1
As noted earlier in Sections 2.2, 2.3 and 2.5, the load/action factors are similar in 2A LRFD and ISO 19902. It is our understanding that the API document was utilized as a starting point for the ISO standards development that started in the 1990’s. Therefore the ISO document have improved considerably on the 2A LRFD document not only in providing more guidance to the designer but also in correcting and clarifying several issues that existed in 2A LRFD such as the separation of the inertia component of the load with different load factor and the definition of an operating environmental condition. Table 2-12 Annual Pf in API Sec. 17 and NORSOK for unmanned and manned platforms Table 2-13 ISO 19906 Reliability Targets for ULS and ALS Exposure Level Maximum Acceptable Annual Failure Probability L1* 1.0 x 10-5 L2* 1.0 x 10-4 L3* 1.0 x 10-3

Pill Lll Eeee Eeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

cvxc

Citation preview

  • As noted earlier in Sections 2.2, 2.3 and 2.5, the load/action factors are similar in 2A LRFD and

    ISO 19902. It is our understanding that the API document was utilized as a starting point for the

    ISO standards development that started in the 1990s. Therefore the ISO document have improved considerably on the 2A LRFD document not only in providing more guidance to the

    designer but also in correcting and clarifying several issues that existed in 2A LRFD such as the

    separation of the inertia component of the load with different load factor and the definition of an

    operating environmental condition.

    Table 2-12 Annual Pf in API Sec. 17 and NORSOK for unmanned and manned platforms

    Table 2-13 ISO 19906

    Reliability Targets for ULS

    and ALS Exposure Level

    Maximum Acceptable Annual

    Failure Probability

    L1* 1.0 x 10-5

    L2* 1.0 x 10-4

    L3* 1.0 x 10-3