377
BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments Appendix March 2015 WORLD BANK EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGION EDUCATION Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

BULGARIA

Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of

Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from

the National Assessments

Appendix

March 2015

WORLD BANK

EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA REGION

EDUCATION

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Page 2: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

1

Appendix

1 [XXX.xxx.Normed = Obl-ID]

1.1 Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 1: Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 101.804

2 100.266

3 101.278

4 97.016

5 96.464

6 98.469

7 96.731

8 100.311

9 103.726

10 96.154

11 100.535

12 101.900

13 98.723

14 96.533

15 93.403

16 97.931

17 95.522

18 96.260

19 94.167

20 97.667

21 102.154

22 103.556

23 99.303

24 98.152

25 108.585

26 98.867

27 96.333

28 101.742

29 100.500

p-value = 9.3084e-19

Page 3: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

2

1.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 2: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Normed by group-

ing variable Obl-ID

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.037 1.538 7.114 1.000

1 3 -5.312 0.527 6.365 1.000

1 4 -1.622 4.789 11.199 0.539

1 5 -3.160 5.340 13.840 0.862

1 6 -3.630 3.335 10.300 0.995

1 7 -3.674 5.074 13.821 0.938

1 8 -5.010 1.493 7.996 1.000

1 9 -8.393 -1.921 4.550 1.000

1 10 -3.097 5.651 14.398 0.825

1 11 -6.006 1.269 8.545 1.000

1 12 -7.015 -0.096 6.824 1.000

1 13 -2.881 3.081 9.043 0.985

1 14 -3.009 5.271 13.551 0.845

1 15 2.319 8.402 14.485 0.000

1 16 -1.376 3.873 9.123 0.567

1 17 -0.829 6.283 13.394 0.186

1 18 -1.375 5.544 12.464 0.377

1 19 -0.105 7.638 15.380 0.059

1 20 -2.614 4.138 10.889 0.891

1 21 -7.182 -0.349 6.483 1.000

1 22 -6.729 -1.752 3.225 1.000

1 23 -3.603 2.502 8.606 1.000

1 24 -2.155 3.652 9.459 0.861

1 25 -14.176 -6.781 0.614 0.132

1 26 -3.598 2.938 9.473 0.998

1 27 -1.280 5.471 12.222 0.352

1 28 -8.116 0.062 8.241 1.000

1 29 -26.845 1.304 29.453 1.000

2 3 -6.621 -1.012 4.597 1.000

2 4 -2.952 3.250 9.452 0.982

2 5 -4.542 3.802 12.146 0.998

2 6 -4.977 1.797 8.570 1.000

2 7 -5.060 3.535 12.131 1.000

2 8 -6.343 -0.045 6.252 1.000

2 9 -9.724 -3.460 2.805 0.964

2 10 -4.483 4.112 12.708 0.995

2 11 -7.361 -0.269 6.823 1.000

2 12 -8.361 -1.634 5.093 1.000

2 13 -4.194 1.543 7.280 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 4: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

Table 2 – Continued from previous page

3

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

2 14 -4.387 3.733 11.852 0.997

2 15 1.001 6.863 12.726 0.004

2 16 -2.658 2.335 7.328 0.996

2 17 -2.180 4.744 11.669 0.725

2 18 -2.721 4.006 10.733 0.918

2 19 -1.471 6.099 13.670 0.365

2 20 -3.954 2.599 9.153 1.000

2 21 -8.525 -1.888 4.750 1.000

2 22 -7.996 -3.290 1.416 0.685

2 23 -4.922 0.963 6.849 1.000

2 24 -3.462 2.114 7.690 1.000

2 25 -15.534 -8.319 -1.104 0.006

2 26 -4.931 1.399 7.730 1.000

2 27 -2.621 3.933 10.486 0.911

2 28 -9.492 -1.476 6.540 1.000

2 29 -28.336 -0.234 27.868 1.000

3 4 -2.177 4.262 10.702 0.787

3 5 -3.709 4.813 13.336 0.954

3 6 -4.184 2.808 9.800 1.000

3 7 -4.222 4.547 13.316 0.984

3 8 -5.565 0.966 7.498 1.000

3 9 -8.948 -2.448 4.052 1.000

3 10 -3.645 5.124 13.892 0.933

3 11 -6.558 0.743 8.044 1.000

3 12 -7.569 -0.622 6.324 1.000

3 13 -3.438 2.555 8.548 0.999

3 14 -3.558 4.744 13.047 0.947

3 15 1.762 7.875 13.989 0.001

3 16 -1.938 3.347 8.632 0.852

3 17 -1.382 5.756 12.894 0.363

3 18 -1.929 5.018 11.964 0.615

3 19 -0.655 7.111 14.878 0.134

3 20 -3.168 3.611 10.390 0.977

3 21 -7.736 -0.876 5.984 1.000

3 22 -7.293 -2.278 2.736 0.998

3 23 -4.160 1.975 8.110 1.000

3 24 -2.713 3.126 8.964 0.976

3 25 -14.728 -7.308 0.113 0.060

3 26 -4.153 2.411 8.975 1.000

3 27 -1.835 4.944 11.724 0.593

3 28 -8.666 -0.464 7.737 1.000

3 29 -27.378 0.778 28.933 1.000

4 5 -8.372 0.551 9.475 1.000

4 6 -8.930 -1.454 6.022 1.000

4 7 -8.874 0.285 9.444 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 5: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

Table 2 – Continued from previous page

4

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 8 -10.343 -3.296 3.751 0.996

4 9 -13.728 -6.710 0.308 0.085

4 10 -8.297 0.862 10.021 1.000

4 11 -11.285 -3.519 4.246 0.998

4 12 -12.318 -4.884 2.549 0.798

4 13 -8.259 -1.707 4.844 1.000

4 14 -8.232 0.482 9.196 1.000

4 15 -3.049 3.613 10.275 0.972

4 16 -6.826 -0.915 4.995 1.000

4 17 -6.119 1.494 9.107 1.000

4 18 -6.678 0.756 8.189 1.000

4 19 -5.356 2.849 11.054 1.000

4 20 -7.928 -0.651 6.626 1.000

4 21 -12.491 -5.138 2.214 0.686

4 22 -12.210 -6.540 -0.871 0.006

4 23 -8.969 -2.287 4.395 1.000

4 24 -7.547 -1.137 5.274 1.000

4 25 -19.448 -11.570 -3.692 0.000

4 26 -8.928 -1.851 5.226 1.000

4 27 -6.595 0.682 7.959 1.000

4 28 -13.344 -4.726 3.892 0.967

4 29 -31.764 -3.484 24.795 1.000

5 6 -11.335 -2.005 7.325 1.000

5 7 -10.992 -0.266 10.460 1.000

5 8 -12.837 -3.847 5.143 0.999

5 9 -16.229 -7.262 1.706 0.353

5 10 -10.416 0.310 11.036 1.000

5 11 -13.634 -4.071 5.493 0.999

5 12 -14.732 -5.436 3.860 0.932

5 13 -10.866 -2.259 6.348 1.000

5 14 -10.418 -0.069 10.280 1.000

5 15 -5.629 3.062 11.753 1.000

5 16 -9.596 -1.467 6.663 1.000

5 17 -8.497 0.943 10.382 1.000

5 18 -9.092 0.204 9.500 1.000

5 19 -7.626 2.298 12.221 1.000

5 20 -10.374 -1.202 7.969 1.000

5 21 -14.921 -5.690 3.542 0.885

5 22 -15.048 -7.092 0.865 0.172

5 23 -11.545 -2.838 5.868 1.000

5 24 -10.188 -1.688 6.812 1.000

5 25 -21.776 -12.121 -2.466 0.001

5 26 -11.416 -2.402 6.611 1.000

5 27 -9.041 0.131 9.302 1.000

5 28 -15.545 -5.278 4.990 0.986

Continued on next page

Page 6: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

Table 2 – Continued from previous page

5

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

5 29 -32.861 -4.036 24.790 1.000

6 7 -7.817 1.739 11.294 1.000

6 8 -9.397 -1.842 5.713 1.000

6 9 -12.784 -5.256 2.271 0.687

6 10 -7.240 2.316 11.871 1.000

6 11 -10.295 -2.065 6.164 1.000

6 12 -11.347 -3.431 4.486 0.999

6 13 -7.349 -0.254 6.842 1.000

6 14 -7.194 1.936 11.066 1.000

6 15 -2.130 5.067 12.264 0.670

6 16 -5.969 0.538 7.046 1.000

6 17 -5.138 2.948 11.033 1.000

6 18 -5.707 2.209 10.126 1.000

6 19 -4.342 4.303 12.948 0.991

6 20 -6.967 0.803 8.573 1.000

6 21 -11.525 -3.684 4.156 0.996

6 22 -11.377 -5.087 1.203 0.356

6 23 -8.049 -0.833 6.382 1.000

6 24 -6.648 0.317 7.282 1.000

6 25 -18.452 -10.116 -1.780 0.002

6 26 -7.980 -0.397 7.186 1.000

6 27 -5.634 2.136 9.906 1.000

6 28 -12.311 -3.273 5.765 1.000

6 29 -30.441 -2.031 26.380 1.000

7 8 -12.805 -3.581 5.643 1.000

7 9 -16.197 -6.995 2.207 0.498

7 10 -10.346 0.577 11.500 1.000

7 11 -13.588 -3.804 5.980 1.000

7 12 -14.692 -5.169 4.353 0.971

7 13 -10.843 -1.992 6.859 1.000

7 14 -10.355 0.197 10.750 1.000

7 15 -5.605 3.328 12.261 1.000

7 16 -9.588 -1.200 7.187 1.000

7 17 -8.454 1.209 10.872 1.000

7 18 -9.052 0.471 9.993 1.000

7 19 -7.572 2.564 12.700 1.000

7 20 -10.337 -0.936 8.465 1.000

7 21 -14.883 -5.423 4.036 0.945

7 22 -15.045 -6.825 1.395 0.300

7 23 -11.520 -2.572 6.376 1.000

7 24 -10.169 -1.421 7.326 1.000

7 25 -21.728 -11.855 -1.981 0.003

7 26 -11.383 -2.136 7.111 1.000

7 27 -9.003 0.397 9.798 1.000

7 28 -15.484 -5.011 5.462 0.995

Continued on next page

Page 7: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

Table 2 – Continued from previous page

6

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

7 29 -32.668 -3.769 25.130 1.000

8 9 -10.517 -3.414 3.688 0.995

8 10 -5.066 4.158 13.382 0.998

8 11 -8.065 -0.223 7.619 1.000

8 12 -9.102 -1.589 5.925 1.000

8 13 -5.053 1.589 8.230 1.000

8 14 -5.004 3.778 12.560 0.999

8 15 0.158 6.909 13.659 0.037

8 16 -3.630 2.380 8.391 1.000

8 17 -2.901 4.790 12.480 0.873

8 18 -3.462 4.051 11.565 0.973

8 19 -2.132 6.145 14.422 0.553

8 20 -4.714 2.645 10.003 1.000

8 21 -9.276 -1.842 5.591 1.000

8 22 -9.019 -3.245 2.529 0.956

8 23 -5.761 1.009 7.779 1.000

8 24 -4.343 2.159 8.662 1.000

8 25 -16.227 -8.274 -0.321 0.029

8 26 -5.716 1.445 8.606 1.000

8 27 -3.380 3.978 11.337 0.973

8 28 -10.117 -1.430 7.256 1.000

8 29 -28.489 -0.189 28.112 1.000

9 10 -1.630 7.572 16.774 0.319

9 11 -4.625 3.191 11.007 1.000

9 12 -5.660 1.826 9.312 1.000

9 13 -1.608 5.003 11.614 0.509

9 14 -1.566 7.192 15.951 0.323

9 15 3.603 10.323 17.043 0.000

9 16 -0.181 5.795 11.771 0.073

9 17 0.540 8.204 15.868 0.019

9 18 -0.020 7.466 14.952 0.052

9 19 1.307 9.559 17.811 0.005

9 20 -1.272 6.059 13.390 0.310

9 21 -5.834 1.572 8.978 1.000

9 22 -5.569 0.170 5.908 1.000

9 23 -2.317 4.423 11.163 0.800

9 24 -0.897 5.574 12.045 0.229

9 25 -12.787 -4.860 3.068 0.890

9 26 -2.273 4.859 11.991 0.735

9 27 0.062 7.392 14.723 0.045

9 28 -6.679 1.984 10.647 1.000

9 29 -25.068 3.226 31.519 1.000

10 11 -14.165 -4.381 5.403 0.998

10 12 -15.268 -5.746 3.776 0.906

10 13 -11.420 -2.569 6.282 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 8: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

Table 2 – Continued from previous page

7

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

10 14 -10.932 -0.379 10.173 1.000

10 15 -6.182 2.751 11.684 1.000

10 16 -10.165 -1.777 6.610 1.000

10 17 -9.031 0.632 10.295 1.000

10 18 -9.628 -0.106 9.416 1.000

10 19 -8.149 1.987 12.123 1.000

10 20 -10.914 -1.513 7.888 1.000

10 21 -15.459 -6.000 3.459 0.850

10 22 -15.622 -7.402 0.818 0.157

10 23 -12.097 -3.149 5.799 1.000

10 24 -10.745 -1.998 6.749 1.000

10 25 -22.305 -12.432 -2.558 0.001

10 26 -11.960 -2.713 6.534 1.000

10 27 -9.580 -0.179 9.221 1.000

10 28 -16.061 -5.588 4.885 0.977

10 29 -33.245 -4.346 24.553 1.000

11 12 -9.556 -1.365 6.826 1.000

11 13 -5.588 1.812 9.212 1.000

11 14 -5.367 4.002 13.370 0.999

11 15 -0.365 7.132 14.630 0.090

11 16 -4.235 2.604 9.442 1.000

11 17 -3.341 5.013 13.367 0.911

11 18 -3.916 4.275 12.466 0.983

11 19 -2.529 6.368 15.265 0.635

11 20 -5.181 2.868 10.918 1.000

11 21 -9.737 -1.619 6.499 1.000

11 22 -9.653 -3.021 3.611 0.998

11 23 -6.283 1.232 8.747 1.000

11 24 -4.893 2.383 9.658 1.000

11 25 -16.647 -8.050 0.546 0.107

11 26 -6.201 1.668 9.537 1.000

11 27 -3.848 4.202 12.251 0.983

11 28 -10.486 -1.207 8.072 1.000

11 29 -28.453 0.035 28.523 1.000

12 13 -3.873 3.177 10.227 0.998

12 14 -3.728 5.367 14.462 0.925

12 15 1.345 8.497 15.650 0.003

12 16 -2.490 3.969 10.428 0.888

12 17 -1.668 6.378 14.424 0.401

12 18 -2.237 5.640 13.517 0.634

12 19 -0.875 7.733 16.342 0.160

12 20 -3.496 4.233 11.963 0.968

12 21 -8.054 -0.254 7.547 1.000

12 22 -7.896 -1.656 4.584 1.000

12 23 -4.574 2.597 9.769 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 9: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

Table 2 – Continued from previous page

8

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

12 24 -3.172 3.748 10.667 0.972

12 25 -14.983 -6.685 1.612 0.365

12 26 -4.508 3.033 10.575 1.000

12 27 -2.163 5.567 13.296 0.622

12 28 -8.845 0.158 9.161 1.000

12 29 -26.999 1.400 29.799 1.000

13 14 -6.200 2.190 10.579 1.000

13 15 -0.911 5.320 11.552 0.245

13 16 -4.629 0.792 6.213 1.000

13 17 -4.038 3.201 10.440 0.999

13 18 -4.587 2.463 9.513 1.000

13 19 -3.303 4.556 12.416 0.938

13 20 -5.829 1.056 7.942 1.000

13 21 -10.396 -3.431 3.534 0.992

13 22 -9.991 -4.833 0.324 0.106

13 23 -6.832 -0.580 5.673 1.000

13 24 -5.391 0.571 6.533 1.000

13 25 -17.380 -9.862 -2.345 0.000

13 26 -6.817 -0.144 6.530 1.000

13 27 -4.496 2.390 9.275 1.000

13 28 -11.309 -3.019 5.271 1.000

13 29 -29.959 -1.777 26.404 1.000

14 15 -5.345 3.131 11.607 1.000

14 16 -9.297 -1.398 6.501 1.000

14 17 -8.231 1.012 10.254 1.000

14 18 -8.822 0.273 9.368 1.000

14 19 -7.369 2.367 12.102 1.000

14 20 -10.101 -1.133 7.835 1.000

14 21 -14.650 -5.621 3.409 0.873

14 22 -14.744 -7.023 0.698 0.143

14 23 -11.261 -2.769 5.722 1.000

14 24 -9.899 -1.619 6.661 1.000

14 25 -21.514 -12.052 -2.590 0.001

14 26 -11.140 -2.333 6.473 1.000

14 27 -8.768 0.200 9.168 1.000

14 28 -15.295 -5.209 4.878 0.985

14 29 -32.728 -3.967 24.795 1.000

15 16 -10.082 -4.528 1.025 0.338

15 17 -9.458 -2.119 5.220 1.000

15 18 -10.010 -2.857 4.295 1.000

15 19 -8.716 -0.764 7.187 1.000

15 20 -11.254 -4.264 2.726 0.895

15 21 -15.820 -8.751 -1.682 0.001

15 22 -15.450 -10.154 -4.857 0.000

15 23 -12.268 -5.900 0.468 0.119

Continued on next page

Page 10: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

Table 2 – Continued from previous page

9

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

15 24 -10.832 -4.750 1.333 0.436

15 25 -22.797 -15.183 -7.569 0.000

15 26 -12.246 -5.464 1.318 0.365

15 27 -9.921 -2.931 4.060 0.999

15 28 -16.716 -8.339 0.038 0.053

15 29 -35.305 -7.097 21.110 1.000

16 17 -4.255 2.409 9.074 1.000

16 18 -4.788 1.671 8.130 1.000

16 19 -3.569 3.764 11.098 0.986

16 20 -6.014 0.264 6.543 1.000

16 21 -10.589 -4.223 2.143 0.783

16 22 -9.939 -5.625 -1.311 0.000

16 23 -6.949 -1.372 4.206 1.000

16 24 -5.470 -0.221 5.028 1.000

16 25 -17.620 -10.654 -3.688 0.000

16 26 -6.981 -0.936 5.110 1.000

16 27 -4.681 1.598 7.876 1.000

16 28 -11.604 -3.811 3.982 0.993

16 29 -30.608 -2.569 25.470 1.000

17 18 -8.784 -0.738 7.308 1.000

17 19 -7.409 1.355 10.119 1.000

17 20 -10.047 -2.145 5.757 1.000

17 21 -14.604 -6.632 1.339 0.296

17 22 -14.487 -8.034 -1.582 0.001

17 23 -11.138 -3.781 3.576 0.986

17 24 -9.742 -2.630 4.481 1.000

17 25 -21.522 -13.064 -4.605 0.000

17 26 -11.063 -3.345 4.373 0.999

17 27 -8.713 -0.812 7.090 1.000

17 28 -15.372 -6.220 2.931 0.740

17 29 -33.425 -4.978 23.469 1.000

18 19 -6.515 2.093 10.702 1.000

18 20 -9.136 -1.407 6.323 1.000

18 21 -13.694 -5.894 1.907 0.512

18 22 -13.536 -7.296 -1.056 0.004

18 23 -10.214 -3.043 4.129 0.999

18 24 -8.812 -1.892 5.027 1.000

18 25 -20.623 -12.325 -4.028 0.000

18 26 -10.148 -2.607 4.935 1.000

18 27 -7.803 -0.073 7.656 1.000

18 28 -14.485 -5.482 3.521 0.897

18 29 -32.639 -4.240 24.159 1.000

19 20 -11.974 -3.500 4.974 1.000

19 21 -16.526 -7.987 0.552 0.108

19 22 -16.531 -9.389 -2.248 0.000

Continued on next page

Page 11: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

Table 2 – Continued from previous page

10

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

19 23 -13.104 -5.136 2.832 0.828

19 24 -11.728 -3.986 3.757 0.986

19 25 -23.414 -14.419 -5.424 0.000

19 26 -13.003 -4.700 3.603 0.953

19 27 -10.641 -2.167 6.307 1.000

19 28 -17.225 -7.575 2.074 0.423

19 29 -34.944 -6.333 22.278 1.000

20 21 -12.139 -4.487 3.165 0.930

20 22 -11.942 -5.889 0.163 0.070

20 23 -8.645 -1.636 5.373 1.000

20 24 -7.237 -0.486 6.266 1.000

20 25 -19.077 -10.919 -2.761 0.000

20 26 -8.587 -1.200 6.187 1.000

20 27 -6.246 1.333 8.913 1.000

20 28 -12.950 -4.075 4.799 0.997

20 29 -31.192 -2.833 25.526 1.000

21 22 -7.546 -1.402 4.741 1.000

21 23 -4.236 2.851 9.939 1.000

21 24 -2.831 4.002 10.834 0.931

21 25 -14.657 -6.432 1.794 0.433

21 26 -4.175 3.287 10.749 0.999

21 27 -1.831 5.821 13.472 0.497

21 28 -8.525 0.412 9.348 1.000

21 29 -26.725 1.654 30.032 1.000

22 23 -1.068 4.253 9.575 0.383

22 24 0.427 5.404 10.381 0.016

22 25 -11.793 -5.029 1.734 0.549

22 26 -1.121 4.689 10.500 0.361

22 27 1.170 7.223 13.276 0.003

22 28 -5.798 1.814 9.426 1.000

22 29 -24.933 3.056 31.046 1.000

23 24 -4.954 1.150 7.255 1.000

23 25 -16.914 -9.283 -1.651 0.002

23 26 -6.365 0.436 7.237 1.000

23 27 -4.040 2.969 9.979 0.999

23 28 -10.832 -2.439 5.954 1.000

23 29 -29.409 -1.197 27.015 1.000

24 25 -17.828 -10.433 -3.038 0.000

24 26 -7.250 -0.714 5.821 1.000

24 27 -4.933 1.819 8.570 1.000

24 28 -11.768 -3.590 4.589 0.999

24 29 -30.497 -2.348 25.801 1.000

25 26 1.739 9.719 17.699 0.002

25 27 4.094 12.252 20.410 0.000

25 28 -2.530 6.843 16.217 0.591

Continued on next page

Page 12: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

Table 2 – Continued from previous page

11

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

25 29 -20.434 8.085 36.604 1.000

26 27 -4.854 2.533 9.921 1.000

26 28 -11.586 -2.875 5.836 1.000

26 29 -29.942 -1.633 26.675 1.000

27 28 -14.283 -5.409 3.466 0.896

27 29 -32.526 -4.167 24.192 1.000

28 29 -27.490 1.242 29.974 1.000

Page 13: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

12

2 [XXX.xxx.Normed = cat]

2.1 Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable cat

Table 3: Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 104.423

1 101.091

2 99.433

3 99.389

4 98.907

5 97.204

6 98.787

7 100.060

8 105.625

p-value = 1.1117e-10

2.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 4: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Normed by group-

ing variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -0.090 3.332 6.753 0.063

1 3 1.653 4.989 8.326 0.000

1 4 1.517 5.034 8.551 0.000

1 5 1.543 5.516 9.489 0.001

1 6 4.188 7.219 10.250 0.000

1 7 2.600 5.636 8.672 0.000

1 8 0.369 4.363 8.356 0.020

1 9 -13.261 -1.202 10.856 1.000

2 3 -1.524 1.658 4.839 0.796

2 4 -1.668 1.702 5.073 0.823

2 5 -1.659 2.185 6.028 0.707

2 6 1.028 3.888 6.748 0.001

2 7 -0.560 2.305 5.170 0.234

2 8 -2.834 1.031 4.896 0.996

2 9 -16.550 -4.534 7.483 0.963

3 4 -3.240 0.044 3.329 1.000

3 5 -3.242 0.527 4.295 1.000

3 6 -0.528 2.230 4.988 0.228

3 7 -2.116 0.647 3.410 0.998

Continued on next page

Page 14: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

13

Table 4 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -4.417 -0.627 3.163 1.000

3 9 -18.184 -6.192 5.801 0.804

4 5 -3.447 0.482 4.412 1.000

4 6 -0.788 2.186 5.159 0.354

4 7 -2.376 0.603 3.581 0.999

4 8 -4.621 -0.671 3.279 1.000

4 9 -18.280 -6.236 5.808 0.802

5 6 -1.798 1.703 5.204 0.852

5 7 -3.385 0.120 3.625 1.000

5 8 -5.514 -1.154 3.207 0.996

5 9 -18.903 -6.718 5.467 0.741

6 7 -3.968 -1.583 0.802 0.502

6 8 -6.381 -2.857 0.667 0.225

6 9 -20.333 -8.421 3.490 0.410

7 8 -4.802 -1.274 2.255 0.971

7 9 -18.751 -6.838 5.074 0.695

8 9 -17.756 -5.565 6.627 0.892

Page 15: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

14

3 [XXX.xxx.Normed = School-Type-1]

3.1 Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable School- Type-1

Table 5: Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 99.092

3 99.891

5 115.000

6 99.506

7 102.214

8 91.125

10 93.818

21 100.000

22 114.719

32 99.810

51 98.667

53 102.667

54 104.500

56 104.000

57 97.250

58 98.000

71 102.000

p-value = 5.7004e-12

3.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 6: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Normed by group-

ing variable School-Type-1

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -2.880 -0.800 1.281 0.997

1 3 -52.938 -15.908 21.121 0.989

1 4 -4.769 -0.415 3.939 1.000

1 5 -13.074 -3.123 6.829 1.000

1 6 0.335 7.967 15.599 0.030

1 7 -5.939 5.274 16.486 0.972

1 8 -17.497 -0.908 15.680 1.000

1 9 -22.259 -15.627 -8.995 0.000

1 10 -8.867 -0.718 7.431 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 16: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

15

Table 6 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 11 -14.724 0.425 15.574 1.000

1 12 -24.972 -3.575 17.822 1.000

1 13 -31.603 -5.408 20.787 1.000

1 14 -26.305 -4.908 16.489 1.000

1 15 -16.697 1.842 20.380 1.000

1 16 -35.938 1.092 38.121 1.000

1 17 -14.120 -2.908 8.304 1.000

2 3 -52.165 -15.109 21.948 0.993

2 4 -4.193 0.385 4.963 1.000

2 5 -12.374 -2.323 7.728 1.000

2 6 1.004 8.766 16.528 0.010

2 7 -5.228 6.073 17.374 0.912

2 8 -16.757 -0.109 16.540 1.000

2 9 -21.608 -14.827 -8.047 0.000

2 10 -8.189 0.082 8.353 1.000

2 11 -13.990 1.225 16.440 1.000

2 12 -24.219 -2.775 18.669 1.000

2 13 -30.842 -4.609 21.625 1.000

2 14 -25.552 -4.109 17.335 1.000

2 15 -15.951 2.641 21.234 1.000

2 16 -35.165 1.891 38.948 1.000

2 17 -13.410 -2.109 9.192 1.000

3 4 -21.760 15.494 52.747 0.992

3 5 -25.527 12.786 51.099 0.999

3 6 -13.902 23.875 61.652 0.737

3 7 -17.478 21.182 59.842 0.898

3 8 -25.547 15.000 55.547 0.998

3 9 -37.307 0.281 37.869 1.000

3 10 -22.695 15.190 53.075 0.995

3 11 -23.646 16.333 56.313 0.993

3 12 -30.407 12.333 55.073 1.000

3 13 -34.833 10.500 55.833 1.000

3 14 -31.740 11.000 53.740 1.000

3 15 -23.633 17.750 59.133 0.989

3 16 -35.346 17.000 69.346 1.000

3 17 -25.660 13.000 51.660 0.999

4 5 -13.462 -2.708 8.046 1.000

4 6 -0.272 8.381 17.035 0.070

4 7 -6.242 5.688 17.619 0.968

4 8 -17.576 -0.494 16.589 1.000

4 9 -22.997 -15.212 -7.427 0.000

4 10 -9.415 -0.303 8.809 1.000

4 11 -14.849 0.840 16.528 1.000

4 12 -24.943 -3.160 18.622 1.000

4 13 -31.504 -4.994 21.517 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 17: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

16

Table 6 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 14 -26.276 -4.494 17.289 1.000

4 15 -16.725 2.256 21.238 1.000

4 16 -35.747 1.506 38.760 1.000

4 17 -14.424 -2.494 9.437 1.000

5 6 -1.358 11.089 23.537 0.150

5 7 -6.517 8.396 23.309 0.875

5 8 -17.070 2.214 21.498 1.000

5 9 -24.365 -12.504 -0.644 0.027

5 10 -10.366 2.405 15.176 1.000

5 11 -14.513 3.548 21.609 1.000

5 12 -24.001 -0.452 23.096 1.000

5 13 -30.266 -2.286 25.694 1.000

5 14 -25.334 -1.786 21.763 1.000

5 15 -16.021 4.964 25.949 1.000

5 16 -34.099 4.214 42.527 1.000

5 17 -14.699 0.214 15.128 1.000

6 7 -16.170 -2.693 10.784 1.000

6 8 -27.071 -8.875 9.321 0.961

6 9 -33.589 -23.594 -13.599 0.000

6 10 -19.745 -8.685 2.376 0.345

6 11 -24.436 -7.542 9.353 0.983

6 12 -34.208 -11.542 11.125 0.943

6 13 -40.617 -13.375 13.867 0.959

6 14 -35.541 -12.875 9.791 0.867

6 15 -26.115 -6.125 13.865 1.000

6 16 -44.652 -6.875 30.902 1.000

6 17 -24.352 -10.875 2.602 0.297

7 8 -26.146 -6.182 13.782 1.000

7 9 -33.837 -20.901 -7.964 0.000

7 10 -19.768 -5.991 7.785 0.987

7 11 -23.634 -4.848 13.937 1.000

7 12 -32.957 -8.848 15.260 0.998

7 13 -39.135 -10.682 17.771 0.997

7 14 -34.290 -10.182 13.927 0.990

7 15 -25.043 -3.432 18.180 1.000

7 16 -42.842 -4.182 34.478 1.000

7 17 -23.965 -8.182 7.601 0.934

8 9 -32.518 -14.719 3.081 0.256

8 10 -18.228 0.190 18.609 1.000

8 11 -21.080 1.333 23.746 1.000

8 12 -29.698 -2.667 24.365 1.000

8 13 -35.468 -4.500 26.468 1.000

8 14 -31.031 -4.000 23.031 1.000

8 15 -22.080 2.750 27.580 1.000

8 16 -38.547 2.000 42.547 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 18: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

17

Table 6 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 17 -21.964 -2.000 17.964 1.000

9 10 4.514 14.909 25.304 0.000

9 11 -0.415 16.052 32.519 0.066

9 12 -10.297 12.052 34.401 0.910

9 13 -16.760 10.219 37.197 0.997

9 14 -11.631 10.719 33.068 0.967

9 15 -2.161 17.469 37.098 0.151

9 16 -20.869 16.719 54.307 0.984

9 17 -0.218 12.719 25.656 0.060

10 11 -15.991 1.143 18.277 1.000

10 12 -25.703 -2.857 19.988 1.000

10 13 -32.081 -4.690 22.700 1.000

10 14 -27.036 -4.190 18.655 1.000

10 15 -17.633 2.560 22.752 1.000

10 16 -36.075 1.810 39.695 1.000

10 17 -15.967 -2.190 11.586 1.000

11 12 -30.173 -4.000 22.173 1.000

11 13 -36.055 -5.833 24.388 1.000

11 14 -31.506 -5.333 20.840 1.000

11 15 -22.476 1.417 25.309 1.000

11 16 -39.313 0.667 40.646 1.000

11 17 -22.119 -3.333 15.452 1.000

12 13 -35.622 -1.833 31.956 1.000

12 14 -31.555 -1.333 28.888 1.000

12 15 -22.853 5.417 33.687 1.000

12 16 -38.073 4.667 47.407 1.000

12 17 -23.442 0.667 24.775 1.000

13 14 -33.289 0.500 34.289 1.000

13 15 -24.805 7.250 39.305 1.000

13 16 -38.833 6.500 51.833 1.000

13 17 -25.953 2.500 30.953 1.000

14 15 -21.520 6.750 35.020 1.000

14 16 -36.740 6.000 48.740 1.000

14 17 -22.109 2.000 26.109 1.000

15 16 -42.133 -0.750 40.633 1.000

15 17 -26.362 -4.750 16.862 1.000

16 17 -42.660 -4.000 34.660 1.000

Page 19: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

18

:......-: --+-

.;............

10

21

22 ---+--- 32

51

53

54

56

57

58

71

60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150

Page 20: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

19

4 [XXX.xxx.Normed = School-Type-2]

4.1 Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable School- Type-2

Table 7: Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 99.049

2 99.312

3 109.432

p-value = 1.4828e-07

4.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 8: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Normed by group-

ing variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.273 -0.263 3.747 0.987

1 3 -16.139 -10.384 -4.629 0.000

2 3 -14.337 -10.120 -5.904 0.000

Page 21: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

20

5 [XXX.xxx.Normed = BudgetFrom]

5.1 Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Bud- getFrom

Table 9: Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Budget-

From

Group Mean

1 101.708

2 102.500

4 82.833

5 99.312

6 109.432

7 98.000

p-value = 4.6989e-09

5.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 10: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Normed by

grouping variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -12.366 -0.792 10.782 1.000

1 3 4.839 18.875 32.911 0.002

1 4 -3.924 2.396 8.716 0.889

1 5 -15.784 -7.724 0.335 0.069

1 6 -27.676 3.708 35.093 0.999

2 3 3.787 19.667 35.546 0.006

2 4 -6.564 3.188 12.940 0.938

2 5 -17.892 -6.932 4.027 0.464

2 6 -27.751 4.500 36.751 0.999

3 4 -29.054 -16.479 -3.903 0.003

3 5 -40.133 -26.599 -13.066 0.000

3 6 -48.381 -15.167 18.048 0.785

4 5 -15.229 -10.120 -5.012 0.000

4 6 -29.447 1.312 32.071 1.000

5 6 -19.731 11.432 42.596 0.903

Page 22: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

21

70 80 90 100 110 120 130

Page 23: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

22

6

6.1

[XXX.xxx.Normed = IsProtected]

Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 11: Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable IsPro-

tected

Group Mean

0 99.426

1 100.628

p-value = 0.22826

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 24: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

23

7

7.1

[XXX.xxx.Normed = IsCentral]

Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 12: Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable IsCen-

tral

Group Mean

0 100.303

1 98.407

p-value = 0.00024808

7.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 13: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Normed by

grouping variable IsCentral

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 0.884 1.896 2.908 0.000

Page 25: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

24

8 [XXX.xxx.Normed = Shifts]

8.1 Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Table 14: Means of XXX.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 98.731

5 101.616

7 92.333

p-value = 1.5205e-06

8.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 15: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Normed by

grouping variable Shifts

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.219 -2.885 -1.550 0.000

1 3 -8.291 6.398 21.087 0.564

2 3 -5.434 9.283 23.999 0.301

Page 26: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

25

9 [XXX.xxx.Scaled = Obl-ID]

9.1 Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 16: Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 49.783

2 48.009

3 49.200

4 44.328

5 43.679

6 46.061

7 43.962

8 48.131

9 51.984

10 43.346

11 48.372

12 49.960

13 46.361

14 43.833

15 40.299

16 45.331

17 42.630

18 43.480

19 41.083

20 45.111

21 50.192

22 51.765

23 46.974

24 45.674

25 57.488

26 46.517

27 43.611

28 49.710

29 48.500

p-value = 6.8599e-19

9.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Page 27: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

26

Table 17: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable Obl-ID

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.540 1.773 8.087 1.000

1 3 -6.029 0.583 7.194 1.000

1 4 -1.804 5.454 12.713 0.525

1 5 -3.521 6.104 15.729 0.850

1 6 -4.166 3.721 11.608 0.996

1 7 -4.084 5.821 15.726 0.928

1 8 -5.712 1.651 9.015 1.000

1 9 -9.529 -2.201 5.126 1.000

1 10 -3.468 6.436 16.341 0.816

1 11 -6.828 1.411 9.649 1.000

1 12 -8.013 -0.177 7.658 1.000

1 13 -3.330 3.421 10.172 0.988

1 14 -3.427 5.949 15.325 0.849

1 15 2.596 9.484 16.372 0.000

1 16 -1.493 4.452 10.396 0.533

1 17 -0.901 7.152 15.205 0.177

1 18 -1.533 6.303 14.138 0.368

1 19 -0.068 8.699 17.466 0.055

1 20 -2.973 4.671 12.316 0.894

1 21 -8.147 -0.410 7.327 1.000

1 22 -7.619 -1.983 3.653 1.000

1 23 -4.104 2.809 9.722 1.000

1 24 -2.467 4.109 10.684 0.869

1 25 -16.079 -7.705 0.669 0.127

1 26 -4.134 3.266 10.666 0.999

1 27 -1.473 6.171 13.816 0.360

1 28 -9.188 0.073 9.334 1.000

1 29 -30.592 1.283 33.157 1.000

2 3 -7.542 -1.191 5.161 1.000

2 4 -3.342 3.681 10.704 0.982

2 5 -5.118 4.331 13.779 0.997

2 6 -5.722 1.948 9.618 1.000

2 7 -5.686 4.048 13.781 0.999

2 8 -7.253 -0.122 7.009 1.000

2 9 -11.069 -3.975 3.119 0.958

2 10 -5.070 4.663 14.396 0.995

2 11 -8.394 -0.363 7.668 1.000

2 12 -9.568 -1.951 5.666 1.000

2 13 -4.849 1.648 8.144 1.000

2 14 -5.019 4.176 13.370 0.998

2 15 1.072 7.710 14.349 0.005

2 16 -2.975 2.678 8.332 0.996

2 17 -2.462 5.379 13.220 0.722

Continued on next page

Page 28: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

27

Table 17 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

2 18 -3.088 4.529 12.146 0.919

2 19 -1.647 6.926 15.498 0.359

2 20 -4.523 2.898 10.319 1.000

2 21 -9.699 -2.183 5.333 1.000

2 22 -9.085 -3.756 1.572 0.668

2 23 -5.629 1.035 7.700 1.000

2 24 -3.978 2.335 8.649 1.000

2 25 -17.649 -9.479 -1.308 0.005

2 26 -5.676 1.493 8.661 1.000

2 27 -3.023 4.398 11.819 0.922

2 28 -10.778 -1.701 7.377 1.000

2 29 -32.313 -0.491 31.331 1.000

3 4 -2.420 4.872 12.164 0.771

3 5 -4.129 5.521 15.172 0.946

3 6 -4.779 3.139 11.056 1.000

3 7 -4.691 5.238 15.168 0.980

3 8 -6.327 1.069 8.465 1.000

3 9 -10.144 -2.784 4.576 1.000

3 10 -4.075 5.854 15.783 0.926

3 11 -7.439 0.828 9.095 1.000

3 12 -8.626 -0.760 7.106 1.000

3 13 -3.948 2.839 9.625 0.999

3 14 -4.035 5.367 14.768 0.948

3 15 1.978 8.901 15.824 0.001

3 16 -2.115 3.869 9.853 0.823

3 17 -1.513 6.570 14.652 0.345

3 18 -2.146 5.720 13.586 0.600

3 19 -0.678 8.117 16.911 0.124

3 20 -3.587 4.089 11.765 0.977

3 21 -8.760 -0.992 6.776 1.000

3 22 -8.244 -2.565 3.113 0.998

3 23 -4.721 2.226 9.174 1.000

3 24 -3.086 3.526 10.138 0.977

3 25 -16.690 -8.288 0.115 0.059

3 26 -4.749 2.683 10.116 1.000

3 27 -2.087 5.589 13.265 0.597

3 28 -9.797 -0.510 8.777 1.000

3 29 -31.182 0.700 32.582 1.000

4 5 -9.455 0.650 10.754 1.000

4 6 -10.198 -1.733 6.732 1.000

4 7 -10.005 0.367 10.738 1.000

4 8 -11.783 -3.803 4.177 0.995

4 9 -15.603 -7.656 0.291 0.078

4 10 -9.389 0.982 11.353 1.000

4 11 -12.837 -4.044 4.749 0.997

Continued on next page

Page 29: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

28

Table 17 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 12 -14.049 -5.632 2.785 0.768

4 13 -9.452 -2.033 5.385 1.000

4 14 -9.373 0.495 10.362 1.000

4 15 -3.514 4.029 11.573 0.976

4 16 -7.695 -1.003 5.690 1.000

4 17 -6.923 1.698 10.318 1.000

4 18 -7.569 0.848 9.265 1.000

4 19 -6.046 3.245 12.536 1.000

4 20 -9.023 -0.783 7.457 1.000

4 21 -14.190 -5.864 2.462 0.669

4 22 -13.858 -7.437 -1.017 0.005

4 23 -10.211 -2.646 4.920 1.000

4 24 -8.605 -1.346 5.913 1.000

4 25 -22.080 -13.160 -4.239 0.000

4 26 -10.202 -2.189 5.825 1.000

4 27 -7.523 0.717 8.957 1.000

4 28 -15.140 -5.382 4.377 0.965

4 29 -36.195 -4.172 27.851 1.000

5 6 -12.947 -2.383 8.182 1.000

5 7 -12.429 -0.283 11.863 1.000

5 8 -14.632 -4.453 5.727 0.999

5 9 -18.459 -8.305 1.849 0.332

5 10 -11.813 0.332 12.478 1.000

5 11 -15.523 -4.694 6.136 0.999

5 12 -16.808 -6.281 4.245 0.916

5 13 -12.429 -2.683 7.063 1.000

5 14 -11.873 -0.155 11.564 1.000

5 15 -6.462 3.380 13.221 1.000

5 16 -10.858 -1.652 7.553 1.000

5 17 -9.641 1.048 11.737 1.000

5 18 -10.328 0.199 10.725 1.000

5 19 -8.642 2.595 13.832 1.000

5 20 -11.818 -1.433 8.953 1.000

5 21 -16.967 -6.514 3.940 0.872

5 22 -17.096 -8.087 0.923 0.161

5 23 -13.154 -3.295 6.564 1.000

5 24 -11.621 -1.995 7.630 1.000

5 25 -24.742 -13.809 -2.876 0.001

5 26 -13.045 -2.838 7.368 1.000

5 27 -10.318 0.067 10.453 1.000

5 28 -17.658 -6.031 5.596 0.984

5 29 -37.462 -4.821 27.819 1.000

6 7 -8.721 2.100 12.920 1.000

6 8 -10.625 -2.070 6.485 1.000

6 9 -14.447 -5.923 2.602 0.697

Continued on next page

Page 30: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

29

Table 17 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

6 10 -8.105 2.715 13.535 1.000

6 11 -11.630 -2.311 7.008 1.000

6 12 -12.863 -3.899 5.066 0.999

6 13 -8.334 -0.300 7.734 1.000

6 14 -8.110 2.228 12.566 1.000

6 15 -2.387 5.763 13.912 0.661

6 16 -6.639 0.730 8.099 1.000

6 17 -5.725 3.431 12.586 1.000

6 18 -6.383 2.581 11.546 1.000

6 19 -4.811 4.978 14.767 0.988

6 20 -7.849 0.950 9.749 1.000

6 21 -13.010 -4.131 4.748 0.997

6 22 -12.827 -5.704 1.419 0.378

6 23 -9.083 -0.912 7.258 1.000

6 24 -7.500 0.387 8.274 1.000

6 25 -20.866 -11.427 -1.988 0.002

6 26 -9.042 -0.455 8.131 1.000

6 27 -6.349 2.450 11.249 1.000

6 28 -13.883 -3.648 6.586 1.000

6 29 -34.610 -2.439 29.732 1.000

7 8 -14.614 -4.170 6.275 1.000

7 9 -18.442 -8.022 2.397 0.468

7 10 -11.753 0.615 12.984 1.000

7 11 -15.489 -4.411 6.668 1.000

7 12 -16.781 -5.998 4.784 0.961

7 13 -12.422 -2.400 7.623 1.000

7 14 -11.821 0.128 12.077 1.000

7 15 -6.452 3.663 13.778 1.000

7 16 -10.867 -1.369 8.128 1.000

7 17 -9.611 1.331 12.273 1.000

7 18 -10.301 0.482 11.264 1.000

7 19 -8.599 2.878 14.356 1.000

7 20 -11.795 -1.150 9.496 1.000

7 21 -16.942 -6.231 4.481 0.936

7 22 -17.112 -7.804 1.504 0.280

7 23 -13.144 -3.012 7.120 1.000

7 24 -11.617 -1.712 8.193 1.000

7 25 -24.706 -13.526 -2.346 0.002

7 26 -13.026 -2.555 7.916 1.000

7 27 -10.295 0.350 10.996 1.000

7 28 -17.608 -5.748 6.111 0.994

7 29 -37.263 -4.538 28.186 1.000

8 9 -11.895 -3.853 4.190 0.995

8 10 -5.660 4.785 15.230 0.997

8 11 -9.121 -0.241 8.639 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 31: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

30

Table 17 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 12 -10.336 -1.829 6.679 1.000

8 13 -5.751 1.770 9.291 1.000

8 14 -5.647 4.298 14.242 0.999

8 15 0.188 7.832 15.476 0.036

8 16 -4.006 2.800 9.606 1.000

8 17 -3.208 5.501 14.209 0.855

8 18 -3.856 4.651 13.159 0.969

8 19 -2.325 7.048 16.420 0.523

8 20 -5.313 3.020 11.353 1.000

8 21 -10.478 -2.061 6.356 1.000

8 22 -10.172 -3.634 2.904 0.962

8 23 -6.509 1.157 8.824 1.000

8 24 -4.906 2.457 9.821 1.000

8 25 -18.363 -9.357 -0.351 0.030

8 26 -6.494 1.614 9.723 1.000

8 27 -3.813 4.520 12.853 0.971

8 28 -11.415 -1.579 8.258 1.000

8 29 -32.415 -0.369 31.678 1.000

9 10 -1.782 8.638 19.057 0.303

9 11 -5.238 3.612 12.462 1.000

9 12 -6.453 2.024 10.500 1.000

9 13 -1.863 5.622 13.108 0.526

9 14 -1.768 8.151 18.069 0.322

9 15 4.076 11.685 19.295 0.000

9 16 -0.114 6.653 13.420 0.062

9 17 0.675 9.353 18.032 0.017

9 18 0.027 8.504 16.980 0.048

9 19 1.556 10.901 20.245 0.005

9 20 -1.428 6.873 15.174 0.306

9 21 -6.594 1.792 10.177 1.000

9 22 -6.279 0.219 6.717 1.000

9 23 -2.622 5.010 12.642 0.800

9 24 -1.018 6.310 13.638 0.229

9 25 -14.481 -5.504 3.473 0.890

9 26 -2.609 5.467 13.543 0.747

9 27 0.072 8.373 16.674 0.045

9 28 -7.536 2.274 12.084 1.000

9 29 -28.555 3.484 35.522 1.000

10 11 -16.105 -5.026 6.053 0.998

10 12 -17.397 -6.614 4.169 0.890

10 13 -13.038 -3.015 7.007 1.000

10 14 -12.436 -0.487 11.462 1.000

10 15 -7.068 3.047 13.163 1.000

10 16 -11.483 -1.985 7.513 1.000

10 17 -10.226 0.716 11.658 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 32: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

31

Table 17 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

10 18 -10.917 -0.134 10.649 1.000

10 19 -9.215 2.263 13.740 1.000

10 20 -12.410 -1.765 8.880 1.000

10 21 -17.558 -6.846 3.865 0.840

10 22 -17.727 -8.419 0.889 0.150

10 23 -13.760 -3.628 6.505 1.000

10 24 -12.233 -2.328 7.577 1.000

10 25 -25.322 -14.142 -2.961 0.001

10 26 -13.641 -3.171 7.300 1.000

10 27 -10.910 -0.265 10.380 1.000

10 28 -18.223 -6.364 5.496 0.975

10 29 -37.878 -5.154 27.570 1.000

11 12 -10.863 -1.588 7.687 1.000

11 13 -6.369 2.011 10.390 1.000

11 14 -6.070 4.539 15.147 0.999

11 15 -0.417 8.073 16.563 0.090

11 16 -4.703 3.041 10.785 1.000

11 17 -3.718 5.742 15.201 0.900

11 18 -4.383 4.892 14.167 0.980

11 19 -2.786 7.289 17.363 0.612

11 20 -5.854 3.261 12.376 1.000

11 21 -11.012 -1.820 7.372 1.000

11 22 -10.903 -3.393 4.117 0.998

11 23 -7.111 1.398 9.908 1.000

11 24 -5.540 2.698 10.936 1.000

11 25 -18.850 -9.116 0.619 0.107

11 26 -7.055 1.855 10.766 1.000

11 27 -4.354 4.761 13.876 0.982

11 28 -11.845 -1.338 9.170 1.000

11 29 -32.387 -0.128 32.131 1.000

12 13 -4.385 3.599 11.582 0.998

12 14 -4.172 6.127 16.426 0.919

12 15 1.562 9.661 17.761 0.003

12 16 -2.685 4.629 11.943 0.853

12 17 -1.781 7.330 16.441 0.368

12 18 -2.439 6.480 15.399 0.602

12 19 -0.871 8.877 18.624 0.141

12 20 -3.903 4.849 13.601 0.963

12 21 -9.065 -0.232 8.601 1.000

12 22 -8.871 -1.805 5.260 1.000

12 23 -5.134 2.986 11.107 1.000

12 24 -3.549 4.286 12.121 0.968

12 25 -16.924 -7.528 1.868 0.377

12 26 -5.096 3.443 11.983 1.000

12 27 -2.403 6.349 15.101 0.606

Continued on next page

Page 33: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

32

Table 17 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

12 28 -9.944 0.250 10.445 1.000

12 29 -30.698 1.460 33.618 1.000

13 14 -6.972 2.528 12.028 1.000

13 15 -0.993 6.063 13.119 0.233

13 16 -5.108 1.030 7.169 1.000

13 17 -4.466 3.731 11.928 0.998

13 18 -5.102 2.881 10.865 1.000

13 19 -3.622 5.278 14.178 0.921

13 20 -6.546 1.250 9.047 1.000

13 21 -11.718 -3.831 4.056 0.994

13 22 -11.244 -5.404 0.436 0.121

13 23 -7.692 -0.612 6.468 1.000

13 24 -6.064 0.688 7.439 1.000

13 25 -19.639 -11.126 -2.614 0.000

13 26 -7.712 -0.155 7.402 1.000

13 27 -5.046 2.750 10.547 1.000

13 28 -12.735 -3.348 6.039 1.000

13 29 -34.050 -2.139 29.773 1.000

14 15 -6.063 3.535 13.133 1.000

14 16 -10.442 -1.498 7.447 1.000

14 17 -9.263 1.203 11.668 1.000

14 18 -9.946 0.353 10.652 1.000

14 19 -8.274 2.750 13.774 1.000

14 20 -11.433 -1.278 8.877 1.000

14 21 -16.583 -6.359 3.865 0.874

14 22 -16.675 -7.932 0.811 0.146

14 23 -12.756 -3.140 6.475 1.000

14 24 -11.217 -1.841 7.535 1.000

14 25 -24.369 -13.654 -2.940 0.001

14 26 -12.655 -2.683 7.289 1.000

14 27 -9.933 0.222 10.377 1.000

14 28 -17.298 -5.876 5.545 0.986

14 29 -37.235 -4.667 27.901 1.000

15 16 -11.321 -5.032 1.256 0.380

15 17 -10.642 -2.332 5.979 1.000

15 18 -11.281 -3.181 4.918 1.000

15 19 -9.789 -0.785 8.219 1.000

15 20 -12.728 -4.812 3.103 0.899

15 21 -17.898 -9.894 -1.889 0.001

15 22 -17.465 -11.467 -5.469 0.000

15 23 -13.886 -6.675 0.536 0.120

15 24 -12.263 -5.375 1.513 0.437

15 25 -25.811 -17.189 -8.567 0.000

15 26 -13.897 -6.218 1.461 0.354

15 27 -11.228 -3.312 4.603 0.999

Continued on next page

Page 34: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

33

Table 17 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

15 28 -18.897 -9.411 0.075 0.055

15 29 -40.142 -8.201 23.739 1.000

16 17 -4.846 2.701 10.247 1.000

16 18 -5.463 1.851 9.165 1.000

16 19 -4.056 4.248 12.552 0.987

16 20 -6.890 0.220 7.329 1.000

16 21 -12.070 -4.861 2.347 0.754

16 22 -11.319 -6.434 -1.549 0.000

16 23 -7.958 -1.643 4.673 1.000

16 24 -6.287 -0.343 5.601 1.000

16 25 -20.045 -12.157 -4.269 0.000

16 26 -8.031 -1.186 5.660 1.000

16 27 -5.390 1.720 8.829 1.000

16 28 -13.203 -4.379 4.446 0.991

16 29 -34.920 -3.169 28.582 1.000

17 18 -9.961 -0.850 8.261 1.000

17 19 -8.376 1.547 11.471 1.000

17 20 -11.428 -2.481 6.467 1.000

17 21 -16.588 -7.562 1.465 0.282

17 22 -16.441 -9.135 -1.829 0.001

17 23 -12.674 -4.343 3.988 0.983

17 24 -11.096 -3.043 5.010 1.000

17 25 -24.435 -14.857 -5.279 0.000

17 26 -12.626 -3.886 4.853 0.998

17 27 -9.928 -0.981 7.967 1.000

17 28 -17.442 -7.079 3.284 0.730

17 29 -38.082 -5.870 26.342 1.000

18 19 -7.351 2.397 12.144 1.000

18 20 -10.383 -1.631 7.121 1.000

18 21 -15.545 -6.712 2.121 0.499

18 22 -15.351 -8.285 -1.220 0.004

18 23 -11.614 -3.494 4.627 0.999

18 24 -10.029 -2.194 5.641 1.000

18 25 -23.404 -14.008 -4.612 0.000

18 26 -11.576 -3.037 5.503 1.000

18 27 -8.883 -0.131 8.621 1.000

18 28 -16.424 -6.230 3.965 0.894

18 29 -37.178 -5.020 27.138 1.000

19 20 -13.623 -4.028 5.568 0.999

19 21 -18.778 -9.109 0.560 0.100

19 22 -18.768 -10.682 -2.596 0.000

19 23 -14.913 -5.890 3.132 0.809

19 24 -13.358 -4.591 4.176 0.982

19 25 -26.590 -16.404 -6.219 0.000

19 26 -14.835 -5.433 3.968 0.940

Continued on next page

Page 35: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

34

Table 17 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

19 27 -12.123 -2.528 7.068 1.000

19 28 -19.553 -8.626 2.301 0.411

19 29 -39.815 -7.417 24.981 1.000

20 21 -13.746 -5.081 3.583 0.930

20 22 -13.508 -6.654 0.200 0.072

20 23 -9.800 -1.863 6.074 1.000

20 24 -8.208 -0.563 7.082 1.000

20 25 -21.614 -12.377 -3.139 0.000

20 26 -9.771 -1.406 6.960 1.000

20 27 -7.082 1.500 10.082 1.000

20 28 -14.648 -4.599 5.450 0.997

20 29 -35.501 -3.389 28.724 1.000

21 22 -8.529 -1.573 5.383 1.000

21 23 -4.807 3.219 11.244 1.000

21 24 -3.219 4.518 12.255 0.933

21 25 -16.610 -7.295 2.019 0.429

21 26 -4.774 3.676 12.125 0.999

21 27 -2.083 6.581 15.246 0.500

21 28 -9.637 0.483 10.602 1.000

21 29 -30.442 1.692 33.827 1.000

22 23 -1.235 4.792 10.818 0.394

22 24 0.455 6.091 11.727 0.017

22 25 -13.381 -5.722 1.936 0.538

22 26 -1.331 5.249 11.828 0.387

22 27 1.300 8.154 15.008 0.003

22 28 -6.564 2.056 10.675 1.000

22 29 -28.429 3.265 34.960 1.000

23 24 -5.613 1.300 8.212 1.000

23 25 -19.156 -10.514 -1.873 0.002

23 26 -7.245 0.457 8.159 1.000

23 27 -4.574 3.363 11.300 0.999

23 28 -12.240 -2.736 6.768 1.000

23 29 -33.472 -1.526 30.420 1.000

24 25 -20.188 -11.814 -3.440 0.000

24 26 -8.243 -0.843 6.557 1.000

24 27 -5.582 2.063 9.708 1.000

24 28 -13.297 -4.036 5.225 0.999

24 29 -34.701 -2.826 29.049 1.000

25 26 1.935 10.971 20.007 0.002

25 27 4.639 13.877 23.114 0.000

25 28 -2.836 7.778 18.392 0.583

25 29 -23.306 8.988 41.282 1.000

26 27 -5.460 2.906 11.271 1.000

26 28 -13.057 -3.193 6.671 1.000

26 29 -34.038 -1.983 30.072 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 36: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

35

Table 17 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

27 28 -16.148 -6.099 3.950 0.900

27 29 -37.001 -4.889 27.224 1.000

28 29 -31.325 1.210 33.745 1.000

Page 37: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

36

10 [XXX.xxx.Scaled = cat]

10.1 Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Table 18: Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 52.754

1 48.942

2 47.056

3 47.097

4 46.483

5 44.601

6 46.393

7 47.784

8 53.875

p-value = 1.5813e-10

10.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 19: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -0.064 3.812 7.688 0.058

1 3 1.919 5.698 9.478 0.000

1 4 1.673 5.657 9.641 0.000

1 5 1.771 6.271 10.772 0.001

1 6 4.720 8.154 11.587 0.000

1 7 2.922 6.361 9.800 0.000

1 8 0.446 4.970 9.493 0.019

1 9 -14.781 -1.121 12.539 1.000

2 3 -1.718 1.887 5.491 0.792

2 4 -1.973 1.845 5.663 0.857

2 5 -1.895 2.459 6.814 0.714

2 6 1.102 4.342 7.581 0.001

2 7 -0.696 2.549 5.794 0.264

2 8 -3.220 1.158 5.536 0.996

2 9 -18.545 -4.933 8.680 0.971

3 4 -3.762 -0.042 3.679 1.000

3 5 -3.696 0.573 4.842 1.000

3 6 -0.669 2.455 5.579 0.263

3 7 -2.467 0.662 3.792 0.999

Continued on next page

Page 38: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

37

Table 19 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -5.022 -0.729 3.565 1.000

3 9 -20.405 -6.819 6.766 0.828

4 5 -3.837 0.614 5.066 1.000

4 6 -0.872 2.497 5.866 0.343

4 7 -2.670 0.704 4.078 0.999

4 8 -5.162 -0.687 3.787 1.000

4 9 -20.422 -6.778 6.866 0.836

5 6 -2.084 1.883 5.849 0.869

5 7 -3.881 0.090 4.061 1.000

5 8 -6.241 -1.301 3.639 0.996

5 9 -21.196 -7.392 6.412 0.770

6 7 -4.495 -1.793 0.909 0.503

6 8 -7.176 -3.184 0.808 0.245

6 9 -22.768 -9.274 4.219 0.451

7 8 -5.388 -1.391 2.606 0.977

7 9 -20.977 -7.482 6.013 0.735

8 9 -19.902 -6.091 7.721 0.910

Page 39: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

38

11 [XXX.xxx.Scaled = School-Type-1]

11.1 Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable School- Type-1

Table 20: Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 46.718

3 47.626

5 65.000

6 47.182

7 50.357

8 37.583

10 40.636

21 47.600

22 64.312

32 47.667

51 46.500

53 50.667

54 52.500

56 52.000

57 44.500

58 46.000

71 49.909

p-value = 6.6374e-12

11.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 21: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable School-Type-1

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -3.264 -0.908 1.449 0.996

1 3 -60.226 -18.282 23.662 0.987

1 4 -5.396 -0.464 4.468 1.000

1 5 -14.911 -3.639 7.632 1.000

1 6 0.490 9.135 17.779 0.026

1 7 -6.618 6.082 18.782 0.967

1 8 -19.672 -0.882 17.908 1.000

1 9 -25.106 -17.595 -10.083 0.000

1 10 -10.179 -0.949 8.281 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 40: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

39

Table 21 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 11 -16.942 0.218 17.378 1.000

1 12 -28.185 -3.949 20.288 1.000

1 13 -35.453 -5.782 23.889 1.000

1 14 -29.519 -5.282 18.955 1.000

1 15 -18.781 2.218 23.216 1.000

1 16 -41.226 0.718 42.662 1.000

1 17 -15.891 -3.191 9.509 1.000

2 3 -59.348 -17.374 24.600 0.992

2 4 -4.741 0.444 5.629 1.000

2 5 -14.116 -2.731 8.654 1.000

2 6 1.250 10.043 18.835 0.009

2 7 -5.811 6.990 19.790 0.901

2 8 -18.832 0.026 18.884 1.000

2 9 -24.367 -16.687 -9.006 0.000

2 10 -9.409 -0.041 9.327 1.000

2 11 -16.108 1.126 18.360 1.000

2 12 -27.330 -3.041 21.249 1.000

2 13 -34.589 -4.874 24.840 1.000

2 14 -28.664 -4.374 19.915 1.000

2 15 -17.934 3.126 24.185 1.000

2 16 -40.348 1.626 43.600 1.000

2 17 -15.084 -2.283 10.517 1.000

3 4 -24.379 17.818 60.015 0.990

3 5 -28.754 14.643 58.040 0.999

3 6 -15.374 27.417 70.207 0.716

3 7 -19.426 24.364 68.154 0.886

3 8 -28.527 17.400 63.327 0.997

3 9 -41.888 0.688 43.263 1.000

3 10 -25.579 17.333 60.246 0.994

3 11 -26.785 18.500 63.785 0.993

3 12 -34.078 14.333 62.745 1.000

3 13 -38.848 12.500 63.848 1.000

3 14 -35.412 13.000 61.412 1.000

3 15 -26.374 20.500 67.374 0.986

3 16 -40.292 19.000 78.292 1.000

3 17 -28.699 15.091 58.881 0.999

4 5 -15.357 -3.175 9.006 1.000

4 6 -0.203 9.598 19.400 0.063

4 7 -6.968 6.545 20.059 0.963

4 8 -19.767 -0.418 18.931 1.000

4 9 -25.949 -17.131 -8.313 0.000

4 10 -10.806 -0.485 9.837 1.000

4 11 -17.089 0.682 18.452 1.000

4 12 -28.158 -3.485 21.188 1.000

4 13 -35.347 -5.318 24.710 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 41: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

40

Table 21 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 14 -29.491 -4.818 19.855 1.000

4 15 -18.819 2.682 24.182 1.000

4 16 -41.015 1.182 43.379 1.000

4 17 -16.241 -2.727 10.787 1.000

5 6 -1.326 12.774 26.873 0.131

5 7 -7.172 9.721 26.613 0.854

5 8 -19.086 2.757 24.600 1.000

5 9 -27.390 -13.955 -0.521 0.032

5 10 -11.775 2.690 17.156 1.000

5 11 -16.601 3.857 24.315 1.000

5 12 -26.983 -0.310 26.364 1.000

5 13 -33.836 -2.143 29.550 1.000

5 14 -28.316 -1.643 25.031 1.000

5 15 -17.913 5.857 29.627 1.000

5 16 -39.040 4.357 47.754 1.000

5 17 -16.444 0.448 17.340 1.000

6 7 -18.319 -3.053 12.213 1.000

6 8 -30.627 -10.017 10.594 0.962

6 9 -38.050 -26.729 -15.408 0.000

6 10 -22.611 -10.083 2.444 0.301

6 11 -28.053 -8.917 10.220 0.974

6 12 -38.758 -13.083 12.591 0.943

6 13 -45.773 -14.917 15.940 0.964

6 14 -40.091 -14.417 11.258 0.878

6 15 -29.559 -6.917 15.726 1.000

6 16 -51.207 -8.417 34.374 1.000

6 17 -27.591 -12.326 2.940 0.295

7 8 -29.577 -6.964 15.649 1.000

7 9 -38.330 -23.676 -9.023 0.000

7 10 -22.635 -7.030 8.574 0.982

7 11 -27.142 -5.864 15.415 1.000

7 12 -37.338 -10.030 17.278 0.998

7 13 -44.092 -11.864 20.365 0.998

7 14 -38.672 -11.364 15.944 0.992

7 15 -28.343 -3.864 20.616 1.000

7 16 -49.154 -5.364 38.426 1.000

7 17 -27.150 -9.273 8.605 0.934

8 9 -36.874 -16.712 3.449 0.252

8 10 -20.930 -0.067 20.796 1.000

8 11 -24.287 1.100 26.487 1.000

8 12 -33.685 -3.067 27.552 1.000

8 13 -39.978 -4.900 30.178 1.000

8 14 -35.018 -4.400 26.218 1.000

8 15 -25.025 3.100 31.225 1.000

8 16 -44.327 1.600 47.527 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 42: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

41

Table 21 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 17 -24.922 -2.309 20.304 1.000

9 10 4.872 16.646 28.420 0.000

9 11 -0.839 17.812 36.464 0.081

9 12 -11.669 13.646 38.961 0.910

9 13 -18.746 11.812 42.371 0.996

9 14 -13.003 12.312 37.628 0.962

9 15 -2.422 19.812 42.047 0.150

9 16 -24.263 18.312 60.888 0.988

9 17 -0.250 14.403 29.057 0.060

10 11 -18.241 1.167 20.575 1.000

10 12 -28.877 -3.000 22.877 1.000

10 13 -35.859 -4.833 26.192 1.000

10 14 -30.211 -4.333 21.544 1.000

10 15 -19.706 3.167 26.039 1.000

10 16 -41.246 1.667 44.579 1.000

10 17 -17.847 -2.242 13.362 1.000

11 12 -33.813 -4.167 25.479 1.000

11 13 -40.232 -6.000 28.232 1.000

11 14 -35.146 -5.500 24.146 1.000

11 15 -25.063 2.000 29.063 1.000

11 16 -44.785 0.500 45.785 1.000

11 17 -24.687 -3.409 17.869 1.000

12 13 -40.106 -1.833 36.440 1.000

12 14 -35.566 -1.333 32.899 1.000

12 15 -25.855 6.167 38.188 1.000

12 16 -43.745 4.667 53.078 1.000

12 17 -26.550 0.758 28.065 1.000

13 14 -37.773 0.500 38.773 1.000

13 15 -28.309 8.000 44.309 1.000

13 16 -44.848 6.500 57.848 1.000

13 17 -29.638 2.591 34.820 1.000

14 15 -24.521 7.500 39.521 1.000

14 16 -42.412 6.000 54.412 1.000

14 17 -25.217 2.091 29.399 1.000

15 16 -48.374 -1.500 45.374 1.000

15 17 -29.888 -5.409 19.070 1.000

16 17 -47.699 -3.909 39.881 1.000

Page 43: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

42

Page 44: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

43

12 [XXX.xxx.Scaled = School-Type-2]

12.1 Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable School- Type-2

Table 22: Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 46.659

2 46.965

3 58.432

p-value = 1.4607e-07

12.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 23: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.848 -0.307 4.235 0.986

1 3 -18.292 -11.774 -5.256 0.000

2 3 -16.243 -11.467 -6.692 0.000

Page 45: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

44

13 [XXX.xxx.Scaled = BudgetFrom]

13.1 Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Bud- getFrom

Table 24: Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Budget-

From

Group Mean

1 49.708

2 50.400

4 28.333

5 46.965

6 58.432

7 46.000

p-value = 4.8894e-09

13.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 25: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -13.801 -0.692 12.417 1.000

1 3 5.478 21.375 37.272 0.002

1 4 -4.415 2.743 9.901 0.885

1 5 -17.852 -8.724 0.404 0.071

1 6 -31.838 3.708 39.255 1.000

2 3 4.081 22.067 40.052 0.006

2 4 -7.610 3.435 14.480 0.950

2 5 -20.446 -8.032 4.381 0.437

2 6 -32.128 4.400 40.928 0.999

3 4 -32.875 -18.632 -4.389 0.003

3 5 -45.427 -30.099 -14.771 0.000

3 6 -55.286 -17.667 19.952 0.764

4 5 -17.253 -11.467 -5.681 0.000

4 6 -33.873 0.965 35.803 1.000

5 6 -22.864 12.432 47.728 0.917

Page 46: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

45

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Page 47: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

46

14

14.1

[XXX.xxx.Scaled = IsProtected]

Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 26: Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable IsPro-

tected

Group Mean

0 47.093

1 48.473

p-value = 0.2219

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 48: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

47

15

15.1

[XXX.xxx.Scaled = IsCentral]

Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 27: Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable IsCentral

Group Mean

0 48.075

1 45.957

p-value = 0.0003007

15.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 28: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable IsCentral

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 0.972 2.119 3.265 0.000

Page 49: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

48

16 [XXX.xxx.Scaled = Shifts]

16.1 Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Table 29: Means of XXX.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 46.313

5 49.560

7 39.000

p-value = 1.763e-06

16.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 30: Between group comparison of XXX.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable Shifts

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.758 -3.247 -1.736 0.000

1 3 -9.325 7.313 23.951 0.558

2 3 -6.109 10.560 27.229 0.298

Page 50: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

49

17 [XXX.mat.Normed = Obl-ID]

17.1 Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 31: Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 102.228

2 101.688

3 100.322

4 97.484

5 97.929

6 97.959

7 97.000

8 97.951

9 104.290

10 94.846

11 100.023

12 101.860

13 98.084

14 93.733

15 92.610

16 98.172

17 94.630

18 96.060

19 94.556

20 97.407

21 104.346

22 104.617

23 99.829

24 96.543

25 111.024

26 97.850

27 97.000

28 100.677

29 95.500

p-value = 4.5119e-25

17.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Page 51: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

50

Table 32: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Normed by

grouping variable Obl-ID

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -5.509 0.540 6.590 1.000

1 3 -4.429 1.906 8.241 1.000

1 4 -2.211 4.744 11.699 0.733

1 5 -4.923 4.300 13.522 0.997

1 6 -3.288 4.269 11.826 0.954

1 7 -4.262 5.228 14.719 0.966

1 8 -2.778 4.277 11.333 0.901

1 9 -9.083 -2.062 4.959 1.000

1 10 -2.108 7.382 16.872 0.445

1 11 -5.688 2.205 10.098 1.000

1 12 -7.139 0.368 7.876 1.000

1 13 -2.325 4.144 10.612 0.836

1 14 -0.489 8.495 17.478 0.096

1 15 3.018 9.618 16.218 0.000

1 16 -1.639 4.056 9.751 0.646

1 17 -0.118 7.598 15.314 0.061

1 18 -1.339 6.168 13.676 0.322

1 19 -0.727 7.673 16.073 0.137

1 20 -2.504 4.821 12.146 0.796

1 21 -9.531 -2.118 5.295 1.000

1 22 -7.789 -2.389 3.011 0.999

1 23 -4.224 2.399 9.023 1.000

1 24 -0.615 5.685 11.985 0.154

1 25 -16.820 -8.796 -0.773 0.013

1 26 -2.712 4.378 11.469 0.882

1 27 -2.097 5.228 12.553 0.641

1 28 -7.323 1.551 10.424 1.000

1 29 -23.812 6.728 37.269 1.000

2 3 -4.720 1.366 7.452 1.000

2 4 -2.525 4.204 10.933 0.869

2 5 -5.293 3.760 12.812 1.000

2 6 -3.620 3.729 11.078 0.988

2 7 -4.638 4.688 14.014 0.990

2 8 -3.095 3.737 10.570 0.968

2 9 -9.399 -2.602 4.195 1.000

2 10 -2.484 6.842 16.168 0.580

2 11 -6.030 1.665 9.360 1.000

2 12 -7.470 -0.172 7.126 1.000

2 13 -2.621 3.604 9.828 0.939

2 14 -0.855 7.955 16.764 0.153

2 15 2.717 9.078 15.439 0.000

2 16 -1.901 3.516 8.932 0.818

2 17 -0.455 7.058 14.570 0.103

Continued on next page

Page 52: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

51

Table 32 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

2 18 -1.670 5.628 12.926 0.465

2 19 -1.081 7.133 15.346 0.215

2 20 -2.830 4.281 11.391 0.908

2 21 -9.860 -2.658 4.543 1.000

2 22 -8.035 -2.929 2.176 0.945

2 23 -4.526 1.859 8.245 1.000

2 24 -0.905 5.145 11.194 0.253

2 25 -17.165 -9.336 -1.508 0.003

2 26 -3.031 3.838 10.707 0.959

2 27 -2.423 4.688 11.799 0.793

2 28 -7.687 1.011 9.708 1.000

2 29 -24.302 6.188 36.678 1.000

3 4 -4.149 2.838 9.825 1.000

3 5 -6.853 2.394 11.640 1.000

3 6 -5.223 2.363 9.949 1.000

3 7 -6.191 3.322 12.836 1.000

3 8 -4.715 2.371 9.458 1.000

3 9 -11.020 -3.968 3.084 0.956

3 10 -4.037 5.476 14.990 0.943

3 11 -7.622 0.299 8.220 1.000

3 12 -9.074 -1.538 5.999 1.000

3 13 -4.265 2.238 8.740 1.000

3 14 -2.419 6.589 15.597 0.587

3 15 1.079 7.712 14.345 0.005

3 16 -3.584 2.150 7.884 1.000

3 17 -2.053 5.692 13.436 0.576

3 18 -3.274 4.262 11.799 0.953

3 19 -2.660 5.767 14.193 0.727

3 20 -4.440 2.915 10.270 1.000

3 21 -11.467 -4.024 3.419 0.973

3 22 -9.736 -4.295 1.146 0.411

3 23 -6.163 0.493 7.150 1.000

3 24 -2.556 3.779 10.114 0.916

3 25 -18.753 -10.702 -2.651 0.000

3 26 -4.649 2.472 9.594 1.000

3 27 -4.033 3.322 10.677 0.998

3 28 -9.254 -0.355 8.543 1.000

3 29 -25.726 4.822 35.370 1.000

4 5 -10.126 -0.444 9.237 1.000

4 6 -8.586 -0.475 7.636 1.000

4 7 -9.453 0.484 10.422 1.000

4 8 -8.112 -0.466 7.179 1.000

4 9 -14.420 -6.806 0.808 0.168

4 10 -7.299 2.638 12.575 1.000

4 11 -10.964 -2.539 5.887 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 53: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

52

Table 32 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 12 -12.441 -4.376 3.689 0.971

4 13 -7.708 -0.600 6.508 1.000

4 14 -5.703 3.751 13.205 1.000

4 15 -2.354 4.874 12.102 0.754

4 16 -7.100 -0.688 5.724 1.000

4 17 -5.405 2.854 11.113 1.000

4 18 -6.641 1.424 9.489 1.000

4 19 -5.973 2.929 11.831 1.000

4 20 -7.818 0.077 7.972 1.000

4 21 -14.839 -6.862 1.116 0.231

4 22 -13.285 -7.133 -0.981 0.005

4 23 -9.594 -2.345 4.905 1.000

4 24 -6.014 0.941 7.896 1.000

4 25 -22.087 -13.540 -4.993 0.000

4 26 -8.044 -0.366 7.313 1.000

4 27 -7.411 0.484 8.380 1.000

4 28 -12.543 -3.193 6.157 1.000

4 29 -28.698 1.984 32.667 1.000

5 6 -10.153 -0.031 10.092 1.000

5 7 -10.709 0.929 12.566 1.000

5 8 -9.776 -0.022 9.732 1.000

5 9 -16.091 -6.362 3.367 0.806

5 10 -8.555 3.082 14.720 1.000

5 11 -12.471 -2.095 8.282 1.000

5 12 -14.017 -3.931 6.154 1.000

5 13 -9.494 -0.156 9.182 1.000

5 14 -7.033 4.195 15.423 1.000

5 15 -4.111 5.318 14.748 0.955

5 16 -9.064 -0.244 8.576 1.000

5 17 -6.944 3.298 13.540 1.000

5 18 -8.217 1.869 11.954 1.000

5 19 -7.394 3.373 14.140 1.000

5 20 -9.430 0.521 10.472 1.000

5 21 -16.433 -6.418 3.598 0.836

5 22 -15.321 -6.689 1.944 0.454

5 23 -11.346 -1.900 7.546 1.000

5 24 -7.837 1.385 10.607 1.000

5 25 -23.571 -13.096 -2.620 0.001

5 26 -9.701 0.079 9.858 1.000

5 27 -9.022 0.929 10.879 1.000

5 28 -13.889 -2.749 8.391 1.000

5 29 -28.846 2.429 33.703 1.000

6 7 -9.408 0.959 11.327 1.000

6 8 -8.189 0.008 8.205 1.000

6 9 -14.499 -6.331 1.836 0.453

Continued on next page

Page 54: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

53

Table 32 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

6 10 -7.254 3.113 13.480 1.000

6 11 -10.993 -2.064 6.865 1.000

6 12 -12.490 -3.901 4.688 0.998

6 13 -7.823 -0.125 7.573 1.000

6 14 -5.680 4.226 14.131 0.999

6 15 -2.460 5.349 13.157 0.725

6 16 -7.274 -0.213 6.847 1.000

6 17 -5.443 3.329 12.101 1.000

6 18 -6.690 1.899 10.488 1.000

6 19 -5.976 3.404 12.783 1.000

6 20 -7.879 0.552 8.982 1.000

6 21 -14.894 -6.387 2.120 0.527

6 22 -13.483 -6.658 0.166 0.068

6 23 -9.698 -1.870 5.959 1.000

6 24 -6.141 1.416 8.973 1.000

6 25 -22.109 -13.065 -4.021 0.000

6 26 -8.118 0.109 8.337 1.000

6 27 -7.471 0.959 9.390 1.000

6 28 -12.524 -2.718 7.088 1.000

6 29 -28.365 2.459 33.284 1.000

7 8 -10.958 -0.951 9.057 1.000

7 9 -17.274 -7.290 2.693 0.591

7 10 -9.697 2.154 14.005 1.000

7 11 -13.638 -3.023 7.592 1.000

7 12 -15.191 -4.860 5.471 0.996

7 13 -10.687 -1.084 8.519 1.000

7 14 -8.182 3.267 14.716 1.000

7 15 -5.302 4.390 14.082 0.998

7 16 -10.273 -1.172 7.928 1.000

7 17 -8.114 2.370 12.853 1.000

7 18 -9.391 0.940 11.271 1.000

7 19 -8.553 2.444 13.442 1.000

7 20 -10.607 -0.407 9.792 1.000

7 21 -17.609 -7.346 2.917 0.635

7 22 -16.536 -7.617 1.301 0.244

7 23 -12.537 -2.829 6.879 1.000

7 24 -9.034 0.457 9.947 1.000

7 25 -24.737 -14.024 -3.312 0.000

7 26 -10.882 -0.850 9.182 1.000

7 27 -10.200 0.000 10.200 1.000

7 28 -15.040 -3.677 7.686 1.000

7 29 -29.854 1.500 32.854 1.000

8 9 -14.045 -6.340 1.366 0.319

8 10 -6.903 3.105 13.112 1.000

8 11 -10.581 -2.072 6.436 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 55: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

54

Table 32 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 12 -12.061 -3.909 4.242 0.995

8 13 -7.340 -0.134 7.073 1.000

8 14 -5.311 4.217 13.746 0.999

8 15 -1.984 5.340 12.664 0.594

8 16 -6.742 -0.222 6.299 1.000

8 17 -5.024 3.320 11.664 1.000

8 18 -6.261 1.891 10.042 1.000

8 19 -5.585 3.395 12.376 1.000

8 20 -7.440 0.543 8.527 1.000

8 21 -14.460 -6.395 1.669 0.400

8 22 -12.931 -6.667 -0.402 0.021

8 23 -9.223 -1.878 5.467 1.000

8 24 -5.648 1.407 8.463 1.000

8 25 -21.703 -13.074 -4.444 0.000

8 26 -7.668 0.101 7.870 1.000

8 27 -7.033 0.951 8.935 1.000

8 28 -12.151 -2.727 6.698 1.000

8 29 -28.254 2.451 33.156 1.000

9 10 -0.539 9.444 19.428 0.096

9 11 -4.213 4.267 12.747 0.989

9 12 -5.691 2.430 10.552 1.000

9 13 -0.967 6.206 13.378 0.221

9 14 1.054 10.557 20.060 0.011

9 15 4.389 11.680 18.971 0.000

9 16 -0.366 6.118 12.602 0.098

9 17 1.345 9.660 17.975 0.005

9 18 0.109 8.230 16.352 0.042

9 19 0.781 9.735 18.688 0.015

9 20 -1.071 6.883 14.836 0.221

9 21 -8.091 -0.056 7.979 1.000

9 22 -6.553 -0.327 5.899 1.000

9 23 -2.851 4.461 11.774 0.895

9 24 0.726 7.747 14.768 0.012

9 25 -15.335 -6.734 1.867 0.430

9 26 -1.298 6.440 14.178 0.295

9 27 -0.663 7.290 15.244 0.132

9 28 -5.786 3.613 13.012 1.000

9 29 -21.907 8.790 39.488 1.000

10 11 -15.792 -5.177 5.438 0.993

10 12 -17.345 -7.014 3.318 0.742

10 13 -12.841 -3.238 6.365 1.000

10 14 -10.336 1.113 12.562 1.000

10 15 -7.456 2.236 11.928 1.000

10 16 -12.426 -3.326 5.774 1.000

10 17 -10.268 0.216 10.700 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 56: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

55

Table 32 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

10 18 -11.545 -1.214 9.118 1.000

10 19 -10.707 0.291 11.288 1.000

10 20 -12.761 -2.561 7.638 1.000

10 21 -19.763 -9.500 0.763 0.120

10 22 -18.690 -9.771 -0.853 0.014

10 23 -14.691 -4.983 4.725 0.986

10 24 -11.188 -1.697 7.793 1.000

10 25 -26.890 -16.178 -5.466 0.000

10 26 -13.036 -3.004 7.029 1.000

10 27 -12.353 -2.154 8.046 1.000

10 28 -17.194 -5.831 5.532 0.986

10 29 -32.008 -0.654 30.701 1.000

11 12 -10.724 -1.837 7.050 1.000

11 13 -6.090 1.939 9.967 1.000

11 14 -3.875 6.290 16.454 0.880

11 15 -0.722 7.413 15.547 0.140

11 16 -5.569 1.851 9.270 1.000

11 17 -3.671 5.393 14.456 0.918

11 18 -4.924 3.963 12.850 0.998

11 19 -4.185 5.468 15.120 0.952

11 20 -6.117 2.616 11.349 1.000

11 21 -13.130 -4.323 4.485 0.993

11 22 -11.790 -4.594 2.601 0.841

11 23 -7.959 0.194 8.348 1.000

11 24 -4.414 3.480 11.373 0.999

11 25 -20.328 -11.001 -1.674 0.004

11 26 -6.364 2.173 10.711 1.000

11 27 -5.710 3.023 11.757 1.000

11 28 -10.722 -0.654 9.413 1.000

11 29 -26.385 4.523 35.432 1.000

12 13 -3.874 3.776 11.425 0.992

12 14 -1.741 8.127 17.994 0.317

12 15 1.489 9.250 17.010 0.003

12 16 -3.320 3.688 10.695 0.981

12 17 -1.500 7.230 15.959 0.305

12 18 -2.746 5.800 14.346 0.743

12 19 -2.035 7.304 16.644 0.432

12 20 -3.933 4.453 12.839 0.978

12 21 -10.949 -2.486 5.977 1.000

12 22 -9.527 -2.757 4.012 1.000

12 23 -5.750 2.031 9.812 1.000

12 24 -2.191 5.317 12.824 0.658

12 25 -18.167 -9.164 -0.162 0.040

12 26 -4.172 4.010 12.192 0.993

12 27 -3.526 4.860 13.246 0.938

Continued on next page

Page 57: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

56

Table 32 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

12 28 -8.585 1.183 10.950 1.000

12 29 -24.452 6.360 37.172 1.000

13 14 -4.752 4.351 13.454 0.995

13 15 -1.287 5.474 12.235 0.354

13 16 -5.969 -0.088 5.793 1.000

13 17 -4.400 3.454 11.308 0.999

13 18 -5.625 2.024 9.674 1.000

13 19 -4.998 3.529 12.056 1.000

13 20 -6.794 0.677 8.147 1.000

13 21 -13.819 -6.262 1.295 0.304

13 22 -12.129 -6.533 -0.937 0.004

13 23 -8.528 -1.745 5.039 1.000

13 24 -4.928 1.541 8.009 1.000

13 25 -21.097 -12.940 -4.784 0.000

13 26 -7.006 0.234 7.475 1.000

13 27 -6.386 1.084 8.555 1.000

13 28 -11.587 -2.593 6.401 1.000

13 29 -27.991 2.584 33.160 1.000

14 15 -8.073 1.123 10.319 1.000

14 16 -13.009 -4.439 4.131 0.984

14 17 -10.925 -0.897 9.130 1.000

14 18 -12.194 -2.327 7.541 1.000

14 19 -11.385 -0.822 9.741 1.000

14 20 -13.404 -3.674 6.056 1.000

14 21 -20.409 -10.613 -0.816 0.016

14 22 -19.261 -10.884 -2.507 0.000

14 23 -15.309 -6.096 3.118 0.787

14 24 -11.794 -2.810 6.173 1.000

14 25 -27.557 -17.291 -7.025 0.000

14 26 -13.671 -4.117 5.438 0.999

14 27 -12.996 -3.267 6.463 1.000

14 28 -17.887 -6.944 3.999 0.849

14 29 -32.971 -1.767 29.438 1.000

15 16 -11.587 -5.562 0.463 0.123

15 17 -9.983 -2.020 5.942 1.000

15 18 -11.210 -3.450 4.311 0.998

15 19 -10.572 -1.945 6.682 1.000

15 20 -12.381 -4.797 2.787 0.854

15 21 -19.405 -11.736 -4.066 0.000

15 22 -17.754 -12.007 -6.260 0.000

15 23 -14.128 -7.219 -0.310 0.028

15 24 -10.533 -3.933 2.667 0.917

15 25 -26.675 -18.414 -10.153 0.000

15 26 -12.598 -5.240 2.118 0.646

15 27 -11.974 -4.390 3.195 0.939

Continued on next page

Page 58: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

57

Table 32 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

15 28 -17.156 -8.067 1.022 0.178

15 29 -33.493 -2.890 27.714 1.000

16 17 -3.689 3.542 10.773 0.993

16 18 -4.895 2.112 9.120 1.000

16 19 -4.340 3.617 11.573 0.998

16 20 -6.047 0.765 7.577 1.000

16 21 -13.080 -6.174 0.733 0.167

16 22 -11.125 -6.445 -1.764 0.000

16 23 -7.708 -1.657 4.394 1.000

16 24 -4.066 1.629 7.324 1.000

16 25 -20.410 -12.852 -5.294 0.000

16 26 -6.237 0.322 6.881 1.000

16 27 -5.639 1.172 7.984 1.000

16 28 -10.960 -2.505 5.950 1.000

16 29 -27.749 2.672 33.094 1.000

17 18 -10.159 -1.430 7.300 1.000

17 19 -9.433 0.075 9.583 1.000

17 20 -11.350 -2.777 5.796 1.000

17 21 -18.364 -9.716 -1.067 0.009

17 22 -16.987 -9.987 -2.987 0.000

17 23 -13.181 -5.199 2.784 0.812

17 24 -9.629 -1.913 5.803 1.000

17 25 -25.571 -16.394 -7.217 0.000

17 26 -11.593 -3.220 5.154 1.000

17 27 -10.943 -2.370 6.204 1.000

17 28 -15.976 -6.047 3.882 0.897

17 29 -31.733 -0.870 29.994 1.000

18 19 -7.835 1.504 10.844 1.000

18 20 -9.733 -1.347 7.039 1.000

18 21 -16.749 -8.286 0.177 0.065

18 22 -15.327 -8.557 -1.788 0.001

18 23 -11.550 -3.769 4.012 0.994

18 24 -7.991 -0.483 7.024 1.000

18 25 -23.967 -14.964 -5.962 0.000

18 26 -9.972 -1.790 6.392 1.000

18 27 -9.326 -0.940 7.446 1.000

18 28 -14.385 -4.617 5.150 0.996

18 29 -30.252 0.560 31.372 1.000

19 20 -12.046 -2.852 6.342 1.000

19 21 -19.055 -9.791 -0.526 0.024

19 22 -17.810 -10.062 -2.314 0.000

19 23 -13.919 -5.273 3.372 0.895

19 24 -10.388 -1.988 6.412 1.000

19 25 -26.228 -16.469 -6.709 0.000

19 26 -12.302 -3.294 5.714 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 59: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

58

Table 32 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

19 27 -11.638 -2.444 6.749 1.000

19 28 -16.591 -6.122 4.348 0.932

19 29 -31.986 -0.944 30.097 1.000

20 21 -15.241 -6.939 1.363 0.287

20 22 -13.777 -7.210 -0.643 0.013

20 23 -10.026 -2.422 5.183 1.000

20 24 -6.461 0.864 8.189 1.000

20 25 -22.468 -13.617 -4.766 0.000

20 26 -8.458 -0.443 7.572 1.000

20 27 -7.816 0.407 8.631 1.000

20 28 -12.898 -3.270 6.358 1.000

20 29 -28.861 1.907 32.676 1.000

21 22 -6.936 -0.271 6.394 1.000

21 23 -3.173 4.517 12.207 0.929

21 24 0.389 7.803 15.216 0.025

21 25 -15.602 -6.678 2.246 0.535

21 26 -1.600 6.496 14.592 0.374

21 27 -0.956 7.346 15.648 0.183

21 28 -6.027 3.669 13.364 1.000

21 29 -21.943 8.846 39.636 1.000

22 23 -0.986 4.788 10.562 0.303

22 24 2.674 8.074 13.474 0.000

22 25 -13.745 -6.407 0.931 0.205

22 26 0.463 6.767 13.072 0.019

22 27 1.050 7.617 14.184 0.005

22 28 -4.319 3.940 12.199 0.995

22 29 -21.250 9.117 39.485 1.000

23 24 -3.338 3.285 9.909 0.991

23 25 -19.475 -11.195 -2.916 0.000

23 26 -5.400 1.979 9.358 1.000

23 27 -4.776 2.829 10.434 1.000

23 28 -9.954 -0.848 8.257 1.000

23 29 -26.280 4.329 34.938 1.000

24 25 -22.504 -14.481 -6.457 0.000

24 26 -8.397 -1.307 5.784 1.000

24 27 -7.782 -0.457 6.868 1.000

24 28 -13.008 -4.134 4.740 0.997

24 29 -29.497 1.043 31.584 1.000

25 26 4.516 13.174 21.832 0.000

25 27 5.173 14.024 22.875 0.000

25 28 0.177 10.347 20.517 0.040

25 29 -15.418 15.524 46.466 0.990

26 27 -7.165 0.850 8.865 1.000

26 28 -12.279 -2.827 6.624 1.000

26 29 -28.363 2.350 33.063 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 60: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

59

Table 32 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

27 28 -13.306 -3.677 5.951 1.000

27 29 -29.268 1.500 32.268 1.000

28 29 -25.996 5.177 36.351 1.000

Page 61: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

60

18 [XXX.mat.Normed = cat]

18.1 Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable cat

Table 33: Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 105.571

1 101.918

2 98.554

3 99.973

4 99.805

5 96.562

6 98.334

7 100.664

8 105.875

p-value = 1.1342e-15

18.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 34: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Normed by

grouping variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -0.069 3.653 7.375 0.059

1 3 3.388 7.018 10.647 0.000

1 4 1.773 5.598 9.424 0.000

1 5 1.445 5.766 10.088 0.001

1 6 5.712 9.009 12.306 0.000

1 7 3.935 7.237 10.540 0.000

1 8 0.564 4.908 9.252 0.014

1 9 -13.421 -0.304 12.814 1.000

2 3 -0.096 3.365 6.826 0.064

2 4 -1.721 1.945 5.612 0.779

2 5 -2.068 2.113 6.295 0.823

2 6 2.245 5.356 8.467 0.000

2 7 0.468 3.584 6.701 0.011

2 8 -2.950 1.254 5.459 0.992

2 9 -17.029 -3.957 9.115 0.991

3 4 -4.992 -1.419 2.154 0.950

3 5 -5.351 -1.251 2.848 0.990

3 6 -1.009 1.991 4.991 0.502

3 7 -2.786 0.219 3.225 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 62: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

61

Table 34 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -6.233 -2.110 2.013 0.812

3 9 -20.367 -7.321 5.725 0.721

4 5 -4.107 0.168 4.442 1.000

4 6 0.176 3.411 6.646 0.030

4 7 -1.602 1.639 4.879 0.822

4 8 -4.988 -0.691 3.606 1.000

4 9 -19.004 -5.902 7.200 0.899

5 6 -0.566 3.243 7.051 0.170

5 7 -2.342 1.471 5.284 0.957

5 8 -5.603 -0.859 3.885 1.000

5 9 -19.325 -6.070 7.185 0.890

6 7 -4.367 -1.772 0.823 0.461

6 8 -7.935 -4.101 -0.268 0.025

6 9 -22.270 -9.313 3.645 0.386

7 8 -6.168 -2.330 1.509 0.626

7 9 -20.500 -7.541 5.418 0.679

8 9 -18.474 -5.211 8.051 0.953

Page 63: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

62

19 [XXX.mat.Normed = School-Type-1]

19.1 Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable School- Type-1

Table 35: Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 98.860

3 100.568

5 112.000

6 100.416

7 102.000

8 85.917

10 87.818

21 104.600

22 119.719

32 100.143

51 99.500

53 100.000

54 100.000

56 97.000

57 97.500

58 99.000

71 99.636

p-value = 1.6539e-23

19.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 36: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Normed by

grouping variable School-Type-1

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -3.949 -1.708 0.533 0.400

1 3 -53.031 -13.140 26.751 0.999

1 4 -6.246 -1.556 3.135 0.999

1 5 -13.860 -3.140 7.580 1.000

1 6 4.721 12.943 21.165 0.000

1 7 -1.037 11.042 23.120 0.121

1 8 -23.610 -5.740 12.130 1.000

1 9 -28.003 -20.859 -13.715 0.000

1 10 -10.062 -1.283 7.495 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 64: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

63

Table 36 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 11 -16.960 -0.640 15.680 1.000

1 12 -24.191 -1.140 21.910 1.000

1 13 -29.359 -1.140 27.079 1.000

1 14 -21.191 1.860 24.910 1.000

1 15 -18.611 1.360 21.331 1.000

1 16 -40.031 -0.140 39.751 1.000

1 17 -12.855 -0.777 11.302 1.000

2 3 -51.352 -11.432 28.488 1.000

2 4 -4.779 0.153 5.084 1.000

2 5 -12.260 -1.432 9.396 1.000

2 6 6.290 14.651 23.013 0.000

2 7 0.576 12.750 24.924 0.029

2 8 -21.967 -4.032 13.903 1.000

2 9 -26.455 -19.151 -11.846 0.000

2 10 -8.484 0.425 9.335 1.000

2 11 -15.323 1.068 17.459 1.000

2 12 -22.533 0.568 23.669 1.000

2 13 -27.692 0.568 28.828 1.000

2 14 -19.533 3.568 26.669 1.000

2 15 -16.961 3.068 23.097 1.000

2 16 -38.352 1.568 41.488 1.000

2 17 -11.242 0.932 13.106 1.000

3 4 -28.548 11.584 51.717 1.000

3 5 -31.274 10.000 51.274 1.000

3 6 -14.613 26.083 66.780 0.715

3 7 -17.465 24.182 65.829 0.845

3 8 -36.280 7.400 51.080 1.000

3 9 -48.211 -7.719 32.774 1.000

3 10 -28.955 11.857 52.669 1.000

3 11 -30.569 12.500 55.569 1.000

3 12 -34.043 12.000 58.043 1.000

3 13 -36.835 12.000 60.835 1.000

3 14 -31.043 15.000 61.043 1.000

3 15 -30.081 14.500 59.081 1.000

3 16 -43.390 13.000 69.390 1.000

3 17 -29.283 12.364 54.011 1.000

4 5 -13.170 -1.584 10.001 1.000

4 6 5.177 14.499 23.821 0.000

4 7 -0.255 12.597 25.450 0.062

4 8 -22.586 -4.184 14.218 1.000

4 9 -27.690 -19.303 -10.917 0.000

4 10 -9.544 0.273 10.089 1.000

4 11 -15.985 0.916 17.816 1.000

4 12 -23.050 0.416 23.881 1.000

4 13 -28.143 0.416 28.975 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 65: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

64

Table 36 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 14 -20.050 3.416 26.881 1.000

4 15 -17.533 2.916 23.364 1.000

4 16 -38.717 1.416 41.548 1.000

4 17 -12.073 0.779 13.632 1.000

5 6 2.674 16.083 29.493 0.004

5 7 -1.884 14.182 30.248 0.161

5 8 -23.374 -2.600 18.174 1.000

5 9 -30.496 -17.719 -4.942 0.000

5 10 -11.901 1.857 15.615 1.000

5 11 -16.957 2.500 21.957 1.000

5 12 -23.368 2.000 27.368 1.000

5 13 -28.142 2.000 32.142 1.000

5 14 -20.368 5.000 30.368 1.000

5 15 -18.106 4.500 27.106 1.000

5 16 -38.274 3.000 44.274 1.000

5 17 -13.702 2.364 18.429 1.000

6 7 -16.420 -1.902 12.617 1.000

6 8 -38.285 -18.683 0.919 0.082

6 9 -44.569 -33.802 -23.035 0.000

6 10 -26.141 -14.226 -2.312 0.004

6 11 -31.783 -13.583 4.617 0.440

6 12 -38.501 -14.083 10.334 0.852

6 13 -43.430 -14.083 15.263 0.966

6 14 -35.501 -11.083 13.334 0.980

6 15 -33.118 -11.583 9.951 0.911

6 16 -53.780 -13.083 27.613 1.000

6 17 -28.238 -13.720 0.799 0.090

7 8 -38.288 -16.782 4.725 0.356

7 9 -45.837 -31.901 -17.964 0.000

7 10 -27.166 -12.325 2.516 0.249

7 11 -31.919 -11.682 8.555 0.851

7 12 -38.153 -12.182 13.790 0.973

7 13 -42.833 -12.182 18.470 0.995

7 14 -35.153 -9.182 16.790 0.999

7 15 -32.963 -9.682 13.600 0.992

7 16 -52.829 -11.182 30.465 1.000

7 17 -28.821 -11.818 5.184 0.576

8 9 -34.294 -15.119 4.056 0.337

8 10 -15.385 4.457 24.299 1.000

8 11 -19.045 5.100 29.245 1.000

8 12 -24.520 4.600 33.720 1.000

8 13 -28.761 4.600 37.961 1.000

8 14 -21.520 7.600 36.720 1.000

8 15 -19.648 7.100 33.848 1.000

8 16 -38.080 5.600 49.280 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 66: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

65

Table 36 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 17 -16.543 4.964 26.470 1.000

9 10 8.378 19.576 30.774 0.000

9 11 2.480 20.219 37.958 0.009

9 12 -4.357 19.719 43.795 0.271

9 13 -9.344 19.719 48.782 0.620

9 14 -1.357 22.719 46.795 0.091

9 15 1.072 22.219 43.365 0.028

9 16 -19.774 20.719 61.211 0.941

9 17 6.146 20.082 34.019 0.000

10 11 -17.815 0.643 19.101 1.000

10 12 -24.468 0.143 24.754 1.000

10 13 -29.364 0.143 29.650 1.000

10 14 -21.468 3.143 27.754 1.000

10 15 -19.110 2.643 24.396 1.000

10 16 -39.669 1.143 41.955 1.000

10 17 -14.334 0.506 15.347 1.000

11 12 -28.695 -0.500 27.695 1.000

11 13 -33.057 -0.500 32.057 1.000

11 14 -25.695 2.500 30.695 1.000

11 15 -23.739 2.000 27.739 1.000

11 16 -42.569 0.500 43.569 1.000

11 17 -20.373 -0.136 20.100 1.000

12 13 -36.400 0.000 36.400 1.000

12 14 -29.557 3.000 35.557 1.000

12 15 -27.954 2.500 32.954 1.000

12 16 -45.043 1.000 47.043 1.000

12 17 -25.608 0.364 26.335 1.000

13 14 -33.400 3.000 39.400 1.000

13 15 -32.032 2.500 37.032 1.000

13 16 -47.835 1.000 49.835 1.000

13 17 -30.288 0.364 31.015 1.000

14 15 -30.954 -0.500 29.954 1.000

14 16 -48.043 -2.000 44.043 1.000

14 17 -28.608 -2.636 23.335 1.000

15 16 -46.081 -1.500 43.081 1.000

15 17 -25.418 -2.136 21.145 1.000

16 17 -42.283 -0.636 41.011 1.000

Page 67: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

66

:.....-: :--+-

:........;...

10

21

22

32

51

53

54

56

57

58

71

60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150

Page 68: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

67

20 [XXX.mat.Normed = School-Type-2]

20.1 Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable School- Type-2

Table 37: Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 97.561

2 99.321

3 111.351

p-value = 5.1694e-09

20.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 38: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Normed by

grouping variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -6.144 -1.760 2.624 0.614

1 3 -20.082 -13.790 -7.498 0.000

2 3 -16.640 -12.030 -7.420 0.000

Page 69: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

68

21 [XXX.mat.Normed = BudgetFrom]

21.1 Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable Bud- getFrom

Table 39: Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable Bud-

getFrom

Group Mean

1 100.458

2 99.700

4 82.167

5 99.321

6 111.351

7 99.000

p-value = 1.3339e-09

21.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 40: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Normed by

grouping variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -11.910 0.758 13.426 1.000

1 3 2.930 18.292 33.654 0.009

1 4 -5.780 1.137 8.054 0.997

1 5 -19.714 -10.893 -2.072 0.006

1 6 -32.892 1.458 35.809 1.000

2 3 0.153 17.533 34.914 0.047

2 4 -10.295 0.379 11.052 1.000

2 5 -23.647 -11.651 0.344 0.063

2 6 -34.599 0.700 35.999 1.000

3 4 -30.918 -17.154 -3.391 0.005

3 5 -43.997 -29.185 -14.372 0.000

3 6 -53.187 -16.833 19.520 0.774

4 5 -17.622 -12.030 -6.439 0.000

4 6 -33.345 0.321 33.987 1.000

5 6 -21.757 12.351 46.460 0.907

Page 70: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

69

70 80 90 100 110 120 130

Page 71: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

70

22

22.1

[XXX.mat.Normed = IsProtected]

Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 41: Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable IsPro-

tected

Group Mean

0 99.414

1 100.992

p-value = 0.14845

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 72: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

71

23

23.1

[XXX.mat.Normed = IsCentral]

Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 42: Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable IsCen-

tral

Group Mean

0 100.340

1 98.390

p-value = 0.00058287

23.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 43: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Normed by

grouping variable IsCentral

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 0.841 1.950 3.059 0.001

Page 73: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

72

24 [XXX.mat.Normed = Shifts]

24.1 Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Table 44: Means of XXX.mat.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 98.612

5 101.996

7 90.333

p-value = 1.7997e-07

24.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 45: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Normed by

grouping variable Shifts

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.844 -3.384 -1.924 0.000

1 3 -7.791 8.279 24.349 0.449

2 3 -4.437 11.663 27.763 0.206

Page 74: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

73

25 [XXX.mat.Scaled = Obl-ID]

25.1 Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 46: Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 50.261

2 49.560

3 47.744

4 44.078

5 44.643

6 44.653

7 43.385

8 44.836

9 52.806

10 40.538

11 47.302

12 49.660

13 44.964

14 39.000

15 37.688

16 44.959

17 40.413

18 42.260

19 40.167

20 43.981

21 52.962

22 53.301

23 47.039

24 42.772

25 61.537

26 44.550

27 43.537

28 48.161

29 41.500

p-value = 5.3475e-25

25.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Page 75: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

74

Table 47: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable Obl-ID

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -7.149 0.701 8.551 1.000

1 3 -5.704 2.516 10.737 1.000

1 4 -2.842 6.183 15.208 0.725

1 5 -6.349 5.618 17.585 0.996

1 6 -4.198 5.608 15.414 0.947

1 7 -5.439 6.876 19.191 0.960

1 8 -3.730 5.425 14.580 0.922

1 9 -11.656 -2.546 6.565 1.000

1 10 -2.592 9.722 22.037 0.410

1 11 -7.284 2.959 13.201 1.000

1 12 -9.141 0.601 10.343 1.000

1 13 -3.097 5.297 13.691 0.857

1 14 -0.396 11.261 22.918 0.076

1 15 4.009 12.573 21.137 0.000

1 16 -2.088 5.302 12.693 0.630

1 17 -0.165 9.848 19.860 0.061

1 18 -1.741 8.001 17.743 0.323

1 19 -0.806 10.094 20.994 0.120

1 20 -3.226 6.279 15.784 0.790

1 21 -12.320 -2.701 6.919 1.000

1 22 -10.047 -3.040 3.967 0.999

1 23 -5.373 3.221 11.816 1.000

1 24 -0.686 7.489 15.664 0.133

1 25 -21.687 -11.276 -0.864 0.016

1 26 -3.490 5.711 14.912 0.877

1 27 -2.781 6.724 16.229 0.660

1 28 -9.415 2.100 13.614 1.000

1 29 -30.869 8.761 48.391 1.000

2 3 -6.082 1.815 9.712 1.000

2 4 -3.250 5.482 14.213 0.863

2 5 -6.831 4.917 16.664 0.999

2 6 -4.630 4.907 14.443 0.986

2 7 -5.926 6.175 18.276 0.987

2 8 -4.142 4.724 13.589 0.977

2 9 -12.067 -3.247 5.573 1.000

2 10 -3.080 9.021 21.123 0.544

2 11 -7.728 2.257 12.242 1.000

2 12 -9.571 -0.100 9.370 1.000

2 13 -3.482 4.596 12.673 0.950

2 14 -0.872 10.560 21.991 0.123

2 15 3.617 11.871 20.125 0.000

2 16 -2.428 4.601 11.630 0.804

2 17 -0.602 9.147 18.895 0.105

Continued on next page

Page 76: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

75

Table 47 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

2 18 -2.171 7.300 16.770 0.466

2 19 -1.265 9.393 20.051 0.190

2 20 -3.649 5.578 14.805 0.904

2 21 -12.747 -3.402 5.943 1.000

2 22 -10.366 -3.741 2.883 0.954

2 23 -5.766 2.520 10.806 1.000

2 24 -1.062 6.788 14.638 0.222

2 25 -22.135 -11.977 -1.819 0.004

2 26 -3.903 5.010 13.923 0.956

2 27 -3.204 6.023 15.249 0.809

2 28 -9.888 1.398 12.684 1.000

2 29 -31.505 8.060 47.624 1.000

3 4 -5.400 3.666 12.732 1.000

3 5 -8.896 3.102 15.100 1.000

3 6 -6.752 3.091 12.935 1.000

3 7 -7.985 4.360 16.705 1.000

3 8 -6.287 2.908 12.104 1.000

3 9 -14.213 -5.062 4.089 0.964

3 10 -5.139 7.206 19.551 0.933

3 11 -9.837 0.442 10.721 1.000

3 12 -11.695 -1.916 7.864 1.000

3 13 -5.657 2.781 11.218 1.000

3 14 -2.945 8.744 20.433 0.535

3 15 1.449 10.056 18.663 0.004

3 16 -4.655 2.786 10.226 1.000

3 17 -2.718 7.331 17.381 0.593

3 18 -4.295 5.484 15.264 0.957

3 19 -3.356 7.578 18.512 0.702

3 20 -5.781 3.763 13.307 1.000

3 21 -14.875 -5.217 4.441 0.973

3 22 -12.617 -5.557 1.503 0.418

3 23 -7.933 0.705 9.343 1.000

3 24 -3.248 4.973 13.193 0.904

3 25 -24.239 -13.792 -3.345 0.000

3 26 -6.047 3.194 12.435 1.000

3 27 -5.337 4.207 13.751 0.999

3 28 -11.964 -0.417 11.130 1.000

3 29 -33.395 6.244 45.884 1.000

4 5 -13.128 -0.565 11.998 1.000

4 6 -11.100 -0.575 9.950 1.000

4 7 -12.201 0.694 13.588 1.000

4 8 -10.679 -0.758 9.163 1.000

4 9 -18.609 -8.728 1.152 0.186

4 10 -9.355 3.540 16.434 1.000

4 11 -14.157 -3.224 7.709 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 77: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

76

Table 47 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 12 -16.047 -5.582 4.883 0.977

4 13 -10.109 -0.886 8.338 1.000

4 14 -7.190 5.078 17.346 1.000

4 15 -2.989 6.390 15.769 0.735

4 16 -9.201 -0.880 7.440 1.000

4 17 -7.053 3.665 14.383 1.000

4 18 -8.647 1.818 12.283 1.000

4 19 -7.640 3.911 15.463 1.000

4 20 -10.149 0.097 10.342 1.000

4 21 -19.235 -8.883 1.468 0.236

4 22 -17.205 -9.223 -1.240 0.005

4 23 -12.368 -2.961 6.445 1.000

4 24 -7.719 1.306 10.331 1.000

4 25 -28.550 -17.458 -6.367 0.000

4 26 -10.435 -0.472 9.492 1.000

4 27 -9.704 0.541 10.786 1.000

4 28 -16.216 -4.083 8.050 1.000

4 29 -37.236 2.578 42.392 1.000

5 6 -13.145 -0.010 13.125 1.000

5 7 -13.843 1.258 16.359 1.000

5 8 -12.850 -0.193 12.463 1.000

5 9 -20.788 -8.164 4.461 0.823

5 10 -10.996 4.104 19.205 1.000

5 11 -16.124 -2.659 10.805 1.000

5 12 -18.105 -5.017 8.070 1.000

5 13 -12.439 -0.321 11.797 1.000

5 14 -8.927 5.643 20.212 1.000

5 15 -5.281 6.955 19.191 0.950

5 16 -11.761 -0.316 11.130 1.000

5 17 -9.060 4.230 17.520 1.000

5 18 -10.705 2.383 15.470 1.000

5 19 -9.495 4.476 18.447 1.000

5 20 -12.251 0.661 13.574 1.000

5 21 -21.315 -8.319 4.678 0.838

5 22 -19.860 -8.658 2.544 0.459

5 23 -14.654 -2.397 9.861 1.000

5 24 -10.096 1.871 13.838 1.000

5 25 -30.487 -16.894 -3.300 0.001

5 26 -12.597 0.093 12.783 1.000

5 27 -11.806 1.106 14.018 1.000

5 28 -17.974 -3.518 10.937 1.000

5 29 -37.439 3.143 43.725 1.000

6 7 -12.184 1.268 14.721 1.000

6 8 -10.820 -0.183 10.454 1.000

6 9 -18.752 -8.153 2.445 0.470

Continued on next page

Page 78: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

77

Table 47 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

6 10 -9.338 4.115 17.567 1.000

6 11 -14.235 -2.649 8.937 1.000

6 12 -16.153 -5.007 6.139 0.998

6 13 -10.300 -0.311 9.678 1.000

6 14 -7.201 5.653 18.507 0.999

6 15 -3.168 6.965 17.097 0.719

6 16 -9.468 -0.306 8.856 1.000

6 17 -7.143 4.240 15.623 1.000

6 18 -8.753 2.393 13.539 1.000

6 19 -7.685 4.486 16.657 1.000

6 20 -10.268 0.672 11.611 1.000

6 21 -19.348 -8.308 2.731 0.521

6 22 -17.504 -8.648 0.208 0.067

6 23 -12.545 -2.386 7.772 1.000

6 24 -7.925 1.881 11.687 1.000

6 25 -28.619 -16.884 -5.148 0.000

6 26 -10.573 0.103 10.779 1.000

6 27 -9.823 1.116 12.055 1.000

6 28 -16.233 -3.508 9.216 1.000

6 29 -36.845 3.153 43.151 1.000

7 8 -14.438 -1.451 11.535 1.000

7 9 -22.377 -9.422 3.533 0.600

7 10 -12.532 2.846 18.224 1.000

7 11 -17.692 -3.918 9.857 1.000

7 12 -19.682 -6.275 7.131 0.996

7 13 -14.040 -1.579 10.882 1.000

7 14 -10.472 4.385 19.241 1.000

7 15 -6.880 5.696 18.273 0.998

7 16 -13.383 -1.574 10.235 1.000

7 17 -10.633 2.972 16.576 1.000

7 18 -12.282 1.125 14.531 1.000

7 19 -11.052 3.218 17.488 1.000

7 20 -13.832 -0.597 12.638 1.000

7 21 -22.895 -9.577 3.741 0.625

7 22 -21.489 -9.916 1.656 0.238

7 23 -16.252 -3.655 8.942 1.000

7 24 -11.702 0.613 12.928 1.000

7 25 -32.052 -18.152 -4.252 0.000

7 26 -14.184 -1.165 11.853 1.000

7 27 -13.388 -0.152 13.083 1.000

7 28 -19.521 -4.777 9.968 1.000

7 29 -38.802 1.885 42.571 1.000

8 9 -17.969 -7.970 2.029 0.389

8 10 -8.688 4.298 17.284 1.000

8 11 -13.507 -2.466 8.574 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 79: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

78

Table 47 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 12 -15.401 -4.824 5.754 0.998

8 13 -9.479 -0.128 9.223 1.000

8 14 -6.528 5.836 18.200 0.996

8 15 -2.356 7.148 16.652 0.523

8 16 -8.584 -0.123 8.339 1.000

8 17 -6.404 4.423 15.250 1.000

8 18 -8.001 2.576 13.154 1.000

8 19 -6.984 4.669 16.322 1.000

8 20 -9.505 0.855 11.215 1.000

8 21 -18.591 -8.125 2.340 0.449

8 22 -16.594 -8.465 -0.336 0.029

8 23 -11.735 -2.203 7.328 1.000

8 24 -7.091 2.064 11.219 1.000

8 25 -27.898 -16.701 -5.503 0.000

8 26 -9.795 0.286 10.367 1.000

8 27 -9.061 1.299 11.659 1.000

8 28 -15.555 -3.325 8.905 1.000

8 29 -36.508 3.336 43.180 1.000

9 10 -0.687 12.268 25.223 0.095

9 11 -5.499 5.504 16.508 0.990

9 12 -7.393 3.146 13.685 1.000

9 13 -1.465 7.843 17.150 0.270

9 14 1.475 13.806 26.138 0.009

9 15 5.657 15.118 24.579 0.000

9 16 -0.566 7.848 16.261 0.111

9 17 1.604 12.393 23.183 0.006

9 18 0.007 10.546 21.085 0.050

9 19 1.022 12.640 24.258 0.015

9 20 -1.496 8.825 19.146 0.242

9 21 -10.581 -0.155 10.271 1.000

9 22 -8.574 -0.495 7.584 1.000

9 23 -3.722 5.767 15.256 0.899

9 24 0.924 10.035 19.145 0.012

9 25 -19.891 -8.730 2.431 0.432

9 26 -1.785 8.256 18.297 0.320

9 27 -1.051 9.269 19.590 0.160

9 28 -7.551 4.645 16.842 1.000

9 29 -28.527 11.306 51.140 1.000

10 11 -20.538 -6.764 7.011 0.993

10 12 -22.528 -9.122 4.285 0.738

10 13 -16.887 -4.425 8.036 1.000

10 14 -13.318 1.538 16.395 1.000

10 15 -9.726 2.850 15.427 1.000

10 16 -16.229 -4.420 7.388 1.000

10 17 -13.479 0.125 13.730 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 80: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

79

Table 47 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

10 18 -15.128 -1.722 11.685 1.000

10 19 -13.898 0.372 14.642 1.000

10 20 -16.678 -3.443 9.792 1.000

10 21 -25.741 -12.423 0.895 0.111

10 22 -24.335 -12.763 -1.190 0.012

10 23 -19.098 -6.501 6.096 0.985

10 24 -14.548 -2.233 10.082 1.000

10 25 -34.899 -20.998 -7.098 0.000

10 26 -17.030 -4.012 9.007 1.000

10 27 -16.234 -2.999 10.237 1.000

10 28 -22.368 -7.623 7.122 0.985

10 29 -41.648 -0.962 39.725 1.000

11 12 -13.889 -2.358 9.174 1.000

11 13 -8.079 2.338 12.756 1.000

11 14 -4.887 8.302 21.492 0.860

11 15 -0.942 9.614 20.170 0.141

11 16 -7.284 2.344 11.972 1.000

11 17 -4.872 6.889 18.650 0.931

11 18 -6.489 5.042 16.574 0.999

11 19 -5.390 7.136 19.661 0.949

11 20 -8.012 3.321 14.653 1.000

11 21 -17.088 -5.659 5.769 0.992

11 22 -15.336 -5.999 3.338 0.832

11 23 -10.318 0.263 10.843 1.000

11 24 -5.712 4.531 14.773 0.999

11 25 -26.337 -14.234 -2.132 0.004

11 26 -8.326 2.752 13.831 1.000

11 27 -7.567 3.765 15.098 1.000

11 28 -13.923 -0.859 12.205 1.000

11 29 -34.305 5.802 45.910 1.000

12 13 -5.230 4.696 14.622 0.996

12 14 -2.145 10.660 23.465 0.295

12 15 1.901 11.972 22.042 0.003

12 16 -4.392 4.701 13.795 0.985

12 17 -2.081 9.247 20.575 0.336

12 18 -3.689 7.400 18.489 0.773

12 19 -2.626 9.493 21.613 0.428

12 20 -5.203 5.679 16.560 0.983

12 21 -14.284 -3.302 7.681 1.000

12 22 -12.426 -3.641 5.144 1.000

12 23 -7.476 2.621 12.717 1.000

12 24 -2.853 6.888 16.630 0.661

12 25 -23.558 -11.877 -0.195 0.040

12 26 -5.507 5.110 15.727 0.994

12 27 -4.759 6.123 17.005 0.956

Continued on next page

Page 81: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

80

Table 47 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

12 28 -11.176 1.499 14.174 1.000

12 29 -31.823 8.160 48.143 1.000

13 14 -5.848 5.964 17.775 0.989

13 15 -1.497 7.276 16.048 0.303

13 16 -7.626 0.005 7.637 1.000

13 17 -5.641 4.551 14.743 0.998

13 18 -7.222 2.704 12.630 1.000

13 19 -6.268 4.797 15.862 0.999

13 20 -8.711 0.982 10.676 1.000

13 21 -17.804 -7.998 1.808 0.338

13 22 -15.598 -8.337 -1.076 0.006

13 23 -10.878 -2.076 6.727 1.000

13 24 -6.202 2.192 10.586 1.000

13 25 -27.157 -16.573 -5.989 0.000

13 26 -8.982 0.414 9.809 1.000

13 27 -8.267 1.427 11.121 1.000

13 28 -14.868 -3.197 8.473 1.000

13 29 -36.212 3.464 43.140 1.000

14 15 -10.621 1.312 13.245 1.000

14 16 -17.080 -5.959 5.162 0.976

14 17 -14.425 -1.413 11.599 1.000

14 18 -16.065 -3.260 9.545 1.000

14 19 -14.873 -1.167 12.540 1.000

14 20 -17.607 -4.981 7.644 1.000

14 21 -26.674 -13.962 -1.250 0.013

14 22 -25.171 -14.301 -3.431 0.000

14 23 -19.995 -8.039 3.916 0.759

14 24 -15.429 -3.772 7.885 1.000

14 25 -35.858 -22.537 -9.215 0.000

14 26 -17.948 -5.550 6.848 0.998

14 27 -17.163 -4.537 8.089 1.000

14 28 -23.361 -9.161 5.039 0.826

14 29 -42.992 -2.500 37.992 1.000

15 16 -15.089 -7.270 0.548 0.115

15 17 -13.057 -2.725 7.608 1.000

15 18 -14.642 -4.572 5.499 0.998

15 19 -13.673 -2.478 8.716 1.000

15 20 -16.135 -6.293 3.548 0.839

15 21 -25.225 -15.273 -5.321 0.000

15 22 -23.070 -15.613 -8.155 0.000

15 23 -18.316 -9.351 -0.386 0.028

15 24 -13.647 -5.083 3.481 0.920

15 25 -34.568 -23.848 -13.129 0.000

15 26 -16.410 -6.862 2.686 0.626

15 27 -15.690 -5.849 3.993 0.919

Continued on next page

Page 82: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

81

Table 47 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

15 28 -22.267 -10.473 1.321 0.178

15 29 -43.524 -3.812 35.900 1.000

16 17 -4.837 4.546 13.928 0.994

16 18 -6.395 2.699 11.792 1.000

16 19 -5.533 4.792 15.117 0.997

16 20 -7.862 0.977 9.816 1.000

16 21 -16.965 -8.003 0.959 0.169

16 22 -14.416 -8.342 -2.269 0.000

16 23 -9.933 -2.081 5.771 1.000

16 24 -5.203 2.187 9.577 1.000

16 25 -26.385 -16.578 -6.771 0.000

16 26 -8.103 0.409 8.920 1.000

16 27 -7.418 1.422 10.261 1.000

16 28 -14.174 -3.203 7.769 1.000

16 29 -36.017 3.459 42.934 1.000

17 18 -13.175 -1.847 9.481 1.000

17 19 -12.092 0.246 12.584 1.000

17 20 -14.693 -3.568 7.556 1.000

17 21 -23.771 -12.548 -1.326 0.010

17 22 -21.972 -12.888 -3.804 0.000

17 23 -16.984 -6.626 3.731 0.838

17 24 -12.371 -2.359 7.654 1.000

17 25 -33.032 -21.124 -9.215 0.000

17 26 -15.003 -4.137 6.729 1.000

17 27 -14.249 -3.124 8.001 1.000

17 28 -20.632 -7.748 5.136 0.909

17 29 -41.136 -1.087 38.962 1.000

18 19 -10.026 2.093 14.213 1.000

18 20 -12.603 -1.721 9.160 1.000

18 21 -21.684 -10.702 0.281 0.069

18 22 -19.826 -11.041 -2.256 0.001

18 23 -14.876 -4.779 5.317 0.996

18 24 -10.253 -0.512 9.230 1.000

18 25 -30.958 -19.277 -7.595 0.000

18 26 -12.907 -2.290 8.327 1.000

18 27 -12.159 -1.277 9.605 1.000

18 28 -18.576 -5.901 6.774 0.997

18 29 -39.223 0.760 40.743 1.000

19 20 -15.745 -3.815 8.115 1.000

19 21 -24.816 -12.795 -0.773 0.021

19 22 -23.188 -13.134 -3.080 0.000

19 23 -18.091 -6.873 4.345 0.891

19 24 -13.505 -2.605 8.295 1.000

19 25 -34.034 -21.370 -8.706 0.000

19 26 -16.072 -4.383 7.306 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 83: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

82

Table 47 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

19 27 -15.300 -3.370 8.560 1.000

19 28 -21.580 -7.995 5.591 0.927

19 29 -41.614 -1.333 38.947 1.000

20 21 -19.753 -8.980 1.793 0.292

20 22 -17.841 -9.320 -0.798 0.014

20 23 -12.926 -3.058 6.810 1.000

20 24 -8.295 1.210 10.715 1.000

20 25 -29.040 -17.555 -6.070 0.000

20 26 -10.969 -0.569 9.832 1.000

20 27 -10.226 0.444 11.115 1.000

20 28 -16.674 -4.180 8.314 1.000

20 29 -37.444 2.481 42.407 1.000

21 22 -8.988 -0.339 8.310 1.000

21 23 -4.056 5.922 15.901 0.921

21 24 0.570 10.190 19.809 0.023

21 25 -20.155 -8.575 3.005 0.559

21 26 -2.094 8.412 18.917 0.378

21 27 -1.348 9.425 20.197 0.202

21 28 -7.781 4.800 17.382 1.000

21 29 -28.492 11.462 51.415 1.000

22 23 -1.231 6.262 13.754 0.287

22 24 3.522 10.529 17.536 0.000

22 25 -17.757 -8.236 1.286 0.222

22 26 0.570 8.751 16.932 0.020

22 27 1.243 9.764 18.285 0.006

22 28 -5.577 5.140 15.857 0.995

22 29 -27.605 11.801 51.207 1.000

23 24 -4.327 4.268 12.862 0.991

23 25 -25.241 -14.497 -3.753 0.000

23 26 -7.086 2.489 12.065 1.000

23 27 -6.366 3.502 13.371 1.000

23 28 -12.938 -1.122 10.694 1.000

23 29 -34.179 5.539 45.258 1.000

24 25 -29.176 -18.765 -8.353 0.000

24 26 -10.979 -1.778 7.422 1.000

24 27 -10.270 -0.765 8.740 1.000

24 28 -16.904 -5.390 6.125 0.996

24 29 -38.358 1.272 40.902 1.000

25 26 5.752 16.987 28.221 0.000

25 27 6.514 18.000 29.485 0.000

25 28 0.179 13.375 26.572 0.042

25 29 -20.114 20.037 60.188 0.991

26 27 -9.387 1.013 11.413 1.000

26 28 -15.875 -3.611 8.653 1.000

26 29 -36.804 3.050 42.904 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 84: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

83

Table 47 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

27 28 -17.118 -4.624 7.870 1.000

27 29 -37.889 2.037 41.963 1.000

28 29 -33.790 6.661 47.112 1.000

Page 85: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

84

26 [XXX.mat.Scaled = cat]

26.1 Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Table 48: Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 54.543

1 49.774

2 45.451

3 47.330

4 46.992

5 42.878

6 45.157

7 48.233

8 54.875

p-value = 1.4025e-15

26.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 49: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -0.061 4.769 9.598 0.056

1 3 4.383 9.092 13.802 0.000

1 4 2.248 7.213 12.178 0.000

1 5 1.943 7.551 13.159 0.001

1 6 7.386 11.665 15.944 0.000

1 7 5.101 9.386 13.671 0.000

1 8 0.673 6.310 11.947 0.015

1 9 -17.354 -0.332 16.690 1.000

2 3 -0.168 4.323 8.815 0.070

2 4 -2.314 2.444 7.202 0.809

2 5 -2.643 2.783 8.209 0.810

2 6 2.859 6.896 10.933 0.000

2 7 0.573 4.617 8.661 0.012

2 8 -3.914 1.541 6.997 0.994

2 9 -22.064 -5.101 11.862 0.991

3 4 -6.515 -1.879 2.757 0.943

3 5 -6.860 -1.541 3.779 0.993

3 6 -1.320 2.573 6.466 0.508

3 7 -3.606 0.294 4.194 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 86: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

85

Table 49 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -8.132 -2.782 2.568 0.798

3 9 -26.353 -9.424 7.505 0.730

4 5 -5.209 0.338 5.885 1.000

4 6 0.254 4.452 8.650 0.028

4 7 -2.032 2.173 6.378 0.804

4 8 -6.479 -0.903 4.673 1.000

4 9 -24.547 -7.545 9.456 0.907

5 6 -0.829 4.114 9.056 0.194

5 7 -3.113 1.835 6.783 0.966

5 8 -7.397 -1.241 4.915 0.999

5 9 -25.084 -7.883 9.317 0.890

6 7 -5.646 -2.279 1.088 0.474

6 8 -10.330 -5.355 -0.380 0.024

6 9 -28.811 -11.997 4.817 0.397

7 8 -8.057 -3.076 1.905 0.603

7 9 -26.534 -9.718 7.098 0.687

8 9 -23.852 -6.642 10.568 0.957

Page 87: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

86

27 [XXX.mat.Scaled = School-Type-1]

27.1 Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable School- Type-1

Table 50: Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 45.828

3 48.095

5 63.000

6 47.844

7 49.714

8 29.250

10 31.636

21 53.200

22 72.875

32 47.429

51 47.000

53 47.333

54 47.500

56 43.000

57 44.000

58 47.000

71 47.000

p-value = 2.5057e-23

27.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 51: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable School-Type-1

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -5.175 -2.266 0.642 0.359

1 3 -68.942 -17.172 34.599 0.999

1 4 -8.103 -2.016 4.071 0.999

1 5 -17.798 -3.886 10.027 1.000

1 6 5.908 16.578 27.249 0.000

1 7 -1.484 14.192 29.868 0.131

1 8 -30.563 -7.372 15.820 1.000

1 9 -36.318 -27.047 -17.775 0.000

1 10 -12.993 -1.600 9.793 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 88: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

87

Table 51 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 11 -22.352 -1.172 20.008 1.000

1 12 -31.420 -1.505 28.410 1.000

1 13 -38.295 -1.672 34.951 1.000

1 14 -27.087 2.828 32.744 1.000

1 15 -24.090 1.828 27.747 1.000

1 16 -52.942 -1.172 50.599 1.000

1 17 -16.847 -1.172 14.504 1.000

2 3 -66.714 -14.905 36.903 1.000

2 4 -6.150 0.251 6.651 1.000

2 5 -15.672 -1.620 12.433 1.000

2 6 7.993 18.845 29.697 0.000

2 7 0.659 16.458 32.258 0.031

2 8 -28.381 -5.105 18.171 1.000

2 9 -34.260 -24.780 -15.300 0.000

2 10 -10.897 0.666 12.229 1.000

2 11 -20.178 1.095 22.367 1.000

2 12 -29.219 0.761 30.742 1.000

2 13 -36.082 0.595 37.271 1.000

2 14 -24.886 5.095 35.075 1.000

2 15 -21.899 4.095 30.088 1.000

2 16 -50.714 1.095 52.903 1.000

2 17 -14.705 1.095 16.894 1.000

3 4 -36.928 15.156 67.240 1.000

3 5 -40.279 13.286 66.851 1.000

3 6 -19.066 33.750 86.566 0.720

3 7 -22.686 31.364 85.413 0.846

3 8 -46.888 9.800 66.488 1.000

3 9 -62.426 -9.875 42.676 1.000

3 10 -37.395 15.571 68.538 1.000

3 11 -39.895 16.000 71.895 1.000

3 12 -44.088 15.667 75.421 1.000

3 13 -47.879 15.500 78.879 1.000

3 14 -39.754 20.000 79.754 0.999

3 15 -38.857 19.000 76.857 0.999

3 16 -57.184 16.000 89.184 1.000

3 17 -38.050 16.000 70.050 1.000

4 5 -16.905 -1.870 13.165 1.000

4 6 6.496 18.594 30.692 0.000

4 7 -0.472 16.208 32.888 0.068

4 8 -29.238 -5.356 18.526 1.000

4 9 -35.915 -25.031 -14.147 0.000

4 10 -12.324 0.416 13.155 1.000

4 11 -21.090 0.844 22.778 1.000

4 12 -29.943 0.511 30.964 1.000

4 13 -36.720 0.344 37.408 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 89: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

88

Table 51 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 14 -25.609 4.844 35.298 1.000

4 15 -22.694 3.844 30.382 1.000

4 16 -51.240 0.844 52.928 1.000

4 17 -15.836 0.844 17.524 1.000

5 6 3.061 20.464 37.867 0.005

5 7 -2.772 18.078 38.928 0.185

5 8 -30.446 -3.486 23.475 1.000

5 9 -39.743 -23.161 -6.579 0.000

5 10 -15.569 2.286 20.141 1.000

5 11 -22.537 2.714 27.965 1.000

5 12 -30.542 2.381 35.304 1.000

5 13 -36.904 2.214 41.333 1.000

5 14 -26.209 6.714 39.637 1.000

5 15 -23.625 5.714 35.053 1.000

5 16 -50.851 2.714 56.279 1.000

5 17 -18.136 2.714 23.564 1.000

6 7 -21.229 -2.386 16.456 1.000

6 8 -49.389 -23.950 1.489 0.093

6 9 -57.599 -43.625 -29.651 0.000

6 10 -33.641 -18.179 -2.716 0.005

6 11 -41.370 -17.750 5.870 0.427

6 12 -49.773 -18.083 13.606 0.863

6 13 -56.336 -18.250 19.836 0.967

6 14 -45.440 -13.750 17.940 0.987

6 15 -42.698 -14.750 13.198 0.924

6 16 -70.566 -17.750 35.066 0.999

6 17 -36.592 -17.750 1.092 0.092

7 8 -49.475 -21.564 6.348 0.375

7 9 -59.325 -41.239 -23.152 0.000

7 10 -35.053 -15.792 3.468 0.269

7 11 -41.627 -15.364 10.900 0.837

7 12 -49.403 -15.697 18.009 0.975

7 13 -55.643 -15.864 23.916 0.995

7 14 -45.070 -11.364 22.342 0.999

7 15 -42.578 -12.364 17.851 0.993

7 16 -69.413 -15.364 38.686 1.000

7 17 -37.429 -15.364 6.702 0.572

8 9 -44.560 -19.675 5.210 0.332

8 10 -19.979 5.771 31.522 1.000

8 11 -25.135 6.200 37.535 1.000

8 12 -31.925 5.867 43.659 1.000

8 13 -37.596 5.700 48.996 1.000

8 14 -27.592 10.200 47.992 1.000

8 15 -25.514 9.200 43.914 1.000

8 16 -50.488 6.200 62.888 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 90: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

89

Table 51 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 17 -21.711 6.200 34.111 1.000

9 10 10.913 25.446 39.979 0.000

9 11 2.853 25.875 48.897 0.011

9 12 -5.705 25.542 56.788 0.275

9 13 -12.343 25.375 63.093 0.635

9 14 -1.371 29.875 61.121 0.080

9 15 1.431 28.875 56.319 0.027

9 16 -26.676 25.875 78.426 0.958

9 17 7.788 25.875 43.962 0.000

10 11 -23.526 0.429 24.384 1.000

10 12 -31.845 0.095 32.035 1.000

10 13 -38.366 -0.071 38.223 1.000

10 14 -27.511 4.429 36.369 1.000

10 15 -24.803 3.429 31.660 1.000

10 16 -52.538 0.429 53.395 1.000

10 17 -18.832 0.429 19.689 1.000

11 12 -36.925 -0.333 36.259 1.000

11 13 -42.753 -0.500 41.753 1.000

11 14 -32.592 4.000 40.592 1.000

11 15 -30.404 3.000 36.404 1.000

11 16 -55.895 0.000 55.895 1.000

11 17 -26.263 0.000 26.263 1.000

12 13 -47.407 -0.167 47.073 1.000

12 14 -37.919 4.333 46.586 1.000

12 15 -36.190 3.333 42.857 1.000

12 16 -59.421 0.333 60.088 1.000

12 17 -33.373 0.333 34.039 1.000

13 14 -42.740 4.500 51.740 1.000

13 15 -41.316 3.500 48.316 1.000

13 16 -62.879 0.500 63.879 1.000

13 17 -39.280 0.500 40.280 1.000

14 15 -40.524 -1.000 38.524 1.000

14 16 -63.754 -4.000 55.754 1.000

14 17 -37.706 -4.000 29.706 1.000

15 16 -60.857 -3.000 54.857 1.000

15 17 -33.215 -3.000 27.215 1.000

16 17 -54.050 0.000 54.050 1.000

Page 91: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

90

:.....-: :......,_

:.......;...

10

21

22

32

51

53

54

56

57

58

71

20 40 60 80 100 120

Page 92: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

91

28 [XXX.mat.Scaled = School-Type-2]

28.1 Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable School- Type-2

Table 52: Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 44.268

2 46.440

3 62.027

p-value = 5.7161e-09

28.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 53: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -7.860 -2.171 3.517 0.644

1 3 -25.923 -17.759 -9.594 0.000

2 3 -21.569 -15.587 -9.606 0.000

Page 93: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

92

29 [XXX.mat.Scaled = BudgetFrom]

29.1 Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Bud- getFrom

Table 54: Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Budget-

From

Group Mean

1 47.917

2 47.100

4 24.500

5 46.440

6 62.027

7 47.000

p-value = 1.6603e-09

29.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 55: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -15.622 0.817 17.255 1.000

1 3 3.482 23.417 43.351 0.011

1 4 -7.499 1.477 10.453 0.997

1 5 -25.557 -14.110 -2.664 0.006

1 6 -43.658 0.917 45.492 1.000

2 3 0.047 22.600 45.153 0.049

2 4 -13.190 0.660 14.511 1.000

2 5 -30.493 -14.927 0.639 0.069

2 6 -45.706 0.100 45.906 1.000

3 4 -39.800 -21.940 -4.079 0.006

3 5 -56.748 -37.527 -18.306 0.000

3 6 -69.674 -22.500 24.674 0.751

4 5 -22.843 -15.587 -8.332 0.000

4 6 -44.247 -0.560 43.126 1.000

5 6 -29.233 15.027 59.288 0.928

Page 94: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

93

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Page 95: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

94

30

30.1

[XXX.mat.Scaled = IsProtected]

Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 56: Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable IsPro-

tected

Group Mean

0 46.560

1 48.643

p-value = 0.14144

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 96: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

95

31

31.1

[XXX.mat.Scaled = IsCentral]

Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 57: Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable IsCentral

Group Mean

0 47.756

1 45.243

p-value = 0.00063265

31.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 58: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable IsCentral

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 1.074 2.514 3.953 0.001

Page 97: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

96

32 [XXX.mat.Scaled = Shifts]

32.1 Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Table 59: Means of XXX.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 45.520

5 49.918

7 34.667

p-value = 1.6807e-07

32.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 60: Between group comparison of XXX.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable Shifts

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -6.292 -4.398 -2.504 0.000

1 3 -9.997 10.853 31.703 0.441

2 3 -5.637 15.251 36.140 0.201

Page 98: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

97

33 [XXX.bel.Normed = Obl-ID]

33.1 Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 61: Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 99.848

2 98.110

3 101.156

4 98.062

5 96.536

6 99.673

7 98.077

8 102.328

9 100.468

10 99.885

11 100.465

12 100.500

13 99.880

14 101.700

15 98.065

16 98.600

17 99.022

18 98.460

19 97.000

20 99.074

21 98.096

22 99.806

23 98.868

24 100.783

25 100.244

26 100.450

27 97.537

28 101.645

29 106.000

p-value = 0.26256

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 99: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

98

34 [XXX.bel.Normed = cat]

34.1 Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable cat

Table 62: Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 100.057

1 99.163

2 100.399

3 98.784

4 98.288

5 99.326

6 99.771

7 98.931

8 101.375

p-value = 0.57167

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 100: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

99

35

35.1

[XXX.bel.Normed = School-Type-1]

Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Table 63: Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 99.602

3 98.857

5 109.000

6 98.442

7 101.071

8 102.083

10 103.909

21 94.200

22 99.562

32 99.238

51 98.333

53 104.000

54 105.500

56 109.333

57 98.250

58 97.000

71 102.727

p-value = 0.4945

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 101: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

100

36

36.1

[XXX.bel.Normed = School-Type-2]

Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Table 64: Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 100.878

2 99.403

3 101.135

p-value = 0.36714

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 102: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

101

37

37.1

[XXX.bel.Normed = BudgetFrom]

Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable Bud-

getFrom

Table 65: Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable Bud-

getFrom

Group Mean

1 101.792

2 103.400

4 93.667

5 99.403

6 101.135

7 97.000

p-value = 0.27818

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 103: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

102

38

38.1

[XXX.bel.Normed = IsProtected]

Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 66: Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable IsPro- tected

Group Mean

0 99.473

1 99.442

p-value = 0.97178

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 104: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

103

39

39.1

[XXX.bel.Normed = IsCentral]

Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 67: Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable IsCen- tral

Group Mean

0 99.741

1 99.094

p-value = 0.16351

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 105: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

104

40 [XXX.bel.Normed = Shifts]

40.1 Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Table 68: Means of XXX.bel.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 99.328

5 99.852

7 99.333

p-value = 0.59351

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 106: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

105

41 [XXX.bel.Scaled = Obl-ID]

41.1 Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 69: Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 40.217

2 38.376

3 41.822

4 38.297

5 36.571

6 40.122

7 38.346

8 43.115

9 41.016

10 40.192

11 41.047

12 41.020

13 40.325

14 42.300

15 38.221

16 38.869

17 39.326

18 38.740

19 37.056

20 39.481

21 38.288

22 40.316

23 39.276

24 41.315

25 40.756

26 41.000

27 37.722

28 42.258

29 47.500

p-value = 0.22109

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 107: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

106

42 [XXX.bel.Scaled = cat]

42.1 Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Table 70: Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 40.600

1 39.524

2 40.914

3 39.119

4 38.610

5 39.697

6 40.172

7 39.310

8 42.250

p-value = 0.56745

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 108: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

107

43

43.1

[XXX.bel.Scaled = School-Type-1]

Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Table 71: Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 40.016

3 39.201

5 50.000

6 38.779

7 41.571

8 42.750

10 44.909

21 34.200

22 40.062

32 39.714

51 38.667

53 44.667

54 46.500

56 50.667

57 38.500

58 38.000

71 43.364

p-value = 0.53393

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 109: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

108

44

44.1

[XXX.bel.Scaled = School-Type-2]

Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Table 72: Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 41.439

2 39.800

3 41.865

p-value = 0.33686

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 110: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

109

45

45.1

[XXX.bel.Scaled = BudgetFrom]

Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Bud-

getFrom

Table 73: Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Budget-

From

Group Mean

1 42.458

2 44.100

4 33.500

5 39.800

6 41.865

7 38.000

p-value = 0.27846

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 111: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

110

46

46.1

[XXX.bel.Scaled = IsProtected]

Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 74: Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable IsPro- tected

Group Mean

0 39.879

1 39.868

p-value = 0.99123

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 112: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

111

47

47.1

[XXX.bel.Scaled = IsCentral]

Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 75: Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable IsCentral

Group Mean

0 40.183

1 39.454

p-value = 0.15761

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 113: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

112

48 [XXX.bel.Scaled = Shifts]

48.1 Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Table 76: Means of XXX.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 39.725

5 40.284

7 39.667

p-value = 0.61864

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 114: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

113

49 [X13.xxx.Normed = Obl-ID]

49.1 Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 77: Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 99.913

2 101.633

3 98.022

4 100.688

5 99.536

6 97.429

7 101.692

8 100.492

9 100.484

10 97.192

11 96.953

12 98.180

13 100.590

14 96.600

15 94.558

16 100.959

17 97.717

18 100.340

19 96.278

20 97.704

21 100.827

22 105.087

23 99.961

24 97.174

25 100.122

26 96.500

27 96.204

28 97.032

29 99.500

p-value = 3.6063e-07

49.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Page 115: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

114

Table 78: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Normed by group-

ing variable Obl-ID

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -8.344 -1.720 4.904 1.000

1 3 -5.046 1.891 8.828 1.000

1 4 -8.390 -0.774 6.841 1.000

1 5 -9.721 0.377 10.476 1.000

1 6 -5.790 2.484 10.759 1.000

1 7 -12.171 -1.779 8.613 1.000

1 8 -8.304 -0.579 7.147 1.000

1 9 -8.259 -0.571 7.117 1.000

1 10 -7.671 2.721 13.113 1.000

1 11 -5.684 2.960 11.603 1.000

1 12 -6.487 1.733 9.954 1.000

1 13 -7.760 -0.677 6.406 1.000

1 14 -6.524 3.313 13.150 1.000

1 15 -1.872 5.355 12.581 0.558

1 16 -7.282 -1.046 5.191 1.000

1 17 -6.253 2.196 10.645 1.000

1 18 -8.647 -0.427 7.794 1.000

1 19 -5.563 3.635 12.833 1.000

1 20 -5.811 2.209 10.230 1.000

1 21 -9.031 -0.914 7.204 1.000

1 22 -11.087 -5.174 0.739 0.202

1 23 -7.300 -0.047 7.205 1.000

1 24 -4.159 2.739 9.638 1.000

1 25 -8.995 -0.209 8.577 1.000

1 26 -4.351 3.413 11.177 0.999

1 27 -4.311 3.709 11.730 0.997

1 28 -6.836 2.881 12.597 1.000

1 29 -33.029 0.413 33.855 1.000

2 3 -3.053 3.611 10.275 0.972

2 4 -6.423 0.946 8.314 1.000

2 5 -7.816 2.097 12.010 1.000

2 6 -3.843 4.204 12.252 0.982

2 7 -10.271 -0.059 10.152 1.000

2 8 -6.340 1.141 8.623 1.000

2 9 -6.293 1.149 8.592 1.000

2 10 -5.771 4.441 14.652 0.999

2 11 -3.746 4.680 13.105 0.962

2 12 -4.539 3.453 11.445 0.999

2 13 -5.773 1.043 7.859 1.000

2 14 -4.613 5.033 14.679 0.983

2 15 0.109 7.075 14.040 0.041

2 16 -5.257 0.674 6.606 1.000

2 17 -4.311 3.916 12.142 0.995

Continued on next page

Page 116: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

115

Table 78 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

2 18 -6.699 1.293 9.285 1.000

2 19 -3.639 5.355 14.349 0.918

2 20 -3.857 3.929 11.715 0.989

2 21 -7.079 0.806 8.692 1.000

2 22 -9.044 -3.454 2.137 0.882

2 23 -5.319 1.673 8.664 1.000

2 24 -2.165 4.459 11.083 0.757

2 25 -7.061 1.511 10.083 1.000

2 26 -2.388 5.133 12.654 0.732

2 27 -2.357 5.429 13.215 0.690

2 28 -4.923 4.601 14.124 0.994

2 29 -31.253 2.133 35.519 1.000

3 4 -10.316 -2.665 4.985 1.000

3 5 -11.638 -1.513 8.611 1.000

3 6 -7.713 0.594 8.900 1.000

3 7 -14.087 -3.670 6.747 1.000

3 8 -10.229 -2.470 5.290 1.000

3 9 -10.184 -2.462 5.260 1.000

3 10 -9.587 0.830 11.247 1.000

3 11 -7.605 1.069 9.742 1.000

3 12 -8.410 -0.158 8.095 1.000

3 13 -9.688 -2.568 4.552 1.000

3 14 -8.442 1.422 11.286 1.000

3 15 -3.799 3.464 10.727 0.995

3 16 -9.215 -2.936 3.342 0.996

3 17 -8.175 0.305 8.785 1.000

3 18 -10.570 -2.318 5.935 1.000

3 19 -7.482 1.744 10.971 1.000

3 20 -7.735 0.319 8.372 1.000

3 21 -10.955 -2.805 5.345 1.000

3 22 -13.022 -7.065 -1.107 0.003

3 23 -9.227 -1.938 5.351 1.000

3 24 -6.088 0.848 7.785 1.000

3 25 -10.915 -2.100 6.716 1.000

3 26 -6.276 1.522 9.320 1.000

3 27 -6.235 1.819 9.872 1.000

3 28 -8.754 0.990 10.734 1.000

3 29 -34.927 -1.478 31.972 1.000

4 5 -9.449 1.152 11.753 1.000

4 6 -5.623 3.259 12.140 1.000

4 7 -11.886 -1.005 9.876 1.000

4 8 -8.176 0.196 8.568 1.000

4 9 -8.134 0.204 8.541 1.000

4 10 -7.386 3.495 14.376 1.000

4 11 -5.492 3.734 12.960 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 117: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

116

Table 78 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 12 -6.323 2.508 11.338 1.000

4 13 -7.686 0.097 7.880 1.000

4 14 -6.265 4.088 14.440 1.000

4 15 -1.785 6.129 14.043 0.455

4 16 -7.293 -0.271 6.750 1.000

4 17 -6.074 2.970 12.014 1.000

4 18 -8.483 0.347 9.178 1.000

4 19 -5.338 4.410 14.157 0.998

4 20 -5.662 2.984 11.629 1.000

4 21 -8.875 -0.139 8.596 1.000

4 22 -11.135 -4.399 2.337 0.808

4 23 -7.211 0.727 8.665 1.000

4 24 -4.102 3.514 11.129 0.997

4 25 -8.794 0.566 9.925 1.000

4 26 -4.220 4.188 12.595 0.991

4 27 -4.162 4.484 13.129 0.984

4 28 -6.583 3.655 13.893 1.000

4 29 -32.409 1.188 34.784 1.000

5 6 -8.977 2.107 13.191 1.000

5 7 -14.899 -2.157 10.586 1.000

5 8 -11.636 -0.956 9.724 1.000

5 9 -11.601 -0.948 9.705 1.000

5 10 -10.399 2.343 15.086 1.000

5 11 -8.780 2.582 13.944 1.000

5 12 -9.688 1.356 12.399 1.000

5 13 -11.280 -1.055 9.171 1.000

5 14 -9.359 2.936 15.230 1.000

5 15 -5.348 4.977 15.303 0.994

5 16 -11.081 -1.423 8.235 1.000

5 17 -9.396 1.818 13.033 1.000

5 18 -11.848 -0.804 10.239 1.000

5 19 -8.531 3.258 15.047 1.000

5 20 -9.064 1.832 12.728 1.000

5 21 -12.258 -1.291 9.676 1.000

5 22 -15.004 -5.551 3.902 0.929

5 23 -10.768 -0.425 9.919 1.000

5 24 -7.737 2.362 12.460 1.000

5 25 -12.057 -0.586 10.884 1.000

5 26 -7.673 3.036 13.744 1.000

5 27 -7.564 3.332 14.228 1.000

5 28 -9.695 2.503 14.702 1.000

5 29 -34.209 0.036 34.281 1.000

6 7 -15.616 -4.264 7.088 1.000

6 8 -12.039 -3.063 5.912 1.000

6 9 -11.999 -3.055 5.888 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 118: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

117

Table 78 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

6 10 -11.116 0.236 11.588 1.000

6 11 -9.302 0.475 10.252 1.000

6 12 -10.157 -0.751 8.654 1.000

6 13 -11.591 -3.162 5.267 1.000

6 14 -10.018 0.829 11.675 1.000

6 15 -5.680 2.870 11.420 1.000

6 16 -11.261 -3.530 4.201 0.998

6 17 -9.894 -0.289 9.317 1.000

6 18 -12.317 -2.911 6.494 1.000

6 19 -9.120 1.151 11.421 1.000

6 20 -9.506 -0.275 8.956 1.000

6 21 -12.714 -3.398 5.917 1.000

6 22 -15.131 -7.658 -0.185 0.036

6 23 -11.104 -2.532 6.040 1.000

6 24 -8.020 0.255 8.529 1.000

6 25 -12.596 -2.693 7.210 1.000

6 26 -8.080 0.929 9.937 1.000

6 27 -8.006 1.225 10.456 1.000

6 28 -10.341 0.396 11.134 1.000

6 29 -35.824 -2.071 31.681 1.000

7 8 -9.758 1.201 12.159 1.000

7 9 -9.723 1.208 12.140 1.000

7 10 -8.477 4.500 17.477 1.000

7 11 -6.885 4.739 16.362 1.000

7 12 -7.800 3.512 14.825 1.000

7 13 -9.413 1.102 11.617 1.000

7 14 -7.444 5.092 17.629 1.000

7 15 -3.479 7.134 17.746 0.760

7 16 -9.231 0.734 10.698 1.000

7 17 -7.505 3.975 15.455 1.000

7 18 -9.960 1.352 12.665 1.000

7 19 -6.627 5.415 17.456 0.998

7 20 -7.180 3.989 15.157 1.000

7 21 -10.373 0.865 12.103 1.000

7 22 -13.160 -3.394 6.371 1.000

7 23 -8.898 1.732 12.362 1.000

7 24 -5.873 4.518 14.910 0.999

7 25 -10.159 1.570 13.300 1.000

7 26 -5.793 5.192 16.178 0.996

7 27 -5.680 5.489 16.657 0.992

7 28 -7.782 4.660 17.102 1.000

7 29 -32.141 2.192 36.525 1.000

8 9 -8.430 0.008 8.446 1.000

8 10 -7.659 3.299 14.258 1.000

8 11 -5.778 3.538 12.855 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 119: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

118

Table 78 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 12 -6.614 2.312 11.238 1.000

8 13 -7.989 -0.099 7.792 1.000

8 14 -6.542 3.892 14.325 1.000

8 15 -2.086 5.933 13.953 0.561

8 16 -7.607 -0.467 6.673 1.000

8 17 -6.362 2.774 11.911 1.000

8 18 -8.774 0.152 9.078 1.000

8 19 -5.619 4.214 14.047 0.999

8 20 -5.954 2.788 11.530 1.000

8 21 -9.166 -0.335 8.496 1.000

8 22 -11.455 -4.595 2.265 0.766

8 23 -7.512 0.531 8.574 1.000

8 24 -4.407 3.318 11.043 0.999

8 25 -9.079 0.370 9.819 1.000

8 26 -4.515 3.992 12.499 0.996

8 27 -4.454 4.288 13.030 0.993

8 28 -6.860 3.460 13.780 1.000

8 29 -32.630 0.992 34.614 1.000

9 10 -7.640 3.292 14.223 1.000

9 11 -5.755 3.530 12.816 1.000

9 12 -6.589 2.304 11.197 1.000

9 13 -7.960 -0.106 7.747 1.000

9 14 -6.522 3.884 14.290 1.000

9 15 -2.058 5.925 13.909 0.554

9 16 -7.574 -0.475 6.625 1.000

9 17 -6.338 2.766 11.871 1.000

9 18 -8.749 0.144 9.037 1.000

9 19 -5.598 4.206 14.010 0.999

9 20 -5.929 2.780 11.489 1.000

9 21 -9.141 -0.343 8.455 1.000

9 22 -11.420 -4.603 2.215 0.752

9 23 -7.484 0.523 8.530 1.000

9 24 -4.378 3.310 10.998 0.999

9 25 -9.056 0.362 9.780 1.000

9 26 -4.489 3.984 12.457 0.996

9 27 -4.429 4.280 12.989 0.992

9 28 -6.840 3.452 13.744 1.000

9 29 -32.629 0.984 34.597 1.000

10 11 -11.385 0.239 11.862 1.000

10 12 -12.300 -0.988 10.325 1.000

10 13 -13.913 -3.398 7.117 1.000

10 14 -11.944 0.592 13.129 1.000

10 15 -7.979 2.634 13.246 1.000

10 16 -13.731 -3.766 6.198 1.000

10 17 -12.005 -0.525 10.955 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 120: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

119

Table 78 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

10 18 -14.460 -3.148 8.165 1.000

10 19 -11.127 0.915 12.956 1.000

10 20 -11.680 -0.511 10.657 1.000

10 21 -14.873 -3.635 7.603 1.000

10 22 -17.660 -7.894 1.871 0.357

10 23 -13.398 -2.768 7.862 1.000

10 24 -10.373 0.018 10.410 1.000

10 25 -14.659 -2.930 8.800 1.000

10 26 -10.293 0.692 11.678 1.000

10 27 -10.180 0.989 12.157 1.000

10 28 -12.282 0.160 12.602 1.000

10 29 -36.641 -2.308 32.025 1.000

11 12 -10.957 -1.227 8.504 1.000

11 13 -12.428 -3.637 5.154 1.000

11 14 -10.777 0.353 11.484 1.000

11 15 -6.512 2.395 11.302 1.000

11 16 -12.130 -4.005 4.119 0.992

11 17 -10.689 -0.764 9.161 1.000

11 18 -13.117 -3.387 6.344 1.000

11 19 -9.894 0.676 11.245 1.000

11 20 -10.313 -0.750 8.813 1.000

11 21 -13.517 -3.873 5.771 1.000

11 22 -16.012 -8.133 -0.254 0.033

11 23 -11.935 -3.007 5.921 1.000

11 24 -8.864 -0.220 8.423 1.000

11 25 -13.381 -3.168 7.044 1.000

11 26 -8.895 0.453 9.802 1.000

11 27 -8.813 0.750 10.313 1.000

11 28 -11.103 -0.079 10.945 1.000

11 29 -36.391 -2.547 31.298 1.000

12 13 -10.786 -2.410 5.966 1.000

12 14 -9.225 1.580 12.385 1.000

12 15 -4.876 3.622 12.119 0.999

12 16 -10.452 -2.779 4.895 1.000

12 17 -9.096 0.463 10.021 1.000

12 18 -11.518 -2.160 7.198 1.000

12 19 -8.325 1.902 12.129 1.000

12 20 -8.706 0.476 9.659 1.000

12 21 -11.914 -2.647 6.620 1.000

12 22 -14.320 -6.907 0.506 0.112

12 23 -10.300 -1.781 6.739 1.000

12 24 -7.214 1.006 9.227 1.000

12 25 -11.800 -1.942 7.916 1.000

12 26 -7.279 1.680 10.639 1.000

12 27 -7.206 1.976 11.159 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 121: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

120

Table 78 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

12 28 -9.548 1.148 11.843 1.000

12 29 -35.059 -1.320 32.419 1.000

13 14 -5.977 3.990 13.958 1.000

13 15 -1.371 6.032 13.435 0.340

13 16 -6.808 -0.368 6.072 1.000

13 17 -5.727 2.873 11.473 1.000

13 18 -8.126 0.250 8.626 1.000

13 19 -5.025 4.313 13.650 0.997

13 20 -5.293 2.887 11.067 1.000

13 21 -8.511 -0.237 8.038 1.000

13 22 -10.624 -4.496 1.631 0.580

13 23 -6.798 0.630 8.058 1.000

13 24 -3.667 3.416 10.499 0.994

13 25 -8.463 0.468 9.400 1.000

13 26 -3.838 4.090 12.019 0.985

13 27 -3.793 4.387 12.567 0.975

13 28 -6.290 3.558 13.406 1.000

13 29 -32.390 1.090 34.571 1.000

14 15 -8.028 2.042 12.111 1.000

14 16 -13.743 -4.359 5.026 0.997

14 17 -12.097 -1.117 9.863 1.000

14 18 -14.545 -3.740 7.065 1.000

14 19 -11.244 0.322 11.888 1.000

14 20 -11.758 -1.104 9.550 1.000

14 21 -14.954 -4.227 6.500 1.000

14 22 -17.659 -8.487 0.686 0.121

14 23 -13.449 -3.361 6.728 1.000

14 24 -10.411 -0.574 9.263 1.000

14 25 -14.763 -3.522 7.719 1.000

14 26 -10.362 0.100 10.562 1.000

14 27 -10.258 0.396 11.050 1.000

14 28 -12.415 -0.432 11.550 1.000

14 29 -37.069 -2.900 31.269 1.000

15 16 -12.998 -6.400 0.197 0.072

15 17 -11.878 -3.159 5.560 1.000

15 18 -14.279 -5.782 2.716 0.738

15 19 -11.166 -1.719 7.727 1.000

15 20 -11.450 -3.145 5.159 1.000

15 21 -14.667 -6.268 2.130 0.541

15 22 -16.821 -10.528 -4.236 0.000

15 23 -12.967 -5.402 2.163 0.640

15 24 -9.842 -2.615 4.611 1.000

15 25 -14.609 -5.564 3.482 0.887

15 26 -9.999 -1.942 6.115 1.000

15 27 -9.950 -1.645 6.659 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 122: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

121

Table 78 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

15 28 -12.426 -2.474 7.478 1.000

15 29 -38.452 -4.942 28.569 1.000

16 17 -4.676 3.241 11.159 1.000

16 18 -7.055 0.619 8.292 1.000

16 19 -4.032 4.681 13.393 0.975

16 20 -4.204 3.255 10.714 0.999

16 21 -7.431 0.132 7.694 1.000

16 22 -9.253 -4.128 0.997 0.365

16 23 -5.628 0.998 7.624 1.000

16 24 -2.452 3.785 10.021 0.900

16 25 -7.439 0.837 9.113 1.000

16 26 -2.723 4.459 11.641 0.876

16 27 -2.704 4.755 12.214 0.843

16 28 -5.332 3.926 13.185 0.999

16 29 -31.853 1.459 34.770 1.000

17 18 -12.181 -2.623 6.936 1.000

17 19 -8.972 1.440 11.851 1.000

17 20 -9.374 0.014 9.401 1.000

17 21 -12.580 -3.110 6.361 1.000

17 22 -15.035 -7.369 0.296 0.080

17 23 -10.983 -2.243 6.497 1.000

17 24 -7.905 0.543 8.992 1.000

17 25 -12.454 -2.405 7.644 1.000

17 26 -7.952 1.217 10.387 1.000

17 27 -7.874 1.514 10.901 1.000

17 28 -10.187 0.685 11.557 1.000

17 29 -35.578 -1.783 32.013 1.000

18 19 -6.165 4.062 14.289 1.000

18 20 -6.546 2.636 11.819 1.000

18 21 -9.754 -0.487 8.780 1.000

18 22 -12.160 -4.747 2.666 0.837

18 23 -8.140 0.379 8.899 1.000

18 24 -5.054 3.166 11.387 1.000

18 25 -9.640 0.218 10.076 1.000

18 26 -5.119 3.840 12.799 0.999

18 27 -5.046 4.136 13.319 0.998

18 28 -7.388 3.308 14.003 1.000

18 29 -32.899 0.840 34.579 1.000

19 20 -11.493 -1.426 8.641 1.000

19 21 -14.693 -4.549 5.595 0.998

19 22 -17.293 -8.809 -0.325 0.030

19 23 -13.149 -3.683 5.784 1.000

19 24 -10.094 -0.896 8.302 1.000

19 25 -14.531 -3.844 6.842 1.000

19 26 -10.086 -0.222 9.642 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 123: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

122

Table 78 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

19 27 -9.993 0.074 10.141 1.000

19 28 -12.219 -0.754 10.710 1.000

19 29 -37.213 -3.222 30.768 1.000

20 21 -12.214 -3.123 5.967 1.000

20 22 -14.574 -7.383 -0.192 0.035

20 23 -10.584 -2.257 6.070 1.000

20 24 -7.491 0.530 8.551 1.000

20 25 -12.110 -2.418 7.274 1.000

20 26 -7.573 1.204 9.980 1.000

20 27 -7.504 1.500 10.504 1.000

20 28 -9.872 0.671 11.214 1.000

20 29 -35.487 -1.796 31.895 1.000

21 22 -11.558 -4.260 3.039 0.933

21 23 -7.554 0.866 9.287 1.000

21 24 -4.464 3.653 11.770 0.998

21 25 -9.067 0.705 10.477 1.000

21 26 -4.538 4.327 13.192 0.993

21 27 -4.467 4.623 13.714 0.988

21 28 -6.822 3.795 14.411 1.000

21 29 -32.387 1.327 35.041 1.000

22 23 -1.196 5.126 11.449 0.351

22 24 2.000 7.913 13.826 0.000

22 25 -3.070 4.965 13.000 0.882

22 26 1.684 8.587 15.490 0.001

22 27 1.692 8.883 16.074 0.001

22 28 -0.989 8.054 17.098 0.173

22 29 -27.666 5.587 38.839 1.000

23 24 -4.466 2.787 10.039 1.000

23 25 -9.228 -0.161 8.905 1.000

23 26 -4.620 3.461 11.541 0.999

23 27 -4.570 3.757 12.084 0.998

23 28 -7.043 2.928 12.899 1.000

23 29 -33.056 0.461 33.977 1.000

24 25 -11.734 -2.948 5.838 1.000

24 26 -7.090 0.674 8.438 1.000

24 27 -7.051 0.970 8.991 1.000

24 28 -9.575 0.142 9.858 1.000

24 29 -35.768 -2.326 31.116 1.000

25 26 -5.858 3.622 13.102 1.000

25 27 -5.774 3.918 13.610 1.000

25 28 -8.046 3.090 14.226 1.000

25 29 -33.259 0.622 34.503 1.000

26 27 -8.480 0.296 9.073 1.000

26 28 -10.881 -0.532 9.817 1.000

26 29 -36.631 -3.000 30.631 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 124: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

123

Table 78 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

27 28 -11.372 -0.829 9.714 1.000

27 29 -36.987 -3.296 30.395 1.000

28 29 -36.602 -2.468 31.667 1.000

Page 125: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

124

50 [X13.xxx.Normed = cat]

50.1 Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable cat

Table 79: Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 105.994

1 104.476

2 99.382

3 100.432

4 96.000

5 97.697

6 97.332

7 98.181

8 101.375

p-value = 2.6288e-20

50.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 80: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Normed by group-

ing variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -2.418 1.518 5.454 0.957

1 3 2.774 6.612 10.451 0.000

1 4 1.516 5.562 9.608 0.001

1 5 5.424 9.994 14.565 0.000

1 6 4.810 8.297 11.784 0.000

1 7 5.170 8.663 12.155 0.000

1 8 3.219 7.813 12.407 0.000

1 9 -9.253 4.619 18.492 0.983

2 3 1.434 5.094 8.754 0.001

2 4 0.166 4.044 7.921 0.033

2 5 4.054 8.476 12.898 0.000

2 6 3.489 6.779 10.069 0.000

2 7 3.848 7.144 10.440 0.000

2 8 1.849 6.295 10.741 0.000

2 9 -10.723 3.101 16.925 0.999

3 4 -4.829 -1.050 2.728 0.995

3 5 -0.953 3.382 7.717 0.273

3 6 -1.488 1.685 4.857 0.779

3 7 -1.128 2.050 5.229 0.543

Continued on next page

Page 126: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

125

Table 80 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -3.159 1.201 5.561 0.995

3 9 -15.790 -1.993 11.804 1.000

4 5 -0.088 4.432 8.953 0.060

4 6 -0.686 2.735 6.156 0.242

4 7 -0.326 3.101 6.528 0.113

4 8 -2.293 2.251 6.796 0.838

4 9 -14.799 -0.943 12.914 1.000

5 6 -5.725 -1.697 2.331 0.930

5 7 -5.364 -1.332 2.701 0.984

5 8 -7.198 -2.181 2.836 0.917

5 9 -19.393 -5.375 8.643 0.959

6 7 -2.379 0.366 3.110 1.000

6 8 -4.538 -0.484 3.571 1.000

6 9 -17.381 -3.678 10.026 0.996

7 8 -4.909 -0.849 3.210 0.999

7 9 -17.748 -4.043 9.661 0.992

8 9 -17.220 -3.194 10.832 0.999

Page 127: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

126

51 [X13.xxx.Normed = School-Type-1]

51.1 Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable School- Type-1

Table 81: Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 99.056

3 100.910

5 92.000

6 97.883

7 98.571

8 91.083

10 88.000

21 101.600

22 116.938

32 99.286

51 95.333

53 99.667

54 98.500

56 100.000

57 97.500

58 100.000

71 105.636

p-value = 6.4361e-13

51.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 82: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Normed by group-

ing variable School-Type-1

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.275 -1.854 0.568 0.392

1 3 -36.045 7.056 50.157 1.000

1 4 -3.895 1.173 6.241 1.000

1 5 -11.098 0.485 12.067 1.000

1 6 -0.911 7.973 16.856 0.141

1 7 -1.995 11.056 24.107 0.218

1 8 -21.852 -2.544 16.764 1.000

1 9 -25.600 -17.881 -10.163 0.000

1 10 -9.715 -0.230 9.255 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 128: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

127

Table 82 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 11 -13.911 3.723 21.356 1.000

1 12 -25.516 -0.611 24.295 1.000

1 13 -29.934 0.556 31.046 1.000

1 14 -25.850 -0.944 23.962 1.000

1 15 -20.022 1.556 23.134 1.000

1 16 -44.045 -0.944 42.157 1.000

1 17 -19.631 -6.580 6.470 0.948

2 3 -34.223 8.910 52.043 1.000

2 4 -2.302 3.027 8.355 0.867

2 5 -9.361 2.339 14.038 1.000

2 6 0.792 9.827 18.861 0.018

2 7 -0.244 12.910 26.064 0.061

2 8 -20.068 -0.690 18.688 1.000

2 9 -23.920 -16.028 -8.135 0.000

2 10 -8.003 1.624 11.251 1.000

2 11 -12.133 5.577 23.287 1.000

2 12 -23.717 1.243 26.203 1.000

2 13 -28.125 2.410 32.945 1.000

2 14 -24.050 0.910 25.870 1.000

2 15 -18.231 3.410 25.051 1.000

2 16 -42.223 0.910 44.043 1.000

2 17 -17.880 -4.726 8.428 0.998

3 4 -49.245 -5.883 37.479 1.000

3 5 -51.167 -6.571 38.024 1.000

3 6 -43.055 0.917 44.888 1.000

3 7 -40.999 4.000 48.999 1.000

3 8 -56.795 -9.600 37.595 1.000

3 9 -68.689 -24.938 18.814 0.864

3 10 -51.383 -7.286 36.811 1.000

3 11 -49.868 -3.333 43.202 1.000

3 12 -57.415 -7.667 42.081 1.000

3 13 -59.266 -6.500 46.266 1.000

3 14 -57.748 -8.000 41.748 1.000

3 15 -53.668 -5.500 42.668 1.000

3 16 -68.929 -8.000 52.929 1.000

3 17 -58.635 -13.636 31.362 1.000

4 5 -13.206 -0.688 11.829 1.000

4 6 -3.272 6.800 16.872 0.629

4 7 -4.004 9.883 23.770 0.531

4 8 -23.600 -3.717 16.166 1.000

4 9 -28.116 -19.054 -9.993 0.000

4 10 -12.009 -1.403 9.204 1.000

4 11 -15.711 2.550 20.811 1.000

4 12 -27.137 -1.784 23.570 1.000

4 13 -31.474 -0.617 30.241 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 129: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

128

Table 82 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 14 -27.471 -2.117 23.237 1.000

4 15 -21.711 0.383 22.477 1.000

4 16 -45.479 -2.117 41.245 1.000

4 17 -21.640 -7.753 6.134 0.883

5 6 -7.001 7.488 21.977 0.936

5 7 -6.787 10.571 27.930 0.789

5 8 -25.474 -3.029 19.417 1.000

5 9 -32.171 -18.366 -4.561 0.001

5 10 -15.579 -0.714 14.151 1.000

5 11 -17.784 3.238 24.260 1.000

5 12 -28.505 -1.095 26.315 1.000

5 13 -32.496 0.071 32.639 1.000

5 14 -28.838 -1.429 25.981 1.000

5 15 -23.354 1.071 25.497 1.000

5 16 -46.024 -1.429 43.167 1.000

5 17 -24.424 -7.065 10.294 0.994

6 7 -12.604 3.083 18.770 1.000

6 8 -31.696 -10.517 10.663 0.954

6 9 -37.488 -25.854 -14.220 0.000

6 10 -21.076 -8.202 4.671 0.725

6 11 -23.915 -4.250 15.415 1.000

6 12 -34.966 -8.583 17.800 1.000

6 13 -39.125 -7.417 24.292 1.000

6 14 -35.300 -8.917 17.466 0.999

6 15 -29.684 -6.417 16.851 1.000

6 16 -52.888 -8.917 35.055 1.000

6 17 -30.240 -14.553 1.134 0.106

7 8 -36.837 -13.600 9.637 0.837

7 9 -43.996 -28.938 -13.879 0.000

7 10 -27.321 -11.286 4.750 0.552

7 11 -29.199 -7.333 14.532 0.999

7 12 -39.728 -11.667 16.395 0.992

7 13 -43.618 -10.500 22.618 1.000

7 14 -40.062 -12.000 16.062 0.989

7 15 -34.655 -9.500 15.655 0.997

7 16 -56.999 -12.000 32.999 1.000

7 17 -36.007 -17.636 0.734 0.077

8 9 -36.055 -15.338 5.380 0.456

8 10 -19.124 2.314 23.753 1.000

8 11 -19.821 6.267 32.355 1.000

8 12 -29.530 1.933 33.397 1.000

8 13 -32.946 3.100 39.146 1.000

8 14 -29.863 1.600 33.063 1.000

8 15 -24.801 4.100 33.001 1.000

8 16 -45.595 1.600 48.795 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 130: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

129

Table 82 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 17 -27.274 -4.036 19.201 1.000

9 10 5.553 17.652 29.751 0.000

9 11 2.437 21.604 40.771 0.011

9 12 -8.743 17.271 43.285 0.658

9 13 -12.964 18.438 49.839 0.833

9 14 -9.076 16.938 42.951 0.690

9 15 -3.411 19.438 42.286 0.212

9 16 -26.814 16.938 60.689 0.996

9 17 -3.757 11.301 26.359 0.430

10 11 -15.991 3.952 23.896 1.000

10 12 -26.972 -0.381 26.210 1.000

10 13 -31.096 0.786 32.668 1.000

10 14 -27.306 -0.714 25.877 1.000

10 15 -21.718 1.786 25.289 1.000

10 16 -44.811 -0.714 43.383 1.000

10 17 -22.386 -6.351 9.685 0.995

11 12 -34.798 -4.333 26.131 1.000

11 13 -38.344 -3.167 32.010 1.000

11 14 -35.131 -4.667 25.798 1.000

11 15 -29.977 -2.167 25.643 1.000

11 16 -51.202 -4.667 41.868 1.000

11 17 -32.168 -10.303 11.562 0.972

12 13 -38.163 1.167 40.496 1.000

12 14 -35.510 -0.333 34.844 1.000

12 15 -30.739 2.167 35.072 1.000

12 16 -50.081 -0.333 49.415 1.000

12 17 -34.031 -5.970 22.092 1.000

13 14 -40.829 -1.500 37.829 1.000

13 15 -36.311 1.000 38.311 1.000

13 16 -54.266 -1.500 51.266 1.000

13 17 -40.255 -7.136 25.982 1.000

14 15 -30.405 2.500 35.405 1.000

14 16 -49.748 0.000 49.748 1.000

14 17 -33.698 -5.636 22.425 1.000

15 16 -50.668 -2.500 45.668 1.000

15 17 -33.291 -8.136 17.019 1.000

16 17 -50.635 -5.636 39.362 1.000

Page 131: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

130

::........-: :--+-

10

21

22

32

51

53

54

56

57

58

71

50 60

70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

Page 132: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

131

52 [X13.xxx.Normed = School-Type-2]

52.1 Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable School- Type-2

Table 83: Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 100.122

2 99.415

3 108.595

p-value = 7.4902e-05

52.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 84: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Normed by group-

ing variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -3.983 0.707 5.397 0.934

1 3 -15.204 -8.473 -1.741 0.009

2 3 -14.111 -9.180 -4.248 0.000

Page 133: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

132

53 [X13.xxx.Normed = BudgetFrom]

53.1 Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Bud- getFrom

Table 85: Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Budget-

From

Group Mean

1 98.875

2 105.900

4 95.500

5 99.415

6 108.595

7 100.000

p-value = 0.00050209

53.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 86: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Normed by group-

ing variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -20.610 -7.025 6.560 0.681

1 3 -13.099 3.375 19.849 0.992

1 4 -7.958 -0.540 6.878 1.000

1 5 -19.179 -9.720 -0.260 0.040

1 6 -37.962 -1.125 35.712 1.000

2 3 -8.238 10.400 29.038 0.605

2 4 -4.961 6.485 17.931 0.589

2 5 -15.559 -2.695 10.169 0.991

2 6 -31.955 5.900 43.755 0.998

3 4 -18.675 -3.915 10.845 0.975

3 5 -28.979 -13.095 2.790 0.175

3 6 -43.485 -4.500 34.485 0.999

4 5 -15.176 -9.180 -3.183 0.000

4 6 -36.688 -0.585 35.518 1.000

5 6 -27.983 8.595 45.172 0.985

Page 134: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

133

60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

Page 135: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

134

54

54.1

[X13.xxx.Normed = IsProtected]

Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 87: Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable IsPro-

tected

Group Mean

0 99.586

1 100.023

p-value = 0.70691

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 136: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

135

55

55.1

[X13.xxx.Normed = IsCentral]

Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 88: Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable IsCen-

tral

Group Mean

0 100.378

1 98.555

p-value = 0.0025216

55.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 89: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Normed by group-

ing variable IsCentral

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 0.642 1.823 3.004 0.002

Page 137: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

136

56 [X13.xxx.Normed = Shifts]

56.1 Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Table 90: Means of X13.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 98.817

5 101.822

7 84.667

p-value = 4.7452e-06

56.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 91: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Normed by group-

ing variable Shifts

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.561 -3.005 -1.449 0.000

1 3 -2.982 14.150 31.283 0.129

2 3 -0.009 17.155 34.319 0.050

Page 138: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

137

57 [X13.xxx.Scaled = Obl-ID]

57.1 Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 92: Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 47.989

2 49.991

3 45.722

4 48.969

5 47.536

6 45.041

7 50.231

8 48.738

9 48.645

10 44.731

11 44.465

12 45.980

13 48.855

14 44.167

15 41.688

16 49.241

17 45.435

18 48.420

19 43.722

20 45.352

21 49.096

22 54.046

23 47.987

24 44.739

25 48.293

26 44.050

27 43.778

28 44.548

29 47.500

p-value = 3.9504e-07

57.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Page 139: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

138

Table 93: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable Obl-ID

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -9.791 -2.002 5.787 1.000

1 3 -5.890 2.267 10.423 1.000

1 4 -9.935 -0.980 7.975 1.000

1 5 -11.421 0.453 12.328 1.000

1 6 -6.782 2.948 12.678 1.000

1 7 -14.461 -2.242 9.978 1.000

1 8 -9.833 -0.749 8.335 1.000

1 9 -9.696 -0.656 8.384 1.000

1 10 -8.961 3.258 15.478 1.000

1 11 -6.639 3.524 13.687 1.000

1 12 -7.657 2.009 11.675 1.000

1 13 -9.195 -0.866 7.462 1.000

1 14 -7.744 3.822 15.389 1.000

1 15 -2.197 6.301 14.798 0.556

1 16 -8.585 -1.252 6.081 1.000

1 17 -7.380 2.554 12.489 1.000

1 18 -10.097 -0.431 9.235 1.000

1 19 -6.549 4.267 15.082 1.000

1 20 -6.794 2.637 12.069 1.000

1 21 -10.652 -1.107 8.438 1.000

1 22 -13.010 -6.057 0.896 0.209

1 23 -8.526 0.002 8.530 1.000

1 24 -4.862 3.250 11.362 1.000

1 25 -10.634 -0.304 10.027 1.000

1 26 -5.190 3.939 13.068 0.999

1 27 -5.220 4.211 13.643 0.998

1 28 -7.985 3.441 14.866 1.000

1 29 -38.834 0.489 39.812 1.000

2 3 -3.567 4.269 12.104 0.970

2 4 -7.642 1.022 9.686 1.000

2 5 -9.201 2.455 14.111 1.000

2 6 -4.512 4.950 14.412 0.982

2 7 -12.248 -0.240 11.768 1.000

2 8 -7.544 1.253 10.050 1.000

2 9 -7.406 1.346 10.097 1.000

2 10 -6.748 5.260 17.268 0.999

2 11 -4.382 5.526 15.433 0.960

2 12 -5.386 4.011 13.408 0.999

2 13 -6.879 1.135 9.150 1.000

2 14 -5.519 5.824 17.167 0.986

2 15 0.112 8.303 16.493 0.042

2 16 -6.225 0.749 7.724 1.000

2 17 -5.117 4.556 14.229 0.996

Continued on next page

Page 140: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

139

Table 93 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

2 18 -7.826 1.571 10.968 1.000

2 19 -4.307 6.269 16.844 0.922

2 20 -4.516 4.639 13.794 0.988

2 21 -8.378 0.895 10.167 1.000

2 22 -10.629 -4.055 2.518 0.884

2 23 -6.218 2.004 10.226 1.000

2 24 -2.537 5.252 13.041 0.755

2 25 -8.381 1.698 11.777 1.000

2 26 -2.903 5.941 14.785 0.761

2 27 -2.942 6.213 15.368 0.743

2 28 -5.756 5.442 16.641 0.994

2 29 -36.767 2.491 41.748 1.000

3 4 -12.242 -3.247 5.749 1.000

3 5 -13.718 -1.813 10.091 1.000

3 6 -9.086 0.681 10.449 1.000

3 7 -16.758 -4.509 7.741 1.000

3 8 -12.140 -3.015 6.109 1.000

3 9 -12.003 -2.923 6.157 1.000

3 10 -11.258 0.991 13.241 1.000

3 11 -8.942 1.257 11.456 1.000

3 12 -9.962 -0.258 9.446 1.000

3 13 -11.506 -3.133 5.239 1.000

3 14 -10.043 1.556 13.154 1.000

3 15 -4.507 4.034 12.574 0.996

3 16 -10.902 -3.519 3.864 0.995

3 17 -9.684 0.287 10.259 1.000

3 18 -12.402 -2.698 7.006 1.000

3 19 -8.849 2.000 12.849 1.000

3 20 -9.100 0.370 9.840 1.000

3 21 -12.957 -3.374 6.209 1.000

3 22 -15.329 -8.324 -1.318 0.003

3 23 -10.835 -2.265 6.306 1.000

3 24 -7.173 0.983 9.140 1.000

3 25 -12.936 -2.570 7.796 1.000

3 26 -7.497 1.672 10.842 1.000

3 27 -7.526 1.944 11.414 1.000

3 28 -10.283 1.174 12.631 1.000

3 29 -41.110 -1.778 37.554 1.000

4 5 -11.033 1.433 13.899 1.000

4 6 -6.515 3.928 14.371 1.000

4 7 -14.057 -1.262 11.533 1.000

4 8 -9.613 0.231 10.075 1.000

4 9 -9.480 0.324 10.127 1.000

4 10 -8.557 4.238 17.033 1.000

4 11 -6.345 4.504 15.352 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 141: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

140

Table 93 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 12 -7.395 2.989 13.373 1.000

4 13 -9.039 0.113 9.265 1.000

4 14 -7.371 4.802 16.975 1.000

4 15 -2.026 7.280 16.586 0.431

4 16 -8.529 -0.273 7.984 1.000

4 17 -7.100 3.534 14.168 1.000

4 18 -9.835 0.549 10.933 1.000

4 19 -6.215 5.247 16.708 0.997

4 20 -6.549 3.617 13.783 1.000

4 21 -10.399 -0.127 10.144 1.000

4 22 -12.998 -5.077 2.843 0.836

4 23 -8.352 0.982 10.316 1.000

4 24 -4.725 4.230 13.185 0.996

4 25 -10.329 0.676 11.681 1.000

4 26 -4.968 4.919 14.805 0.991

4 27 -4.975 5.191 15.357 0.987

4 28 -7.618 4.420 16.459 1.000

4 29 -38.036 1.469 40.974 1.000

5 6 -10.538 2.495 15.528 1.000

5 7 -17.679 -2.695 12.289 1.000

5 8 -13.761 -1.202 11.357 1.000

5 9 -13.636 -1.109 11.417 1.000

5 10 -12.179 2.805 17.789 1.000

5 11 -10.289 3.071 16.431 1.000

5 12 -11.430 1.556 14.542 1.000

5 13 -13.343 -1.320 10.704 1.000

5 14 -11.087 3.369 17.826 1.000

5 15 -6.294 5.847 17.989 0.994

5 16 -13.062 -1.706 9.651 1.000

5 17 -11.086 2.101 15.288 1.000

5 18 -13.870 -0.884 12.102 1.000

5 19 -10.049 3.813 17.676 1.000

5 20 -10.628 2.184 14.996 1.000

5 21 -14.456 -1.560 11.335 1.000

5 22 -17.625 -6.510 4.605 0.931

5 23 -12.614 -0.451 11.711 1.000

5 24 -9.078 2.797 14.671 1.000

5 25 -14.245 -0.757 12.731 1.000

5 26 -9.106 3.486 16.077 1.000

5 27 -9.054 3.758 16.570 1.000

5 28 -11.356 2.987 17.331 1.000

5 29 -40.232 0.036 40.303 1.000

6 7 -18.538 -5.190 8.159 1.000

6 8 -14.251 -3.697 6.857 1.000

6 9 -14.120 -3.604 6.912 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 142: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

141

Table 93 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

6 10 -13.038 0.310 13.659 1.000

6 11 -10.920 0.576 12.072 1.000

6 12 -11.998 -0.939 10.120 1.000

6 13 -13.726 -3.815 6.097 1.000

6 14 -11.880 0.874 13.628 1.000

6 15 -6.701 3.353 13.406 1.000

6 16 -13.291 -4.201 4.890 0.997

6 17 -11.689 -0.394 10.901 1.000

6 18 -14.438 -3.379 7.680 1.000

6 19 -10.758 1.319 13.395 1.000

6 20 -11.166 -0.311 10.544 1.000

6 21 -15.009 -4.055 6.898 1.000

6 22 -17.792 -9.005 -0.218 0.036

6 23 -13.026 -2.946 7.133 1.000

6 24 -9.428 0.302 10.032 1.000

6 25 -14.896 -3.252 8.393 1.000

6 26 -9.602 0.991 11.584 1.000

6 27 -9.592 1.263 12.118 1.000

6 28 -12.133 0.492 13.118 1.000

6 29 -42.147 -2.459 37.229 1.000

7 8 -11.392 1.493 14.378 1.000

7 9 -11.269 1.586 14.440 1.000

7 10 -9.759 5.500 20.759 1.000

7 11 -7.902 5.766 19.433 0.999

7 12 -9.051 4.251 17.553 1.000

7 13 -10.989 1.375 13.740 1.000

7 14 -8.677 6.064 20.805 1.000

7 15 -3.936 8.542 21.021 0.726

7 16 -10.728 0.989 12.706 1.000

7 17 -8.703 4.796 18.295 1.000

7 18 -11.491 1.811 15.113 1.000

7 19 -7.651 6.509 20.668 0.997

7 20 -8.254 4.879 18.011 1.000

7 21 -12.080 1.135 14.349 1.000

7 22 -15.298 -3.815 7.668 1.000

7 23 -10.256 2.244 14.743 1.000

7 24 -6.728 5.492 17.711 0.998

7 25 -11.855 1.938 15.731 1.000

7 26 -6.737 6.181 19.098 0.995

7 27 -6.680 6.453 19.586 0.992

7 28 -8.948 5.682 20.313 1.000

7 29 -37.640 2.731 43.101 1.000

8 9 -9.829 0.093 10.014 1.000

8 10 -8.878 4.007 16.892 1.000

8 11 -6.682 4.273 15.227 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 143: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

142

Table 93 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 12 -7.738 2.758 13.253 1.000

8 13 -9.396 -0.118 9.161 1.000

8 14 -7.697 4.571 16.839 1.000

8 15 -2.381 7.049 16.480 0.537

8 16 -8.900 -0.504 7.892 1.000

8 17 -7.440 3.303 14.046 1.000

8 18 -10.178 0.318 10.813 1.000

8 19 -6.547 5.015 16.578 0.999

8 20 -6.894 3.386 13.665 1.000

8 21 -10.742 -0.358 10.025 1.000

8 22 -13.374 -5.308 2.758 0.796

8 23 -8.707 0.751 10.208 1.000

8 24 -5.085 3.999 13.083 0.999

8 25 -10.665 0.445 11.555 1.000

8 26 -5.316 4.688 14.691 0.996

8 27 -5.320 4.960 15.239 0.994

8 28 -7.946 4.189 16.324 1.000

8 29 -38.297 1.238 40.772 1.000

9 10 -8.940 3.914 16.769 1.000

9 11 -6.738 4.180 15.098 1.000

9 12 -7.792 2.665 13.122 1.000

9 13 -9.445 -0.210 9.025 1.000

9 14 -7.757 4.478 16.714 1.000

9 15 -2.431 6.957 16.344 0.557

9 16 -8.944 -0.596 7.752 1.000

9 17 -7.496 3.210 13.916 1.000

9 18 -10.232 0.225 10.682 1.000

9 19 -6.605 4.923 16.451 0.999

9 20 -6.947 3.293 13.534 1.000

9 21 -10.796 -0.451 9.894 1.000

9 22 -13.417 -5.401 2.616 0.756

9 23 -8.757 0.658 10.073 1.000

9 24 -5.134 3.906 12.946 0.999

9 25 -10.722 0.352 11.427 1.000

9 26 -5.368 4.595 14.558 0.997

9 27 -5.373 4.867 15.108 0.995

9 28 -8.005 4.097 16.199 1.000

9 29 -38.379 1.145 40.670 1.000

10 11 -13.402 0.266 13.933 1.000

10 12 -14.551 -1.249 12.053 1.000

10 13 -16.489 -4.125 8.240 1.000

10 14 -14.177 0.564 15.305 1.000

10 15 -9.436 3.042 15.521 1.000

10 16 -16.228 -4.511 7.206 1.000

10 17 -14.203 -0.704 12.795 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 144: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

143

Table 93 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

10 18 -16.991 -3.689 9.613 1.000

10 19 -13.151 1.009 15.168 1.000

10 20 -13.754 -0.621 12.511 1.000

10 21 -17.580 -4.365 8.849 1.000

10 22 -20.798 -9.315 2.168 0.350

10 23 -15.756 -3.256 9.243 1.000

10 24 -12.228 -0.008 12.211 1.000

10 25 -17.355 -3.562 10.231 1.000

10 26 -12.237 0.681 13.598 1.000

10 27 -12.180 0.953 14.086 1.000

10 28 -14.448 0.182 14.813 1.000

10 29 -43.140 -2.769 37.601 1.000

11 12 -12.957 -1.515 9.927 1.000

11 13 -14.727 -4.390 5.947 0.999

11 14 -12.789 0.298 13.386 1.000

11 15 -7.697 2.777 13.250 1.000

11 16 -14.329 -4.776 4.777 0.990

11 17 -12.640 -0.970 10.700 1.000

11 18 -15.397 -3.955 7.487 1.000

11 19 -11.686 0.743 13.171 1.000

11 20 -12.131 -0.887 10.358 1.000

11 21 -15.971 -4.631 6.709 1.000

11 22 -18.845 -9.581 -0.316 0.032

11 23 -14.020 -3.522 6.977 1.000

11 24 -10.437 -0.274 9.889 1.000

11 25 -15.836 -3.828 8.181 1.000

11 26 -10.577 0.415 11.408 1.000

11 27 -10.557 0.687 11.932 1.000

11 28 -13.046 -0.083 12.879 1.000

11 29 -42.831 -3.035 36.762 1.000

12 13 -12.724 -2.875 6.974 1.000

12 14 -10.892 1.813 14.519 1.000

12 15 -5.700 4.292 14.284 0.999

12 16 -12.284 -3.261 5.761 1.000

12 17 -10.695 0.545 11.785 1.000

12 18 -13.443 -2.440 8.563 1.000

12 19 -9.768 2.258 14.283 1.000

12 20 -10.169 0.628 11.426 1.000

12 21 -14.013 -3.116 7.781 1.000

12 22 -16.782 -8.066 0.651 0.120

12 23 -12.025 -2.007 8.011 1.000

12 24 -8.425 1.241 10.907 1.000

12 25 -13.904 -2.313 9.279 1.000

12 26 -8.605 1.930 12.465 1.000

12 27 -8.595 2.202 13.000 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 145: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

144

Table 93 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

12 28 -11.145 1.432 14.008 1.000

12 29 -41.192 -1.520 38.152 1.000

13 14 -7.031 4.689 16.409 1.000

13 15 -1.538 7.167 15.872 0.318

13 16 -7.958 -0.386 7.186 1.000

13 17 -6.692 3.421 13.533 1.000

13 18 -9.414 0.435 10.284 1.000

13 19 -5.846 5.133 16.112 0.996

13 20 -6.115 3.504 13.122 1.000

13 21 -9.971 -0.241 9.489 1.000

13 22 -12.395 -5.190 2.014 0.621

13 23 -7.866 0.869 9.603 1.000

13 24 -4.212 4.116 12.445 0.992

13 25 -9.939 0.563 11.065 1.000

13 26 -4.517 4.805 14.128 0.985

13 27 -4.541 5.078 14.696 0.980

13 28 -7.273 4.307 15.887 1.000

13 29 -38.013 1.355 40.723 1.000

14 15 -9.362 2.478 14.319 1.000

14 16 -16.109 -5.075 5.960 0.997

14 17 -14.179 -1.268 11.643 1.000

14 18 -16.959 -4.253 8.452 1.000

14 19 -13.156 0.444 14.045 1.000

14 20 -13.713 -1.185 11.342 1.000

14 21 -17.543 -4.929 7.684 1.000

14 22 -20.665 -9.879 0.907 0.133

14 23 -15.683 -3.820 8.042 1.000

14 24 -12.139 -0.572 10.994 1.000

14 25 -17.344 -4.126 9.092 1.000

14 26 -12.185 0.117 12.419 1.000

14 27 -12.139 0.389 12.917 1.000

14 28 -14.472 -0.382 13.708 1.000

14 29 -43.511 -3.333 36.845 1.000

15 16 -15.311 -7.553 0.205 0.069

15 17 -13.999 -3.746 6.506 1.000

15 18 -16.724 -6.732 3.260 0.756

15 19 -13.142 -2.034 9.074 1.000

15 20 -13.429 -3.664 6.102 1.000

15 21 -17.283 -7.408 2.467 0.529

15 22 -19.757 -12.358 -4.958 0.000

15 23 -15.194 -6.299 2.597 0.658

15 24 -11.548 -3.051 5.447 1.000

15 25 -17.241 -6.604 4.032 0.876

15 26 -11.836 -2.362 7.112 1.000

15 27 -11.855 -2.089 7.676 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 146: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

145

Table 93 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

15 28 -14.562 -2.860 8.842 1.000

15 29 -45.216 -5.812 33.592 1.000

16 17 -5.503 3.807 13.116 1.000

16 18 -8.201 0.821 9.844 1.000

16 19 -4.725 5.519 15.764 0.974

16 20 -4.881 3.890 12.660 0.998

16 21 -8.748 0.145 9.038 1.000

16 22 -10.831 -4.805 1.222 0.388

16 23 -6.536 1.255 9.046 1.000

16 24 -2.831 4.502 11.835 0.889

16 25 -8.783 0.949 10.680 1.000

16 26 -3.254 5.191 13.636 0.887

16 27 -3.307 5.464 14.234 0.872

16 28 -6.193 4.693 15.579 0.999

16 29 -37.428 1.741 40.911 1.000

17 18 -14.225 -2.985 8.255 1.000

17 19 -10.530 1.713 13.955 1.000

17 20 -10.956 0.083 11.121 1.000

17 21 -14.797 -3.661 7.474 1.000

17 22 -17.625 -8.611 0.402 0.086

17 23 -12.829 -2.552 7.725 1.000

17 24 -9.239 0.696 10.630 1.000

17 25 -14.674 -2.858 8.958 1.000

17 26 -9.397 1.385 12.166 1.000

17 27 -9.382 1.657 12.696 1.000

17 28 -11.898 0.886 13.671 1.000

17 29 -41.804 -2.065 37.674 1.000

18 19 -7.328 4.698 16.723 1.000

18 20 -7.729 3.068 13.866 1.000

18 21 -11.573 -0.676 10.221 1.000

18 22 -14.342 -5.626 3.091 0.826

18 23 -9.585 0.433 10.451 1.000

18 24 -5.985 3.681 13.347 1.000

18 25 -11.464 0.127 11.719 1.000

18 26 -6.165 4.370 14.905 1.000

18 27 -6.155 4.642 15.440 0.999

18 28 -8.705 3.872 16.448 1.000

18 29 -38.752 0.920 40.592 1.000

19 20 -13.467 -1.630 10.208 1.000

19 21 -17.302 -5.374 6.554 0.998

19 22 -20.300 -10.324 -0.348 0.032

19 23 -15.396 -4.265 6.866 1.000

19 24 -11.832 -1.017 9.799 1.000

19 25 -17.136 -4.570 7.995 1.000

19 26 -11.926 -0.328 11.271 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 147: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

146

Table 93 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

19 27 -11.893 -0.056 11.782 1.000

19 28 -14.306 -0.826 12.654 1.000

19 29 -43.746 -3.778 36.190 1.000

20 21 -14.433 -3.744 6.945 1.000

20 22 -17.149 -8.694 -0.239 0.035

20 23 -12.427 -2.635 7.157 1.000

20 24 -8.819 0.613 10.044 1.000

20 25 -14.337 -2.941 8.455 1.000

20 26 -9.018 1.302 11.622 1.000

20 27 -9.014 1.574 12.162 1.000

20 28 -11.594 0.803 13.201 1.000

20 29 -41.764 -2.148 37.468 1.000

21 22 -13.532 -4.950 3.632 0.941

21 23 -8.792 1.109 11.010 1.000

21 24 -5.188 4.357 13.902 0.998

21 25 -10.687 0.803 12.294 1.000

21 26 -5.377 5.046 15.470 0.994

21 27 -5.371 5.318 16.008 0.991

21 28 -7.936 4.548 17.031 1.000

21 29 -38.047 1.596 41.239 1.000

22 23 -1.375 6.059 13.493 0.339

22 24 2.354 9.307 16.260 0.000

22 25 -3.695 5.753 15.201 0.897

22 26 1.879 9.996 18.113 0.002

22 27 1.813 10.268 18.724 0.002

22 28 -1.136 9.498 20.131 0.169

22 29 -32.554 6.546 45.646 1.000

23 24 -5.280 3.248 11.776 1.000

23 25 -10.966 -0.306 10.355 1.000

23 26 -5.564 3.937 13.438 1.000

23 27 -5.583 4.209 14.001 0.999

23 28 -8.286 3.438 15.163 1.000

23 29 -38.924 0.487 39.897 1.000

24 25 -13.884 -3.554 6.777 1.000

24 26 -8.440 0.689 9.818 1.000

24 27 -8.470 0.961 10.393 1.000

24 28 -11.235 0.191 11.616 1.000

24 29 -42.084 -2.761 36.562 1.000

25 26 -6.905 4.243 15.390 1.000

25 27 -6.881 4.515 15.911 1.000

25 28 -9.350 3.744 16.839 1.000

25 29 -39.047 0.793 40.632 1.000

26 27 -10.047 0.272 10.592 1.000

26 28 -12.667 -0.498 11.671 1.000

26 29 -42.995 -3.450 36.095 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 148: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

147

Table 93 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

27 28 -13.168 -0.771 11.626 1.000

27 29 -43.338 -3.722 35.894 1.000

28 29 -43.089 -2.952 37.186 1.000

Page 149: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

148

58 [X13.xxx.Scaled = cat]

58.1 Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Table 94: Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 55.114

1 53.356

2 47.412

3 48.616

4 43.424

5 45.382

6 44.938

7 45.991

8 49.625

p-value = 3.1298e-20

58.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 95: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -2.870 1.759 6.387 0.961

1 3 3.189 7.702 12.216 0.000

1 4 1.740 6.498 11.256 0.001

1 5 6.316 11.691 17.065 0.000

1 6 5.632 9.733 13.833 0.000

1 7 6.069 10.176 14.283 0.000

1 8 3.721 9.123 14.525 0.000

1 9 -10.823 5.489 21.802 0.982

2 3 1.640 5.944 10.248 0.001

2 4 0.180 4.740 9.299 0.034

2 5 4.732 9.932 15.132 0.000

2 6 4.105 7.974 11.843 0.000

2 7 4.542 8.417 12.293 0.000

2 8 2.136 7.364 12.593 0.000

2 9 -12.525 3.731 19.987 0.999

3 4 -5.647 -1.204 3.239 0.996

3 5 -1.110 3.988 9.086 0.269

3 6 -1.700 2.030 5.761 0.754

3 7 -1.264 2.474 6.211 0.506

Continued on next page

Page 150: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

149

Table 95 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -3.706 1.421 6.548 0.995

3 9 -18.437 -2.213 14.011 1.000

4 5 -0.123 5.192 10.508 0.062

4 6 -0.788 3.235 7.258 0.235

4 7 -0.352 3.678 7.708 0.106

4 8 -2.719 2.625 7.968 0.845

4 9 -17.302 -1.009 15.285 1.000

5 6 -6.694 -1.958 2.778 0.937

5 7 -6.256 -1.515 3.227 0.987

5 8 -8.467 -2.568 3.332 0.916

5 9 -22.685 -6.201 10.283 0.963

6 7 -2.784 0.443 3.670 1.000

6 8 -5.377 -0.610 4.158 1.000

6 9 -20.357 -4.243 11.870 0.996

7 8 -5.826 -1.053 3.720 0.999

7 9 -20.802 -4.687 11.429 0.993

8 9 -20.127 -3.634 12.859 0.999

Page 151: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

150

59 [X13.xxx.Scaled = School-Type-1]

59.1 Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable School- Type-1

Table 96: Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 46.987

3 49.155

5 39.000

6 45.623

7 46.571

8 37.667

10 34.000

21 49.800

22 67.938

32 47.381

51 42.833

53 47.667

54 46.000

56 48.000

57 45.250

58 48.000

71 54.818

p-value = 8.8834e-13

59.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 97: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable School-Type-1

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -5.015 -2.167 0.680 0.403

1 3 -42.701 7.987 58.675 1.000

1 4 -4.596 1.364 7.324 1.000

1 5 -13.206 0.416 14.037 1.000

1 6 -1.127 9.321 19.768 0.148

1 7 -2.360 12.987 28.335 0.220

1 8 -25.520 -2.813 19.894 1.000

1 9 -30.028 -20.950 -11.873 0.000

1 10 -11.548 -0.394 10.761 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 152: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

151

Table 97 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 11 -16.583 4.154 24.891 1.000

1 12 -29.969 -0.679 28.610 1.000

1 13 -34.870 0.987 36.844 1.000

1 14 -30.302 -1.013 28.277 1.000

1 15 -23.639 1.737 27.113 1.000

1 16 -51.701 -1.013 49.675 1.000

1 17 -23.179 -7.831 7.517 0.942

2 3 -40.570 10.155 60.880 1.000

2 4 -2.735 3.531 9.798 0.874

2 5 -11.175 2.583 16.342 1.000

2 6 0.863 11.488 22.113 0.019

2 7 -0.315 15.155 30.624 0.062

2 8 -23.434 -0.645 22.144 1.000

2 9 -28.064 -18.783 -9.501 0.000

2 10 -9.547 1.774 13.095 1.000

2 11 -14.506 6.321 27.149 1.000

2 12 -27.865 1.488 30.842 1.000

2 13 -32.755 3.155 39.064 1.000

2 14 -28.199 1.155 30.508 1.000

2 15 -21.545 3.905 29.355 1.000

2 16 -49.570 1.155 51.880 1.000

2 17 -21.133 -5.663 9.806 0.998

3 4 -57.618 -6.623 44.371 1.000

3 5 -60.016 -7.571 44.873 1.000

3 6 -50.378 1.333 53.045 1.000

3 7 -47.919 5.000 57.919 1.000

3 8 -66.302 -10.800 44.702 1.000

3 9 -80.390 -28.938 22.515 0.876

3 10 -60.240 -8.381 43.478 1.000

3 11 -58.559 -3.833 50.893 1.000

3 12 -67.171 -8.667 49.838 1.000

3 13 -69.053 -7.000 55.053 1.000

3 14 -67.505 -9.000 49.505 1.000

3 15 -62.897 -6.250 50.397 1.000

3 16 -80.653 -9.000 62.653 1.000

3 17 -68.738 -15.818 37.101 1.000

4 5 -15.669 -0.948 13.773 1.000

4 6 -3.888 7.957 19.802 0.637

4 7 -4.708 11.623 27.955 0.531

4 8 -27.559 -4.177 19.206 1.000

4 9 -32.971 -22.314 -11.658 0.000

4 10 -14.231 -1.758 10.716 1.000

4 11 -18.685 2.790 24.265 1.000

4 12 -31.860 -2.043 27.773 1.000

4 13 -36.666 -0.377 35.912 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 153: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

152

Table 97 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 14 -32.193 -2.377 27.440 1.000

4 15 -25.610 0.373 26.356 1.000

4 16 -53.371 -2.377 48.618 1.000

4 17 -25.526 -9.195 7.136 0.875

5 6 -8.134 8.905 25.944 0.930

5 7 -7.843 12.571 32.986 0.774

5 8 -29.625 -3.229 23.168 1.000

5 9 -37.601 -21.366 -5.131 0.001

5 10 -18.291 -0.810 16.672 1.000

5 11 -20.985 3.738 28.461 1.000

5 12 -33.330 -1.095 31.139 1.000

5 13 -37.729 0.571 38.872 1.000

5 14 -33.663 -1.429 30.806 1.000

5 15 -27.404 1.321 30.047 1.000

5 16 -53.873 -1.429 51.016 1.000

5 17 -28.661 -8.247 12.167 0.994

6 7 -14.781 3.667 22.115 1.000

6 8 -37.041 -12.133 12.774 0.962

6 9 -43.952 -30.271 -16.589 0.000

6 10 -24.854 -9.714 5.425 0.714

6 11 -28.293 -5.167 17.959 1.000

6 12 -41.027 -10.000 21.027 1.000

6 13 -45.623 -8.333 28.956 1.000

6 14 -41.360 -10.333 20.693 0.999

6 15 -34.946 -7.583 19.780 1.000

6 16 -62.045 -10.333 41.378 1.000

6 17 -35.600 -17.152 1.297 0.104

7 8 -43.127 -15.800 11.527 0.850

7 9 -51.646 -33.938 -16.229 0.000

7 10 -32.239 -13.381 5.477 0.537

7 11 -34.548 -8.833 16.881 0.999

7 12 -46.668 -13.667 19.334 0.992

7 13 -50.948 -12.000 26.948 1.000

7 14 -47.001 -14.000 19.001 0.990

7 15 -40.833 -11.250 18.333 0.997

7 16 -66.919 -14.000 38.919 1.000

7 17 -42.422 -20.818 0.786 0.074

8 9 -42.502 -18.138 6.227 0.445

8 10 -22.793 2.419 27.631 1.000

8 11 -23.713 6.967 37.647 1.000

8 12 -34.868 2.133 39.135 1.000

8 13 -38.591 3.800 46.191 1.000

8 14 -35.202 1.800 38.802 1.000

8 15 -29.438 4.550 38.538 1.000

8 16 -53.702 1.800 57.302 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 154: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

153

Table 97 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 17 -32.346 -5.018 22.309 1.000

9 10 6.328 20.557 34.786 0.000

9 11 2.564 25.104 47.645 0.013

9 12 -10.322 20.271 50.864 0.661

9 13 -14.992 21.938 58.867 0.820

9 14 -10.655 19.938 50.530 0.689

9 15 -4.182 22.688 49.557 0.223

9 16 -31.515 19.938 71.390 0.996

9 17 -4.589 13.119 30.828 0.454

10 11 -18.906 4.548 28.002 1.000

10 12 -31.558 -0.286 30.986 1.000

10 13 -36.113 1.381 38.875 1.000

10 14 -31.891 -0.619 30.653 1.000

10 15 -25.510 2.131 29.772 1.000

10 16 -52.478 -0.619 51.240 1.000

10 17 -26.295 -7.437 11.421 0.995

11 12 -40.660 -4.833 30.993 1.000

11 13 -44.536 -3.167 38.202 1.000

11 14 -40.993 -5.167 30.660 1.000

11 15 -35.122 -2.417 30.288 1.000

11 16 -59.893 -5.167 49.559 1.000

11 17 -37.699 -11.985 13.729 0.974

12 13 -44.585 1.667 47.919 1.000

12 14 -41.702 -0.333 41.036 1.000

12 15 -36.280 2.417 41.114 1.000

12 16 -58.838 -0.333 58.171 1.000

12 17 -40.153 -7.152 25.850 1.000

13 14 -48.252 -2.000 44.252 1.000

13 15 -43.128 0.750 44.628 1.000

13 16 -64.053 -2.000 60.053 1.000

13 17 -47.766 -8.818 30.129 1.000

14 15 -35.947 2.750 41.447 1.000

14 16 -58.505 0.000 58.505 1.000

14 17 -39.819 -6.818 26.183 1.000

15 16 -59.397 -2.750 53.897 1.000

15 17 -39.151 -9.568 20.015 1.000

16 17 -59.738 -6.818 46.101 1.000

Page 155: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

154

:........--:: : .....,._

...;.........:

10

21

22

32 ' 51

53

54

56

57

58

71

-10 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Page 156: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

155

60 [X13.xxx.Scaled = School-Type-2]

60.1 Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable School- Type-2

Table 98: Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 48.317

2 47.409

3 58.135

p-value = 8.354e-05

60.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 99: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.607 0.908 6.423 0.921

1 3 -17.733 -9.818 -1.903 0.010

2 3 -16.525 -10.726 -4.927 0.000

Page 157: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

156

61 [X13.xxx.Scaled = BudgetFrom]

61.1 Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Bud- getFrom

Table 100: Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Budget-

From

Group Mean

1 46.833

2 55.200

4 42.833

5 47.409

6 58.135

7 48.000

p-value = 0.00053448

61.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 101: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -24.340 -8.367 7.607 0.669

1 3 -15.371 4.000 23.371 0.992

1 4 -9.298 -0.576 8.146 1.000

1 5 -22.425 -11.302 -0.179 0.044

1 6 -44.481 -1.167 42.148 1.000

2 3 -9.549 12.367 34.282 0.593

2 4 -5.668 7.791 21.249 0.565

2 5 -18.061 -2.935 12.191 0.994

2 6 -37.310 7.200 51.710 0.997

3 4 -21.931 -4.576 12.779 0.975

3 5 -33.980 -15.302 3.376 0.180

3 6 -51.006 -5.167 40.673 1.000

4 5 -17.776 -10.726 -3.675 0.000

4 6 -43.042 -0.591 41.860 1.000

5 6 -32.874 10.135 53.144 0.985

Page 158: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

157

Page 159: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

158

62 [X13.xxx.Scaled = IsProtected]

62.1 Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable IsPro- tected

Table 102: Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable IsPro-

tected

Group Mean

0 47.610

1 48.132

p-value = 0.70283

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 160: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

159

63 [X13.xxx.Scaled = IsCentral]

63.1 Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Is- Central

Table 103: Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable IsCentral

Group Mean

0 48.534

1 46.409

p-value = 0.0027495

63.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 104: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable IsCentral

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 0.736 2.125 3.514 0.003

Page 161: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

160

64 [X13.xxx.Scaled = Shifts]

64.1 Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Table 105: Means of X13.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 46.703

5 50.248

7 30.000

p-value = 4.3723e-06

64.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 106: Between group comparison of X13.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable Shifts

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -5.374 -3.545 -1.715 0.000

1 3 -3.439 16.703 36.846 0.127

2 3 0.068 20.248 40.428 0.049

Page 162: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

161

65 [X13.mat.Normed = Obl-ID]

65.1 Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 107: Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 -0.266

2 0.218

3 -0.888

4 1.336

5 0.956

6 -0.260

7 0.471

8 0.474

9 -0.172

10 0.095

11 -1.888

12 -1.286

13 1.596

14 -0.470

15 -0.500

16 0.402

17 0.610

18 0.505

19 -0.337

20 0.367

21 -1.615

22 0.390

23 -0.112

24 0.187

25 -0.357

26 -0.810

27 -1.361

28 -0.017

29 3.472

p-value = 0.61639

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 163: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

162

66 [X13.mat.Normed = cat]

66.1 Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable cat

Table 108: Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 0.496

1 0.614

2 -0.317

3 0.365

4 -2.075

5 0.420

6 -0.255

7 -0.567

8 1.607

p-value = 0.016518

66.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 109: Between group comparison of X13.mat.Normed by

grouping variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -2.234 -0.118 1.998 1.000

1 3 -1.250 0.813 2.877 0.952

1 4 -2.044 0.131 2.306 1.000

1 5 0.114 2.571 5.029 0.032

1 6 -1.799 0.076 1.951 1.000

1 7 -1.126 0.751 2.629 0.947

1 8 -1.407 1.063 3.533 0.921

1 9 -8.569 -1.110 6.348 1.000

2 3 -1.036 0.931 2.899 0.870

2 4 -1.836 0.249 2.334 1.000

2 5 0.312 2.690 5.067 0.013

2 6 -1.575 0.194 1.963 1.000

2 7 -0.902 0.870 2.642 0.845

2 8 -1.209 1.181 3.572 0.840

2 9 -8.425 -0.992 6.440 1.000

3 4 -2.714 -0.682 1.349 0.982

3 5 -0.573 1.758 4.089 0.318

3 6 -2.443 -0.737 0.968 0.919

3 7 -1.771 -0.062 1.647 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 164: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

163

Table 109 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -2.094 0.250 2.594 1.000

3 9 -9.341 -1.924 5.494 0.997

4 5 0.010 2.440 4.871 0.048

4 6 -1.895 -0.055 1.784 1.000

4 7 -1.222 0.620 2.463 0.981

4 8 -1.511 0.932 3.375 0.960

4 9 -8.691 -1.242 6.208 1.000

5 6 -4.661 -2.496 -0.330 0.011

5 7 -3.988 -1.820 0.348 0.185

5 8 -4.206 -1.508 1.189 0.725

5 9 -11.219 -3.682 3.855 0.849

6 7 -0.800 0.676 2.151 0.890

6 8 -1.193 0.987 3.167 0.896

6 9 -8.554 -1.186 6.181 1.000

7 8 -1.871 0.312 2.494 1.000

7 9 -9.230 -1.862 5.506 0.997

8 9 -9.714 -2.173 5.367 0.993

Page 165: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

164

67

67.1

[X13.mat.Normed = School-Type-1]

Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Table 110: Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 0.010

3 -0.174

5 -2.991

6 -0.231

7 -0.263

8 0.958

10 0.273

21 -2.103

22 1.835

32 -0.679

51 0.507

53 -2.220

54 -1.411

56 0.000

57 -1.654

58 0.000

71 1.598

p-value = 0.99208

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 166: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

165

68

68.1

[X13.mat.Normed = School-Type-2]

Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Table 111: Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 0.085

2 -0.015

3 -0.011

p-value = 0.99547

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 167: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

166

69

69.1

[X13.mat.Normed = BudgetFrom]

Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable Bud-

getFrom

Table 112: Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable Bud-

getFrom

Group Mean

1 -1.319

2 1.793

4 2.867

5 -0.015

6 -0.011

7 0.000

p-value = 0.73569

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 168: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

167

70

70.1

[X13.mat.Normed = IsProtected]

Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 113: Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable IsPro- tected

Group Mean

0 -0.018

1 0.058

p-value = 0.90037

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 169: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

168

71

71.1

[X13.mat.Normed = IsCentral]

Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 114: Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable IsCen- tral

Group Mean

0 -0.021

1 -0.002

p-value = 0.9541

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 170: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

169

72 [X13.mat.Normed = Shifts]

72.1 Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Table 115: Means of X13.mat.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 -0.015

5 0.019

7 -4.411

p-value = 0.51818

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 171: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

170

73 [X13.mat.Scaled = Obl-ID]

73.1 Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 116: Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 46.772

2 47.908

3 45.456

4 50.406

5 49.571

6 46.837

7 48.500

8 48.410

9 47.016

10 47.692

11 43.209

12 44.500

13 50.940

14 46.300

15 46.260

16 48.269

17 48.783

18 48.540

19 46.667

20 48.241

21 43.712

22 48.230

23 47.184

24 47.783

25 46.585

26 45.617

27 44.389

28 47.419

29 55.000

p-value = 0.61084

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 172: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

171

74 [X13.mat.Scaled = cat]

74.1 Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Table 117: Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 48.457

1 48.779

2 46.700

3 48.211

4 42.797

5 48.318

6 46.841

7 46.129

8 50.750

p-value = 0.018188

74.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 118: Between group comparison of X13.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -5.033 -0.322 4.389 1.000

1 3 -2.836 1.758 6.352 0.960

1 4 -4.597 0.246 5.089 1.000

1 5 0.190 5.661 11.131 0.036

1 6 -4.035 0.139 4.313 1.000

1 7 -2.564 1.617 5.797 0.957

1 8 -3.171 2.328 7.826 0.928

1 9 -18.897 -2.293 14.311 1.000

2 3 -2.302 2.079 6.460 0.869

2 4 -4.073 0.568 5.209 1.000

2 5 0.689 5.982 11.275 0.014

2 6 -3.477 0.461 4.399 1.000

2 7 -2.007 1.938 5.883 0.845

2 8 -2.672 2.650 7.971 0.835

2 9 -18.518 -1.971 14.575 1.000

3 4 -6.034 -1.511 3.011 0.982

3 5 -1.286 3.903 9.092 0.322

3 6 -5.416 -1.618 2.179 0.925

3 7 -3.946 -0.141 3.663 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 173: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

172

Table 118 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -4.648 0.570 5.789 1.000

3 9 -20.564 -4.050 12.463 0.998

4 5 0.004 5.414 10.825 0.050

4 6 -4.202 -0.107 3.988 1.000

4 7 -2.731 1.370 5.472 0.982

4 8 -3.358 2.082 7.521 0.959

4 9 -19.124 -2.539 14.045 1.000

5 6 -10.342 -5.521 -0.701 0.011

5 7 -8.871 -4.044 0.783 0.187

5 8 -9.337 -3.333 2.672 0.733

5 9 -24.732 -7.953 8.825 0.869

6 7 -1.807 1.477 4.762 0.900

6 8 -2.664 2.189 7.041 0.899

6 9 -18.833 -2.432 13.970 1.000

7 8 -4.147 0.711 5.570 1.000

7 9 -20.313 -3.909 12.494 0.998

8 9 -21.408 -4.621 12.167 0.995

Page 174: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

173

75

75.1

[X13.mat.Scaled = School-Type-1]

Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Table 119: Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 47.426

3 46.993

5 41.000

6 46.883

7 46.786

8 49.417

10 48.000

21 42.600

22 51.469

32 46.000

51 48.333

53 42.333

54 44.500

56 47.000

57 43.750

58 47.000

71 50.909

p-value = 0.99277

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 175: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

174

76

76.1

[X13.mat.Scaled = School-Type-2]

Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Table 120: Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 47.488

2 47.363

3 47.378

p-value = 0.99857

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 176: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

175

77

77.1

[X13.mat.Scaled = BudgetFrom]

Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Bud-

getFrom

Table 121: Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Budget-

From

Group Mean

1 44.375

2 51.300

4 53.667

5 47.363

6 47.378

7 47.000

p-value = 0.73793

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 177: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

176

78

78.1

[X13.mat.Scaled = IsProtected]

Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 122: Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable IsPro- tected

Group Mean

0 47.356

1 47.504

p-value = 0.91294

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 178: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

177

79

79.1

[X13.mat.Scaled = IsCentral]

Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 123: Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable IsCentral

Group Mean

0 47.345

1 47.395

p-value = 0.94374

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 179: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

178

80 [X13.mat.Scaled = Shifts]

80.1 Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Table 124: Means of X13.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 47.368

5 47.418

7 37.667

p-value = 0.52592

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 180: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

179

81 [X13.bel.Normed = Obl-ID]

81.1 Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 125: Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 100.609

2 102.092

3 99.211

4 98.469

5 97.714

6 97.000

7 101.692

8 99.951

9 101.306

10 95.846

11 99.744

12 100.220

13 97.723

14 96.333

15 93.325

16 100.800

17 95.587

18 99.560

19 95.444

20 96.074

21 104.788

22 106.837

23 100.342

24 95.652

25 101.171

26 96.917

27 97.574

28 95.903

29 92.500

p-value = 1.1044e-18

81.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Page 181: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

180

Table 126: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Normed by

grouping variable Obl-ID

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -7.806 -1.483 4.840 1.000

1 3 -5.224 1.398 8.019 1.000

1 4 -5.129 2.140 9.409 1.000

1 5 -6.745 2.894 12.533 1.000

1 6 -4.290 3.609 11.507 0.998

1 7 -11.003 -1.084 8.836 1.000

1 8 -6.716 0.658 8.032 1.000

1 9 -8.036 -0.698 6.640 1.000

1 10 -5.157 4.763 14.682 0.995

1 11 -7.386 0.865 9.115 1.000

1 12 -7.458 0.389 8.235 1.000

1 13 -3.875 2.886 9.647 0.999

1 14 -5.114 4.275 13.665 0.998

1 15 0.386 7.284 14.182 0.024

1 16 -6.144 -0.191 5.761 1.000

1 17 -3.043 5.022 13.086 0.873

1 18 -6.798 1.049 8.895 1.000

1 19 -3.615 5.164 13.944 0.928

1 20 -3.121 4.535 12.191 0.922

1 21 -11.928 -4.180 3.568 0.973

1 22 -11.872 -6.228 -0.584 0.012

1 23 -6.656 0.267 7.189 1.000

1 24 -1.628 4.957 11.541 0.521

1 25 -8.948 -0.562 7.824 1.000

1 26 -3.719 3.692 11.103 0.991

1 27 -4.621 3.035 10.691 1.000

1 28 -4.569 4.705 13.980 0.988

1 29 -23.812 8.109 40.029 1.000

2 3 -3.480 2.881 9.241 0.998

2 4 -3.410 3.623 10.656 0.985

2 5 -5.085 4.377 13.839 0.997

2 6 -2.590 5.092 12.773 0.784

2 7 -9.348 0.399 10.147 1.000

2 8 -5.000 2.141 9.282 1.000

2 9 -6.319 0.785 7.889 1.000

2 10 -3.502 6.246 15.993 0.836

2 11 -5.695 2.348 10.390 1.000

2 12 -5.756 1.872 9.500 1.000

2 13 -2.137 4.369 10.875 0.762

2 14 -3.449 5.758 14.966 0.868

2 15 2.119 8.767 15.415 0.000

2 16 -4.370 1.292 6.953 1.000

2 17 -1.347 6.505 14.357 0.305

Continued on next page

Page 182: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

181

Table 126 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

2 18 -5.096 2.532 10.160 1.000

2 19 -1.938 6.647 15.232 0.455

2 20 -1.414 6.018 13.450 0.354

2 21 -10.224 -2.697 4.830 1.000

2 22 -10.081 -4.745 0.591 0.175

2 23 -4.924 1.750 8.424 1.000

2 24 0.117 6.440 12.762 0.039

2 25 -7.261 0.921 9.103 1.000

2 26 -2.004 5.175 12.354 0.620

2 27 -2.914 4.518 11.950 0.899

2 28 -2.902 6.189 15.279 0.737

2 29 -22.276 9.592 41.459 1.000

3 4 -6.560 0.742 8.045 1.000

3 5 -8.167 1.497 11.161 1.000

3 6 -5.718 2.211 10.140 1.000

3 7 -12.425 -2.481 7.462 1.000

3 8 -8.146 -0.740 6.667 1.000

3 9 -9.466 -2.095 5.276 1.000

3 10 -6.578 3.365 13.308 1.000

3 11 -8.812 -0.533 7.746 1.000

3 12 -8.886 -1.009 6.868 1.000

3 13 -5.308 1.488 8.285 1.000

3 14 -6.537 2.878 12.293 1.000

3 15 -1.046 5.886 12.819 0.256

3 16 -7.582 -1.589 4.404 1.000

3 17 -4.470 3.624 11.719 0.998

3 18 -8.226 -0.349 7.528 1.000

3 19 -5.040 3.767 12.574 0.999

3 20 -4.550 3.137 10.824 1.000

3 21 -13.357 -5.577 2.202 0.631

3 22 -13.312 -7.626 -1.939 0.000

3 23 -8.088 -1.131 5.826 1.000

3 24 -3.062 3.559 10.180 0.975

3 25 -10.374 -1.960 6.455 1.000

3 26 -5.149 2.294 9.738 1.000

3 27 -6.050 1.637 9.324 1.000

3 28 -5.993 3.308 12.608 1.000

3 29 -25.217 6.711 38.639 1.000

4 5 -9.365 0.754 10.874 1.000

4 6 -7.009 1.469 9.946 1.000

4 7 -13.610 -3.224 7.163 1.000

4 8 -9.473 -1.482 6.509 1.000

4 9 -10.796 -2.838 5.121 1.000

4 10 -7.764 2.623 13.009 1.000

4 11 -10.082 -1.275 7.531 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 183: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

182

Table 126 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 12 -10.181 -1.751 6.678 1.000

4 13 -6.683 0.746 8.175 1.000

4 14 -7.746 2.135 12.017 1.000

4 15 -2.410 5.144 12.698 0.736

4 16 -9.033 -2.331 4.371 1.000

4 17 -5.751 2.882 11.514 1.000

4 18 -9.521 -1.091 7.338 1.000

4 19 -6.280 3.024 12.328 1.000

4 20 -5.858 2.395 10.647 1.000

4 21 -14.658 -6.320 2.018 0.505

4 22 -14.798 -8.368 -1.938 0.000

4 23 -9.450 -1.873 5.703 1.000

4 24 -4.453 2.817 10.086 1.000

4 25 -11.636 -2.702 6.232 1.000

4 26 -6.473 1.552 9.577 1.000

4 27 -7.358 0.895 9.147 1.000

4 28 -7.207 2.566 12.338 1.000

4 29 -26.100 5.969 38.038 1.000

5 6 -9.866 0.714 11.294 1.000

5 7 -16.141 -3.978 8.185 1.000

5 8 -12.431 -2.237 7.958 1.000

5 9 -13.761 -3.592 6.576 1.000

5 10 -10.295 1.868 14.031 1.000

5 11 -12.875 -2.030 8.815 1.000

5 12 -13.047 -2.506 8.036 1.000

5 13 -9.769 -0.009 9.752 1.000

5 14 -10.354 1.381 13.116 1.000

5 15 -5.466 4.390 14.245 0.998

5 16 -12.305 -3.086 6.133 1.000

5 17 -8.577 2.127 12.832 1.000

5 18 -12.387 -1.846 8.696 1.000

5 19 -8.983 2.270 13.523 1.000

5 20 -8.760 1.640 12.041 1.000

5 21 -17.543 -7.074 3.394 0.751

5 22 -18.145 -9.122 -0.100 0.043

5 23 -12.501 -2.628 7.245 1.000

5 24 -7.577 2.062 11.701 1.000

5 25 -14.405 -3.456 7.492 1.000

5 26 -9.424 0.798 11.019 1.000

5 27 -10.260 0.140 10.541 1.000

5 28 -9.832 1.811 13.455 1.000

5 29 -27.473 5.214 37.902 1.000

6 7 -15.528 -4.692 6.144 0.999

6 8 -11.518 -2.951 5.617 1.000

6 9 -12.843 -4.306 4.230 0.989

Continued on next page

Page 184: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

183

Table 126 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

6 10 -9.682 1.154 11.990 1.000

6 11 -12.076 -2.744 6.588 1.000

6 12 -12.197 -3.220 5.757 1.000

6 13 -8.769 -0.723 7.323 1.000

6 14 -9.686 0.667 11.020 1.000

6 15 -4.486 3.675 11.837 0.998

6 16 -11.180 -3.800 3.580 0.985

6 17 -7.756 1.413 10.582 1.000

6 18 -11.537 -2.560 6.417 1.000

6 19 -8.248 1.556 11.359 1.000

6 20 -7.885 0.926 9.737 1.000

6 21 -16.680 -7.788 1.103 0.200

6 22 -16.970 -9.837 -2.704 0.000

6 23 -11.524 -3.342 4.840 1.000

6 24 -6.550 1.348 9.246 1.000

6 25 -13.623 -4.171 5.282 0.999

6 26 -8.516 0.083 8.682 1.000

6 27 -9.385 -0.574 8.237 1.000

6 28 -9.152 1.097 11.346 1.000

6 29 -27.717 4.500 36.717 1.000

7 8 -8.718 1.741 12.201 1.000

7 9 -10.049 0.386 10.820 1.000

7 10 -6.540 5.846 18.233 0.996

7 11 -9.147 1.948 13.043 1.000

7 12 -9.326 1.472 12.271 1.000

7 13 -6.068 3.969 14.006 1.000

7 14 -6.607 5.359 17.325 0.998

7 15 -1.762 8.368 18.497 0.311

7 16 -8.619 0.892 10.404 1.000

7 17 -4.852 6.105 17.063 0.961

7 18 -8.666 2.132 12.931 1.000

7 19 -5.246 6.248 17.742 0.971

7 20 -5.042 5.618 16.279 0.980

7 21 -13.823 -3.096 7.631 1.000

7 22 -14.466 -5.144 4.177 0.965

7 23 -8.796 1.350 11.497 1.000

7 24 -3.879 6.040 15.959 0.897

7 25 -10.675 0.522 11.718 1.000

7 26 -5.710 4.776 15.261 0.998

7 27 -6.542 4.118 14.779 1.000

7 28 -6.087 5.789 17.666 0.993

7 29 -23.579 9.192 41.964 1.000

8 9 -9.410 -1.356 6.698 1.000

8 10 -6.355 4.105 14.564 1.000

8 11 -8.686 0.207 9.099 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 185: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

184

Table 126 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 12 -8.789 -0.269 8.251 1.000

8 13 -5.304 2.228 9.760 1.000

8 14 -6.341 3.617 13.576 1.000

8 15 -1.029 6.626 14.281 0.220

8 16 -7.665 -0.849 5.966 1.000

8 17 -4.357 4.364 13.085 0.990

8 18 -8.129 0.391 8.911 1.000

8 19 -4.880 4.506 13.892 0.995

8 20 -4.468 3.877 12.221 0.997

8 21 -13.267 -4.838 3.592 0.945

8 22 -13.434 -6.886 -0.338 0.025

8 23 -8.069 -0.391 7.286 1.000

8 24 -3.075 4.299 11.673 0.934

8 25 -10.239 -1.220 7.799 1.000

8 26 -5.086 3.034 11.154 1.000

8 27 -5.968 2.377 10.721 1.000

8 28 -5.803 4.048 13.898 1.000

8 29 -24.642 7.451 39.544 1.000

9 10 -4.974 5.460 15.895 0.982

9 11 -7.301 1.562 10.425 1.000

9 12 -7.402 1.086 9.575 1.000

9 13 -3.913 3.584 11.080 0.995

9 14 -4.959 4.973 14.906 0.990

9 15 0.361 7.982 15.602 0.027

9 16 -6.270 0.506 7.283 1.000

9 17 -2.971 5.719 14.410 0.796

9 18 -6.742 1.746 10.235 1.000

9 19 -3.496 5.862 15.220 0.866

9 20 -3.081 5.232 13.545 0.860

9 21 -11.880 -3.482 4.916 1.000

9 22 -12.038 -5.530 0.977 0.254

9 23 -6.678 0.964 8.607 1.000

9 24 -1.684 5.654 12.992 0.467

9 25 -8.854 0.136 9.125 1.000

9 26 -3.698 4.390 12.477 0.971

9 27 -4.581 3.732 12.045 0.998

9 28 -4.421 5.403 15.227 0.966

9 29 -23.278 8.806 40.891 1.000

10 11 -14.993 -3.898 7.197 1.000

10 12 -15.172 -4.374 6.424 1.000

10 13 -11.914 -1.877 8.160 1.000

10 14 -12.454 -0.487 11.479 1.000

10 15 -7.608 2.521 12.651 1.000

10 16 -14.465 -4.954 4.558 0.983

10 17 -10.698 0.259 11.217 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 186: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

185

Table 126 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

10 18 -14.512 -3.714 7.084 1.000

10 19 -11.092 0.402 11.896 1.000

10 20 -10.888 -0.228 10.433 1.000

10 21 -19.669 -8.942 1.785 0.292

10 22 -20.312 -10.991 -1.669 0.004

10 23 -14.643 -4.496 5.651 0.999

10 24 -9.725 0.194 10.113 1.000

10 25 -16.521 -5.325 5.872 0.995

10 26 -11.556 -1.071 9.415 1.000

10 27 -12.388 -1.728 8.933 1.000

10 28 -11.934 -0.057 11.819 1.000

10 29 -29.425 3.346 36.117 1.000

11 12 -9.764 -0.476 8.813 1.000

11 13 -6.370 2.021 10.413 1.000

11 14 -7.213 3.411 14.035 1.000

11 15 -2.083 6.420 14.922 0.514

11 16 -8.811 -1.056 6.699 1.000

11 17 -5.316 4.157 13.630 0.999

11 18 -9.104 0.184 9.473 1.000

11 19 -5.789 4.300 14.389 0.999

11 20 -5.458 3.670 12.798 1.000

11 21 -14.250 -5.044 4.161 0.968

11 22 -14.613 -7.093 0.428 0.099

11 23 -9.120 -0.598 7.924 1.000

11 24 -4.158 4.092 12.342 0.991

11 25 -11.175 -1.427 8.322 1.000

11 26 -6.096 2.828 11.751 1.000

11 27 -6.958 2.170 11.298 1.000

11 28 -6.681 3.841 14.363 1.000

11 29 -25.061 7.244 39.549 1.000

12 13 -5.498 2.497 10.492 1.000

12 14 -6.427 3.887 14.200 1.000

12 15 -1.216 6.895 15.007 0.253

12 16 -7.904 -0.580 6.744 1.000

12 17 -4.491 4.633 13.757 0.988

12 18 -8.272 0.660 9.592 1.000

12 19 -4.986 4.776 14.537 0.993

12 20 -4.619 4.146 12.911 0.996

12 21 -13.414 -4.568 4.277 0.985

12 22 -13.692 -6.617 0.459 0.108

12 23 -8.254 -0.122 8.010 1.000

12 24 -3.279 4.568 12.414 0.935

12 25 -10.360 -0.951 8.459 1.000

12 26 -5.248 3.303 11.855 1.000

12 27 -6.119 2.646 11.411 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 187: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

186

Table 126 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

12 28 -5.892 4.317 14.526 0.999

12 29 -24.485 7.720 39.925 1.000

13 14 -8.124 1.390 10.903 1.000

13 15 -2.668 4.398 11.465 0.873

13 16 -9.224 -3.077 3.070 0.990

13 17 -6.073 2.136 10.345 1.000

13 18 -9.832 -1.837 6.158 1.000

13 19 -6.634 2.278 11.191 1.000

13 20 -6.159 1.649 9.457 1.000

13 21 -14.964 -7.066 0.833 0.166

13 22 -14.962 -9.114 -3.265 0.000

13 23 -9.710 -2.619 4.471 1.000

13 24 -4.690 2.071 8.832 1.000

13 25 -11.973 -3.448 5.077 1.000

13 26 -6.762 0.806 8.374 1.000

13 27 -7.659 0.149 7.957 1.000

13 28 -7.581 1.820 11.220 1.000

13 29 -26.735 5.223 37.180 1.000

14 15 -6.603 3.009 12.620 1.000

14 16 -13.424 -4.467 4.491 0.991

14 17 -9.734 0.746 11.227 1.000

14 18 -13.540 -3.227 7.087 1.000

14 19 -10.151 0.889 11.929 1.000

14 20 -9.910 0.259 10.429 1.000

14 21 -18.694 -8.455 1.784 0.312

14 22 -19.259 -10.503 -1.748 0.003

14 23 -13.638 -4.009 5.621 0.999

14 24 -8.708 0.681 10.071 1.000

14 25 -15.567 -4.837 5.892 0.998

14 26 -10.570 -0.583 9.403 1.000

14 27 -11.410 -1.241 8.929 1.000

14 28 -11.008 0.430 11.868 1.000

14 29 -28.782 3.833 36.448 1.000

15 16 -13.773 -7.475 -1.178 0.003

15 17 -10.585 -2.262 6.060 1.000

15 18 -14.347 -6.235 1.876 0.472

15 19 -11.137 -2.120 6.897 1.000

15 20 -10.676 -2.749 5.178 1.000

15 21 -19.480 -11.464 -3.448 0.000

15 22 -19.519 -13.512 -7.506 0.000

15 23 -14.239 -7.017 0.204 0.071

15 24 -9.225 -2.327 4.570 1.000

15 25 -16.480 -7.846 0.788 0.144

15 26 -11.283 -3.592 4.099 0.997

15 27 -12.176 -4.249 3.678 0.975

Continued on next page

Page 188: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

187

Table 126 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

15 28 -12.078 -2.579 6.921 1.000

15 29 -31.162 0.825 32.811 1.000

16 17 -2.344 5.213 12.770 0.712

16 18 -6.084 1.240 8.564 1.000

16 19 -2.961 5.356 13.672 0.829

16 20 -2.394 4.726 11.846 0.782

16 21 -11.207 -3.988 3.230 0.964

16 22 -10.929 -6.037 -1.145 0.001

16 23 -5.867 0.458 6.782 1.000

16 24 -0.805 5.148 11.101 0.222

16 25 -8.270 -0.371 7.529 1.000

16 26 -2.972 3.883 10.739 0.952

16 27 -3.894 3.226 10.346 0.998

16 28 -3.940 4.897 13.734 0.963

16 29 -23.496 8.300 40.096 1.000

17 18 -13.097 -3.973 5.151 0.999

17 19 -9.795 0.143 10.080 1.000

17 20 -9.448 -0.487 8.474 1.000

17 21 -18.241 -9.202 -0.162 0.040

17 22 -18.567 -11.250 -3.933 0.000

17 23 -13.098 -4.755 3.588 0.949

17 24 -8.130 -0.065 7.999 1.000

17 25 -15.176 -5.584 4.008 0.935

17 26 -10.082 -1.330 7.422 1.000

17 27 -10.948 -1.987 6.974 1.000

17 28 -10.694 -0.316 10.061 1.000

17 29 -29.171 3.087 35.345 1.000

18 19 -5.646 4.116 13.877 0.999

18 20 -5.279 3.486 12.251 1.000

18 21 -14.074 -5.228 3.617 0.924

18 22 -14.352 -7.277 -0.201 0.035

18 23 -8.914 -0.782 7.350 1.000

18 24 -3.939 3.908 11.754 0.991

18 25 -11.020 -1.611 7.799 1.000

18 26 -5.908 2.643 11.195 1.000

18 27 -6.779 1.986 10.751 1.000

18 28 -6.552 3.657 13.866 1.000

18 29 -25.145 7.060 39.265 1.000

19 20 -10.239 -0.630 8.980 1.000

19 21 -19.027 -9.344 0.339 0.077

19 22 -19.490 -11.392 -3.294 0.000

19 23 -13.933 -4.898 4.138 0.972

19 24 -8.987 -0.208 8.572 1.000

19 25 -15.927 -5.726 4.474 0.957

19 26 -10.887 -1.472 7.943 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 189: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

188

Table 126 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

19 27 -11.739 -2.130 7.480 1.000

19 28 -11.401 -0.459 10.484 1.000

19 29 -29.500 2.944 35.389 1.000

20 21 -17.391 -8.714 -0.037 0.047

20 22 -17.626 -10.763 -3.899 0.000

20 23 -12.217 -4.268 3.680 0.975

20 24 -7.234 0.422 8.078 1.000

20 25 -14.348 -5.097 4.154 0.966

20 26 -9.220 -0.843 7.535 1.000

20 27 -10.095 -1.500 7.095 1.000

20 28 -9.893 0.171 10.234 1.000

20 29 -28.585 3.574 35.733 1.000

21 22 -9.015 -2.048 4.918 1.000

21 23 -3.591 4.446 12.484 0.964

21 24 1.388 9.136 16.885 0.004

21 25 -5.710 3.618 12.945 1.000

21 26 -0.590 7.872 16.333 0.114

21 27 -1.463 7.214 15.891 0.297

21 28 -1.249 8.885 19.019 0.198

21 29 -19.892 12.288 44.469 1.000

22 23 0.460 6.495 12.529 0.018

22 24 5.541 11.185 16.829 0.000

22 25 -2.004 5.666 13.336 0.564

22 26 3.331 9.920 16.509 0.000

22 27 2.399 9.263 16.126 0.000

22 28 2.301 10.934 19.566 0.001

22 29 -17.403 14.337 46.077 0.998

23 24 -2.233 4.690 11.613 0.746

23 25 -9.482 -0.829 7.825 1.000

23 26 -4.287 3.425 11.138 0.998

23 27 -5.180 2.768 10.717 1.000

23 28 -5.079 4.439 13.956 0.997

23 29 -24.150 7.842 39.834 1.000

24 25 -13.905 -5.519 2.867 0.796

24 26 -8.675 -1.264 6.146 1.000

24 27 -9.578 -1.922 5.734 1.000

24 28 -9.526 -0.251 9.024 1.000

24 29 -28.768 3.152 35.073 1.000

25 26 -4.795 4.254 13.303 0.996

25 27 -5.654 3.597 12.848 1.000

25 28 -5.362 5.268 15.897 0.992

25 29 -23.670 8.671 41.011 1.000

26 27 -9.035 -0.657 7.720 1.000

26 28 -8.865 1.013 10.892 1.000

26 29 -27.685 4.417 36.518 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 190: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

189

Table 126 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

27 28 -8.393 1.671 11.734 1.000

27 29 -27.085 5.074 37.233 1.000

28 29 -29.179 3.403 35.985 1.000

Page 191: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

190

82 [X13.bel.Normed = cat]

82.1 Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable cat

Table 127: Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 107.949

1 105.486

2 100.004

3 100.076

4 98.720

5 95.972

6 96.838

7 98.733

8 98.625

p-value = 6.269e-37

82.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 128: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Normed by

grouping variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -1.283 2.463 6.209 0.515

1 3 4.292 7.944 11.597 0.000

1 4 4.022 7.873 11.723 0.000

1 5 4.879 9.228 13.578 0.000

1 6 8.658 11.977 15.295 0.000

1 7 7.787 11.111 14.434 0.000

1 8 4.844 9.216 13.588 0.000

1 9 -3.879 9.324 22.526 0.412

2 3 1.998 5.481 8.965 0.000

2 4 1.720 5.410 9.100 0.000

2 5 2.557 6.765 10.974 0.000

2 6 6.383 9.514 12.645 0.000

2 7 5.511 8.648 11.784 0.000

2 8 2.521 6.753 10.984 0.000

2 9 -6.296 6.861 20.017 0.796

3 4 -3.667 -0.071 3.524 1.000

3 5 -2.842 1.284 5.410 0.989

3 6 1.013 4.032 7.051 0.001

3 7 0.141 3.166 6.191 0.032

Continued on next page

Page 192: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

191

Table 128 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -2.878 1.272 5.421 0.990

3 9 -11.751 1.379 14.509 1.000

4 5 -2.947 1.355 5.657 0.988

4 6 0.848 4.104 7.360 0.003

4 7 -0.024 3.238 6.499 0.053

4 8 -2.982 1.343 5.668 0.989

4 9 -11.736 1.451 14.637 1.000

5 6 -1.085 2.748 6.581 0.390

5 7 -1.955 1.882 5.720 0.846

5 8 -4.787 -0.012 4.762 1.000

5 9 -13.245 0.095 13.436 1.000

6 7 -3.478 -0.866 1.746 0.983

6 8 -6.619 -2.761 1.098 0.393

6 9 -15.694 -2.653 10.388 0.999

7 8 -5.758 -1.895 1.968 0.846

7 9 -14.829 -1.787 11.255 1.000

8 9 -13.240 0.108 13.456 1.000

Page 193: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

192

83 [X13.bel.Normed = School-Type-1]

83.1 Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable School- Type-1

Table 129: Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 98.812

3 101.921

5 95.000

6 97.701

7 98.643

8 85.167

10 82.091

21 106.600

22 121.062

32 100.571

51 92.333

53 104.000

54 101.000

56 100.000

57 100.000

58 100.000

71 105.273

p-value = 2.2894e-31

83.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 130: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Normed by

grouping variable School-Type-1

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -5.404 -3.109 -0.814 0.000

1 3 -37.036 3.812 44.661 1.000

1 4 -3.692 1.111 5.914 1.000

1 5 -10.808 0.169 11.147 1.000

1 6 5.226 13.646 22.065 0.000

1 7 4.353 16.721 29.090 0.000

1 8 -26.087 -7.788 10.511 0.990

1 9 -29.566 -22.250 -14.935 0.000

1 10 -10.748 -1.759 7.230 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 194: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

193

Table 130 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 11 -10.233 6.479 23.191 0.996

1 12 -28.792 -5.188 18.416 1.000

1 13 -31.084 -2.188 26.709 1.000

1 14 -24.792 -1.188 22.416 1.000

1 15 -21.638 -1.188 19.262 1.000

1 16 -42.036 -1.188 39.661 1.000

1 17 -18.829 -6.460 5.908 0.930

2 3 -33.957 6.921 47.800 1.000

2 4 -0.830 4.220 9.270 0.239

2 5 -7.809 3.279 14.366 1.000

2 6 8.192 16.755 25.317 0.000

2 7 7.364 19.831 32.297 0.000

2 8 -23.044 -4.679 13.687 1.000

2 9 -26.621 -19.141 -11.661 0.000

2 10 -7.774 1.350 10.474 1.000

2 11 -7.196 9.588 26.372 0.862

2 12 -25.734 -2.079 21.577 1.000

2 13 -28.017 0.921 29.860 1.000

2 14 -21.734 1.921 25.577 1.000

2 15 -18.588 1.921 22.431 1.000

2 16 -38.957 1.921 42.800 1.000

2 17 -15.818 -3.351 9.115 1.000

3 4 -43.797 -2.701 38.394 1.000

3 5 -45.907 -3.643 38.621 1.000

3 6 -31.840 9.833 51.506 1.000

3 7 -29.738 12.909 55.556 1.000

3 8 -56.328 -11.600 33.128 1.000

3 9 -67.527 -26.062 15.402 0.745

3 10 -47.363 -5.571 36.221 1.000

3 11 -41.436 2.667 46.769 1.000

3 12 -56.148 -9.000 38.148 1.000

3 13 -56.008 -6.000 44.008 1.000

3 14 -52.148 -5.000 42.148 1.000

3 15 -50.651 -5.000 40.651 1.000

3 16 -62.744 -5.000 52.744 1.000

3 17 -52.919 -10.273 32.374 1.000

4 5 -12.805 -0.942 10.922 1.000

4 6 2.989 12.535 22.080 0.001

4 7 2.449 15.610 28.771 0.005

4 8 -27.742 -8.899 9.945 0.971

4 9 -31.949 -23.361 -14.773 0.000

4 10 -12.922 -2.870 7.182 1.000

4 11 -11.939 5.368 22.674 1.000

4 12 -30.327 -6.299 17.730 1.000

4 13 -32.543 -3.299 25.946 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 195: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

194

Table 130 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 14 -26.327 -2.299 21.730 1.000

4 15 -23.238 -2.299 18.640 1.000

4 16 -43.394 -2.299 38.797 1.000

4 17 -20.732 -7.571 5.590 0.855

5 6 -0.255 13.476 27.208 0.061

5 7 0.101 16.552 33.003 0.047

5 8 -29.230 -7.957 13.315 0.997

5 9 -35.503 -22.420 -9.336 0.000

5 10 -16.017 -1.929 12.160 1.000

5 11 -13.614 6.310 26.233 1.000

5 12 -31.334 -5.357 20.620 1.000

5 13 -33.223 -2.357 28.508 1.000

5 14 -27.334 -1.357 24.620 1.000

5 15 -24.506 -1.357 21.792 1.000

5 16 -43.621 -1.357 40.907 1.000

5 17 -23.081 -6.630 9.821 0.994

6 7 -11.791 3.076 17.943 1.000

6 8 -41.506 -21.433 -1.361 0.023

6 9 -46.922 -35.896 -24.870 0.000

6 10 -27.605 -15.405 -3.204 0.002

6 11 -25.803 -7.167 11.470 0.997

6 12 -43.837 -18.833 6.171 0.423

6 13 -45.884 -15.833 14.218 0.925

6 14 -39.837 -14.833 10.171 0.821

6 15 -36.885 -14.833 7.218 0.635

6 16 -56.506 -14.833 26.840 0.999

6 17 -34.973 -20.106 -5.239 0.000

7 8 -46.532 -24.509 -2.486 0.013

7 9 -53.243 -38.972 -24.701 0.000

7 10 -33.678 -18.481 -3.283 0.003

7 11 -30.965 -10.242 10.480 0.956

7 12 -48.504 -21.909 4.686 0.262

7 13 -50.296 -18.909 12.478 0.803

7 14 -44.504 -17.909 8.686 0.633

7 15 -41.749 -17.909 5.931 0.428

7 16 -60.556 -17.909 24.738 0.991

7 17 -40.592 -23.182 -5.771 0.001

8 9 -34.098 -14.463 5.173 0.465

8 10 -14.290 6.029 26.347 1.000

8 11 -10.458 14.267 38.991 0.852

8 12 -27.219 2.600 32.419 1.000

8 13 -28.562 5.600 39.762 1.000

8 14 -23.219 6.600 36.419 1.000

8 15 -20.790 6.600 33.990 1.000

8 16 -38.128 6.600 51.328 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 196: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

195

Table 130 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 17 -20.695 1.327 23.350 1.000

9 10 9.024 20.491 31.958 0.000

9 11 10.564 28.729 46.894 0.000

9 12 -7.592 17.062 41.717 0.584

9 13 -9.698 20.062 49.823 0.631

9 14 -3.592 21.062 45.717 0.206

9 15 -0.591 21.062 42.716 0.067

9 16 -20.402 21.062 62.527 0.944

9 17 1.519 15.790 30.061 0.014

10 11 -10.663 8.238 27.139 0.987

10 12 -28.630 -3.429 21.773 1.000

10 13 -30.644 -0.429 29.787 1.000

10 14 -24.630 0.571 25.773 1.000

10 15 -21.704 0.571 22.847 1.000

10 16 -41.221 0.571 42.363 1.000

10 17 -19.898 -4.701 10.496 1.000

11 12 -40.539 -11.667 17.205 0.994

11 13 -42.005 -8.667 24.672 1.000

11 14 -36.539 -7.667 21.205 1.000

11 15 -34.023 -7.667 18.690 1.000

11 16 -51.769 -7.667 36.436 1.000

11 17 -33.662 -12.939 7.783 0.755

12 13 -34.274 3.000 40.274 1.000

12 14 -29.338 4.000 37.338 1.000

12 15 -27.185 4.000 35.185 1.000

12 16 -43.148 4.000 51.148 1.000

12 17 -27.868 -1.273 25.322 1.000

13 14 -36.274 1.000 38.274 1.000

13 15 -34.361 1.000 36.361 1.000

13 16 -49.008 1.000 51.008 1.000

13 17 -35.660 -4.273 27.114 1.000

14 15 -31.185 0.000 31.185 1.000

14 16 -47.148 0.000 47.148 1.000

14 17 -31.868 -5.273 21.322 1.000

15 16 -45.651 0.000 45.651 1.000

15 17 -29.113 -5.273 18.568 1.000

16 17 -47.919 -5.273 37.374 1.000

Page 197: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

196

::........--:

---+--

...;..........:

10

21

22

32

51

53

54

56

57

58

71

60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

Page 198: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

197

84 [X13.bel.Normed = School-Type-2]

84.1 Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable School- Type-2

Table 131: Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 100.244

2 99.395

3 112.757

p-value = 5.2004e-10

84.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 132: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Normed by

grouping variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -3.684 0.849 5.382 0.899

1 3 -19.018 -12.513 -6.008 0.000

2 3 -18.128 -13.362 -8.596 0.000

Page 199: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

198

85 [X13.bel.Normed = BudgetFrom]

85.1 Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable Bud- getFrom

Table 133: Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable Bud-

getFrom

Group Mean

1 101.333

2 105.300

4 87.500

5 99.395

6 112.757

7 100.000

p-value = 8.1292e-10

85.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 134: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Normed by

grouping variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -17.077 -3.967 9.143 0.955

1 3 -2.065 13.833 29.731 0.130

1 4 -5.220 1.938 9.097 0.972

1 5 -20.552 -11.423 -2.294 0.005

1 6 -34.216 1.333 36.883 1.000

2 3 -0.187 17.800 35.787 0.054

2 4 -5.141 5.905 16.951 0.649

2 5 -19.871 -7.457 4.957 0.524

2 6 -31.231 5.300 41.831 0.998

3 4 -26.139 -11.895 2.349 0.163

3 5 -40.586 -25.257 -9.927 0.000

3 6 -50.122 -12.500 25.122 0.934

4 5 -19.148 -13.362 -7.575 0.000

4 6 -35.446 -0.605 34.236 1.000

5 6 -22.542 12.757 48.055 0.908

Page 200: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

199

70 80 90 100 110 120 130

Page 201: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

200

86

86.1

[X13.bel.Normed = IsProtected]

Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 135: Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable IsPro-

tected

Group Mean

0 99.651

1 100.132

p-value = 0.67073

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 202: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

201

87

87.1

[X13.bel.Normed = IsCentral]

Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 136: Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable IsCen-

tral

Group Mean

0 100.815

1 98.109

p-value = 3.9009e-06

87.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 137: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Normed by

grouping variable IsCentral

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 1.561 2.706 3.851 0.000

Page 203: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

202

88 [X13.bel.Normed = Shifts]

88.1 Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Table 138: Means of X13.bel.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 98.513

5 102.860

7 87.000

p-value = 2.9619e-11

88.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 139: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Normed by

grouping variable Shifts

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -5.851 -4.347 -2.843 0.000

1 3 -5.043 11.513 28.069 0.233

2 3 -0.727 15.860 32.447 0.064

Page 204: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

203

89 [X13.bel.Scaled = Obl-ID]

89.1 Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 140: Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 54.174

2 55.908

3 52.411

4 51.656

5 50.464

6 49.816

7 55.654

8 53.410

9 55.000

10 48.462

11 53.023

12 53.780

13 50.675

14 48.933

15 45.442

16 54.428

17 48.261

18 52.920

19 48.028

20 48.630

21 59.058

22 61.622

23 53.855

24 48.272

25 54.805

26 49.717

27 50.593

28 48.452

29 44.500

p-value = 1.0845e-18

89.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Page 205: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

204

Table 141: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Scaled by group-

ing variable Obl-ID

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -9.304 -1.734 5.835 1.000

1 3 -6.164 1.763 9.690 1.000

1 4 -6.185 2.518 11.220 1.000

1 5 -7.830 3.710 15.249 1.000

1 6 -5.098 4.358 13.813 0.997

1 7 -13.355 -1.480 10.395 1.000

1 8 -8.064 0.764 9.592 1.000

1 9 -9.611 -0.826 7.959 1.000

1 10 -6.163 5.712 17.587 0.995

1 11 -8.726 1.151 11.027 1.000

1 12 -9.000 0.394 9.788 1.000

1 13 -4.595 3.499 11.593 0.999

1 14 -6.000 5.241 16.481 0.997

1 15 0.474 8.732 16.990 0.023

1 16 -7.380 -0.254 6.873 1.000

1 17 -3.742 5.913 15.568 0.891

1 18 -8.140 1.254 10.648 1.000

1 19 -4.365 6.146 16.657 0.932

1 20 -3.621 5.544 14.710 0.904

1 21 -14.160 -4.884 4.392 0.981

1 22 -14.205 -7.449 -0.692 0.012

1 23 -7.969 0.319 8.606 1.000

1 24 -1.981 5.902 13.785 0.534

1 25 -10.671 -0.631 9.409 1.000

1 26 -4.415 4.457 13.329 0.990

1 27 -5.584 3.581 12.747 1.000

1 28 -5.381 5.722 16.826 0.985

1 29 -28.541 9.674 47.889 1.000

2 3 -4.118 3.497 11.112 0.997

2 4 -4.168 4.252 12.672 0.989

2 5 -5.884 5.444 16.772 0.995

2 6 -3.104 6.092 15.288 0.785

2 7 -11.415 0.254 11.924 1.000

2 8 -6.051 2.498 11.048 1.000

2 9 -7.597 0.908 9.413 1.000

2 10 -4.222 7.447 19.116 0.842

2 11 -6.743 2.885 12.513 1.000

2 12 -7.004 2.128 11.260 1.000

2 13 -2.555 5.234 13.022 0.761

2 14 -4.048 6.975 17.998 0.853

2 15 2.507 10.467 18.426 0.000

2 16 -5.297 1.481 8.259 1.000

2 17 -1.753 7.647 17.048 0.343

Continued on next page

Page 206: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

205

Table 141 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

2 18 -6.144 2.988 12.120 1.000

2 19 -2.397 7.880 18.158 0.478

2 20 -1.619 7.279 16.176 0.331

2 21 -12.160 -3.149 5.862 1.000

2 22 -12.102 -5.714 0.674 0.166

2 23 -5.937 2.053 10.043 1.000

2 24 0.067 7.637 15.206 0.045

2 25 -8.692 1.103 10.899 1.000

2 26 -2.403 6.192 14.786 0.621

2 27 -3.582 5.316 14.213 0.915

2 28 -3.426 7.457 18.340 0.725

2 29 -26.743 11.408 49.559 1.000

3 4 -7.987 0.755 9.497 1.000

3 5 -9.623 1.947 13.516 1.000

3 6 -6.897 2.595 12.087 1.000

3 7 -15.147 -3.243 8.661 1.000

3 8 -9.866 -0.999 7.868 1.000

3 9 -11.413 -2.589 6.235 1.000

3 10 -7.955 3.950 15.854 1.000

3 11 -10.524 -0.612 9.299 1.000

3 12 -10.799 -1.369 8.062 1.000

3 13 -6.400 1.736 9.873 1.000

3 14 -7.794 3.478 14.749 1.000

3 15 -1.330 6.970 15.269 0.277

3 16 -9.191 -2.016 5.158 1.000

3 17 -5.540 4.150 13.841 0.999

3 18 -9.939 -0.509 8.922 1.000

3 19 -6.160 4.383 14.927 1.000

3 20 -5.422 3.781 12.985 1.000

3 21 -15.960 -6.647 2.667 0.641

3 22 -16.019 -9.211 -2.404 0.000

3 23 -9.773 -1.444 6.885 1.000

3 24 -3.787 4.139 12.066 0.982

3 25 -12.468 -2.394 7.680 1.000

3 26 -6.216 2.694 11.605 1.000

3 27 -7.385 1.819 11.022 1.000

3 28 -7.175 3.959 15.094 1.000

3 29 -30.313 7.911 46.135 1.000

4 5 -10.922 1.192 13.306 1.000

4 6 -8.309 1.840 11.989 1.000

4 7 -16.432 -3.998 8.437 1.000

4 8 -11.321 -1.754 7.813 1.000

4 9 -12.871 -3.344 6.184 1.000

4 10 -9.240 3.195 15.629 1.000

4 11 -11.909 -1.367 9.175 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 207: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

206

Table 141 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 12 -12.215 -2.124 7.968 1.000

4 13 -7.913 0.982 9.876 1.000

4 14 -9.107 2.723 14.553 1.000

4 15 -2.829 6.215 15.258 0.719

4 16 -10.795 -2.771 5.252 1.000

4 17 -6.939 3.395 13.730 1.000

4 18 -11.355 -1.264 8.828 1.000

4 19 -7.510 3.628 14.767 1.000

4 20 -6.853 3.027 12.906 1.000

4 21 -17.383 -7.401 2.580 0.556

4 22 -17.664 -9.966 -2.269 0.001

4 23 -11.270 -2.199 6.872 1.000

4 24 -5.318 3.385 12.087 1.000

4 25 -13.844 -3.149 7.547 1.000

4 26 -7.668 1.940 11.547 1.000

4 27 -8.816 1.064 10.943 1.000

4 28 -8.495 3.205 14.904 1.000

4 29 -31.236 7.156 45.548 1.000

5 6 -12.018 0.648 13.314 1.000

5 7 -19.751 -5.190 9.372 1.000

5 8 -15.150 -2.946 9.259 1.000

5 9 -16.709 -4.536 7.638 1.000

5 10 -12.559 2.003 16.564 1.000

5 11 -15.542 -2.559 10.424 1.000

5 12 -15.936 -3.316 9.304 1.000

5 13 -11.895 -0.210 11.474 1.000

5 14 -12.518 1.531 15.580 1.000

5 15 -6.776 5.023 16.822 0.999

5 16 -15.000 -3.963 7.073 1.000

5 17 -10.612 2.203 15.019 1.000

5 18 -15.076 -2.456 10.164 1.000

5 19 -11.036 2.437 15.909 1.000

5 20 -10.616 1.835 14.286 1.000

5 21 -21.126 -8.593 3.939 0.723

5 22 -21.960 -11.158 -0.356 0.033

5 23 -15.211 -3.391 8.429 1.000

5 24 -9.347 2.193 13.732 1.000

5 25 -17.448 -4.341 8.767 1.000

5 26 -11.489 0.748 12.984 1.000

5 27 -12.579 -0.128 12.323 1.000

5 28 -11.927 2.013 15.952 1.000

5 29 -33.169 5.964 45.097 1.000

6 7 -18.810 -5.838 7.135 0.998

6 8 -13.850 -3.594 6.663 1.000

6 9 -15.403 -5.184 5.036 0.988

Continued on next page

Page 208: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

207

Table 141 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

6 10 -11.618 1.355 14.327 1.000

6 11 -14.379 -3.207 7.965 1.000

6 12 -14.711 -3.964 6.784 1.000

6 13 -10.491 -0.858 8.774 1.000

6 14 -11.512 0.883 13.278 1.000

6 15 -5.396 4.375 14.145 0.998

6 16 -13.446 -4.611 4.223 0.983

6 17 -9.421 1.555 12.532 1.000

6 18 -13.851 -3.104 7.644 1.000

6 19 -9.948 1.789 13.525 1.000

6 20 -9.362 1.187 11.735 1.000

6 21 -19.886 -9.241 1.403 0.215

6 22 -20.346 -11.806 -3.267 0.000

6 23 -13.834 -4.039 5.757 1.000

6 24 -7.911 1.545 11.000 1.000

6 25 -16.305 -4.989 6.328 0.999

6 26 -10.195 0.100 10.394 1.000

6 27 -11.325 -0.776 9.772 1.000

6 28 -10.905 1.365 13.635 1.000

6 29 -33.253 5.316 43.886 1.000

7 8 -10.278 2.244 14.766 1.000

7 9 -11.838 0.654 13.146 1.000

7 10 -7.636 7.192 22.021 0.994

7 11 -10.652 2.631 15.913 1.000

7 12 -11.054 1.874 14.801 1.000

7 13 -7.037 4.979 16.995 1.000

7 14 -7.605 6.721 21.046 0.996

7 15 -1.915 10.212 22.340 0.272

7 16 -10.161 1.226 12.613 1.000

7 17 -5.725 7.393 20.511 0.955

7 18 -10.194 2.734 15.661 1.000

7 19 -6.134 7.626 21.387 0.963

7 20 -5.738 7.024 19.787 0.966

7 21 -16.246 -3.404 9.438 1.000

7 22 -17.128 -5.969 5.191 0.976

7 23 -10.349 1.799 13.946 1.000

7 24 -4.493 7.382 19.257 0.875

7 25 -12.555 0.849 14.253 1.000

7 26 -6.616 5.937 18.491 0.996

7 27 -7.701 5.061 17.824 1.000

7 28 -7.016 7.202 21.420 0.988

7 29 -28.079 11.154 50.387 1.000

8 9 -11.232 -1.590 8.052 1.000

8 10 -7.574 4.948 17.471 1.000

8 11 -10.260 0.387 11.033 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 209: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

208

Table 141 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 12 -10.570 -0.370 9.830 1.000

8 13 -6.282 2.735 11.752 1.000

8 14 -7.446 4.477 16.399 1.000

8 15 -1.196 7.968 17.133 0.212

8 16 -9.177 -1.018 7.142 1.000

8 17 -5.292 5.149 15.590 0.992

8 18 -9.710 0.490 10.690 1.000

8 19 -5.855 5.382 16.619 0.995

8 20 -5.210 4.780 14.770 0.995

8 21 -15.739 -5.648 4.443 0.958

8 22 -16.051 -8.213 -0.374 0.027

8 23 -9.636 -0.445 8.746 1.000

8 24 -3.690 5.138 13.966 0.935

8 25 -12.192 -1.395 9.402 1.000

8 26 -6.028 3.693 13.415 1.000

8 27 -7.173 2.817 12.807 1.000

8 28 -6.835 4.958 16.751 0.999

8 29 -29.511 8.910 47.331 1.000

9 10 -5.954 6.538 19.031 0.982

9 11 -8.634 1.977 12.587 1.000

9 12 -8.943 1.220 11.383 1.000

9 13 -4.649 4.325 13.300 0.994

9 14 -5.824 6.067 17.957 0.987

9 15 0.435 9.558 18.682 0.027

9 16 -7.541 0.572 8.685 1.000

9 17 -3.665 6.739 17.143 0.821

9 18 -8.083 2.080 12.243 1.000

9 19 -4.231 6.972 18.175 0.874

9 20 -3.582 6.370 16.322 0.838

9 21 -14.111 -4.058 5.996 1.000

9 22 -14.413 -6.622 1.168 0.253

9 23 -8.005 1.145 10.295 1.000

9 24 -2.057 6.728 15.513 0.481

9 25 -10.567 0.195 10.957 1.000

9 26 -4.399 5.283 14.966 0.969

9 27 -5.545 4.407 14.359 0.999

9 28 -5.212 6.548 18.309 0.961

9 29 -27.911 10.500 48.911 1.000

10 11 -17.844 -4.562 8.721 1.000

10 12 -18.246 -5.318 7.609 1.000

10 13 -14.229 -2.213 9.803 1.000

10 14 -14.798 -0.472 13.854 1.000

10 15 -9.107 3.020 15.147 1.000

10 16 -17.353 -5.966 5.421 0.982

10 17 -12.918 0.201 13.319 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 210: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

209

Table 141 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

10 18 -17.386 -4.458 8.469 1.000

10 19 -13.327 0.434 14.194 1.000

10 20 -12.931 -0.168 12.594 1.000

10 21 -23.438 -10.596 2.246 0.313

10 22 -24.320 -13.161 -2.002 0.004

10 23 -17.541 -5.394 6.754 0.998

10 24 -11.685 0.190 12.065 1.000

10 25 -19.747 -6.343 7.061 0.996

10 26 -13.809 -1.255 11.298 1.000

10 27 -14.894 -2.131 10.631 1.000

10 28 -14.208 0.010 14.228 1.000

10 29 -35.272 3.962 43.195 1.000

11 12 -11.877 -0.757 10.363 1.000

11 13 -7.697 2.349 12.394 1.000

11 14 -8.629 4.090 16.809 1.000

11 15 -2.597 7.582 17.760 0.545

11 16 -10.688 -1.404 7.880 1.000

11 17 -6.579 4.762 16.104 0.999

11 18 -11.017 0.103 11.223 1.000

11 19 -7.083 4.995 17.074 1.000

11 20 -6.534 4.394 15.321 1.000

11 21 -17.055 -6.034 4.986 0.968

11 22 -17.603 -8.599 0.404 0.086

11 23 -11.035 -0.832 9.371 1.000

11 24 -5.125 4.752 14.628 0.995

11 25 -13.452 -1.782 9.889 1.000

11 26 -7.376 3.307 13.989 1.000

11 27 -8.497 2.431 13.358 1.000

11 28 -8.026 4.572 17.169 1.000

11 29 -30.152 8.523 47.198 1.000

12 13 -6.466 3.105 12.677 1.000

12 14 -7.501 4.847 17.194 1.000

12 15 -1.372 8.338 18.049 0.235

12 16 -9.416 -0.648 8.121 1.000

12 17 -5.404 5.519 16.442 0.989

12 18 -9.833 0.860 11.553 1.000

12 19 -5.934 5.752 17.439 0.992

12 20 -5.343 5.150 15.644 0.993

12 21 -15.868 -5.278 5.312 0.991

12 22 -16.313 -7.842 0.628 0.120

12 23 -9.811 -0.075 9.660 1.000

12 24 -3.886 5.508 14.902 0.930

12 25 -12.290 -1.025 10.240 1.000

12 26 -6.175 4.063 14.301 1.000

12 27 -7.306 3.187 13.681 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 211: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

210

Table 141 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

12 28 -6.894 5.328 17.551 0.999

12 29 -29.275 9.280 47.835 1.000

13 14 -9.648 1.741 13.131 1.000

13 15 -3.226 5.233 13.693 0.880

13 16 -11.112 -3.753 3.606 0.987

13 17 -7.414 2.414 12.242 1.000

13 18 -11.817 -2.245 7.326 1.000

13 19 -8.023 2.647 13.317 1.000

13 20 -7.303 2.045 11.393 1.000

13 21 -17.839 -8.383 1.073 0.180

13 22 -17.950 -10.948 -3.946 0.000

13 23 -11.669 -3.181 5.308 1.000

13 24 -5.691 2.403 10.497 1.000

13 25 -14.336 -4.130 6.076 1.000

13 26 -8.102 0.958 10.018 1.000

13 27 -9.265 0.082 9.430 1.000

13 28 -9.031 2.223 13.477 1.000

13 29 -32.084 6.175 44.433 1.000

14 15 -8.015 3.492 14.999 1.000

14 16 -16.218 -5.494 5.230 0.986

14 17 -11.875 0.672 13.220 1.000

14 18 -16.334 -3.987 8.361 1.000

14 19 -12.312 0.906 14.123 1.000

14 20 -11.871 0.304 12.478 1.000

14 21 -22.382 -10.124 2.134 0.311

14 22 -23.171 -12.689 -2.207 0.002

14 23 -16.450 -4.922 6.606 0.999

14 24 -10.579 0.662 11.902 1.000

14 25 -18.717 -5.872 6.974 0.998

14 26 -12.739 -0.783 11.172 1.000

14 27 -13.834 -1.659 10.515 1.000

14 28 -13.211 0.482 14.175 1.000

14 29 -34.612 4.433 43.479 1.000

15 16 -16.525 -8.986 -1.447 0.003

15 17 -12.783 -2.819 7.144 1.000

15 18 -17.189 -7.478 2.232 0.468

15 19 -13.381 -2.586 8.209 1.000

15 20 -12.678 -3.188 6.302 1.000

15 21 -23.213 -13.616 -4.019 0.000

15 22 -23.372 -16.181 -8.990 0.000

15 23 -17.059 -8.414 0.231 0.070

15 24 -11.088 -2.830 5.428 1.000

15 25 -19.700 -9.363 0.973 0.148

15 26 -13.482 -4.275 4.932 0.997

15 27 -14.641 -5.151 4.339 0.971

Continued on next page

Page 212: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

211

Table 141 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

15 28 -14.383 -3.010 8.363 1.000

15 29 -37.352 0.942 39.235 1.000

16 17 -2.881 6.167 15.214 0.735

16 18 -7.261 1.508 10.276 1.000

16 19 -3.556 6.400 16.356 0.832

16 20 -2.726 5.798 14.322 0.738

16 21 -13.272 -4.630 4.012 0.976

16 22 -13.051 -7.195 -1.338 0.002

16 23 -6.999 0.572 8.144 1.000

16 24 -0.971 6.156 13.282 0.224

16 25 -9.834 -0.377 9.080 1.000

16 26 -3.496 4.711 12.918 0.944

16 27 -4.689 3.835 12.359 0.998

16 28 -4.604 5.976 16.555 0.954

16 29 -28.138 9.928 47.993 1.000

17 18 -15.582 -4.659 6.264 0.999

17 19 -11.664 0.233 12.130 1.000

17 20 -11.096 -0.369 10.359 1.000

17 21 -21.619 -10.797 0.025 0.051

17 22 -22.121 -13.362 -4.602 0.000

17 23 -15.582 -5.594 4.393 0.958

17 24 -9.666 -0.011 9.644 1.000

17 25 -18.027 -6.544 4.939 0.949

17 26 -11.934 -1.456 9.022 1.000

17 27 -13.059 -2.332 8.396 1.000

17 28 -12.615 -0.191 12.233 1.000

17 29 -34.858 3.761 42.380 1.000

18 19 -6.794 4.892 16.579 0.999

18 20 -6.203 4.290 14.784 1.000

18 21 -16.728 -6.138 4.452 0.938

18 22 -17.173 -8.702 -0.232 0.035

18 23 -10.671 -0.935 8.800 1.000

18 24 -4.746 4.648 14.042 0.992

18 25 -13.150 -1.885 9.380 1.000

18 26 -7.035 3.203 13.441 1.000

18 27 -8.166 2.327 12.821 1.000

18 28 -7.754 4.468 16.691 1.000

18 29 -30.135 8.420 46.975 1.000

19 20 -12.106 -0.602 10.902 1.000

19 21 -22.622 -11.030 0.562 0.090

19 22 -23.289 -13.595 -3.900 0.000

19 23 -16.645 -5.827 4.990 0.974

19 24 -10.755 -0.244 10.267 1.000

19 25 -18.989 -6.777 5.435 0.962

19 26 -12.960 -1.689 9.583 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 213: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

212

Table 141 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

19 27 -14.069 -2.565 8.939 1.000

19 28 -13.524 -0.424 12.676 1.000

19 29 -35.314 3.528 42.370 1.000

20 21 -20.816 -10.428 -0.040 0.048

20 22 -21.210 -12.993 -4.776 0.000

20 23 -14.741 -5.226 4.290 0.967

20 24 -8.808 0.358 9.523 1.000

20 25 -17.250 -6.175 4.900 0.960

20 26 -11.116 -1.087 8.942 1.000

20 27 -12.252 -1.963 8.327 1.000

20 28 -11.870 0.178 12.226 1.000

20 29 -34.370 4.130 42.629 1.000

21 22 -10.905 -2.565 5.775 1.000

21 23 -4.420 5.202 14.825 0.973

21 24 1.510 10.786 20.062 0.005

21 25 -6.914 4.253 15.419 1.000

21 26 -0.789 9.341 19.471 0.125

21 27 -1.923 8.465 18.853 0.340

21 28 -1.526 10.606 22.738 0.203

21 29 -23.968 14.558 53.084 1.000

22 23 0.542 7.767 14.992 0.018

22 24 6.594 13.351 20.108 0.000

22 25 -2.364 6.818 15.999 0.553

22 26 4.017 11.906 19.794 0.000

22 27 2.813 11.030 19.247 0.000

22 28 2.837 13.171 23.505 0.001

22 29 -20.876 17.122 55.121 0.998

23 24 -2.704 5.584 13.871 0.756

23 25 -11.310 -0.950 9.411 1.000

23 26 -5.095 4.139 13.372 0.998

23 27 -6.253 3.263 12.778 1.000

23 28 -5.990 5.404 16.798 0.996

23 29 -28.945 9.355 47.655 1.000

24 25 -16.573 -6.533 3.506 0.814

24 26 -10.317 -1.445 7.427 1.000

24 27 -11.486 -2.321 6.845 1.000

24 28 -11.283 -0.180 10.923 1.000

24 29 -34.443 3.772 41.986 1.000

25 26 -5.745 5.088 15.922 0.996

25 27 -6.863 4.212 15.287 1.000

25 28 -6.372 6.353 19.079 0.991

25 29 -28.412 10.305 49.022 1.000

26 27 -10.905 -0.876 9.153 1.000

26 28 -10.561 1.265 13.091 1.000

26 29 -33.214 5.217 43.648 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 214: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

213

Table 141 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

27 28 -9.907 2.141 14.189 1.000

27 29 -32.407 6.093 44.592 1.000

28 29 -35.055 3.952 42.958 1.000

Page 215: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

214

90 [X13.bel.Scaled = cat]

90.1 Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Table 142: Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 62.977

1 60.024

2 53.464

3 53.546

4 51.915

5 48.570

6 49.627

7 51.897

8 51.625

p-value = 2.4957e-37

90.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 143: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Scaled by group-

ing variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -1.529 2.953 7.435 0.513

1 3 5.143 9.514 13.884 0.000

1 4 4.824 9.431 14.039 0.000

1 5 5.857 11.062 16.267 0.000

1 6 10.436 14.407 18.378 0.000

1 7 9.373 13.350 17.327 0.000

1 8 5.849 11.081 16.312 0.000

1 9 -4.445 11.352 27.149 0.387

2 3 2.393 6.561 10.729 0.000

2 4 2.062 6.478 10.894 0.000

2 5 3.073 8.109 13.144 0.000

2 6 7.708 11.454 15.201 0.000

2 7 6.644 10.397 14.150 0.000

2 8 3.064 8.127 13.191 0.000

2 9 -7.343 8.399 24.141 0.774

3 4 -4.385 -0.082 4.220 1.000

3 5 -3.389 1.548 6.485 0.988

3 6 1.281 4.894 8.506 0.001

3 7 0.217 3.836 7.456 0.028

Continued on next page

Page 216: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

215

Table 143 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -3.398 1.567 6.532 0.988

3 9 -13.872 1.839 17.550 1.000

4 5 -3.517 1.631 6.778 0.988

4 6 1.080 4.976 8.872 0.002

4 7 0.016 3.919 7.821 0.048

4 8 -3.525 1.649 6.824 0.987

4 9 -13.858 1.921 17.699 1.000

5 6 -1.241 3.345 7.932 0.365

5 7 -2.304 2.288 6.880 0.834

5 8 -5.694 0.019 5.732 1.000

5 9 -15.673 0.290 16.253 1.000

6 7 -4.182 -1.057 2.068 0.981

6 8 -7.943 -3.327 1.290 0.383

6 9 -18.659 -3.055 12.549 1.000

7 8 -6.892 -2.269 2.353 0.845

7 9 -17.604 -1.998 13.608 1.000

8 9 -15.700 0.272 16.243 1.000

Page 217: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

216

91 [X13.bel.Scaled = School-Type-1]

91.1 Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable School- Type-1

Table 144: Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 52.010

3 55.746

5 47.000

6 50.532

7 51.857

8 35.667

10 32.000

21 61.600

22 78.750

32 54.143

51 44.500

53 58.000

54 54.500

56 53.000

57 53.250

58 53.000

71 59.545

p-value = 1.3704e-31

91.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 145: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Scaled by group-

ing variable School-Type-1

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -6.482 -3.736 -0.989 0.000

1 3 -43.878 5.010 53.899 1.000

1 4 -4.271 1.478 7.226 1.000

1 5 -12.985 0.153 13.291 1.000

1 6 6.267 16.344 26.420 0.000

1 7 5.207 20.010 34.813 0.000

1 8 -31.491 -9.590 12.311 0.986

1 9 -35.495 -26.740 -17.984 0.000

1 10 -12.891 -2.133 8.626 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 218: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

217

Table 145 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 11 -12.491 7.510 27.511 0.997

1 12 -34.240 -5.990 22.260 1.000

1 13 -37.074 -2.490 32.094 1.000

1 14 -29.240 -0.990 27.260 1.000

1 15 -25.715 -1.240 23.236 1.000

1 16 -49.878 -0.990 47.899 1.000

1 17 -22.338 -7.535 7.268 0.943

2 3 -40.178 8.746 57.670 1.000

2 4 -0.830 5.213 11.257 0.192

2 5 -9.381 3.889 17.159 1.000

2 6 9.831 20.079 30.327 0.000

2 7 8.826 23.746 38.666 0.000

2 8 -27.834 -5.854 16.126 1.000

2 9 -31.956 -23.004 -14.052 0.000

2 10 -9.316 1.603 12.522 1.000

2 11 -8.842 11.246 31.334 0.880

2 12 -30.565 -2.254 26.057 1.000

2 13 -33.389 1.246 35.880 1.000

2 14 -25.565 2.746 31.057 1.000

2 15 -22.051 2.496 27.042 1.000

2 16 -46.178 2.746 51.670 1.000

2 17 -18.720 -3.799 11.121 1.000

3 4 -52.717 -3.532 45.652 1.000

3 5 -55.440 -4.857 45.726 1.000

3 6 -38.542 11.333 61.209 1.000

3 7 -36.041 15.000 66.041 1.000

3 8 -68.132 -14.600 38.932 1.000

3 9 -81.375 -31.750 17.875 0.718

3 10 -57.161 -7.143 42.875 1.000

3 11 -50.283 2.500 55.283 1.000

3 12 -67.428 -11.000 45.428 1.000

3 13 -67.351 -7.500 52.351 1.000

3 14 -62.428 -6.000 50.428 1.000

3 15 -60.886 -6.250 48.386 1.000

3 16 -75.109 -6.000 63.109 1.000

3 17 -63.586 -12.545 38.495 1.000

4 5 -15.523 -1.325 12.874 1.000

4 6 3.441 14.866 26.290 0.001

4 7 2.781 18.532 34.284 0.005

4 8 -33.620 -11.068 11.485 0.959

4 9 -38.496 -28.218 -17.939 0.000

4 10 -15.641 -3.610 8.420 1.000

4 11 -14.680 6.032 26.745 1.000

4 12 -36.226 -7.468 21.291 1.000

4 13 -38.968 -3.968 31.033 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 219: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

218

Table 145 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 14 -31.226 -2.468 26.291 1.000

4 15 -27.778 -2.718 22.343 1.000

4 16 -51.652 -2.468 46.717 1.000

4 17 -24.765 -9.013 6.739 0.860

5 6 -0.244 16.190 32.625 0.059

5 7 0.168 19.857 39.547 0.045

5 8 -35.202 -9.743 15.717 0.997

5 9 -42.552 -26.893 -11.234 0.000

5 10 -19.147 -2.286 14.575 1.000

5 11 -16.488 7.357 31.202 1.000

5 12 -37.233 -6.143 24.947 1.000

5 13 -39.583 -2.643 34.298 1.000

5 14 -32.233 -1.143 29.947 1.000

5 15 -29.098 -1.393 26.313 1.000

5 16 -51.726 -1.143 49.440 1.000

5 17 -27.378 -7.688 12.001 0.996

6 7 -14.127 3.667 21.460 1.000

6 8 -49.957 -25.933 -1.910 0.020

6 9 -56.279 -43.083 -29.888 0.000

6 10 -33.078 -18.476 -3.874 0.001

6 11 -31.138 -8.833 13.472 0.995

6 12 -52.259 -22.333 7.592 0.440

6 13 -54.799 -18.833 17.132 0.929

6 14 -47.259 -17.333 12.592 0.848

6 15 -43.975 -17.583 8.808 0.652

6 16 -67.209 -17.333 32.542 0.999

6 17 -41.672 -23.879 -6.086 0.000

7 8 -55.957 -29.600 -3.243 0.011

7 9 -63.830 -46.750 -29.670 0.000

7 10 -40.331 -22.143 -3.955 0.003

7 11 -37.301 -12.500 12.301 0.948

7 12 -57.829 -26.000 5.829 0.276

7 13 -60.065 -22.500 15.065 0.810

7 14 -52.829 -21.000 10.829 0.668

7 15 -49.783 -21.250 7.283 0.444

7 16 -72.041 -21.000 30.041 0.993

7 17 -48.383 -27.545 -6.708 0.001

8 9 -40.650 -17.150 6.350 0.483

8 10 -16.860 7.457 31.774 1.000

8 11 -12.491 17.100 46.691 0.850

8 12 -32.088 3.600 39.288 1.000

8 13 -33.786 7.100 47.986 1.000

8 14 -27.088 8.600 44.288 1.000

8 15 -24.432 8.350 41.132 1.000

8 16 -44.932 8.600 62.132 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 220: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

219

Table 145 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 17 -24.303 2.055 28.412 1.000

9 10 10.883 24.607 38.331 0.000

9 11 12.510 34.250 55.990 0.000

9 12 -8.757 20.750 50.257 0.554

9 13 -11.368 24.250 59.868 0.613

9 14 -3.757 25.750 55.257 0.176

9 15 -0.416 25.500 51.416 0.060

9 16 -23.875 25.750 75.375 0.934

9 17 2.125 19.205 36.284 0.011

10 11 -12.979 9.643 32.264 0.989

10 12 -34.019 -3.857 26.305 1.000

10 13 -36.520 -0.357 35.806 1.000

10 14 -29.019 1.143 31.305 1.000

10 15 -25.767 0.893 27.552 1.000

10 16 -48.875 1.143 51.161 1.000

10 17 -23.591 -5.403 12.786 1.000

11 12 -48.055 -13.500 21.055 0.996

11 13 -49.900 -10.000 29.900 1.000

11 14 -43.055 -8.500 26.055 1.000

11 15 -40.294 -8.750 22.794 1.000

11 16 -61.283 -8.500 44.283 1.000

11 17 -39.847 -15.045 9.756 0.794

12 13 -41.110 3.500 48.110 1.000

12 14 -34.900 5.000 44.900 1.000

12 15 -32.573 4.750 42.073 1.000

12 16 -51.428 5.000 61.428 1.000

12 17 -33.375 -1.545 30.284 1.000

13 14 -43.110 1.500 46.110 1.000

13 15 -41.071 1.250 43.571 1.000

13 16 -58.351 1.500 61.351 1.000

13 17 -42.610 -5.045 32.520 1.000

14 15 -37.573 -0.250 37.073 1.000

14 16 -56.428 0.000 56.428 1.000

14 17 -38.375 -6.545 25.284 1.000

15 16 -54.386 0.250 54.886 1.000

15 17 -34.828 -6.295 22.237 1.000

16 17 -57.586 -6.545 44.495 1.000

Page 221: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

220

::........-: --+-

---.--.·

10

21

22

32

51

53

54

56

57

58

71

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Page 222: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

221

92 [X13.bel.Scaled = School-Type-2]

92.1 Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable School- Type-2

Table 146: Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 53.683

2 52.705

3 68.784

p-value = 4.1802e-10

92.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 147: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Scaled by group-

ing variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.448 0.978 6.404 0.906

1 3 -22.888 -15.101 -7.314 0.000

2 3 -21.784 -16.079 -10.374 0.000

Page 223: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

222

93 [X13.bel.Scaled = BudgetFrom]

93.1 Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Bud- getFrom

Table 148: Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Budget-

From

Group Mean

1 55.000

2 59.600

4 38.667

5 52.705

6 68.784

7 53.000

p-value = 7.5257e-10

93.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 149: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Scaled by group-

ing variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -20.294 -4.600 11.094 0.961

1 3 -2.699 16.333 35.366 0.141

1 4 -6.274 2.295 10.865 0.974

1 5 -24.712 -13.784 -2.855 0.004

1 6 -40.557 2.000 44.557 1.000

2 3 -0.599 20.933 42.466 0.062

2 4 -6.328 6.895 20.119 0.673

2 5 -24.045 -9.184 5.678 0.491

2 6 -37.133 6.600 50.333 0.998

3 4 -31.090 -14.038 3.014 0.176

3 5 -48.468 -30.117 -11.766 0.000

3 6 -59.372 -14.333 30.705 0.945

4 5 -23.006 -16.079 -9.152 0.000

4 6 -42.005 -0.295 41.414 1.000

5 6 -26.473 15.784 58.041 0.895

Page 224: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

223

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Page 225: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

224

94 [X13.bel.Scaled = IsProtected]

94.1 Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable IsPro- tected

Table 150: Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable IsPro-

tected

Group Mean

0 53.019

1 53.488

p-value = 0.72911

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 226: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

225

95 [X13.bel.Scaled = IsCentral]

95.1 Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable IsCen- tral

Table 151: Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable IsCentral

Group Mean

0 54.402

1 51.171

p-value = 4.1283e-06

95.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 152: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Scaled by group-

ing variable IsCentral

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 1.860 3.231 4.602 0.000

Page 227: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

226

96 [X13.bel.Scaled = Shifts]

96.1 Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Table 153: Means of X13.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 51.651

5 56.850

7 37.667

p-value = 2.9826e-11

96.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 154: Between group comparison of X13.bel.Scaled by group-

ing variable Shifts

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -6.999 -5.199 -3.398 0.000

1 3 -5.836 13.985 33.806 0.223

2 3 -0.675 19.183 39.041 0.061

Page 228: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

227

97 [X14.xxx.Normed = Obl-ID]

97.1 Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 155: Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 100.793

2 101.541

3 100.544

4 97.953

5 99.393

6 98.816

7 96.654

8 100.164

9 103.016

10 94.385

11 99.535

12 102.500

13 98.904

14 97.200

15 94.727

16 97.614

17 96.000

18 97.180

19 93.167

20 98.167

21 100.731

22 102.531

23 99.566

24 97.522

25 106.951

26 100.283

27 98.315

28 102.387

29 99.000

p-value = 1.9758e-15

97.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Page 229: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

228

Table 156: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Normed by

grouping variable Obl-ID

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -5.862 -0.748 4.366 1.000

1 3 -5.106 0.249 5.604 1.000

1 4 -3.039 2.840 8.720 0.994

1 5 -6.396 1.401 9.197 1.000

1 6 -4.411 1.977 8.366 1.000

1 7 -3.883 4.140 12.163 0.985

1 8 -5.335 0.630 6.594 1.000

1 9 -8.158 -2.223 3.713 1.000

1 10 -1.614 6.409 14.432 0.384

1 11 -5.414 1.259 7.931 1.000

1 12 -8.053 -1.707 4.640 1.000

1 13 -3.579 1.890 7.358 1.000

1 14 -4.001 3.593 11.188 0.996

1 15 0.487 6.066 11.646 0.015

1 16 -1.635 3.180 7.994 0.790

1 17 -1.729 4.793 11.316 0.576

1 18 -2.733 3.613 9.960 0.949

1 19 0.526 7.627 14.728 0.018

1 20 -3.566 2.627 8.819 0.999

1 21 -6.204 0.063 6.330 1.000

1 22 -6.302 -1.737 2.828 1.000

1 23 -4.372 1.228 6.827 1.000

1 24 -2.054 3.272 8.598 0.888

1 25 -12.941 -6.158 0.625 0.145

1 26 -5.484 0.510 6.504 1.000

1 27 -3.714 2.479 8.671 1.000

1 28 -9.095 -1.594 5.908 1.000

1 29 -24.025 1.793 27.612 1.000

2 3 -4.148 0.997 6.142 1.000

2 4 -2.100 3.588 9.277 0.857

2 5 -5.505 2.148 9.802 1.000

2 6 -3.488 2.725 8.938 0.999

2 7 -2.996 4.887 12.771 0.878

2 8 -4.399 1.377 7.153 1.000

2 9 -7.221 -1.475 4.271 1.000

2 10 -0.727 7.157 15.041 0.145

2 11 -4.499 2.006 8.511 1.000

2 12 -7.129 -0.959 5.211 1.000

2 13 -2.625 2.638 7.900 0.990

2 14 -3.106 4.341 11.789 0.934

2 15 1.437 6.814 12.191 0.001

2 16 -0.652 3.927 8.507 0.237

2 17 -0.810 5.541 11.892 0.206

Continued on next page

Page 230: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

229

Table 156 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

2 18 -1.809 4.361 10.531 0.662

2 19 1.431 8.375 15.318 0.002

2 20 -2.637 3.375 9.386 0.957

2 21 -5.277 0.811 6.899 1.000

2 22 -5.305 -0.989 3.327 1.000

2 23 -3.423 1.975 7.374 1.000

2 24 -1.095 4.020 9.134 0.421

2 25 -12.028 -5.410 1.208 0.333

2 26 -4.549 1.258 7.065 1.000

2 27 -2.785 3.226 9.238 0.975

2 28 -8.198 -0.846 6.507 1.000

2 29 -23.234 2.541 28.317 1.000

3 4 -3.315 2.591 8.498 0.999

3 5 -6.665 1.152 8.968 1.000

3 6 -4.685 1.728 8.141 1.000

3 7 -4.152 3.891 11.933 0.994

3 8 -5.610 0.381 6.371 1.000

3 9 -8.434 -2.472 3.490 1.000

3 10 -1.883 6.160 14.202 0.481

3 11 -5.687 1.010 7.706 1.000

3 12 -8.327 -1.956 4.416 1.000

3 13 -3.856 1.641 7.138 1.000

3 14 -4.271 3.344 10.960 0.999

3 15 0.210 5.817 11.425 0.031

3 16 -1.917 2.931 7.778 0.904

3 17 -2.003 4.544 11.091 0.699

3 18 -3.007 3.364 9.736 0.980

3 19 0.254 7.378 14.501 0.031

3 20 -3.840 2.378 8.596 1.000

3 21 -6.478 -0.186 6.106 1.000

3 22 -6.586 -1.986 2.613 0.999

3 23 -4.649 0.979 6.606 1.000

3 24 -2.333 3.023 8.378 0.954

3 25 -13.213 -6.407 0.399 0.101

3 26 -5.759 0.261 6.281 1.000

3 27 -3.988 2.230 8.447 1.000

3 28 -9.365 -1.843 5.680 1.000

3 29 -24.280 1.544 27.369 1.000

4 5 -9.624 -1.440 6.745 1.000

4 6 -7.720 -0.863 5.994 1.000

4 7 -7.102 1.299 9.700 1.000

4 8 -8.674 -2.211 4.253 1.000

4 9 -11.500 -5.063 1.374 0.419

4 10 -4.832 3.569 11.969 0.999

4 11 -8.704 -1.582 5.541 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 231: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

230

Table 156 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 12 -11.365 -4.547 2.271 0.774

4 13 -6.960 -0.950 5.059 1.000

4 14 -7.239 0.753 8.746 1.000

4 15 -2.884 3.226 9.336 0.980

4 16 -5.082 0.339 5.760 1.000

4 17 -5.029 1.953 8.935 1.000

4 18 -6.045 0.773 7.591 1.000

4 19 -2.739 4.786 12.312 0.846

4 20 -6.888 -0.214 6.461 1.000

4 21 -9.522 -2.778 3.966 1.000

4 22 -9.778 -4.577 0.623 0.192

4 23 -7.741 -1.613 4.516 1.000

4 24 -5.448 0.431 6.311 1.000

4 25 -16.224 -8.998 -1.772 0.001

4 26 -8.821 -2.330 4.161 1.000

4 27 -7.036 -0.362 6.313 1.000

4 28 -12.338 -4.434 3.470 0.957

4 29 -26.985 -1.047 24.891 1.000

5 6 -7.981 0.577 9.134 1.000

5 7 -7.099 2.739 12.577 1.000

5 8 -9.017 -0.771 7.475 1.000

5 9 -11.848 -3.623 4.601 0.999

5 10 -4.830 5.008 14.846 0.988

5 11 -8.914 -0.142 8.630 1.000

5 12 -11.633 -3.107 5.419 1.000

5 13 -7.405 0.489 8.384 1.000

5 14 -7.299 2.193 11.685 1.000

5 15 -3.306 4.666 12.637 0.931

5 16 -5.677 1.779 9.236 1.000

5 17 -5.265 3.393 12.051 1.000

5 18 -6.313 2.213 10.739 1.000

5 19 -2.876 6.226 15.328 0.728

5 20 -7.186 1.226 9.638 1.000

5 21 -9.805 -1.338 7.129 1.000

5 22 -10.436 -3.138 4.160 0.999

5 23 -8.159 -0.173 7.813 1.000

5 24 -5.925 1.871 9.668 1.000

5 25 -16.414 -7.558 1.297 0.246

5 26 -9.158 -0.890 7.377 1.000

5 27 -7.334 1.078 9.490 1.000

5 28 -12.412 -2.994 6.423 1.000

5 29 -26.046 0.393 26.832 1.000

6 7 -6.602 2.162 10.927 1.000

6 8 -8.277 -1.348 5.582 1.000

6 9 -11.104 -4.200 2.705 0.898

Continued on next page

Page 232: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

231

Table 156 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

6 10 -4.333 4.432 13.196 0.989

6 11 -8.267 -0.719 6.830 1.000

6 12 -10.945 -3.684 3.578 0.988

6 13 -6.595 -0.087 6.420 1.000

6 14 -6.758 1.616 9.990 1.000

6 15 -2.512 4.089 10.690 0.879

6 16 -4.766 1.203 7.171 1.000

6 17 -4.600 2.816 10.232 1.000

6 18 -5.625 1.636 8.898 1.000

6 19 -2.280 5.650 13.579 0.645

6 20 -6.477 0.650 7.777 1.000

6 21 -9.106 -1.914 5.277 1.000

6 22 -9.484 -3.714 2.055 0.829

6 23 -7.367 -0.749 5.869 1.000

6 24 -5.094 1.295 7.683 1.000

6 25 -15.780 -8.135 -0.489 0.021

6 26 -8.422 -1.467 5.488 1.000

6 27 -6.625 0.502 7.628 1.000

6 28 -11.861 -3.571 4.719 0.999

6 29 -26.242 -0.184 25.875 1.000

7 8 -11.970 -3.510 4.950 1.000

7 9 -14.802 -6.362 2.078 0.518

7 10 -7.749 2.269 12.288 1.000

7 11 -11.855 -2.881 6.093 1.000

7 12 -14.580 -5.846 2.888 0.767

7 13 -10.368 -2.250 5.868 1.000

7 14 -10.225 -0.546 9.133 1.000

7 15 -6.267 1.927 10.120 1.000

7 16 -8.653 -0.960 6.733 1.000

7 17 -8.209 0.654 9.517 1.000

7 18 -9.260 -0.526 8.208 1.000

7 19 -5.810 3.487 12.784 1.000

7 20 -10.135 -1.513 7.110 1.000

7 21 -12.753 -4.077 4.599 0.996

7 22 -13.416 -5.877 1.663 0.440

7 23 -11.119 -2.912 5.295 1.000

7 24 -8.891 -0.868 7.155 1.000

7 25 -19.353 -10.297 -1.241 0.007

7 26 -12.111 -3.629 4.852 0.999

7 27 -10.284 -1.661 6.962 1.000

7 28 -15.339 -5.733 3.873 0.916

7 29 -28.853 -2.346 24.160 1.000

8 9 -9.366 -2.852 3.662 0.999

8 10 -2.681 5.779 14.240 0.730

8 11 -6.564 0.629 7.822 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 233: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

232

Table 156 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 12 -9.227 -2.336 4.555 1.000

8 13 -4.832 1.260 7.352 1.000

8 14 -5.091 2.964 11.019 1.000

8 15 -0.755 5.437 11.628 0.196

8 16 -2.963 2.550 8.063 0.997

8 17 -2.890 4.164 11.218 0.925

8 18 -3.907 2.984 9.875 0.999

8 19 -0.595 6.997 14.589 0.125

8 20 -4.752 1.997 8.747 1.000

8 21 -7.385 -0.567 6.251 1.000

8 22 -7.663 -2.367 2.929 0.998

8 23 -5.611 0.598 6.808 1.000

8 24 -3.322 2.642 8.607 0.999

8 25 -14.082 -6.787 0.508 0.114

8 26 -6.687 -0.119 6.449 1.000

8 27 -4.900 1.849 8.598 1.000

8 28 -10.191 -2.223 5.744 1.000

8 29 -24.794 1.164 27.122 1.000

9 10 0.192 8.632 17.071 0.037

9 11 -3.687 3.481 10.650 0.994

9 12 -6.350 0.516 7.382 1.000

9 13 -1.951 4.113 10.176 0.744

9 14 -2.218 5.816 13.850 0.610

9 15 2.125 8.289 14.453 0.000

9 16 -0.079 5.402 10.884 0.060

9 17 -0.013 7.016 14.045 0.051

9 18 -1.030 5.836 12.702 0.254

9 19 2.280 9.849 17.419 0.000

9 20 -1.874 4.849 11.573 0.618

9 21 -4.507 2.285 9.078 1.000

9 22 -4.778 0.486 5.749 1.000

9 23 -2.731 3.450 9.632 0.960

9 24 -0.441 5.494 11.430 0.120

9 25 -11.206 -3.935 3.336 0.972

9 26 -3.809 2.733 9.274 0.999

9 27 -2.022 4.701 11.425 0.685

9 28 -7.317 0.629 8.575 1.000

9 29 -21.935 4.016 29.967 1.000

10 11 -14.124 -5.150 3.824 0.945

10 12 -16.849 -8.115 0.619 0.116

10 13 -12.637 -4.519 3.599 0.961

10 14 -12.494 -2.815 6.863 1.000

10 15 -8.536 -0.343 7.851 1.000

10 16 -10.922 -3.229 4.464 0.999

10 17 -10.478 -1.615 7.248 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 234: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

233

Table 156 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

10 18 -11.529 -2.795 5.939 1.000

10 19 -8.079 1.218 10.515 1.000

10 20 -12.405 -3.782 4.841 0.999

10 21 -15.022 -6.346 2.330 0.587

10 22 -15.685 -8.146 -0.607 0.017

10 23 -13.388 -5.181 3.026 0.856

10 24 -11.160 -3.137 4.886 1.000

10 25 -21.623 -12.567 -3.511 0.000

10 26 -14.380 -5.899 2.583 0.695

10 27 -12.553 -3.930 4.692 0.998

10 28 -17.609 -8.002 1.604 0.293

10 29 -31.122 -4.615 21.891 1.000

11 12 -10.478 -2.965 4.548 1.000

11 13 -6.156 0.631 7.418 1.000

11 14 -6.258 2.335 10.928 1.000

11 15 -2.069 4.808 11.684 0.685

11 16 -4.351 1.921 8.194 1.000

11 17 -4.127 3.535 11.197 0.997

11 18 -5.158 2.355 9.868 1.000

11 19 -1.792 6.368 14.528 0.437

11 20 -6.015 1.368 8.751 1.000

11 21 -8.642 -1.196 6.250 1.000

11 22 -9.079 -2.996 3.087 0.992

11 23 -6.924 -0.031 6.862 1.000

11 24 -4.660 2.013 8.686 1.000

11 25 -15.301 -7.416 0.468 0.102

11 26 -7.966 -0.748 6.469 1.000

11 27 -6.163 1.220 8.603 1.000

11 28 -11.363 -2.852 5.659 1.000

11 29 -25.595 0.535 26.664 1.000

12 13 -2.870 3.596 10.063 0.961

12 14 -3.042 5.300 13.642 0.848

12 15 1.212 7.773 14.333 0.003

12 16 -1.038 4.886 10.810 0.314

12 17 -0.880 6.500 13.880 0.191

12 18 -1.904 5.320 12.544 0.572

12 19 1.438 9.333 17.229 0.004

12 20 -2.756 4.333 11.423 0.893

12 21 -5.385 1.769 8.924 1.000

12 22 -5.754 -0.031 5.692 1.000

12 23 -3.643 2.934 9.512 0.998

12 24 -1.368 4.978 11.325 0.425

12 25 -12.062 -4.451 3.159 0.932

12 26 -4.700 2.217 9.134 1.000

12 27 -2.904 4.185 11.275 0.925

Continued on next page

Page 235: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

234

Table 156 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

12 28 -8.145 0.113 8.370 1.000

12 29 -22.548 3.500 29.548 1.000

13 14 -5.992 1.704 9.399 1.000

13 15 -1.539 4.176 9.892 0.589

13 16 -3.682 1.290 6.262 1.000

13 17 -3.736 2.904 9.543 0.999

13 18 -4.743 1.724 8.190 1.000

13 19 -1.472 5.737 12.946 0.392

13 20 -5.578 0.737 7.052 1.000

13 21 -8.216 -1.827 4.561 1.000

13 22 -8.358 -3.627 1.104 0.478

13 23 -6.397 -0.662 5.073 1.000

13 24 -4.087 1.382 6.850 1.000

13 25 -14.943 -8.048 -1.152 0.005

13 26 -7.501 -1.380 4.741 1.000

13 27 -5.727 0.589 6.904 1.000

13 28 -11.087 -3.483 4.120 0.997

13 29 -25.945 -0.096 25.752 1.000

14 15 -5.302 2.473 10.247 1.000

14 16 -7.659 -0.414 6.831 1.000

14 17 -7.277 1.200 9.677 1.000

14 18 -8.322 0.020 8.362 1.000

14 19 -4.896 4.033 12.963 0.998

14 20 -9.192 -0.967 7.259 1.000

14 21 -11.812 -3.531 4.751 0.999

14 22 -12.412 -5.331 1.751 0.521

14 23 -10.154 -2.366 5.423 1.000

14 24 -7.916 -0.322 7.273 1.000

14 25 -18.430 -9.751 -1.073 0.009

14 26 -11.161 -3.083 4.994 1.000

14 27 -9.340 -1.115 7.111 1.000

14 28 -14.438 -5.187 4.064 0.958

14 29 -28.180 -1.800 24.580 1.000

15 16 -7.980 -2.887 2.207 0.952

15 17 -8.004 -1.273 5.459 1.000

15 18 -9.013 -2.453 4.108 1.000

15 19 -5.733 1.561 8.854 1.000

15 20 -9.851 -3.439 2.972 0.975

15 21 -12.487 -6.003 0.480 0.120

15 22 -12.662 -7.803 -2.945 0.000

15 23 -10.679 -4.839 1.002 0.305

15 24 -8.374 -2.794 2.785 0.990

15 25 -19.208 -12.224 -5.240 0.000

15 26 -11.776 -5.556 0.664 0.169

15 27 -9.999 -3.588 2.824 0.959

Continued on next page

Page 236: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

235

Table 156 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

15 28 -15.343 -7.660 0.024 0.052

15 29 -30.145 -4.273 21.599 1.000

16 17 -4.499 1.614 7.726 1.000

16 18 -5.490 0.434 6.358 1.000

16 19 -2.279 4.447 11.173 0.788

16 20 -6.312 -0.553 5.206 1.000

16 21 -8.956 -3.117 2.722 0.977

16 22 -8.874 -4.917 -0.960 0.001

16 23 -7.067 -1.952 3.163 1.000

16 24 -4.723 0.092 4.907 1.000

16 25 -15.727 -9.337 -2.948 0.000

16 26 -8.214 -2.670 2.875 0.994

16 27 -6.460 -0.701 5.058 1.000

16 28 -11.921 -4.773 2.374 0.772

16 29 -27.104 -1.386 24.332 1.000

17 18 -8.560 -1.180 6.200 1.000

17 19 -5.205 2.833 10.871 1.000

17 20 -9.414 -2.167 5.081 1.000

17 21 -12.042 -4.731 2.581 0.822

17 22 -12.449 -6.531 -0.613 0.012

17 23 -10.314 -3.566 3.182 0.980

17 24 -8.045 -1.522 5.001 1.000

17 25 -18.709 -10.951 -3.193 0.000

17 26 -11.362 -4.283 2.796 0.903

17 27 -9.563 -2.315 4.933 1.000

17 28 -14.781 -6.387 2.007 0.496

17 29 -29.092 -3.000 23.092 1.000

18 19 -3.882 4.013 11.909 0.988

18 20 -8.076 -0.987 6.103 1.000

18 21 -10.705 -3.551 3.604 0.991

18 22 -11.074 -5.351 0.372 0.108

18 23 -8.963 -2.386 4.192 1.000

18 24 -6.688 -0.342 6.005 1.000

18 25 -17.382 -9.771 -2.161 0.001

18 26 -10.020 -3.103 3.814 0.998

18 27 -8.224 -1.135 5.955 1.000

18 28 -13.465 -5.207 3.050 0.858

18 29 -27.868 -1.820 24.228 1.000

19 20 -12.772 -5.000 2.772 0.831

19 21 -15.396 -7.564 0.268 0.076

19 22 -15.914 -9.364 -2.814 0.000

19 23 -13.708 -6.399 0.909 0.200

19 24 -11.456 -4.355 2.746 0.890

19 25 -22.035 -13.785 -5.534 0.000

19 26 -14.732 -7.117 0.499 0.109

Continued on next page

Page 237: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

236

Table 156 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

19 27 -12.920 -5.148 2.624 0.785

19 28 -18.071 -9.220 -0.370 0.029

19 29 -32.076 -5.833 20.409 1.000

20 21 -9.582 -2.564 4.454 1.000

20 22 -9.916 -4.364 1.188 0.420

20 23 -7.828 -1.399 5.030 1.000

20 24 -5.548 0.645 6.837 1.000

20 25 -16.267 -8.785 -1.302 0.004

20 26 -8.892 -2.117 4.659 1.000

20 27 -7.100 -0.148 6.804 1.000

20 28 -12.360 -4.220 3.919 0.984

20 29 -26.844 -0.833 25.178 1.000

21 22 -7.435 -1.800 3.835 1.000

21 23 -5.336 1.165 7.666 1.000

21 24 -3.058 3.209 9.476 0.987

21 25 -13.765 -6.220 1.324 0.315

21 26 -6.397 0.447 7.291 1.000

21 27 -4.602 2.416 9.434 1.000

21 28 -9.853 -1.656 6.540 1.000

21 29 -24.298 1.731 27.760 1.000

22 23 -1.916 2.965 7.846 0.900

22 24 0.444 5.009 9.574 0.013

22 25 -10.624 -4.421 1.783 0.645

22 26 -3.082 2.247 7.577 0.999

22 27 -1.336 4.216 9.767 0.501

22 28 -6.838 0.144 7.126 1.000

22 29 -22.142 3.531 29.203 1.000

23 24 -3.555 2.044 7.643 1.000

23 25 -14.385 -7.385 -0.386 0.024

23 26 -6.956 -0.718 5.521 1.000

23 27 -5.178 1.251 7.680 1.000

23 28 -10.519 -2.821 4.877 1.000

23 29 -25.310 0.566 26.442 1.000

24 25 -16.212 -9.429 -2.647 0.000

24 26 -8.756 -2.762 3.233 0.997

24 27 -6.986 -0.793 5.399 1.000

24 28 -12.367 -4.865 2.636 0.819

24 29 -27.297 -1.478 24.340 1.000

25 26 -0.651 6.668 13.987 0.140

25 27 1.154 8.636 16.119 0.006

25 28 -4.033 4.564 13.162 0.978

25 29 -18.207 7.951 34.109 1.000

26 27 -4.807 1.969 8.744 1.000

26 28 -10.094 -2.104 5.886 1.000

26 29 -24.681 1.283 27.248 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 238: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

237

Table 156 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

27 28 -12.212 -4.072 4.067 0.990

27 29 -26.696 -0.685 25.326 1.000

28 29 -22.966 3.387 29.740 1.000

Page 239: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

238

98 [X14.xxx.Normed = cat]

98.1 Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable cat

Table 157: Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 102.926

1 100.601

2 98.897

3 98.708

4 99.000

5 97.847

6 99.501

7 100.940

8 102.500

p-value = 3.4269e-06

98.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 158: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Normed by

grouping variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -0.817 2.325 5.467 0.345

1 3 0.965 4.029 7.093 0.001

1 4 0.988 4.218 7.447 0.002

1 5 0.277 3.926 7.574 0.024

1 6 2.295 5.078 7.862 0.000

1 7 0.637 3.424 6.212 0.004

1 8 -1.681 1.986 5.653 0.759

1 9 -10.648 0.426 11.499 1.000

2 3 -1.218 1.704 4.626 0.676

2 4 -1.203 1.893 4.988 0.616

2 5 -1.929 1.601 5.131 0.896

2 6 0.127 2.754 5.380 0.031

2 7 -1.531 1.100 3.731 0.933

2 8 -3.888 -0.339 3.211 1.000

2 9 -12.934 -1.899 9.136 1.000

3 4 -2.827 0.189 3.205 1.000

3 5 -3.564 -0.103 3.358 1.000

3 6 -1.483 1.050 3.582 0.936

3 7 -3.142 -0.604 1.933 0.998

Continued on next page

Page 240: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

239

Table 158 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -5.523 -2.043 1.438 0.669

3 9 -14.616 -3.603 7.410 0.985

4 5 -3.900 -0.292 3.317 1.000

4 6 -1.870 0.861 3.592 0.988

4 7 -3.529 -0.793 1.942 0.993

4 8 -5.859 -2.232 1.396 0.608

4 9 -14.853 -3.792 7.269 0.979

5 6 -2.063 1.153 4.368 0.973

5 7 -3.720 -0.501 2.718 1.000

5 8 -5.944 -1.940 2.065 0.855

5 9 -14.690 -3.500 7.690 0.989

6 7 -3.845 -1.654 0.537 0.317

6 8 -6.329 -3.092 0.144 0.074

6 9 -15.591 -4.653 6.286 0.926

7 8 -4.679 -1.438 1.802 0.907

7 9 -13.939 -2.999 7.941 0.995

8 9 -12.757 -1.560 9.636 1.000

Page 241: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

240

99 [X14.xxx.Normed = School-Type-1]

99.1 Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable School- Type-1

Table 159: Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 99.233

3 99.550

5 100.000

6 100.390

7 105.714

8 91.667

10 90.909

21 102.800

22 110.719

32 98.429

51 106.167

53 101.333

54 102.000

56 97.000

57 100.500

58 99.000

71 103.545

p-value = 4.6159e-10

99.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 160: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Normed by

grouping variable School-Type-1

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -2.221 -0.317 1.587 1.000

1 3 -34.654 -0.767 33.120 1.000

1 4 -5.141 -1.157 2.828 1.000

1 5 -15.588 -6.481 2.625 0.531

1 6 0.582 7.566 14.550 0.019

1 7 -1.937 8.324 18.584 0.287

1 8 -18.748 -3.567 11.613 1.000

1 9 -17.555 -11.486 -5.417 0.000

1 10 -6.653 0.804 8.261 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 242: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

241

Table 160 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 11 -20.797 -6.934 6.930 0.951

1 12 -21.682 -2.101 17.481 1.000

1 13 -26.739 -2.767 21.205 1.000

1 14 -17.348 2.233 21.814 1.000

1 15 -18.232 -1.267 15.698 1.000

1 16 -33.654 0.233 34.120 1.000

1 17 -14.573 -4.313 5.948 0.991

2 3 -34.362 -0.450 33.461 1.000

2 4 -5.029 -0.840 3.349 1.000

2 5 -15.363 -6.165 3.033 0.641

2 6 0.780 7.883 14.986 0.013

2 7 -1.701 8.641 18.982 0.239

2 8 -18.486 -3.250 11.985 1.000

2 9 -17.374 -11.169 -4.964 0.000

2 10 -6.448 1.121 8.690 1.000

2 11 -20.541 -6.617 7.307 0.969

2 12 -21.408 -1.784 17.840 1.000

2 13 -26.457 -2.450 21.556 1.000

2 14 -17.074 2.550 22.174 1.000

2 15 -17.965 -0.950 16.064 1.000

2 16 -33.362 0.550 34.461 1.000

2 17 -14.338 -3.996 6.346 0.996

3 4 -34.481 -0.390 33.702 1.000

3 5 -40.776 -5.714 29.347 1.000

3 6 -26.238 8.333 42.904 1.000

3 7 -26.288 9.091 44.470 1.000

3 8 -39.905 -2.800 34.305 1.000

3 9 -45.116 -10.719 23.679 1.000

3 10 -33.098 1.571 36.241 1.000

3 11 -42.753 -6.167 30.420 1.000

3 12 -40.446 -1.333 37.779 1.000

3 13 -43.485 -2.000 39.485 1.000

3 14 -36.113 3.000 42.113 1.000

3 15 -38.371 -0.500 37.371 1.000

3 16 -46.903 1.000 48.903 1.000

3 17 -38.924 -3.545 31.833 1.000

4 5 -15.166 -5.325 4.517 0.907

4 6 0.804 8.723 16.642 0.015

4 7 -1.438 9.481 20.399 0.183

4 8 -18.043 -2.410 13.222 1.000

4 9 -17.453 -10.329 -3.205 0.000

4 10 -6.378 1.961 10.300 1.000

4 11 -20.134 -5.777 8.580 0.994

4 12 -20.877 -0.944 18.990 1.000

4 13 -25.871 -1.610 22.650 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 243: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

242

Table 160 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 14 -16.544 3.390 23.323 1.000

4 15 -17.481 -0.110 17.260 1.000

4 16 -32.702 1.390 35.481 1.000

4 17 -14.074 -3.156 7.762 1.000

5 6 2.656 14.048 25.439 0.002

5 7 1.158 14.805 28.453 0.018

5 8 -14.733 2.914 20.561 1.000

5 9 -15.858 -5.004 5.849 0.977

5 10 -4.401 7.286 18.973 0.757

5 11 -16.980 -0.452 16.076 1.000

5 12 -17.169 4.381 25.931 1.000

5 13 -21.891 3.714 29.319 1.000

5 14 -12.836 8.714 30.264 0.994

5 15 -13.990 5.214 24.418 1.000

5 16 -28.347 6.714 41.776 1.000

5 17 -11.479 2.169 15.816 1.000

6 7 -11.576 0.758 13.091 1.000

6 8 -27.785 -11.133 5.518 0.646

6 9 -28.199 -19.052 -9.905 0.000

6 10 -16.883 -6.762 3.359 0.647

6 11 -29.961 -14.500 0.961 0.096

6 12 -30.409 -9.667 11.076 0.974

6 13 -35.263 -10.333 14.596 0.992

6 14 -26.076 -5.333 15.409 1.000

6 15 -27.127 -8.833 9.460 0.964

6 16 -41.904 -7.333 27.238 1.000

6 17 -24.212 -11.879 0.454 0.074

7 8 -30.160 -11.891 6.379 0.691

7 9 -31.649 -19.810 -7.971 0.000

7 10 -20.127 -7.519 5.088 0.815

7 11 -32.449 -15.258 1.933 0.155

7 12 -32.487 -10.424 11.638 0.971

7 13 -37.129 -11.091 14.947 0.990

7 14 -28.153 -6.091 15.972 1.000

7 15 -29.368 -9.591 10.186 0.963

7 16 -43.470 -8.091 27.288 1.000

7 17 -27.080 -12.636 1.807 0.173

8 9 -24.207 -7.919 8.370 0.962

8 10 -12.484 4.371 21.227 1.000

8 11 -23.877 -3.367 17.144 1.000

8 12 -23.270 1.467 26.204 1.000

8 13 -27.540 0.800 29.140 1.000

8 14 -18.937 5.800 30.537 1.000

8 15 -20.422 2.300 25.022 1.000

8 16 -33.305 3.800 40.905 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 244: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

243

Table 160 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 17 -19.015 -0.745 17.524 1.000

9 10 2.778 12.290 21.803 0.001

9 11 -10.517 4.552 19.621 1.000

9 12 -11.067 9.385 29.838 0.978

9 13 -15.970 8.719 33.407 0.999

9 14 -6.734 13.719 34.171 0.640

9 15 -7.745 10.219 28.182 0.866

9 16 -22.679 11.719 46.116 0.999

9 17 -4.666 7.173 19.012 0.795

10 11 -23.418 -7.738 7.942 0.957

10 12 -23.811 -2.905 18.002 1.000

10 13 -28.637 -3.571 21.495 1.000

10 14 -19.478 1.429 22.335 1.000

10 15 -20.550 -2.071 16.408 1.000

10 16 -35.241 -0.571 34.098 1.000

10 17 -17.724 -5.117 7.490 0.994

11 12 -19.118 4.833 28.785 1.000

11 13 -23.490 4.167 31.823 1.000

11 14 -14.785 9.167 33.118 0.997

11 15 -16.198 5.667 27.531 1.000

11 16 -29.420 7.167 43.753 1.000

11 17 -14.570 2.621 19.812 1.000

12 13 -31.588 -0.667 30.255 1.000

12 14 -23.323 4.333 31.990 1.000

12 15 -25.037 0.833 26.704 1.000

12 16 -36.779 2.333 41.446 1.000

12 17 -24.275 -2.212 19.850 1.000

13 14 -25.921 5.000 35.921 1.000

13 15 -27.834 1.500 30.834 1.000

13 16 -38.485 3.000 44.485 1.000

13 17 -27.583 -1.545 24.493 1.000

14 15 -29.371 -3.500 22.371 1.000

14 16 -41.113 -2.000 37.113 1.000

14 17 -28.608 -6.545 15.517 1.000

15 16 -36.371 1.500 39.371 1.000

15 17 -22.823 -3.045 16.732 1.000

16 17 -39.924 -4.545 30.833 1.000

Page 245: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

244

10

21

22

32

51

53

54

56

57

58

71

70 80 90 100 110 120 130

Page 246: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

245

100 [X14.xxx.Normed = School-Type-2]

100.1 Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable School- Type-2

Table 161: Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 100.293

2 99.317

3 107.919

p-value = 1.0958e-06

100.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 162: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Normed by

grouping variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -2.688 0.976 4.639 0.807

1 3 -12.883 -7.626 -2.369 0.002

2 3 -12.453 -8.602 -4.750 0.000

Page 247: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

246

101 [X14.xxx.Normed = BudgetFrom]

101.1 Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Bud- getFrom

Table 163: Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Bud-

getFrom

Group Mean

1 102.417

2 103.900

4 86.000

5 99.317

6 107.919

7 99.000

p-value = 4.7684e-08

101.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 164: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Normed by

grouping variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -12.059 -1.483 9.092 0.999

1 3 3.592 16.417 29.241 0.004

1 4 -2.675 3.100 8.874 0.645

1 5 -12.866 -5.502 1.862 0.272

1 6 -25.260 3.417 32.093 0.999

2 3 3.391 17.900 32.409 0.006

2 4 -4.328 4.583 13.493 0.686

2 5 -14.033 -4.019 5.995 0.863

2 6 -24.569 4.900 34.369 0.997

3 4 -24.807 -13.317 -1.827 0.012

3 5 -34.285 -21.919 -9.553 0.000

3 6 -43.348 -13.000 17.348 0.827

4 5 -13.270 -8.602 -3.934 0.000

4 6 -27.788 0.317 28.422 1.000

5 6 -19.555 8.919 37.393 0.948

Page 248: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

247

70 80 90 100 110 120 130

Page 249: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

248

102

102.1

[X14.xxx.Normed = IsProtected]

Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 165: Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable IsPro-

tected

Group Mean

0 99.393

1 101.101

p-value = 0.060446

102.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 166: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Normed by

grouping variable IsProtected

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -3.490 -1.708 0.074 0.060

Page 250: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

249

103

103.1

[X14.xxx.Normed = IsCentral]

Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 167: Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable IsCen-

tral

Group Mean

0 99.926

1 98.938

p-value = 0.036751

103.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 168: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Normed by

grouping variable IsCentral

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 0.061 0.987 1.913 0.037

Page 251: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

250

104 [X14.xxx.Normed = Shifts]

104.1 Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Table 169: Means of X14.xxx.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 99.025

5 100.846

7 92.667

p-value = 0.0011257

104.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 170: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Normed by

grouping variable Shifts

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -3.043 -1.821 -0.599 0.001

1 3 -7.094 6.358 19.810 0.509

2 3 -5.298 8.179 21.656 0.329

Page 252: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

251

105 [X14.xxx.Scaled = Obl-ID]

105.1 Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 171: Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 52.217

2 53.349

3 51.900

4 48.344

5 50.179

6 49.551

7 46.423

8 51.459

9 55.516

10 43.385

11 50.512

12 54.580

13 49.639

14 47.233

15 43.727

16 47.848

17 45.543

18 47.220

19 41.611

20 48.685

21 52.192

22 54.724

23 50.566

24 47.728

25 60.878

26 51.617

27 48.907

28 54.677

29 49.000

p-value = 3.3159e-15

105.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Page 253: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

252

Table 172: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable Obl-ID

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -8.337 -1.131 6.074 1.000

1 3 -7.228 0.317 7.863 1.000

1 4 -4.410 3.874 12.158 0.996

1 5 -8.946 2.039 13.023 1.000

1 6 -6.335 2.666 11.667 1.000

1 7 -5.510 5.794 17.098 0.986

1 8 -7.645 0.758 9.162 1.000

1 9 -11.661 -3.299 5.064 1.000

1 10 -2.471 8.833 20.137 0.434

1 11 -7.696 1.706 11.107 1.000

1 12 -11.305 -2.363 6.579 1.000

1 13 -5.126 2.579 10.283 1.000

1 14 -5.716 4.984 15.684 0.997

1 15 0.629 8.490 16.351 0.017

1 16 -2.415 4.369 11.153 0.829

1 17 -2.516 6.674 15.864 0.603

1 18 -3.945 4.997 13.939 0.959

1 19 0.601 10.606 20.612 0.022

1 20 -5.193 3.532 12.257 1.000

1 21 -8.805 0.025 8.855 1.000

1 22 -8.939 -2.507 3.925 1.000

1 23 -6.237 1.652 9.541 1.000

1 24 -3.015 4.489 11.993 0.914

1 25 -18.217 -8.661 0.896 0.148

1 26 -7.845 0.601 9.046 1.000

1 27 -5.415 3.310 12.035 1.000

1 28 -13.029 -2.460 8.109 1.000

1 29 -33.159 3.217 39.594 1.000

2 3 -5.800 1.449 8.697 1.000

2 4 -3.010 5.005 13.020 0.870

2 5 -7.613 3.170 13.953 1.000

2 6 -4.956 3.798 12.551 0.999

2 7 -4.182 6.926 18.034 0.871

2 8 -6.248 1.890 10.028 1.000

2 9 -10.263 -2.168 5.928 1.000

2 10 -1.144 9.964 21.072 0.162

2 11 -6.328 2.837 12.002 1.000

2 12 -9.924 -1.231 7.462 1.000

2 13 -3.704 3.710 11.124 0.990

2 14 -4.378 6.115 16.608 0.934

2 15 2.045 9.621 17.198 0.001

2 16 -0.952 5.500 11.952 0.248

2 17 -1.143 7.805 16.753 0.207

Continued on next page

Page 254: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

253

Table 172 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

2 18 -2.564 6.129 14.822 0.667

2 19 1.954 11.738 21.521 0.003

2 20 -3.806 4.663 13.133 0.966

2 21 -7.421 1.156 9.734 1.000

2 22 -7.457 -1.376 4.705 1.000

2 23 -4.823 2.783 10.388 1.000

2 24 -1.585 5.620 12.826 0.438

2 25 -16.854 -7.529 1.795 0.360

2 26 -6.449 1.732 9.913 1.000

2 27 -4.028 4.441 12.911 0.982

2 28 -11.688 -1.329 9.031 1.000

2 29 -31.968 4.349 40.665 1.000

3 4 -4.766 3.556 11.878 0.999

3 5 -9.292 1.721 12.734 1.000

3 6 -6.687 2.349 11.385 1.000

3 7 -5.855 5.477 16.808 0.994

3 8 -8.000 0.441 8.882 1.000

3 9 -12.016 -3.616 4.784 0.999

3 10 -2.816 8.515 19.847 0.525

3 11 -8.047 1.388 10.823 1.000

3 12 -11.657 -2.680 6.297 1.000

3 13 -5.484 2.261 10.007 1.000

3 14 -6.063 4.667 15.396 0.999

3 15 0.272 8.173 16.073 0.032

3 16 -2.778 4.052 10.881 0.921

3 17 -2.868 6.357 15.581 0.714

3 18 -4.297 4.680 13.657 0.983

3 19 0.252 10.289 20.325 0.036

3 20 -5.546 3.215 11.975 1.000

3 21 -9.158 -0.292 8.573 1.000

3 22 -9.305 -2.824 3.656 0.999

3 23 -6.594 1.334 9.263 1.000

3 24 -3.374 4.172 11.717 0.964

3 25 -18.567 -8.978 0.611 0.107

3 26 -8.199 0.283 8.766 1.000

3 27 -5.768 2.993 11.753 1.000

3 28 -13.376 -2.777 7.821 1.000

3 29 -33.485 2.900 39.285 1.000

4 5 -13.366 -1.835 9.697 1.000

4 6 -10.868 -1.207 8.454 1.000

4 7 -9.916 1.921 13.757 1.000

4 8 -12.222 -3.115 5.992 1.000

4 9 -16.242 -7.172 1.897 0.407

4 10 -6.877 4.959 16.795 0.999

4 11 -12.203 -2.168 7.868 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 255: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

254

Table 172 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 12 -15.842 -6.236 3.370 0.817

4 13 -9.761 -1.295 7.172 1.000

4 14 -10.151 1.110 12.372 1.000

4 15 -3.992 4.616 13.225 0.975

4 16 -7.142 0.495 8.133 1.000

4 17 -7.037 2.800 12.638 1.000

4 18 -8.482 1.124 10.730 1.000

4 19 -3.870 6.733 17.336 0.849

4 20 -9.746 -0.341 9.063 1.000

4 21 -13.350 -3.849 5.653 1.000

4 22 -13.708 -6.381 0.946 0.210

4 23 -10.856 -2.222 6.412 1.000

4 24 -7.669 0.615 8.900 1.000

4 25 -22.715 -12.534 -2.354 0.002

4 26 -12.419 -3.273 5.873 1.000

4 27 -9.968 -0.564 8.841 1.000

4 28 -17.470 -6.334 4.803 0.950

4 29 -37.202 -0.656 35.889 1.000

5 6 -11.429 0.628 12.684 1.000

5 7 -10.106 3.755 17.617 1.000

5 8 -12.898 -1.280 10.337 1.000

5 9 -16.926 -5.338 6.251 0.997

5 10 -7.067 6.794 20.655 0.993

5 11 -12.692 -0.333 12.026 1.000

5 12 -16.414 -4.401 7.612 1.000

5 13 -10.583 0.540 11.663 1.000

5 14 -10.428 2.945 16.319 1.000

5 15 -4.780 6.451 17.683 0.944

5 16 -8.175 2.330 12.836 1.000

5 17 -7.564 4.635 16.834 1.000

5 18 -9.054 2.959 14.972 1.000

5 19 -4.257 8.567 21.392 0.771

5 20 -10.359 1.493 13.346 1.000

5 21 -13.943 -2.014 9.916 1.000

5 22 -14.828 -4.546 5.736 0.999

5 23 -11.638 -0.387 10.864 1.000

5 24 -8.534 2.450 13.435 1.000

5 25 -23.177 -10.699 1.778 0.237

5 26 -13.086 -1.438 10.210 1.000

5 27 -10.581 1.271 13.123 1.000

5 28 -17.768 -4.499 8.770 1.000

5 29 -36.072 1.179 38.429 1.000

6 7 -9.221 3.128 15.476 1.000

6 8 -11.671 -1.908 7.855 1.000

6 9 -15.693 -5.965 3.763 0.890

Continued on next page

Page 256: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

255

Table 172 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

6 10 -6.182 6.166 18.515 0.991

6 11 -11.595 -0.961 9.674 1.000

6 12 -15.260 -5.029 5.202 0.992

6 13 -9.256 -0.088 9.081 1.000

6 14 -9.481 2.318 14.116 1.000

6 15 -3.477 5.824 15.124 0.866

6 16 -6.707 1.703 10.113 1.000

6 17 -6.441 4.008 14.456 1.000

6 18 -7.900 2.331 12.562 1.000

6 19 -3.232 7.940 19.112 0.650

6 20 -9.175 0.866 10.907 1.000

6 21 -12.774 -2.641 7.491 1.000

6 22 -13.302 -5.173 2.955 0.845

6 23 -10.339 -1.015 8.310 1.000

6 24 -7.178 1.823 10.824 1.000

6 25 -22.099 -11.327 -0.555 0.025

6 26 -11.865 -2.066 7.734 1.000

6 27 -9.398 0.644 10.685 1.000

6 28 -16.806 -5.126 6.553 0.999

6 29 -36.164 0.551 37.266 1.000

7 8 -16.956 -5.036 6.884 0.999

7 9 -20.984 -9.093 2.798 0.484

7 10 -11.077 3.038 17.154 1.000

7 11 -16.732 -4.089 8.555 1.000

7 12 -20.463 -8.157 4.149 0.784

7 13 -14.654 -3.215 8.223 1.000

7 14 -14.447 -0.810 12.827 1.000

7 15 -8.848 2.696 14.240 1.000

7 16 -12.264 -1.425 9.414 1.000

7 17 -11.608 0.880 13.367 1.000

7 18 -13.103 -0.797 11.509 1.000

7 19 -8.287 4.812 17.911 1.000

7 20 -14.411 -2.262 9.887 1.000

7 21 -17.994 -5.769 6.455 0.996

7 22 -18.924 -8.301 2.321 0.434

7 23 -15.706 -4.143 7.420 1.000

7 24 -12.609 -1.305 9.999 1.000

7 25 -27.214 -14.455 -1.696 0.008

7 26 -17.143 -5.194 6.756 0.999

7 27 -14.633 -2.484 9.664 1.000

7 28 -21.789 -8.254 5.280 0.896

7 29 -39.923 -2.577 34.769 1.000

8 9 -13.235 -4.057 5.121 0.999

8 10 -3.846 8.074 19.994 0.746

8 11 -9.187 0.947 11.081 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 257: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

256

Table 172 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 12 -12.830 -3.121 6.588 1.000

8 13 -6.763 1.820 10.404 1.000

8 14 -7.123 4.226 15.575 1.000

8 15 -0.992 7.732 16.455 0.181

8 16 -4.156 3.611 11.378 0.997

8 17 -4.023 5.916 15.854 0.918

8 18 -5.470 4.239 13.948 0.999

8 19 -0.848 9.848 20.544 0.127

8 20 -6.736 2.774 12.283 1.000

8 21 -10.339 -0.733 8.873 1.000

8 22 -10.727 -3.265 4.196 0.999

8 23 -7.856 0.893 9.642 1.000

8 24 -4.673 3.731 12.134 0.998

8 25 -19.697 -9.419 0.859 0.133

8 26 -9.411 -0.158 9.096 1.000

8 27 -6.958 2.552 12.061 1.000

8 28 -14.444 -3.218 8.007 1.000

8 29 -34.114 2.459 39.032 1.000

9 10 0.240 12.132 24.023 0.039

9 11 -5.096 5.005 15.105 0.992

9 12 -8.738 0.936 10.610 1.000

9 13 -2.666 5.878 14.421 0.717

9 14 -3.036 8.283 19.602 0.586

9 15 3.105 11.789 20.473 0.000

9 16 -0.055 7.668 15.391 0.055

9 17 0.069 9.973 19.877 0.046

9 18 -1.378 8.296 17.970 0.237

9 19 3.241 13.905 24.569 0.000

9 20 -2.642 6.831 16.304 0.619

9 21 -6.246 3.324 12.894 1.000

9 22 -6.624 0.792 8.207 1.000

9 23 -3.759 4.950 13.660 0.950

9 24 -0.575 7.788 16.150 0.113

9 25 -15.607 -5.362 4.883 0.982

9 26 -5.317 3.899 13.116 0.999

9 27 -2.865 6.609 16.082 0.689

9 28 -10.356 0.839 12.034 1.000

9 29 -30.047 6.516 43.080 1.000

10 11 -19.771 -7.127 5.517 0.955

10 12 -23.501 -11.195 1.110 0.142

10 13 -17.692 -6.254 5.184 0.969

10 14 -17.486 -3.849 9.788 1.000

10 15 -11.887 -0.343 11.201 1.000

10 16 -15.303 -4.464 6.375 1.000

10 17 -14.646 -2.159 10.328 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 258: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

257

Table 172 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

10 18 -16.141 -3.835 8.470 1.000

10 19 -11.325 1.774 14.872 1.000

10 20 -17.449 -5.301 6.848 0.999

10 21 -21.032 -8.808 3.417 0.621

10 22 -21.962 -11.340 -0.717 0.020

10 23 -18.744 -7.181 4.382 0.876

10 24 -15.648 -4.344 6.960 1.000

10 25 -30.253 -17.493 -4.734 0.000

10 26 -20.182 -8.232 3.718 0.714

10 27 -17.671 -5.523 6.626 0.998

10 28 -24.827 -11.293 2.242 0.290

10 29 -42.961 -5.615 31.731 1.000

11 12 -14.653 -4.068 6.517 1.000

11 13 -8.690 0.873 10.436 1.000

11 14 -8.829 3.278 15.385 1.000

11 15 -2.905 6.784 16.473 0.682

11 16 -6.174 2.663 11.501 1.000

11 17 -5.828 4.968 15.764 0.997

11 18 -7.293 3.292 13.877 1.000

11 19 -2.597 8.901 20.398 0.456

11 20 -8.576 1.826 12.229 1.000

11 21 -12.171 -1.681 8.810 1.000

11 22 -12.783 -4.213 4.358 0.992

11 23 -9.766 -0.054 9.658 1.000

11 24 -6.618 2.783 12.185 1.000

11 25 -21.476 -10.366 0.743 0.111

11 26 -11.274 -1.105 9.064 1.000

11 27 -8.798 1.604 12.006 1.000

11 28 -16.157 -4.166 7.826 1.000

11 29 -35.303 1.512 38.327 1.000

12 13 -4.170 4.941 14.053 0.972

12 14 -4.407 7.347 19.100 0.868

12 15 1.609 10.853 20.096 0.004

12 16 -1.615 6.732 15.078 0.362

12 17 -1.361 9.037 19.434 0.213

12 18 -2.819 7.360 17.539 0.613

12 19 1.844 12.969 24.093 0.005

12 20 -4.094 5.895 15.883 0.925

12 21 -7.693 2.388 12.468 1.000

12 22 -8.208 -0.144 7.919 1.000

12 23 -5.253 4.014 13.282 0.999

12 24 -2.090 6.852 15.794 0.480

12 25 -17.021 -6.298 4.425 0.929

12 26 -6.782 2.963 12.709 1.000

12 27 -4.316 5.673 15.661 0.951

Continued on next page

Page 259: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

258

Table 172 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

12 28 -11.732 -0.097 11.537 1.000

12 29 -31.120 5.580 42.280 1.000

13 14 -8.437 2.405 13.247 1.000

13 15 -2.141 5.911 13.964 0.579

13 16 -5.215 1.790 8.795 1.000

13 17 -5.260 4.095 13.450 0.999

13 18 -6.693 2.419 11.530 1.000

13 19 -2.129 8.027 18.184 0.408

13 20 -7.945 0.953 9.851 1.000

13 21 -11.555 -2.554 6.447 1.000

13 22 -11.751 -5.086 1.579 0.489

13 23 -9.007 -0.927 7.153 1.000

13 24 -5.794 1.910 9.615 1.000

13 25 -20.955 -11.239 -1.524 0.005

13 26 -10.602 -1.978 6.646 1.000

13 27 -8.167 0.731 9.629 1.000

13 28 -15.752 -5.039 5.674 0.996

13 29 -35.780 0.639 37.057 1.000

14 15 -7.447 3.506 14.460 1.000

14 16 -10.823 -0.615 9.593 1.000

14 17 -10.254 1.690 13.633 1.000

14 18 -11.740 0.013 11.767 1.000

14 19 -6.959 5.622 18.204 0.998

14 20 -13.041 -1.452 10.137 1.000

14 21 -16.627 -4.959 6.709 0.999

14 22 -17.469 -7.491 2.487 0.527

14 23 -14.306 -3.332 7.641 1.000

14 24 -11.195 -0.495 10.205 1.000

14 25 -25.872 -13.645 -1.417 0.010

14 26 -15.764 -4.383 6.997 1.000

14 27 -13.263 -1.674 9.915 1.000

14 28 -20.478 -7.444 5.590 0.948

14 29 -38.934 -1.767 35.401 1.000

15 16 -11.298 -4.121 3.056 0.944

15 17 -11.300 -1.816 7.668 1.000

15 18 -12.736 -3.493 5.751 1.000

15 19 -8.159 2.116 12.392 1.000

15 20 -13.992 -4.958 4.076 0.967

15 21 -17.600 -8.465 0.670 0.119

15 22 -17.842 -10.997 -4.152 0.000

15 23 -15.068 -6.839 1.391 0.298

15 24 -11.862 -4.001 3.860 0.988

15 25 -26.990 -17.151 -7.311 0.000

15 26 -16.653 -7.889 0.875 0.157

15 27 -14.214 -5.180 3.853 0.945

Continued on next page

Page 260: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

259

Table 172 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

15 28 -21.776 -10.950 -0.125 0.043

15 29 -41.725 -5.273 31.179 1.000

16 17 -6.308 2.305 10.917 1.000

16 18 -7.718 0.628 8.975 1.000

16 19 -3.240 6.237 15.714 0.796

16 20 -8.950 -0.837 7.277 1.000

16 21 -12.571 -4.344 3.882 0.980

16 22 -12.451 -6.876 -1.301 0.001

16 23 -9.925 -2.718 4.490 1.000

16 24 -6.664 0.120 6.904 1.000

16 25 -22.032 -13.030 -4.028 0.000

16 26 -11.581 -3.768 4.044 0.994

16 27 -9.173 -1.059 7.054 1.000

16 28 -16.900 -6.829 3.242 0.744

16 29 -37.387 -1.152 35.083 1.000

17 18 -12.074 -1.677 8.721 1.000

17 19 -7.393 3.932 15.258 1.000

17 20 -13.353 -3.142 7.070 1.000

17 21 -16.950 -6.649 3.653 0.826

17 22 -17.519 -9.181 -0.843 0.012

17 23 -14.530 -5.022 4.485 0.980

17 24 -11.375 -2.185 7.006 1.000

17 25 -26.265 -15.335 -4.404 0.000

17 26 -16.047 -6.073 3.901 0.897

17 27 -13.575 -3.364 6.848 1.000

17 28 -20.960 -9.134 2.692 0.461

17 29 -40.218 -3.457 33.305 1.000

18 19 -5.516 5.609 16.733 0.989

18 20 -11.454 -1.465 8.523 1.000

18 21 -15.053 -4.972 5.108 0.992

18 22 -15.568 -7.504 0.559 0.114

18 23 -12.613 -3.346 5.922 1.000

18 24 -9.450 -0.508 8.434 1.000

18 25 -24.381 -13.658 -2.935 0.001

18 26 -14.142 -4.397 5.349 0.998

18 27 -11.676 -1.687 8.301 1.000

18 28 -19.092 -7.457 4.177 0.836

18 29 -38.480 -1.780 34.920 1.000

19 20 -18.025 -7.074 3.877 0.825

19 21 -21.616 -10.581 0.453 0.082

19 22 -22.342 -13.113 -3.885 0.000

19 23 -19.252 -8.955 1.342 0.212

19 24 -16.122 -6.117 3.888 0.893

19 25 -30.891 -19.267 -7.643 0.000

19 26 -20.735 -10.006 0.724 0.111

Continued on next page

Page 261: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

260

Table 172 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

19 27 -18.247 -7.296 3.654 0.775

19 28 -25.536 -13.066 -0.596 0.027

19 29 -44.363 -7.389 29.585 1.000

20 21 -13.395 -3.507 6.381 1.000

20 22 -13.861 -6.039 1.783 0.462

20 23 -10.939 -1.881 7.177 1.000

20 24 -7.768 0.957 9.682 1.000

20 25 -22.735 -12.193 -1.650 0.005

20 26 -12.478 -2.931 6.615 1.000

20 27 -10.017 -0.222 9.572 1.000

20 28 -17.461 -5.992 5.476 0.982

20 29 -36.963 -0.315 36.333 1.000

21 22 -10.471 -2.532 5.407 1.000

21 23 -7.533 1.627 10.786 1.000

21 24 -4.366 4.464 13.294 0.989

21 25 -19.315 -8.686 1.944 0.334

21 26 -9.067 0.576 10.218 1.000

21 27 -6.603 3.285 13.173 1.000

21 28 -14.034 -2.485 9.063 1.000

21 29 -33.481 3.192 39.865 1.000

22 23 -2.719 4.159 11.036 0.904

22 24 0.564 6.996 13.428 0.015

22 25 -14.894 -6.154 2.587 0.670

22 26 -4.401 3.108 10.617 1.000

22 27 -2.005 5.817 13.639 0.549

22 28 -9.790 0.047 9.884 1.000

22 29 -30.446 5.724 41.895 1.000

23 24 -5.051 2.838 10.727 1.000

23 25 -20.174 -10.312 -0.450 0.027

23 26 -9.840 -1.051 7.738 1.000

23 27 -7.400 1.658 10.716 1.000

23 28 -14.958 -4.112 6.734 1.000

23 29 -34.892 1.566 38.024 1.000

24 25 -22.706 -13.150 -3.593 0.000

24 26 -12.334 -3.888 4.557 0.997

24 27 -9.904 -1.179 7.546 1.000

24 28 -17.518 -6.949 3.620 0.797

24 29 -37.648 -1.272 35.105 1.000

25 26 -1.051 9.261 19.574 0.161

25 27 1.428 11.971 22.513 0.007

25 28 -5.913 6.201 18.314 0.987

25 29 -24.977 11.878 48.733 1.000

26 27 -6.837 2.709 12.256 1.000

26 28 -14.318 -3.061 8.196 1.000

26 29 -33.966 2.617 39.199 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 262: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

261

Table 172 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

27 28 -17.238 -5.770 5.698 0.989

27 29 -36.741 -0.093 36.555 1.000

28 29 -31.453 5.677 42.808 1.000

Page 263: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

262

106 [X14.xxx.Scaled = cat]

106.1 Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Table 173: Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 55.286

1 52.077

2 49.605

3 49.373

4 49.780

5 48.148

6 50.496

7 52.440

8 54.875

p-value = 3.4789e-06

106.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 174: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -1.216 3.209 7.634 0.374

1 3 1.365 5.681 9.996 0.001

1 4 1.364 5.913 10.462 0.002

1 5 0.367 5.506 10.645 0.025

1 6 3.218 7.138 11.059 0.000

1 7 0.863 4.790 8.716 0.005

1 8 -2.319 2.846 8.011 0.741

1 9 -15.186 0.411 16.008 1.000

2 3 -1.643 2.472 6.587 0.639

2 4 -1.656 2.704 7.064 0.597

2 5 -2.675 2.297 7.269 0.885

2 6 0.230 3.929 7.628 0.027

2 7 -2.125 1.581 5.286 0.925

2 8 -5.362 -0.363 4.636 1.000

2 9 -18.341 -2.798 12.745 1.000

3 4 -4.016 0.232 4.480 1.000

3 5 -5.049 -0.175 4.700 1.000

3 6 -2.109 1.458 5.024 0.941

3 7 -4.465 -0.891 2.683 0.998

Continued on next page

Page 264: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

263

Table 174 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -7.737 -2.835 2.068 0.687

3 9 -20.782 -5.270 10.242 0.980

4 5 -5.489 -0.407 4.676 1.000

4 6 -2.621 1.225 5.072 0.987

4 7 -4.976 -1.123 2.730 0.993

4 8 -8.176 -3.067 2.042 0.640

4 9 -21.080 -5.502 10.076 0.975

5 6 -2.896 1.632 6.161 0.972

5 7 -5.250 -0.716 3.817 1.000

5 8 -8.300 -2.660 2.980 0.873

5 9 -20.856 -5.095 10.665 0.986

6 7 -5.434 -2.349 0.737 0.306

6 8 -8.850 -4.292 0.266 0.084

6 9 -22.134 -6.727 8.679 0.915

7 8 -6.507 -1.944 2.620 0.925

7 9 -19.787 -4.379 11.029 0.994

8 9 -18.205 -2.435 13.334 1.000

Page 265: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

264

107 [X14.xxx.Scaled = School-Type-1]

107.1 Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable School- Type-1

Table 175: Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 50.110

3 50.536

5 50.000

6 51.766

7 59.143

8 39.500

10 38.364

21 55.200

22 66.344

32 48.952

51 59.500

53 53.333

54 53.500

56 47.000

57 51.250

58 50.000

71 56.091

p-value = 5.0131e-10

107.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 176: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable School-Type-1

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -3.107 -0.425 2.256 1.000

1 3 -47.620 0.110 47.841 1.000

1 4 -7.268 -1.656 3.956 1.000

1 5 -21.859 -9.032 3.794 0.551

1 6 0.773 10.610 20.448 0.020

1 7 -2.705 11.747 26.199 0.284

1 8 -26.471 -5.090 16.292 1.000

1 9 -24.781 -16.233 -7.685 0.000

1 10 -9.346 1.158 11.662 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 266: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

265

Table 176 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 11 -28.917 -9.390 10.137 0.966

1 12 -30.803 -3.223 24.357 1.000

1 13 -37.154 -3.390 30.375 1.000

1 14 -24.470 3.110 30.691 1.000

1 15 -25.035 -1.140 22.756 1.000

1 16 -47.620 0.110 47.841 1.000

1 17 -20.433 -5.980 8.472 0.992

2 3 -47.229 0.536 48.301 1.000

2 4 -7.131 -1.230 4.670 1.000

2 5 -21.563 -8.607 4.348 0.657

2 6 1.031 11.036 21.041 0.015

2 7 -2.394 12.172 26.739 0.239

2 8 -26.124 -4.664 16.795 1.000

2 9 -24.548 -15.808 -7.068 0.000

2 10 -9.077 1.583 12.244 1.000

2 11 -28.576 -8.964 10.648 0.979

2 12 -30.438 -2.798 24.843 1.000

2 13 -36.778 -2.964 30.850 1.000

2 14 -24.105 3.536 31.176 1.000

2 15 -24.679 -0.714 23.251 1.000

2 16 -47.229 0.536 48.301 1.000

2 17 -20.122 -5.555 9.012 0.997

3 4 -49.785 -1.766 46.252 1.000

3 5 -58.527 -9.143 40.242 1.000

3 6 -38.194 10.500 59.194 1.000

3 7 -38.195 11.636 61.468 1.000

3 8 -57.464 -5.200 47.064 1.000

3 9 -64.793 -16.344 32.106 0.999

3 10 -47.785 1.048 49.880 1.000

3 11 -61.033 -9.500 42.033 1.000

3 12 -58.424 -3.333 51.757 1.000

3 13 -61.932 -3.500 54.932 1.000

3 14 -52.091 3.000 58.091 1.000

3 15 -54.591 -1.250 52.091 1.000

3 16 -67.472 0.000 67.472 1.000

3 17 -55.922 -6.091 43.740 1.000

4 5 -21.238 -7.377 6.485 0.919

4 6 1.113 12.266 23.420 0.015

4 7 -1.976 13.403 28.781 0.178

4 8 -25.452 -3.434 18.585 1.000

4 9 -24.612 -14.578 -4.543 0.000

4 10 -8.931 2.814 14.559 1.000

4 11 -27.956 -7.734 12.488 0.997

4 12 -29.644 -1.567 26.510 1.000

4 13 -35.905 -1.734 32.438 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 267: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

266

Table 176 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 14 -23.311 4.766 32.843 1.000

4 15 -23.950 0.516 24.983 1.000

4 16 -46.252 1.766 49.785 1.000

4 17 -19.703 -4.325 11.054 1.000

5 6 3.598 19.643 35.688 0.003

5 7 1.556 20.779 40.002 0.019

5 8 -20.913 3.943 28.799 1.000

5 9 -22.489 -7.201 8.087 0.972

5 10 -6.271 10.190 26.652 0.767

5 11 -23.637 -0.357 22.923 1.000

5 12 -24.544 5.810 36.163 1.000

5 13 -30.422 5.643 41.708 1.000

5 14 -18.211 12.143 42.496 0.995

5 15 -19.156 7.893 34.942 1.000

5 16 -40.242 9.143 58.527 1.000

5 17 -16.171 3.052 22.275 1.000

6 7 -16.235 1.136 18.508 1.000

6 8 -39.154 -15.700 7.754 0.643

6 9 -39.727 -26.844 -13.961 0.000

6 10 -23.708 -9.452 4.804 0.660

6 11 -41.776 -20.000 1.776 0.116

6 12 -43.050 -13.833 15.383 0.970

6 13 -49.113 -14.000 21.113 0.995

6 14 -36.716 -7.500 21.716 1.000

6 15 -37.516 -11.750 14.016 0.979

6 16 -59.194 -10.500 38.194 1.000

6 17 -33.963 -16.591 0.781 0.081

7 8 -42.569 -16.836 8.896 0.682

7 9 -44.655 -27.980 -11.305 0.000

7 10 -28.346 -10.589 7.169 0.815

7 11 -45.350 -21.136 3.077 0.176

7 12 -46.045 -14.970 16.106 0.965

7 13 -51.811 -15.136 21.538 0.992

7 14 -39.712 -8.636 22.439 1.000

7 15 -40.743 -12.886 14.970 0.976

7 16 -61.468 -11.636 38.195 1.000

7 17 -38.071 -17.727 2.616 0.178

8 9 -34.087 -11.144 11.799 0.962

8 10 -17.493 6.248 29.989 1.000

8 11 -33.190 -4.300 24.590 1.000

8 12 -32.976 1.867 36.709 1.000

8 13 -38.217 1.700 41.617 1.000

8 14 -26.642 8.200 43.042 1.000

8 15 -28.055 3.950 35.955 1.000

8 16 -47.064 5.200 57.464 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 268: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

267

Table 176 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 17 -26.624 -0.891 24.842 1.000

9 10 3.993 17.391 30.790 0.001

9 11 -14.381 6.844 28.069 1.000

9 12 -15.797 13.010 41.818 0.981

9 13 -21.930 12.844 47.618 0.998

9 14 -9.464 19.344 48.151 0.638

9 15 -10.208 15.094 40.396 0.815

9 16 -32.106 16.344 64.793 0.999

9 17 -6.422 10.253 26.928 0.776

10 11 -32.633 -10.548 11.538 0.968

10 12 -33.828 -4.381 25.066 1.000

10 13 -39.854 -4.548 30.758 1.000

10 14 -27.495 1.952 31.400 1.000

10 15 -28.325 -2.298 23.730 1.000

10 16 -49.880 -1.048 47.785 1.000

10 17 -24.896 -7.139 10.619 0.994

11 12 -27.569 6.167 39.903 1.000

11 13 -32.955 6.000 44.955 1.000

11 14 -21.236 12.500 46.236 0.998

11 15 -22.547 8.250 39.047 1.000

11 16 -42.033 9.500 61.033 1.000

11 17 -20.805 3.409 27.623 1.000

12 13 -43.720 -0.167 43.386 1.000

12 14 -32.622 6.333 45.288 1.000

12 15 -34.356 2.083 38.522 1.000

12 16 -51.757 3.333 58.424 1.000

12 17 -33.833 -2.758 28.318 1.000

13 14 -37.053 6.500 50.053 1.000

13 15 -39.068 2.250 43.568 1.000

13 16 -54.932 3.500 61.932 1.000

13 17 -39.266 -2.591 34.084 1.000

14 15 -40.689 -4.250 32.189 1.000

14 16 -58.091 -3.000 52.091 1.000

14 17 -40.166 -9.091 21.984 1.000

15 16 -52.091 1.250 54.591 1.000

15 17 -32.697 -4.841 23.016 1.000

16 17 -55.922 -6.091 43.740 1.000

Page 269: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

268

:........--:

-------

10

21

22

32

51

53

54

56

57

58

71

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Page 270: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

269

108 [X14.xxx.Scaled = School-Type-2]

108.1 Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable School- Type-2

Table 177: Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 51.439

2 50.228

3 62.243

p-value = 1.4197e-06

108.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 178: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -3.949 1.211 6.371 0.846

1 3 -18.210 -10.804 -3.399 0.002

2 3 -17.441 -12.015 -6.590 0.000

Page 271: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

270

109 [X14.xxx.Scaled = BudgetFrom]

109.1 Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Bud- getFrom

Table 179: Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Budget-

From

Group Mean

1 54.375

2 56.500

4 31.500

5 50.228

6 62.243

7 50.000

p-value = 6.9819e-08

109.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 180: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -17.023 -2.125 12.773 0.999

1 3 4.808 22.875 40.942 0.004

1 4 -3.988 4.147 12.282 0.694

1 5 -18.243 -7.868 2.506 0.256

1 6 -36.023 4.375 44.773 1.000

2 3 4.560 25.000 45.440 0.007

2 4 -6.281 6.272 18.825 0.712

2 5 -19.851 -5.743 8.364 0.856

2 6 -35.014 6.500 48.014 0.998

3 4 -34.915 -18.728 -2.541 0.013

3 5 -48.164 -30.743 -13.323 0.000

3 6 -61.254 -18.500 24.254 0.821

4 5 -18.591 -12.015 -5.440 0.000

4 6 -39.366 0.228 39.821 1.000

5 6 -27.870 12.243 52.357 0.954

Page 272: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

271

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Page 273: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

272

110

110.1

[X14.xxx.Scaled = IsProtected]

Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 181: Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable IsPro-

tected

Group Mean

0 50.331

1 52.705

p-value = 0.063847

110.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 182: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable IsProtected

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.884 -2.375 0.135 0.064

Page 274: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

273

111

111.1

[X14.xxx.Scaled = IsCentral]

Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 183: Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable IsCentral

Group Mean

0 51.056

1 49.720

p-value = 0.044821

111.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 184: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable IsCentral

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 0.032 1.336 2.640 0.045

Page 275: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

274

112 [X14.xxx.Scaled = Shifts]

112.1 Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Table 185: Means of X14.xxx.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 49.796

5 52.412

7 41.333

p-value = 0.00094215

112.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 186: Between group comparison of X14.xxx.Scaled by group-

ing variable Shifts

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.337 -2.616 -0.895 0.001

1 3 -10.482 8.462 27.407 0.547

2 3 -7.901 11.079 30.058 0.358

Page 276: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

275

113 [X14.mat.Normed = Obl-ID]

113.1 Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 187: Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 101.957

2 101.193

3 101.200

4 98.062

5 98.679

6 98.469

7 96.192

8 100.361

9 104.032

10 92.654

11 100.163

12 102.300

13 98.036

14 95.433

15 93.429

16 97.234

17 95.543

18 95.980

19 94.194

20 98.741

21 101.865

22 102.648

23 99.697

24 97.902

25 107.951

26 99.850

27 98.185

28 103.452

29 96.500

p-value = 3.5862e-18

113.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Page 277: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

276

Table 188: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Normed by

grouping variable Obl-ID

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.848 0.764 6.376 1.000

1 3 -5.120 0.757 6.633 1.000

1 4 -2.558 3.894 10.346 0.906

1 5 -5.278 3.278 11.834 1.000

1 6 -3.523 3.487 10.498 0.991

1 7 -3.040 5.764 14.568 0.804

1 8 -4.949 1.596 8.141 1.000

1 9 -8.589 -2.076 4.438 1.000

1 10 0.498 9.303 18.107 0.024

1 11 -5.529 1.794 9.116 1.000

1 12 -7.308 -0.343 6.621 1.000

1 13 -2.081 3.920 9.921 0.808

1 14 -1.811 6.523 14.857 0.430

1 15 2.405 8.528 14.651 0.000

1 16 -0.562 4.722 10.006 0.168

1 17 -0.745 6.413 13.571 0.164

1 18 -0.988 5.977 12.941 0.236

1 19 -0.031 7.762 15.555 0.053

1 20 -3.580 3.216 10.011 0.996

1 21 -6.786 0.091 6.968 1.000

1 22 -5.701 -0.691 4.318 1.000

1 23 -3.885 2.259 8.404 1.000

1 24 -1.790 4.054 9.899 0.701

1 25 -13.438 -5.995 1.449 0.366

1 26 -4.471 2.107 8.684 1.000

1 27 -3.024 3.771 10.567 0.962

1 28 -9.727 -1.495 6.737 1.000

1 29 -22.876 5.457 33.789 1.000

2 3 -5.653 -0.007 5.638 1.000

2 4 -3.112 3.130 9.373 0.990

2 5 -5.884 2.514 10.913 1.000

2 6 -4.095 2.723 9.541 1.000

2 7 -3.651 5.000 13.652 0.940

2 8 -5.506 0.832 7.170 1.000

2 9 -9.145 -2.840 3.466 0.998

2 10 -0.113 8.539 17.190 0.059

2 11 -6.109 1.030 8.168 1.000

2 12 -7.878 -1.107 5.663 1.000

2 13 -2.618 3.157 8.931 0.969

2 14 -2.413 5.759 13.932 0.668

2 15 1.863 7.764 13.665 0.000

2 16 -1.067 3.958 8.983 0.416

2 17 -1.320 5.649 12.619 0.351

Continued on next page

Page 278: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

277

Table 188 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

2 18 -1.558 5.213 11.983 0.469

2 19 -0.622 6.998 14.618 0.130

2 20 -4.145 2.452 9.048 1.000

2 21 -7.354 -0.673 6.008 1.000

2 22 -6.192 -1.455 3.281 1.000

2 23 -4.428 1.495 7.419 1.000

2 24 -2.322 3.290 8.903 0.930

2 25 -14.021 -6.759 0.504 0.114

2 26 -5.030 1.343 7.715 1.000

2 27 -3.589 3.007 9.604 0.998

2 28 -10.328 -2.259 5.810 1.000

2 29 -23.593 4.693 32.978 1.000

3 4 -3.344 3.138 9.619 0.994

3 5 -6.056 2.521 11.099 1.000

3 6 -4.307 2.731 9.768 1.000

3 7 -3.818 5.008 13.834 0.951

3 8 -5.735 0.839 7.413 1.000

3 9 -9.375 -2.832 3.710 0.999

3 10 -0.280 8.546 17.372 0.074

3 11 -6.311 1.037 8.386 1.000

3 12 -8.092 -1.100 5.892 1.000

3 13 -2.869 3.164 9.196 0.981

3 14 -2.590 5.767 14.124 0.711

3 15 1.618 7.771 13.925 0.001

3 16 -1.354 3.966 9.285 0.544

3 17 -1.528 5.657 12.841 0.417

3 18 -1.772 5.220 12.212 0.540

3 19 -0.812 7.006 14.823 0.164

3 20 -4.364 2.459 9.283 1.000

3 21 -7.570 -0.665 6.239 1.000

3 22 -6.495 -1.448 3.599 1.000

3 23 -4.673 1.503 7.678 1.000

3 24 -2.579 3.298 9.175 0.957

3 25 -14.220 -6.751 0.718 0.151

3 26 -5.257 1.350 7.957 1.000

3 27 -3.809 3.015 9.838 0.999

3 28 -10.507 -2.252 6.004 1.000

3 29 -23.639 4.700 33.039 1.000

4 5 -9.598 -0.616 8.366 1.000

4 6 -7.932 -0.407 7.118 1.000

4 7 -7.349 1.870 11.089 1.000

4 8 -9.391 -2.298 4.795 1.000

4 9 -13.033 -5.970 1.094 0.265

4 10 -3.810 5.409 14.628 0.930

4 11 -9.917 -2.100 5.716 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 279: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

278

Table 188 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 12 -11.719 -4.237 3.244 0.952

4 13 -6.568 0.026 6.621 1.000

4 14 -6.142 2.629 11.400 1.000

4 15 -2.071 4.634 11.339 0.708

4 16 -5.121 0.828 6.777 1.000

4 17 -5.143 2.519 10.181 1.000

4 18 -5.399 2.083 9.564 1.000

4 19 -4.390 3.868 12.126 0.996

4 20 -8.003 -0.678 6.646 1.000

4 21 -11.204 -3.803 3.598 0.986

4 22 -10.292 -4.585 1.121 0.371

4 23 -8.360 -1.635 5.090 1.000

4 24 -6.292 0.160 6.613 1.000

4 25 -17.818 -9.889 -1.959 0.001

4 26 -8.911 -1.787 5.336 1.000

4 27 -7.447 -0.123 7.202 1.000

4 28 -14.063 -5.389 3.285 0.876

4 29 -26.902 1.562 30.027 1.000

5 6 -9.182 0.209 9.600 1.000

5 7 -8.310 2.486 13.282 1.000

5 8 -10.731 -1.682 7.367 1.000

5 9 -14.379 -5.354 3.672 0.921

5 10 -4.771 6.025 16.821 0.960

5 11 -11.110 -1.484 8.142 1.000

5 12 -12.978 -3.621 5.735 1.000

5 13 -8.021 0.642 9.306 1.000

5 14 -7.171 3.245 13.661 1.000

5 15 -3.498 5.250 13.998 0.911

5 16 -6.739 1.444 9.627 1.000

5 17 -6.366 3.135 12.637 1.000

5 18 -6.658 2.699 12.055 1.000

5 19 -5.504 4.484 14.472 0.998

5 20 -9.294 -0.062 9.169 1.000

5 21 -12.479 -3.187 6.105 1.000

5 22 -11.978 -3.969 4.039 0.991

5 23 -9.782 -1.019 7.744 1.000

5 24 -7.779 0.776 9.332 1.000

5 25 -18.991 -9.273 0.446 0.087

5 26 -10.244 -1.171 7.901 1.000

5 27 -8.738 0.493 9.725 1.000

5 28 -15.108 -4.773 5.562 0.997

5 29 -26.835 2.179 31.192 1.000

6 7 -7.341 2.277 11.895 1.000

6 8 -9.496 -1.891 5.713 1.000

6 9 -13.140 -5.563 2.014 0.579

Continued on next page

Page 280: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

279

Table 188 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

6 10 -3.802 5.816 15.433 0.904

6 11 -9.977 -1.693 6.590 1.000

6 12 -11.799 -3.831 4.138 0.995

6 13 -6.708 0.433 7.575 1.000

6 14 -6.153 3.036 12.225 1.000

6 15 -2.203 5.041 12.285 0.694

6 16 -5.315 1.235 7.785 1.000

6 17 -5.212 2.926 11.064 1.000

6 18 -5.479 2.489 10.458 1.000

6 19 -4.427 4.275 12.976 0.993

6 20 -8.092 -0.271 7.550 1.000

6 21 -11.288 -3.396 4.496 0.999

6 22 -10.510 -4.179 2.153 0.791

6 23 -8.490 -1.228 6.034 1.000

6 24 -6.443 0.567 7.578 1.000

6 25 -17.872 -9.482 -1.092 0.008

6 26 -9.013 -1.381 6.252 1.000

6 27 -7.537 0.284 8.105 1.000

6 28 -14.079 -4.982 4.115 0.968

6 29 -26.627 1.969 30.565 1.000

7 8 -13.452 -4.168 5.116 0.998

7 9 -17.102 -7.840 1.422 0.262

7 10 -7.456 3.538 14.533 1.000

7 11 -13.818 -3.970 5.877 1.000

7 12 -15.692 -6.108 3.477 0.844

7 13 -10.753 -1.844 7.065 1.000

7 14 -9.862 0.759 11.380 1.000

7 15 -6.228 2.764 11.755 1.000

7 16 -9.484 -1.042 7.400 1.000

7 17 -9.077 0.649 10.375 1.000

7 18 -9.372 0.212 9.797 1.000

7 19 -8.204 1.998 12.200 1.000

7 20 -12.011 -2.548 6.914 1.000

7 21 -15.194 -5.673 3.848 0.917

7 22 -14.729 -6.456 1.818 0.437

7 23 -12.511 -3.505 5.501 1.000

7 24 -10.514 -1.710 7.094 1.000

7 25 -21.697 -11.759 -1.821 0.003

7 26 -12.965 -3.658 5.650 1.000

7 27 -11.455 -1.993 7.469 1.000

7 28 -17.801 -7.259 3.282 0.715

7 29 -29.395 -0.308 28.780 1.000

8 9 -10.820 -3.672 3.477 0.986

8 10 -1.577 7.707 16.991 0.301

8 11 -7.695 0.198 8.091 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 281: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

280

Table 188 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 12 -9.501 -1.939 5.623 1.000

8 13 -4.361 2.325 9.010 1.000

8 14 -3.912 4.927 13.767 0.960

8 15 0.138 6.932 13.727 0.039

8 16 -2.923 3.126 9.176 0.985

8 17 -2.924 4.817 12.558 0.874

8 18 -3.181 4.381 11.943 0.939

8 19 -2.165 6.166 14.497 0.560

8 20 -5.787 1.620 9.027 1.000

8 21 -8.987 -1.505 5.977 1.000

8 22 -8.099 -2.287 3.524 1.000

8 23 -6.151 0.663 7.478 1.000

8 24 -4.087 2.458 9.004 1.000

8 25 -15.596 -7.591 0.415 0.093

8 26 -6.697 0.511 7.718 1.000

8 27 -5.231 2.175 9.582 1.000

8 28 -11.834 -3.091 5.652 1.000

8 29 -24.625 3.861 32.346 1.000

9 10 2.117 11.378 20.640 0.002

9 11 -3.997 3.869 11.736 0.992

9 12 -5.802 1.732 9.267 1.000

9 13 -0.658 5.996 12.650 0.156

9 14 -0.217 8.599 17.415 0.068

9 15 3.840 10.604 17.368 0.000

9 16 0.783 6.798 12.813 0.008

9 17 0.775 8.489 16.203 0.013

9 18 0.518 8.052 15.587 0.020

9 19 1.532 9.838 18.144 0.003

9 20 -2.087 5.292 12.670 0.631

9 21 -5.287 2.167 9.621 1.000

9 22 -4.392 1.384 7.160 1.000

9 23 -2.449 4.335 11.119 0.840

9 24 -0.383 6.130 12.643 0.101

9 25 -11.898 -3.919 4.060 0.993

9 26 -2.996 4.182 11.361 0.935

9 27 -1.531 5.847 13.226 0.402

9 28 -8.139 0.581 9.300 1.000

9 29 -20.946 7.532 36.010 1.000

10 11 -17.357 -7.509 2.339 0.491

10 12 -19.231 -9.646 -0.062 0.046

10 13 -14.291 -5.382 3.527 0.905

10 14 -13.401 -2.779 7.842 1.000

10 15 -9.766 -0.775 8.217 1.000

10 16 -13.023 -4.581 3.862 0.971

10 17 -12.616 -2.890 6.836 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 282: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

281

Table 188 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

10 18 -12.911 -3.326 6.258 1.000

10 19 -11.743 -1.541 8.662 1.000

10 20 -15.549 -6.087 3.375 0.831

10 21 -18.733 -9.212 0.310 0.075

10 22 -18.268 -9.994 -1.720 0.002

10 23 -16.050 -7.044 1.963 0.432

10 24 -14.053 -5.248 3.556 0.917

10 25 -25.235 -15.297 -5.360 0.000

10 26 -16.503 -7.196 2.111 0.459

10 27 -14.994 -5.531 3.931 0.932

10 28 -21.339 -10.798 -0.256 0.037

10 29 -32.934 -3.846 25.242 1.000

11 12 -10.382 -2.137 6.107 1.000

11 13 -5.321 2.127 9.575 1.000

11 14 -4.700 4.729 14.159 0.990

11 15 -0.812 6.734 14.281 0.170

11 16 -3.955 2.928 9.812 0.999

11 17 -3.789 4.619 13.028 0.967

11 18 -4.062 4.183 12.427 0.988

11 19 -2.987 5.968 14.923 0.775

11 20 -6.680 1.422 9.524 1.000

11 21 -9.873 -1.703 6.468 1.000

11 22 -9.160 -2.485 4.190 1.000

11 23 -7.099 0.465 8.030 1.000

11 24 -5.062 2.261 9.583 1.000

11 25 -16.441 -7.788 0.864 0.157

11 26 -7.608 0.313 8.233 1.000

11 27 -6.124 1.978 10.080 1.000

11 28 -12.629 -3.289 6.051 1.000

11 29 -25.011 3.663 32.337 1.000

12 13 -2.832 4.264 11.360 0.910

12 14 -2.288 6.867 16.021 0.529

12 15 1.672 8.871 16.071 0.002

12 16 -1.436 5.066 11.567 0.441

12 17 -1.342 6.757 14.855 0.290

12 18 -1.608 6.320 14.248 0.388

12 19 -0.559 8.106 16.770 0.108

12 20 -4.221 3.559 11.339 0.997

12 21 -7.417 0.435 8.286 1.000

12 22 -6.628 -0.348 5.932 1.000

12 23 -4.616 2.603 9.821 1.000

12 24 -2.567 4.398 11.362 0.856

12 25 -14.003 -5.651 2.701 0.748

12 26 -5.140 2.450 10.040 1.000

12 27 -3.665 4.115 11.895 0.979

Continued on next page

Page 283: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

282

Table 188 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

12 28 -10.213 -1.152 7.910 1.000

12 29 -22.785 5.800 34.385 1.000

13 14 -5.842 2.603 11.047 1.000

13 15 -1.664 4.608 10.880 0.577

13 16 -4.654 0.802 6.258 1.000

13 17 -4.794 2.493 9.779 1.000

13 18 -5.040 2.056 9.152 1.000

13 19 -4.069 3.842 11.752 0.994

13 20 -7.635 -0.705 6.226 1.000

13 21 -10.840 -3.829 3.181 0.969

13 22 -9.803 -4.612 0.579 0.177

13 23 -7.955 -1.661 4.632 1.000

13 24 -5.867 0.134 6.135 1.000

13 25 -17.482 -9.915 -2.348 0.000

13 26 -8.531 -1.814 4.903 1.000

13 27 -7.079 -0.149 6.781 1.000

13 28 -13.759 -5.415 2.928 0.818

13 29 -26.829 1.536 29.902 1.000

14 15 -6.527 2.005 10.536 1.000

14 16 -9.752 -1.801 6.150 1.000

14 17 -9.413 -0.110 9.192 1.000

14 18 -9.701 -0.547 8.608 1.000

14 19 -8.560 1.239 11.038 1.000

14 20 -12.334 -3.307 5.719 1.000

14 21 -15.520 -6.432 2.656 0.659

14 22 -14.986 -7.215 0.557 0.117

14 23 -12.811 -4.264 4.283 0.991

14 24 -10.803 -2.469 5.865 1.000

14 25 -22.042 -12.518 -2.994 0.000

14 26 -13.280 -4.417 4.447 0.991

14 27 -11.778 -2.752 6.275 1.000

14 28 -18.170 -8.018 2.134 0.410

14 29 -30.016 -1.067 27.882 1.000

15 16 -9.396 -3.806 1.784 0.737

15 17 -9.502 -2.115 5.272 1.000

15 18 -9.751 -2.551 4.648 1.000

15 19 -8.769 -0.766 7.238 1.000

15 20 -12.348 -5.312 1.724 0.514

15 21 -15.552 -8.437 -1.322 0.003

15 22 -14.551 -9.219 -3.888 0.000

15 23 -12.678 -6.269 0.141 0.066

15 24 -10.596 -4.474 1.649 0.589

15 25 -22.186 -14.523 -6.859 0.000

15 26 -13.248 -6.421 0.405 0.102

15 27 -11.793 -4.757 2.279 0.750

Continued on next page

Page 284: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

283

Table 188 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

15 28 -18.455 -10.023 -1.591 0.003

15 29 -31.463 -3.071 25.320 1.000

16 17 -5.017 1.691 8.399 1.000

16 18 -5.247 1.254 7.756 1.000

16 19 -4.341 3.040 10.421 1.000

16 20 -7.826 -1.506 4.813 1.000

16 21 -11.038 -4.631 1.776 0.614

16 22 -9.756 -5.413 -1.071 0.001

16 23 -8.076 -2.463 3.151 0.999

16 24 -5.951 -0.668 4.616 1.000

16 25 -17.728 -10.717 -3.705 0.000

16 26 -8.700 -2.616 3.469 0.999

16 27 -7.270 -0.951 5.369 1.000

16 28 -14.061 -6.217 1.627 0.401

16 29 -27.488 0.734 28.957 1.000

17 18 -8.535 -0.437 7.662 1.000

17 19 -7.472 1.349 10.170 1.000

17 20 -11.151 -3.197 4.756 1.000

17 21 -14.345 -6.322 1.702 0.415

17 22 -13.599 -7.104 -0.610 0.014

17 23 -11.559 -4.154 3.251 0.957

17 24 -9.517 -2.359 4.799 1.000

17 25 -20.922 -12.408 -3.894 0.000

17 26 -12.075 -4.307 3.462 0.963

17 27 -10.595 -2.642 5.312 1.000

17 28 -17.119 -7.908 1.303 0.235

17 29 -29.589 -0.957 27.676 1.000

18 19 -6.879 1.786 10.450 1.000

18 20 -10.541 -2.761 5.019 1.000

18 21 -13.737 -5.885 1.966 0.531

18 22 -12.948 -6.668 -0.388 0.022

18 23 -10.936 -3.717 3.501 0.985

18 24 -8.887 -1.922 5.042 1.000

18 25 -20.323 -11.971 -3.619 0.000

18 26 -11.460 -3.870 3.720 0.987

18 27 -9.985 -2.205 5.575 1.000

18 28 -16.533 -7.472 1.590 0.315

18 29 -29.105 -0.520 28.065 1.000

19 20 -13.075 -4.546 3.983 0.977

19 21 -16.265 -7.671 0.924 0.170

19 22 -15.641 -8.454 -1.266 0.004

19 23 -13.523 -5.503 2.517 0.722

19 24 -11.501 -3.708 4.085 0.995

19 25 -22.811 -13.757 -4.703 0.000

19 26 -14.012 -5.656 2.701 0.748

Continued on next page

Page 285: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

284

Table 188 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

19 27 -12.520 -3.991 4.538 0.996

19 28 -18.970 -9.257 0.456 0.088

19 29 -31.103 -2.306 26.492 1.000

20 21 -10.826 -3.125 4.577 1.000

20 22 -9.999 -3.907 2.185 0.835

20 23 -8.012 -0.957 6.098 1.000

20 24 -5.957 0.839 7.634 1.000

20 25 -17.422 -9.210 -0.999 0.009

20 26 -8.545 -1.109 6.326 1.000

20 27 -7.073 0.556 8.184 1.000

20 28 -13.643 -4.711 4.221 0.980

20 29 -26.303 2.241 30.785 1.000

21 22 -6.966 -0.783 5.401 1.000

21 23 -4.966 2.168 9.302 1.000

21 24 -2.914 3.963 10.841 0.942

21 25 -14.365 -6.086 2.193 0.576

21 26 -5.495 2.015 9.526 1.000

21 27 -4.022 3.680 11.382 0.995

21 28 -10.581 -1.586 7.409 1.000

21 29 -23.198 5.365 33.929 1.000

22 23 -2.406 2.951 8.307 0.966

22 24 -0.264 4.746 9.755 0.094

22 25 -12.111 -5.303 1.504 0.441

22 26 -3.051 2.798 8.647 0.995

22 27 -1.629 4.463 10.555 0.584

22 28 -8.466 -0.804 6.858 1.000

22 29 -22.024 6.148 34.320 1.000

23 24 -4.349 1.795 7.940 1.000

23 25 -15.935 -8.254 -0.573 0.018

23 26 -6.998 -0.153 6.693 1.000

23 27 -5.543 1.512 8.567 1.000

23 28 -12.202 -3.754 4.693 0.998

23 29 -25.199 3.197 31.593 1.000

24 25 -17.492 -10.049 -2.606 0.000

24 26 -8.526 -1.948 4.630 1.000

24 27 -7.078 -0.283 6.512 1.000

24 28 -13.782 -5.549 2.683 0.755

24 29 -26.931 1.402 29.735 1.000

25 26 0.069 8.101 16.133 0.045

25 27 1.555 9.766 17.977 0.003

25 28 -4.935 4.500 13.934 0.995

25 29 -17.254 11.451 40.156 1.000

26 27 -5.771 1.665 9.100 1.000

26 28 -12.370 -3.602 5.166 1.000

26 29 -25.143 3.350 31.843 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 286: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

285

Table 188 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

27 28 -14.199 -5.266 3.666 0.926

27 29 -26.859 1.685 30.229 1.000

28 29 -21.968 6.952 35.871 1.000

Page 287: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

286

114 [X14.mat.Normed = cat]

114.1 Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable cat

Table 189: Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 103.331

1 100.361

2 98.223

3 99.395

4 98.449

5 97.534

6 99.704

7 101.948

8 103.000

p-value = 1.8121e-07

114.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 190: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Normed by

grouping variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -0.485 2.971 6.427 0.160

1 3 1.738 5.108 8.479 0.000

1 4 0.384 3.937 7.490 0.017

1 5 0.869 4.882 8.896 0.005

1 6 2.735 5.797 8.859 0.000

1 7 0.560 3.627 6.694 0.008

1 8 -2.651 1.383 5.417 0.979

1 9 -11.850 0.331 12.513 1.000

2 3 -1.077 2.137 5.351 0.499

2 4 -2.439 0.966 4.371 0.994

2 5 -1.972 1.911 5.794 0.843

2 6 -0.063 2.826 5.715 0.061

2 7 -2.238 0.656 3.550 0.999

2 8 -5.492 -1.588 2.317 0.942

2 9 -14.779 -2.639 9.500 0.999

3 4 -4.489 -1.171 2.146 0.975

3 5 -4.033 -0.226 3.581 1.000

3 6 -2.097 0.689 3.475 0.998

3 7 -4.272 -1.481 1.310 0.779

Continued on next page

Page 288: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

287

Table 190 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -7.554 -3.725 0.104 0.064

3 9 -16.892 -4.777 7.338 0.952

4 5 -3.024 0.945 4.915 0.998

4 6 -1.144 1.860 4.864 0.599

4 7 -3.319 -0.310 2.699 1.000

4 8 -6.544 -2.554 1.437 0.554

4 9 -15.772 -3.605 8.562 0.992

5 6 -2.622 0.915 4.452 0.997

5 7 -4.796 -1.255 2.286 0.974

5 8 -7.904 -3.499 0.906 0.250

5 9 -16.860 -4.551 7.759 0.967

6 7 -4.580 -2.170 0.240 0.117

6 8 -7.974 -4.414 -0.854 0.004

6 9 -17.499 -5.466 6.567 0.895

7 8 -5.808 -2.244 1.320 0.577

7 9 -15.330 -3.296 8.738 0.995

8 9 -13.368 -1.052 11.264 1.000

Page 289: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

288

115 [X14.mat.Normed = School-Type-1]

115.1 Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable School- Type-1

Table 191: Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 99.228

3 99.520

5 100.000

6 101.312

7 104.286

8 89.667

10 92.273

21 101.600

22 112.469

32 97.143

51 104.000

53 103.333

54 104.000

56 96.333

57 98.000

58 100.000

71 103.091

p-value = 1.7614e-10

115.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 192: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Normed by

grouping variable School-Type-1

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -2.389 -0.292 1.805 1.000

1 3 -38.094 -0.772 36.550 1.000

1 4 -6.472 -2.084 2.304 0.969

1 5 -15.088 -5.058 4.972 0.948

1 6 1.869 9.561 17.253 0.002

1 7 -4.346 6.955 18.256 0.775

1 8 -19.092 -2.372 14.347 1.000

1 9 -19.925 -13.241 -6.557 0.000

1 10 -6.128 2.085 10.298 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 290: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

289

Table 192 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 11 -20.041 -4.772 10.497 1.000

1 12 -25.672 -4.106 17.461 1.000

1 13 -31.174 -4.772 21.630 1.000

1 14 -18.672 2.894 24.461 1.000

1 15 -17.457 1.228 19.912 1.000

1 16 -38.094 -0.772 36.550 1.000

1 17 -15.164 -3.863 7.437 0.999

2 3 -37.830 -0.480 36.869 1.000

2 4 -6.406 -1.792 2.822 0.996

2 5 -14.896 -4.766 5.364 0.972

2 6 2.030 9.853 17.676 0.002

2 7 -4.143 7.247 18.637 0.727

2 8 -18.860 -2.080 14.700 1.000

2 9 -19.783 -12.949 -6.115 0.000

2 10 -5.959 2.377 10.713 1.000

2 11 -19.816 -4.480 10.855 1.000

2 12 -25.427 -3.814 17.800 1.000

2 13 -30.921 -4.480 21.960 1.000

2 14 -18.427 3.186 24.800 1.000

2 15 -17.219 1.520 20.259 1.000

2 16 -37.830 -0.480 36.869 1.000

2 17 -14.962 -3.571 7.819 1.000

3 4 -38.859 -1.312 36.236 1.000

3 5 -42.901 -4.286 34.330 1.000

3 6 -27.742 10.333 48.409 1.000

3 7 -31.238 7.727 46.692 1.000

3 8 -42.467 -1.600 39.267 1.000

3 9 -50.353 -12.469 25.416 0.999

3 10 -35.327 2.857 41.041 1.000

3 11 -44.295 -4.000 36.295 1.000

3 12 -46.411 -3.333 39.744 1.000

3 13 -49.691 -4.000 41.691 1.000

3 14 -39.411 3.667 46.744 1.000

3 15 -39.710 2.000 43.710 1.000

3 16 -52.759 0.000 52.759 1.000

3 17 -42.056 -3.091 35.874 1.000

4 5 -13.813 -2.974 7.865 1.000

4 6 2.924 11.645 20.367 0.000

4 7 -2.986 9.039 21.064 0.427

4 8 -17.505 -0.288 16.929 1.000

4 9 -19.004 -11.157 -3.311 0.000

4 10 -5.015 4.169 13.353 0.980

4 11 -18.501 -2.688 13.124 1.000

4 12 -23.976 -2.022 19.933 1.000

4 13 -29.408 -2.688 24.032 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 291: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

290

Table 192 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 14 -16.976 4.978 26.933 1.000

4 15 -15.820 3.312 22.443 1.000

4 16 -36.236 1.312 38.859 1.000

4 17 -13.804 -1.779 10.246 1.000

5 6 2.073 14.619 27.165 0.006

5 7 -3.018 12.013 27.044 0.313

5 8 -16.750 2.686 22.122 1.000

5 9 -20.137 -8.183 3.771 0.604

5 10 -5.729 7.143 20.015 0.888

5 11 -17.918 0.286 18.489 1.000

5 12 -22.782 0.952 24.687 1.000

5 13 -27.915 0.286 28.487 1.000

5 14 -15.782 7.952 31.687 0.999

5 15 -14.865 6.286 27.436 1.000

5 16 -34.330 4.286 42.901 1.000

5 17 -13.836 1.195 16.226 1.000

6 7 -16.190 -2.606 10.977 1.000

6 8 -30.273 -11.933 6.406 0.691

6 9 -32.876 -22.802 -12.728 0.000

6 10 -18.624 -7.476 3.671 0.640

6 11 -31.361 -14.333 2.695 0.228

6 12 -36.512 -13.667 9.179 0.811

6 13 -41.790 -14.333 13.123 0.930

6 14 -29.512 -6.667 16.179 1.000

6 15 -28.481 -8.333 11.814 0.992

6 16 -48.409 -10.333 27.742 1.000

6 17 -27.008 -13.424 0.159 0.057

7 8 -29.449 -9.327 10.794 0.976

7 9 -33.235 -20.196 -7.157 0.000

7 10 -18.755 -4.870 9.015 0.999

7 11 -30.661 -11.727 7.206 0.766

7 12 -35.360 -11.061 13.238 0.980

7 13 -40.405 -11.727 16.950 0.993

7 14 -28.360 -4.061 20.238 1.000

7 15 -27.509 -5.727 16.055 1.000

7 16 -46.692 -7.727 31.238 1.000

7 17 -26.726 -10.818 5.089 0.615

8 9 -28.809 -10.869 7.071 0.795

8 10 -14.107 4.457 23.021 1.000

8 11 -24.990 -2.400 20.190 1.000

8 12 -28.978 -1.733 25.511 1.000

8 13 -33.613 -2.400 28.813 1.000

8 14 -21.978 5.267 32.511 1.000

8 15 -21.426 3.600 28.626 1.000

8 16 -39.267 1.600 42.467 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 292: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

291

Table 192 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 17 -21.612 -1.491 18.631 1.000

9 10 4.849 15.326 25.803 0.000

9 11 -8.128 8.469 25.065 0.942

9 12 -13.390 9.135 31.661 0.994

9 13 -18.723 8.469 35.660 1.000

9 14 -6.390 16.135 38.661 0.519

9 15 -5.316 14.469 34.253 0.479

9 16 -25.416 12.469 50.353 0.999

9 17 -3.661 9.378 22.417 0.511

10 11 -24.127 -6.857 10.412 0.995

10 12 -29.216 -6.190 16.835 1.000

10 13 -34.464 -6.857 20.750 1.000

10 14 -22.216 0.810 23.835 1.000

10 15 -21.209 -0.857 19.495 1.000

10 16 -41.041 -2.857 35.327 1.000

10 17 -19.833 -5.948 7.937 0.989

11 12 -25.713 0.667 27.046 1.000

11 13 -30.460 0.000 30.460 1.000

11 14 -18.713 7.667 34.046 1.000

11 15 -18.081 6.000 30.081 1.000

11 16 -36.295 4.000 44.295 1.000

11 17 -18.025 0.909 19.843 1.000

12 13 -34.722 -0.667 33.389 1.000

12 14 -23.460 7.000 37.460 1.000

12 15 -23.160 5.333 33.826 1.000

12 16 -39.744 3.333 46.411 1.000

12 17 -24.057 0.242 24.541 1.000

13 14 -26.389 7.667 41.722 1.000

13 15 -26.308 6.000 38.308 1.000

13 16 -41.691 4.000 49.691 1.000

13 17 -27.768 0.909 29.587 1.000

14 15 -30.160 -1.667 26.826 1.000

14 16 -46.744 -3.667 39.411 1.000

14 17 -31.057 -6.758 17.541 1.000

15 16 -43.710 -2.000 39.710 1.000

15 17 -26.873 -5.091 16.691 1.000

16 17 -42.056 -3.091 35.874 1.000

Page 293: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

292

::.........--::

10

21

22

32

51

53

54

56

57

58

71

70 80

90 100 110 120 130

Page 294: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

293

116 [X14.mat.Normed = School-Type-2]

116.1 Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable School- Type-2

Table 193: Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 100.098

2 99.326

3 107.811

p-value = 1.7838e-05

116.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 194: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Normed by

grouping variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -3.271 0.772 4.815 0.896

1 3 -13.516 -7.713 -1.911 0.005

2 3 -12.736 -8.485 -4.234 0.000

Page 295: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

294

117 [X14.mat.Normed = BudgetFrom]

117.1 Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable Bud- getFrom

Table 195: Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable Bud-

getFrom

Group Mean

1 101.917

2 103.800

4 86.667

5 99.326

6 107.811

7 100.000

p-value = 4.1837e-06

117.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 196: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Normed by

grouping variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -13.569 -1.883 9.803 0.997

1 3 1.079 15.250 29.421 0.026

1 4 -3.790 2.591 8.972 0.857

1 5 -14.032 -5.894 2.243 0.306

1 6 -29.771 1.917 33.605 1.000

2 3 1.100 17.133 33.166 0.028

2 4 -5.372 4.474 14.321 0.788

2 5 -15.077 -4.011 7.055 0.907

2 6 -28.763 3.800 36.363 0.999

3 4 -25.356 -12.659 0.038 0.051

3 5 -34.809 -21.144 -7.480 0.000

3 6 -46.869 -13.333 20.202 0.868

4 5 -13.643 -8.485 -3.327 0.000

4 6 -31.731 -0.674 30.382 1.000

5 6 -23.654 7.811 39.275 0.981

Page 296: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

295

70 80 90 100 110 120 130

Page 297: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

296

118

118.1

[X14.mat.Normed = IsProtected]

Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 197: Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable IsPro-

tected

Group Mean

0 99.377

1 101.326

p-value = 0.051993

118.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 198: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Normed by

grouping variable IsProtected

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -3.912 -1.948 0.016 0.052

Page 298: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

297

119

119.1

[X14.mat.Normed = IsCentral]

Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 199: Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable IsCen-

tral

Group Mean

0 99.970

1 98.881

p-value = 0.036549

119.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 200: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Normed by

grouping variable IsCentral

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 0.069 1.089 2.110 0.036

Page 299: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

298

120 [X14.mat.Normed = Shifts]

120.1 Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Table 201: Means of X14.mat.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 98.896

5 101.194

7 92.333

p-value = 0.00018061

120.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 202: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Normed by

grouping variable Shifts

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -3.643 -2.298 -0.952 0.000

1 3 -8.247 6.563 21.373 0.552

2 3 -5.977 8.861 23.698 0.341

Page 300: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

299

121 [X14.mat.Scaled = Obl-ID]

121.1 Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 203: Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 46.033

2 45.073

3 45.211

4 40.812

5 41.571

6 41.327

7 38.192

8 43.918

9 48.952

10 33.154

11 43.628

12 46.600

13 40.711

14 37.000

15 34.338

16 39.579

17 37.196

18 37.840

19 35.500

20 41.722

21 46.019

22 47.071

23 43.000

24 40.543

25 54.439

26 43.217

27 40.889

28 48.258

29 38.500

p-value = 3.1207e-18

121.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Page 301: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

300

Table 204: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable Obl-ID

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -6.797 0.959 8.716 1.000

1 3 -7.301 0.821 8.944 1.000

1 4 -3.698 5.220 14.138 0.931

1 5 -7.363 4.461 16.286 1.000

1 6 -4.983 4.706 14.395 0.994

1 7 -4.328 7.840 20.009 0.828

1 8 -6.931 2.115 11.161 1.000

1 9 -11.921 -2.919 6.083 1.000

1 10 0.710 12.879 25.047 0.023

1 11 -7.716 2.405 12.525 1.000

1 12 -10.193 -0.567 9.058 1.000

1 13 -2.972 5.322 13.616 0.834

1 14 -2.486 9.033 20.551 0.426

1 15 3.233 11.695 20.157 0.000

1 16 -0.849 6.453 13.756 0.185

1 17 -1.056 8.837 18.730 0.169

1 18 -1.433 8.193 17.818 0.251

1 19 -0.238 10.533 21.303 0.066

1 20 -5.082 4.310 13.702 0.997

1 21 -9.492 0.013 9.518 1.000

1 22 -7.963 -1.039 5.885 1.000

1 23 -5.460 3.033 11.525 1.000

1 24 -2.589 5.489 13.567 0.740

1 25 -18.694 -8.406 1.881 0.334

1 26 -6.275 2.816 11.907 1.000

1 27 -4.248 5.144 14.536 0.968

1 28 -13.603 -2.225 9.152 1.000

1 29 -31.626 7.533 46.691 1.000

2 3 -7.941 -0.138 7.665 1.000

2 4 -4.367 4.261 12.889 0.992

2 5 -8.106 3.502 15.109 1.000

2 6 -5.676 3.747 13.170 1.000

2 7 -5.076 6.881 18.839 0.943

2 8 -7.605 1.155 9.916 1.000

2 9 -12.593 -3.878 4.837 0.998

2 10 -0.038 11.920 23.877 0.052

2 11 -8.421 1.445 11.312 1.000

2 12 -10.884 -1.527 7.831 1.000

2 13 -3.619 4.363 12.344 0.969

2 14 -3.222 8.073 19.369 0.638

2 15 2.580 10.736 18.892 0.000

2 16 -1.451 5.494 12.439 0.406

2 17 -1.755 7.878 17.510 0.332

Continued on next page

Page 302: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

301

Table 204 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

2 18 -2.124 7.233 16.591 0.459

2 19 -0.958 9.573 20.105 0.143

2 20 -5.766 3.351 12.468 1.000

2 21 -10.179 -0.946 8.288 1.000

2 22 -8.544 -1.998 4.548 1.000

2 23 -6.114 2.073 10.261 1.000

2 24 -3.227 4.530 12.286 0.933

2 25 -19.403 -9.366 0.672 0.111

2 26 -6.950 1.857 10.664 1.000

2 27 -4.933 4.185 13.302 0.997

2 28 -14.336 -3.185 7.967 1.000

2 29 -32.520 6.573 45.667 1.000

3 4 -4.560 4.399 13.357 0.993

3 5 -8.216 3.640 15.495 1.000

3 6 -5.842 3.885 13.611 1.000

3 7 -5.179 7.019 19.217 0.943

3 8 -7.793 1.293 10.379 1.000

3 9 -12.783 -3.741 5.302 1.000

3 10 -0.141 12.057 24.255 0.058

3 11 -8.573 1.583 11.740 1.000

3 12 -11.052 -1.389 8.274 1.000

3 13 -3.837 4.500 12.838 0.973

3 14 -3.339 8.211 19.761 0.650

3 15 2.369 10.873 19.378 0.001

3 16 -1.720 5.632 12.984 0.480

3 17 -1.914 8.015 17.945 0.360

3 18 -2.292 7.371 17.034 0.490

3 19 -1.093 9.711 20.515 0.159

3 20 -5.942 3.489 12.919 1.000

3 21 -10.351 -0.808 8.735 1.000

3 22 -8.836 -1.860 5.116 1.000

3 23 -6.324 2.211 10.746 1.000

3 24 -3.455 4.668 12.790 0.944

3 25 -19.551 -9.228 1.095 0.167

3 26 -7.137 1.994 11.125 1.000

3 27 -5.108 4.322 13.753 0.997

3 28 -14.456 -3.047 8.362 1.000

3 29 -32.457 6.711 45.879 1.000

4 5 -13.172 -0.759 11.655 1.000

4 6 -10.914 -0.514 9.886 1.000

4 7 -10.121 2.620 15.362 1.000

4 8 -12.909 -3.106 6.698 1.000

4 9 -17.902 -8.139 1.624 0.292

4 10 -5.083 7.659 20.400 0.910

4 11 -13.618 -2.815 7.987 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 303: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

302

Table 204 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 12 -16.128 -5.788 4.553 0.958

4 13 -9.012 0.102 9.215 1.000

4 14 -8.310 3.812 15.935 1.000

4 15 -2.792 6.475 15.742 0.686

4 16 -6.989 1.233 9.455 1.000

4 17 -6.973 3.617 14.207 1.000

4 18 -7.368 2.972 13.313 1.000

4 19 -6.101 5.312 16.726 0.997

4 20 -11.033 -0.910 9.214 1.000

4 21 -15.435 -5.207 5.022 0.988

4 22 -14.146 -6.259 1.629 0.399

4 23 -11.482 -2.188 7.107 1.000

4 24 -8.649 0.269 9.187 1.000

4 25 -24.586 -13.627 -2.667 0.001

4 26 -12.249 -2.404 7.441 1.000

4 27 -10.200 -0.076 10.047 1.000

4 28 -19.434 -7.446 4.543 0.876

4 29 -37.028 2.312 41.653 1.000

5 6 -12.734 0.245 13.224 1.000

5 7 -11.542 3.379 18.300 1.000

5 8 -14.853 -2.347 10.160 1.000

5 9 -19.855 -7.380 5.094 0.923

5 10 -6.504 8.418 23.339 0.954

5 11 -15.361 -2.056 11.248 1.000

5 12 -17.960 -5.029 7.903 1.000

5 13 -11.113 0.861 12.834 1.000

5 14 -9.825 4.571 18.968 1.000

5 15 -4.857 7.234 19.324 0.914

5 16 -9.317 1.992 13.301 1.000

5 17 -8.756 4.376 17.508 1.000

5 18 -9.200 3.731 16.663 1.000

5 19 -7.733 6.071 19.876 0.999

5 20 -12.909 -0.151 12.608 1.000

5 21 -17.290 -4.448 8.394 1.000

5 22 -16.568 -5.500 5.568 0.991

5 23 -13.540 -1.429 10.683 1.000

5 24 -10.797 1.028 12.853 1.000

5 25 -26.299 -12.868 0.564 0.083

5 26 -14.184 -1.645 10.894 1.000

5 27 -12.076 0.683 13.441 1.000

5 28 -20.970 -6.687 7.597 0.996

5 29 -37.028 3.071 43.171 1.000

6 7 -10.159 3.134 16.427 1.000

6 8 -13.102 -2.592 7.919 1.000

6 9 -18.097 -7.625 2.847 0.597

Continued on next page

Page 304: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

303

Table 204 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

6 10 -5.120 8.173 21.466 0.887

6 11 -13.749 -2.301 9.147 1.000

6 12 -16.286 -5.273 5.740 0.995

6 13 -9.254 0.616 10.486 1.000

6 14 -8.374 4.327 17.027 1.000

6 15 -3.023 6.989 17.001 0.688

6 16 -7.306 1.747 10.800 1.000

6 17 -7.117 4.131 15.378 1.000

6 18 -7.526 3.487 14.500 1.000

6 19 -6.200 5.827 17.853 0.994

6 20 -11.205 -0.396 10.414 1.000

6 21 -15.600 -4.693 6.215 0.999

6 22 -14.495 -5.745 3.006 0.800

6 23 -11.711 -1.673 8.364 1.000

6 24 -8.906 0.783 10.472 1.000

6 25 -24.708 -13.112 -1.517 0.008

6 26 -12.439 -1.890 8.659 1.000

6 27 -10.372 0.438 11.247 1.000

6 28 -19.504 -6.932 5.641 0.965

6 29 -36.696 2.827 42.349 1.000

7 8 -18.557 -5.726 7.106 0.998

7 9 -23.560 -10.759 2.041 0.275

7 10 -10.156 5.038 20.233 1.000

7 11 -19.046 -5.436 8.175 1.000

7 12 -21.654 -8.408 4.839 0.849

7 13 -14.831 -2.519 9.794 1.000

7 14 -13.487 1.192 15.872 1.000

7 15 -8.572 3.855 16.281 1.000

7 16 -13.055 -1.387 10.281 1.000

7 17 -12.446 0.997 14.439 1.000

7 18 -12.894 0.352 13.599 1.000

7 19 -11.408 2.692 16.793 1.000

7 20 -16.608 -3.530 9.548 1.000

7 21 -20.986 -7.827 5.332 0.919

7 22 -20.314 -8.879 2.556 0.449

7 23 -17.255 -4.808 7.640 1.000

7 24 -14.520 -2.351 9.817 1.000

7 25 -29.982 -16.247 -2.512 0.003

7 26 -17.888 -5.024 7.839 1.000

7 27 -15.774 -2.697 10.381 1.000

7 28 -24.635 -10.066 4.504 0.709

7 29 -40.510 -0.308 39.894 1.000

8 9 -14.914 -5.034 4.847 0.987

8 10 -2.067 10.764 23.596 0.279

8 11 -10.619 0.290 11.199 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 305: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

304

Table 204 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 12 -13.134 -2.682 7.770 1.000

8 13 -6.032 3.207 12.447 1.000

8 14 -5.299 6.918 19.135 0.952

8 15 0.190 9.580 18.971 0.039

8 16 -4.022 4.339 12.700 0.984

8 17 -3.976 6.722 17.421 0.862

8 18 -4.374 6.078 16.530 0.936

8 19 -3.096 8.418 19.932 0.588

8 20 -8.041 2.196 12.432 1.000

8 21 -12.442 -2.101 8.239 1.000

8 22 -11.186 -3.153 4.879 1.000

8 23 -8.500 0.918 10.336 1.000

8 24 -5.671 3.375 12.421 1.000

8 25 -21.585 -10.521 0.543 0.091

8 26 -9.260 0.701 10.663 1.000

8 27 -7.208 3.029 13.266 1.000

8 28 -16.424 -4.340 7.744 1.000

8 29 -33.952 5.418 44.788 1.000

9 10 2.997 15.798 28.598 0.001

9 11 -5.549 5.324 16.196 0.993

9 12 -8.062 2.352 12.765 1.000

9 13 -0.956 8.241 17.437 0.164

9 14 -0.233 11.952 24.136 0.063

9 15 5.266 14.614 23.962 0.000

9 16 1.059 9.372 17.686 0.008

9 17 1.095 11.756 22.417 0.012

9 18 0.698 11.112 21.525 0.020

9 19 1.972 13.452 24.931 0.004

9 20 -2.968 7.229 17.427 0.656

9 21 -7.370 2.932 13.234 1.000

9 22 -6.103 1.880 9.863 1.000

9 23 -3.424 5.952 15.327 0.849

9 24 -0.594 8.408 17.410 0.110

9 25 -16.516 -5.487 5.541 0.991

9 26 -4.187 5.735 15.657 0.940

9 27 -2.135 8.063 18.261 0.407

9 28 -11.358 0.694 12.745 1.000

9 29 -28.908 10.452 49.811 1.000

10 11 -24.085 -10.474 3.136 0.470

10 12 -26.693 -13.446 -0.199 0.041

10 13 -19.870 -7.557 4.756 0.889

10 14 -18.526 -3.846 10.834 1.000

10 15 -13.611 -1.184 11.243 1.000

10 16 -18.094 -6.425 5.243 0.966

10 17 -17.484 -4.042 9.400 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 306: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

305

Table 204 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

10 18 -17.933 -4.686 8.561 1.000

10 19 -16.446 -2.346 11.754 1.000

10 20 -21.646 -8.568 4.509 0.803

10 21 -26.025 -12.865 0.294 0.066

10 22 -25.352 -13.918 -2.483 0.002

10 23 -22.294 -9.846 2.601 0.406

10 24 -19.558 -7.390 4.779 0.900

10 25 -35.020 -21.285 -7.550 0.000

10 26 -22.926 -10.063 2.801 0.432

10 27 -20.813 -7.735 5.343 0.923

10 28 -29.674 -15.104 -0.535 0.031

10 29 -45.548 -5.346 34.856 1.000

11 12 -14.367 -2.972 8.422 1.000

11 13 -7.377 2.917 13.211 1.000

11 14 -6.405 6.628 19.661 0.988

11 15 -1.140 9.290 19.720 0.173

11 16 -5.465 4.049 13.562 0.999

11 17 -5.189 6.432 18.054 0.964

11 18 -5.607 5.788 17.182 0.988

11 19 -4.249 8.128 20.504 0.799

11 20 -9.292 1.906 13.103 1.000

11 21 -13.684 -2.391 8.901 1.000

11 22 -12.669 -3.444 5.782 1.000

11 23 -9.827 0.628 11.082 1.000

11 24 -7.036 3.084 13.205 1.000

11 25 -22.770 -10.811 1.148 0.151

11 26 -10.535 0.411 11.358 1.000

11 27 -8.459 2.739 13.937 1.000

11 28 -17.539 -4.630 8.278 1.000

11 29 -34.502 5.128 44.758 1.000

12 13 -3.919 5.889 15.697 0.910

12 14 -3.052 9.600 22.252 0.503

12 15 2.312 12.262 22.213 0.002

12 16 -1.964 7.021 16.006 0.434

12 17 -1.789 9.404 20.597 0.276

12 18 -2.197 8.760 19.717 0.382

12 19 -0.875 11.100 23.075 0.118

12 20 -5.875 4.878 15.630 0.998

12 21 -10.271 0.581 11.432 1.000

12 22 -9.152 -0.471 8.209 1.000

12 23 -6.376 3.600 13.576 1.000

12 24 -3.569 6.057 15.682 0.860

12 25 -19.382 -7.839 3.704 0.741

12 26 -7.107 3.383 13.874 1.000

12 27 -5.041 5.711 16.464 0.978

Continued on next page

Page 307: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

306

Table 204 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

12 28 -14.182 -1.658 10.866 1.000

12 29 -31.407 8.100 47.607 1.000

13 14 -7.960 3.711 15.382 1.000

13 15 -2.295 6.373 15.042 0.575

13 16 -6.409 1.132 8.672 1.000

13 17 -6.555 3.515 13.586 1.000

13 18 -6.937 2.871 12.679 1.000

13 19 -5.723 5.211 16.144 0.995

13 20 -10.590 -1.011 8.567 1.000

13 21 -14.998 -5.308 4.381 0.968

13 22 -13.535 -6.361 0.814 0.180

13 23 -10.987 -2.289 6.409 1.000

13 24 -8.127 0.167 8.461 1.000

13 25 -24.186 -13.728 -3.270 0.000

13 26 -11.790 -2.506 6.778 1.000

13 27 -9.757 -0.178 9.400 1.000

13 28 -19.079 -7.547 3.985 0.805

13 29 -36.993 2.211 41.415 1.000

14 15 -9.129 2.662 14.454 1.000

14 16 -13.568 -2.579 8.409 1.000

14 17 -13.053 -0.196 12.661 1.000

14 18 -13.492 -0.840 11.812 1.000

14 19 -12.044 1.500 15.044 1.000

14 20 -17.198 -4.722 7.753 1.000

14 21 -21.580 -9.019 3.542 0.628

14 22 -20.812 -10.071 0.669 0.105

14 23 -17.813 -6.000 5.813 0.988

14 24 -15.062 -3.543 7.975 1.000

14 25 -30.602 -17.439 -4.276 0.000

14 26 -18.467 -6.217 6.034 0.988

14 27 -16.364 -3.889 8.586 1.000

14 28 -25.289 -11.258 2.773 0.374

14 29 -41.510 -1.500 38.510 1.000

15 16 -12.967 -5.242 2.484 0.743

15 17 -13.067 -2.858 7.351 1.000

15 18 -13.453 -3.502 6.448 1.000

15 19 -12.224 -1.162 9.899 1.000

15 20 -17.109 -7.385 2.340 0.501

15 21 -21.515 -11.682 -1.848 0.003

15 22 -20.102 -12.734 -5.365 0.000

15 23 -17.521 -8.662 0.196 0.066

15 24 -14.668 -6.206 2.256 0.581

15 25 -30.693 -20.101 -9.509 0.000

15 26 -18.313 -8.879 0.555 0.101

15 27 -16.276 -6.551 3.173 0.756

Continued on next page

Page 308: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

307

Table 204 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

15 28 -25.574 -13.920 -2.267 0.003

15 29 -43.402 -4.162 35.077 1.000

16 17 -6.887 2.384 11.655 1.000

16 18 -7.246 1.739 10.724 1.000

16 19 -6.122 4.079 14.281 1.000

16 20 -10.877 -2.143 6.591 1.000

16 21 -15.296 -6.440 2.416 0.600

16 22 -13.493 -7.492 -1.491 0.001

16 23 -11.179 -3.421 4.338 0.999

16 24 -8.267 -0.964 6.338 1.000

16 25 -24.550 -14.860 -5.169 0.000

16 26 -12.047 -3.637 4.772 0.999

16 27 -10.044 -1.310 7.424 1.000

16 28 -19.520 -8.679 2.162 0.379

16 29 -37.927 1.079 40.085 1.000

17 18 -11.837 -0.644 10.549 1.000

17 19 -10.496 1.696 13.887 1.000

17 20 -15.519 -4.527 6.466 1.000

17 21 -19.913 -8.824 2.266 0.393

17 22 -18.852 -9.876 -0.900 0.013

17 23 -16.039 -5.804 4.430 0.952

17 24 -13.241 -3.348 6.545 1.000

17 25 -29.010 -17.243 -5.477 0.000

17 26 -16.758 -6.021 4.716 0.957

17 27 -14.686 -3.693 7.299 1.000

17 28 -23.793 -11.062 1.668 0.213

17 29 -40.877 -1.304 38.269 1.000

18 19 -9.635 2.340 14.315 1.000

18 20 -14.635 -3.882 6.870 1.000

18 21 -19.031 -8.179 2.672 0.518

18 22 -17.912 -9.231 -0.551 0.021

18 23 -15.136 -5.160 4.816 0.985

18 24 -12.329 -2.703 6.922 1.000

18 25 -28.142 -16.599 -5.056 0.000

18 26 -15.867 -5.377 5.114 0.986

18 27 -13.801 -3.049 7.704 1.000

18 28 -22.942 -10.418 2.106 0.296

18 29 -40.167 -0.660 38.847 1.000

19 20 -18.010 -6.222 5.566 0.980

19 21 -22.398 -10.519 1.359 0.182

19 22 -21.506 -11.571 -1.637 0.005

19 23 -18.585 -7.500 3.585 0.748

19 24 -15.814 -5.043 5.727 0.996

19 25 -31.452 -18.939 -6.426 0.000

19 26 -19.267 -7.717 3.833 0.771

Continued on next page

Page 309: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

308

Table 204 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

19 27 -17.177 -5.389 6.399 0.998

19 28 -26.182 -12.758 0.666 0.091

19 29 -42.801 -3.000 36.801 1.000

20 21 -14.942 -4.297 6.348 1.000

20 22 -13.769 -5.349 3.071 0.848

20 23 -11.029 -1.278 8.473 1.000

20 24 -8.213 1.179 10.571 1.000

20 25 -24.065 -12.717 -1.368 0.009

20 26 -11.771 -1.494 8.782 1.000

20 27 -9.710 0.833 11.377 1.000

20 28 -18.881 -6.536 5.809 0.979

20 29 -36.228 3.222 42.673 1.000

21 22 -9.598 -1.052 7.494 1.000

21 23 -6.841 3.019 12.879 1.000

21 24 -4.029 5.476 14.981 0.942

21 25 -19.862 -8.420 3.023 0.573

21 26 -7.578 2.803 13.183 1.000

21 27 -5.514 5.130 15.775 0.994

21 28 -14.670 -2.239 10.193 1.000

21 29 -31.958 7.519 46.997 1.000

22 23 -3.332 4.071 11.475 0.966

22 24 -0.396 6.528 13.452 0.099

22 25 -16.776 -7.368 2.041 0.429

22 26 -4.229 3.855 11.938 0.995

22 27 -2.238 6.183 14.603 0.578

22 28 -11.776 -1.187 9.403 1.000

22 29 -30.365 8.571 47.508 1.000

23 24 -6.036 2.457 10.949 1.000

23 25 -22.055 -11.439 -0.823 0.018

23 26 -9.678 -0.217 9.245 1.000

23 27 -7.640 2.111 11.862 1.000

23 28 -16.934 -5.258 6.417 0.998

23 29 -34.746 4.500 43.746 1.000

24 25 -24.183 -13.896 -3.608 0.000

24 26 -11.764 -2.673 6.418 1.000

24 27 -9.737 -0.345 9.047 1.000

24 28 -19.092 -7.715 3.663 0.744

24 29 -37.115 2.043 41.202 1.000

25 26 0.121 11.222 22.323 0.043

25 27 2.201 13.550 24.899 0.003

25 28 -6.859 6.181 19.221 0.996

25 29 -23.734 15.939 55.612 1.000

26 27 -7.949 2.328 12.604 1.000

26 28 -17.160 -5.041 7.077 0.999

26 29 -34.663 4.717 44.097 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 310: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

309

Table 204 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

27 28 -19.715 -7.369 4.976 0.916

27 29 -37.062 2.389 41.839 1.000

28 29 -30.212 9.758 49.728 1.000

Page 311: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

310

122 [X14.mat.Scaled = cat]

122.1 Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Table 205: Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 48.006

1 43.942

2 40.996

3 42.589

4 41.305

5 39.985

6 43.026

7 46.069

8 47.625

p-value = 1.9119e-07

122.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 206: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable cat

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -0.714 4.063 8.841 0.171

1 3 2.351 7.010 11.669 0.000

1 4 0.505 5.417 10.328 0.018

1 5 1.153 6.701 12.248 0.006

1 6 3.789 8.021 12.253 0.000

1 7 0.741 4.980 9.219 0.008

1 8 -3.639 1.937 7.513 0.978

1 9 -16.457 0.381 17.219 1.000

2 3 -1.496 2.947 7.389 0.503

2 4 -3.354 1.353 6.060 0.993

2 5 -2.730 2.637 8.005 0.845

2 6 -0.036 3.958 7.951 0.054

2 7 -3.084 0.917 4.917 0.999

2 8 -7.524 -2.127 3.270 0.952

2 9 -20.462 -3.683 13.097 0.999

3 4 -6.180 -1.593 2.993 0.977

3 5 -5.572 -0.309 4.953 1.000

3 6 -2.840 1.011 4.862 0.996

3 7 -5.888 -2.030 1.828 0.787

Continued on next page

Page 312: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

311

Table 206 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

3 8 -10.365 -5.073 0.219 0.072

3 9 -23.375 -6.629 10.117 0.951

4 5 -4.203 1.284 6.771 0.998

4 6 -1.548 2.604 6.757 0.582

4 7 -4.596 -0.437 3.723 1.000

4 8 -8.995 -3.480 2.036 0.574

4 9 -21.854 -5.036 11.782 0.991

5 6 -3.568 1.320 6.209 0.996

5 7 -6.615 -1.721 3.174 0.976

5 8 -10.853 -4.764 1.325 0.269

5 9 -23.335 -6.320 10.695 0.966

6 7 -6.372 -3.041 0.290 0.106

6 8 -11.005 -6.084 -1.163 0.004

6 9 -24.273 -7.640 8.992 0.889

7 8 -7.970 -3.043 1.884 0.603

7 9 -21.234 -4.599 12.035 0.995

8 9 -18.580 -1.556 15.468 1.000

Page 313: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

312

123 [X14.mat.Scaled = School-Type-1]

123.1 Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable School- Type-1

Table 207: Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 42.347

3 42.751

5 43.000

6 45.312

7 49.429

8 28.958

10 32.818

21 45.800

22 60.719

32 39.524

51 48.833

53 48.000

54 49.000

56 38.667

57 41.000

58 44.000

71 47.909

p-value = 1.1527e-10

123.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 208: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable School-Type-1

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -3.301 -0.403 2.494 1.000

1 3 -52.225 -0.653 50.920 1.000

1 4 -9.028 -2.964 3.100 0.960

1 5 -20.940 -7.081 6.778 0.942

1 6 2.760 13.389 24.019 0.002

1 7 -6.086 9.529 25.145 0.786

1 8 -26.556 -3.453 19.651 1.000

1 9 -27.607 -18.371 -9.135 0.000

1 10 -8.526 2.824 14.173 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 314: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

313

Table 208 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 11 -27.585 -6.486 14.613 1.000

1 12 -35.453 -5.653 24.148 1.000

1 13 -43.136 -6.653 29.831 1.000

1 14 -26.120 3.681 33.482 1.000

1 15 -24.472 1.347 27.167 1.000

1 16 -53.225 -1.653 49.920 1.000

1 17 -21.177 -5.562 10.054 0.999

2 3 -51.860 -0.249 51.361 1.000

2 4 -8.937 -2.561 3.815 0.994

2 5 -20.677 -6.678 7.321 0.968

2 6 2.982 13.792 24.603 0.001

2 7 -5.807 9.932 25.672 0.739

2 8 -26.236 -3.049 20.138 1.000

2 9 -27.412 -17.968 -8.524 0.000

2 10 -8.292 3.227 14.746 1.000

2 11 -27.274 -6.083 15.108 1.000

2 12 -35.115 -5.249 24.617 1.000

2 13 -42.786 -6.249 30.287 1.000

2 14 -25.782 4.084 33.950 1.000

2 15 -24.144 1.751 27.645 1.000

2 16 -52.860 -1.249 50.361 1.000

2 17 -20.898 -5.159 10.581 0.999

3 4 -54.196 -2.312 49.573 1.000

3 5 -59.789 -6.429 46.932 1.000

3 6 -38.572 14.042 66.656 1.000

3 7 -43.661 10.182 64.025 1.000

3 8 -59.271 -2.800 53.671 1.000

3 9 -70.069 -17.719 34.632 0.999

3 10 -49.288 3.476 56.240 1.000

3 11 -61.515 -5.833 49.848 1.000

3 12 -64.526 -5.000 54.526 1.000

3 13 -69.137 -6.000 57.137 1.000

3 14 -55.193 4.333 63.859 1.000

3 15 -55.636 2.000 59.636 1.000

3 16 -73.904 -1.000 71.904 1.000

3 17 -58.752 -4.909 48.934 1.000

4 5 -19.095 -4.117 10.861 1.000

4 6 4.302 16.353 28.405 0.000

4 7 -4.123 12.494 29.110 0.426

4 8 -24.279 -0.488 23.303 1.000

4 9 -26.250 -15.407 -4.565 0.000

4 10 -6.903 5.788 18.479 0.979

4 11 -25.372 -3.522 18.329 1.000

4 12 -33.026 -2.688 27.649 1.000

4 13 -40.611 -3.688 33.234 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 315: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

314

Table 208 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

4 14 -23.692 6.645 36.982 1.000

4 15 -22.125 4.312 30.748 1.000

4 16 -50.573 1.312 53.196 1.000

4 17 -19.214 -2.597 14.019 1.000

5 6 3.134 20.470 37.807 0.005

5 7 -4.160 16.610 37.381 0.312

5 8 -23.229 3.629 30.486 1.000

5 9 -27.809 -11.290 5.229 0.606

5 10 -7.882 9.905 27.692 0.885

5 11 -24.559 0.595 25.750 1.000

5 12 -31.369 1.429 34.226 1.000

5 13 -38.540 0.429 39.397 1.000

5 14 -22.035 10.762 43.559 0.999

5 15 -20.798 8.429 37.655 1.000

5 16 -47.932 5.429 58.789 1.000

5 17 -19.251 1.519 22.290 1.000

6 7 -22.630 -3.860 14.910 1.000

6 8 -42.184 -16.842 8.501 0.656

6 9 -45.681 -31.760 -17.840 0.000

6 10 -25.969 -10.565 4.838 0.600

6 11 -43.405 -19.875 3.655 0.222

6 12 -50.610 -19.042 12.527 0.801

6 13 -57.982 -20.042 17.899 0.923

6 14 -41.277 -9.708 21.860 1.000

6 15 -39.882 -12.042 15.799 0.988

6 16 -67.656 -15.042 37.572 1.000

6 17 -37.721 -18.951 -0.181 0.045

7 8 -40.786 -12.982 14.823 0.974

7 9 -45.918 -27.901 -9.883 0.000

7 10 -25.893 -6.706 12.481 0.999

7 11 -42.178 -16.015 10.148 0.782

7 12 -48.759 -15.182 18.395 0.981

7 13 -55.809 -16.182 23.446 0.993

7 14 -39.426 -5.848 27.729 1.000

7 15 -38.281 -8.182 21.917 1.000

7 16 -65.025 -11.182 42.661 1.000

7 17 -37.072 -15.091 6.891 0.598

8 9 -39.709 -14.919 9.871 0.804

8 10 -19.376 6.276 31.929 1.000

8 11 -34.249 -3.033 28.182 1.000

8 12 -39.848 -2.200 35.448 1.000

8 13 -46.331 -3.200 39.931 1.000

8 14 -30.514 7.133 44.781 1.000

8 15 -29.781 4.800 39.381 1.000

8 16 -54.671 1.800 58.271 1.000

Continued on next page

Page 316: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

315

Table 208 – Continued from previous page

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

8 17 -29.914 -2.109 25.695 1.000

9 10 6.718 21.195 35.672 0.000

9 11 -11.049 11.885 34.819 0.934

9 12 -18.408 12.719 43.846 0.993

9 13 -25.855 11.719 49.293 1.000

9 14 -9.075 22.052 53.179 0.540

9 15 -7.620 19.719 47.058 0.506

9 16 -35.632 16.719 69.069 1.000

9 17 -5.208 12.810 30.827 0.533

10 11 -33.173 -9.310 14.554 0.996

10 12 -40.294 -8.476 23.342 1.000

10 13 -47.625 -9.476 28.672 1.000

10 14 -30.961 0.857 32.675 1.000

10 15 -29.600 -1.476 26.647 1.000

10 16 -57.240 -4.476 48.288 1.000

10 17 -27.572 -8.385 10.802 0.986

11 12 -35.619 0.833 37.285 1.000

11 13 -42.258 -0.167 41.925 1.000

11 14 -26.285 10.167 46.619 1.000

11 15 -25.443 7.833 41.109 1.000

11 16 -50.848 4.833 60.515 1.000

11 17 -25.239 0.924 27.087 1.000

12 13 -48.059 -1.000 46.059 1.000

12 14 -32.758 9.333 51.425 1.000

12 15 -32.373 7.000 46.373 1.000

12 16 -55.526 4.000 63.526 1.000

12 17 -33.486 0.091 33.668 1.000

13 14 -36.726 10.333 57.393 1.000

13 15 -36.644 8.000 52.644 1.000

13 16 -58.137 5.000 68.137 1.000

13 17 -38.537 1.091 40.718 1.000

14 15 -41.706 -2.333 37.039 1.000

14 16 -64.859 -5.333 54.193 1.000

14 17 -42.820 -9.242 24.335 1.000

15 16 -60.636 -3.000 54.636 1.000

15 17 -37.008 -6.909 23.190 1.000

16 17 -57.752 -3.909 49.934 1.000

Page 317: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

316

; 10

: 21

22

32

51

53

54

56 . 57

58

71

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Page 318: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

317

124 [X14.mat.Scaled = School-Type-2]

124.1 Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable School- Type-2

Table 209: Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 43.683

2 42.489

3 54.108

p-value = 2.1429e-05

124.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 210: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.396 1.194 6.783 0.871

1 3 -18.447 -10.425 -2.404 0.007

2 3 -17.496 -11.619 -5.742 0.000

Page 319: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

318

125 [X14.mat.Scaled = BudgetFrom]

125.1 Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Bud- getFrom

Table 211: Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Budget-

From

Group Mean

1 46.125

2 48.900

4 25.167

5 42.489

6 54.108

7 44.000

p-value = 5.0412e-06

125.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 212: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -18.929 -2.775 13.379 0.997

1 3 1.368 20.958 40.549 0.028

1 4 -5.185 3.636 12.457 0.849

1 5 -19.232 -7.983 3.266 0.329

1 6 -41.680 2.125 45.930 1.000

2 3 1.570 23.733 45.897 0.028

2 4 -7.201 6.411 20.022 0.761

2 5 -20.505 -5.208 10.089 0.927

2 6 -40.115 4.900 49.915 1.000

3 4 -34.875 -17.323 0.229 0.055

3 5 -47.831 -28.941 -10.052 0.000

3 6 -65.192 -18.833 27.525 0.857

4 5 -18.749 -11.619 -4.488 0.000

4 6 -44.443 -1.511 41.422 1.000

5 6 -33.388 10.108 53.604 0.986

Page 320: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

319

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Page 321: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

320

126

126.1

[X14.mat.Scaled = IsProtected]

Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 213: Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable IsPro-

tected

Group Mean

0 42.567

1 45.178

p-value = 0.05955

126.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 214: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable IsProtected

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -5.326 -2.611 0.103 0.059

Page 322: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

321

127

127.1

[X14.mat.Scaled = IsCentral]

Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 215: Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable IsCentral

Group Mean

0 43.384

1 41.870

p-value = 0.035556

127.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 216: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable IsCentral

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 0.103 1.514 2.924 0.035

Page 323: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

322

128 [X14.mat.Scaled = Shifts]

128.1 Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Table 217: Means of X14.mat.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 41.901

5 45.060

7 33.000

p-value = 0.00020099

128.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 218: Between group comparison of X14.mat.Scaled by group-

ing variable Shifts

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -5.019 -3.159 -1.300 0.000

1 3 -11.571 8.901 29.373 0.565

2 3 -8.450 12.060 32.570 0.352

Page 324: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

323

129 [X14.bel.Normed = Obl-ID]

129.1 Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 219: Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 98.413

2 100.615

3 98.889

4 98.797

5 100.107

6 99.755

7 99.154

8 99.426

9 99.371

10 100.462

11 98.674

12 100.720

13 100.434

14 101.333

15 99.571

16 99.400

17 99.022

18 100.360

19 96.139

20 98.259

21 98.365

22 100.337

23 99.303

24 98.337

25 100.390

26 100.333

27 99.407

28 99.129

29 102.500

p-value = 0.59114

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 325: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

324

130 [X14.bel.Normed = cat]

130.1 Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable cat

Table 220: Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 100.097

1 100.245

2 100.159

3 98.276

4 99.992

5 99.354

6 99.231

7 98.716

8 100.000

p-value = 0.1911

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 326: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

325

131

131.1

[X14.bel.Normed = School-Type-1]

Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Table 221: Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 99.436

3 99.492

5 100.000

6 98.519

7 103.286

8 99.833

10 94.909

21 102.200

22 100.906

32 100.905

51 104.500

53 97.000

54 97.500

56 99.667

57 102.500

58 97.000

71 101.545

p-value = 0.53846

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 327: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

326

132

132.1

[X14.bel.Normed = School-Type-2]

Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Table 222: Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 99.902

2 99.422

3 102.595

p-value = 0.050152

132.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 223: Between group comparison of X14.bel.Normed by

grouping variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -2.435 0.480 3.395 0.921

1 3 -6.875 -2.692 1.491 0.287

2 3 -6.237 -3.172 -0.107 0.040

Page 328: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

327

133

133.1

[X14.bel.Normed = BudgetFrom]

Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable Bud-

getFrom

Table 224: Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable Bud-

getFrom

Group Mean

1 100.958

2 101.100

4 94.167

5 99.422

6 102.595

7 97.000

p-value = 0.076187

133.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 225: Between group comparison of X14.bel.Normed by

grouping variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -8.582 -0.142 8.299 1.000

1 3 -3.444 6.792 17.027 0.408

1 4 -3.073 1.536 6.145 0.933

1 5 -7.514 -1.636 4.241 0.969

1 6 -18.930 3.958 26.846 0.996

2 3 -4.647 6.933 18.514 0.528

2 4 -5.434 1.678 8.789 0.985

2 5 -9.487 -1.495 6.498 0.995

2 6 -19.420 4.100 27.620 0.996

3 4 -14.427 -5.256 3.915 0.576

3 5 -18.298 -8.428 1.442 0.145

3 6 -27.056 -2.833 21.389 0.999

4 5 -6.898 -3.172 0.553 0.147

4 6 -20.009 2.422 24.854 1.000

5 6 -17.132 5.595 28.321 0.982

Page 329: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

328

75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120

Page 330: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

329

134

134.1

[X14.bel.Normed = IsProtected]

Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 226: Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable IsPro- tected

Group Mean

0 99.476

1 99.783

p-value = 0.6697

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 331: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

330

135

135.1

[X14.bel.Normed = IsCentral]

Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 227: Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable IsCen- tral

Group Mean

0 99.579

1 99.385

p-value = 0.60407

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 332: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

331

136 [X14.bel.Normed = Shifts]

136.1 Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Table 228: Means of X14.bel.Normed by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 99.492

5 99.524

7 97.667

p-value = 0.91937

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 333: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

332

137 [X14.bel.Scaled = Obl-ID]

137.1 Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Obl- ID

Table 229: Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Obl-ID

Group Mean

1 43.707

2 47.505

3 44.544

4 44.453

5 46.714

6 46.143

7 45.115

8 45.590

9 45.403

10 47.154

11 44.233

12 47.620

13 47.289

14 48.733

15 45.805

16 45.497

17 45.043

18 47.140

19 39.833

20 43.667

21 43.769

22 47.010

23 45.263

24 43.739

25 47.122

26 47.050

27 45.481

28 45.129

29 50.500

p-value = 0.57605

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 334: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

333

138 [X14.bel.Scaled = cat]

138.1 Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Table 230: Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable cat

Group Mean

0 46.606

1 46.889

2 46.730

3 43.584

4 46.576

5 45.443

6 45.198

7 44.207

8 46.500

p-value = 0.18286

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 335: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

334

139

139.1

[X14.bel.Scaled = School-Type-1]

Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Table 231: Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-1

Group Mean

2 45.527

3 45.686

5 46.000

6 43.987

7 52.071

8 46.167

10 37.545

21 50.600

22 47.875

32 48.000

51 54.000

53 41.667

54 42.000

56 46.000

57 50.750

58 42.000

71 48.909

p-value = 0.51067

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 336: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

335

140

140.1

[X14.bel.Scaled = School-Type-2]

Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Table 232: Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable School-

Type-2

Group Mean

1 46.317

2 45.516

3 50.865

p-value = 0.048944

140.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 233: Between group comparison of X14.bel.Scaled by group-

ing variable School-Type-2

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -4.093 0.801 5.695 0.922

1 3 -11.572 -4.548 2.476 0.283

2 3 -10.495 -5.349 -0.203 0.039

Page 337: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

336

141

141.1

[X14.bel.Scaled = BudgetFrom]

Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Bud-

getFrom

Table 234: Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Budget-

From

Group Mean

1 48.125

2 48.200

4 36.667

5 45.516

6 50.865

7 42.000

p-value = 0.075583

141.2 Between group comparison

As p-value is less than sig. level, the grouping variable affects the estimated

SVA a between group comparison is performed.

Table 235: Between group comparison of X14.bel.Scaled by group-

ing variable BudgetFrom

Group 1 Group 2 CI dn Difference CI up p-value

1 2 -14.248 -0.075 14.098 1.000

1 3 -5.728 11.458 28.645 0.402

1 4 -5.130 2.609 10.348 0.930

1 5 -12.609 -2.740 7.129 0.969

1 6 -32.306 6.125 44.556 0.998

2 3 -7.911 11.533 30.978 0.538

2 4 -9.257 2.684 14.626 0.988

2 5 -16.085 -2.665 10.755 0.993

2 6 -33.292 6.200 45.692 0.998

3 4 -24.248 -8.849 6.550 0.573

3 5 -30.770 -14.198 2.374 0.142

3 6 -46.005 -5.333 35.338 0.999

4 5 -11.605 -5.349 0.906 0.144

4 6 -34.149 3.516 41.181 1.000

5 6 -29.295 8.865 47.025 0.986

Page 338: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

337

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Page 339: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

338

142

142.1

[X14.bel.Scaled = IsProtected]

Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Protected

Table 236: Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable IsPro- tected

Group Mean

0 45.609

1 46.078

p-value = 0.6984

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 340: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

339

143

143.1

[X14.bel.Scaled = IsCentral]

Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Is-

Central

Table 237: Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable IsCentral

Group Mean

0 45.763

1 45.474

p-value = 0.64533

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 341: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

340

144 [X14.bel.Scaled = Shifts]

144.1 Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Table 238: Means of X14.bel.Scaled by grouping variable Shifts

Group Mean

4 45.640

5 45.666

7 42.667

p-value = 0.92626

As p-value is greater than sig. level, the grouping variable does NOT affects

the estimated SVA.

Page 342: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

341

145 SAV compared according number of peda-

gogues

145.1 XXX.xxx.Normed by NumOfPedag

R-squared 0.032095

Page 343: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

342

Estimated SE p-value

Constant -6.802 4.525 0.133

NumOfPedag 0.351 0.045 0.000

Table 239: Est. parameters of the regression XXX.xxx.Normed with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 344: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

343

XXX.xxx.Scaled by NumOfPedag 145.2

R-squared 0.031809

XXX_xxx_Scaled vs. NumOfPedag

3

Data

Page 345: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

344

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 13.590 1.947 0.000

NumOfPedag 0.309 0.040 0.000

Table 240: Est. parameters of the regression XXX.xxx.Scaled with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 346: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

345

145.3 XXX.mat.Normed by NumOfPedag

R-squared 0.048774

XXX_mat_Normed vs. NumOfPedag

Nonnal Probability Plot

0.999

0.997

/ / /' ./ ·

3

Data

Page 347: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

346

Estimated SE p-value

Constant -11.195 4.100 0.006

NumOfPedag 0.395 0.041 0.000

Table 241: Est. parameters of the regression XXX.mat.Normed with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 348: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

347

XXX.mat.Scaled by NumOfPedag 145.4

R-squared 0.048925

XXX_mat_Scaled vs. NumOfPedag

!120 {:51 100

I

80

Nonnal Probability Plot

0.999

0.997

//// ./ ·

3

Data

Page 349: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

348

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 13.907 1.552 0.000

NumOfPedag 0.305 0.032 0.000

Table 242: Est. parameters of the regression XXX.mat.Scaled with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 350: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

349

145.5 XXX.bel.Normed by NumOfPedag

R-squared 1.8288e-05

XXX_bei_Normed vs. NumOfPedag

11 20

1 100

I

80

Nonnal Probability Plot

3 Data

Page 351: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

350

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 29.098 5.126 0.000

NumOfPedag -0.009 0.051 0.855

Table 243: Est. parameters of the regression XXX.bel.Normed with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 352: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

351

XXX.bel.Scaled by NumOfPedag 145.6

R-squared 1.7984e-05

XXX_bei_Scaled vs. NumOIPedag

Nonnal Probability Plot

3 Data

Page 353: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

352

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 28.500 1.909 0.000

NumOfPedag -0.008 0.046 0.856

Table 244: Est. parameters of the regression XXX.bel.Scaled with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 354: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

353

145.7 X13.xxx.Normed by NumOfPedag

R-squared 0.038302

X13_xxx_Normed vs. NumOfPedag

-g120

§ 1 100

I

X so

3

Data

Page 355: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

354

Estimated SE p-value

Constant -4.641 3.881 0.232

NumOfPedag 0.329 0.039 0.000

Table 245: Est. parameters of the regression X13.xxx.Normed with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 356: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

355

145.8 X13.xxx.Scaled by NumOfPedag

R-squared 0.038625

X13_xxx_Scaled vs. NumOfPedag

Nonnal Probability Plot

3

Data

Page 357: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

356

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 14.764 1.641 0.000

NumOfPedag 0.281 0.033 0.000

Table 246: Est. parameters of the regression X13.xxx.Scaled with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 358: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

357

145.9 X13.mat.Normed by NumOfPedag

R-squared 1.9328e-05

X13_mat_Normed vs. NumOfPedag

3 Data

Page 359: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

358

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 28.166 0.501 0.000

NumOfPedag 0.014 0.075 0.851

Table 247: Est. parameters of the regression X13.mat.Normed with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 360: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

359

X13.mat.Scaled by NumOfPedag 145.10

R-squared 1.5391e-05

X13_mat_Scaled vs. NumOfPedag

-g 1 20

rol 1oo

I

X so

3 Data

Page 361: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

360

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 27.898 1.677 0.000

NumOfPedag 0.006 0.034 0.867

Table 248: Est. parameters of the regression X13.mat.Scaled with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 362: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

361

145.11 X13.bel.Normed by NumOfPedag

R-squared 0.084724

X13_bei_Normed vs. NumOfPedag

120

051 100

I

X so

Nonnal Probability Plot

3 Data

Page 363: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

362

Estimated SE p-value

Constant -22.028 3.894 0.000

NumOfPedag 0.504 0.039 0.000

Table 249: Est. parameters of the regression X13.bel.Normed with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 364: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

363

X13.bel.Scaled by NumOfPedag 145.12

R-squared 0.08518

X13_bei_Scaled vs. NumOfPedag

Nonnal Probability Plot

3 Data

Page 365: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

364

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 5.793 1.783 0.001

NumOfPedag 0.422 0.032 0.000

Table 250: Est. parameters of the regression X13.bel.Scaled with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 366: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

365

145.13 X14.xxx.Normed by NumOfPedag

R-squared 0.017281

X14_xxx_Normed vs. NumOfPedag

-g120

§ 1 100

;, X so

Nonnal Probability Plot

3

Data

Page 367: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

366

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 0.046 4.991 0.993

NumOfPedag 0.283 0.050 0.000

Table 251: Est. parameters of the regression X14.xxx.Normed with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 368: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

367

X14.xxx.Scaled by NumOfPedag 145.14

R-squared 0.017544

X14_xxx_Scaled vs. NumOfPedag

Nonnal Probability Plot

3

Data

Page 369: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

368

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 17.958 1.857 0.000

NumOfPedag 0.202 0.035 0.000

Table 252: Est. parameters of the regression X14.xxx.Scaled with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 370: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

369

145.15 X14.mat.Normed by NumOfPedag

R-squared 0.020764

X14_mat_Normed vs. NumOfPedag

0.999

0.997

Nonnal Probability Plot

// //// .. ..

3

Data

Page 371: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

370

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 0.196 4.526 0.965

NumOfPedag 0.281 0.045 0.000

Table 253: Est. parameters of the regression X14.mat.Normed with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 372: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

371

X14.mat.Scaled by NumOfPedag 145.16

R-squared 0.020992

X14_mat_Scaled vs. NumOfPedag

/ X

0.999

0.997

Nonnal Probability Plot

// // .." .·

3

Data

Page 373: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

372

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 19.426 1.483 0.000

NumOfPedag 0.204 0.033 0.000

Table 254: Est. parameters of the regression X14.mat.Scaled with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 374: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

373

145.17 X14.bel.Normed by NumOfPedag

R-squared 5.9035e-05

X14_bei_Normed vs. NumOfPedag

120

051 100

I

X so

3 Data

Page 375: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

374

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 26.089 6.352 0.000

NumOfPedag 0.021 0.064 0.743

Table 255: Est. parameters of the regression X14.bel.Normed with predictor

NumOfPedag

Page 376: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

375

X14.bel.Scaled by NumOfPedag 145.18

R-squared 6.5684e-05

X14_bei_Scaled vs. NumOfPedag

3 Data

Page 377: Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of · 2016-07-15 · BULGARIA Piloting Statistical Models for Estimation of Schools’ Value-Added Using the Results from the National Assessments

376

Estimated SE p-value

Constant 27.568 1.801 0.000

NumOfPedag 0.013 0.038 0.729

Table 256: Est. parameters of the regression X14.bel.Scaled with predictor

NumOfPedag