Upload
rohit-mittal
View
36
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Project Report on A Study of Micro, Small and Medium ,Enterprise in India
Citation preview
1
Portfolio Management
Project Report on A Study of Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprise in India
Submitted To: Submitted By:
Dr. Raman Subramanian Rohit Gupta (FT-12-129)
Prof. Raju Majumdar
2
CONTENTS
Sr. No. Content Page No.
1 Introduction 3 2 Indian SME- Current Scenario 4 3 Economic Contribution of MSME 5 4 MSME Industry in India 6 5 MSME Growth Impacted by Multiple Constraints 7-8 6 Flow of Finance to MSME Sector 9 7 Demand of Finance in MSME Sector 10-12 8 Finance Gap in the MSME Sector 13
9 Enabling Environment for Growth of Finance to the MSME
Sector 14 10 MSME Current Outlook 15 11 Advantages of MSME 15 12 Government outlook on MSME 16 13 RBI View on MSME 17
14 Common Guidelines / Instructions for Lending to MSME
Sector by RBI 17-18 15 Future of MSME 19 16 Financial Infrastructure Support 20-21 17 Potential Interventions to Increase Access to MSME Finance 22 18 Other Intervention 23 19 Conclusion 24
3
Introduction
The MSME sector plays a significant role in the Indian economy. A catalyst for socio-economic
transformation of the country, the sector is critical in meeting the national objectives of generating
employment, reducing poverty, and discouraging rural-urban migration. These enterprises help to
build a thriving entrepreneurial eco-system, in addition to promoting the use of indigenous
technologies.
The term ‘MSME’ is widely used to describe small businesses in the private sector. Regulators
and financial institutions across the world use parameters such as employee strength, annual sales,
value of fixed assets, and loan size proxies to define the sector in the context of finance.
The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise Development Act 2006 (MSMED Act) of the
Government of India provides the definition of the MSME sector. An extension of the erstwhile
definition of Small Scale Industry (SSI), this classification uses the investment metric to define
MSMEs because investment in plant and machinery can be measured and verified. The MSMED
Act broadly segments the MSME sector in the following manner:
Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) are the backbone of economy and also drivers of
growth. With their inherent strength and resilience, SMEs weather adverse situations, and
emerge successfully in a competitive environment.
In order to sustain and grow, it is very important for the SMEs around the world not only to
deal with big corporate and Government companies but also to interact amongst themselves
to identify new business opportunities which are huge.
4
Indian MSME – Current Scenario
As per the All India Census of Micro, Small
and Medium Enterprises (MSME), there are
36.176 million Micro, small and medium
Enterprises employing 80 million people.
Out of the total MSME units, 10.33 million
units are in manufacturing sector comprising
28.56% while 25.84 million units belong to
service sector which is a staggering 71.44%.
They are the major creator of Employment,
creating 1.13 million jobs per annum.
As regards the contribution of MSME to the
Indian economy, 40% of exports and 45% of
industrial output are coming from this sector. Indian SME offer a variety of products and services
and are well equipped to cater to the needs of National, Regional and World Markets.
5
Economic Contribution of MSME
It is important to note that in addition to helping catalyze the growth of the economy, MSMEs feed
large local and international value chains as well as local consumer markets as suppliers,
manufacturers, contractors, distributors, retailers and service providers.
They account for a large share of industrial units, and contribute significantly to employment in
the country.
Growing at 11.5 percent a year, the MSME sector has been performing better than the overall GDP
(8 percent growth per annum) and overall industrial output (measured by Index of Industrial
Production-IIP). Current estimates of MSME contribution to GDP do not take into consideration
the contribution made by unorganized private enterprises, for which asset and sales data is not
tracked by government agencies.
MSMEs are also effective vehicles for employment
generation. India’s cities have been experiencing
the burden of a consistently growing population,
comprising an ever – increasing proportion of
migrants in search of employment and livelihood.
City infrastructure is already stretched, and policy
makers are seeking solutions to mitigate issues
arising from migrant population growth.
Rural MSMEs and those based outside of the large
cities, offer a viable alternative for employment to
local labor, hence presenting an opportunity for
people to participate in productive, non-farm
activities, without needing to migrate to urban areas.
6
MSME Industry in India
There are over 6000 products ranging from traditional to high-tech items, which are being
manufactured by the MSME sector in addition to provide wide range of services. The leading
industries with their respective shares are as depicted below:
Total number of enterprises in MSME Sector was estimated to be 361.76 lakh with total
employment of 805.24 lakh. The estimated numbers of enterprises and employment, as per Fourth
All India Census of MSME, have increased at an annual compound growth rate of 28.02% and
26.42% respectively as compared to third All India Census of SSI.
The ten leading States, in terms of enterprises, are Uttar Pradesh (44.03 lakh), West Bengal (36.64
lakh), Tamil Nadu (33.13 lakh), Maharashtra (30.63 lakh), Andhra Pradesh (25.96 lakh), Kerala
(22.13 lakh), Gujarat (21.78 lakh), Karnataka (20.19 lakh), Madhya Pradesh (19.33 lakh) and
Rajasthan (16.64 lakh).
The ten leading industries, in terms of enterprises, (as per National Industry Classification 2004 -
2 digit ) are Retail Trade except of Motor Vehicles and Motorcycles; Repair of Personal and
Household Goods (144.15 lakh), Manufacture of Wearing Apparel; Dressing and Dyeing of fur
(31.65 lakh), Manufacture of Food Products and Beverages (25.12 lakh), Other Service Activities
(22.43 lakh), Other Business Activities (13.64 lakh), Hotels and Restaurants(13.18 lakh), Sale,
Maintenance and Repair of Motor Vehicles and Motorcycles; Retail Sale of Automotive
Fuel(12.92 lakh), Manufacture of Furniture & Manufacturing not elsewhere classified (11.61
lakh), Manufacture of Fabricated Metal Products, except Machinery and Equipment (8.42 lakh),
Manufacture of Textiles (8.42 lakh).
7
MSME Growth impacted by Multiple Constraints
Although the MSME sector has been growing at a faster rate than the overall industrial sector,
MSMEs experience multiple constraints that threaten to derail the sector’s growth trajectory.
Inadequate market linkages: Except in the case of cluster-linked and ancillary MSMEs
that have natural linkages with large enterprises, MSMEs tend to have poor market access.
The non-cluster MSMEs are fragmented, and as a result, are unable to organize themselves
in order to reduce procurement cost from large enterprises or streamline the output supply
chain. What is worse, in the absence of adequate market linkages, any demand disruption
in the supply chain can severely impact operations because the enterprise capital of these
businesses tends to be locked in illiquid inventory and receivables.
Lack of infrastructure: Limited access to infrastructure such as power, water and roads
increases operational costs for MSMEs and makes their businesses uncompetitive.
Inadequate access to support infrastructure discourages these units from adopting newer
technologies, where available. In addition, poor infrastructure forces small and medium
businesses to operate in select geographies, increasing the demand for natural resources in
that region.
Inadequate finance: MSMEs consider challenges in access to finance as one of the biggest
constraints in growth. A study on the MSME sector also suggests that the multiple growth
constraints (like those mentioned above) can be largely linked to inadequate access to
finance. The Report of Working Group on Rehabilitation of Sick MSMEs by RBI also
finds lack of adequate and timely access to working capital finance is one of the key reasons
for sickness in the sector.
8
Lack of managerial competence: Micro and small enterprises in particular largely
comprise first-generation entrepreneurs, who have had a limited structured training on
resource planning, capital management and labor management. As a result, lack of
managerial competence often shows in poor book-keeping and a limited knowledge of
formal financial institutions, which further inhibits the growth of these enterprises.
Obsolete technology: While industries such as automotive, forging, software development
sector require advanced technologies in operations, the majority of the small and medium
enterprises do not have that kind of technological edge. A low technology base results in
low productivity, which makes these enterprises uncompetitive. Financial institutions
associate lack of technology with uncompetitive businesses and therefore are wary of
financing enterprises which are not technologically up-to-date in operations. These
enterprises too have limited awareness about new technologies, or the technology financing
schemes.
The 2007 MSME Census indicated that only 5 percent of enterprises in the sector had access to
some form of formal finance, while over 92 percent of the units lacked access to any form of
institutional finance. Studies on financing pattern in the sector and the MSME census suggest that
MSMEs prefer self-financing, which not just includes the savings of the entrepreneurs, but also
the finance availed from friends, family and relatives.
However, the situation has been changing in recent years. As a result of greater focus on the MSME
segment by the government and the regulator as well as by the financial sector, institutional finance
to MSMEs has increased considerably. Building on the 2010 data from the Reserve Bank of India
(RBI), the study estimates that financial institutions serve, to some extent or the other, nearly (33
percent) of the enterprises. However, despite the improved access, many micro and small
enterprises remain unserved and underserved.
Policymakers in India have always retained a focus on MSME finance, as indicated by the Priority
Sector Lending (PSL) norms for commercial banks that were established, and have been in place,
for several decades now. Establishing programs such as the Credit Guarantee Trust in recent times
has given a renewed thrust to that objective. However, despite the policy efforts and a clearly more
responsive formal financial sector, the MSME sector continues to face a financing gap due to
inherent demand and supply-side constraints.
9
Flow of Finance to the MSME Sector
The overall finance demand of INR 32.5 trillion ($650 billion), 78 percent, or INR 25.5 trillion
($510 billion) is either self-financed or from informal sources.
Formal sources cater to only 22 percent or INR 7 trillion ($140 billion) of the total MSME debt
financing. Within the formal financial sector, banks account for nearly 85 percent of debt supply
to the MSME sector, with Scheduled Commercial Banks comprising INR 5.9 Trillion (USD 118
Billion). Non-Banking Finance Companies and smaller banks such as Regional Rural Banks
(RRBs), Urban Cooperative Banks (UCBs) and government financial institutions (including State
Financial Corporation and State Industrial Development Corporations) constitute the rest of the
formal MSME debt flow.
Within the informal financial sector non-institutional sources include family, friends, and family
business, while institutional sources comprise moneylenders and chit funds.
Formal sources of finance, i.e. banks and non-banking institutions, account for INR 6.97 trillion
($139.4 billion) of the overall formal finance supply, and commercial banks are the largest formal
sources of finance, primarily providing debt capital to the MSMEs.
It estimates that the supply of formal equity to the sector is INR 0.03 trillion ($0.6 billion).
It estimates that informal sources account for an estimated INR 24.4 trillion ($488 billion) in
finance to the sector. Informal sources include both institutional sources such as moneylenders and
chit funds, and non-institutional sources such as family, friends, and family business
In addition, entrepreneurs also leverage personal resources and contribute equity to the enterprise.
Self-equity contributions are estimated to account for INR 1.1 trillion ($22 billion) of finance flow
into the sector.
10
Demand of Finance in the MSME Sector
There is a total finance requirement of INR 32.5 trillion ($650 billion) in the MSME sector, which
comprises of INR 26 trillion ($ 520 Billion) of debt demand and INR 6.5 trillion ($130 Billion) of
equity demand. To estimate the debt demand that Financial Institutions would consider financing
in the near term, it does not take into account the demand from the enterprises that are either not
considered commercially viable by formal financial institutions, or those enterprises that
voluntarily exclude themselves from formal financial services.
Thus, after excluding (a) sick enterprises, (b) new enterprises (those with less than a year in
operation), (c) enterprises rejected by financial institutions (d) micro enterprises that prefer finance
from the informal sector, the viable and addressable debt demand is estimated to be INR 9.9 trillion
($198 billion), which is 38 percent of the total debt demand.
The viable and addressable equity demand is estimated to be INR 0.67 trillion ($13.4 billion), after
excluding:
(a) Entrepreneurs’ equity contribution to enterprises estimated at INR 4.6 trillion ($92 billion) and,
(b) Equity demand from micro and small enterprises that are structured as proprietorship or
partnership, and are unable to absorb equity from external sources. The second is estimated to be
worth INR 1.23 trillion ($24.6 billion).
Debt Demand
Financial institutions have traditionally limited their exposure to the sector due to the
perception that these businesses carry high risk and high cost of delivery, and have limited
access to immovable collateral. Although the overall debt demand in the sector is estimated
to be INR 26 trillion ($520 billion), not all of it can be met immediately by the formal
financial sector due to several reasons. To estimate the viable debt demand that can be
addressed by financial institutions, the study does not take into account the demand from
the enterprises that are either considered unviable in the near term, or those that voluntarily
exclude themselves from formal financial services. Given Figure provides these exclusions
and their share of the total debt demand.
11
It is clear from the above that almost 38 percent of the overall debt demand is not viable
and addressable as it comprises enterprises that are sick, or with limited operational history,
or suffer from poor financial health.
A large number of micro services enterprises such as small retail trade and repair shops
account for 25 percent of the debt demand. These enterprises prefer informal sources to the
formal financial institutions due to the ease of access, speed of disbursal and need for
negligible documentation. Additionally, the urgency of demand for finance often outscores
the cost differential between the two sources.
Based on the above exclusions, it is estimated that of the total debt demand of INR 26
trillion ($520 billion), at least 38 percent or INR 9.9 trillion ($198 billion) is the size of the
viable demand that can be addressed by the formal financial sector in the near term.
Nearly 90 percent of the total viable and addressable debt demand (approximately INR 8.9 trillion
or $178 billion) is from unregistered enterprises, and the balance demand of INR 1 trillion ($20
billion) is from registered MSMEs. What is interesting though is that registration of enterprises in
no way impacts the access to finance from formal financial institutions.
Equity Demand
The overall equity demand in the sector is estimated to be INR 6.5 trillion ($130 billion),
with short-term equity requirement accounting for INR 4 trillion ($80 billion), and long-
term equity making up a demand of INR 2.5 trillion ($50 billion).
Analysis of financing patterns in the MSME sector suggests that enterprises use internal
accruals and informal sources to finance the short-term equity demand (INR 4 trillion; $80
billion) and 25 percent of the long-term equity demand (INR 0.6 trillion or $12 billion)[52].
Excluding entrepreneurs’ equity contribution (internal accruals and informal sources), the
equity demand from external sources is estimated to be INR 1.9 trillion ($38 billion).
12
However, all the equity demand may not be viable and addressable as 95.7 percent of
enterprises are structured as either proprietorships or partnerships that are not amenable to
external equity infusion. In the estimation, all the micro enterprises and a section of small
enterprises are assumed to be structured as either proprietorships or partnerships.
Excluding the equity demand totaling INR 1.23 trillion ($24.6 billion) from proprietorship
and partnership enterprises, the viable and addressable equity demand is estimated to be
INR 0.67 trillion ($13.4 billion).
13
Finance Gap in the MSME Sector
Despite the increase in financing to MSMEs in recent years, there is still a considerable
institutional finance gap of INR 20.9[9] trillion ($418 billion). After exclusions in the debt demand
(62 percent of the overall demand) and the equity demand (from MSMEs that are structured as
proprietorship or partnership), there is still a demand-supply gap of INR 3.57 trillion ($ 71.4
billion), which formal financial institutions can viably finance in the near term. This is the demand-
supply gap for approximately 11.3 million enterprises. While a large number of these already
receive some form of formal finance, they are significantly underserved with only 40-70 percent
of their demand currently being met. With appropriate policy interventions and support to the
MSME sector, a considerable part of the currently excluded demand can be made financially viable
for the formal financial sector. Of the viable and addressable demand-supply gap, the debt gap is
INR 2.93 trillion ($58.6 billion) and the equity gap is INR 0.64 trillion ($12.8 billion).
The micro, small, and medium enterprise segments respectively account for INR 2.25 trillion ($45
billion), INR 0.5 trillion ($10 billion) and INR 0.18 trillion ($3.6 billion), of the debt gap that is
viable and can be addressed by financial institutions in the near term.
Micro and small enterprises together account for 97 percent of the viable debt gap and can be
addressed by financial institutions in the near term. Available data and primary interviews indicate
that medium enterprises in India are relatively well financed.
The equity gap in the sector is a combined result of demand-side challenges such as the legal
structures of enterprises, as well as supply-side gaps, such as a lack of investment funds focused
on MSMEs. The equity requirements for the MSME sector are concentrated in the growth-stage
enterprises (~70 percent).
14
Enabling Environment for Growth of Finance to the MSME Sector
Growth of MSMEs needs to be reinforced by holistic fiscal support and enabling policies.
Similarly, improving the policy framework and incentivizing financial institutions to innovate can
increase the penetration of formal financial services to the MSME sector.
There have been significant efforts to strengthen the enabling environment for MSMEs, which
have had a positive impact on the sector as a whole. However, challenges in formulating and
implementing effective policy continue to impede the growth of MSMEs and MSME finance.
There are several reports that address the overall policy environment for the MSME sector. For
the purposes of this study, analysis has been restricted to policy and enabling environment as it
relates to MSME finance specifically.
The three main pillars of the enabling environment that the study has analyzed are:
(a) Legal and regulatory framework
(b) Government support
(c) Financial infrastructure support.
15
MSME Current Outlook
A dynamic global economic scenario has thrown up various opportunities and challenges to the
MSME sector in India. On the one hand, numerous opportunities have opened up for this sector to
enhance productivity and look at new national and international markets. On the other hand, these
opportunities compel the MSMEs to upgrade their competences to contend with competition since
obsolescence is rapid with new products being launched at an incredible pace and are available
worldwide in a short time.
Key Challenges faced by the MSME Sector:
• Lack of availability of adequate and timely credit
• High cost of credit
• Collateral requirements
• Limited access to equity capital
• Procurement of raw material at a competitive cost
• Problems of storage, designing, packaging and product display
• Lack of access to global markets
• Inadequate infrastructure facilities, including power, water, roads
• Low technology levels and lack of access to modern technology
• Lack of skilled manpower for manufacturing, services, marketing, etc
• Multiplicity of labour laws and complicated procedures associated with compliance of such laws
Despite the various challenges it has been facing, the MSME sector has shown admirable
innovation, adaptability and resilience to survive the recent economic downturn and recession.
Advantages of MSME
The Micro Small and Medium enterprises (MSMEs) have been accepted as the engine of economic
growth and play an important role in the equitable economic development of country.
The major advantage of the sector is its employment potential at low capital cost. The labour
intensity of the MSME sector is much higher than that of large enterprises. MSMEs constitute
more than 90% of total enterprises in most of the economies and are credited with generating the
highest rates of employment growth and account for a major share of industrial production and
exports. In India too, MSMEs play an essential role in the overall industrial economy of the
country. In recent years, the MSME sector has consistently registered higher growth rate compared
with the overall industrial sector. With its agility and dynamism, the sector has shown admirable
innovativeness and adaptability to survive the recent economic downturn and recession.
The MSME sector in India is highly heterogeneous in terms of the size of the enterprises, variety
of products and services, and levels of technology. The sector not only plays a critical role in
providing employment opportunities at comparatively lower capital cost than large industries but
also helps in industrialization of rural and backward areas, reducing regional imbalances and
assuring more equitable distribution of national income and wealth. MSMEs complement large
industries as ancillary units and contribute enormously to the socioeconomic development of the
country.
16
Government Outlook on MSME
Giving the benefits to the micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), government proposed
a number of measures including, non-tax benefits for three years to MSMEs, more funds to SIDBI
to support refinancing and factoring, extension of Technology Fund Scheme (TUFS) for textile
industry, fund of Rs. 2200 crore for tool-room and technology development and loan at 6 percent
interest rate for hand-loom weavers.
The government has taken several measures to solve the problems faced by micro, small and
medium enterprises and enable them to play an effective role in the country's economy. These
measures may be broadly classified into:
Protective Measures, which are designed to protect small scale industries from the
competition of large firms.
Promotional Measures, which have been undertaken to promote the growth of the small
scale sector in the country.
Institutional Measures, which have been taken by the government in the form of setting up
of several institutions or agencies to provide liberal and manifold assistance to small scale
industries.
Recently, major initiatives have been taken by the government to revitalize the MSME sector.
They include:
Implementation of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED)
Act, 2006.
A "Package for Promotion of Micro and Small Enterprises" was announced in February
2007. This includes measures addressing concerns of credit, fiscal support, cluster-based
development, infrastructure, technology, and marketing.
To make the Credit Guarantee Scheme more attractive, the following modifications have
been made: (a) enhancing eligible loan limit from Rs. 25 lakh to Rs. 50 lakh; (b) raising
the extent of guarantee cover from 75 per cent to 80 per cent for (1) micro enterprises for
loans up to Rs. 5 lakh, (2) MSEs operated or owned by women and (3) all loans in the
North-East Region; and (c) reducing one-time guarantee fee from 1.5 per cent to 0.75 per
cent for all loans in the North-East Region.
The phased deletion of products from the list of items reserved for exclusive manufacture
by micro and small enterprises is being continued. 125 items were de-reserved on March
13, 2007, reducing the number of items reserved for exclusive manufacture in micro and
small enterprise sector to 114. Further, 79 items were de-reserved on February 5, 2008, 14
items in October 2008, followed by a revision in July 2010. Click here to view the current
list of items reserved.
17
RBI view on MSME
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has advised banks to improve credit flow to micro, small and
medium Enterprises (MSMEs) with focus on entrepreneurs from minorities. Towards this, it has
directed banks to open more branches dedicated to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in
different micro, small enterprises clusters (MSE).
Banks have been advised to take appropriate measures to improve the credit flow to the identified
clusters of micro and small entrepreneurs from the minority communities residing in the minority
concentrated districts of the country.
Programs for the poor or micro-finance need to be inserted into the larger bank structure at the
same time retaining flexibility, operational independence and autonomy.
Banks need an appropriate financial methodology to work with efficiency. In order to increase
penny economy, they need suitable financial methodology to service the micro enterprise sector
and financial innovations that enable cost effective analysis of credit worthiness, monitoring of
relatively poor clients and acceptance of effective collateral substitutes. Also, the problems of
urban poverty can only be addressed by encouraging the small scale service and manufacturing
enterprises which generate employment.
Common Guidelines / Instructions for Lending to MSME Sector by RBI:
Scheme of Small Enterprises Financial Centre’s (SEFCs):
A scheme for strategic alliance between branches of banks and SIDBI located in clusters, named
as “Small Enterprises Financial Centre’s” has been formulated. SIDBI has so far executed MoU
with 15 banks so far.
Disposal of Applications
(a) All loan applications for MSE units up to a credit limit of Rs. 25,000/- should be disposed of
within 2 weeks and those up to Rs. 5 lakh within 4 weeks provided, the loan applications are
complete in all respects.
(b) Collateral - It is mandatory for the banks not to accept collateral security in the case of loans
upto Rs.10 lakh extended to units in the MSE sector. To extend collateral-free loans up to Rs. 10
lakh to all units financed under the Prime Minister Employment Generation Programme of KVIC.
Banks may, increase the limit of dispensation of collateral requirement for loans up to Rs.25 lakh.
(c) Composite loan - A composite loan limit of Rs.1 crore can be sanctioned by banks to enable
the MSE entrepreneurs to avail of their working capital and term loan requirement through Single
Window.
Specialized MSME branches:
Public sector banks have been advised to open at least one specialized branch in each district.
18
Delayed Payment:
After the enactment of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED), Act
2006, the existing provisions of the Interest on Delayed Payment Act, 1998 to Small Scale and
Ancillary Industrial Undertakings, have been strengthened.
Guidelines for rehabilitation of SSI (now MSE) units:
As per the definition, a unit is considered as sick when any of the borrowal account of the unit
remains substandard for more than 6 months or there is erosion in the net worth due to accumulated
cash losses to the extent of 50% of its net worth during the previous accounting year and the unit
has been in commercial production for at least two years. The criteria will enable banks to detect
sickness at an early stage and facilitate corrective action for revival of the unit. As per the
guidelines, the rehabilitation package should be fully implemented within six months from the date
the unit is declared as potentially viable/viable. During this six months period of identifying and
implementing rehabilitation package banks/FIs are required to do “holding operation” which will
allow the sick unit to draw funds from the cash credit account at least to the extent of deposit of
sale proceeds.
Debt Restructuring Mechanism for MSMEs:
For stepping up credit to small and medium enterprises, a debt restructuring mechanism for units
in MSME sector has been formulated.
(a) All non-corporate MSMEs irrespective of the level of dues to banks.
(b) All corporate MSMEs, which are enjoying banking facilities from a single bank, irrespective
of the level of dues to the bank.
(c) All corporate MSMEs, which have funded and non-funded outstanding up to Rs.10 crore under
multiple/ consortium banking arrangement.
(d) Accounts involving willful default, fraud and malfeasance will not be eligible for restructuring
under these guidelines.
Cluster Approach:
Clusters of the state have been identified by the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises,
Government of India for focused development of Small Enterprises.
Major Instructions issued to Public Sector banks subsequent to the policy announcements:
(a) The banks were advised to fix their own targets for funding SMEs in order to achieve a
minimum 20% year on year growth in credit to SMEs.
(b) The banks were advised to follow a transparent rating system with cost of credit being linked
to the credit rating of the enterprise.
(c) All banks, may make concerted efforts to provide credit cover on an average to at least 5 new
small/ medium enterprises at each of their semi-urban/ urban branches per year.
(d) The banks may ensure specialized MSME branches in identified clusters/ center’s with
preponderance of small Enterprises to enable the entrepreneurs to have easy access to the bank
credit.
19
Future of MSME
We know that small-scale industries were the dream of our father of nation Mahatma Gandhi. He
has supported the growth of small-scale industries in India, because he had the vision that it will
help the poor people of India to come up. “Small is beautiful” - E. F. Schumachar, Economist,
(1911-1977).
MSMEs sector has consistently registered a higher growth rate than the rest of the industrial
sectors. There are over 6000 products ranging from traditional to high-tech items, which are being
manufactured by the MSMEs. In India, after agriculture, the MSMEs sector provides the maximum
opportunities for both self-employment and jobs in the country. The MSMEs sector in India holds
great potential for further expansion and growth in the future. In fact, the employment potential of
the sector is un-matched by any other sector of the economy.
CRISIL conducted a study on the funding patterns of 2000 Small and Medium Enterprises revealed
that there is an opportunity for banks to increase their funding to SMEs to Rs 500 billion.
Strengthening of infrastructure in rural India will help SME sector to record sustainable growth.
On 5th November 2012 Tata Steel unveiled a new brand of its hot rolled products called “Tata
Austrum” to meet demands in small and medium enterprises (SMEs). In 2013-14 Tata Steel targets
nearly Rs 4000 crore revenue from the segment.
Although the future may look promising due to manufacturing flexibility, abundance of raw
materials and cheap labour, there are many problems that need to be addressed as the sector is still
in its incubatory stage of growth. The sector is highly fragmented and is suffering from
technological obsolescence and high cost of raw materials. The sector is threatened by stiff
competition from developing economy and pricing pressure posed due to locational disadvantage.
The emerging economy of India will help SME sector to grow due to end of quota regime and
increasing disposable income. The credit policy of financing institutions like Oriental Bank of
Commerce and SIDBI (Small Industries Development Bank of India) should be eased. In strategic
association with SME Rating Agency of India Ltd (SMERA) has conceptualized a series of
publications targeted to Emerging SMEs of India. The help from corporate such as
moneycontrol.com (SME Mentor) and Dun and Bradstreet should inspire other corporates to
contribute. Due to recent government initiatives by the Indian Government, many SMEs are
planning to go international next year and future certain looks bright for the sector.
20
Financial Infrastructure Support
In order to expand formal finance in the MSME sector, financial institutions require the support
of a financial support infrastructure, including credit bureau, collateral registry, platform to settle
nonperforming assets and platforms to raise equity. While both financial institutions and the
government have undertaken several finance-support mechanisms, most of these interventions are
in their infancy and have significant potential to scale up.
Credit Bureau
• Studies in developed countries suggest that there is a strong correlation between the presence of
Credit Bureaus and the penetration of formal finance in an economy. The enactment of the CIC
Act has facilitated the formation of credit bureaus in India.
• The Credit Information Bureau (India) Limited (CIBIL) is the leading credit information
company in the country. CIBIL’s database of credit information is based on the principle of
reciprocity, i.e. only members who submit data to the database can access information. Currently,
146 credit guarantors, including 77 commercial banks (out of 169 commercial banks), are member
of the bureau.
• CIBIL is segregated into two distinct bureaus: consumer and commercial. The consumer bureau
tracks the individual finance data, while the commercial bureau tracks the finance data of
enterprises. The other credit bureaus in the country are still relatively nascent.
Collateral Registry
• As a large share of current debt financing tends to be secured, access to information on collateral
ownership, pledge history and seniority of charge in case of default minimizes the occurrences of
adverse selection for financial institutions. The current asset registration regime is governed by
multiple laws and regulations based on the type of the enterprise or the asset type. Some examples
of registration regime include: The Companies Act 1956, The Registration Act 1908, Motor
Vehicles Act 1988, The Patents Act 1970, and The Depositories Act 1996.
• The Ministry of Finance has spearheaded the establishment of a Centralized Collateral Registry
for India, currently placed within the National Housing Bank (NHB). The Central Registry of
Securitization Asset Reconstruction and Security Interest of India has been established under the
provisions of the SARFAESI Act. Alongside, the RBI mandated in March 2011 that all financial
institutions covered by the SARFAESI Act would be required to register any mortgages with
CERSAI. Although CERSAI was focused on mortgages when established, its scope is now being
broadened with the passing of the new Factoring Law. The registry will be expanded to include
receivables as well.
Asset Reconstruction Company
• SIDBI has promoted the India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Limited (ISARC) to assist
commercial banks in managing liquidation of non-performing assets. As non-performing assets
management can be cumbersome, commercial banks seek the support of special entities such as
21
the asset reconstruction companies to facilitate this process. This initiative is in partnership with
12 public sector banks, three state financial corporations, the Life Insurance Corporation of India
and APITCO Limited.
• The objective of ISARC-like initiatives is to minimize the cost of managing non-performing
assets. ISARC plans to acquire, manage and recover illiquid or non-performing portfolios of
scheduled commercial banks and financial institutions.
SME Stock Exchange
In order to facilitate the flow of equity capital to the small and medium enterprises, and offer
potential investors a platform for exit, the government and the Securities and Exchange Board of
India (SEBI) proposed the formation of the SME Stock Exchange. Currently, two mainstream
stock exchanges – the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and the National Stock Exchange (NSE) –
have started SME stock exchanges in India. Both the exchanges expect at least ten small and
medium enterprises to list over a period of twelve months.
22
Potential Interventions to Increase Access to MSME Finance
Formal financing to the MSME sector has multiple constraints on both the demand and the supply
side. Among the multiple challenges that the sector experiences there are a few common factors
such as:
(a) Inadequate capacity – building support for enterprises
(b) Financial asymmetry, or inadequate information infrastructure support
(c) Gaps in the legal and regulatory framework and,
(d) Conservative mindset of the financial institutions (particularly the large financial institutions).
While policymakers are taking numerous steps to mitigate constraints experienced by MSMEs,
this study proposes interventions that could reinforce some of these measures for reducing the
financing gap in the sector. The proposed policy and institutional interventions address the
following domains:
23
Other Interventions
Other areas where finance flow to the MSME sector could be increased include:
Sales Turnover
The current definition in the MSMED Act uses enterprise investment in plant and machinery to
segment the market into micro, small and medium enterprise segments. The MSMED Act adopted
the current definition with the objective of having a segmentation parameter that is both verifiable
and consistent with earlier regulations.
Financial institutions tend to adopt internal definitions such as enterprise sales turnover, as the
MSMED Act definition provides limited information on the finance absorption capacity of
enterprises. Also, the current government data on sector does not track sales revenues, making it
difficult for financial institutions to use the data for any strategic purposes.
To address this issue, the Ministry of MSME could consider gradual expansion of the MSME
definition by including other globally accepted parameters such as sales turnover. This would
increase the information available about the enterprise and allow for consistency with internal
definitions of the financial institutions to some extent.
Non-MFI NBFCs under the CGTMSE scheme to incentivize unsecured finance
A dominant share (~80 percent) of the portfolio of non-microfinance NBFCs that have limited
access to collateral is unsecured. Such NBFCs need regulatory incentives, such as refinancing or
credit insurance, to continue supporting MSME enterprises.
Financial stakeholders, including regulators and industry bodies should evaluate the potential and
feasibility of NBFCs under the credit guarantee scheme, CGTMSE. Coverage under the credit
guarantee could allow MSME-focused NBFCs to access additional debt funds from large financial
institutions. A similar cover can be extended to RRBs, UCBs and revitalized SFCs (in case they
are restructured as NBFCs).
Promote intermediary entities to provide advisory support to enterprises during
rehabilitation
Enterprises in the sector have limited external support during sickness and rehabilitation. An
external independent intermediary could be established to provide advisory support to enterprises
in negotiating with financial and statutory stakeholders. The entity could offer services such as
debt consolidation and restructuring of package terms and customized financial support. Financial
institutions could also use the intermediary’s services to assess the viability of sick enterprises and
to design rehabilitation packages.
24
CONCLUSION
MSMEs, as a major contributor towards growth of domestic economy and employment generation,
should get adequate support in terms of policy framework, incentives and other relevant aids. Steps
like providing infrastructural facilities, developing various industrial parks and technology
incubators under MSME cluster development programmes, creating networks of organizations that
help provide training to skilled workforce to improve productivity, encourage entrepreneurship
and competency in management, funding R&D investments, technology advancement may work
for the betterment of the sector. The supply of formal finance to the MSME sector is constrained
by multiple challenges on both the supply and demand sides. The demand-side is constrained by
factors such as limited access to collateral that directly impact access to finance, as well as factors
such as limited capacity of the entrepreneurs that indirectly impact access to finance. The supply-
side is constrained by internal institutional challenges such as limited branch outreach and external
operating environment challenges such as changes in macroeconomic scenario. Although, Indian
MSMEs are finding it difficult to sell their products in the domestic and international markets
because of increasing competition. To make their products globally competitive, Indian MSMEs
need to up-grade their technology and put more emphasis on innovation.