Upload
dory
View
52
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Population Genetics. Evolution depends upon mutation to create new alleles. Evolution occurs as a result of allele frequency changes within/among populations. What evolutionary forces alter allele frequencies?. How do allele frequencies change in a population from generation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Population Genetics
Evolution depends upon mutation to create new alleles.
Evolution occurs as a result of allele frequencychanges within/among populations.
What evolutionary forces alter allele frequencies?
How do allele frequencies changein a population from generationto generation?
Allele frequencies in the gene pool:
A: 12 / 20 = 0.6a: 8 / 20 = 0.4
Alleles Combine to Yield Genotypic Frequencies
Our mice grow-up and generate gametesfor next generations gene pool
Allele frequency across generations: A General Single Locus, 2 Allele Model
Freq A1 = pFreq A2 = q
Genotypic frequencies are givenby probability theory
One locus, 2 Allele Model
Genotype A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
Frequency of allele A1 = pFrequency of allele A2 = 1 - p = q
In a diploid organism, there are two alleles for each locus.Therefore there are three possible genotypes:
Given:
Then:Genotype A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
Frequency p2 2pq q2
A population that maintains such frequencies is said to be at Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
(1) Allele frequencies in a population will not change, generation after generation.
(2) If allele frequencies are given by p and q, the genotype frequencies will be given by p2, 2pq, and q2
When none of the evolutionary forces (selection, mutation, drift, migration, non-random mating) are operative:
Hardy-Weinberg Principle Depends Upon the Following Assumptions
1. There is no selection
2. There is no mutation
3. There is no migration
4. There are no chance events
5. Individuals choose their mates at random
The Outcome of Natural Selection Depends Upon:
(1) Relationship between phenotype and fitness.
(2) Relationship between phenotype and genotype.
These determine the relationship between fitness and genotype.
Outcome determines if there is evolution
12.2 Growth of 2 genotypes in an asexually reproducing population w/ nonoverlapping generations
% survival to reproduction:
A = 0.05B = 0.10
Fecundity (eggs produced):
A = 60B = 40
Fitness A = 0.05 x 60 = 3Fitness B = 0.01 x 40 = 4
R = Per Capita Growth Rate = Represents Absolute Fitness
The rate of genetic change in a populations depends upon relative fitness:
Relative Fitness of A = Absolute fitness AHighest Absolute Fitness
WA = 3/4 = 0.75
Often by convention, fitness is expressed relative to the genotype with highest absolute fitness.
Thus,WB = 4/4 = 1.0
The fitness of a genotype is the average lifetimecontribution of individuals of that genotype to thepopulation after one or more generations, measuredat the same stage in the life history.
12.3 Components of natural selection that may affect the fitness of a sexually reproducing organism
12.1(2) Modes of selection on a polymorphism consisting of two alleles at one locus
12.1(1) Modes of selection on a heritable quantitative character
Genotype A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
Frequency p2 2pq q2
Fitness w11 w12 w22
Individuals may differ in fitness because of their underlying genotype
Incorporating Selection
Average fitness of the whole population:
p2w11 + 2pqw12 + q2w22w =
Given variable fitness, frequencies after selection:
Genotype A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
Freq p2 w11 2pq w12 q2 w22
w w w
New Frequency of A1
New allele frequencies after mating:
New Frequency of A2
p2 w11
w pq w12 pq w12
wq2w22+ +
Fitness: Probability that one’s genes will be represented in future generations.
Hard to measure. Often, fitness is indirectly measured:(e.g. survival probability given a particular genotype)
WAA WAa Waa
1 1 1 + s
Selection coefficientFitness is often stated in relative terms gives the selection differential
Persistent Selection Changes Allele Frequencies
Strength of selection is given by themagnitude of the selection differential
Selection Experiments Show Changes in Allele Frequencies
Cavener and Clegg (1981)
Food spiked with ethanol
HW
Selection can drive genotype frequenciesaway from Hardy Weinberg Expectations
Predicted change in allele
frequencies at CCR5
High frequency (Europe)High selection/transmisson (Africa)
High frequency (Europe)Low selection/transmisson (Europe)
Low frequency (Europe)High selection/transmisson (Africa)
pt + 1 =
What is the frequency of A1 in the next generation?
p2w11 + pqw12
p2w11 + 2pqw12 + q2w22
What is the change in frequency of A1 per generation?
p = pt + 1 - pt = p / w (pw11 + qw12 - w )
With this equation we can substitute values for relative fitness and analyze various cases of selection.
A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
1+s 1 + s 1
A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
1+s 1 1
A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
1 + s 1 1 + t
A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
1 + s 1 1 + t
Dominance
Recessivity
Overdominance
Underdominance
Fitness RelationshipGene Action
Genotype A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
Fitness 1 + s 1 + s 1
Dominance
S = 0.01
A1
Genotype A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
Fitness 1 + s 1 1
Recessive
S = 0.01
A1
Evolution in labpopulations of flour beetles support theoreticalpredictions. Dawson (1970)
Genotype A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
Fitness 1 + s 1 1 + t
Overdominance/Heterozygote Superiority
S = - 0.02 t = - 0.04
A1
Stable equilibriumis reached
Genetic diversityis maintained
Mukai and Burdick 1958
Viable allele did not fixin the population
Underdominance
S = 0.01 t = 0.02
Genotype A1A1 A1A2 A2A2
Fitness 1 + s 1 1 + t
A1
Unstable equilibrium
A1 maybe fixed orlost from thepopulation
Frequency-Dependent Selection
Allele frequencies in a population remain near an equilibriumbecause selection favors the rarer allele.
As a result, both alleles are maintained in the population.
Frequency-Dependent Selection
Perissodus
Incorporating Mutation Mutation alone is a weak evolutionary force
However, mutation and selection acting in concertare a powerful evolutionary force