here.FORECAST: UTEP (+) BYU by 3 RATING: 2★ UTEP (+)

Crowd

QB - -

MINERS ATS: 5-7 O/U: 5-7

UTEP BYU UTEP BYU UTEP BYU

RB - - WR 4 -

ST 4 - SCH - 441/2

OVERALL -

UTEP avg 6-5 307, 5 Sr, 14 sk all’d (3.5%), 4.6 ypc.BYU avg 6-5 314, 1 Sr, 21 sk all’d (5.4%), 4.2 ypc. UTEP avg 6-2 273, 1 Sr, 12 of tm 14 sk, 4.9 ypc.BYU avg 6-4 276, 1 Sr, 10 of tm 20 sk, 4.1 ypc.Irving #2 tkl’r w/78, 4.5 tfl, Carter #4, 2.5 tfl.Hunter #2 tkl’r w/81, 3.5 tfl, Ogletree #4, 5 tfl.UTEP #64 pass eff D, 223 ypg (61%), 20-9 ratio.BYU #24 pass eff D, 188 ypg (54%), 17-13 ratio.

BYU

by 2' 4’s

UTEP (6-6)

BYU (6-6)

UTEP BYU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 18, 2010 • 2:00 pm ESPN • University Stadium • Albuquerque, NMPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.UTEP 112 190 16 2.5 44 89.0BYU 218 215 28 1.7 – 99.4

UTEP BYU

COUGARS ATS: 7-5 O/U: 3-9

3

Page 4: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

POWER SWEEP DOUBLE BOWL ISSUELast 3 Years 65-30 68%! ★’S AT 154-75 67%!!

4

In the text of the bowl write-ups, we have ranked each special teams unit. We devised a formula which takes into account net punting, kick returns, punt returns & kick return defense. The total opportunities for each team was also factored into the equation. As an example, this year, Toledo punted 67 times and returned 20 punts all year. Their net punting average was weighted over 3 times as much as their punt return aver-age ranking due to the difference in attempts. We added a new category a few years ago for net return TD/Blk’s. A negative number means a team allowed more blocks & TD’s than they garnered. A positive number means that they blk’d more kicks and scored more TD’s on returns than they allowed. If a team blocked a punt AND returned the same punt for a TD, we only gave credit for one TD/Blk. However if a team fumbled a punt snap and the other team recovered it we counted that as a blocked punt. A few years ago we added a formula to grade the kickers and we looked at them in 6 categories. The first was overall accuracy and that % was multiplied by 5 (graded everything on a scale of 1-5). Then we took the amount of FG’s made and divided it into the largest amount of FG’s made (24) and that percentage was multiplied by 5. Each accounted for 30% of the overall grade. Then we looked at the FG’s between 40-49 yds (both # of kicks and %) and that accounted for 30% of the grade. The 50+ factors accounted for 10% of the grade. This grading method gave kickers with stronger legs a higher grade. In past years we have listed a special teams rating, a kicker rating and then two years ago added a combined special teams rating. The K rating accounts for about 26% of the overall grade. This year we just list them by the combined rating, but for you long-time readers looking for the individual ratings that are in the chart listed below.

2010 SPECIAL TEAMS RATINGS

Special Tms Net KR PR KR KR BLK/ ST ST Kick FG Including K Punts Off Off Def w/TB TD Ranking Rating Rating Total % 50+1. Florida 12.3 41.8 26.8 8.7 20.5 20.5 3 3 9.34 1.30 6-12 50% 0-02. UCF 12.2 36.1 28.3 14.2 17.7 17.4 2 2 9.77 1.51 10-20 50% 0-13. Oregon 11.5 38.6 21.9 18.2 19.3 18.6 5 1 9.85 2.32 12-16 75% 0-04. LSU 11.4 39.2 25.8 13.5 20.8 20.5 1 5 8.60 4.40 26-31 84% 2-35. Nebraska 11.4 38.1 23.3 12.9 23.8 18.6 2 9 8.46 4.34 18-19 95% 2-36. Utah 11.2 33.8 23.9 18.1 18.8 17.3 2 4 8.91 2.62 12-14 86% 0-07. Georgia 11.0 40.6 21.2 10.3 19.6 18.3 1 12 7.97 3.88 18-22 82% 2-28. Maryland 10.9 36.0 18.1 18.1 19.2 19.2 5 11 8.14 3.46 13-16 81% 1-19. TCU 10.7 36.8 26.7 14.8 20.5 19.3 0 10 8.27 2.17 10-12 83% 0-010. Oklahoma St 10.7 41.0 22.8 9.9 27.0 19.1 2 8 8.55 4.33 24-28 86% 2-311. Tulsa 10.4 39.2 22.5 12.1 18.9 18.7 0 17 7.76 2.04 14-22 64% 0-012. Kansas St 10.4 39.8 25.8 8.5 21.3 19.7 1 7 8.58 2.42 8-10 80% 0-013. Clemson 10.4 38.5 23.6 11.0 20.8 20.3 2 13 7.90 2.38 12-19 63% 0-014. Florida St 10.3 38.3 20.5 8.8 21.6 17.9 3 23 7.55 3.05 18-24 75% 2-415. Ohio 10.3 39.4 21.5 10.2 18.7 18.7 1 22 7.56 3.54 11-14 79% 1-116. UTEP 10.2 36.5 25.7 13.9 22.3 20.2 2 6 8.59 2.25 11-20 55% 2-419. Northwestern 10.0 38.2 22.8 9.3 20.0 18.6 1 19 7.70 2.51 15-22 68% 0-020. Virginia Tech 10.0 38.2 23.7 12.4 24.5 20.8 2 14 7.88 4.53 20-21 95% 1-122. Iowa 10.0 38.2 24.7 9.0 21.5 19.8 1 21 7.56 2.40 12-15 80% 0-023. Boise St 9.9 36.1 24.0 12.6 21.5 20.9 2 26 7.24 2.82 14-21 67% 1-325. Missouri 9.9 38.9 21.9 6.4 21.4 20.5 2 38 6.94 3.42 16-18 89% 1-226. Alabama 9.6 36.9 24.8 13.1 21.1 20.2 1 20 7.66 3.06 19-25 76% 0-127. Penn St 9.5 38.4 22.2 8.8 20.7 18.2 2 18 7.74 3.27 19-24 79% 0-128. Pittsburgh 9.5 40.3 20.8 11.8 21.8 20.3 0 28 7.21 2.32 16-23 70% 0-129. Auburn 9.5 34.7 24.0 6.2 19.8 19.4 2 39 6.93 2.75 15-20 75% 0-131. Middle Tennessee 9.5 37.0 25.3 6.7 20.5 19.8 -1 40 6.79 3.23 10-12 83% 1-132. Air Force 9.5 38.7 22.8 7.9 22.0 21.1 2 36 7.01 1.04 5-10 50% 0-036. Louisville 9.0 37.1 24.1 12.5 24.1 21.4 0 33 7.09 2.49 13-17 76% 0-037. Texas Tech 9.0 38.8 22.6 6.3 20.7 18.6 0 25 7.28 2.35 9-14 64% 1-338. Oklahoma 9.0 40.5 22.7 7.0 20.5 19.3 -1 30 7.17 2.91 21-27 78% 0-039. Miami, Fl 8.8 38.7 19.5 4.8 21.5 19.5 2 52 6.18 2.64 10-14 71% 1-142. Stanford 8.8 36.5 21.7 10.2 22.4 19.5 0 43 6.47 3.04 17-19 89% 0-043. Michigan St 8.7 38.2 18.8 12.9 21.1 19.9 3 31 7.15 3.95 14-15 93% 1-144. Connecticut 8.7 34.8 26.5 8.5 22.8 21.8 1 42 6.50 4.04 23-29 79% 2-245. Syracuse 8.6 38.9 23.0 9.4 22.6 23.0 -1 46 6.29 3.20 17-18 94% 0-0

Special Tms Net KR PR KR KR BLK/ ST ST Kick FG Including K Punts Off Off Def w/TB TD Ranking Rating Rating Total % 50+47. Mississippi St 8.6 38.2 21.4 9.0 22.5 22.5 1 51 6.20 2.33 12-18 67% 0-048. Illinois 8.6 37.9 20.0 3.3 22.1 19.3 3 41 6.59 3.94 21-26 81% 2-350. Notre Dame 8.5 36.1 20.9 5.9 19.3 18.7 0 60 5.98 4.18 15-15 100% 1-151. Northern Illinois 8.5 33.7 21.6 9.5 20.9 18.6 4 34 7.09 2.41 17-28 61% 0-152. Troy 8.5 37.7 17.8 12.2 20.0 19.5 0 59 6.02 2.53 15-20 75% 0-154. Arizona 8.3 34.1 22.0 6.2 20.4 19.2 2 58 6.04 2.85 13-16 81% 0-055. Army 8.3 36.6 19.0 7.1 20.1 19.8 1 75 5.63 2.50 13-20 65% 0-256. Ohio St 8.3 35.1 26.9 10.1 21.7 21.1 -1 47 6.25 2.90 19-24 79% 0-261. BYU 8.0 35.8 21.8 7.9 22.7 19.1 0 53 6.17 2.71 16-20 80% 0-063. West Virginia 8.0 37.4 18.5 8.9 20.5 19.5 -1 71 5.67 1.93 10-15 67% 0-065. Fresno St 7.9 35.2 22.5 9.3 24.1 23.8 0 94 5.03 4.05 20-24 83% 2-367. Texas A&M 7.9 34.2 24.0 7.1 21.2 21.1 2 62 5.87 3.38 15-19 79% 1-168. Wisconsin 7.8 37.2 22.8 11.1 24.4 23.0 -2 93 5.05 3.00 15-19 79% 0-170. South Carolina 7.8 37.9 20.5 3.6 20.7 20.0 -1 83 5.49 3.14 16-23 70% 1-374. USF 7.7 34.4 23.2 10.9 22.4 22.7 1 66 5.79 2.68 17-24 71% 0-279. Tennessee 7.5 36.3 21.4 3.6 18.8 19.4 -1 82 5.50 2.92 15-18 83% 0-181. Southern Miss 7.4 36.3 23.6 7.2 23.7 23.1 1 79 5.58 4.41 26-30 87% 2-383. Arkansas 7.4 36.6 19.6 17.2 25.9 23.4 -1 92 5.10 3.60 13-16 81% 1-186. East Carolina 7.3 36.2 20.2 9.6 20.3 20.1 1 61 5.96 3.28 14-16 88% 1-288. Kentucky 7.3 36.5 22.5 6.9 24.1 21.6 -1 80 5.53 2.92 11-16 69% 1-292. Washington 7.2 36.6 20.9 4.9 24.4 23.9 0 100 4.71 2.70 12-17 71% 2-594. Hawaii 7.1 36.3 20.2 4.6 20.0 19.8 1 78 5.59 2.40 17-21 81% 0-095. SMU 7.1 34.9 22.3 4.8 24.8 23.8 -1 110 4.20 2.25 8-12 67% 1-296. Michigan 7.1 36.7 21.1 5.4 21.4 20.8 -2 91 5.10 0.69 4-13 31% 0-099. Boston College 6.8 38.5 17.6 4.6 19.9 20.1 -1 90 5.11 2.71 20-23 87% 0-0101. Baylor 6.7 37.8 19.3 6.7 21.3 20.1 -2 98 5.00 3.81 19-26 73% 2-2102. Georgia Tech 6.6 32.9 20.7 6.8 19.0 19.2 -2 103 4.62 2.75 15-17 88% 0-0103. Navy 6.6 33.9 22.3 5.4 23.8 22.7 -1 108 4.25 2.17 8-11 73% 0-0104. Miami, Oh 6.6 35.0 20.0 5.1 20.9 21.1 0 101 4.69 2.56 18-25 72% 0-0105. Toledo 6.4 32.3 25.5 2.9 19.2 19.4 -2 95 5.01 0.87 5-13 38% 0-0107. Nevada 6.4 37.7 22.7 8.2 26.1 23.9 -1 102 4.68 1.58 10-15 67% 0-1108. NC State 6.3 33.7 18.7 9.3 21.9 21.4 0 106 4.29 3.04 18-23 78% 0-0109. San Diego St 6.1 36.7 19.7 6.7 26.1 21.4 -2 104 4.58 3.49 17-22 77% 1-1115. North Carolina 5.5 31.1 20.3 9.2 22.6 22.5 -1 116 3.30 2.69 16-19 84% 0-0118. FIU 4.7 31.1 21.0 6.1 20.9 20.4 -3 117 3.21 3.61 15-18 83% 1-1

OL - -

DL - -

LB 4 -

DB 4 -

NEW ORLEANSBOWL

Would favor HC Solich by more but Ohio has had a pair of poor bowl performances. OU will struggle to bring fans while Troy will enjoy the southern hospitality.Troy has a small, aggressive DL but OU can negate that edge by running the ball.OU is bowl elig for the 4th time in 5Y while Troy has been elig 5 consec.

CCH 1/2 -

Turf/ - 44

MTCH 41/2 -

INT - -

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGShawn Southward #216 12/3 106 568 20 548 7 5.2DuJuan Harris #506 11/2 83 510 12 498 5 6.0Chris Anderson #83 12/7 92 422 44 378 3 4.1Jerrel Jernigan #155 12/10 42 316 10 306 2 7.3Jamie Hampton #111 5/0 17 67 0 67 0 3.9Corey Robinson #113 12/12 47 97 202 -105 0 -2.2PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTCorey Robinson #113 12/12 463 289 62.4 3339 24 15Jamie Hampton #111 5/0 8 7 87.5 28 2 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJERREL JERNIGAN #155 12/10 77 774 10.1 5 70Jason Bruce #233JC 12/12 43 554 12.9 5 47Tebiarus Gill #216JC 12/8 48 498 10.4 3 29Chip Reeves #169 12/4 26 484 18.6 5 79Jamel Johnson #966 12/1 20 222 11.1 3 39PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Will Goggans #53 12 62 2619 42.2 12 37.5 0 19KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGMichael Taylor #18 12 44-47 7-8 5-6 3-5 0-1 15-20 43POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Xavier Lamb #303 12/12 87 2 5.5 4 0LB Daniel Sheffield #271JC 12/12 74 1.5 4 4 1DE JONATHAN MASSAQUOI #150JC 12/12 68 11 6.5 1 0SS Willard Ross #1798JC 12/12 63 0 2 1 0FS LaDarrius Madden #356JC 11/9 47 0 0 3 3DE Mario Addison #312JC 11/11 45 9 5 1 0LB Kanorris Davis #222 10/2 41 3 6 4 0LB Donnell Golden #437 9/7 35 0 2 1 1CB KeJuan Phillips #500 12/5 33 0 3 6 0CB Chris Pickett #544 9/9 33 0 0.5 7 0CB Bryan Willis #317 12/7 31 0 0 3 2CB Jimmie Anderson #33JC 12/4 27 0 3 5 2PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJERREL JERNIGAN 22 301 13.7 1 JERREL JERNIGAN 23 600 26.1 1

First meeting. This is Ohio’s 5th bowl game ever and its 3rd in HC Solich’s 6 ssns. LY they lost to Marshall in the Little Caesars 21-17 (-3) bringing Solich’s record to 2-5 SU/ATS in bowl gms and dropping Ohio to 0-4 SU (0-2 ATS) in bowls. Ohio has been sitting since Nov 26th with bitter disap-pointment as they lost their ssn finale to Kent St 28-6 (-4) keeping them from their 2nd straight MAC East Title and a spot in the MAC Title game. Troy and HC Blakeney are 1-3 SU and 1-2-1 ATS all-time in bowls losing their last 2 by 3 pts each (both in OT). They have faced the MAC in 2 bowl gms losing 34-21 (-3) to NI in ‘04 and 44-41 (+3) to CM LY. The Trojans finished the ssn on Dec 4th with 2 wins and when FIU dropped their reg ssn finale by 1, Troy won a share of the crown. They return to the New Orleans Bowl for the third time in the L/5Y. Ohio played 4 bowl tms this TY going 2-2 SU/ATS. They were outscored by a 25-21 avg while being outgained 349-250 (incl a 43-7 loss at Ohio St where they were outgained 439-162). Troy also faced 4 bowl tms TY going 1-3 SU (2-2 ATS) being outscored 44-35 and outgained 464-392. Ohio was 3-3 SU but 4-2 ATS on the road incl an outright upset of Temple 31-23 (+8’). They were outscored 25-22 on the road and outgained 365-291 but that again was weighted down by the Ohio St blow out. Troy was 3-4 SU/ATS on the road TY. OU has 10 Sr starters among 15 upperclassmen while Troy is led by 11 Sr starters and 16 upperclassmen. Ohio started the ssn playing 2 QB’s but former Iowa St transfer Bates was inj’d (missed 3) while Jackson, who was coming off a MedRS (2 gms), played all 12. They finished as Ohio’s #2 and #3 rushers and comb to lead the Bobcats in rushing in 7 gms TY incl Bates’ 142 vs BG (OU’s ssn high). Jackson however had almost 90% of the tm’s pass att. RB Davidson had two 100+ yd gms and Harden was the #4 rusher despite missing 6. Ohio lost its top returning WR Brazill (53 rec, 13.2 LY) for the ssn (ply’d 3). Their top WR McCrae, who finished #3 LY, did not even match LY’s totals (35, 545). The starting OL avg 6’4” 305 and all 5 have started 8+ gms TY incl 3 that started all 12. OU avg 169 ypg and 4.4 ypc behind them but despite 2 mobile QB’s all’d 17 sks (6.8%). OU finished with our #97 off. The D (#66) has 7 fifth yr Sr st’rs (incl all 4 DL) and is all’g just 115 ypg rushing (3.2) and on the ssn has 24 sks. Ohio has our #71 pass eff D all’g 218 ypg (59%) with a 17-17 ratio. The Bobcats have our #15 ST’s unit. While not all’g a P block this ssn, all 3 of K Weller’s FG misses were blocked. They lead the MAC in net punting (39.4) as Hershey has just 1 TB despite 10 punts of 50+ yds and OU is all’g just 6.9 ypr on punts and just 18.7 on KR’s. OU is avg 10.2 on PR’s and 21.5 on KR’s. Troy has 7 Sr starters on offense (#57) and led the SBC in scoring and ttl off. They are led by rFr QB Robinson, who in his 1st yr as a starter, led the SBC in pass ypg and was 2nd in pass eff but did go through a rough 5 gm patch (3 losses) when he threw 11 of his 15 int. The run game has 4 players with 306+ rush yds each avg at least 4.0 ypc. That incl their top WR Jernigan who not only leads the SBC in rec but also all-purp yds (165 ypg). The OL avg 6’3” 303 with 4 upperclassmen incl 3 Sr’s. They have paved the way for 151 rush ypg (4.2) while all’g 24 sks (4.9%). The OL had three 12 gm st’rs while 2 others started 9 each. The D (#103) was just #6 in scoring and #8 in ttl def in the SBC but did lead with 35 sks. Their DE’s ranked #2 and #3 in the SBC in sks with DE Massaquoi leading the SBC in tfl (17.5). Despite their sack total they are still all’g 171 ypg rush (4.5) and could struggle vs OU’s rush attack (DL avg just 6’2” 257). Troy had our #62 pass eff D all’g 248 ypg (58%) with a 20-12 ratio. They had our #52 spec tms unit despite WR Jernigan having 2 ret TD’s as they also all’d 2 TD’s (1 PR, 1 KR). They were #2 in the SBC in net punting. Both had their sights set on conf champs but after failing to reach those goals, meet in the Super-dome. Ohio has struggled in their 2 recent bowls and the last time they came down South, they lost to SM 28-7. We do like OU having the options with both QB’s and they get a favorable matchup vs a small, aggressive DL. Troy looked like the SBC’s top team early, but dropped 5 straight ATS incl outright losses as 16’ and 8’ pt favs until winning their L/2. This is the Trojans’ 3rd trip to this bowl in the L/5Y and they’ve split the two previous meetings. We’ll back the team with the better D who can run the ball. FORECAST: Ohio by 6 RATING: 1★ OHIO

Crowd

QB - -

BOBCATS ATS: 8-4 O/U: 6-5-1

OU TROY OU TROY OU TROY

RB - 41/2 WR - 1/2

ST 4 - SCH - -

OVERALL -

OU avg 6-4 305, 0 Sr, 17 sk all’d (6.8%), 4.4 ypc. Troy avg 6-3 303, 3 Sr, 24 sk all’d (4.9%), 4.2 ypc.OU avg 6-3 282, 4 Sr, 14 of tm 24 sk, 3.2 ypc.Troy avg 6-2 257, 2 Sr, 28.5 of tm 35 sk, 4.5 ypc.Clemens #1 tkl’r w/72, 2 tfl, Benjamin #5, 3 tfl.Lamb #1 tkl’r w/87, 7.5 tfl, Sheffield #2, 5.5 tfl.OU #71 pass eff D, 218 ypg (59%), 17-17 ratio.Troy #62 pass eff D, 248 ypg (58%), 20-12 ratio.

OHIO

by 1 4’s

OHIO (8-4)

TROY (7-5)

OU TROY CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 18, 2010 • 9:00 pm ESPN • Superdome • New Orleans, LA

OU TROY

TROJANS ATS: 4-8 O/U: 6-6RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGVince Davidson #389 12/12 132 544 31 513 6 3.9Phil Bates #30 9/5 73 534 26 508 3 7.0Boo Jackson #63JC 12/8 122 472 147 325 7 2.7Donte Harden #193 6/0 45 230 11 219 3 4.9Ryan Boykin #1005 10/0 41 215 2 213 3 5.2PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTBoo Jackson #63JC 12/8 224 135 60.3 1688 15 16Phil Bates #30 9/5 22 9 40.9 178 1 2RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGTerrence McCrae #111 12/12 32 481 15.0 9 46Steven Goulet #166 12/7 23 348 15.1 0 56Riley Dunlop #308 12/6 23 296 12.9 2 39Jordan Thompson #101 12/12 19 179 9.4 3 21Donte Foster #264 12/12 7 123 17.6 0 47Vince Davidson #389 12/12 8 110 13.8 1 61PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20PAUL HERSHEY #287 12 44 1800 40.9 15 39.4 0 13KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGMatt Weller #49 12 37-41 3-3 2-3 5-7 1-1 11-14 51 POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Chad Clemens #1288 12/0 72 0 2 3 0SS Donovan Fletcher #215 12/11 68 0 0.5 3 5FS Steven Jackson #510 12/12 65 0.5 3 3 3DE Stafford Gatling #537 12/12 49 6.5 7 2 0LB Eric Benjamin #1288 12/11 47 3 0 3 0LB Jay Edwards #228 12/9 47 0 2.5 0 1DB Shannon Ballard #355 12/5 44 0.5 2 2 0DT Carl Jones #604 12/0 40 3.5 1.5 1 1DE Dak Notestine #1283 12/12 38 2.5 2.5 0 0LB Alphonso Lewis #161 12/6 38 1 3.5 0 1CB Julian Posey #277 12/12 38 0 1 12 0DB Travis Carrie #1663 11/11 36 2 3.5 4 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDTravis Carrie 17 188 11.1 0 Julian Posey 19 422 22.2 0

POWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.OHIO 149 195 29 3.1 44 90.6TROY 141 290 30 3.1 91.9

Page 5: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

KEY SELECTIONS4★ INDIANAPOLIS over Jacksonville - IND can still win their 7th Div title in 8 years by winning out which makes this the AFC South Championship game. JAX is actually 6-1-1 ATS in IND with a 20-16 avg score. They upset IND 31-28 as a 7 pt HD in the 1st meeting TY with the 8th longest FG in NFL history (59 yds). The Colts are 2-3 SU and 4-1 ATS vs foes with a winning record TY (not inc JAX). They have a 372-313 yd edge with a 25-15 scoring edge but are -8 TO’s as Manning has pressed to make up for the depleted skill players. The Jaguars are 0-4 SU and 1-3 ATS vs foes with a winning record TY (minus IND) losing the yardage battle in all 4 events. They have been outgained 409-291 in those (-9 TO’s) losing by a 33-14 avg score. Yes, the Colts have failed to cover 3 straight but they expect to get WR Collie, WLB Session and possibly CB Hayden and RB Addai back with the extra rest. Del Rio deserves to be commended for making the most out of a soft schedule and a healthy roster TY (only 2 starts on IR). We’ll side with the more veteran team used to big games at the end of the year. FORECAST: INDIANAPOLIS 34 Jacksonville 203★ PITTSBURGH over NY Jets - This is the 1st meeting between the Jets and Steelers since NY won 19-16 as a 9.5 pt AD back in 2007. However, Ryan has plenty of experience with PIT as the Ravens DC from 2005-08 logging a 4-4 SU and 6-2 ATS record. This is a big battle between a pair of Playoff bound teams here and the Steelers could go a long ways to wrapping up the #2 seed with a win while the Jets need a win to stay ahead of the Wild Card pack. The Jets were upset by MIA LW and a closer look shows that the Jets are just 1-4 SU and ATS vs foes with a winning record TY being held to 10 or less in 3 matchups. Minus the 28-14 win vs NE in Wk 2 they have been outgained by 29 ypg (-4 TO’s) with a 21-4 avg score. Sanchez has been pretty bland in all 4 games avg 179 ypg (53%) with a 3-5 ratio with a puny 5.9 ypa. PIT is 3-3 SU and ATS being outgained by 3 ypg (0 TO’s) with a 19-18 scoring edge. While Roethlisberger is 1-2 SU and ATS vs a foe with a winning record TY avg 278 ypg (60%) with a 4-3 ratio, the key here is the rush attack. PIT has outrushed winning foes 111 (4.4) to 66 (2.9) on the year. We’ll side with the home team that relishes physical games with only CAR and CLE on deck vs a Jets team with a road trip to CHI on deck. FORECAST: PITTSBURGH 23 NY Jets 13

OTHER SELECTIONS2★ Houston over TENNESSEE - The Texans have won and covered 3 of the L4 vs the Titans includ-ing a 20-0 shutout win as a 6 pt HF in the 1st meeting TY. TEN started #3 QB Rusty Smith and the Texans had a 346-162 yd edge while being held to just 24 yds rushing (2.0). After starting a different QB for 6 straight games (1-5 ATS), TEN went with Collins and put forth their best effort since the SD game. TEN stole the backdoor cover from the Colts with a 77/14 pl drive and were outgained 399-288 prior to that. In their 6 game losing streak they have been outgained by 116 ypg (-9 TO’s) losing by a 25-15 avg score. The defense has given up 147 ypg rush (4.0) with a surprising 9-3 TD/Int ratio and 4 games of a 99 or higher QBR allowed. HOU is off LW’s MNF game vs BAL and are 2-5 ATS vs a DIV foe. The Texans have followed the same pattern the last few years and LY after they were out of the playoff race they finished winning 4 straight with a relaxed offense averaging 429 ypg and a fired up defense allowing only 300 ypg. Tennessee’s defense has allowed 300+ yards passing in 7 of the last 11 games and if they try to drop back in coverage Houston can again exploit the D with the run game as they did 4 weeks ago (188 yds, 4.8). FORECAST: Houston 31 TENNESSEE 242★ SEATTLE (+) over Atlanta - This is the Falcons 3rd straight road game (4th in 5 Wks) and they have a big MNF rematch at home vs the Saints on deck. NDIV AF’s after a road game with a MNF Div game on deck are 7-1-1 ATS though since 1995. There won’t be a lot of enthusiasm for backing SEA here as they are 3-5 SU and ATS vs a NDIV being outgained by 142 ypg and losing by an avg of 11 ppg. In their L3 games vs a foe with a winning record (NYG, NO, KC) they are 0-3 SU and ATS being outgained by 203 ypg (-4 TO’s) and losing by 22 ppg. ATL has logged a 7-2 SU and 6-3 ATS record vs NDIV foes TY covering 4 straight with a 30-22 avg score. With those points noted we will take a contrarian stand. This will be the first poor weather game for Ryan and the Falcons this year with the early forecasts in the 40’s. A wet field takes away their speed edge and it will be tough to keep the Falcon players from not looking ahead to hosting the Saints next week. Having an energetic HC in his first season with a team that is 4-2 ATS at home has us leaning with the Seahawks. FORECAST: SEATTLE 17 Atlanta 13

OTHER GAMESSan Francisco at SAN DIEGO - When the schedule makers drew this up the thoughts were that a pair of division leaders would be facing off. San Fran is now playing their 3rd away game in 18 days while San Diego is home for a 3rd straight. The Chargers are used to playing with “must win” pressure but LY when they had to run the table they finished 0-2-1 ATS as a favorite. Call the NC Debit Card System for the winner on tonight’s PPH Play for $9. Updated Thurs at 3:00 pm EST! ST LOUIS 34 Kansas City 31 - The state of Missouri has a rebirth of NFL talent as these 2 were a combined 4-22 SU at the same time LY and they are familiar with each other as they meet annually in preseason for the Governors Cup. LW KC was without QB Cassel (appendix) and the Chiefs were forced to go with Brodie Croyle at the helm. Croyle was ineffective but Cassel should be fine to go here. The Chiefs playoff run started LW as they traveled to SD and perception met reality as SD dominated. They are now playing with added pressure as are also playing on the road for a 2nd straight and a tiring 5th time in 7 weeks. The Rams return home after a lengthy 3 game road trip incl LW as they lost to NO as we cashed our NFL GOY. This Rams team continues to be resilient as they’re 5-1 ATS off a SU loss. QB Bradford was bothered by the Saints blitzing LW but KC has not had success away from home with only 10 sacks in their 1st 6 road games. We went against both teams with Late Phone Winners last week but will side with the home team that can easily get energized by their home crowd. CAROLINA 17 Arizona 13- This is the 5th meeting in 4 years with visitor being 4-0 ATS (3-1 SU) with a 29-18 avg score. CAR won LY’s matchup 34-21 as a 10 pt AD as the Cardinals self-destructed with 6 TO’s that the Panthers converted into 13 pts. CAR wore down the Cardinals with a 270 (6.1) to 94 (5.5) rush edge after taking a 28-7 lead at the half. Much has been made of Fox’s disconnect with the front office and ownership lately especially with the Panthers being 1-6 SU/ATS at home. Clausen has had a steep learning curve TY (0-7 SU and 2-5 ATS with 1 TD pass) but he has a huge edge over ARZ who could be starting John Skelton again here. Buried as the #3 QB all year Skelton only had a weeks worth of practice snaps with the #1’s LW and it showed. Against a depleted DEN defense he was just 15-37-146. We have profited by going against both teams this year but will side with the home team this week. Carolina has the better defense and a young QB will struggle making his first road start against a defense allowing 56% completions at home. If Arizona tries to be conservative and run the Panthers are holding opponents to under 4.0 ypc at home. Cleveland 23 CINCINNATI 16 - CLE is 5-2 ATS vs the Bengals logging a 23-20 win as a 2.5 pt HD TY starting the Bengals on a 10 game losing streak. CIN had a 413-295 yd edge but 2 fumbles set up a pair of FG’s for the Browns. On their final drive CIN worked the ball down the field to the CLE 31. An offensive pass interference penalty on Ochocinco made it 3 & 13 on the 41 where Palmer was sacked and CLE ran out the final 4:41. Owens had his best game of they year with 10 rec (22.2) but his 78 yd TD came when the CLE defender slipped in coverage. The Browns have gone with Delhomme at QB the L3W and after a win against Carolina the offense had bogged down and gained 252 yds in a win at Miami but LW the offense totaled just 187 yds including just 56 yds on the last 6 drives. Cincinnati meanwhile got out to an early 7-0 lead at Pittsburgh but they were held to 132 TOTAL yards before 58 yds in garbage time trailing 23-7. The Bengals have now been outgained in 4 straight games by an average of 133 ypg as the veterans have resigned themselves to a lost season.

5

4★ Excellent3★ Very Good2★ Good

MIAMI 24 Buffalo 21 - The Dolphins are 4-1 SU/ATS vs the Bills including a 15-10 win as a 3 pt AF in Wk 1. There was little film of how Gailey worked his offense from the preseason and the Dolphins were cautious on both sides of the ball. MIA had a 296-166 yd edge holding the Bills to just 1 drive over 30 yds with 7 of their 1st 9 drives ending as a punt. Henne was very tentative with 182 yds (62%) as the Dolphins had a 132 (3.7) to 50 (2.9) yd rush edge. Henne (268 yds 63% 7-9) is 1-4 SU and 2-3 ATS as a starter at home TY and has only led MIA a TD on 9 of 56 drives (16%) at home with 18 drives (32%) ending in punts. He hasn’t had much help on the ground as the Brown/Williams combo have been largely ineffective TY with MIA being outrushed 108 (3.7) to 81 (3.5) at home (159 ypg 4.5 at home LY). The Bills got a win last week as they outgained the Browns 323-187 holding them to 9 FD’s. Since their bye week Buffalo is 5-1-2 ATS and much of the credit can go to a beleaguered OL that has allowed 2 sacks in just 1 game (BAL). BUF continues to play hard and keeps it within the number. NY GIANTS 33 Philadelphia 23 - Including playoffs PHI has won and covered 5 straight vs NYG with a 31-19 avg score. PHI won the 1st game TY 27-17 as a 3 pt HF. NY rallied from a 16-3 deficit to take the lead early 4Q but a def offsides pen on 3&5 set up a 50 yd TD run by McCoy on 4th Dn. Manning then fmbl’d the ball on a 16 yd scramble which set up a 30 yd FG to seal it. Despite being outgained 392-208 the Giants had a solid def gameplan as while Vick had 258 yds passing (63%) he only had 34 yds rushing (3.1) and no passing TD’s. The Giants had an unusual week flying into KC and then back to Detroit to face MIN. While it took them out of their routine and gave them one less day to prep they know the Eagles well enough to not make that an issue. Manning blamed himself for the loss to the Eagles and NYG continues to be overlooked as one of the league’s premier teams (#2 off, #4 def YTD).DALLAS 31 Washington 14 - Despite traditionally having the talent and coaching edge over the L5Y over WAS the Cowboys are 4-4 SU and 2-6 ATS vs the Redskins. This includes a 13-7 loss as a 3.5 pt AF in Wk 1 on SNF. DAL had 380-250 yd and 8:06 TOP edges in the game with an impressive goal line stand by the defense on the 1st drive of the 2H when the Redkskins had 1&gl from the 5. DAL missed a 34 yd FG WR in the 2Q and were hit with 5 penalties including an offensive holding penalty which nullified the game winning TD by Romo after a great scramble and throw to WR Williams on the final play of the game. The Cowboys are off a Sunday Night game with Philly but have reeled off 4 straight ATS wins since making the coaching change. While the offense has put up their 2nd and 3rd highest totals gaining 427 at the NYG and 457 vs NO the key to the turnaround is that the Kitna run offense has turned the ball over just 2 times in the 3 SU wins. While a late season win LW could have given the Redskins a morale boost to finish the season we can’t think of a more deflating way to lose a game than to score on the final play and then botch an extra point attempt. TAMPA BAY 24 Detroit 21 - TB won the last meeting in 2008, 38-20 as an 8.5 pt AF. This is the Lions 1st road game in 4 Wks and they’ve lost an NFL record 26 straight road games (9-16-1 ATS). TB is only 3-14 ATS at home though where they have been outgained by 25 ypg (+2 TO’s) and outscored 24-18 TY. Both teams have had their share of injuries lately with DET down to #3 QB Stanton, losing DE Vanden Bosch (neck) and CB Smith (right shoulder) landing on IR. TB’s injury situation is more dire however as prior to LW’s17-16 win vs WAS they lost their best CB (Talib), starting SS (Grimm), Ctr (Faine), RG (Joseph), #3 DE (Moore) and demoted their starting RT (Trueblood) due to poor play. The Lions knocked GB’s Rogers out of the game and the defense came to play holding the Packers to 13 FD’s and 258 yds. Detroit is now 9-3-1 ATS on the year and a late season win over a division rival can give this young team the energy to not only finish the season strong but perhaps pull an upset as well. Tampa Bay is still not accustomed to the favorites role and they play much tighter with the lead. DL Suh is dominating the middle for Detroit and by him occupying 2 OL on every play the Lions have held 5 of their last 10 opponents to 290 yds or less. It’ll be a low scoring close game with one team playing loose which gives DET the edge.New Orleans 23 BALTIMORE 20 - This game features a pair of playoff teams that have to play hard and get a little help to win their divisions. NO hasn’t done very well at cold weather sites in Dec the L3Y going 2-2 SU and 0-3-1 ATS losing to CHI twice SU, being taken to OT vs WAS LY as a 9.5 pt fav LY and blowing a lead vs CIN 2 Wks ago to lose ATS. Baltimore is off a Monday night game at Houston and they still are thinking about giving the game away vs Pittsburgh. While the Ravens defense has held 4 of 5 opponents to under 290 yds the L5W they are still getting exposed thru the air. They allowed 307 yds passing at home vs Denver, 374 yds passing at home vs Buffalo and allowed 307 yds passing to Atlanta vs the only true passing offenses they’ve faced. If you can move on Baltimore and their offense doesn’t get setup with good field position they’ve been pedestrian averaging 333 ypg the L4W. The Saints offense is now getting their weapons back and last week cashed as our NFL GOY in a 31-13 win over St Louis. New Orleans on the road has now topped 400+ yds 4 straight games averaging 433 ypg. The early forecast is for temperatures in the 40’s so we have no problems leaning with a quality road team that has won 13 of their last 14 away games outright.OAKLAND 34 Denver 24 - In a mild surprise, the Raiders find themselves with the situational, technical and talent edges here. OAK is 7-2 ATS vs DEN including a 59-14 win as a 7 pt AD in the 1st meeting TY where they dominated with a 328 (6.3) to 75 (4.4) rush edge. Including that game the Raiders are 4-0 SU/ATS in DIV play outgaining foes by 35 ypg (+2 TO’s) with a 36-18 avg score. They are getting the Broncos at the right time as they are on their 4th road game in 5 Wks (3rd straight) with career RB coach Studesville in his 2nd game as interim HC. DEN had a favorable matchup vs an ARZ team down to its 3rd string QB LW and looked inept getting outgained 357-288. The secret to the Raiders success is simple and that is running the ball. They have rushed for over 135+ yards 4 times this season winning each and now they face a Broncos defense allowing 169 ypg & 4.6 ypc on the road. The Broncos have also struggled with protection and in the L6W they’ve allowed 3+ sacks in 5 games losing all of them and the Raiders have had multiple sacks in 12 of 13 games TY incl 26 L/7W.Green Bay at NEW ENGLAND - The Patriots are playing in the national TV spotlight for the 4th time in 6 weeks. New England has won 15 straight at home covering 9 of the last 13. The Packers meanwhile have been road warriors going 13-4-1 ATS as an AD. Both need a win to stay in conten-tion for a division crown. Get the Sunday Night winner on the NC Debit Card System for only $9 after 11:00 am EST on Sunday.Chicago at MINNESOTA - MIN was uprooted last week having to play in Detroit versus the Giants but they should be able to host this game. The Vikings are now playing for pride and nothing would please them more then knocking off the Bears. The home team has now won 6 straight (covered 5 straight) in this rivalry and can the Vikings extend the streak? We offer a MONEY BACK PLUS Guarantee on MNM through the NC Debit Card System - take advantage on Monday night after 3:00 pm EST! Pay just $30 for the MNM Play and if it fails to cover - you’ll get $40 back on your debit card the very next day! Monday Nights now 9-3-1 75% on the year (as of 12/12/10).

PRO SELECTIONS WK 15

MONDAY NIGHT MAGICPAY $30 FOR YOUR WINNER ON MONDAYOffer Available on the Northcoast Debit Card System

IF YOU DO NOT WIN

YOU GET YOUR MONEY BACK PLUS!If our ★ RATED release fails to cover, we will credit

$40 back to your Northcoast Debit Card!

9-3-1 75% TY!

Page 6: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

ATLANTA (SU: 11-2 ATS: 9-4) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 at Pittsburgh (OT) L -1 9-15 38S 19 Arizona W -6’ 41-7 43S 26 at New Orleans (OT) W +3 27-24 49O 3 San Francisco L -7 16-14 42’O 10 at Cleveland W -3 20-10 41O 17 at Philadelphia L +2 17-31 42’O 24 Cincinnati W -3’ 39-32 43O 31 BYE WEEKN 7 Tampa Bay L -9’ 27-21 45’N 11 Baltimore (Th) W -1 26-21 43’N 21 at St Louis W -3 34-17 42’N 28 Green Bay W -1’ 20-17 47D 5 at Tampa Bay W -3 28-24 43’D 12 at Carolina W -7 31-10 41D 19 at SeattleD 27 New Orleans (Mon)J 2 Carolina

BUFFALO (SU: 3-10 ATS: 6-5-2) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 Miami L +3 10-15 39S 19 at Green Bay L +13 7-34 43S 26 at New England W +14’ 30-38 42’O 3 NY Jets L +6 14-38 36’O 10 Jacksonville L -2 26-36 41O 17 BYE WEEKO 24 at Baltimore (OT) W +13 34-37 40O 31 at Kansas City(OT) W +7 10-13 45N 7 † Chicago (Toronto) T +3 19-22 41’N 14 Detroit T -2 14-12 45N 21 at Cincinnati W +4’ 49-31 41’N 28 Pittsburgh (OT) W +6 16-19 43D 5 at Minnesota L +5 14-38 43’D 12 Cleveland W -1 13-6 39D 19 at MiamiD 26 New EnglandJ 2 at NY Jets

ARIZONA (SU: 4-9 ATS: 4-9) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 at St Louis W -3’ 17-13 39’S 19 at Atlanta L +6’ 7-41 43S 26 Oakland L -5 24-23 39O 3 at San Diego L +9’ 10-41 46O 10 New Orleans W +6’ 30-20 45’O 17 BYE WEEKO 24 at Seattle L +7 10-22 40 O 31 Tampa Bay L -3 35-38 39N 7 at Minnesota OT W +7’ 24-27 42N 14 Seattle L -3 18-36 41N 21 at Kansas City L +7’ 13-31 44N 29 San Fran (M) L +2 6-27 41D 5 St Louis L +3 6-19 44D 12 Denver W +4 43-13 43’D 19 at CarolinaD 25 Dallas (Sat)J 2 at San Francisco

BALTIMORE (SU: 8-4 ATS: 5-6-1) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 13 at NY Jets (M) W +1 10-9 36’S 19 at Cincinnati L -2’ 10-15 39’S 26 Cleveland L -11 24-17 37O 3 at Pittsburgh W +2’ 17-14 34O 10 Denver W -7’ 31-17 39’O 17 at New England (OT) L +2’ 20-23 44’O 24 Buffalo (OT) L -13 37-34 40O 31 BYE WEEKN 7 Miami W -5’ 26-10 41N 11 at Atlanta (Th) L +1 21-26 43’N 21 at Carolina W -11’ 37-13 37 N 28 Tampa Bay T -7 17-10 42D 5 Pittsburgh (N) L -3 10-13 39’D 13 at Houston (Mon)D 19 New OrleansD 26 at ClevelandJ 2 Cincinnati

CAROLINA (SU: 1-12 ATS: 3-10) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 at NY Giants L +5’ 18-31 41S 19 Tampa Bay L -3 7-20 38’S 26 Cincinnati L +3 7-20 38O 3 at New Orleans W +13 14-16 44O 10 Chicago L -3 6-23 33O 17 BYE WEEKO 24 San Francisco W +2’ 23-20 35’O 31 at St Louis L +2’ 10-20 37N 7 New Orleans L +6’ 3-34 40’N 14 at Tampa Bay L +7 16-31 37N 21 Baltimore L +11’ 13-37 37N 28 at Cleveland W +9 23-24 37D 5 at Seattle L +4 14-31 40D 12 Atlanta L +7 10-31 41D 19 ArizonaD 23 at Pittsburgh (Th)J 2 at Atlanta

CHICAGO (SU: 9-4 ATS: 6-6-1) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 Detroit L -6’ 19-14 44’S 19 at Dallas W +7 27-20 40’S 27 Green Bay (M) W +3 20-17 46O 3 at NY Giants (N) L +3’ 3-17 44O 10 at Carolina W +3 23-6 33O 17 Seattle L -5’ 20-23 37’O 24 Washington L -3 14-17 40’O 31 BYE WEEKN 7 † Buffalo (Toronto) T -3 22-19 41’ N 14 Minnesota W +1 27-13 40’N 18 at Miami (Th) W +1’ 16-0 39’N 28 Philadelphia W +3 31-26 43D 5 at Detroit L -4’ 24-20 43D 12 New England L +3 7-36 37’D 20 at Minnesota (Mon)D 26 NY JetsJ 2 at Green Bay

CINCINNATI (SU: 2-11 ATS: 4-8-1) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 at New England L +5’ 24-38 44’S 19 Baltimore W +2’ 15-10 39’S 26 at Carolina W -3 20-7 38O 3 at Cleveland L -2’ 20-23 37O 10 Tampa Bay L -6’ 21-24 38O 17 BYE WEEKO 24 at Atlanta L +3’ 32-39 43O 31 Miami L -1 14-22 44N 8 Pittsburgh (M) T +6 21-27 41N 14 at Indianapolis W +7 17-23 47’N 21 Buffalo L -4’ 31-49 41’N 25 at NY Jets (Th) L +9 10-26 42’D 5 New Orleans W +6 30-34 45D 12 at Pittsburgh L +8’ 7-23 39D 19 ClevelandD 26 San Diego (Nite)J 2 at Baltimore

CLEVELAND (SU: 5-8 ATS: 5-7-1) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 at Tampa Bay T +3 14-17 37S 19 Kansas City L -3 14-16 38’S 26 at Baltimore W +11 17-24 37O 3 Cincinnati W +2’ 23-20 37O 10 Atlanta L +3 10-20 41O 17 at Pittsburgh L +14 10-28 37’O 24 at New Orleans W +13 30-17 43’O 31 BYE WEEKN 7 New England W +4 34-14 44N 14 NY Jets (OT) L +3 20-26 37’N 21 at Jacksonville L +2’ 20-24 43N 28 Carolina L -9 24-23 37D 5 at Miami W +5’ 13-10 43’D 12 at Buffalo L +1 6-13 39D 19 at CincinnatiD 26 BaltimoreJ 2 Pittsburgh

DALLAS (SU: 4-8 ATS: 5-7) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 at Washington (N) L -3’ 7-13 40S 19 Chicago L -7 20-27 40’S 26 at Houston W +2’ 27-13 47O 3 BYE WEEKO 10 Tennessee L -7 27-34 42O 17 at Minnesota L +1 21-24 44’O 25 NY Giants (M) L -3 35-41 44’O 31 Jacksonville L -6’ 17-35 43’N 7 at Green Bay (N) L +7 7-45 45’N 14 at NY Giants W +12’ 33-20 45’N 21 Detroit W -6 35-19 47’N 25 New Orleans (Th) W +3’ 27-30 50’D 5 at Indianapolis (OT) W +5 38-35 47’D 12 Philadelphia (Nite)D 19 WashingtonD 25 at Arizona (Sat)J 2 at Philadelphia

DENVER (SU: 3-10 ATS: 4-9) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 at Jacksonville L +3 17-24 40S 19 Seattle W -3 31-14 40S 26 Indianapolis L +5’ 13-27 47O 3 at Tennessee W +6’ 26-20 43’O 10 at Baltimore L +7’ 17-31 39’O 17 NY Jets L +3’ 20-24 43O 24 Oakland L -7 14-59 42’ O 31 † San Fran (London) L +2’ 16-24 41’N 7 BYE WEEKN 14 Kansas City W +1 49-29 44’N 22 at San Diego (M) L +8’ 14-35 50N 28 St Louis L -3’ 33-36 45D 5 at Kansas City W +8 6-10 48D 12 at Arizona L -4 13-43 43’D 19 at OaklandD 26 HoustonJ 2 San Diego

DETROIT (SU: 3-10 ATS: 9-3-1) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 at Chicago W +6’ 14-19 44’S 19 Philadelphia W +6’ 32-35 41’S 26 at Minnesota L +11’ 10-24 43O 3 at Green Bay W +14’ 26-28 45O 10 St Louis W -3 44-6 42’O 17 at NY Giants W +10 20-28 45’O 24 BYE WEEKO 31 Washington W -3 37-25 44’N 7 NY Jets OT W +5’ 20-23 42N 14 at Buffalo T +2 12-14 45N 21 at Dallas L +6 19-35 47’N 25 New England (Th) L +6’ 24-45 51D 5 Chicago W +4’ 20-24 43D 12 Green Bay W +6’ 7-3 46’D 19 at Tampa BayD 26 at MiamiJ 2 Minnesota

GREEN BAY (SU: 8-5 ATS: 7-6) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 at Philadelphia W -3 27-20 47’S 19 Buffalo W -13 34-7 43S 27 at Chicago (M) L -3 17-20 46O 3 Detroit L -14’ 28-26 45O 10 at Washington (OT) L -2’ 13-16 45O 17 Miami (OT) L -3 20-23 44O 24 Minnesota (N) W -3 28-24 44O 31 at NY Jets W +6 9-0 42N 7 Dallas (N) W -7 45-7 45’N 14 BYE WEEKN 21 at Minnesota W -3 31-3 44’N 28 at Atlanta L +1’ 17-20 47D 5 San Francisco W -8’ 34-16 41D 12 at Detroit L -6’ 3-7 46’D 19 at New EnglandD 26 NY GiantsJ 2 Chicago

HOUSTON (SU: 5-7 ATS: 5-6-1) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 Indianapolis W +1 34-24 48S 19 at Washington (OT) W -2’ 30-27 43S 26 Dallas L -2’ 13-27 47O 3 at Oakland W -3 31-24 43’O 10 NY Giants L -3 10-34 48’O 17 Kansas City T -4 35-31 44’O 24 BYE WEEKN 1 at Indianapolis (M) L +5’ 17-30 51N 7 San Diego L +3 23-29 49’N 14 at Jacksonville L +1’ 24-31 48’N 21 at NY Jets W +6’ 27-30 46N 28 Tennessee W -6 20-0 47D 2 at Philadelphia (Th) L +8 24-34 52D 13 Baltimore (Mon)D 19 at TennesseeD 26 at DenverJ 2 Jacksonville

INDIANAPOLIS (SU: 7-6 ATS: 6-6-1) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 at Houston L -1 24-34 48S 19 NY Giants (N) W -5 38-14 48’S 26 at Denver W -5’ 27-13 47O 3 at Jacksonville L -7 28-31 46O 10 Kansas City W -7 19-9 45’O 17 at Washington (N) T -3 27-24 44O 24 BYE WEEKN 1 Houston (Mon) W -5’ 30-17 51N 7 at Philadelphia W +3 24-26 47N 14 Cincinnati L -7 23-17 47’N 21 at New England W +4 28-31 49’N 28 San Diego (N) L -2’ 14-36 50’D 5 Dallas (OT) L -5 35-38 47’D 9 at Tennessee (Th) L -3 30-28 45D 19 JacksonvilleD 26 at OaklandJ 2 Tennessee

JACKSONVILLE (SU: 8-5 ATS: 9-4) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 Denver W -3 24-17 40S 19 at San Diego L +7 13-38 45S 26 Philadelphia L +3 3-28 44’O 3 Indianapolis W +7 31-28 46O 10 at Buffalo W +2 36-26 41O 18 Tennessee (M) L +3 3-30 45O 24 at Kansas City L +9 20-42 37O 31 at Dallas W +6’ 35-17 43’N 7 BYE WEEKN 14 Houston W -1’ 31-24 48’N 21 Cleveland W -2’ 24-20 43N 28 at NY Giants W +7 20-24 44D 5 at Tennessee W +3 17-6 43D 12 Oakland W -3’ 38-31 41’D 19 at IndianapolisD 26 WashingtonJ 2 at Houston

KANSAS CITY (SU: 8-5 ATS: 6-6-1) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 13 San Diego (M) W +4’ 21-14 45’S 19 at Cleveland W +3 16-14 38’S 26 San Francisco W +3 31-10 37O 3 BYE WEEKO 10 at Indianapolis L +7 9-19 45’O 17 at Houston T +4 31-35 44’O 24 Jacksonville W -9 42-20 37’O 31 Buffalo (OT) L -7 13-10 45N 7 at Oakland (OT) L E 20-23 40’N 14 at Denver L -1 29-49 44’N 21 Arizona W -7’ 31-13 44N 28 at Seattle W -2 42-24 45’D 5 Denver L -8 10-6 48D 12 at San Diego L +9’ 0-31 45’D 19 at St LouisD 26 TennesseeJ 2 Oakland

MIAMI (SU: 7-6 ATS: 8-5) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 at Buffalo W -3 15-10 39S 19 at Minnesota W +5’ 14-10 41S 26 NY Jets (N) L -2’ 23-31 35’O 4 New Eng (M) L E 14-41 48 O 10 BYE WEEKO 17 at Green Bay (OT) W +3 23-20 44O 24 Pittsburgh W +3 22-23 41O 31 at Cincinnati W +1 22-14 44N 7 at Baltimore L +5’ 10-26 41N 14 Tennessee W E 29-17 43N 18 Chicago (Th) L -1’ 0-16 39’N 28 at Oakland W +2’ 33-17 38D 5 Cleveland L -5’ 10-13 43’D 12 at NY Jets W +5 10-6 38’D 19 BuffaloD 26 DetroitJ 2 at New England

MINNESOTA (SU: 5-7 ATS: 4-7-1) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 9 at New Orleans (Th) T +5 9-14 48’S 19 Miami L -5’ 10-14 41S 26 Detroit W -11’ 24-10 43O 3 BYE WEEKO 11 at NY Jets (M) L +5 20-29 38’O 17 Dallas W -1 24-21 44’O 24 at Green Bay (N) L +3 24-28 44O 31 at New England L +5’ 18-28 44N 7 Arizona OT L -7’ 27-24 42N 14 at Chicago L -1 13-27 40’N 21 Green Bay L +3 3-31 44’N 28 at Washington W -2 17-13 43’D 5 Buffalo W -5 38-14 43’D 13 † NY Giants (Mon)D 20 Chicago (Mon)D 26 at PhiladelphiaJ 2 at Detroit

NEW ENGLAND (SU: 11-2 ATS: 9-4) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 Cincinnati W -5’ 38-24 44’S 19 at NY Jets L -3 14-28 38’S 26 Buffalo L -14’ 38-30 42’O 4 at Miami (M) W E 41-14 48O 10 BYE WEEKO 17 Baltimore (OT) W -2’ 23-20 44’O 24 at San Diego W +3 23-20 48’O 31 Minnesota W -5’ 28-18 44N 7 at Cleveland L -4 14-34 44N 14 at Pittsburgh (N) W +5 39-26 45N 21 Indianapolis L -4 31-28 49’N 25 at Detroit (Th) W -6’ 45-24 51D 6 NY Jets (M) W -3’ 45-3 44’D 12 at Chicago W -3 36-7 37’D 19 Green Bay (Nite)D 26 at BuffaloJ 2 Miami

NEW ORLEANS (SU: 10-3 ATS: 5-7-1) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 9 Minnesota (Th) T -5 14-9 48’S 20 at San Francisco (M) L -5 25-22 44S 26 Atlanta (OT) L -3 24-27 49O 3 Carolina L -13 16-14 44O 10 at Arizona L -6’ 20-30 45’O 17 at Tampa Bay W -4 31-6 44O 24 Cleveland L -13 17-30 43’O 31 Pittsburgh (N) W -1 20-10 44’N 7 at Carolina W -6’ 34-3 40’N 14 BYE WEEKN 21 Seattle W -11 34-19 44’N 25 at Dallas (Th) L -3’ 30-27 50’D 5 at Cincinnati L -6 34-30 45D 12 St Louis W -9 31-13 47D 19 at BaltimoreD 27 at Atlanta (Mon)J 2 Tampa Bay

ST LOUIS (SU: 6-7 ATS: 9-4) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 Arizona L +3’ 13-17 39’S 19 at Oakland W +3’ 14-16 37S 26 Washington W +4’ 30-16 39O 3 Seattle W +2 20-3 40’O 10 at Detroit L +3 6-44 42’O 17 San Diego W +8’ 20-17 44’O 24 at Tampa Bay W +3 17-18 38’O 31 Carolina W -2’ 20-10 37N 7 BYE WEEKN 14 at San Fran (OT) W +5’ 20-23 38’N 21 Atlanta L +3 17-34 42’N 28 at Denver W +3’ 36-33 45D 5 at Arizona W -3 19-6 44D 12 at New Orleans L +9 13-31 47D 19 Kansas CityD 26 San FranciscoJ 2 at Seattle

TENNESSEE (SU: 5-8 ATS: 6-7) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 Oakland W -6’ 38-13 40S 19 Pittsburgh L -5 11-19 36S 26 at NY Giants W +3 29-10 43’O 3 Denver L -6’ 20-26 43’O 10 at Dallas W +7 34-27 42O 18 at Jacksonville (M) W -3 30-3 45O 24 Philadelphia W -3 37-19 42O 31 at San Diego L +4’ 25-33 44’N 7 BYE WEEKN 14 at Miami L E 17-29 43N 21 Washington (OT) L -7 16-19 44N 28 at Houston L +6 0-20 47D 5 Jacksonville L -3 6-17 43D 9 Indianapolis (Th) W +3 28-30 45D 19 HoustonD 26 at Kansas CityJ 2 at Indianapolis

SAN DIEGO (SU: 7-6 ATS: 7-6) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 13 at Kansas City (M) L -4’ 14-21 45’S 19 Jacksonville W -7 38-13 45S 26 at Seattle L -4 20-27 44O 3 Arizona W -9’ 41-10 46O 10 at Oakland L -6’ 27-35 44’O 17 at St Louis L -8’ 17-20 44’O 24 New England L -3 20-23 48’O 31 Tennessee W -4’ 33-25 44’N 7 at Houston W -3 29-23 49’N 14 BYE WEEKN 22 Denver (M) W -8’ 35-14 50N 28 at Indianapolis (N) W +2’ 36-14 50’D 5 Oakland L -13 13-28 44’D 12 Kansas City W -9’ 31-0 45’D 16 San Francisco (Th)D 2 at Cincinnati (Nite)J 2 at Denver

SAN FRANCISCO (SU: 5-8 ATS: 6-7) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 at Seattle L -3 6-31 37S 20 New Orleans (M) W +5 22-25 44S 26 at Kansas City L -3 10-31 37O 3 at Atlanta W +7 14-16 42’O 10 Philadelphia (N) L -3 24-27 38’O 17 Oakland W -7 17-9 41’O 24 at Carolina L -2’ 20-23 35’O 31 † Denver (London) W -2’ 24-16 41’N 7 BYE WEEKN 14 St Louis (OT) L -5’ 23-20 38’N 21 Tampa Bay L -3’ 0-21 42’N 29 at Arizona (M) W -2 27-6 41D 5 at Green Bay L +8’ 16-34 41D 12 Seattle W -5 40-21 41’D 16 at San Diego (Th)D 26 at St LouisJ 2 Arizona

PHILADELPHIA (SU: 8-4 ATS: 6-6) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 Green Bay L +3 20-27 47’S 19 at Detroit L -6’ 35-32 41’S 26 at Jacksonville W -3 28-3 44’O 3 Washington L -5’ 12-17 43O 10 at San Fran (N) W +3 27-24 38’O 17 Atlanta W -2 31-17 42’O 24 at Tennessee L +3 19-37 42O 31 BYE WEEKN 7 Indianapolis L -3 26-24 47N 15 at Washington (M) W -3 59-28 43N 21 NY Giants (N) W -3 27-17 47’N 28 at Chicago L -3 26-31 43D 2 Houston (Th) W -8 34-24 52D 12 at Dallas (Nite)D 19 at NY GiantsD 26 MinnesotaJ 2 Dallas

TAMPA BAY (SU: 8-5 ATS: 6-4-3) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 Cleveland T -3 17-14 37S 19 at Carolina W +3 20-7 38’S 26 Pittsburgh L +2’ 13-38 33O 3 BYE WEEKO 10 at Cincinnati W +6’ 24-21 38O 17 New Orleans L +4 6-31 44O 24 St Louis L -3 18-17 38’O 31 at Arizona W +3 38-35 39N 7 at Atlanta W +9’ 21-27 45’N 14 Carolina W -7 31-16 37N 21 at San Francisco W +3’ 21-0 42’N 28 at Baltimore T +7 10-17 42D 5 Atlanta L +3 24-28 43’D 12 at Washington T -1 17-16 40’D 19 DetroitD 26 SeattleJ 2 at New Orleans

WASHINGTON (SU: 5-8 ATS: 5-6-2) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 Dallas (N) W +3’ 13-7 40S 19 Houston (OT) L +2’ 27-30 43S 26 at St Louis L -4’ 16-30 39O 3 at Philadelphia W +5’ 17-12 43O 10 Green Bay (OT) W +2’ 16-13 45O 17 Indianapolis (N) T +3 24-27 44O 24 at Chicago W +3 17-14 40’O 31 at Detroit L +3 25-37 44’N 7 BYE WEEK N 15 Philadelphia (M) L +3 28-59 43N 21 at Tennessee (OT) W +7 19-16 44N 28 Minnesota L +2 13-17 43’D 5 at NY Giants L +7 7-31 43D 12 Tampa Bay T +1 16-17 40’D 19 at DallasD 26 at JacksonvilleJ 2 NY Giants

NY GIANTS (SU: 8-4 ATS: 6-6) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 Carolina W -5’ 31-18 41S 19 at Indianapolis (N) L +5 14-38 48’S 26 Tennessee L -3 10-29 43’O 3 Chicago (N) W -3’ 17-3 44O 10 at Houston W +3 34-10 48’O 17 Detroit L -10 28-20 45’O 25 at Dallas (Mon) W +3 41-35 44’O 31 BYE WEEKN 7 at Seattle W -7’ 41-7 40’N 14 Dallas L -12’ 20-33 45’N 21 at Philadelphia (N) L +3 17-27 47’N 28 Jacksonville L -7 24-20 44D 5 Washington W -7 31-7 43D 13 † Minnesota (Mon)D 19 PhiladelphiaD 26 at Green BayJ 2 at Washington

NY JETS (SU: 9-4 ATS: 7-6) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 13 Baltimore (M) L -1 9-10 36’S 19 New England W +3 28-14 38’S 26 at Miami (N) W +2’ 31-23 35’O 3 at Buffalo W -6 38-14 36’O 11 Minnesota (M) W -5 29-20 38’O 17 at Denver W -3’ 24-20 43O 24 BYE WEEKO 31 Green Bay L -6 0-9 42N 7 at Detroit OT L -5’ 23-20 42N 14 at Cleveland (OT) W -3 26-20 37’N 21 Houston L -6’ 30-27 46N 25 Cincinnati (Th) W -9 26-10 42’D 6 at New England (M) L +3’ 3-45 44’D 12 Miami L -5 6-10 38’D 19 at PittsburghD 26 at ChicagoJ 2 Buffalo

OAKLAND (SU: 6-7 ATS: 6-7) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 at Tennessee L +6’ 13-38 40S 19 St Louis L -3’ 16-14 37S 26 at Arizona W +5 23-24 39O 3 Houston L +3 24-31 43’O 10 San Diego W +6’ 35-27 44’O 17 at San Francisco L +7 9-17 41’O 24 at Denver W +7 59-14 42’O 31 Seattle W -2’ 33-3 42N 7 Kansas City (OT) W E 23-20 40’N 14 BYE WEEKN 21 at Pittsburgh L +7 3-35 41N 28 Miami L -2’ 17-33 38D 5 at San Diego W +13 28-13 44’D 12 at Jacksonville L +3’ 31-38 41’D 19 DenverD 26 IndianapolisJ 2 at Kansas City

SEATTLE (SU: 6-7 ATS: 6-7) ADATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 San Francisco W +3 31-6 37S 19 at Denver L +3 14-31 40S 26 San Diego W +4 27-20 44O 3 at St Louis L -2 3-20 40’O 10 BYE WEEKO 17 at Chicago W +5’ 23-20 37’O 24 Arizona W -7 22-10 40O 31 at Oakland L +2’ 3-33 42N 7 NY Giants L +7’ 7-41 40’N 14 at Arizona W +3 36-18 41N 21 at New Orleans L +11 19-34 44’N 28 Kansas City L +2 24-42 45’D 5 Carolina W -4 31-14 40D 12 at San Francisco L +5 21-40 41’D 19 AtlantaD 26 at Tampa BayJ 2 St Louis

PITTSBURGH (SU: 10-3 ATS: 7-5-1) GDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORE TOTALS 12 Atlanta (OT) W +1 15-9 38S 19 at Tennessee W +5 19-11 36S 26 at Tampa Bay W -2’ 38-13 33O 3 Baltimore L -2’ 14-17 34O 10 BYE WEEKO 17 Cleveland W -14 28-10 37’O 24 at Miami L -3 23-22 41O 31 at N Orleans (N) L +1 10-20 44’N 8 at Cincinnati (M) T -6 27-21 41N 14 New England (N) L -5 26-39 45 N 21 Oakland W -7 35-3 41N 28 at Buffalo (OT) L -6 19-16 43D 5 at Baltimore (N) W +3 13-10 39’D 12 Cincinnati W -8’ 23-7 39D 19 NY JetsD 23 Carolina (Th)J 2 at Cleveland

LOGS UPDATED ALL SEASON4 PAGES-120 COLLEGE AND ALL NFL TEAMSAll the ATS & SU Results Updated for you weekly!SUBSCRIBE NOW TO POWER SWEEP 2011 - LOG EDITION

Add $10 to cover postage/printing for logsLOGS are INCLUDED with the download version1-800-654-3448LOGS ARE VIEWABLE ONLINE AT WWW.NCSPORTS.COM EACH WEEK • FREE TO ‘10 & ‘11 SUBS

Page 7: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL - -

DL - 1/2

LB - 4

DB - 44

LAS VEGASBOWL

Whittingham has taken his team to a bowl all 6Y but can’t pick against Petersen.Utah has not been to this bowl S/’01 so fans will travel, while BSU fans are disappointed.Utah has a balanced off and has played tougher competition. Utah 9 straight bowl wins, and DD dog. Boise bubble-burst.

CCH - -

Turf/ 4 -

MTCH - -

INT 44 -

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGDOUG MARTIN #297 12/12 184 1142 29 1113 11 6.0Jeremy Avery #1402 12/0 83 461 21 440 11 5.3Jarvis Hodge #486 12/1 46 305 0 305 3 6.6DJ Harper #292 3/0 18 160 0 160 2 8.9Kellen Moore #24 12/12 16 37 58 -21 1 -1.3PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTKELLEN MOORE #24 12/12 345 245 71.0 3506 33 5Joe Southwick #41 8/0 24 17 70.8 202 1 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGTITUS YOUNG #152 12/10 65 1151 17.7 9 83AUSTIN PETTIS #127 12/10 59 804 13.6 9 58Tyler Shoemaker #453 12/7 27 493 18.3 4 48Doug Martin #297 12/12 27 323 12.0 2 79Kyle Efaw #102 12/6 23 292 12.7 5 41PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Kyle Brotzman #102 11 17 746 43.9 4 36.1(t) 0 4KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGKyle Brotzman #102 11 57-59 5-7 5-6 3-4 1-3 14-20 50POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTS JERON JOHNSON #618 12/11 72 0 1 6 1LB JC Percy #455 12/3 63 1 3 0 0S GEORGE ILOKA #264 12/12 59 0 1 5 2NB WINSTON VENABLE #91 12/11 51 4.5 3.5 2 0DE RYAN WINTERSWYK #285 12/12 42 2.5 4.5 2 1LB Aaron Tevis #72 11/9 39 1 1.5 0 2LB Hunter White #134 12/1 37 0 1.5 0 1LB Byron Hout #30 9/9 34 1 3 0 0CB Jamar Taylor #141 12/11 34 1 2.5 1 0CB Brandyn Thompson #406 12/12 30 0 2 7 3DT Chase Baker #365 12/12 29 4.5 1.5 2 0DT BILLY WINN #121 12/12 27 4 5.5 1 0DE SHEA McCLELLIN #268 12/12 26 8.5 4 0 1PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDCHRIS POTTER 21 278 13.2 1 Titus Young 23 550 23.9 0

Boise leads the series 4-2 SU (3-0 ATS) and has won the L/3. In the most recent meeting in ‘06, BSU won 36-3 (+5) in Salt Lake City, but this is their first bowl matchup. Utah is 12-3 SU and 10-3 ATS in bowl gms (5-0 SU and 4-1 ATS under HC Whittingham) and owns the nation’s longest active bowl win streak at 9 gms (‘99, ‘01, ‘03-’09) going 7-2 ATS during that span. The Utes are 2-0 SU and 1-1 ATS in the Las Vegas Bowl with wins over Fresno (‘99) and USC (‘01) while Boise is making its first appearance here. While this spot is normally reserved for the MWC winner, Utah stepped up into this one after TCU earned a BCS spot. BSU is making its 9th consecutive bowl appearance and its 11th in the L/12 yrs. The Broncos are 6-4 SU and 7-3 ATS in bowls (2-2 SU and 3-1 ATS under HC Petersen). In Boise’s L/7 bowl gms, all 7 were decided by less than one score with the avg MOV of just 3.6 ppg! Each school has manageable driving distances (Salt Lake City 6 hrs, Boise 10 hrs) allowing both fan bases easy accessibility to Las Vegas. Utah QB Wynn started 10 gms TY after missing 2 early (inj) but was pulled in the ssn finale for Cain (reinserted after Cain threw his 2nd int). Wynn hoped to redeem himself in the bowl gm after a subpar outing vs BYU, but shoulder surg will sideline him which means the duties have been turned back over to Cain. RB’s Asiata and Wide spent the ssn splitting carries and while the Utes have split carries like that in the past, it was the 1st time S/’05 that the top 2 had more than 140 att (in ‘05, QB Johnson was #2 with 152). The OL avg 6’4” 299 (2 Sr) and has started 97% of the gms together. They paved the way for 157 ypg (4.7) while all’g just 8 sks (2.1%). The DL avg 6’4” 275 (1 Sr) starting 81% of the gms together while all’g 104 ypg rush (3.0) with 14 of the tm’s 28 sks. LB’s Walker and Martinez are the tm’s top two tkl’rs, respectively. Utah ranks #83 in our pass eff D all’g 216 ypg (60%) with an 18-11 ratio. The ST’s rank #6 behind AA PR Smithson. Early in the ssn, his ret’s put Utah in a position to win numerous times and he got into the EZ twice on PR (19.7). He also avg 24.1 on KR but hasn’t scored a TD that way (yet). P Sellwood has booted nine of 50+ yds TY. The PR D all’s 9.8 while the KR D all’s 18.8. Heisman finalist QB Moore is 37-2 as a starter and is #2 in the NCAA in pass eff (185.04). He has completed 60% or better in every gm TY incl 10 gms in which he hit over 70% of his passes. Moore leads an off that avg 319 ypg pass and 200 ypg rush and has a pair of outstanding WR’s in Pettis (BSU career rec leader) and Young (BSU career rec yds leader) who both rank in the Top 5 at Boise in career rec, rec yds and rec TD’s. Moore also has the luxury of 1,000-yd rusher RB Martin who played his way out of a talent-filled backfield and has proven to be a rec threat himself. The OL avg 6’3” 284 (2 Sr) and opened holes for a run gm that avg 5.3 ypc and has all’d just 7 sks (1.8%) which is 4th-best in the NCAA. BSU is arguably the most balanced tm in the nation ranking #4 in the NCAA in both ttl off (520 ypg) and ttl def (259 ypg). The D plays so well together that many of the individual stats are underwhelming. The DL avg 6’3” 277 (1 Sr) and accounted for 33.5 of the tm’s 45 sks (74%) while holding foes to just 2.9 ypc. The Broncos are #3 in our pass D rankings allowing just 8 TD passes and nearly doubled that amount (14) in int. BSU’s ST rank #23 and Brotzman had quietly been going about his business (needs 3 pts to break the record for most career pts by a K in FBS history) handling both P and PK duties. Prior to his costly FG misses vs UN (26 and 29 yds), he hadn’t missed a FG inside 50 yds since the opener. Brotzman also uses an effective rugby-style technique on P. BSU’s PR unit is solid with 3 players avg at least 10 ypr. This year’s bowl for Boise should be defined as “bubble-burst.” The BCS Championship gm was within reach and while they rebounded with a convincing win in the ssn finale, the layoff in the bowl will have them thinking about ‘what if’. The Utes travel to Vegas with the nation’s longest current bowl streak having won 9 straight and remember, they have a pair of BCS bowl wins in the L/6Y. Utah will not be intimidated by Boise, is used to traveling to Vegas and will relish the role of underdog as they are the second largest dog on the board. FORECAST: Utah (+) Boise by 3 RATING: 4★ UTAH (+)

Crowd

QB - 44

UTES ATS: 7-4-1 O/U: 7-5

UT BSU UT BSU UT BSU

RB - - WR - 1/2

ST 1/2 - SCH 4 -

OVERALL -

UT avg 6-4 299, 2 Sr, 8 sk all’d (2.1%), 4.7 ypc.BSU avg 6-3 284, 2 Sr, 7 sk all’d (1.8%), 5.3 ypc.UT avg 6-4 275, 1 Sr, 14 of tm 28 sk, 3.0 ypc.BSU avg 6-3 277, 1 Sr, 33.5 of tm 45 sk, 2.9 ypc.Walker #1 tkl’r w/103, 7 tfl, Martinez #2, 5.5 tfl.Percy #2 tkl’r w/63, 4 tfl, Venable #4, 8 tfl.UT #83 pass eff D, 216 ypg (60%), 18-11 ratio.BSU #3 pass eff D, 156 ypg (52%), 8-14 ratio.

BOISE ST

by 1' 4’s

UTAH (10-2)

BOISE ST (11-1)

UT BSU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 22, 2010 • 8:00 pm ESPN • Sam Boyd Stadium • Las Vegas, NVPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.UTAH 115 203 26 2.7 4 97.0BOISE ST 146 288 37 1.9 – 95.7

UT BSU

BRONCOS ATS: 8-4 O/U: 7-5RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGEddie Wide #121 12/5 143 706 23 683 11 4.8Matt Asiata #17JC 12/9 150 680 7 673 8 4.5Griff Robles #39 4/0 17 130 6 124 0 7.3Sausan Shakerin #48 6/0 12 105 0 105 2 8.8Reggie Dunn #76JC 12/2 12 107 8 99 2 8.2Terrance Cain #9JC 9/2 11 75 9 66 1 6.0Jordan Wynn #52 10/10 18 41 52 -11 0 -0.6PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTJordan Wynn #52 10/10 299 186 62.2 2334 17 10Terrance Cain #9JC 9/2 72 51 70.8 610 6 2RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGDeVonte Christopher #27 11/7 39 660 16.9 6 71Jereme Brooks #293 12/6 50 628 12.6 4 75Shaky Smithson #218JC 12/4 22 327 14.9 3 61Luke Matthews #111 12/10 17 283 16.6 3 57Eddie Wide #121 12/5 31 250 8.1 2 31Kendrick Moeai #192 11/10 11 225 20.5 1 47Matt Asiata #17JC 12/8 31 185 6.0 1 19PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Sean Sellwood – 12 33 1353 41.0 16 33.8(t) 3 10KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGJOE PHILLIPS #273JC 12 55-56 5-5 3-3 4-6 0-0 12-14 48POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Chaz Walker #467 12/12 103 2 5 1 1LB Matt Martinez – 12/12 83 1.5 4 1 1DB Brian Blechen #93 12/12 61 1.5 2 5 4DB Lamar Chapman #71JC 12/12 58 5.5 4 3 0DB Justin Taplin-Ross #470 12/12 54 1 3.5 1 2DL CHRISTIAN COX – 12/12 50 4 3.5 0 0DB Brandon Burton #443 12/12 46 0 1 8 2LB Chad Manis #52JC 10/7 44 0 2.5 1 0DL Sealver Siliga #211 11/11 36 1.5 2.5 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDSHAKY SMITHSON 29 572 19.7 2 Shaky Smithson 20 482 24.1 0

OL 1/2 -

DL 1/2 -

LB 1/2 -

DB - -

BEEF ‘O’ BRADY’SBOWL

Third str bowl gm for Fedora, but this is a step up in class after facing a pair of SBC tms.UL may get some BE support, but this gm in the Dome is a new venue for both and SM will have fans.Southern Miss has the offensive edge but Louisville rates the better defense. AQ tms that are 6-6 stay focused to keep from a losing ssn.

CCH - 4

Turf/ - -

MTCH - -

INT 1/2 -

Ex-CUSA rivals meet in this bowl with SM holding an 18-9-1 edge in the series. UL has won the L/4 vs SM with the most recent meeting being a 25-23 contest in ‘09 (UL +2’ at home). UL grabbed their 1st bowl bid S/’06’s trip to the Orange Bowl and they should have a strong fan following. It’s a 10 hr drive for SM fans and they traditionally travel well but have played closer to home in recent yrs. UL HC Strong will coach his 2nd bowl as he was the interim coach of FL for their 27-10 loss to Miami (FL) in the ‘04 Peach Bowl. SM HC Fedora is 1-1 SU/ATS in bowls but has faced 2 Sun Belt foes and now jumps up to a BCS foe. Strong (DC) and Fedora (OC) coached together at FL from ‘03-’04. UL is 6-8 SU (4-7 ATS) all-time in bowls and SM is playing their 9th str bowl gm. UL is 3-2 SU, 4-1 ATS on the road TY while SM is 4-2 SU, 3-3 ATS on the road. Both tms dominated Mem with substantial yd edges. SM has 8 Sr st’rs (16 up-perclassmen) while UL has 13 Sr’s (14 upperclassmen). UL is 2-4 SU/ATS vs bowl tms being outgained 282-277. SM is 1-3 SU/ATS vs bowl tms being outscored 41-34 but outgaining those tms 446-439. UL has shown great improvement under 1st yr HC Strong. The offense ranks #57 but has been besieged by inj’s to key players incl their starting QB, RB and top WR. Starting QB Froman missed the L/4 with a leg inj (CS) and the off became more conservative under Burke. In the L/4 UL avg’d 161 pass ypg (213 avg 1st 8). AA RB Powell had seven 100+ yd gms but missed most of 2 gms (incl 4 carries for 0 yds vs WV w/flu) and the off was held to a ssn low 171 yds without him. Because of the conservative passing gm, TE Graham is the tm’s top receiver and is the top receiving TE in the BE. Top WR Beaumont missed 2 (knee) and has been banged up all yr. The OL avg 6’5” 299 with 4 Sr st’rs and has all’d 16 sks (#2 BE). Strong was one of the top DC’s in the country at FL and S Carolina for many yrs and the UL D has improved from all’g 371 ypg LY to 305 ypg in ‘10. UL’s #36 D all’d just 259 ypg in the L/6 (350 ypg 1st 6) and 142 rush ypg (4.0) for the year. The DL avg 6’3” 271 with 1 Sr st’r but 3 frosh (2 true) start on the DL. UL ranks #31 in our pass D rankings (#106 LY) all’g just 163 ypg (54%) with a 13-9 ratio. Patrick is 1 of the top CB’s in the NCAA and leads the BE in pd (16). UL is #37 in our ST rankings with a solid net punting avg of 37.1 and excellent returnmen plus solid coverage units (allow 4.9 per PR, 24.1 per KR). SM has our #39 off ranking as they avg’d 38 ppg and 458 ypg, both significant improvements from LY. QB Davis did a nice job TY after playing in just the 1st 5 LY before being lost with inj. In fact, his health kept Young from seeing much action as he appeared in just 6 (207 less pass att). RFr Hardy took over at RB as he tallied 676 of his 855 yds over the L/6. A surprising note for the SM pass gm TY was that they had most of their success w/o star WR Brown who ply’d in just 5 gms (1 start) due to a leg inj (31 fewer rec than ‘09). Morris, Pierce and JC trans Bolden took in the majority of the catches. The OL (6’3” 303) was patchwork due to some inj’s and heading into the bowl, the projected st’rs compiled 49 of the 60 sts (82%). The unit still paved the way for 203 ypg rush (4.7) while all’g just 16 sks (3.7%). The SM def all’d 361 ypg on the ssn (29 ppg) as they only trailed UCF in yds all’d among CUSA members (our #58 rating). The DL avg 6’2” 273 (2 Sr) but much like the OL, had a plethora of inj (32 of 48 sts, 67%) incl losing DE Jones who was one of the shooting victims after the upset of UCF. The front 4 surrendered 113 ypg on the ground (3.6) while compiling 16 of the tm’s 26 sks (62%). The LB unit took a big hit when 2 yr st’r Martez Smith was lost to a knee inj after just 6 (later paralyzed due to gunshot wound). The secondary all’d 248 ypg (57%) w/a 26-17 ratio ranking #58 in our pass D ratings led by S Justin Wilson and rFr Deron Wilson. The ST’s have been carried all yr by AA and Groza Finalist Hrapmann. The return units avg’d 23.6 on KR and 7.2 on PR’s while they all’d 23.7 on KR and 5.1 on PR. SM’s offense has been near-dominant going Over the total 7 of the L/8 incl avg 47 ppg the L/5. Louisville plays in the offensively-challenged BE and they’ve spent the 2H of the season without some key offensive stars. All should be back and each tm has enough playmakers to favor the Over.FORECAST: OVER 57 L’ville/SM RATING: 2★ OVER

Crowd

QB - 1/2

CARDINALS ATS: 6-6 O/U: 5-7

UL SM UL SM UL SM

RB 1/2 - WR - 4

ST 1/2 - SCH 44 -

OVERALL -

UL avg 6-5 299, 4 Sr, 16 sk all’d (4.8%), 4.9 ypc.SM avg 6-3 303, 2 Sr, 16 sk all’d (3.7%), 4.7 ypc.UL avg 6-3 271, 1 Sr, 20 of tm 37 sk, 4.0 ypc.SM avg 6-2 273, 2 Sr, 16 of tm 26 sk, 3.6 ypc.Heath #3 tkl’r, 7.5 tfl, Brown #4, 11 tfl.Williams #1 tkl’r, 11 tfl, Collins #2, 2.5 sk.UL #31 pass eff D, 163 ypg (54%), 13-9 ratio.SM #58 pass eff D, 248 ypg (57%), 26-17 ratio.

LOUISVILLE

by 2' 4’s

LOUISVILLE (6-6)

SOUTHERN MISS (8-4)

UL SM CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 21, 2010 • 8:00 pm ESPN • Tropicana Field • St Petersburg, FLPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.LOUISVILLE 155 205 30 1.9 44 97.6SOUTHERN MISS 170 200 26 1.7 – 91.9

UL SM

GOLDEN EAGLES ATS: 6-6 O/U: 8-4RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGBILAL POWELL #230 11/9 211 1401 71 1330 10 6.3Jeremy Wright #194 10/2 54 303 7 296 4 5.5Victor Anderson #30 9/1 64 302 16 286 0 4.5Adam Froman #75JC 8/8 36 147 72 75 2 2.1Justin Burke #12 7/4 17 34 47 -13 0 -0.8PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTAdam Froman #75JC 8/8 218 132 60.6 1633 11 4Justin Burke #12 7/4 97 55 56.7 612 8 3RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGCAMERON GRAHAM #510JC 12/11 37 439 11.9 4 39Doug Beaumont #24 10/9 34 383 11.3 1 44Josh Bellamy #57JC 12/9 27 372 13.8 5 44Andrell Smith #535 12/12 23 361 15.7 3 42Josh Chichester #31 11/6 19 290 15.3 4 48PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Chris Philpott #24 12 30 1225 40.8 5 37.1(t) 0 11Josh Blesor – 11 30 1193 39.8 8 – 0 12KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGChris Philpott #24 12 37-39 5-5 4-5 4-7 0-0 13-17 46POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTS Hakeem Smith #371 12/11 80 1 5 1 0S Shenard Holton #137 12/9 65 0 2 1 1LB Brandon Heath #31 11/10 59 2 5.5 2 0LB Daniel Brown #493 12/12 53 4 7 0 0CB JOHNNY PATRICK #134 12/12 47 1 4.5 11 5LB Dexter Heyman #77 12/8 44 2 1.5 2 0DE Malcolm Tatum #367JC 12/12 42 4.5 2.5 1 0CB Bobby Burns #438JC 12/12 35 0 1 3 0LB Antwone Canady #311JC 10/3 25 1 0 0 0DE Rodney Gnat #101 12/1 24 9 0.5 1 0DE BJ Butler #49 11/2 22 2.5 3.5 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDDOUG BEAUMONT 13 199 15.3 1 Jeremy Wright 13 355 27.3 0Josh Bellamy 7 63 9.0 0 Victor Anderson 12 369 30.8 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGKendrick Hardy #16 12/2 127 871 16 855 7 6.7Desmond Johnson #141 9/0 105 539 30 509 7 4.8Austin Davis #285 12/12 132 571 135 436 10 3.3Tracy Lampley #86 11/6 62 352 3 349 1 5.6VJ Floyd #209 10/8 69 243 15 228 2 3.3PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTAustin Davis #285 12/12 410 259 63.2 2898 18 6Martevious Young #166 6/0 23 12 52.2 132 1 1RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGKelvin Bolden #29JC 11/7 41 667 16.3 6 56JOHDRICK MORRIS #330 11/10 46 663 14.4 4 55Quentin Pierce #158 11/10 34 400 11.8 3 67DeAndre Brown #7 5/1 16 264 16.5 3 53William Spight #294 12/7 25 219 8.8 0 25PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Peter Boehme #145 12 44 1729 39.3 11 36.3(t) 0 17KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGDANNY HRAPMANN #32 12 51-51 8-9 10-10 6-8 2-3 26-30 54POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Korey Williams #63 12/12 80 3 8 0 1LB Jamie Collins #31 12/6 71 2.5 0 2 2S Kendrick Presley #63 12/12 60 0 4 3 1LB Ronnie Thornton #391 12/8 59 1 3.5 3 0S Chico Hunter #190 12/6 53 1 0.5 6 2DL Cordarro Law #451 12/12 47 6 5.5 0 0DL Anthony Gray #258 12/10 42 1.5 4 1 0S Justin Wilson #294 12/12 38 0 3 4 4CB Deron Wilson #164 12/12 34 0 2.5 11 3DL John Henderson #143JC 12/8 28 0.5 2 0 0DL Deddrick Jones #265 11/10 27 0 3.5 0 0CB CJ Bailey #103 10/10 25 0 1 3 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDTracy Lampley 19 117 6.2 0 Reggie Hunt 12 343 28.6 0

1-347-677-1700Free Winners Everyday

7

Page 8: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

SMU(SU: 7-6 ATS: 5-7-1) A-Turf PremierDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 5 at Texas Tech (S) W +13’ 27-35S 11 UAB W -11’ 28-7S 18 Wash St L -23 35-21S 24 TCU (F) W +17’ 24-41O 2 at Rice L -11’ 42-31O 9 Tulsa L -6’ 21-18O 16 at Navy L +1’ 21-28O 23 Houston (HC) L -8’ 20-45O 30 at Tulane W -8 31-17N 6 at UTEP L -6’ 14-28N 13 N 20 Marshall T -14 31-17N 26 at E Caro (F) OT W -1 45-38D 4 at UCF L +8’ 7-17

8

College Bowl TOTALS Plays 45-27 63% on Triple Plays L9Y!!Released on game day on the ncEvery TOTAL Is Rated SINGLE/DOUBLE/TRIPLE DEBIT CARD system for $9

UTEP(SU: 6-6 ATS: 5-7) Astro PlayDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Ark Pine-Bluff L -38 31-10S 10 at Houston (F) L +20’ 24-54S 18 New Mex St W -15’ 42-10S 25 Memphis L -11’ 16-13O 2 at New Mexico W -15 38-20O 9 at Rice HC W -9’ 44-24O 16 at UAB L +2’ 6-21O 23 Tulane L -10 24-34O 30 at Marshall L +2’ 12-16N 6 SMU W +6’ 28-14N 13 at Arkansas L +28’ 21-58N 20 at Tulsa W +17’ 28-31N 27 D 4

BYU(SU: 6-6 ATS: 7-5) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Washington W -1 23-17S 11 at Air Force L +2 14-35S 18 at Florida St L +10 10-34S 25 Nevada L +4 13-27O 1 at Utah St (F) L -4 16-31O 9 San Diego St (HC) W +4’ 24-21O 16 at TCU W +29 3-31O 23 Wyoming L -10’ 25-20O 30 N 6 UNLV W -18 55-7N 13 at Colorado St W -6’ 49-10N 20 New Mexico W -29’ 40-7N 27 at Utah W +8’ 16-17D 4

NORTHERN ILLINOIS(SU: 10-3 ATS: 9-4) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 at Iowa St (Th) L +4’ 10-27S 11 N Dakota L -24’ 23-17S 18 at Illinois W +7 22-28S 25 at Minnesota W +4 34-23O 2 at Akron W -13’ 50-14O 9 Temple W -3’ 31-17O 16 Buffalo (HC) W -14 45-14O 23 C Michigan W -10 33-7O 30 at W Michigan L -7’ 28-21N 9 Toledo (Tue) W -11 65-30N 13N 20 at Ball St W -14’ 59-21N 27 at E Mich (F) W -24 71-3D 3 † Miami OH (F) L -17’ 21-26

FRESNO STATE(SU: 8-4 ATS: 5-7) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Cincinnati W -2 28-14S 11 S 18 at Utah St W -3’ 41-24S 25 at Mississippi L +2 38-55O 2 Cal Poly L -25’ 38-17O 9 Hawaii L -10’ 27-49O 16 New Mex St (HC) L -30 33-10O 23 at San Jose St L -19 33-18O 30 N 6 at Louisiana Tech W +2’ 40-34N 13 Nevada W +8’ 34-35N 19 at Boise St (F) L +30 0-51N 27 Idaho L -10 23-20D 3 Illinois (F) W +5 25-23

TROY(SU: 7-5 ATS: 4-8) Astro PlayDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Bowling Green L -13’ 30-27S 11 at Oklahoma St W +13’ 38-41S 18 at UAB L -3’ 33-34S 25 Arkansas St L -10’ 35-28O 5 at Middle Tenn (Tu) W +3 42-13O 9 O 16 Louisiana L -20’ 31-24O 23 O 30 at ULM L -16’ 14-28N 6 at North Texas L -11’ 41-35N 13 FIU L -8’ 35-52N 20 at S Carolina L +21’ 24-69N 27 WKU W -13 28-14D 4 at Florida Atl W -5 44-7

OHIO(SU: 8-4 ATS: 8-4) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Wofford W -17 33-10S 11 Toledo L -9’ 13-20S 18 at Ohio St L +29’ 7-43S 25 at Marshall W +6’ 23-24O 2 at E Michigan W -10 30-17O 9 Bowling Green W -9 49-25O 16 Akron (HC) W -16’ 38-10O 23 at Miami, Oh W -3 34-13O 30 Louisiana L -14’ 38-31N 4 Buffalo (Th) W -16 34-17N 16 at Temple (Tue) W +8’ 31-23N 20N 26 at Kent St (F) L -4 6-28D 4

LOUISVILLE(SU: 6-6 ATS: 6-6) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Kentucky L +3 16-23S 11 E Kentucky L -32 23-13S 18 at Oregon St W +20 28-35S 25O 2 at Arkansas St W -6 34-24O 9 Memphis W -17 56-0O 15 Cincinnati (F) L +3 27-35O 23 Connecticut W -3 26-0O 30 at Pittsburgh L +9 3-20N 6 at Syracuse W +7 28-20N 13 USF (OT) L -2’ 21-24N 20 W Virginia L +3’ 10-17N 26 at Rutgers (F) W -3 40-13D 4

SOUTHERN MISS(SU: 8-4 ATS: 6-6) MomentumDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 2 at S Carolina (Th) L +13’ 13-41S 11 PV A&M L -32’ 34-7S 17 Kansas (F) W -5’ 31-16S 25 at Louisiana Tech L -3’ 13-12O 2 Marshall W -9 41-16O 9 E Carolina L -8 43-44O 16 at Memphis W -14’ 41-19O 23 O 30 UAB (2OT) L -10’ 49-50N 6 at Tulane W -10 46-30N 13 at UCF W +10 31-21N 20 Houston W -3’ 59-41N 26 at Tulsa (F) L +3’ 50-56D 4

UTAH(SU: 10-2 ATS: 7-4-1) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 2 Pitt (Th) OT T -3 27-24S 11 UNLV W -21 38-10S 18 at New Mexico W -22’ 56-14S 25 San Jose St W -30’ 56-3O 2 O 9 at Iowa St W -6 68-27O 16 at Wyoming W -20’ 30-6O 23 Colorado St W -30’ 59-6O 30 at Air Force L -7 28-23N 6 TCU L +5 7-47N 13 at Notre Dame L -5’ 3-28N 20 at San Diego St W -2’ 38-34N 27 BYU L -8’ 17-16D 4

BOISE ST(SU: 11-1 ATS: 8-4) Blue Astro TurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 † Virg Tech (M) W -1’ 33-30S 11 S 18 at Wyoming W -23’ 51-6S 25 Oregon St L -18’ 37-24O 2 at New Mex St W -43 59-0O 9 Toledo W -38’ 57-14O 16 at San Jose St W -40’ 48-0O 26 LA Tech (Tu) L -38 49-20O 30 N 6 Hawaii W -22 42-7N 12 at Idaho (F) W -34’ 52-14N 19 Fresno St (F) W -30 51-0N 26 at Nevada (F) OT L -14 31-34D 4 Utah St L -38’ 50-14

SAN DIEGO STATE(SU: 8-4 ATS: 7-4-1) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Nicholls St W -31 47-0S 11 at New Mex St W -13’ 41-21S 18 at Missouri W +14’ 24-27S 25 Utah St W -8’ 41-7O 2 O 9 at BYU L -4’ 21-24O 16 Air Force W +1 27-25O 23 at New Mexico L -23’ 30-20O 30 at Wyoming T -10 48-38N 6 Colorado St L -17 24-19N 13 at TCU W +27’ 35-40N 20 Utah L +2’ 34-38N 27 UNLV W -23’ 48-14

NAVY(SU: 8-3 ATS: 6-5) Field TurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 † Maryland (M) L -6’ 14-17 S 11 GA Sthrn L -30 13-7S 18 at Louis Tech W -3 37-23S 25 O 2 at Air Force W +9’ 6-14O 9 at Wake Forest L -3’ 28-27 O 16 SMU W -1’ 28-21O 23 † Notre Dame W +6’ 35-17O 30 Duke (HC) L -13’ 31-34N 6 at E Carolina W +3 76-35N 13 C Michigan L -14 38-37N 20 Arkansas St W -12’ 35-19N 27 D 4 D 11 † Army -

Results UnknownAt Presstime

TULSA(SU: 9-3 ATS: 8-4) Field TurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 5 at E Carolina (S) L -7 49-51 S 11 Bowling Grn L -17 33-20S 18 at Oklahoma St L +7 28-65S 25 C Arkansas W -20 41-14O 2 at Memphis W -9 48-7O 9 at SMU W +6’ 18-21O 16 Tulane (HC) W -18 52-24O 23 O 30 at Notre Dame W +8’ 28-27N 6 Rice W -17 64-27N 13 at Houston W +2’ 28-25N 20 UTEP L -17’ 31-28N 26 S Miss (F) W -3’ 56-50D 4

HAWAII(SU: 10-3 ATS: 11-2) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 2 USC (Th) W +21 36-49S 11 at Army W +3 31-28S 18 at Colorado L +13’ 13-31S 25 Charl Sth W -32 66-7O 2 Louisiana Tech W -8’ 41-21O 9 at Fresno St W +10’ 49-27O 16 Nevada W +6’ 27-21O 23 at Utah St W -3’ 45-7O 30 Idaho (HC) W -15 45-10N 6 at Boise St L +22 7-42N 13 N 20 San Jose St W -29’ 41-7N 27 at New Mex St W -27’ 59-24D 4 UNLV W -34 59-21

FIU(SU: 6-6 ATS: 6-6) AstroPlayDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 S 11 Rutgers W +16 14-19S 18 at Texas A&M W +28 20-27S 25 at Maryland L +12 28-42O 2 at Pittsburgh L +17’ 17-44O 9 WKU L -9’ 28-21O 16 at North Texas W -5 34-10O 23 O 30 at Florida Atl L -4’ 9-21N 6 ULM 2OT L -9’ 42-35N 13 at Troy W +8’ 52-35N 20 at Louisiana W -10 38-17N 27 Arkansas St W -4’ 31-24D 4 Middle Tenn L -5 27-28

TOLEDO(SU: 8-4 ATS: 7-5) NeXturfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 3 Arizona (F) L +16 2-41S 11 at Ohio W +9’ 20-13S 18 at W Michigan W +3 37-24S 25 at Purdue W +11’ 31-20O 2 Wyoming (HC) L -4’ 15-20O 9 at Boise St L +38’ 14-57O 16 Kent St W -3’ 34-21O 23 Ball St L -11’ 31-24O 30 at E Michigan W -10’ 42-7N 9 at N Illinois (Tue) L +11 30-65N 13N 17 Bowling Green (W) W -10’ 33-14N 26 C Mich (F) W -4 42-31D 4

GEORGIA TECH(SU: 6-6 ATS: 5-7) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 S Caro St L -31’ 41-10S 11 at Kansas L -13’ 25-28S 18 at N Carolina W +3 30-24S 25 NC State L -7’ 28-45O 2 at Wake Forest L -10 24-20O 9 Virginia (HC) W -10 33-21O 16 Middle Tenn W -18’ 42-14O 23 at Clemson L +4’ 13-27O 30 N 4 at Virg Tech (Th) W +13 21-28N 13 Miami, Fl L +2’ 10-35N 20 Duke L -10’ 30-20N 27 at Georgia W +13’ 34-42D 4

AIR FORCE(SU: 8-4 ATS: 4-8) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 N’western St L -48 65-21S 11 BYU W -2 35-14S 18 at Oklahoma W +16’ 24-27S 25 at Wyoming L -13’ 20-14O 2 Navy L -9’ 14-6O 9 Colorado St L -24 49-27O 16 at San Diego St L -1 25-27O 23 at TCU L +18’ 7-38O 30 Utah W +7 23-28N 6 at Army W -6’ 42-22N 13 New Mexico L -33 48-23N 18 at UNLV (Th) L -19’ 35-20N 27D 4

NORTH CAROLINA STATE(SU: 8-4 ATS: 9-3) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 W Carolina W -36 48-7S 11 at UCF W +3 28-21S 16 Cincinnati (Th) W -2 30-19S 25 at Georgia Tech W +7’ 45-28O 2 Virginia Tech L +3’ 30-41 O 9 Boston Coll W -9’ 44-17O 16 at E Carolina (OT) L -7’ 27-33O 23 O 28 Florida St (Th) W +3’ 28-24N 6 at Clemson W +3’ 13-14N 13 Wake Forest W -18’ 38-3N 20 at N Carolina W +2’ 29-25N 27 at Maryland L -2’ 31-38D 4

WEST VIRGINIA(SU: 9-3 ATS: 8-4) Field TurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Coastal Caro L -41’ 31-0S 10 at Marshall (F) OT L -12 24-21S 18 Maryland W -10 31-17S 25 at LSU W +10 14-20O 2 O 9 UNLV W -27’ 49-10O 14 USF (Th) W -10 20-6O 23 Syracuse (HC) L -13’ 14-19O 29 at Connecticut (F) OT L -5’ 13-16N 6 N 13 Cincinnati W -5 37-10N 20 at Louisville W -3’ 17-10N 26 at Pittsburgh (F) W +2’ 35-10D 4 Rutgers W -20’ 35-14

MISSOURI(SU: 10-2 ATS: 7-5) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 † Illinois L -12 23-13S 11 McNeese St W -42 50-6S 18 San Diego St L -14’ 27-24S 25 Miami, Oh W -20 51-13O 2O 9 Colorado W -11’ 26-0O 16 at Texas A&M W +3’ 30-9O 23 Oklahoma (HC) W +3 36-27O 30 at Nebraska L +7’ 17-31N 6 at Texas Tech L -4 17-24N 13 Kansas St L -13 38-28N 20 at Iowa St W -11 14-0N 27 † Kansas W -24’ 35-7D 4

IOWA(SU: 7-5 ATS: 5-6-1) Artificial TurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 E Illinois L -39 37-7S 11 Iowa St W -13’ 35-7S 18 at Arizona L +1’ 27-34S 25 Ball St W -28 45-0O 2 Penn St (HC) W -7’ 24-3O 9O 16 at Michigan W -3’ 38-28O 23 Wisconsin L -6 30-31O 30 Michigan St W -6’ 37-6N 6 at Indiana L -17’ 18-13N 13 at Northwestern L -10 17-21N 20 Ohio St T +3 17-20N 27 at Minnesota L -15 24-27D 4

EAST CAROLINA(SU: 6-6 ATS: 6-6) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 5 Tulsa (S) W +7 51-49S 11 Memphis W -14 49-27S 18 at Virg Tech L +20’ 27-49S 25 O 2 at N Carolina L +14 17-42O 9 at Southern Miss W +8 44-43O 16 NC State (OT) W +7’ 33-27O 23 Marshall (HC) W -12’ 37-10O 30 at UCF L +7’ 35-49N 6 Navy L -3 35-76N 11 at UAB (Th) W +2 54-42N 20 at Rice L -8’ 38-62N 26 SMU (F) OT L +1 38-45D 4

MARYLAND(SU: 8-4 ATS: 8-4) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 6 † Navy (M) W +6’ 17-14S 11 Morgan St W -34’ 62-3S 18 at W Virginia L +10 17-31S 25 FIU W -12 42-28O 2 Duke L -9 21-16O 9 O 16 at Clemson L +14’ 7-31O 23 at Boston Coll W +4 24-21O 30 Wake Forest W -5’ 62-14N 6 at Miami, Fl W +8’ 20-26N 13 at Virginia W -2’ 42-23N 20 Florida St L +3’ 16-30N 27 NC State W +2’ 38-31D 4

ILLINOIS(SU: 6-6 ATS: 8-4) Field TurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 † Missouri W +12 13-23S 11 S Illinois W -14 35-3S 18 N Illinois L -7 28-22S 25O 2 Ohio St W +16’ 13-24O 9 at Penn St W +8’ 33-13O 16 at Michigan St L +7 6-26O 23 Indiana W -13 43-13O 30 Purdue W -17 44-10N 6 at Michigan 3OT W +3 65-67 N 13 Minnesota L -21 34-38N 20 † Northwestern W -7’ 48-27N 27D 3 at Fresno St (F) L -5 23-25

BAYLOR(SU: 7-5 ATS: 5-7) Prestige TurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Sam Houston L -39’ 34-3S 11 Buffalo W -14’ 34-6S 18 at TCU L +21 10-45S 25 at Rice W -8 30-13O 2 Kansas W -8’ 55-7O 9 † Texas Tech L +1 38-45O 16 at Colorado W -2 31-25O 23 Kansas St (HC) L -6’ 47-42O 30 at Texas W +7’ 30-22N 6 at Oklahoma St L +9 28-55N 13 Texas A&M L +3 30-42N 20 Oklahoma L +7 24-53N 27D 4

ARIZONA(SU: 7-5 ATS: 4-7-1) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 3 at Toledo (F) W -16 41-2S 11 Citadel W -40’ 52-6S 18 Iowa W -1’ 34-27S 25 California L -6’ 10-9O 2 O 9 Oregon St L -8 27-29O 16 at Wash St L -23’ 24-7O 23 Washington (HC) W -6’ 44-14O 30 at UCLA L -9 29-21N 6 at Stanford L +8 17-42N 13 USC L -4 21-24N 20 N 26 at Oregon (F) T +19 29-48D 2 Ariz St (Th 2OT L -5 29-30

OKLAHOMA ST(SU: 10-2 ATS: 8-3-1) Synthetic TurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Wash St W -17’ 65-17S 11 Troy L -13’ 41-38S 18 Tulsa W -7 65-28S 25S 30 Texas A&M (Th) T -3 38-35O 8 at Louisiana (F) W -24 54-28O 16 at Texas Tech W +3 34-17O 23 Nebraska (HC) L +6 41-51O 30 at Kansas St W -4’ 24-14N 6 Baylor W -9 55-28N 13 at Texas W -5 33-16N 20 at Kansas W -24 48-14N 27 Oklahoma L -3 41-47D 4

ARMY(SU: 6-5 ATS: 5-6) Astro PlayDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 at E Michigan L -9 31-27 S 11 Hawaii L -3 28-31S 18 N Texas W -5’ 24-0S 25 at Duke W +6’ 35-21O 2 Temple (HC) L +6 35-42O 9 at Tulane W +1 41-23O 16 † Rutgers (OT) W +7 20-23O 23 O 30 VMI L -33’ 29-7N 6 Air Force L +6’ 22-42 N 13 at Kent St W +1 45-28N 20 † Notre Dame L +8 3-27N 27 D 4D 11 † Navy

Results UnknownAt Presstime

KANSAS STATE(SU: 7-5 ATS: 6-6) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 UCLA W -2 31-22S 11 Missouri St L -28’ 48-24S 18 † Iowa St W -3’ 27-20S 25 UCF L -6’ 17-13O 2 O 7 Nebraska (Th) L +10’ 13-48O 16 at Kansas W -3 59-7O 23 at Baylor W +6’ 42-47O 30 Oklahoma St L +4’ 14-24N 6 Texas W +3’ 39-14N 13 at Missouri W +13 28-38N 20 at Colorado L -2 36-44N 27 at North Texas L -14’ 49-41D 4

SYRACUSE(SU: 7-5 ATS: 7-5) Field TurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 at Akron W -7’ 29-3S 11 at Washington L +13’ 20-41S 18 Maine W -23’ 38-14S 25 Colgate W -28 42-7O 2 O 9 at USF W +8 13-9O 16 Pitt (HC) L +2 14-45O 23 at W Virginia W +13’ 19-14O 30 at Cincinnati W +5’ 31-7N 6 Louisville L -7 20-28N 13 at Rutgers W -2’ 13-10N 20 Connecticut L -3’ 6-23N 27 Boston Coll L -3’ 7-16D 4

NORTH CAROLINA(SU: 7-5 ATS: 6-6) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 † LSU W +9’ 24-30S 11 S 18 Georgia Tech L -3 24-30S 25 at Rutgers W -2’ 17-13O 2 East Carolina W -14 42-17O 9 Clemson W -2 21-16O 16 at Virginia W -6’ 44-10O 23 at Miami, Fl L +6’ 10-33O 30 WM & Mary (HC) L -21’ 21-17 N 6 at Florida St W +10’ 37-35N 13 Virginia Tech L +3’ 10-26 N 20 NC State L -2’ 25-29N 27 at Duke L -7’ 24-19D 4

TENNESSEE(SU: 6-6 ATS: 7-5) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 UT-Martin W -38’ 50-0S 11 Oregon L +11’ 13-48S 18 Florida L +13’ 17-31S 25 UAB (2OT) L -14 32-29O 2 at LSU W +16’ 14-16O 9 at Georgia L +11 14-41O 16 O 23 Alabama L +16’ 10-41O 30 at S Carolina W +17 24-38N 6 at Memphis W -19’ 50-14N 13 Mississippi (HC) W -2’ 52-14N 20 at Vanderbilt W -8 24-10N 27 Kentucky W -2’ 24-14D 4

WASHINGTON(SU: 6-6 ATS: 5-7) Field TurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 at BYU L +1 17-23S 11 Syracuse W -13’ 41-20S 18 Nebraska L +3 21-56S 25 O 2 at USC W +10 32-31O 9 Arizona St L -1 14-24O 16 Oregon St (2OT) L -2 35-34O 23 at Arizona L +6’ 14-44O 30 Stanford L +7’ 0-41N 6 at Oregon L +36’ 16-53N 13 N 18 UCLA (Th) W -2 24-7N 27 at California W +6’ 16-13D 4 at Wash St W -5’ 35-28

NEBRASKA(SU: 10-3 ATS: 7-6) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 WKU W -38 49-10S 11 Idaho L -27’ 38-17S 18 at Washington W -3 56-21S 25 S Dakota St (HC) L -44 17-3O 2 O7 at Kansas St (Th) W -10’ 48-13O 16 Texas L -9’ 13-20O 23 at Oklahoma St W -6 51-41O 30 Missouri W -7’ 31-17N 6 at Iowa St OT L -17 31-30N 13 Kansas L -35 20-3N 20 at Texas A&M L -2 6-9N 26 Colorado (F) W -16’ 45-17D 4 † Oklahoma W +4 20-23

USF(SU: 7-5 ATS: 5-7) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Stony Brook W -37 59-14S 11 at Florida L +16 14-38S 18 S 25 WKU L -27’ 24-12O 2 Florida Atl W -21’ 31-3O 9 Syracuse L -8 9-13O 14 at W Virg (Th) L +10 6-20O 22 at Cincinnati (F) W +8’ 38-30 O 30 N 3 Rutgers (W) L -10 28-27N 13 at Louisville (OT) W +2’ 24-21N 20 Pittsburgh L +3 10-17N 27 at Miami, Fl OT W +12 23-20D 4 Connecticut L -2’ 16-19

CLEMSON(SU: 6-6 ATS: 5-7) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 N Texas L -27’ 35-10S 11 Presbyterian L -46 58-21S 18 at Auburn (OT) W +7 24-27S 25 O 2 Miami, Fl (HC) L +3 21-30O 9 at N Carolina L +2 16-21O 16 Maryland W -14’ 31-7O 23 Georgia Tech W -4’ 27-13O 30 at Boston Coll L -7 10-16N 6 NC State L -3’ 14-13N 13 at Florida St W +5’ 13-16N 20 at Wake Forest W -14 30-10N 27 S Carolina L +3 7-29D 4

NOTRE DAME(SU: 7-5 ATS: 6-4-2) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Purdue W -10’ 23-12S 11 Michigan L -3’ 24-28S 18 at Mich St (OT) W +3’ 31-34S 25 Stanford L +4’ 14-37O 2 at Boston Coll W -2’ 31-13O 9 Pittsburgh T -6 23-17O 16 W Michigan T -24 44-20O 23 † Navy L -6’ 17-35O 30 Tulsa L -8’ 27-28 N 6 N 13 Utah W +5’ 28-3N 20 † Army W -8 27-3N 27 at USC W +4’ 20-16D 4

MIAMI (FL)(SU: 7-5 ATS: 5-7) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 2 Florida A&M (Th) W -41 45-0S 11 at Ohio St L +8 24-36S 18 S 23 at Pitt (Th) W -3’ 31-3O 2 at Clemson W -3 30-21O 9 Florida St L -6 17-45O 16 at Duke L -18 28-13O 23 N Carolina W -6’ 33-10O 30 at Virginia L -16 19-24N 6 Maryland L -8’ 26-20N 13 at Georgia Tech W +2’ 35-10N 20 Virginia Tech L +2 17-31N 27 USF OT L -12 20-23D 4

UCF(SU: 10-3 ATS: 10-3) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 S Dakota W -26’ 38-7S 11 NC State L -3 21-28S 18 at Buffalo W -7’ 24-10S 25 at Kansas St W +6’ 13-17O 2 O 6 UAB (W) W -12’ 42-7O 13 at Marshall (W) W -6 35-14O 23 Rice (HC) W -22’ 41-14O 30 E Carolina W -7’ 49-35N 5 at Houston (F) W -2 40-33N 13 Southern Miss L -10 21-31N 20 at Tulane W -18’ 61-14N 27 at Memphis L -26 37-17D 4 SMU W -8’ 17-7

GEORGIA(SU: 6-6 ATS: 5-7) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Louisiana W -28’ 55-7S 11 at S Carolina L +3 6-17S 18 Arkansas L -2 24-31S 25 at Miss St L +1 12-24O 2 at Colorado L -4’ 27-29 O 9 Tennessee W -11 41-14O 16 Vanderbilt (HC) W -14 43-0O 23 at Kentucky W -4 44-31 O 30 † Florida (OT) L -1 31-34N 6 Idaho St W -45 55-7N 13 at Auburn L +6’ 31-49N 20 N 27 Georgia Tech L -13’ 42-34D 4

Page 9: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL 1/2 -

DL - 4

LB 1/2 -

DB - 4

HAWAIIBOWL

UH failed to show up in McMackin’s only bowl gm while TU won by a comb 108-20 in Graham’s two.Fairly obvious that the Warriors have the largest home edge we allow, where they went 7-0 ATS. UH’s D was impressive vs a pair of mobile QB’s in Kaepernick (293 yds) and Borel (181 yds).Huge edge being a DD dog in a non-NYD/BCS bowl.

CCH 44 -

Turf/ - 4444

MTCH - 4

INT 4 -

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGAlex Green #44JC 13/13 133 1201 33 1168 17 8.8Chizzy Dimude #133JC 13/0 44 283 25 258 1 5.9Bryant Moniz #1817JC 13/13 70 272 196 76 4 1.1PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTBryant Moniz #1817JC 13/13 508 337 66.3 4629 36 11Shane Austin #197 13/0 24 13 54.2 190 2 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGGREG SALAS #1274 13/13 106 1675 15.8 12 54KEALOHA PILARES #280 12/12 88 1306 14.8 15 80Royce Pollard #1274 13/13 56 772 13.8 6 41Rodney Bradley #196JC 12/12 48 511 10.6 1 56Alex Green #44JC 13/13 26 343 13.2 1 66Dustin Blount #448JC 10/1 18 169 9.4 2 41PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Alex Dunnachie #287 13 46 1981 43.1 5 36.3 0 15KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGScott Enos #87 13 66-66 9-10 7-7 1-4 0-0 17-21 40POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB COREY PAREDES #1288 13/13 144 0 4 5 4FS MANA SILVA #295 13/13 76 0 2 6 8LB Aaron Brown #95JC 13/9 75 5 4 6 3SS Richard Torres #1663 13/12 56 1 1 4 2CB Lametrius Davis #188JC 13/11 53 0 1 5 0CB JERAMY BRYANT #407JC 13/13 48 0 2 5 4SS John Hardy-Tuliau #729 13/8 46 0 5 3 0DE Kamalu Umu #1817JC 13/10 42 4 8.5 3 1DT Haku Correa #142 13/2 42 1.5 3 1 0DE Elliot Purcell #537 13/11 33 3 0 1 0LB Po’okela Ahmad #537 13/2 33 0 0 1 1DT Kaniela Tuipulotu #65 13/12 32 1 2.5 3 0DE Paipai Falemalu #105 13/3 32 3 1.5 0 0DT Vaughn Meatoga #226 13/13 32 1 1.5 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDRyan Henry 9 48 5.3 0 Dustin Blount 25 603 24.1 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGGJ Kinne #24 12/12 145 726 169 557 7 3.8 Damaris Johnson #164 12/11 50 481 19 462 6 9.2Alex Singleton #112 12/0 84 402 11 391 9 4.7Ja’Terian Douglas #89 11/1 42 343 10 333 3 7.9Trey Watts #1022 10/4 59 195 5 190 1 3.2PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTGJ KINNE #24 12/12 429 258 60.1 3307 28 10Shavodrick Beaver #23 7/0 6 4 66.7 62 0 1 RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGDamaris Johnson #164 12/11 53 771 14.5 3 43CHARLES CLAY #370 12/12 41 488 11.9 7 42Trae Johnson #495 11/1 28 427 15.2 3 40Ricky Johnson #91 12/10 21 334 15.9 1 41Thomas Roberson #145 12/8 28 304 10.9 1 44Willie Carter #368 12/3 18 295 16.4 5 75PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Michael Such #79 12 42 1802 42.9 15 39.2 0 17KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGKevin Fitzpatrick #74 12 55-56 7-8 5-6 2-8 0-0 14-22 47POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Curnelius Arnick #500 12/12 106 3 3.5 4 2S MARCO NELSON #1192 12/11 81 0 0 5 6LB Shawn Jackson #116 12/9 80 5.5 7 2 2LB Tanner Antle #537 11/11 79 2 5.5 1 0LB Brian Moore #113 12/6 52 0 5 2 1S Dexter McCoil #360 11/10 47 0 1 3 6DL Cory Dorris #413 12/12 45 1 4.5 1 0CB John Flanders #110 12/12 42 1 0.5 3 1S Charles Davis #380 11/8 41 0 3 10 1DL Tyrunn Walker #94JC 12/12 40 4.5 5.5 3 0S DeWitt Jennings #225 11/3 30 0 1 2 0LB Donnell Hawkins #386 12/0 21 0.5 1 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDDAMARIS JOHNSON 22 274 12.5 1 Damaris Johnson 29 795 27.4 1

These two are former WAC foes (‘96-’04) and UH leads the series 5-3 SU and 4-3 ATS and has won 3 of the L/4 (2-2 ATS). The Warriors won the most recent gm 44-16 (-11) in Honolulu where they are 3-1 SU and 2-2 ATS vs the Hurricane. TU is 7-9 SU and 4-2 ATS in bowl gms incl a mark of 2-0 SU/ATS under HC Graham. The Hurricane is making its 5th bowl in the L/6Y and is on a 3-1 SU/ATS run. UH is 5-4 SU and 4-5 ATS in bowls (0-1 SU/ATS under HC McMackin) and is playing in its 7th bowl the L/9Y. This will also be UH’s 6th appearance in the hometown Hawaii Bowl where they’re 3-2 SU and 2-3 ATS (Warriors are 4-3 SU and 3-4 ATS in bowls on the Island). TU was 3-3 SU/ATS vs bowl-eligible tms TY while UH went 3-2 SU and 4-1 ATS. The Hurricane has a lethal off (#17) that avg’d 40 ppg and 503 ypg. QB Kinne improved his play throughout the yr and actually ended up leading the tm in rush yds making him an even more valu-able threat. TU used a slew of RB’s TY but surprisingly, the top RB (Singleton) ended up 3rd behind QB Kinne and WR D. Johnson. It was impressive to see the way Kinne was able to distribute the ball as 7 had 18 or more rec led by D. Johnson whose big-play ability was displayed in their upset of ND. HB Clay led the tm in TD rec while true Fr Roberson and R. Johnson filled out the rest of the st’rs. The OL avg 6’3” 331 (0 Sr) paving the way for a CUSA-best 219 ypg rush (5.2) while all’g 24 sks (5.5%). TU was one of just 6 CUSA tms to allow less than 30 ppg on the ssn (443 ypg) but finished with our #91 overall rating. The DL avg 6’3” 277 (1 Sr). The 3 man group all’d 137 ypg on the ground (4.0) while posting 11 of the tm’s 24 sks (46%). The LB unit was led by Arnick and True Fr Jackson who finished 1st and 3rd on the tm in tkls. The secondary was victimized for 574 pass yds vs OkSt early in the yr but improved towards the EOY holding 3 of their L/4 opp under 300 yds. Overall TU all’d 306 ypg (61%) with a 30-19 ratio for a #85 pass def ranking. The ST’s were outstanding finish-ing with our #11 rating. D. Johnson broke WM West’s 4 yr NCAA career KR record (3,118) which is remarkable considering he’s just a Jr. The tm has been equally impressive in KR and PR yds all’d as they are 10th (18.9) and 1st (2.1) in the nation. UH added a new wrinkle to its off TY by incorporating the “Pistol” into the mix with its staple - the Run-and-Shoot. While the high-octane off (#16) is still churning the passing yds and still utilizes the “Hawaii-Five-O” set, the run gm has flourished and produced a 1,000 yd rusher for the first time S/’99 in RB Green (schl record 327 yds vs NMSt). The OL avg 6’3” 308 (4 Sr) and under McMackin, UH’s rush avg has improved each yr going from 3.2 in ‘08, to 4.5 to 5.0. Despite the upgrade in the run gm, the off still centers around the QB. Former walk-on Moniz was not only buried on the 2 dp LY (#6 QB at one point), he was better known for his job as a pizza delivery guy than a UH QB. However, as attrition took its toll on the unit, he worked his way up the chart before eventually being named the st’r and hasn’t looked back since. Moniz, the NCAA’s leader in ttl off (362 ypg), etched his name into the UH record books TY setting a schl record with 560 pass yds vs SJSt. Slot WR Salas (UH’s all-time leading rec) has 272 career rec for 4,131 yds and is #2 in the NCAA in rec ypg and #3 in rec per gm. The Warriors run a base 4-3 but also utilize a 4-2-5 (“45 scheme”) and a 3-3-5 (“Okie”) look. The DL avg 6’3” 276 (2 Sr) and accounted for 17 of the tm’s 26 sks while the LB unit is led by Paredes who is #11 NCAA in tkls. UH’s def cut its yds all’d from 405 (in ‘09) to 344 ypg, increased its int’s from 12 to 23 and raised the sk ttl from 18 to 26 (incl a school-record 8 vs SJSt). K Enos improved his mark to 17-21 (12-19 ‘09) and his streak of 100 PAT’s without a miss is a school record, while P Dunnachie improved his avg to 43.1 ypp (39.2) while adjusting to not outkicking his coverage. UH’s PR unit has struggled as it avg’s just 4.6 ypr while all’g 14.1 ypr. Two of the nation’s hottest tms square off as Tulsa has covered 8 of 9 while Hawaii is 11-2 ATS. The Warriors have used their home edge to maul teams but now with the added time prior to the bowl it negates some of that advantage. From gm 4 on, the Tulsa offense has clicked and that includes outright upsets at both Notre Dame and Houston. FORECAST: TULSA (+) Hawaii by 3 RATING: 2★ TULSA (+)

Crowd

QB - -

GOLDEN HURRICANE ATS: 8-4 O/U: 6-6

TU UH TU UH TU UH

RB - 44 WR - 1/2

ST 44 - SCH - -

OVERALL -

TU avg 6-3 331, 0 Sr, 24 sk all’d (5.5%), 5.2 ypc.UH avg 6-3 308, 4 Sr, 34 sk all’d (6.0%), 5.0 ypc.TU avg 6-3 277, 1 Sr, 11 of tm 24 sks, 4.0 ypc.UH avg 6-3 276, 2 Sr, 17 of tm 26 sks, 3.5 ypc.Arnick #1 tkl’r w/106, 6.5 tfl, Jackson #3, 12.5 tfl.Paredes #1 tkl’r w/144, 4 tfl, Brown #3, 9 tfl.TU #85 pass eff D, 306 ypg (61%), 30-19 ratio.UH #41 pass eff D, 212 ypg (59%), 21-23 ratio.

HAWAII

by 3' 4’s

HAWAII(10-3)

TU UH CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 24, 2010 • 8:00 pm ESPN • Aloha Stadium • Honolulu, HIPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.TULSA 178 250 32 2.7 4 4 4 92.4HAWAII 112 440 41 2.9 – 94.0

TU UH

WARRIORS ATS: 11-2 O/U: 6-7

OL - -

DL - -

LB - 44

DB - 44

POINSETTIABOWL

Navy has experience but still lean with Hoke and his coordinators esp DC Long. SDSt is playing at home but fewer cities have a larger Naval presence than San Diego.Navy facing a pair of NFL WR’s while Rocky Long with extra time to prep for option.Service acads always good in bowls but Navy just 12 days to prep.

CCH - 4

Turf/ - 4

MTCH - 444

INT - -

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGRONNIE HILLMAN #236 12/8 234 1370 66 1304 14 5.6Walter Kazee #882 9/0 60 289 6 283 3 4.7Davon Brown #243 12/3 30 151 7 144 2 4.8Brandon Sullivan #120 12/5 40 126 2 124 7 3.1Ryan Lindley #74 12/12 18 42 81 -39 0 -2.2PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTRyan Lindley #74 12/12 398 225 56.5 3554 26 14Jake Bernards #182 11/0 1 1 100.0 10 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGVINCENT BROWN #148 12/11 61 1187 19.5 9 90DeMARCO SAMPSON #94 12/12 65 1175 18.1 8 71Brandon Sullivan #120 12/5 25 375 15.0 3 57Gavin Escobar #107 12/11 26 299 11.5 4 45Dominique Sandifer #146 12/5 22 253 11.5 0 29PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20BRIAN STAHOVICH #10 11 50 2285 45.7 14 36.7(t) 1 15KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGAbel Perez #296JC 12 49-51 8-9 6-7 2-5 1-1 17-22 53POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB MILES BURRIS #131 12/12 74 9.5 9.5 0 0DB Andrew Preston #445 12/11 68 0 3 3 2DB LEON MCFADDEN #542 12/12 54 1 6 12 2LB Logan Ketchum #227 12/12 46 0.5 2 2 0DB Darryn Lewis – 12/11 41 0 1 4 2LB Marc Yarbrough #86 9/9 41 2 2.5 1 0DB Nat Berhe #204 11/1 37 0 1 4 1DB Khalid Stevens #923 12/1 35 0 3.5 2 0LB Rob Andrews #138 12/3 34 1 0.5 2 0DB Brandon Davis #210 11/10 33 1 1 3 0DL Jerome Long #464 12/9 28 1.5 4.5 0 0LB Nick Tenhaeff #468JC 12/7 26 2 1.5 0 0DB Jose Perez – 11/10 25 0 3 10 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDLarry Parker 16 116 7.2 0 Brandon Davis 22 490 22.3 0

SDSt and Navy meet for the 3rd time and SDSt has won both previous matchups. The last meeting was a 45-31 final in ‘97. This is SDSt’s first bowl appearance since the 1998 Las Vegas Bowl, a 20-13 loss to NC. This is Navy’s 8th str bowl, a school record, and their 3rd trip to the Poinsettia Bowl (1-1 SU/2-0 ATS previously) with their last trip a 35-32 loss to Utah in ‘07. SDSt HC Hoke is 0-1 SU/ATS losing his only bowl as HC (at Ball St) to Rutgers 52-30 in the ‘07 Int’l Bowl. Navy HC Niumatalolo is 1-2 SU/2-1 ATS in bowls as he earned his first bowl win LY in their blowout upset (+6’) of Missouri 35-13 in the Texas Bowl. Niumatalolo and Hoke faced each other in ‘08 and Hoke’s Ball St squad won 35-23 (-7). Navy is 4-2 SU/5-1 ATS vs bowl tms outscoring those tms 32-20 and outgaining them 416-382. SDSt is 1-4 SU/3-2 ATS vs bowl tms being outscored 31-28 and outgained 462-410 but none of their 4 losses were by more than 5 pts. They were a blown call (vs Missouri on GW TD run), a “replay-gate” (BYU) and a blk’d P (Utah, set up GW score) from an 11-1 record. Both tms faced AF with SDSt (+1) winning 27-25 despite being outgained 487-452 and outFD’d 29-16 and Navy (+9’) losing 14-6. Navy is 5-2 SU/ATS on the road TY and SDSt is 3-3 SU/3-2-1ATS. Although SDSt is playing in their home stadium, Navy brought 20,000+ fans to the last 2 Poinsettia Bowls as there is a large Naval Base in San Diego and SDSt only avg’d 31,814 fans per home gm this year. Although it’s another winning season for the Midshipmen, they didn’t live up to the lofty pressn expecta-tions. Navy lost to rival AF ending a streak of 7 str wins in that series and lost the CIC Trophy for the 1st time S/’02. Navy did heat up in the 2H of ssn avg 43 ppg in L/5 gms prior to Army incl a convincing win over rival ND. Coming into the ssn, QB Dobbs was listed as a Heisman contender after he broke Tim Tebow’s record for rush TD’s (27) LY. Dobbs suffered through some inj’s during the ssn and missed the CM gm with a concussion but still finished as the tm’s top rusher and threw for a career-high pass yds, but his rush totals fell by 343 yds. FB Teich took over the starting job in gm 6 after Murray was inj’d and never relinquished the job. WR Jones will finish with the most rec yds for Navy since ‘94. The OL starters avg 6’4” 270 with 1 Sr st’rs and Navy is avg 289 rush ypg which is #5 in the NCAA. Overall Navy is #54 in our off rankings and #81 on defense. The DL avg 6’3” 258 with 2 Sr st’rs, but the leader of the unit is Jr DE Tuani who has been playing through inj all yr but leads the tm in tfl (15.5). Overall the tm has just 18 sks with 12.5 by the DL. Top tkl’r LB Simmons has been outstanding in his 1st yr as a starter and has 4.6 spd. Navy always ranks low in our pass D rankings because they don’t face a pass attack in practice and this year is #104 allowing 220 ypg (68%) with an 20-7 ratio. ROV Middleton is Navy’s defensive leader and 1 of the academy’s top Safeties in recent yrs. Navy is #103 in our ST rankings with low net punting and mediocre returns but solid K Buckley ret’d from missing 3 gms in the 2H of the ssn and should be healthy for the bowl. San Diego St is led by MWC COY Hoke, who in his 2nd year, led the Aztecs to their most wins since 1996. The offense comes in at #32. Slinger Lindley has six 300 yd pass gms incl a career-high 528 vs Utah. His 30 straight starts set SDSt’s record and he is just the 3rd in school history with B2B 3,000 yd passing seasons. He helped his offense to more than 500 ttl yds 5x’s this season. The run gm is led by MWC FOY true Hillman, who exploded on the scene after an investigation sent him home last season (grayshirt). He’s drawn many comparisons to SDSt-great Marshall Faulk. For the 1st time S/’02, SDSt had 2 rec’s over 1,000 yds in future-NFL’ers Sampson and Brown. The OL avg 6’4” 298 with 1 Sr starter and has started every gm together. They pave the way for 152 ypg (4.6) and allowed just 9 sks (2.2%) which is even more impressive when you consider that Lindley hesitates to run. The DL avg 6’3” 272 with 2 Sr starters and tallied just 9 of the tm’s 28 sks (32%). They have been susceptible to the run this year, allowing 200+ yds 3x’s incl a ssn-high 312 vs the AF option (5.0). LB Burris is the team’s top tkl’r and leads with 19 tfl TY. The Aztecs rank #44 in our pass eff D all’g 210 ypg (52%) with an 17-9 ratio. 1st Tm MWC McFadden has totaled 14 pd TY while Perez has 10. SDSt finished #109 in our ST’s ratings. It’s not easy to buck a service academy in a bowl but this is more like a regular season gm with Navy having played just 12 days ago. SDSt now has the benefit of extra practice time to prep while also having faced Air Force each year in their conf sked. One of the biggest mismatches of this bowl season are the WR’s of SDSt vs the CB’s of Navy. FORECAST: San Diego St by 16 RATING: 3★ SAN DIEGO ST

Crowd

QB - 1/2

MIDSHIPMEN ATS: 7-5 O/U: 6-6

NAVY SDSt NAVY SDSt NAVY SDSt

RB - - WR - 444

ST - - SCH - -

OVERALL -

Navy avg 6-4 270, 1 Sr, 10 sk all’d (7.0%), 5.4 ypc. SDSt avg 6-4 298, 1 Sr, 9 sk all’d (2.2%), 4.6 ypc.Navy avg 6-3 258, 2 Sr, 12.5 of tm 18 sk, 4.4 ypc.SDSt avg 6-3 272, 2 Sr, 9 of tm 28 sk, 3.6 ypc.Simmons #1 tkl’r w/124, 2 tfl, McCauley #2, 10.5 tfl.Burris #1 tkl’r w/74, 19 tfl, Ketchum #4, 2.5 tfl.Navy #104 pass eff D, 220 ypg (68%), 20-7 ratio.SDSt #44 pass eff D, 210 ypg (52%), 17-9 ratio.

SDSt

by 12' 4’s

NAVY (9-3)

SAN DIEGO ST (8-4)

NAVY SDSt CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 23, 2010 • 8:00 pm ESPN • Qualcomm Stadium • San Diego, CAPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.NAVY 279 95 28 1.0 4 95.8SAN DIEGO ST 136 335 32 2.4 – 93.3

NAVY SDSt

AZTECS ATS: 7-4-1 O/U: 5-7RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGRICKY DOBBS #142 11/11 242 989 129 860 13 3.6ALEXANDER TEICH #402 12/6 137 830 5 825 5 6.0Gee Gee Greene #336 12/12 67 472 13 459 5 6.9Vince Murray #506 9/6 68 383 1 382 3 5.6Kriss Proctor #197 7/1 32 304 0 304 4 9.5Aaron Santiago #506 9/5 23 177 3 174 1 7.6PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTRicky Dobbs #142 11/11 135 74 54.8 1380 12 5Kriss Proctor #197 7/1 5 2 40.0 33 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGGREG JONES #442 12/12 30 577 19.2 4 85Gee Gee Greene #336 12/12 17 256 15.1 0 38Aaron Santiago #506 9/5 12 235 19.6 3 51PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Kyle Delahooke #75 12 36 1373 38.1 6 33.1 1 8KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGJoe Buckley #96 10 29-30 2-3 4-6 1-1 0-0 7-10 42Jon Teague #35 12 16-16 1-1 1-1 0-0 0-0 2-2 38POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB TYLER SIMMONS #449 12/12 124 0.5 1.5 0 1ROV WYATT MIDDLETON – 12/12 81 0 0 5 0LB Aaron McCauley #417 12/10 81 3 7.5 2 0DE JABAREE TUANI #352 12/12 68 5.5 10 2 0LB Jerry Hauburger – 12/12 62 1.5 3.5 0 0LB Max Blue #290 8/5 58 0 1 1 1CB Kevin Edwards – 12/12 51 0 1.5 4 1DE Billy Yarborough – 12/12 47 6 3 4 0FS De’Von Richardson #443 11/8 44 0 0.5 3 1CB Kwesi Mitchell #321 12/12 44 0 0.5 3 1LB Tra’ves Bush #1078 12/2 40 0 0 0 1NT Chase Burge #389 12/8 39 0 1.5 3 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDGary Myers 13 70 5.4 0 Marcus Thomas 21 457 21.8 0 ALEXANDER TEICH 15 395 26.3 0

9

TULSA(9-3)

Page 10: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

QB PASS EFFICIENCYRank Player, Team Gm Att Comp % Int Int % Yds Ydspatt TD TD % Rating1 Cam Newton, Auburn 13 246 165 67.07 6 2.44 2589 10.52 28 11.38 188.162 Kellen Moore, Boise St. 12 345 245 71.01 5 1.45 3506 10.16 33 9.57 185.043 Ryan Mallett, Arkansas 12 364 242 66.48 11 3.02 3592 9.87 30 8.24 170.534 Scott Tolzien, Wisconsin 12 245 182 74.29 6 2.45 2300 9.39 16 6.53 169.805 Andy Dalton, TCU 12 293 194 66.21 6 2.05 2638 9.00 26 8.87 167.036 Greg McElroy, Alabama 12 296 209 70.61 5 1.69 2767 9.35 19 6.42 166.947 Andrew Luck, Stanford 12 349 245 70.20 7 2.01 3051 8.74 28 8.02 166.108 Jeffrey Godfrey, UCF 13 209 143 68.42 6 2.87 2042 9.77 13 6.22 165.289 Aaron Murray, Georgia 12 304 188 61.84 6 1.97 2851 9.38 24 7.89 162.7310 Bryant Moniz, Hawaii 13 508 337 66.34 11 2.17 4629 9.11 36 7.09 161.9411 Richard Stanzi, Iowa 12 324 210 64.81 4 1.23 2804 8.65 25 7.72 160.5012 Dan Persa, Northwestern 10 302 222 73.51 4 1.32 2581 8.55 15 4.97 159.0413 Tyrod Taylor, Virginia Tech 13 284 172 60.56 4 1.41 2521 8.88 23 8.10 159.0414 Terrelle Pryor, Ohio St. 12 298 196 65.77 11 3.69 2551 8.56 25 8.39 157.9815 Brandon Weeden, Oklahoma St. 12 470 317 67.45 13 2.77 4037 8.59 32 6.81 156.5316 Chandler Harnish, Northern Ill. 12 266 172 64.66 5 1.88 2230 8.38 20 7.52 156.1417 Colin Kaepernick, Nevada 13 326 213 65.34 7 2.15 2830 8.68 20 6.13 154.2118 Stephen Garcia, S Carolina 13 315 205 65.08 11 3.49 2816 8.94 20 6.35 154.1419 Kirk Cousins, Michigan St. 12 320 216 67.50 9 2.81 2705 8.45 20 6.25 153.5120 Denard Robinson, Michigan 12 250 155 62.00 10 4 2316 9.26 16 6.40 152.9421 Darron Thomas, Oregon 12 321 195 60.75 7 2.18 2518 7.84 28 8.72 151.0622 Geno Smith, West Virginia 12 333 219 65.77 6 1.8 2567 7.71 23 6.91 149.7123 T.J. Yates, North Carolina 12 383 259 67.62 8 2.09 3184 8.31 18 4.70 148.7924 Mike Hartline, Kentucky 12 405 268 66.17 9 2.22 3178 7.85 23 5.68 146.3825 Ryan Lindley, San Diego St. 12 398 225 56.53 14 3.52 3554 8.93 26 6.53 146.0626 Nick Foles, Arizona 10 376 254 67.55 7 1.86 2911 7.74 19 5.05 145.5427 Landry Jones, Oklahoma 13 568 371 65.32 11 1.94 4289 7.55 35 6.16 145.2128 Robert Griffin III, Baylor 12 413 274 66.34 8 1.94 3195 7.74 21 5.08 144.2329 Ryan Colburn, Fresno St. 12 322 199 61.80 9 2.8 2529 7.85 21 6.52 143.7130 G.J. Kinne, Tulsa 12 429 258 60.14 10 2.33 3307 7.71 28 6.53 141.7732 Ryan Tannehill, Texas A&M 12 199 130 65.33 3 1.51 1434 7.21 11 5.53 141.0834 Taylor Potts, Texas Tech 12 495 326 65.86 9 1.82 3357 6.78 31 6.26 139.8635 Jordan Wynn, Utah 10 299 186 62.21 10 3.34 2334 7.81 17 5.69 139.8536 Tino Sunseri, Pittsburgh 12 327 214 65.44 8 2.45 2476 7.57 15 4.59 139.2937 Carson Coffman, Kansas St. 11 240 154 64.17 7 2.92 1832 7.63 12 5.00 138.9538 Taylor Martinez, Nebraska 12 187 109 58.29 6 3.21 1578 8.44 9 4.81 138.6439 Dominique Davis, E Carolina 12 552 358 64.86 14 2.54 3699 6.70 36 6.52 137.5941 Christian Ponder, Florida St. 11 294 183 62.24 8 2.72 2038 6.93 20 6.80 137.4842 Kyle Padron, SMU 13 474 279 58.86 12 2.53 3526 7.44 29 6.12 136.4743 Danny O’Brien, Maryland 12 315 179 56.83 6 1.9 2257 7.17 21 6.67 135.2045 Austin Davis, Southern Miss. 12 410 259 63.17 6 1.46 2898 7.07 18 4.39 134.11

WIDE RECEIVERSRank Player, Team GM Catches Yds TD Rec/Gm YPC YPG1 Justin Blackmon, Oklahoma St. 11 102 1665 18 9.27 16.32 151.362 Greg Salas, Hawaii 13 106 1675 12 8.15 15.80 128.854 Ryan Broyles, Oklahoma 13 118 1452 13 9.08 12.31 111.695 Kealoha Pilares, Hawaii 12 88 1306 15 7.33 14.84 108.836 Alshon Jeffery, S Carolina 13 79 1387 9 6.08 17.56 106.697 Vincent Brown, San Diego St. 12 61 1187 9 5.08 19.46 98.928 Juron Criner, Arizona 12 73 1186 10 6.08 16.25 98.839 DeMarco Sampson, San Diego St. 12 65 1175 8 5.42 18.08 97.9210 Titus Young, Boise St. 12 65 1151 9 5.42 17.71 95.9212 Aldrick Robinson, SMU 13 60 1225 13 4.62 20.42 94.2316 Leonard Hankerson, Miami (FL) 12 66 1085 12 5.50 16.44 90.4217 Julio Jones, Alabama 12 75 1084 7 6.25 14.45 90.3318 Eric Page, Toledo 12 94 1081 8 7.83 11.50 90.0819 Dwayne Harris, East Carolina 12 93 1055 10 7.75 11.34 87.9220 Torrey Smith, Maryland 12 65 1045 12 5.42 16.08 87.0823 Jermaine Kearse, Washington 12 62 1001 12 5.17 16.15 83.4224 Michael Floyd, Notre Dame 11 73 916 10 6.64 12.55 83.2726 Jeff Fuller, Texas A&M 12 65 983 12 5.42 15.12 81.9227 Lance Lewis, East Carolina 12 78 979 13 6.50 12.55 81.5829 Cole Beasley, SMU 13 84 1036 6 6.46 12.33 79.6930 Randall Cobb, Kentucky 12 79 955 7 6.58 12.09 79.5832 Jeffrey Maehl, Oregon 12 68 943 12 5.67 13.87 78.5833 Jeremy Ebert, Northwestern 12 59 919 8 4.92 15.58 76.5834 Kris Adams, UTEP 12 44 917 11 3.67 20.84 76.4235 Denarius Moore, Tennessee 12 43 912 9 3.58 21.21 76.0036 Armand Robinson, Miami (OH) 13 90 981 6 6.92 10.90 75.4638 Chris Matthews, Kentucky 12 57 897 9 4.75 15.74 74.7539 Dwight Jones, North Carolina 12 57 895 4 4.75 15.70 74.5840 T.J. Moe, Missouri 12 77 893 6 6.42 11.60 74.4241 Dane Sanzenbacher, Ohio St. 12 52 889 10 4.33 17.10 74.0842 Roy Roundtree, Michigan 12 63 882 6 5.25 14.00 73.5044 Owen Spencer, NC State 12 57 868 4 4.75 15.23 72.3345 Darvin Adams, Auburn 13 48 909 7 3.69 18.94 69.9248 Kendall Wright, Baylor 12 66 825 6 5.50 12.50 68.7549 Doug Baldwin, Stanford 12 56 824 9 4.67 14.71 68.6750 TY Hilton, FIU 12 56 816 4 4.67 14.57 68.0052 Jonathan Baldwin, Pittsburgh 12 52 810 5 4.33 15.58 67.5053 Lyle Leong, Texas Tech 12 64 808 17 5.33 12.63 67.3354 Derek Moye, Penn St. 12 48 806 7 4.00 16.79 67.1755 Austin Pettis, Boise St. 12 59 804 9 4.92 13.63 67.00

PUNTERSRank Player, Team Punt Yds Avg1 Chas Henry, Florida 44 2042 46.413 Quinn Sharp, Oklahoma St. 46 2127 46.247 Brian Stahovich, San Diego St. 50 2285 45.7010 Aaron Bates, Michigan St. 50 2261 45.2211 Anthony Santella, Illinois 59 2665 45.1714 Ian Campbell, UTEP 45 2013 44.7315 Drew Butler, Georgia 45 2012 44.7116 Ryan Donahue, Iowa 51 2274 44.5918 Matt Bosher, Miami (FL) 55 2434 44.2519 Derek Epperson, Baylor 49 2166 44.2020 Tress Way, Oklahoma 69 3049 44.1921 Spencer Lanning, S Carolina 52 2296 44.1522 Brian Saunders, Virginia Tech 52 2291 44.0623 Kiel Rasp, Washington 65 2861 44.0224 Alex Henery, Nebraska 63 2763 43.8625 Shawn Powell, Florida St. 47 2061 43.8526 Rob Long, Syracuse 64 2806 43.8429 Ryan Tydlacka, Kentucky 46 2009 43.6731 Jackson Rice, Oregon 35 1507 43.0632 Josh Davis, Middle Tenn. 52 2234 42.9636 Dawson Zimmerman, Clemson 56 2388 42.6437 Matt Grabner, Missouri 65 2770 42.6239 Dylan Breeding, Arkansas 45 1906 42.3640 Will Goggans, Troy 62 2619 42.2442 Chad Cunningham, Tennessee 58 2443 42.1244 Travis Baltz, Maryland 64 2686 41.9745 Ryan Doerr, Kansas St. 54 2262 41.8949 Ryan Quigley, Boston College 70 2924 41.7750 Gregg Pugnetti, West Virginia 63 2630 41.7553 Anthony Fera, Penn St. 43 1789 41.6054 Matt Szymanski, SMU 51 2109 41.3555 Heath Hutchins, Mississippi St. 57 2356 41.3356 Riley Stephenson, BYU 49 2022 41.2759 Paul Hershey, Ohio 44 1800 40.9161 Cole Wagner, Connecticut 72 2932 40.7266 Keenyn Crier, Arizona 46 1860 40.4367 Brandon Williams, Northwestern 56 2261 40.3868 Zac Murphy, Miami (OH) 53 2132 40.2369 John Penza, Toledo 54 2170 40.1975 Jonathan LaCour, Texas Tech 54 2149 39.8076 Ben Ryan, East Carolina 49 1949 39.78

ALL PURPOSE YARDSRank Player, Team Gm Rush Rec PR KR TTL Yards Yds/Gm Plays YDS PP1 Damaris Johnson, Tulsa 12 462 771 274 795 2302 191.83 154 14.952 Randall Cobb, Kentucky 12 401 955 201 635 2192 182.67 184 11.915 Dwayne Harris, East Carolina 12 111 1055 186 700 2052 171.00 160 12.837 LaMichael James, Oregon 11 1682 169 -2 0 1849 168.09 295 6.278 Jerrel Jernigan, Troy 12 325 755 301 600 1981 165.08 164 12.089 Justin Blackmon, Oklahoma St. 11 77 1665 7 0 1749 159.00 106 16.5010 Eric Page, Toledo 12 -1 1081 31 794 1905 158.75 136 14.0112 T.Y. Hilton, FIU 12 278 816 126 659 1879 156.58 125 15.0314 Jordan Todman, Connecticut 11 1574 91 0 55 1720 156.36 322 5.3416 Trent Richardson, Alabama 10 658 254 0 616 1528 152.80 147 10.3917 Titus Young, Boise St. 12 85 1151 43 550 1829 152.42 103 17.7618 DeMarco Murray, Oklahoma 13 1121 595 0 249 1965 151.15 336 5.8520 Vai Taua, Nevada 12 1534 216 0 0 1750 145.83 277 6.3222 Eric Stephens, Texas Tech 12 542 193 0 989 1724 143.67 181 9.5223 Kendall Hunter, Oklahoma St. 12 1516 106 0 87 1709 142.42 285 6.0025 Cyrus Gray, Texas A&M 12 1033 242 0 422 1697 141.42 230 7.3826 Mikel Leshoure, Illinois 12 1513 175 0 0 1688 140.67 267 6.3228 Daniel Thomas, Kansas St. 12 1495 163 0 0 1658 138.17 302 5.4929 Jon Williams, East Carolina 12 846 439 0 359 1644 137.00 214 7.6830 Denard Robinson, Michigan 12 1643 0 0 0 1643 136.92 245 6.7131 Ray Graham, Pittsburgh 11 832 199 0 459 1490 135.45 174 8.56

TACKLES FOR LOSSRank Player Total PG Solo Ast Yds2 Da’Quan Bowers, Clemson 25 2.08 22 6 1523 J.J. Watt, Wisconsin 21 1.75 18 6 914 Nate Irving, NC State 20.5 1.71 16 9 725 Dontay Moch, Nevada 22 1.69 20 4 838 Nick Fairley, Auburn 21 1.62 18 6 929 Miles Burris, San Diego St. 19 1.58 17 4 9610 Justin Houston, Georgia 18.5 1.54 16 5 8111 Brandon Jenkins, Florida St. 19.5 1.5 18 3 8611 VIctor Aiyewa, Washington 18 1.5 15 6 2814 Jonathan Massaquoi, Troy 17.5 1.46 15 5 9316 Jeremy Beal, Oklahoma 18 1.38 16 4 9017 Chris Carter, Fresno St. 16.5 1.38 14 5 9319 Brandon Lindsey, Pittsburgh 16 1.33 16 0 8419 Sean Spence, Miami (FL) 16 1.33 14 4 5719 Danny Trevathan, Kentucky 16 1.33 14 4 5722 Jabaree Tuani, Navy 14.5 1.32 11 7 5623 Brandon Bair, Oregon 15.5 1.29 13 5 5428 Mario Addison, Troy 14 1.27 12 4 5031 Vince Browne, Northwestern 15 1.25 14 2 6634 Jabaal Sheard, Pittsburgh 14.5 1.21 14 1 7734 Von Miller, Texas A&M 14.5 1.21 13 3 8841 Bruce Taylor, Virginia Tech 15.5 1.19 13 5 6042 Max Holloway, Boston College 13 1.18 12 2 7443 Jamari Lattimore, Middle Tenn. 14 1.17 12 4 7043 Quinton Coples, N Carolina 14 1.17 12 4 6943 Logan Harrell, Fresno St. 14 1.17 11 6 84

PASSES DEFENDEDRank Player, Team PBU Int Total PG1 Cliff Harris, Oregon 15 5 20 1.672 Jamell Fleming, Oklahoma 13 4 17 1.424 Johnny Patrick, Louisville 11 5 16 1.336 Jayron Hosley, Virginia Tech 7 8 15 1.256 Keith Tandy, West Virginia 9 6 15 1.2510 John Boyett, Oregon 9 5 14 1.1710 Deron Wilson, Southern Miss. 11 3 14 1.1710 Leon McFadden, San Diego St. 12 2 14 1.1710 Stephen Harrison, Kansas St. 12 2 14 1.1710 Josh Robinson, UCF 12 2 14 1.1716 Xavier Rhodes, Florida St. 12 3 15 1.1516 Isaiah Frey, Nevada 14 1 15 1.1518 Richard Sherman, Stanford 9 4 13 1.0818 Dustin Harris, Texas A&M 9 4 13 1.0818 Jarvis Phillips, Texas Tech 9 4 13 1.0818 Jordan Mabin, Northwestern 13 0 13 1.0822 Mana Silva, Hawaii 6 8 14 1.0823 Morris Claiborne, LSU 6 5 11 1.0023 Nate Fellner, Washington 8 4 12 1.0023 Trenton Robinson, Michigan St. 8 4 12 1.0023 Greg Reid, Florida St. 10 3 13 1.0023 Chris Smith, Northern Ill. 9 3 12 1.00

10

TOTAL TACKLESRank Player, Team GM Solo Ast Total TPG1 Luke Kuechly, Boston Coll 12 102 69 171 14.252 Mason Foster, Washington 12 97 54 151 12.585 Archie Donald, Toledo 12 54 80 134 11.177 Lavonte David, Nebraska 13 78 67 145 11.158 Dan Molls, Toledo 12 33 100 133 11.0811 Corey Paredes, Hawaii 13 84 60 144 11.0812 Danny Trevathan, Kentucky 12 74 56 130 10.8316 Manti Te’o, Notre Dame 12 65 62 127 10.5818 Taylor Reed, SMU 13 90 43 133 10.2319 Akeem Dent, Georgia 12 68 54 122 10.1720 Tyler Simmons, Navy 11 55 56 111 10.0920 Jonas Mouton, Michigan 11 59 52 111 10.0923 Orie Lemon, Oklahoma St. 12 93 26 119 9.9225 Colin McCarthy, Miami (FL) 11 46 60 106 9.6426 Lawrence Wilson, Connecticut 12 64 51 115 9.5826 Byron Landor, Baylor 12 73 42 115 9.5832 Alex Wujciak, Maryland 12 42 70 112 9.3332 Jordan Kovacs, Michigan 12 59 53 112 9.3334 Dustin Lineback, E Carolina 12 50 61 111 9.2534 Michael Hodges, Texas A&M 12 59 52 111 9.2540 Kelvin Sheppard, LSU 12 42 66 108 9.0043 Pete Fleps, SMU 13 68 48 116 8.9246 Curnelius Arnick, Tulsa 12 59 47 106 8.8346 Andrew Rich, BYU 12 59 47 106 8.8348 Martez Wilson, Illinois 12 42 63 105 8.7548 Chris White, Mississippi St. 12 52 53 105 8.7555 Sio Moore, Connecticut 12 67 37 104 8.6757 Chaz Walker, Utah 12 29 74 103 8.5857 Derrell Smith, Syracuse 12 67 36 103 8.5861 Chris Colasanti, Penn St. 12 34 68 102 8.561 Ahmad Black, Florida 12 68 34 102 8.564 Jeremy Kellem, Middle Tenn. 12 67 34 101 8.4264 Bront Bird, Texas Tech 12 70 31 101 8.4266 Sean Spence, Miami (FL) 12 55 45 100 8.3366 Nate Williams, Washington 12 62 38 100 8.3371 Greg Jones, Michigan St. 12 43 55 98 8.1771 Winston Guy, Kentucky 12 48 50 98 8.1773 Garrick Williams, Texas A&M 12 50 47 97 8.0873 Tanner Brock, TCU 12 53 44 97 8.0873 Brian Peters, Northwestern 12 61 36 97 8.0877 Cort Dennison, Washington 11 46 42 88 8

PUNT RETURNSRank Player AVG KR’s YDS TD’s1 Shaky Smithson, Utah 19.72 29 572 22 Cliff Harris, Oregon 19.46 28 545 43 Tony Logan, Maryland 18.77 30 563 24 Joe Adams, Arkansas 17.93 14 251 15 Josh Robinson, UCF 17.29 17 294 06 Patrick Peterson, LSU 16.08 26 418 29 Doug Beaumont, Louisville 15.31 13 199 111 Keshawn Martin, Michigan St. 14.2 15 213 113 Jerrel Jernigan, Troy 13.68 22 301 114 Marquis Maze, Alabama 13.61 18 245 015 Chris Potter, Boise St. 13.24 21 278 116 Drew Terrell, Stanford 13.07 14 183 017 Jeremy Kerley, TCU 12.93 30 388 019 Jayron Hosley, Virginia Tech 12.58 19 239 120 Damaris Johnson, Tulsa 12.45 22 274 122 Niles Paul, Nebraska 11.43 14 160 023 Travis Carrie, Ohio 11.06 17 188 024 Cameron Saddler, Pittsburgh 10.71 24 257 025 Mike Holmes, Syracuse 10.59 27 286 026 Dwayne Harris, East Carolina 10.33 18 186 027 Terrence Mitchell, South Fla. 10.21 19 194 028 Jordan Hall, Ohio St. 10.13 23 233 028 Marcus Gilchrist, Clemson 10.13 23 233 030 Greg Reid, Florida St. 9.00 29 261 132 Rashad Evans, Fresno St. 8.61 23 198 034 Chad Bumphis, Mississippi St. 8.56 16 137 036 Taylor Mack, Connecticut 8.40 15 126 037 Janoris Jenkins, Florida 8.33 18 150 037 Colin Sandeman, Iowa 8.33 15 125 039 Rishard Matthews, Nevada 8.19 21 172 041 T.J. Graham, North Carolina St. 8.11 19 154 143 Tommy Davis, Northern Ill. 7.89 18 142 0

KICKOFF RETURNSRank Player Avg KR’s YDS TD’s1 William Powell, Kansas St. 34.57 21 726 12 Quincy McDuffie, UCF 32.65 26 849 23 Eric Page, Toledo 31.76 25 794 34 Vic Anderson, Louisville 30.75 12 369 05 Marlon McClure, UTEP 29.81 27 805 26 Andre Debose, Florida 29.68 19 564 27 Patrick Peterson, LSU 29.34 29 851 08 Derrell J.-Koulianos, Iowa 29.29 17 498 110 Johnathan Warzeka, Air Force 28.9 21 607 111 Reggie Hunt, Southern Miss. 28.58 12 343 013 Lindsey Lamar, South Fla. 28.07 30 842 214 Justin Gilbert, Oklahoma St. 28.00 23 644 214 Jeremy Kerley, TCU 28.00 17 476 020 Venric Mark, Northwestern 27.63 16 442 121 T.Y. Hilton, FIU 27.46 24 659 122 Damaris Johnson, Tulsa 27.41 29 795 123 Jeremy Wright, Louisville 27.31 13 355 027 Eric Russell, Middle Tenn. 26.83 29 778 128 Trent Richardson, Alabama 26.78 23 616 129 David Wilson, Virginia Tech 26.50 20 530 231 Alexander Teich, Navy 26.33 15 395 032 Isaiah Burse, Fresno St. 26.29 17 447 033 Jerrel Jernigan, Troy 26.09 23 600 134 Robbie Frey, Connecticut 26.08 12 313 035 Aubrey Quarles, Kansas St. 25.87 15 388 136 David Gilreath, Wisconsin 25.78 23 593 141 Jaamal Berry, Ohio St. 25.43 21 534 042 Brandon Boykin, Georgia 25.39 31 787 143 Josh Huff, Oregon 25.33 21 532 044 Marcus Gilchrist, Clemson 25.32 22 557 045 Niles Paul, Nebraska 25.19 16 403 146 Mike Ball, Nevada 25.06 31 777 047 Demond Washington, Auburn 25.00 41 1025 148 Darryl Fields, SMU 24.97 32 799 0

SACK LEADERS Player, Team Solo Asst Total Sk/gm Yds1 Da’Quan Bowers, Clemson 15 1 15.5 1.29 1123 Brandon Jenkins, Florida St. 12 2 13 1.00 713 Bruce Irvin, West Virginia 12 0 12 1.00 816 Jamari Lattimore, Middle Tenn. 11 1 11.5 0.96 667 Ricky Elmore, Arizona 10 2 11 0.92 677 Chris Carter, Fresno St. 10 2 11 0.92 637 Jonathan Massaquoi, Troy 9 4 11 0.92 7910 Logan Harrell, Fresno St. 8 5 10.5 0.88 7911 Josh McNary, Army 9 1 9.5 0.86 8412 Brandon Lindsey, Pittsburgh 10 0 10 0.83 6212 Justin Houston, Georgia 8 4 10 0.83 6715 Mario Addison, Troy 8 2 9 0.82 3716 Nick Fairley, Auburn 9 3 10.5 0.81 67

RUSHINGRank Player, Team Gm Carries Net TD YPC YPG1 LaMichael James, Oregon 11 281 1682 21 5.99 152.912 Jordan Todman, Connecticut 11 302 1574 14 5.21 143.094 Denard Robinson, Michigan 12 245 1643 14 6.71 136.926 Vai Taua, Nevada 12 262 1534 19 5.85 127.837 Kendall Hunter, Oklahoma St. 12 261 1516 16 5.81 126.338 Mikel Leshoure, Illinois 12 252 1513 14 6.00 126.089 Daniel Thomas, Kansas St. 12 276 1495 16 5.42 124.5810 Bilal Powell, Louisville 11 211 1330 10 6.30 120.9111 Montel Harris, Boston College 11 269 1243 8 4.62 113.0013 Robbie Rouse, Fresno St. 10 191 1097 8 5.74 109.7014 Ronnie Hillman, San Diego St. 12 234 1304 14 5.57 108.6715 Cam Newton, Auburn 13 242 1409 20 5.82 108.3816 Zach Line, SMU 13 227 1391 10 6.13 107.0017 Chris Polk, Washington 12 226 1238 8 5.48 103.1718 Anthony Allen, Georgia Tech 12 217 1225 6 5.65 102.0819 Marcus Lattimore, South Carolina 12 248 1198 17 4.83 99.8320 Chad Spann, Northern Ill. 13 243 1293 20 5.32 99.4621 Edwin Baker, Michigan St. 12 195 1187 13 6.09 98.9223 Knile Davis, Arkansas 12 178 1183 13 6.65 98.5826 Jay Finley, Baylor 12 183 1155 11 6.31 96.2527 Adam Robinson, Iowa 10 203 941 10 4.64 94.1029 John Clay, Wisconsin 10 176 936 13 5.32 93.6030 James White, Wisconsin 11 148 1029 14 6.95 93.5532 Roy Helu Jr., Nebraska 13 177 1211 11 6.84 93.1533 Doug Martin, Boise St. 12 184 1113 11 6.05 92.7534 Colin Kaepernick, Nevada 13 164 1184 20 7.22 91.0835 Alex Green, Hawaii 13 133 1168 17 8.78 89.8536 Daneil Herron, Ohio St. 12 192 1068 15 5.56 89.0037 Ed Wesley, TCU 12 162 1065 11 6.57 88.7538 Dion Lewis, Pittsburgh 11 197 956 12 4.85 86.9139 Stevan Ridley, LSU 12 225 1042 14 4.63 86.8340 Delone Carter, Syracuse 12 204 1035 7 5.07 86.2541 DeMarco Murray, Oklahoma 13 257 1121 14 4.36 86.2342 Cyrus Gray, Texas A&M 12 180 1033 12 5.74 86.0843 Stepfan Taylor, Stanford 12 210 1023 15 4.87 85.2545 Asher Clark, Air Force 12 174 1001 5 5.75 83.4246 Tauren Poole, Tennessee 12 193 994 11 5.15 82.8347 Joshua Nesbitt, Georgia Tech 9 166 737 10 4.44 81.8948 Mark Ingram, Alabama 10 146 816 11 5.59 81.6050 Vick Ballard, Mississippi St. 11 166 892 16 5.37 81.09

Page 11: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL - 1/2

DL 1/2 -

LB - -

DB - 41/2

INDEPENDENCEBOWL

Johnson has had B2B ugly bowl gms covered his L/3 at Navy while Calhoun got a solid win LY in bowl.GT struggles to bring fans and the heavy military presence will give AF the edge.GT has been shutdown in bowls while tms have prepped for AF but have yet to stop them.GT with 6 wins while HC Johnson was 5-0 ATS L/5 vs AF at Navy.

CCH - -

Turf/ - 41/2

MTCH - 4

INT 1/2 -

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGAsher Clark – 12/11 174 1045 44 1001 5 5.8Tim Jefferson #390 12/12 142 838 69 769 15 5.4Jared Tew – 7/6 110 542 2 540 3 4.9Nathan Walker #446 12/5 98 457 4 453 6 4.6Jonathan Warzeka #311 12/2 40 328 13 315 4 7.9Connor Dietz – 5/0 16 61 4 57 1 3.6PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTTim Jefferson #390 12/12 136 71 52.2 1342 10 6Connor Dietz – 5/0 7 5 71.4 67 1 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJonathan Warzeka #311 12/2 17 394 23.2 3 63Kyle Halderman #411 12/10 14 254 18.1 2 49Zack Kauth – 11/3 14 253 18.1 4 39PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Keil Bartholomew – 11 25 1028 41.1 8 38.7(t) 0 7KICKING PS# GP XP 1–29 30–39 40–49 50+ TTL LNGErik Soderberg #90 11 42-44 4-5 1-1 0-4 0-0 5-10 30POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTDB Jon Davis #406 12/12 89 0 2 2 2ILB Jordan Waiwaiole #247 12/12 88 2 5.5 1 1ILB Brady Amack #64 11/11 77 1.5 3 2 1DE Rick Ricketts #495 12/12 61 1.5 7.5 2 1OLB Andre Morris #310 12/12 54 1 2.5 3 1OLB Patrick Hennessey #427 10/9 54 2 6 0 0DE Zach Payne #465 12/12 49 1 5.5 0 0DB REGGIE REMBERT #444 12/12 48 0 2 9 3DB Anthony Wright #381 12/12 47 0 2.5 5 2ILB Austin Niklas – 10/1 34 0 1 1 0DB Brian Lindsay #433 10/6 31 1 3.5 3 0DB Anthony Wooding – 6/5 28 0 0 2 1DL Bradley Connor #438 9/2 23 1 3 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDAnthony Wright 6 74 12.3 0 Jonathan Warzeka 21 607 28.9 1

This bowl matches up two option offenses and former Navy HC Johnson against his rival AF. GT is likely disappointed with the season as a whole, as after winning the ACC Title LY, they’ve fallen to 6-6 and barely got by WF who lost 3 QB’s during the game. AF, however is thrilled, after going 8-4 TY beating BYU and winning the CIC Trophy for the 1st time since 2002. The Jackets have taken on the tougher sked (#58-81) but remember that AF travelled to Oklahoma and gave them a scare, only losing by 3. This is a long distance from both schools but AF has the edge with military bases located nearby and the Bowl offering up a Military Ticket Initiative to donate to local bases. AF HC Calhoun has only taken on a Johnson-coached Navy team one time (‘07) and his Falcons lost SU and ATS. Both struggled vs bowl tms with AF posting a 3-4 SU record (4-3 ATS) while GT went 2-5 SU (4-3 ATS). On artificial turf GT went 1-2 SU (0-3 ATS) while AF plays its home games on the fake stuff and went 8-1 SU but just 3-6 ATS. While AF ended its season earlier (11/18, GT done 11/27), this is the offense each team takes on daily, so extra prep time weighs no benefit to either. GT comes in with our #51 offense but there is a question at QB. Against VA Tech, st’r Nesbitt broke his arm while trying to make a tkl. He is aiming to return here, but with the early date it is ? if he will be ready in time. His bkup Washington has thrown for 97 ypg (63%) with a 2-1 ratio while adding 289 rush (4.4) in his 3 starts. HC Johnson called out RB Allen at times throughout the season and he responded by earning 1st Tm ACC and finished #2 in the conference in rushing. Johnson had some issues with the OL and was forced to alter the rotation due to injuries throughout the season (5 different starting combos used). The unit paved the way for 327 ypg rush (5.6) while allowing 15 sks (9.7%). The #65 defense has not had the same inj issues as they’ve missed 1 start due to inj this entire year. The DL avg 6’3” 286 with 0 Sr starters but has tallied just 4 of the tm’s 17 sks (24%) while allowing 170 ypg rush (4.6). The LB duo of Jefferson (7.5 tfl) and Burnett (2 tfl) form the #1 and #2 tkl’rs on the team. GT comes in ranked #79 in our pass eff D all’g 209 ypg (61%) with a 14-8 ratio. Both Butler and Tarrant have taken an int back for a TD TY. The ST’s come in with our #105 ranking. The Jackets have used 3 punters and they comb to avg 37.6, landing 10 In20. The PR unit avg 6.8 ypr but all’s 9.9 (with 1 TD) while the KR unit avg 20.7 and all’s 19.0 (with 1 TD). AF’s #43 offense is led by QB Jefferson. While AF is definitely a run first offense (699 rush att, 145 pass TY), Jefferson went over 100 yds pass 7x’s incl a ssn high 201 vs Utah. Three of AF’s top 5 rushers are underclassmen led by Jr Clark. AF was thin at FB after losing Tew vs SDSt (CS) but Walker stepped up and rushed for 264 (5.0) in the L/3. AF’s run offense ranks #2 in the NCAA and the Falcons are 20-4 SU (14-9 ATS, 1 NL) when a player goes over 100 rush yds in a gm. The OL avg 6’3” 261 with 2 Sr st’rs and paved the way for 318 rush ypg (5.5). Led by 1st Tm MWC OG Wallerstein, the Falcons have only all’d 5 sks TY (3.7%). AF’s D has been known for TO’s under HC Calhoun as into TY they were +46 in his tenure! While they’ve forced 20 fmbl’s TY, they’ve only recovered 7 and on the season they’re just +1 TO. LY the run D all’d zero 200 yd rush gm, but TY 6 have gone over that number (incl 377 all’d to TCU). The tm recorded 24 sks LY, but TY they’ve tallied just 13 incl 5.5 by the DL (42%). They rank #21 in our pass eff D all’g 157 ypg (56%) with a 10-11 ratio. The #12 ST’s unit is led by KR Warzeka who had a 100 yd KR TD. The PR unit had only 15 att’s TY but avg 7.9 ypr. The unit has blk’d at least 1 kick every year since ‘90 and has 3 TY. The PR D all’s 5.3 and the KR all’s 22.0. Air Force, as all service academies do, prepares well for the bowls and this year they see a new venue after having been to the Armed Forces Bowl three straight years. Georgia Tech, with 6 wins, is disappointed at being here but, of course, does not have to spend the time most teams do prepping for this opponent. The Yellow Jackets have dropped 4 of their last 5 gms, all by a TD plus and we to feel that it’ll be tough for them to be motivated. FORECAST: Air Force by 7 RATING: 1★ AIR FORCE

Crowd

QB - 4

YELLOW JACKETS ATS: 5-7 O/U: 5-7

GT AF GT AF GT AF

RB 1/2 - WR - 1/2

ST - 44 SCH 4 -

OVERALL -

GT avg 6-4 287, 1 Sr, 15 sk all’d (9.7%), 5.6 ypc.AF avg 6-3 261, 2 Sr, 5 sk all’d (3.4%), 5.5 ypc.GT avg 6-3 286, 0 Sr, 4 of tm 17 sk, 4.6 ypc. AF avg 6-3 258, 1 Sr, 5.5 of tm 13 sk, 4.8 ypc.Jefferson #1 tkl’r, 7.5 tfl, Burnett #2 tkl’r.Waiwaiole #2 tkl’r, 7.5 tfl, Amack #3, 4.5 tfl.GT #79 pass eff D, 209 ypg (61%), 14-8 ratio.AF #21 pass eff D, 157 ypg (56%), 10-11 ratio.

AIR FORCE

by 5' 4’s

GEORGIA TECH(6-6)

AIR FORCE (8-4)

GT AF CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 27, 2010 • 5:00 pm espn2 • Independence Stadium • Shreveport, LAPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.GEORGIA TECH 347 60 27 2.4 – 99.2AIR FORCE 308 120 27 2.3 4444 96.4

GT AF

FALCONS ATS: 4-8 O/U: 4-8RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGANTHONY ALLEN #73 12/12 217 1252 27 1225 6 5.6Joshua Nesbitt #16 9/9 166 876 139 737 10 4.4Orwin Smith #102 12/5 49 494 18 476 4 9.7Tevin Washington #136 7/3 88 440 57 383 4 4.4Roddy Jones #53 12/12 50 361 25 336 4 6.7Embry Peeples #70 12/4 46 312 25 287 1 6.2PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTJoshua Nesbitt #16 9/9 105 39 37.1 674 7 4Tevin Washington #136 7/3 48 20 41.7 376 2 2RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGStephen Hill #97 12/9 15 291 19.4 3 79Orwin Smith #102 12/5 11 189 17.2 0 41Roddy Jones #53 12/12 7 119 17.0 1 41PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Sean Poole – 9 27 1062 39.3 5 32.9(t) 0 8KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGScott Blair – 12 36-37 5-5 2-2 8-10 0-0 15-17 47POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Brad Jefferson #54 12/12 78 4 3.5 0 0LB Julian Burnett #185 12/7 76 0 2 0 1DB Mario Edwards #308 12/12 68 0 0 1 0DB Dominique Reese #210 12/12 61 1 7 9 0LB Anthony Egbuniwe #530 12/12 59 1 2 1 0DB Jerrard Tarrant #147 12/8 55 0 2.5 2 3LB Steven Sylvester #49 12/12 55 3 7.5 1 0DB Mario Butler #142 12/7 47 0 2 5 1DL Jason Peters #15 12/12 41 1.5 2.5 0 0DB Isaiah Johnson #87 12/3 41 1 1 1 1DL Izaan Cross #78 12/12 36 2.5 4 4 0DB Rod Sweeting #104 12/0 36 0 0 5 1LB Brandon Watts #79 11/3 21 0 1 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJerrard Tarrant 20 131 6.6 0 BJ Bostic 27 565 20.9 0

OL 1/2 -

DL 1/2 -

LB - -

DB 1/2 -

LITTLE CAESARSPIZZA BOWL

These two HC were assistants at Ohio St and Miami (FL) and each is in their 1st bowl.FIU will have family and friends while Toledo is about a one hour drive away. Both tms have improved TY, but neither has a distinct advantage on either side of the ball.UT with 8 wins, while FIU could be SBC champs w/a losing ssn.

CCH - -

Turf/ - 41/2

MTCH - -

INT 1/2 -

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGAdonis Thomas #131 12/11 151 937 32 905 6 6.0Austin Dantin #118 9/9 103 442 150 292 8 2.8Morgan Williams #32 12/1 80 300 15 285 0 3.6David Fluellen #185 8/0 31 176 8 168 1 5.4David Pasquale #201 11/0 27 129 9 120 1 4.4PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTAustin Dantin #118 9/9 192 127 66.1 1254 7 8Terrance Owens #120 6/2 136 82 60.3 1112 12 2RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGERIC PAGE #202 12/12 94 1081 11.5 8 53Adonis Thomas #131 12/11 29 368 12.7 2 68Kenny Stafford #280 12/8 16 313 19.6 4 75Danny Noble #453 12/12 16 198 12.4 4 74Morgan Williams #32 12/1 20 157 7.8 0 37PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Vince Penza – 12 54 2170 40.2 6 32.3 3 17KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGBill Claus #88 12 28-30 1-1 2-4 0-1 0-0 3-6 38Ryan Casano #263JC 4 10-11 1-1 1-1 0-5 0-0 2-7 34POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB ARCHIE DONALD #290 12/12 134 1 0.5 2 3LB Dan Molls #235 12/12 133 4 5.5 4 3LB Isaiah Ballard #399 12/12 76 0 6 5 2CB Desmond Marrow #431 11/11 68 1 2 5 3FS Mark Singer #347 12/12 65 0 0 3 2DE TJ Fatinikun #399 12/11 46 5 7 2 0SS Jermaine Robinson #151 12/12 45 0.5 0.5 2 1DT Malcolm Riley #440 12/12 39 5.5 3.5 1 0S Diauntae Morrow #62 12/0 38 0 1 3 2DL Johnie Roberts #785JC 12/11 33 0.5 2 0 0CB Byron Best #185 12/4 31 0 0 3 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDEric Page 16 31 1.9 0 ERIC PAGE 25 794 31.8 3

This is the Rockets and Golden Panthers third meeting in the past three seasons. The series is tied at 1-1 SU/ATS with the road team winning both matchups. In 2008 FIU pulled the outright 35-16 upset as a 19’ pt AD despite Toledo having 20-12 FD and 302-239 yd edges as FIU was +4 TO’s. Last year UT (pick ‘em) had a 566-372 yd edge but gave up a TD with :03 left and only won 41-31. FIU won its first ever SBC Title and this is also its first ever bowl. While the SBC Champion has usually gone to the New Orleans Bowl, the Panthers avg’d just 16,545 fans this year while a huge turnout from nearby Toledo is expected (UT campus just 60 miles from Detroit) to fill Ford Field. This is the Rockets 11th all-time postseason bowl trip but their first since ‘05 when they beat UTEP in the GMAC Bowl 45-13 as just a 3 pt favorite. Toledo went 7-1 in MAC play but was steamrolled by Div rival NI. FIU was 1-4 SU (2-3 ATS) vs bowl tms TY while the Rockets went 2-3 SU/ATS (outscored 40-21 and outgained 440-266) vs their 5 bowl caliber foes. The Panthers have 8 Sr starters among 12 upperclassmen while the Rockets started 5 Sr’s and 16 upperclassmen. The Golden Panthers finished #3 in scoring and ttl off in the SBC despite playing 4 BCS tms (#73 overall off). QB Carroll had just one 300+ yd gm in his first yr as the starter but that was 355 vs Maryland. FIU has 5 players with 278+ rush yds who all avg at least 4.0 ypc. That includes WR Hilton who avg 157 all-purp ypg. FIU’s OL has 2 Sr starters and avg just 6’3” 295 but paved the way for 189 ypg rushing and an impressive 4.7 ypc while all’g 18 sks (5.1%). FIU’s #82 defense is the reason they are here as they led the SBC in both scoring and total def despite having 7 underclassmen starters in the lineup. The DL (6’3” 253) is allowing 158 ypg rushing (4.4) while posting 21 of the team’s 31 sacks (8.6%). They have a pair of outstanding DE’s in Tourek Williams and Wilson who comb for 13.5 sacks. The Golden Panthers have our #36 pass eff D led by Sr DB Gaitor and is all’g 206 ypg (54%) with an 18-12 ratio. The Panthers have our #119 spec tms despite having an outstanding returnman in Hilton. The problem area is net punting (#119 NCAA - 30.7) with the Panthers allowing 3 P’s to be blocked. UT lost starting QB Dantin to a shoulder injury early vs EM causing him basically miss the L/4 games of the regular season but there is a chance that he may return for the bowl. Backup Owens took over and surprisingly, after the Rockets avg’d 318 ypg in the first 8 games under Dantin, they avg 443 ypg in the L/4 under Owens. Owens avg 237 (62%) with an 11-2 ratio in those 4. RB Thomas came on strong late in the yr with three 130+ yd gms in the final 5 gms (0 in first 7). 1st Tm All-MAC WR Page posted more receptions than the next 5 Rocket receivers combined and leads the conference in all-purp yds (159 ypg). UT’s OL avg 6’5” 304 and is a big reason for their success as all 5 started all 12 gms. They paved the way for 156 ypg rush (4.1). With a mobile QB for much of the ssn (Dantin #2 rusher) they allowed 20 sks (5.9%). While UT’s D is just #9 in scoring and #7 in total def in the MAC, they were #3 in the FBS in takeaways with 33 (T-#3 TO margin, +14). Soph Fatinikun led the DL with 46 tkls and 12 tfl. They are allowing 131 ypg rushing (3.9) and have 20.5 of the team’s 27 sks (6.4%). UT has our #61 pass eff def allowing 239 ypg (63%) with an outstanding 15-19 ratio. The Rockets have our #111 spec tms as they have hit just 5-13 FG’s and are last in the MAC with a 32.3 net punt avg incl all’g 2 PR TD’s. They would be even lower except for their outstanding KR Page, who finished #3 in the FBS. These two meet for the 3rd straight yr and Toledo, again, has a winning record for the 1st time in 5 seasons while FIU has reached 6 wins for the 1st time since they started a football program in 2002. FIU started impressively playing 4 BCS schools and were only outgained by 18 ypg. They finished the ssn winning 4 straight and had clinched the SBC Title prior to their loss to Middle Tennessee. Toledo did knock off Purdue on the road and then later finished the season winning 5 of 6 gms but they did get mauled vs Northern Illinois in what was a quazi-MAC West Title gm. While the tms are even on paper, the deciding factor is FIU being +6.8 ypg vs bowl elig tms while UT was -174 ypg vs the same. FORECAST: FIU by 4 RATING: 2★ FIU

Crowd

QB - -

PANTHERS ATS: 6-6 O/U: 5-7

FIU UT FIU UT FIU UT

RB 1/2 - WR 1/2 -

ST - - SCH - -

OVERALL -

FIU avg 6-3 295, 2 Sr, 18 sk all’d (5.1%), 4.7 ypc.UT avg 6-5 304, 2 Sr, 20 sk all’d (5.9%), 4.1 ypc.FIU avg 6-3 253, 1 Sr, 21 of tm 31 sk, 4.4 ypc.UT avg 6-3 266, 1 Sr, 20.5 of tm 27 sk, 3.9 ypc.Smith #2 tkl’r w/84, 10.5 tfl, Fraser #3, 8 tfl.Donald #1 tkl’r w/134, 1.5 tfl, Molls #2 w/133.FIU #36 pass eff D, 206 ypg (54%), 18-12 ratio.UT #61 pass eff D, 239 ypg (63%), 15-19 ratio.

FIU

by 1' 4’s

FIU (6-6)

TOLEDO (8-4)

FIU UT CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 26, 2010 • 8:30 pm ESPN • Ford Field • Detroit, MIPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.FIU 151 230 28 2.7 – 93.3TOLEDO 184 225 31 1.7 4 94.9

FIU UT

ROCKETS ATS: 7-5 O/U: 7-5RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGDarriet Perry #151 12/1 154 730 23 707 14 4.6Darian Mallary #366 12/4 118 702 33 669 2 5.7Jeremiah Harden #125 7/6 76 324 23 301 1 4.0Kedrick Rhodes #133 8/1 40 299 6 293 1 7.3TY Hilton #419 12/11 26 291 13 278 4 10.7Wesley Carroll #92 12/12 51 138 142 -4 1 -0.1PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTWesley Carroll #92 12/12 340 210 61.8 2483 15 13Wayne Younger #283 5/0 13 8 61.5 75 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGTY HILTON #419 12/11 56 816 14.6 4 67Greg Ellingson #420 11/11 36 546 15.2 5 52Wayne Times #239 12/3 26 320 12.3 1 46Darian Mallary #366 12/4 22 178 8.1 1 55Darriet Perry #151 12/1 12 137 11.4 0 30Jacob Younger #400 12/8 13 132 10.2 0 21PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Josh Brisk #84 12 61 2393 39.2 14 30.7(t) 3 15KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGJack Griffin #57 12 41-41 5-5 7-9 2-3 1-1 15-18 50POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTSS JONATHAN CYPRIEN #570 12/12 105 0 2.5 5 1LB TORONTO SMITH #172 12/11 84 4 6.5 0 1LB Winston Fraser #372 12/12 66 1 7 3 1FS Ashlyn Parker #372 12/12 61 0.5 0 1 2DB ANTHONY GAITOR #540 12/12 50 3 5.5 4 2CB Jose Cheeseborough – 12/12 46 1 0.5 4 0DE Tourek Williams #471 12/12 42 6 6.5 0 0DE JARVIS WILSON #427 12/11 36 7.5 5.5 2 0DB Chuck Grace #416 12/1 33 0 0 0 1CB Emmanuel Souarin #297 12/4 29 0 1 4 1PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDTY Hilton 19 126 6.6 0 TY HILTON 24 659 27.5 1

Comp Phone is on FIRE! Call for daily winners! 1-347-677-1700

11

Page 12: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL 4 -

DL - 4

LB - 1/2

DB 1/2 -

INSIGHTBOWL

Ferentz has had his tm prepared in all roles as a fav or a dog and is 6-2 ATS all vs BCS foes.Bowls often overlook MU b/c of lack of fan base while UI has many southwest fans.Both have physical offensive and defensive lines and we’ll call this even.MU satisfied with 10 wins, Iowa needs to win to salvage ssn.

CCH - 41/2

Turf/ - 41/2

MTCH - -

INT - 4

After yrs of being passed over by bowl selection committees the Tigers are thrilled to be facing their border rivals (250 miles apart) for the 1st time in 100 yrs! Early in his tenure Pinkel cancelled a scheduled 4 gm series while he was building his program and there are several cch ties between the staffs which routinely recruit vs each other. Pinkel is 3-3 SU/ATS in bowls with Missou while Ferentz is 5-3 SU/6-2 ATS. MU is 7-0 SU/5-2 ATS vs B10 tms under Pinkel beating IL TY 23-13 but failing to cover in the opener. The Hawks are 3-1 SU/4-0 ATS vs current B12 tms in bowls. Both tms beat ISU TY with Iowa dominating their rivals at home, 35-7 (-13’) with a 479-275 yd edge while despite being outgained 332-306 MU shutout the Cyclones in Ames, 14-0 (-11) on 11/20. Iowa instead is the team who slid down the bowl pecking order after their miserable Nov which saw them lose their L/3 so it’s up to Ferentz and the 26 Sr’s to rally the tm. MU previously played in the ‘98 Insight.com Bowl, a 34-31 win over WV while this is Iowa’s 1st bowl in Ariz. The Hawks did have several thousand fans in Tucson on Sept 18th when they lost to Arizona (34-27, +1’). MU went 1-4 ATS as a fav vs bowl tms TY while Iowa is 11-4-1 ATS as a dog the L/4Y. After a disappointing ‘09 ssn the Tigers rocketed out to their 1st 7-0 start S/’60 after beating the BCS’s #1 tm OK before B2B losses to Neb and TT. The spread offense (#40) is built around Gabbert who finished as the least efficient of the B12’s bowl bound QB’s. In the B2B upsets of A&M and OU, however, he played his best avg 335 (69%) with a 4-0 ratio. A&M’s DC admitted that playing a zone D vs the Tigers was a mistake and several D’s including Neb and TT played much tighter coverage on their rec’s including #1 rec WR Moe and the FBS’s top rec TE Egnew. MU used a RB by committee led by Moore and the speedy Josey. The OL (6’4” 303, 1 Sr) allowed 20 sk (4.6%). The most underrated aspect of the Tigers is their D which despite massive inj’s led the B12 in scoring D (15.2, #6 NCAA) and sks (38, #6 NCAA). MU used a DE rotation up front which allowed them to weather the storm when they lost top pass rusher Aldon Smith for 3 gms and top DT Hamilton for the L/5. Pinkel called the LB corps the most decimated by inj’s he’d seen in his cch career but despite the nicks Gachkar led the tm in tkls. MO is #10 in pass eff D (204, 57%, 13-16) led by the CB combo of Gettis and Rutland. MU is #29 in ST thanks to a strong K combo of K Ressel who has hit 42-45 in the L/2Y and P Grabner whose 38.9 net is #14 NCAA. The ret units are below par although McGaffie’s 86 yd KR TD on the opening KO vs Oklahoma was 1 of the biggest plays of the yr. The Tigers allowed 4.3 on PR and 21.4 on KR. After throwing a B10 worst 15 int in ‘09, Stanzi was #11 NCAA pass eff (234, 65%, 25-4). The finale saw UI down to true Fr RB Coker as Robinson missed 2 of the L/4 gms due to concussions but is expected to return here. Two All-Conf performers highlight the rec corps in Iowa’s WR McNutt and TE Reisner but UI’s career rec leader J-Koulianos is susp for the bowl (career over) due to an off-field issue. The OL (6’4” 289, 2 Sr) allowed 20 sk (6.0%) but they had problems in run blocking avg just 107 rush ypg (3.4) vs bowl eligible squads. Iowa is tied for the NCAA lead with just 9 TO’s lost. The Hawks had to go much of the season without veteran DC Parker who was hospitalized. Though the #’s were comparable to LY the D amazingly allowed gm winning late 4Q TD drives in all 5 of their losses. The deep DL remained one of the B10’s best led by DE Clayborn whose numbers shrunk from ‘09’s 11.5 sk and 8.5 tfl to 3.5 sk and 3.5 tfl thanks to constant doubles. Leading tkl’r Hunter was the only LB to play in all 12 and true Fr Morris stepped in as the starter in the 2H of yr. Iowa is #15 pass eff D (214, 61%, 11-17) led by S’s Greenwood and Sash. Ray Guy finalist Donahue finished #16 NCAA in avg (44.6) with a team net of 38.2. KR Johnson-Koulianos led the B10 with a 29.3 avg and will be missed here. The kicking gm was an issue all season as the staff settled on walk-on true Fr Meyer and he hit just 2-3 from 40+ including a costly miss vs OSU. The Hawks allowed 4.2 on PR and 21.5 on KR including a 100 yd TD to Ariz. Iowa was either winning or tied with 5:00 left in their 5 losses this year but was a dropped TD pass from Indiana from finishing with 4 straight losses. Now they must regroup and they’ll use this game as the kickoff towards next season. Missouri dropped late season gms on the road to Neb and TT and while they won their L/2, they were vs Iowa St and Kansas and that has over adjusted the line. FORECAST: Iowa by 10 RATING: 4★ IOWA

Crowd

QB - 1/2

TIGERS ATS: 7-5 O/U: 3-9

MU UI MU UI MU UI

RB - - WR 1/2 -

ST - - SCH - -

OVERALL -

MU avg 6-4 303, 1 Sr, 20 sk all’d (4.6%), 4.8 ypc.UI avg 6-4 289, 2 Sr, 20 sk all’d (6.0%), 4.1 ypc.MU avg 6-4 275, 0 Sr, 26.5 of tm 38 sks, 3.9 ypc.UI avg 6-4 282, 3 Sr, 17 of tm’s 20 sks, 3.3 ypc.Gachkar #1 tkl’r, 8.5 tfl, Gooden #2, 7.5 tfl.Hunter #1 tkl’r, 0.5 tfl, Morris #4, 1.5 tfl.MU #10 pass eff D, 204 ypg (57%), 13-16 ratio.UI #15 pass eff D, 214 ypg (61%), 11-17 ratio.

IOWA by 4 4’s

MISSOURI(10-2)

IOWA (7-5)

MU UI CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 28, 2010 • 10:00 pm ESPN • Sun Devil Stadium • Tempe, AZPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.MISSOURI 127 215 19 1.8 – 101.4IOWA 103 245 21 2.0 – 100.3

MU UI

HAWKEYES ATS: 5-6-1 O/U: 3-9RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGAdam Robinson #198 10/9 203 993 52 941 10 4.6Marcus Coker #41 6/3 81 424 21 403 1 5.0Jewel Hampton #186 2/0 27 117 3 114 1 4.2Derrell Johnson-Koulianos #57 12/10 5 46 6 40 0 8.0Ricki Stanzi #76 12/12 46 120 135 -15 2 -0.3PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTRicky Stanzi #76 12/12 324 210 64.8 2804 25 4RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGMarvin McNutt #43 12/12 51 798 15.6 8 66D. JOHNSON-KOULIANOS #57 12/10 46 745 16.2 10 70Allen Reisner #362 12/12 39 410 10.5 2 55Adam Robinson #198 10/9 24 290 12.1 1 48Colin Sandeman #32 11/2 17 183 10.8 2 19Keenan Davis #14 12/0 10 126 12.6 1 20PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Ryan Donahue #3 12 51 2274 44.6 9 38.2 1 21KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGMike Meyer #134 12 28-30 5-6 5-6 2-3 0-0 12-15 42POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Jeremiha Hunter #13 11/11 85 0 0.5 4 1CB Micah Hyde #202 12/12 76 0 0 7 3S TYLER SASH #83 12/12 73 0 2.5 2 2LB James Morris #42 12/5 63 1 0.5 4 0CB SHAUN PRATER #132 11/11 59 0 0.5 5 4DT Karl Klug #232 12/12 52 4.5 6.5 3 0LB Troy Johnson #307 12/5 52 0 1 3 1DE ADRIAN CLAYBORN #17 12/12 51 3.5 3.5 1 0S Brett Greenwood #470 12/12 50 0 1 3 4LB Jeff Tarpinian #52 7/4 44 2 0.5 0 0LB Tyler Nielsen #9 8/8 42 0 4.5 4 1DT Mike Daniels #451 12/7 40 4 7 0 0DL Broderick Binns #31 11/5 33 0 1 2 1PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDColin Sandeman 15 125 8.3 0 Derrell J-Koulianos 17 498 29.3 1

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGDe’Vion Moore #295 12/10 93 510 25 485 8 5.2Henry Josey #134 12/1 74 449 24 425 4 5.7Kendial Lawrence #57 11/1 67 401 19 382 4 5.7Blaine Gabbert #10 12/12 99 405 166 239 4 2.4Marcus Murphy #108 11/0 22 185 4 181 2 8.2TJ Moe #49 12/12 11 82 0 82 1 7.5PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTBlaine Gabbert #10 12/12 418 260 62.2 2752 15 7James Franklin #19 9/0 14 11 78.6 106 1 1RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGTJ Moe #49 12/12 77 893 11.6 6 68MICHAEL EGNEW #210 12/12 83 698 8.4 4 29Jerrell Jackson #320 11/9 41 527 12.9 3 38Wes Kemp #31 12/12 32 359 11.2 3 35Brandon Gerau #426 11/0 6 110 18.3 0 28PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Matt Grabner – 12 65 2770 42.6 13 38.9(t) 0 27KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGGrant Ressel – 12 42-44 6-6 8-9 1-1 1-2 16-18 50POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Andrew Gachkar #176 12/12 81 1 7.5 4 2LB Zaviar Gooden #148 12/12 79 3 4.5 4 2FS Jarrell Harrison #26 12/9 64 0 0 3 1SS Kenji Jackson #132 12/12 59 0 3.5 3 2CB Carl Gettis #205 12/12 46 0 2 3 2DE ALDON SMITH #158 9/9 44 5.5 3.5 2 1LB Will Ebner #159 9/7 38 0 1 1 0CB Kevin Rutland #283 12/12 37 4 0 5 2DT Terrell Resonno #173 12/12 35 2 2 0 0CB Kip Edwards #112 12/0 35 1 4 6 1DE Jacquies Smith #135 12/12 33 5.5 4.5 3 0DE Brad Madison #134 12/2 31 7.5 3.5 2 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDCarl Gettis 23 148 6.4 0 Marcus Murphy 19 393 20.7 0

OL - 1/2

DL - 41/2

LB - -

DB - 44

CHAMPS SPORTSBOWL

O’Brien is an elite bowl cch who is 1-0 ATS here and was 6-1 ATS at Boston College.NCSt often gets overlooked while the Orange Bowl would’ve taken WV b/c of its fan base.Tm’s matchup well as both units are better stopping what the opponent does best.WV comes in hot but tm’s off 4+ SU/ATS wins is a negative.

CCH 41/2 -

Turf/ - 44

MTCH - -

INT - -

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGMustafa Greene #24 12/1 131 605 21 584 4 4.5Russell Wilson #61 12/12 129 607 213 394 9 3.1Dean Haynes #235 10/8 83 334 14 320 3 3.9PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTRUSSELL WILSON #61 12/12 482 280 58.1 3288 26 14Mike Glennon #2 3/0 13 9 69.2 78 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGOwen Spencer #151 12/12 57 868 15.2 4 60Jarvis Williams #121 12/12 46 636 13.8 4 50GEORGE BRYAN #45 12/10 32 344 10.8 3 37TJ Graham #105 12/0 23 309 13.4 4 49Darrell Davis #171 11/3 21 259 12.3 3 35Mustafa Greene #24 12/1 29 256 8.8 1 17PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Andy Leffler #88 9 31 1199 38.7 7 33.7(t) 0 15KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGJosh Czajkowski #39 12 40-41 7-8 6-10 4-4 0-0 17-22 47POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTSS Earl Wolff #152 12/12 92 2 2.5 2 1LB NATE IRVING #162 12/12 88 6 14.5 5 0LB Audie Cole #54 12/12 81 5 5 3 1LB Terrell Manning #12 12/12 70 4.5 6 3 1FS Brandan Bishop #216 12/11 61 0 1 4 3DT JR Sweezy #247 11/11 50 5.5 6 3 0CB David Amerson #52 12/8 50 0 0.5 0 0CB CJ Wilson #226 12/12 42 0 0 6 2DE Michael Lemon #151 12/2 32 3.5 6 1 0DT Natanu Mageo #53JC 12/12 27 4 2 1 0DE Jeff Rieskamp #280 11/10 22 2 2.5 2 0DE David Akinniyi #1277 12/12 20 3 1.5 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDTJ Graham 19 154 8.1 1 TJ Graham 27 512 19.0 0 James Washington 9 204 22.7 0

WV and NCSt meet for the 10th time and 3rd time overall in the bowls. WV holds a 5-4 lead in the series but NCSt has won 3 of the L/4 meetings incl the most recent meeting a 38-14 win in Morgantown in ‘79. In the last bowl meeting, WV’s Bobby Bowden escaped with a 13-10 win over NCSt’s Lou Holtz in the 1975 Peach Bowl. WV HC Stewart is 2-1 SU/1-2 ATS in bowls as LY WV ran into an emotional FSU tm in Bobby Bowden’s final gm and lost 33-21 (-2’). HC O’Brien is 0-1 SU/1-0 ATS in bowls at NCSt, but overall 7-1 SU/ATS. Both tms faced Cincinnati and Maryland with WV winning and covering both by an avg score of 34-14 while NCSt was 1-1 SU/ATS losing to MD in the finale, a gm they needed to win to earn an ACC Title berth. WV was 4-3 SU/5-2 ATS vs bowl tms outscoring those tms by an avg of 21-14 and outgaining them 323-244. NCSt is bowling for just the 2nd time in 5Y but was 5-4 SU/6-3 ATS vs bowl teams outscoring foes 31-27 and outgaining them 391-369. WV fans are known for travelling well and the Champs Bowl bypassed a chance to get ND to take the Mountaineers TY. The Pack’s #47 offense is led by prolific Jr Wilson, who may be playing in his final gm here (MLB). He enters this gm leading the ACC in pass ypg and ttl off and has put up twelve 300 yd pass gms in his career. True Fr RB Greene became the 1st NCSt player to score a TD in his 1st 4 gms S/’80 (Tol Avery) and many thought he could become NCSt’s first 1,000 yd rusher S/’02 as he continued to get more experience. He fell short of that TY, but is the leading rusher. The rec gm is led by Sr’s Spencer and Williams and boasts 1st Tm ACC TE Bryan. The OL avg 6’4” 310 with 1 Sr st’r. They paved the way for just 125 rush ypg (3.5) and even with a mobile QB, have all’d 34 sks (6.8%). The #44 D is led by NCSt’s outstanding group of LB’s. Nate Irving, who DNP LY after a horrific car accident, has rebounded to be #2 in the ACC in tfl including setting a schl rec’d with 8 tfl vs WF surpassing #1 DC Mario Williams record of 6 (‘05). The DL avg 6’4” 271 with 2 Sr’s and allows just 113 ypg rush (3.3). They’ve only tallied 19.5 of the tm’s 40 sks though. The Pack ranks #96 in our pass eff D all’g 228 ypg (61%) with a 20-8 ratio led by CJ Wilson who has taken both of his int’s back for TD’s. The ST’s (#103) seemed to take a hit when PK Czajkowski was declared OFY in early Nov. He came back vs rival UNC and hit a 47 yd FG in the 4 pt gm. The PR unit avg 9.3 ypr but has recorded an outstanding 3 PR TD’s while the KR unit struggles avg just 18.7 ypr. The Pack gives up 8.4 ypr on PR and 21.9 with 2 TD on KR. WV’s season has been a little rocky and ultimately disappointing as they narrowly missed out on a BCS Bowl due to B2B losses to Syr and a 16-13 loss in OT to Connecticut. After those 2 losses fans were calling for HC Stewart to be ousted, but the Mountaineers were able to regroup on their bye week and won and covered their L/4 gms. QB Smith had great stats overall in his 1st year as a st’r but had some rough outings in the tm’s 2 losses with a 1-3 ratio vs Syr and Conn (WV -6 TO’s in those 2 gms). Star RB Devine was hampered by a foot inj all yr and his production fell drastically (-581 yds) but he managed to play in every gm. WV used their Jumbo backs set late in the ssn with Clarke (247 lbs) and Alston (222) helping to protect QB Smith, reduce the pounding on Devine (5’8” 180), and improving the tm’s redzone success. The WR corps is led by All-BE WR Austin and versatile playmaker Sanders. The OL avg 6’3” 298 with 1 Sr st’r and paved the way for 162 rush ypg (3.9) while allowing 25 sks (7.3%). Overall WV is #45 on offense and #4 on defense in our rankings. WV’s defense is vastly underrated as they are #2 in the nation in rush D allowing just 85 ypg and have only all’d 3 rush TD’s (#1 in NCAA). WV runs their 3-3 Stack D and the DL avg 6’2” 283 with 1 Sr st’r. LB Lazear wasn’t healthy all yr (#1 tkl’r, 2nd Tm BE ‘09, leg inj in Aug) so 1st Tm BE LB Thomas and Leonard were the tm’s top LB tkl’rs. WV is #28 in our pass D rankings allowing 166 ypg (58%) with a 10-12 ratio vs a very soft slate of opposing QB’s. CB Tandy leads the BE in int and is #2 in pbu as tm’s threw away from 2nd Tm BE CB Hogan who should be an early round draft pick in ‘11. WV is #59 in our ST rankings finishing #3 in the BE in net punting (37.4) but having just avg numbers on returns. West Virginia imploded with a couple poor mid-season performances but since then have demonstrated just how talented they are beating 3 of their L/4 opps by 21+ pts. The D has not all’d any opp to top 21 pts while the offense has topped 35 in 3 of the L/4 gms. NCSt has trailed at HT in 4 of their L/6 gms and have been fortunate in several of their wins. Offenses are almost even, but a huge defensive edge to WV. FORECAST: WV by 14 RATING: 3★ WEST VIRGINIA

Crowd

QB - -

WOLFPACK ATS: 9-3 O/U: 6-6

NCSt WV NCSt WV NCSt WV

RB - 41/2 WR - -

ST - 4 SCH 1/2 -

OVERALL -

NCSt avg 6-4 310, 1 Sr, 34 sk all’d (6.8%), 3.5 ypc.WV avg 6-3 298, 1 Sr, 25 sk all’d (7.3%), 3.9 ypc.NCSt avg 6-4 271, 2 Sr, 19.5 of tm 40 sk, 3.3 ypc.WV avg 6-2 283, 1 Sr, 27 of tm 40 sk, 2.7 ypc.Irving #2 tk’r w/88, 20.5 tfl, Cole #3, 10 tfl.Leonard #2 tkl’r w/65, 6.5 tfl, Thomas #3, 7 tfl.NCSt #96 pass eff D, 228 ypg (61%), 20-8 ratio.WV #28 pass eff D, 166 ypg (58%), 10-12 ratio.

WEST VIRGINIA

by 6' 4’s

NC STATE (8-4)

WEST VIRGINIA (9-3)

NCSt WV CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 28, 2010 • 6:30 pm ESPN • Citrus Bowl Stadium • Orlando, FLPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.NC STATE 54 240 20 2.6 – 99.5WEST VIRGINIA 146 225 25 2.1 4 98.5

NCSt WV

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGNoel Devine #2 12/9 200 959 75 884 6 4.4Ryan Clarke #391 12/4 80 302 11 291 8 3.6Shawne Alston #141 12/0 54 250 8 242 0 4.5Geno Smith #4 12/12 94 380 222 158 0 1.7Tavon Austin #15 12/10 15 154 1 153 1 10.2PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTGENO SMITH #4 12/12 333 219 65.8 2567 23 6RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGTavon Austin #15 12/10 53 757 14.3 8 71Jock Sanders #114 12/12 64 670 10.5 4 48Bradley Starks #41 12/1 19 317 16.7 4 48Stedman Bailey #64 12/9 20 256 12.8 3 32Noel Devine #2 12/9 30 237 7.9 1 48JD Woods #104 12/3 16 191 11.9 1 21PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Gregg Pugnetti - 12 63 2630 41.7 21 37.4 0 21KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGTyler Betancurt #7 12 40-40 5-6 3-4 2.5 0-0 10-15 43POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTSS Terrance Garvin #166 12/12 71 1 3.5 4 0LB Anthony Leonard #64 12/12 65 1 5.5 3 0LB JT THOMAS #110 12/12 63 2.5 4.5 4 0BS Sidney Glover #105 12/11 59 3 3 4 0CB KEITH TANDY #195 12/12 54 0 2 9 6DE Julian Miller #128 12/11 50 8 5 3 0FS ROBERT SANDS #172 12/12 45 0.5 5 0 1LB Najee Goode #310 12/11 44 3 5.5 4 0CB Brandon Hogan #134 11/11 37 0 0 6 3DT Scooter Berry #68 12/12 34 4 0.5 0 0NT CHRIS NEILD #48 12/12 31 3 1 0 0DB Eain Smith #118 12/0 23 1 0 2 1DB Bruce Irvin #5JC 12/0 19 12 0 1 0 PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDBrandon Hogan 12 93 7.8 0 Jock Sanders 10 212 21.2 0

MOUNTAINEERS ATS: 8-4 O/U: 4-8

12

Page 13: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

13

Air Force 32.3 22.3 58.3 317.9 5.5 0.9 6.4 12.1 53.1 119.5 6 12 22.3 18.7 41.0 195.1 4.8 0.6 5 12Alabama 34.6 22.0 35.3 175.3 5.0 0.8 19.5 28.3 69.0 259.5 5 23 14.1 15.5 33.9 123.5 3.6 0.3 31 22Arizona 29.8 24.2 33.0 135.2 4.1 0.8 27.1 39.6 68.4 309.3 9 24 21.6 19.0 38.3 136.1 3.6 0.8 16 20Arkansas 37.3 22.4 32.5 150.5 4.6 0.8 23.1 34.8 66.3 338.4 14 34 22.8 18.2 39.8 157.1 4.0 1.2 23 34Army 28.5 18.5 56.7 260.3 4.6 0.8 5.4 10.1 53.2 77.9 3 5 24.6 17.4 32.9 141.7 4.3 1.1 4 22Auburn 42.7 24.5 46.3 287.5 6.2 0.7 13.4 20.1 66.7 210.5 6 29 24.5 21.4 32.0 111.7 3.5 0.8 18 35Baylor 32.6 23.9 36.6 202.3 5.5 0.8 23.5 35.7 65.9 277.6 8 22 29.8 24.3 38.1 160.3 4.2 0.8 16 20Boise St 46.7 25.3 38.3 200.2 5.2 0.8 22.6 32.0 70.6 319.4 5 36 13.6 15.3 36.0 105.8 2.9 0.8 7 46Boston College 18.9 15.3 36.5 133.2 3.6 0.5 13.8 26.4 52.4 175.3 17 13 19.5 18.1 30.1 80.0 2.7 0.9 27 19BYU 24.0 21.3 39.0 163.8 4.2 0.8 18.1 32.7 55.4 190.3 9 13 21.4 18.0 36.6 150.9 4.1 0.6 20 20Clemson 23.8 18.1 35.8 147.5 4.1 0.8 17.1 30.6 55.9 191.1 12 15 17.8 17.0 37.3 131.7 3.5 0.3 16 29Connecticut 26.9 15.9 37.7 179.9 4.8 0.8 14.1 26.5 53.1 145.1 7 10 19.8 18.1 37.3 147.3 3.9 0.8 12 27East Carolina 38.2 24.0 28.2 127.2 4.5 0.9 30.7 47.4 64.7 318.3 14 37 43.4 23.8 42.9 220.8 5.1 0.9 14 15Florida 29.3 19.2 39.6 170.8 4.3 1.2 18.0 29.5 61.0 191.4 11 12 21.1 17.9 37.2 130.3 3.5 0.6 23 21FIU 28.3 19.6 40.4 189.2 4.7 0.6 18.2 29.7 61.2 213.8 13 15 26.9 18.5 36.0 157.8 4.4 0.8 18 31Florida St 31.8 19.7 35.1 167.8 4.8 0.8 18.2 28.8 63.2 219.1 12 23 19.8 19.8 38.2 127.9 3.4 0.8 25 45Fresno St 30.0 18.8 38.3 156.9 4.1 1.2 16.7 27.2 61.3 214.3 9 21 29.2 17.8 35.3 155.0 4.4 0.4 30 37Georgia 34.3 18.9 35.3 147.7 4.2 0.6 16.4 26.8 61.4 246.1 6 25 23.1 18.1 40.1 149.4 3.7 0.8 22 23Georgia Tech 27.6 20.6 58.0 327.0 5.6 1.4 4.9 12.8 38.3 87.5 6 8 26.2 19.7 36.7 169.7 4.6 1.1 15 17Hawaii 39.9 23.1 20.5 106.9 5.2 0.5 27.5 41.8 65.6 380.2 10 38 22.7 18.9 36.3 128.5 3.5 0.8 36 25Illinois 32.1 20.2 47.4 242.5 5.1 0.6 12.3 21.8 56.3 143.2 12 18 24.3 17.6 33.7 130.1 3.9 1.2 23 20Iowa 29.1 20.8 34.3 142.3 4.1 0.4 17.9 28.0 64.0 237.7 4 24 16.4 18.7 31.3 106.7 3.4 0.4 15 11Kansas St 33.6 18.8 40.8 198.6 4.9 0.8 14.4 22.2 65.0 180.0 9 15 28.5 22.0 40.8 218.6 5.4 0.8 32 16Kentucky 33.0 22.4 35.0 163.1 4.7 0.8 23.1 35.2 65.6 274.2 9 26 28.5 18.0 37.9 170.1 4.5 0.5 15 20Louisville 26.0 19.1 36.9 180.5 4.9 0.5 16.4 27.6 59.5 195.3 8 20 18.7 16.3 35.9 142.2 4.0 0.7 16 37LSU 28.8 17.0 40.3 179.0 4.4 1.0 13.6 23.5 57.8 155.2 10 7 17.8 15.8 37.4 135.0 3.6 1.0 18 29Maryland 30.7 17.3 32.9 124.9 3.8 0.3 17.2 30.6 56.1 217.5 8 26 22.3 20.1 38.3 132.2 3.5 0.7 22 27Miami, Fl 27.1 22.3 39.0 190.6 4.9 0.8 17.8 33.6 53.1 231.9 23 19 19.7 16.5 41.6 171.8 4.1 1.0 14 37Miami, Oh 20.5 18.8 30.6 96.8 3.2 0.7 23.1 35.8 64.4 250.3 13 17 23.4 17.0 32.0 121.4 3.8 1.0 34 32Michigan 34.3 24.0 44.2 251.3 5.7 1.1 18.0 28.7 62.8 249.8 14 22 33.8 22.7 41.3 186.6 4.5 0.6 12 16Michigan St 31.3 20.4 34.4 166.3 4.8 0.8 19.3 28.8 67.0 239.0 9 22 20.1 19.1 33.8 114.9 3.4 0.6 19 19Middle Tennessee 26.9 18.9 41.2 179.4 4.4 1.1 17.3 29.5 57.5 192.7 20 9 27.5 19.8 45.8 193.7 4.2 0.7 19 31Mississippi St 27.1 20.3 46.8 215.2 4.6 0.7 12.6 21.4 58.8 179.3 12 14 20.3 19.7 34.1 121.3 3.6 1.2 19 22Missouri 30.3 21.6 34.1 162.8 4.8 0.7 22.7 36.3 62.5 239.4 8 16 15.2 19.3 37.4 148.6 4.0 0.9 20 36N Illinois 37.8 21.6 42.5 264.8 6.2 0.5 14.7 23.2 63.2 181.2 8 22 19.1 17.2 32.6 130.5 4.0 0.6 13 24Navy 31.0 20.7 54.8 302.5 5.5 0.6 6.4 11.9 53.4 111.5 4 10 22.8 20.3 34.1 151.6 4.4 1.2 9 15NC State 32.6 23.5 35.4 125.0 3.5 0.6 24.3 41.7 58.2 281.7 14 26 22.5 15.8 34.0 113.0 3.3 1.3 34 40Nebraska 32.7 19.0 45.5 261.4 5.7 1.2 11.7 20.1 58.2 153.8 7 15 17.2 16.8 38.3 144.5 3.8 0.3 23 31Nevada 42.6 27.5 48.5 309.5 6.4 0.5 17.0 26.3 64.6 229.6 8 19 22.1 19.8 31.9 124.8 3.9 0.8 10 31North Carolina 24.9 18.8 34.3 123.6 3.6 1.1 21.7 32.1 67.5 266.5 8 18 22.9 17.8 34.3 133.8 3.9 0.4 34 25Northwestern 25.4 22.1 42.2 150.6 3.6 1.1 20.7 29.5 70.1 241.3 9 16 27.7 21.6 36.5 185.2 5.1 0.5 35 14Notre Dame 25.8 19.9 30.7 122.8 4.0 0.7 22.3 37.5 59.6 255.5 16 26 20.5 17.8 36.8 147.5 4.0 0.6 20 25Ohio 28.0 17.3 38.8 169.2 4.4 1.0 12.1 20.8 58.0 158.4 18 17 21.8 17.7 35.4 115.0 3.2 0.7 17 24Ohio St 39.4 23.0 41.9 218.4 5.2 0.2 17.8 27.0 66.0 229.3 13 28 13.3 14.1 31.0 94.5 3.0 0.9 21 19Oklahoma 36.4 27.4 41.9 146.4 3.5 0.4 29.3 44.9 65.2 336.1 11 35 21.9 17.9 35.4 154.8 4.4 0.7 20 30Oklahoma St 44.9 26.8 35.6 181.2 5.1 0.7 27.8 41.0 67.7 355.3 14 34 27.8 22.3 38.3 138.2 3.6 1.2 11 24Oregon 49.3 27.8 49.7 307.0 6.2 1.3 18.2 29.3 62.1 231.3 7 29 18.4 18.9 35.1 117.8 3.4 1.3 7 27Penn St 24.6 19.4 34.3 143.9 4.2 0.3 18.3 32.0 57.0 230.9 12 18 22.6 18.4 36.5 164.6 4.5 0.5 10 16Pittsburgh 26.3 18.3 35.3 157.8 4.5 0.8 18.4 28.4 64.8 210.0 10 15 19.8 18.4 34.3 121.3 3.5 0.7 23 30Southern Miss 37.6 24.1 43.2 201.7 4.7 0.7 22.8 36.4 62.5 254.8 8 21 29.4 20.1 31.5 114.7 3.6 0.8 16 25San Diego St 35.0 19.8 33.2 151.5 4.6 0.7 18.8 33.6 56.1 297.3 14 26 22.8 20.0 39.2 142.0 3.6 0.5 9 28SMU 26.6 20.8 29.1 140.9 4.8 0.8 21.6 37.1 58.3 273.8 12 27 26.4 20.7 38.5 140.6 3.7 0.4 32 28South Carolina 32.0 20.6 37.8 156.1 4.1 0.5 17.8 27.2 65.4 235.5 14 22 22.9 18.6 32.6 106.2 3.3 1.2 27 39Stanford 40.3 25.3 41.8 212.6 5.1 0.7 20.7 29.7 69.7 256.3 7 28 17.8 18.9 31.0 126.8 4.1 1.0 5 29Syracuse 21.0 16.8 33.8 130.3 3.9 1.1 16.0 28.5 56.1 178.0 8 16 18.1 16.5 37.7 137.4 3.6 0.7 31 26TCU 43.3 25.8 47.8 261.2 5.5 0.6 16.9 25.7 65.9 230.0 6 28 11.4 11.3 28.8 90.4 3.1 0.8 9 26Tennessee 27.0 17.6 31.6 116.1 3.7 0.8 17.6 31.2 56.4 249.8 12 22 24.7 19.5 37.1 152.7 4.1 0.8 37 23Texas A&M 31.8 24.0 41.3 169.7 4.1 1.2 23.6 39.5 59.7 279.1 12 25 20.3 20.3 35.3 119.5 3.4 0.8 36 27Texas Tech 32.1 24.3 34.2 137.9 4.0 1.2 30.1 46.6 64.6 314.2 10 34 30.3 23.9 38.3 157.8 4.1 0.7 21 23Toledo 27.6 17.3 37.7 156.0 4.1 0.7 17.8 28.2 63.0 203.5 11 22 28.1 19.8 33.4 130.6 3.9 1.2 20 27Troy 32.9 22.8 36.8 154.0 4.2 1.3 25.2 40.0 62.9 285.6 15 29 31.0 20.3 38.2 170.9 4.5 1.3 23 33Tulsa 39.7 26.3 42.2 219.3 5.2 0.5 21.9 36.4 60.2 284.2 11 29 29.9 22.1 34.0 136.9 4.0 0.9 24 24UCF 33.8 21.1 44.1 193.2 4.4 0.6 13.4 20.4 65.7 191.7 9 15 18.0 17.1 32.2 108.8 3.4 0.5 19 29USF 23.5 16.6 37.5 149.4 4.0 0.4 13.8 24.6 55.9 162.5 15 11 19.5 17.3 36.3 131.8 3.6 0.3 24 28Utah 35.6 19.5 33.2 156.8 4.7 0.9 19.8 31.2 63.6 247.8 12 24 19.8 16.3 34.5 104.1 3.0 0.8 8 28UTEP 26.2 21.0 41.8 149.4 4.6 0.6 17.8 33.3 53.6 221.5 11 20 25.4 22.2 36.9 181.1 4.9 0.4 14 14Virginia Tech 35.5 21.0 41.2 208.9 5.1 0.6 14.2 23.8 59.4 202.2 4 23 19.1 17.3 33.4 148.9 4.5 0.6 26 33Washington 22.1 18.4 35.7 119.5 4.6 0.6 16.8 29.8 56.1 201.0 9 19 31.2 21.6 40.7 198.2 4.9 0.5 18 20West Virginia 26.7 20.1 41.8 162.1 3.9 1.3 18.6 28.6 65.0 214.6 7 23 12.8 13.1 31.2 85.0 2.7 0.8 25 39Wisconsin 43.3 24.8 44.7 249.3 5.6 0.3 15.8 21.3 74.5 202.2 6 17 20.5 17.5 33.1 131.4 4.0 0.8 11 24

PASS EFFICIENCY DEFENSE OFF OFF - RUSHING - - PASSING - DEF DEF - OPPONENTS RUSH - SK SK PTS FD ATT YDS AVG FUM COM ATT PCT YDS INT TD PTS FD ATT YDS AVG FUM VS BY

COLLEGE TEAM STATISTICAL AVERAGES TEAM YDS ATT COM % TD INT GRADE OPPNebraska 159.8 371 184 49.6 13 19 15.0 10.91TCU 126.0 301 145 48.2 10 12 14.1 10.02Boise St 155.8 347 180 51.9 8 14 14.0 10.46Alabama 172.7 338 178 52.7 11 21 13.7 10.46Oregon 214.0 454 243 53.5 13 20 13.5 10.52Virginia Tech 199.3 406 206 50.7 15 22 13.3 10.25Miami, Fl 146.3 298 147 49.3 7 16 13.1 9.41Oklahoma 212.2 457 252 55.1 15 17 13.0 11.31Ohio St 156.2 338 183 54.1 7 18 13.0 9.75Missouri 203.8 420 238 56.7 13 16 12.3 10.70Texas A&M 240.6 491 298 60.7 16 15 12.1 12.22LSU 165.8 308 173 56.2 12 16 11.3 10.10Florida 173.0 331 183 55.3 16 17 11.1 9.96Iowa 213.6 422 257 60.9 11 17 11.1 10.49UCF 207.7 437 237 54.2 21 15 11.1 10.46Maryland 220.9 437 231 52.9 15 17 11.0 9.16Stanford 200.3 391 225 57.5 15 17 11.0 10.10Clemson 192.1 354 185 52.3 16 14 10.7 9.44Air Force 156.7 307 171 55.7 10 11 10.6 9.44Michigan St 215.8 399 224 56.1 18 17 10.5 9.94Arkansas 182.3 315 173 54.9 11 11 10.4 9.85BYU 187.8 351 191 54.4 17 13 10.4 9.81Tennessee 229.3 399 229 57.4 13 17 10.4 9.90Boston College 229.8 477 304 63.7 13 19 10.3 10.10West Virginia 166.3 348 200 57.5 10 12 10.2 9.11Mississippi St 236.4 405 231 57.0 17 12 10.2 10.82Pittsburgh 182.9 358 203 56.7 15 13 10.2 9.63Louisville 162.5 309 167 54.0 13 9 10.0 9.25Wisconsin 191.8 344 194 56.4 19 14 10.0 10.18Connecticut 206.4 395 227 57.5 13 19 10.0 8.85Notre Dame 205.9 399 247 61.9 9 14 9.9 9.73FIU 205.5 360 196 54.4 18 12 9.8 9.77Kansas St 212.3 378 208 55.0 20 13 9.8 9.90Florida St 221.2 441 257 58.3 16 12 9.7 10.12Oklahoma St 275.5 520 324 62.3 23 16 9.7 11.56Nevada 252.7 454 259 57.0 15 10 9.7 10.54Hawaii 212.4 413 245 59.3 21 23 9.7 9.72N Illinois 202.1 410 235 57.3 13 16 9.6 8.86Miami, Oh 214.4 395 223 56.5 14 17 9.6 9.12San Diego St 209.8 412 213 51.7 17 9 9.6 8.66Georgia 186.7 287 158 55.1 15 14 9.5 9.79Arizona 206.6 372 208 55.9 16 9 9.5 9.82North Carolina 204.7 386 232 60.1 19 16 9.5 10.02Syracuse 157.6 343 190 55.4 13 9 9.4 8.41Illinois 212.8 370 211 57.0 19 11 9.3 10.16SMU 221.8 423 253 59.8 18 10 9.2 10.81Fresno St 201.2 350 202 57.7 18 8 9.1 10.46USF 187.8 363 214 59.0 16 13 9.0 9.16Kentucky 183.8 300 163 54.3 13 8 9.0 9.19Southern Miss 248.1 398 227 57.0 26 17 8.9 10.46Washington 202.4 338 206 60.9 14 11 8.9 10.38Northwestern 230.5 410 242 59.0 21 14 8.9 10.00Toledo 238.9 425 269 63.3 15 19 8.8 9.56Troy 247.6 405 233 57.5 20 12 8.7 10.04UTEP 223.0 406 248 61.1 20 9 8.6 10.70Texas Tech 306.1 490 303 61.8 27 14 8.5 12.39Army 190.9 282 158 56.0 18 11 8.5 9.37Ohio 217.7 365 215 58.9 17 17 8.1 8.60Middle Tennessee 190.8 354 202 57.1 17 9 8.1 8.59Penn St 187.9 324 200 61.7 19 9 8.0 10.36Georgia Tech 209.0 342 210 61.4 14 8 7.9 9.91Auburn 250.5 474 297 62.7 23 10 7.8 10.85Utah 215.5 340 204 60.0 18 11 7.7 9.67Tulsa 305.7 451 276 61.2 30 19 7.6 11.23Baylor 267.0 441 291 66.0 16 10 7.6 10.93South Carolina 253.6 439 277 63.1 22 9 7.0 10.70Michigan 260.3 386 243 63.0 18 11 6.7 9.81NC State 227.5 367 224 61.0 20 8 6.7 9.30Navy 228.8 381 261 68.5 18 7 6.0 9.70East Carolina 258.0 383 229 59.8 30 9 5.9 10.04

• BOWL GAME RESULTS SINCE 2003 •NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP2003 LSU (+7) 21 Oklahoma 142004 USC ( -1) 55 Oklahoma 192005 Texas 41 (+7) USC 382006 Florida (+7’) 41 Ohio St 142007 LSU (-4) 38 Ohio St 242008 Florida (-6) 24 Oklahoma 142009 Alabama (-4) 37 Texas 21

FIESTA BOWL2003 Ohio St (+7) 35 Kansas St 282004 Utah (-15) 35 Pittsburgh 72005 Ohio St (-4’) 34 Notre Dame 202006 Boise St (+7) 43 Oklahoma 422007 W Virginia (+7’) 48 Oklahoma 282008 Texas (-8’) 24 Ohio St 21 2009 Boise St (+7’) 17 TCU 10

ROSE BOWL2003 USC (-7) 28 Michigan 142004 Texas (-7’) 38 Michigan 372005 Texas (+7) 41 USC 382006 USC (+1) 32 Michigan 182007 USC (-14) 49 Illinois 172008 USC (-9) 38 Penn St 242009 Ohio St (+4) 26 Oregon 17

ORANGE BOWL2003 Miami, Fl (-1’) 16 Florida St 142004 USC (-1) 55 Oklahoma 192005 Penn St (-10) 26 Florida St 23 (3OT)2006 Louisville (-10) 24 Wake Forest 132007 Kansas (+3) 24 Virginia Tech 212008 Virginia Tech (+2) 20 Cincinnati 72009 Iowa (+6) 24 Georgia Tech 14

SUGAR BOWL2003 LSU (+7) 21 Oklahoma 142004 Auburn (-6) 16 Virginia Tech 132005 W Virginia (+6) 38 Georgia 352006 LSU (-8’) 41 Notre Dame 142007 Georgia (-7’) 41 Hawaii 102008 Utah (+9’) 31 Alabama 172009 Florida (-12’) 51 Cincinnati 24

OUTBACK BOWL2003 Iowa (+3’) 37 Florida 172004 Georgia (-8) 24 Wisconsin 212005 Florida (E) 31 Iowa 242006 Penn St (+4’) 20 Tennessee 102007 Tennessee (-1’) 21 Wisconsin 172008 Iowa (-3’) 31 South Carolina 102009 Auburn (-9) 38 Northwestern 35

COTTON BOWL2003 Mississippi (-2’) 31 Oklahoma St 282004 Tennessee (+4’) 38 Texas A&M 72005 Alabama (+3’) 13 Texas Tech 102006 Auburn (-2) 17 Nebraska 142007 Missouri (-3) 38 Arkansas 72008 Mississippi (+4) 47 Texas Tech 342009 Mississippi (-3) 21 Oklahoma St 7

GATOR BOWL2003 Maryland (-3’) 41 W Virginia 72004 Florida St (-10) 30 W Virginia 182005 Virginia Tech (-9) 35 Louisville 242006 W Virginia (-10) 38 Georgia Tech 352007 Texas Tech (-6) 31 Virginia 282008 Nebraska (+2) 26 Clemson 21 2009 Florida St (+3) 33 West Virginia 21

CAPITAL ONE BOWL2003 Georgia (-3’) 34 Purdue 27 (OT)2004 Iowa (+6’) 30 LSU 252005 Wisconsin (+10) 24 Auburn 102006 Wisconsin (+2’) 17 Arkansas 142007 Michigan (+11) 41 Florida 352008 Georgia (-8’) 24 Michigan St 122009 Penn St (+1) 19 LSU 17

CHICK-FIL-A BOWL2003 Clemson (+4’) 27 Wisconsin 142004 Miami (-4) 27 Florida 102005 LSU (+7) 40 Miami, Fl 32006 Georgia (+3) 31 Virginia Tech 242007 Auburn (+2) 23 Clemson 20 (OT)2008 LSU (+4’) 38 Georgia Tech 32009 Virginia Tech (-5’) 37 Tennessee 14

INDEPENDENCE BOWL2003 Arkansas (-2’) 27 Missouri 142004 Iowa St (+1) 17 Miami, Oh 132005 Missouri (+4) 38 South Carolina 312006 Oklahoma St (-2’) 34 Alabama 312007 Alabama (-3’) 30 Colorado 242008 Louisiana Tech (-1) 17 N Illinois 102009 Georgia (-6’) 44 Texas A&M 20

HAWAII BOWL 2003 Hawaii (-10’) 54 Houston 48 (3OT)2004 Hawaii (-4) 59 UAB 402005 Nevada (-2’) 49 UCF 48 (OT)2006 Hawaii (-7) 41 Arizona St 242007 E Carolina (+10’) 41 Boise St 382008 Notre Dame (-2) 49 Hawaii 212009 SMU (+12) 45 Nevada 10

SUN BOWL2003 Minnesota (-4’) 31 Oregon 302004 Arizona St (+8) 27 Purdue 232005 UCLA (-2’) 50 Northwestern 382006 Oregon St (-3’) 39 Missouri 382007 Oregon (+6) 56 USF 212008 Oregon St (-1) 3 Pittsburgh 02009 Oklahoma (-10) 31 Stanford 27

CHAMPS SPORTS BOWL2003 NC State (-12) 56 Kansas 26 2004 Georgia Tech (-5’) 51 Syracuse 142005 Clemson (-10’) 19 Colorado 102006 Maryland (+1) 24 Purdue 72007 Boston Coll (-5’) 24 Michigan St 212008 Florida St (-6) 42 Wisconsin 13 2009 Wisconsin (+3’) 20 Miami 14

EMERALD BOWL2003 Boston Coll (E) 35 Colorado St 212004 Navy (+3) 34 New Mexico 192005 Utah (+9) 38 Georgia Tech 102006 Florida St (+3’) 44 UCLA 272007 Oregon St (-5) 21 Maryland 142008 California (-10) 24 Miami FL 172009 USC (-7) 24 Boston College 13

LIBERTY BOWL2003 Utah (-2) 17 S Mississippi 02004 Louisville (-10’) 44 Boise St 402005 Tulsa (+7) 31 Fresno St 242006 South Carolina (-5) 44 Houston 362007 Mississippi St (+3) 10 UCF 32008 Kentucky (+3) 25 E Carolina 192009 Arkansas (-7’) 20 East Carolina 17

HOLIDAY BOWL2003 Washington St (+9’) 28 Texas 202004 Texas Tech (+11) 45 California 312005 Oklahoma (+3) 17 Oregon 142006 California (-3) 45 Texas A&M 102007 Texas (-2’) 52 Arizona St 342008 Oregon (+1) 42 Oklahoma St 312009 Nebraska (-2’) 33 Arizona 0

LAS VEGAS BOWL2003 Oregon St (-2) 55 New Mexico 142004 Wyoming (+12’) 24 UCLA 212005 California (-8) 35 BYU 282006 BYU (-3’) 38 Oregon 82007 BYU (+6’) 17 UCLA 162008 Arizona (-3’) 31 BYU 212009 BYU (+2’) 44 Oregon St 20

INSIGHT BOWL2003 California (+3) 52 Virginia Tech 492004 Oregon St (-4) 38 Notre Dame 212005 Arizona St (-9) 45 Rutgers 402006 Texas Tech (-7) 44 Minnesota 412007 Oklahoma St (-5) 49 Indiana 332008 Kansas (-8) 42 Minnesota 212009 Iowa St (+2) 14 Minnesota 13

GMAC BOWL2003 Miami, OH (-14) 49 Louisville 282004 Bowling Green (-3) 52 Memphis 352005 Toledo (-3) 45 UTEP 132006 S Mississippi (-6) 28 Ohio 72007 Tulsa (-5’) 63 Bowling Green 72008 Tulsa (-2’) 45 Ball St 132009 Central Michigan (-3) 44 Troy 41

ARMED FORCES BOWL2003 Boise St (-11) 34 TCU 312004 Cincinnati (-1) 32 Marshall 142005 Kansas (-3) 42 Houston 132006 Utah (-1’) 25 Tulsa 132007 California (-4) 42 Air Force 362008 Houston (-3’) 34 Air Force 282009 Air Force (+4’) 47 Houston 20

ALAMO BOWL2003 Nebraska (-3) 17 Michigan St 32004 Ohio St (+3’) 33 Oklahoma St 72005 Nebraska (+10) 32 Michigan 282006 Texas (-8’) 26 Iowa 242007 Penn St (-5) 24 Texas A&M 172008 Missouri (-12) 30 Northwestern 23 (OT)2009 Texas Tech (-7) 41 Michigan St 31

LITTLE CAESARS PIZZA BOWL2003 Bowling Green (-7) 28 N’western 242004 Connecticut (+3’) 39 Toledo 102005 Memphis (-4) 38 Akron 312006 C Michigan (-8) 31 Middle Tennessee 142007 Purdue (+7’) 51 C Michigan 482008 Florida Atlantic (+7) 24 C Michigan 212009 Marshall (+3) 21 Ohio 17

HUMANITARIAN BOWL2003 Georgia Tech (-7) 52 Tulsa 10 2004 Fresno St (+5) 37 Virginia 34 [OT]2005 Boston College (-2’) 27 Boise St 212006 Miami, Fl (-3’) 21 Nevada 202007 Fresno St (+6) 40 Georgia Tech 282008 Maryland (+2’) 42 Nevada 352009 Idaho (E) 43 Bowling Green 42

MUSIC CITY BOWL2003 Auburn (-3’) 28 Wisconsin 142004 Minnesota (+1) 20 Alabama 162005 Virginia (+6’) 34 Minnesota 312006 Kentucky (+10’) 28 Clemson 202007 Kentucky (-9) 35 Florida St 282008 Vanderbilt (+3’) 16 Boston College 142009 Clemson(-6’) 21 Kentucky 13

TEXAS BOWL (Houston)2003 Texas Tech (-11’) 38 Navy 142004 Colorado (-4) 33 UTEP 28

2005 TCU (-3) 27 Iowa St 242006 Rutgers (-8’) 37 Kansas St 102007 TCU (-6) 20 Houston 132008 Rice (-3) 38 W Michigan 142009 Navy (+6’) 35 Missouri 13MEINEKE CAR CARE BOWL2003 Virginia (-3) 23 Pittsburgh 162004 Boston College (+1) 37 N Carolina 242005 NC State (-3’) 14 USF 02006 Boston College (-7) 25 Navy 242007 Wake Forest (-2) 24 Connecticut 102008 W Virginia (-2) 31 N Carolina 302009 Pittsburgh (-1)19 N Carolina 17

NEW ORLEANS BOWL2003 Memphis (-4) 27 N Texas 172004 S Miss (-6) 31 N Texas 102005 S Miss (15’) 31 Arkansas St 192006 Troy (+5) 41 Rice 172007 Florida Atlantic (-3) 44 Memphis 272008 Southern Miss (+4’) 30 Troy 272009 Middle Tennessee (+3’) 42 Southern Miss 32

POINSETTIA BOWL2005 Navy (-3) 51 Colorado St 302006 TCU (-12) 37 N Illinois 72007 Utah (-8) 35 Navy 322008 TCU (-3) 17 Boise St 162009 Utah (+3) 37 California 27

PAPA JOHNS BOWL2006 USF (-5) 24 E Carolina 72007 Cincinnati (-11) 31 S Mississippi 212008 Rutgers (-6’) 29 NC State 232009 Connecticut (+3’) 20 South Carolina 7

NEW MEXICO BOWL2006 San Jose St (+3) 20 New Mexico 122007 New Mexico (-2’) 23 Nevada 02008 Colorado St (+2’) 40 Fresno St 352009 Wyoming (+10’) 35 Fresno St 28

BEEF O’BRADY BOWL2008 USF (-11’) 41 Memphis 142009 Rutgers (-2’) 45 UCF 24EAGLEBANK/MILITARY BOWL2008 Wake Forest (-3) 29 Navy 192009 UCLA (-4’) 30 Temple 21

Page 14: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL - 44

DL 1/2 -

LB 41/2 -

DB 4 -

TEXASBOWL

We like the job Briles has done at BU and it’s only Zook’s 2nd bowl gm in his 6Y here.Obvious home state edge to the Bears while IL fans can’t be thrilled at the Texas Bowl berth.The Illini struggles against mobile QB’s while Baylor struggles to stop the run.The Bears are 0-6 ATS vs bowl tms. IL is a 6-6 AQ tm in bowl (74%).

CCH - 4

Turf/ - 44

MTCH - -

INT 4 -

Baylor is off to its 1st bowl since 1994 facing an Illini team which will play in its first non-BCS bowl since 1999 and just its 3rd bowl in the last 10 years. The teams have played just once before, a 34-19 Illinois home win in ‘76. Since 1982 Illinois is 3-9 SU (6-6 ATS) in bowls and Zook is 0-3 SU/ATS as a HC. The Bears are 8-8 SU (5-3 ATS) in bowls with Briles 0-3 SU (1-2 ATS) as Houston’s HC. While both are excited to be in the posteason Waco is about 190 miles away from Houston which should give the Bears a large crowd edge. Both teams struggled down the stretch as the 7-2 Bears were ranked for the 1st time since 1993 before losing their last 3, all to ranked teams, while Illinois lost 3 of its last 4. Baylor was 1-5 SU (0-6 ATS) vs bowl tms this year being outgained by 72 ypg while Illinois was 3-5 SU but 5-3 ATS outgaining those foes by 23 ypg. The Illini were 4-1 ATS as a dog this year while BU was 3-1 as a single digit fav. The Bears last played on Nov 20th while Illinois finale came 13 days later on Dec 3rd so they should have less rust to knock off. After B2B losing ssns IL went the unusual route of keeping HC Zook but making wholesale staff changes. Six new assistants were hired including OC Petrino from Ark and DC Koenning from K-St and Zook now has more of an advisory role. RFr Scheelhaase won the QB job in spg which left the Illini with 3 scholarship Fr QB’s. Scheelhaase, who was compared by Petrino to Louisville’s Stefan LeFors due to his mobility and accuracy, shined running the zone read option and improved as a passer late in the ssn. IL had just one 1st Tm All-B10 RB in the L/25Y but Leshoure changed that as he led B10 RB’s in rushing including a school record 330 (FBS best in ‘10) vs NW. Jenkins was the Illini’s only big play threat at WR. The OL (6’4” 309, 2 Sr) all’d 23 sk (8.8%) but finished #13 NCAA in rush. The Illini looked to have 1 of the most improved D’s in the country before allowing 39.3 ppg and 430 ypg in the L/4 vs spreads. 1st Tm B10 DT Liuget lost weight and his added quickness made him the B10’s best interior DL in ‘10. 1st Tm B10 LB Wilson ret’d from inj and finally began to live up to his immense promise. The secondary battled pressn inj’s which caused position changes and finished #51 pass eff D (213, 57%, 19-11). Zook attributed ST improvements to using more starters as IL finished #50 (#110 in ‘09). Both K’s rec’d All-Conf recognition with P Santella #2 B10 avg with a 37.9 net while K Dimke has hit 26-31 in his career. The return units need work but the Illini also blk’d 2 P’s. The Bears big ssn came courtesy of dynamic QB Griffin who sparked a big play offense (26 plays of 30+ incl 18 TD). Griffin was #7 NCAA ttl off just 1 yr removed from ACL surgery which ended his ‘09 ssn after 3 gms. “RG3” picked up where he left off earning 2nd Tm B12 honors and becoming the Bears 1st 3,000 yd passer. His ability to run the zone read option sparked a run gm which featured the Bears 1st 1,000 yd rusher, Finley S/‘03. The Bears WR corps is built on speed with Wright and Gordon being the primary big play targets. The OL (6’4” 312, 1 Sr) is led by ex-fireman LT Watkins and allowed 17 sks (4.0%). In the offssn Briles called the D his speediest and deepest unit yet. The DL is stout in the middle with NFL prospect NG Taylor anchoring the front wall although DE play was inconsistent as just 1 lineman (Elliott) had more than 2 sks and the Bears had just 19 overall. The top LB is Antonio Johnson who is the D’s spark plug. The secondary is #87 in pass eff D (267, 66%, 16-10) with the tm’s top 2 tkl’rs being their S combo of All-B12 Landor and FS Atchison. The ST finished just #95 although P Epperson was #19 NCAA in avg with a respectable 37.8 net. K Jones started off on fire hitting 18 of his 20 before missing 2, having 1 blk’d and also missing an xp in a loss to A&M. The return units were unremarkable avg 6.7 on PR and 19.3 on KR with their TD being a fluky onside KR vs TT. The coverage units need improvement allowing 13.4 on PR and 21.3 on KR including 3 TD! BU’s Griffin does not receive the credit he deserves and he is certainly a player to watch. We like this matchup as both tms are facing opposing offenses which they’ve struggled against. While both teams would obviously prefer to be in bigger bowls, each is happy to be making a postssn appearance and we expect the offenses to play loose and the coaches to provide them with the plays to do so.FORECAST: OVER 62 Illinois/Baylor RATING: 2★ OVER

Crowd

QB - 41/2

ILLINI ATS: 8-4 O/U: 7-5

IL BU IL BU IL BU

RB 4 - WR - 4

ST 1/2 - SCH 1/2 -

OVERALL -

IL avg 6-4 309, 2 Sr, 23 sk all’d (8.8%), 5.1 ypc.BU avg 6-4 312, 1 Sr, 17 sk all’d (4.0%), 5.5 ypc. IL avg 6-3 269, 1 Sr, 12 of tm 20 sk, 3.9 ypc.BU avg 6-3 305, 1 Sr, 11 of tm 19 sk, 4.2 ypc.Wilson #1 tkl’r w/105, 10.5 tfl, Bussey #2, 7.5 tfl.Johnson #3 tkl’r w/62, 4.5 tfl, Francis #4, 1.5 tfl.IL #51 pass eff D, 213 ypg (57%), 19-11 ratio.BU #87 pass eff D, 267 ypg (66%), 16-10 ratio.

BAYLOR

by 1' 4’s

ILLINOIS (6-6)

BAYLOR (7-5)

IL BU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 29, 2010 • 6:00 pm ESPN • Reliant Stadium • Houston, TXPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.ILLINOIS 253 183 32 1.6 4 101.7BAYLOR 168 278 31 2.7 – 101.0

IL BU

BEARS ATS: 5-7 O/U: 7-4-1RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGMIKEL LESHOURE #63 12/12 252 1559 46 1513 14 6.0Nathan Scheelhaase #19 12/12 176 970 155 815 4 4.6Jason Ford #32 11/4 87 446 20 426 7 4.9PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTNathan Scheelhaase #19 12/12 241 137 56.8 1583 17 8Eddie McGee #72 11/8 17 8 47.1 111 0 4RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGAJ Jenkins #44 12/8 50 694 13.9 7 54Jarred Fayson #9 11/4 34 324 9.5 1 29Mikel Leshoure #63 12/12 15 175 11.7 3 32Evan Wilson #331 12/11 9 110 12.2 2 34Fred Sykes #195 10/0 7 85 12.1 0 27Ryan Lankford #292 11/1 5 77 15.4 1 33PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20ANTHONY SANTELLA #71 12 59 2665 45.2 8 37.9 0 15KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGDEREK DIMKE #72 12 40-40 8-9 6-7 5-7 2-3 21-26 52POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB MARTEZ WILSON #7 12/12 105 4 6.5 4 1LB Nate Bussey #46 12/12 75 1 6.5 2 1CB Travon Bellamy #146 12/12 66 1 4 6 0LB Ian Thomas #143 12/12 65 1 5.5 2 1S Trulon Henry #114 12/12 60 0 3 3 3DT COREY LIUGET #16 12/12 58 3.5 6.5 3 0CB Justin Green #8 12/12 50 0 0.5 4 0DT Akeem Spence #274 12/11 45 1 3 0 0S Tavon Wilson #140 12/12 41 0 2 7 1DE Michael Buchanan #92 10/7 35 1.5 2.5 2 0LB Jonathan Brown #67 11/0 26 0 1 0 1LB Justin Staples #69 12/3 24 1 3.5 1 0DE Clay Nurse #254 12/12 20 3 0 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJack Ramsey 13 38 2.9 0 Darius Millines 19 382 20.1 0Jarred Fayson 2 8 4.0 0 Troy Pollard 16 367 22.9 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGJay Finley #450 12/12 183 1181 26 1155 11 6.3Robert Griffin III #34 12/12 133 728 137 591 8 4.4Terrance Ganaway – 12/0 46 299 4 295 2 6.4Jarred Salubi #177 12/0 26 217 2 215 2 8.3PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTRobert Griffin III #34 12/12 413 274 66.3 3195 21 8Nick Florence #76 6/0 11 5 45.5 48 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGKendall Wright #60 12/10 66 825 12.5 6 62Josh Gordon #116 12/3 36 664 18.4 7 94Terrance Williams #179 12/10 42 472 11.2 4 59Lanear Sampson #65 12/9 40 387 9.7 0 47Tevin Reese #176 12/3 42 379 9.0 0 33PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Derek Epperson #35 12 49 2166 44.2 14 37.8 0 13KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGAaron Jones #280 12 44-45 5-8 9-11 3-5 2-2 19-26 50POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTS Byron Landor #96JC 12/12 115 0 3 5 1S Tim Atchison #269 12/12 66 0 1 8 1LB Antonio Johnson #277 12/12 62 3 1.5 1 1LB Chris Francis #109 10/10 61 0 1.5 1 0DT Phil Taylor #15 12/12 52 2 5 2 0LB Elliot Coffey #142 9/8 50 0 2.5 1 1CB Chance Casey #227 9/9 45 0 2.5 3 1CB Mikail Baker #120 9/9 40 0 1 3 1LB Chris McAllister #160 12/2 39 1 3.5 0 0LB Earl Patin #53 10/2 38 0 2 0 0DE Tevin Elliott #205 12/4 35 5 4 2 0DT Nicolas Jean-Baptiste – 12/9 31 0.5 1 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDTerrance Williams 8 90 11.2 0 Terrance Williams 20 427 21.4 0 Krys Buerck 9 53 5.9 0 Mikail Baker 18 353 19.6 0

14

OL 41/2 -

DL - 44

LB - 441/2

DB - 441/2

MILITARYBOWL

McNeill brings energy but his 1st test with full prep vs Fridge who’s 4-1 ATS L/5 bowls.EC gets solid support but the Washington DC area is where many UM players call home.While MD will have plenty of tape on the quirky TT offense, it’s the first time they’ve faced it.EC led VT & NC in 3Q and beat NCSt & thrives vs ACC tms.

CCH - 4

Turf/ - 44

MTCH 4 -

INT 41/2 -

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGDavin Meggett #97 12/0 119 669 11 658 4 5.5Da’Rel Scott #73 12/12 109 529 21 508 3 4.7 DJ Adams #71 8/0 54 214 10 204 7 3.8Jamarr Robinson #208 10/3 37 181 84 97 0 2.6Danny O’Brien #67 12/9 31 55 103 -48 1 -1.5PASSING PS# GS/GP ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTDanny O’Brien #67 12/9 315 179 56.8 2257 21 6Jamarr Robinson #208 10/3 49 26 53.1 349 4 2RECEIVING PS# GS/GP REC YDS AVG TD LONGTORREY SMITH #72 12/11 65 1045 16.1 12 80Adrian Cannon #36 12/12 36 324 9.0 1 26Quintin McCree #195 12/0 16 188 11.8 1 55Da’Rel Scott #73 12/12 14 170 12.1 3 71Matt Furstenburg #98 12/11 10 166 16.6 1 53Ronnie Tyler #75 12/1 13 149 11.5 1 30Kevin Dorsey #24 12/0 13 137 10.5 1 42PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Travis Baltz #33 12 64 2686 42.0 11 36.0 0 21KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGTravis Baltz #33 12 47-47 5-5 5-7 2-3 1-1 13-16 52POS PLAYER PS# GS/GP TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB ALEX WUJCIAK #62 12/12 112 0 5 5 2DB KENNY TATE #15 12/12 94 3.5 4.5 3 3LB Demetrius Hartsfield #155 12/12 75 0.5 4.5 2 1LB Adrian Moten #68 12/12 72 2.5 3 6 4DB Antwine Perez #3 12/12 66 1 4 8 3DB Cameron Chism #65 12/12 64 1 3 7 0DL Joe Vellano #163 12/12 59 5 5.5 2 0DL AJ Francis #101 12/9 42 2.5 4.5 0 0DB Trenton Hughes #308 12/12 34 0.5 0 7 1LB Darin Drakeford #48 11/0 33 1 4.5 1 0DL Drew Gloster #14 12/12 33 1 1.5 4 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDTONY LOGAN 30 563 18.8 2 Torrey Smith 27 511 18.9 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGJonathan Williams #117 12/11 153 882 36 846 10 5.5Giavanni Ruffin #163JC 12/4 74 361 4 357 2 4.8Dominique Davis #68JC 12/12 74 286 144 142 9 1.9Dwayne Harris #60 12/9 15 117 6 111 0 7.4PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTDominique Davis #68JC 12/12 552 358 64.9 3699 36 14Brad Wornick #400 4/0 14 9 64.3 95 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGDWAYNE HARRIS #60 12/9 93 1055 11.3 10 76Lance Lewis #284JC 12/12 78 979 12.6 13 61Jonathan Williams #117 12/11 48 439 9.1 1 77Michael Bowman #107 12/8 45 435 9.7 3 36Andrew Bodenheimer #359 12/9 35 327 9.3 2 29Giavanni Ruffin #163JC 12/4 22 153 7.0 1 21Justin Jones #34 12/4 17 151 8.9 4 33Dayon Arrington #285 11/1 10 102 10.2 0 29PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Ben Ryan – 12 49 1949 59 12 35.1 0 13 KICKING PS# GP XP 1–29 30–39 40–49 50+ TTL LNGMike Barbour – 12 54-55 3-3 7-7 3-4 1-2 14-16 52POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB DUSTIN LINEBACK #520JC 12/12 111 1.5 4.5 3 0LB Melvin Patterson #87 12/11 87 0 1.5 0 0S Bradley Jacobs #132JC 12/12 76 0 1 6 3DL Josh Smith #386 12/11 62 2 8 3 0S Derek Blacknall #197 11/11 62 0 2 5 2LB Lamar McLendon #204 12/9 54 0 7 2 0CB EMANUEL DAVIS #199 12/12 48 0 3 9 1DL Matt Milner #182 12/10 44 3 3 1 0DL Derrel Johnson #615 11/10 40 1 3.5 0 0CB Travis Simmons #391 11/9 34 0 1 4 1CB Jacobi Jenkins #408 12/3 30 0 0 2 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDDWAYNE HARRIS 18 186 10.3 0 Dwayne Harris 34 700 20.6 0

First meeting. EC dropped the final 2 gms of the reg ssn by a 107-76 mark finishing at 6-6 and narrowly reaching the postssn. MD is very disappointed as they went from a 2-10 tm, to 8-4 but were relegated to the 8th seeded ACC bowl and HC Friedgen noted, “it is what it is”. Prior to the NCSt win, Fridge promised his players that if they won the gm he would “fight like hell” to get them into a good bowl gm and he has concerns about the gm being ply’d in MD’s backyard and creating a true bowl gm atmosphere. First yr EC HC McNeill is taking the Pirates to its 5th consec bowl while Fridge is 4-2 SU/ATS in bowls but this is the 1st time he’ll be meeting a CUSA tm. EC went 3-5 SU/ATS vs bowl caliber tms being outscored 48-35 and outgained 478-440 while MD went 4-4 (5-3 ATS) vs bowl tms being outscored 27-23 and outgained 402-322. The Pirates have 10 Sr st’rs among 17 upperclassmen and Terps have 8 Sr’s st’rs among 13 upperclassmen. These two both played Navy and NCSt with EC going 1-1 SU/ATS as they knocked off NCSt in OT before being blasted at home vs Navy 76-35 (all’d 521 rush yds). MD went 2-0 SU/ATS stopping Navy twice at the GL to preserve a 3 pt win in the opener and they fought off an NCSt comeback bid in the finale. EC’s success TY can be solely credited to their off (#26) led by JC trans Davis who broke Jeff Blake’s schl TD pass record with 36 as EC avg’d 38 ppg and 445 ypg. The run gm was led by Williams who also pulled in the 3rd highest ttl of catches and rec yds. Davis had plenty of rec options throughout the yr led by Harris who is just 7 rec away from 100 and Lewis who is nearing the 1,000 yd plateau. The OL avg 6’5” 306 (3 Sr) paving the way for 126 ypg (4.5) while giving up just 14 sks (2.5%). The def is ranked #119 all’g 43 ppg and an FBS worst 479 ypg on the yr incl dismal performances vs Navy (76 pts, 521 rush) and Rice (62 pts, 639 yds). The DL avg 6’3” 255 (2 Sr) and all’d 221 rush ypg (5.1) but in fairness, they did lose st’rs Brooks and Powell in early Nov to inj. LB’s Lineback and Patterson finished #1 and #2 in tkls but the full success of the duo was overshadowed by the struggles the tm had on that side of the ball. The secondary all’d 258 ypg (60%) with a 30-9 ratio placing them #102 in our pass D rankings. S Jacobs and CB Davis were the stars of the group as the 2 comb for 19 pd. A pair of newcomers handled the kicking chores with K Barbour hitting 88% of his FG att and walk-on Ryan handling the punting. Dwayne Harris handled both the KR and PR duties while the coverage units all’d KR and PR avg’s of 20.3 and 7.2 respectively. EC has our #98 ST unit. Many MD fans were up in arms when bkup QB O’Brien saw the field vs Navy (fmbl’d his 1st col-lege att). Now those same fans are singing his praise. O’Brien was thrust into the spotlight vs FIU and remained the starter even after option runner Robinson ret’d from inj. RB’s Meggett and Scott both improved on LY’s numbers and Meggett led the tm in rushing despite not starting any gms. The top rec, Smith, is the first 1,000 yd rec here S/’92. The OL has been hit by inj’s. The current OL avg 6’5” 299 and has started 73% of the gms together. They pave the way for 125 ypg rush (3.8) and have all’d 22 sks (6.0%). The Terps have scored 6 non-off TD’s TY and 4 have come by the #44 rated D. The DL (6’3” 278, 1 Sr) all’s just 132 ypg rush (3.5) and has totaled 13 of the tm’s 27 sks. LB Wujciak is the top tkl’r and Hartsfield has 5 tfl TY. MD ranks #24 in our pass eff D all’g 221 ypg (53%) with a 15-17 ratio. Tate is the #2 tkl’r while Perez is tied for 4th in the ACC with 11 pd. Entering the ssn MD felt they had the PK position locked up, but the expected st’r struggled in pressn with blocks and P Baltz took over both duties. He has just 5 TB’s but boomed a 52 yd FG vs NCSt. MD has our #5 ST’s unit with PR Logan finishing #3 NCAA and avg nearly as much as the top KR. The PR D all’g 9.2 and KR D all’g 19.2. MD is +4 in the punt blk department. EC has been one-dimensional as they have our #119 D and have all’d 40+ pts 9 of 12 gms but MD is not an offense that sustains long drives. EC’s offense has been dynamic and they have topped 32 pts in their L/8 gms. Have to believe that during the break, EC’s defense can improve enough to slow MD while MD’s D will struggle vs EC’s offense. Psychological edge to EC vs a MD tm that was banking on the 4th best ACC bowl which would match their standings but instead were disappointed to play in their own backyard.FORECAST: EC (+) MD by 1 RATING: 2★ EAST CAROLINA (+)

Crowd

QB 41/2 -

PIRATES ATS: 6-6 O/U: 10-2

EC MD EC MD EC MD

RB - - WR - -

ST - 4 SCH - -

OVERALL -

EC avg 6-5 306, 3 Sr, 14 sk all’d (2.5%), 4.5 ypc.MD avg 6-5 299, 1 Sr, 22 sk all’d (6.0%), 3.8 ypc.EC avg 6-3 255, 2 Sr, 11.5 of tm 15 sk, 5.1 ypc.MD avg 6-3 278, 1 Sr, 13 of tm 27 sk, 3.5 ypc.Lineback #1 tkl’r w/111, 6 tfl, Patterson #2.Wujciak #1 tkl’r w/112, 5 tfl, Hartsfield #3, 5 tfl.EC #102 pass eff D, 258 ypg (60%), 30-9 ratio.MD #24 pass eff D, 221 ypg (53%), 15-17 ratio.

MARYLAND

by 5' 4’s

E CAROLINA (6-6)

MARYLAND (8-4)

EC MD CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 29, 2010 • 2:30 pm ESPN • RFK Stadium • Washington, DCPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.EAST CAROLINA 97 305 29 2.5 – 98.0MARYLAND 198 240 44 1.5 4444 99.0

EC MD

TERRAPINS ATS: 8-4 O/U: 7-4-1

Page 15: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL - 1/2

DL 44 -

LB - -

DB 1/2 -

ALAMOBOWL

OSU HC Gundy has exceeded our expectations while AZ HC Stoops has underwhelmed.The Orange Crush likely to take over Alamodome after AZ’s disappointing finish.Arizona has 2 outstanding DE’s for pressure and 2 excellent cover CB’s.OKSt was thinking B12 Championship & BCS. AZ shutout LY in bowl.

CCH - 4

Turf/ - 441/2

MTCH 1/2 -

INT 4 -

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGKENDALL HUNTER #116 12/12 261 1558 42 1516 16 5.8Joseph Randle #40 12/5 80 461 11 450 2 5.6Jeremy Smith #22 12/1 51 251 5 246 6 4.8Justin Blackmon #107 11/10 4 92 15 77 1 19.2Brandon Weeden #261 12/12 17 40 108 -68 0 -4.0PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTBRANDON WEEDEN #261 12/12 470 317 67.4 4037 32 13Clint Cheif #97 4/0 19 14 73.7 213 2 1RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJUSTIN BLACKMON #107 11/10 102 1665 16.3 18 81Josh Cooper #74 12/3 61 683 11.2 5 41Bo Bowling #488 12/4 39 402 10.3 0 32Joseph Randle #40 12/5 35 399 11.4 1 38Isaiah Anderson #146 11/3 12 216 18.0 0 42Colton Chelf #450 11/5 11 200 18.2 1 62Tracy Moore #120 12/6 15 199 13.3 1 29Michael Harrison #430 10/2 14 135 9.6 3 24Hubert Anyiam #105 9/3 11 135 12.3 3 34PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20QUINN SHARP #11 12 46 2127 46.2 16 41.0 0 15KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGDAN BAILEY #60 12 65-66 9-9 7-9 6-7 2-3 24-28 52POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB ORIE LEMON #28 12/12 119 2.5 6.5 3 0LB Justin Gent #42 11/11 71 2 1 0 0CB Brodrick Brown #189 12/12 70 0 2 8 2S Johnny Thomas #288 12/10 58 0 0 5 2LB Shaun Lewis #14 12/5 55 0 7 0 3S Markelle Martin #56 12/0 51 0 2 8 2LB James Thomas #56 12/7 47 2 0 4 0CB ANDREW MCGEE #231JC 11/11 45 0 2 9 5DL Ugo Chinasa #31 12/12 32 3 2 3 1PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJosh Cooper 14 138 9.9 1 Justin Gilbert 23 644 28.0 2

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGKeola Antolin #39 12/7 142 694 27 667 7 4.7Nic Grigsby #108 11/5 102 505 31 474 8 4.6Greg Nwoko #204 12/1 46 241 7 234 3 5.1Matt Scott #15 7/2 35 188 53 135 0 3.9Nick Foles #33 10/10 26 32 138 -106 1 -4.1 PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTNick Foles #33 10/10 376 254 67.6 2911 19 7Matt Scott #15 7/2 93 66 71.0 776 4 2 RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJURON CRINER #91 12/11 73 1186 16.2 10 85David Roberts #114 11/4 42 468 11.1 2 27David Douglas #176 12/9 46 424 9.2 5 38Terrence Miller #40 12/3 27 340 12.6 0 38William Wright #495 8/2 25 294 11.8 2 27PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Keenyn Crier – 12 46 1860 40.4 10 34.1(t) 0 10KICKING PS# GP XP 1–29 30–39 40–49 50+ TTL LNGAlex Zendejas #8 12 40-45 5-5 2-4 6-7 0-0 13-16 47POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Paul Vassallo #111JC 12/12 94 2 5.5 2 0S Joseph Perkins #446JC 12/12 64 0 1 8 2CB Robert Golden #21 12/12 55 0 2.5 8 1LB Jake Fischer #102 12/7 52 2 5.5 2 0DB Adam Hall #6 12/7 50 0 3.5 3 2DL Ricky Elmore #182 12/11 48 11 2 1 0DL Justin Washington #368 11/9 45 6 4.5 1 0LB Derek Earls #15JC 12/11 44 1 5.5 4 1S Anthony Wilcox 478JC 12/9 44 0 0 8 0DL BROOKS REED #109 12/1 44 6.5 3 2 0CB Trevin Wade #540 11/10 43 1.5 0 2 1DL D’Aundre Reed #192 10/10 38 2 4 1 0DL Lolomana Mikaele #237 12/12 32 0.5 7 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDWilliam Wright 14 85 6.1 0 Travis Cobb 29 708 24.4 1

Both were thinking BCS bowls after hot starts but wound up here instead for the school’s 7th ever meeting (1st S/’42). AZ was 7-1 and ranked #13 but a 4 gm slide KO’d them from the Top 25. OSU’s 10-1 start marked the 1st time in program hist they tied for the B12 South Title and won 10 gms in a ssn. OSU was blitzed by OU for 588 yds in a 47-41 loss which landed them here for the 3rd time (0-2 SU/ATS vs B10 tms). Third str bowl gm that Stoops has guided his tm to (1-1 SU/ATS) but they did catch a break with a lack of bowl bids in the conf (USC inelig) to get what is normally the #2 P10 bowl. Stoops is very familiar with OSU as he was OU’s DC from ‘99-’03. Gundy has led his program to a record 5th consec bowl (2-2 SU/ATS). AZ has 10 Sr’s among 20 upperclassmen while OSU has 8 Sr’s and 16 upperclassmen. AZ took on 7 bowl elig tms (3-4 SU, 3-3-1 ATS) outscoring them 31-27 and outgaining them 438-372. OSU was 6-2 SU (4-3-1 ATS) vs bowl tms with 42-32 scoring and 536-452 yd edges. Both beat WSU with OSU winning the opener 65-17 (-17’) at home while AZ got a 24-7 (-23’) road win. AZ’s #23 ranked off avg’d 30 ppg and 445 ypg. QB Foles answered his ‘09 campaign with an equally as impressive 2nd yr despite missing 2 gms mid-yr with a dislocated kneecap. Scott took over and picked up 2 important conf wins (Wash, UCLA) as the off avg’d 520 ypg in his 2 gm stint. RB Grigsby began the ssn as the tm’s st’r but inj’s landed him in the #2 role behind Antolin. WR Criner led the P10 in both rec and yds despite playing through a toe inj. Criner has more yds than the next 2 WR’s combined. The OL avg 6’5” 321 and paved the way for 135 ypg (4.1) while all’g 27 sks (5.7%) led by 4 yr str Baxter. The Wildcat D all’d 22 ppg and 343 ypg ranking them 23rd. The unit actually held 6 of their first 7 opp under 310 yds (455 ypg all’d over L/4, all bowl eligible tms). The UA DL (6’3” 271) all’d 137 ypg (3.6) rushing while posting 28 of the tm’s 33 sks. The LB unit was originally thought to be a weak spot due to a lack of experience but didn’t really prove to be that much of a liability led by JC transfer Vassallo. The secondary all’d 207 ypg (56%) with a 16-9 ratio ranking them #27 in the FBS. CB Wade was exp to have an AA type yr but struggled throughout. The ST unit earned our #58 rating with All-P10 K Zendejas best known for the 2 missed xp’s in the finale vs ASU. The coverage units avg 22.0 per KR (all’d 20.4) and 6.2 per PR (all’d 6.6). Gundy probably earned his B12 COY award by giving up play calling duties after LY’s bowl loss and hiring ex-Houston OC Holgorsen. OSU exploded to become our #3 off thanks to the 1st Tm B12 triplets of QB Weeden, RB Hunter and WR Blackmon. Weeden became the 1st QB ever to be named 1st Tm All-Conf in OSU history leading the conf in pass eff and #3 nationally in pass ypg. His main weapon was B12 OPY Biletnikoff winner WR Blackmon who had 100 yd rec and at least 1 TD in 11 gms. OSU was held to its lowest pt ttl of the ssn vs K-St (24) when Blackmon was susp and he had his ‘worst’ gm of the ssn (8-105-1) vs OU while playing with a noticeable limp due to an ankle inj. RB Hunter led the B12 in rushing after an inj-plagued ‘09. The OL (6’4” 309) all’d just 10 sks (2.0%) with RT Adcock earning 1st Tm B12. Despite replacing 9 st’rs, OSU finished with our #48 D as DC Young knew the challenge of fielding a capable stop unit along side a quick strike off was to build up the depth. The DL is led by All-B12 DE Chinasa. The D’s stars are #1 tkl’r LB Lemon who missed ‘09 due to inj and true Fr LB Lewis who earned OSU’s 1st co-B12 Def Fr of the Yr award S/’06. OSU has the NCAA’s #47 pass eff D (276, 62%, 23-16) led by CB McGee. OSU usually has 1 of our best ST units thanks to 1 of the NCAA’s best ST coord DeForrest (HC candidate at ULL). OSU finished #33 thanks to all’g 3 KR TD as the young unit struggled in coverage all’g an NCAA 2nd worst 27.0 on KR and 10.1 on PR. Groza winner Bailey hit 8-10 from 40+. P Sharp’s 41.0 net was #3 NCAA and his 53 TB led the nation. On Nov. 1st, both teams were 7-1 with Arizona ranked #13 and Oklahoma St was ranked #19. Now six weeks later, Arizona is off 4 straight losses while OKSt was hoping for a Big 12 Championship but lost the their Bedlam Rivals in the finale for the 2nd straight ssn with a BCS bowl on the line. We certainly appreciate the job that HC Gundy has done but have to feel that the Alamo Bowl was not in their plans. It may actually be easier for Stoops to motivate his squad after losing 4 straight and to use this as a building block towards next ssn.FORECAST: Arizona by 1 RATING: 3★ ARIZONA

Crowd

QB - -

WILDCATS ATS: 4-7-1 O/U: 8-4

AZ OSU AZ OSU AZ OSU

RB - 41/2 WR - 1/2

ST - 4 SCH 4 -

OVERALL -

AZ avg 6-5 321, 5 Sr, 27 sk all’d (5.7%), 4.1 ypc.OSU avg 6-4 309, 0 Sr, 10 sk all’d (2.0%), 5.1 ypc.AZ avg 6-3 271, 3 Sr, 28 of tm 33 sk, 3.6 ypc.OSU avg 6-3 278, 3 Sr, 18 of tm 25 sk, 3.6 ypc.Vassallo #1 tkl’r w/94, 7.5 tfl, Fischer #4, 7.5 tfl.Lemon #1 tkl’r w/119, 9 tfl, Gent #2, 3 tfl.AZ #27 pass eff D, 207 ypg (56%), 16-9 ratio.OSU #47 pass eff D, 276 ypg (62%), 23-16 ratio.

OKLA ST

by 2 4’s

ARIZONA (7-5)

OKLAHOMA ST (10-2)

AZ OSU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 29, 2010 • 9:15 pm ESPN • Alamodome • San Antonio, TXPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.ARIZONA 135 278 27 2.4 – 103.7OKLAHOMA ST 141 323 32 2.3 4 101.7

AZ OSU

COWBOYS ATS: 8-3-1 O/U: 8-4

Bonus 1. FREE 2011 SUBSCRIPTION TO POWER SWEEP DOWNLOAD VERSION ($185 Value) The #1 ranked newsletter over 28 years - 22 issues are yours FREE!Bonus 2. FREE SEPTEMBER 5★ LATE PHONE SELECTION ($50 Value) You receive our first September 5★ of the 2011 season ABSOLUTELY FREE! Our record for 5★ Late Phone Selections in September are 20-12 63%!!!Bonus 3. FREE 2011 POWER SWEEP PREVIEW ($8 Value) A complete preview of the 2011 College and Pro Football season. Bonus 4. FREE SUNDAY OF NFL LATE PHONE SERVICE ($50 Value) Get Wk 15 OR 16 OR 17 of the reg season ABSOLUTELY FREE!Bonus 5. Discount of $30 off the 2011 POWER PLAYS newsletter’s current rateBonus 6. CERTIFICATE FOR $10 OFF THE 2011 PRO FOOTBALL SCOREBOOK You receive a discount of $10 on the 2011 Pro

Football Scorebook, the most informative book of its kind on the market! Over 330 pages of Pro Football Info. Reg $34.95 - you pay only $24.95 (+s/h).Bonus 7. FREE 2 WEEKS OF PRESEASON LATE PHONE SERVICE ($150 VALUE) OR $50 CREDIT ON A 2011 NORTHCOAST SPORTS DEBIT CARD

15

This is a chart of conf vs conf ATS records of bowl teams only. This shows that the PAC 10 had the best ATS record vs other conferences and also the highest win % vs BCS tms.

OVERALL VS BCS CONF W L T % W L T %ACC 22 13 0 62.9% 10 8 0 55.6%PAC 10 14 9 1 60.9% 7 6 0 53.8%WAC 18 13 0 58.1% 8 5 0 61.5%SEC 21 16 0 56.8% 7 9 0 43.8%INDEPENDENT 14 11 3 56.0% 5 5 2 50.0%BIG 12 21 19 0 52.5% 7 5 0 58.3%BIG EAST 14 14 2 50.0% 6 8 0 42.9%BIG TEN 15 18 1 45.5% 4 5 0 44.4%MWC 14 17 2 45.2% 6 6 2 50.0%MAC 18 23 1 43.9% 10 17 0 37.0%CUSA 17 24 0 41.5% 9 16 0 36.0%SUN BELT 12 22 0 35.3% 10 16 0 38.5%

OVERALL VS BCS CONF W L % W L %BIG 12 30 2 93.8% 6 1 85.7%SEC 37 3 92.5% 10 3 76.9%BIG 10 28 4 87.5% 5 3 62.5%PAC 10 10 2 83.3% 4 1 80.0%WAC 15 3 83.3% 5 3 62.5%MWC 14 6 70.0% 5 3 62.5%INDEPENDENT 13 7 65.0% 5 5 50.0%ACC 23 13 63.9% 5 9 35.7%BIG EAST 18 11 62.1% 3 8 27.3%CUSA 13 11 54.2% 3 8 27.3%MAC 6 10 37.5% 2 7 22.2%SUN BELT 2 10 16.7% 0 8 0.0%

SU RECORD OF CONFERENCEBOWL TEAMS

OVERALL VS BCS CONF W L % W L %SEC 41 7 85.4% 10 6 62.5%BIG 12 40 8 83.3% 8 4 66.7%BIG TEN 35 9 79.5% 5 4 55.6%PAC 10 21 10 67.7% 9 4 69.2%INDEPENDENT 19 11 63.3% 6 6 50.0%ACC 30 18 62.5% 6 12 33.3%BIG EAST 24 16 60.0% 3 11 21.4%WAC 23 17 57.5% 5 9 35.7%MWC 17 20 45.9% 5 9 35.7%CUSA 20 28 41.7% 4 21 16.0%MAC 15 37 28.8% 3 24 11.1%SUN BELT 4 32 11.1% 0 26 0.0%

CONFERENCE VS CONFERENCESU RECORDS

OVERALL VS BCS CONF W L T % W L T %PAC 10 7 2 0 77.8% 4 1 0 80.0%WAC 11 4 0 73.3% 5 3 0 62.5%ACC 17 10 0 63.0% 8 6 0 57.1%SEC 18 12 0 60.0% 6 7 0 46.2%BIG EAST 12 8 2 60.0% 5 6 0 45.5%IND 9 7 3 56.3% 3 5 2 37.5%BIG 12 14 12 0 53.8% 5 2 0 71.4%BIG TEN 12 12 1 50.0% 3 5 0 37.5%MWC 8 9 1 47.1% 4 3 1 57.1%CUSA 9 11 0 45.0% 4 7 0 36.4%MAC 6 8 0 42.9% 4 5 0 44.4%SUN BELT 3 8 0 27.3% 3 5 0 37.5%

CONFERENCE VS CONFERENCEATS RECORDS

CONFERENCE VS CONFERENCEATS RECORDS - BOWL TEAMS

This is a chart of conference vs conference SU records. This shows that the SEC had the best SU record vs other conferences. The Pac 10 had the highest winning percentage vs BCS teams.

This is a chart of conf vs conf records using only the bowl participants. As you can see, the Big 12 had the highest % overall and had the highest % vs BCS teams.

This is a chart of conf vs conf ATS records. As you can see the ACC teams led the way with the highest percentage overall and the highest % vs BCS teams was the WAC.

It’s the BEST way to get Post Season Winners! CALL 1-800-654-3448

• Selections & Opinions on EVERY BOWL Side & Total• Selections and Opinions on EVERY NFL PLAYOFF GAME• BOWL PLAY OF THE YEAR• PLAYOFF PLAY OF THE YEAR

POST SEASONPACKAGE

$600

EXECUTIVE

CLUB SERVICE

PLUSLUCKY “7”

BONUSES

POST SEASON LATE PHONES 2007 • 2008 • 2009 38-19 67%

Page 16: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL 1/2 -

DL - 44

LB - 44

DB - -

PINSTRIPEBOWL

Marrone has brought Syr their first winning ssn S/’01 but HOF’er Snyder gets the edge.SU fans will be ecstatic to make any bowl gm, especially in-state at Yankee Stadium.K-St needs to run to be effective but Syr allows 3.6 ypc. K-St’s rush D all’g a whopping 5.9.Both tms come in 7-5. K-St’s 1st bowl S/’06, Syr 1st S/’04.

CCH 4 -

Turf/ - 44

MTCH - 41/2

INT - -

This is the inaugural yr of the Pinstripe Bowl but the 3rd postssn matchup between the Orange and Cats. Both previous meetings took place in Arizona with SU winning the ‘01 Insight.com Bowl (26-3, +6) and KSU beating McNabb and Co, 35-18 (-3) in the ‘97 Fiesta Bowl. Syracuse earned its 1st bowl bid S/’04 and clinched its 1st winning ssn S/’01 at 7-5. SU is 12-9-1 all-time in bowls (7-3 SU, 6-4 ATS S/‘90). Both tms have 11 Sr st’rs. K-St HC Snyder is 6-5 SU/4-7 ATS in bowls. SU is just 2-5 SU/ATS vs bowl tms being outscored by 25-14 and outgained by 321-275. K-St is 1-4 SU/2-3 ATS vs bowl tms losing by an avg of 34-23 and being outgained by 513-341. SU had trouble selling out their home games this year but should definitely have the crowd edge in this one. K-St returns to the postseason for the 1st time S/’06 thanks to a solid run gm led by 2nd Tm B12 RB Thomas who finished #9 in the NCAA. Thomas is a former JC QB who also runs the Wildcat. QB Coffman was benched the prev ssn and looked to be headed there again after struggling vs Neb. He kept the job until the Texas gm when Snyder inserted the more mobile Klein. Klein set K-St QB rush records in 2 str gms before being inj’d vs Colo and both QB’s played in the L/3. The WR unit took a big hit when #1 rec Brodrick Smith was KO’d after 5 and Quarles was the only WR with more than 23 rec. The OL (6’4” 314) all’d a whopping 30 sk (11.2%) but paved the way for the B12’s #2 run gm. K-St runs a 4-2-5 which is ideal vs the B12’s many spreads. It is not ideal however vs physical rush attacks as the Cats finished #118 NCAA in rush D with their 229 ypg (5.9), the school’s most S/’90. Thanks to attrition the Cats have fewer than 70 scholarship players and they were so desperate for DL depth that FB Wilson and OL Viers played there vs Texas. DE Brown is the leading sk’r with 5 and no other DL has more than 2. The LB’s suffered a big blow when then #1 tkl’r (prior to missed action) Hrebec missed 2 gms and true Fr Walker (a Snyder rarity) saw increased action. K-St has our #37 pass eff D (212, 55%, 20-13) with the top playmakers Garrett (10 tfl, 9 pbu) and 2nd Tm B12 FS Zimmerman (3 int). The Cats have had some spectacular ST units and ‘10 was no different (#8). P Doerr’s net was #8 NCAA. KR Powell was #1 in the NCAA when he was inj’d while Quarles finished #3 in the B12. The top PR is Thompson (7.4). The Cats allow just 6.4 on PR and 21.3 on KR. Snyder was dissatisfied with the K gm in Aug and Cantele started the first 2 before giving way to Cherry who hit 7-8. HC Marrone has turned the Orange around in just 2 yrs. The team had gone just 10-37 overall and 3-25 in BE play from ‘05-’08 under Robinson and improved to 4-8 in ‘09 and now 7-5 TY with a 4-3 BE record, the most BE gms they have won S/’04. The Orange started the ssn hot at 6-2 but their lack of depth due to inj’s and low scholarship numbers resulted in a 1-3 record the L/4. QB Nassib runs the #94 off and was solid most of the yr but avg’d just 172 ypg (57%) with a 2-3 ratio in the L/4 including 0 TD in the L/2 (both losses). RB Carter is #3 in the BE in rush yds with five 100+ yd gms and has topped 1,000 yds for the 2nd str yr. The starters on the OL avg 6’4” 302 with 2 Sr’s and paved the way for 130 rush ypg (3.9) with 31 sks all’d (9.1%). Whereas the offense fell from 330 ypg in ‘09 to 308 ypg TY, the #38 defense improved from all’g 337 ypg in ‘09 to just 295 ypg TY. The DL avg 6’3” 268 with 2 Sr st’rs but surprisingly their sks dropped from 35 LY to just 26 TY. They boast 2 of the best LB’s in the BE in D. Smith and Hogue who are both decorated Sr’s. SU is #50 in our pass D rankings all’g 158 ypg (55%) with a 13-9 ratio. SU ranks #45 in our ST rankings with 1st Tm BE K Krautman the most accurate K in the BE and P Long 2nd Tm BE with an excellent 38.9 net. Unfortunately Long will miss the bowl after having a benign brain tumor removed in early Dec. Take a look at the checklist and it’s obvious K-St’s strength is on offense while Syracuse’s is on defense. There are few coaches in the last 2 seasons that have done as much with their talent as Marrone. While the Orange limped down the stretch dropping 3 of L/4 gms (all as a fav), that trend should get turned around with the extra bowl practices. Syracuse has played better away from home winning and covering all 4 conference gms while K-St had a tough end to the season playing 3 straight road gms and struggled to get a win at NT.FORECAST: Syracuse by 4 RATING: 1★ SYRACUSE

Crowd

QB 4 -

WILDCATS ATS: 6-6 O/U: 9-3

K-St SU K-St SU K-St SU

RB 4 - WR 4 -

ST 4 - SCH 4 -

OVERALL -

K-St avg 6-4 314, 3 Sr, 30 sk all’d (11.2%), 4.8 ypc.SU avg 6-4 302, 2 Sr, 31 sk all’d (9.1%), 3.9 ypc.K-St avg 6-3 276, 2 Sr, 9 of tm 18 sk, 5.9 ypc.SU avg 6-3 268, 2 Sr, 12.5 of tm 26 sk, 3.6 ypc.Garrett #1 tkl’r w/86, 13 tfl, Hrebec #3, 2 tfl.Smith #1 tkl’r w/103, 8 tfl, Hogue #2, 9.5 tfl.K-St #37 pass eff D, 212 ypg (55%), 20-13 ratio.SU #50 pass eff D, 158 ypg (55%), 13-9 ratio.

SYRACUSE

by 1 4

KANSAS ST(7-5)

SYRACUSE (7-5)

K-St SU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 30, 2010 • 3:20 pm ESPN • Yankee Stadium • Bronx, NY

K-St SU

ORANGE ATS: 7-5 O/U: 4-8

POWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.KANSAS ST 169 145 26 2.0 44 100.4SYRACUSE 191 175 24 2.4 – 97.4

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGDelone Carter #98 12/11 204 1060 25 1035 7 5.1Antwon Bailey #86 12/1 107 519 15 504 2 4.7Ryan Nassib #93 12/12 60 183 238 -55 1 -0.9PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTRyan Nassib #93 12/12 337 189 56.1 2095 16 8Charley Loeb #135 4/0 5 3 60.0 41 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGVan Chew #406 12/12 41 611 14.9 5 48Alec Lemon #116 11/10 30 377 12.6 4 51Nick Provo #60 12/2 32 356 11.1 1 33Antwon Bailey #86 12/1 32 277 8.7 3 37Marcus Sales #35 10/2 21 242 11.5 1 26PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Rob Long #96 12 64 2806 43.8 10 38.9 0 19KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGROSS KRAUTMAN #15 12 27-28 7-7 5-5 5-6 0-0 17-18 48POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB DERRELL SMITH #146 12/12 103 1.5 6.5 1 1LB DOUG HOGUE #82 12/12 89 3 6.5 1 2FS Phillip Thomas #682 12/12 85 0 4 3 1SS Shamarko Thomas #257 12/7 63 2 0.5 3 0CB Mike Holmes #400 12/12 62 3 1 5 1DE Chandler Jones #67 12/12 53 4 4.5 4 0LB Marquis Spruill #361 12/12 47 2 6.5 1 0SS Max Suter #125 12/5 44 1 2.5 1 0DT Andrew Lewis #152 12/12 28 1 3.5 0 0DT Anthony Perkins #102 12/2 26 2 1 0 0DE Mikhail Marinovich #64 12/12 24 2.5 1 4 0CB Da’Mon Merkerson #255 12/12 21 0 2.5 5 2CB Jeremi Wilkes #265 12/0 18 0 0 1 1DL Brandon Sharpe #596 12/0 17 3 0 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDMike Holmes 27 286 10.6 0 Prince-Tyson Gulley 25 565 22.6 0Steve Rene 3 6 2.0 0 Dorian Graham 16 392 24.5 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGDaniel Thomas #25 12/12 276 1519 24 1495 16 5.4Collin Klein #82 9/2 75 484 54 430 6 5.7William Powell #685 9/0 23 251 1 250 4 10.9Carson Coffman #76 11/10 102 297 166 131 9 1.3PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTCarson Coffman #76 11/10 240 154 64.2 1832 12 7Collin Klein #82 9/2 18 11 61.1 138 1 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGAubrey Quarles #74 12/8 47 685 14.6 5 67Chris Harper #17 12/6 20 274 13.7 3 38Tramaine Thompson #154 7/6 19 258 13.6 0 73Adrian Hilburn #186 12/1 23 215 9.3 1 35PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Ryan Doerr #28 12 54 2262 41.9 33 39.8(t) 0 17KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGJosh Cherry #4 11 43-43 1-2 3-3 3-3 0-0 7-8 48Anthony Cantele #281 2 6-7 0-1 1-1 0-0 0-0 1-2 35POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTDB David Garrett #200 12/11 86 3 10 9 1S Tysyn Hartman #82 12/11 76 0 1 1 2LB Alex Hrebec – 10/10 74 0 2 9 0FS Ty Zimmerman #657 12/11 69 0 4 3 3LB Jarell Childs #103 12/7 53 0 1 1 0LB Tre Walker #104 12/2 47 1 1 0 1LB Blake Slaughter #1663 11/4 47 2 0 0 0DB Terrance Sweeney #471 12/12 42 0 1 9 2DE Brandon Harold #84 12/8 41 2 5.5 2 0DE Prizell Brown #119 12/12 38 5 2 5 0FS Emmanuel Lamur #211 11/3 37 1 1 2 1DB Stephen Harrison – 12/10 36 1 1.5 12 2PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDTramaine Thompson 13 96 7.4 0 WILLIAM POWELL 21 726 34.6 1Tysyn Hartman 4 41 10.2 0 Aubrey Quarles 15 388 25.9 1

OL 1/2 -

DL - 4

LB - 41/2

DB - 1/2

ARMED FORCESBOWL

HC Jones is now 5-1 SU and 4-2 ATS in bowls while Ellerson is in his 2nd yr coaching IA.SMU gets the edge for playing at home but Army will have its share of support.SMU physical RB vs small DL. Held Navy to 337 and these are best WR’s Army has seen.Army loaded w/plyrs from TX and this is the Armed Forces Bowl.

CCH - 44

Turf/ - 44

MTCH - 444

INT 44 -

These two last met in ‘67 (Army leads series 2-0) as Army left CUSA after the ‘04 ssn while SMU joined in ‘05. The Black Knights accomplished a major goal as they are back in a bowl for the 1st time S/’96 (lost to Aub in the Independence Bowl). This is Ellerson’s first bowl as a HC. The Mustangs were also lacking in the postssn until LY’s trip to the Hawaii Bowl where they destroyed Nevada as a 12’ pt dog. Prior to LY the Mustangs had not been in a bowl S/’84 however HC Jones does have postssn experience going 4-2 SU (3-3 ATS) with Hawaii. Army has 12 Sr’s among 16 upperclassmen starters while the Ponies have 4 Sr’s with 15 upperclassmen. Army took on 5 bowl caliber squads going 0-5 SU (0-5 ATS) being outscored 35-21 and outgained 371-301. SMU took on 7 going 2-5 SU (3-4 ATS) being outscored 29-23 despite outgaining those foes 382-370. They had 2 common opp TY (Tulane and Navy) with the Knights and Mustangs both beating Tulane: Army (+1) 41-23 and SMU (-8) 31-17. Both lost to Navy: SMU (+1’) blew a 14-0 HT lead in a 28-21 loss. Army (+7’) lost 31-17 despite a 337-325 yd edge as they all’d a 98 yd FR TD just before HT (14 pt turnaround). Army’s option hit its stride in the 2nd ssn under Ellerson. They scored their most points in a ssn S/’96 when they last went to a bowl. LY QB Steelman became the 1st frosh QB to start the opener for Army in the modern era. He was the tm’s leading rusher in ‘09 but is #2 TY as they added FB Hassin (originally at AF) who has a shot at breaking the 1,000 yd barrier here. Army’s receivers are mostly extra blockers but WR Barr is avg 15.4 ypc and has 3 of Army’s 7 receiving TD’s. The OL is a big part of the Knights off but they avg just 6’2” 269. However, this a veteran line that has four 12 gm st’rs with 4 Sr’s led by C Peterson. Army has our #86 off and #72 D. HC Ellerson invented the “Desert Swarm” def when he was DC at AZ and brings the same attacking philosophy here that takes advantage of Army’s small but fast players. The DL is on the small side avg (6’1” 248) and is led by Army’s all-time sack leader DE McNary. The DL accounted for 18 of Army’s 23 sks. They are all’g 142 ypg rushing (4.2). The LB unit is led by Sr Anderson (#1 tkl’r and #2 in tfl). Army’s secondary has our #67 pass D ranking all’g 191 ypg (56%) with a 20-12 ratio led by FS Travis who has 5 int. Army has our #55 spec tms but they avg just 7.1 on PR’s and 19.5 on KR’s. The Mustangs’ Run n’ Shoot off has been more balanced in each of the L/2Y as they avg’d 27 ppg and 415 ypg and have our #68 ranking. After starting the L/6 (‘09), QB Padron finished his 1st full ssn as the st’r in solid form leading SMU to the CUSA West Title. A year after the speedy Shawnbrey McNeal became HC Jones’ first 1,000 yd rusher, Line became the 2nd RB to accomplish that feat but in different fashion as he was extremely tough up the middle getting plenty of yac. The WR corps consists on 2 gamebreakers in deep-threat Robinson and possession rec Beasley who joined Robinson as a 1,000 yd receiver in the CUSA Title gm. The OL (6’3” 295), led by 3Y starting LT Beachum paved the way for 141 ypg (4.8) while all’g 32 sks (6.6%). The Mustang D has our #52 ranking, all’g 26 ppg and 362 ypg. The DL avg 6’6” 282 led by the 3 man unit of Hunt, Frazier and Thompson. The group all’d 141 ypg (3.7) rush while recording 13.5 of the tm’s 28 sks. The LB corps was the strength of the unit with Reed, Fleps and Davis all earning All-CUSA honors. The secondary has our #53 pass D ranking as they allow 222 ypg (60%) with an 18-10 ratio. HC Jones mentioned that CB Moore had NFL potential but his Sr ssn was full of inj’s (missed 5). The Mustangs have our #95 ST ranking led by K/P Szymanski who did miss some time at the EOY (leg) but should be a full go here. SMU avg’d 22.3 ypr on KR and 4.8 ypr on PR while all’g 24.8 ypr on KR and 5.1 ypr on PR. June Jones has taken the Mustangs from B2B one win seasons to 8 wins LY and playing for the CUSA Championship TY. They have struggled in the favorites role this year but he showed LY just how well he can prep his team with the extra bowl time. This is a great matchup as they played Navy each of the L/3Y and have improved vs the option having only all’d 337 yds this year. It is fantastic to see Army in a bowl game but, truth be told, it was vs a very watered-down sked TY. They have not seen this type of offensive fire power and the extra prep time won’t help them in this matchup. FORECAST: SMU by 17 RATING: 3★ SMU

Crowd

QB - 44

KNIGHTS ATS: 5-7 O/U: 8-4

ARMY SMU ARMY SMU ARMY SMU

RB - - WR - 44

ST 4 - SCH - 44

OVERALL -

Army avg 6-2 269, 4 Sr, 7 sk all’d (5.3%), 4.5 ypc.SMU avg 6-3 295, 0 Sr, 32 sk all’d (6.6%), 4.8 ypc.Army avg 6-1 248, 3 Sr, 18 of tm 23 sk, 4.2 ypc.SMU avg 6-6 282, 0 Sr, 13.5 of tm 28 sk, 3.7 ypc.Anderson #1 tkl’r w/94, 10.5 tfl, Erzinger #2, 4.5 tfl.Reed #1 tkl’r w/133, 4.5 tfl, Fleps #2 w/116, 6.5 tfl.Army #67 pass eff D, 191 ypg (56%), 20-12 ratio.SMU #53 pass eff D, 222 ypg (60%), 18-10 ratio.

SMU

by 12' 4’s

ARMY (6-6)

SMU (7-6)

ARMY SMU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 30, 2010 • 12:00 pm ESPN • Gerald J Ford Stadium • Dallas, TXPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.ARMY 213 65 22 1.1 4 91.7SMU 122 280 26 2.5 – 96.8

ARMY SMU

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGZACH LINE #341 13/11 227 1420 29 1391 10 6.1Kyle Padron #134 13/13 96 407 153 254 4 2.6Chris Butler #361 13/1 33 191 9 182 0 5.5Darryl Fields #143 10/0 8 30 2 28 0 3.5PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTKyle Padron #134 13/13 474 279 58.9 3526 29 12JJ McDermott #366 4/0 4 2 50.0 33 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGALDRICK ROBINSON #254 13/13 60 1225 20.4 13 82Cole Beasley #211 13/13 84 1036 12.3 6 49Darius Johnson #218 12/9 69 693 10.0 5 50Bradley Haynes #177 13/10 34 317 9.3 3 25Zach Line #341 13/11 15 158 10.5 0 19Keenan Holman #390 11/3 6 66 11.0 1 15Patrick Fleming #237 8/4 8 52 6.5 1 14PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Matt Szymanski #76 12 51 2109 41.4 5 34.9(t) 0 14KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGMatt Szymanski #76 12 30-30 4-4 1-1 1-3 1-2 7-10 61POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Taylor Reed #361 13/13 133 2 2.5 1 0LB Pete Fleps #397 13/13 116 0.5 6 3 0FS Chris Banjo #261 13/12 83 0 4.5 6 2LB JA’GRED DAVIS #299 13/12 82 9 6 2 0LB Youri Yenga #252 13/13 81 2 2 6 0CB RICHARD CRAWFORD #167JC 13/13 56 0 2 8 4DL Marquis Frazier #61 13/11 46 2.5 0 1 0DL Margus Hunt – 13/12 44 3 3.5 2 0SS Ryan Smith #456 11/11 44 0 0 2 2DE TAYLOR THOMPSON #48 13/13 32 4.5 1 2 0CB Sterling Moore #260JC 8/7 24 1 2 8 2S Justin Sorrell #196JC 12/2 19 0 1.5 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDDarius Johnson 10 33 3.3 0 Darryl Fields 32 799 25.0 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGJARED HASSIN #391 12/11 173 941 10 931 9 5.4Trent Steelman #245 12/12 187 809 115 694 11 3.7Patrick Mealy #154 12/10 90 426 13 413 2 4.6Malcolm Brown #430 8/8 57 325 13 312 3 5.5Brian Cobbs – 12/5 48 307 16 291 5 6.1Raymond Maples #321 9/1 45 218 8 210 1 4.7PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTTrent Steelman #245 12/12 126 69 54.8 965 7 3Max Jenkins #95 7/0 5 1 20.0 20 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGAustin Barr #495 12/10 14 215 15.4 3 39Davyd Brooks #495 12/11 13 208 16.0 1 41Jared Hassin #391 12/11 12 154 12.8 0 28George Jordan – 12/3 15 148 9.9 0 19PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Jonathan Bulls – 12 50 1961 39.2 4 36.8 0 20KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGAlex Carlton #61 12 40-40 4-4 3-5 7-10 0-2 14-21 49POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB STEPHEN ANDERSON #485 12/12 94 0.5 10 5 1S Steve Erzinger #450 12/12 71 1.5 3 5 0FS DONOVAN TRAVIS #540 12/10 53 0 0.5 6 5S Donnie Dixon #540 12/11 45 1 4.5 5 1DL Jarett Mackey #414 12/12 45 4 2.5 0 0DE JOSH MCNARY #500 12/12 43 9.5 2.5 2 0DE Marcus Hilton #500 12/9 36 2 1 0 0S Jordan Trimble #540 12/4 35 0 1.5 2 1LB Chad Littlejohn #391 12/7 30 0.5 2.5 0 0CB Josh Jackson #540 12/9 29 0 0 2 0NG Mike Gann #495 12/12 27 2 6 0 0CB Antuan Aaron #540 7/6 27 1 0 2 0LB Kingsley Ehie #400 12/0 25 0 1 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJosh Jackson 18 132 7.3 0 Josh Jackson 26 523 20.1 0

MUSTANGS ATS: 5-7-1 O/U: 6-7

16

Page 17: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL - 1/2

DL - 44

LB - 4

DB - 44

HOLIDAYBOWL

Pelini is 3-0 SU/ATS in bowls but Sarkisian has knocked off USC twice as DD dogs. Neb fans travel to any venue but the Huskers were in the same bowl last year.Neb wants to run the ball on offense and Washington’s D all’s 4.9 ypc.UW embarrassed at home TY, DD dog, and they’re a 6-6 AQ tm.

CCH - 4

Turf/ - 41/2

MTCH - 4

INT 44 -

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGRoy Helu Jr #98 13/12 177 1252 41 1211 11 6.8Taylor Martinez #99 12/11 148 1129 187 942 12 6.4Rex Burkhead #39 13/1 160 934 22 912 7 5.7Cody Green #21 8/2 34 121 23 98 1 2.9Dontrayevo Robinson #82 8/0 24 77 10 67 0 2.8Zac Lee #13 5/0 15 57 0 57 0 3.8PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTTaylor Martinez #99 12/11 187 109 58.3 1578 9 6Cody Green #21 8/2 48 30 62.5 295 3 1RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGNiles Paul #7 11/11 39 516 13.2 1 33Brandon Kinnie #47JC 13/11 42 473 11.3 5 55Kyler Reed #89 13/9 20 364 18.2 7 79Mike McNeill #29 13/4 18 313 17.4 1 64Rex Burkhead #39 13/1 13 136 10.5 0 31PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Alex Henery #12 13 63 2763 43.9 13 37.3 0 26KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGAlex Henery #12 13 53-53 5-5 3-3 8-8 2-3 18-19 53POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB LAVONTE DAVID #6JC 13/13 145 6 8 10 0S DeJon Gomes #32JC 13/13 93 1 3 7 3DL JARED CRICK #109 13/13 63 9.5 6.5 2 0DL Cameron Meredith #59 13/13 60 1.5 6.5 1 0CB PRINCE AMUKAMARA #73 13/13 58 1 0 13 0DL PIERRE ALLEN #112 13/13 57 3.5 6.5 2 0DL Baker Steinkuler #1 13/13 46 3.5 0.5 2 0DB ERIC HAGG #122 13/13 46 1 2 4 5S Austin Cassidy #169 13/6 41 0 0 0 1S PJ Smith #121 13/3 38 0 0 1 3S Courtney Osborne #297 13/4 35 1 4 0 1S Rickey Thenarse #49 10/5 34 0 1 1 1PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDNILES PAUL 14 160 11.4 0 Niles Paul 16 403 25.2 1

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGChris Polk #18 12/12 226 1287 49 1238 8 5.5Jesse Callier #93 12/3 73 442 18 424 0 5.8Jake Locker #8 11/11 101 456 154 302 5 3.0Keith Price #87 7/1 16 49 34 15 0 0.9PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTJake Locker #8 11/11 316 179 56.6 2209 17 9Keith Price #87 7/1 37 19 51.4 164 2 0 RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJermaine Kearse #27 12/11 62 1001 16.1 12 66D’Andre Goodwin #326 12/7 42 500 11.9 4 80Devin Aguilar #47 10/6 28 352 12.6 2 44Chris Polk #18 12/12 20 158 7.9 0 25Cody Bruns #84 12/0 7 102 14.6 0 43Jesse Callier #93 12/3 18 98 5.4 0 15Jordan Polk #82 7/1 7 94 13.4 0 25Marlion Barnett #29 9/4 4 31 7.8 0 10PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Kiel Rasp #34 11 65 2861 44.0 10 36.0(t) 0 21KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGErik Folk #32 12 31-31 4-4 4-4 2-4 2-5 12-17 54POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB MASON FOSTER #404 12/11 151 4.5 6.5 2 0S Nate Williams #113 12/12 100 3.5 3.5 4 0LB Cort Dennison #500 11/11 88 2 6.5 3 2LB Victor Aiyewa #540 12/11 77 3.5 14.5 3 0S Nathan Fellner #99 12/12 75 0 1.5 8 4CB Desmond Trufant #101 12/12 46 0.5 1 4 1DL Hau’oli Jamora #186 12/6 45 2 3 1 0DL Alameda Ta’amu #22 12/12 37 0.5 3.5 1 0CB Quinton Richardson #47 12/12 34 0 2 8 2DL Everrette Thompson #30 12/12 32 1.5 3.5 1 0DL Talia Crichton #183 6/6 12 2 1 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDCody Burns 16 63 3.9 0 Jesse Callier 29 671 23.1 0

The Huskies benefitted from a collapse by Cal and a late GW TD drive vs WSU to sneak into the postssn but now faces a NU tm which destroyed them in Seattle back in Sept, a gm in which QB Locker hit just 4-20 passes in the 56-21 loss (+3). Neb leads the series 4-3-1 SU (3-2 ATS). NU began its final B12 ssn 5-0 and ranked in the Top 5 of both polls before being upset by nemesis Texas. Neb lost 2 of its L/3 incl blowing a 17-0 lead in the B12 Championship gm to return to San Diego for a 2nd straight ssn after the Alamo and Insight Bowls surprisingly passed them up. NU (-2’) destroyed AZ 33-0 here LY and is 1-1 SU/ATS all time in this gm. UW is in its 1st bowl since the ‘02 Sun Bowl (23-60 record from ‘03-’09). In the post-Tom Osborne era NU is 6-4 SU/ATS in bowls (HC Pelini 3-0 SU/ATS). Incl USC, the Huskies faced 8 bowl caliber tms going 2-6 SU/ATS being outscored 37-19 and outgained 451-332. NU went 4-2 SU/5-1 ATS vs bowl foes outscoring them 35-21 and outgaining them 452-360. UW boasts 7 Sr st’rs among 15 upperclassmen while Neb has 9 Sr’s and 15 upperclassmen. UW has our #41 off avg 22 ppg and 364 ypg. QB Locker was unable to carry through on his preseason Heisman hype while also slipping on many NFL Draft boards after being proj #1 overall to begin the yr. In Locker’s defense, he was nicked-up with inj’s at the beginning of the yr and dealt with a broken rib at the EOY (DNP vs Oreg). While Locker struggled, RB Chris Polk posted his 2nd consec 1,000 yd ssn. Polk was assisted in the backfield by true Fr Callier who was forced to burn his RS after inj. Locker’s #1 target all ssn long was WR Kearse who actually doubled up #2 WR Goodwin in rec yds. TE’s Izbicki and Barnett were relegated to more of a blocking role. The OL avg 6’5” 293 and paved the way for 164 rush ypg (4.6) while all’g 24 sks (6.7%). With inj’s and inconsistency UW started 6 diff OL lineups. The UW def (#56) had some issues of its own as they all’d 31 ppg and 401 ypg. The DL (6’4” 277) surrendered 199 rush ypg (4.9) with just 9 of the tm’s 23 sks (39%). The LB unit was led by Sr Foster who finished 2nd in the nation in tkls. The secondary, led by S Williams all’d 202 ypg (61%) with a 14-11 ratio. The group posted our #59 pass eff D ranking but with the tm’s struggles to contain the run, many opp opted to stay on the ground rather than attacking via the air. The Huskies have our #92 ST’s and had to start with a walk-on punter for the final 10 gms of the yr after Mahan tore his ACL. QB Martinez’s speed and ability to run the option gave NU a weapon they hadn’t had at the position since Osborne retired. When Martinez set a NU QB rush record vs K-St there was Heisman talk but that quieted when he was benched in the Texas loss. Martinez rebounded with a career high passing gm vs OSU and MO’s overpursuit of him opened rush lanes for Helu who ran for 307. Martinez inj’d an ankle vs the Tigers and wasn’t the same the rest of the yr and neither was the Huskers offense which finished #26. Martinez virtually missed 2 gms (ISU and CU), was instructed not to take contact vs KU, was reinj’d vs A&M and NU used the Wildcat extensively in its L/2 as Martinez struggled vs the Sooners hitting 12-24 for 143 with an int and being sk’d 7x. Pelini said he expects Martinez to return to the program in ‘11 despite constant transfer rumors. All-B12 IB Helu and #2 Burkhead, who is the Wildcat QB, both ran for 100 vs the Huskies (along with Martinez). Top WR Paul (foot) missed the L/2 and is ? here. The OL (6’4” 302) allowed 24 sks (9.2%). The Huskers D finished #5 led up front by All-B12 DL Crick and Allen. After Aug inj’s JC LB David stepped in and was named the B12’s Def Newcomer of the Yr. NU went to a 4-2-5 “Peso” base to get the versatile Hagg on the field on every play. While it helped vs the pass (#1 pass eff D all’g 160, 50%, 13-19), it made NU vulnerable vs the run (#52 FBS all’g 144, 3.8). The secondary is anchored by Top 10 NFL pick CB Amukamara. The ST finished #5 led by 1 of the nation’s most powerful legs in P/K Henery who hit 10-11 FG from 40+. NU had both KR and PR TD’s but did allow a generous 10.2 on PR and 23.8 on KR. This is the only rematch of a regular season gm TY and UW was embarrassed at home in a gm that was Nebraska QB Martinez’s coming out party. We’ll side with the loser of the first game who is now a DD underdog and has a healthy QB Locker for one of the few times this season. This is Washington’s first bowl in 8 years so they will be thrilled while Nebraska is making an appearance in the Holiday Bowl for the 2nd straight season. Remember at the beginning of the year, Locker was projected to be the #1 overall draft choice and it would be no surprise if he finishes the season with a dynamic ending. FORECAST: Wash (+) Neb by 3 RATING: 2★ WASHINGTON (+)

Crowd

QB 1/2 -

HUSKIES ATS: 5-7 O/U: 7-5

UW NU UW NU UW NU

RB - 1/2 WR 1/2 -

ST - 441/2 SCH 44 -

OVERALL -

UW avg 6-5 293, 2 Sr, 24 sk all’d (6.7%), 4.6 ypc.NU avg 6-4 302, 3 Sr, 24 sk all’d (9.2%), 5.7 ypc.UW avg 6-4 277, 0 Sr, 9 of tm 23 sk, 4.9 ypc.NU avg 6-5 276,1 Sr, 19 of tm 31 sk, 3.8 ypc.Foster #1 tkl’r w/151, 11 tfl, Aiyewa #4, 18 tfl.David #1 tkl’r w/145, 14 tfl, next LB #14 overall.UW #59 pass eff D, 202 ypg (61%), 14-11 ratio.NU #1 pass eff D, 160 ypg (50%), 13-19 ratio.

NEBRASKA

by 7 4’s

WASHINGTON (6-6)

NEBRASKA (10-3)

UW NU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 30, 2010 • 10:00 pm ESPN • Qualcomm Stadium • San Diego, CAPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.WASHINGTON 182 140 16 1.8 – 107.7NEBRASKA 253 160 33 1.8 4444 100.7

UW NU

HUSKERS ATS: 7-6 O/U: 7-6

OL - -

DL 1/2 -

LB 4 -

DB - 1/2

MUSIC CITYBOWL

Derek Dooley only in his 2nd bowl while Butch Davis is in 3rd here and is 5-1 ATS overall.Tenn thrilled to be here and the Volunteer Nation stretches across Tennessee.Rush #’s even on both sides of the ball and sack #’s are very close.UT needed 4 str wins to get here and is now a 6-6 AQ tm.

CCH 44 -

Turf/ - 441/2

MTCH - -

INT - 1/2

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGJohnny White #84 9/8 130 763 43 720 7 5.5Shaun Draughn #128 11/1 106 500 23 477 5 4.5Anthony Elzy #52 11/3 72 308 12 296 2 4.1TJ Yates #119 12/12 75 187 236 -49 2 -0.7PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTTJ Yates #119 12/12 383 259 67.6 3184 18 8Bryn Renner #20 3/0 2 1 50.0 14 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGDwight Jones #13 12/11 57 895 15.7 4 81Anthony Elzy #52 11/3 25 338 13.5 2 52Zack Pianalto #41 6/6 30 311 10.4 1 46Jheranie Boyd #8 12/1 14 310 22.1 3 97Erik Highsmith #166 12/8 24 309 12.9 2 52Johnny White #84 9/8 24 288 12.0 0 51PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20CJ Feagles #13 11 39 1439 36.9 8 31.1(t) 0 8KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGCasey Barth – 12 35-35 9-9 5-7 2-3 0-0 16-19 49POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Zach Brown #224 12/4 68 0 0.5 0 2LB Kevin Reddick #59 12/12 66 1 4 4 2LB Bruce Carter #96 11/10 57 2.5 1 2 1DL QUINTON COPLES #23 12/11 53 8.5 5.5 2 0LB Quan Sturdivant #69 7/6 49 2 4.5 1 0DB Deunta Williams #30 8/8 47 0 2 3 0DL Tydreke Powell #16 12/12 45 2.5 0.5 1 0DL Donte Paige-Moss #5 12/11 43 5.5 5.5 1 0DB Da’Norris Searcy #81 9/8 36 0 2 4 4DB Matt Merletti #254 12/5 36 0 1 4 2DB Tre Boston #142 9/4 32 0 1 4 1DB Kendric Burney #60 5/5 24 0 0.5 2 1DL Jared McAdoo #35 10/3 19 1.5 0.5 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDDa’Norris Searcy 10 85 8.5 0 Da’Norris Searcy 10 257 25.7 0

Tenn meets NC for the 32nd time and holds a 20-10-1 edge (last meeting ‘61). This is their 1st meeting in a bowl. This is the Vols 1st appearance in the nearby Music City Bowl (180 miles) and Orange should dominate the crowd. UT was politicking for the Gator Bowl, but is still happy as they won their L/4 to get here. This is Dooley’s 2nd bowl game as a HC as he led LA Tech to a 17-10 win over NI in the ‘08 Indep Bowl. NC HC Davis is 0-2 SU (1-1 ATS) in bowls with NC but owns a 4-2 record (5-1 ATS) overall in postssn play. Both faced LSU with NC mounting a late comeback but falling 30-24 (missing 13 to susp) and UT losing 16-14 due to a penalty for having too many men on the field. UT was 2-3 SU, but 4-1 ATS on the road TY and 2-4 ATS as a dog. NC was 4-2 SU/ATS on the road TY (2-1 as AF). Both are fielding young tms with UT having just 9 Sr st’rs while NC has 10. Neither impressed vs bowl squads with UT going 1-6 SU (3-4 ATS) losing 33-17 and being outgained 423-322. NC went 3-5 SU (4-4 ATS) being outscored 27-24 but actually outgained those foes 371-365. NC’s season has been highly publicized with susps (and an asst cch change) decimating the lineup and taking NC from a darkhorse Title contender to here. QB Yates stepped up to lead the #60 off. He entered the Miami gm with the FBS’s lowest int % but tossed 2 in the 2H and finished with a 7-7 ratio the L/6. The top 2 RB’s were susp for the 1st gm but White filled in nicely and Draughn ret’d for gm 2 (Houston will RS). The rec corps took a huge hit when Little was ruled permanently inelig, then lost TE Pianalto (CS) 4pl after his 1st TD of the ssn (inj’d after 1st TD of ssn each of L/3Y). The OL avg 6’5” 304 with 2 Sr st’rs. They paved the way for 124 ypg rush (3.6) but all’d 34 sks (8.8%), 30 of which came vs bowl tms. The DL avg 6’5” 271 with 0 Sr’s but this might have been the area hit hardest by the scandal as they lost 2 proj 1st Rd DC’s and their DL cch. The patchwork unit held opps to 139 ypg rush (3.9) while tallying 18.5 of the tm’s 25 sks. LB’s rank #1, 2, 3 in tkls but the unit took a hit as ‘09’s top tkl’r, Sturdivant was only able to play 7. NC ranks #48 in our pass D all’g 205 ypg (60%) with a 19-16 ratio. Top DB Searcy was not cleared to play until gm 4 but still tallied a team leading 8 pd incl an IR TD. Overall NC has our #27 rated D. NC was led by the ACC’s active leader in career FG, Barth, who hit the GW FG vs FSU w/:55 left. The PR unit only has 13 att TY but avg 9.2 ypr while the KR unit avg 20.3 ypr. The PR D all’s 11.0 and has given up 2 TD’s while the KR D all’s 22.6. Their net P avg of 31.1 was #118 in the NCAA which helps account for the Heels #115 ST finish. Dooley took this ragtag bunch and by the end of the yr molded a solid tm following in the footsteps of his dad (Vince) and mentor Nick Saban. Dooley named JC transfer Simms the starting QB coming out of Aug and he started the 1st 8 gms and the Vols sat at 2-6. True frosh Bray started the L/4 and UT swept the board. Bray avg’d 309 ypg (55%) with a 12-4 ratio in the L/4 but only faced 1 bowl tm in that stretch (6-6 UK). RB Poole played tough all yr running behind a very young OL, as he finished #5 in the SEC in rush ypg. WR Moore emerged as the deep threat and has the best ypc of the top 10 WR’s in the SEC. TE Stocker is NFL caliber and helped out more with the blocking TY due to the OL’s inexperience. The OL avg 6’5” 310 with only 1 Sr st’r and 3 true frosh st’rs. UT all’d 37 sks (9.9%) with 116 rush ypg (3.7) and finished last in both categories in the SEC. Overall UT has our #59 off and #40 def. The DL lost 3 key players in Aug and it took a while to recover. The DL starters avg 6’4” 263 with 265 lb USC transfer Malik Jackson converting from DE to start at DT the L/7. The LB’s are led by MLB Reveiz who is a finalist for the Burlsworth Trophy (top walk-on). UT ranks #25 in our pass D rankings all’g 229 ypg (57%) with a 13-17 ratio. Starting CB Evans started 6 but was susp the L/4 gms (CS) which forced SS Waggner to move to CB and gave true Fr and former MLB ply’r Brewer a starting job the L/4. The Vols struggled on ST (#79) as they were unable to find a PR (3.6 avg) who could merely catch the ball without fumbling and PK Lincoln hit 7-7 FG before missing 5 gms w/inj (ret’d L/3). A tumultuous season winds down for NC and this team has impressed playing without numerous NFL caliber players. Tennessee went thru growing pains but the season finished just as we expected with a slow-learning start and then 4 str wins to become bowl eligible. We’ll side with the hotter team playing in their home state and the stadium will have a vast majority of Orange throughout.FORECAST: Tennessee by 3 RATING: 1★ TENNESSEE

Crowd

QB 1/2 -

TARHEELS ATS: 6-6 O/U: 6-6

NC UT NC UT NC UT

RB - 4 WR - 4

ST - 4 SCH - -

OVERALL -

NC avg 6-5 304, 2 Sr, 34 sk all’d (8.8%), 3.6 ypc.UT avg 6-5 310, 1 Sr, 37 sk all’d (9.9%), 3.7 ypc.NC avg 6-5 271, 0 Sr, 18.5 of tm 25 sk, 3.9 ypc.UT avg 6-3 263, 3 Sr, 19.5 of tm 23 sk, 4.1 ypc.Brown #1 tkl’r w/68, Reddick #2 w/66, 5 tfl. Reveiz #1 tkl’r w/94, 6 tfl, Lathers #2, 4.5 tfl.NC #48 pass eff D, 205 ypg (60%), 19-16 ratio.UT #25 pass eff D, 229 ypg (57%), 13-17 ratio.

TENNESSEEby 2' 4’s

NORTH CAROLINA (7-5)

TENNESSEE (6-6)

NC UT CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 30, 2010 • 6:30 pm ESPN • LP Field • Nashville, TNPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.NORTH CAROLINA 111 250 23 2.7 – 102.7TENNESSEE 114 255 23 2.5 44 103.3

NC UT

VOLUNTEERS ATS: 7-5 O/U: 8-4RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGTauren Poole #51 12/12 193 1044 50 994 11 5.2David Oku #9 12/0 42 184 10 174 1 4.1Rajion Neal #45 9/0 37 180 11 169 0 4.6Da’Rick Rogers #4 12/3 14 133 9 124 0 8.9Tyler Bray #17 8/4 15 12 85 -73 0 -4.9PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTTyler Bray #17 8/4 179 98 54.7 1537 14 7Matt Simms #20 11/8 195 113 57.9 1460 8 5RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGDenarius Moore #53 12/12 43 912 21.2 9 64Gerald Jones #2 9/9 46 507 11.0 3 37Justin Hunter #14 12/2 15 407 27.1 6 80Luke Stocker #55 12/12 34 359 10.6 1 32Zach Rogers #71 11/0 13 202 15.5 1 72PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Chad Cunningham #8 12 58 2443 42.1 14 36.3 0 16KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGDaniel Lincoln #48 11 24-25 2-3 3-3 5-5 0-0 10-11 49Michael Palardy #5 10 13-14 1-1 4-4 0-1 0-1 5-7 39POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Nick Reveiz – 12/12 94 0 6 0 2LB Herman Lathers #91 11/11 68 2.5 2 1 0FS Janzen Jackson #27 12/12 65 1 3 5 4LB LaMarcus Thompson #167 12/11 55 0 3.5 3 1DB Prentiss Waggner #52 12/12 54 0 2 4 5DL Malik Jackson #54 12/11 46 5 6 3 1CB Marsalis Teague #17 10/7 44 0 0.5 8 0CB Eric Gordon #40 12/6 43 0 1.5 1 2DE Chris Walker #38 12/12 43 3 3 1 0LB Austin Johnson #52 12/0 42 0 3.5 0 1DL Gerald Williams #43JC 12/8 41 3.5 3 1 0SS Brent Brewer #121 12/5 27 0 1 2 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDEric Gordon 6 39 6.5 0 Eric Gordon 14 324 23.1 0

17

Page 18: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL - 4

DL - 4

LB - -

DB - 41/2

SUNBOWL

Although Kelly is 0-3 ATS in bowls, he has the exp and certainly rates the edge vs an interim.UM sold out its allotment of 8K but no question the majority of fans will be rooting for ND.UM rates a little higher on both offense and defense but ND has plenty of skill players. Both tms are disenchanted w/7-5 records and it cost 1 cch his job.

CCH 44 -

Turf/ 44 -

MTCH - -

INT - -

These ‘80’s era rivals both make their first trip to El Paso to face each other for the first time S/’90 which resulted in the quickest sellout in Sun Bowl history. NO leads the all-time series 15-7-1 but UM has won 6 of the L/8, many with Title implications. ND ended its 9 gm bowl losing streak in their last postssn gm, a 49-21 win over Hawaii in the ‘08 Hawaii Bowl and they are 2-8 ATS in their L/10 bowls. Kelly is 2-1 SU/0-3 ATS in bowls. As of presstime OL coach Stoutland will coach this gm with the rest of the staff intact. UM last won a bowl in ‘06 and is 1-3 ATS its L/4. ND should have a solid crowd edge although UM sold its allotment of 8,000. Incl USC ND went 6-5 SU/5-4-2 ATS vs bowl elig foes outscoring them on avg 26-21 and outgaining them by 24 ypg. UM went 5-4 SU/4-5 ATS vs bowl elig foes outscoring them on avg 26-22 (+81 ypg). UM fielded a young squad as 20 frosh saw the field TY (still 18 upperclassmen st’rs) while ND has 15 upperclassmen incl 7 Sr’s. Both tms ply’d Pitt TY as UM covered as an AF (-3’) 31-3 and ND won 23-17 as a 6 pt HF. ND went into the yr with just 1 non-true Fr scholarship QB in Crist. After Crist tore his patella vs Tulsa, Rees was forced into the lineup leading ND to 3 str wins. This is the 1st time S/’71 that the ND RB’s haven’t had a 100 yd gm as leading rusher Wood became the st’r after Allen underwent career ending surg as ND lost its #1 QB and #1 RB for the 1st time in a season S/’66. To make matters worse top TE Rudolph only ply’d in the 1st 6 before being KO’d. #2 rec Riddick missed 4 of L/5 (inj) but ply’d in the finale. Four of the 5 OL started every gm and the OG play improved when they moved back to a 3 pt stance. ND (6’4” 307, 2 Sr) all’d 20 sk (4.4%) although they finished just #96 NCAA in rush off. ND finished with our #46 off and #18 D. Despite losing their top player NT Ian Williams (knee, CS), ND all’d 2 TD in their L/4 and held B2B opp (Utah & Army) without a TD for the 1st time since the ‘88 National Champ ssn. The 22 pts all’d in the L/3 is the fewest in a 3 gm stretch S/’93. The leading tkl’r is LB Te’o. ND is #34 in pass eff D (206, 62%, 9-14) led by S Smith. Kelly’s L/2 Cincy teams finished #1 and #8 in our ST rankings but surprisingly, ND struggled to find a KR until true Fr Jackson emerged and the unit finished #47. Primary PR Goodman avg’d just 1.4. ND all’d just 6.1 on PR and 19.3 on KR. P Turk was inconsistent but did manage to land 23 inside the 20. The star unquestionably was Groza finalist Ruffer who hit all 15 of his FG att’s. Former HC Shannon spent much of the season defending his QB, Jacory Harris and criticizing his WR’s. Harris suffered a shoulder inj vs Pitt, then admitted he was also playing with a groin inj later in the season (missed 3). Vs UVA he took a nasty hit and was KO’d for the MD gm. Fourth string true Fr QB Morris led the Canes to a couple of wins and remained the st’r despite Harris being cleared. After Morris’ 1st int vs USF, Shannon pulled him and both saw action in the finale. Sr RB Berry improved his stats TY and speedy rFr Miller emerged as a solid #2. Future NFL’er Hankerson became the 1st 1,000 yd rec here S/’02 (Andre Johnson) and passed Michael Irving’s record for TD rec’s in a single ssn. The OL avg 6’5” 321 with 1 Sr st’r and paved the way for 190 ypg rush (4.9) while all’g just 16 sks (4.0%). Overall UM finished with our #22 off and #5 D and the Canes lead the NCAA in tfl. The DL avg 6’4” 289 with 1 Sr st’r led by Bailey (7 sk), Ojomo (5) and Vernon (6). LB’s McCarthy and Spence are the #1 and 2 tkl’rs. UM has our #7 pass eff D all’g 146 ypg (49%) with a 7-16 ratio. 1st Tm ACC Harris locked down the 1 CB spot and he had nearly as many pd as he had passes comp vs him while Hill held down the other CB spot and led the tm with 11 pd. 1st Tm ACC P Bosher handles all K duties and boomed 17 punts of 50+ while also nailing a 51 yd FG at Ohio St (set UM rec’d for consec FG’s). Johnson leads with a 21.1 avg on KR although Miller only has 2 less yds (on 3 less att) and a TD. Benjamin is the top PR but only avg 5.0 ypr although he’s had a PR TD. The Canes allow 21.5 ypr on KR and 8.9 ypr on PR (only avg 4.8 ypr). If you mention Miami, Notre Dame or Brian Kelly, you think of offense. However, times have changed and both tms have been led by defensive units which rank in our top 18. Injuries have plagued Miami and now they expect to be led by their OL coach which would favor a more conservative game plan. ND has not topped 28 pts in their L/5 gms but their D finished on an incredible run holding Utah, Army and USC to 22 total points and an avg of 234 ypg. The Canes have gone 0-6-1 Over/Under to finish the year while the Irish have gone Under 4 straight and we’ll call for another Under here.FORECAST: UNDER 47 Notre Dame/Miami RATING: 2★ UNDER

Crowd

QB - - ND UM ND UM ND UM

RB - 1/2 WR - 1/2

ST - - SCH - -

OVERALL -

ND avg 6-4 307, 2 Sr, 20 sk all’d (4.4%), 4.0 ypc.UM avg 6-5 321, 1 Sr, 16 sk all’d (4.0%), 4.9 ypc.ND avg 6-4 283, 0 Sr, 9.5 of tm 26 sk, 4.0 ypc.UM avg 6-4 289, 1 Sr, 29.5 of tm 37 sk, 4.1 ypc.Te’o #1 tkl’r w/127, 9.5 tfl, Calabrese #4, 5 tfl.McCarthy #1 tkl’r w/106, Spence #2, 100 tkl, 16 tfl.ND #34 pass eff D, 206 ypg (62%), 9-14 ratio.UM #7 pass eff D, 146 ypg (49%), 7-16 ratio.

MIAMI

by 1/2 4

NOTRE DAME (7-5)

MIAMI, FL (7-5)

ND UM CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 31, 2010 • 2:00 pm CBS • Sun Bowl • El Paso, TXPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.NOTRE DAME 151 235 23 3.2 – 103.8MIAMI, FL 129 180 18 3.0 – 102.7

ND UM

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGDamien Berry #37 11/10 181 896 31 865 5 4.8Lamar Miller #15 10/1 103 656 23 633 6 6.1Mike James #58 12/2 66 394 10 384 3 5.8Stephen Morris #99 5/4 20 93 25 68 1 3.4Jacory Harris #7 9/8 29 123 96 27 2 0.9PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTJacory Harris #7 9/8 263 144 54.8 1756 14 12Stephen Morris #99 5/4 120 60 50.0 958 5 8RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGLEONARD HANKERSON #30 12/10 66 1085 16.4 12 79Travis Benjamin #56 12/8 40 699 17.5 3 60LaRon Byrd #44 12/5 37 394 10.6 1 40Aldarius Johnson #9 12/3 15 157 10.5 0 17PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20MATT BOSHER #4 12 55 2434 44.3 17 38.7 0 19KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGMatt Bosher #4 12 35-38 5-5 6-8 0-2 1-1 12-16 51POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Colin McCarthy #38 11/11 106 2 8 1 1LB SEAN SPENCE #35 12/12 100 2.5 13.5 6 0SS Ray-Ray Armstrong #23 12/3 71 0 4.5 3 3FS Vaughn Telemaque #26 12/12 53 0 1 3 3LB Ramon Buchanan #20 12/9 51 0 5.5 0 1CB Ryan Hill #37 12/10 47 0 2 8 3DE Allen Bailey #10 12/12 43 7 4 1 0CB BRANDON HARRIS #8 12/12 42 0 2 8 1DT Micanor Regis #32 11/9 35 3 4 1 1DE Adewale Ojomo #58 12/2 34 5 2.5 1 0DE Oliver Vernon #34 12/10 33 6 4 0 0DT Marcus Forston #2 12/11 31 3 6 1 1SS JoJo Nicolas #90 12/9 31 0 1.5 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDTravis Benjamin 21 106 5.0 1 Storm Johnson 8 169 21.1 0 Lamar Miller 5 167 33.4 1

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGCierre Wood #4 12/5 107 564 42 522 2 4.9Armando Allen #13 8/7 107 534 20 514 2 4.8Robert Hughes #9 12/0 41 220 1 219 2 5.3Tommy Rees #49 8/3 11 18 22 -4 0 -0.4PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTDayne Crist #5 9/9 294 174 59.2 2033 15 7Tommy Rees #49 8/3 135 85 63.0 905 10 8RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGMICHAEL FLOYD #2 11/11 73 916 12.5 10 80Theo Riddick #24 8/7 39 412 10.6 3 37Kyle Rudolph #2 6 /6 28 328 11.7 3 95TYLER EIFERT #24 10/6 23 321 14.0 2 39TJ Jones #187 11/8 22 287 13.0 3 53Robby Toma #109 8/2 14 187 13.4 0 26 PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20BEN TURK 10 12 64 2444 38.2 22 36.1 0 6KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGDAVID RUFFER – 12 34-37 3-3 7-7 4-4 1-1 15-15 50POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB MANTI TE’O #1 12/12 127 1 8.5 2 0S HARRISON SMITH #22 12/12 86 0 0.5 7 4CB Gary Gray #12 12/12 59 0 5 6 1LB Carlo Calabrese #27 10/8 59 2.5 2.5 0 0DE Kapron Lewis-Moore #40 12/12 58 2 0.5 1 0LB DARIUS FLEMING #26 12/12 46 6 4 3 1S Zeke Motta #17 12/7 46 0 1.5 2 1LB Brian Smith #34 12/4 46 1 2.5 5 1DB Robert Blanton #22 12/0 43 1 6 5 1CB DARRIN WALLS #5 12/12 39 0 2 3 4NT IAN WILLIAMS #45 8/8 37 1.5 2 1 1NT Sean Cwynar #13 12/4 32 0 3 0 0DL Ethan Johnson #11 12/12 31 5 1 2 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJohn Goodman 11 15 1.4 0 Bennett Jackson 29 645 22.2 0

HURRICANES ATS: 5-7 O/U: 3-8-1FIGHTING IRISH ATS: 6-4-2 O/U: 3-8-1

OL - 41/2

DL - 41/2

LB 1/2 -

DB - 41/2

CAR CAREBOWL

Swinney has split his 1st 2 bowl gms but we’ll give edge to Holtz who has impressively covered 2 of 3.Charlotte in heart of ACC country and the Tigers will be well supported in the stands.CU has done well vs mobile QB’s.USF struggles vs a powerful RB.At 6-6, CU needs a win to keep this from being a losing ssn.

CCH 4 -

Turf/ - 44

MTCH - 1/2

INT - 4

First meeting. USF is making its 6th str bowl appearance but its 1st under HC Holtz. They are 3-2 SU/ATS all-time but are 0-2 SU/ATS vs BCS tms in bowls being outscored 70-21 (Oreg, NCSt). This is USF’s 2nd trip to the Car Care Bowl losing 14-0 to NCSt in their 1st ever bowl in ‘05. Holtz is 1-3 SU/2-2 ATS in bowls and LY his EC tm (+7’) lost a heartbreaker in OT 20-17 to Ark despite a 393-283 yd edge. Clem is 16-16 all-time in bowls and this is their 6th str bowl (2-3 SU/1-4 ATS) and 1st Car Care Bowl. HC Swinney is 1-1 SU/ATS in bowls beating KY LY 21-13 (-6’). The Car Care Bowl targeted CU due to their fans’ reputation for traveling well and the Tigers should certainly have the crowd edge here as CU is just 130 miles away. Both tms faced Miami (FL) with CU losing 30-21 (outgained 376-311) and USF winning 23-20 in OT despite being outgained 353-294 (3-1 TO edge). CU is 3-6 SU/4-5 ATS vs bowl tms being outscored 19-18 and outgained 327-312 while USF is 2-5 SU/ATS vs bowl tms being outscored 21-15 and outgained 319-274. USF is 3-2 SU/ATS on the road TY winning 2 gms in OT outright as dogs. CU is 1-4 SU/3-2 ATS on the road but their 4 losses were by an avg of 4.3 ppg incl a 27-24 OT loss to #1 Aub. There was great anticipation at USF after Holtz took over in Jan. The Bulls played 6 gms decided by a TD or less (3 wins incl 2 in OT) and captured their 1st ever win over Miami. One sore spot all year was the erratic play of QB Daniels. He has suffered numerous inj’s TY (missed finale) but is expected to return here. Daniels threw 7 of his 12 int vs FL and WV, both gms that were closer than the final suggests. Holtz wanted the RB’s to get more of the carries TY and that comb with Daniels’ inj caused his rush #’s to plummet (-535 yds). RB Plancher stepped up teaming with Murray as a solid RB duo. The WR corps was banged up with ‘09 st’rs Griffin and Love missing the entire yr. Bogan became the top threat with converted QB Landi #2. The OL avg 6’3” 301 with 3 Sr st’rs and paved the way for 149 ypg rush (4.0) while all’g 24 sks (8.1%). Overall USF is #89 on off and #41 on def. The DL starters avg 6’3” 278 with 2 Sr st’rs and all’d 132 rush ypg (3.6) with 17 of the tm’s 28 sks. USF’s sk leader DE Marshall (brkn foot) missed the L/5 gms but could ret here. LB Williams leads the tm in tkls and tfl. USF is #55 in our pass D rankings all’g 188 ypg (59%) with a 16-13 ratio vs a very soft slate of opposing QB’s. USF is #60 in our ST rankings with a low net punt avg (34.4, last in BE) but strong ret specialists with KR Lindsey #2 in the BE in avg and PR Mitchell #4. PK Bonani ret’d from a severe inj TY and was nearly perfect inside the 50 (16-17). CU began the season 3-3 for the 9th time S/’95 and 3rd year in a row. After two easy wins, they faced their toughest test in the entire month of Sept when they traveled to Aub. After punching Aub in the mouth, CU all’d a comeback and fell in OT, which started a streak of 3 str losses. They faced two Top 25 non-conf teams (only ACC tm to do so TY) for the 2nd time S/‘89 and they’re believed to be the 1st tm in the reg ssn to play 2 non-conf teams that played for a conf champ (SC/Aub). The off comes in rated #64. Colorado Rockies #1 DC QB Parker struggled with int TY but mended his rift with Swinney after being benched vs SC and will start the last gm of his career here. RB Ellington was leading the ACC in rush TD’s and all-purp yds when he was inj’d vs NCSt but is OFY. Harper has filled in nicely, putting up 343 yds (5.1) the L/3. Fr Hopkins set CU records for rec’s and rec yds by a frosh. The OL (6’6” 313, 1 Sr) paved the way for 146 ypg (4.1) and all’d 16 sks (4.3%). The DL (6’4” 290) totalled 25.5 of the tm’s 28 sks, led by ACC DPY/Nagurski winner Bowers (15.5). The DL is constantly harassing opposing QB’s, tallying 89 qbh. The LB unit is led by Hawkins. The secondary ranks #20 all’g 192 ypg (52%) with a 16-14 ratio. Top tkl’r McDaniel enters this gm two int away from the CU record. Both CB Brewer and S Hall have IR TD’s TY. The D is ranked #13 overall while the ST’s come in at #9 led by Ray Guy semifinalist P Zimmerman (only ACC P in final 10). They avg 11.0 on PR while the PR D all’s 5.8 ypr and in the last 6 gms allowed 17 yds! (all vs SC in last gm). The KR’s avg 23.6 ypr with 1 TD while the KR D all’s 20.8. There’s a reason Clemson’s last 8 gms have gone Under the total as no Tigers gms have topped 40 pts during that stretch. If Clemson’s offense comes to play, this could become a blowout. USF will have either a young QB or the inconsistent Daniels under C and either could possibly implode vs this front 7. USF had a pair of impressive bowl gms but those were vs MAC and CUSA teams. This year against the two quality D’s of Florida and WV, they were outscored 58-20.FORECAST: Clemson by 8 RATING: 2★ CLEMSON

Crowd

QB - -

BULLS ATS: 5-7 O/U: 4-8

USF CU USF CU USF CU

RB - 4 WR - 41/2

ST - 4 SCH - 41/2

OVERALL -

USF avg 6-3 301, 3 Sr, 24 sk all’d (8.1%), 4.0 ypc.CU avg 6-6 313, 1 Sr, 16 sk all’d (4.3%), 4.1 ypc.USF avg 6-3 278, 2 Sr, 17 of tm 28 sk, 3.6 ypc.CU avg 6-4 290, 1 Sr, 25.5 of tm 29 sk, 3.5 ypc.Williams #1 tkl’r w/68, 9.5 tfl, Barrington #2, 5 tfl.Hawkins #5 tkl’r w/61, 9 tfl, Maye #11 tkl’r.USF #55 pass eff D, 188 ypg (59%), 16-13 ratio.CU #20 pass eff D, 192 ypg (52%), 16-14 ratio.

CLEMSON

by 11' 4’s

USF (7-5)

CLEMSON (6-6)

USF CU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 31, 2010 • 12:00 pm ESPN • Bank of America Stadium • Charlotte, NCPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.USF 123 138 14 1.8 – 99.6CLEMSON 148 198 22 2.1 444 101.3

USF CU

TIGERS ATS: 5-7 O/U: 2-10RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGMoise Plancher #367 12/11 162 769 26 743 4 4.6Demetris Murray #90 10/0 112 546 29 517 4 4.6BJ Daniels #76 11/11 101 387 150 237 4 2.3PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTBJ Daniels #76 11/11 218 123 56.4 1496 9 12Bobby Eveld #200 6/1 75 42 56.0 454 2 3RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGDontavia Bogan #456 11/11 46 670 146 5 64Evan Landi #235 12/12 26 354 13.6 2 51Faron Hornes #475JC 12/0 10 128 12.8 1 70Lindsey Lamar #173 12/4 20 121 6.1 0 14PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20J. Brockhaus-Kann #18 12 61 2318 38.0 22 34.3 0 18KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGMaikon Bonani #36 12 14-15 4-4 8-8 4-5 0-2 16-19 47POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Jacquian Williams #14JC 12/12 68 2.5 7 2 1LB Sam Barrington #162 12/11 61 0 5 2 0LB DeVekeyan Lattimore #109 12/10 60 2 2 0 0CB Quenton Washington #220 12/11 54 0 1 4 0CB Mistral Raymond #435 11/10 52 0 4 7 1LB Sabbath Joseph #388 12/1 43 3 3 3 0SS Jon Lejiste #147 12/11 39 3 3.5 2 1FS Jerrell Young #618 11/10 38 0 1.5 3 3DE David Bedford #46JC 12/12 36 1 3 0 1DE Craig Marshall #217JC 8/7 31 4 4 0 1LB Mike Lanaris #196 12/0 29 0.5 3 0 2DB Kayvon Webster #128 12/3 28 0 1 0 0DT TERRELL MCCLAIN #127 12/12 23 3 1.5 0 0DE Patrick Hampton #252 10/3 20 2.5 4.5 2 0DE Ryne Giddens #7 11/2 19 3.5 2.5 0 1PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDTerrence Mitchell 19 194 10.2 0 LINDSEY LAMAR 30 842 28.1 2

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGJamie Harper #31 12/6 177 783 57 726 6 4.1Andre Ellington #37 9/6 118 718 32 686 10 5.8Roderick McDowell #30 7/0 32 117 16 161 1 5.0Kyle Parker #31 12/12 45 117 97 20 0 0.4PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTKyle Parker #31 12/12 324 185 57.1 2079 12 10Tahj Boyd #8 6/0 40 20 50.0 217 2 2RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGDeAndre Hopkins #23 11/7 43 532 12.4 4 45Jaron Brown #99 11/9 28 384 13.7 3 74Dwayne Allen #6 12/12 31 356 11.5 1 47Jamie Harper #31 12/6 31 308 9.9 3 40Bryce McNeal #13 11/3 19 187 9.8 0 30Marquan Jones #41 12/3 20 146 7.3 0 19PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Dawson Zimmerman #13 12 56 2388 42.6 21 40.9(t) 0 18KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGChandler Catanzaro #28 8 31-31 4-5 3-7 5-7 0-0 12-19 48POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTS DEANDRE MCDANIEL #19 12/12 73 0 5.5 6 4DE Da’QUAN BOWERS #1 12/12 67 15.5 10 2 1S Rashard Hall #246 12/11 63 0 1 3 2CB Marcus Gilchrist #30 12/12 62 0 2 10 1LB Corico Hawkins #50 12/12 61 3 6 0 0DT Brandon Thompson #26 12/10 53 1 6.5 3 0DT JARVIS JENKINS #53 11/11 51 1 8 1 0CB Xavier Brewer #73 12/9 49 0 4.5 8 2DE Andre Branch #381 12/12 49 4 1.5 7 0CB Byron Maxwell #33 12/7 46 0 2.5 7 1LB Brandon Maye #297 8/7 38 0.5 1 1 0DT Rennie Moore #89 12/1 25 2 4 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDMarcus Gilchrist 23 233 10.1 0 Marcus Gilchrist 22 557 25.3 0Jaron Brown 3 52 17.3 0 Andre Ellington 7 238 34.0 1

18

Page 19: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL 1/2 -

DL - -

LB 1/2 -

DB 4 -

CHICK-fil-ABOWL

While FSU Fisher learned from one of the best, Spurrier is on the opposite sideline.SC will not only have the majority of the fans, they just played here in the SEC Champ.Two sack-happy tms who are almost dead even in our off and def rankings.FSU going for 1st 10 win ssn S/’03 but SC was embarrassed.

CCH - 41/2

Turf/ - 44

MTCH - -

INT - 1/2

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGMARCUS LATTIMORE #1 12/12 248 1230 32 1198 17 4.8Brian Maddox #23 13/0 62 350 12 338 2 5.5Stephen Garcia #10 13/13 97 362 154 208 6 2.1PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTStephen Garcia #10 13/13 315 205 65.1 2816 20 11Connor Shaw #47 8/0 33 23 69.7 223 1 2RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGALSHON JEFFERY #13 13/13 79 1387 17.6 9 72Tori Gurley #76 13/13 42 416 9.9 4 25Marcus Lattimore #1 12/12 26 364 14.0 2 48Ace Sanders #156 13/0 24 300 12.5 2 51DL Moore #102 13/11 15 160 10.7 2 20Patrick DiMarco #172 13/12 15 147 9.8 3 26PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Spencer Lanning #85 13 52 2296 44.2 10 37.3 0 18KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGSpencer Lanning #85 13 49-52 3-5 6-6 6-9 1-3 16-23 51POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTCB STEPHON GILMORE #6 13/13 71 3 3 2 2S Antonio Allen #104 11/10 64 2.5 7.5 4 1S DJ Swearinger #85 13/8 62 0 2 5 1SS DeVonte Holloman #21 13/9 61 0 2 3 2LB Josh Dickerson #73JC 13/13 59 0 6.5 0 0FS Akeem Auguste #91 13/9 51 1 2.5 2 0DT Ladi Ajiboye #292 13/13 41 2 3 0 0LB Quin Smith #137 13/0 41 0 2 0 0DE DEVIN TAYLOR #134 13/13 39 7.5 4.5 8 1DE Cliff Matthews #22 13/13 38 4.5 2 1 0DT Travian Robertson #26 13/13 37 4 6 2 0CB Chris Culliver #88 7/7 34 1 1.5 2 0LB Tony Straughter #70JC 13/12 32 0 2 1 0LB Rodney Paulk #53 13/0 32 2.5 1.5 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDStephon Gilmore 9 47 5.2 0 Bryce Sherman 33 675 20.5 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGChris Thompson #29 13/5 109 723 25 698 5 6.4Ty Jones #197 10/0 83 529 9 520 5 6.3Jermaine Thomas #81 12/8 85 522 38 484 6 5.7Christian Ponder #22 11/11 95 344 167 177 4 1.9PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTChristian Ponder #22 11/11 294 183 62.2 2038 20 8EJ Manuel #4 9/2 78 54 69.2 777 3 4RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGBert Reed #107 13/12 56 589 10.5 2 44Willie Haulstead #36 12/4 36 573 15.9 6 41Taiwan Easterling #310 13/12 41 541 13.2 4 47Rodney Smith #47 13/6 30 436 14.5 3 53Beau Reliford #21 13/11 17 198 11.6 1 19PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Shawn Powell #54 13 47 2061 43.9 5 38.4 0 15KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGDustin Hopkins #1 13 51-51 5-5 10-12 1-3 2-4 18-24 55POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Nigel Bradham #4 13/13 93 5 0.5 5 0LB Kendall Smith #21 13/13 91 0 3.5 1 0FS Nick Moody #23 13/11 72 0.5 3 2 1CB Greg Reid #9 13/13 60 0 3 10 3DE Markus White #3JC 13/13 58 8 4.5 1 0CB Xavier Rhodes #75 13/13 55 2 1.5 12 3DE BRANDON JENKINS #41 13/13 55 13 6.5 2 0LB Mister Alexander #72 13/13 51 1 4 1 0DB Mike Harris #43JC 13/0 39 0 0 5 3SS Terrance Parks #47 13/13 39 0 0 5 0DT Everett Dawkins #79 13/7 35 2.5 3.5 0 0NG Jacobbi McDaniel #1 13/13 30 0.5 5 2 1DL Bjoern Werner #143 13/0 19 3 2.5 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDGreg Reid 29 261 9.0 1 Greg Reid 30 724 24.1 0

The Chick-fil-A Bowl will pit the runners-up of the SEC and ACC for the 1st time ever. This is the 19th meeting between these two (1st S/’91, FSU 15-3), but the first time they’ve met in a bowl gm. Although they weren’t the ACC’s top pick in the pressn, big things were exp from FSU TY. They lost two close gms (on a fmbl and a “wide right”) however and had to rely on a MD win over NCSt to get to the ACC Title gm, where they lost to VT. The Chick-fil-A Bowl has had its eye on FSU for awhile, since FSU’s last trip to this bowl was in ‘83 (still playing it outside). This will be HC Fisher’s 1st bowl. The Noles went 7-3 SU but just 4-6 ATS vs bowl tms TY winning by an avg of 29-23 but being outgained 375-364. Spurrier is 7-9 SU/ATS all-time in bowls and just 1-3 SU/ATS at SC. SC is 4-11 all-time in bowls and their L/2 bowls have had embarrassing outcomes with blowout losses to Iowa (31-10) and Conn (20-7) LY. SC ply’d its last gm in this building, another embarrassing blowout loss to Aub in the SEC Title gm (56-17) so this is their chance for redemption. Overall SC has faced an incredible 11 bowl tms TY (Aub 2x) with a 7-4 SU/6-5 ATS record outscoring those tms 33-25 and outgaining them 384-371. SC was 3-3 SU/ATS on the road (6-3 as AF under Spurrier). The Chick-fil-A is expecting its 14th consec sellout and both tms should be well represented as it’s just a 5 hr drive from Tallahassee and 3.5 hr drive from Columbia. For the first time since ‘00 (Chris Weinke), FSU began the season touting a Heisman candidate in Ponder. He bruised a tricep vs Okla, then ended up needing fluid drained from his elbow and only topped 250 pass yds in a gm once TY. He DNP the ACC Title gm, but should be ready to go here after resting his elbow for over a month. FSU’s RB’s were banged up towards the end of the year as Thomas missed the L/3 and Jones was bothered by an ankle sprain. Third Tm All-ACC Haulstead had 20 fewer rec’s than the top guy (Reed) but found the EZ 4 more times. FSU’s OL (6’4” 298, 2 Sr) was only able to start 77% of the gms together. They gave up 25 sks (6.6%) but paved the way for 168 rush ypg (4.8) behind 4x All-ACC Hudson (only 7th 4x All-ACC in conf history). The Noles have our #21 off. FSU’s #20 D leads the NCAA in sks with 46. The DL all’s 128 ypg (3.3) totaling 33.5 of the tm’s sks led by 1st Tm ACC Jenkins’ 13 (T-#3 NCAA). LB’s Bradham and Smith are the tm’s #1 and #2 tkl’rs. The Noles have our #23 pass eff D all’g 221 ypg (58%) with a 16-12 ratio, led by 2nd Tm ACC Rhodes and 3rd Tm ACC Reid. FSU’s #23 ST’s has provided highs (walk-off 55 yd FG vs Clem) and some lows (“wide right” vs NC). PR/KR Reid avg 9.0 on PR with 1 TD and 24.1 on KR (long 55) but has not found the EZ. The PR D allows 7.4 ypr while the KR D allows 21.6. SC earned its 1st berth in the SEC Title gm since joining the league in ‘92 and several major improvements on offense made that possible. First, QB Garcia finally had a more mature attitude and settled down in the pocket making fewer mistakes. Prob the most important improvement was at RB where PS#1 RB Lattimore took over and changed SC’s whole gameplan taking pressure off of Garcia. Suddenly the oft-maligned OL looked better, and SC was no longer scratching for pts like in years past (+11.4 ppg over LY’s 20.6). Soph WR Alshon Jeffery had an outstanding ssn finishing in the top 3 for the Biletnikoff Awd as the NCAA’s top receiver. The OL avg 6’5” 303 with 2 Sr st’rs and thanks in part to Lattimore and in part to new OL coach Elliott improved from 121 rush ypg (3.6) LY to 156 ypg (4.1) TY while allowing 9 less sks (28, 7.9%). Overall the offense is #27 and the defense is #24 in our rankings. The DL avg 6’4” 275 with 2 Sr. It was a disappointing inj-riddled yr for DE Cliff Matthews but he played through his inj’s and the DL only all’d 104 rush ypg (3.2) which was #1 in the SEC. SC also leads the SEC in sks with 39 (+11 from LY). The LB’s lost st’r Wilson after 1 gm but SPUR Allen was a nice surprise with 10 tfl. The secondary was the problem all year other than 1st Tm SEC CB Gilmore who led the tm in tkls. SC is #93 in our pass D rankings all’g 254 ypg (63%) with a 22-9 ratio and was forced to go to a walk-on at times at the other CB spot after ‘09 All-SEC Culliver was lost for the yr in gm 8. The ST are #62 with K/P Lanning solid in both areas but the returns tms are below avg. Fisher has done as expected, bringing the Noles back onto the national stage. They have, however, lost 3 of their L/6 but have to be pleased with a 9 win ssn incl a convincing win over rival Fla while also beating Mia by 28. Spurrier almost saw his dream realized but they were beaten by a better team in the SEC Champ. Instead of expecting a letdown, we feel they’ll bounce back convincingly after being out of that gm early. Rankings-wise, these tms are fairly even but in a close game, we’ll side with the SEC tm almost everyday.FORECAST: S Carolina by 6 RATING: 1★ SOUTH CAROLINA

Crowd

QB - 1/2

SEMINOLES ATS: 7-6 O/U: 5-8

FSU SC FSU SC FSU SC

RB - 1/2 WR - 4

ST 4 - SCH - -

OVERALL -

FSU avg 6-4 298, 2 Sr, 25 sk all’d (6.6%), 4.8 ypc.SC avg 6-5 303, 2 Sr, 28 sk all’d (7.9%), 4.1 ypc. FSU avg 6-2 275, 1 Sr, 33.5 of tm 46 sk, 3.3 ypc.SC avg 6-4 275, 2 Sr, 29 of tm 39 sk, 3.2 ypc.Bradham #1 tkl’r w/93, 5.5 tfl, Smith #2, 3.5 tfl.Allen #2 tkl’r w/64, 10 tfl, Dickerson #5, 6.5 tfl.FSU #23 pass eff D, 221 ypg (58%), 16-12 ratio.SC #93 pass eff D, 253 ypg (63%), 22-9 ratio.

SOUTH CAROLINA

by 3 4’s

FLORIDA ST (9-4)

S CAROLINA (9-4)

FSU SC CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 31, 2010 • 7:30 pm ESPN • Georgia Dome • Atlanta, GAPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.Florida St 119 240 26 2.4 44 103.3S Carolina 146 255 27 2.0 – 105.1

FSU SC

GAMECOCKS ATS: 7-6 O/U: 9-4

OL - 4

DL - 1/2

LB - 4

DB 1/2 -

LIBERTYBOWL

Richt has led the Bulldogs to 4 str bowl wins and covers while O’Leary is 0-3 SU in bowls. UCF will struggle with fans AND may be playing in the cold while the crowd will be dominant with red.UCF’s D is impressive and outside of the CUSA held K-St to 17 pts and NCSt’s Wilson to 10-30.GA disappointed but Richt will not allow a 7th loss and a losing ssn.

CCH - 44

Turf/ - 41/2

MTCH - -

INT - 44

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGWashaun Ealey #3 11/6 141 768 17 751 11 5.3Caleb King #7 8/5 80 455 25 430 2 5.4Carlton Thomas #35 9/1 60 272 18 254 2 4.2Aaron Murray #6 12/12 75 325 162 163 4 2.2Branden Smith #5 8/8 6 46 0 46 0 7.7PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTAaron Murray #6 12/12 304 188 61.8 2851 24 6Hutson Mason #43 4/0 17 9 52.9 102 1 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGAJ Green #3 8/7 49 771 15.7 9 50Kris Durham #34 10/8 29 612 21.1 3 66Tavarres King #6 11/5 23 471 20.5 3 63Orson Charles #2 12/11 24 403 16.8 2 36Aron White #12 12/3 9 125 13.9 0 30Marlon Brown #3 11/0 10 125 12.5 1 31PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Drew Butler #21 12 45 2012 44.7 16 40.6 0 18KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGBLAIR WALSH #5 12 46-47 8-8 5-6 3-5 2-2 18-21 53POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Akeem Dent #82 12/12 122 2.5 4 2 0S Bacarri Rambo #76 12/12 76 0 3 3 3LB JUSTIN HOUSTON #103 12/12 57 10 8.5 2 1LB Marcus Dowtin #34 11/2 57 1.5 3 1 1CB Brandon Boykin #62 12/11 41 1 5.5 3 2LB Christian Robinson #64 12/10 41 2 3 0 0LB Darryl Gamble #53 12/7 39 0 3.5 1 1DL DeAngelo Tyson #3 12/11 35 1.5 2.5 0 0CB Sanders Commings #97 11/8 34 0 0.5 1 3S Shawn Williams #79 12/3 33 0 0 1 0DL Abry Jones #24 12/6 32 0 3.5 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDBranden Smith 10 143 14.3 0 Brandon Boykin 31 787 25.4 1

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGRonnie Weaver #506 13/7 185 946 56 891 11 4.8Jeff Godfrey #32 13/11 142 676 130 546 10 3.8Latavius Murray #43 13/3 93 556 23 533 10 5.7Jonathan Davis #24 11/3 65 251 17 234 1 3.6PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTJeff Godfrey #32 13/11 209 143 68.4 2042 13 6Rob Calabrese #78 5/2 39 25 64.1 316 2 2RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJamar Newsome #705 13/5 34 597 17.6 3 56Brian Watters #275 13/10 41 594 14.5 2 41Kamar Aiken #87 13/12 29 471 16.2 2 60AJ Guyton #42 12/5 28 353 12.6 3 44Quincy McDuffie #537 13/1 12 138 11.5 2 28PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Blake Clingan #66 12 33 1381 41.8 13 35.7(t) 0 13KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGNick Cattoi #77 12 46-49 5-6 4-6 1-5 0-1 10-18 47POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTS KEMAL ISHMAEL #535 13/13 82 0 1 3 2LB Derrick Hallman #234 13/13 81 1 6.5 6 1LB Josh Linam #112 13/13 72 1 7.5 4 0LB Lawrence Young #264 11/11 61 1 8.5 1 0DL BRUCE MILLER #409 13/13 55 7 4.5 2 2CB JOSH ROBINSON #102 12/11 55 0 0.5 12 2LB Chance Henderson #167 11/0 39 0 3 1 0CB Justin Boddie #288 12/11 39 0 0.5 3 0S Reggie Weams #189 12/11 35 0 1.5 2 4DL David Williams #479 13/13 33 2.5 3.5 0 1DL Darius Nall #426 13/0 31 8.5 1 3 0DL Victor Gray #263 13/9 27 1 5 5 0DB AJ Bouye #461 12/1 26 1 2 7 1PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJosh Robinson 17 294 17.3 0 QUINCY MCDUFFIE 26 849 32.7 2

These 2 met one time previously (‘99), a gm in which UCF (+27’) nearly pulled the upset (24-23) in Athens vs a #11 ranked GA squad. This is UCF’s 3rd bowl in 4 ssns (2nd Liberty Bowl). UCF was clearly the most dominant CUSA tm TY going 8-1 incl a win over Mem in this very stadium less than a month ago. UCF HC O’Leary is 2-5 all-time in bowl matchups but does have some history vs GA from his days coaching at GT (3-4 record). UCF has 11 Sr’s among 15 upperclassmen st’rs and has ply’d 5 bowl elig tms going 2-3 SU (3-2 ATS) outgaining those foes by 344-333 ypg (24-24 avg score). GA (14th consec bowl) has played B2B non-BCS/non-NYD bowls after a string of 7 str prestigious bowls. Overall GA HC Richt has gone 7-2 SU, 6-3 ATS in bowls winning and covering the L/4. GA struggled on the road TY with a 1-5 SU/ATS record incl neutral site OT loss to FL. GA has 7 Sr’s among 15 upperclassmen st’rs and has ply’d 8 bowl elig tms going 3-5 SU (2-6 ATS). GA was outgained by a 402-368 margin vs those foes. UCF’s #69 off avg’d 34 ppg and 384 ypg. The biggest story early on however was at QB as true Fr Godfrey took over the starting reins in wk 3 from Calabrese. Godfrey had an All-Conf ssn while Calabrese was still used as a change of pace Wildcat before an ACL inj in Oct. Stanford trans Crow will be Godfrey’s bkup here but saw very little time. Starting RB Harvey tore his ACL and RS leaving the job to the duo of Weaver and Murray who actually surpassed Harvey’s 1,109 mark of LY. While UCF is more run-oriented, three WR’s posted 470+ yds giving the young QB plenty of options. The OL (6’5” 305) is led by 1st Tm CUSA RT Reid who helped pave the way for 193 ypg (4.4) while all’g 20 sks. The Knight def (#39) led CUSA in ttl def as they surrendered 18 ppg and 318 ypg. In fact, the group didn’t allow more than 326 yds over the 1st 7. The DL (6’3” 261) is led by ‘09 DPY Miller and all’d 110 ypg rush (3.4) while accounting for 25 of the tm’s 29 sks. The LB unit is led by 3rd Tm CUSA Young who led the tm in tfl. UCF’s secondary all’d 208 ypg (54%) with a 21-15 ratio finishing with our #13 pass D ranking. The premier player on the unit is CB Robinson who has now earned All-Conf honors in 3 consec ssns. While the off and def have been solid in UCF’s run through CUSA, the kicker pos was a pain in O’Leary’s side all yr as they hit just 10-20 FG’s forcing the Knights to go for it on 4th down a few more times than they wanted. McDuffie finished 2nd in the nation in KR’s while Robinson bolstered the tm’s PR unit finishing #10 in the NCAA. All together UCF finished with our #1 ST ranking. This hasn’t been the typical ssn for GA as they are used to playing on NY’s Day or in BCS bowls and they were lucky to escape with a 42-34 win over rival GT in the finale to land here. RFr QB Murray played surprisingly well finishing #3 in the SEC in pass ypg and #4 in pass eff finishing ahead of veteran QB’s like SC’s Garcia and Miss’ Masoli. The run gm struggled (148 ypg, 4.2) with inj’s and susp to the top 2 Ealey and King. The largest problem on off was that WR Green was susp the 1st 4 gms (sold a jersey) and the tm went 1-3 without him. When he ret’d in gm 5 vs Colo, he wasn’t in gm shape and the altitude also bothered him and he didn’t play the full gm which gave GA its 1st 4 gm losing streak S/’90. With Green healthy, GA went 5-2 to finish the yr and he is #2 in the SEC in rec ypg (96.4) and is expected to leave early and be the 1st WR taken in the ‘11 draft. The veteran OL was shuffled 5x’s during the ssn but settled on the same 5 st’rs for the L/3 gms. The OL avg 6’5” 311 with 2 Sr st’rs and all’d 22 sks (6.9%). Overall the off finished #18. The #27 D adjusted to new DC Grantham’s 3-4 as the ssn went on but all’d 400+ yds off in 4 of their L/5 gms. GA actually all’d 23 more rush ypg than LY (149 ypg) but their ppg all’d went down (from 25.9 ppg in ‘09 to 23.1 ppg TY) for the 1st time in 4 yrs. AA LB Houston leads the SEC in sks and is #2 in tfl per gm. GA is #46 in our pass D rankings all’g 187 ypg (55%) with a 15-14 ratio. The #7 ST unit boasts ‘09 Ray Guy winning P Butler and strong-legged K Walsh with solid return units. There are times to play against an SEC team, especially if they fall to the Liberty Bowl. At 6-6 GA has 2 options: either a positive finish or a losing season, which would put added pressure on HC Richt. The checklist shows the disparity between these tms and while UCF’s D can potentially slow GA, they will not stop them. UCF’s offense has looked impressive but that was vs CUSA opps and on the year they faced 5 defenses in the bottom 20 and found their success without having to face a D rated in our Top 50. FORECAST: Georgia by 21 RATING: 4★ GEORGIA

Crowd

QB - 1/2 UCF GA UCF GA UCF GA

RB - 44 WR - 444

ST - - SCH - 4441/2

OVERALL -

UCF avg 6-5 305, 2 Sr, 20 sk all’d (7.5%), 4.4 ypc.GA avg 6-5 311, 2 Sr, 22 sk all’d (6.9%), 4.2 ypc.UCF avg 6-3 261, 3 Sr, 25 of tm 29 sks, 3.4 ypc.GA avg 6-3 291, 1 Sr, 5 of tm 24 sks, 3.7 ypc.Hallman #2 tkl’r, 7.5 tfl, Linam 8.5 tfl, Young 9.5 tfl.Dent #1 tkl’r, 6.5 tfl, Houston #3, 18.5 tfl!UCF #13 pass eff D, 208 ypg (54%), 21-15 ratio.GA #46 pass eff D, 187 (55%), 15-14 ratio.

GEORGIA

by 16' 4’s

UCF (10-3)

GEORGIA (6-6)

UCF GA CHECKLIST COMMENTS

December 31, 2010 • 3:30 pm ESPN • Liberty Bowl • Memphis, TNPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.UCF 129 140 20 2.0 4 91.8GEORGIA 176 245 34 1.9 – 101.2

UCF GA

GOLDEN KNIGHTS ATS: 10-3 O/U: 5-7-1 BULLDOGS ATS: 5-7 O/U: 9-3

19

Page 20: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

20

1 NOTRE DAME 89 42 67.9% 102 TEXAS A&M 90 44 67.2% 83 S CAROLINA 94 50 65.3% 74 AUBURN 92 52 63.9% 75 FLORIDA 86 49 63.7% 86 LSU 84 48 63.6% 87 ARKANSAS 84 49 63.2% 68 IOWA STATE 85 50 63.0% 99 OKLAHOMA 91 54 62.8% 810 MISSOURI 84 50 62.7% 811 MINNESOTA 83 50 62.4% 812 OREGON ST 83 50 62.4% 613 ILLINOIS 82 50 62.1% 814 CINCINNATI 82 51 61.7% 1015 MIAMI (FL) 82 51 61.7% 816 SAN JOSE ST 88 56 61.1% 917 MICHIGAN 80 51 61.1% 818 ALABAMA 81 53 60.4% 819 LOUISIANA TECH 81 53 60.4% 820 UNLV 88 58 60.3% 821 PURDUE 80 53 60.2% 822 MISSISSIPPI 80 53 60.2% 723 WASHINGTON ST 80 54 59.7% 724 PITTSBURGH 78 54 59.1% 825 FLORIDA ST 85 59 59.0% 826 KANSAS 79 55 59.0% 827 PENN STATE 77 54 58.8% 728 OKLAHOMA ST 78 56 58.2% 829 CALIFORNIA 77 56 57.9% 630 BAYLOR 76 56 57.6% 731 MISS ST. 76 56 57.6% 532 WASHINGTON 77 57 57.5% 633 N CAROLINA 77 57 57.5% 634 IOWA 75 56 57.3% 735 TEXAS TECH 76 57 57.1% 736 COLORADO 77 58 57.0% 737 CLEMSON 76 58 56.7% 838 E CAROLINA 76 58 56.7% 839 NEBRASKA 81 63 56.3% 540 DUKE 73 57 56.2% 941 NC STATE 75 59 56.0% 642 ARIZONA ST 73 58 55.7% 643 TEXAS 74 60 55.2% 744 VIRGINIA TECH 78 65 54.5% 745 WAKE FOREST 72 60 54.5% 746 ARIZONA 72 60 54.5% 547 MICHIGAN ST 71 60 54.2% 648 AIR FORCE 71 60 54.2% 649 C MICHIGAN 72 61 54.1% 850 BOSTON COLLEGE 72 61 54.1% 751 KANSAS STATE 72 61 54.1% 552 BOISE STATE 74 63 54.0% 553 WYOMING 71 61 53.8% 754 OHIO STATE 71 61 53.8% 655 COLORADO ST 73 63 53.7% 656 UTAH STATE 73 63 53.7% 657 USC 77 67 53.5% 558 MARYLAND 70 61 53.4% 659 WEST VIRGINIA 71 62 53.4% 660 UCLA 71 62 53.4% 5

TOUGHEST OPPONENTS BY OPPONENT WIN %

OPP OPP OPP TMS W/ WINS LOSS WIN% WIN REC

OPP OPP OPP TMS W/ WINS LOSS WIN% WIN REC

The above chart shows the combined records of the opponents each team faced. Opponents win percent-age is the sole component of the NCAA’s ranking of toughest opponents faced. Although this is a useful system, it doesn’t really take into account the actual strength of the opponent faced as a team like a ranked South Carolina at 9-4 is the same as facing a 9-4 Miami (OH) and we know that is not accurate. Also if a team played a FCS/IAA opponent such as SE Missouri St which finished 9-3, this system would rate them as tough of an opponent as Alabama. It is interesting to note that even though 7 of the top 8 teams made bowls, 6 of those had a win over an FCS/1-AA team this year. Once again for our toughest schedule rank-ing see the front page, but this analysis can be useful. For our complete ranking of toughest opponents ranked by units faced, see page 23.

On the front page of this edition of Power Sweep we list which teams played the toughest schedules and that is indeed the best method of ranking the strength of opponent played. For comparison's sake, here is a listing of the final records of each team's opponents in 2010. Taking out the team's own record from their opponents’ stats the numbers reflect only how their opponents did against other teams. For example Auburn’s opponents are listed at 92-52 63.9% if you add the Auburn’s record they would be 92-65 58.6%.

TOUGHEST OPPONENTS BY OPPONENT WIN %

61 BYU 72 63 53.3% 662 SMU 76 67 53.1% 563 RUTGERS 69 61 53.1% 864 TENNESSEE 70 62 53.0% 665 STANFORD 70 62 53.0% 566 GEORGIA 70 63 52.6% 567 VIRGINIA 69 64 51.9% 868 MARSHALL 69 65 51.5% 669 CONNECTICUT 67 64 51.1% 770 VANDERBILT 68 65 51.1% 671 NEW MEXICO 68 65 51.1% 672 MEMPHIS 68 65 51.1% 473 USF 66 65 50.4% 774 BOWLING GREEN 67 66 50.4% 775 GEORGIA TECH 67 66 50.4% 576 FRESNO ST 68 67 50.4% 477 SYRACUSE 65 65 50.0% 678 KENT ST 65 66 49.6% 879 NAVY 66 68 49.3% 680 NEVADA 72 75 49.0% 481 TEMPLE 65 68 48.9% 782 HOUSTON 65 68 48.9% 683 WISCONSIN 65 68 48.9% 584 TCU 65 68 48.9% 585 NORTHWESTERN 64 67 48.9% 586 RICE 65 69 48.5% 587 TULSA 64 68 48.5% 588 SOUTHERN MISS 64 69 48.1% 489 HAWAII 70 76 47.9% 590 NEW MEXICO ST 65 71 47.8% 591 BUFFALO 64 70 47.8% 792 UAB 64 70 47.8% 593 ULM 63 69 47.7% 494 OREGON 63 69 47.7% 395 IDAHO 70 77 47.6% 596 E MICHIGAN 63 70 47.4% 697 AKRON 63 70 47.4% 598 LOUISVILLE 62 69 47.3% 699 TULANE 62 70 47.0% 5100 OHIO 62 71 46.6% 5101 INDIANA 61 70 46.6% 6102 SAN DIEGO ST 61 71 46.2% 4103 KENTUCKY 61 72 45.9% 4104 TOLEDO 61 72 45.9% 4105 UTAH 61 73 45.5% 5106 ARMY 60 72 45.5% 5107 ARKANSAS ST 60 72 45.5% 3108 UCF 62 81 43.4% 4109 BALL STATE 57 75 43.2% 5110 W MICHIGAN 57 76 42.9% 4111 FLORIDA INTL 56 76 42.4% 4112 LOUISIANA 56 76 42.4% 3113 MIAMI (OH) 61 83 42.4% 5114 WKU 56 77 42.1% 3115 FLORIDA ATL 55 77 41.7% 3116 N ILLINOIS 57 86 39.9% 3117 TROY 53 80 39.8% 2118 NORTH TEXAS 51 80 38.9% 3119 UTEP 51 81 38.6% 3120 MIDDLE TENN 40 91 30.5% 1

BOWL TEAMS VS BOWL TEAMSBelow is a list of statistical averages for all of this season’s bowl teams when they faced other bowl eligible teams. They are ranked in order of net yard differential. TEAM OFF RUSH RUSH PASS PASS DEF RUSH RUSH PASS PASS TM NET PTS YPG YPC YPG % PTS YPG YPC YPG % ATS YDS

1 Boise St 42.8 175.0 5.00 350.8 70.2 17.0 111.2 3.16 178.8 56.6 4-1 235.82 TCU 40.3 228.2 4.85 255.2 67.5 14.3 103.3 3.85 146.8 45.4 3-3 233.23 Ohio St 30.9 205.3 4.84 185.9 57.9 16.1 125.6 3.72 160.0 56.3 4-2-1 105.64 Arkansas 35.8 147.5 4.40 331.8 67.9 28.1 174.0 4.30 205.6 57.2 7-1 99.65 Nebraska 35.3 277.7 6.24 174.5 59.3 20.7 159.8 4.13 200.3 52.1 5-1 92.06 Auburn 37.6 276.3 5.61 185.6 64.2 26.0 116.9 3.67 253.2 62.3 7-2 91.87 Stanford 34.2 193.2 4.73 274.5 71.1 21.8 139.2 4.61 238.2 60.2 3-3 90.38 Oregon 49.3 289.5 5.93 229.8 61.7 25.3 146.0 4.11 286.3 55.2 4-1-1 87.09 Oklahoma St 42.4 181.4 5.18 354.4 67.1 32.3 155.8 3.85 296.3 64.7 4-3-1 83.810 Oklahoma 36.0 120.5 3.13 340.0 64.1 25.3 186.9 4.76 191.9 56.9 4-4 81.811 Miami, Fl 25.9 191.9 4.77 227.0 53.2 22.1 189.8 4.58 148.3 46.8 4-5 80.812 West Virginia 20.6 139.3 3.45 184.1 60.6 14.0 86.3 2.65 157.7 56.2 5-2 79.413 Alabama 27.4 146.1 4.36 255.5 67.4 17.0 127.6 3.60 205.8 58.2 4-4 68.314 Arizona 30.7 114.6 3.70 323.4 66.9 26.7 162.9 4.10 209.1 57.0 3-3-1 66.015 N Illinois 33.4 219.2 5.17 219.0 66.7 24.4 156.0 5.23 219.4 55.0 3-2 62.816 Michigan St 29.4 164.5 4.65 245.5 67.4 22.3 129.3 3.76 225.9 56.6 6-2 54.917 Wisconsin 37.3 228.5 5.13 193.5 73.0 25.3 157.5 4.40 215.2 61.5 4-2 49.318 Navy* 31.8 352.4 5.89 81.2 54.2 20.8 186.8 5.66 203.6 65.6 4-1 43.219 Texas A&M 27.1 139.6 3.58 282.9 58.6 24.3 121.4 3.41 261.9 63.8 4-3-1 39.320 Air Force 24.3 290.7 5.38 115.0 49.5 23.1 221.1 5.14 158.0 52.4 4-3 26.621 Notre Dame 26.0 117.9 3.93 262.2 58.9 21.3 151.4 4.07 204.6 60.5 5-4-2 24.122 Illinois 28.6 273.3 5.42 118.3 52.9 28.4 141.5 4.16 226.8 60.4 5-3 23.323 NC State 30.6 128.2 3.49 263.1 55.4 26.8 120.6 3.60 248.8 60.7 6-3 22.024 Missouri 29.9 161.4 4.95 254.5 60.5 21.1 173.6 4.51 223.8 57.5 3-5 18.525 Nevada 29.3 221.8 4.77 196.3 57.5 26.3 136.3 4.66 264.5 62.3 2-2 17.326 Pittsburgh 23.1 138.4 4.03 197.7 63.0 21.1 125.8 3.72 194.8 58.2 4-3-2 15.627 Miami, Oh 17.4 87.4 3.10 254.8 61.1 28.6 143.8 4.13 184.2 56.8 3-2 14.228 South Carolina 32.5 155.5 4.22 228.7 63.3 24.7 108.8 3.28 261.9 65.2 6-5 13.529 SMU 22.7 121.1 4.28 261.1 58.4 29.3 150.0 3.82 219.9 63.2 3-4 12.430 UCF 24.2 180.2 4.29 164.2 61.5 23.6 115.0 3.48 217.6 56.3 3-2 11.831 Virginia Tech 33.5 199.6 4.82 189.0 58.7 21.4 158.9 4.74 221.9 54.6 6-2 7.932 Southern Miss 34.3 144.0 3.74 302.3 62.2 40.5 157.5 5.00 281.5 59.7 1-3 7.333 FIU 28.8 201.8 4.83 218.6 59.0 35.2 181.6 5.28 232.0 56.4 2-3 6.834 North Carolina 24.1 101.8 3.10 269.1 64.0 27.0 163.1 4.50 202.1 60.8 4-4 5.635 Georgia Tech 25.4 322.1 5.58 91.9 37.1 30.7 187.1 4.96 222.1 64.7 4-3 4.736 Florida 24.8 147.3 4.04 178.2 60.3 22.9 139.6 3.76 185.6 56.0 4-6 0.337 Michigan 29.5 220.5 5.04 254.0 60.3 37.1 223.9 5.12 254.9 61.1 2-6 -4.338 Louisville 17.3 136.8 3.73 139.7 53.1 17.3 145.2 4.03 136.8 56.3 2-4 -5.539 LSU 24.0 162.4 4.12 162.1 60.5 20.5 138.1 3.65 193.9 58.2 3-5 -7.540 Penn St 19.1 138.0 4.07 223.1 52.6 26.5 202.3 5.01 169.4 64.0 2-6 -10.541 Florida St 28.9 154.0 4.43 209.6 61.6 23.8 145.8 3.74 229.1 57.2 4-6 -11.342 Clemson 18.1 124.1 3.46 187.6 55.0 19.1 132.6 3.58 194.0 50.6 4-5 -14.943 Kentucky 23.4 109.7 3.23 278.1 65.6 31.6 176.3 5.06 226.7 57.8 3-4 -15.144 Boston College 14.6 116.4 3.34 164.0 49.3 22.7 93.7 2.98 208.4 63.5 3-4 -21.745 Iowa 27.1 106.9 3.35 238.0 63.1 20.4 105.1 3.23 261.4 65.8 3-3-1 -21.746 Tulsa 35.0 193.8 4.85 297.3 58.5 40.3 158.0 4.69 363.8 62.0 3-3 -30.747 Georgia 28.9 123.4 3.75 244.4 60.5 29.3 180.5 4.02 221.8 64.9 2-6 -34.548 Texas Tech 25.8 149.3 4.07 305.7 63.3 34.3 182.3 4.91 310.2 65.1 2-4 -37.549 East Carolina 35.0 110.6 4.02 329.4 65.9 47.5 239.8 5.31 237.9 58.4 3-5 -37.650 USF 14.6 143.1 3.88 131.4 49.7 21.1 160.7 4.06 158.3 58.5 2-5 -44.451 Syracuse 14.1 115.1 3.60 160.0 54.2 25.1 145.7 3.82 175.1 57.6 2-5 -45.752 San Diego St 28.2 121.0 5.13 289.4 54.0 30.8 208.0 4.33 254.0 56.9 3-2 -51.653 Hawaii 30.0 67.8 3.32 323.2 62.1 33.4 192.8 4.48 252.0 65.4 4-1 -53.854 Utah 20.0 108.3 3.48 223.7 54.6 28.7 120.0 3.44 275.2 65.4 1-4-1 -63.255 Mississippi St 17.1 181.7 3.89 130.1 52.3 21.4 152.6 3.99 225.6 59.6 3-4 -66.356 Connecticut 16.3 160.4 4.32 131.1 51.1 21.3 177.1 4.49 184.1 62.4 4-3 -69.757 Baylor 29.5 197.2 5.38 266.3 65.9 47.0 186.5 4.89 349.2 74.2 0-6 -72.258 Troy 34.8 132.0 3.97 259.3 65.7 43.8 215.5 5.42 249.0 65.5 2-2 -73.359 Maryland 22.6 94.6 3.41 227.1 58.0 26.5 176.5 3.92 225.5 56.1 5-3 -80.360 BYU 14.7 132.3 3.66 165.0 53.6 26.0 186.3 4.81 197.0 54.8 4-3 -86.061 Army* 22.0 216.0 4.04 75.5 47.7 35.5 174.5 5.06 208.0 60.5 0-4 -91.062 Ohio 21.3 138.0 3.76 111.5 51.9 24.8 88.0 2.65 261.0 63.1 2-2 -99.563 Tennessee 16.6 91.9 2.99 230.4 56.7 32.7 184.3 4.64 238.7 62.5 3-4 -100.764 Washington 19.4 137.6 4.12 194.5 54.2 36.5 228.6 5.40 222.3 65.5 2-6 -118.865 Fresno St 21.5 115.8 3.56 208.0 52.2 39.5 196.0 5.37 254.8 59.9 2-2 -127.066 Northwestern 23.8 156.6 4.08 198.4 62.9 41.0 262.8 5.87 232.0 61.7 1-4 -139.867 UTEP 25.7 152.7 4.63 193.0 56.3 34.3 216.0 5.63 277.0 63.6 2-1 -147.368 Middle Tennessee 18.3 98.7 2.90 198.7 57.6 37.0 267.7 5.70 181.7 68.4 1-2 -152.069 Kansas St 22.8 134.0 3.51 207.0 63.2 34.0 285.4 6.93 227.6 60.3 2-3 -172.070 Toledo 20.6 107.2 3.10 158.8 59.7 40.0 158.6 4.58 281.6 71.4 2-3 -174.2* Does not include Army vs Navy game stats due to printing time restrictions

• Every Bowl Late Phone Selection Released• Top Opinions on sides not released as LPS• ★ Rated Bowl Totals• Bowl Play of the Year!• The ONLY way to receive the Bowl Play of the

Year which is NOT announced to the public!

You'll receive all of our Late Phone Plays & Opinions on the sides of the games, including our Bowl Play of the Year, with your own 800 passcodes to access the plays. This is the ONLY PACKAGE YOU NEED for all of our COLLEGE BOWL WINNERS!

CallNorthcoast

Sports

Northcoast SportsBowl Package

Tis The Season! 1-800-654-3448Every Bowl from New Mexico

to the BCS Championship!$299

Page 21: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

GATORS ATS: 6-6 O/U: 6-6

OL - 1/2

DL - 4

LB - -

DB - 41/2

OUTBACKBOWL

Meyer leaving may tilt towards UF, but we’ll leave it even as legendary JoePa is as good as it gets in bowls.PSU’s always supported but have to give edge to Fla with the in-state fans rooting for Meyer.Both tms loaded with VHT’s but neither has matched seasons of recent years.Final gm for Meyer. LY Gators rallied around Tebow in final gm.

CCH - -

Turf/ - 41/2

MTCH - -

INT - 4

A topsy-turvy ssn comes to an end on NY’s day for UF and PSU. UF has won both prev matchups in the ‘62 Gator and the ‘98 FL Citrus (21-6, -13’). PSU plays in its 4th ever Outback Bowl going 3-0 SU/ATS. Paterno is the all-time bowl win leader going 24-11-1 SU/22-10-1 ATS and is 7-2 SU/ATS L/9 vs SEC tms in bowls. UF is playing in their 20th consec bowl (2nd longest in nation) and Meyer is 6-1 SU/ATS in bowls incl 4-1 at UF. This is UF’s 4th trip to the Outback (1-2 SU/ATS). UF’s fans are used to more prestigious bowls w/BCS bids in 3 of the L/4Y but UF will clearly have the home crowd edge as fans will come out to support Meyer in his last gm. UF is 3-2 SU/ATS on the road (incl OT win vs GA) TY. PSU went 0-3 SU/ATS as an AD TY losing all 3 to ‘09 BCS bowl winners. PSU now faces a 4th BCS bowl winner here (1st tm in history) but also lost 4 gms by 20+ for the 1st time in tm history. PSU is 3-5 SU/2-6 ATS vs bowl tms being outscored 27-19 and outgained 372-361 while UF is 5-5 SU/4-6 ATS vs bowl tms but outscored those tms 25-23 (outgained them 326-325). Both lost to AL but UF actually outgained the Tide 281-273 while PSU was outgained 409-283. Rob Bolden became the 1st true Fr QB to start in the Paterno era. Bolden struggled getting the ball downfield causing D’s to put more players in the box to stop PSU’s all-time leading rusher Royster. When Bolden was hurt vs Minn, McGloin came off of the bench to hit 6-13 and 2 TD’s. In his 1st start he led the Lions to a win over Mich with their biggest yd and pt totals of the ssn. Bolden started vs NW but McGloin led them to PSU’s biggest comeback ever (trailing 21-0). Vs OSU McGloin threw the 1st PSU TD passes of the B10 era in Columbus while taking PSU to a 14-3 HT lead. In the 2H he threw 2 pick sixes but he started the L/2 with Paterno naming him the bowl’s QB starter. Top WR Moye’s play picked up with McGloin at QB. Although all 5 OL (6’3” 301, 1 Sr) ply’d a diff position LY PSU all’d just 12 sks (3.1%). Thanks to inj’s and attrition the D never quite lived up to the standards of recent editions (top 15 NCAA scoring and ttl D from ‘04-’09). The star up front is DT Ogbu with the DE’s probably the unit’s most banged up position. The LB’s also had their inj woes as top LB Mauti missed the L/2 (shldr). PSU had the #64 pass eff D (188, 62%, 19-9). The ST finished #38 although PSU will be w/o their top P Fera who missed the L/2 and was replaced by walk-on true Fr Butterworth and the tm finished w/a 38.4 net. K Wagner hit 8-10 from 40+. PSU all’d 7.3 on PR and 20.7 on KR. Tough yr for mighty UF as the off took a nosedive w/o QB Tebow and struggled with inj’s at RB all yr. QB Brantley is more of a pure passer and not well suited to the Tebow-ran off, so adjustments were eventually made w/TE Reed and bkup QB Burton serving as the Tebow-like QB’s while Brantley remained the st’r and threw most of the passes. RB Demps is one of the fastest players in the nation (Olympic trials 100m) but suffered from a foot inj which limited him almost all yr (2 gms missed-won’t be 100% for bowl). After his 5 gm susp, WR Rainey helped out at RB and WR and is one of the top off threats on the tm. The OL (6’4” 322, 4 Sr) was shaky w/OG Mike Pouncey moving to C to take over for his twin brother Maurkice (1st RD DC). In the opener snaps were flying everywhere and UF was held below 100 yds rushing in 4 gms TY (Mia OH, AL, LSU, SC) and only 1 LY (AL) with the rush avg falling from 222 ypg (5.6) in ‘09 to 166 ypg (4.3) TY. Overall UF finished #32 on off and #13 on D. New DC Austin faced a tough rebuilding job replacing 5 DC’s (all 1st 3 Rd’s). They all’d 50 ypg more than LY (303 ypg) and 8.7 ppg more. UF’s D only generated 21 sks (tied #10 SEC) after from 39 LY. The DL avg 6’3” 278 with 3 Sr st’rs but loses DL cch McCarney who was hired as NT’s HC. UF all’d 130 ypg rush, its most S/’04. One bright spot is the secondary that is #11 in our pass D rankings all’g 173 ypg (55%) with a 16-17 ratio led by #1 tkl’r S Black and CB Jenkins. The ST’s are always strong (#3) with P Henry leading the nation in avg and net. One weak spot is kicking as P Henry was forced to take over for the inj’d Sturgis. If we told you PSU was facing UF in a bowl - it wouldn’t be with a pair of 7-5 tms. If we told you that it was Meyer vs Paterno and one was going to retire - it wouldn’t be Meyer. While we initially sided with PSU, Meyer’s sudden retirement has caused us to reevaluate this game as we wait to see how the team and fan base responds. FORECAST: Penn St vs Florida RATING: NO PLAY

Crowd

QB - -

NITTANY LIONS ATS: 5-7 O/U: 7-5

PSU UF PSU UF PSU UF

RB 1/2 - WR - -

ST - 1/2 SCH - 1/2

OVERALL -

PSU avg 6-3 301, 2 Sr, 12 sk all’d (3.1%), 4.2 ypc.UF avg 6-4 322, 4 Sr, 23 sk all’d (6.5%), 4.3 ypc.PSU avg 6-4 284, 1 Sr, 12 of tm 16 sk, 4.5 ypc.UF avg 6-3 281, 3 Sr, 12 of tm 21 sk, 3.5 ypc.Colasanti #1 tkl’r w/102, 8 tfl, Stupar #2, 6.5 tfl.Jenkins #2 tkl’r w/73, 4 tfl, Bostic #4, 3 tfl.PSU #64 pass eff D, 188 ypg (62%), 19-9 ratio.UF #11 pass eff D, 173 ypg (55%), 16-17 ratio.

FLORIDA

by 6 4’s

PENN ST (7-5)

FLORIDA (7-5)

PSU UF CHECKLIST COMMENTS

January 1, 2011 • 1:00 pm ABC • Raymond James Stadium • Tampa, FL

PSU UF

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGEvan Royster #18 12/12 188 941 25 916 6 4.9Silas Redd #10 11/0 69 439 15 424 2 6.1Stephfon Green #145 12/0 48 190 2 188 1 3.9Matt McGloin #171 8/4 11 23 20 3 1 0.3Rob Bolden #5 10/8 30 80 91 -11 1 -0.4PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTRob Bolden #5 10/8 193 112 58 1360 5 7Matt McGloin #171 8/4 174 101 58 1337 13 4RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGDerek Moye #57 12/12 48 806 16.8 7 80Brett Brackett #37 12/9 37 497 13.4 5 49Justin Brown #20 12/7 31 439 14.2 1 45Devon Smith #86 12/5 27 363 13.4 1 48PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Anthony Fera #3 10 43 1789 41.6 19 38.4(t) 0 13Alex Butterworth 27 2 8 289 36.1 3 38.4(t) 0 2KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGColin Wagner #84 12 31-31 5-5 6-8 8-10 0-1 19-24 49POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Chris Colasanti #12 12/10 102 0 8 1 0LB Nate Stupar #16 12/6 72 2 4.5 4 1CB D’Anton Lynn #43 12/12 71 0 1.5 3 2S Drew Astorino #335 12/11 68 0 0 5 1LB Michael Mauti #21 10/9 63 2 3 1 0LB Bani Gbadyu #25 11/9 48 0 2.5 0 0DB Malcolm Willis #105 12/5 47 0 0 2 1DT Ollie Ogbu #198 12/11 46 0.5 8 1 0CB Stephon Morris #76 12/7 37 0 0.5 1 0DL Jordan Hill #130 12/4 34 0.5 1.5 1 0DE Pete Massaro #109 12/9 33 3.5 4.5 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJustin Brown 14 71 5.1 0 Chaz Powell 21 503 24.0 1 Devon Smith 11 152 13.8 0 Stephfon Green 16 337 21.1 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGJeffery Demps #28 10/4 89 571 40 531 3 6.0Trey Burton #26 12/10 73 353 6 347 11 4.8Mike Gillislee #46 11/0 54 319 4 315 6 5.8Chris Rainey #15 7/6 45 318 18 300 2 6.7John Brantley #4 12/12 51 73 180 -107 0 -2.1PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTJohn Brantley #4 12/12 316 194 61.4 2020 9 9Jordan Reed #25 12/3 33 18 54.5 192 3 1RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGDeonte Thompson #4 12/11 36 548 15.2 1 44Carl Moore #1JC 12/6 27 349 12.9 1 51Frankie Hammond #53 10/7 20 270 13.5 2 39Omarius Hines #30 12/7 18 254 14.1 1 42Chris Rainey #15 7/6 22 198 9.0 3 40Trey Burton #26 12/10 30 188 6.3 1 21PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20CHAS HENRY #20 12 44 2042 46.4 13 41.8 0 16KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGCaleb Sturgis #6 4 19-21 1-1 0-1 1-2 0-0 2-4 44Chas Henry #20 12 24-25 1-2 3-4 0-2 0-0 4-8 39POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTSS AHMAD BLACK #59 12/12 102 1 9 3 3LB Jelani Jenkins #2 12/10 73 2 2 1 1DE Justin Trattou #11 12/12 56 2 10 0 1LB Jonathan Bostic #14 12/6 52 2 1 1 3LB AJ Jones #1 11/9 49 1 3 3 0FS Will Hill #2 10/10 48 0 2 1 2CB Janoris Jenkins #10 12/11 44 1 5 8 3LB Duke Lemmens #50 12/12 41 4 3 0 0LB Brandon Hicks #19 12/5 34 3 0 0 0DL Jaye Howard #23 10/7 24 3 8 0 0DT Sharrif Floyd #3 12/1 21 0 7 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJanoris Jenkins 18 150 8.3 0 ANDRE DEBOSE 19 564 29.7 2

POWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.PENN ST 118 178 17 1.7 – 102.6FLORIDA 173 183 30 2.4 4 4 4 104.5

OL - 41/2

DL - 4

LB 1/2 -

DB 4 -

TicketCityBOWL

Tuberville in 1st yr of new systems and Fitzgerald is 2-0 ATS both as 9+ dogs, both in OT.Tech fans will be abundant making the short trip while NW will struggle with their share of tix.In 4 of TT’s 5 losses, they all’d 224 ypg rush (4.8) while NW has #36 pass eff D. NW excels as a dog and extra time gives new NW QB time to prep.

CCH 4 -

Turf/ - 444

MTCH 44 -

INT 44 -

This is the inaugural year of the TicketCity Bowl which will be played at the Cotton Bowl and fittingly this is the 1st matchup for these programs. The Raiders return to the post season for the 11th str year (6-4 SU/4-6 ATS) and they are the only tm in the B12 to be bowl elig every ssn in the conf’s existence. TT is now led by Tuberville who is 6-3 SU/ATS in bowls in his career. NW is headed to its 3rd str bowl under Fitzgerald who is 0-2 SU/2-0 ATS in his career and he has made it the program’s goal to win a bowl gm for the 1st time S/’48 (lost L/7). TT played Baylor in this stadium on Oct 9th beating the bowl bound Bears 45-38 as a 1 pt fav while this is the Cats 1st trip here. TT will have a significant crowd edge as Lubbock is a 6 hr drive from Dallas and they have many alums in the area. NW went 1-4 SU/ATS vs bowl teams getting outscored 41-24 and outgained 495-355. TT went 3-3 SU/2-4 ATS being outscored 34-26 and outgained 492-455. The Raiders went 2-1-1 as an AF TY while the Cats were 0-3 as an dog outside of Ryan Field with 2 contests coming after 1st Tm B10 QB Persa was KO’d for the ssn. After throwing the GW TD pass to knock off Iowa, Persa ruptured his Achilles tendon. Persa had accounted for 75.5% of NW’s offense and his 73.5% comp set a school record and is #2 in B10 his-tory. His replacement is 6’6” pocket passer Watkins who hit 129 (55%) with a 1-4 ratio (49 rush) in his 2 sts and the Cats actually burned the RS of the more mobile Colten for the L/2. The 2 QB’s comb for 6 TO’s in the finale loss to Wisky and Ftizgerald vowed the squad would get right back to work with pract so the frosh QB’s could get more exp before the bowl. The Cats started 4 diff TB’s before finally settling on Trumpy whose 80 yd TD run vs IL was the Cats’ longest S/‘82 although he missed the finale and is ? here (fractured wrist). WR Ebert stepped up as all star caliber TE/SB Dunsmore battled inj’s. The OL (6’5” 303, 1 Sr) all’d the most sk among bowl tms (39, 11%). The DL is led by DE Browne who has 7 of their 8.5 sks up front. Nate Williams is the top tackler among the LB’s but the unit has a tendency to overpursue which opens up cutback lanes which IL’s OC Petrino cited as a reason for the Illini’s 519 rush yds. NW finished #36 pass eff D (231, 59%, 21-14) led by #1 tkl’r S Peters and top cover CB Mabin. K Demos struggled at times (missing 2 FG’s in the Purdue loss) and would like to atone for missing the potential GW in LY’s wild OT bowl loss to Auburn. P Williams is #3 B10 in net (38.2) with good placement (18 FC) and their 3.3 ypr all’d is #4 in the NCAA. True Fr Mark set a school record with 273 KR yds vs Wisky including a 94 yd TD. Tuberville vowed to keep the Air Raid offense but he added more of an emphasis on the run gm and after running for over 140 yd in a gm 18x in the previous 10Y, the Raiders did it 7x TY led by the combo of Batch and Stephens. The pass #’s shrunk as expected -72 ypg although QB Potts finished as the B12’s #3 passer. After Potts was briefly benched for fan favorite Sheffield who got the start vs MO, he returned to finish out the yr. The receiving corps battled inj’s to #3 rec Torres and #5 Franks but Leong finished #2 FBS in TD rec. The OL (6’5” 313) struggled early on with run blocking after lining up in wide splits under Leach but improved with exp (no Sr’s) and allowed 21 sk (3.7%). The D also had a major scheme change as they went to a 3-4. Depth was a major issue and Tuberville numerous times bemoaned the unit’s lack of speed until he eventually said the best way for them to win was to simply outscore people. 1st Tm B12 NT Whitlock was solid in the middle with the top sk’r being ex-LB Duncan. LB Bird was the tm’s top tkl’r. Inj’s really hit the secondary hard as TT’s pass D finished dead last in the FBS ypg all’d although they were #87 in our pass eff D (306, 62%, 27-14). TT was #36 in ST’s even though they allowed onside K’s to be ret’d for TD’s in B2B gms vs ISU and Baylor. P LaCour’s net of 38.8 was #16 NCAA and KR Stephens remains 1 of the B12’s best. PR Lewis (6.2) was mediocre and the K gm was an adventure as Williams and Carona combined to hit 9-14 with 3 blk’s. The Raiders allowed 5.8 on PR and 20.7 on PR and blk’d 2 P’s. A disappointing finish for NW, losing by 21 and 47 after losing QB Persa. No question, Fitzgerald will have new QB Watkins ready with the extra prep time. TT finished the season with wins vs Weber and Houston but did not beat a BCS team by more than 7 pts on the season. Give the edge to the better defense with the better coach getting the generous points. FORECAST: N’western (+) TT by 3 RATING: 3★ NORTHWESTERN (+)

Crowd

QB - 441/2

WILDCATS ATS: 3-9 O/U: 7-5

NW TT NW TT NW TT

RB - 4 WR - -

ST 1/2 - SCH - 41/2

OVERALL -

NW avg 6-5 303, 1 Sr, 39 sk all’d (11.0%), 3.5 ypc.TT avg 6-5 313, 0 Sr, 21 sk all’d (3.7%), 4.1 ypc.NW avg 6-4 280, 1 Sr, 8.5 of tm 17 sk, 5.1 ypc.TT avg 6-2 276, 2 Sr, 20 of tm 24 sk, 4.1 ypc.Williams #2 tkl’r w/82, 9.5 tfl, McNaul #3, 5 tfl.Bird #1 tkl’r w/101, 4.5 tfl, Dewhurst #9.NW #36 pass eff D, 231 ypg (59%), 21-14 ratio.TT #87 pass eff D, 306 ypg (62%), 27-14 ratio.

TEXAS TECH

by 3' 4’s

NORTHWESTERN (7-5)

TEXAS TECH (7-5)

NW TT CHECKLIST COMMENTS

January 1, 2011 • 12:00 pm espnU • Cotton Bowl • Dallas, TXPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.NORTHWESTERN 156 255 26 2.7 4 98.1TEXAS TECH 164 350 37 2.6 – 101.3

NW TT

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGBaron Batch #40 12/11 172 817 12 805 5 4.7Eric Stephens #59 12/3 113 555 13 542 5 4.8Steven Sheffield #269 10/1 18 61 45 16 1 0.9Taylor Potts #19 12/11 31 134 149 -15 1 -0.5PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTTaylor Potts #19 12/11 495 326 65.9 3357 31 9Steven Sheffield #269 10/1 58 33 56.9 359 3 1RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGDetron Lewis #81 12/11 79 803 10.2 6 54Lyle Leong #231 12/10 64 808 12.6 17 40Alex Torres – 10/5 36 439 12.2 3 45Austin Zouzalik #292 11/3 26 382 14.7 1 55Jacoby Franks #145 7/3 25 254 10.2 0 30Tramain Swindall #92 12/8 30 240 8.0 0 36Baron Batch #40 12/11 31 220 7.1 3 44PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Jon LaCour #17 12 54 2149 39.8 13 38.8(t) 0 11KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGMatt Williams – 12 50-50 3-3 2-2 3-5 0-0 8-10 42POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Bront Bird #363 12/12 101 1 3.5 2 3S Cody Davis #137 12/12 79 1 5.5 4 1S Tre’ Porter #55 12/9 70 0 3 6 1DE Brian Duncan #46 12/11 58 7 5 0 0CB Jarvis Phillips #379 12/10 52 0 1 9 4DT Colby Whitlock #220 12/12 50 2 6.5 1 0CB DJ Johnson #255 11/8 43 0 2 3 3DE Sam Fehoko #24 12/6 35 1 1.5 1 0LB Brett Dewhurst #375 12/6 34 0 0 4 0LB Julius Howard #138 12/5 32 0 4 0 0S Frank Mitchem #114 12/6 31 1 1 4 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDDetron Lewis 10 62 6.2 0 Eric Stephens 40 989 24.7 0Austin Zouzalik 6 5 0.8 0 Harris Jeffers 5 89 17.8 0

RED RAIDERS ATS: 5-6-1 O/U: 6-6RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGMike Trumpy #78 11/4 116 550 20 530 4 4.6Dan Persa #53 10/10 164 717 198 519 9 3.2Jacob Schmidt #506 7/5 49 171 10 161 4 3.3Adonis Smith #113 8/1 30 136 1 135 0 4.5PASSING PS# GS/GP ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTDAN PERSA #53 10/10 302 222 73.5 2581 15 4Evan Watkins #34 6/2 49 26 53.1 302 1 4RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJEREMY EBERT #223 12/12 59 919 15.6 8 45Sidney Stewart #100 12/12 38 437 11.5 0 28Drake Dunsmore #73 12/8 39 378 9.7 5 47Demetrius Fields #326 12/12 22 260 11.8 1 23PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Brandon Williams #144 12 56 2261 40.4 18 38.2 0 20KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGStefan Demos #9 12 31-35 7-9 3-3 5-10 0-0 15-22 47POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTS Brian Peters #443 12/12 97 0 3.5 4 3LB Nate Williams #104 12/12 82 2 7.5 1 0LB Bryce McNaul #41 10/10 61 1 4 1 0CB Jordan Mabin #55 12/12 58 0 0 13 0DE Vince Browne #73 12/11 57 7 8 0 0LB Quentin Davie #73 12/12 56 1.5 2.5 4 3CB Justan Vaughn #173 12/12 51 0 0 4 1S Hunter Bates #333 12/2 34 1 1 2 2S David Arnold #65 7/2 33 0 0.5 2 1DE Jack DiNardo #29 12/12 30 0.5 6 0 0S Jared Carpenter #304 10/8 26 0 1.5 0 0DE Kevin Watt #93 12/11 24 0 5 0 0LB David Nwabuisi #295 12/0 24 0 2 2 1DT Corbin Bryant #157 12/12 21 1 7 1 1PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDVenric Mark 9 116 12.9 0 Venric Mark 16 442 27.6 1Hunter Bates 9 51 5.7 0 Stephen Simmons 23 508 22.1 0

21

Page 22: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL 4 -

DL - 41/2

LB - 41/2

DB - 44

GATORBOWL

First bowl at UM for Rich Rod but did win L/3 at WV. Mullen is a an up-and-comer.This, of course, is SEC country and MSU may have more fans, but UM will be well supported.While each tm has a definite edge with UM on off and MSU on D, they do cancel out.L/9Y, MSU to 1 bowl and that was just the Liberty. RR under duress.

CCH - -

Turf/ - -

MTCH - -

INT - 444

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGVick Ballard #16JC 11/9 166 917 25 892 16 5.4Chris Relf #87 12/12 179 831 148 683 4 3.8LaDarius Perkins #99 12/0 92 556 30 526 3 5.7Robert Elliott #19 12/6 54 193 8 185 0 3.4PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTChris Relf #87 12/12 197 111 56.3 1508 10 5Tyler Russell #7 8/0 67 39 58.2 635 5 6RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGChad Bumphis #21 12/11 44 634 14.4 5 57Arceto Clark #132 12/11 22 317 14.4 2 33Brandon Heavens #107 12/2 20 304 15.2 2 40Chris Smith #53 11/7 20 218 10.9 1 19Leon Berry #66JC 6/5 8 188 23.5 1 58PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Heath Hutchins #23JC 12 57 2356 41.3 19 38.2 0 24KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGDerek DePasquale – 11 21-21 5-5 2-3 2-3 0-0 9-11 43Sean Brauchle #27 12 20-20 0-0 1-4 2-3 0-0 3-7 47POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB CHRIS WHITE #21JC 12/12 105 6 9.5 1 2LB KJ Wright #94 12/12 93 3 4 9 0SS Charles Mitchell #19 12/12 86 0 3 1 0CB Johnthan Banks #106 11/11 50 1 0.5 5 2CB Corey Broomfield #256 12/12 48 1 2 6 3DB Nickoe Whitley #127 12/10 47 1.5 0 3 3LB Emmanuel Gatling – 12/12 41 0 1 1 0DB Wade Bonner #123 11/0 34 1.5 0 1 0DE PERNELL MCPHEE #6JC 12/12 32 2 7.5 4 0DT Fletcher Cox #27 11/10 28 2.5 4 0 0DE Sean Ferguson #260 12/6 23 0 5 1 0DT Josh Boyd #38 12/12 22 2.5 5 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDChad Bumphis 16 137 8.6 0 Leon Berry 14 375 26.8 1

Michigan returns to the postssn for the 1st time S/’07 and their 1st ever matchup with Miss St. This is UM’s 3rd appearance in the Gator Bowl (1-1 SU/ATS) with their last visit in ‘90 and they are 7-3 SU/6-4 ATS in bowls vs SEC tms. Rich Rod is 2-3 SU/1-4 ATS in bowls. MSU makes its 1st bowl appearance S/’07’s Liberty Bowl win over UCF. It is Mullen’s 1st bowl gm as a HC but of course he was part of Urban Meyer’s FL and Utah staffs that went to bowls. This is MSU’s 1st NY’s Day bowl S/’99 and just the 10th meeting with a current B10 tm (Illini in ‘80). The Bulldogs sold out their original allotment of tix even before the destination was announced and asked for more while UM will bring fans for its 1st bowl in 3 yrs. MSU is 3-2 SU/ATS on the road TY and covered both times they were a road fav incl a 5★ GOM Winner for us vs Hou. UM is 3-2 SU/1-4 ATS on the road TY. MSU is 3-4 SU/ATS vs bowl tms TY getting outscored 21-17 and outgained 378-312 while UM is 3-5 SU/2-6 ATS vs bowl tms being outscored 37-30 and just slightly outgained 479-475. Rodriguez finally found the perfect QB in B10’s OPY Robinson to run his spread. FL native Robinson exploded for UM QB ttl off records in his 1st 2 sts, earning nat’l POW honors vs Conn and ND. Robinson was considered the front runner for the Heisman until his 3 int vs Mich St (2 in EZ) doomed UM and D’s learned how to contain him. He also was banged up as he left several gms due to inj. Robinson still finished the ssn with a IA QB rush record 1,643 yds and became the first IA QB to run for 1,500 yds and throw for 2,000. UM went with a RB-by-committee as leading TB rusher Smith wasn’t quite 100% to start the yr. The leading receiver was Roundtree who had a UM record 246 yd vs IL but struggled with drops. The OL (6’5” 302, 2 Sr) is anchored by All-B10 C Molk. UM all’d just 11 sks and their 5.7 ypc led the B10. UM was held to fewer than 27 pts just twice TY by B10 co-champs MSU and OSU and finished as our #8 off. Attrition caused the Wolves to play 6 true Fr on D (#80). DC Robinson’s controversial 3-3-5 struggled all’g the most yds and pts in UM hist incl 39 ppg in B10 play (7 of 8 scored 34+). NT Martin is the top D player but he’s routinely doubled. He suffered a sprained ankle vs Iowa and wasn’t 100% the rest of the year. LB Mouton led the league in tkls for most of the yr before being edged out by S Kovacs in the finale. By yr’s end UM was starting 2 true Fr, an ex-walk-on and a journeyman Sr in the secondary which finished #95 pass eff D (260, 63%, 18-11). K’s Gibbons and Broekhuizen comb to hit just 4-13 FG (L/37). P Hagerup avg’d an impressive 43.6 as a true and will return after being susp’d vs OSU. Top returnman Gallon avg’d just 4.3 on PR and 21.8 on KR. The Wolves allow 9.8 on PR’s and 21.4 on KR’s. Questions on Rich Rod’s future could be a distraction. MSU surprised some folks TY with a strong squad playing in the brutal SEC West with an 8-4 record which was quite an accomplishment. Along the way HC Mullen defeated his mentor Meyer in the Swamp and came close vs BCS-bound Ark losing in 2OT. Their #53 offense is a cookie-cutter of Meyer’s UF off with a strong run gm led by mobile QB Relf. Passing QB Russell split time with Relf early in the yr, but after the 2 comb for 5 int vs LSU, the pass gm was scaled back and Relf took most of the snaps the rest of the yr. Top RB Ballard took over as the st’r in gm 3 and was very productive finishing #3 in the SEC in scoring (9.3 ppg). Big play WR Berry was lost to inj in gm 6 but could return here. The OL has been solid in run blocking as MSU is #2 in the SEC in rush ypg (216, 4.6), but all’d 22 sks (9.0%). The OL starters avg 6’3” 303 with 2 Sr st’rs led by LT Sherrod who is projected as one of the top OT’s for the ‘11 draft. MSU is #16 in our def rankings. The whole team was rocked by tragedy when starting DE Nick Bell (3 sts) was diagnosed with a brain tumor and eventually died during the tm’s bye wk (Nov 6th). MSU all’d 122 rush ypg (3.6) with 26 sks and the tm’s sk leader was LB White (6). White was highly productive finishing #4 in the SEC in tkls and tfl. MSU is #29 in our pass D rankings all’g 236 ypg (57%) with a 17-12 ratio. MSU has faced 2 QB’s similar to Robinson TY (Newton and Masoli) and held Aub to a ssn low 17 pts (Newton 70 rush yd, 136 pass) and Masoli (12 rush, 261 pass). Rumors of Mullen being a candidate for multiple jobs could be a distraction. These two teams have provided us with three Bowl or Game of the Year Winners! Michigan’s of-fense obviously runs thru Robinson and despite the extra practice, we don’t expect much improvement from the D. The Bulldogs are potent enough on offense for us to anticipate a high scoring gm.FORECAST: OVER 59 Michigan/Miss St RATING: 2★ OVER

Crowd

QB 441/2 -

WOLVERINES ATS: 3-9 O/U: 7-4-1

UM MSU UM MSU UM MSU

RB - 1/2 WR 1/2 -

ST - 41/2 SCH - -

OVERALL -

UM avg 6-5 302, 2 Sr, 11 sk all’d (3.2%), 5.7 ypc.MSU avg 6-3 303, 2 Sr, 22 sk all’d (9.0%), 4.6 ypc.UM avg 6-4 278, 0 Sr, 11 of tm 17 sk, 4.5 ypc.MSU avg 6-4 284, 1 Sr, 10 of tm 26 sk, 3.6 ypc.Mouton #2 tkl’r w/111, 8.5 tfl, Gordon #3, 2 tfl.White #1 tkl’r w/105, 15.5 tfl, Wright #2, 7 tfl.UM #95 pass eff D, 260 ypg (63%), 18-11 ratio.MSU #29 pass eff D, 236 ypg (57%), 17-12 ratio.

MISS ST

by 6 4’s

MICHIGAN(7-5)

MISSISSIPPI ST (8-4)

UM MSU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

January 1, 2011 • 1:30 pm espn2 • Municipal Stadium • Jacksonville, FLPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.MICHIGAN 195 235 24 3.3 – 102.5MISS ST 220 195 29 2.4 44 102.2

UM MSU

BULLDOGS ATS: 6-6 O/U: 5-6-1RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGDenard Robinson #35 12/12 245 1733 90 1643 14 6.7Vincent Smith #56 12/9 129 599 11 588 5 4.6MIchael Shaw #26 11/5 71 395 12 383 9 5.4Stephen Hopkins #51 10/0 37 157 6 151 4 4.1PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTDENARD ROBINSON #35 12/12 250 155 62.0 2316 16 10Tate Forcier #16 8/0 84 54 64.3 597 4 4RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGRoy Roundtree #68 12/11 63 882 14.0 6 75Darryl Stonum #12 12/11 42 574 13.7 4 66Junior Hemingway #17 9/7 28 544 19.4 4 70Martavious Odoms #49 6/3 15 214 14.3 0 49Kelvin Grady #127 12/1 17 211 12.4 0 43PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Will Hagerup #3 10 33 1440 43.6 6 36.7(t) 1 11KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGSeth Broekhuizen – 11 42-43 0-0 3-7 0-2 0-0 3-9 37Brendan Gibbons #8 6 11-12 1-1 0-1 0-2 0-0 1-4 24POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTS Jordan Kovacs #479 12/12 112 1 7.5 1 2LB Jonas Mouton #11 11/11 111 2 6.5 2 2S Cameron Gordon #46 12/12 73 0 2 4 2LB Kenny Demens #29 12/6 69 0 1.5 1 0CB JT Floyd #63 9/8 66 0 2 4 1LB Obi Ezeh #80 12/8 56 0 3.5 0 0DE Craig Roh #16 12/12 41 0.5 5 1 0DE Greg Banks #66 12/8 36 3 3.5 2 0NT Mike Martin #24 11/11 36 2.5 3.5 0 0CB James Rogers #115 12/12 34 0 1 3 3DE Ryan Van Bergen #43 12/12 30 4 4.5 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJeremy Gallon 10 43 4.3 0 Jeremy Gallon 27 589 21.8 0Drew Dileo 2 13 6.5 0 Darryl Stonum 22 513 23.3 0

OL - -

DL - 4

LB - -

DB - 41/2

CAPITAL ONEBOWL

MSU two of L/3 bowls suspension-ladened while Saban 2-1 at AL with a Nat’l Champ.Bama will travel anywhere and this is actually their 1st bowl gm in FL since 1999.MSU struggled vs quality D’s and they avg’d just 113 rush ypg in L/6 (225 in 1st six). MSU thought BCS but happy w/11 while Bama yearns for 10th win.

CCH - 41/2

Turf/ - 44

MTCH - 4

INT - 41/2

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGMark Ingram #66 10/10 146 843 27 816 11 5.6Trent Richardson #2 10/2 102 676 18 658 5 6.5Eddie Lacy #27 11/0 51 324 4 320 4 6.3Greg McElroy #27 12/12 59 144 160 -16 1 -0.3PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTGreg McElroy #27 12/12 296 209 70.6 2767 19 5AJ McCarron #9 12/0 42 24 57.1 338 3 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJULIO JONES #1 12/12 75 1084 14.5 7 68Marquis Maze #40 12/7 34 480 14.1 2 48Darius Hanks #284 12/11 32 456 14.2 3 51Trent Richardson #2 10/2 22 254 11.5 4 85Mark Ingram #66 10/10 20 252 12.6 1 78Preston Dial #19 12/7 21 209 10.0 3 20PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Cody Mandell #16 12 39 1528 39.2 15 36.9 0 13KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGJeremy Shelley #102 11 43-44 4-6 7-8 1-2 0-0 12-16 42Cade Foster #7 12 7-7 2-2 0-0 5-6 0-1 7-9 49POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTSS MARK BARRON #17 12/12 75 2 1 6 3LB Dont’a Hightower #53 12/12 67 0 3.5 3 0LB CJ Mosley #15 12/3 66 0.5 1 8 2CB DeMarcus Milliner #4 12/9 52 0 4 5 1CB Dre Kirkpatrick #2 12/11 50 0 4 7 3FS Robert Lester #110 12/12 47 1 0.5 3 7LB Courtney Upshaw #48 12/11 47 5 6.5 2 0DE MARCELL DAREUS #154 10/10 31 3.5 5.5 4 0DB DeQuan Menzie #13JC 10/7 31 1 2 4 0NG Josh Chapman #75 12/12 30 1 1.5 1 0DE Damion Square #38 12/5 26 3 4 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDMarquis Maze 18 245 13.6 0 Trent Richardson 23 616 26.8 1

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGEDWIN BAKER #10 12/11 195 1221 34 1187 13 6.1Le’Veon Bell #106 12/0 103 630 38 592 8 5.7Keshawn Martin #339 10/5 14 157 0 157 0 11.2Larry Caper #21 10/0 37 161 18 143 2 3.9Kirk Cousins #179 12/12 35 56 136 -80 1 -2.3PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTKirk Cousins #179 12/12 320 216 67.5 2705 20 9Andrew Maxwell #32 4/0 19 9 47.4 80 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGMark Dell #22 12/7 49 761 15.5 6 55BJ Cunningham #198 12/7 50 611 12.2 9 48Keshawn Martin #339 10/5 29 353 12.2 1 42Charlie Gantt #32 12/12 22 261 11.9 3 35Keith Nichol #7 12/7 19 240 12.6 1 42Brian Linthicum #48 12/5 17 202 11.9 1 34PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20AARON BATES #54 12 50 2261 45.2 10 38.2 0 15KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGDAN CONROY #52 12 44-45 3-3 7-8 3-3 1-1 14-15 50POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB GREG JONES #146 12/12 98 1 7 3 2LB Eric Gordon #44 12/12 88 2 4.5 2 1SS Marcus Hyde #345 12/12 77 0 0 8 3FS Trenton Robinson #203 12/11 69 0 0 8 4CB Chris L Rucker #165 10/9 61 0 3.5 7 2LB Chris Norman #16 11/9 59 0 0.5 3 1CB Johnny Adams #61 12/12 43 0 2 7 3DT Jerel Worthy #112 12/12 37 4 4 3 0DE Tyler Hoover #44 12/9 35 3 0.5 2 0DE Colin Neely #76 11/11 32 2.5 7.5 1 0NT Kevin Pickelman #404 10/7 31 0.5 2 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDKESHAWN MARTIN 15 213 14.2 1 Keshawn Martin 20 355 17.8 0

This bowl pairs AL HC Nick Saban vs his former tm where he was 34-24-1 from ‘95-’99 with MSU HC Dantonio serving as his DB cch. This is the 1st meeting between these 2 and the 1st time Saban’s faced MSU since leaving there. MSU won a share of the B10 Title for the 1st time S/‘90 and now plays in just their 3rd Jan bowl S/’89. Moments after the ND win B10 Cch of the Yr Dantonio suffered a mild heart attack and the tm was led to 2 wins incl 1 over Wisky by OC Treadwell. The team rallied for incred-ible 4Q comebacks vs NW and Purdue to finish with a program record 11 wins. This is the Spartans’ 4th bowl under Dantonio (0-3 SU/1-2 ATS). MSU has played their bowl game in Orlando 3 out of the L/4Y (‘07, ‘08) and is 1-1 SU/ATS in this bowl, losing 24-12 to UGA and QB Stafford as an 8’ pt dog in ‘08. The Spartans are 3-8 as dog the L/3Y (2-1 TY). AL was selected over LSU because they have never played in the Capital One while LSU was here LY. Saban is 5-6 SU/ATS in bowls (2-1 SU/ATS at Bama). Orlando is about a 9 hr drive from Tuscaloosa so the Tide should have a strong fan following for this one. UA is 5-3 SU/4-4 ATS vs bowl tms TY outscoring those tms by 27-17 and outgaining them by 462-333. MSU is 7-1 SU/6-2 ATS vs bowl caliber tms outgaining those tms by 410-356. Both tms faced PSU with AL winning 24-3 (409-283 edge) and MSU winning 28-22 (outgained 396-331). MSU’s off leader is QB Cousins who fought off shldr and ankle inj’s to score the GW TD vs Purdue to cap a 22 pt 4Q. He should be 100% with the time off and finished #19 NCAA pass eff. MSU had over 200 rush yd in their first 4 for the 1st time S/’68 and RB Baker became just the 6th MSU soph to run for 1,000 yds. The rec corps is deep with 5 WR and 2 TE’s seeing regular action incl WR’s Dell and Cunningham and All-B10 TE Gantt. The OL (6’5” 300, 3 Sr) all’d 19 sk (5.5%) with a strong left side (LG Foreman and LT Young). The Spartans have our #37 off and #32 D. MSU’s star up front is Worthy who led the tm in sks with just 4 from his DT spot. The LB’s feature the FBS’s most productive duo in AA Jones and Gordon who were the tm’s top 2 tkl’rs. After allowing a 32-6 ratio in ‘09 (#103 pass eff D), the Spartans improved to 18-17 TY (#22) with all 4 st’rs named All-B10. MSU’s 3 biggest plays of the season came on ST: the blk’d punt vs PU, “Little Giants”: the fake FG in which holder Bates hit TE Gantt for a 28 yd TD pass to beat ND and the “Mousetrap”: trailing NW 24-14 in the 4Q, a fake P on 4&11 at the NW36 in which Bates hit a 21 yd pass to Fowler. P Bates led the B10 in avg and was #2 in net (38.2). K Conroy hit his 1st 13 FG’s in the 1st 7 gms before cooling off to hit just 1-2 in the final 5. Martin led the league in PR at 14.2 incl the pivotal 74 yd TD vs Wisky. The Spartans allow 8.7 on PR and 21.1 on KR and finished #49 in ST. After AL earned their first Nat’l Title since ‘92 LY, a 9-3 ssn seems disappointing. Still this is one of the most talented teams in the country with their only losses to 2 squads in the SEC Title gm and 10-2 LSU. QB McElroy entered the ssn 30-0 as a starting QB in HS and college (now 39-3). McElroy was still efficient but held onto the ball too long resulting in 32 sks (+12 from LY). 2009 Heisman winner RB Ingram is a Michigan native but suffered a knee inj in Aug and missed the 1st 2. Backup Richardson suffered a knee inj midssn and also missed 2. The rushing production fell by 40 ypg (175, 5.0). On the bright side super WR Jones stayed healthy TY for his 1st 1,000 yd ssn. The OL avg 6’4” 301 with 1 Sr st’r. Overall AL has our #13 off and #2 def. Super DE Dareus was susp the 1st 2 and he was the most exp plyr returning to the DL in ‘10. The DL starters avg 6’3” 312 with 0 Sr’s. LB Hightower ret’d TY after a knee inj cut his ‘09 ssn short but wasn’t as dominating as expected and JLB Upshaw led the tm in sks and tfl. The secondary was quite inexperienced heading into the ssn but developed nicely with new FS Lester leading the SEC in int. AL ranks #4 in our pass D rankings all’g 173 ypg (53%) with an excellent 11-21 ratio vs a strong slate of opposing QB’s. A big loss is AL defensive leader SS Barron who will miss the bowl with a torn pectoral muscle. AL is #18 in our ST rankings led by excellent PR Maze and KR Richardson. There’s only one question in this entire writeup and that’s motivation. Take a look at the checklist and you’ll see it’s a complete shutout as Bama has a 14’-0 edge. While the loss to Aub will be tough to rebound from, we have to believe that they’ll consider a 10 win season a success. MSU was hoping for a BCS berth but the truth is, the last time they faced a quality D on the road they were destroyed 37-6 to Iowa (trailed 30-0 at half). FORECAST: Alabama by 21 RATING: 4★ ALABAMA

Crowd

QB - 4

SPARTANS ATS: 7-5 O/U: 5-7

MSU AL MSU AL MSU AL

RB - 41/2 WR - 1/2

ST - 4 SCH - 44

OVERALL -

MSU avg 6-5 300, 3 Sr, 19 sk all’d (5.5%), 4.9 ypc.AL avg 6-4 301, 1 Sr, 32 sk all’d (9.4%), 5.0 ypc. MSU avg 6-4 277, 1 Sr, 15 of tm 20 sk, 3.6 ypc.AL avg 6-3 312, 0 Sr, 8.5 of tm 22 sk, 3.6 ypc.Jones #1 tkl’r w/98, 8 tfl, Gordon #2, 6.5 tfl.Hightower #2 tkl’r w/67, 3.5 tfl, Mosley #3. MSU #22 pass eff D, 216 ypg (56%), 18-17 ratio.AL #4 pass eff D, 173 ypg (53%), 11-21 ratio.

ALABAMA

by 14' 4’s

MICHIGAN ST(11-1)

ALABAMA (9-3)

MSU AL CHECKLIST COMMENTS

January 1, 2011 • 1:00 pm ESPN • Citrus Bowl Stadium • Orlando, FLPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.MICHIGAN ST 124 190 16 2.2 – 98.9ALABAMA 161 265 30 1.5 44 102.2

MSU AL

CRIMSON TIDE ATS: 7-5 O/U: 4-7-1

22

Page 23: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

RUSH AVG RANK PASS AVG RANK TOTAL AVG RANK RUSH AVG RANK PASS AVG RANK TOTAL AVG RANK OFFENSE RUSH TOP TOP OFFENSE PASS TOP TOP OFFENSE TOTAL TOP TOP DEFENSE RUSH TOP TOP DEFENSE PASS TOP TOP DEFENSE TOTAL TOP TOP SCHEDULE OFF Faced 40 20 SCHEDULE OFF Faced 40 20 SCHEDULE OFF Faced 40 20 SCHEDULE DEF Faced 40 20 SCHEDULE DEF Faced 40 20 SCHEDULE DEF Faced 40 20AIR FORCE 79 69.3 3 3 94 73.1 4 2 86 72.9 4 2 94 76.3 3 1 64 64.8 4 2 78 72.2 2 2ALABAMA 27 53.3 6 2 25 54.3 5 3 20 50.3 5 2 19 47.8 7 4 21 50.8 6 4 20 48.8 7 4ARIZONA 16 50.5 5 3 28 54.8 4 1 21 51.0 5 3 15 47.2 6 5 5 36.1 7 4 18 47.8 7 3ARKANSAS 22 51.4 6 2 44 58.7 5 3 26 52.9 6 4 18 47.7 8 4 26 53.7 5 2 16 47.6 7 4ARMY 95 75.3 2 2 106 79.2 3 2 96 77.2 1 1 98 78.6 2 1 120 90.8 1 0 96 78.0 1 1AUBURN 21 51.4 7 1 11 47.4 7 2 12 45.7 7 3 3 40.8 9 5 20 50.3 5 4 6 42.7 8 6BAYLOR 73 68.0 2 2 22 53.5 6 4 35 54.5 5 4 49 58.3 5 2 53 61.8 3 2 53 59.4 4 3BOISE STATE 96 76.0 2 2 69 64.5 2 1 77 70.2 3 2 105 79.8 0 0 59 63.6 4 3 86 75.0 2 0BOSTON COLLEGE 65 66.1 3 1 64 62.7 3 1 70 65.2 2 0 23 50.2 6 3 56 63.2 4 2 36 53.9 5 3BYU 53 59.7 5 3 80 67.7 3 1 54 60.7 6 2 92 75.7 3 2 67 65.7 3 2 73 68.8 2 2CLEMSON 23 51.9 4 3 81 68.3 5 1 40 56.8 4 2 8 44.3 8 4 34 58.8 5 0 21 49.5 6 4CONNECTICUT 60 63.3 4 1 109 80.7 2 1 94 76.4 1 1 47 58.0 3 1 40 60.0 5 1 52 59.3 4 1EAST CAROLINA 59 62.5 4 2 45 59.3 4 2 65 63.2 3 1 40 55.8 2 0 100 76.3 2 2 63 64.3 3 0FIU 110 81.8 1 0 93 71.5 2 1 108 82.8 1 1 88 75.0 3 0 97 75.9 1 0 98 78.1 2 0FLORIDA 10 47.4 7 0 58 61.9 5 1 29 53.6 5 2 6 42.9 7 4 13 45.1 5 2 3 39.3 6 5FLORIDA STATE 42 56.9 4 2 68 64.2 4 1 47 58.6 4 2 7 44.2 8 3 8 41.9 8 4 4 40.5 7 5FRESNO ST 55 61.3 5 3 62 62.3 4 2 61 62.2 5 3 85 73.3 3 1 84 69.5 4 2 90 75.9 2 1GEORGIA 32 54.4 5 2 49 60.0 5 2 37 55.3 5 2 34 53.1 5 4 36 59.3 5 2 34 53.4 5 3GEORGIA TECH 58 62.4 4 2 70 64.8 5 2 64 62.7 3 2 56 61.2 5 1 31 56.2 5 3 60 61.3 5 2HAWAII 85 71.0 4 3 86 69.8 3 1 90 74.4 3 3 100 78.7 2 2 108 79.2 3 3 103 78.5 2 1ILLINOIS 20 51.3 5 3 27 54.4 4 2 31 53.8 5 2 51 59.0 3 1 71 66.8 3 3 57 60.2 4 1IOWA 38 55.8 5 3 19 52.2 4 3 32 53.9 5 3 63 65.0 3 2 50 61.1 5 4 64 64.6 5 1KANSAS STATE 45 57.5 2 1 72 65.3 4 2 57 61.8 4 2 61 63.3 3 1 103 77.2 1 0 47 57.6 4 2KENTUCKY 35 54.8 6 2 84 69.8 4 2 60 62.1 5 2 26 51.1 6 4 30 55.5 5 2 31 52.6 6 3LOUISVILLE 68 67.2 4 0 98 74.9 2 0 88 73.8 1 0 46 57.3 3 1 81 69.3 3 1 58 61.2 4 1LSU 31 54.2 6 2 32 55.8 5 2 30 53.8 5 3 5 41.3 8 5 35 58.9 5 2 7 43.3 7 4MIAMI (FL) 18 51.0 6 3 82 68.9 3 1 39 56.1 3 1 22 48.8 7 3 36 59.3 5 3 12 46.8 6 3MIAMI (OH) 103 79.2 2 1 108 80.5 2 0 110 84.7 3 0 79 71.2 2 1 76 68.4 4 1 83 74.6 2 1MICHIGAN 36 55.4 6 3 50 60.3 4 1 34 54.4 4 2 14 47.0 6 3 62 64.6 4 3 27 51.3 7 3MICHIGAN ST 61 63.5 4 3 45 59.3 4 1 56 60.8 3 2 59 62.7 4 2 18 49.3 5 4 62 62.2 5 2MIDDLE TENNESSEE 114 83.3 1 1 111 80.8 1 0 117 90.5 0 0 120 92.1 0 0 116 84.5 1 0 120 94.5 0 0MISSISSIPPI ST 10 47.4 7 2 13 49.6 6 4 7 43.4 8 4 30 52.3 7 3 24 52.8 6 4 32 52.9 6 3MISSOURI 66 66.5 3 3 42 58.5 4 4 36 55.2 6 2 60 62.9 4 0 43 60.4 3 1 50 58.5 4 2NC STATE 33 54.5 4 2 97 74.2 3 1 54 60.7 3 0 31 52.6 5 3 33 56.5 6 2 40 54.3 6 3NAVY 73 68.0 3 2 70 64.8 4 3 83 71.6 1 0 87 74.4 2 1 117 84.6 1 0 86 75.0 1 1NEBRASKA 70 67.4 2 1 31 55.6 6 3 48 58.7 5 3 65 66.7 4 1 61 64.2 2 1 45 56.5 4 2NEVADA 119 85.4 2 0 73 65.5 3 2 102 78.9 2 2 104 79.7 2 2 98 75.9 3 1 104 79.4 2 2NORTH CAROLINA 39 56.1 6 3 63 62.6 4 2 32 53.9 4 1 50 58.6 5 2 15 46.1 5 3 28 51.8 5 4NORTHERN ILLINOIS 113 83.2 1 1 116 83.9 1 0 118 90.8 1 0 115 83.5 1 0 115 82.8 2 1 115 85.2 1 0NORTHWESTERN 62 64.6 4 2 55 61.3 2 1 73 67.0 3 1 51 59.0 4 1 87 70.3 3 2 68 65.8 5 1NOTRE DAME 2 35.8 8 5 30 55.3 6 3 11 45.5 6 4 17 47.3 7 2 32 56.3 4 3 33 53.1 5 1OHIO 117 84.3 2 1 118 87.3 1 0 120 97.7 1 1 84 73.2 2 1 95 74.8 2 1 96 78.0 1 1OHIO STATE 24 52.3 5 4 59 62.0 4 2 43 57.4 4 3 36 55.0 4 1 23 52.6 6 3 54 59.8 5 2OKLAHOMA 19 51.3 4 2 10 46.5 7 4 3 41.2 7 3 39 55.6 5 2 80 69.2 2 0 17 47.6 5 3OKLAHOMA ST 49 58.1 4 2 8 43.4 7 5 13 45.8 6 4 66 67.3 4 1 22 51.6 3 1 65 64.8 4 3OREGON 36 55.4 4 2 25 54.3 5 2 40 56.8 5 2 36 55.0 5 4 7 39.8 8 3 37 54.1 6 1PENN STATE 25 52.8 5 3 37 56.8 5 2 38 55.4 5 3 25 50.7 6 3 45 60.6 5 2 41 54.4 5 3PITTSBURGH 46 57.6 4 1 83 69.3 4 0 68 64.6 2 1 9 45.8 5 2 55 63.0 4 0 10 45.7 5 3SAN DIEGO ST 97 76.5 2 2 113 81.8 3 0 107 81.3 3 1 119 87.6 2 1 89 72.2 3 1 95 77.8 2 1SMU 64 66.0 3 2 17 51.3 5 4 45 57.6 5 2 102 79.0 1 1 79 69.2 2 1 106 80.5 2 1SOUTH CAROLINA 9 46.3 8 2 9 45.3 8 4 5 42.1 8 5 13 46.5 7 5 10 42.3 9 5 11 46.7 7 3SOUTHERN MISS 98 76.8 1 0 53 61.0 4 3 81 71.1 4 1 109 80.9 1 1 111 80.7 0 0 117 86.7 2 1STANFORD 27 53.3 4 2 37 56.8 4 1 26 52.9 5 2 12 46.4 6 6 4 35.7 9 4 14 47.3 7 3SYRACUSE 41 56.7 6 0 117 85.0 1 0 95 77.0 1 0 38 55.6 4 2 57 63.5 4 0 58 61.2 4 2TCU 105 79.3 2 1 75 66.5 4 3 92 74.8 3 1 116 83.8 1 0 85 69.8 3 1 93 77.3 1 0TENNESSEE 10 47.4 7 2 48 59.4 4 1 24 52.2 7 3 15 47.2 7 4 27 53.8 5 4 19 48.4 6 5TEXAS A&M 52 59.6 2 1 3 37.5 7 5 10 44.9 7 4 53 59.4 5 1 50 61.1 2 2 37 54.1 5 3TEXAS TECH 77 68.5 1 0 1 34.2 8 6 18 50.1 6 4 61 63.3 4 1 74 67.3 2 1 48 57.8 4 2TOLEDO 102 78.7 2 1 95 73.3 3 2 103 80.4 3 1 76 70.7 4 2 38 59.6 6 2 79 72.3 2 1TROY 108 80.2 0 0 88 70.5 2 1 109 83.6 2 1 108 80.4 2 1 110 80.5 0 0 112 83.3 1 1TULSA 120 86.7 1 0 16 51.0 5 4 74 68.6 4 1 112 81.6 2 1 114 82.3 1 1 116 86.6 1 1UCF 112 82.8 2 1 56 61.5 4 3 89 73.9 3 0 107 80.2 1 0 113 80.8 1 1 118 86.8 0 0USC 29 53.5 4 2 5 40.8 5 3 6 43.4 6 3 20 48.2 6 5 11 43.8 7 3 9 45.5 7 3USF 56 61.7 6 1 101 76.2 2 0 78 70.3 2 1 35 53.7 4 2 41 60.1 4 1 25 50.6 6 3UTAH 100 77.0 3 2 84 69.8 3 1 91 74.6 2 1 96 77.2 3 2 88 70.7 3 1 70 68.4 3 2UTEP 118 84.9 1 0 65 62.8 4 4 101 78.3 3 2 118 85.4 1 0 112 80.8 1 1 119 91.6 1 0VIRGINIA TECH 50 58.7 4 2 39 57.0 6 3 42 57.4 4 2 43 56.8 6 3 29 54.5 5 1 44 56.2 5 4WASHINGTON 8 46.0 5 4 20 52.4 4 2 14 45.9 6 3 2 38.6 7 5 2 32.1 9 4 2 35.2 9 3WEST VIRGINIA 71 67.5 4 0 112 81.8 1 0 99 78.1 0 0 44 56.9 4 0 68 65.9 4 1 49 58.3 4 1WISCONSIN 88 71.9 3 2 21 52.9 5 2 69 64.7 4 2 58 62.5 5 3 70 66.4 3 3 72 68.5 4 2

BOWL TEAMS TOUGHEST UNITS FACEDHere is a chart showing how difficult of a schedule each bowl team faced in opposing units. For example, Texas A&M ranks #27 in the NCAA in pass eff defense, but #11 in our rankings (see our rankings on pg 13). The Aggies have taken on the #3 schedule of passing teams TY with 5 of their opponents ranking in our top 20 of pass offenses (7 in the top 40). Don’t be misled by pure stats. This chart is very helpful to look at bowl matchups. For instance if team A is playing Team B who has a strong rush offense, you will want to see how strong the rush defenses were that team B faced this year to get an idea of how they matchup vs their bowl opponent.

23

SACKS BY/VERSUS - BOWL TEAMS SK ALL'DKentucky 21 15Louisville 38 17LSU 32 22Maryland 27 22Miami (FL) 37 16Miami (OH) 32 34Michigan 17 11Michigan St 20 19Middle Tenn 33 20Mississippi St 26 22Missouri 37 20Navy 15 9Nebraska 31 24Nevada 32 11North Carolina 25 34NC State 39 34Northern Ill 24 13Northwestern 16 39Notre Dame 26 20Ohio 24 17Ohio St 19 22Oklahoma 34 21Oklahoma St 24 10

SK ALL'DOregon 31 8Penn St 16 11Pittsburgh 30 23San Diego St 28 9SMU 29 32South Carolina 39 28Southern Miss 26 16Stanford 27 5Syracuse 26 31TCU 25 9Tennessee 23 37Texas A&M 28 35Texas Tech 24 21Toledo 27 20Troy 35 23Tulsa 24 24UCF 29 20USF 28 24Utah 28 8UTEP 14 15Virginia Tech 33 26Washington 23 24West Virginia 40 25Wisconsin 23 12

SK ALL'DAir Force 13 5Alabama 22 32Arizona 33 27Arkansas 37 24Army 22 4Auburn 33 21Baylor 18 17Boise St 45 7Boston College 19 28BYU 20 21Clemson 29 16Connecticut 28 12East Carolina 14 14FIU 31 18Florida 21 23Florida St 46 25Fresno St 37 30Georgia 24 22Georgia Tech 17 15Hawaii 26 34Illinois 20 23Iowa 20 20Kansas St 18 30

FD's FD/gm FD's FD/gm TCU 309 25.75 136 11.33 14.42Boise St 303 25.25 184 15.33 9.92Oklahoma 344 26.46 229 17.62 8.84Ohio St 269 22.42 165 13.75 8.67Oregon 322 26.83 227 18.92 7.91NC State 282 23.5 190 15.83 7.67Nevada 353 27.15 255 19.62 7.53Wisconsin 291 24.25 202 16.83 7.42West Virginia 241 20.08 157 13.08 7.00Alabama 262 21.83 186 15.5 6.33Miami (FL) 268 22.33 196 16.33 6.00Stanford 297 24.75 225 18.75 6.00Arizona 283 23.58 225 18.75 4.83Oklahoma St 320 26.67 265 22.08 4.59Kentucky 269 22.42 216 18.00 4.42Hawaii 306 23.54 249 19.15 4.39Northern Ill 281 21.62 224 17.23 4.39Arkansas 268 22.33 216 18.00 4.33Southern Miss 291 24.25 241 20.08 4.17Tulsa 315 26.25 265 22.08 4.17Texas A&M 286 23.83 239 19.92 3.91UCF 274 21.08 224 17.23 3.85Virginia Tech 273 21 225 17.31 3.69

FIRST DOWNS PER GAME FOR BOWL TEAMS OFF DEF +/- FD/gm

Air Force 267 22.25 224 18.67 3.58BYU 255 21.25 216 18.00 3.25Utah 235 19.58 196 16.33 3.25Auburn 316 24.31 276 21.23 3.08Illinois 243 20.25 209 17.42 2.83Louisville 229 19.08 196 16.33 2.75Troy 273 22.75 243 20.25 2.50Missouri 255 21.25 229 19.08 2.17Iowa 242 20.17 217 18.08 2.09Notre Dame 238 19.83 215 17.92 1.91Miami (OH) 245 18.85 221 17.00 1.85South Carolina 266 20.46 242 18.62 1.84Nebraska 240 18.46 217 16.69 1.77Florida 230 19.17 214 17.83 1.34Penn St 233 19.42 217 18.08 1.34LSU 204 17.00 188 15.67 1.33Michigan 282 23.50 266 22.17 1.33Michigan St 240 20.00 224 18.67 1.33Army 203 18.45 191 17.36 1.09Clemson 217 18.08 204 17.00 1.08FIU 235 19.58 222 18.50 1.08Fresno St 225 18.75 214 17.83 0.92North Carolina 225 18.75 214 17.83 0.92Georgia 226 18.83 215 17.92 0.91

Georgia Tech 247 20.58 236 19.67 0.91Mississippi St 242 20.17 235 19.58 0.59Texas Tech 289 24.08 283 23.58 0.5Navy 228 20.73 223 20.27 0.46Northwestern 261 21.75 257 21.42 0.33Syracuse 202 16.83 198 16.50 0.33East Carolina 288 24.00 286 23.83 0.17SMU 269 20.69 269 20.69 0Florida St 256 19.69 258 19.85 -0.16Pittsburgh 219 18.25 221 18.42 -0.17San Diego St 237 19.75 241 20.08 -0.33Baylor 285 23.75 290 24.17 -0.42Ohio 207 17.25 212 17.67 -0.42Middle Tenn 227 18.92 237 19.75 -0.83USF 197 16.42 208 17.33 -0.91UTEP 252 21.00 266 22.17 -1.17Tennessee 211 17.58 234 19.50 -1.92Connecticut 191 15.92 217 18.08 -2.16Kansas St 231 19.25 259 21.58 -2.33Toledo 208 17.33 238 19.83 -2.5Washington 219 18.25 251 20.92 -2.67Maryland 208 17.33 241 20.08 -2.75Boston Coll 183 15.25 217 18.08 -2.83

OFF DEF +/- FD/gm OFF DEF +/- FD/gm

Page 24: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL - -

DL - 41/2

LB - 44

DB - 441/2

FIESTABOWL

Stoops has been to a BCS gm 8 of 10 years but his disappointing 4 str ATS losses make it even.UC thrilled at a BCS but fans will be scarce while OU will have their normal contingent.UC was -86 ypg in a weak BE league while OU was +159 in the powerful Big 12.OU has lost the L/2 Fiesta Bowls and Stoops cont’s to hear that.

CCH - -

Turf/ - 44

MTCH - 44

INT - 44

These programs come in from opposite ends of the spectrum for their 1st ever meeting as this is UC’s 1st ever BCS Bowl while it is OU’s 8th. The Huskies come in as the biggest dog of the BCS gms at +17’. Conn won a share of the BE Title and UC HC Edsall is 3-1 SU/ATS in bowls incl LY’s upset of SC as 3’ pt dogs. OU won their 7th B12 Title but has lost their L/5 BCS gms SU/ATS incl being upset in B2B yrs (‘06-’07) in the Fiesta Bowl where they are 1-3 SU/ATS. Stoops is 5-6 SU/3-8 ATS in bowls. The tms both faced Cincy TY with the Huskies (-2’) winning 38-17 at home on Nov 27th despite being outgained 399-357 while OU (-14) edged the Bearcats 31-29 despite being outgained 461-452. UC was 2-4 SU/ATS on the road TY but finished the ssn with 2 str outright upsets as an AD. OU had struggled on the road until winning their L/3 outside of Norman for the conf crown. Both are young with UC having only 5 Sr starters while OU has just 4. The Huskies began the ssn with high hopes coming off their upset of SC in LY’s bowl. Prospects looked bleak after they began the ssn 3-4 with losses to Temple and Rutgers that had some calling for Edsall to be ousted. UC went on to upset BE leaders WV, Pitt and Syr in 3 str gms to gain control of the BE and took care of business vs Cincy and USF to tie WV and Pitt for the BE Title and grab the BCS bid. QB Frazer began the ssn as the starter (1st 4) but was benched for Endres (2 sts). Endres was then dismissed and instead of going back to Frazer, Edsall started Box vs L’ville (4-12, 35 yds) but he left the gm with inj and the job went back to Frazer. No doubt the strength of the offense is 5’9” 193 RB Todman who is #2 in the FBS in rush ypg (143). The receivers were shortchanged due to the inconsistencies at QB with UC finishing last in the BE in pass ypg (145). The OL avg 6’5” 305 with 2 Sr st’rs. UC is tied for 14th in the FBS (1st BE) in sks all’d (12, 3.8%) and don’t have the benefit of a mobile QB. UC is #2 in the BE in rush ypg (180, 4.7) but 5th in ttl off due to the poor passing. Overall UC has our #67 off and #51 def. The DL avg 6’3” 268 with 0 Sr st’rs. UC has all’d 147 rush ypg (3.9) and the def has posted 27 sks. UC boasts some of the best LB’s in the BE led by 2x 1st Tm BE MLB Wilson who leads the BE in tkls. UC is #33 in our pass D rankings all’g 206 ypg (58%) with a 13-19 ratio and leads the BE in int (19). UC is #44 in our ST rankings with a poor net punt avg of 34.8 (2nd last BE) but lead the BE in KR avg (26.5) with 2 TD. After an “off” 8-5 ssn, the Sooners proved that they are the B12’s most powerful program by winning their L/4 to wind up in Glendale on NY’s Day. OU lost OC Wilson after the championship gm but veteran staffers QB cch Heupel/WR cch Norvell should be effective replacements. QB Jones despite some road struggles vs MO and A&M, rebounded to pilot our #9 off. The workhorse is AA RB Murray who led FBS RB’s in rec’s in addition to rushing for 1,121 yds. Biletnikoff finalist and AA WR Broyles finished #2 FBS in rec despite a nagging ankle inj. The OL (6’5” 297) all’d 21 sks (3.6%) but did struggle in short yd situations. The Sooners D had its own struggles replacing AA DT McCoy as the top interior lineman and Taylor was never 100% after LY’s gruesome leg inj before he was KO’d for the ssn vs TT. B12’s DL of the Yr DE Beal is #2 all-time in school history in sks. The LB’s suffered a blow when projected MLB Box missed the 1st 4 due to a back inj (burned by mobile QB’s early on). OU’s 152 rush ypg (4.3) all’d was the most in the Stoops era. OU ranked #8 in pass eff D (212, 55%, 15-17) led by All-B12 S Carter. The ST are #38 with P Way’s 40.5 net finishing #5 NCAA. The K’s continue to be a concern although Stevens hit 10 of his L/11 after winning the job back for the L/4. Broyles’ ankle inj limited his effectiveness on PR but Madu provided a spark on KR. The Sooners all’d 3.2 on PR and 20.5 on KR with 3 TD. There’s a reason this is the biggest line of all the bowls and if you look to the left at the checklist it pretty much explains why. The only question in this gm is the motivation of the Sooners and with the recent bowl disappointments you can be assured Stoops will have his team ready. UC has been one of the most fortunate teams in football as they’ve been outgained in 6 of their 7 conf gms yet came away with the championship. It’s not hard to favor a team when they have a superior offense, superior D, better ST’s and are hungry for a BCS Bowl win. FORECAST: Oklahoma by 28 RATING: 3★ OKLAHOMA

Crowd

QB - 444

HUSKIES ATS: 8-4 O/U: 5-7

UC OU UC OU UC OU

RB - - WR - 441/2

ST - 1/2 SCH - 444

OVERALL -

UC avg 6-5 305, 2 Sr, 12 sk all’d (3.8%), 4.7 ypc.OU avg 6-5 297,1 Sr, 21 sk all’d (3.6%), 3.4 ypc.UC avg 6-3 268, 0 Sr, 21.5 of tm 27 sk, 3.9 ypc.OU avg 6-3 272, 1 Sr, 23.5 of tm 34 sk, 4.3 ypc.Wilson #1 tkl’r w/115, 10 tfl, Moore #2, 10.5 tfl.Lewis #1 tkl’r w/99, 5.5 tfl, Wort #7, 7.5 tfl.UC #33 pass eff D, 206 ypg (58%), 13-19 ratio.OU #8 pass eff D, 212 ypg (55%), 15-17 ratio.

OKLAHOMA

by 21 4’s

CONNECTICUT (8-4)

OKLAHOMA (11-2)

UC OU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

January 1, 2011 • 8:30 pm ESPN • University of Phoenix Stadium • Glendale, AZPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.CONNECTICUT 150 93 20 2.6 – 97.8OKLAHOMA 156 363 38 2.7 – 105.1

UC OU

SOONERS ATS: 7-6 O/U: 6-7RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGDeMARCO MURRAY #5 13/13 257 1152 31 1121 14 4.4Roy Finch #16 8/1 85 412 14 398 2 4.7Mossis Madu #149 10/0 58 266 15 251 1 4.3Trey Millard #19 13/2 24 74 0 74 3 3.1Landry Jones #3 13/13 50 88 213 -125 1 -2.5PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTLandry Jones #3 13/13 568 371 65.3 4289 35 11RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGRYAN BROYLES #41 13/13 118 1452 12.3 13 81Kenny Stills #13 13/13 53 713 13.5 5 59DeMarco Murray #5 13/13 69 595 8.6 5 76Cameron Kenney #17JC 13/3 26 390 15.0 3 86James Hanna #25 13/11 17 284 16.7 6 76PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Tress Way #29 13 69 3049 44.2 14 40.5 0 17KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGJimmy Stevens #3 11 47-47 9-10 6-8 2-3 0-0 17-21 42Patrick O’Hara – 9 9-10 0-0 3-4 1-2 0-0 4-6 45POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Travis Lewis #49 13/13 99 1.5 4 3 3S Jonathan Nelson #38 13/13 98 0 3 6 2S QUINTON CARTER #220 13/13 92 0 2.5 5 4DE JEREMY BEAL #112 13/13 66 8.5 17.5 6 0CB Jamell Fleming #38 12/12 64 1 6.5 13 4DB Tony Jefferson #6 13/8 63 1 5 7 1LB Tom Wort #11 11/9 61 4.5 3 0 0CB Demontre Hurst #134 13/13 44 0 4 10 1DE Frank Alexander #120 12/7 36 6 5 2 0LB Ronnell Lewis #6 10/4 35 2.5 1.5 3 1CB Aaron Colvin #144 13/1 31 0 2 3 0LB Austin Box #6 8/4 29 0 1.5 0 1PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDRyan Broyles 29 176 6.1 0 DeMarco Murray 10 249 24.9 0 Mossis Madu 10 292 29.2 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGJORDAN TODMAN #124 11/11 302 1632 58 1574 14 5.2Robbie Frey #150 10/0 70 402 21 381 4 5.4Zach Frazer #7 10/9 25 86 55 31 0 1.2Cody Endres #186 3/2 2 1 0 1 0 0.5PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTZach Frazer #7 10/9 222 117 52.7 1202 5 4Cody Endres #186 3/2 75 45 60.0 471 5 2RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGMichael Smith #144 12/11 42 595 14.2 2 56Kashif Moore #157 12/9 32 390 12.2 4 40Ryan Griffin #91 12/8 27 197 7.3 1 18PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Cole Wagner – 12 72 2932 40.7 11 34.8 0 24KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGDAVE TEGGART #46 12 34-34 9-10 9-10 3-7 2-2 23-29 52POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB LAWRENCE WILSON #192 12/12 115 3.5 6.5 2 1LB Sio Moore #218 12/9 104 1.5 9 1 1CB Dwayne Gratz #147 12/12 60 0 2 8 1S Jerome Junior #88 12/9 53 0 2 0 4CB Blidi Wreh-Wilson #271 12/12 50 0 1 4 4LB Scott Lutrus #331 9/8 48 0.5 2 0 1DB Mike Lang #218 12/3 41 0 0 1 2DL KENDALL REYES #201 12/12 38 2.5 7.5 4 2DE JESSE JOSEPH #606 11/11 37 8.5 3 0 0S Harris Agbor #540 10/8 34 0 4 2 0DT Twyon Martin #293 11/11 28 3 2 0 0DE Trevardo Williams #99 12/7 27 4.5 5 1 0DT Shamar Stephen #271 12/7 27 2 2 0 0LB Greg Lloyd #129 7/3 25 0 3 0 1S Kijuan Dabney #244 9/4 18 0 0 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDMack Taylor 15 126 8.4 0 Nick Williams 11 463 42.1 2Nick Williams 7 94 13.4 0 Robbie Frey 12 313 26.1 0

OL - -

DL 1/2 -

LB 4 -

DB 44 -

ROSEBOWL

HC Patterson gets the most out of his players while Bielema has made some ? decisions.Wisky will have the edge in fans and have to give the edge to a Big 10 tm in the Rose Bowl.TCU has done a good job handling the big OL’s they’ve faced and they have a mobile QB.UW on a 6 gm ATS streak (negative) but is a dog vs non-AQ tm.

CCH 1/2 -

Turf/ - 41/2

MTCH 1/2 -

INT - -

TCU trailed Boise most of the yr in the AP polls, but jumped them in the BCS standings after a 47-7 blowout of then-undefeated Utah. TCU breathed a sigh of relief with Nevada’s upset of the Broncos which assured them of becoming the 1st non-AQ to make consecutive BCS bowls and the 1st to play in the Rose Bowl. TCU easily sold its allotment of 20,000 tix while UW has a 35,000 allotment and outnumbered P10 fans in their 3 recent trips to Pasadena. Patterson is 5-4 SU/4-4-1 ATS in bowls losing LY’s Fiesta Bowl to Boise,17-10 (-7). The final BCS standings officially gave UW the B10’s nod as they were co-champs with MSU and OSU all tied at 11-1 (7-1 in B10 play). This is the Badgers 7th trip to Pasadena (1st S/’99) where they are 3-3 SU winning their L/3 (2-1 ATS). Under Bielema UW is 2-2 SU/ATS in bowls with this being their 1st BCS bid. They both faced UNLV in LV as the Frogs (-34’) won 48-6 on 10/30 (30-12 FD and 530-197 yd edges). UW (-20) beat the Rebels 41-21 in the opener (23-10 FD and 475-217 yd edges). TCU was fav’d in every gm TY but this is only the 2nd gm (Utah -5) where the line has been under 13. UW was 2-0 SU/ATS as a dog TY with their 2 biggest wins of the yr B2B vs OSU and at Iowa. TCU flat out dominated opp’s TY outscoring them 43-11 behind their vaunted D. The closest game for the Frogs was a 5 pt win over underrated SDSt. TCU fell behind 14-0 (its biggest deficit TY) but scored 37 unanswered before all’g SDSt to battle back. The #10 offense has had some slow starts TY as the Frogs had leads of just 14 or less at halftime 5x’s incl 3 gms of single-digit leads. Sr QB Dalton (1st Tm MWC) does not hesitate to make plays with his feet (407 rush) and is #5 NCAA pass eff. RB Wesley is the first Frog over 1,000 yds rushing S/’03. For the first time S/’03-’04, TCU has 2 rec’s with more than 500 yds in B2B seasons. The OL avg 6’4” 317 with 4 Sr st’rs. Led by two 1st Tm MWC’ers (incl Rimington winner Kirkpatrick), they pave the way for 261 ypg (5.5) while giving up 9 sks (2.9%). TCU placed 8 defenders on the first two All-MWC teams. They lead the NCAA in many categories and our #3 D. The DL (6’2” 281), with 3 Sr starters, has totaled 17.5 of the tm’s 25 sks. LB Brock leads TCU in tkls. The Frogs rank #2 in our pass eff D led by 1st Tm MWC Johnson and had 3 IR TD’s TY. The ST’s unit (#9) is led by Kerley who avg an outstanding 12.9 on PR and 28.0 on KR. P Kelton has landed 15 In20 and the PR D is giving up 7.2 (KR D 20.5). Johnny Unitas QB Awd Winner Tolzien (#5 NCAA pass eff) leads the NCAA in comp % which is also a new B10 record. UW is the only team in B10 history to avg 40+ in conf play and have 3 RB who have at least 13 rush TD. HC Bielema immediately saw the power/speed potential in B10’s ‘09 OPY Clay and true Fr White. Clay became the 1st back in 29 gms to have 100 yds vs Ohio St but suffered a knee inj missing the L/3. #3 TB Ball scored the GW TD vs Iowa and ran for 645 yd and 13 TD in the L/4. The WR corps struggled with inj’s as their top 2 (Toon and Gilreath) missed 4 and 2. Mackey finalist TE Kendricks led the squad in rec. The true stars are the OL (6’5” 321, 3 Sr) led by B10 OL of the Yr/Outland winner LT Carimi. UW ran for less than 150 yds just once (142 vs Iowa) and they all’d just 12 sks (4.7%). UW (#12 off) also had the NCAA’s fewest pens per gm and was tied for the NCAA lead with just 9 TO’s lost. All-B10 DE Watt leads the DL (avg 6’4” 279) with big plays in big gms. Wisky (#37 D) suffered a huge loss when LY’s B10 Fr of the Yr LB Borland was KO’d (shoulder) and Taylor led the unit in tfl. The secondary (#32 pass eff D all’g 192, 56%, 19-14) cut down on big plays. ST’s (#68) have been the source of big plays TY for both the Badgers and their opponents. After allowing KR’s of 97 and 95 yds vs Arizona St, the Badgers blk’d the gm tying xp in a 1 pt win. A 74 yd PR TD keyed MSU’s win but perhaps the biggest play of the season was Gilreath’s 97 yd KR TD on the opening KO vs OSU. There have been times when non-AQ teams have reached a BCS bowl without being truly deserving but this is not one of them as this Horned Frogs unit has both an excellent offense and defense. They’ll look forward to the challenge of their 2nd straight BCS game. Wisky comes in as B10 Champs and is now an underdog to a MWC team in the Rose Bowl. They’ll play the disrespect card and it will be a great matchup with their big physical OL and trio of solid RB’s vs the TCU front 7.FORECAST: TCU by 6 RATING: 1★ TCU

Crowd

QB 4 -

HORNED FROGS ATS: 7-5 O/U: 6-5-1

TCU UW TCU UW TCU UW

RB - 41/2 WR - -

ST 41/2 - SCH - 1/2

OVERALL -

TCU avg 6-4 317, 4 Sr, 9 sk all’d (2.9%), 5.5 ypc.UW avg 6-5 321, 3 Sr, 12 sk all’d (4.7%), 5.5 ypc. TCU avg 6-2 281, 3 Sr, 17.5 of tm 25 sk, 3.1 ypc.UW avg 6-4 279, 0 Sr, 18 of tm 23 sk, 4.0 ypc.Brock #1 tkl’r w/97, 5.5 tfl, Carder #4, 6.5 tfl.Sorensen #1 tkl’r w/60, 1 tfl, St Jean #3, 2 tfl.TCU #2 pass eff D, 126 ypg (48%), 10-12 ratio.UW #32 pass eff D, 192 ypg (56%), 19-14 ratio.

TCU

by 3' 4’s

TCU (12-0)

WISCONSIN (11-1)

TCU UW CHECKLIST COMMENTS

January 1, 2011 • 5:00 pm ESPN • Rose Bowl • Pasadena, CAPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.TCU 211 208 34 2.7 444 95.1WISCONSIN 205 133 28 1.4 – 97.6

TCU UW

BADGERS ATS: 7-4-1 O/U: 8-3-1RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGJames White #59 11/0 148 1061 32 1029 14 7.0John Clay #3 10/9 176 952 16 936 13 5.3Montee Ball #64 11/3 141 881 17 864 17 6.1Scott Tolzien #109 12/12 26 64 78 -14 0 -0.5PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTScott Tolzien #109 12/12 245 182 74.3 2300 16 6RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGLANCE KENDRICKS #17 12/10 39 627 16.1 5 34Nick Toon #14 8/6 33 413 12.5 3 30David Gilreath #51 10/1 21 347 16.5 1 45Jared Abbrederis #692 12/2 19 273 14.4 3 74Isaac Anderson #142 12/5 23 223 9.7 0 30PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Brad Nortman #39 12 35 1497 42.8 9 37.2 0 13KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGPhilip Welch #25 12 66-66 2-2 5-5 8-11 0-1 15-19 49POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Blake Sorenson #62 12/11 60 0 1 1 2DE JJ WATT #122 12/12 59 7 14 7 1LB Culmer St Jean #301 12/11 59 0 2 2 1CB ANTONIO FENELUS #416 12/12 53 0 0 7 4S Aaron Henry #139 12/12 53 0 0.5 6 2LB Mike Taylor #66 11/11 51 1 7 0 2S Niles Brinkley #79 12/12 46 0 0 9 0DE Louis Nzegwu #68 12/12 44 3 4.5 2 0S Jay Valai #239 11/11 39 0 2 3 1CB Devin Smith #180 12/1 29 0 1 1 1DT Patrick Butrym #37 12/12 27 2.5 0.5 1 0LB Kevin Claxton #164 12/1 24 0 2 0 0DT Jordan Kohout #33 11/7 22 1 0.5 0 0DE David Gilbert #87 10/7 20 1.5 0 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG T#D KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDDavid Gilreath 6 69 11.5 0 David Gilreath 23 593 25.8 1Jared Abbrederis 7 67 9.6 0 James White 17 329 19.4 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGED WESLEY #183 12/12 162 1080 15 1065 11 6.6Matthew Tucker #96 12/1 144 719 25 694 7 4.8Waymon James #80 10/0 83 500 11 489 5 5.9Andy Dalton #74 12/12 77 481 74 407 5 5.3Casey Pachall #27 8/0 15 107 13 94 2 6.3PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTANDY DALTON #74 12/12 293 194 66.2 2638 26 6Casey Pachall #27 8/0 9 6 66.7 78 1 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJosh Boyce #228 12/6 33 602 18.2 6 93JEREMY KERLEY #127 12/10 50 517 10.3 10 50Jimmy Young #294 12/9 27 429 15.9 4 45Bart Johnson #129 12/5 30 396 13.2 3 37Antoine Hicks #38 11/2 12 171 14.2 2 41PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Anson Kelton #85 11 38 1602 42.2 13 36.8(t) 0 15KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGRoss Evans #56 12 65-70 6-7 4-4 1-2 0-0 11-13 43POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB TANNER BROCK #42 12/12 97 2 3.5 3 1S Colin Jones #230 12/11 70 2 8.5 2 1S TEJAY JOHNSON #84 12/12 56 0 1.5 3 3LB TANK CARDER #500 12/12 54 2.5 4 5 1S Tekerrein Cuba #54 12/5 45 0 2 1 0S Alex Ibiloye #560 10/7 36 0 4.5 1 0DE WAYNE DANIELS #57 12/12 33 6.5 5.5 1 0CB Jason Teague #178 12/12 33 0 1.5 7 2DE Stansly Maponga #173 11/11 29 2.5 0.5 1 0LB Kenny Cain #91 12/0 27 0 1 1 0CB Greg McCoy #329 12/12 25 0 0 5 2S Jurrell Thompson #68 12/0 22 1 0 0 1NT Cory Grant #495 12/12 18 3.5 1.5 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJEREMY KERLEY 30 388 12.9 0 JEREMY KERLEY 17 476 28.0 0

24

Page 25: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

NCAA OFF RANKS REDZONE OFF NCAA DEF RANKS REDZONE DEF Scr YPG PPG TURNOVERS Scr YDS Scr Rush Pass Rank Drive TD’s % Team Record DIFF DIFF lost + Total YDS Scr Rush Pass Rank Drive TD’s % 25 32 2 117 38 47 35 85% Air Force 8-4 86 10.0 17 18 1 44 37 100 5 90 45 29 87% 27 21 36 28 52 53 32 83% Alabama 9-3 140 20.5 14 25 11 6 5 22 12 6 29 10 69% 23 47 85 9 107 51 29 75% Arizona 7-5 102 8.2 18 18 0 37 33 39 44 64 35 21 83% 10 16 65 3 5 46 33 91% Arkansas 10-2 150 14.6 23 25 2 34 43 69 16 71 37 20 84% 86 52 9 120 5 45 34 91% Army 6-5 6 3.8 12 23 11 27 55 50 25 90 31 24 87% 7 6 6 69 27 63 44 87% Auburn 13-0 136 18.2 15 20 5 54 54 11 105 95 40 25 88% 12 29 23 20 76 44 22 80% Baylor 7-5 51 2.8 18 20 2 98 83 73 114 64 54 31 83% 4 2 24 6 33 64 46 86% Boise St 11-1 260 33.1 15 24 9 4 4 6 3 2 27 12 56% 105 109 87 93 82 39 13 79% Boston College 7-5 -1 -0.6 23 30 7 14 19 1 83 71 37 15 84% 80 84 46 86 27 45 26 87% BYU 6-6 15 2.6 19 20 1 33 32 61 21 102 28 19 89% 87 86 73 84 114 42 22 71% Clemson 6-6 14 6.1 21 18 -3 23 9 30 27 83 36 18 86% 96 62 31 112 4 45 24 93% Connecticut 8-4 -29 7.1 17 29 12 48 23 57 42 53 36 16 81% 22 12 91 7 5 58 44 91% East Carolina 6-6 -33 -5.3 25 20 -5 120 118 116 108 90 62 46 87% 44 53 28 68 38 47 28 85% FIU 6-6 39 1.4 20 21 1 57 65 69 41 20 40 21 75% 79 48 44 85 116 53 33 70% Florida 7-5 54 8.2 25 24 -1 9 31 26 13 53 36 19 81% 55 38 42 61 17 59 37 88% Florida St 9-4 38 11.9 22 22 0 41 25 25 67 24 45 19 76% 71 45 55 67 33 43 26 86% Fresno St 8-4 15 0.8 23 13 -10 50 79 66 34 80 39 24 85% 48 23 72 38 12 54 34 89% Georgia 6-6 58 11.2 14 24 10 30 49 59 19 64 35 26 83% 34 55 1 119 93 52 30 77% Georgia Tech 6-6 36 1.4 23 21 -2 67 60 78 47 29 46 28 78% 8 9 106 1 63 62 35 82% Hawaii 10-3 153 17.2 20 36 16 39 42 32 53 20 40 27 75% 57 34 13 115 3 48 31 94% Illinois 6-6 42 7.8 19 25 6 38 53 29 54 110 41 20 90% 61 49 76 45 12 45 30 89% Iowa 7-5 62 12.7 9 22 13 15 7 6 55 24 38 21 76% 62 25 20 97 5 43 35 91% Kansas St 7-5 -63 5.1 18 22 4 106 74 118 52 71 37 21 84% 26 26 47 21 52 48 34 83% Kentucky 6-6 83 4.5 19 15 -4 49 74 79 18 112 47 33 91% 65 71 30 78 52 36 22 83% Louisville 6-6 71 7.3 15 18 3 12 15 51 9 35 28 15 79% 92 50 33 107 27 46 24 87% LSU 10-2 31 11.0 23 28 5 8 9 38 10 35 29 18 79% 85 42 94 63 33 43 27 86% Maryland 8-4 -11 8.3 12 25 13 46 38 35 66 17 50 25 74% 31 58 26 49 99 50 28 76% Miami (FL) 7-5 105 7.4 32 28 -4 16 21 81 2 7 46 18 70% 83 103 114 33 93 47 20 77% Miami (OH) 9-4 11 -2.8 22 30 8 29 50 19 57 7 40 23 70% 6 22 11 35 52 52 39 83% Michigan 7-5 53 0.5 27 18 -9 108 102 94 111 71 51 31 84% 39 39 40 44 5 43 30 91% Michigan St 11-1 69 11.3 18 24 6 31 26 21 60 13 41 21 73% 70 62 32 80 87 41 25 78% Middle Tenn 6-6 -12 -0.6 33 17 -16 71 66 99 24 35 52 31 79% 47 58 16 91 99 42 25 76% Mississippi St 8-4 36 6.8 20 26 6 53 27 20 89 29 36 16 78% 45 44 48 43 17 49 29 88% Missouri 10-2 50 15.2 16 27 11 42 6 56 38 1 31 13 55% 36 40 5 118 52 53 38 83% Navy 8-3 34 8.2 11 21 10 69 45 62 81 71 43 29 84%

25

2010 LOGS FOR BOWL MATCHUPS LOGS CONTINUED ON From Pg 8

NC

AA

RA

NK

ING

S F

OR

BO

WL

TE

AM

S

FLORIDA STATE(SU: 9-4 ATS: 7-6) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Samford W -36 59-6S 11 at Oklahoma L +7 17-47S 18 BYU W -10 34-10S 25 Wake Forest W -20 31-0O 2 at Virginia W -6’ 34-14O 9 at Miami, Fl W +6 45-17O 16 Boston Coll L -21’ 24-19O 23 O 28 at NC St(Th) L -3’ 24-28 N 6 N Carolina (HC) L -10’ 35-37N 13 Clemson L -5’ 16-13N 20 at Maryland W -3’ 30-16N 27 Florida W -2’ 31-7D 4 † Virginia Tech L +3’ 33-44SOUTH CAROLINA

(SU: 9-4 ATS: 7-6) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 2 S Miss (Th) W -13’ 41-13S 11 Georgia W -3 17-6S 18 Furman L -33 38-19S 25 at Auburn L +3 27-35O 2 O 9 Alabama W +7 35-21O 16 at Kentucky L -5 28-31O 23 at Vanderbilt W -12 21-7O 30 Tennessee L -17 38-24N 6 Arkansas L -4’ 20-41N 13 at Florida W +6 36-14N 20 Troy W -21’ 69-24N 27 at Clemson W -3 29-7D 4 † Auburn L +4’ 17-56

NORTHWESTERN(SU: 7-5 ATS: 3-9) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 at Vanderbilt L -3 23-21S 11 Illinois St W -28 37-3S 18 at Rice W -6’ 30-13S 25 C Michigan L -6’ 30-25O 2 at Minnesota L -5 29-28O 9 Purdue L -8’ 17-20O 16 O 23 Mich St (HC) L +6 27-35O 30 at Indiana L -4 20-17N 6 at Penn St L +6’ 21-35N 13 Iowa W +10 21-17N 20 † Illinois L +7’ 27-48N 27 at Wisconsin L +23’ 23-70D 4

TEXAS TECH(SU: 7-5 ATS: 5-6-1) Field TurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 5 SMU (S) L -13’ 35-27S 11 at New Mexico W -25 52-17S 18 Texas L +3’ 14-24S 25 O 2 at Iowa St L -7 38-52O 9 † Baylor W -1 45-38O 16 Oklahoma St L -3 17-34O 23 at Colorado T -3 27-24O 30 at Texas A&M L +7 27-45N 6 Missouri W +4 24-17N 13 at Oklahoma L +15’ 7-45N 20 Weber St W -26 64-21N 27 Houston W -9 35-20D 4

PENN STATE(SU: 7-5 ATS: 5-7) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Youngstown St L -39’ 44-14S 11 at Alabama L +12’ 3-24S 18 Kent St W -21 24-0S 25 Temple L -14 22-13O 2 at Iowa L +7’ 3-24O 9 Illinois (HC) L -8’ 13-33O 16O 23 at Minnesota W -9’ 33-21O 30 Michigan W +3 41-31N 6 Northwestern W -6’ 35-21N 13 at Ohio St L +18’ 14-38N 20 † Indiana W -10 41-24N 27 Michigan St L +1 22-28D 4

FLORIDA(SU: 7-5 ATS: 6-6) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Miami, Oh L -38 34-12S 11 USF W -16 38-14S 18 at Tennessee W -13’ 31-17S 25 Kentucky W -14 48-14O 2 at Alabama L +8’ 6-31O 9 LSU L -6’ 29-33O 16 Miss St (HC) L -8 7-10O 23O 30 † Georgia (OT) W +1 34-31N 6 at Vanderbilt W -14 55-14N 13 S Carolina L -6 14-36N 20 Appalachian St W -25’ 48-10N 27 at Florida St L +2’ 7-31D 4

MICHIGAN STATE(SU: 11-1 ATS: 7-5) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 W Michigan W -23 38-14S 11 † Florida Atl L -26 30-17S 18 Notre Dame (OT) L -3’ 34-31S 25 N Colorado W -31 45-7O 2 Wisconsin W +1’ 34-24O 9 at Michigan W +4’ 34-17O 16 Illinois (HC) W -7 26-6O 23 at Northwestern W -6 35-27O 30 at Iowa L +6’ 6-37N 6 Minnesota L -24 31-8N 13 N 20 Purdue L -20 35-31N 27 at Penn St W -1 28-22D 4

ALABAMA(SU: 9-3 ATS: 7-5) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 San Jose St W -37’ 48-3S 11 Penn St W -12’ 24-3S 18 at Duke W -23’ 62-13S 25 at Arkansas L -7 24-20O 2 Florida W -8’ 31-6O 9 at S Carolina L -7 21-35O 16 Mississippi L -20’ 23-10O 23 at Tennessee W -16’ 41-10O 30 N 6 at LSU L -6’ 21-24N 13 Miss St W -13’ 30-10N 20 Georgia St W -45 63-7N 26 Auburn (F) L -3’ 27-28D 4

MICHIGAN(SU: 7-5 ATS: 3-9) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Connecticut W -3 30-10S 11 at Notre Dame W +3’ 28-24S 18 Massachusetts L -29 42-37S 25 Bowling Grn W -25’ 65-21O 2 at Indiana L -10 42-35O 9 Michigan St L -4’ 17-34O 16 Iowa L +3’ 28-38O 23 O 30 at Penn St L -3 31-41N 6 Illinois 3OT L -3 67-65N 13 at Purdue L -12’ 27-16N 20 Wisconsin L +4’ 28-48N 27 at Ohio St L +17 7-37D 4MISSISSIPPI STATE

(SU: 8-4 ATS: 6-6) Grass P.A.T.DATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Memphis W -21 49-7S 9 Auburn (Th) L +1 14-17S 18 at LSU L +7’ 7-29S 25 Georgia W -1 24-12O 2 Alcorn St L -42 49-16O 9 at Houston W -5 47-24O 16 at Florida W +8 10-7O 23 UAB (HC) L -20 29-24O 30 Kentucky W -6’ 24-17N 6 N 13 at Alabama L +13’ 10-30N 20 Arkansas 2OT L +3’ 31-38N 27 at Mississippi W -3 31-23D 4

TCU(SU: 12-0 ATS: 7-5) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 † Oregon St L -13 30-21S 11 Tenn Tech W -53 62-7S 18 Baylor W -21 45-10S 24 at SMU (F) L -17’ 41-24O 2 at Colorado St L -33’ 27-0O 9 Wyoming W -35 45-0O 16 BYU L -29 31-3O 23 Air Force W -18’ 38-7O 30 at UNLV W -34’ 48-6N 6 at Utah W -5 47-7N 13 San Diego St L -27’ 40-35N 20 N 27 at New Mexico W -43’ 66-17D 4

WISCONSIN(SU: 11-1 ATS: 7-4-1) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 at UNLV T -20 41-21 S 11 San Jose St L -39’ 27-14S 18 Arizona St L -12 20-19S 25 Austin Peay W -42’ 70-3O 2 at Michigan St L -1’ 24-34O 9 Minnesota (HC) L -22 41-23O 16 Ohio St W +3’ 31-18O 23 at Iowa W +6 31-30O 30 N 6 at Purdue W -20 34-13N 13 Indiana W -22’ 83-20N 20 at Michigan W -4’ 48-28N 27 Northwestern W -23’ 70-23D 4

CONNECTICUT(SU: 8-4 ATS: 8-4) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 at Michigan L +3 10-30S 11 TX Sthrn W -43 62-3 S 18 at Temple L -6 16-30S 25 Buffalo W -20’ 45-21O 2 Vanderbilt (HC) W -7 40-21O 8 at Rutgers (F) L -5 24-27O 16 O 23 at Louisville L +3 0-26O 29 W Virg (F) OT W +5’ 16-13N 6 N 11 Pittsburgh (Th) W +6 30-28N 20 at Syracuse W +3’ 23-6N 27 Cincinnati W -2’ 38-17D 4 at USF W +2’ 19-16

OKLAHOMA(SU: 11-2 ATS: 7-6) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Utah St L -34’ 31-24S 11 Florida St W -7 47-17S 18 Air Force L -16’ 27-24S 25 at Cincinnati L -14 31-29O 2 † Texas W -3’ 28-20O 9O 16 Iowa St W -22 52-0O 23 at Missouri L -3 27-36O 30 Colorado W -23’ 43-10N 6 at Texas A&M L -3 19-33N 13 Texas Tech W -15’ 45-7N 20 at Baylor W -7 53-24N 27 at Oklahoma St W +3 47-41D 4 † Nebraska L -4 23-20

VIRGINIA TECH(SU: 11-2 ATS: 10-3) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 6 † Boise St (M) L +1’ 30-33S 11 James Madison L -35 16-21S 18 E Carolina W -20’ 49-27S 25 at Boston Coll W -4 19-0O 2 at NC State W -3’ 41-30O 9 C Michigan W -21’ 45-21O 16 Wake Forest (HC) W -22’ 52-21O 23 Duke W -27 44-7O 30 N 4 GA Tech (Th) L -13 28-21N 13 at N Carolina W -3’ 26-10N 20 at Miami, Fl W -2 31-17N 27 Virginia W -23 37-7D 4 † Florida St W -3’ 44-33

STANFORD(SU: 11-1 ATS: 7-5) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Sacramento St L -42 52-17S 11 at UCLA W -6 35-0S 18 Wake Forest W -17’ 68-24S 25 at Notre Dame W -4’ 37-14O 2 at Oregon L +6’ 31-52O 9 USC L -10 37-35O 16 O 23 Wash St (HC) L -36 38-28O 30 at Washington W -7’ 41-0N 6 Arizona W -8 42-17N 13 at Arizona St L -4’ 17-13N 20 at California W -6’ 48-14N 27 Oregon St W -13’ 38-0D 4

ARKANSAS(SU: 10-2 ATS: 9-3) Grass/Little Rock: AstroDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Tenn Tech L -49’ 44-3S 11 ULM L -34 31-7S 18 at Georgia W +2 31-24S 25 Alabama W +7 20-24O 2 O 9 † Texas A&M W -5 24-17O 16 at Auburn L +3’ 43-65O 23 Mississippi W -10 38-24O 30 Vanderbilt W -20 49-14N 6 at S Carolina W +4’ 41-20N 13 UTEP W -28’ 58-21N 20 at Miss St 2OT W -3’ 38-31N 27 LSU W -3’ 31-23D 4

OHIO STATE(SU: 11-1 ATS: 9-2-1) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 2 Marshall (Th) W -28 45-7S 11 Miami, Fl W -8 36-24S 18 Ohio W -29’ 43-7S 25 E Michigan W -44’ 73-20O 2 at Illinois L -16’ 24-13O 9 Indiana W -23 38-10O 16 at Wisconsin L -3’ 18-31O 23 Purdue W -23’ 49-0O 30 at Minnesota W -25 52-10N 6N 13 Penn St W -18’ 38-14N 20 at Iowa T -3 20-17N 27 Michigan W -17 37-7D 4

MIDDLE TENNESSEE(SU: 6-6 ATS: 4-8) ArtificialDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 2 Minnesota (Th) L +1 17-24S 11 Austin Peay L -31’ 56-33S 18 at Memphis L -3’ 17-24S 25 at Louisiana W -2 34-14O 5 Troy (Tue) L -3 13-42O 9 O 16 at Georgia Tech L +18’ 14-42O 23 ULM (HC) W -12 38-10N 2 at Ark St (Tue) L -1’ 24-51N 6 N 13 North Texas L -11 17-23N 20 at WKU L -5 27-26N 27 Florida Atl W -5’ 38-14D 4 at FIU W +5 28-27

MIAMI (OH)(SU: 9-4 ATS: 8-5) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 at Florida W +38 12-34S 11 E Michigan L -14 28-21S 18 Colorado St W -7’ 31-10S 25 at Missouri L +20 13-51O 2 Kent St W +3 27-21O 9 at Cincinnati L +17 3-45O 16 at C Michigan W +13’ 27-20O 23 Ohio (HC) L +3 13-34O 30 at Buffalo W -3 21-9N 6N 10 at Bowling Grn (W) W -2’ 24-21N 17 at Akron (W) L -9 19-14N 23 Temple (Tue) W +7 23-3D 3 † N Illinois (F) W +17’ 26-21

TEXAS A&M(SU: 9-3 ATS: 8-3-1) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 SF Austin W -33’ 48-7S 11 Louis Tech W -19 48-16S 18 FIU L -28 27-20S 25 S 30 at Okla St (Th) T +3 35-38O 9 † Arkansas L +5 17-24O 16 Missouri L -3’ 9-30O 23 at Kansas W -14 45-10O 30 Texas Tech W -7 45-27N 6 Oklahoma W +3 33-19N 13 at Baylor W -3 42-30N 20 Nebraska W +2 9-6N 25 at Texas (Th) W -3’ 24-17D 4

LSU(SU: 10-2 ATS: 5-7) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 † N Carolina L -9’ 30-24S 11 at Vanderbilt W -10 27-3S 18 Miss St W -7’ 29-7S 25 W Virginia L -10 20-14O 2 Tennessee L -16’ 16-14O 9 at Florida W +6’ 33-29O 16 McNeese St L -42 32-10O 23 at Auburn L +5’ 17-24O 30 N 6 Alabama W +6’ 24-21N 13 ULM (HC) W -33 51-0N 20 Mississippi L -15’ 43-36N 27 at Arkansas L +3’ 23-31D 4

KENTUCKY(SU: 6-6 ATS: 6-6) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 at Louisville W -3 23-16S 11 WKU W -24’ 63-28S 18 Akron W -24’ 47-10S 25 at Florida L +14 14-48O 2 at Mississippi L +3 35-42O 9 Auburn W +6 34-37O 16 S Carolina W +5 31-28O 23 Georgia (HC) L +4 31-44O 30 at Miss St L +6’ 17-24N 6 Chlstn Sthrn L -46’ 49-21N 13 Vanderbilt W -15 38-20N 20 N 27 at Tennessee L +2’ 14-24D 4

PITTSBURGH(SU: 7-5 ATS: 6-4-2) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 2 at Utah (Th) OT T +3 24-27 S 11 New Hamp L -27 38-16S 18 S 23 Miami, Fl (Th) L +3’ 3-31O 2 FIU W -17’ 44-17O 9 at Notre Dame T +6 17-23O 16 at Syracuse W -2 45-14O 23 Rutgers W -12’ 41-21O 30 Louisville W -9 20-3N 6 N 11 at Conn (Th) L -6 28-30 N 20 at USF W -3 17-10N 26 W Virginia (F) L -2’ 10-35D 4 at Cincinnati W +1’ 28-10

NEVADA(SU: 12-1 ATS: 7-6) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 2 E Wash (Th) L -28 49-24S 11 Colorado St W -23’ 51-6S 17 California (F) W +2’ 52-31S 25 at BYU W -4 27-13O 2 at UNLV L -20’ 44-26O 9 San Jose St L -37’ 35-13O 16 at Hawaii L -6’ 21-27O 23 O 30 Utah St L -27 56-42N 6 at Idaho W -11 63-17N 13 at Fresno St L -8’ 35-34N 20 New Mex St W -38 52-6N 26 Boise St (F) OT W +14 34-31D 4 at Louisiana Tech W -8’ 35-17

BOSTON COLLEGE(SU: 7-5 ATS: 5-7) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Weber St L -24’ 38-20S 11 Kent St L -17’ 26-13S 18 S 25 Virg Tech L +4 0-19O 2 Notre Dame L +2’ 13-31O 9 at NC State L +9’ 17-44O 16 at Florida St W +21’ 19-24O 23 Maryland L -4 21-24O 30 Clemson W +7 16-10N 6 at Wake Forest W -3 23-13 N 13 at Duke W -3 21-16N 20 Virginia L -7 17-13N 27 at Syracuse W +3’ 16-7D 4

OREGON(SU: 12-0 ATS: 8-3-1) FieldTurfDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 New Mexico W -35 72-0S 11 at Tennessee W -11’ 48-13S 18 Portland St W -51 69-0S 25 Arizona St L -11’ 42-31O 2 Stanford W -6’ 52-31O 9 at Washington St L -35’ 43-23O 16 O 21 UCLA (Th) W -26 60-13O 30 at USC W -6’ 53-32N 6 Washington W -36’ 53-16N 13 at California L -19’ 15-13N 20 N 26 Arizona (F) T -19 48-29D 4 at Oregon St W -16’ 37-20

AUBURN(SU: 13-0 ATS: 9-4) GrassDATE OPPONENT W/L LINE SCORES 4 Arkansas St L -31’ 52-26S 9 at Miss St (Th) W -1 17-14S 18 Clemson (OT) L -7 27-24S 25 S Carolina W -3 35-27O 2 ULM W -35 52-3O 9 at Kentucky L -6 37-34O 16 Arkansas W -3’ 65-43O 23 LSU W -5’ 24-17O 30 at Mississippi W -7 51-31N 6 UT-Chatt (HC) L -41 62-24N 13 Georgia W -6’ 49-31N 20 N 26 at Alabama (F) W +3’ 28-27D 4 † S Carolina W -4’ 56-17

NCAA OFF RANKS REDZONE OFF NCAA DEF RANKS REDZONE DEF Scr YPG PPG TURNOVERS Scr YDS Scr Rush Pass Rank Drive TD’s % Team Record DIFF DIFF lost + Total YDS Scr Rush Pass Rank Drive TD’s % 35 28 10 109 38 40 26 85% Nebraska 10-3 110 15.5 22 23 1 10 8 52 7 102 35 16 89% 3 7 3 54 68 73 50 81% Nevada 12-1 158 20.5 16 22 6 65 36 23 106 35 47 23 79% 51 78 95 25 12 45 26 89% North Carolina 7-5 52 2.0 21 21 0 32 46 36 39 29 49 22 78% 39 29 93 19 87 64 35 78% NC State 8-4 66 10.1 21 24 3 35 39 12 78 42 40 24 80% 21 13 7 89 38 59 37 85% Northern Ill 10-3 113 18.8 14 24 10 26 16 27 35 11 32 16 72% 49 74 68 40 52 47 29 83% Northwestern 7-5 -23 -2.3 22 20 -2 92 67 92 85 83 43 29 86% 63 73 96 29 52 42 25 83% Notre Dame 7-5 25 5.3 24 21 -3 47 29 55 42 53 37 15 81% 94 54 39 105 17 41 31 88% Ohio 8-4 -5 6.3 25 30 -5 28 34 14 61 42 45 27 80% 18 11 14 55 27 63 39 87% Ohio St 11-1 198 26.1 15 29 14 2 3 4 4 7 27 14 70% 13 17 77 4 68 72 41 81% Oklahoma 11-2 114 14.5 16 30 14 58 35 63 51 112 32 17 91% 1 3 29 2 1 59 39 95% Oklahoma St 10-2 125 17.2 22 30 8 90 68 41 115 60 44 27 82% 2 1 4 48 45 63 42 84% Oregon 12-0 206 30.9 22 35 13 25 14 16 56 5 37 17 68% 68 80 75 52 76 44 24 80% Penn St 7-5 22 2.0 16 15 -1 45 40 76 23 118 32 24 94% 73 69 54 70 76 45 23 80% Pittsburgh 7-5 64 6.5 21 21 0 11 22 18 17 71 38 21 84% 19 20 64 11 52 53 30 83% San Diego St 8-4 97 12.3 22 15 -7 43 43 49 50 42 46 25 80% 33 66 78 22 45 43 30 84% SMU 7-6 52 0.2 24 15 -9 56 61 48 69 53 54 38 81% 50 36 60 47 27 53 36 87% South Carolina 9-4 33 9.1 21 25 4 52 48 9 107 10 45 22 71% 103 88 70 101 63 38 18 82% USF 7-5 -8 4.0 20 18 -2 21 19 33 21 42 35 15 80% 15 15 21 31 33 58 34 86% Southern Miss 8-4 96 8.2 16 25 9 55 81 13 103 116 38 28 92% 14 8 17 30 17 69 47 88% Stanford 11-1 142 22.5 15 29 14 24 11 24 32 29 27 18 78% 106 99 88 92 38 40 20 85% Syracuse 7-5 13 2.9 21 17 -4 5 13 42 6 35 34 16 79% 9 4 8 53 17 66 48 88% TCU 12-0 276 31.9 13 22 9 1 1 3 1 53 16 10 81% 74 61 100 36 99 37 18 76% Tennessee 6-6 -16 2.3 21 26 5 70 56 64 82 27 44 24 77% 20 37 43 18 17 48 30 88% Texas A&M 9-3 90 11.5 26 24 -2 51 27 15 94 3 43 20 63% 16 34 82 8 76 59 40 80% Texas Tech 7-5 -11 1.8 24 22 -2 116 85 68 120 27 53 29 77% 78 55 58 73 87 37 24 78% Toledo 8-4 -10 -0.5 19 33 14 62 71 28 93 13 48 28 73% 24 27 62 12 76 51 29 80% Troy 7-5 23 1.9 30 28 -2 93 92 80 101 35 42 27 79% 5 10 15 16 45 64 42 84% Tulsa 9-3 61 9.8 17 30 13 107 84 40 119 29 37 23 78% 58 24 25 83 45 57 40 84% UCF 10-3 66 15.8 17 21 4 18 12 10 45 102 27 18 89% 42 18 56 37 27 47 33 87% Utah 10-2 85 15.8 23 21 -2 20 23 8 59 71 32 15 84% 72 70 69 60 38 39 25 85% UTEP 6-6 -33 0.8 18 14 -4 86 58 90 72 60 50 32 82% 38 19 18 75 11 60 39 90% Virginia Tech 11-2 63 16.5 12 30 18 40 16 58 31 20 40 23 75% 75 93 45 77 17 34 22 88% Washington 6-6 -37 -9.1 17 17 0 84 93 103 36 116 48 34 92% 64 65 49 66 107 53 31 75% West Virginia 9-3 125 13.9 23 22 -1 3 2 2 11 42 20 6 80% 17 4 12 74 5 65 52 91% Wisconsin 11-1 127 22.8 9 23 14 22 29 30 26 95 32 19 88%

Page 26: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL - 4

DL - 4

LB - 4

DB - 41/2

SUGARBOWL

Petrino has bowl exp but in L/8Y Tressel 6 ATS wins and 3 Nat’l Champ appearances.Clearly in the middle of SEC country but no team travels better than the Bucks. Buckeyes have Top 10 pass eff D but haven’t faced this type of competition. 0-9 vs SEC tms is all that the Bucks will hear coming into this bowl.

CCH - 4

Turf/ - -

MTCH - -

INT - 44

This is the 1st ever meeting between the schools and the Sugar Bowl got their wish to host 2 high profile BCS programs. Ark is making its 1st trip to a BCS Bowl but HC Petrino took his L’ville tm to the Orange Bowl in ‘06 where they defeated WF, 24-13. Overall, Petrino is 3-2 SU but 1-4 ATS in bowls and LY led Ark (-7’) to a 20-17 OT win over EC in the Liberty Bowl. OSU is making a national record 9th BCS appearance (5-3 SU/ATS) and 6th consec. The Bucks are 5-4 SU/6-3 ATS in bowls under Tressel but will be reminded often by the media of their 0-9 SU/ATS record vs SEC tms in the postssn. OSU is 1-3 SU/0-4 ATS in New Orleans with their last trip here being the National Champ loss to LSU in ‘07 (38-24, +4). This is Ark’s 38th bowl and 6th trip to the Sugar Bowl with their last appearance on Jan 1, 1980, a 24-9 loss to AL. Ark fans sold out their allotment the day after the bowl was announced and they should have a slight crowd edge in SEC country. Ark was 4-1 ATS on the road TY and 3-1 ATS as a dog with 2 outright upsets. OSU went 1-2-1 ATS on the road TY with their lone SU loss coming at Wisky. UA went 6-2 SU/7-1 ATS vs bowl opp while OSU went 6-1 SU/4-2-1 ATS but the Bucks haven’t beaten a currently ranked squad (Ark 4 W’s). Ark has just 7 Sr st’rs while OSU has 11. Everyone knew Ark had a great offense (#5) led by future NFL QB Mallett and a strong receiving corps, but this yr the surprises were a greatly improved run gm led by 1st Tm SEC RB Davis and an improved D. Mallett led the SEC in pass ypg (#5 NCAA) for the 2nd str yr and was #3 in the NCAA in pass eff. Mallett transferred from Mich and actually faced the Bucks in ‘07 coming off the bench for an inj’d Henne in a 14-3 loss (1-3 for 8 yds) with current OSU LG Boren blk’g in front of him. Davis finished #3 in the SEC in rush ypg (99) despite not taking over the starting job until the L/5 (178 ypg L/6). One disappointing occurrence was losing top WR Childs to inj after 8 gms and another st’r Joe Adams was also banged up and only started 3. Mackey Award Winning TE DJ Williams led the tm in rec and led the SEC in rec by a TE. The OL avg 6’4” 315 with 3 Sr st’rs incl LT Love who will be 1 of the top OT’s in next yr’s NFL draft. The OL all’d 24 sks (5.7%) and paved the way for 151 rush ypg (4.6). The DL avg 6’4” 285 with 1 Sr st’r. Ark improved their sks to 37 (29 LY) which is #2 in the SEC. Ark’s biggest def improvement was in pass D where they finished #23 in our rankings (#80 LY) allowing just 182 ypg (55%) with an 11-11 ratio. UA’s ST feature solid P Breeding and K Hocker plus excellent PR Adams. The only weakness is KR’s with a low avg (19.6) and weak KR D (25.9). Ark finished the ssn on a 9-1 ATS run. After LY’s Rose Bowl MVP performance the expectations for QB Pryor’s ssn were enormous and he was named the B10’s Pressn OPY for the 2nd straight yr. While he greatly improved as a passer and provided OSU with its biggest play of the ssn - a 14 yd scramble on 4&10 at the 50 with 4:02 left on the gm winning TD drive vs Iowa - he wasn’t on either of the cch’s or media’s All-Conf ballot. He is still the 1st QB in the post WWII era to lead his tm to a B10 champ in his Fr, So and Jr ssns. “Boom” Herron took ahold of the TB job in conf play running for 109 ypg (5.8) with a TD in 11 straight gms. Gritty Sanzenbacher and sleek Posey make a formidable WR duo. C Brewster, LG Boren and LT Adams were all named all conf as the front (6’5” 305) all’d 22 sks (6.8%). OSU’s D continued its strong run as they finished #1 in our rankings. OSU’s DL is led by DE Heyward whose numbers dipped from ‘09 as he had a less exp’d line around him as the Bucks allowed Wisky’s Clay (104) to become the 1st RB to have 100 yd in 29 gms. LB’s Rolle and Homan earned All-Conf honors. OSU finished #9 in our pass eff D (156, 54%, 7-18) with FS Hines being 1 of the league’s hardest hitters. UW KR Gilreath ret’d the opening KO 97 yd for a TD and OSU also all’d a PR and KR TD in the same gm vs Miami (FL) for the 1st time in school history. After a rough start OSU cleaned up its act down the stretch to finish #56 in our ST rankings. The standouts were a KR unit that finished #3 NCAA led by Hall’s 85 yd KR TD vs Mich and K Barclay was consistent. This is the 8th BCS Bowl for the Buckeyes in 9 years and HC Tressel is 6-3 ATS with 2 losses in National Championship games. The Razorbacks come in as one of the hottest teams with 6 straight wins and covers but as we told you in the Cotton Bowl, that is actually a negative. The Buckeyes have a great set of CB’s and this will allow them to confuse Mallett with blitzes. When the Buckeyes have the ball, while you don’t perceive them as explosive they have scored 473 pts TY (2 off school record) and Terrelle Pryor continues to make this offense one of the country’s best. FORECAST: Ohio St by 10 RATING: 3★ OHIO ST

Crowd

QB - -

RAZORBACKS ATS: 9-3 O/U: 7-5

UA OSU UA OSU UA OSU

RB 1/2 - WR 1/2 -

ST - 1/2 SCH 4 -

OVERALL -

UA avg 6-4 315, 3 Sr, 24 sk all’d (5.7%), 4.6 ypc.OSU avg 6-5 305, 3 Sr, 22 sk all’d (6.8%), 5.3 ypc.UA avg 6-4 285, 1 Sr, 20 of tm 37 sk, 4.0 ypc.OSU avg 6-3 282, 2 Sr, 12 of tm 19 sk, 3.0 ypc.Franklin #1 tkl’r w/93, 12.5 tfl, Nelson #2, 11 tfl.Rolle #1 tkl’r w/70, 10 tfl, Homan #2, 2 tfl.UA #23 pass eff D, 182 ypg (55%), 11-11 ratio.OSU #9 pass eff D, 156 ypg (54%), 7-18 ratio.

OHIO ST

by 6 4’s

ARKANSAS (10-2)

OHIO ST (11-1)

UA OSU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

January 4, 2011 • 8:30 pm ESPN • Superdome • New Orleans, LAPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.ARKANSAS 96 305 27 2.4 – 102.6OHIO ST 209 190 31 2.5 4 100.1

UA OSU

BUCKEYES ATS: 9-2-1 O/U: 7-4-1RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGKNILE DAVIS #26 12/7 178 1215 32 1183 13 6.6Broderick Green #9 12/2 104 389 24 365 3 3.5Ronnie Wingo Jr #12 12/5 40 246 7 239 1 6.0Ryan Mallett #1 12/12 40 59 105 -46 4 -1.1PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTRyan Mallett #1 12/12 364 242 66.5 3592 30 11Tyler Wilson #32 6/0 51 34 66.7 453 4 3RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJarius Wright #36 12/12 38 718 18.9 4 89Joe Adams #25 11/3 41 693 16.9 5 85Greg Childs #48 8/7 46 659 14.3 6 54Cobi Hamilton #141 12/5 31 609 19.6 6 85DJ WILLIAMS #18 12/12 49 589 12.0 4 46Ronnie Wingo Jr #12 12/5 27 274 10.1 4 43PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Dylan Breeding #145 12 45 1906 42.4 17 36.6 1 14KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGZach Hocker #20 12 55-55 4-4 4-5 4-6 1-1 13-16 51POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Jerry Franklin #171 12/12 93 6.5 6 2 0LB Jerico Nelson #54 12/12 83 2.5 8.5 3 1S Tramain Thomas #279 12/12 71 0.5 4 4 4LB Anthony Leon #67JC 12/11 58 2.5 8 2 0S Rudell Crim #58JC 12/11 48 0 1.5 2 3S Elton Ford #92 12/1 39 1 3.5 3 0CB Ramon Broadway #59 9/9 38 0 0.5 6 0LB Terrell Williams #87 12/1 38 0 3.5 0 0DE Tenarius Wright #99 12/0 36 6 2 0 0DT DeQuinta Jones #66 11/7 34 0 0.5 1 0DT Jake Bequette #112 12/12 31 7 1 2 0DE Damario Ambrose #147 12/12 31 3.5 3 1 0CB Isaac Madison #443 12/9 29 0 0 5 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJoe Adams 14 251 17.9 1 Lance Ray 22 494 22.5 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGDAN HERRON #44 12/8 192 1103 35 1068 15 5.6Terrelle Pryor #1 12/12 120 782 143 639 4 5.3Brandon Saine #2 12/8 66 326 14 312 2 4.7Jaamal Berry #7 12/0 32 267 1 266 1 8.3Jordan Hall #45 12/0 37 169 8 161 2 4.4PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTTerrelle Pryor #1 12/12 298 196 65.8 2551 25 11Joe Bauserman #59 12/0 22 16 72.7 174 2 1RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGDANE SANZENBACHER #106 12/12 52 889 17.1 10 65DeVier Posey #4 12/12 50 778 15.6 6 62Brandon Saine #2 12/8 22 195 8.9 5 60Jake Stoneburner #4 10/5 18 183 10.2 2 21Dan Herron #44 12/8 18 180 10.0 0 47PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Ben Buchanan #3 12 40 1649 41.2 16 35.1 1 13KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGDevin Barclay – 12 58-58 9-10 7-8 3-4 0-0 19-22 48POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB BRIAN ROLLE #26 12/11 70 2.5 7.5 4 2LB ROSS HOMAN #14 10/10 63 1 1 3 1FS JERMALE HINES #25 12/10 61 0.5 1.5 4 1SS Orhian Johnson #101 12/10 44 0 0.5 1 1DE Nathan Williams #27 11/9 44 4.5 5 3 1CB Devon Torrence #43 12/12 44 0 2 7 2DE CAMERON HEYWARD #28 12/12 42 2.5 7 0 1CB CHIMIDI CHEKWA #130 12/12 42 1 3 8 3LB Andrew Sweat #13 11/9 40 0 3 1 1DT John Simon #20 12/12 38 2 5.5 2 0DT Dexter Larimore #80 12/12 34 2 3.5 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJordan Hall 23 233 10.1 0 Jaamal Berry 21 534 25.4 0Corey Brown 4 32 8.0 0 Jordan Hall 13 390 30.0 1

OL - 44

DL - -

LB - 1/2

DB 41/2 -

ORANGEBOWL

Harbaugh has taken SU from 1 to 4 to 5 to 8 to 11 wins but we still lean with the vet Beamer.Third Orange Bowl trip in 4Y for VT and going to a BCS Bowl never gets old. SU excited but VT has crowd edge.SU more physical on both the OL and DL. QB Luck will benefit with the extra practice.SU is making its 1st BCS appearance since the ‘99 Rose Bowl.

CCH 1/2 -

Turf/ 44 -

MTCH - 4

INT - 4

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGStepfan Taylor #36 12/11 210 1057 34 1023 15 4.9Andrew Luck #8 12/12 51 497 59 438 3 8.6Anthony Wilkerson #22 12/0 87 420 11 409 3 4.7Tyler Gaffney #13 9/0 58 253 8 245 4 4.2Alex Loukas #39 8/0 18 156 6 150 1 8.3Usua Amanam #32 11/0 28 131 5 126 0 4.5Owen Marecic #281 12/12 20 42 0 42 4 2.1PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTANDREW LUCK #8 12/12 349 245 70.2 3051 28 7Alex Loukas #39 8/0 5 2 40.0 18 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGDoug Baldwin #227 12/11 56 824 14.7 9 81Ryan Whalen #289 10/9 39 415 10.6 2 30Stepfan Taylor #36 12/11 26 259 10.0 1 59Chris Owusu #77 6/3 24 394 16.4 3 45Coby Fleener #158 12/7 22 261 11.9 4 36Griff Whalen #478 12/1 17 249 14.6 1 27PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Daniel Zychlinski #74 12 24 1003 41.8 5 36.5(t) 0 8KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGNATE WHITAKER – 12 57-60 9-9 4-5 4-5 0-0 17-19 46POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Shayne Skov #11 10/10 72 4.5 2 4 0LB CHASE THOMAS #90 12/12 66 7.5 4 3 1CB Michael Thomas #151 12/10 57 0 4.5 2 1S Delano Howell #27 11/11 56 0 0.5 5 4CB Richard Sherman #102 12/11 49 0 1 9 4LB OWEN MARECIC #281 12/12 45 1 3.5 5 2S Taylor Skaufel #221 12/5 42 1 0 0 1CB Johnson Bademosi #416 10/8 36 0 0 4 1LB Thomas Keiser #365 12/12 35 3.5 4.5 2 1DL Matthew Masifilo #145 12/12 31 4 0.5 2 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDDrew Terrell 14 183 13.1 0 Chris Owusu 17 420 24.7 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGDarren Evans #16 13/8 139 846 29 817 11 5.9Tyrod Taylor #3 13/13 130 823 186 637 5 4.9David Wilson #8 12/1 111 639 23 616 5 5.5Ryan Williams #11 9/5 106 525 52 473 9 4.5PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTTYROD TAYLOR #3 13/13 284 172 60.6 2521 23 4Logan Thomas #3 7/0 26 12 46.2 107 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJARRETT BOYKIN #118 13/13 48 763 15.9 6 69Danny Coale #162 13/13 32 640 20.0 3 59Dyrell Roberts #94 9/3 21 303 14.4 2 43Marcus Davis #50 13/1 18 228 12.7 2 46David Wilson #8 12/1 13 207 15.9 3 65Andre Smith #18 13/11 19 187 9.8 5 21Ryan Williams #11 9/5 10 109 10.9 1 29PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Brian Saunders – 12 52 2291 44.1 10 38.2 1 15KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGChris Hazley – 12 52-55 6-6 7-8 6-6 1-1 20-21 52POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Bruce Taylor #28 13/13 84 6 9.5 4 0ROV Davon Morgan #64 13/13 76 0 1 4 5FS Eddie Whitley #82 12/12 73 0 4 6 2LB Lyndell Gibson #55 13/13 66 2 4 1 0DE Steven Friday #91 13/13 64 8.5 6.5 1 0FS Antone Exum #45 13/5 45 0 1.5 9 0DT Antoine Hopkins #92 13/11 43 2 4 1 0OLB J. Gouveia-Winslow #76 13/6 39 0 1 1 2CB JAYRON HOSLEY #60 12/12 37 0 1 7 8CB Rashad Carmichael #153 12/11 35 0 1.5 7 4DT John Graves #25 13/13 35 0.5 3.5 1 0CB Kyle Fuller #159 13/6 32 0 4 6 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDJayron Hosley 19 239 12.6 1 David Wilson 20 530 26.5 2

First meeting. After an 0-2 start to the season, VT capped its incredible turnaround with a win in the ACC Champ game. The Hokies rattled off 11 straight wins and are the only school in the FBS to win 10 gms in each of the L/7Y. They also became the 1st tm S/’00 to win every ACC gm (Fla St). The Cardinal had a superb regular ssn as they never trailed heading into HT the entire year with one 2H slip up coming against BCS Champ bound Oregon. Hokie HC Beamer owns an 8-9 SU/ATS record in bowls while SU HC Harbaugh is 0-1 SU, 1-0 ATS. The Hokies faced 8 bowl caliber tms going 7-1 SU (6-2 ATS) with a 34-21 avg score and 389-381 yd edge while the Cardinal took on 6 bowl caliber programs (5-1 SU, 3-3 ATS) with a 34-22 avg score and 468-377 yd edges. VT has 8 Sr st’rs among 17 upperclassmen while SU has 12 Sr’s with 17 upperclassmen. Both tms faced and destroyed WF TY with the Deacons being their only common opp. Stanford does have the benefit of an extra week of rest (Hokies played into Dec with ACC Title gm) but does travel more than 3,000 miles to get to Miami while VT is playing in ACC country. The #20 VT off is led by prolific QB Taylor who is one of only two active FBS QB’s with 6,000 pass yds and 2,000 rush yds in his career (Nev’s Kaepernick). He owns the most wins by a QB in VT history. VT has used a 3-headed monster to man the RB spot with Evans, Wilson and Williams combining for 25 of the tm’s 30 rush TD’s (Taylor other 5). The top WR’s are Boykin and Coale but TE Smith has become one of Taylor’s fav targets in the RZ. The OL avg 6’4” 294 with just 1 Sr starter and they’ve started 100% of the games together. They pave the way for 209 rush ypg (5.1) but have all’d 26 sks (8.4%). The DL has tallied 25 of the tm’s 33 sks TY (76%) led by 2nd Tm ACC DE Friday who has 8.5. LB Taylor leads VT in tkls and has tallied 15.5 tfl TY. The secondary comes in ranked #6 in our pass eff D all’g 199 ypg (51%) with a 15-22 ratio. CB Hosley has grabbed an NCAA leading 8 int TY. He needs one here to tie Ron Davidson’s 1967 record of 9 in a ssn. Overall the D ranks #22. Once again VT relied on a Sr walk-on PK to handle the duties and he’s responded by hitting 20 straight (only miss was first att of ssn vs Boise). The return teams have been spectacular as VT avg’s 12.4 ypr on PR with 1 TD while the KR’s avg 23.7 ypr with 2 TD’s (by Wilson). The PR D all’d just 4.2 ypr but the KR D has all’d 24.5. VT (#20 ST ranking) has blocked a kick in 126 gms under Beamer. With the departure of Heisman runner-up Gerhart, many thought the off could be down some but they answered critics early and avg’d 40 ppg. The group is led by AA QB Luck who some expect to be the #1 overall pick in the ‘11 draft. This will be his 1st bowl gm as he was unable to go in the Sun Bowl LY (inj). Luck took 98% of the tm’s passes and was so durable that coaches flirted with using bkup Loukas at other positions during the spg. Loukas was used as a “Wildcat” option at times during the yr but is out here (inj). The tm used a RB-by-committee approach through the beginning of the ssn before settling on Taylor. True Fr Wilkerson and soph Gaffney were the only others to see 50+ att while Marecic remains one of the top FB’s in the nation. SU had 2 All-Conf WR’s heading into ‘10 in Ryan Whalen and Owusu but due to early inj’s (8 gms lost comb), the 2 comb for 799 yds less than in ‘09. Baldwin (4 rec in ‘09) stepped up to lead the group in rec, yds and TD’s while Luck also used a solid trio of TE’s in Reuland, Fleener and Ertz. The OL avg 6’5” 301 (3 Sr) paving the way for 5.0 ypc while all’g the nation’s 2nd best mark of just 5 sks (1.4%, started all 60 gms). Overall the SU off finished with our #4 ranking. The SU def finished with our #25 ranking all’g just 18 ppg on the ssn (7 opp under 300 yds). The DL avg 6’3” 290 (2 Sr) and collected 10.5 (38%) of the tm’s 28 sks. The LB’s were the most stable part of the D led by Skov and Thomas who finished #1 and #2 in tkls. The secondary all’d 200 ypg (58%) with a 15-17 ratio ranking #19 in our pass def. ST’s were led by the steady kicking of Whitaker who delivered the GW FG vs USC. The return units are avg 21.7 KR and 10.2 PR while surrendering 22.4 KR and 13.0 PR. SU has our #42 ST ranking. While both offenses rank in our Top 20, both defenses rank in our top 25. VT will try to run the clock with their diversified rush offense and prior to the ACC Championship, the D had all’d 21 pts or under 7 straight games. SU’s D gets overlooked but has 3 shutouts this year and finished the season all’g 8.8 ppg the L/5.FORECAST: UNDER 58’ VT/Stanford RATING: 1★ UNDER

Crowd

QB - 4

HOKIES ATS: 10-3 O/U: 6-7

VT SU VT SU VT SU

RB 1/2 - WR - -

ST 1/2 - SCH - 4

OVERALL -

VT avg 6-4 294, 1 Sr, 26 sk all’d (8.4%), 5.1 ypc.SU avg 6-5 301, 3 Sr, 5 sk all’d (1.4%), 5.0 ypc.VT avg 6-3 271, 2 Sr, 25 of tm 33 sk, 4.5 ypc.SU avg 6-3 290, 2 Sr, 10.5 of tm 28 sk, 4.0 ypc.Taylor #1 tkl’r w/84, 15.5 tfl, Gibson #4, 6 tfl.Skov #1 tkl’r w/72, 6.5 tfl, Thomas #2, 11.5 tfl.VT #6 pass eff D, 199 ypg (51%), 15-22 ratio.SU #19 pass eff D, 200 ypg (58%), 15-17 ratio.

STANFORD

by 1' 4’s

VIRGINIA TECH (11-2)

STANFORD (11-1)

VT SU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

January 3, 2011 • 8:30 pm ESPN • Sun Life Stadium • Miami, FLPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.VIRGINIA TECH 194 190 30 2.0 4 101.1STANFORD 196 230 31 2.2 – 103.7

VT SU

CARDINAL ATS: 7-5 O/U: 6-6

26

Page 27: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL - 1/2

DL - 1/2

LB - -

DB - 41/2

COTTONBOWL

Sherman in B2B bowls but got blown out LY.Miles 4-1 SU/ATS at LSU plus Nat’l Champ.A&M 2nd time here this year with in-state fans but LSU fans will be just as loud.QB Tannehill was only 33-59 with 150 ypg vs the two top 10 D’s he faced TY.Tms on a 4+ SU/ATS win streak is a negative & a bowl loser 66% of the time.

CCH - 41/2

Turf/ 4 -

MTCH - 4

INT - 44

After a 3-3 start which saw ?’s about HC Sherman’s future the Aggies rallied for 6 str wins to secure their 1st Cotton Bowl invite S/’04. It is the Aggies 12th Cotton Bowl overall where they’re 4-7 SU (4-4 ATS) and Sherman’s 2nd bowl (0-1 SU/ATS). These tms have a rich history with LSU having a 26-20-3 advantage with the last meeting in ‘95. The bowl is a 3 hr drive from College Station and A&M has played Ark in this stadium the L/2Y (0-2 SU/ATS) but B12 teams are 2-7 ATS in Cotton Bowls. Miles suffered his 1st bowl loss at LSU (4-1 SU/ATS) LY 19-17 to Penn St in a muddy Capital One Bowl. Overall Miles is 5-3 SU, 4-3-1 ATS in bowls as a HC. This is LSU’s 1st trip to the Cotton Bowl S/’02 so there should be a strong following. LSU is 3-2 SU and 2-3 ATS on the road TY (incl neutral non-conf gm) while A&M is 3-2 SU/3-1-1 ATS. LSU (+3’) lost to Ark TY 31-23 (outgained 464-294) while A&M (+5) lost 24-17 (outgained 442-324). Miles was 2-2 SU/ATS vs A&M as OSU’s HC. LSU is 6-2 SU, 3-5 ATS vs bowl squads outscoring those tms by 24-21 but despite being outgained 332-325. A&M is 5-3 SU, 4-3-1 ATS vs bowl tms outscoring them 27-24 and outgaining them 423-383. The B12’s pressn OPY QB Johnson had shoulder surg which limited his offssn participation and seemed out of sync in Sept behind a rebuilt OL. He threw int on 4 consec poss vs FIU and the Ags were forced to rally from a 20-6 3Q deficit. Sherman remained loyal to his QB who threw for 409 yds and 5 TD but also had 5 TO’s in the loss to OSU incl the int which set the Cowboys up for the GW FG. After Johnson became A&M’s all-time ydg leader vs KU he was benched for bkup WR Tannehill. Tannehill was efficient (235, 65%, 11-3) in the L/6 and his ability to get rid of the ball quickly helped the OL as he was sk’d just 10x in his 5 sts vs 25 in Johnson’s 7. Michael and Gray shared TB carries until Michael was OFY vs TT. Gray took over running for 100+ in the L/6 becoming A&M’s 1st 1,000 yd rusher S/’03. The WR’s feature a solid size/speed combo of 6’4” Fuller and Swope. The OL (6’4” 300, 1 Sr) gelled down the stretch led by LSU transfer C Allen. A&M has our #19 off and #24 defense. New DC DeRuyter moved the Ags back to the 3-4 the same formation as the legendary Wrecking Crew. The LB unit (top 4 tkl’rs) was the B12’s best led by Butkus Winner Miller. A&M finished #1 in the league in rush D thanks to their DL whose job is to clog rush lanes. The Ags are #11 pass eff D (241, 61%, 16-15). The ST’s were a disappointment at #67 with the B12’s worst net P (34.2). K Bullock hit 15-19 but was just 2-3 from 40+. KR Judie, who took over the job after Gray became the primary TB, was a star avg 31.4 with TD’s in B2B gms. LSU has had another strange ssn in which they started out 7-0 climbing to #6 in the AP poll before a loss to Aub. Miles was said to be on the hotseat early in the ssn especially after a near-loss to Tenn in which UT rec’d a fmbl’d snap with no time left, but LSU RB Ridley scored the GW TD on an untimed down after UT was called for 13 men on the field. The criticism waned after upsets of FL and AL, but losing the finale to Ark has restarted the fire-Les Miles talk again. Miles was forced to alternate QB’s all yr as Jefferson is the better runner and Lee the better passer but Lee only had 6 att in the L/2 gms. Ridley was a nice surprise and the RB’s stayed healthy TY (LY down to 4th str RB end of yr) and LSU avg’d 177 rush ypg (4.4) which is 54 ypg better than LY. Receivers Toliver, Shepard and Randle weren’t used to their potential with LSU preferring to run the ball and win gms with their #8 D. The OL avg 6’5” 302 with only 1 Sr st’r and all’d 22 sks (7.8%). The DL avg 6’’4” 271 with 2 Sr st’rs at DT including AA Nevis (#6 SEC tfl). LB Sheppard is #3 in the SEC in tkl per gm. LSU is #13 in our pass D rankings all’g 166 ypg (56%) with a 12-16 ratio led by Thorpe/Bednarik winner CB Patrick Peterson. Peterson also helped the ST earn their #4 ranking as a standout RS. LSU also has AA PK Jasper who also helps P Helton as the 2 comb for a 43.6 avg and 39.2 net. A&M has had an impressive season and their win streak down the stretch has made this line much smaller than it should be. LSU has struggled offensively but their weapons are dynamic on offense and their top 10 D can match any that A&M has faced TY. The LSU CB’s can play man-to-man and therefore A&M’s OL will face more pressure than they have all year. Prior to last year’s mud-fest, LSU had averaged 39 points per game in bowls under Miles. FORECAST: LSU by 13 RATING: 4★ LSU

Crowd

QB 4 -

AGGIES ATS: 8-3-1 O/U: 5-7

A&M LSU A&M LSU A&M LSU

RB 1/2 - WR - -

ST - 441/2 SCH - 1/2

OVERALL -

A&M avg 6-4 300, 1 Sr, 35 sk all’d (7.3%), 4.1 ypc.LSU 6-5 302, 1 Sr, 22 sk all’d (7.8%), 4.4 ypc.A&M avg 6-4 293, 1 Sr, 5 of tm 28 sk, 3.3 ypc.LSU avg 6-4 271, 2 Sr, 15.5 of tm 32 sk, 3.6 ypc.Hodges #1 tkl’r, Butkus winner Miller 9.5 sk.Sheppard #1 tkl’r w/108, 11 tfl, Baker 10 tfl.A&M #11 pass eff D, 241 ypg (61%), 16-15 ratio.LSU #13 pass eff D, 166 ypg (56%), 12-16 ratio.

LSU

by 7' 4’s

LSU (10-2)

TEXAS A&M(9-3)

A&M LSU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

January 7, 2011 • 8:00 pm FOX • Cowboys Stadium • Arlington, TXPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.TEXAS A&M 148 253 24 2.5 – 103.2LSU 168 133 23 2.0 4 4 4 4 103.5

A&M LSU

TIGERS ATS: 5-7 O/U: 4-7-1RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGCyrus Gray #13 12/6 180 1078 45 1033 12 5.7Christine Michael #6 8/6 126 653 22 631 4 5.0Jerrod Johnson #27 7/7 79 323 177 146 2 1.8Ryan Tannehill #83 12/5 44 140 107 33 1 0.8PASSING PS# GS/GP ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTJerrod Johnson #27 7/7 279 158 56.6 1947 14 9Ryan Tannehill #83 12/5 199 130 65.3 1434 11 3RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJEFF FULLER #14 12/12 65 983 15.1 12 69Ryan Swope #59 12/12 67 780 11.6 4 64Uzoma Nwachukwu #43 12/5 32 369 11.5 2 44Cyrus Gray #13 12/6 33 242 7.3 1 28Kenric McNeal #68 10/1 21 189 9.0 1 32Christine Michael #6 8/6 13 174 13.4 0 60Ryan Tannehill #83 12/5 11 143 13.0 1 38PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Ryan Epperson #81 12 41 1541 37.6 15 34.2(t) 1 5KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGRandy Bullock #18 12 47-47 9-10 4-6 1-2 1-1 15-19 50POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Michael Hodges #201 12/12 111 4.5 3 2 2LB Garrick Williams #185 12/12 97 0 5 1 0LB Sean Porter #173 12/12 68 0.5 6.5 6 0LB VON MILLER #27 12/12 59 9.5 5 6 1CB Coryell Judie #10 12/9 52 0 2 4 3CB Terrence Frederick #416 12/12 52 1 7 9 1DE Tony Jerod-Eddie #43 12/12 46 0 2.5 2 0DE Lucas Patterson #62 12/12 46 2 3 0 0DT Jonathan Mathis #46 12/6 39 0.5 3 1 0CB Dustin Harris #170 12/3 39 0 0.5 9 4LB Damontre Moore #101 12/0 39 5.5 1 1 1PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDKenric McNeal 24 138 5.8 0 Cyrus Gray 17 422 24.8 0Dustin Harris 8 92 11.5 1 Coryell Judie 13 408 31.4 2

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGSTEVAN RIDLEY #36 12/6 225 1077 35 1042 14 4.6Jordan Jefferson #9 12/12 111 529 146 383 6 3.5Michael Ford #11 9/2 41 257 22 235 3 5.7Russell Shepard #1 12/8 31 249 27 222 2 7.2Alfred Blue #131 10/1 20 101 0 101 1 5.1Richard Murphy #27 10/2 23 99 17 82 0 3.6Jarrett Lee #13 11/0 10 12 58 -46 0 -4.6PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTJordan Jefferson #9 12/12 190 108 56.8 1253 4 9Jarrett Lee #13 11/0 89 54 60.7 573 2 1RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGRueben Randle #1 12/9 31 525 16.9 3 75Terrence Toliver #2 12/12 36 467 13.0 2 38Russell Shepard #1 12/8 33 254 7.7 1 22DeAngelo Peterson #54 9/2 16 198 12.4 0 40Spencer Ware #14 10/0 8 84 10.5 0 29Stevan Ridley #36 12/6 11 61 5.5 0 18PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Derek Helton #97JC 12 33 1497 45.4 5 39.2(t) 0 14KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGJOSH JASPER #22 12 31-32 7-7 10-11 7-10 2-3 26-31 53POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB KELVIN SHEPPARD #90 12/12 108 4 7 2 1LB Ryan Baker #68 11/11 82 6 4 1 0FS Karnell Hatcher #37 11/10 63 0 1.5 2 0DT DRAKE NEVIS #48 12/12 56 6 7 1 1DB Tyrann Mathieu #99 12/1 50 3.5 4 6 1SS Brandon Taylor #36 9/9 44 0 4 5 0CB PATRICK PETERSON #1 12/12 36 0 1.5 6 4LB Stefoin Francois #20 12/12 36 1 1 2 0CB Morris Claiborne #121 11/11 36 0 1 6 5PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDPATRICK PETERSON 26 418 16.1 2 Patrick Peterson 29 851 29.3 0

OL 4 -

DL - -

LB - 1/2

DB - 1/2

GODADDY.COMBOWL

Stockstill is now in his 3rd bowl here and got a win and cover LY. Haywood is a bowl virgin.This bowl chose Middle over other SBC tms because they knew they would bring some fans.Miami has struggled with mobile QB’s and we all remember what Dasher did in LY’s bowl.MU has NCAA’s biggest turnaround TY. MT needs win for winning ssn.

CCH 4 -

Turf/ 4 -

MTCH 4 -

INT 4 -

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGThomas Merriweather #48 13/10 149 853 32 821 10 5.5Tracy Woods #312 13/1 93 397 21 376 1 4.0Zac Dysert #85 10/10 79 220 193 27 1 0.3Austin Boucher #98 6/3 29 82 59 23 0 0.8PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTZac Dysert #85 10/10 343 222 64.7 2406 13 12Austin Boucher #98 6/3 120 77 64.2 831 4 1RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGArmand Robinson #137 13/13 90 981 10.9 6 62Nick Harwell #825 13/7 57 785 13.8 5 82Andy Cruse #181 12/4 25 342 13.7 2 71Chris Givens #61 10/7 22 325 14.8 0 44DeMarco Paine #69 13/5 29 237 8.2 0 27Jamal Rogers #495 6/3 19 178 9.4 1 24PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Zac Murphy #167 13 53 2132 40.2 24 35.0(t) 0 11KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGTREVOR COOK #48 11 20-22 6-7 8-9 2-6 0-0 16-22 48Seth Philip – 12 4-5 1-2 0-0 1-2 0-0 2-4 40POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Jerrell Wedge #381 13/13 88 3.5 11.5 2 1LB Evan Harris #282 13/11 85 2 7.5 3 5S Pat Hinkel #318 13/13 67 0.5 2.5 4 2DL Austin Brown #471 13/13 50 3 7 2 0CB Dayonne Nunley #270 13/10 50 0 6.5 4 5CB DJ Brown #247 13/13 47 0.5 1.5 12 1LB CJ Marck #156 10/6 45 3.5 2.5 0 0DL Jason Semmes #278 12/11 42 5 4 3 0S Anthony Kokal #347 13/1 37 2.5 0 4 1S Jordan Gafford #240 11/11 35 1 2 5 1CB Brandon Stephens #249 12/9 33 0 1 11 1LB Ryan Kennedy #222 5/3 32 2.5 5 0 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDDeMarco Paine 12 53 4.4 0 DeMarco Paine 34 673 19.8 0

First meeting. Middle Tennessee is 10-9 SU and 1-3 ATS vs current MAC tms incl losing to C Mich 31-14 (+8) in the ‘06 Motor City Bowl. Miami is 2-0 SU and 1-1 ATS vs current SBC tms (both vs ULL but last meeting in ‘93). MT is 1-1 SU/ATS in bowl gms, both under HC Stockstill. Last year they knocked off Southern Miss 42-32 (+3) to finish 10-3 which led to them being the overwhelm-ing pick to win the SBC TY. The Raiders had a disappointing season and needed to win their final 3 gms just to be bowl eligible (2 of those wins were by 1 pt). Miami is 6-2 SU and 1-1 ATS in bowl gms but this is their first since losing 17-13 (-1) to Iowa St in the ‘04 Independence Bowl and this is Haywood’s 1st as a HC. Miami made the biggest turnaround in the FBS this year going from 1-11 to 9-4 and the RedHawks are flying high after winning the MAC Championship. MT only faced 3 bowl teams (1 BCS) going 1-2 SU/ATS being outscored 37-18 and outgained 449-297. Miami faced 5 bowl squads (2 BCS) going 2-3 SU (3-2 ATS) being outscored 29-17 but outgaining them 342-328. MT went 3-3 SU (2-4 ATS) on the road while Miami was 5-3 SU/ATS. MT does have the advantage of 12 Sr starters among 20 upperclassmen while Miami has just 5 among 10. MT QB Dasher was voted the Sun Belt preseason OPY, but was then suspended by the NCAA for the first 4 games. In his first four games back he had 13 TO’s. Backup QB’s Kilgore and Murphy started the first four but each was injured (applied for MedRS) forcing a WR to serve as Dasher’s backup. Dasher threw “just” 4 int in the final 4 games. In LY’s bowl, Dasher rushed for 201 with 2 TD’s while throwing for an additional 162 (2 TD) earning Bowl MVP. While Dasher and RB Kyles combined for more than 83% of MT’s rush yds LY, TY MT has 4 players with 348+ rush yds. However, 3 receivers finished with 420+ yds LY but MT’s top receiver this year had just 364. The OL has 4 upperclassmen starters (1 Sr) and avg 6’3” 292 but no OL started all 12. MT is avg 179 ypg rushing (4.3) while all’g 20 sks (5.6%). The offense has our #95 rating while the D, with just 1 underclassman and 8 Sr starters, comes in at #96. They are #2 in the Sun Belt in scoring and #4 in ttl def. The DL has 4 Sr starters but is all’g 194 rush ypg (4.2). The D did have 33 sks as DE Lattimore led the SBC with 11.5. MT has our #72 pass eff D as they are all’g 191 ypg (57%) with a 17-9 ratio. LY a big part of MT’s success was the D having 33 takeaways as MT finished +12 TO’s. TY the D has just 17 and MT is -16 TO’s. MT has our #31 spec tms unit as K Gendreau led the SBC in FG % (83%). Miami lost starting QB Dysert (#3 in the MAC in passing ypg) to a lacerated spleen in the BG game (out 4-6 wks). He suffered the injury in the 2Q but played the rest of the game. With this late bowl game, he may have a shot at returning. However, bkup Boucher did lead Miami to 3 straight wins incl one over Temple to get to the MAC Championship. Boucher also threw for 333 vs NI. After Miami rushed for just 841 yds as a tm LY, RB Merriweather had 821 by himself TY. Beside WM, which led the MAC in passing, Miami is the only MAC tm to have 2 WR’s in the top 10 in the MAC in both rec and rec yds. Miami’s OL avg 6’5” 298 but is young with 3 starting underclassmen (three 13 gm starters). The RedHawks still avg just 97 ypg rushing (3.2) and the OL all’d 34 sks (7.3%) despite Dysert having 220 gross rush yds. MU finished with our #96 off. Miami’s def (#62) improved as the ssn went on as they all’d 30 ppg in their first 8 gms and just 14 ppg in the L/3 incl holding Temple to 3 and NI, the MAC’s top scoring offense (came in avg 39 ppg) to just 21. Miami is all’g just 121 ypg rush and 3.8 ypc thanks in part to their 32 sks. They have our #43 pass eff D all’g 214 ypg passing (57%) with a very good 14-17 ratio. They have just our #104 spec tms. They are a true Turnovers=Turnaround tm as LY they were -24 TO’s and TY are +7. Prior to the year, MT would’ve been a DD fav and now after a great RedHawk turnaround and a disappointing Raiders season, they’re actually a dog. Middle Tennessee has many players that could play for BCS teams and has more talent than Miami on both sides of the ball. The only 3 games Miami covered as a fav TY were vs 3-9 Colo St, 2-10 Buffalo and 2-10 BG. On the flip side MT has been a dog just once against a non-BCS team and in that role they upset TY’s SBC Champ on the road. FORECAST: Middle Tenn by 7 RATING: 2★ MIDDLE TENN

Crowd

QB - -

BLUE RAIDERS ATS: 4-8 O/U: 4-8

MT MU MT MU MT MU

RB 4 - WR - 1/2

ST 44 - SCH - -

OVERALL -

MT avg 6-3 292, 1 Sr, 20 sk all’d (5.6%), 4.3 ypc.MU avg 6-5 298, 1 Sr, 34 sk all’d (7.3%), 3.2 ypc.MT avg 6-2 249, 4 Sr, 17.5 of tm 33 sk, 4.2 ypc.MU avg 6-2 268, 0 Sr, 15 of tm 32 sk, 3.8 ypc.Davis #2 tkl’r w/73, 8 tfl, Jones #4, 5 tfl.Wedge #1 tkl’r w/88, 14.5 tfl, Harris #2, 9.5 tfl.MT #72 pass eff D, 191 ypg (57%), 17-9 ratio.MU #43 pass eff D, 214 ypg (57%), 14-17 ratio.

MID TENN

by 6' 4’s

MIDDLE TENN (6-6)

MIAMI, OH (9-4)

MT MU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

January 6, 2011 • 8:00 pm ESPN • Ladd-Peebles Stadium • Mobile, ALPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.Middle Tennessee 167 190 24 3.3 444 87.6Miami, OH 113 245 25 2.0 – 93.6

MT MU

REDHAWKS ATS: 8-5 O/U: 2-11RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGPhillip Tanner #190 12/12 149 889 48 841 11 5.6Dwight Dasher #152 8/8 125 601 148 453 7 3.6DD Kyles #495 12/0 74 433 43 390 4 5.3Benjamin Cunnningham #316 12/2 77 363 15 348 4 4.5William Pratcher #288 9/0 20 65 9 56 1 2.8PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTDwight Dasher #152 8/8 222 127 57.2 1388 6 14Logan Kilgore #100JC 3/3 80 50 62.5 540 3 5RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGMalcolm Beyah #197 12/8 27 364 13.5 2 62Garrett Andrews #410JC 12/12 30 341 11.4 2 35Sancho McDonald #114 12/11 18 278 15.4 1 53Tyler Mason #138JC 12/2 17 263 15.5 2 53Tavarres Jefferson #250 12/6 19 247 13.0 2 44Phillip Tanner #190 12/12 16 160 10.0 0 75PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Josh Davis – 12 52 2234 43.0 12 37.2(t) 1 18KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGALAN GENDREAU – 12 41-42 5-5 2-2 2-4 1-1 10-12 55POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTFS JEREMY KELLEM #441 12/12 101 0 1.5 5 2LB Darin Davis #408 12/12 73 3.5 4.5 0 3DE JAMARI LATTIMORE #326JC 12/12 64 11.5 2.5 1 0LB Justin Jones #257 12/7 62 1 4 2 0LB Antwan Davis #404 12/10 61 0.5 1.5 1 0SS Kevin Brown #328 12/12 61 0 1 4 0CB Arness Ikner #153JC 12/11 53 0 1.5 4 1CB ROD ISSAC #540 12/11 49 0 4.5 5 3DE Emmanuel Perez #309 12/12 41 3 3.5 0 0DT DWIGHT SMITH #451 12/12 36 2.5 4 3 0S Derrick Crumpton #416 12/5 32 1.5 2.5 5 0LB Craig Allen #596 12/0 32 2 0 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDEric Russell 23 163 7.1 0 Eric Russell 29 778 26.8 1

27

Page 28: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

KEY SELECTIONS3★ Dallas over ARIZONA - Christmas - This is a short road trip for the Cowboys who are 4-1 ATS vs the Cardinals since realignment. DAL is even statistically with the #5 and #32 units (+6 TO’s) vs the Cardinals #27 and #12 units (+3 TO’s) in the L4W prior to the DAL/PHI game 2 Wks ago. They are 4-1 ATS with Kitna at the helm prior to PHI and he’s put together respectable numbers on the road avg 226 ypg (64%) with a 5-3 ratio. While DAL has been outgained by 100 ypg on the road since Romo was KO’d they are +7 TO’s upsetting the Giants and the Colts. Its unknown who ARZ will field at QB here as Anderson will be released soon after the season ends and Whisenhunt may opt to keep Skelton (146 yds 41% 0-0 vs DEN) to gain valuable snaps. ARZ is 3-3 SU and 2-4 ATS at home TY being outgained by 95 ypg (+1 TO’s) with a 25-21 avg score. They have been outgained by 109 ypg (+2 TO’s) by NDIV foes TY with a 26-21 avg score (2-5 ATS). Despite their record the Cowboys are a playoff talent team that is playing hard for a potential new coach while ARZ is simply playing out the string while hoping for a better QB will be under the tree for 2011. FORECAST: Dallas 31 ARIZONA 14 3★ CHICAGO over NY Jets - This is a matchup of 2 good playoff teams that are strikingly similar to each other. Both teams rely on strong defenses to hold up under inconsistent offensive efforts. The Jets have a slight stat edge over the L4W with the #19 and #3 units (-1 TO’s) vs the Bears #29 and #18 units (-4 TO’s). While both teams have had fairly soft sked the Jets are 2-4 SU and ATS vs a foe with a winning record TY. The Bears are 3-2 SU and ATS vs foes with a winning record TY upsetting GB and PHI (getting MIA at the right time). The Jets have logged a 371-293 yd edge (-2 TO’s) with a 2-1 SU and 1-2 ATS record (17-16 avg score) vs the NFC North TY. CHI has a 2-1 SU and 1-1-1 ATS record vs AFC East teams TY being outgained 334-245 (-2 TO’s) with a 18-15 avg score. With GB’s loss to DET and the uncertain status of Rodgers vs NE the Bears have a good chance to lock down the NFC North soon. We’ll lean with the Bears with their fast and aggressive defense vs Sanchez who has since the bye avg 250 ypg (52%) with a 7-10 ratio leading the Jets to a 2-5 ATS mark prior to PIT. FORECAST: CHICAGO 21 NY Jets 14 2★ New England over BUFFALO - NE has won 14 straight in the series but slipped to 9-4-1 ATS after a 38-30 win as a 14.5 pt HF in the 1st meeting TY. The game wasn’t as close as the final score indicated though as the Patriots had a 38-23 lead halfway thru the 4Q before they switched to a prevent defense giving up a 80/7pl drive to make it close. BUF switched to Fitzpatrick and he had some success with 247 yds (71%) with a 2-2 ratio and they also got a spark off a 95 yd KR by Spiller for a TD. Brady has torched the Bills with a 241 ypg avg (67%) with a 35-10 ratio in his career. NE has significant stat edges with the #3 and #16 units (+12 TO’s) vs BUF’s #15 and #17 units (+11 TO’s) over the L4W prior to MIA. They have been outgained by 81 ypg at home TY (+2 TO’s) with a 21-16 avg score. In their L3 games they have avg’d 14 ppg while NE has avg’d 39 ppg even with the CHI Snow Bowl. Gailey deserves to be commended for getting the most out of his offense but look for Brady to take apart a Bills defense that has allowed a 7-3 TD/int ratio at home with their best game coming against Delhomme. FORECAST: New England 31 BUFFALO 10

OTHER GAMESCarolina at PITTSBURGH - Thurs - We won a 5★ NFL GOY on PIT in ‘02 as they were coming off a com-mandingly misleading game the previous week with a 30-14 win as an 8.5 pt HF. PIT may be locked into the #2 seed already if they beat the Jets LW and may not have much interest. If they do have playoff need then the line may be wildly inflated vs a CAR team trying to salvage some shred of dignity in a humiliating season. PIT is only 1-5 ATS as a DD Fav and we’ve seen them struggle in inclement weather vs poor teams before.MIAMI by 3 over Detroit - This is the 2nd straight trip to Florida for DET who have a home game vs MIN on deck. There is an outside chance that they’ll get Stafford (shoulder) back to get him some extra snaps before the season ends. MIA is 0-4 ATS in their final home game of the season and 0-5 ATS at home vs the NFC. MIA is 2-1 SU and ATS vs the NFC North TY despite being outgained by 66 ypg (+2 TO’s) as the defense has logged a 1-5 ratio with a 15-12 avg deficit. DET is 0-3 SU but 1-1-1 ATS vs the AFC East only being outgained by 20 ypg (+0 TO’s) losing by a 27-19 avg score. Their #14 pass defense has given up a 6-1 ratio vs the AFC East with a 12-5 ratio on the road prior to TB. MIA came into 2010 as a Wildcard prospect but the #21 run game (106 ypg 3.7) has been a major disappoint-ment as Henne has had to force the ball to an avg at best receiver group with the addition of Marshall (hamstring) who missed 3 games. Both teams have stout defenses but MIA could have its hands full vs a Lions team that has firmly bought into Schwartz despite their talent issues. PHILADELPHIA by 8 over Minnesota - The Vikings attitude towards this game will be a big question here. A veteran heavy team out of the playoffs off 3 Domed games with a return trip to DET on deck they now have to travel after hosting CHI on MNF and return to a cold weather site. MIN is only 1-9 SU and 2-7-1 ATS on the road (outscored 26-18) with their only win being vs an injury depleted Redskins team in Frazier’s 1st role as HC. MIN has the #23 and #7 units (-2 TO’s) not counting the relocated Giants game the L4W vs PHI’s #1 and #19 units (+6 TO’s) prior to DAL. PHI has outgained foes by 83 ypg (+7 TO’s) at home TY (4-2 SU 3-3 ATS) with a 25-21 avg score. MIN will key in on containing Vick who has led PHI to a 4-1 SU (3-2 ATS) mark since the bye avg 288 ypg (65%) with a 9-2 ratio with 280 yds (5.8) added on the ground. Depending on LW’s results the Eagles are either neck and neck with the Giants in the NFC East race or playing for potentially the #2 seed in the NFC. MIN may have packed it up here and we want to see if Favre can tough out the rest of the season. JACKSONVILLE by 7 over Washington - This game could have lots or little in terms of playoff implica-tions. JAX could be off losing their big game vs the Colts LW. If JAX beat the Colts LW then they will be playing hard to keep their lead in the AFC South with the Texans on deck. JAX (2-6 ATS in final HG) is only 3-7 ATS vs the NFC and have been outgained by 83 ypg (+1 TO’s) with a 23-19 scoring deficit vs the rest of the NFC East TY. WAS is 1-1-1 ATS vs the AFC South TY being outgained by 49 ypg (+3 TO’s) with a 24-23 score. Their only ATS win was vs TEN who were in disarray at QB and it was also their only/1st game where they won the yardage battle TY. WAS has only scored over 20 pts on the road once TY and that was vs DET in a losing effort. JAX also has the stat edge over the L4W with the #8 and #14 units (-4 TO’s) vs the Redskins #11 and #21 units (-4 TO’s) that could very well have shut down their 2 best pass defenders (CB Rogers SS Landry) by now. With both teams in between Div sandwiches this late in the year we’ll side with the home team by a TD here. ST LOUIS by 3 over San Francisco - This could be the 2nd HF role for STL since Wk13 ‘07. STL beat CAR in the 1st role TY 20-10 (2.5 pt HF) but only had a 246-201 yd edge (+4 TO’s). SF dropped to 9-3 SU and ATS vs STL with a 23-20 win but failed to cover as a 5.5 pt HF in OT. SF had a bye to install Troy Smith at QB and while they had a 421-332 yd edge, the 49ers self-destructed with 14 pen’s which cost them 2 4Q TD’s. While SF has the edge of 3 extra days rest here they could very well be out of the playoff chase after facing SD last Thurs. Singletary was forced to go back to Alex Smith so they could use more of the playbook as he is better with the spread offense. If SF lost then there will be plenty of noise on how a team that was looked at favorably for the postseason is out of it while the Rams who had the #1 pick in the draft have managed to stay in it. SF has been outgained by 56 ypg (+2 TO’s) with a 22-17 scoring deficit on the road TY (2-5 SU 3-4 STS) and face a Rams team that is 4-2 SU and ATS at home with a 20-16 avg score (+4 ypg +5 TO’s). Both teams are close statistically (Rams #14 #22 vs 49ers #25 #9) with TO’s (STL +2 SF +3) and consistent QB play separating them and we’ll call for the home team by 3 as we want to see how the playoff scenario’s turn out. TAMPA BAY by 10 over Seattle - It would be misleading to say the Bucs pulled a major upset of SEA

28

4★ Excellent3★ Very Good2★ Good

(24-7) LY as a 6.5 pt AD. The injury depleted the Seahawks were simply playing out the string for Jim Mora while TB was playing to retain Morris. TB converted 5 TO’s into 10 pts with 4 of SEA’s TO’s coming on their final 6 drives (380-339 yd edge). 3-0 SU and 1-1-1 ATS as a HF TY. The Bucs have seen injuries mount against them at an alarming rate the 3W prior to DET. Vs WAS they only had 1 OL in its original spot and DT McCoy was KO’d with a biceps injury. They have gone 8-0 SU and 5-1-2 ATS vs foes with a losing record TY as they have pulled out wins via 4Q comebacks, special teams play and defensive efforts. This will be an interesting coaching challenge for Carroll with a SEA team that is 0-3 SU and ATS in its final road game of the year. While 2-5 SU and ATS on the road TY they have been outgained by 49 ypg (-10 TO’s) with a 28-17 scoring deficit. While 3-5 SU and ATS vs NDIV foes they have outgained by 142 ypg (-7 TO’s) with a 29-19 avg score prior to ATL. Despite their injuries we’ll side with the Bucs at home for the 2nd straight week vs a SEA team coming cross country this late in the year by 10. Baltimore by 13 over CLEVELAND - The Ravens moved to 5-0 SU and 4-1 ATS vs the Browns with a 24-17 win but failed to cover as an 11 pt HF in the 1st meeting in Wk 3. Hillis stunned the Ravens a breakout game rushing for 144 yds (6.5) but Boldin had a field day vs the CLE secondary with 8 rec (17.8) and 3 TD’s. Flacco has avg’d 227 ypg (68%) with a 6-2 ratio with both int coming in his 1st game vs the Browns (Wk 3 2008). BAL has major stat edges with the #17 and #6 units (-2 TO’s) vs the Browns #30 and #11 units (+4 TO’s) the L4W at presstime. While BAL has enjoyed stability at QB the Browns have fielded all 3 QB’s in 2010 and its unknown who will take the field here. With Delhomme defenses know they can play the receivers underneath the routes as he lacks arm strength, Wallace is mobile but has been a career backup due to consistency and while McCoy has exceeded expectations he may not get the nod to keep him from being injured. The Ravens secondary has been exploited TY but minus the BUF (going into bye with Bills coming off) and ATL (on a short week) games (7-2 ratio) they have given up just 181 ypg (56%) with a 7-9 ratio. Look for BAL to dominate here as they flex playoff need muscle especially if they lost badly to NO LW. KANSAS CITY by 14 over Tennessee - Every year in the NFL there are surprise teams that come out of nowhere and exceed expectations. On the flip side there are talent laden teams that get preseason booking for the playoffs only to crumble and this game features both sides of the coin. The Titans have little to play for here other than pride on the road for the 1st time in a month after 4 straight Div games with a rematch vs IND on deck. TEN is 6-10 ATS on the road where they have been outgained by 122 ypg with a 23-20 avg score thanks to +6 TO’s. KC is likely still in the playoff hunt especially if Cassel returned vs STL. They are 6-0 SU and 4-2 ATS at home TY where they have outgained foes by 51 ypg (+5 TO’s) with a 25-12 avg score. Even with their lopsided loss to SD without Cassel, the Chiefs have the #21 and #5 units (+4 TO’s) vs the Titans #28 and #30 units (-8 TO’s) in the L4W at presstime. Tossing out the 2nd SD game where they were out of their gameplan and outmatched the Chiefs had outrushed foes by an NFL best 73 ypg while TEN who had the #1 rush attack in 2009 have been outrushed by 7 ypg which is in the bottom 3rd of the league. We’ll call KC to win by 2 TD’s for now as we wait and see if playoff need inflates the line vs a Titans team playing out the string. Indianapolis by 10 over OAKLAND - Win or lose vs the Jags LW this game will still have meaning for the Colts as they will at least be trying to avoid their 1st non-winning season with Manning at the helm since they went 6-10 in 2001. If OAK beat DEN LW they are playing for their 1st non-losing season since going 11-5 in 2002. This game also features a clash of offensive ideology with the Raiders control the clock and wear down defenses strategy with the run vs the Colts pass 1st to eliminate the run and force teams to pass from behind. OAK deserves to be commended TY but the fact is that they are 2-7 SU and ATS vs a NDIV foe TY being outscored 26-19 thanks to -9 TO’s (only +5 yds). Injuries have kept IND from dominating NDIV play but they are a respectable 5-4 SU and 5-3-1 ATS vs a NDIV foe outgaining foes by 25 ypg but are -6 TO’s leaving them with a 26-23 scoring edge. IND does have OL issues TY forcing Manning to release the ball before he’s ready and locking onto Wayne. With Collie slated to return vs JAX along with the defense finally getting both LB’s Sessions and Brackett on the field as well we’ll call for the Colts by 10 as they are used to being in playoff mode albeit not this early. Houston by 10 over DENVER - If the Texans lost badly to the Ravens and Titans the L2W the buzz around this game will be if former QB and OC Kubiak will head over to the Broncos sidelines in 2011 with Elway assuming a front office role. This will be interim HC Studesville’s 1st home game and with the Broncos having struggled so badly TY they may not have much of a home crowd for this game. DEN is on a 3-8 SU and ATS run and even though they’ve been outgained by 12 ypg (-1 TO’s) with a 32-27 avg score. With the season out of reach there is a chance for the Broncos to start Tebow to get him some snaps vs a pass defense that has given up 287 ypg (67%) with a 27-10 ratio TY. HOU is only 3-5 SU and 2-5-1 ATS vs a NDIV foe TY being outgained by 12 ypg (+0 TO’s) with a defense that has given up 400 ypg 7 times TY (3-3-1 ATS). While only 2-4 SU and 3-3 ATS on the road TY the matchup is very favorable for Schaub on the road where he’s avg’d 299 ypg (63%) with an 11-3 ratio vs a beat up and depleted Broncos team that has allowed a 24-6 ratio on the year. NY Giants by 3 over GREEN BAY - Depending on recent results this is could be a battle for one of the final Wild Card spots. Despite both teams having fielded quality teams this is only the 4th meeting since realignment including playoffs with the road team bing 3-0 SU and ATS. The Packers loss to the Lions was devastating as it cost them a key Div win and it’s unknown if Rodgers was available for the Patriots. GB is 5-1 SU and 4-2 ATS at home TY outgaining foes by 49 ypg with an impressive +7 TO’s helping them avg 32-17 score. The Packers are 2-1 SU and ATS vs the NFC East TY with an 81 ypg edge (+2 TO’s) with a 28-14 edge. However GB did get the Eagles with Kolb making only his 3rd career start, were sent to OT vs an underwhelming WAS team and beat up a reeling DAL team that just lost Romo. The Giants are 3-2 SU and ATS on the road not counting the relocated MIN game outgaining foes by 90 ypg and have a 29-23 scoring margin despite being -6 TO’s. GB has struggled vs formidable defensive fronts TY (CHI, DET, MIA, ATL, DET) that can stump their feeble run game and allow the LB’s to flow into coverage. The Giants won’t be bothered by the cold weather and we’ll call for them by a FG for now though we reserve the right to increase this margin later. San Diego by 20 over CINCINNATI - With SD having been at home for 3 straight weeks and travelling to CIN images of the coldest NFL game ever played comes to mind. SD has been wildly inconsistent on the road TY as while they’ve outgained foes by an avg of 105 ypg, special teams and TO’s (-4) have them 2-4 SU and ATS on the road with a 24-23 avg score. Provided they took care of business at home LW the Chargers will come into this game with extra rest to try and take the AFC West from KC. CIN once again crumbled under expectations after LW’s surprise season and are 1-5 SU and 2-4 ATS at home prior to CLE. They have wilted vs NDIV foes TY going 1-8 SU and 3-6 ATS as despite being outgained by only 33 ypg they are -7 TO’s being outscored 29-22. Despite his credentials, Palmer (21-18 TD/int ratio 6.4 ypa) is at his best with a run oriented offense (avg’d 119 ypg 4.2 in 2005, 129 ypg 4.1 LY). Injuries to the defense increased the pressure on the overvalued offense and simply the Bengals haven’t produced. We’ll take the Chargers by 20 and expect the NFL to flex this game as CIN’s downward spiral continues.New Orleans at ATLANTA - This has the potential to be the NFC South Championship game if the Falcons stumbled vs SEA and the Saints beat BAL LW. NO lost the 1st game 27-24 as a 3 pt HF. NO forced ATL to go 3 and out on the 1st OT drive then drove down to the ATL 11. The Saints missed a 29 yd FG and the Falcons went 12 plays/59 yds for game winning 46 yd FG. The Falcons ability to run the ball (202 yds 4.0 vs 43 yds 2.7) and force Brees into 2 Int were the keys to the game. At the least this game will have seeding implications with the Falcons trying to wrap up the #1 spot and the Saints trying to get the best Wildcard seeding.

PRO SELECTIONS WK 16 We are not forecasting the actual lines, just the Totals Plays that we like for Week 16:

3★ Texans/Broncos OVER3★ Jets/Bears UNDER2★ 49ers/Rams UNDER2★ Lions/Dolphins OVER

OVER/UNDERS

PLEASE NOTE: This Double Issue has 2 weeks of NFL write-ups with this being the second week. If a major injury or a drastic shift in the expected line occurs we reserve the right to differ from the Other Selections below. WE WILL NOT GO AGAINST A STAR RATED PLAY!

Page 29: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL - 4

DL 4 -

LB 441/2 -

DB 4 -

KRAFT FIGHTHUNGER BOWL

We do like the job Spaz has done but we must pay tribute to HOF HC Ault.UN lobbied for this bowl but can’t make the margin bigger with BC here for the 2nd str time.UN has big DL #’s but vs the 4 quality OL’s they faced, they’ve all’d 178 ypg and 4.6 ypc.Teams in same bowl B2B yrs that lost by 6+ LY are a 60%+ play.

CCH - 1/2

Turf/ - 4

MTCH 41/2 -

INT 4 -

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGVAI TAUA #289 12/12 262 1546 12 1534 19 5.9Colin Kaepernick #153 13/13 164 1277 93 1184 20 7.2Lampford Mark #420 9/1 55 414 1 413 3 7.5Mike Ball #90 10/0 37 264 5 259 4 7.0Courtney Randall #595 11/0 47 238 4 234 2 5.0PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTCOLIN KAEPERNICK #153 13/13 326 213 65.3 2830 20 7Tyler Lantrip #277 6/0 13 8 61.5 155 1 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGRishard Matthews #160JC 13/11 49 793 16.2 4 55Brandon Wimberly #395 13/12 39 473 12.1 0 36VIRGIL GREEN #705 13/13 31 453 14.6 5 48Malcolm Shepherd #497JC 13/3 32 375 11.7 1 33Tray Session #274 12/4 17 313 18.4 3 57Vai Taua #289 12/12 15 216 14.4 3 79PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Brad Langley #502JC 13 30 1273 42.4 9 37.7 0 10KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGAnthony Martinez #287 13 74-75 4-6 5-7 0-0 0-0 9-13 36POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB JAMES-MICHAEL JOHNSON #500 13/13 84 2.5 5.5 2 0LB Kevin Grimes #435 13/13 76 3 1.5 0 0SS Duke Williams #232 12/9 68 0 4.5 3 2DE DONTAY MOCH #153 13/13 61 8.5 13.5 1 0FS Marlon Johnson #408 13/12 57 0 0 1 1LB Brandon Marshall #353 13/13 56 1 5.5 4 2DE Ryan Coulson #160 13/13 53 3.5 4.5 1 0CB Doyle Miller – 13/13 52 1 0 8 2DT Brett Roy #450 13/13 46 7 6.5 1 0CB Isaiah Frey #234 13/13 46 0.5 1.5 14 1CB Thaddeus Brown #157 13/0 30 0 0 3 0DT Zack Madonick #331 13/13 28 1.5 2 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDRishard Matthews 21 172 8.2 0 Mike Ball 31 777 25.1 0

First meeting. These two are both on hot streaks as UN (6) and BC (5) are two of 13 tms in the nation riding win streaks of 5 or more gms. The Eagles are 13-8 SU (8-6 ATS) in bowl gms (1-1 SU/0-2 ATS under HC Spaziani) and are making their 12th consec appearance. BC is 12-4 SU S/’85 in bowls including a mark of 8-2 SU (6-4 ATS) S/’00 but has failed to cover the L/4. UN is thrilled with their season as they pulled the upset of Cal earlier TY (+2’) then got the OT win which KO’d Boise from the BCS. BC is disap-pointed with this season as they struggled at the QB spot, were quickly eliminated from the ACC Atlantic race, and needed to win out to get to the postssn. They relied heavily on a D which was the NCAA’s #1 vs the run and featured the ACC’s best LB corps. UN fans can easily make this trek as San Fran is just over 200 miles away from Reno, while BC fans are notoriously bad travelers. UN is 3-7 SU and 1-5 ATS all-time (1-6 SU and 1-4 ATS under Ault) in bowls and is making its 6th consec appearance (lost the L/4, 1-3 ATS). BC is 1-0 SU/ATS vs the WAC in bowls, while UN is 0-2 SU/ 1-1 ATS vs the ACC in bowls. BC had high expectations for its off TY, returning 2,000 yd passer Shinskie. The Eagles opened the yr with two expected wins but in gm 3 vs VT, TO’s hit and BC lost 19-0 (1st shutout in 148 gms). BC went on to lose the next 4, but HC Spaziani rallied the troops and BC won out to land here. In gm 4, BC started true Fr Rettig but he was inj’d early and missed the NCSt gm. He returned vs FSU and started the L/7. The off relied heavily on RB Harris and he responded by becoming the ACC’s OFF POY. He missed the finale (knee) but is expected to return here. The WR corps is led by a true Fr in Swigert. The OL avg 6’5” 302 and many noted that the opening day OL was bigger than the NE Patriots. The unit struggled though, opening holes for 133 ypg (3.6) and allowed 25 sks (7.9%). Overall, the off has our #91 rating. BC’s def (#15) has been a constant in Spaz’s tenure (DC ‘99-’08). The already stingy unit toughened up the L/5W of the ssn all’g just 3 off TD’s. The DL recorded 15 of the tm’s 19 sks and BC ranks #1 in the NCAA all’g 80 ypg rush. S/’05, the D has all’d just eight 100 yd rushers incl 0 TY. The LB unit is one of the best in the country with AA Kuechly (#1 tkl’r NCAA), Piccolo winner Herzlich and true Fr Pierre-Louis. The secondary ranks #27 in our pass eff D all’g 230 pass ypg (64%) with a 13-19 ratio. The ST’s come in at #99. RFr Freese became the only BC K to hit 4 FG’s in a gm twice in the same ssn. The PR D all’s 3.8 ypr but has given up 1 TD while the KR unit all’s 19.9. In the L/3Y, UN has avg over 500 ttl ypg (536 ypg TY). What’s made Ault’s Pistol off so potent and effective is the type of QB and OL he’s had to run it. Kaepernick became the 1st QB in college FB hist to throw for 2,000 and rush for 1,000 in a ssn in 3 consec yrs. What’s more, he’s tied for the most rushing TD’s by a QB ever (59) and teamed with RB Taua to become the most prolific rushing duo ever in NCAA history (broke SMU’s mark of 8193 yds from ‘79-’82). UN’s OL “The Union” is just as vital as the unit avg 6’6” 302 (2 Sr) and excels in both run-blocking (6.3) and pass-protection (11 sk). The Pack recorded over 400 ypg in all but one gm TY (at UH) and in fact, posted over 500 yds in 8 gms incl 884 yds (UN record) vs ID. UN finished as our #7 off and #64 D. The DL avg 6’2” 266 (2 Sr) and is anchored by Moch, a dynamic DE who is the NCAA’s active leader in tfl (#6 all-time) with 63. UN brought in DC Buh to shore up the tm’s Achilles’ heel and the D responded. UN not only dropped its pts all’d by nearly a TD, but after all’g 298 ypg pass with a 33-8 LY, the Pack’s #40 pass D all’d 253 ypg (57%) with only a 15-10 ratio TY! UN went thru a mid-ssn slump going 5 gms without a made FG but when unheralded walk-on K Martinez split the uprights with the GW FG vs Boise, he became “Big Man on Campus” in one swift kick. The ST rank #107 as UN att’d just one FG over 40 and the KR def is all’g 26.1 ypr. Kudos to Nevada for their impressive win vs Boise which cost the WAC about $13 mil. We will side with a well coached team that has a solid rush attack and most probably the best set of LB’s in the country. Nevada was held 189 yds under their avg at Hawaii and 120 yds under their avg at Fresno and this is the 1st D they’ve faced that’s in the Top 45 away from home. Kaepernick is used to breaking to the outside but will find that task much more difficult vs this QUALITY front 7. FORECAST: BC (+) Nev by 3 RATING: 3★ BOSTON COLLEGE (+)

Crowd

QB - 441/2

EAGLES ATS: 5-7 O/U: 3-9

BC UN BC UN BC UN

RB - - WR - 1/2

ST 1/2 - SCH 44 -

OVERALL -

BC avg 6-5 302, 2 Sr, 25 sk all’d (7.9%), 3.6 ypc. UN avg 6-6 302, 2 Sr, 11 sk all’d (3.2%), 6.3 ypc. BC avg 6-3 278, 2 Sr, 15 of tm 19 sk, 2.7 ypc.UN avg 6-2 266, 2 Sr, 22 of tm 32 sk, 4.0 ypc.BC has ACC top LB’s, Kuechly #1 NCAA w/171 tkl.Johnson #1 tkl’r w/84, 8 tfl, Grimes #2, 4.5 tfl.BC #27 pass eff D, 230 ypg (64%), 13-19 ratio.UN #40 pass eff D, 253 ypg (57%), 15-10 ratio.

BOSTON COLLEGE

by 4 4’s

BOSTON COLLEGE(7-5)

NEVADA (12-1)

BC UN CHECKLIST COMMENTS

January 9, 2011 • 9:00 pm ESPN • AT&T Park • San Francisco, CAPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.Boston College 140 178 20 2.1 4 99.8Nevada 236 238 31 1.9 – 94.5

BC UN

WOLF PACK ATS: 7-6 O/U: 6-6-1RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGMONTEL HARRIS #159 11/11 269 1278 35 1243 8 4.6Andre Williams #101 11/1 76 404 13 391 1 5.1James McCluskey #27 12/7 5 25 0 25 0 5.0Dave Shinskie #53 4/4 12 19 44 -25 0 -2.1Chase Rettig #40 8/8 31 63 95 -32 0 -1.0PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTChase Rettig #40 8/8 161 86 53.4 1117 6 7Dave Shinskie #53 4/4 96 46 47.9 618 5 6RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGBobby Swigert #128 12/3 36 494 13.7 4 63Alex Amidon #149 9/0 14 320 22.9 2 67Ifeanyl Momah #137 12/12 19 296 15.6 3 40Chris Pantale #27 12/12 27 291 10.8 1 31Johnathan Coleman #421 12/4 14 260 18.6 0 44Clyde Lee #183 9/6 14 144 10.3 1 31Montel Harris #159 11/11 18 112 6.2 1 36PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Ryan Quigley #42 12 70 2924 41.8 17 38.5 0 25KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGNate Freese #44 12 23-24 11-11 8-9 1-3 0-0 20-23 49POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB LUKE KEUCHLY #77 12/12 171 1.5 9 3 2LB Kevin Pierre-Louis #25 12/12 86 0 2.5 3 0LB Mark Herzlich #43 12/12 60 0 3.5 4 4DB Donnie Fletcher #103 12/12 51 0 2.5 2 5DB Wes Davis #107 7/7 36 0 1 0 1DB Jim Noel #61 12/7 34 0 1 1 4DL Kaleb Ramsey #78 10/8 34 1.5 4 1 0DL Max Holloway #180 11/5 34 4 9 2 0DB Chris Fox #52 12/5 29 0 0.5 6 1DL Damik Scafe #58 12/2 27 3 6 4 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDMontel Harris 9 49 5.4 0 Chris Fox 15 281 18.7 0DeLeon Gause 8 34 4.2 0 DeLeon Gause 13 274 21.1 0

OL 1/2 -

DL - 441/2

LB - 4

DB - 41/2

BBVA COMPASSBOWL

HC Wannstedt has stepped down which adds extra emotion and rates sizeable edge vs 1st yr cch.Wildcat fans will travel while Pitt struggles with fan base. In middle of SEC country.Pitt wants to run on off while UK is all’g 4.5 ypc. UK has QB questions.The Pitt players will rally around their departing HC.

CCH - 41/2

Turf/ 44 -

MTCH - 4

INT - 44

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGDion Lewis #110 11/10 197 982 26 956 12 4.9Ray Graham #31 11/2 131 867 35 832 8 6.4Tino Sunseri #29 12/12 49 208 153 55 1 1.1PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTTino Sunseri #29 12/12 327 214 65.4 2476 15 8Pat Bostick #9 4/0 11 7 63.6 44 0 2RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJON BALDWIN #15 12/12 52 810 15.6 5 61Mike Shanahan #81 12/10 42 577 13.7 1 36Devin Street #164 12/3 24 316 13.2 2 79Dion Lewis #110 11/10 27 216 8.0 0 31Ray Graham #31 11/2 23 199 8.7 2 33Mike Cruz #96 12/11 17 189 11.1 2 26Henry Hynoski #31 12/9 23 155 6.7 1 20PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20DAN HUTCHINS #102 12 42 1896 45.1 7 40.3 1 13KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGDan Hutchins #102 12 37-37 6-8 8-9 2-5 0-1 16-23 42POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTSS DOM DECICCO #71 11/11 85 0 4 2 5LB Max Gruder #404 12/12 82 0 0.5 1 1LB Greg Williams #92 12/11 58 1 4.5 2 0DT Chas Alecxih – 12/12 55 6.5 1.5 3 0DE JABAAL SHEARD #95 12/12 52 9 5.5 4 0FS Jarred Holley #31 12/12 50 0 1 3 5DE Brandon Lindsey #56 12/10 47 10 6 1 0SS Jason Hendricks #701 12/5 42 0 1 3 0CB Antwuan Reed #84 12/12 40 0 0 6 1LB Tristan Roberts #169 12/6 37 0 4.5 0 0CB Ricky Gary #54 12/12 31 0 0 5 1NT Myles Caragein #69 12/12 30 2 2.5 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDCameron Saddler 24 257 10.7 0 Ray Graham 20 459 23.0 0Antwuan Reed 1 18 18.0 0 Cameron Saddler 22 460 20.9 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGDerrick Locke #367 8/8 154 848 32 816 10 5.3Randall Cobb #70 12/12 52 423 22 401 5 7.7Donald Russell #167 12/4 64 308 15 293 2 4.6Raymond Sanders #122 11/0 65 283 32 251 3 3.9Mike Hartline #24 12/12 32 77 112 -35 1 -1.1PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTMike Hartline #24 12/12 405 268 66.2 3178 23 9Randall Cobb #70 12/12 10 5 50.0 58 3 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGRANDALL COBB #70 12/12 79 955 12.1 7 48Chris Matthews #19JC 12/12 57 897 15.7 9 55La’Rod King #138 12/6 33 436 13.2 5 47Derrick Locke #367 8/8 28 257 9.2 0 32Jordan Aumiller #138 11/8 18 193 10.7 1 35PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Ryan Tydlacka #28 12 46 2009 43.7 11 36.5 0 13KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGCraig McIntosh – 11 33-34 3-3 3-4 3-4 1-2 10-13 50POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB DANNY TREVATHAN #177 12/11 130 3 13 3 0SS Winston Guy #91 12/11 98 0 3 1 3LB Ronnie Sneed #281 12/11 56 1.5 2.5 1 0FS Mychal Bailey #108JC 12/12 55 0 1 2 2CB Martavius Neloms #412 10/10 50 2 3.5 2 0CB Randall Burden #377 12/12 34 0 3.5 6 0DB Anthony Mosley #283 12/9 32 0.5 0.5 5 1DE Taylor Wyndham #214 12/5 26 2.5 3 1 0DE Collins Ukwu #299 12/12 26 1 0.5 2 0DT Mark Crawford #72JC 10/5 24 2 2.5 0 0DT Ricky Lumpkin #256 12/12 19 1 4.5 0 0DT Luke McDermott – 12/5 17 3 2 0 1DE DeQuin Evans #60JC 11/6 13 1.5 2.5 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDRandall Cobb 26 201 7.7 1 Randall Cobb 27 635 23.5 0

First meeting. UK was hoping for a better (warmer) bowl trip but is making a 5th str bowl trip and is 3-1 SU, 2-2 ATS. Overall UK is 8-6 SU in bowls while Pitt is 11-15 and is making their 3rd str bowl trip (1-1 SU/ATS) winning LY’s Car Care over NC, 19-17. UK HC Phillips becomes UK’s first HC to take his tm to a bowl in his 1st yr of coaching. Wannstedt was forced to step down at Pitt but said he would coach here (1-1 SU/ATS), so the emotional Panthers get a chance to send him out as a winner. UK is 1-4 SU/ATS on the road TY while Pitt is 3-3 SU/3-1-2 ATS. UK was 2-5 SU/3-4 ATS vs bowl tms being outscored 32-23 and outgained 403-388 while Pitt was 4-5 SU/4-3-2 ATS vs bowl tms but outscored those tms 23-21 and outgained them 336-321. Both tms defeated L’ville with UK having a 466-317 yd edge in a 23-16 win and Pitt having a 255-185 yd edge in a 20-3 win. UK fans travel well especially when the bowl is within driving distance (5.5 hrs) while Pitt fans are not known as good travellers, so this should be a predominantly blue crowd. On the positive side, UK is making their 5th consec bowl trip, a school record. On the negative side, UK limps into the bowl 6-6 after losing their 26th in a row to Tenn (longest series losing streak in the NCAA) as Joker Phillips’ 1st year as HC had ups and downs. One major up was the improvement of QB Hartline who finished #2 in the SEC in pass ypg which was a tremendous improvement over LY’s inj riddled ssn in which he hit only 59% with a 6-7 ratio. Unfortunately, he will miss here after an off-field incident. A major down was a shoulder inj that kept top RB Locke out for 4 gms at midssn. UK does have one of the most exciting players in the nation in WR Cobb who is #2 in the NCAA in all-purp ypg. The OL was expected to be down after losing 4 starters from ‘09 but held up well only allowing 15 sks (3.6%) and the tm avg’d 163 ypg rush (4.7) despite Locke’s inj. The OL starters avg 6’4” 304 with only 1 Sr st’r. Overall the #28 offense is more exciting and productive this year, but the #64 defense struggled. The DL suffered after ‘09’s top sackman DE Evans (6 sk ‘09) struggled all yr with inj’s and only started 6 gms. The DL avg 6’3” 276 with 2 Sr st’rs but all’d 170 rush ypg (4.5), 2nd to last in SEC. LB Trevathan is a one-man tackling machine finishing 1st in the SEC in tkl per gm. UK is #56 in our pass D rankings allowing 184 ypg (54%) with a 13-8 ratio vs a pretty soft slate of opposing QB’s plus tms were able to run vs UK and were not forced to pass. UK ranks #88 in our ST rankings with solid P Tydlacka but need some work on returns as they all’d 24.1 and 2 TD on KR and 11.2 on PR. It was a tough ssn for the Panthers as fans expected the BE Title and a BCS Bowl but the tm finished 7-5 with a share of the BE Title and a trip to Birmingham. Pitt started out 3-0 in the BE with a 2 gm lead over all of the others but was tripped up by Conn in a 30-28 loss (-2 TO) and then WV smashed them 35-10 to settle for a 3-way tie in the BE. QB Sunseri was decent in his 1st yr as a starter finishing #2 in the BE in pass eff, but had poor outings vs Miami (FL) and Conn which contributed to those losses. RB Lewis began the ssn as a pressn AA but had a disappointing yr and split carries with Graham early before coming on late in the yr and finishing with a career-high 261 yds in the finale vs Cincy. Top WR Baldwin is 6’5” 230 and UK’s top CB is 6’0”. Pitt’s OL starters avg 6’4” 299 with 2 Sr’s but had trouble creating room for the running gm TY (158 ypg, 4.5 vs 180, 4.9 LY) and allowed 8 more sks than LY (23, 6.7%). Overall Pitt is #43 on off and #25 on def. The DL starters avg 6’3” 270 with 1 Sr st’r and all’d 121 rush ypg (3.5) with 30 sks overall by the D. Pitt lost AA DE Romeus after 1 gm but DE Sheard was named BE DPY and teamed with Romeus’ replacement Lindsey for 19 sks. The LB unit lost MLB Mason after 3 gms and was forced to pull super SS DeCicco to play WLB at times. Pitt is #30 in our pass D rankings allowing 183 ypg (57%) with a 15-13 ratio and held the BE’s top passing QB (Cincy’s Collaros) to 109 yds and a 1-3 ratio in the finale. Pitt is #28 in our ST rankings with solid P/PK Hutchins who finished #6 in the NCAA in net (40.3). The checklist has been made with QB Hartline not playing for Kentucky. Obviously, the offense will be affected without him. While many considered the Pittsburgh season a disappointment, HC Wannst-edt has said throughout the season this is one of the youngest teams he’s had. Down the stretch the Panthers won 6 of 8 games but with a disappointing loss at Connecticut their chance at a Big East Title was diminished. We feel the Pitt players will rally around a quality, hard working coach and if the running game is on par with the season finale, they’ll be able to control the game.FORECAST: Pitt by 10 RATING: 2★ PITTSBURGH

Crowd

QB - -

WILDCATS ATS: 6-6 O/U: 9-3

UK PITT UK PITT UK PITT

RB - 41/2 WR 4 -

ST - 41/2 SCH - 4

OVERALL -

UK avg 6-4 304, 1 Sr, 15 sk all’d (3.6%), 4.7 ypc.Pitt avg 6-4 299, 2 Sr, 23 sk all’d (6.7%), 4.5 ypc.UK avg 6-3 276, 2 Sr, 12.5 of tm 19.5 sk, 4.5 ypc.Pitt avg 6-3 270, 1 Sr, 29 of tm 30 sk, 3.5 ypc.Trevathan #1 tkl’r w/130, 16 tfl, Sneed #3, 4 tfl.Gruder #2 tkl’r w/82, Williams #3, 5.5 tfl.UK #56 pass eff D, 184 ypg (54%), 13-8 ratio.Pitt #30 pass eff D, 183 ypg (57%), 15-13 ratio.

PITT

by 10 4’s

KENTUCKY(6-6)

PITTSBURGH (7-5)

UK PITT CHECKLIST COMMENTS

January 8, 2011 • 12:00 pm ESPN • Legion Field • Birmingham, ALPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.Kentucky 139 235 25 2.4 – 98.9Pittsburgh 186 185 30 1.8 44 101.5

UK PITT

PANTHERS ATS: 6-4-2 O/U: 6-6

29

Page 30: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

OL 1/2 -

DL - 1/2

LB - -

DB 44 -

BCS NATIONALCHAMPIONSHIP

Both HC’s now in B2B bowls and while Oreg was in BCS Bowl, each was unimpressive LY.The fan base should be split 50/50 but we’ll give a slight edge to Aub for the grass field.The way to beat Aub is passing but UO runs. UO has not faced QB comparable to Newton.Tough to give anyone an edge in a Nat’l Championship.

CCH - -

Turf/ - 1/2

MTCH - 4

INT - -

This is the first meeting between Oregon and Auburn and takes place on the NCAA’s biggest stage. This is Oreg’s 6th consec bowl appearance and the 2nd str under AP COY Kelly who dropped his 1st postssn gm LY in the Rose Bowl. UO is playing for their 1st Nat’l Title and nearly missed out on playing for the Title in ‘01 when an 11-1 squad was relegated to the Fiesta Bowl and smashed Colo 38-16. AU is playing for their 3rd Nat’l Title (last 1957) and will try to keep alive the streak of 4 str BCS Titles for the SEC. A 13-0 Aub squad was passed over in ‘04 as undefeated USC and Okla ply’d for the Title. This is Chizik’s 2nd bowl gm as a HC and LY he led the Tigers to a 38-35 OT win over N’western in the Outback Bowl. The Ducks have 11 Sr st’rs among 16 upperclassmen while Aub has 12 Sr st’rs and 18 upperclassmen. Oreg has ply’d 6 bowl elig tms going 6-0 SU and 4-1-1 ATS. One thing to point out however is that in those 6 contests, UO gave up 25 ppg (7 pts over ssn avg) and 432 ypg (100 yds over ssn avg). Aub is 5-0 SU/4-1 ATS on the road TY (3-1 as AF) while Oreg is 3-2 ATS on the road TY and this is their 1st time getting pts. Aub is 9-0 SU/7-2 ATS vs bowl tms outscoring those opps by 38-26 (462-370 yd advantage). The Ducks off (#2, 49 ppg, 538 ypg) became the talk of the college football with their fast-paced, no-huddle schemes that saw them deliver 25 TD drives TY in less than 1:00. Soph QB Thomas won the starting job late in fall camp and has had a banner yr. Something to keep an eye on however is the bkup QB situation as Costa, who was competing for the job in the summer was inj’d a month ago and will miss here leaving no depth. Despite Thomas’ splendid 1st ssn as a st’r, some of his accolades may have to take a backseat to Heisman finalist RB James who finished as the nation’s #1 rusher despite not playing in the opener. Barner started for James in gm 1 and posted 225 ttl yds with 5 TD’s. Barner was inj’d midssn on a KR and missed a few gms before returning to form over the L/3 wks of the reg ssn. Maehl led UO in rec but UO could be w/o (#4) Tuinei after he inj’d his shldr in wk 10 (CS). The OL avg 6’5” 296 (3 Sr) and paved the way for 304 rush ypg (6.1) while all’g a miniscule 7 sks (2.0%). The UO def (#14, 18 ppg, 332 ypg) dominated the 2H of gms TY all’g just 77 pts incl an unfathomable 24 pts in the 4Q. The DL (6’4” 259), led by Sr’s DE Rowe and DT Bair all’d 118 rush ypg (3.3) while the unit as a whole comb for 20.5 of the tm’s 31 sks (66%). The LB unit is led by 1st Tm P10 Matthews while soph CB Harris came alive in the 2H of the ssn to help lead a UO secondary that all’d 214 ypg (54%) with a 13-20 ratio (#5 pass D ranking). Harris was also the stalwart on the ST’s with an NCAA best 4 PR TD’s guiding the unit to our #3 ranking. Auburn’s ssn has been riddled by controversy surrounding Heisman winning QB Newton. Newton was able to stay focused and play through the troubles seemingly without missing a step and the Tigers rode their playmaker into the BCS Title gm. Newton was a perfect fit for OC Malzahn’s spread off and leads the NCAA in pass eff and is #15 in rush ypg (#1 SEC). True frosh Dyer emerged as the top RB starting the L/4 gms. WR Adams is a big play threat but his numbers were a little down from LY due to the improved running gm. The Tigers have a large, veteran OL that avg 6’5” 304 with 4 Sr starters (1 Jr). Aub leads the SEC in rush ypg at 287 (71 ypg more than #2 Miss St) and scoring off (43 ppg). The OL is led by AA LT Ziemba and has all’d 21 sks (8%). Their #33 defense isn’t unbeatable allowing 25 ppg but is solid in rush D allowing just 112 ypg (3.5). The DL avg 6’4” 277 with 2 Sr st’rs. DT Fairley won the Lombardi Awd and led the SEC in sks (10.5) and tfl (21) despite double and triple tms. Fairley was criticized in the GA gm for late hits and dirty play, but reviews led to no ejection or susp and he is certainly a force to be reckoned with. The LB corps is led by #1 tkl’r Bynes and ‘09’s #2 tkl’r Stevens (#4 tkl’r TY, susp 2) who are both Sr’s. The biggest weakness is on pass D (#81) as they allow 251 ypg (63%) with a 23-10 ratio but luckily they face a Ducks tm that prefers to run the ball. The Tigers are #29 in our ST rankings but struggle in punting 37.5 avg (34.7 net) and on PR’s (6.2 tm avg). K Byrum is reliable on FG’s but only has 1 att from 50+ (missed). While doing the checklist it was surprising that these two teams came out right at the Vegas line. A few weeks ago, Oregon would’ve been a FG+ favorite but now that the season is over, it has been reversed. Obviously the best player on the field is Cam Newton but this Oregon defense is fast and physical. It’s a great matchup as these two teams are worthy of playing for the Title and with this being written about a month in advance, we’ll pass on a selection and wait until the game draws near. FORECAST: Oregon vs Auburn RATING: NO PLAY

Crowd

QB - 44

DUCKS ATS: 8-3-1 O/U: 8-4

UO AU UO AU UO AU

RB 4 - WR - 4

ST 1/2 - SCH - 44

OVERALL -

UO avg 6-5 296, 3 Sr, 7 sk all’d (2.0%), 6.1 ypc.AU avg 6-5 304, 4 Sr, 21 sk all’d (8.0%), 6.2 ypc.UO avg 6-4 259, 3 Sr, 20.5 of tm 31 sk, 3.3 ypc.AU avg 6-4 277, 2 Sr, 27.5 of tm 33 sk, 3.5 ypc.Matthews #1 tkl’r w/73, 8.5 tfl, Paysinger #2, 6.5 tfl.Bynes #1 tkl’r w/71, 5.5 tfl, Stevens #4, 3.5 tfl.UO #5 pass eff D, 214 ypg (54%), 13-20 ratio.AU #81 pass eff D, 251 ypg (63%), 23-10 ratio.

AUBURN

by 3 4’s

OREGON (12-0)

AUBURN (13-0)

UO AU CHECKLIST COMMENTS

January 10, 2011 • 8:30 pm ESPN • U of Phoenix Stadium • Glendale, AZPOWER PLAYS PROJECTION RUSH PASS POINTS TO’s ST A.O.R.OREGON 256 233 42 2.2 44 100.5AUBURN 255 213 34 2.4 – 104.7

UO AU

TIGERS ATS: 9-4 O/U: 9-4RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGLAMICHAEL JAMES #41 11/11 281 1786 104 1682 21 6.0Kenjon Barner #115 10/1 80 537 18 519 6 6.5Darron Thomas #22 12/12 85 563 71 492 5 5.8Remene Alston #149 8/0 63 378 22 356 5 5.7Josh Huff #116 12/2 12 214 0 214 2 17.8PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTDarron Thomas #22 12/12 321 195 60.7 2518 28 7Nate Costa #56 9/0 33 25 75.8 286 1 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGJEFF MAEHL #117 12/12 68 943 13.9 12 47DJ Davis #21 12/12 36 410 11.4 3 38DAVID PAULSON #26 12/12 21 370 17.6 4 61Lavasier Tuinei #128JC 10/10 33 321 9.7 2 33Josh Huff #116 12/2 19 303 15.9 3 57LaMichael James #41 11/11 13 169 13.0 1 84PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Jackson Rice #9 9 35 1507 43.1 6 38.5(t) 0 17KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGRob Beard #74 11 63-64 4-5 3-4 2-3 0-0 9-12 42POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB CASEY MATTHEWS #70 12/12 73 3 5.5 2 3LB Spencer Paysinger #485 12/12 68 3 3.5 6 0S John Boyett #39 12/11 67 0 1.5 9 5CB TALMADGE JACKSON #205 12/12 67 0 1.5 6 2S Eddie Pleasant #118 12/12 63 2 3 2 0DL Brandon Bair #95 12/11 45 3 12.5 8 0DL Kenny Rowe #19 12/12 38 6 6.5 3 0LB Michael Clay #52 12/0 38 0 0.5 0 1DL Zac Clark #63JC 12/10 37 3 5.5 1 0LB Boseko Lokombo #39 12/0 35 0 2 3 0LB Josh Kaddu #278 12/12 31 2.5 4 2 0CB CLIFF HARRIS #19 12/6 30 0 1 15 5PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDCLIFF HARRIS 28 545 19.5 4 Josh Huff 21 532 25.3 0

RUSHING PS# GP/GS ATT GAIN LOST NET TD AVGCAM NEWTON #2JC 13/13 242 1580 171 1409 20 5.8Michael Dyer #2 13/8 160 962 12 950 5 5.9Onterio McCalebb #69 13/3 89 801 38 763 9 8.6Mario Fannin #16 12/4 61 413 18 395 5 6.5PASSING PS# GP/GS ATT COMP PCT YDS TD INTCAM NEWTON #2JC 13/13 246 165 67.1 2589 28 6Barrett Trotter #44 6/0 9 6 66.7 64 0 0RECEIVING PS# GP/GS REC YDS AVG TD LONGDarvin Adams #67 13/12 48 909 18.9 7 62Terrell Zachery #18 13/10 37 557 15.1 4 80Emory Blake #35 13/6 29 500 17.2 7 94Mario Fannin #16 12/4 16 157 9.8 2 38Philip Lutzenkirchen #10 12/4 13 137 10.5 5 26Kodi Burns #17 13/13 10 142 14.2 0 33PUNTING PS# GP NO YDS AVG FC NET BLK In20Ryan Shoemaker #42 8 27 1052 39.0 12 34.7(t) 0 7KICKING PS# GP XP 1-29 30-39 40-49 50+ TTL LNGWes Byrum #12 13 70-71 7-8 5-8 3-3 0-1 15-20 48POS PLAYER PS# GP/GS TKL SK TFL PBU INTLB Josh Bynes #23 13/13 71 1 4.5 4 3S Zac Etheridge #159 13/13 66 0 1.5 2 2CB Neiko Thorpe #151 13/12 62 0 0.5 9 0LB Craig Stevens #56 11/11 57 0.5 3 1 0DT NICK FAIRLEY #22JC 13/13 55 10.5 10.5 0 1CB Demond Washington #18JC 13/12 48 1 4.5 3 2LB Daren Bates #400 11/9 47 0 1 0 1S Mike McNeil #21 13/6 42 0 0 2 0S Aairon Savage #183 7/7 37 0 1 1 0LB Eltoro Freeman #61JC 10/3 36 1 3 0 0DB T’Sharvan Bell #121 10/2 33 1 1.5 4 1DE Antoine Carter #133 12/11 31 4.5 5.5 1 0DT Zach Clayton #226 13/13 25 0 7 1 0PUNT RETURNS NO YDS AVG TD KICK RETURNS NO YDS AVG TDQuindarius Carr 19 108 5.7 0 Demond Washington 41 1025 25.0 1

30

ALL TIME BOWL RECORDS 2010 SEASON VS LAST 3 AS AS COACH COACH ATS VS '10 ON THE FAV/ RECORD OUTRIGHT SPREAD YEARS FAV DOG SU ATS RATING BowlCaliber Tms ROAD DOG FAV/DOG AIR FORCE 9-10-1 11-6 1-2 3-1 8-5 1-2 1-2 C- 4-3 2-4 F 2-7ALABAMA* 32-22-3 17-11 2-1 11-9 5-2 2-1 2-1 A 4-4 2-3 F 7-5ARIZONA 6-8-1 6-5-1 1-1 2-3-1 4-2 1-1 1-1 C 3-3-1 1-3-1 D 0-1-1ARKANSAS 12-22-1 8-15 0-2 3-6 5-9 1-0 0-1 C 7-1 4-1 D 3-1ARMY 2-2 4-0 0-0 0-0 4-0 0-0 0-0 I 0-4 4-2 D 4-3AUBURN 20-13-2 8-13 1-1 5-10 3-3 1-0 0-1 C 7-2 4-1 F 8-4BAYLOR* 8-8 5-3 0-0 1-1 3-2 0-0 0-0 I 0-6 3-3 F 4-2BOISE ST 6-4 7-3 2-1 2-2 5-1 2-2 3-1 B 4-1 5-1 F 8-4BOSTON COLL* 13-8 10-8 0-3 4-4 5-4 0-1 0-1 C- 3-4 4-1 D 3-3BYU* 10-17-1 10-16-1 1-2 3-6-1 7-9 3-2 3-2 C 4-3 3-3 F 4-2CLEMSON* 16-16 11-13-1 1-2 7-9-1 4-3 1-0 1-0 B 4-5 3-2 F 3-4CONNECTICUT 3-1 3-1 2-1 1-0 2-1 3-1 3-1 A- 4-3 2-4 D 4-2E CAROLINA 5-6 5-5 2-1 1-3 4-2 0-0 0-0 I 3-5 2-4 D 4-4FLORIDA INT’L 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 0-0 I 2-3 4-3 D 3-2FLORIDA ST 22-14-2 20-10-1 3-0 12-7-1 8-3 0-0 0-0 I 4-6 3-3 D 1-2FLORIDA* 18-19 12-14-1 2-1 7-8 4-6-1 4-1 4-1 A 4-6 3-2 F 5-4FRESNO ST 10-9 6-7 1-2 0-6 6-1 4-6 5-5 B- 2-2 2-3 D 3-2GEORGIA TECH* 22-16 9-8 0-3 4-6 5-2 0-2 0-2 D 4-3 3-3 D 3-2GEORGIA* 26-16-3 17-11 3-0 9-7 7-4 7-2 6-3 A 2-6 1-5 F 5-4HAWAII* 5-4 4-5 0-2 2-2 1-3 0-1 0-1 C- 4-1 4-2 F 7-0ILLINOIS* 6-9 6-6 0-1 2-2 4-3 0-1 0-1 C- 5-3 4-2 D 4-1IOWA* 13-10-1 10-12 2-0 4-6 6-6 5-3 6-2 B+ 3-3-1 1-4 D 0-1-1KANSAS ST* 6-7 4-9 0-0 4-7 0-1 6-5 4-7 C-/I 2-3 4-2 F 3-4KENTUCKY 8-6 6-4 1-2 1-2 5-2 0-0 0-0 I 3-4 1-4 D 2-5LOUISVILLE 6-7-1 4-7 0-0 3-3 1-4 0-0 0-0 I 2-4 4-1 F 4-2LSU* 21-19-1 13-9 2-1 6-4 7-4 4-1 4-1 A 3-5 2-3 F 3-5MARYLAND* 10-11-2 6-8-1 1-1 4-4 2-3-1 4-2 4-2 B 5-3 4-2 F 4-1MIAMI (FLA) 18-15 14-11 1-1 11-10 3-1 0-2 1-1 C 4-5 3-3 F 4-5MIAMI (OH) 6-3 1-1 0-0 1-1 0-0 0-0 0-0 I 3-2 5-3 F 3-2MICHIGAN ST** 7-13 7-9 1-2 1-3 5-6 0-3 1-2 C- 6-2 3-2 D 2-1MICHIGAN* 19-20 15-16-1 1-0 8-9 7-6-1 0-0 0-0 I 2-6 1-4 D 1-3MIDDLE TENNESSEE 1-1 1-1 1-0 0-0 1-1 1-1 1-1 B- 1-2 2-4 D 1-2MISSISSIPPI ST 7-6 4-5 1-0 1-3 3-2 0-0 0-0 I 3-4 3-2 F 5-2MISSOURI 12-15 4-9 1-2 2-4 2-5 3-3 3-3 C 3-5 3-3 F 5-4N CAROLINA 12-15 10-7-2 1-1 5-3-1 5-4-1 0-2 1-1 C 4-4 4-2 F 4-4

* Indicates number of even lined bowl games. ★ Since 1980.

ALL TIME BOWL RECORDS 2010 SEASON VS LAST 3 AS AS COACH COACH ATS VS ‘10 ON THE FAV/ RECORD OUTRIGHT SPREAD YEARS FAV DOG SU ATS RATING BowlCaliber Tms ROAD DOG FAV/DOG

N CAROLINA ST* 12-11-1 10-7 1-0 4-2 6-4 0-1 1-0 B- 6-3 4-2 D 5-1N ILLINOIS 2-3 1-3 0-2 0-0 1-3 0-0 0-0 I 3-2 5-3 F 7-3NAVY 7-8-1 8-3 2-1 3-0 5-3 1-1 1-1 C 4-1 4-2 D 3-0NEBRASKA* 24-22 17-15 2-0 12-8 5-7 2-0 2-0 B+ 5-1 4-2 F 6-6NEVADA* 3-7 1-6 0-3 0-4 1-1 2-5 1-5 D 2-2 3-3 F 5-6NORTHWESTERN 1-7 3-4 2-0 0-0 3-4 0-2 2-0 C+ 1-4 1-6 D 1-4NOTRE DAME* 13-16 14-15 1-0 5-5 4-8 0-0 0-0 I 5-4-2 4-1 D 3-1OHIO 0-4 0-2 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-2 0-2 D 2-2 3-3 D 2-1OHIO ST** 19-22 13-17-1 2-1 5-9 7-8-1 5-4 6-3 B+ 4-2-1 1-2-1 F 9-2-1OKLAHOMA 25-17-1 10-16 0-3 6-12 4-4 5-6 4-7 C- 4-4 3-4 F 6-6OKLAHOMA ST 12-8 7-7-1 1-2 7-2-1 0-5 2-2 2-2 C 4-3-1 5-0 F 7-2-1OREGON 9-14 7-10 2-1 1-7 6-3 0-1 0-1 C- 4-1-1 3-2 D 0-0PENN ST** 27-13-2 18-10 2-1 10-2 6-8 24-11-1 22-11 A 2-6 2-3 D 1-4PITTSBURGH* 11-15 8-10 1-1 4-5 3-5 1-1 1-1 C 4-3-2 3-1-2 F 5-3S CAROLINA 4-11 4-8 0-2 2-3 2-5 1-3 1-3 D 6-5 3-3 F 5-4S MISSISSIPPI 9-9 8-6-1 2-1 4-5 4-1-1 1-1 1-1 C 1-3 3-3 D 1-2SAN DIEGO ST 1-4 1-1-1 0-0 0-1 1-0-1 0-0 0-0 I 3-2 3-2-1 F 4-3-1SMU 5-6-1 3-2 1-0 0-2 3-0 1-0 1-0 B 3-4 3-4 F 3-5-1STANFORD 9-11-1 5-5 1-0 1-4 4-1 1-0 1-0 B 3-3 4-2 F 7-4SYRACUSE 12-9-1 10-5 0-0 5-1 5-4 0-0 0-0 I 2-5 5-1 D 3-2TCU 11-14-1 6-5-2 1-2 2-4-1 4-1-1 5-3 4-3-1 C+ 3-3 3-3 F 7-5TENNESSEE 25-23 16-11 1-1 6-6 10-5 0-0 0-0 I 3-4 4-1 D 2-4TEXAS A&M 13-18 12-10 0-2 4-4 8-6 0-1 0-1 C- 4-3-1 3-1-1 D 2-1-1TEXAS TECH 11-21-1 6-12-1 1-2 3-9 3-3-1 0-0 0-0 I 2-4 2-3-1 F 4-3-1TOLEDO* 7-3 3-2 0-0 2-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 I 2-3 4-2 F 4-2TROY 1-3 1-2-1 0-1-1 0-2 1-0-1 1-2-1 1-2-1 C- 2-2 3-4 F 2-7TULSA 7-9 5-2 2-0 2-0 3-2 2-0 2-0 B 3-3 4-2 D 3-1UCF 0-3 0-3 0-2 1-0 0-2 0-3 1-2 C- 3-2 5-1 D 1-0USF 3-2 3-2 2-1 3-1 0-1 0-0 0-0 I 2-5 3-2 D 3-3UTAH 12-3 10-3 2-1 3-2 7-1 5-0 4-1 A 1-4-1 4-2 D 0-1UTEP 5-7 0-4 0-0 0-1 0-3 0-2 0-2 D 2-1 3-4 D 2-4VIRGINIA TECH 9-14 9-11 2-1 5-6 4-5 8-9 8-9 B 6-2 5-1 D 0-1W VIRGINIA 13-16 6-14-1 1-2 0-6 6-8-1 1-1 0-2 C- 5-2 3-2 F 6-4WASHINGTON* 14-14-1 12-9-1 0-0 6-4-1 6-4 0-0 0-0 I 2-6 3-3 D 2-5WISCONSIN* 10-10 10-8 1-2 2-4 7-4 2-2 2-2 C 4-2 3-1-1 D 2-0

Limit one per 2010

sub please

Get $500 in NC Debit Credit FOR $399!!!!Northcoast Debit Card ★ Special ★

WHEN THE SEASON ENDS, USE YOUR NORTHCOAST DEBIT CARD FOR BASKETBALL, HOCKEY & BASEBALL

Offer Valid Through Bowl Season. Expires 1/10/11. Call 1-800-654-3448

Page 31: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

PRO ANGLES There are 3 main methods of handicapping, Fundamental, Situation & Technical. Fundamental handicapping, or the analysis of personnel matchups & power ratings, is our main method of handicapping. This accounts for roughly 50% of how we view a game. Situ-ational handicapping (analysis of letdown, look ahead, systems) takes up approximately 25% of our handicapping. Technical handicapping (analysis of angles) takes up the rest. You should never base your final selection on 1 factor. To be a complete handicapper you must look at all 3 methods. For more complete analysis you should read Ten Keys To A Winning Season. Each week in Power Sweep we provide the angle section to add to your handicapping arsenal. Many times we will agree with the angle plays. Sometimes the Fundamental & Situational aspects of a game will outweigh the angles & we have the other side written up in Power Sweep. We want to make it clear that the side we write up in Power Sweep is the side we are on. We are NOT Technical handicappers, but we do use them in our handicapping analysis. Each week in Power Sweep we provide pro angles for the current week's games. For the angle plays the number in the ( ) indicates how many angles apply to that team. The higher the number the stronger the angle play.

ATL is 8-2 on the roadARZ is 2-8-1 on the roadARZ is 3-7 vs a NDiv foeBAL is 5-1 hosting NFCBUF is 8-4-1 away vs a Div foeCAR is 2-7 hosting a NDIV foeCAR is 1-6 after a Div lossCIN is 0-7 as a HFCLE is 11-5 as a Div dogDAL is 4-9 as a Div favDEN is 8-16 as an ADDEN is 3-8 after losing by 14+DET is 5-12 away vs NDivGB is 11-5 as an ADHOU is 5-9 away vs DivIND is 11-3 after a Div winJAX is 6-3 as a Div ADJAX is 5-1 off a SU winKC is 3-10 after a Div lossKC is 5-0 vs the NFCMIA is 2-5 as a Div favMIA is 12-26 at home

Week 15:(3) BUFFALO(3) OAKLAND

31

To Read rankings - YPC is yards per carry for each team's offense and defense. Turnover edge is the amount of turnovers that team is + or -. OFF YPP is offensive yds per point. This shows the avg amount of yds a team travelled per point scored. The lower the number the more efficient the off. DEF YPP is defensive yds per point. The higher the number here, the better the def is at making their opponents work at scoring points. The remaining columns show the team's rank in that category. Next to the passing ratings there may be a ★ or an X. On the offensive side a ★ means they are completing over 59% of their passes while the X shows that their QB's are completing less than 53%. Defensively, the opposite holds true as the ★ has that team's def holding its opp under 53% completions and the X shows that they allow over 59% completions.

PRO STAT PLAY: NO PLAY

AFC REC PF PA vs AFC ALL HOME AWAY FAV DOG DIV N/DIV O/U HOME AWAYNE 11-2 415 276 8-2 9-4 4-2 5-2 6-4 2-0 2-2 7-2 11-2 5-1 6-1NYJ 9-4 273 242 7-3 7-6 3-4 4-2 5-5 2-1 3-2 4-4 9-4 3-4 6-0MIA 7-6 225 244 5-5 8-5 2-4 6-1 1-3 6-1 2-2 6-3 5-8 4-2 1-6BUF 3-10 256 339 2-7 6-5-2 2-3-1 4-2-1 1-1-1 5-4-1 1-2 5-3-2 6-7 2-4 4-3PIT 10-3 290 198 8-2 7-5-1 4-2 3-3-1 4-4-1 3-1 3-1-1 4-4 5-8 2-4 3-4BAL 8-4 260 201 6-3 6-5-1 3-2-1 3-3 3-3-1 3-2 1-3 5-2-1 5-7 3-3 2-4CLE 5-8 235 252 3-6 5-8 2-4 3-4 0-3 5-5 2-1 3-7 8-5 4-2 4-3CIN 2-11 262 345 1-8 4-8-1 2-3-1 2-5 1-4 3-4-1 1-2-1 3-6 7-6 4-2 3-4JAX 8-5 295 331 7-3 9-4 5-2 4-2 4-0 5-4 3-1 6-3 9-3-1 5-2 4-1-1IND 7-6 347 318 5-4 6-6-1 3-3 3-3-1 4-6-1 2-0 1-3 5-3-1 8-5 2-4 6-1TEN 5-8 291 265 2-7 6-7 3-4 3-3 3-4 3-2 2-2 4-5 7-6 4-3 3-3HOU 5-7 288 321 4-4 5-6-1 2-3-1 3-3 3-1-1 2-5 2-2 3-4-1 8-4 3-3 5-1KC 8-5 295 268 5-5 6-6-1 4-2 2-4-1 3-3 3-2-1 1-4 5-2-1 6-6-1 2-3-1 4-3SD 7-6 354 253 6-4 7-6 5-2 2-4 6-6 1-0 2-3 5-3 6-7 3-4 3-3OAK 6-7 314 307 4-5 6-7 3-3 3-4 1-2 4-5 4-0 2-7 8-5 4-2 4-3DEN 3-10 269 376 2-7 4-9 2-4 2-5 1-3 3-6 2-2 2-7 9-4 5-1 4-3NFC REC PF PA vs NFC ALL HOME AWAY FAV DOG DIV N/DIV O/U HOME AWAYNYG 8-4 308 247 6-2 6-6 3-4 3-2 4-4 2-2 2-2 4-4 6-5-1 3-3-1 3-2PHI 8-4 344 281 5-3 6-6 3-3 3-3 5-4 1-2 2-1 4-5 8-4 3-3 5-1WAS 5-8 238 310 4-6 5-6-2 2-3-2 3-3 0-1 5-5-2 2-2 3-4-2 5-8 3-4 2-4DAL 4-8 294 336 2-6 5-7 2-4 3-3 1-5 4-2 1-2 4-5 10-2 6-0 4-2CHI 9-4 253 228 7-3 6-6-1 3-4 3-2-1 0-4-1 6-2 2-2 4-4-1 5-8 3-4 2-4GB 8-5 306 189 6-4 7-6 4-2 3-4 6-5 1-1 2-3 5-3 4-9 4-2 0-7MIN 5-7 227 253 4-4 5-7 3-3 2-4 4-3 1-4 1-3 4-4 6-6 3-3 3-3DET 3-10 285 309 3-7 9-3-1 6-1 3-2-1 2-0 7-3-1 4-1 5-2-1 9-4 6-1 3-3ATL 11-2 335 243 8-1 9-4 4-2 5-2 8-3 1-1 3-1 6-3 8-4-1 4-2 4-2-1NO 10-3 330 240 8-2 5-8 3-4 2-4 5-8 0-0 2-2 3-6 7-6 3-4 4-2TB 8-5 260 267 6-3 6-4-3 1-4-1 5-0-2 1-2-2 5-2-1 3-2 3-2-3 6-7 3-3 3-4CAR 1-11 154 307 1-8 3-9 1-5 2-4 0-2 3-7 1-3 2-6 6-6 2-4 4-2SEA 6-7 261 329 5-4 6-7 4-2 2-5 2-1 4-6 3-2 3-5 9-3-1 4-1-1 5-2STL 6-7 245 268 4-6 9-4 4-2 5-2 2-0 7-4 3-1 6-3 5-8 2-4 3-4SF 5-8 243 280 3-7 6-7 3-3 3-4 4-6 2-1 2-2 4-5 7-5-1 4-2 3-3-1ARZ 4-9 243 351 2-7 4-9 2-5 2-4 1-3 3-6 1-4 3-5 8-4-1 5-2 3-2-1

PRO STATISTICS2010 NFL TEAM RANKINGS

VERSUS SPREAD2010 REG SEASON O/U

AFC

EAST

AFC

NORT

HAF

C SO

UTH

AFC

WES

TNF

C EA

STNF

C NO

RTH

NFC

SOUT

HNF

C W

EST

RUSHING PASSINGTEAM LINE SCORE FD Att-Comp-Yds Att-Comp-Yds I/FNFL Week THIRTEEN December 5th & 6thPittsburgh 39' 13 17 24-54 22-38-234 1-0Baltimore -3 10 14 20-43 17-33-226 0-1NY Jets 44' 3 18 31-152 17-33-149 3-0New England -3' 45 23 26-101 21-29-304 0-0NFL Week FOURTEEN December 9th &12thIndianapolis -3 30 21 32-87 25-35-312 0-0Tennessee 45 28 22 25-121 28-39-244 0-2 Oakland 41' 31 21 25-153 22-33-323 1-1Jacksonville -3 38 19 34-234 11-22-151 1-0 Cincinnati 39 7 14 14-34 20-32-156 3-0Pittsburgh -8' 23 18 27-123 21-33-231 0-0 New England -3 36 27 35-124 27-40-351 0-0Chicago 37' 7 12 14-47 12-26-138 2-2Cleveland 39 6 9 25-105 12-20-82 1-2Buffalo -1 13 19 42-192 14-23-131 0-1NY Giants Game moved to Detroit on Monday 12/13Minnesota Results Will Be included in the next issue Green Bay -6' 3 13 20-66 22-37-192 2-1Detroit 46' 7 15 41-190 10-22-96 2-0 Atlanta -7 31 24 36-127 20-34-200 1-0Carolina 41 10 13 28-212 15-25-76 1-1Tampa Bay -1 17 15 26-103 15-25-262 0-2Washington 40' 16 22 28-188 22-35-211 0-0 St Louis 47 13 14 24-136 18-32-191 2-1New Orleans -9 31 22 29-132 25-40-213 2-1 Seattle 41' 21 20 22-84 27-42-277 4-1San Francisco -5 40 10 27-95 17-27-241 0-0 Miami 38' 10 6 32-101 5-19-30 0-3NY Jets -5 6 14 31-87 17-44-199 1-1 Denver -4 13 20 31-132 19-41-156 3-3Arizona 43' 43 21 34-211 15-38-146 0-1 Kansas City 45' 0 5 17-48 9-20-19 0-0San Diego -9' 31 25 43-207 18-24-219 1-1COLLEGE Week FIFTEEN December 10th & 11Navy -7' 31 16 38-139 6-11-186 1-3Army 53 17 20 54-209 11-20-128 0-2 Villanova 54 42 21 42-285 14-18-164 0-1Appalachian St -2' 24 21 28-100 31-56-361 1-1 New Hampshire 43' 3 15 25-101 20-36-136 1-0Delaware -7 16 23 41-122 27-37-261 0-0 North Dakota St 46 31 16 51-188 12-24-128 1-2E Washington OT -5' 38 16 38-241 13-32-141 2-3 Georgia Southern 43 23 14 41-168 5-11-78 0-1Wofford -1' 20 19 52-183 8-13-160 0-2

Our Over/Under Section is in its 23rd season. Each week we list the Top 5 plays as of Sunday Night. An * denotes an estimated line. 3★'s are on a current 36-24-2 60% run since 2009!!!3★ Chiefs/Rams Over 44*3★ Panthers/Cardinals Under 383★ Seahawks/Falcons Under 452★ Raiders/Broncos Over 442★ Giants/Eagles Over 44*

THE OPENING LINE OVER/UNDERS WK 15NY GIANTS-Philadelphia NL NL NLDALLAS-Washington NL NL NLTAMPA BAY-Detroit 3 5' 42'BALITMORE-New Orleans NL NL NLAtlanta-SEATTLE E 6' 45PITTSBURGH-NY Jets 10 6' 36OAKLAND-Denver 10 6' 44NEW ENGLAND-Green Bay NL NL NLMonday, Dec 20MINNESOTA-Chicago NL NL NL

LAST WEEK'S STATS

(4) Angle Plays

30-16-1 65%

L/5Y!

TOTAL OFF OFF OFF TOTAL DEF DEF DEF SCKS SCKS TURN OFF DEF AFC OFF RUSH YPC PASS DEF RUSH YPC PASS VS BY EDGE YPP YPPBaltimore 15 18 3.7 13★ 7 6 4.0 12 15 25 -2 15.8 18.2Buffalo 26 12 4.4 25 24 32 4.7 4X 12 25 -6 15.9 13.9Cincinnati 24 30 3.6 15★ 21 24 4.6 16X 18 31 -7 15.7 13.1Cleveland 29 17 4.0 27★ 22 23 4.1 17X 15 16 5 16.4 18.0Denver 10 29 3.8 5 28 31 4.5 19 26 31 -10 17.0 13.0Houston 6 7 4.8 11★ 31 10 3.9 32X 12 30 0 15.5 14.5Indianapolis 5 32 3.4 1★ 20 29 4.8 9X 2 18 -4 14.4 14.1Jacksonville 16 2 4.7 29★ 26 18 4.4 28X 21 20 -9 15.0 14.6Kansas City 12 1 4.8 28★ 18 16 4.3 23 6 14 9 15.4 16.6Miami 22 21 3.7 17★ 5 8 3.6 6 18 7 -6 18.5 15.9New England 8 15 4.2 8★ 27 15 4.2 30X 6 23 18 11.4 17.7NY Jets 13 5 4.5 22 3 3 3.4 8★ 12 10 5 16.7 15.7Oakland 14 3 4.8 24 14 26 4.6 7 29 1 -3 14.5 14.2Pittsburgh 20 10 4.1 18★ 4 1 3.0 22X 27 1 13 14.9 19.2San Diego 2 13 4.1 3★ 1 4 3.7 1 23 1 -7 14.7 13.6Tennessee 28 14 4.4 30 25 21 4.0 26X 4 9 -4 13.3 17.9NFC Arizona 31 28 4.5 31X 29 30 4.4 25X 29 20 -5 14.5 14.1Atlanta 9 9 4.0 14★ 17 13 4.6 24X 4 18 12 14.0 17.8Carolina 32 16 4.3 32X 15 25 4.1 10X 31 20 -8 20.9 13.0Chicago 30 25 3.7 26★ 9 2 3.7 18X 32 15 -1 15.0 17.9Dallas 7 23 3.9 4★ 23 14 4.2 27X 6 25 -4 14.9 12.9Detroit 19 27 3.8 12★ 19 22 4.5 14X 11 5 2 15.3 14.4Green Bay 11 24 4.0 7★ 10 19 4.5 3 20 4 7 14.9 21.6Minnesota 18 8 4.5 19★ 6 5 3.7 13X 9 28 -11 17.9 14.3New Orleans 3 22 4.1 2★ 8 17 4.3 5X 3 16 -4 15.3 16.7NY Giants 4 6 4.7 9★ 2 7 3.9 2 1 7 -1 15.0 14.1Philadelphia 1 4 5.2 6★ 11 11 4.0 15 25 11 15 14.0 13.9San Francisco 23 19 4.2 20 12 9 3.7 19X 24 11 -1 17.0 15.2Seattle 27 31 3.7 16★ 30 20 4.1 31 21 11 -7 15.4 15.2St Louis 25 20 3.8 21★ 13 12 4.5 21 15 5 5 16.7 16.2Tampa Bay 21 11 4.3 23★ 16 27 4.7 11 9 29 8 16.2 16.5Washington 17 26 4.3 10 32 28 4.9 29X 28 23 1 18.5 16.6

Thursday, Dec 16 2010 • NFLFav-Dog NC OPEN TTLSAN DIEGO-San Fran NL 9 44Sunday, Dec 20, 2010 • NFLST LOUIS-Kansas City NL NL NLTENNESSEE-Houston NL NL NLINDIANAPOLIS-Jacksonville 10 5 48'CAROLINA-Arizona 4 2' 38CINCINNATI-Cleveland CL-4 2 40MIAMI-Buffalo 3 5' 40

NE is 5-2 vs the NFCNO is 9-2 vs the AFCNYG is 2-5 as a Div HFNYJ are 5-1 away vs NDivOAK is 8-2 vs a Div foePHI is 2-6 as a dogPIT are 3-6 as a non-div favPIT is 5-9 after a Div winSTL is 6-2 vs the AFCSTL is 4-1 at homeSEA is 6-3 as a HDTB is 3-14 at homeTEN is 4-8 vs a Div foeWAS is 9-2 on the road vs div

2010 NFL POWER RATINGSWe grade each team position by position and list the 2010 PowerRatings. Each week we update these Power Ratings in our weekly PowerSweep editions. The following are the 2010 Power Ratings.

POWER RATING PLAY OF THE WEEK: NO PLAY1995-2010 Power Ratings Record 77-52-1 60%

TEAM ................... RTG1 New England ..103.62 Pittsburgh .......103.13 Baltimore ........103.04 Atlanta ............102.74 NY Giants .......102.76 New Orleans ...102.37 NY Jets ...........102.08 San Diego .......101.69 Green Bay .......101.410 Chicago ..........101.2

TEAM .................... RTG11 Philadelphia ..101.212 Jacksonville ..101.113 Minnesota ......101.014 Indianapolis ..100.915 Kansas City ...100.816 Oakland .........100.717 Tampa Bay.....100.718 Dallas .............100.619 Miami ...............99.620 St Louis ...........99.3

TEAM .................... RTG21 Washington .....99.322 Houston ...........98.823 Cleveland ........98.724 Tennessee .......98.325 Seattle ..............96.726 San Francisco ...96.627 Denver .............95.828 Arizona ............95.429 Detroit ..............94.3 30 Cincinnati ........94.031 Buffalo .............93.832 Carolina ...........91.9

Play the dog if both teams were held to 200 yards or less last week.

1995-2010 12-4-1 75%WEEK 15 PLAY: CLEVELAND

SYSTEM

This is the 27th season of our System Section & it has been a consistent winner. Each week we release a super system which pertains to that week's games. Here is an NFL Week 15 System:

SECTION

HA

PP

Y H

OL

IDA

YS

FR

OM

N

OR

TH

CO

AS

T S

PO

RT

S

College Bowl TOTALSAll Totals Listed As Single, Double or Triple

Triple Plays 45-27 63% L9Y!!!BOWL TOTALS ARE $9 EACH ON THE NC DEBIT CARD SYSTEM

AVAILABLE ON GAMEDAY.College Bowl TOTALS Plays are included when you sign up for the

POST SEASON PACKAGE See page 15 for more details.

Page 32: POWER SWEEP - Northcoast Sports · 2018. 8. 23. · POWER SWEEPS 2007-’10 ... TEAM AVG RK PTS % RK PTS % AVG A&H RB CM KM JS PW % 1 Auburn .9866 1 2809 .9856 2 1437 .9742 1 1 1

32

Northcoast Debit Card ★ Special ★

Get $500 in Credit FOR $399!!!!

Offer Valid Through Bowl Season expires 1/10/11WHEN THE SEASON ENDS, USE YOUR NORTHCOAST

DEBIT CARD FOR BASKETBALL, HOCKEY & BASEBALL

Limit one per

2010 subplease

www.ncsports.comprice is for download version, add $40 for mail delivery

Saturday December 1811:00 am to 1:00 pmSunday December 1911:00 am to 1:00 pmTuesday December 213:00 pm to 7:00 pmWednesday December 223:00 pm to 7:00 pmThursday December 233:00 pm to 7:00 pmFriday December 2411:00 am to 1:00 pmSunday December 2611:00 am to 1:00 pmMonday December 273:00 pm to 5:00 pmTuesday December 283:00 pm to 6:30 pmWednesday December 2911:00 am to 2:30 pmThursday December 3011:00 am to 12:00 noonFriday December 3111:00 am to 12:00 noonSaturday January 111:00 am to 12:00 noonSunday January 2PRO CALL-IN 11-1 pmMonday January 33:00 pm to 7:00 pm

If POWER SWEEP OR POWER PLAYSIs On Their Christmas Wish List . . . ADD A Gift Subscription With Your 2011

Renewal FOR JUST $64 MORE• INCLUDES ALL 4 BONUSES!

A) FREE 2 weeks of 2011 Preseason Late Phone Service ($150 value) OR FREE $50 Debit Card (your choice).

B) FREE 2011 September 5★ Late Phone Selection, 5★'s in September are now 20-12 63% ($50 value).

C) FREE Preseason Power Sweep Issue D) FREE 2011 FOOTBALL Schedules.

Overrated YardagePlay on a non-New Year's Day team that avg 146 yards less

than their opp in total ypg difference (offense - defense). Reasoning: Many times schools that run up yds do so vs weaker foes, which feeds the public perception of a high power offense. The line gets over adjusted and they are then exposed in a bowl.

12-2 86% ATS Since 1996PLAY: BOSTON COLLEGE,

UTAH, WASHINGTON

POST SEASON PACKAGE (First Bowl Dec 18th) .................................$600It's Post Season Executive Club! This is the best value for the Post Season and includes the Lucky 7 Bonuses (see pg 15). You'll get every Late Phone Play that we release in the Post Season for College Bowls and Pro Playoffs including the Bowl and Playoff Plays of the Year! Opinions on all sides and totals not released as Late Phone Selections will be given out as well!

COLLEGE BOWL PACKAGE ............................................................................$299Sign up for our Bowl Package and receive every Executive Club Late Phone Selection for the entire bowl season. You will receive opinions on sides not released as Late Phone Plays. Your first selection will start on December 18th. All ★ rated College Bowl Totals are included (only if an actual Late Phone release). This package will GUARANTEE you will get the Bowl Play of the Year (date not released to public).

COLLEGE BOWL TOTALS PACKAGE ............................................................ $199We rate our Private Play Hotline Bowl Totals as Single, Double and Triple Plays. Over the last 9 years, the Triple Bowl Totals have gone 45-27 63%! If you were to purchase these plays separately it would cost over $400! Sign up for the Bowl Totals Package and don't miss a single Winner!

EXECUTIVE CLUB FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE 2010 SEASON ......$699When you join the Executive Club you will receive EVERY SINGLE football play from Northcoast Sports. Not only will you receive a play or opinion on each and every bowl and playoff game (sides and totals) but you also will be an Executive Club Member for the last 2 weeks of the NFL Regular season) including the red-hot Monday Night NFL Plays! You'll be covered from the moment you sign up through the Pro Bowl and you will automatically be eligible for significant discounts on a 2011 Executive Club Membership!!! Don't miss out!

LAST 2 WEEKS TO RENEW AT $79! CALL BEFORE 12/31/10

❏ I enclose $79 for my 2011 download subscription to POWER SWEEP. (Every issue thru the Super Bowl!) This includes ALL 4 BONUSES MENTIONED!!!

❏ I enclose $79 for my 2011 download subscription to POWER PLAYS with all 4 bonuses! ❏ I enclose $600 for the Post Season Package.❏ I enclose $299 for the Bowl Package.❏ I enclose $199 for the Bowl Totals Package.***All prices in Vol. 28 Issue 16/17 Expire 12-31-10 & cannot be used in conjunction with any other offer***

LATE PHONE SPECIALS!SUBSCRIBE TO POWER SWEEP 2011!

& RECEIVE ALL 4 OF OUR SPECIAL BONUSES FREE!!BONUS #1 FREE SEPTEMBER 5★ - $50 VALUE - The highest

rated play that we release is a 5★ Play. Our record for College 5★'s in September is now 20-12 63%! That's DOCUMENTED! You receive our first College 5★ September Late Phone Selection of the 2011 season ABSOLUTELY FREE when you subscribe to Power Sweep! Don't miss out on this Easy Winner!

BONUS #2 FREE 2 WEEKS NFL PRESEASON PHONE SERVICE - $150 VALUE OR NORTHCOAST DEBIT CARD - $50 VALUE - We tell you each year that Preseason football is the easiest to forecast. Our 28 year record of NFL Exhibition Late Phones is a DOCUMENTED 63%! We are the #1 ranked service over 22 years as DOCUMENTED by The Sports Monitor!!! Get your 2011 season started on a Winning Note and receive 2 WEEKS OF PRESEASON NFL LATE PHONE PLAYS ABSOLUTELY FREE!!! OR $50 credit on a 2011 Northcoast Debit Card (added 8/31/11). A toll free number with savings on every call vs purchasing through our office! (Choose One).

BONUS #3 FREE POWER SWEEP PREVIEW ISSUE - This is a must read Preseason publication. Who will be this year's NFL Champ? Get our Preview of the 2011 season & more in this information packed issue, yours ABSOLUTELY FREE!!!

BONUS #4 FREE SCHEDULES - $15 VALUE - FREE Schedules sent automatically from Northcoast Sports. Sent to you from Preseason thru the Post Season. Additional copies can also be purchased at a discounted rate.

SAVE NOW - PAY ONLY $79price is for download version, add $40 for mail delivery

Name

Address

City State Zip

Credit Card

Signature NORTHCOASTSPORTSSERVICE PO Box 450829 Cleveland, OH 44145

Exp. Date / /

Northcoast Sports is the #1 ranked College Late Phone Service over 28 years in net wins as documented by The Sports Monitor of Oklahoma City, OK. Our weekly Late Phone Selections are the same plays we release to our Executive Club Members, The Sports Monitor and SportsWatch.

SYSTEMSECTION

SUBSCRIBE TO POWER SWEEP

Payment Method: ❏MasterCard ❏Visa ❏AMEX ❏Discover ❏Check/Money Order

1-800-654-3448VISA/MC has 16 or 13 digitsDISC has 16 digits, AMEX has 15 digits

YOUR SUBSCRIPTION $79ADD A GIFT for $64!

Offer Expires 12/31/2010

The Computer Corner features the top plays from our Computer Power Ratings. These plays are based solely on the team's Power Ratings vs the Vegas lines and does not take into account matchups, etc. The team that is listed in bold is the computer's selection.

COMPUTER CORNER

* 2011 Power Sweep subscription price will increase on Jan. 1st.

Order Before 12/31/10and pay just $79!

All T

imes

Lis

ted

Are

East

ern

Stan

dard

Tim

e an

d Su

bjec

t to

Chan

ge.

The Staff at Northcoast Sports would like to wishyou and yours a very Happy Holiday Season!

BOWLLATE

PHONE CALL-IN

SCHEDULE 35-19 65% L8Y IN THE DOUBLE BOWL ISSUE!!(9-3 75% THE LAST 2 YEARS!!!!)

Computer Forecast Diff/Vegas

Boise St by 9.6 over Utah 7.4West Virginia by 8.8 over NC State 6.3Hawaii by 6.7 over Tulsa 4.8Georgia by 10.9 over UCF 4.4Alabama by 16.2 over Michigan St 6.2

CLOSEDCHRISTMAS DAY(Times EST & Subject

to Change)

Buy The Big DogPlay on a non-New Year's Day bowl

team that are 15' point + dogs.Since 19965-0 100%

PLAY ON: UTAH

Tuesday January 43:00 pm to 7:00 pmThursday January 63:00 pm to 7:00 pmFriday January 73:00 pm to 7:00 pmSaturday January 811:00 am to 1:00 pmBowl starts at noon Sunday January 911:00 am to 1:00 pmMonday January 103:00 am to 7:00 pm


Jeopardy Game The 5 Themes of Geography. Map Skills Maps 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 5 Themes 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts

Jeopardy Game The 5 Themes of Geography. Map Skills Maps 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 5 Themes 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts

Documents
Jeopardy Game Cells/Living Systems. Cells Vocabulary 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Kingdoms 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Random

Jeopardy Game Cells/Living Systems. Cells Vocabulary 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Kingdoms 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Random

Documents
Jeopardy Game The Changing Earth. Earth’s Layers Tectonic Plates 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Continental Drift 10 pts 20 pts

Jeopardy Game The Changing Earth. Earth’s Layers Tectonic Plates 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Continental Drift 10 pts 20 pts

Documents
People 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts Radical Reconstruction 5 pts 5 pts 10 pts 10 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10 pts

People 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts Radical Reconstruction 5 pts 5 pts 10 pts 10 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10 pts

Documents
Jeopardy Game Oceans (SOL 5.6). Ocean Floor Ocean Surface 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Ocean Life 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts

Jeopardy Game Oceans (SOL 5.6). Ocean Floor Ocean Surface 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Ocean Life 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts

Documents
Jeopardy Game Matter (SOL 5.4). States of Matter Phases 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Solutions/ Mixtures 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts

Jeopardy Game Matter (SOL 5.4). States of Matter Phases 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Solutions/ Mixtures 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts

Documents
AVG AntiVirus 2014 - Creativemark · AVG AntiVirus, Anti-Malware, AVG Anti-Rootkit, AVG Email Scanner, AVG Protective Cloud Technology, AVG Community Protection Network, AVG LinkScanner

AVG AntiVirus 2014 - Creativemark · AVG AntiVirus, Anti-Malware, AVG Anti-Rootkit, AVG Email Scanner, AVG Protective Cloud Technology, AVG Community Protection Network, AVG LinkScanner

Documents
AVG. SCORE - Bookwalter · Avg. 89 pts Avg. N/A 2000 88 2001 89 2002 92 2003 87 2004 82 2005 NS 2006 93 2007 93 2008 92 2009 93 201090 201189 201292 201391 Avg. 90 pts 201588 Avg

AVG. SCORE - Bookwalter · Avg. 89 pts Avg. N/A 2000 88 2001 89 2002 92 2003 87 2004 82 2005 NS 2006 93 2007 93 2008 92 2009 93 201090 201189 201292 201391 Avg. 90 pts 201588 Avg

Documents
20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 50 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 50 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 50 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 50 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts

20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 50 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 50 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 50 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 50 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts

Documents
CaddoComancheKarankawaJumano Lipan- Apache 100 pts 200 pts 400 pts 200 pts 300 pts 400 pts 500 pts 300 pts 200 pts

CaddoComancheKarankawaJumano Lipan- Apache 100 pts 200 pts 400 pts 200 pts 300 pts 400 pts 500 pts 300 pts 200 pts

Documents
Invest in Spain - Swanlaab Venture Factory · RK Country Billion $ RK unit $ RK Millions RK Exports RK Imports RK Exports RK Imports RK Billions RK Millions RK Billions RK Billions

Invest in Spain - Swanlaab Venture Factory · RK Country Billion $ RK unit $ RK Millions RK Exports RK Imports RK Exports RK Imports RK Billions RK Millions RK Billions RK Billions

Documents
10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20

10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20

Documents
10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5pts 10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20

10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5pts 10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20 pts 25 pts 5 pts 10 pts 15 pts 20

Documents
Vocabulary 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 ptsCulture 5 pts 5 pts 10 pts 10 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts

Vocabulary 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 ptsCulture 5 pts 5 pts 10 pts 10 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts

Documents
Resources 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts Land Use 5 pts 5 pts 10 pts 10 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts

Resources 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts Land Use 5 pts 5 pts 10 pts 10 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts

Documents
Mr.Scharich placespeoplepotluckEgypt Social Studies Soup 100 pts 200 pts 400 pts 200 pts 300 pts 400 pts 500 pts 300 pts 200 pts

Mr.Scharich placespeoplepotluckEgypt Social Studies Soup 100 pts 200 pts 400 pts 200 pts 300 pts 400 pts 500 pts 300 pts 200 pts

Documents
RK Club Nombre Club T.R. Pts. Resultado · m06+f07 trofeo san isidro 2016_acta 22, 14 mayo 2016 madrid_m86 resultados 1 - 6x50 libre mixto 14/05/2016 rk club nombre club t.r. pts

RK Club Nombre Club T.R. Pts. Resultado · m06+f07 trofeo san isidro 2016_acta 22, 14 mayo 2016 madrid_m86 resultados 1 - 6x50 libre mixto 14/05/2016 rk club nombre club t.r. pts

Documents
People 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10 pts 30 pts 30 pts 50 pts 50 ptsPlaces 10 pts 10 pts 20 pts 20 pts 30 pts 30 pts 40 pts 40 pts 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10 pts

People 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10 pts 30 pts 30 pts 50 pts 50 ptsPlaces 10 pts 10 pts 20 pts 20 pts 30 pts 30 pts 40 pts 40 pts 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10 pts

Documents
GEORGIA SOUTHERN Head Coach Career Record … Player gp-gs min avg fg-fga fg% 3fg-fga 3fg% ft-fta ft% off def tot avg pf dq a to blk stl pts avg 00 DeGray, Ronjanae 19-8 574 30.2 116-219

GEORGIA SOUTHERN Head Coach Career Record … Player gp-gs min avg fg-fga fg% 3fg-fga 3fg% ft-fta ft% off def tot avg pf dq a to blk stl pts avg 00 DeGray, Ronjanae 19-8 574 30.2 116-219

Documents
Electricity Jeopardy. ElectricityCircuits 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Magnets…

Electricity Jeopardy. ElectricityCircuits 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Magnets…

Documents
placespeoplepotluck Egypt and Persia Social Studies Soup 100 pts 200 pts 400 pts 200 pts 300 pts 400 pts 500 pts 300 pts 200 pts

placespeoplepotluck Egypt and Persia Social Studies Soup 100 pts 200 pts 400 pts 200 pts 300 pts 400 pts 500 pts 300 pts 200 pts

Documents
Jeopardy Game Light, Heat, and Sound. HeatLight 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Sound 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Anything Goes

Jeopardy Game Light, Heat, and Sound. HeatLight 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Sound 10 pts 20 pts 30 pts 40 pts Anything Goes

Documents
French & Indian War 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts Causes of the Revolution 5 pts 5 pts 10 pts 10 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts

French & Indian War 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts Causes of the Revolution 5 pts 5 pts 10 pts 10 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts

Documents
The Railroads 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts The Open Range 5 pts 5 pts 10 pts 10 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10 pts

The Railroads 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts The Open Range 5 pts 5 pts 10 pts 10 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10 pts

Documents
Land & Water 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts Climate & Vegetation 5 pts 5 pts 10 pts 10 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10

Land & Water 10 pts 10 pts 5 pts 5 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts Climate & Vegetation 5 pts 5 pts 10 pts 10 pts 15 pts 15 pts 20 pts 20 pts 10 pts 10

Documents
1 pt. 2 pts. 5 pts. 10 pts. 20 pts. 1 pt. 2 pts. 5 pts. 10 pts. 20 pts. 1 pt. 2 pts. 5 pts. 10 pts. 20 pts. 1 pt. 2 pts. 5 pts. 10 pts. 20 pts. 1 pts

1 pt. 2 pts. 5 pts. 10 pts. 20 pts. 1 pt. 2 pts. 5 pts. 10 pts. 20 pts. 1 pt. 2 pts. 5 pts. 10 pts. 20 pts. 1 pt. 2 pts. 5 pts. 10 pts. 20 pts. 1 pts

Documents
EcosystemsFood Chains Who’s Eating Whom? Changing Environment Potluck 100 pts 200 pts 400 pts 200 pts 300 pts 400 pts 500 pts 300 pts 200 pts

EcosystemsFood Chains Who’s Eating Whom? Changing Environment Potluck 100 pts 200 pts 400 pts 200 pts 300 pts 400 pts 500 pts 300 pts 200 pts

Documents
RK Club Nome Club T.R. Pts. Resultado

RK Club Nome Club T.R. Pts. Resultado

Documents
Investment Framework Business Opportunities Your p… · RK Country Billion $ RK unit $ RK Millions RK Exports RK Imports RK Exports RK Imports RK Billions RK Millions RK Billions

Investment Framework Business Opportunities Your p… · RK Country Billion $ RK unit $ RK Millions RK Exports RK Imports RK Exports RK Imports RK Billions RK Millions RK Billions

Documents
Game Notes • CURReNt teRPs at aCC’s€¦ · Game GP/GS Score Min.-Avg. FG-FGA Pct. 3FG-3FGA Pct. FT-FTA Pct. OR-DR Tot-Avg. PF-D A TO Blk Stl Pts.-Avg 3/3/06-GT * W, 71-66 38

Game Notes • CURReNt teRPs at aCC’s€¦ · Game GP/GS Score Min.-Avg. FG-FGA Pct. 3FG-3FGA Pct. FT-FTA Pct. OR-DR Tot-Avg. PF-D A TO Blk Stl Pts.-Avg 3/3/06-GT * W, 71-66 38

Documents