24
Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program Kieran Humphries [email protected] tel: +1 613-949-0920 Emissions Research and Measurement Section Environment and Climate Change Canada 335 River Road, Ottawa, ON Canada

Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

Power Determination Test

Procedure Validation Program

Kieran Humphries

[email protected] tel: +1 613-949-0920

Emissions Research and Measurement Section

Environment and Climate Change Canada

335 River Road, Ottawa, ON

Canada

Page 2: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

Vehicle Description

2016 GM Volt 2018 BMW 530e

• 158 km/h top speed

• 75kW Engine

• 110kW Motors combined

• 235 km/h top speed

• 134kW Engine

• 83kW Motor

• 185kW Total rated power

Page 3: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

Vehicle Settings

2016 GM Volt 2018 BMW 530e

(1)

(2)

(3)

• Hood closed

• Disable TC

• Select Sport mode

• Use ‘Hold’ mode for warmup

• Use EV mode for testing

Page 4: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

Instrumentation and Measurements

• HIOKI 3390-10 power analyzer with HIOKI CT6843 200A probes

• CAN OBD logging

• GM Volt: OEM Scantool – GM MDI 2

• BMW 530e: Diagra-D

• Chassis Dyno (in-house designed, fabricated and programmed)

• GM Volt: 200hp 48in 2WD dyno

• BMW 530e: 400hp 48in AWD dyno (rear/front master)

• Graphtec GL800 datalogger

Page 5: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

Instrumentation and Measurements

• HIOKI 3390-10 power analyser and HIOKI CT6843 probes (20Hz logging) • GM Volt: Motors, DC-DC converter, onboard charger, heater, A/C

compressor currents, with high voltage and 12V voltages

• BMW 530e: High voltage battery terminal (+’ve and –’ve) current only

• CAN OBD logging - BMW 530e using Diagra D (~1Hz logging)

1. Calculated load [%]

2. Engine coolant temp [degC]

3. Intake manifold pressure [kPa]

4. Engine speed [rpm]

5. Vehicle speed [kph]

6. Air flow rate [g/s]

7. Absolute throttle [%]

8. Lambda

9. Relative throttle [%]

10. Ambient temp [degC]

11. SOC [%]

12. Engine oil temp [%]

13. Intake air temp [degC]

14. Catalyst temp [degC]

Page 6: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

Instrumentation and Measurements

• CAN OBD logging – GM Volt using MDI 2 (100hz logging)

1. Engine speed [rpm]

2. Vehicle speed [kph]

3. Power mode

4. Ignition off/on/start

5. SOC [%]

6. HV battery current [A]

7. Max HV battery temp [C]

8. Min HV battery temp [C]

9. Regen torque [Nm]

10.Engine Torque [Nm]

11.Axle torque [Nm]

12.Brake torque [Nm]

13.Engine running [bit]

14.Calculated throttle pos [%]

15.Motor 1 current [A]

16.Motor 2 current [A]

17.Motor 1 voltage [V]

18.Motor 2 Voltage [V]

Page 7: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

Instrumentation and Measurements

• Chassis Dyno (100hz logging)

Dyno Cell 2 Cell 4

Max Speed 145 km/h Same

Max steady-state wheel load 6200 N 6200 N per axle

Short time absorption (30sec) 225 kW 225 kW per axle

Continuous absorption 150 kW 150 kW per axle

Rolls Cell 2 Cell 4

Material Steel Steel

Diameter 121.9 cm 120.65 cm

Width 309.9 cm 317.5 cm

Spacing 71.1 cm 80 cm

Surface Finish Machine cut lathe Same

Wheelbase N/A 2.3m – 3.9m

Page 8: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

Instrumentation and Measurements

•Graphtec GL800 datalogger (1hz logging)

•Amb Temp: Omerga type-T thermocouple

•Rel. Hum. : Graphtec B-530 humidity sensor

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Tem

pre

atu

re (

de

g.

C)

Re

lative

Hu

mid

ity

(%

)

Time (s)

Test Cell Conditions

Cell RH

Cell Temperature

Page 9: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

Test Overview • Before conducting the fixed speed

tests, ERMS ran several full throttle acceleration tests to get a comparison power curve like on a standard “tuning shop” dyno

• Next we conducted the test procedure in the GTR using steady-speed 10 second full-throttle segments

• We used speed increments of 10kph in a first pass sweeping from 50 to 130 or 140 km/h and then 2.5 km/h increments in a second sweep of the speed area near max power

Page 10: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

GM Volt Test Results – Preliminary

Acceleration Tests

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Wh

ee

l Fo

rce

[N

]

Speed [km/h]

Volt Roll Force during Acceleration Tests

Average Roll Force 03Oct201803:48PM [N]

Average Roll Force 03Oct201803:47PM [N]

Average Roll Force 03Oct201803:49PM [N]

Page 11: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

GM Volt Test Results – Preliminary

Acceleration Tests

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Po

we

r [k

W]

Speed [km/h]

Volt Wheel Power during Acceleration Tests

Acceleration Power

03Oct2018 03:48PM [kW]

Acceleration Power

03Oct2018 03:47PM [kW]

Acceleration Power

03Oct2018 03:49PM [kW]

Page 12: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

GM Volt Test Results – GTR Testing

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

50 70 90 110 130

Av

era

ge

Po

we

r (k

W)

Speed (km/h)

Volt Average Steady State Power [kW]

Page 13: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

GM Volt Test Results – GTR Results • Maximum Wheel Power from Dynamometer, Steady State 10s average:

• Pwh = 95 kW (128 HP)

• GTR efficiency multiplier for the selected vehicle type (closest match):

• Power split with planetary gearset, ηgearbox = 0.93

• Maximum HEV System Power:

• PHEV_system = Pwh / ηgearbox = 102 kW (137 HP)

Page 14: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

GM Volt Test Results – Accel vs Steady

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Wh

ee

l Fo

rce

[N

]

Speed [km/h]

Volt Roll Force Comparison

Average Roll Force 03Oct2018 03:48PM [N]

Average Roll Force 03Oct2018 03:47PM [N]

Average Roll Force 03Oct2018 03:49PM [N]

Average Steady State Force [N]

Page 15: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

GM Volt Test Results – Accel vs Steady

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Po

we

r [k

W]

Speed [km/h]

Volt Wheel Power Comparison

Acceleration Power 03Oct2018 03:48PM [kW]

Acceleration Power 03Oct2018 03:47PM [kW]

Acceleration Power 03Oct2018 03:49PM [kW]

Average Steady State Power [kW]

Page 16: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

Discussion of Volt Test Results • Gearbox multiplier does not take into account wheel rolling resistance

and additional power loss that this causes, this would be an additional multiplier such that: Pwh = PHEV_system * ηgearbox * ηtires PHEV_system is thus underreported by this method (i.e. vehicle is rated at 149 HP and test results using method TP2 showed only 137 HP, 8% lower)

• Power split HEV with planetary gearset type of powertrain was chosen for determination of ηgearbox since vehicle has two planetary gearsets, however was run in full electric mode (engine did not turn on), there are only a few options for powertrains in the GTR Appendix

• Acceleration run results were very similar to steady-state results, could potentially be used to determine locations of interest for steady-state testing in order to speed up the method

• Power curve is very flat, difficult to determine exact peak power location of interest from coarse sampling run

Page 17: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

BMW 530e Test Results

Page 18: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

BMW 530e Test Results

Page 19: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

BMW 530e Test Results

Page 20: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

BMW 530e Test Results

120.0

125.0

130.0

135.0

140.0

145.0

150.0

155.0

160.0

40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0

Dyn

amo

me

ter

Po

we

r (k

W)

Roll Speed (km/h)

BMW 530e Power Determination

Coarse Test Fine Test

Page 21: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

BMW 530e Test Results – GTR Results • Maximum Wheel Power from Dynamometer, Steady State 10s average:

• Pwh = 157 kW (210 HP)

• GTR efficiency multiplier for the selected vehicle type (closest match):

• AWD with Multi-speed automatic transmission, ηgearbox = 0.96

• Maximum HEV System Power:

• PHEV_system = Pwh / ηgearbox = 164 kW ( 219 HP)

Page 22: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

Discussion of BMW 530e Test Results • Gearbox multiplier does not take into account wheel rolling resistance

and additional power loss that this causes, this would be an additional multiplier such that: Pwh = PHEV_system * ηgearbox * ηtires PHEV_system is thus underreported by this method (i.e. vehicle is rated at 248 HP and test results using method TP2 showed only 219 HP, 12% lower, potentially also due to AWD system losses)

Page 23: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program

Conclusions

• Coarse test dyno power from computer was used to determine position of a high resolution pass, several hours long procedure

• Quick acceleration runs (3 minutes) may be able to replace this procedure

• Manufacturer-specified test speed would eliminate the need for multiple test points entirely

• Is there an instruction about speed values for coarse test runs? 50-130 km/h was used with intervals of 10 km/h to start and 2.5 km/h for fine test

• Tie down instructions from the manufacturer would be ideal, side restraints were added but had some vehicle motion on dyno due to offset front and rear tow hooks vs suspension tie-down mounts

• In the draft document, paragraph of 6.8.2 states some considerations about temperature after prep and measurement “loops”, clarification could be added to this section

Page 24: Power Determination Test Procedure Validation Program