Upload
others
View
39
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
22nd January 2003
File Reference: u:\Guidelines - BlueScope Lysaght PowerPoint Template
Port Kembla Steelworks
Blast Furnace Technology & Ironmaking Process
RBS Investor Lunch
OSCAR GREGORY, General Manager Iron & SlabAustralian and NZ Steel Manufacturing Businesses
October 2010
Page 2
Important notice
THIS PRESENTATION IS NOT AND DOES NOT FORM PART OF ANY OFFER, INVITATION OR RECOMMENDATION IN RESPECT OF SECURITIES. ANY DECISION TO BUY OR SELL BLUESCOPE STEEL LIMITED SECURITIES OR OTHER PRODUCTS SHOULD BE MADE ONLY AFTER SEEKING APPROPRIATE FINANCIAL ADVICE. RELIANCE SHOULD NOT BE PLACED ON INFORMATION OR OPINIONS CONTAINED IN THIS PRESENTATION AND, SUBJECT ONLY TO ANY LEGAL OBLIGATION TO DO SO, BLUESCOPE STEEL DOES NOT ACCEPT ANY OBLIGATION TO CORRECT OR UPDATE THEM. THIS PRESENTATION DOES NOT TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, FINANCIAL SITUATION OR PARTICULAR NEEDS OF ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR.
THIS PRESENTATION CONTAINS CERTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHICH CAN BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF FORWARD-LOOKING TERMINOLOGY SUCH AS “MAY”, “WILL”, “SHOULD”, “EXPECT”, “INTEND”, “ANTICIPATE”, “ESTIMATE”, “CONTINUE”, “ASSUME” OR “FORECAST” OR THE NEGATIVE THEREOF OR COMPARABLE TERMINOLOGY. THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS WHICH MAY CAUSE OUR ACTUAL RESULTS, PERFORMANCE AND ACHIEVEMENTS, OR INDUSTRY RESULTS, TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM ANY FUTURE RESULTS, PERFORMANCES OR ACHIEVEMENTS, OR INDUSTRY RESULTS, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.
TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, BLUESCOPE STEEL AND ITS AFFILIATES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS PRESENTATION, INCLUDING ANY FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION, AND DISCLAIM ANY LIABILITY WHATSOEVER (INCLUDING FOR NEGLIGENCE) FOR ANY LOSS HOWSOEVER ARISING FROM ANY USE OF THIS PRESENTATION OR RELIANCE ON ANYTHING CONTAINED IN OR OMITTED FROM IT OR OTHERWISE ARISING IN CONNECTION WITH THIS.
3
Overview of Steel Production Processes
?
?
Steel Scrap
Scrap Ladle
Electric Arc Furnace
Continuous Casting Machine
Molten Steel Ladle
Basic Oxygen Furnace (converter)
Molten Iron
Torpedo Ladle
Blast Furnace
Hot rolled strip mill
Cold rolled strip mill
Wide coil Narrow strip
Electrical coil Metal Coated coil
Cut lengths
PlateReversing mill
Slab
SCRAP ROUTE
MOLTEN IRON
ROUTE
STEEL PRODUCTION FLAT PRODUCTSSEMI’s
Painted coil Laminated coil
H-section I-section T-section U-section Z-section L-section Rail
I-sectionH-sectionRound Square Half Round Flat
Seamless tube mill
Wire rod Wire drawing
Wire
Tubes Welded tube mill
Rod mill
Heavy section
mill
Bar/Section mill
Billet
Bloom
LONG PRODUCTS
4
Steel Production Processes – Integrated Plant and “Mini-Mill”
Flat Products “Mini-Mill”
EAF/Thin Slab Caster
Flat Products
Integrated Plant
Iron Ore
Coal
Coke
COKE OVEN
SINTERING
BLAST FURNACE
Slag
Molten pig iron
CONVERTER (BOF)
Sintered ore
“Graded” Liquid Steel
REFINING STAND
Slab
CONTINUOUS CASTING
ROLLING MILL
Hot Rolled Coils
REHEAT FURNACE
ROLLING MILL
“Graded” Liquid Steel
REFINING STAND
Scrap
& HBI
ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE
TUNNEL FURNACE
Raw liquid steel
Hot Rolled Coils
THIN SLAB CASTING
e.g. Port Kembla Steelworks e.g. NorthStar BSL
5
Overview of Steel Production Process – Pt Kembla
Slab
Hot rolled strip mill
Cold rolled strip mill
Wide coil Narrow strip
Electrical coil Metal Coated coil
Cut lengths
PlateReversing mill
FLAT PRODUCTS
Painted coil Laminated coil
Tubes
Welded tube mill
CONVERTER (BOS)
COKE OVEN
Iron Ore
Coal
Coke
SINTERING
BLAST FURNACE
Slag
Molten pig iron
Sintered ore
“Graded” Liquid
Steel REFINING STAND
Slab
CONTINUOUS CASTING
ROLLING MILL
Hot Rolled Coils
REHEAT FURNACE
6
Overview of Steel Production Process
Run out tablecooling
Minimill Thin-Slab Casting – 1 to 2 Mt/a
– 300 to 400 m4-6 m/minute
50-60mm thickHolding furnace
Finisher
300-400 m
1-10mm thick
Coiler
20-40 metric ton coil
Integrated “Conventional” Slab Casting – 3 to 5 Mt/a
– 500 to 800 m
200-300 mm thick
20-40 metric ton coil
1-2m/minute
Gas cutter
Cooling
Reheat furnace
RougherCoil box Finisher
1-10mm thick
Coiler
500-800 m
Run out tablecooling
Strip Casting – 0.5 Mt/a
– 60 m15-150 m/minute
Scale ControlChamber
20-40 metric ton coil
0.7 - 1.8 mm thick
60 m
Mill
Coiler
Run out tablecooling
7
Steel Production – NZS has a Unique Process
Continuous
Casting
Machine
MHF 5
MHF 4
MHF 3
MHF 2
PC
Coal
&
Limestone
Kiln 5
Kiln 4
Kiln 3
Kiln 2
Storage Hopper
Liquid Raw Iron &
Vanadium Slag
Weigh
BridgeVanadium Slag
VRU LTS
Steel
Slag
Slag
Melter 1
Dry PC &
Electricity
KOBM
Slag
Processed
Liquid
Iron
Slab
KOBM/LTSKILNS MELTERS CCM
Scrap
Continuous Ironmaking Process Batch Slabmaking Process
Millscale
Added
Millscale
Added
MHF Off-Gas
Kiln Off-Gas
Melter Off-Gas
To Electricity Grid
MHF Cogeneration Kilns Cogeneration
RPCC
Fluxes
Ironsand From
Mine
Melter 2
Dry PC &
Electricity
8
Markets and Supply Chain – Port Kembla
Building &
Construction
Export
Domestic
Distributors
Distribution
& Solutions
Australia
Direct
Manufacturing
Pipe & Tube
Western Port
Illawarra
Page 9
Consumption of primary raw materials at Port Kembla Steelworks
Note: (1) coking coal volumes shown are dry tonnes; market pricing is typically for wet tonnes, 8% moisture content difference to dry tonnes
(2) measure shows tonnage rate used in steel making, and excludes coal used for export coke making
(3) 40% of scrap feed is sourced externally; balance, internally sourced scrap.
Indicative use rate
FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 per slab tonne
Iron Ore
Fines 4.0 2.9 4.0 0.97t
Lump 1.6 1.0 1.5 0.31t
Pellets 2.3 1.6 1.5 0.24t
Total 7.9 5.5 7.0 1.51t
Coal
Coking (1)
3.0 2.2 2.7 0.49t
PCI 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.14t
Anthracite 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.02t
Total 3.7 2.6 3.4 0.65t
Scrap (3)
1.0 0.7 0.9 0.2t
Raw Steel Production 5.3 3.5 4.7
Export Coke Despatches 264kt 282kt 175kt
Volume consumed in production (dry mt)
Reflects mix shift
from sinter plant
upgrade
(+1.1mtpa fines,
-1.0mtpa pellets)
Possible slight
shift towards
higher PCI use
in future in lieu
of hard coking
coal
Includes
around 300kt
consumed
for export
coke
despatches
(2)
Page 10
Notes:
(1) Slab, HRC and plate. Variances of totals from sum of constituents is be due to rounding
(2) See Coated Australia Annual Capacities slide for Western Port Works capacities
(3) Domestic HRC ex Port Kembla Steelworks only; ie excludes export HRC despatches from Western Port when reconciling from the ASX Release, Attachment 1
(4) Export HRC ex Port Kembla Steelworks only; ie excludes export HRC despatches from Western Port when reconciling from the ASX Release, Attachment 1
(5) See Coated Australia Annual Capacities slide for Springhill Works capacities
(6) See ASX Release, Attachment 1 for detail
PKSW – Production & Despatch Flow
Domestic21 0
Port Kembla Steelworks
Slab ProductionFY 2010 FY 2009
4,724 3,517
Domestic555(3) 425
Interco985 796
Domestic1,011 900
Export535(4) 409
Interco1,558 1,241
HRC2,648 2,075
Export547 341
Domestic85 72
Interco85 72
Export43 46
Domestic183 175
Plate311 293
Western Port (2)
Springhill(5) /
Distribution
Asia / Nth
Am(6)
Distribution
Slab 1,678 1,098
Hot Strip Mill
Plate Mill
Product / DestFY10 kt FY09 kt
Legend:
Port Kembla Steelworks
Despatches(1)
FY 2010 FY 2009
4,636 3,466
Inventory movements
& yield losses
Export672 302
11
Cokemaking
16
12
GAS
PROCESSING
COKE SCREEN
3.0Mtpa
BLENDED COAL
COKE PLANT
2.3Mtpa COKE
SOLIDS
Cokemaking Process Overview
TARSULPHATE
39Kt 86Kt
BTX
(Benzene)
23ML
COKE OVENS GAS 19,000TJ
Interworks energy (boilers,
furnaces)
BREEZE(< 10 mm)
NUT(10 – 25 mm)
LUMP(25 – 80 mm)
TATA(20 – 50 mm)
86%
7%
2%
5%
Coke usage
Blast furnaces 1.9Mtpa
Sinter plant 0.2Mtpa
Export 0.2Mtpa
2.3Mtpa
Export coke
BlueScope approach is to sell excess production on a spot basis.
Generally offered in 30-45kt cargo sizes.
1 tonne of coke solids is equivalent to 1.30t coking coal
Types of coke solids produced
•Lump•Tata•Nut•Breeze
13
Coke Ovens Process
Coal is blended and charged into an oven
The coal is levelled to allow passage for the gas generated to exit
OVEN
DOORS
STANDPIPE
GAS PASSAGE
COAL MASS
After levelling
CHARGE HOLES
For Filling Oven with coal
CHUCK
DOOR
COLLECTOR
MAIN
OVEN
DOORS
14
Regenerators
• Air and gas are preheated by separate regenerators and the heat distributed across the refractories next to the oven wall
• The oven heats the coal for approx 19-20 hrs – driving off the volatiles, leaving behind relatively pure carbon (88%) + ash (10-12%) in what is termed coke.
• The surplus gas produced (Coke Ovens Gas (COG) and other by-products (Ammonium Sulphate, Benzene, Tar) are collected
• The coke is pushed from the oven and quenched with water
• Coke is then mixed with iron ore in the Blast Furnace to make iron
G
A
S
A
I
R
A
I
R
G
A
S
OV
EN
OV
EN
REFRACTORY BRICK - HEATED
Coal & Cokemaking Course March, 2010 15
What is Metallurgical Coke?
Desirable physical properties
• strong and large lumps
• withstand the blast furnace environment without generating fines
• an irregular shape, so that it doesn‟t pack tightly (permeability)
• very porous (react with Blast)
Chemical properties
• Low Sulphur & Phosphorus ( Steel quality)
• Low Ash (less slag, less fuel, lower hot metal cost)
Solid residue after pyrolysis of a coking coal• the coal is heated to >1000ºC in the absence of air
• largely carbon plus some hydrogen, nitrogen, sulphur and inorganic minerals
Coal & Cokemaking Course March, 2010 16
Coking and Non-Coking Coals
Only a limited range of coals are suitable for making metallurgical coke
• bituminous coals
• need to exhibit plasticity and swelling
• depending on the quality of the coke produced can be classified as hard, semi-hard, semi-soft or soft coking coals
Non-coking coals form a char when heated
• fine powder approximately the same size as the original coal
Key processes that form metallurgical coke during pyrolysis
• Softening, swelling (dilatation) and agglomeration
Binds individual coal particles into large lumps; feed coal typically 85% < 3.35 mm to coke with mean size 50 mm.
• Shrinkage
Affects coke size, strength and oven wall pressure (OWP) through the generation of fissures and micro-fissures
17
Push Side - 6 Battery
OVENS
RAM
REGENERATORS
18
Charger - 7 Battery
CHARGER
CHARGE HOLES
COKE WHARF
RAM
19
Coke Side - 7 Battery Coke Wharf
COKE
QUENCHER
20
Ironmaking Department
Sinter & RMH
5 BF
6BF
PCI
21
What we look for in IRON ORES
• High % Fe – yield of hot metal
• Low combined gangue (SiO2, Al2O3) = less slag volume (costs)
• Low Phosphorus (P) = quality of steel
• Low Loss on Ignition (LOI) – combined water = freight cost & fuel
• Low Specific Trace elements – Ti, V, Cr and alkali (Zn, K2O)
LUMPS ( Typically 61-64% Fe)
• As received from the Mine, has -6mm material which are
screened out and treated as Fines (“secondaries”). Yield
normally 72% Lump (+6mm)
• Remaining Lump Ore (+6 – 60mm) is direct charged to BF
• However difficult to control chemistry – comes as “Mother
Nature” including variability in SiO2, Al2O3, Phos, MgO,
CaO etc
• Therefore “non ideal” smelting in the BF – wide temperature range ; affects zones in BF
• Generally limited to < 20% of Burden mix, however in lower productivity scenarios can use higher
proportions
• Comes with penalty of increased slag volume (gangue) and fuel costs
22
What we look for in IRON ORES
FINES Typically (58-63% Fe) - South American exception @ 66%Fe
• Generally the cheapest, due to lower %Fe and higher gangue
• Not suitable for direct charge to Blast Furnace (too fine, gets blown out as dust)
• Requires agglomeration into larger solid forms such as Sinter or Pellet by :
o Blending the fine ores to control chemistry & size
23
Raw Materials Handling Area - Ore storage yards
Secondary Ore Blending yard facility 2 Beds (Each 300kt nominal capacity)
One variable speed Barrel Reclaimer
Bed consumed over 18 -20 days
24
What we look for in IRON ORES
FINES Typically (58-63%Fe) - South American exception @ 66%Fe
• Generally the cheapest, due to lower %Fe and higher gangue
• Not suitable for direct charge to Blast Furnace (too fine, gets blown out as dust)
• Requires agglomeration into larger solid forms such as Sinter or Pellet by:
• Blending the fine ores to control chemistry & size
• Then add fluxes (Limestone (CaCO3) & Dolomite (MgO) & Serpentine (SiO2; MgO)
• Add Fuels (Coke & Anthracite) and layered on a moving grate
25
Sintering Process
Air Suction
• Coke is ignited by Nat Gas Burner; and Air is sucked through the
material bed
• The Air and the Coke react to partially soften and reduce the
ferrous materials with the slag forming materials bonding
everything together into a sintered (Cooked) lump of Solid Sinter
MOVING GRATE
26
27
SINTER
28
Built
Revamped
1975
2009
Grate Area 480 m2
Production 6.6 Mtpa
Productivity 38-40 t/m2/d
BF Burden ~60 - 70%
No.3 Sinter Machine
Ore Preparation – Sinter & Raw Materials Handling
Zone 1 added to the Electro-Static Precipitators
New Strand Feeder and New Ignition Furnace
Strand Extended and New Cooler Feed Chute
Sinter Cooler – wider and more fan power
Higher Strand Pallets
Waste Gas Main & Spillage Conveyors extended
Recent Upgrades made to the No.3 Machine
30
31
IGNITION FURNACE
SINTER BED
32IGNITION FURNACE
STRAND
+
SINTER
DISCHARGE
33
ROTARY COOLERSINTER
34
What we look for in IRON ORES
PELLETS (65 - 67% Fe)
• Similar to Sintering process where fine ore is agglomerated into solid, lump material - pellets
• Generally the ores for pelletising are already very fine and soft and easier for grinding and balling
• i.e. Magnetites – generally too fine and also because of oxidised state, impede sinter bed
permeability
• Due to greater amount of grinding, balling and binding required, Pellets generally more
expensive to produce, however preparation allows improvement of grade, i.e. Increased % Fe
and lower gangue.
• Consequently selling price / tonne also more expensive
• Pellets generally used in High Productivity
scenarios, higher Fe yield - where high cost is
justifiable, however, first material to shed in
downturn scenario, due to cost.
• Typically used at between 10-20% of Burden Mix
(although some plants use at 50% – 80%)
35
Whyalla Fines
Sinter
Carajas Fines Yandi Fines
Savage River Pellets
FINE ORES
LUMP ORES
PREPARED BURDENS
Blended and Fluxed in
Sinter Machine to
Produce Sinter
BLAST FURNACE
PELLETS
Mt Newman Lump
Mt Newman Fines
Prefer: ≥ 80% Prepared Burden ≤ 20% Lump Ore
36
Ironmaking – Blast Furnaces
No.5BF No.6BF
Built 1972 1996
Relined 1978, 1991, 2009 -
Inner Vol – m3 3427 3208
Work Vol – m3 3000 (88%) 2749 (86%)
Campaign Life 18 - 20 yrs 20+ yrs
Output 2.7 Mtpa 2.7 Mtpa
No.5 Blast Furnace No.6 Blast Furnace
Combustion
Key Zones
850~950°C Upper Shaft
950 ~ 1200°C Lower Shaft
1200~1400°C Cohesive
>1400°C Deadman
2050-2250°C Raceway
Ind
irec
t R
edu
ctio
nD
irec
t R
edu
ctio
n
Hearth
1500°C
• Function of a Blast Furnace is to
• Remove Oxygen from Iron Oxide
• Remove gangue from the Iron Ore to form Slag
• This is achieved through the used of Carbon Monoxide gas from the combustion of Carbon from Coke & Coal
• There are key Zones in the BF
• Lumpy zone - still solid in Shaft
• Cohesive zone – start to soften
• Deadman – Coke & Liquids
• Raceway – Gas Reaction
• Hearth - Iron & Slag
Blast Furnace
2C + O2 2CO
Carbon Oxygen (Carbon Monoxide)
(Coke & PCI) (Air)
3 Fe2O3 + CO 2 Fe3O4 + CO2
Haematite Magnetite Carbon Dioxide
(Iron Ore, Sinter, Pellets)
Fe3O4 + CO 3 FeO + CO2
Wustite
FeO + CO Fe + CO2
Molten Iron
(All reactions occur at various stages & temperatures & pressures within the furnace)
38
Chemical Process
Raw materials , Lump Ore,
Sinter , Pellets, Coke & fluxes
Charged Through top of
furnace
Hot Air (including additional
Oxygen) i+ PCI s blown into
Furnace through Tuyeres.
Temp = 1200 Deg C
Pressure =370 Kpa
Velocity = 230 m/sec
Molten Iron drained from
taphole in side of furnace into
brick lined torpedo shaped
vessels.
Slag converted to either „sand-
like‟ particles in a Granulator or
„rock slag‟ when cooled in pits
Excess Hot gases flow from top
of Furnace to Gas Cleaning
Plant and reused for heating
Layers of Coke & Ferrous
Materials descend over 8
hrs to bottom of furnace –
soften then melt and collect
in the hearth
Carbon Refractory Lining
Cast Iron / Copper Stave
Cooling system
Blast Furnace Process
100 oC
2200 oC
1500 oC
40
SHAFT
BELLY
HEARTH
BOSHTUYERE CENTRELINE
TAPHOLE CENTRELINE
Working Volume (M3) =Volume from Tuyere Centreline
to Furnace Top
= SHAFT+BELLY+BOSH
Inner Volume (M3) =Volume from Taphole Centreline
to Furnace Top
= HEARTH + BOSH + BELLY +SHAFT
Working Volume = 85% - 89% of Inner Volume
• Size – BF are defined by Inner & Working Volumes
Differences in Blast Furnaces
Asia use t/d/m3 IVEurope use t/d/m3 WV
41
Differences in Blast Furnaces
• Size – BF are defined by Inner & Working Volumes• The size determines the output capability, expressed as Tonnes/day/m3 IV (or WV)
• Results > 2.1-2.2 t/d/m3IV is considered good and
• Campaign results of >10,000 – 12,000 t/m3IV are considered excellent
• i.e. on a 3400 m3IV BF = 41 Million tonnes during the campaign, over 15+ years
• Modernisation• Degree of modernisation determines productivity, efficiency, quality, reliability and ultimately cost/tonne
• Eg. Furnace Top pressure- structure designed to operate under much higher pressures – puts a back pressure
on the process, slows down the velocity of gas in the furnace, gas stays in furnace longer to undergo more
reaction = more production at lower fuel consumption
• No. of Casting floors – 1 versus 2, 3, 4. Capable of handling greater volumes of liquid production; continuous
casting – still operate the other CHF whilst repair & maintain others.
• Automation - Labour saving devices and equipment
• Degree of computer control, automation, monitoring and assessment – leads to greater product control, uptime
and asset life
• Skilled operators / engineers
• Raw Materials• Availability of high grade raw materials – strategic advantage vs. forced to use localised domestic low grade
materials requiring additional processing facilities and higher costs, product quality impact
(NZS is classic example – Titaniferous Ironsands, although not BF route)
42
Issues that impact Cost curve – different globally
Raw Materials - Coal, Iron Ores, Alloys & Scrap are single biggest contributor to Costs
Depending on proximity (freight) and quality, as well as ownership (JV partnerships)
Labour Costs – developing countries have lower cost of labour for both operations and
construction.
Statutory Compliance – Europe, Australia, Japan, Korea & Taiwan have significant
Government control and statutory requirements for both environmental & safety performance
– requiring greater technological facilities installed (greater Capex & Opex) as compared to
developing countries.
Exchange Rate – relativity of exchange rates will impact competitiveness