20
POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

POWER & PROTECTIONELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

Page 2: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

WHAT IMPACTS?

Environment and natural resources

• Species and habitat• Waterways and wetlands• Woodlands

Health

• Electric and magnetic fields• Human safety

Property

• Viewshed• Noise• Real estate value• Agriculture

Page 3: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

Viewshed

WHAT IMPACTS?

Courtesy of http://airphotoslive.com/portfolio/electric-power-transmission-line-simulations/

Page 4: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

Birds and bats

WHAT IMPACTS?

Courtesy of Wisconsin PSC, Environmental Impacts of Transmission Lines (2011)

Page 5: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

CRITTERS: AIRBirds and bats

Main impact: collision with towers and lines, and possible electrocution

Laws that apply:

• Federal

• Migratory Birds Treaty Act• Endangered Species Act• Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act• National Environmental Policy Act

• Pennsylvania

• Title 34 of Pennsylvania statutes, especially Chapters 1, 9, and 21 (Game Commission)

• Title 58 Chapters 131, 133, 137, and 147 of the Pennsylvania Code (Game Commission)

Page 6: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

Streams and wetlands

WHAT IMPACTS?

Courtesy of Wisconsin PSC, Environmental Impacts of Transmission Lines (2011)

Page 7: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

CRITTERS: WATERFish, frogs, turtles

Main impact: erosion, habitat loss

Laws that apply:

• Federal

• Clean Water Act• Endangered Species Act• National Environmental Policy Act

• Pennsylvania

• Title 30 of the Pennsylvania statutes, especially Chapters 1, 9, and 21 (Fish & Boat); Title 58 Chapter 75 of the Pennsylvania Code (fish, amphibaeans, reptiles)

• Clean Streams Law; Title 25 Chapter 102 (E&S)

Page 8: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

FRUITS & VEGGIES

Laws that apply:

• Federal

• Endangered Species Act• Pennsylvania

• Title 32 Chapter 24 of the Pennsylvania statutes (wild resource conservation)

• Title 17 Chapter 45 of the Pennsylvania Code (protected plants)

Page 9: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

DISCORD ELSEWHERE

California & Arizona, 2005

• 230 mile hV line transporting electrons from Arizona nuclear power plant to California consumers

• Environmental complaints:

• Impaired viewshed• Harm to wildlife and vegetation• Impacts to archeological and historic sites

Page 10: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

DISCORD ELSEWHERE

Arizona & New Mexico, 2013

• Sunzia, 500 miles of 500kV lines transporting electrons across BLM land

• Environmental complaints:

• Done through NEPA process• Habitat fragmentation through significant desert

riparian area and migratory bird corridor• Increased air quality impacts because transmission-

capacity would feed fossil fuel generation• Viewshed impairment

Page 11: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

SunZia line

DISCORD ELSEWHERE

Courtesy of http://jaguarhabitatusa.wordpress.com/threats-to-habitat/transmission-line/

Page 12: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

DISCORD ELSEWHERE

New York & Connecticut, 2005

• 23 mile hV line transporting electrons from Connecticut power plants to New York consumers

• Environmental complaints:

• Excessive dredging• Harm to shellfish beds

Page 13: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

DISCORD HERE

TrAIL in Pennsylvania & West Virginia

• Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company or TrAILCo

• TrAIL line to get electrons from western PJM to eastern PJM

• Crosses PA, WV, VA for 240 miles – 1.2 miles in PA

• Environmental complaints:

• Inadequate impact analysis

Page 14: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

TRANSMISSION & ENVIRONMENT IN PA25 Pa Code § 57.72 – What must an applicant submit?

• (7) A description of studies which had been made as to the projected environmental impact of the HV line as proposed and of the efforts which have been and which will be made to minimize the impact of the HV line upon the environment and upon scenic and historic areas, including but not limited to impacts, where applicable, upon land use, soil and sedimentation, plant and wildlife habitats, terrain, hydrology and landscape.

• (8) A description of the efforts of the applicant to locate and identify archaeologic, geologic, historic, scenic or wilderness areas of significance within 2 miles of the proposed right-of-way and the location and identity of the areas discovered by the applicant.

• (10) A general description of reasonable alternative routes to the proposed HV line, including a description of the corridor planning methodology, a comparison of the merits and detriments of each route, and a statement of the reasons for selecting the proposed HV line route

Page 15: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

TRANSMISSION & ENVIRONMENT IN PA

25 Pa Code § 57.76 – How does the Commission decide?

• (1) That there is a need for it.• (2) That it will not create an unreasonable risk of

danger to the health and safety of the public.• (3) That it is in compliance with applicable statutes

and regulations providing for the protection of the natural resources of this Commonwealth.

• (4) That it will have minimum adverse environmental impact, considering the electric power needs of the public, the state of available technology and the available alternatives.

Page 16: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

TRANSMISSION & ENVIRONMENT IN PASpringfield Twp v Pa PUC, 41 A.3d 142 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012)

• HV lines needed in Lehigh Valley for reliability• Functional configuration vs route• PPL chooses configuration first, then does multi-

route analysis based on that configuration• Springfield demanded that PPL and Commission do

environmental analysis of all configurations, not just selected one

• Held: routes should be evaluates, not all configurations

Page 17: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

TRANSMISSION & ENVIRONMENT IN PATrAIL cases

Energy Conservation Council v. Pa PUC, 995 A.2d 465 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2010)

Energy Conservation Council v. Pa PUC, 25 A.3d 440 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011)

• No need to produce studies• No need for non-transmission alternatives• No need for independent PUC analysis of

environmental impacts• Okay to have early, conditional approval

Page 18: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

TRANSMISSION & ENVIRONMENT IN PATRAiL cases

Re Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Co., 267 P.U.R.4th 169 (W.Va. P.S.C. Aug 1, 2008)

• Similar law in WV “will result in an acceptable balance between reasonable power needs and reasonable environmental factors” 24 W.Va. Code § 24-2-11a.

• Like PA, no specific substantive standards; just a factual debate before the Commission

Page 19: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

MITIGATION• Edison Electric Institute, Reducing Avian Collisions

with Power Lines: The State of the Art in 2012 (2012)

• Wisconsin Public Service Commission, Environmental Impacts of Transmission Lines (2011)

• Commission orders approving certificates, especially environmental conditions

Page 20: POWER & PROTECTION ELECTRICITY, ENVIRONMENT, SITING

AUTHOR

Oday Salim, Esq.

Staff AttorneyEnvironmental Law Clinic

University of Pittsburgh School of Law

[email protected]

[email protected]

412.648.1300