Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    1/56

    Dr.Anupam Goswami

    Professor & Head

    Department of Cardiac AnesthesiologyI.P.G.M.E&R KOLKATA

    Dr.Sandeep Kumar Kar

    Rmo-cum clinical tutor Department of Cardiac

    Anesthesiology I.P.G.M.E&R KOLKATA

    When Numbers Are Wrong!(Pitfalls In Anesthethesia Monitoring)

    http://images.google.co.in/imgres?imgurl=http://ipgmer.gov.in/images/oth-03.jpg&imgrefurl=http://ipgmer.gov.in/gallery.html&h=108&w=115&sz=8&hl=en&start=30&usg=__IJ7v73cl1nmoZiIP73OQJG_9yg4=&tbnid=4lMqFpruexcovM:&tbnh=82&tbnw=87&prev=/images%3Fq%3DIPGMER%26start%3D20%26gbv%3D2%26ndsp%3D20%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN
  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    2/56

    INTRODUCTION

    Heisenbergs uncertainty principle The very act of measuring a physiologic

    variable may affect the value of that

    variable. It is therefore appropriate to the use in

    practice of imperfect measures of the

    status of our patients with humility . Be vigilant for potentially misleading

    information.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    3/56

    Uncertainty principle and ourmeasurement systems

    A more formal inequality relatingthe standard deviationof position x andthe standard deviation of momentum

    p was derived by Heisenberg in 1927x*p >= h/4

    where x is the uncertainty as to the

    particle's position andp is theuncertainty as to its momentum (andthus its velocity).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation
  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    4/56

    What We Infer?

    Historically, the uncertainty principle hasbeen confused with a somewhat similareffect in physics, called the observereffect, which notes that measurementsof certain systems cannot be madewithout affecting the systems.

    Uncertainty principle is inherent in the

    properties of allwave-like systems

    How can our Haemodynamic waveformwhether IBP, CVP , ECG escape from it?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics
  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    5/56

    The ideal Clinician:

    The practitioner must be :

    1)Aware of potential sources of error inmeasurement and interpretation.

    2)Interpret data in context

    3)Consider the entire picture of the

    patient. 4)Should not view the data as a

    collection of independent variables.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    6/56

    Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring

    It is not uncommon for discrepancies tooccur between invasive and noninvasive

    measurements of blood pressureresulting in confusion at the bedsideover which number to use in directing

    therapy.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    7/56

    Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring

    Physical properties of the system beingmeasured have significant influence onthe potential errors.

    The vascular system is complex, withperiodic variations in pressure followingeach heart beat over a wide range offrequency.

    The high heart rate of infants interferedin responsiveness and ideality of thetransduced waveforms early indevelopment of monitoring devices

    T R P I A

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    8/56

    T e Rea Pro em In AccurateMonitoring

    Transmission of the pressure waveformdown a progressively smaller, branchingvascular tree with variable elastance andresistance depending on humoral andneural regulation of vascular tone.

    In clinical situations associated withincreased resistance (hypovolemia, earlycompensated shock), reflection of kineticenergy back from the vascular tree to the

    end-hole vascular cannula can giveSBP

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    9/56

    Damping Damping of the pulse waveform is

    associated with falsely low systolicpressures and falsely high diastolicpressures.

    Most common cause :

    1.vasospasm of the vessel in which thecannula lies.

    2. Air bubble in the fluid-filled tubingleading from the vascular cannula to theelectronic transducer.

    3. Loose connection in the tubing

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    10/56

    How to Reduce Damping?

    Make tubing bubble-free.

    Ensure there are no loose connections.

    Adding papaverine to the arterial lineinfusate is often helpful in reducingvasospasm at the site of the lineinsertion, which may result in a betterwaveform and more reliable pressuremeasurement.

    Use MABP in guiding therapy

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    11/56

    Why MABP?

    It is a function of the area under thearterial pulse waveform curve and isless affected by damping of thesignal.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    12/56

    The Problem of Resonance

    Resonance refers to the interactionbetween the natural frequency of a

    physical monitoring system and thefrequency of the physiologic parameterbeing measured.

    This causes erroneous waveforms andpressures to be displayed.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    13/56

    How To Reduce Resonance? The natural frequency of a

    tubing/transducer system is notdissimilar to that of a xylophone, so thatthe monitoring system itself may, with itsintrinsic physical properties, influence thedata generated.

    Using stiff, noncompliant, narrow gauge,and short tubing.

    It is common to seeflingelevation of theSBP visible as a needle point at the peakof the pulse waveform as the system are

    set up to reduce damping of the signal

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    14/56

    Catheter whip due to movement

    Catheter whip due to movement withinthe vessel in a hyperdynamic circulatorystate may impart kinetic energy to theend hole of the cannula, resulting in ahigher pressure measurement.

    This is more in catheters placed in larger

    central arteries or the aorta orpulmonary artery.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    15/56

    Strive for Excellence!

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    16/56

    Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring

    Two methods:

    1) Auscultation of Korotkoff sounds.

    2) Oscillometric Method( Automated)

    Both the methods depend on flow being

    present in the extremity being subjectedto assessment.

    Unreliable in low flow states

    The effect of kinetic energy componentin IBP monitoring makes intraarterialIBP 8-16 Torr higher than NIBP

    normally and 25-30 Torr higher in Sepsis.

    Pitf ll i i i bl d

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    17/56

    Pitfalls in noninvasive bloodpressure monitoring

    Data acquisition is intermittent ratherthan continuous making it more difficultto assess response to therapy with

    titration. Severe vasoconstriction may make

    noninvasive blood pressure

    measurements unobtainable. Cuff size must be appropriate to

    acquire accurate measurements.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    18/56

    DETERMINANTS OF CARDIACOUTPUT

    Cardiac output is the product ofstroke volume and heart rate.Determinants of stroke volume

    include

    Preload,

    Contractility

    Afterload.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    19/56

    Easy question?

    What is the most directphysiological measure ofPreload?

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    20/56

    The Answer comes

    Measurement of fiber length in thesarcomere at end-diastole

    This is not clinically feasible

    Wh t i th l ti ?

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    21/56

    What is the solution?

    Extrapolation from measurementsthat are clinically available is necessary.

    But.

    With each step away from directmeasurement there is more potentialerror in measurement andinterpretation.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    22/56

    Contractility

    Contractility is also an extrapolatedassessment in clinical practice

    Either derived from hemodynamic

    calculations or echocardiographic visualevidence involving measurementsthemselves subject to error.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    23/56

    Afterload?

    Clinically recognized by physicalexamination.

    Qualitatively assessed if anatomic

    abnormalities or abnormal flow patternsare present by echocardiography.

    Quantitatively calculated if pulmonary

    artery catheterization is performed.All methods are subject to errors in

    interpretation.

    Why?

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    24/56

    We need to be Realistic

    Despite the difficulties inmeasurement and interpretation,such data can be successfully

    incorporated into goal-directedtherapeutic algorithms with a holisticclinical approach leavened by

    knowledge of the pitfalls.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    25/56

    And Remember this person

    x*p>= h/4

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    26/56

    Preload Assessment(CVP)

    Being utilized to assess a remote left-sided volume As a right-sided pressuremeasurement being utilized to assess a

    remote left sided volume parameter, leftventricular end diastolic volume(LVEDV),numerous factors may result in a

    misleading value. In pediatric patients isolated LV

    dysfunction is not reflected in high CVP

    measurements but must be kept in mind.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    27/56

    Preload Assessment(CVP) Myocardial infarction related to

    anomalous left coronary artery arisingfrom the pulmonary (ALCAPA)Kawasaki disease with coronary

    aneurysms. Acute myocarditis or cardiomyopathy

    related to various metabolic disorders

    may also present with significant leftventricular (LV) dysfunction notnecessarily reflected by a high CVP ifright ventricular (RV) compliance is

    normal.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    28/56

    Ventricular ComplianceA stiff ventricle, either on the right or the

    left side, may result in a high pressureeven if the left ventricle is under filled

    pericardial effusion with tamponade,

    constrictive pericarditis, or highpericardial pressure secondary to highventilatory pressures may produce highfilling pressures with low end-diastolic

    volume

    Obstructions to left ventricular emptyingsuch as aortic valvular stenosis produce a

    high end-diastolic pressure.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    29/56

    Ventricular ComplianceAny anatomic or pathophysiologic cause of

    increased resistance to left ventricular fillingsituated between the tip of the catheter andthe left ventricular chamber may result inmisleading high pressure readings suggestingadequate preload is present.

    On left side:MV disease, Pulmonary VenousObstructionOn The right side:PulmonaryHypertension, PVD,PE, TVD, R-L shunts,allthese obfuscate the true volume status of LVby producing high pressure measurement

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    30/56

    How Much We Rely on CVP

    Observation of the response to volumeexpansion with continuous monitoringof the CVP can help identify adequate

    volume loading and prompt addition ofinotropic support.

    Echocardiography comes to our rescue

    in case we get dubious results. The knowledge of abnormal wave

    forms in CVP

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    31/56

    Pulmonary artery occlusionpressure (PAOP)

    The assumption may be made thatpulmonary artery occlusion pressureaccurately reflects intravascular volume

    status and left ventricular preload.

    PAOP may be high in LV dysfunction andMitral valve disease with decreased

    compliance, prompting the potentiallyincorrect conclusion that luidresuscitation hasbeen adequate or

    excessive.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    32/56

    Airway Pressure & PAOPAirway pressure is another very important

    factor in interpretation of the PAOP in patientsreceiving positive pressure ventilatorysupport.

    placement of the catheter in West Zone III toachieve a continuous fluid column betweenthe catheter tip and the LV

    Placement in upper lobes or anteriorsegments with relatively more inflation ofalveoli than pulmonary blood flow, WestZone I, will exaggerate the effect of PPV on the

    measurement causing misleading high value.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    33/56

    The Cause of erroneous PAOP

    If the respiratory cycle alveolar airwaypressure exceeds pulmonary venous pressure,thereby interrupting pulmonary blood lowthrough vascular compression

    High levels of positive ventilatory pressure mayconvert the monitored lung site from optimalWest Zone III to Zone II (lower low to

    ventilation ratio) despite proper initialplacement of the catheter tip in a dependentlower lobe.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    34/56

    Avoiding this Pitfall

    Careful measurement of PAOP at end-expiration as judged by observation ofrespiratory variation in the pressuretracing

    Aggressive diuresis resulting inhypovolemia may cause the conversionof Zone III lung physiology to that of

    Zone II, causing misleadingly high PAOPin volume-depleted patients on highlevels of PEEP.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    35/56

    Contractility Assessment

    Contractility is defined as the velocity of

    myocardial fiber shortening.

    Measuring approximating strokevolume as a marker of contractility are

    subject to the influence of afterload andvalvular regurgitation.

    High afterload secondary to valvular

    stenosis or increased systemic vascularresistance will decrease stroke volumeeven with normal contractility.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    36/56

    Contractility Assessment Pharmacologic vasodilation can increase

    stroke volume even with poor contractility.Valvular regurgitation may effectively reduce

    afterload allowing a large stroke volume,

    partially in the wrong direction with a net resultof inadequate systemic low.

    Estimations of contractility via nuclear medicine

    scans or calculations based on data derivedfrom thermodilution pulmonary arterycatheters are subject to the same confounding

    factors

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    37/56

    Afterload AssessmentPitfalls

    Pitfall in interpretation of a high PAP isthat high flow due to L-R shunt mayproduce a high pressure even in thepresence of normal pulmonary vascularresistance.

    Echocardiographic data estimatingresistance via flow patterns is availableonly intermittently and is subject to error.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    38/56

    Cardiac Output Assessment

    Operator variation, computational errors,

    Based on the assumption that there isno intracardiac shunt through septaldefects.

    Other confounding conditions which mayinvalidate the measurement include

    tricuspid regurgitation, atrialarrhythmias, and variation in timing ofthe respiratory cycle with indicator

    injection.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    39/56

    Echocardiography

    Low estimation depends on thecross-sectional area of the vesselbeing evaluated; a high flow across

    a narrow vessel may not representadequate output.

    Measurements of ejection fraction and

    shortening fraction may suggest ahigher systemic output than exists dueto mitral valve regurgitation or aortic

    insufficiency.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    40/56

    Capnography Pitfalls in interpretation are revealed when

    arterial blood gases are performedshowing a gap between paCO2 andETCO2 ,and include:

    1) severe airway or parenchymallung disease causing significant ventilation-perfusion mismatch, resulting in dead-space

    ventilation and a false low ETCO2 2) false low value because of failure to

    obtain a true alveolar sample due to

    expiratory obstruction.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    41/56

    Pulse- oximetry limitations

    Carbon Monoxide

    Carbon monoxide molecules, even in a smallamount, can attach to the patient'shemoglobin replacing oxygen molecules. Apulse oximeter cannot distinguish thedifferences and the reading will show the total

    saturation level of oxygen and carbonmonoxide. If 15% of hemoglobin has carbonmonoxide and 80% has oxygen, the reading

    would be 95%.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    42/56

    Pulse- oximetry limitations

    Blood Volume Deficiency

    Conditions, such as hypovolemia,hypotension, and hypothermia, mayhave adequate oxygen saturation, butlow oxygen carrying capacity.

    Due to the reduction in blood flow, the

    sensor may not be able to pick upadequately the pulsatile waveformresulting in no signal or loss of

    accuracy.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    43/56

    Pulse- oximetry limitations

    Skin Pigmentation Dark skin pigmentation can give over-

    estimated SpO2 readings when it is

    below 80%. Find a place where the skin color is

    lighter.

    Intravenous Dyes Intravenous dyes (such as methylene

    blue, indigo carmine, and indocyanine

    green) can cause inaccurate readings.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    44/56

    Pulse- oximetry limitations

    External Interference

    Exposure to strong external lightwhile taking measurement mayresult in inaccurate readings.

    Shield the sensors from bright lights.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    45/56

    Pulse -oximetry andMethemoglobenemia

    Methemoglobin is a form of hemoglobinthat does not carry oxygen.

    It is normal to have 1-2% of

    haemoglobin in this form. A high level of methaemoglobin would

    cause a pulse oximter to have a reading

    of around 85% regardless of the actualoxygen saturation level.

    A i Pitf ll Mi l di N b !

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    46/56

    A serious Pitfall. Misleading Numbers!Alveolar hypoventilation is the main

    form of respiratory failurepostoperatively results fromcombinations of central respiratorydepression,muscular weakness, andupper airways obstruction.

    As arterial carbondioxide tension risesso does alveolar carbon dioxide tension

    (Pco2); alveolar Po2 falls, leading toarterial hypoxaemia.

    This is diagnosed very late if the patient

    in on supplemental 02 or Anesthesia

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    47/56

    Electrocardiography Artifacts

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    48/56

    Electrocardiography Artifacts

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    49/56

    Electrocardiography Artifacts

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    50/56

    Electrocardiography Artifacts

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    51/56

    Electrocardiography Artifacts

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    52/56

    Electrocardiography Artifacts

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    53/56

    REFERENCES 1. Swedlow DB, Cohen DE. Invasive

    assessment of the failing circulation. Clinics inCritical Care

    2. Clark JA, Lieh-Lai MW, Sarnaik A, MattooTK. Discrepancies between direct and indirectblood pressure measurements usingvariousrecommendations for arm cuff selection.

    Pediatrics. 2002;110(5):920-923. 3. Pinsky MR. Clinical signfiicance

    ofpulmonary artery occlusion pressure.

    Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:175-178.

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    54/56

    REFERENCES 4.SM, Murdoch IA. Monitoring cardiac function

    in intensive care. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88:46-52.

    5.Piehl, MD, Manning J, McCurdy SL, et al.

    Comparison of pulse contour analysis withpulmonary artery thermodilution in 2004Pediatric Critical Care.

    6. Egan JR, Festa M, Cole AD, et al. Clinicalassessment of cardiac performance in infantsand children following cardiac surgery.

    Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:568-573.

    Are we living in the world of

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    55/56

    Are we living in the world ofApproximations?

    THINK A

  • 8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring

    56/56

    THANK YOU