34
Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far? Associate Professor Lois Surgenor Psycho-oncology meeting, Christchurch 24 Sept 2012

Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

  • Upload
    zubin

  • View
    19

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Associate Professor Lois Surgenor. Psycho-oncology meeting, Christchurch 24 Sept 2012. Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?. Outline What is positive psychology? How is it applied in cancer? What is the evidence? Implications?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge

too far?

Associate Professor Lois Surgenor

Psycho-oncology meeting, Christchurch 24 Sept 2012

Page 2: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Outline

What is positive psychology?How is it applied in cancer?

What is the evidence?Implications?

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 3: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

History of positive psychologySeligman and Csikszentmihalyi (2000) take credit for the revolution, and coining term “Positive Psychology”

Though part of a wider movement, including the increased demand from people who are not severely psychologically unwell but want to increase their well-being.

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 4: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

History of positive psychology• Criticisms of conventional psychology as

“negative psychology”

(focusing on psychopathology)

• Focus on mental health has “developed a distorted view of what normal- and exceptional- human experience is like”

• “It is not enough to help those who suffer”

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 5: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

History of positive psychologyHistory goes back much further:

e.g., James “healthy mindedness” (1902)Maslow “hierarchy of needs” (1950s)Rogers “person-centred therapy” (1960s)

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 6: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

What is positive psychology?

Psychology traits that contribute:

•Subjective well-being•Hope and Optimism •Happiness and contentment•Self-determination

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 7: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

What is positive psychology?

Positive personality traits at an individual level:•capacity for love and vocation•courage•interpersonal skill•aesthetic sensibility•perseverance•forgiveness•originality•future mindedness•spirituality•high talent•wisdom

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 8: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Fighting Spirit

Cancer is a challenge, be optimistic, the cancer is controllable, take an active role in recovery, and attempt to live life as normal as possible.

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 9: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Post-traumatic growth

Experiencing improved relationships, increased inner strength, deepening spirituality from having undergone a traumatic or life-threatening experience.

People overly link (attribute) change to a traumatic experience

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 10: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Optimism – the generalised expectancies for desirable future outcomes

Carver et al., 2010

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 11: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Benefit-finding

Exactly what this is has not been clearly spelt out in the literature? positive illusory process (bias, selective recall)? positive self-narratives Benefit-finding researchers has not been able to consistency show that this is linked to adjustment

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 12: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Self-help books: the popular (commercial) arm of positive psychology

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 13: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Not to be reproduced without permission

“Can the Mind Cure Cancer? Several studies we have examined show that there is a definite correlation between emotional stress and the development of disease, including cancer. Likewise, we can conclude that a positive outlook, lowered anxiety and depression, a sense of control, and improved mood increase the survival times of cancer patients. There is solid evidence that stress and mood negatively affect the status of the immune system”

http://curezone.com/diseases/cancer/psychology.asp(downloaded 13.09.12)

Page 14: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

The lay expectation is that a diagnosis of cancer (and living with cancer) is distressing….and something should be done to ameliorate this distress.

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 15: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

“Received wisdom is what we know to be true, because it is said often enough (with enough gravitas by such senior people) that it would seem like heresy to think otherwise”

Waller, 2011

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 16: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Social pressure and a desire to find answers

“If it is not true, it ought to be”Coyne, 2010

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 17: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Reality checks

Studies claiming that psychological interventions improve immune functioning have been found to be seriously flawed in their conclusions

(See Coyne et al., 2010)

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 18: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Reality checks

It has not been demonstrated that psychotherapy promotes survival in people with cancer.

(the view that it does mainly rests on 2 studies [Fawzy et al., 1993; Spiegel et al, 1989] that have been found to be seriously flawed)

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 19: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Reality checks

How so?

Fawsy et al (1993) and follow-up (2003)Never intended to study survival…only decided to look at this later

Statistically under-powered for survival analysisNo intent to treat analysisProblems with data analysis

See Coyne et al., 2007

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 20: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Time to air our dirty laundry in public:

A famous historical example

Eysenck co-published a study ‘demonstrating’ that personality was related to smoking, and personality was related to lung cancer, and thus any direct relationship between smoking and lung cancer was illusionary.

When do you think this study was published?

1988Eysenck received £ 800,000 from American tobacco companies

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 21: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Reality checks

Straw man argument used:Positive psychology falsely depicts clinical psychology as not taking into account the positives (in assessment and interventions)

Clinical work is routinely assessing protective factors

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 22: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Reality checks

Much has been learned about the study of happiness through the study of depression

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 23: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Reality checks

The benefits of any emotional/psychological coping style are not linear.

No emotion is uniformly positive or negative

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 24: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Reality checks

Context is important: studies show that psychological traits such as forgiveness, optimism, hope etc can be beneficial or harmful depending on the context.

‘Negative emotions’ can be helpful: Anger can help avoid depression in some contexts

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 25: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Reality checks

Context is important: studies show that psychological traits such as forgiveness, optimism, hope etc can be beneficial or harmful depending on the context.

(optimism in a gambler is problematic; forgiveness in a victim of domestic violence may be dangerous)

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 26: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Reality checks

Context is important: studies show that psychological traits such as forgiveness, optimism, hope etc can be beneficial or harmful depending on the context.

Optimists are less likely to disengage from an unwinnable task and are more likely to overspread their resources (Norem & Chang, 2002)Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 27: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Criticisms

• “Saccharine terrorism”

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 28: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Criticisms

Distracts practitioners and public from what the hard science offers (and this has resultant implications for service provision decisions).

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 29: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Criticisms

Over-promise (of the effect of ineffectual approaches) risks public backlash generalising to other branches of psychology where there are well-validated interventions.

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 30: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Challenges

• How do we, as health workers, make the buyer beware?

• How do we utilise the coping mechanisms that patients bring but not collude with beliefs that are ill-founded?

Why is this such an uphill battle? Social psychology theory helps us out…

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 31: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

The goal has to be…

- applying specific psychological technologies for conditions where there is evidence that these technologies are effective

- early detection of clinically significant psychological problems and conditions

- avoiding a ‘waiting list’ situation for those who deemed to require treatment.

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 32: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Health science should not be a social movement, marketing, or a political manifesto

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 33: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Conclusion

A bridge too far, although the promises are tempting

Not to be reproduced without permission

Page 34: Positive psychology in cancer care: safe territory or a bridge too far?

Thank you for your attention

Dr Lois SurgenorAssociate Professor in Psychological MedicineAssociate Dean (Postgraduate Studies)University of Otago at Christchurch, PO Box 4345 Christchurch 8140New Zealand Tel 64 3 3720400 Fax 64 3 3720407