Upload
sakib-ahmed-chowdhury
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Performance and Attribution Analysis
1/13
PORTFOLIO
PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION AND
ATTRIBUTIONANALYSIS
Date of Submission
22nd
June, 2011
8/3/2019 Performance and Attribution Analysis
2/13
| 1 |
PORTFOLIO
PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION AND
ATTRIBUTIONANALYSIS
Submitted by:
Sakib Ahmed Chowdhury
B.B.A. 13th
Batch
Section: A, ID: 13-161
Group # 9
Department of Finance
University of Dhaka
Submitted to:
Mahmood Osman Imam, Ph.D.
Professor
Department of Finance
University of Dhaka
8/3/2019 Performance and Attribution Analysis
3/13
| 1 |
22nd June, 2011
Dr. Mahmood Osman Imam
Professor
Department of Finance
Faculty of Business Studies
University of Dhaka
Sir,
With due respect, I, a student of B.B.A. Program (13th Batch) under Department of
Finance, University of Dhaka, submit the report entitled Portfolio Performance
Evaluation and Attribution Analysisthat you have assigned us as the project work for
the course Security Pricing and Portfolio Theoryin the running semester.
I thank you, sir, for this assignment which has enriched my knowledge of this topic.
Sincerely,
_________________
Sakib Ahmed Chowdhury
Section: A, ID: 13-161
B.B.A. 13
th
BatchDepartment of FinanceFaculty of Business StudiesUniversity of Dhaka
8/3/2019 Performance and Attribution Analysis
4/13
| 1 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents .............................................................................................. iv
Abstract ............................................................................................................. 1
Methodology ...................................................................................................... 1
Limitation .......................................................................................................... 1
Portfolio Construction ........................................................................................ 2
Selection of Stocks ............................................................................................. 2
Return Series..................................................................................................... 2
Individual Stock Returns .................................................................................. 2
Market Return ................................................................................................ 2
Benchmark Returns for Individual Sectors .......................................................... 3
Optimization of Weights ...................................................................................... 3
Portfolio Performance Measurement .................................................................. 4
Sharpe Portfolio Performance Measure .................................................................. 4
Treynor Portfolio Performance Measure ................................................................. 4
Jensen Portfolio Performance Measure .................................................................. 4
Fama Decomposition .......................................................................................... 5
Components of Overall Performance ..................................................................... 5
Investors Risk................................................................................................ 5
Managers Risk ............................................................................................... 6
Selectivity ...................................................................................................... 6
Diversification ................................................................................................. 6
Net Selectivity ................................................................................................ 6
Decomposition ................................................................................................... 6
Performance Attribution Analysis ....................................................................... 8
Benchmark Portfolio ........................................................................................... 8
Allocation Effect ................................................................................................. 8Selection Effect .................................................................................................. 9
Attribution ......................................................................................................... 9
Findings ........................................................................................................... 10
8/3/2019 Performance and Attribution Analysis
5/13
| 1 |
INTRODUCTION
Portfolio performance evaluation and attribution analysis help the analysts to identify
their point of efficiency and improve. The focus of this project is to continue on the last
projects work and of portfolio performance evaluation and attribution analysis.
Methodology
The project involves analysis based on some listed companies from different industries.
The data range was 2005 to 2009 and is collected from Dhaka Stock Exchange Data
Library. Microsoft Excel software has been used to conduct some critical programming
work. Interpretation and justification are included as well.
Limitation
The numbers of stocks have been limited to ten. Therefore, this model needs to beexpanded if it to be applied in real world. Another drawback is that there were no
separate calculated indexes for stocks of different industries.
8/3/2019 Performance and Attribution Analysis
6/13
| 1 |
PORTFOLIO CONSTRUCTION
Stock Selection
The stock selection criteria have been previously presented in the prequel project titled Portfolio Construction and Optimization. Focusing on the purpose of the current
project, the detailed description is irrelevant to include here. Therefore, from this point
forward, the method of measuring performance of previously constructed portfolio (or
any other portfolio) is illustrated.
The selected stocks are as followings:
Industry Company
Bank AB Bank Limited
Islami Bank Limited
Pubali Bank Limited
NBFI IDLC Finance Limited
Fuel & Power Padma Oil
Summit Power
Service & Real Estate Samorita Hospital
Eastern Housing
Pharmaceuticals Renata Limited
Cement Heidelberg Cement
Return Series
Individual Stock Returns
The average returns on stock have been calculated on the basis of capital gain yield and
dividend yield. It is worth mentioning that the capital gain yield was calculated based on
the adjusted stock prices where these adjustments were made to normalize the effect
stock dividend as bonus share. Stock price adjustments were also made when there
were any stock splits (or reverse splits).
Market Return
DSE General Index has been considered as the proxy variable. The rationales are,
It reflects all the price and volume of all the securities listed in Dhaka StockExchange Limited.
It reflects all the price sensitive information available in the stock market.The final market return is the simple average of monthly returns calculated on index.
The month returns on index is calculated with the following formula:
8/3/2019 Performance and Attribution Analysis
7/13
| 1 |
Benchmark Returns for Individual Sectors
The DSE general index will not serve the purpose to identify the benchmark returns for
individual sectors. Therefore, separate indices for every sector are required to be
calculated the benchmark returns for them. First thing to consider is that DSE general
index is calculated by the contribution of the sectors based on their market
capitalization. If the market capitalization of a particular sector is multiplied to the index
value, the approximate index for that month and for that sector can be identified. For
example:
By repeating this process, the separate index for each of the sectors can be obtained by
applying their contribution in terms of market capitalization. From the separate indices
separate benchmark returns of different sectors can be calculated by applying the same
formula used to find the market return.
Weights and OptimizationThe objective for the optimization of the weights is to maximize the portfolio excess
return per unit of risk taken under the situation where no short selling is allowed. The
portfolio excess return is the weighted average excess returns of the individual
securities. The individual excess returns are the individual average returns in excess of
the monthly risk free rate of return. With the help of Microsoft Excel program it is very
easier to calculate the optimum percentage of weight to be put on individual securities in
order to reach the predefined objective. It is beyond the scope of the current project
because optimization process has been described in details in the previous project.
The optimum percentages of weights to that have to be put on are as followings.
Company Weights %
AB Bank Limited 0.00%
Islami Bank Limited 0.00%
Pubali Bank Limited 0.00%
IDLC Finance Limited 13.62%
Padma Oil 9.68%
Summit Power 4.67%
Samorita Hospital 11.33%
Eastern Housing 23.31%
Renata Limited 37.39%
Heidelberg Cement 0.00%
8/3/2019 Performance and Attribution Analysis
8/13
| 1 |
PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Sharpe Portfolio Performance Measure
The Sharpe ratio uses the total risk of the portfolio, not its systematic risk. The use oftotal risk is appropriate if the portfolio is an investors total portfolio that is, the
investor does not own any other assets. The portfolio with highest Sharpe ratio has the
best performance.
Treynor Portfolio Performance Measure
The Treynor ratio uses the systematic risk of the portfolio. Like, Sharpe ratio, the
portfolio with highest Treynor ratio has the best performance.
Both of the above performance measures suffer from a common limitation they can be
interpreted from a single number. Rather, they need to be compared with values
measuring other portfolios.
Following table summarizes the values of these two measures.
Portfolio Manager Investor X Investor Y Investor Z
Portfolio Excess Return 1.98% 1.95% 1.30%
Portfolio Standard Deviation 5.93% 6.90% 11.10%
Portfolio Beta 0.77 0.89 1.13
Sharpe Ratio 0.2864 0.2826 0.1171
Treynor Ratio 0.0261 0.0219 0.0115
Jensen Portfolio Performance Measure
Like the Treynor ratio, Jensens alpha is based on systematic risk. It is the vertical
distance from the SML measuring the excess return for the same risk as that of the
market and is given by
The following table shows the calculation of Jensens alpha for the optimized portfolio.
Portfolio Manager Investor X Investor Y Investor Z
Portfolio Annualized Return 30.02% 28.94% 26.38%
Market Return 22.08% 22.08% 22.08%
Risk-free Return 5.82% 5.82% 5.82%
Jensen's 0.1747 0.1447 0.0801
8/3/2019 Performance and Attribution Analysis
9/13
| 1 |
FAMA DECOMPOSITION
Eugene F. Fama has suggested a somewhat finer breakdown of performance. 1 The basic
idea of his breakdown was that the overall performance, in other words, the excess
return of a portfolio can be decomposed into measures of risk-taking and securityselection skill. Decomposition process is described below.
The following graph can clarify the concept of the decomposition.
Where,
Components of Overall Performance
Investors Risk
Investors risk is referred to as the highest systematic risk the investor wants to assume
for his/her investment. For taking this risk s/he would require additional return as
1Eugene F. Fama Components, Components of Investment Performance,Journal of Finance 27, no. 3 (June1972): 551-567
8/3/2019 Performance and Attribution Analysis
10/13
| 1 |
compensation to invest some portion of his wealth in risky assets. This is the return
against investors assumed risk.
Managers Risk
Managers risk is referred to as the highest systematic risk assumed by the portfolio
manager in a fully diversified portfolio. The return is the compensation for assuming thatrisk which is ultimately the referred to the security market line. This is the required rate
of return a portfolio manager has to earn with his portfolio for the investor to
compensate for taking additional risk than the target risk of the investor himself/herself.
Investors risk and managers risk together forms the portfolio risk.
Selectivity
Selectivity component represents the portion of the portfolios actual return beyond that
available to an unmanaged portfolio with identical systematic risk. This return represents
the superior skill of the portfolio manager in selecting the appropriate asset class (sector
in case of this project) to arrive at above average rates of return for the portfolio.Selectivity is the vertical difference between the return for assuming the market
systematic risk and the actual return of the portfolio.
Diversification
If a portfolio manager attempts to select undervalued stocks and in the process gives up
some diversification, it is possible to measure the added return necessary to justify this
diversification decision. This term emphasizes that diversification is the elimination of all
unsystematic variability.
Net Selectivity
Net selectivity is the vertical distance between the actual return on the portfolio and the
return on the combination of the riskless asset and the market portfolio that has return
dispersion equivalent to that of the portfolio being evaluated. The values of net
selectivity and diversification will be equal when the portfolio is completely diversified.
Decomposition
For decomposing, first the individual stock returns on securities have been annualized.
Then the individual beta of the stocks has been calculated. The beta of a security is the
covariance of the returns of the security itself with the market, divided by the variance
of the return of the market. In order to make the results more meaningful, the adjusted
beta has been used. The adjusted beta can be calculated to reflect the mean reversion
theory. Here, 2/3 weight is put on the market beta (1.00) and 1/3 weight is put on the
assets individual beta to find the result more correlated with the market beta.
8/3/2019 Performance and Attribution Analysis
11/13
| 1 |
Company AnnualizedMean Return
Beta AdjustedBeta
Weights
AB Bank Limited 0.257916 1.39 1.13 0.00%
Islami Bank Limited 0.047319 0.37 0.79 0.00%
Pubali Bank Limited -0.147307 1.31 1.10 0.00%
IDLC Finance Limited 0.269079 0.82 0.94 13.62%
Padma Oil 0.266969 0.27 0.76 9.68%
Summit Power 0.229869 0.73 0.91 4.67%
Samorita Hospital 0.269169 -0.08 0.64 11.33%
Eastern Housing 0.382292 0.21 0.74 23.31%
Renata Limited 0.275669 0.36 0.79 37.39%
Heidelberg Cement 0.152585 0.94 0.98 0.00%
The following table lists the outcomes of the decomposition where the return for everycomponent except the breakdown of portfolio risk.
Portfolio Return 29.59%Portfolio Total Risk 0.06Portfolio Systematic Risk 0.78Market Return 22.08%Market Total Risk 0.08Risk Free Return 5.82%Ratio of Total Risk 0.74
Return for Systematic Risk SML 18.55%Return for Total Risk CML 17.88%
Return for Selectivity 11.04%Return for Diversification -0.67%Return for Net Selectivity 11.71%
As the return for diversification and return for net selectivity is not equal, it indicates
that the portfolio is not completely diversified. -0.67% additional return is there for
diversification in the portfolio.
8/3/2019 Performance and Attribution Analysis
12/13
| 1 |
PERFORMANCEATTRIBUTIONANALYSIS
The purpose attribution analysis is to isolate the reason for any positive or negative
value-added performance. These factors are the two ways by which a portfolio manager
can earn above average return for the investors portfolios. The two ways are (1)selecting superior securities and (2) demonstrating superior market timing skills by
allocating funds to different assets classes or market segments. Specifically, this method
compares the total return to the managers actual investment holdings to the return for
a predetermined benchmark portfolio and decomposes the difference into an allocation
effect and a selection effect.
Benchmark Portfolio
For constructing the benchmark portfolio, first the market capitalization is used for
individual companies to find out the individual security weights against the market. Then
the weights have been rescaled in the scale of 100%. Followed by the annualizing ofsector returns for each of the sector, the process continues with calculation of
benchmark portfolio return from the sum of the products of rescaled weights for
securities and their benchmark returns of their respective industries.
Company Industry MarketCapitalization
(in Millions)
MarketWeight
(Individual)
RescaledWeight
MarketSegment
Return
AB Bank Limited Bank 29607.637 1.11% 14.02% 22.08%
Islami Bank Limited Bank 47986.979 1.79% 22.72% 22.08%
Pubali Bank Limited Bank 34678.344 1.30% 16.42% 22.08%
IDLC Finance Limited NBFI 20262.825 0.76% 9.59% 26.91%
Padma Oil Fuel & Power 21556.080 0.81% 10.20% 26.70%
Summit Power Fuel & Power 9773.179 0.37% 4.63% 22.99%
Samorita Hospital Service & Real Estate 855.393 0.03% 0.40% 26.92%
Eastern Housing Service & Real Estate 5848.853 0.22% 2.77% 38.23%
Renata Limited Pharmaceuticals 17199.690 0.64% 8.14% 27.57%
Heidelberg Cement Cement 23474.262 0.88% 11.11% 15.26%
Total Market 2676118.807
Benchmark PortfolioReturn
23.21%
Allocation Effect
The allocation effect measures the portfolio managers decision to over- or under-weight
a particular market segment or sector, i.e. (wai wpi) in terms of that segments return
performance relative to the overall return to the benchmark, i.e. (Rai Rp). Good timing
skill is therefore a matter of investing more money in those market segments that end
up producing greater than average returns. The allocation effect is measured by the
following formula.
8/3/2019 Performance and Attribution Analysis
13/13
| 1 |
Selection Effect
The selection effect measures the managers ability to form specific market segment
portfolios that generate superior returns relative to the way in which the comparable
market segment is defined in the benchmark portfolio (i.e., (Rai Rpi), weighted by the
managers actual market segment investment proportion.
Attribution
Company Actual
Weight
Benchmark
Weight
Weight
Difference
Actual
Return
Benchmark
Return
Return
Difference
AB Bank Limited 0.00% 14.02% 25.79% 22.08% -14.02% 3.71%
Islami Bank Limited 0.00% 22.72% 4.73% 22.08% -22.72% -17.35%
Pubali Bank Limited 0.00% 16.42% -14.73% 22.08% -16.42% -36.81%
IDLC Finance Limited 13.62% 9.59% 26.91% 26.91% 4.03% 0.00%
Padma Oil 9.68% 10.20% 26.70% 26.70% -0.53% 0.00%
Summit Power 4.67% 4.63% 22.99% 22.99% 0.05% 0.00%
Samorita Hospital 11.33% 0.40% 26.92% 26.92% 10.93% 0.00%
Eastern Housing 23.31% 2.77% 38.23% 38.23% 20.54% 0.00%
Renata Limited 37.39% 8.14% 27.57% 27.57% 29.24% 0.00%
Heidelberg Cement 0.00% 11.11% 15.26% 15.26% -11.11% 0.00%
Actual Portfolio Return 29.59%
Benchmark Return 23.21%
Allocation Effect *(Wai - Wpi) (Rpi - Rp)]0.06
Selection Effect *(Wai) (Rai - Rpi)]0.00
Net Effect [Allocation + Selection]0.06
The difference in the benchmark portfolio return and actual portfolio return indicates that
the portfolio manager has succeeded to add value to his investors portfolio. In other
words, the portfolio manager, with his current constructed portfolio, has outperformed
the market on 1-point basis. This outperformance is attributable to the efficient
allocation to sectors.