Upload
joy-smith
View
222
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Performance Appraisal :
Performance Appraisal (PA) refers to all those procedures that are used to evaluate the personality, performance, potential, of its group members
Question arises?
Why do we measure performance? Effective performance appraisal
systems How do we measure performance?
Characteristics It is a step by step process It examine the employee strengths and
weaknesses Scientific and objective study Ongoing and continuous process Secure information for making correct
decisions on employees
Appraisal Benefits Appraisals offer the company:
Documentation Employee Development Feedback Legal protection Motivation system
Steps in performance appraisal
Establishing job standards
Designing an appraisal programme
Appraise performance
Performance interview
Use appraisal dataFor appropriate purpose
Process of PASetting
performancestandardsTaking corrective
standards
Discussingresults
Comparing standards
Measuringstandards
Communicatingstandards
Issues in appraisal system
Appraisal Design?
Formal and informal
Whose performance?
Who are the raters?
What problems?
How to solve?
What to evaluate?
When to evaluate?
What methods?
How PA contribute to firm’s competitive advantages Improving
performance
Making correct decision
Ensuring legal competence
Minimizing dissatisfactionAnd turnover
Values and behavior
Competitive advantage
Problems in performance appraisal
1. Errors In rating Halo effects Stereotyping Central tendency Personal bias
During the Meeting
Review performance: Based on previous goals Noting strengths and accomplishments Identifying areas for improvement
End the Meeting Encourage good performance Lay out action plan Communicate outcome of goals not
met Confirm understanding
Performance Appraisal Methods Individual Evaluation Methods
Confidential report Essay evaluation Critical incidents Checklists Graphic rating scale Behaviorally anchored rating scale MBO
Critical Incident methodEx: A fire, sudden breakdown, accident
Workers reaction scale
A informed the supervisor immediately 5B Become anxious on loss of output 4C tried to repair the machine 3D Complained for poor maintenance 2E was happy to forced test 1
Checklist method
•Simple checklist method•Forced choice method
Simple checklist method:Is employee regular Y/NIs employee respected by subordinate Y/NIs employee helpful Y/NDoes he follow instruction Y/NDoes he keep the equipment in order Y/N
Forced choice method
Criteria Rating
1.Regularity on the job Most Least•Always regular•Inform in advance for delay•Never regular•Remain absent•Neither regular nor irregular
Graphic Rating Scale• Continuous Rating Scale
Employee name_________ Deptt_______Rater’s name ___________ Date________------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exc. Good Acceptable Fair Poor 5 4 3 2 1 _
DependabilityInitiativeOverall outputAttendanceAttitudeCooperationTotal score Continuous Rating Scale
BARS( behaviorally Anchored rating scale)
Step 1. Identify critical incidents
Step 2. Select performance dimension
Step 3. Retranslate the incidents
Step 4. Assign scales to incidents
Step 5. Develop final instrument
Group Appraisal Ranking Paired comparison Performance tests Field review
technique
Performance Appraisal Methods (cont.)
Paired comparison methodAppraiser compares each employee with every other employee , one at a time.
For ex:
there are 5 employees A,B,C,D,ESo the performance of a will A compared with B & decision will be taken on whose performance is better…then A is compared with rest all one by one.
Field review methodPerformance subordinate peers superior customerDimension
Leadership ^ ^
Communication ^ ^
Interpersonal skills ^ ^
Decision making ^ ^ ^
Technical skills ^ ^ ^
Motivation ^ ^ ^
Performance criteria for executives For top managers
Return on capital employed Contribution to companies development Degree of growth and expansion of
employees
For middle level managers Departmental performance Coordination among employees Degree of clarity about corporate goals and
policies Achievement of standards