Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Pollen dynamics in building-integrated rooftop greenhouse in urban areas
GROOF
Pollen dynamics in building-integrated rooftop greenhouse in urban areas
GROOF
Ercilla-Montserrat M., Izquierdo R., Montero, J., Muñoz P., Belmonte J., De Linares, C., Rieradevall J
CTM2016-75772-C3-1-R, AI/UE-Feder
Building-integrated rooftop greenhouseBuilding-integrated rooftop greenhouse
2
Future
two-way connections
between the building
and its greenhouse
Fertilecity Project1: The i-RTG-Lab is an Integrated rooftop greenhouse that
exchanges the metabolic flows (energy, water and gas) with the ICTA-ICP building
In winter: Use of residual hot air accumulated in the i-RTG,
which needs to be ventilated, to heat the building.
1. http://www.fertilecity.com
E
Hightemperature
ObjectivesObjectives
1. To assess the greenhouse workers’ exposure to airborne pollen in order
to prevent allergy problems in urban i-RTGs
2. To determine the influence of indoor and outdoor meteorological
conditions and crop management practices on the biological air quality.
3. To evaluate whether the quality of the hot air accumulated in the i-RTG
is adequate for reuse inside the building, and to assess the risk of
causing or aggravating respiratory problems.
3
In conventional greenhouses, workers are exposed to dust and
biological particles suspended in the air, including pollen grains, which
can cause respiratory problems. The exposure levels vary depending
on the type of crop, the tasks carried out and the season of the year.
The goals of this study are:
Materials & methodsMaterials & methods
4
Airborne samples collection and analysis:
Hirst volumetric suction pollen-spore trap, standard method in the European aerobiological networks
Analyzing norms from Red Española de Aerobiología (REA)
Daily average pollen
concentrations
Materials & methodsMaterials & methods
5
ICTA-ICP building i-RTG Lab
Volumetric suction pollen-spore
5. Results and discussion5. Results and discussion
6
In the i-RTG
total 4,924 pollen grains/m3; 33 taxa
daily peak 334 pollen grains/m3
4/03/2016
Outdoor
total 17,132 pollen grains/m3, 45 taxa
daily peak 932 pollen grains/m3
27/03/2016
Platanus and Pinus accounted for 56 and 58% of the total pollen in
both the indoor and outdoor environments
The most important source of pollen grains indoors was, in general,
the outdoor environment.
98% of total indoor pollen and 97% of the total outdoor: Acer, Alnus,
Cupressaceae, Fraxinus, Morus, Pinus, Platanus, Populus, Quercus
deciduous type, Quercus evergreen type, Salix, Ulmus, Coriaria, Corylus,
Mercurialis, Urticaceae and Solanaceae
Pollen dynamic
5. Results and discussion5. Results and discussion
7
During winter the estimated pollen penetration from outdoor to indoor was one hundred
times lower than in summer. Therefore, we focused our attention on indoor Solanaceae pollen
concentrations that was the only pollen taxon detected exclusively indoor. As a conclusion, the
recirculation of air from the i-RTG Lab to other parts of the building is recommended to occur
during winter (using adequate filters to avoid distribution of particles)
Pollen dynamic, Solanaceae (3th)
5. Results and discussion5. Results and discussion
8
Fungal spores dynamic
In the i-RTG
total of 295,038 fungal spores/m3 ; 29 taxa
daily peak: 26,185 spores/m3; 27/07/2016
Outdoor,
Total of 606,642 fungal spores/m3, 31 taxa
daily peak: 28,000 spores/m3;10/05/2016
The most important source of fungal spores observed indoors was, in general, the
outdoor environment. Nevertheless, some fungal spore taxa, such as the allergenic
Aspergillus/Penicillium, largely originated inside the greenhouse or were able to colonize
the indoor environment due to more favorable growing conditions than outside
99.9% of the total spores in both environments, 26 fungal spore taxa were selected: Agaricus,
Agrocybe, Alternaria, Arthrinium, Aspergillus/Penicillium, Chaetomium, Cladosporium,
Coprinaceae, Drechslera/Helminthosporium, Epicoccum, Ganoderma, Leptosphaeria, Myxomycota,
Oidium, Pithomyces, Pleospora, Polythrincium, Stemphyllium, Thelephoraceae, Torula, Ustilago,
Xylariaceae, other Ascospores (unicellular, bicellular, pluricellular) and other Basidiospores
Bibliography daily peak
recommendations
105 spores/m3 (Eduard, 2009)
103 spores/m3 (Santilli and Rockwell, 2003)
5. Results and discussion5. Results and discussion
9
Oidium and Torula are related to fungal diseases of tomato crops. Their indoor
concentrations showed no relationship with concentrations outside of the greenhouse
Depending on the fungal spore taxon, both positive and negative significant correlations
were observed for temperature, relative humidity and precipitation
High development of Oidium disease in the tomato crop which is characterized by the
climatic conditions of the i-RTG
Hightemperature
Low humiity
Fungal spores dynamic
5. Results and discussion5. Results and discussion
10
Agricultural management tasks, such as pollination by hand, fungal treatments and
sweeps, increased the exposure to Torula and Oidium spores. Growers’ exposure to
mesophilic fungi was found to be highest in environments where tomato plants were
being removed, followed by environments in which tomatoes were harvested
Torula and Oidium airborne fungal spore concentrations recorded in the i-RTG
Fungal spores dynamic
6. Conclusions6. Conclusions
11
It is possible to recirculate the air of the i-RTG to the building without posing allergy
health risks for the building users
1. The most important source of indoor pollen and fungal spores was the outdoor
environment. The lowest ventilation rate occurs during winter when the recirculation of
the hot air is needed
2. The operational crop tasks that cause critical moments when the recirculation of residual
i-RTG air is not appropriate have been identified (crops removal and harvesting periods)
3. Preventive measures
- install a system to interrupt the recirculation of air to the building during critical periods.
- implement appropriate air filters in ventilation air ducts
Assessment of pollution air as a contributor of heavy metals in Vertical Farming agriculture.
CTM2016-75772-C3-1-R, AI/UE-Feder
IntroductionIntroduction
13
hydropoinc
Building=barrier
Distance to a road
Heavy metal concentration in crops
Social perception
Heavy metals from air
contaminate the crops!
Air
ObjetivesObjetives
14
• To determine heavy metal contamination of horticultural
products grown on roofs in urban and peri-urban areas of
Barcelona
• To evaluate the potential air pollution vector in isolation in
heavy metal contamination of VF products
• To determine the wash effect (manually and by the rain)
• To evaluate whether greenhouses can act as barrier to heavy
metals and in what way
Materials and Methods Materials and Methods
15
Materials and Methods Materials and Methods
16
High-volume sensors
ResultsResults
17
Sumary of target values and assessment thresholds in UE legislation and results of heavy metal
concentration in the sampled air. Legend: 1. Data from (EU, 2004) 2. Annual average (2016) concentration of
heavy metals; data derived from (Xarxa de Vigilància i Previsió de la Qualitat de l’Aire (XVPCA), 2017.)
Ni (ng/m3) As (ng/m3) Cd (ng/m3) Pb (ng/m3)
EU legislation
Target value UE1 20 6 5 500
Upper assessment threshold UE1 14 3.6 3 350
Lower assessment threshold UE1 10 2.4 2 250
Periurban
Rooftop
Campaign 1 6.66 0.83 3 24.41
Campaign 2 9.02 0.67 3 21.18
Periurban i-RTG Campaign 1 4.90 0.76 3 26.69
Campaign 2 5.44 0.69 3 20.66
Urban Courtyard Campaign 2 8.66 0.68 3 22.44
Urban Rooftop Campaign 2 7.42 0.71 3 20.76
BCN average2 3.74 1 0.39 10.75
Castellvisbal average2 3.49 0.65 0.14 5.44
ResultadosResultados
18
Heavy metal concentration in lettuce (Ni, Hg, As, Cd i Pb) in lettuce samples. U: unwashed; W: washed
Ni (mg Ni /
kg sample)
Hg (mg Hg /
kg sample)
As (mg As /
kg sample)
Cd (mg Cd /
kg sample)
Pb
(mg Pb /
kg sample)
% from EU
legislation
Periurban
Rooftop
Campaign1 U < 0.020 < 0.008 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.0090 9%
Campaign1 W < 0.020 < 0.008 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.0080 8%
Campaign2 U < 0.020 < 0.008 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.0228 23%
Periurban i-
RTG
Campaign1 U < 0.020 < 0.008 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.0060 6%
Campaign1 W < 0.020 < 0.008 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.0070 7%
Campaign2 U < 0.020 < 0.008 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.0090 9%
Urban
Courtyard
Campaign1 U < 0.020 < 0.008 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.0110 11%
Campaign1 W < 0.020 < 0.008 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.0090 9%
Campaign2 U < 0.020 < 0.008 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.0244 24%
Urban
Rooftop Campaign 2 U < 0.020 < 0.008 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.0187 19%
EU legislation - - - 0.050 0.1
ConclusionsConclusions
19
This study has proven the feasibility of produce leaves crops on the rooftops of the
Barcelona city and its surroundings. This new methodology allow simultaneously
analysing air quality and the quality of food (in the same places and in the same time) in
urban areas.
First, because all the vegetable samples contain a heavy metal concentration below UE
legislation. Specifically for Ni, H, As and Cd the concentration of heavy metal are below
the detectable analytic values (<0.02 mg Ni/kg, <0.008 mg Hg/kg, 0.005 mg As/kg and
<0.005 mg Cd/kg that is a 10% of the UE limit). Pb concentration ranged from 0.0060
mg/kg to 0.0244 mg/Kg (between the 6% and the 24% of the EU limit).
Secondly, in the air none of the metals is above the legal value. We further confirm that
air quality in Barcelona and its surroundings is adequate on the UA point of view despite
the sampling points are really close to high density roads.
Finally, greenhouse is not potential detected as a barrier in Barcelona context due to low
levels of heavy metal absorption by plants. However, the preliminary results show that
the greenhouse is preventing the washing of lead by rain.
ConclusionsConclusions
20
In conclusion, in Barcelona UA developed in hydroponics systems (as an
alternative of soil agriculture) can avoid heavy metal concentration in the
aliments because it’s possible to guarantee non contaminated substrates
and the air is also discarded as a contamination vector. Furhermore, as
the patrons of heavy metal concentration in BCN air are similar than EU
cities, these results can be export to the other urban areas of the UE.
www.fertilecity.com/
CTM2016-75772-C3-1-R, AI/UE-Feder