PHILPROSYL

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/4/2019 PHILPROSYL

    1/4

    DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITYCOLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS

    Department of Philosophy

    COURSE SYLLABUS

    COLLEGE: College of Liberal Arts DEPARTMENT: Philosophy

    COURSE CODE: PHILPRO COURSE TITLE: Philosophical ProblemsCLASS DAYS AND CLASS TIME: __________ ROOM: __________

    COURSE DESCRIPTION

    This course is an in-depth study of various philosophical problems. It will touch on the major branches of philosophy andin so doing delve into the major philosophical problems of each branch of philosophy thereby exposing and giving theserious student of philosophy an opportunity to experience the different aspects and methods found in the variety ofphilosophical problems including solutions offered by different philosophers.

    LEARNING OUTCOME

    On completion of the course, the student is expected to be able to do the following:

    ELGA LEARNING OUTCOME

    Critical and CreativeKnowledge Producer

    LO1: Realize the value of critical and analytical thinking thru philosophical problems

    Socially Responsible andCollaborative Citizen

    LO2: Appreciate the value of intellectual discourse.

    Competent Professional LO3: Become familiar with the different philosophical problems and the variousperspectives of the problems and the different methods philosophers offered to solvethem

    Diversity-sensitiveCommunicator

    LO4: Appreciate the various viewpoints and orientations through application to reallife situations and the consequences of the problems applications.

    Morally Principled andFaith-inspired Leader

    LO5: Develop a sincere understanding of intellectual integrity.

    FINAL COURSE OUTPUT

    LEARNINGOUTCOME

    REQUIRED OUTPUT DUE DATE

    LO1 Paper Proposal

    LO2 Paper Proposal

    LO3 Comprehensive Exam

    LO4 Comprehensive Exam, Paper Proposal

    LO5 Paper Proposal

    1

  • 8/4/2019 PHILPROSYL

    2/4

    RUBRIC FOR ASSESSMENT OF ESSAY-TYPE REQUIREMENTS

    CRITERIA EXEMPLARY4.0

    SATISFACTORY3.0 3.5

    DEVELOPING2.0 2.5

    BEGINNING1.0 1.5

    RATING

    1. Grammar andSpelling

    No spelling andgrammatical

    errors

    Spelling andgrammar is mostly

    correct

    Spelling andgrammatical errors

    are frequent

    Spelling andgrammatical

    errors are foundin almost everysentence

    2. Exposition ofIdeas

    Authorsintendedmeaning isreadily andeasilyunderstood

    Authors intendedmeaning isgenerally easy tounderstand

    Authors intendedmeaning is difficultto understand

    Authorsintendedmeaning isimpossible tounderstand

    3. Developmentof Ideas

    Ideas presentedare cogently andclearly defended

    Ideas presented aresatisfactorilydefended

    Ideas presented areweakly andincoherentlydefended

    Ideas presentedare notdefended

    4. Organization Sequence of ideas is fluid andeasy to follow

    Sequence of ideasis generally smooth

    Sequence of ideasis jumpy

    Sequence ofideas isawkward andconfusing

    AVERAGE:

    GRADING SYSTEMComprehensive Exam 40%Paper Proposal 40%Journal Article Review 10Apprenticeship 10

    ====100%

    Comprehensive Exam

    The student will take a written comprehensive exam in three areas. He or she has the option to take an examon either one history course and two major courses or two major courses and one elective. He needs to get a passinggrade in all three exams to get 40 points. If he or she gets a failing grade in any of these exams he or she gets 0.

    Paper Proposal

    Three readers would be assigned for each paper. The three must confer with each other regarding the merits ofthe paper and agree on conditions for it to be approved. Approval comes from the readers. This process will be doneblindly. The students are allowed to consult faculty members on his or her own as the writing is being done but the finalapproval is announced by the faculty in charge. If his or her proposal is approved he or she gets 40 points, if not heor she gets 0.

    Apprenticeship

    As part of the PHLPRO program the students will be under the tutelage of a lecturer who is an expert in his orher are of interest. As part of the PHLPRO program the students will be under the tutelage of a lecturer who is an expertin his or her area of interest. The lecturer has the discretion of setting his or her grading system for this requirement.

    Journal Article Review

    Guidelines for this will be discussed in class.

    RATING SYSTEM

    2

    POINTS FINAL GRADE

    97-100 4.0

    93-96 3.5

    89-92 3.0

    85-88 2.5

    80-84 2.0

    75-79 1.5

    70-74 1.0Below 70 0.0

  • 8/4/2019 PHILPROSYL

    3/4

    LEARNING PLAN

    LEARNING OUTCOME TOPIC WEEK LEARNING ACTIVITIES

    LO1 Orientation to the program 1

    LO3LO4 Problems in Metaphysics and

    Metaethics

    2Lectures, discussions,

    close reading of texts

    LO1LO3LO4

    Problems in Feminist andPostmodern Philosophy

    3Lectures, discussions,close reading of texts

    LO3LO4

    Problems in the Philosophy of Myth and

    Eastern Philosophy4

    Lectures, discussions,close reading of texts

    LO3LO4

    Problems in the Philosophy of Mind and

    Language5

    Lectures, discussions,close reading of texts

    LO3LO4

    Problems in Pragmatism and the

    Philosophy of Life6

    Lectures, discussions,close reading of texts

    LO3LO4

    Problems in Aesthetics and thePhilosophy of Art

    7Lectures, discussions,close reading of texts

    LO1LO3

    Written Comprehensive Examination 8

    Lectures, discussions,close reading of texts

    LO1LO3

    Logic and Argument for Writing 9Lectures, discussions,close reading of texts

    LO2 Structure of a Philosophical Essay 10Lectures, discussions,close reading of texts

    LO5

    Research and Writing Break 11

    LO5

    Research and Writing Break

    12

    LO5 Submission of Paper Proposal 13

    METHODS OF INSTRUCTIONSeveral teaching methods shall be employed throughout the course including lecture, close reading of texts, andenrichment lectures outside class. A number of exercises in philosophical reasoning will also be done inside theclassroom.

    CLASSROOM POLICIES

    1. All guidelines stipulated in the handbook regarding plagiarism, cheating, student discipline, etc. will beimplemented.

    2. Students are required to attend all the seminars on time. Attendance will be checked regularly.

    a. A student who exceeds the allowed number of absences, which includes the accumulation oftardiness, will get a final grade of 0.0.

    3. Late submissions are not allowed. Unless specified, requirements must be submitted during class hours of thespecified date. Requirements that will be submitted late shall only be considered for acceptance in extremelyextenuating circumstances, which also depends on the discretion of the lecturer.

    3

  • 8/4/2019 PHILPROSYL

    4/4

    4. There will be no make up for the comprehensive exam.5. The lecturer has the discretion to modify the course requirements depending on the performance of students

    and the class.

    OTHER REQUIREMENTS

    Each student is required to submit a 3x5 index card with full contact details and a 2x2 recent ID picture.

    SUGGESTED REFERENCE MATERIALS: To be provided by the lecturers.

    4