Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Physics at HERA
Katja Krüger KirchhoffInstitut für Physik
H1 Collaborationemail: [email protected]
Summer Student Lectures20 22 August 2007
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 2
Overview Part 2
● Reminder● Parton Density Fits ● High Q2 and Electroweak Physics
– Neutral Current
– Charged Current
● Exotics– Model Dependent Searches
– Model Independent Searches
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 3
Reminder: Deep Inelastic Scattering● fourmomentum transfer
● inelasticity
● parton momentum fraction
Q2=−q2=−k−k '2
y=q⋅Pk⋅P
kk'
P
xP
q
F 2 x ,Q2=x∑ eq2 q x q x
d 2dx dQ2
=42
Q41x [1−y y
2
2 F2 x ,Q
2]
x=Q2
2 q⋅P=
Q2
ys
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 4
DGLAP Evolution Equations
● Q2 dependence of quark densities q(x,Q2) and gluon density g(x,Q2) is predicted
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 5
Parton Density FitsDGLAP predicts only Q2 dependence➔ assume parametrisation of the parton density functions
(PDFs) as a function of x at a starting scale Q02 (typically
around 47 GeV2):
➔ evolve the PDFs to all measured Q2, calculate F2, and fit
the parameters to match the data
some freedom in the procedure!– how many parameters, which Q0
2 ?
– how to combine quark and antiquark densities?
x q x ,Q02=a x b1−x c [1d x ]
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 6
Parton Density Fitsquark and antiquark densities:● most general:
● distinguish valence and sea quarks: (some assumptions on decomposition of sea needed)
● distinguish uptype and downtype quarks:
u ,u , d , d ,s ,s ,c ,c ,b ,b
uv , d v , sea
U=uc , D=ds b U=uc , D=ds buv=U−U , d v=D−D
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 7
H1 & ZEUS Parton Densities
differences:● H1:
–
–
– 10 free parameters
● ZEUS:–
–
– 11 free parameters
U ,U , D , D , gx U = a xb 1−x c
[1d x f x3 ]
uv , d v , sea , g
x uv = a xb 1−x c [1d x ]
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 8
High Q2 & Electroweak Physics
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 9
More Structure Functions
d 2NC±
dx dQ2=
22
Q41x
Y [F 2 x ,Q2 − y2Y F L x ,Q2 ∓ Y−Y x F3 x ,Q2]
/Z 0
FL = F
2 – 2xF
1 = 0 in the QPM
F3 :−Z0−interference
● FL relevant only at large y
● F3 relevant only at large Q2,
different sign for e+ and e–
e e
p
Y± = 1±1−y2
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 10
High Q2 Neutral Current
● difference between e+p and e–p only at large
➔
Q2≈M Z2
−Z 0−interference
M Z2
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 11
High Q2 Neutral Current
=x Q4
221
Y
d 2NC±
dx dQ2
e– positive interference
e+ negative interference
x F 3∝ x∑ eq2 q−q
direct handle on valence quark distribution!
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 12
Charged Current Interactions
e
pq
q'
e
neutrino not visiblein detector
imbalance in transverse plane
W
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 13
Charged Current Cross Section
● W bosons couple differently to up and downtype quarks
● in the QPM:
➔
d2CC±
dx dQ2=
GF2
4 x M W2M W2 Q2 2
Y[W 2± − y2Y W L± ∓ Y−Y x W 3±]
W 2=xUD , xW 3
=x D−U
W 2−=x UD , x W 3
−=x U−D
W L±=0
CC− ∝ x [U 1− y2 D ]
CC ∝ x [U 1−y2 D ]
e+
e–
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 14
Comparison NC vs. CC● at low Q2: different
dependences because of photon in NC
● at high Q2: „electroweak unification“ but:
∝1
Q4
∝1
M W2 Q22
d2CC±
dx dQ2≈
GF2
4 x⋅ MW2M W2 Q2
2
⋅YW 2±
d2NC±
dx dQ2≈
22
x⋅
1Q4
⋅Y F 2
GF≈4
2 M W2similar because
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 15
Electroweak Parameters: W Mass
● G = GF determined by normalization of the CC cross section
● Mprop = MW determined by the Q2 dependence of the CC cross section
82.87±1.82exp 0.30−0.16model GeV
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 16
CC & Polarization
● CC cross section depends on longitudinal electron/positron polarization Pe
● reason: W boson couples only to lefthanded (LH) particles and righthanded (RH) antiparticles:
d 2CC±
dx dQ2Pe ≈ 1±Pe
GF2
4 x⋅ MW2M W2 Q2
2
⋅YW 2±
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 17
Polarization @ HERA
● transverse polarization builds up in ~40 minutes through synchrotron radiation (SokolovTernov effect)
● spin rotators flip transverse longitudinal before experiments and back after
Pe =N RH−N LHN RHN LH
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 18
Polarization @ HERA
spin rotator
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 19
eP1 0.5 0 0.5 1
(p
b)
CC
σ
0
20
40
60
80
100
120p Scattering±Charged Current e
Xν→p e
Xν→p +e
2 > 400 GeV2Q
y
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 20
Electroweak Parameters: Z0 Couplings
1 0.5 0 0.5 1
1
0.5
0
0.5
1PDF (prel.)uvu ZEUSpola
total uncert. uncorr. uncert.
H1 prel. (HERA I+II 9505)
SM CDF LEP
1 0.5 0 0.5 1
1
0.5
0
0.5
1
ua
uv
68% CL
ZEUS
1 0.5 0 0.5 1
1
0.5
0
0.5
1PDF (prel.)dvd ZEUSpola
total uncert. uncorr. uncert.
H1 prel. (HERA I+II 9505)
SM CDF LEP
1 0.5 0 0.5 1
1
0.5
0
0.5
1
da
dv
68% CL
ZEUS
polarization also allows better sensitivity to vector and axialvector couplings of up and downtype quarks to the Z0
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 21
Exotics orBeyond the Standard Modell
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 22
New Particles
many theories predict more particles than the SM:● SUSY:
– every Standard Model particles has a supersymmetric partner
– fermion partners are bosons, boson partners fermions
● leptoquarks– particle with lepton and quark properties
– can be produced resonantly in ep collisions
● ... exited fermions, contact interactions, large extradimensions ...
but experimentally search also modelindependent!
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 23
Leptoquarks
● MLQ2 = (xP + k)2 = xs
● compare measured cross section with SM expectation
● derive limits on coupling
/ GeVLQM50 100 150 200 250 300
Eve
nts
/ 20
GeV
1
10
210
310
410
/ GeVLQM50 100 150 200 250 300
Eve
nts
/ 20
GeV
1
10
210
310
410
NC, P=27%H1 data (prelim.)SMSM uncertainty
/ GeVLQM50 100 150 200 250 300
Eve
nts
/ 20
GeV
1
10
210
310
/ GeVLQM50 100 150 200 250 300
Eve
nts
/ 20
GeV
1
10
210
310
CC, P=27%H1 data (prelim.)SMSM uncertainty
e e
q q
LQk
xP
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 24
Limits on Leptoquarks
100 150 200 250 300 350 400
210
110
1
/ GeVLQM
λ
d)νu, (e0,LS
u) (e0,RS
d) (e0,RS~
d)νu, d, e (e1,LS
d)νu, (e0,LS
u) (e0,RS
d) (e0,RS~
d)νu, d, e (e1,LS
d)νu, (e0,LS
u) (e0,RS
d) (e0,RS~
d)νu, d, e (e1,LS
d)νu, (e0,LS
u) (e0,RS
d) (e0,RS~
d)νu, d, e (e1,LS
Exclu
ded
at 95
% C
.L.
H1 preliminary
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 25
SUSY● R parity violation:
single SUSY particle can be produced
● limits depend on many parameters (masses, couplings)
● example: stop
ZEUS
102
101
1
100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300Mstop (GeV)
λ'13
1
Exclud
ed at 9
5% CL
ZEUS (prel.) 9900 e+p
100 GeV Λ M2 Λ 300 GeV
300 GeV Λµ Λ 300 GeV
tanβ=6
Excluded in part of SUSY parameters
λ` 131 (APV)
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 26
General Searches
● idea: new particles have typically large mass
➔ final state should contain particles with large transverse momentum from the decay– jets
– electrons
– muons
– photons
– neutrinos (missing transverse momentum)
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 27
General Searches
every channel in reasonable agreement with the standard model
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 28
MultiLeptonsin HERA1 a small excess of di and trielectron events at high transverse momenta observed by H1
[GeV]12M0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Eve
nts
110
1
10
210
310
[GeV]12M0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Eve
nts
110
1
10
210
310SM
SM Signal
Data (prelim.)
)1p, 0.94 fb±Dielectrons, HERA I+II (e
HE
RA
Exo
tics
Wo
rkin
g G
roup
2e H1+ZEUS (common phase space)
[GeV]12M0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Eve
nts
110
1
10
210
310
[GeV]12M0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Eve
nts
110
1
10
210
310
SM
SM Signal
Data (prelim.)
)1p, 0.94 fb±Trielectrons, HERA I+II (e
HE
RA
Exo
tics
Wo
rkin
g G
roup
3e H1+ZEUS (common phase space)
HERA2 data show no significant excess
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 29
Isolated Leptons and Missing PT
● spectacular events
● excess in HERA1 data at large transverse momenta of the hadronic system (PTX) seen by H1
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 30
Isolated Leptons and Missing PT
● no excess in e– data● what about e+?
Katja Krüger Physics @ HERA 31
Isolated Leptons and Missing PT
● H1+ZEUS combined: 1.8 excess● H1 alone: 2.9 excess
?