Porter County Bridge No. 110

Porter County Bridge No. 110 Engineering Assessment Report

Bridge File Number:

Porter County Bridge Number 110

Bridge NBI Number: 640071

Route Identification & Feature Crossed:

CR 600E over Crooked Creek

Project Location: CR 600E, 0.70 Mile N of CR 200N

Prepared By: USI Consultants, Inc.

November 2019

Porter County Bridge No. 110 NBI No.: 6400071

P a g e | 1

DATA FOR ITAP APPLICATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION Replacement of Porter County Bridge #110 carrying County Road 600E over Crooked Creek to meet current INDOT and FHWA standards due to deteriorated condition of existing structure and load rating/posting of 16 Tons.

PURPOSE FOR THE PROJECT To replace this approximately 50-year-old bridge with a poor superstructure in order to achieve condition ratings of “7” or greater on all bridge elements. The need for this bridge replacement is due to the existing side-by side prestressed box beams that have spalls, seepage, cracks and exposed, rusting prestressing strands, with several that are broken already. Box beams in this state of disrepair rapidly deteriorate and expected life is not more than a few years at best. In addition, the substructure concrete abutments are also showing signs of age, with minor cracks, wearing of the concrete and rust holes in the steel sheet piling that was left in place around the abutments when they were originally constructed. Waterway adequacy of the bridge appears adequate, as the bridge spans the main channel of this creek, which is well defined and maintained in this rural farming area. The structural deficiencies will continue to worsen rapidly over the next few years and replacement in 2025 will become increasingly needed to ensure continued use without the need to lower the load limit even further on this bridge.

PLANNING SUPPORT Replacement of bridge #110 aligns with the bridge asset management plan of Porter County, NBIS SI&A recommendations, and INDOT bridge funding letter of October 8, 2019.

SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS Replacement of the structure will improve the condition of the bridge, which will ensure continued safe use for the travelling public and the new structure will include upgrades to current safety features such as bridge and approach railing, as well as superelevation rate of the roadway cross section, which is likely substandard at this time.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMPACT For most bridges, even those in rural locations like Bridge #110, there is an economic benefit linked to maintaining them in good condition and assuring they provide efficient and safe routes of travel, even on rural local routes such as this bridge site. Residential, commercial, agricultural, school, and emergency vehicle traffic all gain economically by maintaining efficient routes and keeping bridges open.

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Porter County is systematically rehabilitating and replacing bridges in a budget conscious manner. Each funding request is prioritized and submitted with thorough consideration of the entire bridge inventory and overall county infrastructure.


P a g e | 2

EXISTING STRUCTURE DATA AND CONDITIONS ITEM VALUE/DESCRIPTION NBI # 6400071 Feature Crossed by Bridge Crooked Creek Feature Carried CR 600 E Project Location (Lat, Long) Latitude: 41.47565, Longitude: -86.9498 Functional Class Rural Local INDOT District LaPorte Sub District LaPorte Year Built 1971 Year Reconstructed N/A Rural/Urban Population Rural US Congressional District Peter Visclosky - Indiana 1st Superstructure Type Adjacent non-composite Prestressed Concrete Box Beams with Asphalt Overlay Substructure Type Concrete Abutments Deck Type None Wearing Surface Type Bituminous Bridge Width 24.4 ft O-O Deck, 23.7’ Clear Roadway Bridge Length 46.5 ft # of Spans 1 Skew 0 degrees Posted Weight Limit 16 tons Posted Speed (MPH) 35 MPH Current Number of Lanes 2 Current Roadway Width (feet) 20.0 ft AADT 80 ADTT 0 Year of Latest Count 2018 Substructure Condition Rating 6 – Satisfactory Superstructure Condition Rating 4 - Poor Deck Condition Rating 4 - Poor Wearing Surface Condition Rating 5 - Fair Sufficiency Rating 51.7 Scour Critical Rating 7 – Countermeasures installed to correct scour problem

Porter County Bridge #110, a single-span, adjacent prestressed concrete box beam bridge, carries County Road 600E over Crooked Creek in east central Porter County, Indiana, just east of the City of Valparaiso. Originally built in 1971, the bridge is approximately 46.5’ long with a 23.7’ clear roadway across the structure. The structure is built square to a channel that is skewed about 20 degrees in relation to the bridge centerline, thus the bridge abutments do not align well with the channel flow. There is a bituminous wearing surface on top of the concrete box beams, without a waterproofing membrane, which has allowed water and road salts to infiltrate the beams causing advanced deterioration. Large spalls exist, with exposed and rusted prestressing strands. Several of the exposed strands are rusted through and are no longer acting as part of the beams support. These severed strands have caused the load rating on this structure to be reduced to 16 Tons. The bridge has side-mounted steel W-beam rail that is not to current design standards. The substructures consist of full depth concrete abutments that may be from the previous bridge at this site, as these abutments have steel sheeting driven around them with concrete pumped between the sheeting and the existing abutments, which may indicate these older abutments had scour issues prior to the reconstruction. The steel sheeting is severely rusted with numerous rust thru holes. The Superstructure is currently rated 4, Poor Condition.


P a g e | 3

At the project location, County Road 600 East has an estimated 2018 AADT of only 80 VPD, with no known truck traffic according to the latest NBIS report, except during planting and harvest seasons. However, this area will become increasingly utilized as it is located within a few miles of the growing city of Valparaiso.

No reinforced concrete bridge approach slabs are present. Approach pavement appears to be chip and seal, with extensive alligator cracking and minor potholes. Off the bridge, the approach shoulders are grass and in fair condition. There is a very short amount of approach guardrail with buried end sections off the ends of the bridge, with a very short run of curved w-beam rail at the northwest corner where a field entrance exists immediately off the end of the bridge. There is also a field entrance located approximately 75’ off the southeast corner of the bridge.

Current bridge condition ratings vary from Poor to Satisfactory per the May 2019 NBIS report. The following items have been identified:

1) Wearing Surface – 5 – Fair – 2” bituminous chip and seal with transverse and longitudinal cracks at the beam lines and ends 2) Superstructure – 4 – Poor– 21” Side-by-Side Prestressed Concrete Box Beams – Beam spalled, Cracked, w/ exposed and rusted thru

prestressing strands in several locations 3) Substructure – 6 – Satisfactory – Concrete Abutments - minor cracks and a few spalls; Steel sheet piling around the concrete toewall

has rust thru holes and undermining of the concrete toewall that was installed at some point to protect the concrete abutments 4) Channel – Abutments skewed about 20 degrees to the flow centerline; the channel is reported as having a sand and gravel bottom 5) Approach Roadway Alignment – Alignment is good for 35 mph design/posted speed limit, structure is in a horizontal curve with fairly

level vertical alignment; Approach pavement is in poor condition

Photos of the existing structure and a copy of the latest NBIS inspection report are also located in the Appendix.


P a g e | 4

PROPOSED SCOPE NARRATIVE

The proposed replacement (3R) includes removal of the existing bridge structure and construction of the new replacement bridge. The existing horizontal alignment is anticipated to stay the same, as the horizontal curve meets design standards for a 35-mph design speed, which the posted speed limit on CR 600 E. The existing curve radius is approximately 575’, which is above the 553’ minimum radius required for a 35 mph horizontal curve at superelevation rate (e) equal to 6.8%, per the Indiana Design Manual Figure 43-3A(3), Minimum Radius for Design Superelevation Rate emax = 8.0%. It is noted the horizontal curve north of the project location does not satisfy the minimum radius or superelevation rate requirements presented in the IDM. The need for design exceptions for superelevation rate transitions is anticipated. The proposed structure is estimated herein to consist of an approximate 80’ single-span bridge. This is an estimate based on the existing structure length extended with 2:1 spill-thru slopes at each end. This configuration allows for A bank-to-bank span of the proposed bridge with spill-thru slopes, skewed 20 degrees left to align with the channel. This bridge opening will be refined and finalized as part of the hydraulic analysis and preliminary design, once funding is determined and the design process commences. The estimated bridge length will require a grade raise to accommodate the new span length. The existing bridge has a structure depth of approximately 2’, while the proposed structure will have an approximate structure depth of 4’ to accommodate 36” prestressed concrete bulb-tee beams, an 8” composite concrete deck, and the new superelevation rate. Per available hydraulic data, the existing structure appears to have approximately 0.6’ of freeboard above the 100-year flood event. In order to increase the freeboard to at least 1’ of freeboard, while accommodating the structure depth increase, an approximate 2.5’ grade raise will be required at the bridge. This grade raise will mandate approach reconstruction for approximately 400’ in each direction from the bridge. The proposed typical roadway section will consist of two 10’-0” travel lanes with 4’-0” shoulders, thus providing a nominal bridge cross section minimum clear roadway width of 28’-0”. A clear roadway width of 24’ would meet the minimum Level One Criteria for a 35-mph rural local road, as defined in IDM Fig. 55-3D (Geometric Design Criteria for Rural Local Roads). However, due to the rural nature of this bridge site, it is recommended that a minimum roadway width of 28’ be utilized to allow additional clearance for wide farming equipment. Full closure with a detour during construction is recommended, with a limited road closure window of only 90-120 days. Full closure will help keep costs to a minimum, improve the safety of the construction zone and allow for the shortest possible project duration. The detour route proposed would include CR 200 N, west to CR 450 E north to State Road 2, then east on CR 400 N, adding approximately 2.6 miles to a thru trip. The preliminary engineering estimated herein would include approximately 1,100 lineal feet of survey coverage, consisting of the bridge area and 500’ north and south along the roadway. A route survey plat will be necessary due to needed right-of-way to complete the project. A geotechnical study will also be necessary to design the bridge foundations, approach embankments and pavement section, in accordance with INDOT requirements. Coordination with all overhead and underground utilities will be required to determine if they are in conflict with the proposed design, as more fully described in the Utilities section of this report. It is anticipated that the overhead electric and cable lines, along with the buried cable lines throughout the project length will require relocation to accommodate the proposed work.


P a g e | 5

*Beam size/type estimated, final size/type to be determined during design.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

ITEM ACTION DESCRIPTION/NOTES

Environmental Document Category

CE-2 The project limits dictate that a Categorical Exclusion Level 2 document will be required, due to the acquisition of more than 0.5 acres of right-of-way.

Section 106 MPPA-Category A Porter County Bridge #110 was built in 1971. The structure is not eligible to be listed on the National Registry. There were no historical properties located within 1 mile of the project area per the SHAARD map. The Minor Projects Programmatic Agreement-Section A should apply to this project due to the no affect to historical features.

Stream Impacts <300 LFT Stream impacts to Crooked Creek are anticipated to be less than 300’; therefore, no stream mitigation is anticipated. Crooked Creek is listed by IDEM as a 303 (d) impaired waterway for an impaired biotic community including PCB contamination found on fish tissue. No work within the waterway is anticipated, besides riprap placed on the spill through slopes.

Wetlands Impacts N/A Wetlands are not listed in the area according to the National Wetlands Inventory. Additionally, there were no wetland characteristics observed during the site visit conducted October 2019.

Section 7 No Effect According to the Indiana Natural Heritage Database no ETR species have been located within 0.5 miles of the project site. Section 7 consultation with USFWS will be completed during the completion of the Environmental Document and waterway permitting.

IDEM 401 RGP Required Crooked Creek is designated as a Waters of the United States. Consultation of Section 401 Water Quality Certification with the Indiana Department of Environmental Management will be required for any impacts below the Ordinary High-Water Mark (OHWM) of a Waters of the US.


P a g e | 6

USACE 404 RGP No. 1 Permit

Required Crooked Creek is designated as a Waters of the United States. Consultation of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act with the United States Army Corps of Engineers will be required for any impacts below the Ordinary High-Water Mark of a Waters of the US. The USACE will be the final ruling of the jurisdictional Waters of the US and any mitigation requirements to impacts to Waters of the US.

IDEM Rule 5 Permit Not Required The proposed project likely results in less than 1 acre of soil disturbance.

FAA Permit Required The FAA Notice Criteria Tool indicates the project does exceed the notice criteria per CFR Title 14 Part 77.9, therefore FAA permitting will be required.

IDNR CIF Permit Not Required Crooked Creek has a drainage area of 21.4 sq. miles at the project location per the USGS Stream Stats Report. The project is considered rural by the IDNR definition. Since the drainage area is less than 50 sq. miles, this rural setting that is more than 2 miles outside of the Valparaiso city limits will not require a Construction in a Floodway (CIF) permit with IDNR.

UTILITIES Utility Involvement Design Ticket Created: 10/25/19 Utilities on Ticket:

• Comcast – response received 10/28/19 stating no facilities • Frontier – response received 11/4/19 • Kankakee Valley REMC – response received 10/29/19

NPMS Check: No DOT pipeline facilities within the project area Google Drive Assessment Google drive is unavailable in this area. Information reflected below is from responses and pictures of the site.

• Electric – Kankakee Valley REMC maintains a three-phase aerial line on the south side of the roadway • Water – No water utilities were on the design ticket • Communications – Frontier communications maintains aerial facilities on the south side of the roadway • Gas – No gas utilities were on the design ticket • Sanitary – No sanitary utilities were on the design ticket • Pipelines – No pipeline utilities were on the design ticket.

Risks/Assumptions • Electric facilities will require relocation due to crossing over the structure at a diagonal. • Telephone facilities may require relocation for constructability purposes.

Recommendations • Early coordination will be required with Kankakee Valley to determine what options are available to de-energize, temporarily

relocate, or full relocation. Kankakee valley is eligible for reimbursement, therefore minimizing costly impacts should be evaluated

Estimated Costs (High Level) • Design costs – from research to letting, not including pre-con or construction – $10,000 • SUE costs – SUE is not recommended for this project • Relocation costs – Kankakee Valley REMC is eligible for reimbursement. Approximate relocation costs are $50,000. • NOTE: Full utility coordination will be required during the design process.


P a g e | 7

RIGHT OF WAY CONSIDERATIONS ITEM VALUE/DESCRIPTION Estimated Parcel Count 5 Estimated Taking Area > 0.50 AC Additional Comments See Property Owner Map in Appendix – Takes are likely from Parcels #2, #4, #5, #6 and #7

HYDRAULICS ITEM VALUE/DESCRIPTION (All elevations approximate from internet sources) BFE Elevation (NAVD88) 735.1 ft Q100 Elevation (NAVD 88) 734.4ft Freeboard Provided (ft) Approximately 0.6 ft Existing Roadway Elevation (NAVD88) 737 ft

CRASH DATA YEAR # of Fatalities/Injuries # of Property Damage 2016 0 0 2017 0 1 2018 0 0

PRELIMINARY OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS Phase Month/Year

for Phase TOTAL COST Federal Funds Local Funds

Preliminary Engineering 06/2020 $294,500.00

$235,600.00 $58,900.00 Right of Way (Services + LID) 06/2023 $65,125.00 $52,100.00 $13,025.00 Utility 06/2024 $50,000.00 $40,000.00 $10,000.00 Railroad N/A N/A N/A N/A Construction 01/2025 $1,051,100.00 $840,880.00 $210,220.00 Construction Inspection 01/2025 $158,000.00 $126,400.00 $31,600.00 TOTAL $1,618,725.00 $1,294,980.00 $323,745.00


A P P E N D I X

APPENDIX OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PORTER #110

A. LOCATION MAP B. PHOTOS

C. COST ESTIMATE

D. SI&A

E. UTILITY


A P P E N D I X

APPENDIX A: LOCATION MAP


A P P E N D I X

APPENDIX B: PHOTOS


A P P E N D I X

APPENDIX C: COST ESTIMATE

PORTER COUNTYBRIDGE #110

CR 600 EAST OVER CROOKED CREEKCONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE

NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT1 MITIGATION, WETLAND (IN-LIEU) 0.0 AC $95,000.0 -$ 2 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING {2%} 1.0 LS 15,200.00$ 15,200.00$ 3 MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION {5%} 1.0 LS 38,000.00$ 38,000.00$ 4 CLEARING RIGHT OF WAY {2%} 1.0 LS 15,200.00$ 15,200.00$ 5 EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1.0 LS 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 6 BORROW 1150.0 CYS 20.00$ 23,000.00$ 7 EXCAVATION, COMMON 490.0 CYS 40.00$ 19,600.00$ 8 SUBGRADE TREATMENT, TYPE 1C 2920.0 SYS 15.00$ 43,800.00$ 9 COMPACTED AGGREGATE NO. 53 230.0 TON 28.00$ 6,440.00$

10 QC/QA-HMA, 3, 64, SURFACE 9.5MM 240.0 TON 100.00$ 24,000.00$ 11 QC/QA-HMA, 2, 64, INTERMEDIATE 19.0MM 330.0 TON 80.00$ 26,400.00$ 12 QC/QA-HMA, 2, 64, BASE 19.0MM 870.0 TON 80.00$ 69,600.00$ 13 REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE APPROACH, 12 IN. 160.0 SYS 120.00$ 19,200.00$ 14 GEOTEXTILES 960.0 SYS 2.50$ 2,400.00$ 15 RIPRAP, REVETMENT 730.0 TON 60.00$ 43,800.00$ 16 PILE, STEEL PIPE, 0.312 IN., 14 IN. 700.0 LF 60.00$ 42,000.00$ 17 CONCRETE, A, SUBSTRUCTURE 27.8 CY 800.00$ 22,240.00$ 18 REINFORCING BARS, EPOXY COATED 44300.0 LBS 1.08$ 47,844.00$ 19 CONCRETE, C, SUPERSTRUCTURE 138.0 CY 850.00$ 117,300.00$ 20 CONCRETE BRIDGE RAILING TRANSITION, TPF-2 4.0 EACH 2,200.00$ 8,800.00$ 21 RAILING, STEEL PF-2 0.0 LF -$ -$ 22 RAILING, CONCRETE C 15.0 CY 1,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 23 STRUCTURAL MEMBER, PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BULB TEE, 36" 316.0 LF 400.00$ 126,400.00$ 24 PRESENT STRUCTURE REMOVE 1.0 LS 35,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 25 GUARDRAIL, W-BEAM, 6 FT 3 IN SPACING 200.0 LF 30.00$ 6,000.00$ 26 GUARDRAIL, END TREATMENT, OS 2.0 EA 3,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 27 GUARDRAIL, CURVED W-BEAM GUARDRAIL SYSTEM 2.0 EA 3,500.00$ 7,000.00$ 28 AGGREGATE FOR END BENT BACKFILL 70.0 TON 80.00$ 5,600.00$ 29 LINE, PAINT, SOLID, WHITE, 4 IN 2000.0 LF 1.00$ 2,000.00$ 30 LINE, PAINT, SOLID, YELLOW, 4 IN (DOUBLE) 2000.0 LF 1.00$ 2,000.00$ 31 CONSTRUCTION SIGN, A 20.0 EACH 150.00$ 3,000.00$ 32 CONSTRUCTION SIGN, B 8.0 EACH 100.00$ 800.00$ 33 MAINTAINING TRAFFIC 1.0 LS 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 34 BARRICADE, III-B 8.0 EACH 200.00$ 1,600.00$ 35 ROAD CLOSURE SIGN ASSEMBLY 4.0 EACH 250.00$ 1,000.00$ 36 MULCHING SEEDING 8000.0 SYS 3.00$ 24,000.00$ 37 MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION FOR SEEDING 2.0 EACH 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 38 SODDING 0.0 SYS 5.00$ -$ 39 PERMANENT TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT 0.0 SYS 10.00$ -$ 40 PLANT, DECIDUOUS TREE, SINGLE STEM, 1.25 IN OR UNDER 0.0 EACH 100.00$ -$ 41 PLANT, DECIDUOUS TREE, SINGLE STEM, OVER 2 TO 2.5 IN 0.0 EACH 200.00$ -$ 42 MITIGATION, STREAM (IN-LIEU) 0.0 LFT 500.00$ -$ 43 MISCELLANEOUS (DRIVE PIPES, TILES, MISC.) (5%) 1.0 LSUM 38,000.00$ 38,000.00$

TOTAL 880,224.00$ 2019 880,224.00$

3% INCREASE PER YEAR 2025 1,051,100.00$

PhaseRequesting Funds For (MM/YYYY)

Total Project CostExisting Federal Funds (if Applicable)

Federal Funds Being Requested for this Application

Local Funds

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 06/2020 $294,500 $0 $235,600 $58,900 80% 20%Right-of-Way (Services + LID) 06/2023 $65,125 $0 $52,100 $13,025 80% 20%Utility 06/2024 $50,000 $0 $40,000 $10,000 80% 20%Railroad $0 $0 $0 $0 80% 20%Construction 01/2025 $1,051,100 $0 $840,880 $210,220 80% 20%Construction Inspection 01/2025 $158,000 $0 $126,400 $31,600 80% 20%TOTAL $1,618,725 $0 $1,294,980 $323,745 80% 20%

Anticipated Awarded % Split


A P P E N D I X

APPENDIX D: SI&A

Bridge Inspection Report

64-00110CR 600E

over

CROOKED CREEK

Inspection Date: 05/29/2019

Inspected By:

Inspection Type(s):

James R. Lesh

Routine

LOCATION MAP 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

NATIONAL BRIDGE INVENTORY 5

ELEMENTS 9

PICTURES 10

MISCELLANEOUS ASSET DATA 14

CRITICAL FINDINGS 16

SCOUR CHANNEL PROFILE 18

MAINTENANCE - BRIDGE 19

LOAD RATING - BRADIN 20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE NUMBER

Latitude: 41.47565

Longitude: -86.9498

James R. LeshInspector:


Asset Name: 64-00110


Facility Carried: CR 600E

Page 3 of 20






Page 4 of 20

IDENTIFICATION

(1) STATE CODE:

(8) STRUCTURE:

(5 A-B-C-D-E) INV. ROUTE:

(2) HIGHWAY AGENCYDISTRICT:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

185 - Indiana

6400071

04 - La Porte

064 - PORTER

1 4 2 00245 0

(11) MILEPOINT:

(4) PLACE CODE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK:

CR 600E

00000 - N/A

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(9) LOCATION:

CROOKED CREEK

0000.000

00.70 N 200 N

0

(13A) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(13B) SUBROUTE NUMBER:

(16) LATITUDE:

(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCT.NO:

(98) BORDER

41.47565

(17) LONGITUDE:

B) PERCENT

-86.9498

A) STATE NAME:

%

- - - -

STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL(43) STRUCTURE TYPE, MAIN:

5 - Prestressed concrete

05 - Box Beam orGirders - Multiple

A) KIND OFMATERIAL/DESIGN:

B) TYPE OF DESIGN/CONSTR:

(44) STRUCTURE TYPE,APPROACH SPANS:

0 - Other

00 - Other

A) KIND OFMATERIAL/DESIGN:

B) TYPE OF DESIGN/CONSTR:

(45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAINUNIT:(46) NUMBER OF APPROACHSPANS:

001

0

(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE: 2 - Concrete PrecastPanels

(108) WEARING SURFACE/PROTSYS:

A) WEARING SURFACE: 6 - Bituminous

0 - NoneB) DECK MEMBRANE:

0 - NoneC) DECK PROTECTION:

AGE OF SERVICE

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

1971

0000 A) ON BRIDGE:

006

0

2018

(28) LANES:

(30) YEAR OF AVERAGE DAILYTRAFFIC:

(109) AVERAGE DAILY TRUCKTRAFFIC:

B) UNDER BRIDGE:

(19) BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH:

02

(42) TYPE OF SERVICE: 80

00

(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC:

%

MI

1 - HighwayA) ON BRIDGE:

5 - WaterwayB) UNDER BRIDGE:






Page 5 of 20






GEOMETRIC DATA

00046.5

0040.4

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH: 99.99

(48) LENGTH OF MAX SPAN:

023.7

00.0

00.0

(34) SKEW:

024.4

(51) BRDG RDWY WIDTH CURB-TO-CURB:

(32) APPROACH ROADWAY

A) LEFT

(10) INV RTE, MIN VERTCLEARANCE:

(52) DECK WIDTH, OUT-TO-OUT:

00

0 - No median

020.0

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(50) CURB/SIDEWALK WIDTHS:

B) RIGHT:

0 - No flare(35) STRUCTURE FLARED:

(53) VERT CLEAR OVER BR RDWY:

000.0(56) MIN LATERAL UNDERCLEARON LEFT:

(54) MIN VERTICALUNDERCLEARANCE:

(47) TOT HORIZ CLEARANCE:

N

99.99

023.7

N

(55) LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCERIGHT:

0

000.0

A) REFERENCE FEATURE:B) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR:

A) REFERENCE FEATURE:

B) MIN LATERAL UNDERCLEAR:

FT

FT

FT

FT

FT

FT

FT

DEG

FT

FT

FT

FT

FT

FT

INSPECTIONS

(90) INSPECTION DATE: (91) DESIGNATED INSPECTIONFREQUENCY:(92) CRITICAL FEATURE

INSPECTION:A) FRACTURE CRITICALREQUIRED/FREQUENCY:

B) UNDERWATER INSPECTIONREQUIRED/FREQUENCY:

C) OTHER SPECIAL INSPECTIONREQUIRED/FREQUENCY:

(93) CRITICAL FEATUREINSPECTION DATE:

05/29/2019 12

N

N

N

A) FRACTURE CRITICAL DATE:

B) UNDERWATER INSP DATE:

C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP DATE:

MONTHS

CONDITION

(58) DECK: 4 - Poor Condition(advanceddeterioration)

5 - Fair Condition(58.01) WEARING SURFACE:

4 - Poor Condition(advanceddeterioration)

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: 6 - SatisfactoryCondition (minordeterioration)

(61) CHANNEL/CHANNELPROTECTION:

7 - Bank protectionneeds minor repairs

(62) CULVERTS: N - Not Applicable

CONDITION COMMENTS(58) DECK: 4 - Poor Condition (advanced deterioration)

Comments:POOR - SEE SUPERSTRUCTURE COMMENTS.Material:PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BOX BEAMS (21")

(58.01) WEARING SURFACE: 5 - Fair Condition

Comments:FAIR - TRANSVERSE CRACKS AT BRIDGE ENDS. LONGITUDINAL AND MAP CRACKS AT BEAM EDGES.Material:BITUMINOUS WITH MEMBRANE (2")

Page 6 of 20






(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE: 4 - Poor Condition (advanced deterioration)

Comments:POOR - SEEPAGE. MINOR SPALL IN BEAM 2 NEAR NORTH ABUTMENT. BEAM 3 CRACKS NEAR 3/4 LENGTH SPALLW/ ONE STRAND EXPOSED ON WEST EDGE & ONE 6' LONG SPALL W/ 2 EXPOSED/BROKEN STRANDS. BEAM 4 HASDELAM AND SPLLING W/ 1 STRAND EXPOSED. TIE ROD ENDS NOT GROUTED.Material:PRESTRESSED CONCRETE BOX BEAMS (21")

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE: 6 - Satisfactory Condition (minor deterioration)

Comments:SATIS - LEAKING ON ABUTMENTS. ABUTMENTS HAVE MINOR CRACKS AND NORTH ABUTMENT HAS POPOUTSWITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE. BM 3 E SIDE SPALL W/ EXP STRANDS. BM 4 SPALL 6' TO 10' W SIDE OF BM. BM 5DELAM/CRACK 8 TO 11, CRACK 19 TO 25.Material:CONCRETE ABUTMENTS

(61) CHANNEL/CHANNELPROTECTION

7 - Bank protection needs minor repairs

Comments:GOOD - SAND AND GRAVEL FLOWLINE - CONCRETE WITH STEEL SHEET PILING PROTECTING ABUTMENTSEXCEPT EAST HALF OF SOUTH ABUTMENT - RIPRAP DAM ACROSS CHANNEL. AREAS OF SHEET PILING MISSING.HEAVY BANK EROSION.Material:SAND AND GRAVEL FLOWLINE

(62) CULVERTS: N - Not Applicable

Comments:N/AMaterial:N/A

LOAD RATING AND POSTING(31) DESIGN LOAD:

(63) OPERATING RATINGMETHOD:

(64) OPERATING RATING:

(70) BRIDGE POSTING

(41) STRUCTUREOPEN/POSTED/CLOSED:

5 - HS 20

0 - Field evaluation anddocumented engineeringjudgment

29

5 - Equal to or abovelegal loads

P - Posted for Load

22(66) INVENTORY RATING:

(65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD: 0 - Field evaluationand documentedengineeringjudgment

(66B) INVENTORY RATING (H): 16

(66C) TONS POSTED : 16

(66D) DATE POSTED/CLOSED: 06/03/2015

APPRAISAL

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES,VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURE:

36A) BRIDGE RAILINGS:

36B) TRANSITIONS:

36C) APPROACH GUARDRAIL:

36D) APPROACH GUARDRAILENDS:

4

5

N

0

0

0

0

SUFFICIENCY RATING:

1STATUS:

51.7

Page 7 of 20






(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY: 7 - Slight Chance of Overtopping BridgeComments:ADEQUATE

(72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT: 6 - Equal to present minimum criteria

Comments:APPROACHES SETTLED AT BRIDGE ENDS WITH INSUFFICIENT WEDGE AND LEVEL PLACED. APPROACHESMODERATELY CRACKED.Material:BITUMINOUS72: LEVEL, IN HORIZONTAL CURVE

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES: 7 - Countermeasures installed to correct scour problem

Comments:NO MAJOR SCOUR VISIBLE.

CLASSIFICATION

(112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH:

(104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM OFINVENTORY ROUTE:

(26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS OFINVENTORY RTE:

(100) STRAHNET HIGHWAY:(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:

(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE:

(105) FEDERAL LANDSHIGHWAYS:

(110) DESIGNATED NATIONALNETWORK:

(20) TOLL: (21) MAINT. RESPONSIBILITY:

(22) OWNER:

(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE:

Yes

0 - Structure/Route isNOT on NHS

09 - Rural - Local

Not a STRAHNET routeN - No parallel structure

2-way traffic

0-Not Applicable

Inventory route not onnetwork

3 - On Free Road 02 - County HighwayAgency

02 - County HighwayAgency

5 - Not eligible

NAVIGATION DATA(39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEAR:

(116) MINIMUM NAVIGATION VERT.CLEARANCE, VERT. LIFT BRIDGE:

(40) NAV HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE:

000.0

0000.0

FT

FT

FT

0 - No navigationcontrol on waterway(bridge permit notrequired)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:

(111) PIER OR ABUTMENTPROTECTION:

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

000557(96) TOTAL PROJECT COST:

2018

(95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST: 000174

(97) YR OF IMPROVEMENT COST EST:

(115) YR OF FUTURE ADT:

(114) FUTURE AVG DAILY TRAFFIC: 150

2038

$

$

(75A) TYPE OF WORK: 31 - Replacement -Load/Geometry

(75B) WORK DONE BY: 1 - Work to be done bycontract

(94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTCOST:

000267

000068(76) LENGTH OF IMPROVEMENT: FT

$

Page 8 of 20






Page 9 of 20

PHOTO 1

Description LOOKING NORTH AT APPROACH

PHOTO 2

Description LOOKING SOUTH AT APPROACH






Page 10 of 20

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING WEST THROUGH CHANNEL

PHOTO 4

Description LOOKING EAST THROUGH CHANNEL






Page 11 of 20

PHOTO 5

Description CRACKS AND SPALL IN BEAM 4

PHOTO 6

Description CRACKS AND SPALLS IN BEAM 3






Page 12 of 20






PHOTO 7

Description SPALL WITH BROKEN STRANDS, BEAM 3

Page 13 of 20

Miscellaneous Asset DataAsset Management

Joints: * Indicate location, type, and rating of lowest rated joint.

Comments:

Has the dead load or the structural condition of the primary load carrying members changed since the last inspection?

Load Rating 2:

Extended Frequency:

This bridge has been accepted into the Extended Frequency Program.

_______________________________________________________________

Bearings: * Indicate type, and rating of lowest rated bearing.

Comments:

Approach Slabs: * Indicate if present & condition rating.

Comments:

6400071

_______________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________

Inspector:

INDOT Reviewer:

Submittal Date:

Comments:

Concrete Slopewall:

_______________________________________________________________

Comments:

Terminal Joints:

_______________________________________________________________

Approval Date:

*Rating of lowest rated terminal joint.

*Rating of lowest rated slopewall.

Endangered Species:

Bats: seen or heard under structure? *

Birds/swallows/nests seen? Empty nests present? *

NBI 113 Scour Comment:

Comments:

NO MAJOR SCOUR VISIBLE.

N/AMaterial:N/A

Paint:

* If yes, add one photo to the dropdown field

BRIDGE Culvert Geometry:

Barrel Length:

Width:

Height:

* Indicate if paint present , year painted & condition rating.

Not Rated

Scour POA?

_______________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________

Scour Analysis: Scour Critical:

Date of Channel Measurements:

Distance Measured From:

Depth Measured From:

Number of Measurement Points Taken:

Number of Fixed Objects in Channel:

Water Level:

High Water Mark:

Measurement Type:

Channel Measurement



Structure Number: 6400071



Date Reported:

Priority:

Work Code:

Deficiency Description:

Work Description:

REPLACE STRUCTURE DUE TO DETERIORATION.

Date Repairs Completed:

UNTIL REPLACED, INSTALL CURRENT STANDARD BRIDGE AND APPROACH RAIL WITH END TREATMENTS.WEDGE AND LEVEL APPROACHES. MONITOR BEAM CRACKS.

Maintenance Comments:






LOAD RATING - BRADINNational Bridge Inventory (NBI):

(66B) INVENTORY RATING (H):

(65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD:

(66) INVENTORY RATING:

(63) OPERATING RATING METHOD:

(64) OPERATING RATING:

(31) DESIGN LOAD:

(70) BRIDGE POSTING:

(41) STRUCTURE OPEN/POSTED/CLOSED:

(66C) TONS POSTED:

(66D) DATE POSTED/CLOSED:

16

22

29

16

Posting Configurations:

Emergency Vehicles:

EV2: LEGAL RF:

EV3: LEGAL RF:

5-Axles:

AASHTO TYPE 3S2: LEGAL RF:

SU5: LEGAL RF:

TOLL ROAD LOADING NO. 1: ROUTINE PERMIT RF:

2-Axles:

H20-44: LEGAL RF:

ALTERNATE MILITARY: LEGAL RF:

6+-Axles:

AASHTO TYPE 3-3: LEGAL RF:

LANE TYPE: LEGAL RF:

SU6: LEGAL RF:

SPECIAL TOLL ROAD TRUCK: ROUTINE PERMIT RF:

SU7: LEGAL RF:

MICHIGAN TRAIN TRUCK NO. 5: ROUTINE PERMIT RF:

MICHIGAN TRAIN TRUCK NO. 8: ROUTINE PERMIT RF:

3-Axles:

HS20: LEGAL RF:

AASHTO TYPE 3: LEGAL RF:

4-Axles:

SU4: LEGAL RF:

TOLL ROAD LOADING NO. 2: ROUTINE PERMIT RF:

Other Configurations:

H20-44: DESIGN RF:

NRL: LEGAL RF:

SUPERLOAD-11 AXLES: SPECIAL PERMIT RF:



SUPERLOAD-19 AXLES (152.5T): SPECIAL PERMIT RF:

SUPERLOAD-19 AXLES (240.045T): SPECIAL PERMIT RF:

06/03/2015

0

0

5

5

P

Load Rating Date:


A P P E N D I X

APPENDIX E: UTILITY

UTILITY ASSESSMENT

PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Porter 110 Date Requested: 10/17/19 Requested By: B. Beer Date Needed: ASAP Client: Porter County Board of Commissioners Location: CR 600 E over Crooked Creek, Porter County Work Type: Bridge Replacement Funding: TBD R/W Acquisition Required: TBD Bid/Letting Date: TBD

PROJECT LOCATION County: Porter Township: Washington

UTILITY INVOLVEMENT Design Ticket Created: 10/25/19 Utilities on Ticket:

• Comcast – response received 10/28/19 stating no facilities • Frontier – response received 11/4/19 • Kankakee Valley REMC – response received 10/29/19

NPMS Check: No DOT pipeline facilities within the project area

GOOGLE DRIVE ASSESSMENT Google drive is unavailable in this area. Information reflected below is from responses and pictures of the site.

• Electric – Kankakee Valley REMC maintains a three phase aerial line on the south side of the roadway • Water – No water utilities were on the design ticket • Communications – Frontier communications maintains aerial facilities on the south side of the roadway • Gas – No gas utilities were on the design ticket • Sanitary – No sanitary utilities were on the design ticket • Pipeline – No pipeline utilities were on the design ticket.

RISKS/ASSUMPTIONS • Electric facilities will require relocation due to crossing over the structure at a diagonal. • Telephone facilities may require relocation for constructability purposes.

RECOMMENDATIONS • Early coordination will be required with Kankakee Valley to determine what options are available to de-energize, temporarily

relocate, or full relocation. Kankakee Valley is eligible for reimbursement, therefore minimizing costly impacts should be evaluated.

ESTIMATED COSTS (HIGH LEVEL) Design costs – from research to letting, not including pre-con or construction – $10,000 SUE costs – SUE is not recommended for this project Relocation costs – Kankakee Valley REMC is eligible for reimbursement. Approximate relocation costs are $50,000.

UTILITY ASSESSMENT

Date Completed: 11/19/19 Completed By: N. Parks NOTE: Full utility coordination will be required during the design process.

Documents

Porter County Bridge No. 110