79
1 CHAPTER – I INTRODUCTION

Performance Report Project

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Performance Report Project

1

CHAPTER – I

INTRODUCTION

Page 2: Performance Report Project

2

INTRODUCTION

Organizations are made up of people and function through people.

Without people organizations cannot exists. The resources of men, money,

machinery and materials are collected, coordinated and utilized through people.

These resources by themselves cannot fulfill the objectives of an organization.

They need to be united into a team. It is through the combine efforts of people

that material and monetary resources are effectively utilized for the attainment

of common objectives. Without united human efforts no organization can

achieve its goals. All the activities of an organization are initiated and

completed by the persons who make up the organization. Therefore, People are

the most significant resource of any organization. This resource is called human

resource and it is most important factor of the production. According to

L.F.Urwick, “business houses are made or broken in the long run not by

markets or capital, patents or equipment but by men.” Of all the resources

manpower is the only resource, which does not depreciate, with passage of time.

Human resource is considered to be the most valuable asset in any

organization. It is the sum-total of inherent abilities, acquired knowledge and

skills represented by the talents and attitudes of the employees. It may be noted

here that human resource should be utilized to the maximum possible extent, in

order to achieve individual and organizational goals. It is thus the employee’s

performance, which ultimately decides the attainment of goals.

A major concern of every organization should be to contribute positively

towards the achievement of its objectives. Organizational effectiveness is often

equated with Managerial efficiency. A Manager can ensure organizational

effectiveness only by guaranteeing the full utilization of the human resources

Page 3: Performance Report Project

3

available through individual employees under his guidance. Hence, it is always

required for a manager to monitor and measure the performance of employees.

Moreover, since the organization exists to achieve the goals, the degree of

success that individual employees have in reaching this individual goal is

important in determining organizational effectiveness. The assessment of how

successful employees have been at meeting their individual goal becomes a

critical part of Human Resource Management. This leads to concept of

Performance Appraisal.

A performance appraisal system functions as definition of performance.

Performance appraisal is a method of evaluating the behavior of employees in

the work spot, including both qualitative and quantitative aspects of job

performance indicates how an individual is fulfilling the job demands and it is

always in terms of results. Under performance appraisal not only the

performance of an employee but also his potential for development is evaluated.

“Performance appraisal is a systematic description of an employee’s job

relevant strengths and weaknesses”.

In performance appraisal or merit rating refers to all the formal

procedures used in working organizations to evaluate the personalities and

contributions and potential group members. In appraisal system the employee’s

merits like initiatives, dependability, personality etc., are compared with others

and ranked to rated. Appraisals might be based on the criteria of employee’s

skills, educational qualifications, knowledge, abilities to delegate plans,

supervise, assume responsibility, exercise leadership, personal qualities,

creativity, decision making and interpersonal skills.

Page 4: Performance Report Project

4

An appraisal motivates an employee into increased effort aimed at

enhancing the outcome of the assessment. It tells an employee what set of

activities or what qualities are considered desirable by the organization.

In performance planning and review, the Reporting Manager is

expected to set targets or tasks for the appraise in the beginning of the year. In

the middle of the year, the appraise fills the self-appraisal form, indicating the

extent to which the target or task has been completed, the difficulties faced and

the suggestions for improvement. At the end of the year, there is the annual

review and targets/tasks set for the next year. Both in the mid-year review and

annual review, the self-appraisal is supplemented by a performance review,

discussion, the problems are discussed and the appraiser is given feedback on

how he is doing.

Human Resource Management is the function with in an organization that

focuses on recruitment of management and providing direction for the people

who work in the organization. Human Resources Management can also be

performed by line managers. Human Resource Management is the

organizational function that deals with issues related to people such as

compensation, hiring, performance management, organization development,

safety, wellness, benefits, employee motivation, communication, administration

and training.

Page 5: Performance Report Project

5

Definition:

According to Flippo, human resource management is the planning,

organizing, directing and controlling of the procurement, development,

compensation, integration maintenance and reproduction of human resources to

the end those individual, organizational and societal objectives are

accomplished.

According to L.F.Urwick, “business houses are made or broken in the long

run not by markets or capital, patents or equipment but by men.” Of all the

resources manpower is the only resource, which does not depreciate, with

passage of time.

Objectives of Human Resource Management

Objective are pre-determined goals to which individual or group activity in an

organization is directed. Objectives of personal management are influenced by

social objectives, organizational objectives, functional objectives and individual

objectives.

1. To create and utilize an able and motivated work force to accomplish the

basis organizational goals.

2. To establish and maintain sound organizational structure and desirable

working relationships among with those all the members of the

organization..

3. To secure the integration of the individual and groups within the

organization by co-ordination of the individual and groups goals with those

of the organization.

Page 6: Performance Report Project

6

4. To create facilitate and opportunities for individual or group development so

as to much it with the growth of the organization.

5. To attain an effective utilization of human resources in the achievement of

organizational.

6. To identify and satisfy individual and group needs by providing adequate

and equitable wages, incentives, employee benefits and social security and

measures for challenging work, prestige recognition, security, status etc.

Page 7: Performance Report Project

7

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

� It provides organized if mission for making hr decisions like placement,

pay, transfers, and promotions.

� It improves and evaluates Performance of employee

� It improves communication.

� It decides pay rises when regular payment system does not respond.

� It tests the Performance of hr activities like recruitment selection and

training.

� It provides coaching, counseling and motivation to sub-ordinates.

• Broadly, Performance appraisal has four objectives they are:

• Developmental uses

• Administrative decisions

• Organizational objectives

• Documentation purpose.

Page 8: Performance Report Project

8

NEED OF THE STUDY

� The study on performance appraisal is needed in order to

� To do a comprehensive study on performance appraisal system

� To provide the prevent grievance and indeciplinary action.

� To provide the information this helps to council the sub-ordinates.

� To provide the information about the performance ranks basing on

which decision regarding salary fixation, conformation, promotion,

transfer, and demotions are taken.

� To provide feedback information about the level of achievement and

behavior of sub- ordinate.

� To determine the Training and Development.

� To study the design of performance appraisal system existing on the

organization. To create and maintain satisfactory level of performance.

� To facilitate fair and equitable compensation.

• To ensure organizational effectiveness.

• It guarantees useful information about employees and the nature of

their duties.

Page 9: Performance Report Project

9

SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The study is confined to performance appraisal function of the activities

of organization and does not cover any other aspect of Human Resource

Management. Further the study is restricted to the respondents of kesoram

cement and not other organizations. The focus of the study was to understand

the existing performance appraisal system with an eye on the lacunae. which

might have crewed into the system also the drawbacks of the system. In the

present study an attempt has been made to know the actual implementation of

performance appraisal techniques in general and some other aspects such as

awareness of the workers, effectiveness of the performance appraisal system in

particular.

Human resource projections are valid on appraisals. By improving job

skills, the employees have lot of scope for development and prepare themselves

for higher responsibilities.

A through analysis of the performance appraisal system will help the

management to know the shortcomings, if any. It also help the company in

knowing whether the performance appraisal techniques are used to the full

extent or not, there by the researcher can understand the effective

implementation of the performance appraisal

Page 10: Performance Report Project

10

METHODOLOGY

The research methodology is a systematic way to solve the problem and it is an

important component of the study without which researcher may not be able to

obtain the facts and figures from the employees.

SOURCE OF DATA:

The study is based on primary as well as secondary data collected from different

sources:

a) Primary Data:

The primary data is collected with the help of questionnaires. The

questionnaires are chosen because of its simplicity and liability. Researcher can

expect straight answers to the questions. Administration a well-designed

questionnaire to the employees and their opinions collect primary and

suggestions were sorted with the help of the questionnaire.

b) Secondary Data:

Secondary data is collected through the documents provided by the personnel

department. The documents include personnel manuals, reports, books,

journals, various magazines and additional information from personal

Department of Kesoram Cement Industry.etc.

Page 11: Performance Report Project

11

LIMITATIONS

� The rater most of the employees on the higher side of their performance.

� The main limitation of this method is that it takes a lot of time and effort

to construct several evaluating statements.

� The population of the study is limited and hence the findings may not to

be representative of the entire system existing in India.

� Due to security reason, enter into many of the technical complexes was

difficult which provide as a hindrance for gathering qualitative data.

� The time duration for the study has been a limitation for the in depth

study of the existing system.

� The shift existing in certain departments created problems for the return

of filled questionnaire.

Page 12: Performance Report Project

12

CHAPTER – II

INDUSTRY PROFILE

Page 13: Performance Report Project

13

INDUSTRY PROFILE

Insurance Industry of India

Insurance is divided in two categories:

1) Life insurance

2) General insurance

Insurance may be described as a social device to reduce or eliminate risk

of life and property. Under the plan of insurance, a large number of people

associate themselves by sharing risk, attached to an individual.

The risk, which can be insured against include fire, the peril of sea, death,

incident and burglary. Any risk contingent upon these may be insured against at

a premium commensurate with the risk involved.

Insurance is actually a contract between two parties whereby one party called

insurer undertakes in exchange for a fixed sum called premium to pay the other

party at the happening of a certain Event.

Insurance is a contract whereby, in return for the payment of premium by

the insured, the insurers pay the financial losses suffered by the insured as a

result of the occurrence of unforeseen events like death or accidents.

With the help of insurance, large number of people exposed to a similar

risk makes contributions to a common fund out of which the losses suffered by

the unfortunate few, due to accidental events, are made good.

Page 14: Performance Report Project

14

Brief History of the Insurance Sector in India:

The insurance sector in India has come a full circle from being an open

competitive market to nationalization and back to a liberalized market again.

Tracing the developments in the Indian insurance sector reveals the 360-

degree turn witnessed over a period of almost 190 years.

The business of life insurance in India in its existing form started in India

in the year 1818 with the establishment of the Oriental Life Insurance Company

in Calcutta.

Some of the important milestones in the life insurance business in India are

1912 - The Indian Life Assurance Companies Act enacted as the first statute to

regulate the life insurance business.

1928 - The Indian Insurance Companies Act enacted to enable the government

to collect statistical information about both life and non-life insurance

businesses.

1938 - Earlier legislation consolidated and amended to by the Insurance Act

with the objective of protecting the interests of the insuring public.

1956 - 245 Indian and foreign insurers and provident societies taken over by the

central government and nationalized. LIC formed by an Act of Parliament, viz.

LIC Act, 1956, with a capital contribution of Rs. 5 crore from the Government

of India.

The General insurance business in India, on the other hand, can trace its

roots to the Triton Insurance Company Ltd., the first general insurance company

established in the year 1850 in Calcutta by the British.

Page 15: Performance Report Project

15

Some of the important milestones in the general insurance business in India

are:

1907 - The Indian Mercantile Insurance Ltd. set up the first company to

transact all classes of general insurance business.

1957 - General Insurance Council, a wing of the Insurance Association of India,

frames a code of conduct for ensuring fair conduct and sound business practices.

1968 - The Insurance Act amended to regulate investments and set minimum

solvency margins and the Tariff Advisory Committee set up.

1972 - The General Insurance Business (Nationalization) Act, 1972 nationalized

the general insurance business in India with effect from 1st January 1973. 107

insurers amalgamated and grouped into four companies’ viz. the National

Insurance Company Ltd., the New India Assurance Company Ltd., the Oriental

Insurance Company Ltd. and the United India Insurance Company Ltd. GIC

incorporated as a company

Regulatory Body:

The insurance should be changed

1) an insurance regulatory body should be set up

2) Controller of insurance (currently a part from the finance ministry) should be

made independent.

3) IRDA is the insurance regulatory and development authority. Each and every

life insurance company has to comply with the rules and regulations of this

act.

Page 16: Performance Report Project

16

Customer Service

� LIC should pay interest on delays in payments beyond 30 days.

� Insurance companies must be encouraged to set up unit linked pension plans.

� Computerization of operations and updating of technology to be carried out

in the insurance industry.

The committee emphasized that in order to improve the customer services

and increase the coverage of the insurance industry should be opened up to

competition. But at the same time, the committee felt the need to exercise

caution as any failure on the part of new players could ruin the public

confidence in the industry. Hence, it was decided to allow competition in a

limited way by stipulating the minimum capital requirement of Rs.100 Crores.

The committee felt the need to provide greater autonomy to insurance

companies in order to improve their performance and enable them to act as

independent companies with economic motives. For this purpose, it had

proposed setting up an independent regulatory body.

Page 17: Performance Report Project

17

S.No. Registration

Number

Date of

Reg. Name of the Company

1 101 23.10.2000 HDFC Standard Life Insurance Co.

2 104 15.11.2000 Max New York Life Insurance Co.

3 105 24.11.2000 ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co.

4 107 10.01.2001 Kotak Mahindra Life Insurance Co.

5 109 31.01.2001 Birla Sunlife Life Insurance Co.

6 110 12.02.2001 Tata AIG Life Insurance Co.

7 111 30.03.2005 SBI Life Insurance

8 114 02.08.2008 ING Vysya Life Insurance Co.

9 116 03.08.2010 Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Co.

10 117 06.08.2011 MetLife Life Insurance Co.

11 125 08.11.2012 Mahendra life insurance co.

Page 18: Performance Report Project

18

Investments

� Mandatory investments of LIC life fund in government securities to be

reduced from 75% to 50%.

� Gic and its subsidiaries are not to hold more than 5% in any company (there

current holdings to be brought down to this level over a period of time)

Market Players in Vizag:

LIC

SBI LIFE

ICICI PRUDENTIAL

BIRALA SUNLIFE

BAJAZ ALLIANZ

AVIVAA

MET LIFE

TATA AIG

Page 19: Performance Report Project

19

Competitors with Market Share:

The competition is very tough in the insurance sector. There is neck-to-

neck competition among all the players. But the majority of share is covered by

LIC. All the companies give almost the same policy but there is a little

variation in the charges that the companies are charging.

S. No. Name of the competitor Market Share

(%)

01. Bajaj Allianz 4.18

02. ING Vysya 0.54

03. AMP Sanmar 0.46

04. SBI Life Insurance 1.47

05. Tata AIG 1.75

06. HDFC Standard Life Insurance

Co. 3.05

07. ICICI Prudential 7.12

08. Birla Sunlife 1.72

09. Aviva Life Insurance 1.11

10. Kotak Mahindra 0.71

11. Max Newyork Life Insurance 1.33

12. MetLife 0.37

13. Sahara Life Insurance 0.03

14. LIC 72.23

Others 3.93

Total 100.00

Page 20: Performance Report Project

20

CHAPTER – III

COMPANY PROFILE

Page 21: Performance Report Project

21

Company Profile

With over 140 years of experience, the MetLife companies serve millions

of customers in the America and Asia with one goal in mind – to build financial

freedom for everyone. The MetLife companies are a leader in group benefits

that serve 88 of the top one hundred FORTUNE 500®* companies, and provide

benefits to 37 million employees and family members through its plans sponsors

in the U.S. The MetLife companies are also ranked #1 in group life and #1 in

commercial dental in the U.S . The MetLife companies are the number one life

insurer in the U.S. With approximately US $2.8 trillion of life Insurance in

force.

In India, MetLife was in corporated in 2001, and aims to differentiate

itself through customized need based selling, simple and innovative products,

and technology-backed service experience, to tread its path to build financial

freedom for everyone.

Mission / Vision / Values:

Build financial freedom for all through leadership in providing financial

advice and building long-term relationships through innovative protection,

accumulation and retirement products, robust underwriting processes and

creating world-class customer service experience for our customers and to

provide customers in India with world-class solAXISons for financial security,

and in the process add significant value to our shareholders, associates and

society.

Page 22: Performance Report Project

22

Core Values

� It lead through Innovation to offer world class and competitive products to

our customers

� It build Long Term Relationships with our customers by creating a world

class service experience through operational excellence and the innovative

use of technology

� It create a Customer Centered and Result Focused Vision that inspires each

one of our Associates and has their buy-in

� They are committed to creating a High Performance Organization by

creating an environment that allows each one of our Associates to perform at

their peak. As a result we will also be recognized as an Employer of Choice

� They are committed to Partnering with our internal and external Customers

for mutual success

� They work with Integrity, Fairness and Financial Prudence in all our

dealings keeping the interests of our Shareholders, Customers and Associates

paramount

MetLife, the Indian affiliate of the largest life insurer in the U.S.*, is

going through changes that are unprecedented in size and scope. And that means

an unprecedented array of career opportunities and growth potential. It provides

customers in India with world-class solAXISons for financial security, and in

the process add significant value to their shareholders, associates and society.

Corporate Partners

As the vital channel for MetLife’s products, it has chosen some

exemplary banks and financial institAXISons. These will serve as the interface

between our customers and us to aid us understand the unique needs and

aspirations of every Indian. And update its products with features that form the

cornerstones of financial freedom.

Page 23: Performance Report Project

23

Jammu & Kashmir Bank

The Jammu & Kashmir Bank is today one of the fastest growing banks in

India with a network of more than 500 branches/offices spread across the

country offering world class banking products/services to its customers. Today,

the Bank has a status of value driven organization and is always working

towards building trust with Shareholders, Employees, Customers, Borrowers,

Regulators and other diverse Stakeholders, for which it has adopted a strategy

directed to developing a sound foundation of relationship and trust aimed at

achieving excellence, which of course, comes from the womb of good

Corporate Governance. trusteeship, transparency, fairness and control, leading

to stakeholders delight, enhanced shareholder value and ethical corporate

citizenship. It also ensures that bank is managed by an independent and highly

qualified

Karnataka Bank

The Karnataka Bank Ltd., a premier private sector bank of the country, was

incorporated on February 18th, 1924 at Mangalore, a coastal town in South

Kanara, a district of Karnataka state, which has attained renown as the Cradle of

Indian Banking.

Today it is one of the leading private sector banks in the country, known for its

steady and disciplined growth and cordial customer service. The Bank has a

strong national presence through a widespread network of 358 branches. The

bank has 230 branches wholly/partially computerized, as of now.

Plans are underway to put in place additional products to enhance customer

satisfaction and to increase income stream with the help of upgraded

technology. The bank has already put in place an elaborate risk monitoring and

asset liability management system.

Page 24: Performance Report Project

24

Dhanalakshmi Ban k

Dhanalakshmi Bank charts a 79-year course commencing from its incorporation

in the year 1927 by a group of enterprising entrepreneurs of Thrissur, the

cultural capital of Kerala. The Bank has foreseen transition and made the right

moves towards sustained development.

Dhanalakshmi Bank has today attained national stature with 181 branches

and 26 Extension Counters spread over the States of Kerala, Tamil Nadu,

Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Delhi and West Bengal.

The high growth trajectory is powered by strong fundamentals. As at the end

of March 2011, the Capital Adequacy Ratio of the Bank was above the

mandatory requirement of 9%. The highlights of our performance during the

year 2005-11are as follows:

� Operating profits increased by 53%

� Non-interest income increased by 83.8%

� Cost of deposits declined to 5.19% and yield on advances improved to

9.44%

� Micro credit recorded a growth of 92.2%

� Net NPA brought down to 2.44%

� Bank posted a net profit of Rs. 20.51 crores.

� 85% of Bank’s business brought under centralized banking solAXISon

(CBS)

The Bank has ventured into both life and non-life insurance. It is selling

life insurance products of M/s. MetLife India, a renowned global player in this

segment and non-life insurance products of M/s. IFFCO-TOKIO as their

corporate agent. The Bank is also a depository participant of NSDL (National

Security Depository Limited) offering Demat services through selected

branches.

Page 25: Performance Report Project

25

In essence, the Bank is paying focused attention on its core competence

like ever expanding client-base, constantly upgraded customer service,

professional management, skilled manpower, wide network of branches and

excellent customer support.

The Bank is managed by a professional and forward looking Board of

Directors drawn from various walks of life with Mr. A.D. Navaneethan as the

Chairman, Mr. P.S Prasad as the MD & CEO and Mr. V S R Murthy as

ExecAXISve Director.

AXIS Bank

AXIS Bank was the first of the new private banks to have begun

operations in 1994, after the Government of India allowed new private banks to

be established. AXIS Bank is one of the fastest growing private sector banks in

the country. The Bank has strengths in both retail and corporate banking and is

committed to adopting the best industry practices internationally in order to

achieve excellence

AXIS Bank is one of the few banks in India that have built up a fully

integrated centralized banking architecture to offer banking services anywhere,

anytime. Currently the Bank has a network of 509 Branches & Extension

counters and 2224 ATMs spread across 299 cities, towns and villages, offering

a complete range of retail and corporate services, including retail loans,

corporate credit, forex services, investment banking, depository services, and

investment advisory services to our customer base of over 5.2 million.

AXIS Bank is uniquely positioned to harness the high growth opportunity

in India. At AXIS Bank, it has been our constant endeavour to bring a sharper

focus to the requirements of our customers and we strive to leverage cutting-

edge technology to provide the highest levels of service to them. The Bank has

customised offerings for various segments:

Page 26: Performance Report Project

26

� Priority Banking: For High Net Worth Customers

� Senior Privilege: For Senior Citizens

� Smart Privilege: For Women

� Salary Power: For Payroll accounts

� Power Salute: For Defence personnel

� Trusts and NGO

� NRI Accounts

Other Partners

Karvy

In 1982, a group of Hyderabad-based practising Chartered Accountants

started Karvy Consultants Limited with a capital of Rs.1,50,000 offering

auditing and taxation services initially. Later, it forayed into the Registrar and

Share Transfer activities and subsequently into financial services. All along,

Karvy's strong work ethic and professional background leveraged with

Information Technology enabled it to deliver quality to the individual.

Geojit Securities

Geojit Securities was founded by Mr.C.J George in 1987 as a

Proprietorship for doing Broking business in Cochin Stock Exchange. In 1994,

the business was taken over by Geojit Securities Ltd, a Joint Venture between

Mr.C.J George and the Kerala State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. In

the following year, the company came up with an IPO and the shares were listed

in various Stock Exchanges in India in 1995.

Page 27: Performance Report Project

27

Way2wealth

Way2Wealth is a premier Investment Consultancy Firm that has been

launched with the aim of making investing simpler, more understandable and

profitable for the investors. Way2Wealth brings a wide range of product

offerings from Fixed Income Securities, Life Insurance and Mutual Funds to

Equity and Derivatives (on the National Stock Exchange) for the convenience

and benefit of it customers. Way2Wealth has over 40 easily accessible

Investment Outlets spread across 20 major towns and cities in the country.

Mini Muthoothu

Established in 1921, Mini Muthoothu with an illustrious history of

banking behind them today operates from 75 branches in Kerala and 5 in

Bangalore. All business concerns of Mini Muthoothu function under the strict

guidelines set by the Department of Company Law Affairs and Reserve Bank of

India. They also have a certificate of compliance with the requirements

regarding prudential norms from the Reserve Bank of India. Mini Muthoothu,

under the able leadership of its Chairman, Mr. Roy M Mathew, offers both the

resources and capabilities like any national player coupled with individualized

attention to its customers.

Metlife to Double Consultants

MetLife Insurance will be doubling the number of financial planning

consultants it has from 11,480 people to around 20,000 during the next calendar

year between January and December, 2007.

"The idea is to grow into a bigger player in the market by expanding the

distribAXISon system. We want to increase our market share and the way we

have decided to do this is by strengthening our multi distribAXISon system

Page 28: Performance Report Project

28

which consists of agency sales, third party sales and institAXISonal sales,"

Rajesh Relan, MD, MetLife India Insurance Company said.

Apart from hiring more financial planning consultants, the company had

recently entered into a banc assurance tie-up with the AXIS Bank. This is

MetLife’s fourth bancassurance tie-up after J&K Bank, Karnataka Bank and

Dhanalaxmi Bank

The tie-up will give MetLife a national footprint as AXIS Bank is

currently the third largest private bank in India. Also, the tie up is a referral

model under which MetLife would be deploying its own staff in the bank’s

branches and the staff would work on the leads generated by AXIS Bank.

MetLife is also looking at raising capital from its existing investors. The

capital base of the company is currently Rs 355 crore. J&K bank holds 25 per

cent of the equity, M Pallonji holds 20 per cent, 26 per cent is held by MetLife

while the rest is with other investors.

"We are building our plans. We will raise capital but we have not

finalized details," Mr. Relan said.

Page 29: Performance Report Project

29

Management Team

Gaurav Suri Rajesh Relan

Managing Director Director(Marketing)

Rajesh Relan – Managing Director

Chander Chellani - Officer, Agency Sales

Miro Farrugia – Chief Financial Officer

B Ashwin - Chief Administrative Officer

K P Sarma – Appointed Actuary

Phanesh M S V S - Chief Actuary

KR Anil Kumar - Chief Planning, Legal and Compliance Officer and Financial

Controller

Smitashree Menon – Director, Human Resources

Sanyog Jain – Director, Training and Development Center of Excellence

Gaurav Suri – Director, Marketing

Neerav Kaushik – Director, Individual Service Delivery

Page 30: Performance Report Project

30

Organizational Structure

Organization Chart:

Organization structure is a basic framework which the manager’s

decision making behavior takes place. Structure basically deals with

relationships. Organization structure is the pattern of relationships among

various components or parts of the organizations. This prescribes the

relationship of various activities and positions.

Organization chart is the vital tool for providing information about

organization relations.

The organization structure plays a vital role in the smooth functioning of

the MetLife Insurance India Pvt. Ltd. Visakhapatnam. The organization chart

for the firm depends on the customer coverage.

The personnel department is under the main company i.e., MetLife

Insurance India Private Limited, Visakhapatnam. It is a insurance Branch

Office, there are only three departments i.e., accounts, and marketing and

human resource.

Page 31: Performance Report Project

1

OO RR GG AA NN II ZZ AA TT II OO NN CC HH AA RR TT OO FF MM EE TT LL II FF EE II NN DD II AA

II NN SS UU RR AA NN CC EE CC OO .. PP VV TT .. LL TT DD -- VV II SS HH AA KK AA PP AA TT NN AA MM

BRANCH

MANAGER Mr.V.ANIL

KUMAR

HR Department Mr.Shastri

MsVaralakshmi

Agency Manager Mr.Aamir Khan

Agency Manager Mr.Leeladar

Banc assurance

Front End Office Ms.Srilakshmi

Backend Operator

10 Sales Managers

Mr.M.Srinivas

Financial Advisors

5 INC interns

4 Executives

Agency

Manager

Mr.Rajasekhar

10 Sales Managers

Ms.Krishna Koppaka

Financial Advisors

5 INC interns

Page 32: Performance Report Project

PRODUCTS

• Accumulation

� Whole Life Policy

� Endowment Policy

• MET Suvidha

� Money Back Policy

� Met Sukh Money Back Non Participating

� Met Bhavishya

• Multi Purpose

� Met Ultimate

� Met Smart Plus

� Met Smart Premier

� Met Smart Plus - Single Pay

� Met Smart Premier - Single Pay

• Protection

� Met Suraksha - TROP

� Met Suraksha - TA

� Met-Mortgage Protector SP/Limited pay(MRTA)

• Retirement

� MET pension

� MET Advantage Plus

Page 33: Performance Report Project

• Add Ons

� Accidental Death Benefit (ADB)

� Term Rider

• Waiver Of Premium

• Critical Illness

• Additional Benefits

• Rider benefits

• Tax benefit

Insurance Is For Saving Tax

The primary function of life insurance is to cover you against sudden

losses arising out of sudden death or liability. Unlike other investment

options like the Public Provident Fund that offers 20% tax rebate under

Section 88 of the Income Tax Act, 1961or other small savings schemes like

post office deposits and national savings certificates, Insurance isn’t a tax

saving investment vehicle.

Insurance, primarily offers you complete security arising out of risk

coverage against the uncertainties of life. And secondarily serves you as a

good investment option and tax saving tool. Hence, as an instrument, life

insurance offers you the ideal blend of risk cover, returns and tax benefits.

Page 34: Performance Report Project

CHAPTER – IV

THEORITICAL

FRAME WORK

Page 35: Performance Report Project

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Performance appraisal is one of the methods of evaluating the

behavior of employees in both quantitative and qualitative job performance.

It is a time based survey which gives a technological based edge. It

integrates a full sit of tools & techniques for bringing out employees

Performance.

It helps to achieve the organizational objectives by evaluating the

Performance of employees over a specified period of time for better

utilization of employee’s skills. The Performance of employees helps for

the growth of organization.

Performance appraisal is a scientific approach .it is a systematic

examination of employee strengths and weakens. It consists of sequentially

organized steps. Performance appraisal range from confidential reporting to

360-degree appraisal.

In industry the performance appraisal is a systematic evaluation of

personnel by supervisors or others familiar with their performance because

employers are interested in knowing about employee performance.

Employees also wish to know their position in the organization. Performance

appraisal can be defined as the process of evaluating an employee’s

performance of a job in terms of its requirement.

Page 36: Performance Report Project

Definition of Performance Appraisal:

Performance appraisal is the process of obtaining, analyzing and

recording information about the relative worth of an employee. The focus of

the performance appraisal is measuring and improving the actual

performance of the employee and also the future potential of the employee.

Its aim is to measure what an employee does.

Communicating the Standards

Once set, it is the responsibility of the management to communicate

the standards to all the employees of the organization. The employees should

be informed and the standards should be clearly explained to the. This will

help them to understand their roles and to know what exactly is expected

from them. The standards should also be communicated to the appraisers or

the evaluators and if required, the standards can also be modified at this

stage itself according to the relevant feedback from the employees or the

evaluators.

Features

The main characteristics of performance appraisal may be listed thus. The

appraised is a systematic process involving three steps Setting work

standards:

� Assessing employees’ actual performance relative to the se standards.

� Offering feedback to the employee so that he can eliminate

deficiencies and improve performance in course of time.

Page 37: Performance Report Project

What Is To Be Appraised

� behaviors which measure o observable physical actins , movements

� objectives which measure job related results like amounts of deposits

mobilized, and ‘

� Traits which are measured in terms of personal characteristics

observable in employee’s job activities.

Who Will Appraise

Supervisors, Peers, Sub ordinates self -appraisal, users of services,

consultant

The Performance Appraisal Process

Performance appraisal is planned, developed and implemented

through a series of steps

• Establish performance standards

• Communicate the standards.

• Measure the actual performance

• `compare actual performance with standards and discuss the appraisal

• Taking corrective action, if necessary

Page 38: Performance Report Project

Who Appraises:

The appraiser may be person who has through knowledge of job

content attributes and understand for appraisal. The appraiser should be able

to determine which attributes are important in performing a particular job.

He should prepare reports without any bias and leniency.

Typical praises are supervisors, peers and sub-ordinates, employees

themselves (self-appraisal).Appraisal by all ie.360=degree appraisal.

The Attributes That Are Appraised:

� Technical

� Intelligence

� Integrity

� Initiative

� Honesty

� Sincerity

� Judgment skills

� Creativity

� Ability to accustom to new things area of interest

� Quality of work

� Quantity of work

� Knowledge of the job

� knowledge of the work

� punctuality

� good housekeeping

� Attendance

Page 39: Performance Report Project

PROCESS OF EVALUATION

Page 40: Performance Report Project

Methods:

A number of Performance appraisal methods are available to measure

and appraise Performance. Each organization follows its own method of

appraisal but each method with its strengths and weakness may be suitable

for one organization and non- suitable for another. As such there is no single

method which is accepted and used by all the organizations. All the appraisal

methods are classified differentially by different authors. But the most used

classification is divided into two categories.

1. Traditional method

2. Modern method

Traditional methods lay emphasis on rating the individual’s

personality traits, whereas Modern methods are more objectives and lays

emphasis on evaluating the work result. A common approach to assessing

performance is to use a numerical or scalar rating system whereby managers

are asked to score an individual against a number of objectives/attributes. In

some companies, employees receive assessments from their manager, peers,

subordinates, and customers, while also performing a self assessment. This

is known as a 360-degree appraisal and forms good communication patterns.

Page 41: Performance Report Project

The most popular methods used in the performance appraisal process

include the following:

• Management by objectives

• 360-degree appraisal

• Behavioral observation scale

• Behaviorally anchored rating scales

Trait-based systems, which rely on factors such as integrity and

conscientiousness, are also commonly used by businesses. The scientific

literature on the subject provides evidence that assessing employees on

factors such as these should be avoided. The reasons for this are two-fold:

Because trait-based systems are by definition based on personality traits,

they make it difficult for a manager to provide feedback that can cause

positive change in employee performance. This is caused by the fact that

personality dimensions are for the most part static, and while an employee

can change a specific behavior they cannot change their personality. For

example, a person who lacks integrity may stop lying to a manager because

they have been caught, but they still have low integrity and are likely to lie

again when the threat of being caught is gone.

Page 42: Performance Report Project

Trait-based systems, because they are vague, are more easily influenced by

office politics, causing them to be less reliable as a source of information on

an employee's true performance. The vagueness of these instruments allows

managers to fill them out based on who they want to/feel should get a raise,

rather than basing scores on specific behaviors employees should/should not

be engaging in. These systems are also more likely to leave a company open

to discrimination claims because a manager can make biased decisions

without having to back them up with specific behavioral information.

Traditional Methods:

� Ranking Method

� Grading Method

� Paired Comparison Method

� Force Choice Method

� Forced Distribution Method

� Checklist Method

� Critical Incidents Method

� Graphic Rating Scale method

Page 43: Performance Report Project

Ranking Method:

In this method of Performance Appraisal>it is systematic in nature. In

this method each Individual employee is compared with all others and is

placed in simple rank order of worth. The employees are ranked from the

highest to the lowest or from the best to worst. The main limitations of this

method are:

1. It does not specify how much one individual is better than the other.

2. This method is difficult when there are large number of employees.

Grading Method:

In this method certain Well-defined grades are established in advance.

Certain Categories of worth are first established and carefully defined as

grades like A-Outstanding. B - Satisfactory. C- Unsatisfactory. Employee

Performance is compared with defined grades and each employee is allotted

a grade that best describes his /her performance.

Forced-choice Method:

J.P. Guilford developed this method. This method contains a series of

statements and rates how effectively a statement describes each individual

being evaluated. The main limitation of this method is that it takes a lot of

time and effort to construct several evaluating statements.

Page 44: Performance Report Project

Paired comparison method:

In this method each individual employee is compared with other

employee on one-on-one basis. i.e. usually based on one trait only. The rater

is given a bunch of slips each containing a pair of names, the rater ticks

against the employee whom he considers the better of the two. The number

of times this employee is compared as better, determines his/her final

ranking.

Forced Distribution Method:

The appraiser is forced to rate the performance of the employees

through their factors categorized into different types of either a five point

scale or a three- point scale. For example the appraisal may distribute his

employee's performance as outstanding, above average below average.

Critical Incident Method:

In this Method, the rater lays emphasis on those key behaviors that

make the difference between performing a job in net worth manner. In this

method the employee's performance is appraised in three basic steps:

1. Preparing a list of one worthy on-the job behavior of specific incidents.

2. Group of experts assign weight age to these incidents, depending on their

degree of desirability to perform a job.

3. Finally constructing a Checklist indicating incidents describing workers

as ‘Good' or 'Bad'. The, he checklist is given to the rater to evaluate the

workers.

Page 45: Performance Report Project

Check list Method:

The rater does not evaluate employee performance. The appraiser supplies

reports about the performance of appraisers and the personnel department

does the final rating. A series of questions are presented concerning an

employee to his behavior. The rater then checks to indicate if the answer to a

question about an employee is positive or negative. The value of each

question may be weighed equally or certain question may be weighed more

heavily than others.

Free Essay Method:

The supervisor makes a free from, open-ended appraisal of an employee in

his words and puts down his impressions about the employee. The

description is all ways as factual and concrete as possible. No attempt is

made to evaluate in a quantitative manner.

Field review method:

A trainer employee from the personnel department interview line supervisors

to evaluate their respective subordinates. The appraiser takes detailed notes

of the collected information and proceeds to evaluation process.

The above listed traditional method are easy and simple to adopt but their

effectiveness is listed because a majority of the methods are based on rating

the personality traits of the appraises rather than the task related traits.

Page 46: Performance Report Project

Group Appraisal Method:

Appraises are rated by an appraisal group consisting of their supervisor and

there or four other supervisors who have some knowledge of their

performance.

Modern Methods of Performance Appraisal:

Some of the modern methods of performance appraisal are described below.

� Management by Objective

� psychological appraisal

� Human asset accounting method

� 360-degree appraisal

� Behaviorally anchored rating scales(BARS)method

� Assessment center method

Management by Objective (MBO) OR appraisal by result method:

Management by objective methods was developed by Peter F.

Drucker in 1954.According to him MBO is " A process whereby the

superior and sub-ordinates of an organization jointly identify its common

goals, define each individuals major areas of responsibility in terms of

results expected of him and use these measures as guides for operating the

unite and assuming the contribution of its members".

This method provides responsibility and accountability and recognizes

that employee has need for achievement and self full fiment. The philosophy

of by MBO stresses on goals rather than methods and is results -oriented.

Page 47: Performance Report Project

360-degree Appraisal Method:

The 360-degree appraisal method was first developed and used by Fenral

Electronic Company of USA in 1992.an employee is appraised by his

supervisors, sub -ordinates, peers and customers with whom he interacts in

the course of his job performance. All these appraisers provide feedback on

the employee by completing a survey questionnaire designed for this

purpose. All the information so gathered is then compiled through the

computerized system to prepare individualized reports. These reports are

then to the employees who were rated.

Assessment Centers:

It Is simulation method developed initially for military situations. The

important feature of this method is 'job-related stimulation's which involves

characteristics that managers that managers feel are important to the job

success. The evaluators observe and evaluate participants as they perform

activities commonly found in these higher-level jobs.

Psychological appraisal:

Large organizations employee fulltime industrial psychologists. When

psychologists are used for evaluations. they assess an individual's future and

past performance . The appraisal normally consists of in-depth interviews,

psychologists and discussion with the superior.

Page 48: Performance Report Project

Behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS) Method:

In this method developed during 1960's, the procedure for Behaviorally

Anchored Rating scale is usually five stepped. The first step is generation of

critical incidents by appraisers. The next step is to developed performance

dimensions, which are clusters of the critical incidents. He third step is to

reallocate incidents. Scaling of the incident usually in a 7-point or in a 9-

point scale to represent effective and ineffective performance is the fourth

step. The last step in this procedure is to develop a final instrument in which

a subset of incidents is used as "Behavior anchors" for the performance

dimensions. This system is time consuming and expensive.

Human Asset Accounting Method:

It refers to activity devoted to attaching money estimates to the value of a

form's internal human organization and its external customer goodwill. the

human asset is considered to be enhance if a worthy employee joins in the

organization. If distrust and conflict prevails in organization then human

asset are considered to be devalued. the current value of an organization' s

human assets can be appraised by developed procedures by undertaking

periodic measures of key casual and intervening enterprise variables.

Page 49: Performance Report Project

Need For Performance Appraisal:

Performance appraisal is needed in order to:

The study on performances appraisal is needed in order to

1. Provide information about the performances ranks basing on which

decision regarding salary fixations; confirmation, promotion, transfer and

demotion are taken.

2. Provide feedback information about the level of achievement and

behavior of subordinate. The information helps to review the

performance of the subordinate, rectifying performance deficiencies and

to set new standards of work, if necessary.

3. Provide information to diagnose deficiency in employee regarding skill,

knowledge, determine training and developmental needs and to prescribe

the means of employee growth, provides information for correcting

placement.

4. Provide information which helps to counsel the subordinate.

5. To prevent grievances and in disciplinary action.

Page 50: Performance Report Project

Purpose:

Performance appraisal aims at attaining the different purpose

They are:

1. To create and maintain a satisfactory level of performance.

2. To contribute to the employee growth and development through training,

self and management development programmes.

3. To help the superiors to have a proper understanding about their

subordinates

4. To guide job changes with the help to continuous ranking.

5. To facilitate fair and equitable compensation based on performances.

6. To facilitate for testing and validating selection tests, interview

techniques through comparing their sources with performance appraisal

ranks.

7. To provide information for making decisions regarding layoff,

retrenchment extra.

Page 51: Performance Report Project

CHAPTER - 5 DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION

Page 52: Performance Report Project

Data Analysis and Interpretation

A reach has been conducted among 60 employees of Performance

appraisal in MetLife by providing them with questionnaires. The feed back

obtained was useful in analyzing the level of satisfaction among the

employees and management in the organization. The data has been

collected, selecting criteria such as age , sex ,designation, nature of job,

family back ground ,educational qualification etc.,

For the purpose of survey, a sample of 60 employees has been taken

into consideration with a view to assess the “Performance Appraisal

System” in MetLife India insurance Ltd.

Page 53: Performance Report Project

1. Age group

Age No of employees Percentage No of

employees

25-35 29 54

35-45 15 28

45-55 8 15

55 above 2 4

Total 54 100

54%

28%

15%

4%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

25-35 35-45 45-55 55 above

Age

No of employees

PE

RC

EN

TA

GE

Interpretation:

From the survey It was found that 53% .of the respondent belong to

the age group of 25-35, 28% of the respondents belongs to the group of 35-

45, 15 % of the respondents belongs to the group of 45-55, and 4% of

respondents belongs to the group 55 an above.

Page 54: Performance Report Project

2. Sex:

Sex No. of employees Percentage

Male 50 50

Female 10 10

Total 60 60

80%

20%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Male Female

Sex

No. of employees

PE

RC

EN

TA

GE

The male respondents were 80% and female employees occupied 20%

Page 55: Performance Report Project

3. Educational Qualification

Qualification No. of employees Percentage

Post Graduate 27 50

Graduate 19 35

Under graduate 5 9

Technical 3 6

total 54 100

Interpretation:

The educational attainments of the respondents showed that 50% people

were Post graduate 35% were graduate, 8% were undergraduate reaming

6% have completed technical or other course etc.

50%

35%

9%6%

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Post Graduate Graduate Under graduate Technical

No of employees

Percentage

PE

RC

EN

TA

GE

Page 56: Performance Report Project

4. I am aware of the present Performance Appraisal System in my

Organization.

Response

Number of

Respondents Percentage of Response

Yes 36 66.67

To some extent 17 31.48

No 1 1.85

Total 54 100.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

perc

en

tag

e

Yes To some extent No

response

Percentage of Response

Percentage of Response

Page 57: Performance Report Project

Interpretation:

The above diagram clearly represents that a large percentage of

employees are aware of the Performance Appraisal System existing in the

organization. At the same time, significant percentage of employees said

that they know about Performance Appraisal up to some extent only. Only

2% of the employees said that they were not aware of Performance

Appraisal. So, there’s a need to educate these 33% employees about the

importance of the Performance Appraisal. So, it can be said that the purpose

of conducting Performance Appraisal is fulfilled as 67% employees

answered ‘Yes’ while asked about their awareness.

Page 58: Performance Report Project

5. Period of Performance Appraisal system.

Response

Number of

Respondents

Percentage of

Response

3 Months 0 0.00

6 Months 21 38.89

1 Year 33 61.11

No Specified Time 0 0.00

Total 54 100.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

perc

en

tag

e

3 Months 6 Months 1 Year No Specified Time

Time period

Percentage of Response

Interpretation:

Maximum Number of Employees i.e. 61% said that

Performance Appraisal is done to them once in a year. 39% of the

employees said that Performance Appraisal is done for every 6 months.

Employees strongly believe that Performance Appraisal is done for their

benefit only.

Page 59: Performance Report Project

6. Performance Appraisal is done by

Response Number of

Respondents

Percentage of

Response

Immediate Superior 29 53.70

HR Personnel 2 3.70

Outer Consultant 23 42.59

Others 0 0.00

Total 54 100.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

perc

en

tages

Immediate Superior HR Personnel Outer Consultant Others

Respondents

Percentage of Response

Interpretation:

A large number of employees said that their immediate superior

appraises them. Up to 96% of employees say that their superior appraises

them. At the same time, 4% of employees said that HR Personnel appraises

them.No question of outer consultant and other source of appraisal, the role

and responsibility of both superior and subordinate are very significant in

making the Performance Appraisal more efficient for their future

development.

Page 60: Performance Report Project

7. Performance Appraisal is used as a basis for

Response Number of

Respondents

Percentage of

Response

Training &

Development 6 11.11

Job Rotation 5 9.26

Promotion 3 5.56

Incentives 0 0.00

Salary Hike 30 55.56

Wage Fixation 0 0.00

All the above 10 18.52

Total 54 100.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Pe

rcen

tag

e

Training &

Development

Job Rotation Promotion Incentives Salary Hike Wage

Fixation

All the above

Response

Percentage of Response

Page 61: Performance Report Project

Interpretation:

56% of the employees agreed that the Performance Appraisal is used

as a basis for salary hike. Next to that, majority employees (18%) opined

that Performance Appraisal is used as a basis for Training & Development,

Job Rotation, Promotion, Salary Hike, Incentives and Wage fixation. No

incentives are given on the basis of Performance Appraisal.

Page 62: Performance Report Project

8. Satisfaction of Performance Appraisal System.

Response Number of

Respondents

Percentage of

Response

Highly Satisfied 4 7.41

Satisfied 42 77.78

Can't Say 7 12.96

Dissatisfied 1 1.85

Highly Dissatisfied 0 0.00

Total 54 100.00

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Pe

rcen

tag

es

Highly Satisfied Satisfied Can't Say Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied

respondents

Percentage of Response

Page 63: Performance Report Project

Interpretation:

Maximum numbers of employees i.e. 78% are satisfied with the

Performance Appraisal system in the organization. 7% of employees were

highly satisfied with it. A minor proportion of employees are not satisfied

and 13% employees said that they can’t say exactly their decision.

Employees are satisfied with the existing one. Employees will be

highly satisfied, if the management appraises employees regularly and guide

them, lead them in all aspects.

Page 64: Performance Report Project

9. The timely completion of performance appraisal system in Metlife

insurance company

Table -9

Time rate No. of employees Percentage

With in time 37 57

Beyond the Schedule 18 33

Cant say 5 9

Total 54 100

57%

33%

9%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

With in time Beyond the Schedule Cant say

Percentage

PE

RC

EN

TA

GE

Interpretation:

From the survey 57% Of Employees with in the time rate of the

completion of performance appraisal system, 33 % Of Employees beyond

the schedule of the completion of performance appraisal system, 9 Of

Employees can’t say the completion of performance appraisal system

was held in metlife company.

Page 65: Performance Report Project

10. Development of the performance appraisal system

Result No. of employees Percentage

Yes 39 72

No 15 28

Total 54 100

72%

28%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Yes No

No. of employees

Perc

en

tag

es

Interpretation:

For the survey 72% of employees are satisfied with work performance

appraisal system helps you for the development of career, 28% of

employees are satisfied with work performance appraisal system helps you

for the development of career in metlife company.

Page 66: Performance Report Project

11. Opinion Regarding the awards or rewards for better performance

Rewards taken No. of employees Percentage

Yes 49 90

No 5 10

Total 54 100

90

10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Yes No

Percentage

Pe

rce

nta

ge

s

Result

For the survey 90% of employees are satisfied to get the awards or

rewards for better performance, 10 % of employees are satisfied to get the

awards or rewards for better performance, in MetLife Company.

Page 67: Performance Report Project

12. Types of benefits that you will get after Performance appraisal

Benefits No. of employees Percentage

Monetary 42 78

Non Monitory 12 22

Total 54 100

78 %

22 %

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Monetary Non Monetory

Percentage

Pe

rce

nta

ge

s

For the survey78% of employees are satisfied to get the monetary

benefits for the better performance, 22 % of employees are satisfied to get

the non monetary benefits for the better performance, in MetLife Company.

Page 68: Performance Report Project

13. Do you get any supporting work environment in achieving highest

performance

Result No. of employees Percentage

Yes 33 61

No 21 39

Total 54 100

61 %

39 %

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Yes No

Result

Percentage

Pe

rce

nta

ge

s

For the survey 61% of employees are to get the supporting work

environment in achieving highest performance, 39% of employees are to get

the supporting work environment in achieving highest performance, in

metlife company.

Page 69: Performance Report Project

14. The correct feed back of your strengths or weaknesses in

performance appraisal system

Feed back Reslt No. of employees Percentage

Yes 36 67

No 18 33

Total 54 100

67

33

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Yes No

Percentage

Pe

rce

nta

ge

s

For the survey 67% of employees are to the correct feed back of our

strengths or weaknesses in performance appraisal system, 33% of employees

are to the correct feed back of our strengths or weaknesses in performance

appraisal system, in metlife company.

Page 70: Performance Report Project

15. Is there any scope to meet the higher authority, if performance

appraisal is not done in fair.

Scope No. of employees Percentage

Yes 33 61

No 16 30

No idea 5 9

Total 54 100

61.11%

30 %

9 %

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Yes No No idea

Scope

Percentage

Pe

rce

nta

ge

s

Result

From the survey 61% Of Employees share their feelings to meet the

higher authority. 30% Of Employees not share their feelings to meet higher

authority .9 % Of Employees are no idea about the performance appraisal

system.

Page 71: Performance Report Project

41 % 41%

18 %

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Yes No No idea

Percentage

Pe

rce

nta

ge

s

Result

16. Performance appraisal system helps you in achieving organization

goals

Table- 16

Feed back Result No. of employees Percentage

Yes 22 41

No 22 41

No idea 10 18

Total 54 100

From the survey 41% Of Employees are respond to help in achieving

organization goals. 41% Of Employees not respond to help in achieving

organization goals.9 % Of Employees are dilemma to achieving the

organization goal.

Page 72: Performance Report Project

17. The suggestion and modifications in the present performance

appraisal system for effective implementation.

Feed back Reslt No. of employees Percentage

Yes 34 62.962963

No 11 20.3703704

No idea 9 16.6666667

Total 54 100

63 %

21 %17 %

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Yes No No idea

Percentage

Pe

rce

nta

ge

s

Result

From the survey 63% Of Employees are respond to suggest any

modifications in the present performance appraisal system for effective

implementation and 24 % Of Employees are not respond to suggest any

modifications in the present performance appraisal system for effective

implementation.9 % Of Employees are no idea about the present

performance appraisal system

Page 73: Performance Report Project

CHAPTER CHAPTER CHAPTER CHAPTER ---- 6666

FINDINGSFINDINGSFINDINGSFINDINGS AND AND AND AND

SUGGESTIONSSUGGESTIONSSUGGESTIONSSUGGESTIONS

Page 74: Performance Report Project

FINDINGS

� The employees in the organization are aware of Performance Appraisal

System of the organization.

� Performance Appraisal to employees is once in a year

� The employees say that they were highly satisfied with the Performance

Appraisal done by Superior.

� So the employees say that the role of performance appraisal in achieving

the organizational effectiveness is high.

� The respondents say that the performance management is effectively

formulated and implemented in the organization.

� Respondents says that in performance management key performance

areas are taken into consideration while evaluation of measuring

performance.

� Respondents say that performance management will improve directly or

indirectly productivity.

� Respondents say that needs minor changes in power grid performance

management system.

� Respondents say that the performance is improved by the behavioral

training.

Page 75: Performance Report Project

SUGGESTIONS

� The organization can give special training on soft skills to the

employees. Whoever lacked in the Communication skills in the

organization

� Open system of Performance appraisal can also be followed.

� Senior management should continually review the appraisal

conducted, which shall be seen as positive support to the system by

the appraiser as well as appraises, and their interest will be

maintained.

� The management should identify the significant improvements in the

employee's performance appraisal.

� The management can also encourage the efforts and suggestions from

employees.

� The management should also give importance to senior employees for

promotions, increments.

� Taking proper care of dissatisfied employees is essential as one bad

fish spoils the whole sea.

� The management should allow the employees to set their own targets

so that they can improve their performance.

� An effective performance appraisal system must be implemented so it

will have an impact on the employee's performance.

Page 76: Performance Report Project

CONCLUSION

After my thorough observation and analysis, I would like to

conclude that the organization is good in the overall implementation of the

performance appraisal process.

One of the conclusions based on appraiser’s views is that the major

purpose of performance appraisal is to promoting the employee and helping

for their career development.

The major factors considered by them in evaluating the performance

are their job knowledge and performance and dedication to the organization.

The employees were very friendly and helped in doing my project

and answered to my questions very spontaneously and accurately.

My project guide is also very co-operative and has guided me in

every step in completing my project.

Page 77: Performance Report Project

BIBIOLOGRAPHY

Text Books:

1. Aswathappa K. Human Resources and Personnel Management. Tata

McGraw-Hill Publishing Company limited, New Delhi.

2. Edwin B.Flippo, Principles of Personal Management, McGraw-Hill, New

York.

3. L.M.Prasad, Principles and Practices of Management Sultan Chand

&Sons Educational Publishers, New Delhi.

4. Personnel and Human Resource Management Himalya Publishing house,

New Delhi. Dr. P.SUBBA RAO

W e b s i t e s :

� www.insuranceindia.com

� www.metlife.com

� www.irda.com

� www.wikipedia.com

� www.hrsolutions.inc

Page 78: Performance Report Project

QUESTIONNAIRE ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

1. Are you aware of the performance appraisal system exists in your

company?

(a) Yes [ ] (b) No [ ]

2. By whom you are appraised?

(a) Superiors (b) Peers

(c) Self (d) Group appraisers

3. In your opinion what is the objective3 or purpose of performance

appraisal

(a) Promotion (b) Increments

(c) Transfers (d) all the above

4. What is the periodicity of the performance appraisal system?

(a) 2 months (b) 3 months

(c) 6 months (d) 1 year

5. How does you rate the timely completion of performance appraisal

system in MetLife insurance company

(a) With in time (b) beyond the schedule

(c) can’t say

6. Will the performance appraisal system helps you for the development

of your career?

(a) Yes (b) No

7. Do you get any awards or rewards for better performance?

(a) Yes (b) No

(c) can’t say

8. If yes, what types of benefits will you get?

(a) Monetary (b) Non Monetary

Page 79: Performance Report Project

9. Is there any bias in assessing the performance?

(a) Yes (b) No

10. Do you get any supporting work environment in achieving highest

performance?

(a) Yes (b) No

11. Do you get the correct feed back of your strengths or weaknesses in

performance appraisal system?

(a) Yes (b) No

12. Is there any scope to meet the higher authority, if performance

appraisal is not done in fair?

(a) Yes (b) No

(c) No idea

13. Will the performance appraisal system help in achieving organization

goals?

(a) Yes (b) No

(c) No idea

14. Do you suggest any modifications in the present performance

appraisal system for effective implementation?

(a) Yes (b) No

(c) No idea