Upload
vukhanh
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PLANT PROTEIN SUBSTITUTION in
DIETS for JUVENILE TILAPIA
(Sarotherodon mossambicus)
GABRIEL I. AYENI
INSTITUTE OF AQUACULTURE
UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING
STIRLING, SCOTLAND
Thesis submitted to the University in partial
fulfilment of the Degree of Master of Science
of the University of Stirling.
1981
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
LITERATURE REVIEW
ALTERNATIVE PROTEIN SOURCES
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
Plates I and II
Tables I and II
Table III
Tables IV and V
Tables VI
Tables VII and VIII
Figure 1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge with gratitude my indebtedness most especially
to my supervisor Dr Kim Dauncey who with patience helped me with
corrections, criticisms and ideas, throughout the duration of this
uork. My gratitude is also due to my student adviser, Dr Albert Tacon,
for his help and advice in verious ways during my course. I also
thank the laboratory staff for their aseistance.
Finally, I thank Professor Ronald Roberts, the director of the
Institute for his encouragement throughout my stay at the University.
i
ABSTRACT
Studies were conducted to investigate the effects of three oil-seed
meals on several nutritional parameters of Sarotherodon mossambicus. and
hence determine whether they would be suitable fishmeal replacers. The
three oil seeds were sunflower seed meal, soyabean meal and rapeseed meal.
Six diets were formulated to give 30% protein. One of them was the
control, fishmeal. Three of the diets were formulated with 25% protein
supplied by each of the 3 plant sources. The remaining two diets were
all-plant protein derived by mixing the plant sources at different
proportions.
Fish of average weight approximately Q.8g were stocked at 20 per
tank. Feed was given at the rate of 5% of the total body weight per day
with regular adjustment, for 50 days.
Rapeseed meal gave the best specific growth rate, Food Conversion
ratio, Protein Efficiency ratio and Net Protein Utilization at the 25^
protein inclusion level. Its values were similar to those given by the
fishmeal. The soyabean meal also gave fairly good values, while the
sunflower seed meal generally gave poor values at the 25^ protein
inclusion level. The all-plant protein diets gave poor results similar
to those of the feed containing 25^ sunflower protein and 5% fishmeal
protein.
i i
INTRODUCTION
Aquaculturey that is the growing of aquatic organisms under
controlled conditions} can make a unique contribution to nutrition in
many parts of the world by virtue both of its extremely high
productivity in many situations and the fact that aquatic animal crops
are primarily composed of protein rather than sources of starchy staple
foods (Bardach at al.. 1972). Some aquatic organisms may be better
converters of primary food than ruminants, fowl or even pigs. These
facts have led to an almost world-wide interest, in the last two
decades, in the potential of aquatic husbandry.
In Africa, the culture of the cichlid fish known as tilapia is
believed to offer one possible solution to the nutritional problems of
the continent. Since 1924 when tilapia culture was first initiated in
Africa, there has been much progress both in the African continent and
other areas of the world such as the diddle East, South America, South
East Asia and even the Southern United States, where water temperatures
are suitable for their growth and reproduction. Tilapia are relatively
simple to cultivate, resistant to poor water quality and diseases, and
able to convert efficiently, many organic animal and agricultural waste
materials into high quality protein, hence its popularity as fish for
culture (Bardach et al.. 1972). In Africa, tilapia make up 60-70£ of
farmed fish (Shehadali, 1975). In terms of energy requirements for
aquaculture, Edwardaon (1976) suggests that both milkfish and
subsistence tilapia farming have the lowest energy requirements for
protein production. This combination of factors make tilapia an
eminently suitable spaciss for rearing in developing nations where
the problems of protein deficiency are most acute.
The supposed ease of tilapia culture has however bean exaggerated.
Thsir ability to multiply at phenomenal rates under pond conditions
leads to stunting of growth, and this disadvantage, along with marketing
problems and poor management systems caused a general disillusionment
among the farmers. This, in turn, led to a marked decline in interest
in tilapia as a cultured fish. However, in recent years the develop
ment of new techniques through the combined efforts of the Food and
Agricultural Organisation (FAO) and other Research Centres has led to
revival of interest in the culture of this fish. Such techniques
include polyculture of tilapia with other fish species like carp and
mullet; hybridization which produces monosex tilapia (usually males)
for culture. Another is the control of reproduction through cropping
of fingerlings by predators like Oohicephalus spp.. Clarias spp. and
Hemichromis spp. The use of these techniques lead to greater overall
production, and large-sized fish by prevention of growth stunting, and
thus are becoming widespread.
Under the extensive system of tilapia cultivation the ponds are
fertilized in order to promote the provision of natural food for the
fish. In contrast, with increased intensification of culture densities
natural food alone become insufficient ad the use of supplementary
artificial feeds, in the form of pellets, becomes imperative (Van de
Lingen, 1959). The advantages of dry pellets are the possibility of
storage, availability of a consistent product, ease of handling, high
quality, high protein and energy content and controllability of feeding
rates and frequencies.
One of the most costly factors when culturing fish intensively is
feed (Kohler et al. 1978). The cost may bBprohibitive in regions of
the world such as the developing nations where many of the commercial
fish feed ingredients, such as fish-meal, are imported. Today fish-meal
constitutes an appreciable part of all commercial palleted diets for fish
(Almazan et al., 1978). The high cost of fish-maal may bo a constraint
in the future development of aquaculture. For this reason many
aquaculturists have commenced research into possible, mors economical,
replacamants for fish-meal. Numerous studios have bean conducted to
3
find alternative sources of protein and feed-stuffs, such as idhey
(fieske et al.. 1977), petroleum yeast (Iida et al.. 1970), yeests
(Appelbqum, 1977) or even insects and small prawns (lakshmanan et al..
1967). Several of these have produced good results, but their
scarcity makes their general use uneconomical.
Other researchers have concentrated on more widely available
alternative protein sources and these are more extensively considered
in the literature review.
The best solution to the provision of protein in fish feeds, in
aquaculture, therefore, appears to lie in the use of local agricultural
food-stuffs and waste products as feed ingredients.
The aim of this present study was to investigate the nutritional
qualities of three protein sources of plant origin which are widely
cultivated viz, soyabean, rapeseed and sunflower seed meals.
Evaluation of the three protein sources was achieved by progressive
partial substitution of fish-meal.
4
LITERATURE REVIEW
Members of the genus tilepia (femily Cichlidae) have been an
important source of food for man at least since recorded history began
(Bardach et al.. 1972). A study of the bas reliefs and inscriptions
on the monuments of Ancient Egypt is probably good evidence that
tilapia culture was practised before 2000 B.C. in well constructed
drainable ponds. One member of the group Tilaoia niloticus.
recognizable by the slightly rounded caudal fin, uas probably the one
cultured at that time. This species is still very abundant in the
Nile. It uas a sacred fish closely connected uith the goddess Hathor,
and symbolized the hope for rebirth after death. Also the fish Saint
Peter caught in the Sea of Galilee and those uith uhich Christ fed the
multitudes uere tilapia, probably Tilapia oalilaeus (Bardach et al..
1972).
The family Cichlidae is very diverse and uidely distributed
throughout Africa, most of South America and parts of India and Ceylon.
Tilapia are, houever, mainly indigenous to Africa uhere some 100 species
can be found. The "knoun" natural ranges have been described by
Chimits (1955, 1957), Sterba (1967), Fryer and lies (1972) and Thingrav
and Gopalakrishnan (1974).
The taxonomy of the tilapia group has come under critical revieu
in recent years. At first Van den Audeneerde (1968) proposed a
separation into three divisions, but Trewauras (1973) uas even more
radical and erectad tuo distinct genara. Her claaaification allows
separation into tha tuo distinct breeding and feeding types. This
scheme is gaining acceptance in apite of some continued adherence to
older names. The major verifying distinctions of the tuo genera era
as follows
5
Tilapia species : These are substrate spawnersthat guard the developing eggs and fry. They are generally herbivorous and have 7-16 gill- rakers on the lower part of the first arch.
Sarotherodon species : These are mouth-broodersthe fry tend to be planktophagous having a finer set of 10-28 gill rakers on the lower part of the first arch.
for the sake of clarity references to the fish as a group are denoted
by the use of the term tilapia whereas references generically or
specifically precise are denoted as, for example :
Tilaola species, Sarotherodon species, Tilapia zilli.
Tilapia melanopleura. Sarotherodon variabilis
Sarotherodon leucostictus etc.
Today no fish, with the exception of the common carp (Cvprinus
carpio). is more widely cultured than tilapia (Bardach et al.. 1972).
As early as the 1920s experiments in tilapia culture were being
carried out in Kenya. Due to the missionary efforts of such
organizations as food and Agricultural Organisation (fAO) and the
enthusiasm generated by the research of such men as H. S, Swingle at
Auburn University in Alabama and C. f. Hickling at the Tropical fish
Culture Research Institute in Malaysia, tilapia species are now
cultured at least experimentally in South east Asia, Japan, Asiatic
Russia, the Indian subcontinent, the Near East, virtually all of Africa,
parts of Europe, the United States, and many of the Latin American
countries. What has made the introduction of tilapia so successful
in this wide geographical range can be aeen in at least 14 species
which have been cultured. These species all share hardiness, ease
of breading, rapid growth, and high quality of flesh which has made
one particular species Tilaois mossambicus vary popular.
About 23 species have bean evaluated by culturists and all share
ths same important characteristics listed above. Any of these or new
6
species, or hybrids as yet untried, may prove to be the right fish for
culture in a given situation. Often problems in tilapia culture have
arisen from hasty or uninformed selection of a species (Bardach, et al.,
1972). Certain factors such as availability, food habits, salinity
and temperature tolerance, growth, reproduction and temperament have
to be considered before a species is selected for culture in a particu
lar environment.
At present the 10 most popular cultured tilapia species are:
S. andersonii S. aureus S. aalilaeus S. spilurus nicer
S. macrochir 5. mossambicusS. nilolicusT. rendalli T. soerrmanii T. zillii
Sarotherodon andersonii is mainly cultured in Southern Africa, while
Tilapia rendallii is cultured both in Southern and Central Africa.
S. aureus is cultured mainly in West Africa. S. galilaeus. S. niloticus
and T. zillii are mainly cultured in west Africa, Central and North
Eastern Africa and the Middle East. S. mossambicus is cultured in East
Southern Africa. S. macrochir. and T. sperrmanii are cultured in
Southern Africa. S. spilurus nioer is cultured in East Africa.
Through accidental release or intentional stocking a large number
of tilapia species have now become established in the wild in areas
where they have not been indigenous. For instance the spread of tilapia
in the Far East began soon after the Second World War. It is reputed
to stem from five specimens believed to have escaped from an aquarist's
collection (Trevauras, 1967) which were discovered at Papungan, near
Kedini in East Cava (Schuster, 1952, quoted in Chimits, 1955).
i) The nutritional requirements of cultivated cold water and warmwater fish species.
Worldwide pressure to expand and develop aquaculture is motivated
primarily by the need for increased protein supply. Future interest
in aquaculture would seem to be increasing because it has been
recognised that the cultivation of fish offers certain advantages over
7
that of domesticated land animals (Hastings, 1976
One of these advantages is the ability of many species of fish to
convert prepared feeds into weight gain more efficiently than do
most terrestrial animals. Another is that ingredients in prepared
fish feeds compete less for human use than feeds for terrestrial
animals (Hastings, 1976). for such reasons the stocking of
ponds, tanks, race-ways and other water bodies with fish is common
practice today.
It was estimated that over six million tons of finfish and
shellfish are produced annually by world aquaculture (Hastings, 1976
This amount must be increased to meet the ever-increasing
demand for protein all over the world. An increase in the yield of
fish per unit area of pond can be achieved only by intensification of
the culture methods. This always means an increase in the stocking
density of fish in the pond and a corresponding increase in the
standing crop. Under such conditions the growth rate of the
individual fish is sustained at its highest level only if enough food
is available. Since the amount of natural food in the pond is
limited, it is obvious that with the increase in standing crop, the
dependence of growth and yield on supplementary feed also increases.
A most important ingredient of this feed is the protein. It should
supplement the natural proteins not only in quantity but also in
quality so as to provide a source of protein of high biological value
which will support growth.
Among the fishes cultured commercially using prepared feeds are i
Salmónida, carps, tilapias, catfishes, milkfish, tropical or ornamental
fishes, eels, grey mullets and flat fishes. The intensive cold water
aquaculture of such species as salmon, rainbow trout and some flat
fishes, like turbot and dovar sole, depende solely on artificial feed
because they are carnivorous animals. On the other hand the
cultured warm water fish such as carp, catfishss, tilapias, milkfish
ft «i: »
«**■
immnm
»mu
s
and mullet are omnlvorea feeding largely on both mlcrophytea and
macrophytea and detritus. Thus, Increase of primary productivity
by fertilization plays a significant role in their culture.
Apart from the cost of feed, another essential basic nutritional
problem ia to formulate the feed ao that it approximates as closely as
possible the nutritional requirements of the fiah. Any balanced
formula for fish diets must include an energy source plus sufficient
essential amino acids, essential fatty acids, specific vitamina and
minerals to support life and to promote growth. The majority of
research to date has been performed in order to understand the
nutritional requirements of the salmónida and cyprinida. for
example, Halver (1972) found that the nutritional requirements of tha
rainbow trout (Salmo oairdneri) change with fish size, water temperature
and with the balance of components in the ration. As dividends from
this research and development effort, practical rations for rainbow
trout can now be formulated throughout the world from locally available
dietary ingredients and can be used with a rsasonable degree of
assurance to rear rainbow trout to either market aize or to broodatock.
The same data ia not ao clearly defined for other speciae of fish and
mors work needs to be done to evaluate the specific nutrient require
ments of cyprinids, Cichlida and several othr fishes of potential
economic importance in the tropical countrisa where shortage of protein
ia moat acute,
ii) Protein requirements
All anímala require protein for growth and maintenance. In
fiah the level needed varies with epeciea (35% for tha channel catfish
Ictalurua ounctatuai 38% for the oommon carp Cvorlnue carpió), fish
size, water quality, biological value of the protein aource and tha
accompanying non-protein energy (Garling and Wilson, 1976).
Inveetigatione of protein needs for growing fish have been complicated
by genetic differancoe batwean straina, the effects of watar
temperature end, in some cases, an inadequate test diet (Lee and
Putnam, 1973).
Proteins ere mads up of amino acid unite. All fish species
used in experiments so fsr require the some ten indispenseble
(essential) amino acids for growth (Ccwey and Sargent, 1972; hertz,
1969). These amino acids are:
arginine histidine leucinephenylalanine valine iso-leucinetryptophan threomina lysine
histidine
They must be present in the diet end must be present in balanced
relative amounts to furnish an acceptable amino acid pattern before
fish protein can be synthesised. Thus, these 10 easential amino acids
in the correct proportions are determinants for the success or failure
of any particular feed ingredient as a major protein source. fish
that are fed diets devoid of any easential amino acid fail to grow,
whereas other fish that are fed diets devoid of non-oasential amino
acids grow as well as fish fad with control diet receiving all amino
acids in the reference protein (Halver, 1972).
It can be aean from the foregoing that not only the quantity but
also the quality of protein is important in fish culture practice.
In general usage the term quality as applied to food proteins refers
to the assortment and proportions of essential amino acids. The more
complete the assortment and the more nearly the proportions approach
the physiological needs of a species for amino acids the higher the
quality of the protein (Lloyd at al. 1978)
Experiments have ahown a considerable difference in the effect
on fish growth of dietary protein from different sources. This is
quantified as differences in biological value of these proteins.
Orino and Chon (1973), working with carp, found the biological values
of proteins from animal souroes such as egg yolk (89), casein (80)
white fish meal (76) to be higher than those of proteins from
vegetable sourcea auoh as soya bean meal (74) or c o m gluten meal (55)
10
(figures in parentheses are the corresponding biological values).
Proteins are primarily used for building and maintenance of the
tissues and organs of tha fish. However in fish they also serve as
an snergy sourcs. Whether protein calories are uaed for catabolic or
anabolic purposes is dependent upon the availability of othar caloria
sources such as fats and carbohydrates. These can spare the
protein for tissue production. However, excessive dietary energy
intake may restrict protein consumption and subsequent growth if fish
feed to a sat intaka of diatary anargy (Las A Putnam, 1973). Tha
catabolism or anabolism of diatary protein also depends upon its quality.
Protein of poor quality is catabolised for the release of energy or
excess may be metabolised and storad as carcass lipid (Halvsr, 1972).
In contrast with the cold water fishes, such as rainbow trout,
little has been determined concerning the protein requirement and anargy
utilization of tilapia. Research in this field is very important in
view of the recent increase of the culture of tilapia.
S.moasambais has been shown to require 50% dietary protein for
maximum growth on first feeding, 40% at weights from 0.5 - 10g, 35%
between 15 - 50g and 30% at fish weights over 50g (Jauncey, 1981,
Pars. comm.).
nazid at al (1978) have also determined that T. zillii has a
qualitative requirement for the same tan essential amino acids reported
necessary for the growth of other fish species,
iii) Lioid requirement
Fats and oils are high energy oompounds. They are therefore a
ready source of anorgy for fish. In most forms they are 85 - 90%
digestible and successful fish feeds oontain from 4 - 1 8 % fat (Hastings,
1976). Tat as an anargy source has a protein-sparing action which
enables the fish to utilise the protein for maximum growth. Thus fats
are an especially useful ingredient in foods of fry and young fish where
higher energy intake is neceasary to promote more rapid growth.
Apart from aerving aa the principal energy source, dietary lipida
play important role8 in the nutrition of warm water fiahea by providing
phospholipid and steroid components of vital organa, and in maintenance
of neutral bouyancy.
Essential fatty adds
These are fatty acida of the omega -3 and omega -6 series required
for maximal growth and normal tissue deposition in fish. The fish
cannot synthesize them and they must be supplied in the diet.
Essential fatty acid requirements have been demonstrated for several
species of fish. Tor rainbow trout linolenic acid (18:3 3) will meet
the fatty acid requirement at 0.8 - 1.0% of the diet or 1.66 - 2.7% of
dietary anergy. (Sinnhuber et al. 1972; Watanabe at al. 1974).
However marine fiahas such as red seabream (Paourua major) and turbot
(ScoDhthalreus maximus) are apparently unable to convert linolenic acid
to longer chain polyunsaturated acida at rates needed for normal growth.
These omega 3 fatty acida must therefore be supplied pre-formed in the
diet (Yone and Fugii, 1975; Cowey, 1976) principally as C22 fatty acids.
A recent study (Kanizawa et al. 1980)has shown that, unlike cold water
species, Tilaoia zillii utilizes omega 6 fatty acids, rather than
omaga 3, as an*essential fatty acid source, the requirement being 1% of
the diet.
Fats in fish food must be accompanied by sufficient choline,
methionine and tocopherols for efficient metabolism. Fats altered by
oxidation or hydrogenation may function as energy sources but not as
sources of essential fatty acids (Hastings,1976). To avoid oxidation
of fats to aldehydes, ketones and acids (which cause toxicity and loss
of vitamins in foods) antioxidants ars recommended in prepared fish
feeds e.g. alpha-tocopherol (Vitamin C) (Hastings, 1976).
lv cwfthrflHtf nil
Carbohydrates are another aourea of energy that may have a protein
sparing action. Exoaaa dietary carbohydrate is partially etored in the
livar aa glycogan and partially convartad into viscaral and auacular
fat. Carbohydratas rafar generally to the nitrogen free - axtractivaa
(NFE) portion of a feed and are calculated aa the difference between
100% and the sun of protein, fat, fibre, and moisture. NFE is
considered to have an average digestibility approximating that of
starch. Carbohydrate is an inexpensive energy source compared to the
cost of protein and fat for this purpose. The range of carbohydrate
levels found in prepared fish feeds rangss 10 - 50% and ths efficiency
of utilization as energy varies from 40 - 99% (Hastings, 1976).
There is still much controversy surrounding ths efficiency with which
dietary carbohydrate is utilized by fish and soma studies of carbohy
drate metabolizing enzymes have indicated that fish resemble diabetic
higher animals (Cowey & Sargent, 1972; Cowey & Sargent, 1979).
v) Vitamins and mineral reoulreaents
Dost of the nutrients known as vitamins for terrestrial animala
are required by fish (Hastings, 1976). Lack of vitamins cause deficiency
diseases in fish. Vitamin deficiency dieeasas have been described for
many speciae of fiah (Halver, 1972).
Commercial and test fish feeds contain vitamins as a premix
additive compounded by special formulation, as shown in Table III.
To avoid lose in processed and stored feeds, vitamins may be added as
a spray after manufacture or procured in the water* repellent form which
protect them from chemical change even during the proceas of expansion
palleting (Hastings and Simco, 1973).
Minerals are also Important components of the diet of fish.
Little is known about the trace mineral requirements of fish. Macro
mineral requirements have been studiad with a few species under care
fully controlled experimental conditions (NAS/NRC, 1973). Mineral
additione to a formula for feeds to be used in salt water are somewhat
laae than for those used in freshwater. Most watere contribute
ionized mineral compounds which era exohangsd through the gills and
13
skin with thoss in the fish body by simple diffusion, enzymatic action,
metabolic carriers or special cellular selection (Hastings, 1976).
A mineral premix that supplies all the known requirements of fish
is presented in Table III. Vitamins, minerals, non-digestible
components, and food contaminants in the diet are regerded as
non-energy components because the energy derived from them is
negligible and are usually not considered as contributing calories to
the diet.
14
ALTERNATIVE PROTEIN SOURCES
Sines protein is generally regarded to be the single most
expensive dietary ingredient, its source of regular supply is very
crucial to the success of modern aquaculture practice. At present
the major aource of this protein is fish-meal, and among the more
successful fish production diets used to date, none has contained
less than 10% fish-meal (Halver, 1972).
This dependence on fish-meal as an aesential ingredient in warm
water fish feed imposes soma difficulties on the development of fish
culture and its intensification. Fish-meal is not only more expensive
than many proteins, but its supply is much less reliable. Often there
is a shortage of supply which forces the prices to rise in the market
and there is no assurance that this trend will not continue in the
future. In contrsst, reliance on alternatives such as plant protein
sources may be more economical and successful since plants can be
intensively cultivated, ensuring uniformity of supply,
i) Non-protein nitrogen (NPN)
Various non-protein nitrogen compounds have bean thought of as
possible supplements to fiah-neal as a aource of food for fish. It is
well known that ruminants can utilize non-protein nitrogen instead of
true dietary protein (Hepher, 1978). The primary non-protein nitrogen
compound uaed in cattle feeding is urea. This changes in the rumen
into ammonia which is utilized by bacteria to form cellular protain
which in turn la uead as eouroe of protein by the animal. Exparimanta
have shown that high yialde of milk could b* obtained from cows fad
purified rations in which the only souroa of nitrogen was urea and
ammonium salte, but the usual practice is that not more than one-third
of the total protain equivalent should eome from urea (Coppock and Slack,
1970). Many workers have triad to find whether this source of nitrogen
could also aarve as a protain replacement in warm water fish diets.
15
This possibility is dubious if the dependence of the fish on fish-meal
and essential amino acids is taken into account (Hepher, 1978).
Nevertheless a few studies have ehown such a possibility with the
grey mullet, Leary (1970) reported that urea can replace protein at
least in part, in the diet of mullet. Further experiments to determine
if it ia possible to tranaform non-protein nitrogen into protein in the
gut of warm water fish were conducted on carp at the Fish and Aquacultura
Research Station at Dor Israal (floaz at al. 1977). Tha rasults show
conclusively that carp cannot utilize urea. This conclusion is strongly
supported by the results of an experiment carried out by Kerns and
Roalofs (1977) who substituted dried poultry wastes for fish-meal in the
diet of carp. Although the diets tested by these authors wars
iso-caloric and equal in nitrogen levala, the poultry waate diet gave a
much lower growth rate. Lu and Keveren (1975) also obtained a much
lower growth rata from catfiah with increaaing levels of poultry wastes
in the diets. The conclusion from these observations is that it seams
that at least carp and catfish, of the warm water fish, cannot utilize
non-protein nitrogen aa a cheap protein eource and a replacement for
fish-meal. Investigation of the use of non-protein nitrogen by tilapia
should be carried out before a general atatement concerning warm water
fiah could be made,
ii) Aloal protein
The unicellular algae are a class of plant proteins that have bean
considered for the replacement of fiah-meal in fiah feeds. The most
common single-call algae produced in mass cultures and which, therefore,
can be used as a feed ingredient are Chlorella. Scsnedesmus and Soirulinc.
Under uncontrolled eonditiona the culture of other algae species like
Euolana. Oocvetls and Plicrotinlum may prove economical. The dried oell
material of most of theae algae contain 50 - 69* protein (Taaiya, 1975)
and if provided with sufficient nutrients and light, algal cultures can
produce very high yields. Retovsky (1966) states that currently 110g
of Chlorella dry mattsr can ba harvested daily from a 1-m2 araa of
production unit. Extrapolated to common land unite, this equals
396 ton/ha/yr. The production of protein will than ba savaral thousand
fold greater than by tha usual form of agriculture. Thus a successful
replacement of fish-meal by algae would indicate a brighter future for
warm water fish husbandry.
The use of unicellular algae as feed for warm water fish has bean
studied in a number of experiments (Terao, 1960; Ahmed, 1966;
Anonymous 1969; Reed et al. 1974; Stanley and Donee, 1976; neska and
Pruas, 1977). dost of these studies although conducted on email
samplea and in aquaria or tanks, showed good reaulte. The fish were
able to utilize the algae, quite efficiently as a source of protain.
It would thus be nacesaary to carry out these experiments under field
conditions as aquarium conditions are not exactly the earn as pond
conditions.
However the high cost of the algae was the main drawback from a
practical point of view. The production of aingle cell algae ia at
preaent too expensive to be competitive with exiating protein sources.
The main difficulties encountered in thia reapect were:
i The coet of production unit and the nutrients
ii Tha method and costs of harvesting
iii The coats of drying the harvested algae.
Recent work carried out in Israel on the culture of algae on waste
water have shown that the economic problems can be overcome (Shelef et al.
1976). The reeulte indicated that sufficient algae nutrients are con
tained in one litre of domestic waste water to support tha growth of 500
to 1000mg of algae dry matter (Shelef et al. 1966). The system is an
integrated process in which the algae fix C02 and release 0j by
photosynthesis.
This 02 is used by bacteria in oxidising the organic matter while
tha baotaria produce auffieiant C02 and nutrients for tha algao. Sines
17
both wests water treatment and the integral culture aystem share the
cost of algae production and due to improved methoda of harvesting and
drying, it is believed that algaa meal produced in this way can be
economically competitive with other protein sources for animal feeds.
Multi-cellular algal meal:
Researchers have also looked into the possibility of using
multi-cellular algaa to replace fish-meal. Stanley and Donas (1976)
investigated growth in bigmouth buffalo Ictlobua cvprlnellus. blue tilapia
Tllapja aurea and graas carp CtanoDharvnoodon idella which had been fed
fresh algaa. The conclusion drawn from thair axparimanta is that growth
obtained for blue tilapia and bigmouth buffalo suggests that aquaculture
with Spirulina is feasible.
Mathavan et al. (1976) also reported the results of feeding algee
to Tilapia mossambicus. Soiroovra maxima, a natural food of Tilapia
mossambicus. (Chacko and Krishnamurth; 1954) was ehoaan aa plant food,
while goat liver and frog'a tadpole (mobile pray) size 25mg) served as
animal food. The authors concluded from their study that to ensure
"true growth in herbivorous fishes, animal matter is essential and that
a hsrbivoroua fiah neither will nor can consume and utilize sufficient
amounts of algae to meet its metabolic energy demands". This
conclusion ia fallacious and unscientific in that, by definition, a
herbivore does not consume animal matter. In addition the authors
have insufficient data to support this sweeping statement and should
only have concluded that their particular animal protein diets ware
superior to Solroovra. In addition, this conclusion contradicts the
results of many recent experiments such as Stanley end Jones (1976) which
have shown that tilapia can derive sufficient nutrients from some
filamentous algae for adequate growth. The contradictory results
obtained by these authors might be due to an improper balanee of amino
acids in the teat diet they used.
Another teat conducted on the replacement of fish-meal with diets
1B
containing algaa was carriad out in tha Soviat Union by Plironova in
1975. In thasa experiments tha author teatad tha nutritive value of
the protococcal alga Kirchnerlella obese aa feed for tilapia. The
testa involved rearing tilapia on 8 vegetable/meat and bona meal mix
tures. Tha author concluded that when Tilapia is fad on vegetable
feed the availability of tha feed and tha growth rata of tha fish
increase aa the proportion of Kirchnarialla obesa in the feed mix ia
increased, which confirms tha previous conclusion on tha nutritive
value of algaa totilapia.
iii) Other plant proteins and by-products
Pantastico and Baldia (1976) studied supplemental feeding of
Tilapia moasambicus at Laguna da Bay in the Philippines. Thair aim
was to find an economical and* nutritious food for tilapia. The fish
ware cultured in floating enclosures to minimize the problem of over
breeding since fry escaped through tha nets. Whilst natural food
abounded in tha lake it was still nacaasary to determine if tha growth
rats and protein quality could be improved by supplemental feeding.
Tha mean weight of tha fish used was about 10g.
Economical and nutritious aupplaaantal feeds ware prepared using:
i rica bran - ipil - ipil - fish-meal 60 : 20 : 20 (feed 1)
ii chopped snaila - rics bren 30 : 70 (feed 2)
The feeds wars ground finely, moistened, pelletized and sundried.
Feeding level was 10jt of tha body weight adjusted monthly. Feeds ware
given once a day during the first month of the experiment. Later
feeding waa given twica daily, onoe in tha morning and tha other in the
afternoon. Tilapis without supplemental feed were maintained as
control. Tha experiment was conductsd for 90 daya. The results show
that Tllaola moaaamblcus given supplemental feed showed significantly
faster growth as oompared to the control. Of the two rations tested,
feed 1 gave improved growth. This was attributed to the higher protein
oontsnt of food 1 (23.81%) as oompared to food 2 (12.73%).
19
In another related experiment the effect of varying levela of
ipil - ipil on the protein content of tilapia was determined. Ten
fingerlinga were stocked in 60-litre capacity aquaria with tap water,
tilater was changed every two days. Initial length - weight
measurements ware taken. Dried and finely ground ipil - ipil
(Leucaena leucocephala) leaves were given at 3 levels adjusted monthly:
(s) 3% (b) 6% and (c) 9% of the body weight were fed.
The results showed the beneficial effect of feeding Tilapia moseambicus
with varying levels of ipil - ipil leafmeal. The crude protein
content of tilapia increased proportionately with the levels of
feeding.
Tha authors concluded that the protein gain obtained with ipil -
ipil feeding is highly encouraging considering that this type of feed
could be given at a very minimal cost.
Bayna at al. (1976) made a study of supplemental feeds containing
coffee-pulp for rearing tilapia in El-Salvador, Central America. In
their experiment, 3 prepared feeds wars evaluated, each with a similar
basic composition. Two of the 3 feeds contained 30% coffee-pulp, and
the third feed contained compensatory quantities of wheat bran and
ground corn and no coffas-pulp. All feeds wars formulated to contain
approximately 20% crude protein. This protein level is well below the
optimum for tilepie (Cruz end Laudencia, 1977). The feeds were then
fed to Tilepie aurea.
findings from these etudies demonstrated that coffee-pulp is en
adequete substitute for wheet bren end ground corn in e supplemental
diet for Tllapls auras at levels up to 30% in the feed.
Kohler end Pegen-font (1976) reported the results of e study
conducted on using rum distillation wastes, pharmaceutical wastes and
chicken feed for rearing Tilepie auras in Puerto Rieo.
Distiller's solubles are the major waste product resulting from
the rum distillation process. The by-produet is high in organic
20
content (Hill at «1. 1963) and has bean uaad as an agricultural
fertilizer (Innas, 1951). In addition to the rum distiller's solubles,
dead yeast cells collected from the bottom of the distillation vats,
wars evaluated in the study. 'Spent beers' are pharmaceutical wastes
the expended media in which strains of bacteria were cultured for the
production of antibiotics.
Twenty-four plastic pools were used as the experimental units.
Each was about 0.9m in depth and 3.7m in diameter. The experiment
consisted of 8 treatments with 3 replications for each treatment.
Each pool was stocked with 10 Tilaoia aurea fingerlings. The mean
weight per stocked fish was 1g. The rum and pharmaceutical wastes
were applied concurrently to their respective pools in their raw,
viscous forms approximately every 2 weeks. The chicken feed was
applied as fertilizers.
The results showed that the fish from the spent beer treatment
attained the highest weights. The mean standing crop was near that
of the fish which fed on the commercial fish fead, and was over 4 times
that of fish from the unmanaged system. It resulted in no adverse
effect to the fish or the quality of water. The fish fed the rum
distiller's solubles yielded a mean standing crop at harvest that was
twice that of the unmanaged system. In the rum distiller'a yeaet
treatment, there was more than three fold increase of fish weight
over that of the unmanaged system. However, it resulted in poor water
quality conditions.
If the wastes were not fed as fertilizers in the raw form as
already indicated, but were harvested, dried and incorporated into a
dried feed, their utilization and concomitantly water quality would
probably be improved.
The investigators concluded that with the exception of the spent
beer, it is doubtful that the raw waste produots would be more
economical than intensive fertilization using inorganic aeureee.
21
Cridland (1960) of Cast African Fiahariaa Research Organization,
Dinja, Uganda conducted a study of the value-of various foods fed to
Tilapia esculents. Hs used fry that had an average length of 14.8mm
and average weight of 0.044gm. The fish wars fad twice daily at
regular intervals with as much as they could consume.
In the feeding experiments glass aquaria which contained 12 litres
of water, were used. The feeds used included animal flesh and plants
such as the following:
Oligochaete worms (Stvhlmania sp)Liver of either sheep or cows Beef muscle The flesh of tilapia The flesh of PlormvrusThe stomach content of tilapia (phytoplankton)The stomach content of Wormvrua (insect larvae)Larvae of Chironomua oulcher UiedmannDaohnla maona StrausPrawns (Caridina nllotica Roux)Splroovra sp.Euolana sp.BemaxBoiled maize meal.
Results indicated that the best growth was obtained when the fish
were given a mixed diet, but certain whole organisms gave similar results.
Fish fed exclusively on oligochaete worms grew almost as well as fish fed
on a more elaborate diet. The author attributed this to all essential
requirements provided by the worm and believed that their gut contents
provided any elements that.might be lacking in the tissues of the worm
themselves. Fish fed exclusively on certain animal tissues such as
beef and tilapia muscle did not grow well and developed abnormally. It
is interesting to note that while a similar rate of growth was made by
fish fed on flormvrus muscle they developed normally. Thus the result
schisvsd with bssf and tilapia muscle as feed was probably due to
inadequate balance of amino acids in the feed which could not mast the
raquiramanta of the fish.
A dist composed of algae Including diatoms which ara the principal
natural food of Tilapia aeculenta did not give as good rasults aa a diet
containing a high proportion of aniaal protain.
Highly farinaceous food such as bemax and maiza gave poor reaulta.
Initially bemax appeared to be the batter food. Pish fad on this product
reached a length of 7.0cn and a weight of 4.5g in aix months but after
four months they started to develop abnormally and ahowed deformations
of the head and were flabby and pale in colour. They showed a high
mortality rate and after six months all of them had died. Fish fad on
maize meal made vary poor growth and only reached a length of 4.5cm and
a weight of 1.7g after 12 months which is the poorest result with any of
these foods. After thrae months these fish also developed daformationa
of the head and tail and their eyaa became protuberant.
Obviously the growth in the fish fed bemax and maiza meal was poor
dua to the low laval of protein in the two feeds. The diseases were
probably deficiency diseases caused by lack of certain vitamins. Thus
the use of bemax and maiza maal as single ingredient feed should be
discouraged.
However maize can be successfully used as fish feeds if mixed with
other ingredients with high level of protein as shown in the following
example. Flabaye (1971) atudiad the growth of Tllaoia mossamblcus in
which he uaed 3 feeds.
Feed 1 t 60% maize meal, 20% groundnut cake and 20% fish-meal and penicillin (60mg/kg of food)
Feed 2 > The same as feed 1 but no penicillin.
Feed 3 i 80% maize meal, 20% fish-meal and no penicillin.
There were 8 fiah par tank.
Fish ware fed a dally ration of 5% of their total body weight, twioe a day.
The resulta showed that there was no significant difference between
the mean weight gain of fish fed on foods 1 and 2. There was however a
significant difference in mean weight gain between feed 2 and 3.
The author concluded that addition of groundnut cake to maize meal
23
in correct proportions to givs a ratio of digestible protein to
carbohydrate of approximately 1 : 2 increases the rate of growth of
T. mossambicus. The addition of penicillin as a biostimulant to
this maize meal plus groundnut cake diet did not produce any
significant difference in the rate of growth of the fish,
iv) Oil-seed meals
Plant proteins include the by-products of the oil-seed industry
and comprise principally the presscake and extracted meals from soya
bean, peanut, sunflower, cottonseed, linseed, rapeseed, coconut and
groundnut.
Many of the oil-seeds have been evaluated as possible substitutes
for fish-meal in catfiah, carp and the sslmonids, but only few studies
havs been documented for tilapia. The principal reaeon for the interest
in oil-seed meals as dietary protein sources for fish lies in their
relatively high protein content (40 - 50%) compared to other plant
materials. Following are some investigations that havs been conducted
on oil-seed meals
Wu and Dan (1977) reported the reaulte of investigation they
conducted on the possible use of 2 oil-seed meals and other proteins as
feeds for Tlleole auree.
The teat diets contained 25% of crude protein in form of fish-meal,
casein, soyabean meal, peanut cake and yeaat individually.
The experimante were performed in aquaria stocked with 20 - 30 fish
each. Feeding rate was S* of the total body weight given 3 times daily.
The experiments lasted for 4 weeks.
The results showed that casein, followed by fish-meal gave the
highest body weight gain, protein efficiency ratio (PER) and net-protain
utilization (NPU). Fish fad on ooyabean meal had a weight gain of about
65* of that of fiah-moal. Fiah fad on peanut caka had a weight gain or
about 29* of that of fiah-meal while fiah fad on yaaat only had about
18* of the weight produced in fish fad on fish-meal.
The protein efficiency retio end net-protein utilizetion of the
different diete ere ee follows: casein end fish-meal had the beet
nutritional value. Theae ware followed by soyabean. Peanut cake and
yeast diats had poor values.
From these it can be concluded soyabean meal rather than peanut
cake would be an efficient fiah-oeal replacar at the 2536 crude protein
levels among the two oil seeda.
Oauncey (Ph.O Thasia 1979) investigated the substitution of
fish-meal by aoyabean in the diet of fingerling mirror carp (Cvcrinua
caroio). In this study he formulated 7 diets on an isonitrogenous
and isoenergatic basis to supply 30% protein and 3.4 kcal/g of
metabolisable energy.
The proportion of the dietary protein supplied by each protein
aourca was varied with percentages of fieh-meal protein and soyabean
protein in the following ratios: 30:0, 25:5, 20:10, 15:15, 10:20,
5:25, and 0:30. Tan fiah were stocked in each tank and the faada ware
fed to duplicate tanka at the rate of 4% of the body weight per day far
5 weeks.
The results showed that in a 30% fish-meal protein diet
substitution of only one third of the protein with soyabean protein
concentrate caused a significant decrease in growth rate and food
utilization. The author concluded that, however, it ia poaeibla that
this might be offset by tha reduction in feed coats achieved by replacing
fish-meal with soyabean.
These results are in agreement with previous studies of the
isonitrogenoua replacement of fish-meal with soyabean protein.
For example Cowey at al. (1971) replaced approximately half of tha
protein in 4036 cod-maal protein diet, with soyabean meal and found that
this depressed the growth and protein utilisation of plaica (Plevronectes
Plateaaa).
Andrews and Page (1974) have also reported similar raeults for
The protein efficiency retio end net-protein utilizetion of the
different diete ere es follows: casein end fish-meel had the best
nutritional value. These were followed by soyabean. Peanut caka and
yaast diets had poor values.
From these it can be concluded aoyabean meal rather than peanut
cake would be an efficient fish-meal replacer at the 25% crude protein
level, among the two oil seeds,
3auncay (Ph.O Thesis 1979) investigated the substitution of
fish-meal by soyabsan in the diet of fingerling mirror carp (Cvorinua
carpio). In this study he formulated 7 diets on an isonitrogenous
and isosnergetic basis to supply 30% protein and 3.4 kcal/g of
metabolisable energy.
The proportion of the dietary protein supplied by each protein
source waa varied with percentages of fish-meal protein and eoyabean
protein in the following ratios: 30:0, 25:5, 20:10, 15:15, 10:20,
5:25, and 0:30. Tan fish were atocksd in each tank and the feeds wars
fed to duplicate tanks at the rats of 4% of the body weight per day for
5 weeks.
The results showed that in a 30% fish-meal protein diet
substitution of only one third of the protein with soyabean protein
concentrate caused a significant decreeae in growth rate and food
utilization. The author concluded that, however, it is possible that
this might be offset by the reduction in feed costa achieved by replacing
fish-meal with eoyabean.
These results are in agreement with previous studies of the
isonitrogenous replacement of fiah-meal with eoyabean protein.
For example Cowey at el. (1971) replaced approximately half of the
protein in 40% cod-meal protein diet, with eoyebean meal and found that
this depreeaed the growth and protein utilization of plaioe (Plevronectea
pletoaaah
Andrews and Page (1974) have alee reported similar results far
25
channel catfish Ictalurua punctatua where isonitrogenous replacement of
dietary menhaden-meal with soyabean meal depressed growth and food
utilization even when the soyabean meal was supplemented with methionine,
cystine and lysine to the levels found in the fish-meal control.
Koops et al. (1975) studied the utilization of soyabsan protein by
the rainbow trout (Salmo oairdneri). They used isocaloric feed rations
with crude protein levels of 47% and 39%. They found that heavy growth
depressions occurred in rainbow trout, if fish-msal is entirely replaced
by soyabean protein. When equal quantity of food was fad the feed
conversion for soybean (2.5 - 3.0) was roughly double that of fish-meal
(1.3 - 1.4) and the weight gain was less than half. Addition of amino
acids did not influence the feed conversion. Furthermors the trout
rejected the soyabean rations because of taste. This could be
compensated only partially when soyabean oil was replaced by red fish
oil.
In a second experiment 25% of the fish-meal protein was replaced
by the soyabean concentrate "Heypro". Here the soyabean was supple
mented by methionine as well as animal protein. In this case feed
conversion and growth rate were as favourable as in the control ration.
Adding of amylolytic enzymes to the Haypro-ration did not yield any
improvement of the result.
The authors concluded that rainbow trout can utiliza aoyabaan
protein if supplemented by methionine and animal protein.
Brandt (1979) conducted a atudy to determine if channel catfish
and golden shinere could uae soyabeans processed by the heating method.
Such beano are termed full-fat cooked eoyabeans. Prior to thie the
problem confronting researchers is how to economically destroy the
growth inhibitors present in eoyabeans which presumably ere responsible
for the depresalons in growth earlier discussed.
Six experimental diets ulh varying proportions of fieh-meal and
full fat oooked aoyabeans were fomulstsd to contain 33 - 34% protein.
25
channel catfish Ictalurua punctatua where isonitroganous replacement of
dietary menhaden-meel with soyabean meal depressed growth and food
utilization oven whan the soyabean meal was supplemented with methionine,
cystine and lysine to tha levels found in the fish-meal control.
Koops et al. (1975) studied the utilization of soyabean protein by
the rainbow trout (Salmo oairdneri). They used isocaloric feed rations
with crude protein levels of 47% and 39%. They found that heavy growth
depressions occurred in rainbow trout, if fish-asal is entirely replaced
by soyabean protein. When equal quantity of food was fed the feed
conversion for soybean (2.5 - 3.0) was roughly double that of fish-meal
(1.3 - 1.4) and the weight gain was less than half. Addition of amino
acids did not influence the feed conversion. Furthermore tha trout
rejected the soyabean rations because of taste. This could be
compensated only partially whan soyabean oil waa replaced by red fish
oil.
In a second experiment 25% of the fish-meal protein was replaced
by tha soyabean concentrate "Haypro". Here the soyabean was supple
mented by methionine aa well as animal protein. In this case feed
conversion and growth rate were as favourable as in the control ration.
Adding of amylolytic enzymes to tha Haypro-ration did not yield any
improvement of the result.
The authors concluded that rainbow trout can utilize soyabean
protein if supplemented by methionine and animal protein.
Brandt (1979) conducted a study to determine if channel catfish
and golden shinere could use soyabeans prooeaaed by the heating method.
Such beans are termed full-fat cooked soyabeans. Prior to this the
problem confronting researchers is how to economically destroy the
growth inhibitors present in soyabeans which presumably are responsible
for the depressions in growth earlier discussed.
Six experimental diets wJh varying proportions of fish-meal and
full fat oooked eoyabeans ware formulated to contain 33 - 34% protein.
26
The fish wars fad st tha rata of 3£ of thair body weight par day»
6 days a weak.
The results showed that there ware no significant differences in
tha average weight of fish receiving tha different feeds. From this
the conclusion can be drawn that fish-meal can be successfully
replaced both partly and completely by full-fat soyabeans.
It was also found out from this study that as bean processing
treatment increases from 170 to 207°C the use of full-fat soyabeans
by catfish decreases slightly. No problems were encountered in feeding
the golden shiners a 100$S full-fat soyabean diet» the soyabeans were
readily consumed by the fieh.
Rapeased
Rapeseed is one of the potential leading sources of food protein
because of the production capacity of the crop and nutritional value of
the protein. The essential amino acid composition of rapeseed protein
compared favourably with that of soyabean. For this reason many studies
have recently been conducted on the possible use of rapeseed meal as a
fish-meal protein substitute in fish diets.
In Poland» Dabrowaki and Kozlowska (1980) studied the possibilities
of fish-meal substitution by rapsssed meal in the diet offered common
carp. Experimental diets were prepared by substituting rapeseed meals
for 50 or 100)1 of the fish-meal protein. One hundred fish were stocked
per tank in 1400 litre capacity. Average size of fish used was 2.5g.
The fish were fed by hand at the rate of 4% dry diet per wet body
weight for 74 daya.
The reaults showed that 50)1 of fish-meal protein can be substituted
by rapaeeed meal protein without a significant drop in fish performance.
It can thus be concluded that rapeseed is an efficient fish-meal replaoer.
However tha rssulte of other investigations conducted do not justify this
conclusion
For example, Yurkowski at el. (1978) indicated that the rapeeeed
or rapeeeed flour aupplied to rainbow trout at levels of 72.3% and
64.7% respectively significantly reduced fish growth.
Also in West Germany, another attempt with rdnbow trout has shown
that even adding 5% rapeeeed impairs feed utilization, and when supplied
at the levels of 10% and 20% of the diet increases the Taluctance of
fish to eat food (Anon 1979).
Higgs et al. (1979) worked with Pacific salmon and rapaseed meal
in diets containing levels of 9%, 11% and 22%. Fish gain and diet
utilization were slightly reduced only at the highest ratio of rapeseed
meal in the diet. In addition, thyroid hypertrophy was observed in
fish fed a diet composed of 11% and 22% rapesaed meal.
The results so far obtained are inconclusive mainly due to
superficial characteristics of the rapeseed.
Rapeseed is contaminated with toxic substances among which
glucosinolate derivatives that can have harmful affect on animal thyroid
fland. Furthermore typical crude fibre content of commercial rapeseed
meal is 13-16% which is an unfavourable factor.
It appears that the rapeasad meals used in the experiments already
mentioned originated from different strains with varied glucoainolate
levels, hence the inconsistent results. Glucosinolate, which is a
growth inhibitor, can however be reduced or eliminated by preventing
its hydrolysis through inactivation of myrosinase. For example it has
bean shown with mammals that higher digestibility of rapeseed meal can
be obtained by heat treatment which inactivates myrosinaae.
The conclusion that can be drawn from the foregoing is that
efficient utilization of rapeeesd in fiah diets can be achieved by
heat treatment or by use of rapesssd with a low level of glucosinolataa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental system and animals
This experiment was oonducted in the Tropical Aquarium of the
Institute of Aquaculture for a period of 50 days. The experimental facility
employed was made up of a warm water recycling system, consisting of twelve,
9 litre, self-cleaning circular tanks which drained into a 200 litre solids
3 3settling tank and then into a 0.5m filter tank containing 0.3m of 0.5 -
1.0cm gravel. Water was pumped from the base of the submerged gravel
filter into a 120 litre heated, aerated, header tank from which it flowed
into the experimental tanks each of which received a flow of 1.5 litres/min.
The header tank was vigorously aerated so that the level of dissolved oxygen
in the experimental tanks did not fall below 90% saturation. Fresh water
was added to the eystem at a rate of 0.25 litres/min. to replace splashing
and evaporation losses. The temperature was maintained at 27°C - 1°C by a
3Kw immersion heater placed in the header tank and controlled by a thermis
tor sensor via a proportional output circuit designed and constructed by the
Shared Technical Services Department of the University of Stirling (see
Plates 1 and II).
The species of fish used in this study was Sarotherodon mossambicus
(Peters). The juveniles of the fiah ware produced in the Institute from
stock that had bean idantifiad as genetically purs by starch-gel
electrophoretic typing (McAndrew, B. Personal communication 1981).
DietThe plant protein sources used in the experiment were sunflower seeds
(Hellanthus ennuus L.), raoeseeds (Brassica spp) and soyabean (Glycine epp).
Supplied es deeortioeted mechanically oil extracted (expressed) meals by
Erith Oil Works Ltd., Church Manor Way, Erith, Kent. These plant materials
were selected for this study because a literature review revealed that,
apart from soyabean, they have not yet been evaluated in diets for many warm
water fiah species.
29
The raw materials ware ground in an electric coffee grinder and
then passed through a 1mm sieve to obtain a fine powder of each.
Tha proximate analysis of the sunflower seeds, rapeseeds and
soyabean, and the herring fishmeal were then performed prior to diet
formulation to obtain the following:
i Moisture content - by loss in weight on drying at 105°C for 24 hours
li Crude protein - by micro Kjsldahl method
iii Crude lipid - by Soxhlet ether extract method
iv Aah - by measuring rosidus after heating at 450°C for 12 hours
v NFC (nitrogen free extractives)- obtained by eubtracting above
values from 100.
Diet preparation
Six diets were prepared by combinations of varying proportions of
the three plant materials with the herring fishmeal, to give 30% protein
in every caee. The levels of dietary aunflowar rapeaeeds and aoyabean
and the white fiahmeal needed to provide the required dietary protein
level (30%) were then calculated and tha lipid and NFC eoapounda ware
balanced by cod liver oil, mineral aixtura and atarch reapactively aa
ahown in Table III.
The dieta ware prepared by thoroughly mixing of the dry ingredienta
with the oil and than adding cold water until a atiff dough reaulted.
This was then paaaed through a mincer with a 3mm die and the resulting
'sphagatti-like' strings were dried in a forced convection sir-dryer at
35°C. After drying tha diets were broken up and sieved into convenient
pellet sizes. Diets ware stored at -20°C until required.
F eedino
Prior to transfar to tha experimental tanks the fish ware 72 days
post-raleaao and had been roared on a commercial trout ration ('Omega',
31
TABLE I : Analysis of Plant materials
Protein Lipid Floiature Ash NFE
Sunflower 31.1 2.8 1.4 13.6 51.1
Rapeaeeds 3B.6 1.7 1.3 14.4 44
Soyabean 48.7 2.2 1.7 13.6 33.8
Fishmeal 68.9 10.4 1.0 10.7 8.0
TABLE II i Proportion» of Protein supplied by inoradianta In experimental diets
Diet Ingradianta
1 Fishmeal (30%) - Control
2 Fishmeal (5%), Sunflower (25%)
3 Fishmeal (5%), Rapeaeeds (25%)
4 Fishmeal (5%), Soyabean (25%)
5 Rapeaeeda (15%), Soyabean (7.5%),A Sunflower (7.5%)
6 Soyabean (1SJ6), Rapaaaad (7.5%),A Sunflower (7.5%)
Edward Baker, Sudbury, Suffolk, Great Britain). Fiah were atocked at
21 par tank for 2 weeks prior to the experiment to acclimatise them to
the conditions of the recycling system. At the beginning of the
experiment the fish were redistributed at 20 fish par tank with average
individual fish weight per tank being about 0.9g.
A fixed feeding regime of 5$ of the body weight per day (dry food/
whole fish) divided into 3 equal faeda was adopted. Feeding was done
in the morning, afternoon and in the evening. Each diet was fed to
randomly assigned duplicate tanks of fish. Feeding was performed for
nine consecutive days with no food being given on the tenth day when the
fish were weighed.
The necessary adjustment in the quantity of food fed was made at
the end of every weighing period.
Weight determination
Small hand nets ware uaed to remove the fiah from the axparimantal
tanks and than they were placed on a paper towel to remove exceaa
moiature before being tranaferred to a balanoe where their weight waa
recorded. The method of anaeathetizing the fiah by uaing 0.5g of
benzocaine in 1,500ml of water (Rosa and Geddea 1978) waa not uaed because
this may cause mortality in the fiah through undue stress. Therefore
the lengths of individual fiah wera not recorded and the condition
factor (k) was not calculated.
The weights recorded were used to calculate various parameters for
each weighing period end averaged over the whole experiment. These
parameters were calculated as followst
Ciloulatlona
Food Conversion Ratio (FCR) I This waa ealoulated from the following
relationship
TOR - Amount of food fed (o) ea dry waioht Total wet weight gain (g)
i’rotein efficiency ratio (PER)
PER * Total wat weight gain (□)Amount of Protain fad (g)
Spacific growth rata (SGR)
SGR - logaM2 - 109,11), X 100
whara • final naan weight of fiah
W1 ■ initial naan weight of fiah
t ■ time interval in days
Mean weight ■ Total waioht No, of fish
Feed Analysis
Ths crude protain content of tha formulated diet waa determined by
the micro Kjaldahl method (Rsrkham, 1942) tha fat content by soxhlet
extraction with petroleum ether. Ash content was determined by heating
a weighed sample of tha diet in a muff la furnace at 450°C for 12 hours.
The moisture content was determined by drying a weighed sample of ths
feed in an oven at 105°C for 24 hours.
Ths gross energy content of the diet was determined from proximate
analysis values by calculation using the factors 5.7kcal/g for protein,
9.5kcal/g for fat and 4.1kcal/g for nitrogan-frss extractives (NFE)
(Brody, 1945).
Feed Preparation for digestibility studies
During formulation of tha experimental diets, 0.5g in 100g diet, of
chromic oxide was included in each ration before palleting. Tha diets
and tha faacas of ths fish ware than analysed for chromic oxide oontent
by tha method of Furukawa and Taukahara (1966). Tha weights of tha
chromic oxide wars than used in determining the digsstibilitlas of tha
different experimental diets.
Collection of faeces
Faeces wars collected once a day during tha last weak of tha
experiment et 1.00pm, by siphoning the wster conteining faecal material
into a bucket. This was thmn vacuum filtered immediately in a Buchner -
flask fitted with Whatman paper (Dyka and Sutton, 1977). Prior to
collection of the faeces any faeces and debris of uneaten food was
removed in order to ensure that the faecal material collected was as
fresh and uncontaminated as possitts to ensure accuracy of reaults and
that no leaching of nutrients had taken place. After collection the
faeces were then dried in the oven at 100°C for 24 hours prior to
analysis of pooled samples for chromic oxide and protein to enable
protein digestibility determination.
Determination of chromic oxide in feed and faeces
About 200mg of the sample was accurately weighed and transferred
carefully to a dry 100ml Kjeldahl flaak. Into this was carefully added
5ml of concentrated nitric acid and the mixture was left to stand for a
short period. After this the flask was heated gently in a gas mantle
until a white precipitate was obtained (for about 20 minutes). The
flask was than allowed to cool before 3ml perchloric acid was added to
the digestion mixture. The flask was then re-heated until the green
colour chenged to yellow, orange or red. The flask was than allowed to
ooo1 down slightly before 50ml of distilled water was added. Then the
mixture was cooled to room temperature end made up to 100ml in a
volumetric flask with distilled water. The solution was then trans
ferred to a colorimetric tube and the optical density was road at 350mu
against distilled water as blank. The chromic oxide content (X) was
calculated from the following relationship.
X ■ absorbency reading - 0.032 x 100weight of sample in mg/100g dryweight
The apparent digestibility was calculated aa follows
App. Olgaat. - 100 - (100 x * Cr-0- in feed x ft Pfgfin 10 ftlBIt)( % Cr'Oj in faaoas % Protein in feed )
and the dry matter digaatibility was calculatsd as follows
Dry matter Digest. - 100 - (100 x % Cr203 in fasces)
( % Cr203 in feed )
(Furukawa and Tsukahara 1966)
Carcass analysis of fish
Before the beginning of ths experiment and at ths and, six fish from
each tank were sacrificed and proximate analysis was performed on them
by the methods already stated.
The following parameters were then calculated from ths results of
the analysis.
Apparent Nat Protein Utilization
App. NPU - B - Bo x 10Q
where
B * Total body protein of test fish st and of trial Bo * Total body protein of fish at beginning of trial I ■ Protein intake on test diet.
If a zero protein diet was fad to ths fish during the experiment
then the following can also ba calculated.
Nat Protein Utilization
NPU I 100
whare
B ■ Total body nitrogen of test fish at and of trialBk - Total body nitrogen of fish fad zero protein dietI ■ Nitrogen intake on teat diet.
True Oigostibility (TO)
TD • I - (F - rk)x x 100
whore I » Nutrient intakaF ■ Faocal nutrientFk ■ metabolic faooal nutriont
Biologioal Value (BV)
m x 100TD
Statistical analyoool
Those wore performed by the method of Dunean multiple
RESULTS
The results of the proximate chemicsl analysis of ths plant
protein sources are presented in Table I, whilst Table II shows ths
proportions of protein supplied by ingredients in experimental dists.
Proximate analysis of formulatsd diets is in Table IV.
Of the three plant materials, soyabean has ths highest level of
crude protein (46.7$) followed by rapeseed (38.6$) and then sunflower
seeds (31.3$). There is less variation in ths lipid levels. The
sunflower seed meal has the highest value (2.8$) followed by soyabean
meal (2.2$) and then by the rapeseed meal (1.7$). All three of these
protein sources are 'meals' produced by mechanical and solvent lipid
extraction of the raw product followed by grinding.
The proximate analysis of the experimental diets show close
approximation to the formulated nutrient levels. Instead of the
30$ protein value formulated for each of the six diets there was
variation from 29.1$ in diet 2 to 32.5$ in diet 1 as shown in Table IV.
These variations are email and no more than expected. The mineral and
vitamin mix content are presented at the bottom of Table III.
The proximate analysis of the fish initially and at the end of the
experiment are shown in Table VII.
The proximate analysis of the faeces if shown in Table V. The
chromium oxide content of the diets is generally lower than the
formulated values. This may be due to some losses during mixing of
the ingredients. However the level in the faeces is much higher than
in the diet ae expected. But the level of protein in the faeces is
much lower then in the diet suggesting that muoh had been abeorbed into
the body for growth.
Diet Acceptance
The control diet, in which the protein souroe was herring meal, was
no re acceptable to the fiah than any of the other experimental diets
most especially during the first week of the experiment. This was
probably due to the fact that the fish had bean fed on a fishmeal based
commercial feed during the acclimation period and had become used to it
thus not readily accepting alternative materials. Furthermore, the
texture of the control diet was slightly softer. Soma of the
experimental diet% especially the ones containing sunflower seed meal,
were coarse and hard, and were not raedily ingested. For example,
diets 2, 5 and 6 wars often mouthed by the fiah and then spat out and
then mouthed again several times before ingestion, suggesting that they
may have been too hard for the fish. However, after being immersed in
the water for a few minutes they softened and ware more readily ingested.
One further observation concerning fiah fed diets containing
sunflower meal was that they produced danse faeces which could be seen
at the bottom of the tank. This may have been due to the high fibre
content of sunflower seed meal (Gohl 1975). This would have mada the
diets containing thia protein source leas digestible than the others.
The fish fed on diets containing rapesead maal and aoyabsan meal
produced leas apparent faeces than ths ones containing sunflower seed
meal but mora than tha ones fed fiehmaal.
Growth
The average specific growth rate (SGR) for each diet is presented
in Table VI. The increase in averege fiah weight throughout the
experiment is shown in figure 1. Both sets of data show highest
growth rates for the control diet (fishmeal). Statistical analyaia
shows that diets 3 and 4 have a significantly higher specifie growth
rats than diets 2, 5 and 6. The control diet gave significantly the
highest growth. There was no signifiosnt difference between the
specific growth retes produced by diets 3 and 4. Also there is no
significsnt difference between SGR produoed by diets 2, S and 6.
These results showed thst diets containing 5% fishmeal and 25J6 protein
from either rapsseed meal or soyabean meal produced better growth then
the purely plant protein diets (diets 5 and 6) or diet 2 containing %
fishmeal and 25% protein from sunflower meal,
mortality
The parcentsge of mortslity was generally low as shown in Table VI.
However the percentage mortality in fish fed diets 1 and 4 was much
higher than in the other diets for reasons which are not understood.
Body composition
The proximate carcass analyses of fish et the beginning and at tha
end of the experimental period are presented in Teble VII. The gross
body composition was not greatly altered during the experimental period.
However, there wes slight variation according to the dietary protein
source. The fish fed on diets containing sunflower seed meals (diets
2, 5 and 6) had lower levels of pro tain than those fed diets containing
either all fishmeal or 25£ protein from rapaeeads or soyabean but there
was no significant difference betwasn them. Only the fishmeal protein
fed fish had a significantly higher protein content than the others.
There was no significant difference between the moisture level in
the fish fad the different diets. The lipid level in fish fed the
control diet wes significantly higher than values for the other diete.
This was followed by diete 3 and 4, then diete 5, 6 and 2 rsepectively.
Tha body moisture and lipid level appeared to be slightly inversely
relsted ea has been noted in previous experiments (Kausch and Ballionousmano,
1976j Dabrowska and Wojno, 1977; Crayton and Beamish, 1977j Hurray
et al.. 1977; Ateck at al. 1979; Oauncey 1980).
Body ash was not much affected by dietary rsgieme ae has bean noted
with other fish species (Phillips et al. 1966, Cowey etji. 1974,
Elliot, 1976; Dabrowsks and litojno, 1977; Yu at al. 1977; Atack at al.
1979).
Food Conweraion ratio (FCR)
The values of the food conversion ratios are presented in Table VI.
The pattern of variation ia similar to that of mean weight and specific
growth rates i.e. diet 1 gave the best value followed by diets 3 and 4.
Thera are no significant differences in FCR values between diets 2, 5 and
6. However diet 2 had the lowest FCR followed by 5 and 6 respectively.
Protein efficiency ratio (PER)
The average protein efficiency ratio (PER) values are preaented in
Table VI. Fishmeal gave the best value followed by diets 3, 4 and 2
respectively.
Apparent Net-Protein Utilization
Since no zero protein diet was included in the experimental diets,
the true net-protein utilization was not calculated. Inetead the
apparent net protein utilization wae calculated from the carcass analysis
data presented in Table VII.
The fishmeal diet gave the highest value followed by diets 3, 2, 5,
4 and 6 in decreasing order.
Apparent Digestibility
The apparent protein digestibilities of the diets are presented in
Table VI. They were determined by analysis of faecal samples.
Diet 4 gave the highest value followed by diets 6, 1, 3, 5 and 2 in
decreasing order
TABLE III ? Composition of experimental dieta
Ingredianta Diat1 2 3 4 5 6
Herring meal 43.52 7.3 7.3 7.3Sunflower 80.4 24.1 24.1Rapeaaad 64.8 38.9 19.4Soyabean 51.3 15.4 30.8
Lipid derived from fiahmaal 4.5 0.8 0.8 0.8Lipid derived from plant
protein aourca 2.3 1.1 1.1 1.6 1.7Cod liver oil 0.5 4.2 4.2 4.2 5.0 5.0Corn oil 5.0 2.7 3.9 3.9 3.4 3.3
Mineral mix2 2 2 2 2 2 2Vitamin mix 1 1 1 1 1 1Binder 2 2 2 2 2 2Chromic oxide 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Starch 22.74 2.7 7.2 13.9 3.9 5.9Dextrin 22.74 2.7 7.2 13.9 3.9 6.0
Total 100 105.5 100.1 100 100.1 100
1 Mineral mix : - g/lOOg2 Vitamin mix s - g/lOOg3 Binder
1 Mineral Mix (g/lOQg)
MgS04 7H20 12.75g KCL 5,>0g, Nacl 6.0g,
CaHP04 2H20 72.78g FeSQ4 7H20 2.5g, ZuS04 7H20
CuS04 s h2o O.OSg, MuS04 4H20 0.25g, CoS04 7H20
C.I03 6H20 0.03g, CrCL3 6H20 0.01g
0.55g
0.05g
2 Vitamin aupplamant (g/lDOg)
Thiamine (B) 0.30g, Riboflavin (B2) 0.76g, Pyridoxin Bb
0.20, Panthothanic acid 2.00g, Inoaitol 7.10g
Biotin 0.10g, Folic acid O.OBg, Parci aminobanzoic acid 1.50g,
Choline 30.00g, Niacin (Nicotinic acid B3) 2.66g, Cyanocobalamin
(B12) 0.005g, Vitamin A (Retinol palmitate) 10,000 u, x - tocophanol
(E) 1,5g, Aacorbic acid (C) 10.Og Menadione (K) 0.2g, 0f
cholicalcitarol 1.0g.
3 Binder - Sodium Carboxymothylcalluloaa (high vlacoaity)
41
TABLE IV t Proximate analysis of Experimental diets
Component1 2
Oiat3 4 5 6
Moisture 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.5Crude Protein (%) 32.5 29.1 30.9 32.0 30.8 30.7Ether extract (%) 10.2 11.2 8.6 9.2 8.8 8.8Ash (%) 15.0 15.4 15.5 15.2 15.9 15.2NFE 41.0 42.9 43.4 42.0 42.8 43.8GE Kcal/g 6.4 6.2 6.9 7.1 7.4 6.5PjE ratio 50.8 47.0 44.8 45.1 41.6 47.2
GE t calculated on tha basis of
Protein 5.7 keal/gFat 9.5 keal/gNFE 4.1 keal/g
Broady, (1945) Bioanargatics and growthPublished by Reinnold, New York, U.S.A.
NFE t Nitrogen free extractives calculated as NFE dsrived fron fishmeal and dietary starch ♦ dietary dextrin
GE : Gross energy content
P:E : Protein to energy ratio in mg protein/kcal of GE
TABLE V i Proximate analysis of protein in faeces and chromic oxide in
Oiat
diets and faeces
^ ^r2°3% Cr203 % Protein
in diet in faeces in faeces
1 0.15* 0.56* 21.5*2 0,19* 0.27* 11.5?3 0.15* 0.45* 18.6*4 0.21? 0.89* 20.5*5 0.19* o .m J 15.25°6 0.20* 0.52* 13.7°
Figures in the aame column having the same auperacript are inaignifioantly different (P < 0.05)
43
TABLE VII : Gross body composition data
Diet Body composition wet weight)
Moisture Fat Protein Ash
F° 75.1 6.6 14.3 3.6
1 71.7® 9.5® 16.8® 4.3®
2 71.9® 5.9C 15.5® 4.3®
3 72.6® 7.5b 15.9® 4.2®
4 72.7* 7.7b 15.8® 4.1®
5 73.3® 6.4° 15.4® 4.2®
6 74.1® 6.1C 15.8® 3.9®
r° - Body composition of sample fish analysed at the beginning of the experiment.
Figures in each column having the same superscript ere insignificantly different. (P< 0.05)
1
tovO OV 4- OV vO Ov to ov r-
vO OV vO to in in vo CM to to 4T
^ O r* T™ 4“ o T— 4* o 4"
to00 o *c CO vO CM r- vo CM
in co r- oí m * vO CM in to *
(4 4- o r* T— 4- ó 4“ o 4-CD
f- 00 vo r* •c to vO CM «- *© -c OV VO to 4“ CO < to 4" <
+> r* O 4- Ol o 4" 4- o
o to to in to 0- CM to to o ovto vo r* 4“ O in VO r- OV to
4Í 4- O 4- Oí 4* o 4- 4* o 4-c to0 OlE O vo n to in o CM o* CO <30 Oí ■9 vO to to m 4- CM o to in
•H Ol o 4- O 4- T- 4“ r* o r*□* 0) CM CM0 4J r* o o o* ■c 4—U 0 r
•Hov 0- to 4- 00 4" CM to OD
0 Q 4" o 4" Ol Ol o 4“ T- o 4“r4Í*o 4—c0 C
00 £ a.0Ü
0 (4 (4 0 to 4“ m to o r- in ov OD VO
u •H O • • • • • • • • •DO • CT h
< Ol Ol to m to VO to o to
0 ^ o
O 0cr w
C -Hl
OV OD COcm ^ in00 Oí <
* *O O N 440 OD ^ ^ r t O ' • • • • • •
■9 M 9 M « - 9
CM C- CM >0 O' CM 9 P» >0 tO
in cm o C D i O
i n N i o t o ^ c n i O f *
CM *« in to m c m to cm in cm c- r- vOO N < C i n r « f l i - «
s.
Oí
w
l
s
, Oí 00 CD ñ i o Ñ o O ' C D O ü q\0 < r r rs
l ! S S - « 3 I S i s> U. L. K8 Is ä i s l f ||i I S CCS
I l l i i i s l l l s : 3 s s s
DISCUSSION
Tha crude protein levela of 31.1%, 38.6% and 48.7% for sunflower,
rapeseeds and soyabean meals respectively aa presented in Table I arm much
lower than the 68.9% obtained for fishmeal. Their crude protein levels,
however, are high enough for their uee as protein sources for the feeds of
Tilapia and Sarotherodon species to be considered.
The protein requirements of tilapia are dependent on many factors,
especially siz% and appear to lie between 29 and 38 per cent (Cruz and
Laudencia, 1977; Davies and Stickney, 1978) for fingerlings. As the
percentage protein in sunflower seed meal is only 31.1, it was not possible
to formulate a solely plant protein diet of 30% crude protein from it.
In order to compare it with the other plant protein sourcs% the fishmeal
was only partially substituted by the plant sources in diets 2, 3 and 4.
Only diets 5 and 6 were solely plant protein diets each formulated from
all three of the plant protein sources.
The crude protein content of the six diets, based on proximate
chemical analysis, varied from 29.1 - 32.5 per cent, as compared to the
computed value of approximately 30 per cent. Cruz and Laudencia (1978)
observed a wider variation of 29.6 - 36.6 per cent from the computed value
of 30 per cent in their experiment using fishmeal, rioe bran fine, copra
meal, soyabean meal, and mulberry leafmeal in the culture of tilapia.
These workers attributed the variation to lack of homogeneity of the
feedstuffs. Thus the variation in tha present experiment was ooneidered
acceptable.
Results of the acceptability trial showed that the fish had difficulty
in consuming some of the diets. Perhaps an improvement in formulation or
pelletisation of the feed might have enhanced their consumption. A
possible method of doing this would hsve been to make them softer by
raising the moisture content. Ptabays (1971) noted that one of the prime
considerations in preparing fish diets is acceptance together with the
whole array of its attendant physical and biological factors with which
it varies. He also noted that unless food is acceptable to fish, it is
of little value however well balanced it may be. fish may accept or
reject food according to whether it is coarsely or finely divided or
given dry or moist.
Swingle (1968) demonstrated thet there wee significant benefit to
feed conversion for catfish and carp if the feedstuffs were pelleted.
Allison et al. (1976) however observed no significant difference in net
yields and feed conversions when they cultured Tllapia eurea. More
research needs to bo dons with other feedstuffs and other tilepia species
before a general rula can be stated on what form of feed is the best to
use, and how a particular form of feed affect growth and development of
a given fish. Pelleted feeds are usually directly consumed by the fish
whereas the same ingredients fed in an unpelleted form under pond
conditions also act as a fertilizer increasing natural food production.
The form of the feed thus depends on whether the grsetest benefits are
obtained by direct consumption or indirect fertilization. In intensive
culture situations with a through-flow of water pelleted feeds are
obviously required.
Growth
The everage specific growth rates obtained ware somewhat similar to
values obtained with mirror carp (Atack et al. 1978) in an experiment
employing herring fishmeal, soyabean meal and Splrulina as the protein
sources with a 30% dietary protein level. The averege specific growth
ratea in the above experiment were 2.3%, 1.24% and 1.2% per day
reepectively for the three protein sources.
As already indicated diets containing eolely fishmeal or partial
substitution of it (diote 1, 2, 3 and 4) generally produoad higher growth
rates than those containing only plant proteins as in diets S and 6.
47
This observation is supported by Lloyd et al. (1578) who stated thet the
essentiel amino acid content of animel protein is generelly better then
that of plant proteins because it approximates to the amino acid profiles
of the enimal itself. This might account for the higher specific growth
rates obtainable with the high fishmeal diets. However, diets 2 and 3 and
4, having the same percentage protein supplied by fishmeal, produced
varying specific growth rotes, which must have depended directly on the
plant protein source. Among these three, diets 2 and 4 produced poorer
specific growth retes than diet 3. This varietion must be due to the
neture of sunflower, soyabean meal and rapeseed meal. Diet 4, which
contained meinly soyabean produced lower growth rates then rapeseed
possibly because soyabean is deficient in the essential amino acids
methionine and lysine (see Table VIII).
As for diet 2 which was mainly sunflower seed meal in composition,
poor specific growth rate can be attributed mainly to the high fibre
content ' (Gohl 1975). Also the amino acid balance may be partly
responsible.
As indicated in Table VIII diets 5 and 6 would have emino acid
profiles not thet dissimilar to fishmeal, yet they produced the poorest
specific growth rstas. This is probably due to the absence of animal
proteins in them.
These obeervetions thus confirm thet growth depends on quality as
well ss quentity. To produce maximum growth it would appear that there
is a need to strike an optimum balance between the plant and animal
portions of the diet. However it must be realised that even though
chemioal analysis shows an amino acid to be praaant, it doss not
neceesarily follow that it la biologically available. Dora knowledge
is thus required on the digestive phyeiology to determine the best food
snd optimum feeding rates snd times.
Food Conversion ratio (FCR)
As shown in Tabls VI, the fishmeal (control diet) gave the best food
conversion as expected. This was followed closely by diet 3, while diets
2, 5 end 6 gave similar and poorer conversions. Atack at el. (1979) re
ported food conversion of 2.50 when the mirror carp (Cyprinus caroio) was
fed with Soirulina. This value is poorer than 1.6 recorded for diet 3
but similar to 2.2 - 2.4 recorded for the pure plant protein sources in
diets 5 and 6. A comparison of the food conversion ratio for diets 1
and 3 suggests that rapsseed meal can successfully replace fishmeal at the 25£
protein substitution level. The same thing cannot however be said of the
soyabean and the sunflower seed meals.
The relatively low food conversion ratio obtained for the substitution
of fishmeal by soyabean at 25£ protein level may be partially attributed
to non availability of the amino acids it contains.
As Ll-oyd et al (1978)stated, soyabean can contain a trypsin inhibitor
which inactivates trypsin reducing protain digestibility. The soyabean
meal used in the current experiment appears not to be affected by trypsin
inhibitor as diet 4 shows the highest protein digestibility (Tabls VI).
Diet 2 which is fishmeal substitution by sunflower at 25£ protain level
also had a poor FCR probably due to its high fibre content which may have
resulted in poor absorption. Diets 5 and 6 had poor FCR probably because
fishmeal contains amino acids that are more available than those present
in the plant proteins.
The food conversion ratios in the present study are poorer than those
obtained by Atack at al. (1979) for bacterial meal (1.14), casein (high)
(1.39), herring meal (1.42) and yeast meal (1.55) in an exparimant using
carp. However the values are better than those for algal meal (2.50)
and soyabean meal (2.86) at identical 30£ protain level.
Amino acid profiles and digestibility data for the oilseed meals
would indicate a higher degree of utilisation and better food convereion
retioe than obtained in the current experiment. It is possible that the
the processing of these meals wee sufficiently hersh es to render some
of the essential amino acids, particularly methionine and lysine,
unavailable.
Protein efficiency ratio (PER)
The value of protein efficiency ratio reported in the present work
for diet 3 is very similar to the values reported by Soeder (i960) for
Spirullna (1.80). Scenedesmus (1.85) and Coelastrum (1.85) when he fed
tilapia with test diets. However the PER of about 1.4 reported here
for the pure plant protein sources of diets 5 and 6 is slightly higher
than that for Spirulina (1.15) and soyabean (1.35) reported for carp by
Atack et el. (1979).
Iilu ard Jen (1977), using Tilapia aurea, obtained a PER of 3.45 for
casein. This value is much higher than the value for the fishmeal in
the present work. His value of 2.23 for soyabean is also higher than
that for diet 4 (mainly soyabean) in the present work. The PER for
peanut cake (1.75) and yeast (1.13) are generally lower than the values
obtained in the present work. As already stated in the discussion of the
food conversion ratios, the poor protein efficiency ratios for diets 2, 4,
5 and 6 may be due to harsh processing of the oilseed meals, the high
fibre content of sunflower eaad meals and some essential amino acid
deficiencies.
It can thus be concluded that rapeseed meal appears to be the most
promising of the three oileeed meal protein sources investigated.
Apparent Net Protein Utilisation
The pattern of variation here was similar to that of food conversion
ratio and the protein efficiency ratio. The causes can also be
attributed to the nature of soyabean and sunflower as already stated.
Apparent Dloestlbllity
The apparent protein digestibilities as shown in Table VI are all
high. flenn (1967) recorded a lower digestibility value of 53% during
balance tests when feeding Tilapia melanopleura with the algae
Soirodella oolvrrhiza and Elodea Canadensis.
Shcherbina (1964) determined the digestibility of protein from sun
flower and cottonseed oil meals for carp as 76.8% and 73.7% respectively,
and in another study Shcherbina and Sorvacher (1967) obtained
digestibilities of 74.5% and 76.2% for sunflower and cotton seed
respectively. These values are very similar to those of diets 2 and 5
containing sunflower in the present work. Though diet 6 also contains
sunflower, its digestibility is higher possibly due to the higher
digestibility of the soyabean it contains.
The values in the present work are however lower than determinations
made for the common carp (Cvorinus carpio) where the digestibility of the
fishmeal was 89%, the alga Zygnama 92% and flougeh'a 95% (Singh & Bhanot,
1970).
In the present work, diets 4 and 6, which have the highest proportion
of soyabean, have the highest digestibilities. This suggests that soya
bean is more digestible than rapeseed maal and sunflower meal, and avan
fishmeal. On the other hand, diets 2 and 5 which have the highest
proportion of sunflower seed sisal have the lowest digestibilities. This
is probably dua to the high NFE and hence fibre content of the sunflower
seed meals.
The digestibility of rapaseed meal is close to that of the fishmeal
as is indicated by the similarity of the value for diet 3, which has the
highest proportion of rapesesd meal, with thé fishmeal control.
However, there was not such variation in the digestibilities of the
6 diets
CONCLUSIONS
Investigations to find more economic fish feeds than fishmeal will
probably continue because of the high cost of fishmeal which is by far
the most widely used protein source of animal origin in fish feeds.
The factors responsible for the high cost are; the expansion of the
aquaculture industry in virtually all the countries of the world which
makes the demand for the fishmeal rise every year; another factor is the
sea fishing regulations and quotas imposed by the United Nations which
limit the activities of certain fishing companies and thus reduce the
supply of the commodity. Also the competition for fishmeal as food
for other domestic animels coupled with the growing interest all over
ths world in the use of all fishery resources as human food have made
the cost prohibitive.
In order to make more economical use of proteins in fish feeds,
which would effect significant reduction in total feed cost, researchers
have turned their attention to many potential fishmeal replacers. One
important maans that has been thought of, replacing fishmeal, is the use
of a new generation of novel feed ingredients such ae t
a) Single cell protein (SCP, 'Pruteen' ICI bacterial protein, yeasts, algae)
b) Plilk replacers (a.g. animal and plant protein concentrates)
c) Whole food organisms (e.g. terrestrial/aquatic worms silk worms, pupae, krill)
d) Animal and food processing waates.
The cold water carnivorous fishes like the salmonids have a high
dietary requirement for protein and are likely to benefit in the use of
milk replacars, whole food organisms and animal processing wastea, in
which a lot of research is currently being undertaken. Ae for
herbivorous or omnivorous fishes like tilapia the uee of some single
call protein and food prooessing wastes hss been investigated. Among
theaa the algae and oertaln food processing waste produots, like spent
52
beers and coffee pulp, have been identified as possible fishmeal
repl8cers.
The second means of replacing fishmeal is the use of existing feed
ingredients but maximising their utilization. In the culture of
tilapia the existing feed ingredients are mainly plant proteins both
aquatic and terrestrial, and a lot of research has been conducted on-
them. For in&ance, the cereals have been evaluated and found to be low
in protein level and thus are normally incorporated at relatively low
dietary inclusion levels (5 - 10%) by weight for individual secondary
protein sources depending on the food stuff (Tacon, 1981). In contrast,
the oil seeds generally have higher protein levels but research performed
on them to date is scanty, hence their selection for the present study.
The throe oil seeds, sunflower, rapeseed and soyabean can bs grown
in tropical and sub-tropical regions (Godin and Spensley 1971) and hence
would be economical fishmeal replacers if they are accepted by tilapia.
Of the three plant protein sources, rapeseed meal had the best food con
version, protein efficiency ratio, and specific growth rate. This was
followed by soyabean while the sunflower was the poorest due probably to
its high fibre content. The sunflower used in this trial was unusually
poor. It had a very low protein content and may not reflect sunflower
seed meal in general.
Though the fiahmsal gave higher values for the parameters already
enumerated, the plant sources gave fairly high values, especially the
rapaseeda which, in some eases, ranked equal with the fishmeal. Thus
the rapeseed meal would appear to be a potential partial fishmeal rsplacar.
Plore work is however required to improve the utilization of the
three plant materials. In the past, processing of such ingredients as
complete soyabeans or other oil-bearing seeds or cereals for animal
feeding, consisted of grinding, crushing or flaking.
Now, with tte aid of various heat-proceaaing tschniquas, it is
possible to grestly enhance the nutritionel characteristics and
consequent feed value of feeding stuffs such as full-fat oil seeds
and cereals, which otherwise may have only small feed value to the
animal. As previously mentioned, these heat-processing techniques
have been used in eliminating the trypsin inhibitor in soyabean,
and inactivating myrosinase which in turn reduces the growth inhibitor
(glucosinolate) present in rapeseed.
Another means of maximizing the utilization of the feed ingredient
is through genetic selection. This is very relevant in the case of
rapeseed which consists of different strains, many of which may possess
a high level of toxic substances. The rapeseed strain used in this
study gave good results, probably due to its low level of toxic
substances. By means of genetic selection the unfavourably high
level of toxicity in oilseeds can be decreased. More work needs to
be done in this ares for more plant protein used in fish feeds. Though
improvement of growth of fish through amino acid supplementation is at
present less than rewarding, and the results contradictory, this
should be tried as a means of improving the utilization of the plant
sources in the present study.
Another area where more work needs to be dons is the evaluation
of these oilseeds under pond conditions which may vary significantly
from those of a laboratory aquarium.
REFERENCES
AHMED, M.R. (1966): Observation on the effect of feeding Labeho rohita (Ham.) with Microcystis aeruginosa (Kutz).
ALLISON, R.O. SMITHERMAN & CAR0REO, 3. (1976): Effects of high density culture on reproduction and yield of Tllaoia aurea. FAO Technical Conference on Aquaculture, Kyoto, Japan, AQ/Conf,/76/E.47:3p.
ALMAZAN, G. & BOYD, C.E. (1978): Plankton Production and Tilapia yield in Ponds Aquaculture: 15:75-77.
ANDREWS, J.W. & PAGE, 3.W. (1974): Growth factors in the fish meal components of catfish diets. 3. Nutv. 104(8): 1091-1096.
ANON (1979): Tilapia growth on carp feed plus vitamins. Intern. Fish Farm., 6(2):47.
ANONYMOUS (1969): Aufzucht von Kerpfen mit Grünalgen als Eiweissquelle Fischwirt, 19(9):208.
APPELBAUM, S. (1977): Geeigneter Ersatz fur Lebendnahrung von Karpfenbrut. Arch, Fisch. Wiss.. 28(1):31-43.
ATACK, T.H. 3AUNCEY, K. & MATTY, A.3. (1979): The utilization of some single-celled proteins by fingerling mirror carp (Cyprlnus carplo L.) Aquaculture. 18:331-348.
ATACK, T.H. 4 MATTY, A.3. (1978): The evaluation of some single-cell proteins in the diet of rainbow trout. II Tha determination of net protein utilization, biological values and true digestibility. In: Proceedings of the World Symposium on Finfish Nutrition and Fishfead Technology, Hamburg 20-23 June, 1978 l/ol. 1 Berlin 1979, pp. 261-271.
BAROACH, 3.E. RYTHER, 3.H. & McLARNEY, W.O. (1972): Aquaculture - The farming and husbandry of freshwater and marine organisms. Wiley - Interscience, New York, N.Y. 868pp.
BAYNE, D.R. DUNSETH, 0. 4 RAMIRI0S, C.G. (1976). Supplemental feeds containing coffee-pulp for rearing Tilapia in Central America. Aquaculture. 7:133-146.
BRANDT, T.M. (1979): Use of heat treated-full-fat soyabeans in channel catfish and golden shiner feeds. Texas fish farming conference A 4 M University, January 17-19.
BRODY, S. (1945): "Bioenergetics and growth" published by Reinhold,New York, u.S.A.
CHACK0, P.I. 4 KRISHNAMURTHI (1954): Observations on Ti l ^ il "»Hf" * ! « (Peters) in Madree. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 52:349-353.
CHIMITS, P. (1955): TilaPle and its culture - a preliminary bibliography. FAO Fish. Bull., 8(1):1-33.
CHIMITS, P. (1957): The Tilapia and their Culture - a e.cond review and bibliography» FAO Fiah* Bull»* 10(1)i1-24»
C0PP0CK 4 SLACK, (1970): rr<ff Bull. N.Y. St. Colli
The use of uree in dairy cattle feeding. Aorlc. Cornell Univ., 1219:15pp.
COWEY, C.B. POPE, 3.A. AORON, 3.W. & BLAIR, A. (1971): Studies on the nutrition of marine flatfish. Growth of the plaice, Pleuroneetes plstessa. on diets containing proteins derived from plants and other sources.Mar. Biol, 10,2s 145-153.
COWEY, C.B. & SARGENT, 3.R. (1972): Fish Nutrition. Ad. Pier. Biol. 10:382-492.
COWEY, C.B. 4 SARGENT, 3.R. (1979): Fish Physiology Vol. VIII.
CRIDLAND, C.C. (i960): Laboratory experiments on the growth of Tilaoia sp. The value of various foods. Hydrobiolooia 15:135-160.
CRUZ, E.M. & LAUDENCIA,I.L. (1977): Protein requirements of Tilaoia mossambica fingerlings, Kalihaxu. Philipp. 3« Biol. 6(2):177-182.
DABROWSKA, H. & W03N0, T. (1977): Studies on the utilization by rainbow trout (Salmo oairdneri) of feed mixtures containing soyabean meal and an addition of amino acids. Aquaculture. 10:297-310.
DABR0WSKI, K. & K0ZL0WSKA, H. (1980): Symposium on new developments in the utilization of heated effluents and of recirculation systems for intensive Aquaculture El/FAC/80/Symp.: E/63/80.
DAVIES, T. & STICKNEY, S. (1978): Growth responses of Tilapla aurea to dietary protein quality and quantity EIFAC symposium fin fish nutrition and feed technology, Hamburg.
DUNCAN, D.B. (1955): Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biometrics, 11:1-42.
DYKE, 3.M. 4 SUTTON, D.L. (1977) Digestion of duckweed (Lemna ap.) by grass carp. (Ctenopharvnoodon idella) 3. Fish. Biol. Vol II: 273-278.
EDWARDS0N, lit. (1976): Energy demands of Aquaculture: a world-wide survey. Fish Farming Int., 3(4): 10-13.
ELLIOT, 3.M. (1976): The energetics of feeding metabolism and growth of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in relation to body weight, water temperature and ration size. Dournal of Animal Eco. 46:923-948.
FRYER, G. 4 ILES, T.D. (1972): The cichlid fishes of the great lakes of Africa: Thair Biology and Evolution. Oliver 4 Boyd; Edinburgh 641p (book).
FURUKAWA, A. 4 TSUKAHARA, H. (1966): On the acid digestion method for the determination of chromic oxide as an indec aubstanca in the study of digestibility of fiah feed. Bull. 3ap. Soc. Sc. Fish. 32(6): 502-506.
GARLING, D.L. 4 WILSON, R.P. (1976): Optimum dietary protein to energy ratio for channel catfish fingarlings, Ictalurus punctatua. 3. Nutr.106, 1368 - 1375.
GODIN 4 SPENLEY (1971): Oils and oilseeds TPI crop and product digests.The Tropical Products Institute Foreign and Commonwealth Office (Overseas Davalopmsnt Administration) 170pp (book).
G0HL, B. (1975): Tropical faads. FA0 Roma 661p (book)
GRAYT0N, B.D. 4 BEAMISH, F.W. (1977): Effect of feeding frequency on food inteke, growth end body composition of rainbow trout (Selmo qairdneri) Aquaculture. 11:159-172.
HALVER, 3.E. (1972): Fish Nutrition. Academic Press, New York, 652p. (book).
HASTINGS, W.H. (1976): Fish Nutrition and Fish Feed Manufacture, _IH: Advances in Aquaculture: Papers presented at tha FAO Technical Conference on Aquaculture, Kyoto, Japan pp.568j574.
HASTINGS, U.H. & SIMCO, B. (1973): Fish feed management and processing have impact on profits fri Proceedings of the Fish Farm Conference and Convention. Catfish farmers of Texas, Texas Agricultural Extension Station, Texas, A A M University p.29-40.
HEPHER, B. CHERVINSKI, 3. & TAGARI, H. (1971): Experiment on the effect on fish yield of dietary protein source and concentration. Bamidieh.23(1):11-37.
HIGGS, D.A. MARKERT, 3.R. MacQUARRIE, D.W., McBRIDE, 3.B. D0SAN3H, B.S. NICHOLS, C. A HOSKINS, G. (197 ): Developments of practical diets for coho salmon Oncorhynchus Kisutch. using poultry by-product meal, feather meal, soyabean meal and rapeseed meal aa major protein sources. In:Proc. World Symp. on fin fiah nutr. Fish Feed Technol. Vol. 1, Halver,3.E. k Tiewa, K.
HILL, U.G. TAYLOR, W.A. k ELLINGTON, A.C. (1963): The disposal of rum distillery slop by dilution. Bulletin 2/1963, Scientific Research Council, Jamaica, 16pp.
HUET, H. (1972): Textbook of fish culture. Breeding and cultivation of fish. Fishing News (Books) Ltd« 436p.
IIDA, A. et al.(1970): (Studies on the nutritive value of petroleum yeast in carp and rainbow trout feeding) (In Japanese) Suisanzoskoku (The Aquaculture) 18: 35-43.
INNES, R.F. (1951): The agricultural utilization of dunder. Int. Sugar 3., 55:99-101.
JAUNCEY, K. (1979): Growth and nutrition of carp in heated effluents.Ph.O. Thesis, University of Aston, Birmingham 202p.
JAUNCEY, K. (1980): The effects of varying dietary composition on mirror carp (C^£rinu£ cajgi^) maintained in thermal effluents and laboratory recycling systems. Symposium on new developments in the utilization of heated effluents and of re-circulation system for Aquaculture Stavanger 28 - 30 May, 1980, E.66.
KANAZAWA, A. TESHIMA, S. SAKAMOTO, n. A AWAL, A. (1980): Requirements of Tileoie zillii for essential fatty acids. Bull, of Jap, Soc. of Sc. Fish.
KAUSCH, H. k BALLI0N-CUSMAN0, M.F. (1976): Korperzusammensetzung wachten und nahrungsauanutzung bei jungen Karpfan (Cyprinus carpio L.) unter intensivhaltungsbedinggungen. Arch. Hydrobiol: 48:141-180.
KERNS, C.L. k R0EL0FS, E.W. (1977): Poultry wastes in the diet of Israeli carp Bamldoeh. 29(4): 125-135.
KOHLER, C.C. PAGAN-FONT, F.A. (1978). Evaluations of rum distillation wastes, pharmaceutical wastes snd chicksn feed for rearing Tllapla suras in Pusrto Rico. Aquaculture 14 (1978) 339-347.
KOOPS, H.K. TIEWS, H. BECK A GROPP, 3. (1976): Oia verwertung von sojaprotsin durch die Reganboganforelle (Salmo galrdnarl) Arch, Fish. Iiiias. 26, 2-3:181-191.
LAKSHAMANAN, M.A.V. (1967): On a new artificial feed for carp fry.FAO Fish. Rap. 44(3):373-3B7.
LEE, D.3. A PUTNAM (1973): The response of rainbow trout to varying protein/energy ratios in a test diet. 3. Nutr. 103, 916-922.
LLOYD, L.E. MCDONALD, B.E. & CRAMPTON, E.lil. (1978): Fundamentals of Nutrition 2nd Edn. W.H. Freeman & Company, San Fransisco 457pp (book)
LU, 3.D. A KEVEREN, N.R. (1975): The feasibility of using waste materials as supplemental fish feed. Progr. Fish. Cult., 37(4):241-244.
MABAYE, A.B.E. (1971): Observation on the growth of Tilapia mossambica fed on artificial diets. Fish Res. Bull. Zambia 5: 379-396.
MANN, H. (1967): The utilization of food by Tilapia malanopheura dum.FAO Fish Repts. Vol 3 No. 44.
MARKHAM, T. (1942): Biochem. Journal 36:70
MATHAVAN, S. VIVEKANANDAN & RAUDIAH, 3.3. (1976): Food utilization in the fish Tilapia moasamblca fed on plant and animal foods. HelQolandBrwiss Neereaunters. 28(1): 66-70.
MAZID, M.A. TANAKA, Y. KATAYAMA, T, RAHMAN, 3. SIMPSON, K.L. A CHICHESTER, C.O. (1979): Growth response of Tilapia zillli flnoerllnos fad isocaloric diets with variable protein levels.
MERTZ, E.T. (1969). Nutritional score Jn Fiah in research, edited by O.W. Newhans A 3.E. Halver, New York, N.Y. Academic Press pp 263-92.
MESKE, E. A PRUSS, H.D. (1977): Mikroalgen ala komponante von fiachmehl- freiem Fischfutter. Fortschr. Tlerphvaiol Tierenaehr: 8:71-81 (with English abstract).
MIRONOVA, N.V. (1975): The Nutritive value of Algae as food for Tilapia mossambica 3. Ichthvol Voor Ikhtlol. Vol 15(3) pp 510-514.
MOAV, R. WOHLFARTH, G.W. SCHROEDER, G.L. HULATA, G. A BARASH, H. (1977): Intensive Polyculture of fish in freshwater ponds.Substitution of expensive foods by liquid oow manure. Aquaculture 10(1) : 25-43.
MURRAY, M.W. ANDREWS, 3.W. A DELOACH, H.L. (1971): Effects of dietary lipids dietary protein and environmental temperature on growth, feed conversion and body composition of channel catfish. Journal of Nutr. 107: 272-280.
NOSE, T. (1979): Summary report on the requirements of essential amino aside for earp. In: symposium Fin fish Nutr. A Feed Teohnol, Hamburg. F.R.G. 20 June 1978. E.I. EAC/78/symp. E/8. FAO, Rome, FAO Aooess No. 41390, 23pp.
58
N.A.C. (1973): Nutrient requirements of trout, salmon and channel catfish. National Academy of Sciences Sub Committee on Fish Nutrition No. 4 57p.
ogino, c. 7 chen, m.s. (1973a): Protein nutrition in fish. Ill Apparent and true digestibilities of dietary proteins in carp. Bulletin of the 3ap. Soc. of Sc. Fish. 39: 649-651.
OGINO, C. & CHEN, M.S. (1973b): Protein nutrition in Fish IV Biological value of dietary proteins in carp. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries, 39: 797-800.
PANTASTICO, 3.B. & BALDIA, J.P. (1976): Culture of Tilaola nilotlca at two densities with fertilization and supplemental feeding. Freshwater Aquaculture Station, Southern Asian Fisheries Development Centre.
PHILLIPS, A.M. Or. LIVINGSTON, O.L. & POSTON, H.A. (1966): Use of calorie sources by brook trout. Progressive Fish Culturist. 28:67-72.
REED, O.R. SAMSEL, G.L. OANB, R.R. & LLEWELLYN, G.G. (1974):Oxidation pond algae as a supplement for commercial catfish feed.Proc. Ann. Conf. Sth East Ass. Game Fish. Game Fish Commrs.. 27:465-470.
RETOVSKY, R. (1966): Continuous cultivation of algae, ¿n Malek, 1 & 2 French (eds). Theoretical and methodological basis of continuous culture of micro-organisms. Prague. The Czechoslovak Aced. of Sci. 443-455.
ROSS, L.G. 4 GEODES, 3.A. (1978): Sedation of warm water fish species in Aquaculture research Aquaculture 16 (1979) 183-186.
SHCHERBINA, M.A. (1964): Determination of the digestibility of artificial foods of pond fish by means of an inert substance. Voor. ikhtiol. 4. No. 4 (33).
SHCHERBINA, M.A. 4 SORVACHER, K.F. (1967): On digestion of oil msal by two-year-old carp. (In Russian) Rvbovod. Rybolov (2):12-13.
SHEHADAH, Z.H. (1976): Ed. Report of the symposium on Aquaculturs in Africa, Accra, Ghana CIFA Tech. Pap. 4, : 36p.
SHELEF, G.R. MORAIN 4 SANDBANK, E. (1968): Physico-chemical treatment of pond effluenta for unreetricted agricultural re-use with recovery of algae as protein eource: pilot and field scale experiments Jin Jenkins, S. (ed) Advances in water research) Oxford, Pargamon Prase.
SHELEF, C. MORAINE, R. 4 SHANDBANK, E. (1976): Combined algae production waste water treatment and reclamation aystem. JLn Schlagel, H.G. 4 Barrea,J. (ede) microbial energy converaion, Gottingen. Eric Goltze: 427-442.
SINGH, C.8. 4 BHANOT, K.K. (1970): Nutritive food value of algal feeds for common carp, Cvprinue carolo Linnoreus. 3. Inland Fish. Soc. Indie M i- l l i .SINNHUBER, R.O. 4 YU, T.C. (1972): Effect of dietary linoleric acid and docoeahexaenoic acid on growth and fatty acid compoaition of rainbow trout (Selmo oeirdneri) Licide 7, 450-454.
S0EDER, C.3. (1980): Maesive cultivation of microalgae: Reaults and proapeota. Hvdrobloloola 72: 197-209.
59
STANLEY, 3.G. & 30NES, B.3. (1975): Feeding algae to fish.Aquaculture 7:219-223.
STERBA, G. (1967): Freshwater fishes of the world. Studio vista,E. Germany 77p (book).
SWINGLE, H.S. (1968): Biological means of increasing productivity in ponds. FAQ Fish. Rep. (44) Vol. 4: 243-57.
TACON, A.G.3. (1981): The possible substitution of fishmeal in fish diets. Paper presented at Oban Fish Farming Conference.
TAPIIYA, H. (1975): Green micro algae. In: Prie, N.W. (ed).Food protein sources. Cambridge, Cambridge llniv. Press: 35-39.
TERAO, T. (1960): (Studiss on fish culture foods. On the effect of dry powder of freshwater green algae Chlorella elliosoldea added to diets of carp fingarlings). (In: 3apanese English Summary). Sci. Rep. Hokkaido Fish Hatch. 15:85-68, .
THINGRAV, V.G. & GOPALAKRISHNAN, V. (1974): Catalogue of cultivated squatic organisms. FAQ Fish Tech. Pap. 130, 83pp (FIRl/RTBO).
TREWAVAS, E. (1973): On the cichlid fish of the genus Pelmatochramis on the relationship between Pelreatochramis and Tilapie and the recognition of Sarotherodon as a distinct genus. Bull. Brit. Mus.(Nat. Hist.) Zool.. 25:1-26.
TREWAVAS, E. (1967): The name and natural distribution of the Tilapia from Zauziban (Pisces, Cichlidae) FAQ Fish. Rep. 44(5): 246-254.
VAN DER AUDENAERDE, D.F.E. Thys (1968): Annotated bibliography of Tilapia (Pisces, Cichlidas). Plus, v A. Africa Centr. Docum. Zool.,14:i-XI, 1-406.
VAN OER LINGEN, PI.I. (1959b): Some obaervations on the growth of Tilapia mossamblca under different population densities and on different levels of feeding at the Fisheries Research Centre. Proca. 1st Fiah Day in S. Rhodesia, August 1957, Govn. Printer; Saliabury: 63-68.
WATANABE, T., 0GIN0, C. KOSHIISHI, Y AND PIATSUNAGA, T. (1974):Requirements of rainbow trout for easential fatty acids. Nippon Sulsan Gakkalshl 40: 493-499.
WU, 3.L. k 3AN, L. (1977): Comparison of the nutritive value of dietary proteins in Tilapia auraa. 3. Fish. Soc. Taiwan pp.55-60.
Y0NE, Y. k FU3II (1975a): Studios on nutrition of rad asa bream XI.Effect of W3 fatty acid supplement in a corn oil diet on growth rata and feed efficiency. Nippon Suisan Gakkaiahi 41: 73-77.
YU, T.C., SINNHUBER, R.0. k PUTNAPI, G.B. (1977): Use of swine fat as an energy aouroa in trout ratione. Progressive Fish Culturiat 39:95-97.
a
YURK0WSKI, PI. BAILEY, 3.K. EVANS, R.E. TABACHEK, 3.A.L. AYLES, G.B. *EALES, 3.G. (1978): Aoeaptability of rapossod proteins in diet of rainbow trout (Salmo oalrdnerl) 3. Fiah. Rea. Board of Can. 35: 951-962.
fits] '-m •* ''I»" ~
t
Attention is drawn to the fact that the copyright of this thesis rests with its author.
This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior written .consent.