Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Supplementary Material (ESI) for Soft Matter
This journal is (c) The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
1
Polymeric Nanocontainers with High Loading
Capacity of Hydrophobic Drugs
Supporting Information
Oana G. Schramm, Michael A. R. Meier, Richard Hoogenboom, Hannes H. P. van Erp,
Jean-Francois Gohy, Ulrich S. Schubert*
Experimental Part
Materials
All reagents were used without further purification unless stated otherwise. Solvents were
purchased from Biosolve Ltd. (Valkenswaard, The Netherlands). Pentaerythritol, dipentaerithritol,
stannous octoate, ε-caprolactone, poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (mPEGMA),
copper bromide and N,N,N′,N′,N′′-pentamethyl-diethylenetriamine (PMDETA) were purchased
from Aldrich (Oakville, On, Canada).
Instrumentation
GPC was measured on a Shimadzu system equipped with a SCL-10A system controller, a LC-
10AD pump, a RID-10A refractive index detector, a SIL-10AD autosampler and a Polymer
Laboratories Mixed-D column utilizing a chloroform:triethylamine:isopropanol (93:5:2) mixture
as eluent at a flow rate of 1 mL/min and a column temperature at 50 °C. Calibration was
performed utilizing linear poly(ethylene glycol) standards.
UV/vis spectra were recorded on a FlashScan S12 (AnalytikJena, Germany) in 96-well microtiter
plates (polypropylene, flat bottom) from Greiner (Greiner Bio-One, Germany) in a range from 250
2
to 700 nm. All spectra were referenced to an empty microtiter plate and measurements were
performed with four flashes. The actual time for the measurement of one microtiter plate with 96
full UV/Vis spectra was approximately 40 seconds.
NMR spectra were measured on a Varian Gemini 400 NMR spectrometer in CDCl3 and D2O. The
chemical shifts were calibrated to TMS.
DLS measurements were performed on a Brookhaven Instruments Corp. BI-200 apparatus
equipped with a BI-2030 digital correlator and a Spectra Physics He-Ne laser with a wavelength of
633 nm. The scattering angle used for the measurements was 90°. The experimental correlation
function was analyzed by the method of the cumulants, as described elsewhere.1 The
Stokes-Einstein approximation was used to convert diffusion coefficient into hydrodynamic
diameter (Dh).
General procedure for the synthesis of 4- and 6-arm starPCL-OH
Ring opening polymerizations of ε-caprolactone were performed at 130 °C for 8 h using 20.00 g
(20.60 mL, 0.18 mol) of monomer. The initiator amount was calculated according to the M/I ratio
of 48:1 and 72:1, respectively. The monomer, ε-caprolactone, and the initiator, pentaerythritol for
4-arm starPCL-OH or dipentaerythritol for 6-arm starPCL-OH, were added to a flask and stirred
for 15 min at 130 °C in order to obtain a homogeneous solution. Subsequently, the polymerization
was started by adding the catalyst, stannous octoate (n(cat) = 1/20 of n(OH-functional groups)).
After the reaction time was elapsed the very viscous reaction mixtures were cooled to room
temperature in an ice bath to stop the polymerization. The polymers were purified from residual
monomer and catalyst by precipitation from a concentrated dichloromethane solution into ice-cold
heptane resulting in powdery products. The yields were in the order of > 95%. The corresponding
analytical data are depicted in Table 1.
Supplementary Material (ESI) for Soft Matter
This journal is (c) The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
3
General procedure for the synthesis of 4- and 6-arm starPCL-Br macroinitiators
To a stirred solution of starPCL-OH (1.0 mmol; 5.6 g of 4-arm starPCL-OH or 8.5 g of 6-arm
starPCL-OH) and triethylamine (2.0 mmol/arm in 200 mL dry THF), 2.0 mmol/arm of
2-bromoisobutyryl bromide were added dropwise. The reaction was performed at room
temperature for 48 to 72 h. The reaction mixture was filtrated through a short pad of neutral
alumina to remove the quaternary ammonium salts. After the solvent evaporation and precipitation
from a small amount of THF in cold methanol, white powdery polymers were obtained in
quantitative yield.
Table 1 Analytical data of the synthesized star-shaped polymers
Mn (GPC) obtained using linear poly(ethylene glycol) calibration.
polymer M/I units of CL per arm Mn (GPC) Mn (1H NMR) PDI yield
4-arm starPCL-OH 48 12 4100 5600 1.18 98%
6-arm starPCL-OH 72 12 6600 8500 1.18 96%
4-arm starPCL-Br - 12 4600 6200 1.17 ∼100%
6-arm starPCL-Br - 12 7000 9300 1.17 ∼100%
4
4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0
(b)
(a)
he
g
b+dc
a
f
ec
b+da
O
OO
O
n
OR2R2O
R2O O
OBr
ab cd
e
g
a bc dh
O
OO
O
n
R1O
R1O OH
OR1
ab cd
e
f
a bc d
δ / ppm
Fig. S1 1H NMR spectra of starPCL-OH (a) and star-PCL-Br (b).
General procedure for the synthesis of 4- and 6-arm starPCL-p(mPEGMA)s
The catalyst CuBr (0.05 mmol) and the ligand PMDETA (0.05 mmol) were added to 5 mL of
toluene previously purged with argon for 10 minutes. A solution of macroinitiator (0.05 mmol)
and monomer mPEGMA in 15 mL of toluene was purged with argon for 10 minutes and then
added to the catalyst suspension. The amount of monomer was calculated according to the M/I
ratios. The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 to 4 h at 70 ºC under an inert atmosphere. The
Supplementary Material (ESI) for Soft Matter
This journal is (c) The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
5
reaction was stopped by cooling to room temperature and dilution with toluene in air. The content
was then passed through a short pad of alumina to remove the copper catalyst. After solvent
evaporation, the polymer was precipitated from a small amount of toluene in diethyl ether, filtered
and dried under vacuum for several hours. The conversions (48-85%) were determined by 1H
NMR spectroscopy. A typical 1H NMR spectrum and GPC traces of star PCL-p(mPEGMA)s are
depicted in Figure S2 and S3, respectively.
Fig. S2 Representative 1H NMR spectrum for 4- and 6-arm star-PCL-p(mPEGMA)s.
4 3 2 1
δ / ppm
R3O OR3
O
OO
OBr
n
OR3O
R3O
O O
p
O
O
O
x
R3O
j
j
a
b
c
d
e
f
g h
i j
j k
l
O
OO
OBr
n
OR3R3O
R3O
O O
p
O
O
O
x
j
a
b
c
d
e
f
g h
i j
j
j k
la b+d
c
e+i
j+k
l
hgf
or
6
The molar masses of all star-shaped polymers were calculated according to the DP of the PCL, DP
of the pPEGMA shell and the number of arms. The degree of polymerization (DP) of mPEGMA
related to the DP of PCL (12/arm) was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy from the integrated
ratios of the signal at 4.1 ppm corresponding to the resonances of the methylenic protons from the
PCL core and the signals at 3.4 ppm assigned to the methoxy protons from the
starPCL-pPEGMAs.
Fig. S3 GPC traces of starPCL-p(mPEGMA), P5-P8.
The semilogaritmic plot of the conversion versus time of the polymerizations at 90 °C and
70 °C are linear, except a fast activation step, suggesting that at the beginning of polymerization,
elevated temperatures induce a fast monomer consumption as well as radical terminations.2 This
fast initiation step could be diminished by reducing the temperature (Fig. S4).
8 12 16 20
7 00032 10065 40083 400
170 000
PDI 1.176-arm starPCL-BrP5, PDI 1.29P6, PDI 1.3P7, PDI 1.18P8, PDI 1.15
Mn - 1H NMR (Da)
elution volume/ mL
Supplementary Material (ESI) for Soft Matter
This journal is (c) The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
7
Fig. S4 Semi-logarithmic kinetic plot for ATRP of mPEGMA at different temperatures.
Fig. S5 1H NMR spectra of (a) p(mPEGMA) from the acid-catalysed hydrolysis of 6-arm starPCL-
p(mPEGMA), (b) 6-arm star-PCL-p(mPEGMA) (P8), (c) 6-arm starPCL-Br.
0 50 100 150 200 250 3000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
ln([M
0]/[M
])
time/ minutes0 50 100 150 200 250 300
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
ln([M
0]/[M
])
time, minutes
Temperature 90 ºC Temperature 70 ºC
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
(a)
(b)
(c)
δ / ppm
H2O
8
The degradation of the PCL core was also performed using a lipase from Rhizopus arrhizus
(enzyme/polymer 1:5 (w/w)), in phosphate buffer solution (PBS, pH = 7.0). Every 24 h, new
amounts of enzyme were added, to enssure that the enzyme present in the PBS solution is
catalytically active. The starPCL core was completely degraded after 4 days of stirring at 37 °C, as
determined by GPC measurements.
General procedure for the UV/Vis polymer titrations
For the preparation of a [1]:[1] molar ratio [dye]/[polymer] aqueous solution, 4.84 mg,
(0.02 mmol) of disperse orange 3 were added to a solution of polymer, 0.02 mmol, in 200 mL of
demineralized water. After ultrasonication for 2 minutes at 40 ºC when the dye was completely
dissolved and 10 mL of this solution were placed into a separated vial. To the rest of the solution
4.35 mg of dye were added, corresponding to a [dye]/[polymer] ratio of [2]:[1] and after
ultrasonication at 40 ºC for 2 minutes, another 10 mL were placed into a separated vial. The
procedure has been repeated for all 10 or 15 solutions of different ratio [dye]/[polymer] ratios. The
solutions were then diluted with 30 mL of water and their UV/Vis absorptions were measured. A
control UV/Vis spectrum was recorded for a suspension of 1.21 mg of dye in 10 mL of water, (0.5
mM) in the absence of polymer (see Figure S6, S7).
Fig. S6 Different aqueous solutions for the titration of polymer with guest 1.
Supplementary Material (ESI) for Soft Matter
This journal is (c) The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
9
Fig. S7 UV/Vis data obtained from titration of P7 with guest 1 ([P7] = 15 μM).
8 6 4 2 0
f d+e cba
SCl
NH
OO
ONH2
OHO
a
bc
d e
f
DMF
DMFH2O
P4 + guest 2
P3 + guest 2
P2 + guest 2
guest 2 + DMF in D2O
P1 + guest 2
δ / ppm
Fig. S8 1H NMR spectra of polymer encapsulated guest 2 in D2O (DMF as internal standard).
12 16 20 24 28
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
abso
rptio
n at
443
nm
/ a.u
.
no. of encapsulated molecules of guest 1 per molecule of P7
300 400 500 600 700
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
[dye]/[polymer]ab
sorp
tion/
a.u
.
wavelength/ nm
26:1 24:1 22:1 20:1 18:1 16:1 14:1 12:1
10
8 6 4 2 0
ba
NH
NHSS
O
ONH2
Cl
OOa
b
H2ODMF DMF
P4 + guest 3
P3 + guest 3
P2 + guest 3
P1 + guest 3
guest 3 +DMF in D2O
δ / ppm
Fig. S9 1H NMR spectra of polymer encapsulated guest 3 in D2O (DMF as internal standard).
Supplementary Material (ESI) for Soft Matter
This journal is (c) The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
11
References
1 B. J. Berne, R. J. Pecora, Dynamic Light Scattering; John Wiley and Sons: Toronto, 1976. 2 K Matyjaszewski, J. Xia, Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2921-2990.