Upload
dinhhanh
View
231
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Xi WangJetting Technology CenterFUJIFILM Dimatix, Inc.
www.dimatix.com
Piezoelectric Inkjet Technology— From Graphic Printing to
Material Deposition
2
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Examples of Piezoelectric Printheads
Dimatix’ products
3
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Market / Technology Positioning
Markets
New
New
Current
Technology
Marking
& Coding
Wide Format Graphics
Ceramic Displays
Electronics
Product Decoration
BioTech
Textiles
Current
Glass
Sensors/RFID
Sensors/RFID
4
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Piezoelectric Inkjet Printing:
General Requirements
As a tool for depositing materials, inkjet printing must
v generate droplets sustainably;
v obtain a required drop volume;
v deliver material accurately;
v achieve a desired delivery rate.
5
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Case 1: Wide Format GraphicsHigh Quality Gray Scale Printing
l Definition: capability of varying drop sizes
l Major requirements
– Productivity
• Sustainability
– Wide range of ink types
• Water, Solvent, UV Curing
– High-end photographic image quality
• High resolution
– Small drop for highlights
– Large drop for dark tones
– High jet straightness
6
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
VersaDropTM: Waveform Tunability
7
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
VersaDropTM: Waveform Tunability
Small Medium Large
√
√
√
3
√√Large Drop
√Medium Drop
Small Drop
21Pulse #
8
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
24kHz, Steady State
Drop Speed Uniformity
9
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Imaging & Applications - Variable Dropsizes
Binary Small Drops Graininess-13%
OD-1.1
Multiple Size Drops Graininess-12%
OD-1.5
Binary Large DropsGraininess-18%
OD-1.7
10
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Case 2: Micro Feature Printing
l Key attributes of ink jet
– Drop Control (Drop Volume and Placement)
– Small Drop Sizes
– Non-Contact
– Variety of Working Fluids
– Additive Process (vs. Subtractive)
– Production Speeds
11
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Delivering OLEP for Fabricating Displays
Nozzle
Display Substrate
Droplet
Jet Trajectory
12
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Pixel Width
Standoff
Nozzle
Droplet
Drop Placement Error
θθθθ
Jet Trajectory Error
θθθθ
Jet Trajectory Error
Drop Placement Error Error Reduction
Standoff Decrease
θθθθ
Jet Trajectory Error
Nozzle Placement Error
Drop Placement Error Error Reduction
Standoff Decrease
Overall Drop Placement Error
XY
Z
13
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Drops too large Drops too small
Slow Jet
Crooked Jet
Weak jet Weak jet w/ good jet
Issues
14
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Non-Ideal Results
Courtesy Philips PolyLed
Non-optimum pixel filling
Overflow
15
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
SX3/SE3 with Per Nozzle Drive
Rocktrap
Descender Plate (2)
Silicon Nozzle Plate
Array body
Per Nozzle Driver Electrical Connection
16
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
X Straightness (microns)
Y S
traig
htn
ess (
mic
rons)
SX-3: X and Y Straightness
Spec +/-10microns
@ 1mm standoff
17
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Trimming Using Jet Velocity
l Velocity variation results in different time of flight
l Trimmed jets have similar velocities
l Velocity uniformity is NOT a guarantee of volume uniformity
Before trimming After trimming
18
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Results from Jet Trimming
Drop mass uniformity is about +/-10%
1300733 All Jets S ing le V oltage
0.9
0.95
1
1.05
1.1
0 32 64 96 128
Je t #
No
rmali
zed
Vo
lum
e
1300733 Tuned Voltages
0.9
0.95
1
1.05
1.1
0 32 64 96 128
Je t #
No
rmali
zed
Vo
lum
e
Drop mass uniformity is now +/- 2%
19
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 2 4 6 8 10
Frequency (kHz)
Velo
cit
y (
m/s
)
Alone
All Jets
SX3 Frequency Response
20
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Results
Courtesy Philips PolyLed
21
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Parameters in Piezoelectric Inkjet Material Deposition
Jetting Fluid
Properties
Drop Size
and Speed
Frequency/
Productivity
Printhead
Design
Drop
Placement
Sustainability
UniformityWaveform
Jetting
Voltage
22
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Jetting Fluid
Application
Target
Printhead
Design
Waveform
Jetting
Voltage
Frequency+
Sustainability
Drop Size
and Speed
Productivity
Drop
Placement
Uniformity
23
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Baytron® P Jet UA (PEDT/PSS)
Drop separation: 40µmDrop merging insufficient
Drop separation: 25µmDrop merging excellentLayer thickness 100nmSurface roughness Ra ca. 1nm
Photos Courtesy of H. C. Stark
Target: Deposition of uniform area hole-injection layers for OLED lighting
24
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
3D Imaging -Pharmaceuticals
l Unique Dosage Forms
l Controlled Release
l Taste Masking
l Additional Features
Digital and Non-Contact is Key!
25
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Conclusions
l Piezoelectric inkjet printing technology has been proven in graphics and is promising as a process tool for material deposition;
l We need to integrate jetting fluid, printhead, and waveform design for a specified application target;
l Through selecting the correct printhead and managing the jetting performance, the high demand (accuracy, robustness, and productivity) of material deposition can be achieved.
26
Nanotech Conference & Expo 2009, Houston, TX
Performance today, platforms for tomorrow