1
Map Use and Disclaimer Statement Cre ek H oagl and D itch M o ots Cr e e k Pi ke Cre e k Honey Creek McKillip Ditch Sp ring C ree k Big Pine Creek Ha r p D i tc h S l o u gh C r e e k Big Monon Ditch Burn e t ts L it t l e I n di a n C r e e k McKillip Ditch § ¨ ¦ 65 ¬ « 18 ¬ « 43 ¬ « 39 ¬ « 119 £ ¤ 24 £ ¤ 421 £ ¤ 231 Buffalo Monticello Norway Monon Wolcott Reynolds Brookston Burnettsville Chalmers WHITE COUNTY GAMEBIRD HABITAT AREA C r e ek R a t t le s n a k e C r e e k Kankakee River Basin Upper Wabash River Basin Lee Seafield Smithson Badger Grove Roundgrove Springboro Indiana Beach Sitka Headlee Idaville ¬ « 16 ¬ « 119 ¬ « 39 § ¨ ¦ 65 £ ¤ 24 Ti pp e c an o e R i v e r Lake Freeman Lake Shafer Ti p pec a n oe Bi g Kankakee River Basin Upper Wabash River Basin Cr e e k B i g River Upper Wabash River Basin Middle Wabash River Basin Middle Wabash River Basin Upper Wabash River Basin B i g M on o n C r e e k ¬ « 16 £ ¤ 421 £ ¤ 24 £ ¤ 421 £ ¤ 421 ¬ « 43 ¬ « 18 £ ¤ 231 £ ¤ 24 ® Location Map Elevation (feet) 888 526 Digital Elevation Model of White County, IN § ¨ ¦ 65 £ ¤ 24 ¬ « 16 EXPLANATION 720 Potentiometric Surface Map of the Bedrock Aquifers of White County, Indiana

POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP OF THE BEDROCK AQUIFERS …€¦ · POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP OF THE BEDROCK AQUIFERS OF WHITE COUNTY, INDIANA Map generated by Reuben Q. Arvin Indiana

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP OF THE BEDROCK AQUIFERS …€¦ · POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP OF THE BEDROCK AQUIFERS OF WHITE COUNTY, INDIANA Map generated by Reuben Q. Arvin Indiana

POT ENT IOMET RIC SU RFACE MAP OF T HE BEDROCKAQU IFERS OF WHIT E COU NT Y, INDIANA

Map generated by Reub en Q. ArvinInd ia na Dep artm ent o f Natura l Reso urc es,Divisio n o f Water, Reso urc e Assessm ent Sectio n

We request that the fo llo wing a genc y b e a c kno wled ged in pro d ucts d erived fro m this m a p : Ind ia na Dep artm ent o f Natura l Resourc es, Divisio n o f Water.T his m a p was c o m p iled by sta ff o f the Ind ia na Dep a rtm ent o f Natura l Resourc es, Divisio n o f Water using d a ta b elieved to b e reaso na b ly a c curate. Ho wever, a d egree o f error is inherent in a ll m a p s. T his pro d uct is d istributed “as is” witho ut warra nties o f a ny kind , either exp ressed or im p lied . T his m a p is intend ed fo r use o nly at the pub lished sc a le.

Map Use and Disclaimer Statement

Mic ha el R. Penc e, Go verno rDep a rtm ent o f Natura l Reso urc esCa m ero n F. Clark, Directo rDivisio n o f Water Potentio m etric Surfa c e Ma p 49-B

1

7

7

24 3

3

6 5

2

56

2 63

61

6

4

7

3

7 79

4

1

5

8

6 5

8

6

1

2

1

8

5

2

4 2

3

5

1

7

2

5

9

8

1

9

45

9

9

1

8

8

3

9

2

8

4

31

8 9

2

4

79

9

8

8

8

8

2

2

6 3

54

9

9

2

9

5

7

2

8

35 4 5

13

4

3 4

3

1 3

7

3

3

2

7

1

7

6

4 65

2

1

1

1

6

7

6

7

6

30

18

31

12

19

19

11

18 13

31

1814

30

13

31

22

18

11

13

19

34

27

11

24

11

11

11

18

30

1111

15

11

21

11

11

32

11

16

16

31

12

20

31

10

28

22

17

34

25

17

10

26

23

33

36

26

2120 19

2423

1924

30

13

25

36

18

3535

11

29

28

1414

29

32

30

17

36

30

32 33

23

33

15

11

35

15

17

12

12

15

19

28

21

13

22

22

22

27

21

36

22

24

16

10

25

23

14

25

20 20

1616

28

21

12

25

35

21

34

28

32

27

35

23

15

22

13

14

23

15

28

26

26

27

33

16

34

14

21

14

34

27

32

12

35

18

24

28

20

21

24

17

36

1417

11

25

29

12

36

14

25 29

36

36

16

34

13

10

10

20

27

20

17

16

35

28 26 25

36

15

33

32

14 15

29

22

33

13

26

20

27

13

36

24

26

32

23

29

13

34

12

28

26

24

23

15

29

32

30

31

20

17 14

22

12

29

17

16

36

32

10

17

13

29

35

27

22

35

24

12

21

33

23

10

31

10

34

12

23

36

30

33

20

28

12

35

24

34

33

15

27

23

35

32

15

10

27

29

24

27 25

2223

15

34

35

20

35

17

19

25

29

34

24

25

25

35

20

32

10

22

13

20

10 10

32

26

25

13

10

21

1517

15

21

33

24

23

22

34

26

2726

34

16

26

26

14

26

25

19

16

31

23

22

13

32

33

27

3636

29

35

23

34

12

34

27

18

24

14

26

31

25

17

30

35

29 27

14

14

24

36

22

31

36

10

18

34

21

18

1815

28

30

33

19

13

19

30

19

12

31

19

31

10

12

31

2830

18

18

19

30

31

32

16

3

10

Creek

Hoagland Ditch

Moots Creek

Pike Creek

Honey Creek

McKillip Ditch

Spring CreekBig Pine Creek

Harp Ditch

Slough Creek

Big Monon Ditch

Burnetts

Little Indian

Creek

McKillip Ditch

CR 250 N

CR 400 N

CR 75 W

CR 800 S

CR 1400 E

CR 600 S

CR 350 S

CR 900 S

CR 1000 N

CR 1300 E

CR 300 N

CR 150 E

CR 475 N

CR 850 N

CR 1100 S

CR 1250 E

CR 1200 S

CR 750 N

Lowes Rd

CR 650 S

CR 100 W

CR 275 N

CR 225 E

Park Rd

Evans Rd

CR 125 W

CR 775 S

Bed fo rd Rd

Freeman Rd

CR 950 S

CR 375 E

Cha lm ers Rd

CR 525 W

Springbo ro Rd

CR 325 N

CR 980 W

CR 1350 E

CR 1450 E

CR 1050 N

Diener Rd

Shoop

Quarry Rd

Nelso n Rd

CR 650 W

Burnettsville Rd

West Shafer Dr

CR 350 W

CR 675 N

CR 75 E

CR 500 S

CR 700 S

CR 350 N

CR 150 S

25

CR 50 N

CR 100 S

CR 150 W

CR 1000 W

CR 100 W

CR 1150 S

CR 325 N

CR 900 S

CR 700 W

CR 800 N

CR 175 N

CR 225 N

CR 400 S

CR 500 N

CR 850 S

CR 1000 N

CR 600 W

Divisio n Rd

CR 75 ECR 100 E

CR 400 N

CR 400 S

CR 650 W

CR 550 E CR 450 N

CR 375 N

CR 800 S

CR 450 W

CR 600 N

CR 300 W

CR 800 W

Meridian Rd

CR 700 W

CR 100 N

CR 1000 W

CR 1200 E

CR 100 E

CR 1000 W

CR 1000 E

CR 300 W

CR 950 N

CR 225 W

CR 1150 E

CR 900 E

CR 100 E

CR 750 E

CR 1200 S

West Shafer Dr

CR 800 W

CR 750 W

CR 900 W

CR 900 N

Divisio n Rd

CR 775 N

CR 200 N

CR 950 E

CR 600 N

CR 100 N

CR 800 W

CR 175 E

CR 300 N

25

CR 700 S

CR 75 W

CR 1100 S

CR 200 E

CR 600 E

CR 50 E

CR 400 W

CR 1450 E

CR 150 W

CR 200 N

Sm ithso n Rd

CR 300 E

CR 200 W

CR 300 S

CR 1100 E

CR 325 S

CR 475 N

CR 700 N

CR 1250 S

CR 100 N

CR 600 S

CR 500 N

Divisio n Rd

CR 75 E

L use Rd

CR 900 N

CR 100 E

CR 700 N

CR 1000 S

CR 300 E

CR 450 S

CR 900 S

CR 1300 E

CR 200 S

§̈¦65

¬«18

¬«43

¬«39

¬«119

£¤24

£¤421

£¤231

Buffalo

Monticello

Norway

Monon

Wolcott

Reynolds

Brookston

Burnettsville

Chalmers

WHITE COUNTYGAMEBIRD

HABITAT AREA

660

670

650

640

680

720

710

700

690

630

630

600

670

660

690

670

670

660

670

670

660

660

640

700

Creek

CR 300 E

East Sha fer Dr

Rattlesnake Creek

KankakeeRiver Basin

Upper WabashRiver Basin

670

670

660

Lee

Seafield

Smithson

BadgerGrove

Roundgrove

Springboro

Indiana Beach

Sitka

Headlee

Idaville

650

¬«16

¬«119

¬«39

710

680

650

640

§̈¦65

650

690

680

T. 29 N.T. 28 N.

R. 5 W. R. 4 W. R. 4 W. R. 3 W. R. 3 W. R. 2 W.

T. 29 N.T. 28 N.

R. 2 W. R. 1 W.

T. 28 N.T. 27 N.

T. 27 N.T. 26 N.

R. 2 W. R. 1 W.R. 3 W. R. 2 W.

T. 26 N.T. 25 N.

T. 25 N.T. 24 N.

R. 4 W. R. 3 W.R. 5 W. R. 4 W.R. 6 W. R. 5 W.

T. 25 N.T. 24 N.

T. 26 N.T. 25 N.

T. 27 N.T. 26 N.

T. 28 N.T. 27 N.

R. 6 W. R. 5 W.

£¤24

Tipp ecanoe

R iver

LakeFreeman

LakeShafer

Tippecanoe

Big

KankakeeRiver Basin

Upper WabashRiver Basin

Creek

Big

River

Upper WabashRiver Basin

Middle WabashRiver Basin

Middle Wabash

River Basin

Upper Wabash

River Basin

Big Monon Creek

¬«16

£¤421

£¤24

£¤421£¤421

¬«43

¬«18

£¤231

£¤24

®1 0 10.5 Mile

1 0 10.5 Kilo m eter

Location Map

Elevation (feet)888

526

Digital Elevation Model of White County, IN

County Ro a d

Interstate§̈¦65

U S Highwa y£¤24

State Ro a d ¬«16

EXPLANATION

Strea m

L ine o f equa l elevatio n, in feet a b o ve m ea n sea levelPotentio m etric Co ntour interva l 10 feet

L a ke & River

No Aquifer Materia lo r L im ited Data

Basin Bound ary

720

DNR Ma na ged L a nd s

Munic ip a l Bound ary

T his m a p has b een created fro m severa l existing sha p efiles. T o wnship a nd Ra nge L ines o f Ind ia na (line sha p efile, 20020621), L a nd Survey L ines o f Ind ia na (p o lygo n sha p efile, 20020621), a nd County Bound aries o f Ind ia na (p o lygo n sha p efile, 20020621), are fro m the Ind ia na Geo lo gic a l Survey a nd b ased o n a 1:24,000 sc a le. Ro a d s (T IGER a nd INDOT ) (line sha p efile, 2005) is fro m the Ind ia na Dep artm ent o f T ra nsp o rtatio n a nd b ased o n a 1:24,000 sc a le. System 1 (line sha p efile, 2003) is fro m the Ind ia na Dep a rtm ent o f Tra nsp o rtatio n a nd b a sed o n a 1:24,000 sc a le. Inc o rp o rated Bound aries in Ind ia na (p o lygo n sha p efile, 20060501) is fro m the Gra p hics a nd Engineering Sectio n Ind ia na Dep artm ent o f T ra nsp o rtatio n. Hydro gra p hy, Strea m s (NHD) (line sha p efile, 20081218), Rivers (NHD) (p o lygo n sha p efile, 20081218), a nd L a kes (NHD) (p o lygo n sha p efile, 20081218) are fro m the U .S. Geo lo gic a l Survey a nd the U .S. Enviro nm enta l Protectio n Agenc y, a nd b ased o n a 1:24,000 sc a le. Basin b o und aries are m o d ified fro m the Watershed Bound ary Dataset (p o lygo n sha p efile, 2008) fro m the Natura l Resourc e Co nservatio n Servic e. Ma na ged L a nd s IDNR IN (p o lygo n sha p efile, 20100920) is fro m the Ind ia na Dep a rtm ent o f Natura l Resourc es a nd b ased o n a 1:24,000 sc a le. Digita l Elevatio n Mo d el im a ge is d erived fro m the Ind ia na Ortho/L iDAR Statewid e Co llectio n Pro gra m (2013). White Co unty Bedro c k No Aquifer Materia l or L im ited Data (p o lygo n sha p efile, Sc hm id t, 2015), a nd Potentio m etric Surfa c e Ma p o f the Bed ro c k Aquifers o f White County, Ind ia na (line sha p efile, Sc hm id t, 2015) are b ased o n a 1:24,000 sc a le.

White County is lo c ated in the no rthwest sectio n o f Ind ia na , a nd is b o und ed by the c o unties o f T ip p ec a no e, Bento n, Jasp er, Pulaski, Cass, a nd Carro ll. T he m a jo rity o f the c o unty is situated within the U p p er Wa b ash River Basin with two p o rtio ns o f the c o unty in the no rthwest c o rner lo c ated within the Ka nka kee River Basin a nd two p o rtio ns within the Mid d le Wa b ash River Basin lo c a ted in the south-southwest sectio n o f the c o unty.T he Potentio m etric Surfa c e Ma p (PSM) o f the b ed ro c k aquifers o f White County was m a p p ed by c o ntouring the elevatio ns o f 760 static water-levels rep o rted o n well rec o rds rec eived prim arily o ver a 50 year p erio d . T hese wells are c o m p leted in aquifers at vario us d ep ths, a nd typ ic a lly, und er c o nfined c o nd itio ns (b o und ed b y im p erm ea b le la yers a b o ve a nd b elo w the water bearing fo rm atio n). Ho wever, so m e wells were c o m p leted und er unc o nfined (no t b o und ed by im p erm ea b le la yers) settings.T he p o tentio m etric surfa c e is a m easure o f the p ressure o n water in a water bearing fo rm atio n. Water in a n unc o nfined aquifer is at atm o sp heric pressure a nd will no t rise in a well a b o ve the to p o f the aquifer, in c o ntrast to ground water in a c o nfined aquifer whic h is und er hydrostatic pressure a nd will rise in a well a b o ve the to p o f the water bearing fo rm atio n.

U niversa l T ra nsverse Merc ator (U T M) c o o rd ina tes for the water wells were either p hysic a lly o bta ined in the field , d eterm ined through a d d ress geo c o d ing, or rep o rted o n water well rec o rd s. T he lo c atio n o f the m a jo rity o f the water well rec o rds used to m a ke the PSM were field verified . Elevatio n d ata were o bta ined fro m a d igita l elevatio n m o d el. Qua lity c o ntro l/qua lity assura nc e pro c ed ures were utilized to refine or rem o ve d ata where errors were rea d ily a p p a rent.Potentio m etric surfa c e elevatio ns ra nge fro m a high o f 720 feet m ea n sea level (m sl) in the west-c entra l sectio n o f the c o unty, to a lo w o f 590 feet m sl in the south-c entra l p o rtio n. Ground water flo w d irectio n within the m a jo rity o f the c o unty is genera lly to wards the T ip p ec a no e River a nd its m a jo r tributaries; ho wever, within the Ka nka kee River Basin, ground water flo w is to the no rthwest. Bed ro c k p o tentio m etric surfa c e elevatio n c o ntours ha ve no t b een extend ed through p o rtio ns o f the c o unty. T hese areas are la c king in d a ta a nd /or c o vered by m o re pro lific unc o nso lid ated d ep o sits that lim it the nec essity to c o m p lete wells in the b ed ro c k. T he c o unty PSM c a n b e used to d efine the regio na l ground water flo w p a th a nd to id entify signific a nt areas o f ground water rec harge a nd d isc harge. County PSM’s represent o vera ll regio na l c hara cteristics a nd are no t intend ed to b e a substitute for site-sp ec ific stud ies.

Static water-level m easurem ents in ind ivid ua l wells used to c o nstruct c o unty PSM’s are ind ic ative o f the water-level at the tim e o f well c o m p letio n. T he ground water level within a n aquifer c o nsta ntly fluctuates in resp o nse to ra infa ll, eva p o tra nsp iratio n, ground water m o vem ent a nd pum p a ge. T herefo re, m easured static water-levels in a n area m a y d iffer due to lo c a l o r seaso na l variatio ns. Bec ause fluctuatio ns in ground water are typ ic a lly sm a ll, static water-levels c a n b e used to c o nstruct a genera lized PSM. As a genera l rule, but c erta inly no t a lwa ys, ground water flo w a p p ro xim ates the o verlying to p o gra p hy a nd intersects the la nd surfa c e at m a jo r strea m s.

Potentiometric Surface Map of the Bedrock Aquifersof White County, Indiana

b yRo b ert K. Sc hm id t

Divisio n o f Water, Resourc e Assessm ent Sectio nFebruary 2015