Upload
drsandeep-kumar-kar
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
1/56
Dr.Anupam Goswami
Professor & Head
Department of Cardiac AnesthesiologyI.P.G.M.E&R KOLKATA
Dr.Sandeep Kumar Kar
Rmo-cum clinical tutor Department of Cardiac
Anesthesiology I.P.G.M.E&R KOLKATA
When Numbers Are Wrong!(Pitfalls In Anesthethesia Monitoring)
http://images.google.co.in/imgres?imgurl=http://ipgmer.gov.in/images/oth-03.jpg&imgrefurl=http://ipgmer.gov.in/gallery.html&h=108&w=115&sz=8&hl=en&start=30&usg=__IJ7v73cl1nmoZiIP73OQJG_9yg4=&tbnid=4lMqFpruexcovM:&tbnh=82&tbnw=87&prev=/images%3Fq%3DIPGMER%26start%3D20%26gbv%3D2%26ndsp%3D20%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
2/56
INTRODUCTION
Heisenbergs uncertainty principle The very act of measuring a physiologic
variable may affect the value of that
variable. It is therefore appropriate to the use in
practice of imperfect measures of the
status of our patients with humility . Be vigilant for potentially misleading
information.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
3/56
Uncertainty principle and ourmeasurement systems
A more formal inequality relatingthe standard deviationof position x andthe standard deviation of momentum
p was derived by Heisenberg in 1927x*p >= h/4
where x is the uncertainty as to the
particle's position andp is theuncertainty as to its momentum (andthus its velocity).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviation8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
4/56
What We Infer?
Historically, the uncertainty principle hasbeen confused with a somewhat similareffect in physics, called the observereffect, which notes that measurementsof certain systems cannot be madewithout affecting the systems.
Uncertainty principle is inherent in the
properties of allwave-like systems
How can our Haemodynamic waveformwhether IBP, CVP , ECG escape from it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
5/56
The ideal Clinician:
The practitioner must be :
1)Aware of potential sources of error inmeasurement and interpretation.
2)Interpret data in context
3)Consider the entire picture of the
patient. 4)Should not view the data as a
collection of independent variables.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
6/56
Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring
It is not uncommon for discrepancies tooccur between invasive and noninvasive
measurements of blood pressureresulting in confusion at the bedsideover which number to use in directing
therapy.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
7/56
Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring
Physical properties of the system beingmeasured have significant influence onthe potential errors.
The vascular system is complex, withperiodic variations in pressure followingeach heart beat over a wide range offrequency.
The high heart rate of infants interferedin responsiveness and ideality of thetransduced waveforms early indevelopment of monitoring devices
T R P I A
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
8/56
T e Rea Pro em In AccurateMonitoring
Transmission of the pressure waveformdown a progressively smaller, branchingvascular tree with variable elastance andresistance depending on humoral andneural regulation of vascular tone.
In clinical situations associated withincreased resistance (hypovolemia, earlycompensated shock), reflection of kineticenergy back from the vascular tree to the
end-hole vascular cannula can giveSBP
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
9/56
Damping Damping of the pulse waveform is
associated with falsely low systolicpressures and falsely high diastolicpressures.
Most common cause :
1.vasospasm of the vessel in which thecannula lies.
2. Air bubble in the fluid-filled tubingleading from the vascular cannula to theelectronic transducer.
3. Loose connection in the tubing
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
10/56
How to Reduce Damping?
Make tubing bubble-free.
Ensure there are no loose connections.
Adding papaverine to the arterial lineinfusate is often helpful in reducingvasospasm at the site of the lineinsertion, which may result in a betterwaveform and more reliable pressuremeasurement.
Use MABP in guiding therapy
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
11/56
Why MABP?
It is a function of the area under thearterial pulse waveform curve and isless affected by damping of thesignal.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
12/56
The Problem of Resonance
Resonance refers to the interactionbetween the natural frequency of a
physical monitoring system and thefrequency of the physiologic parameterbeing measured.
This causes erroneous waveforms andpressures to be displayed.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
13/56
How To Reduce Resonance? The natural frequency of a
tubing/transducer system is notdissimilar to that of a xylophone, so thatthe monitoring system itself may, with itsintrinsic physical properties, influence thedata generated.
Using stiff, noncompliant, narrow gauge,and short tubing.
It is common to seeflingelevation of theSBP visible as a needle point at the peakof the pulse waveform as the system are
set up to reduce damping of the signal
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
14/56
Catheter whip due to movement
Catheter whip due to movement withinthe vessel in a hyperdynamic circulatorystate may impart kinetic energy to theend hole of the cannula, resulting in ahigher pressure measurement.
This is more in catheters placed in larger
central arteries or the aorta orpulmonary artery.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
15/56
Strive for Excellence!
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
16/56
Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring
Two methods:
1) Auscultation of Korotkoff sounds.
2) Oscillometric Method( Automated)
Both the methods depend on flow being
present in the extremity being subjectedto assessment.
Unreliable in low flow states
The effect of kinetic energy componentin IBP monitoring makes intraarterialIBP 8-16 Torr higher than NIBP
normally and 25-30 Torr higher in Sepsis.
Pitf ll i i i bl d
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
17/56
Pitfalls in noninvasive bloodpressure monitoring
Data acquisition is intermittent ratherthan continuous making it more difficultto assess response to therapy with
titration. Severe vasoconstriction may make
noninvasive blood pressure
measurements unobtainable. Cuff size must be appropriate to
acquire accurate measurements.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
18/56
DETERMINANTS OF CARDIACOUTPUT
Cardiac output is the product ofstroke volume and heart rate.Determinants of stroke volume
include
Preload,
Contractility
Afterload.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
19/56
Easy question?
What is the most directphysiological measure ofPreload?
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
20/56
The Answer comes
Measurement of fiber length in thesarcomere at end-diastole
This is not clinically feasible
Wh t i th l ti ?
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
21/56
What is the solution?
Extrapolation from measurementsthat are clinically available is necessary.
But.
With each step away from directmeasurement there is more potentialerror in measurement andinterpretation.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
22/56
Contractility
Contractility is also an extrapolatedassessment in clinical practice
Either derived from hemodynamic
calculations or echocardiographic visualevidence involving measurementsthemselves subject to error.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
23/56
Afterload?
Clinically recognized by physicalexamination.
Qualitatively assessed if anatomic
abnormalities or abnormal flow patternsare present by echocardiography.
Quantitatively calculated if pulmonary
artery catheterization is performed.All methods are subject to errors in
interpretation.
Why?
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
24/56
We need to be Realistic
Despite the difficulties inmeasurement and interpretation,such data can be successfully
incorporated into goal-directedtherapeutic algorithms with a holisticclinical approach leavened by
knowledge of the pitfalls.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
25/56
And Remember this person
x*p>= h/4
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
26/56
Preload Assessment(CVP)
Being utilized to assess a remote left-sided volume As a right-sided pressuremeasurement being utilized to assess a
remote left sided volume parameter, leftventricular end diastolic volume(LVEDV),numerous factors may result in a
misleading value. In pediatric patients isolated LV
dysfunction is not reflected in high CVP
measurements but must be kept in mind.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
27/56
Preload Assessment(CVP) Myocardial infarction related to
anomalous left coronary artery arisingfrom the pulmonary (ALCAPA)Kawasaki disease with coronary
aneurysms. Acute myocarditis or cardiomyopathy
related to various metabolic disorders
may also present with significant leftventricular (LV) dysfunction notnecessarily reflected by a high CVP ifright ventricular (RV) compliance is
normal.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
28/56
Ventricular ComplianceA stiff ventricle, either on the right or the
left side, may result in a high pressureeven if the left ventricle is under filled
pericardial effusion with tamponade,
constrictive pericarditis, or highpericardial pressure secondary to highventilatory pressures may produce highfilling pressures with low end-diastolic
volume
Obstructions to left ventricular emptyingsuch as aortic valvular stenosis produce a
high end-diastolic pressure.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
29/56
Ventricular ComplianceAny anatomic or pathophysiologic cause of
increased resistance to left ventricular fillingsituated between the tip of the catheter andthe left ventricular chamber may result inmisleading high pressure readings suggestingadequate preload is present.
On left side:MV disease, Pulmonary VenousObstructionOn The right side:PulmonaryHypertension, PVD,PE, TVD, R-L shunts,allthese obfuscate the true volume status of LVby producing high pressure measurement
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
30/56
How Much We Rely on CVP
Observation of the response to volumeexpansion with continuous monitoringof the CVP can help identify adequate
volume loading and prompt addition ofinotropic support.
Echocardiography comes to our rescue
in case we get dubious results. The knowledge of abnormal wave
forms in CVP
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
31/56
Pulmonary artery occlusionpressure (PAOP)
The assumption may be made thatpulmonary artery occlusion pressureaccurately reflects intravascular volume
status and left ventricular preload.
PAOP may be high in LV dysfunction andMitral valve disease with decreased
compliance, prompting the potentiallyincorrect conclusion that luidresuscitation hasbeen adequate or
excessive.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
32/56
Airway Pressure & PAOPAirway pressure is another very important
factor in interpretation of the PAOP in patientsreceiving positive pressure ventilatorysupport.
placement of the catheter in West Zone III toachieve a continuous fluid column betweenthe catheter tip and the LV
Placement in upper lobes or anteriorsegments with relatively more inflation ofalveoli than pulmonary blood flow, WestZone I, will exaggerate the effect of PPV on the
measurement causing misleading high value.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
33/56
The Cause of erroneous PAOP
If the respiratory cycle alveolar airwaypressure exceeds pulmonary venous pressure,thereby interrupting pulmonary blood lowthrough vascular compression
High levels of positive ventilatory pressure mayconvert the monitored lung site from optimalWest Zone III to Zone II (lower low to
ventilation ratio) despite proper initialplacement of the catheter tip in a dependentlower lobe.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
34/56
Avoiding this Pitfall
Careful measurement of PAOP at end-expiration as judged by observation ofrespiratory variation in the pressuretracing
Aggressive diuresis resulting inhypovolemia may cause the conversionof Zone III lung physiology to that of
Zone II, causing misleadingly high PAOPin volume-depleted patients on highlevels of PEEP.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
35/56
Contractility Assessment
Contractility is defined as the velocity of
myocardial fiber shortening.
Measuring approximating strokevolume as a marker of contractility are
subject to the influence of afterload andvalvular regurgitation.
High afterload secondary to valvular
stenosis or increased systemic vascularresistance will decrease stroke volumeeven with normal contractility.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
36/56
Contractility Assessment Pharmacologic vasodilation can increase
stroke volume even with poor contractility.Valvular regurgitation may effectively reduce
afterload allowing a large stroke volume,
partially in the wrong direction with a net resultof inadequate systemic low.
Estimations of contractility via nuclear medicine
scans or calculations based on data derivedfrom thermodilution pulmonary arterycatheters are subject to the same confounding
factors
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
37/56
Afterload AssessmentPitfalls
Pitfall in interpretation of a high PAP isthat high flow due to L-R shunt mayproduce a high pressure even in thepresence of normal pulmonary vascularresistance.
Echocardiographic data estimatingresistance via flow patterns is availableonly intermittently and is subject to error.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
38/56
Cardiac Output Assessment
Operator variation, computational errors,
Based on the assumption that there isno intracardiac shunt through septaldefects.
Other confounding conditions which mayinvalidate the measurement include
tricuspid regurgitation, atrialarrhythmias, and variation in timing ofthe respiratory cycle with indicator
injection.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
39/56
Echocardiography
Low estimation depends on thecross-sectional area of the vesselbeing evaluated; a high flow across
a narrow vessel may not representadequate output.
Measurements of ejection fraction and
shortening fraction may suggest ahigher systemic output than exists dueto mitral valve regurgitation or aortic
insufficiency.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
40/56
Capnography Pitfalls in interpretation are revealed when
arterial blood gases are performedshowing a gap between paCO2 andETCO2 ,and include:
1) severe airway or parenchymallung disease causing significant ventilation-perfusion mismatch, resulting in dead-space
ventilation and a false low ETCO2 2) false low value because of failure to
obtain a true alveolar sample due to
expiratory obstruction.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
41/56
Pulse- oximetry limitations
Carbon Monoxide
Carbon monoxide molecules, even in a smallamount, can attach to the patient'shemoglobin replacing oxygen molecules. Apulse oximeter cannot distinguish thedifferences and the reading will show the total
saturation level of oxygen and carbonmonoxide. If 15% of hemoglobin has carbonmonoxide and 80% has oxygen, the reading
would be 95%.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
42/56
Pulse- oximetry limitations
Blood Volume Deficiency
Conditions, such as hypovolemia,hypotension, and hypothermia, mayhave adequate oxygen saturation, butlow oxygen carrying capacity.
Due to the reduction in blood flow, the
sensor may not be able to pick upadequately the pulsatile waveformresulting in no signal or loss of
accuracy.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
43/56
Pulse- oximetry limitations
Skin Pigmentation Dark skin pigmentation can give over-
estimated SpO2 readings when it is
below 80%. Find a place where the skin color is
lighter.
Intravenous Dyes Intravenous dyes (such as methylene
blue, indigo carmine, and indocyanine
green) can cause inaccurate readings.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
44/56
Pulse- oximetry limitations
External Interference
Exposure to strong external lightwhile taking measurement mayresult in inaccurate readings.
Shield the sensors from bright lights.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
45/56
Pulse -oximetry andMethemoglobenemia
Methemoglobin is a form of hemoglobinthat does not carry oxygen.
It is normal to have 1-2% of
haemoglobin in this form. A high level of methaemoglobin would
cause a pulse oximter to have a reading
of around 85% regardless of the actualoxygen saturation level.
A i Pitf ll Mi l di N b !
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
46/56
A serious Pitfall. Misleading Numbers!Alveolar hypoventilation is the main
form of respiratory failurepostoperatively results fromcombinations of central respiratorydepression,muscular weakness, andupper airways obstruction.
As arterial carbondioxide tension risesso does alveolar carbon dioxide tension
(Pco2); alveolar Po2 falls, leading toarterial hypoxaemia.
This is diagnosed very late if the patient
in on supplemental 02 or Anesthesia
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
47/56
Electrocardiography Artifacts
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
48/56
Electrocardiography Artifacts
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
49/56
Electrocardiography Artifacts
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
50/56
Electrocardiography Artifacts
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
51/56
Electrocardiography Artifacts
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
52/56
Electrocardiography Artifacts
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
53/56
REFERENCES 1. Swedlow DB, Cohen DE. Invasive
assessment of the failing circulation. Clinics inCritical Care
2. Clark JA, Lieh-Lai MW, Sarnaik A, MattooTK. Discrepancies between direct and indirectblood pressure measurements usingvariousrecommendations for arm cuff selection.
Pediatrics. 2002;110(5):920-923. 3. Pinsky MR. Clinical signfiicance
ofpulmonary artery occlusion pressure.
Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:175-178.
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
54/56
REFERENCES 4.SM, Murdoch IA. Monitoring cardiac function
in intensive care. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88:46-52.
5.Piehl, MD, Manning J, McCurdy SL, et al.
Comparison of pulse contour analysis withpulmonary artery thermodilution in 2004Pediatric Critical Care.
6. Egan JR, Festa M, Cole AD, et al. Clinicalassessment of cardiac performance in infantsand children following cardiac surgery.
Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:568-573.
Are we living in the world of
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
55/56
Are we living in the world ofApproximations?
THINK A
8/22/2019 Pitfalls in Anesthesia Monitoring
56/56
THANK YOU