13
1 Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17 Barcelona 12-15 May 2003 Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment Ralf Heitbreder Volkswagen AG Germany Steffen Schmidt Siemens AG Germany

Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

  • Upload
    kris

  • View
    102

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment. Ralf Heitbreder Volkswagen AG Germany. Steffen Schmidt Siemens AG Germany. Structure of 6 kV system. 110 kV. 6 kV switchgear (with circuit breakers). 0.4 kV busbar. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

1Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17

Barcelona 12-15 May 2003

Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

Ralf Heitbreder

Volkswagen AG

Germany

Steffen Schmidt

Siemens AG

Germany

Page 2: Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

2Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17

Barcelona 12-15 May 2003

Structure of 6 kV system 110 kV

6 kV switchgear(with circuit breakers)

0.4 kV busbar 6 kV unit substation (with load interrupter switches and HV fuses)

Page 3: Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

3Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17

Barcelona 12-15 May 2003

IC=100A

transient earth fault relay

IC=100A

transient earth fault relay

Initial state (isolated neutral)

- unreliable operation of transient earth fault relays - high overvoltages (transient and power frequent)- high fault current over a long time

virtually every earth fault results in multi-pole fault- high voltage dips in 0.4 kV system in case of multi-pole 6 kV fault- man power needed for fault location and switch off

Page 4: Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

4Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17

Barcelona 12-15 May 2003

Steps of Investigation

• Measurements for data acquisition– Zero sequence impedance; Reduction factor of cable shield

– Earthing and touch Voltages

• Calculation of earth fault currents

• Comparison of variants of neutral treatment– Effects on operation; Risk of fault propagation

– Devices for fault detection and protection

– Neutral devices

– Compliance with touch voltage criteria

• Installation of proposed variant of neutral treatment

• Commissioning and earth fault test

Page 5: Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

5Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17

Barcelona 12-15 May 2003

Measurements for data acquisitionItestCurrent source

A VItest U

6 kV cableNYFG(b)Y

V

remote stationfeeding station

V

measurement of earthingand touch voltages

A Isheath

A Iearth

measurement of earthingand touch voltages

Results:

• Z0 1,5 /km + j 1,5 /km

• rE = 0,60 ... 0,80

• UE 20 V/kA

• UB 10 V/kA

Results:

• Z0 1,5 /km + j 1,5 /km

• rE = 0,60 ... 0,80

• UE 20 V/kA

• UB 10 V/kA

Page 6: Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

6Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17

Barcelona 12-15 May 2003

Improved operation with isolated neutral

+ no interruption of supply + no cost for neutral devices

- high fault current over a long time risk of multi-pole fault - high overvoltages (transient and power frequent) risk of double fault- new capacitive directional earth fault relays necessary- man power needed for fault location and switch off

IC=100A

capacitive earth fault relayIE> = 50 A

IC=100A

capacitive earth fault relayIE> = 50 A

Page 7: Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

7Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17

Barcelona 12-15 May 2003

Operation with earth fault compensation

+ no interruption of supply+ small earth fault current low risk of multi-pole fault

- high overvoltages (transient and power frequent) risk of double fault- new wattmetric earth fault relays and window-type transformers

necessary- high costs for neutral earthing transformer and arc suppression coil - man power needed for fault location and switch off

IRest<10A

wattmetric earth fault relaywindow-type current transformer

ICoil = 140 AIRest<10A

wattmetric earth fault relaywindow-type current transformer

ICoil = 140 A

Page 8: Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

8Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17

Barcelona 12-15 May 2003

Low impedance earthing 2000 A

+ fast fault clearing low risk of multi-pole fault+ no transient overvoltages low risk of double fault+ existing overcurrent-time relays with phase fault detection can be used

- setting of phase fault detection must changed to -smaller starting currents (to detect earth faults) and -higher delay times (to prevent tripping by inrush currents)

- voltage dips of up to 10 % in 0.4 kV system in case of 6 kV earth faults- unselective or no tripping of HV fuses

Ik1,max=2kAIk1,min=0,77kA

overcurrent-time relay(phase fault detection)t» = 0,3 s

Ik1,max=2kAIk1,min=0,77kA

overcurrent-time relay(phase fault detection)t» = 0,3 s

Page 9: Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

9Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17

Barcelona 12-15 May 2003

Low impedance earthing 500 A

+ fast fault clearing and low fault current low risk of multi-pole fault+ no transient overvoltages low risk of double fault+ low voltage dips in 0.4 kV system in case of 6 kV earth faults

- new overcurrent-time relays with earth fault detection necessary

- unselective or no tripping of HV fuses

Ik1,max=500AIk1,min=310A

overcurrent-time relay(earth fault detection)IE> = 200A; tE> = 0,3 s

Ik1,max=500AIk1,min=310A

overcurrent-time relay(earth fault detection)IE> = 200A; tE> = 0,3 s

Page 10: Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

10Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17

Barcelona 12-15 May 2003

Comparison of Investment Costs

Isolated neutral

Earth fault compensation

Low impedance earthingIk1 = 2000 A

Low impedance earthingIk1 = 500 A

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

cost for protection devices

costs for neutral device

Page 11: Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

11Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17

Barcelona 12-15 May 2003

Equipment used for low impedance earthing

Neutral earthing transformer

Neutral resistor

Page 12: Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

12Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17

Barcelona 12-15 May 2003

Results of the short-circuit test

R

6 kV0,4 kV

voltages 6 kV system

voltages 400 V system

earth fault current

Page 13: Performance of Industrial Network improved by Low Resistance Neutral Treatment

13Schmidt DE Session 2 – Block 1 – Paper 17

Barcelona 12-15 May 2003

Operational experience

• low impedance earthing (Ik1 = 500 A) is in operation for more than 2 years

• 2 earth fault were selectively cleared by protection relays

• no unselective tripping in response to earth fault starting

• no sensible voltage dips in 0.4 kV system during 6 kV earth faults