Posiquit vs People

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/16/2019 Posiquit vs People

    1/2

    REYNALDO POSIQUIT @ "Chew", Petitioner, vs. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.G.R. No. 193943 !#!$% 1&, '(1'FACTS:

    • On the strength of a Search Warrant issued by RTC udge !i""anueva of #igao City,

    the co$bined forces of A"bay Po"ice Provincia" O%ce, #iban Po"ice Station, Po"angui

    Po"ice Station and P&'A conducted a search on the house of esus Saunar in(arangay )ina"e, Po"angui, A"bay on Septe$ber *+, --.

    • (efore the search tea$ arrived, Reyna"do Posiuit, Saunar, Ricardo /orada and /y"a

    &e"a Cru0 1ere inside Saunar2s house engaged in an activity 1hich see$ed "i3e a potsession.

    • 4pon the arriva" of the search tea$2s vehic"es in front of Saunar2s house, Posiuit and

    the others sca$pered to1ards the bac3 of the ad5acent house. Whi"e atte$pting toescape, Posiuit thre1 his 1a""et a1ay. 6o1ever, $e$bers of the search tea$ caughtup 1ith Posiuit and, thereupon, recovered his 1a""et 1hich contained three s$a""p"astic sachets containing 1hite crysta""ine substances.

    • /ean1hi"e, the other $e$bers of the search tea$, after sho1ing the search 1arrant

    to Saunar and his 1ife, proceeded to conduct the search.

    •  The search yie"ded, a$ong others, three s$a"" p"astic sachets and one big p"astic bag

    containing 1hite crysta""ine substances and a stic3 of dried marijuana "eaves. Afterthe search 1as co$p"eted, the search tea$ prepared a receipt of the ite$s sei0ed1hich 1as signed by the $e$bers of the search tea$ and Saunar. Pictures of thesei0ed ite$s 1ere thereafter ta3en. The petitioner and Saunar 1ere then brought tothe po"ice station.

    •  The fo""o1ing day, SPO7 6er$inigi"do Caritos brought the sei0ed ite$s to the P8P9

    Regiona" Cri$e #aboratory at Ca$p Si$eon O"a, #egaspi City 1here it 1as ea$inedby Forensic Che$ist P;

  • 8/16/2019 Posiquit vs People

    2/2

    o Seo-, contrary to the tenor of the Posiuit2s argu$ent, the cri$e of 

    conspiracy to co$$it possession of dangerous drugs does not eist. Si$p"yput, the circu$stance of conspiracy is not appreciated in the cri$e of possession of dangerous drugs under Section **, Artic"e