Upload
shelby-capacio
View
181
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The full petition for a writ of prohibition that was filed in the Minnesota Supreme Court by petitioners Doug Mann, Linda Mann and David Tilsen. The filing may delay construction and opening of the new Vikings stadium.
Citation preview
Page 1 of 4
petition for writ of prohibition, Mann et al vs Showalter, Commissioner of Mn Magm't & Budget 1/10/14 10:30 AM
State of Minnesota Supreme Court
PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITIONDoug Mann, Linda Mann, David Tilsen Petitioners, Supreme Court Case Number:vs.
Jim Showalter, Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget Respondent
CC: Lori Swanson, Attorney General of the State of Minnesota, 445 Minnesota Street, #1100St. Paul, MN 55101
TO: The Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota:
The petitioners, Doug Mann, Linda Mann, and David Tilsen request a writ of prohibition
restraining Jim Showalter, Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget from
proceeding with the sale and issuance of appropriation bonds authorized by Session Laws of
2012, chapter 299, Article 2.
Petitioners reside in the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, and for a cause of action
allege the following:
WHEREAS
1. Session Laws of 2012, chapter 299, (2012 Stadium Act), Article 2, section 1, sub. 2,
authorizes the sales of appropriation bonds by the commissioner of Minnesota Management
and Budget, not to exceed $498,000,000. "Proceeds of the appropriation bonds must be
credited to a special appropriation stadium bond proceeds fund in the state treasury. . . " ;
2. The 2012 Stadium Act, Article 2 section 1, subd. 10 c. states: "The Minnesota Supreme
Court shall have original jurisdiction to determine the validation of appropriation bonds and all
Page 2 of 4
petition for writ of prohibition, Mann et al vs Showalter, Commissioner of Mn Magm't & Budget 1/10/14 10:30 AM
matters connected therewith;"
3. The 2012 Stadium Act, Article 2, section 1, subs. 10(d) states: "The commissioner may
determine the commissioner's authority to issue appropriation bonds and the legality of all
preceding in connection with issuing bonds. For this purpose, a complaint shall be filed by
the commissioner in the Minnesota Supreme Court against the state and the taxpayer and
citizens;"
4. The 2012 Stadium Act, Article 2, section 1, subd. 10(i) states: "Any taxpayer, citIzen, or
person interested may become a party to the action by moving against or pleading to the
complaint at or before the time set for hearing. The Minnesota Supreme Court shall
determine all questions of law and fact and make orders that will enable it to properly try and
determine the action and render a final judgement within 30 days of the hearing with the least
possible delay;"
5. The commissioner has determined that he has the authority to issue appropriation bonds
without a validation hearing before the Supreme Court as provided by the 2012 Stadium Act,
Article 2, section 1, subs. 10(g);
6. The 2012 Stadium Act, Article 3, section 1, subs. 4. dedicates local sales tax revenues
". . . for state bond debt service support beginning in calendar year 2021, and for each
calendar year thereafter through calendar year 2046, periodic amounts so that not later than
December 31, 2046, an aggregate amount equal to a present value of $150,000,000 has been
deposited in the general fund. . .";
7. The 2012 Stadium Act, Article 2, Section 1, subs. 6. states: "No full faith and credit: state
not required to make appropriations. The appropriation bonds are snot public debt of the
state, and the full faith, credit, and taxing powers of the state are not pledged to the payment
Page 3 of 4
petition for writ of prohibition, Mann et al vs Showalter, Commissioner of Mn Magm't & Budget 1/10/14 10:30 AM
of the appropriation bonds or to any payment that the state agrees to make under this
section. . . Appropriation bonds shall be canceled and shall no longer be outstanding on the
earlier of (1) the first day of a fiscal year for which the legislature shall not have appropriated
amounts sufficient for debt service, or (2) the date of final payment of the principal of and
interest on the appropriation bonds."
8. The Stadium Act of 2012, Article 1, section 15, subs. 4(b) states: "The state share of
stadium costs shall be limited to $348,000,000 for construction of a new stadium, as
permitted under section 16A.726. The city of Minneapolis share shall be limited to no more
than a $150,000,000 contribution for construction, and the annual operating cost and capital
contribution contained under section 473J.13; and
9. City of Minneapolis sales tax revenues are to be dedicated to the repayment of state
appropriation bonds in violation of Minnesota constitution, Article X, section 1, which
prohibits such an arrangement.
WHEREFORE, the petitioners request an order granting the petition for a writ of prohibition
and the issuance of a writ of prohibition restraining the Commissioner of Management and
Budget from proceeding with the sale and issue of state appropriation bonds to pay for the
construction of the Vikings stadium authorized by Article 2 of Minnesota Session Laws of
2012, Chapter 299.
A memorandum of points of law and authorities in support of the petition are attached to the
petition along with exhibits.
Dated: 10 January 2014 ___________________________ Doug Mann
Page 4 of 4
petition for writ of prohibition, Mann et al vs Showalter, Commissioner of Mn Magm't & Budget 1/10/14 10:30 AM
Petitioner, pro se 3706 Logan Avenue N. Minneapolis, MN 55412 Phone: (612) 824-8800
_____________________________
Linda Mann Petitioner, pro se 1821 First Avenue South, #303 Minneapolis, MN 55403 Phone: (612) 871-4102
______________________________
David M. Tilsen Petitioner, pro se 3220 10th Ave S. Minneapolis, MN 55407 Phone: (612) 823-8169