Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Perkins. Post Secondary. Carl D. Perkins CTE Act. First authorized by the federal government in 1984 and was reauthorized in August 2006 PTE is required to collect data from Perkins recipients as a required in the Perkins Act of 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
PerkinsPost Secondary
Carl D. Perkins CTE Act
• First authorized by the federal government in 1984 and was reauthorized in August 2006
• PTE is required to collect data from Perkins recipients as a required in the Perkins Act of 2006
• The Perkins Act is structured to provide an increased focus on the academic achievement of career and technical education students, strengthen the connections between secondary and postsecondary education, and improves state and local accountability.
• Perkins funding supports career and technical education that prepares students both for postsecondary education and the careers of their choice.
Federal
• U.S. Department of Education• Office of Vocational and Adult Education (now OCTAE)
• Carl D. Perkins Act of 2006
State
• Eligible Agency• Sole state agency responsible for administering program
• State Plan/Improvement Plan
Local
• Eligible Institution (postsecondary)• Eligible Recipient (secondary)
• Local Plan/Annual Plan/Improvement Plan
Oversight and Authority
Timeframe
• Starting in October, each technical college includes an annual report, performance measures, and an improvement plan if needed.
• Data is analyzed for the State and submitted in December for our Annual Report.
• In March, we negotiate our targets annually for continuous improvement. Each local program accepts the State targets or they can negotiate their own w/supporting data.
• Perkins allocations in June – based on Pell and BIA numbers for each institution.
Performance Measures – Targets & Definitions
Perkins Performance Measures Form
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
13.0 13.3 13.5 14.0
18.0 18.2 18.2 18.416.3
17.9 16.4 16.513.8
5P 1 Performance and Targets
5P1 Nontraditional Participation 5P1 Performance
Looks like we didn’t meet in FY12, met at 90%
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-150.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
13.1 13.4 13.6 13.9 14.1 14.4 14.4 14.6
19.2
13.1 12.715.9
12.2
5P 2 Performance and Targets
5P2 Nontraditional Completion 5P2 Performance
Plan Needed Yes/No5P1 CSI CWI EITC ISU LCSC NIC StateFY09 No No Yes No Yes Yes NoFY10 No No Yes No Yes Yes NoFY11 No No No No Yes Yes NoFY12 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes NoFY13 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Plan Needed Yes/No5P2 CSI CWI EITC ISU LCSC NIC StateFY09 No No No No Yes No NoFY10 No Yes Yes No No Yes YesFY11 No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesFY12 No No No Yes No Yes NoFY13 No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Performance Improvement Plan – FY13
• Part of our plan was updating the non-trad list from 2006• TCLC discussed on 6/17, they will ask for volunteers to serve on
a team for improvement• Review each schools plan that was submitted• Analyze data by demographics (race, LEP, single parents, etc.) • Look at best practices (CWI, NAPE)• Possibly reallocate money for improvement plan• Look at redefining our non-trad list (ex. Healthcare, STEM)• Align our efforts with the PTE strategic plan and Go-On
5-STEP IMPROVEMENT PROCESS
STEP 1Document
Performance Results
STEP 5ImplementSolutions
STEP 4Pilot Test and
Evaluate Best Solutions
STEP 3Choose
Best Solutions
STEP 2Identify
Root Causes
Analyze Data by:Total InstitutionSpecial PopulationsRaceGenderProgram
The government is shifting their focus from compliance to performance and as a State we need to collaborate our efforts.
