1
with the ability to sleep through the night, lifestyle improvement, and daytime sleepiness. The patients rated the questions on a scale from 0-8. In addition, a retrospective chart review was performed which mea- sured preoperative and postoperative respiratory distur- bance indices (RDI) and Epworth Sleep Scales (ESS). Method of Data Analysis: A mean was taken to compress all data, a t-test and ANOVA were employed, with a p-value less than 0.05 to be statistically significant. Results: Pre- versus postoperative ESS for phase I patients was 12.96 and 7.56. Pre- versus postoperative ESS for phase II patients was 16.29 and 5.47. Pre- versus postoperative RDI for phase I was 38.83 and 18.7. Pre- versus postoperative RDI for phase II was 67.27 and 10.46. Also, improvement average for phase II versus phase I was 5.80 and 4.16. Satisfaction average for phase II versus phase I was 5.75 and 5.0, p-value .258, not statistically significant. Conclusion: Reduction in the RDI to a value of less than or equal to 10, or of 50% or greater of the original is considered a success. In addition, a ESS value of less than 11 was considered successful. According to this criteria, phase I was 61% (RDI) and 74% (ESS) successful. Also, phase II was 100% (RDI) and 94% (ESS) successful. Overall, both phase I and phase II surgeries have shown increased improvement and satisfaction average, with phase II surgery showing higher averages when com- pared to phase I. References Dattilo D, Drooger S. “Outcome assessment of patients undergoing maxillofacial procedures for the treatment of sleep apnea: comparison of subjective and objective results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62: 164-168 Prinsell JR. “Maxillomandibular advancement surgery in site-specific treatment approach for obstructive sleep apnea 50 consecutive pa- tients. Chest. 1999;116:1519-1524 POSTER 37 Evaluation of the Nasal Airway and Septum Before and After Le Fort I Osteotomy Rakesh Shah, MD, DMD, Birmingham, AL (Waite P) Statement of the Problem: Little research has been done to examine the nasal septum after separation from the maxillary crest during Le Fort I procedures. Disrup- tion of the interface between the nasal septum and the maxillary crest can permanently change the nasal anat- omy. The changes in the nasal airway could potentially cause ozena, nasal crusting, perforation, or septal devia- tion. The project was designed to evaluate changes of the nasal airway before and after Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillomandibular advancement in patients with ob- structive sleep apnea. Materials and Methods: Nasopharyngoscopy is rou- tinely used to examine the airway before and approxi- mately 4-6 weeks after maxillomandibular advancement. Photographs are taken to document changes in the nasal airway. The photographs of 8 patients status post max- illary and mandibular advancement were used to evalu- ate the nasal airway for ozena, nasal crusting, perfora- tion, and septal deviation. Method of Data Analysis: A nasopharyngoscopy form was created to evaluate the nasal airway and sep- tum for ozena, nasal crusting, perforation, and septal deviation. Nasopharyngoscopy photographs for 8 cases were reviewed and preoperative and postoperative forms were completed. Results: The mean age of patients is 54 years with a range of 35-74 years. The mean time to post-operative nasopharyngoscopy was 40 days with a range of 27-50 days. At post-operative nasopharyngoscopy, 25% of pa- tients had nasal crusting and 62.5% of patients had a septal perforation; 83.3% of patients with septal devia- tion prior to surgery were corrected during surgery. No patients demonstrated post-operative ozena. Conclusion: A greater incidence of change in the nasal airway was shown than previously anticipated. A substantial change in the nasal airway was not expected, yet this limited study shows otherwise. Further research is necessary to determine whether the demonstrated septal perforations will close and whether the nasal crusting will resolve. References Lehotay, Göde U, Wigand ME, Neukam FW. Nasal airway changes M. Erbe, M. after Le Fort I—impaction and advancement: anatomical and functional findings. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30:123–129 Smith K, Heggie A. Vomero-sphenoidal disarticulation during the Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1995;53:465-467 POSTER 38 Survey of General Dentist and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Warfarin Protocol for Tooth Extractions Ryan D. Morris, DDS, Iowa City, IA (Morris R; Synan W; Morgan T; Zeitler D; Qian F; Damiano P) Statement of the Problem: Perioperative bleeding risk must be weighed against the risks of thromboem- bolic events when warfarin anticoagulant therapy dis- continuation is considered. Dentists and dental special- ists may not be aware of the protocols recommended by current literature that discourage discontinuation of war- farin prior to dental treatment as patients may be placed at unnecessary medical risk. Scientific Poster Session 90 AAOMS 2009

Poster 37: Evaluation of the Nasal Airway and Septum Before and After Le Fort I Osteotomy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

wirrsb

cw

pEpv1pIs

titcAOipp

mo1

tt

PESOR

dttmocttms

tmPaiat

ftdwf

rndtstp

nsyisc

Ef

F1

PSMfRW

rbcicf

Scientific Poster Session

9

ith the ability to sleep through the night, lifestylemprovement, and daytime sleepiness. The patientsated the questions on a scale from 0-8. In addition, aetrospective chart review was performed which mea-ured preoperative and postoperative respiratory distur-ance indices (RDI) and Epworth Sleep Scales (ESS).Method of Data Analysis: A mean was taken to

ompress all data, a t-test and ANOVA were employed,ith a p-value less than 0.05 to be statistically significant.Results: Pre- versus postoperative ESS for phase I

atients was 12.96 and 7.56. Pre- versus postoperativeSS for phase II patients was 16.29 and 5.47. Pre- versusostoperative RDI for phase I was 38.83 and 18.7. Pre-ersus postoperative RDI for phase II was 67.27 and0.46. Also, improvement average for phase II versushase I was 5.80 and 4.16. Satisfaction average for phaseI versus phase I was 5.75 and 5.0, p-value .258, nottatistically significant.

Conclusion: Reduction in the RDI to a value of lesshan or equal to 10, or of 50% or greater of the originals considered a success. In addition, a ESS value of lesshan 11 was considered successful. According to thisriteria, phase I was 61% (RDI) and 74% (ESS) successful.lso, phase II was 100% (RDI) and 94% (ESS) successful.verall, both phase I and phase II surgeries have shown

ncreased improvement and satisfaction average, withhase II surgery showing higher averages when com-ared to phase I.

References

Dattilo D, Drooger S. “Outcome assessment of patients undergoingaxillofacial procedures for the treatment of sleep apnea: comparison

f subjective and objective results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62:64-168Prinsell JR. “Maxillomandibular advancement surgery in site-specific

reatment approach for obstructive sleep apnea 50 consecutive pa-ients. Chest. 1999;116:1519-1524

OSTER 37valuation of the Nasal Airway andeptum Before and After Le Fort Isteotomy

akesh Shah, MD, DMD, Birmingham, AL (Waite P)

Statement of the Problem: Little research has beenone to examine the nasal septum after separation fromhe maxillary crest during Le Fort I procedures. Disrup-ion of the interface between the nasal septum and theaxillary crest can permanently change the nasal anat-

my. The changes in the nasal airway could potentiallyause ozena, nasal crusting, perforation, or septal devia-ion. The project was designed to evaluate changes ofhe nasal airway before and after Le Fort I osteotomy foraxillomandibular advancement in patients with ob-

tructive sleep apnea. a

0

Materials and Methods: Nasopharyngoscopy is rou-inely used to examine the airway before and approxi-ately 4-6 weeks after maxillomandibular advancement.

hotographs are taken to document changes in the nasalirway. The photographs of 8 patients status post max-llary and mandibular advancement were used to evalu-te the nasal airway for ozena, nasal crusting, perfora-ion, and septal deviation.

Method of Data Analysis: A nasopharyngoscopyorm was created to evaluate the nasal airway and sep-um for ozena, nasal crusting, perforation, and septaleviation. Nasopharyngoscopy photographs for 8 casesere reviewed and preoperative and postoperative

orms were completed.Results: The mean age of patients is 54 years with a

ange of 35-74 years. The mean time to post-operativeasopharyngoscopy was 40 days with a range of 27-50ays. At post-operative nasopharyngoscopy, 25% of pa-ients had nasal crusting and 62.5% of patients had aeptal perforation; 83.3% of patients with septal devia-ion prior to surgery were corrected during surgery. Noatients demonstrated post-operative ozena.Conclusion: A greater incidence of change in the

asal airway was shown than previously anticipated. Aubstantial change in the nasal airway was not expected,et this limited study shows otherwise. Further researchs necessary to determine whether the demonstratedeptal perforations will close and whether the nasalrusting will resolve.

References

Lehotay, Göde U, Wigand ME, Neukam FW. Nasal airway changes M.rbe, M. after Le Fort I—impaction and advancement: anatomical andunctional findings. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30:123–129

Smith K, Heggie A. Vomero-sphenoidal disarticulation during the Leort I maxillary osteotomy. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.995;53:465-467

OSTER 38urvey of General Dentist and Oral andaxillofacial Surgeon Warfarin Protocol

or Tooth Extractionsyan D. Morris, DDS, Iowa City, IA (Morris R; Synan; Morgan T; Zeitler D; Qian F; Damiano P)

Statement of the Problem: Perioperative bleedingisk must be weighed against the risks of thromboem-olic events when warfarin anticoagulant therapy dis-ontinuation is considered. Dentists and dental special-sts may not be aware of the protocols recommended byurrent literature that discourage discontinuation of war-arin prior to dental treatment as patients may be placed

t unnecessary medical risk.

AAOMS • 2009