5
1 KEY ISSUES: How do poor people in South Africa feed themselves – what food do they get, how and where do they access it? What influences the choices poor people make in terms of food preference, access and consumption? How does the rise of Big Food affect these foodways? What are the health impacts of these foodways? How are the provisioning strategies of the poor shaping food economies from retail to production? POLICY BRIEF 48 Florian Kroll FOODWAYS OF THE POOR IN SOUTH AFRICA: HOW POOR PEOPLE GET FOOD, WHAT THEY EAT, AND HOW THIS SHAPES OUR FOOD SYSTEM BACKGROUND Foodways are the set of strategies shaping what food people choose as well as how and where they access and consume it. Informed by culture and social context, the foodways of the poor simultaneously respond to and influence food systems change. South African food systems are in a process of change. These changes are caused by many factors, including urbanisation, consolidation and concentration in food value chains, and changing dietary patterns. These transitions have important consequences for the nature of poverty and food insecurity. However, poor people are not simply passive victims of food systems transition. They make concrete and deliberate decisions about what foods they eat, where they get the food they want and need, and how to deal with the difficulties this involves. These strategies are often complex and are informed by local knowledge, cultural preference, economic considerations and many other factors. In addition to responding to price and convenience, foodways express peoples' aspirations, their sense of identity and belonging. These foodways play a role in influencing the strategies of ‘Big Food’ - powerful food corporations which are transforming food environments. This is particularly important because the foodways of the poor and the values they express can promote non-communicable diseases and undermine immunity. While they embody rational and understandable responses to poverty, they can also entrench processes of impoverishment and poor health. This policy brief explores these links between the foodways of the poor and food system transition in South Africa. SUPPORTED BY Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences www.plaas.org.za | Email: [email protected]

Policy Brief 48 Florian Kroll - foodsecurity.ac.zaconspicuous sign of participating in the mainstream economy. Visible consumption of food at work and in the street demonstrates social

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Policy Brief 48 Florian Kroll - foodsecurity.ac.zaconspicuous sign of participating in the mainstream economy. Visible consumption of food at work and in the street demonstrates social

1

KEY ISSUES:

● HowdopoorpeopleinSouthAfrica

feedthemselves–whatfooddotheyget,howandwheredotheyaccessit?

● Whatinfluencesthechoicespoorpeoplemakeintermsoffoodpreference,accessandconsumption?

● HowdoestheriseofBigFoodaffect

thesefoodways?

● Whatarethehealthimpactsofthesefoodways?

● Howaretheprovisioningstrategies

ofthepoorshapingfoodeconomiesfromretailtoproduction?

POLICY BRIEF 48 Florian Kroll

FOODWAYS OF THE POOR IN SOUTH AFRICA: HOW POOR PEOPLE GET FOOD, WHAT THEY EAT, AND HOW THIS SHAPES OUR FOOD SYSTEM

BACKGROUND

Foodwaysarethesetofstrategiesshapingwhatfoodpeoplechooseaswellashowandwheretheyaccessandconsumeit.Informedbycultureandsocialcontext,thefoodwaysofthepoorsimultaneouslyrespondtoandinfluencefoodsystemschange.SouthAfricanfoodsystemsareinaprocessofchange.Thesechangesarecausedbymanyfactors,includingurbanisation,consolidationandconcentrationinfoodvaluechains,andchangingdietarypatterns.Thesetransitionshaveimportantconsequencesforthenatureofpovertyandfoodinsecurity.However,poorpeoplearenotsimplypassivevictimsoffoodsystemstransition.Theymakeconcreteanddeliberatedecisionsaboutwhatfoodstheyeat,wheretheygetthefoodtheywantandneed,andhowtodealwiththedifficultiesthisinvolves.Thesestrategiesareoftencomplexandareinformedbylocalknowledge,culturalpreference,economicconsiderationsandmanyotherfactors.Inadditiontorespondingtopriceandconvenience,foodwaysexpresspeoples'aspirations,theirsenseofidentityandbelonging.Thesefoodwaysplayaroleininfluencingthestrategiesof‘BigFood’-powerfulfoodcorporationswhicharetransformingfoodenvironments.Thisisparticularlyimportantbecausethefoodwaysofthepoorandthevaluestheyexpresscanpromotenon-communicablediseasesandundermineimmunity.Whiletheyembodyrationaland

understandableresponsestopoverty,theycanalsoentrenchprocessesofimpoverishmentandpoor

health.ThispolicybriefexplorestheselinksbetweenthefoodwaysofthepoorandfoodsystemtransitioninSouthAfrica.

SUPPORTED BY

Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences

www.plaas.org.za | Email: [email protected]

Page 2: Policy Brief 48 Florian Kroll - foodsecurity.ac.zaconspicuous sign of participating in the mainstream economy. Visible consumption of food at work and in the street demonstrates social

2

FOOD INSECURITY, POVERTY AND FOODWAYS

Everyday,thepoorinSouthAfricafacethechallengeofnourishingthemselvesinthecontextofrapidurbanisation,unemployment,stagnatingincomesandsteepfoodpriceincreases.Theyadoptvariousstrategiestomakeendsmeet.Theseincludereducingthequalityandquantityoffood,andchoosingtoconsumecheap,energy-densefoods(pap,bread,sugarydrinksandsnacks),thatareeasilyaccessiblebutnutritionallypoor.Thiscontributestowardsthetripleburdenofmalnutrition–thesimultaneousexistenceofhunger,obesity,andmicronutrientdeficiency.Tocopewiththethreatofimmediatehunger,poorSouthAfricansthereforemakechoicesthaterodetheirlong-termhealth,employmentanddevelopmentprospects.Thecostoftreatingdiet-relatedillnessiscompoundedbyalossofearningsandassetswhichcantraphouseholdsinpoverty.Inadditiontothepersonalsufferingthisentails,ithassevereimplicationsforpublichealthcareandtheeconomyalikewithhealthcostsandproductivitylossesamountingtobillionseachyear.Effectivepolicyresponsesarehinderedbyblurrednotionsofpovertyandfoodinsecurity.Officialpovertystatisticsarebasedonanincomepovertylinederivedfromthecostofastandardfoodbasket.Thebasketiscalculatedfromconsumptiondata.Thisisproblematicbecauseitassumesthatthesefoodsareavailableandaccessiblethroughoutthecountryatsimilarpriceswithouttakingintoaccountthemanydifferentwayspoorpeopleaccessfood.Inaddition,thisfoodbasketisenergy-denseandmicro-nutrientdeficient.Accordingly,manypeoplearenotofficiallyregardedaspoorwheninrealitytheirincomeenablesaccesstoabasketoffoodthatmayprovidebarelyenoughcalories,butunderminestheirhealthinthelongterm.Suchpovertylinesthusunder-estimatepovertyandfoodinsecurity,limitingtheattentionandresourcesdirectedtowardspovertyrelief.

Withoutaddressingstructuralpovertywhichmakeshealthyoptionssimplyunaffordableformost,healtheducationinitiativesexhortingthepoortoadopthealthierlifestylesaremisdirected.Accesstofoodisinfluencednotonlybymoney,butalsobygeography.Multidimensionalandspatialmeasuresofdeprivationshowthatthedepthandexperienceofpovertyandfoodinsecurityvaryspatially,andthatpovertyisparticularlysevereinformerhomelandareasandindenseinformalsettlementsaroundcities.LongitudinalstudiesrevealthatalargeproportionofSouthAfrica'spoorcycleinandoutofpovertyandhunger.Thismeansthattheyareparticularlyvulnerabletopriceincreasesandincomelosses.However,thepoorarenothelplessvictims.Innegotiatingoftenhostilefoodenvironments,poorpeopleactivelyleverageknowledge,socialnetworksandmeagrecashresourcesinwaysthatshapelocalfoodenvironmentsandinfluencethewiderfoodsystem.Topromotesustainableandjustfoodsystemsgovernance,policymakers,changeagentsandresearchersneedtounderstandthesefoodwaysaswellasthevalues,identitiesandaspirationstheyexpress.Itisthereforeimportanttounderstandnotonlyhowpoorpeopleindifferentsettingschangetheirfoodwaystoadapttoshocksaswellastothespecificconstraintsoftheirdifferentfoodenvironments,butalsohowthesefoodwaysinfluencethefoodsystem.Household purchasing and consumption Whatfoodpoorhouseholdsarebuyingandeatingemergesfromareviewofexpenditure(StatisticsSA)anddietarydiversitydata(SASAS;SANHANES;AFSUN).Althoughmaizeandbreadareessential,high-energystaplefoodsofthepoor,sugarandsweetsaswellassoftdrinksarealsoprevalent.Despitepoverty,expenditureonmeatisconspicuouslyhighandincreasesfornon-poorhouseholds.Whenpeoplemanagetoescapepoverty,dairyintakeissignificantlyincreased.Bycontrast,the

Page 3: Policy Brief 48 Florian Kroll - foodsecurity.ac.zaconspicuous sign of participating in the mainstream economy. Visible consumption of food at work and in the street demonstrates social

3

poorconsumealimitedrangeandquantityoffruit,legumes,nutsandeggs,eventhoughtheserepresentaffordableandhealthyalternativesprovidingessentialmicro-nutrientsandproteins.Thisdietaryprofiledrivestheriseinobesity,hypertension,diabetesandheartdiseasealongsidecompromisedimmunitytoinfectiousillness. Strategies employed by the poor to source food Foodsourcingstrategiesofthepoorarediverseandrelyheavilyontheinformalmarket.Althoughmostpoorpeoplerelyonoccasionalvisitstosupermarketstosourcebulkfoodscheaply,mostrelyontheinformalfoodtradefortheirmorefrequentprovisioning.Theconsumptionofstreetfoodslike“kota”,“vetkoek”,chipsand“walkie-talkies”reflectstheneedforconvenient,affordablefoodsthatcanbeeatenonthegobypoorurbanitescommutingacrossthespatialdividesthatfragmentSouthAfricancities.Eatingoutsideofthehomeisverycommon,andincludestheconsumptionofstreetfoodsandtoalesserextentfastfoods.Forthefoodinsecure,socialnetworksareanimportantfoodchannel,enablingthemtobuyfoodoncredit,borrowfoodoreatwithneighbourswhentimesaretough.Inruralandperi-urbanareas,thegatheringofseasonalwildfoodsplaysanimportantsupplementaryrole.However,urbanagriculture,foodaid,orcommunityfoodkitchensappeartoplayaminorroledespiteconsistentemphasisinfoodsecurityprogramming.Foodwaystellstoriesaboutpoverty,statusandwealth.Atfirstglance,thefoodwaysoftheSouthAfricanpoormayseemirrational:althoughbread,papandsugararecheapwaystoensuredietaryenergy,itseemsstrangethatsoftdrinks,meatanddairyaresopopular.Whychoosethemratherthanaffordableandhealthpromotingoptionssuchasfruit,vegetablesandpulses?Thesepatternsonly

begintomakesenseinlightofthesymbolicvaluesandidentitynarrativescommunicatedbyfood:Whilepap(maize)representsthefoundationalfoodconstitutingasharedAfricanidentity,consumptionofmeatisseennotonlyasamarkofwealth,butalsospecificallyofpowerandautonomy.Variouschickensnacks,beingthemostaffordablemeat,arethereforeespeciallypopularamongthepoorurbanmen.Chesanyamashopswherepeoplegrilltheirownmeatonthestreetarepopularsocialspacesamongmen.Consumptionofdairy,particularlycheeseandfermentedmilk,alsosignifieswealthandaffluence.

Imagecredit:LeifPetersen

Bycontrast,vegetablesareseenaswomen'sfoodandofsecondaryvalue,reflectingsubordinatefemalegenderstereotypes.Beans,sampandwildgreensinvokeimagesofbackwardnessandruralpoverty.Brandedsoftdrinksandfastfoodareaconspicuoussignofparticipatinginthemainstreameconomy.Visibleconsumptionoffoodatworkandinthestreetdemonstratessocialstatuswhilesharingathomeorincelebrationsnurturessocialnetworksandconstitutescommunity.Insummary,whilepoorpeopleavoidhungerbyrelyingonenergy-densestaples,theyalsoexpressgenderandclassidentities,cultivatesocialcapitalandrespondtothestigmaof

Page 4: Policy Brief 48 Florian Kroll - foodsecurity.ac.zaconspicuous sign of participating in the mainstream economy. Visible consumption of food at work and in the street demonstrates social

4

povertyandexclusionattachedtovegetables,pulsesandwildfoodsbyconsumingmeat,dairy,streetfoods,sweetsandcarbonatedsoftdrinks.POOR PEOPLE’S STRATEGIES SHAPE FOOD VALUE CHAINS

Demandsdrivenbythefoodwaysofthepoorsendmessagesupstreamintoformalandinformalvaluechains,affectingretail,distribution,processingandproduction.Informaltraderespondstothesedemands,providingaffordableandconvenientaccesstofoodinimpoverishedandspatially-dislocatedrural,peri-urbanandinformalurbansettlements.FormalvaluechainsalsorespondtothesedemandsasBigFoodmakesultra-processed,energy-densefoodmoreavailable,accessibleandappealingtothepoorthroughretailbrands,packagingandlabellingandbyextendingretailoutletsintopoorerareas.Advertisingandmediaemploysophisticatedmarketresearch,advertisingandbrandingstrategiesthatrespondtothevaluesandaspirationsattachedtofood.ThemessagingprojectedbymediatosellBigFoodinvokes,exploitsandmanipulatestheaspirationsofthepoor,amplifyinganddistortingtheirfoodways.Thislegitimisesandentrenchesconsumptionofmaizemeal,bread,sugar,softdrinks,dairy,meatandfastfoodsassymbolsoftradition,power,success,andthegoodlife.Byfuellingdemandforhigh-volume,low-valueprocessedcommodities,BigFoodandmediareinforceconsolidationandconcentrationinthesevaluechains.Theseprocessesinturnfeedbackintosocialandeconomictransitionswhichdrivepoverty,urbanisation,andenvironmentaldegradation,nurturingaviciouscycleacceleratingfoodsystemtransitionandmalnutrition.WhileBigFoodreapsbigprofits,itisthepoorwhoshoulderthegrowingburdenofpoorhealth,stunteddevelopment,reducededucationalattainmentandproductivity,andultimatelyitistheyandthestatewhofootthebillforcheapfood.

GLOSSARY/ACRONYMS

AFSUN:AfricanFoodSecurityUrbanNetwork

BigFood:Thepowerfulnetworkofcorporationscontrollingregionalandglobalfoodvaluechains.

Chesanyama:Meatgrilledataroadsidegrill.

FoodSystem:Thecoherentsetofprocessesandinteractionslinkingstakeholdersoperatingalongmultiplefoodvaluechains.

Kota:Aquarter-loafofbreadhollowedandfilledwithvariousgarnishes.

SANHANES:SouthAfricanNationalHealthandNutritionExaminationSurvey

SASAS:SouthAfricanSocialAttitudesSurvey

Foodvaluechain:Theactivities,agentsandrelationshipsbywhichvalueisaddedtoandderivedfromfood,fromproductionviaprocessing,packaging,distribution,retail,toconsumptionandwaste.

Vetkoek:Adumplingfriedinoil.

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Revisefoodpovertyline:Povertylinesneedtotakeintoaccounthowthepooraccessfoodindifferentsettingsandraisethebartoaccommodatetherealcostsofhealthydiets.

2. Establishpro-poorvaluechainstandards:

IncentiviseBigFoodtodevelopandenforceappropriateandtransparentenvironmental,social,nutritionalandpricingstandardsforpriorityvaluechainsservingthepoor,especiallymaize,wheat,poultry,freshfruitandvegetables.Thisshouldbecommunicatedthroughlabellingthatrespondstothevaluesandsymbolismembeddedinfood.Improvedaccesstorelevantinformationcanempowerpoorpeopletooptimisefoodchoice,sourcingandbargainingpower.

3. EnhanceInformalTrade:Asinformaltrade

andstreetfoodareamongthemost

Page 5: Policy Brief 48 Florian Kroll - foodsecurity.ac.zaconspicuous sign of participating in the mainstream economy. Visible consumption of food at work and in the street demonstrates social

Copy Editor: Andries du Toit | Series Editor: Mafa Hara | Photograph: Leif Petersen

5

importantsourcesoffoodforpoorpeople,policiesshouldprotect,capacitateandsupportinformalfoodeconomies,particularlytradersprovidingaccesstodietarystaples,freshfruitandvegetables.Subsidisedmarketfacilitiesforfreshproducecouldimprovelocalaccessandreducecosts.Collaboratingwithtraderstoenhancetheaccessibilityandsafetyoftradingfacilitiesanddevelopappropriatestandardscanleveragevaluableeconomicandpublichealthbenefits.Focusonwhatisreallyactionable.4. Improvegovernanceofmediaand

communicationinlocalfoodenvironments:Monitor,regulateandtaxfoodpromotion,advertisementsandcommunicationinthemedia,publicinstitutionsandinpublicspacesliketransportfacilities,schoolsandclinics.Penalisetheadvertisingofunhealthy,highly-processedfoodshighinsugarandsaltandincludehealthriskadvice.Usemediataxrevenuetofundhealthmessagingthatrespondstoculturalvaluesandstereotypesandengageswiththeinstitutions,organisationsandrole-modelswhichshapecultureandidentity,suchasfaith-basedalliances,universities,sportscelebrities,musiciansandTVpersonalities.

5. Validatediverse,healthyfoodways:

Incentivisemediatocultivatenarrativesthatpromotehealthyfoodwaysresponsivetothecapabilitiesofthepoorandderivedfrominclusiveandsustainablefoodvaluechains.Promotecriticalinterrogationoffood-basedgender,race,classandethnicstereotypes.Encourageresearchersandmediatoexplorefoodwaysthatchallengedominantfoodnarratives

REFERENCES & RESOURCES

Alkon,A.H.,Block,D,,Moore,K.,Gillis,C.,DiNuccio,N.,Chavez,N.,2013.Foodwaysoftheurbanpoor.Geoforum48(2013)126–135Battersby,J.,2011.“TheStateofUrbanFoodInsecurityinCapeTown”,UrbanFoodSecuritySeriesNo.11,Queen’sUniversityandAFSUN,KingstonandCapeTown.Greenberg,S.,2010,ContestingthefoodsysteminSouthAfrica:issuesandopportunities(No.42).InstituteforPoverty,LandandAgrarianStudies,UniversityoftheWesternCape.Jones,M.O.,2007.FoodChoice,Symbolism,andIdentity:Bread-and-ButterIssuesforFolkloristicsandNutritionStudies(AmericanFolkloreSocietyPresidentialAddress,October2005).JournalofAmericanFolklore120(476):129–177Labadarios,D.;Steyn,N.P.;Nel,J.,2011.HowdiverseisthedietofadultSouthAfricans?NutritionJournal2011.10:33PuoaneT,MatwaP,BradleyH&HughesG,2006.Socio-culturalfactorsinfluencingfoodconsumptionpatternsintheblackpopulationinanurbantownshipinSouthAfrica.HumanEcologySpecialIssue14:89-93Rudolph,M.,Kroll,F.,Ruysenaar,S.,andDhlamini,T.,2012.TheStateofFoodInsecurityinJohannesburg,UrbanFoodSecuritySeriesNo.12,UniversityofCapeTownandAFSUN,KingstonandCapeTown.ShisanaO,LabadariosD,RehleT,SimbayiL,ZumaK,DhansayA,ReddyP,ParkerW,HoosainE,NaidooP,HongoroC,MchizaZ,SteynNP,DwaneN,MakoaeM,MalulekeT,RamlaganS,ZunguN,EvansMG,JacobsL,FaberM,&SANHANES-1Team,2013.SouthAfricanNationalHealthandNutritionExaminationSurvey(SANHANES-1).CapeTown:HSRCPressStatisticsSouthAfrica,2014.PovertyTrendsinSouthAfrica.Anexaminationofabsolutepovertybetween2006and2011.ReportNo.03-10-06