Upload
rizwan-alam
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
1/15
1
Pillars of Human Resource
ManagementI. Management Exercise
II. First PillarLegal
III.
Case Point: Fat ChanceIV. Second PillarHRM Practices
V. General Models for Diversity Management
VI. (If time): Moving to an Integration Model of Diversity
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
2/15
Pratt (2006)
2
Managerial Exercise Debriefing
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
3/15
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
4/15
Pratt (2006)
4
Broad Overview Important EEOC
Laws (Noe, et al, 2006 and Kulik, 2004)Acts
XIII Amend.
Content / Requirements CoversEnforcementAgency
Abolished slavery Everyone Court System
Civil Rights Act
(1964, 1991)
Title VII
Employers >15
employees (as well as
labor unions and
employment agencies)
Prohibits discrimination based on race,
color, religion, sex, or national origin(applies to majority, too)
Age
Discrimination in
Employment Act
(1967)
Forbids employment
discrimination based on age for
those 40 and older
Same as above
as well as
federal govt.
EEOC
Americans with
Disabilities Act
(1990)
EEOCForbids discrimination based on
physical or mental disabilities;
requires reasonable
accommodation of qualified
applicants
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
5/15
Pratt (2006)
5
Other Important Laws & Regulations(Noe, et al, 2006 and Kulik, 2004)
Pregnancy Discrimination Act (1978)amends CRA andtreats pregnancy as a temporary disability.
Family & Medical Leave Act (1993)employees can takeup to 12 weeks off (unpaid) to attend to various familymatters and still retain same or comparable (equal status &pay) job.
Executive Order 11246requires government agencies andfederal contractors (& subcontractors with contracts >$2,500)to engage in affirmative action when hiring women andminorities. Overseen by Office of Federal ContractCompliance Procedures (OFCCP).
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
6/15
Pratt (2006)
6
Laws & Discrimination (Cascio, 2006; Kulik, 2004;Noe, et al., 2006)
Disparate Treatment Adverse ImpactReasonable
Accommodation
Domain: for intentional
discrimination; retaliation
Prima Facie Case: individualfrom protected group had proper
job qualifications, was turned
down, and the job remained open
Employers Defense: legitimate
nondiscriminatory reason fordecision orbona fide
occupational qualification
(BFOQ)
$$: compensatory and punitive
damages
Domain: unintentional
discrimination; same standards
had different consequences for
groups
Prima Facie Case: statistical
disparity (e.g.,4/5ths rulewhen
selection rate for one group is
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
7/15Pratt (2006)
7
Cityside Financial: Case in Brief
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
8/15Pratt (2006)
8
Spencer Owens & Co.: Case in Brief
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
9/15Pratt (2006)
9
Discussion Questions
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
10/15Pratt (2006)
10
Pillars of HR: HRM Practices Practices fill in the broad sketches provided by
legislation, and allow organizations to cultivate corecompetencies (see Pfeffer & Veigas 7 best
practices).
Diversity management has begun to move awayfrom a predominantlypassive, legal stance to more
proactive (e.g., affirmative action),practice-basedstances. [However, many organizations still ignorethe problem].
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
11/15Pratt (2006)
11
Three General Models of Diversity(Thomas & Ely, 2002, Thomas, 1990)
1. Assimilation (Discrimination & Fairness)Paradigm - Organizations should be color blind. Hirediverse people but encourage similar behavior. (Most
dominant and closest to the legal model of managingdiversity).
Metaphor:
Advantages: Promotes fair hiring / gets diverseindividuals into the workplace.
Disadvantages: Does not transform diverse opinions intocreativity / innovation; may not do a good job inpromoting individuals. Employees can feel detached.
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
12/15Pratt (2006)
12
Three General Models of Diversity(Thomas & Ely, 2002, Thomas, 1990)
2. Differentiation (Access & Legitimacy)Paradigmmatch diverse employees to nichemarkets. (Also a common modelthis was a
reaction to the assimilation model.) Metaphor:
Advantages: Expands markets; utilizes cultural diversity.
Disadvantages: Motivation for diversity is short-term.
Diverse identity groups remain separate andknowledge does not impact the company as a whole.Employees can feel exploited and underutilized.
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
13/15Pratt (2006)
13
Three General Models of Diversity(Thomas & Ely, 2002, Thomas, 1990)
3. Integration (Learning & Effectiveness)Paradigmcreates a diverse workforce and thenchanges business practices to reflect new cultural
learning (e.g., law company takes on language issues at work). Metaphor:
Advantages: Combines and extends advantages of firsttwo paradigms (recruitment and marketing niches) while
incorporating cultural knowledge learning to change howbusiness is done and fully harness diversity.
Disadvantages: Few benchmarks; high investment oforganizational resources.
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
14/15Pratt (2006)
14
Moving to an Integration Model(If time permits) (Thomas & Ely, 2002)
1. Leaders must truly value and understand thechallenges and opportunities inherent indiversity(e.g., must be motivated by more than fear of compliance,
must value critique)2. Organizations must have have a culture that
supports & nourishes performance throughdiversity(e.g., expects high standards, stimulate personaldevelopment, encourage openness, have clear mission)
3. Organizations should be relatively egalitarianand non-bureaucratic
4.
8/2/2019 Pillars of HRM Sessions 2&3 (2006)
15/15Pratt (2006)
15
Any Questions?