PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT

2003 - 2004

OSU QATASKGROUP

OSU QATASKGROUP

OSU QATASKGROUP

AIM AVIATION UNITED KINGDOM

AIM AVIATION RENTON, WA

AIRBUS GERMANY

BODYCOTE ORTECH INC. CANADA

BOEING RENTON, WA

BOEING EVERETT, WA

C&D AEROSPACE LAPALMA, CA

CAAC Test Center CHINA

DELSEN TESTING LABS GLENDALE, CA

DGA/CEAT FRANCE

DLR GERMANY

DUNLOP UNITED KINGDOM

FAA Wm. J. HUGHES TECH CENTER AC AIRPORT, NJ

HERB CURRY, INC. MT. VERNON, IN

ISOVOLTA AG AUSTRIA

JAMCO AMERICA, INC. EVERETT, WA

LANTAL TEXTILES SWITZERLAND

NORTH WEST COMPOSITES MARYSVILLE, WA

SCHNELLER, INC. KENT, OH

SCHNELLER, INC. PINELLAS PARK, FL

SHOWA AIRCRAFT CO. JAPAN

TESTCORP MISSION VIEJO, CA

The Govmark Organization, Inc. FARMINGTON, NY

5596 PANEL

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

H I E O W M S X K B V A Q L G D R C Y T F P J H I O S M R W L Q X E K V J D C P A T B G Y F

Peak

Avg +/- 2SD

2 Min Total

5596 PANEL

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

H I E O W M S X K B V A Q L G D R C Y T F P J H I O S M R W L Q X E K V J D C P A T B G Y F

Peak

Avg +/- 2SD

2 Min Total

5524 PANEL

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

O E H W S M L I K D Q B U R X G V A C P Y T F J O H E S I D L M W X A R K Q G V P B U C T Y J F

Peak 2 Min TotalAvg +/- 2SD

5524 PANEL

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

O E H W S M L I K D Q B U R X G V A C P Y T F J O H E S I D L M W X A R K Q G V P B U C T Y J F

Peak 2 Min TotalAvg +/- 2SD

PEAK TIME (Seconds)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Q G I W L C F B Y O J K V R X P S T A M D H E

5596 Panel

Kh (kW-min/mV)

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

L H O W E S V D M U I R B F C K Y G T P J A X Q

Peak/Total Ratio for 5596 Panel

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

E B G Y F V A K I X D C W T O M P S Q L J R H

Smoke Denesity (Dm4)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

J T L B O V X Q K Y D W E G A M H S C F I P R U

Peak, 2001 - 2003

H

E

OI

M

W SK

B L

A

UV D

G

Q FT C X R Y

P

J

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

% D

ev

iati

on

Fro

m A

vg

+2SD

-2SD

AVG

2 Min Total, 2001 - 2003

H

OE

S

L

A

W M

I

K

C

U Q

T

D

VX

J

GR

P

F Y

B

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

% D

ev

iati

on

Fro

m A

vg

+2SD

-2SD

AVG

Smoke, 2001 - 2003

J

L

G

B Q

C T

D WK

OV

YX

AM H

F P

S

E U

I

R

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

% D

ev

iati

on

Fro

m A

vg

+2SD

-2SD

AVG

Parameter Lab Value1 Value2 Value3Lab

Mean Difference Z NOTES5596 A 50.69 54.30 54.25 53.08 2.06 0.23 PopulationPEAK B 45.71 53.70 47.46 48.96 -2.06 -0.23 Mean 51.02(kW/sq.m) C 55.32 58.69 54.22 56.08 5.06 0.57 StdDev 8.87

D 53.23 52.45 58.87 54.85 3.83 0.43 Valid Results 23E 38.00 33.18 39.06 36.75 -14.27 -1.61F 53.60 64.00 65.60 61.07 10.05 1.13G 53.43 55.92 54.85 54.73 3.71 0.42H 33.00 36.00 33.00 34.00 -17.02 -1.92I 34.48 34.32 35.44 34.75 -16.27 -1.83J 64.63 66.57 69.00 66.73 15.71 1.77K 49.17 50.19 46.77 48.71 -2.31 -0.26L 54.40 54.00 55.10 54.50 3.48 0.39M 49.00 44.00 44.00 45.67 -5.35 -0.60O 49.08 41.12 37.93 42.71 -8.31 -0.94P 67.80 66.20 58.20 64.07 13.05 1.47Q 57.11 53.37 50.54 53.67 2.65 0.30R 47.00 62.80 58.30 56.03 5.01 0.57S 44.70 44.70 47.90 45.77 -5.25 -0.59T 58.26 62.49 61.44 60.73 9.71 1.09V 54.88 45.61 46.76 49.08 -1.94 -0.22W 47.14 44.54 44.90 45.53 -5.49 -0.62X 42.00 46.00 52.00 46.67 -4.35 -0.49Y 60.19 59.23 58.84 59.42 8.40 0.95

The copper slug indicated a heat flux 3.1% higher than a NIST calibrated gage and 2.5% higher than a copper disk for the NBS Smoke Chamber

per ASTM E662