Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 1
Plasma Treatment of NIL
polymers to enhance
anti-adhesion properties
Isabel Obieta ([email protected])
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 2
INDEX -Objective- Plasma conditions- Characterization techniques - Materials- Results
*Contact angle: lifetime*AFM: Roughness and thickness modified*XPS: main functional groups and depth of modification
- Imprinting trials- Conclusions
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 3
Objective to enhance the anti-adhesion behavior via plasma functionalization of the polymer surface in order
to avoid the problems of adhesion between the stamp and the substrate during the de-moulding in
the NIL process.
A process for low pressure plasma treatment has been developed, including the nature of reactive gases and the configuration of the plasma reactor.
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 4
CVD-RF (ASM) at 13,56MHz:a) tubular reactor, low pressure and
capacitive-coupled plasma.b) Power: 25-150 Wc) Time: 1-5 mind) Flow of reactive gases: 25-225 sccm
MW plasma (Iplas) at 2,45GHz:a) Remote cold plasmab) Distance to plasma: 8 to 20cmc) Power: 1500-3000 Wd) Time: 3-20 mine) Flow of reactive gases: 50-225 sccm
SF6 + ArCF4 + Ar
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 5
Characterization
- Contact Angle: verification of stability and lifetime oftreatments
- AFM: roughness and thickness modification
- XPS: chemical composition and in-depth profile
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 6
MATERIALS
- mr-I 9030 (allyl from mrt) ⇒ 300nm thickness
- PDAP (allyl from mrt) ⇒ 280 nm thickness
- mr-I 8030 (acrylate from mrt) ⇒ 300 nm thickness
- mr-I 7030 (acrylate from mrt) ⇒ 300 nm thickness
- PMMA (acrylate from mrt) ⇒ 500 nm thickness
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 7
mrI-9000: RF plasma
84889296
100104108
9000 Sample1 Sample2 Sample3
C.A
. Day1
Day4
Day8
Sample1 Time=2min Power=100W SF6=37,5 Ar =150Sample2 Time=2min Power=25W SF6=50 Ar =200Sample3 Time=2min Power=100W SF6=200 Ar =0
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 8
AFM (mr-I 9000)Before treatment:
CA=86ºAfter treatment
CA=105,9 ± 1,2º º
RF PLASMA Time =2min Power =25W SF6= 50sccm Ar =200sccm • Before treatment: thickness = 287,86nm; roughness = 0,62nm• After treatment: thickness = 248,84nm; roughness = 0,353nm
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 9
PDAP: MW plasma
• PDAP (IVb_3) MW 2500W 15min 200SF6 50Ar• PDAP (IVb_4) MW 2500W 5min 200SF6 50Ar• PDAP (IVb_5) MW 2000W 5min 200SF6 50Ar
No modification in the thickness, slight increase of the roughness
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
PDAP (IVb_3) PDAP (IVb_4) PDAP (IVb_5)
Sample
CA CA Untreated
CA (+0 days)
CA (+1 days)
CA (+3 days)
CA (+5 days)
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 10
Sample1 Time=2min Power=100W SF6=37,5 Ar =150 Sample4 Time=1min Power=125W SF6=37,5 Ar= 100Sample2 Time=2min Power=25W SF6=50 Ar =200 Sample5 Time=1min Power=125W SF6=175 Ar=25Sample3 Time=2min Power=100W SF6=200 Ar =0 Sample6 Time=1min Power=125W SF6=225 Ar= 25
90
95
100
105
110
115
8000 Sample1
Sample2
Sample3
Con
tact
Ang
le
Day1
Day4
Day8
90
95
100
105
110
115
8000
Sample
4Sam
ple5
Sample
6
Con
tact
Ang
le
Day1
Day5
mrI-8000: RF plasma
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 11
mrI-8000: MW plasma
86889092949698
100102104106
8000 Sample 1 Sample 2
C.A
.
C.A (+1 day)
C.A. (+6 days)C.A. (+8 days)
8000: UntreatedSample 1: Ar:200 sccm SF6: 50 sccm Pow er: 2000W Time: 15 minSample 2: Ar:50 sccm SF6: 200 sccm Pow er: 2000W Time: 10 min
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 12
Before treatment:CA=92º
After RF treatmentCA=101,8 ± 1,6º
RF PLASMA Time= 1min Power= 125W CF4= 175sccm Ar= 25sccmMW PLASMA Time= 10min Power= 2000W SF6= 200sccm Ar= 50sccm Before treatment: thickness = 385-400nm ; roughness = 2-3nmAfter RF treatment : thickness =373,69nm; roughness = 0,3-0,4 nmAfter MW treatment : thickness =379,14nm; roughness = 1-3 nm
After MW treatmentCA=104,5 ± 2,1º
AFM (mr-I 8000)
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 13
Lifetime of the treatment
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
2000W 15min 200SF6 50Ar
CA
Day 0Day 14Day 15Day 29
mrI-7000: 2000W 15min 200:50, SF6:Ar
mrI-7000: MW plasma
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 14
Before treatment: CA=80,7º
After treatmentCA=126,9º
AFM (mr-I 7000)
MW PLASMA Time =10min Power =2000W SF6= 200sccm Ar =50sccm • Before treatment: thickness = 326,89nm ; roughness = 0,265nm• After treatment: thickness = 303,68nm; roughness = 6,399nm
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 15
PMMA
PMMA2_8 RF 125W 1min 175SF6 25ArPMMA2_11 RF 25W 2min 50SF6 200ArPMMA6_1 MW 2000W 5min 200SF6 50Ar
Basically no modification in the thickness and roughness after MW plasma, higher after RF treatment
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
PMMA2_8 PMMA2_11 PMMA6_1
Samples
CA
CA untreated
CA (+1)
CA (+5)
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 16
XPS results (In-depth profile)
02004006008001000
Energía de enlace (eV.).
F 1s
C 1sO 1s
F KLL
F 2s
O 2s
02004006008001000200
Energía de enlace (eV.).
F 1s
C 1sO 1s
F KLL
F 2s
O 2s
BulkSurface
02004006008001000
Energía de enlace (eV.).
C 1s
O 1sO 2s
0102030405060708090
100
0 100 200 300 400 500
nm.
% a
t FCSi
mr-I 8000
mr-I 7000
mr-I 8000
mr-I 7000
MW
PLA
SMA
∅63,296F
96,63933,36C
3,3613,344O
BulkSurfaceElement
6nm deep
•In-depth spectra show no fluorine groups after few nanometers (~6nm)
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 17
280285290295
Energía de enlace (eV.).
293.2
286.7285.0
289.2
291.4
276281286291296301
Energía de enlace (eV.).
293.2 286.7
285.0
289.2
291.4
Surface
mr-I 8000
Bulk
280285290295300
Energía de enlace (eV.).
286.7
284.4
289.2
mr-I 7000
mr-I 8000
• CF2 (291,4eV) and CF3 (293,2eV) are themain groups responsible for the anti-adhesion.
• The spectrum of mr-I 7000 has more intensity in this region. (Higher CA)
XPS results (Functional groups)
C pe
ak
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 18
Stamp Plasma Power (W) Time (min) SF6 Ar Contact Angle Silane (2 PDMS) Untreated --- --- --- --- aprox.81º Si (1 PDMS) MW 3000 10 200 50 128,11º Si (2 PDMS) MW 3000 10 200 50 129,66º Si (1 PDMS) RF 25 2 50 200 116,59º
Si
MW
3000
10
200
50
Aprox. 127º
All the tests were made under the same imprint conditions that were optimized previously by Tekniker:
- Temperature of 140ºC- Force of 50000N (≈63 bar)- Embossing time of 5 minutes (total time of each imprint aprox. 20min).
Imprinting trials (I)
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 19
• The colour pattern of the residual layer shows no differences.
• Characteristics well defined and good filling of the patterns.
INASMET
INASMET
TEKNIKER
TEKNIKER
Imprinting trials (II)
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 20
TEKNIKER
INASMET
• Treated samples do not adhere at all during demoulding, although someresist sticks on the walls of the stamp after several imprints.
•The process was correct: filling correct, details well defined, …
•The treated polymer has the same etch rate as the untreted one.
• More regular pattern obtained with the Inasmet sample.
Imprinting trials (III)
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 21
A short process for low pressure plasma treatment has been developed, which improves the pattern transfer and eliminates the manual de-
moulding needed after NIL processing
-This has been proved on several polymers
-A complete characterization of the surface of the different polymershas been performed
Conclusions
LITHO2006, Marseille June 2006 22
Thank you for yourattention
The partial support of the EC-funded project NaPa(Contract no.NMP4-CT-2003-500120) is gratefully acknowledged