9
Paul Reuteman, PT, DPT, MHS, OCS, ATC Clinical Professor University of Wisconsin - La Crosse Program of Physical Therapy La Crosse, WI Staff Physical Therapist Gundersen Health System Onalaska, WI Program Director Specialized Physical Therapy Education Orthopedic Residency Program La Crosse, WI POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES Cervical and Lumbar Spine Independent Study Course 27.1.4 CONTINUING PHYSICAL THERAPY EDUCATION Orthopaedic Section, APTA, Inc. Downloaded from www.orthoptlearn.org at the Orthopaedic Section on September 26, 2018. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright © 2017 Orthopaedic Section, APTA, Inc. All rights reserved.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · comes and postoperative complications after pri-mary versus revision lumbar spinal fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar disc

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    12

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · comes and postoperative complications after pri-mary versus revision lumbar spinal fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar disc

Paul Reuteman, PT, DPT, MHS, OCS, ATCClinical Professor

University of Wisconsin - La Crosse Program of Physical Therapy

La Crosse, WI

Staff Physical TherapistGundersen Health System

Onalaska, WI

Program DirectorSpecialized Physical Therapy Education

Orthopedic Residency ProgramLa Crosse, WI

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES

Cervical and Lumbar Spine

Independent Study Course 27.1.4

CONTINUING PHYSICAL THERAPY EDUCATION

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 2: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · comes and postoperative complications after pri-mary versus revision lumbar spinal fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar disc

25

1. Kalakoti P, Missios S, Maiti T, et al. Inpatient out-comes and postoperative complications after pri-mary versus revision lumbar spinal fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar disc disease: a national (nationwide) inpatient sample analysis, 2002-2011. World Neurosurg. 2016;85:114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.020. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

2. Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI. United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(12):1441-1445; discussion 1446-1447.

3. Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, Delamarter RB. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(1):67-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb.

4. Marquez-Lara A, Nandyala SV, Fineberg SJ, Singh K. Current trends in demographics, practice, and in-hospital outcomes in cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(6):476-481. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000165.

5. Oglesby M, Fineberg SJ, Patel AA, Pelton MA, Singh K. Epidemiological trends in cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases be-tween 2002 and 2009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(14):1226-1232. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828be75d.

6. Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Howard J. Fusion and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review of Os-westry Disability Index and MOS Short Form-36 outcomes. Spine J. 2008;8(5):747-755. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

7. Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson A, et al. Long-term outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis: eight-year results of the Spine Patient Out-comes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(2):63-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000731.

8. Louw A, Puentedura EJ, Diener I. A descriptive study of the utilization of physical therapy for postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergo-ing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(11):3550-3559. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

9. Louw A, Butler DS, Diener I, Puentedura EJ. Preoperative education for lumbar radiculopathy: A survey of US spine surgeons. Int J Spine Surg. 2012;6:130-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsp.2012.03.001. eCollection 2012.

10. Oosterhuis T, Costa LO, Maher CG, de Vet HC, van Tulder MW, Ostelo RW. Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(3):CD003007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003007.pub3.

REFERENCES

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 3: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · comes and postoperative complications after pri-mary versus revision lumbar spinal fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar disc

26

11. Gilmore SJ, McClelland JA, Davidson M. Phys-iotherapeutic interventions before and after surgery for degenerative lumbar conditions: a sys-tematic review. Physiotherapy. 2015;101(2):111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

12. Ebenbichler G, Inschlag S, Pflüger V, et al. Twelve-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of comprehensive physiotherapy following disc her-niation operation. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(6):548-560. doi: 10.1177/0269215514552032. Epub 2014 Oct 6.

13. Beneck GJ, Popovich JM Jr, Selkowitz DM, Azen S, Kulig K, Physical Therapy Clinical Research Network (PTClinResNet). Intensive, progressive exercise improves quality of life following lum-bar microdiskectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(9):892-901. doi: 10.1177/0269215514525059. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

14. Newsome RJ, May S, Chiverton N, Cole AA. A pro-spective, randomised trial of immediate exercise following lumbar microdiscectomy: a preliminary study. Physiotherapy. 2009;95(4):273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Sep 16.

15. McGregor AH, Doré CJ, Morris TP, Morris S, Jamrozik K. ISSLS Prize Winner: Function after spinal treatment, exercise, and rehabilitation (FASTER): a factorial randomized trial to de-termine whether the functional outcome of spinal surgery can be improved. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(21):1711-1720. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318214e3e6.

16. Danielsen JM, Johnsen R, Kibsgaard SK, Hellevik E. Early aggressive exercise for postoperative rehabilitation after discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(8):1015-1020.

17. Deyo RA, Mirza SK. Clinical Practice. Herniat-ed Lumbar Intervertebral Disk. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(18):1763-1772. doi: 10.1056/ NEJMcp1512658.

18. Walker JL, Schulak D, Murtagh R. Midline disk herniations of the lumbar spine. South Med J. 1993;86(1):13-17.

19. Radcliff K, Cook C. Surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation: Open discectomy (indications, technique, outcomes, and complications). Semin Spine Surg. 2016;28(1):14-19. doi:10.1053/j.semss.2015.08.005.

20. Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, et al. Sys-tematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(4):811-816. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4173. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

21. Verwoerd AJ, Peul WC, Willemsen SP, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of history taking to as-sess lumbosacral nerve root compression. Spine J. 2014;14(9):2028-2037. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.049. Epub 2013 Dec 8.

22. Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA. Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of lumbosacral nerve root compression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72(5):630-634.

23. Iversen T, Solberg TK, Romner B, et al. Accuracy of physical examination for chronic lumbar radicu-lopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:206. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-206.

24. van der Windt DA, Simons E, Riphagen II, et al. Physical examination for lumbar radiculop-athy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(2):CD007431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007431.pub2.

25. Manchikanti L, Hirsch JA. Clinical man-agement of radicular pain. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15(6):681-693. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1048226. Epub 2015 May 17.

26. Delitto A, George SZ, Van Dillen LR, et al. Low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42(4):A1-57. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.0301. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

27. Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, et al. Surgery versus prolonged conser-vative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(22):2245-2256.

28. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Wedge JH, Yong-Hing K, Reilly J. Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1978;3(4):319-328.

29. Katz JN, Harris MB. Clinical practice. Lumbar spi-nal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(8):818-825. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0708097.

30. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, et al. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J. 2009;9(7):545-550. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Apr 23.

31. de Graaf I, Prak A, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Thomas S, Peul W, Koes B. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of the accura-cy of diagnostic tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(10):1168-1176.

32. Kreiner DS, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL, et al. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal ste-

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 4: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · comes and postoperative complications after pri-mary versus revision lumbar spinal fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar disc

27

nosis (update). Spine J. 2013;13(7):734-743. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.059.

33. Backstrom KM, Whitman JM, Flynn TW. Lumbar spinal stenosis-diagnosis and management of the aging spine. Man Ther. 2011;16(4):308-317. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Mar 2.

34. Whitman JM, Flynn TW, Childs JD, et al. A com-parison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(22):2541-2549.

35. Whitman JM, Flynn TW, Fritz JM. Nonsurgical management of patients with lumbar spinal steno-sis: a literature review and a case series of three patients managed with physical therapy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003;14(1):77-101, vi-vii.

36. Deyo RA. Fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease: still more questions than answers. Spine J. 2015;15(2):272-274. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.11.004.

37. Matz PG, Meagher RJ, Lamer T, et al. Guideline summary review: An evidence-based clini-cal guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine J. 2016;16(3):439-448. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.11.055. Epub 2015 Dec 8.

38. Willems P. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spi-nal fusion. Acta Orthop Suppl. 2013;84(349):1-35. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.753565.

39. Mirza SK, Deyo RA. Systematic review of random-ized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to nonoperative care for treatment of chronic back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(7):816-823.

40. Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J, et al. Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chron-ic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ. 2005;330(7502):1233. Epub 2005 May 23.

41. Brox JI, Sørensen R, Friis A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(17):1913-1921.

42. Yoshihara H, Yoneoka D. National trends in the surgical treatment for lumbar degenera-tive disc disease: United States, 2000 to 2009. Spine J. 2015;15(2):265-271. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.09.026. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

43. Lubelski D, Williams SK, O’Rourke C, et al. Dif-ferences in the surgical treatment of lower back

pain among spine surgeons in the United States. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(11):978-986. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001396.

44. Lee JY, Hohl JB, Fedorka CJ, et al. Surgeons agree to disagree on surgical options for degenerative conditions of the cervical and lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(3):E203-E212. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df8063.

45. Irwin ZN, Hilibrand A, Gustavel M, et al. Variation in surgical decision making for degenerative spinal disorders. Part I: lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(19):2208-2213.

46. Irwin ZN, Hilibrand A, Gustavel M, et al. Variation in surgical decision making for degenerative spinal disorders. Part II: cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(19):2214-2219.

47. Gray DT, Deyo RA, Kreuter W, et al. Popula-tion-based trends in volumes and rates of ambu-latory lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(17):1957-1963, discussion 1964.

48. Ahn J, Rossi VJ, Sershon RA, et al. Surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: MIS, en-doscopic, and percutaneous techniques. Semin Spine Surg. 2016;28(1):20-25. doi:10.1053/j.semss.2015.08.006.

49. Lang SS, Chen HI, Koch MJ, et al. Development of an outpatient protocol for lumbar discec-tomy: our institutional experience. World Neu-rosurg. 2014;82(5):897-901. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.05.035. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

50. Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes SA. Outpatient surgery reduces short-term com-plications in lumbar discectomy: an analysis of 4310 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(3):264-271. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182697b57.

51. Fallah A, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG, et al. Ad-mission and acute complication rate for outpa-tient lumbar microdiscectomy. Can J Neurol Sci. 2010;37(1):49-53.

52. Hersht M, Massicotte EM, Bernstein M. Patient satisfaction with outpatient lumbar microsur-gical discectomy: a qualitative study. Can J Surg. 2007;50(6):445-449.

53. Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, et al. Sur-gical versus nonoperative treatment for lum-bar disc herniation: eight-year results for the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(1):3-16. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000088.

54. Veresciagina K, Spakauskas B, Ambrozaitis KV. Clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation, selected for one-level open-dis-cectomy and microdiscectomy. Eur Spine J.

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 5: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · comes and postoperative complications after pri-mary versus revision lumbar spinal fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar disc

28

2010;19(9):1450-1458. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1431-9. Epub 2010 May 26.

55. Machado GC, Witzleb AJ, Fritsch C, Maher CG, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML. Patients with sciatica still experience pain and disability 5 years after surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(10):1700-1709. doi: 10.1002/ejp.893. Epub 2016 May 12.

56. Kim CH, Chung CK, Park CS, Choi B, Kim MJ, Park BJ. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar her-niated intervertebral disc disease: nationwide co-hort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(7):581-590. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318274f9a7.

57. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(8):936-943.

58. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC, Levine SA, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Seven- to 10-year outcome of de-compressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spi-nal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(1):92-98.

59. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, et al. Sur-gical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis four-year results of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(14):1329-1338. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e0f04d.

60. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Sur-gical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Re-search Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA. 2006;296(20):2451-2459.

61. Ghogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler W, et al. Lami-nectomy plus fusion versus laminectomy alone for lumbar spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1424-1434. doi: 10.1056/NEJ-Moa1508788.

62. Försth P, Ólafsson G, Carlsson T, et al. A random-ized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(15):1413-1423. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513721.

63. Frelinghuysen P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP Jr. Lumbar total disc replacement part I: Ratio-nale, biomechanics, and implant types. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36(3):293-299.

64. Ding F, Jia Z, Zhao Z, et al. Total disc replace-ment versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Eur Spine J. 2016;(473):1-10. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4714-y.

65. Nie H, Chen G, Wang X, Zeng J. Comparison of Total Disc Replacement with lumbar fusion: a

meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015:25(1):60-67. doi: 01.2015/JCPSP.6067.

66. Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, Resnick DK, Shaffer WO, Loeser JD. Surgery for low back pain: a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(10):1094-1109. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a105fc.

67. Iyer S, Kim HJ. Cervical radiculopathy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016;9(3):272-280. doi: 10.1007/s12178-016-9349-4.

68. Cook C, Brown C, Isaacs R, Roman M, Davis S, Richardson W. Clustered clinical findings for di-agnosis of cervical spine myelopathy. J Man Manip Ther. 2010;18(4):175-180. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12804993427045.

69. Wong JJ, Côté P, Quesnele JJ, Stern PJ, Mior SA. The course and prognostic factors of symp-tomatic cervical disc herniation with radicu-lopathy: a systematic review of the literature. Spine J. 2014;14(8):1781-1789. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.032. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

70. Radhakrishnan K, Litchy WJ, O’Fallon WM, Kur-land LT. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy: A population-based study from Rochester, Min-nesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain. 1994;117(Pt 2):325-335.

71. Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, et al. Sys-tematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(4):811-816. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4173. Epub 2014 Nov 27.

72. Wainner RS, Gill H. Diagnosis and nonoperative management of cervical radiculopathy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30(12):728-744.

73. Rhee JM, Yoon T, Riew KD. Cervical radiculopathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(8):486-494.

74. Engquist M, Löfgren H, Öberg B, et al. Surgery ver-sus non-surgical treatment for cervical radiculop-athy: a prospective, randomized study comparing surgery plus physiotherapy with physiotherapy alone with a 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(20):1715-1722. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ff095.

75. Peolsson A, Söderlund A, Engquist M, et al. Phys-ical function outcome in cervical radiculopathy patients after physiotherapy alone compared with anterior surgery followed by physiotherapy: a prospective randomized study with a 2-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(4):300-307. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d2cbb.

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 6: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · comes and postoperative complications after pri-mary versus revision lumbar spinal fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar disc

29

76. Saal JS, Saal JA, Yurth EF. Nonoperative man-agement of herniated cervical intervertebral disc with radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(16):1877-1883.

77. Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(2):284-299. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.008.

78. Childs JD, Cleland JA, Elliott JM, et al. Neck pain: clinical practice guidelines linked to the Interna-tional Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health from the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(9):A1-34. Epub 2008 Sep 1.

79. Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, Delamarter RB. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(1):67-76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb.

80. Mansfield H, Canar J, Gerard C, O’Toole J. Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus minimally invasive posterior cer-vical foraminotomy for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a cost analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(5):E9. doi: 10.3171/2014.8. FOCUS14373.

81. Shriver MF, Lewis DJ, Kshettry VR, Rosenbaum BP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Pseudoarthrosis rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a me-ta-analysis. Spine J. 2015;15(9):2016-2027. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.05.010. Epub 2015 May 15.

82. Engquist M, Löfgren H, Öberg B, et al. A 5- to 8-year randomized study on the treatment of cer-vical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompres-sion and fusion plus physiotherapy versus physio-therapy alone. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;(1):19-27. doi:10.3171/2016.6.SPINE151427.

83. Peolsson A, Peolsson M. Predictive factors for long-term outcome of anterior cervical decom-pression and fusion: a multivariate data analysis. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(3):406-414. Epub 2007 Dec 13.

84. Hermansen A, Hedlund R, Vavruch L, Peolsson A. Positive predictive factors and subgroup analysis of clinically relevant improvement after anterior cervical decompression and fusion for cervical disc disease: a 10- to 13-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study: clinical arti-cle. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(4):403-411. doi: 10.3171/2013.7.SPINE12843. Epub 2013 Aug 2.

85. Peolsson A, Vavruch L, Öberg B. Disability after anterior decompression and fusion for cervical disc disease. Adv Physiother. 2009;4(3):111-124.

86. Archer KR, Wegener ST, Seebach C, et al. The effect of fear of movement beliefs on pain and disability after surgery for lumbar and cer-vical degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(19):1554-1562. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f8c6f4.

87. Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, Reah C, How-ell KM, McAfee PC. Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthro-plasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fu-sion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(10):674-683. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000869.

88. Coric D, Cassis J, Carew JD, Boltes MO. Prospec-tive study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical ar-ticle. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13(6):715-721. doi: 10.3171/2010.5.SPINE09852.

89. Hu Y, Lv G, Ren S, Johansen D. Mid- to long-term outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of eight prospective randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149312. eCollection 2016.

90. Bydon M, Mathios D, Macki M, et al. Long-term patient outcomes after posterior cervi-cal foraminotomy: an analysis of 151 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(5):727-731. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE131110. Epub 2014 Aug 15.

91. Woertgen C, Rothoerl RD, Henkel J, Brawanski A. Long term outcome after cervical foraminotomy. J Clin Neurosci. 2000;7(4):312-315.

92. Ronco M, Iona L, Fabbro C, Bulfone G, Palese A. Patient education outcomes in surgery: a systematic review from 2004 to 2010. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012;10(4):309-323. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00286.x.

93. Wallis JA, Taylor NF. Pre-operative interventions (non-surgical and non-pharmacological) for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis await-ing joint replacement surgery - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Carti-lage. 2011;19(12):1381-1395. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Sep 10.

94. den Boer JJ, Oostendorp RA, Beems T, Munneke M, Oerlemans M, Evers AW. A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavour-able outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(5):527-536. Epub 2005 May 25.

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 7: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · comes and postoperative complications after pri-mary versus revision lumbar spinal fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar disc

30

95. Rolving N, Nielsen CV, Christensen FB, Holm R, Bünger CE, Oestergaard LG. Does a preoperative cognitive-behavioural intervention affect dis-ability, pain behaviour, pain and return to work the first year after lumbar spinal fusion surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(9):593-600. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000843.

96. Rolving N, Ostergaard LG, Willert MV, et al. Description and design considerations of a ran-domized clinical trial investigating the effect of a multidisciplinary cognitive-behavioural interven-tion for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-62.

97. Hanscom DA, Brox JI, Bunnage R. Defining the role of cognitive behavioral therapy in treating chronic low back pain: an overview. Global Spine J. 2015;5(6):496-504. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1567836. Epub 2015 Nov 19.

98. Moore JE. Chronic low back pain and psy-chosocial issues. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010;21(4):801-815. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2010.06.005.

99. Abbott AD, Tyni-Lenné R, Hedlund R. Early reha-bilitation targeting cognition, behavior, and motor function after lumbar fusion: a randomized con-trolled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(8):848-857. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d1049f.

100. Jensen MP, Romano JM, Turner JA, Good AB, Wald LH. Patient beliefs predict patient function-ing: Further support for a cognitive-behavioural model of chronic pain. Pain. 1999;81(1-2):95-104.

101. Louw A, Diener I, Landers MR, Puentedura EJ. Preoperative pain neuroscience education for lumbar radiculopathy: a multi-center randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(18):1449-1457. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000444.

102. Louw A, Butler DS, Diener I, Puentedura EJ. De-velopment of a preoperative neuroscience educa-tional program for patients with lumbar radiculop-athy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92(5):446-452. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182876aa4.

103. Greenwood J, McGregor A, Jones F, Mullane J, Hurley M. Rehabilitation following lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(1):E28-36. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001132.

104. Williamson E, White L, Rushton A. A survey of post-operative management for patients fol-lowing first time lumbar discectomy. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(6):795-802. Epub 2006 Aug 30.

105. Tarnanen S, Neva MH, Dekker J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of postoperative exercise rehabil-

itation program after lumbar spine fusion: study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-123.

106. Hebert JJ, Marcus RL, Koppenhaver SL, Fritz JM. Postoperative rehabilitation following lumbar discectomy with quantification of trunk muscle morphology and function: a case report and review of the literature. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(7):402-412. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3332.

107. Rohlmann A, Arntz U, Graichen F, Bergmann G. Loads on an internal spinal fixation device during sitting. J Biomech. 2001;34(8):989-993.

108. Olsen MA, Nepple JJ, Riew KD, et al. Risk fac-tors for surgical site infection following ortho-paedic spinal operations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(1):62-69. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01515.

109. Pull ter Gunne AF, Mohamed AS, Skolasky RL, van Laarhoven CJ, Cohen DB. The presentation, incidence, etiology, and treatment of surgical site infections after spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(13):1323-1328. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bcde61.

110. Tomov M, Mitsunaga L, Durbin-Johnson B, Nallur D, Roberto R. Reducing surgical site infection in spinal surgery with betadine irrigation and intra-wound vancomycin powder. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(7):491-499. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000789

111. Yoshioka K, Murakami H, Demura S, Kato S, Tsuchiya H. Prevalence and risk factors for development of venous thromboembolism after degenerative spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(5):E301-306. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000727.

112. Wells P, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet. 1997;350(9094):1795-1798.

113. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Douketis J, et al. An eval-uation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(11):812-821.

114. Streiff MB, Agnelli G, Connors JM, et al. Guid-ance for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016;41(1):32-67. doi: 10.1007/s11239-015-1317-0.

115. Haggman S, Maher CG, Refshauge KM. Screen-ing for symptoms of depression by physical therapists managing low back pain. Phys Ther. 2004;84(12):1157-1166.

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 8: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · comes and postoperative complications after pri-mary versus revision lumbar spinal fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar disc

31

116. Whooley MA, Avins AL, Miranda J, Browner WS. Case-finding instruments for depression: Two questions are as good as many. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(7):439-445.

117. Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F, Kerse N, Fishman T, Gunn J. Effect of the addition of a “help” question to two screening questions on specificity for diag-nosis of depression in general practice: diagnostic validity study. BMJ. 2005;331(7521):884. Epub 2005 Sep 15.

118. Belin EJ, Gelb DE, Koh EY. Complications in cervical spine surgeries. Semin Spine Surg. 2014;26(2):106-113. doi:10.1053/j.semss.2014.05.007.

119. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66(8):271-273.

120. Davidson M, Keating JL. A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther. 2002;82(1):8-24.

121. Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther. 2001;81(2):776-788.

122. Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):409-415.

123. Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM. Psycho-metric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126.

124. Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993;52(2):157-168.

125. George SZ, Fritz JM, Bialosky JE, Donald DA. The effect of a fear-avoidance-based physical therapy intervention for patients with acute low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(23):2551-2560.

126. Fritz JM, George SZ. Identifying psychosocial vari-ables in patients with acute work-related low back pain: the importance of fear-avoidance beliefs. Phys Ther. 2002;82(10):973-983.

127. Monticone M, Ferrante S, Teli M, et al. Man-agement of catastrophising and kinesiophobia improves rehabilitation after fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis. A randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J. 2014;23(1):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2889-z. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

128. Vlaeyen JW Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its con-sequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain. 2000;85(3):317-332.

129. Monticone M, Cedraschi C, Ambrosini E, et al. Cognitive-behavioural treatment for subacute and chronic neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(5):CD010664. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010664.pub2.

130. Thompson DP, Oldham JA, Woby SR. Does adding cognitive-behavioural physiotherapy to exercise improve outcome in patients with chronic neck pain? A randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2016;102(2):170-177. doi: 10.1016/j. physio.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

131. Ostelo RW, Köke AJ, Beurskens AJ, et al. Behav-ioral-graded activity compared with usual care after first-time disk surgery: considerations of the design of a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23(5):312-319.

132. Magalhães MO, Muzi LH, Comachio J, et al. The short-term effects of graded activity ver-sus physiotherapy in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Man Ther. 2015;20(4):603-609. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.02.004. Epub 2015 Feb 23.

133. George SZ, Zeppieri G. Physical therapy utiliza-tion of graded exposure for patients with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(7):496-505. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2983.

134. Cook FM, Hassenkamp AM. Active rehabilita-tion for chronic low back pain. Physiotherapy. 2000;86(2):61-68.

135. López-de-Uralde-Villanueva I, Munõz-García D, Gil-Martínez A, et al. A systematic review and me-ta-analysis on the effectiveness of graded activity and graded exposure for chronic nonspecific low back pain. Pain Med. 2016;17(1):172-188.

136. Macedo LG, Latimer J, Maher CG, et al. Effect of motor control exercises versus graded activity in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012;92(3):363-377. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110290. Epub 2011 Dec 1.

137. Richardson CA, Jull GA, Hodges PW, Hides JA. Therepeutic Exercise for Spinal Segmental Stabili-zation in Low Back Pain. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1999

138. Reiman MP. Trunk stabilization training: an evi-dence basis for the current state of affairs. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2009;22(3):131-142. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2009-0226.

139. Zoidl G, Grifka J, Boluki D, et al. Molecular evi-dence for local denervation of paraspinal muscles

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.

Page 9: POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERIES · comes and postoperative complications after pri-mary versus revision lumbar spinal fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar disc

32

in failed-back surgery/postdiscotomy syndrome. Clin Neuropathol. 2003;22(2):71-77.

140. Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljärvi L, Airaksinen O, Par-tanen J, Tapaninaho A. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993;18(5):575-581.

141. Mayer TG, Mooney V, Gatchel RJ, et al. Quanti-fying postoperative deficits of physical function following spinal surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(244):147-157.

142. Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ, et al. Com-parison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative pa-tients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989;14(1):33-36.

143. Hodges PW. Is there a role for transversus abdominis in lumbo-pelvic stability? Man Ther. 1999;4(2):74-86.

144. O’Leary S, Falla D, Elliott JM, Jull G. Muscle dysfunction in cervical spine pain: implications for assessment and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(5):324-333. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2872.

145. Andary MT, Hallgren RC, Greenman PE, Rechtien JJ. Neurogenic atrophy of suboccipital muscles after a cervical injury: a case study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;77(6):545-549.

146. Elliott J, Jull G, Noteboom JT, Darnell R, Galloway G, Gibbon WW. Fatty infiltration in the cervical extensor muscles in persistent whiplash-associat-ed disorders: a magnetic resonance imaging analy-sis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(22):E847-E855.

147. Falla D, Bilenkij G, Jull G. Patients with chron-ic neck pain demonstrate altered patterns of muscle activation during performance of a functional upper limb task. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(13):1436-1440.

148. Hardwick DH, Beebe JA, McDonnell MK, Lang CE. A comparison of serratus anterior muscle activation during a wall slide exercise and other traditional exercises. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(12):903-910.

149. Gross AR, Paquin JP, Dupont G, et al. Exercises for mechanical neck disorders: A Cochrane review update. Man Ther. 2016:25-45. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 Apr 20.

150. Tarnanen S, Neva MH, Dekker J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of postoperative exercise rehabil-itation program after lumbar spine fusion: study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-123.

151. Nee RJ, Butler D. Management of peripheral neuropathic pain: Integrating neurobiology, neu-

rodynamics, and clinical evidence. Phys Ther Sport.

2006;7(1):36-49.

152. Efstathiou MA, Stefanakis M, Savva C, Giakas

G. Effectiveness of neural mobilization in pa-

tients with spinal radiculopathy: a critical review.

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015;19(2):205-212. doi:

10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 17.

153. Butler DS. The Sensitive Nervous System. Adelaide,

AUS: Noigroup publications; 2000.

154. Schacklock MO. Clinical Neurodynamics: A New System of Musculoskeletal Treatment. London, UK:

Elsevier; 2005

155. Philip K, Lew P, Matyas TA. The inter-therapist

reliability of the slump test. Aust J Physioth-er. 1989;35(2):89-94. doi: 10.1016/S0004-

9514(14)60499-2.

156. Kleinrensink GJ, Stoeckart R, Mulder PG, et al.

Upper limb tension tests as tools in the diagno-

sis of nerve and plexus lesions. Anatomical and

biomechanical aspects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000;15(1):9-14.

Ort

hopa

edic

Sec

tion,

APT

A, I

nc.

Dow

nloa

ded

from

ww

w.o

rtho

ptle

arn.

org

at th

e O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n on

Sep

tem

ber

26, 2

018.

For

per

sona

l use

onl

y. N

o ot

her

uses

with

out p

erm

issi

on.

Cop

yrig

ht ©

201

7 O

rtho

paed

ic S

ectio

n, A

PTA

, Inc

. All

righ

ts r

eser

ved.