PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    1/49

    PE-7221

    Quality Engineering and

    Management (Taguchi Method)

    Prof. Charlton S. InaoDefence University

    College of Engineering

    Bishoftu,Ethiopia

    Chapter 2: Quality Loss Function

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    2/49

    Week 2 outline

    Introduction to Quality Loss Function

    Quality Loss Function for Various Quality

    Characteristics Specification Tolerance

    Tolerance Design

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    3/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    4/49

    Quality is often referred to as conformance to

    specifications. However, Taguchi proposes

    a different view of quality, one that relates it to

    cost and loss in dollars, not just to the

    manufacturer at the time of production but to

    the consumer and to society as a whole.

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    5/49

    Loss is usually thought of as additional

    manufacturing costs incurred up to the point that a

    product is shipped. After that, it is society, thecustomer, who bears the cost for loss of quality.

    Initially, the manufacturer pays in warranty costs.

    After the warranty period expires, the customer

    may pay for repair on a product. But indirectly, themanufacturer will ultimately foot the bill as a

    result of negative customer reaction and costs that

    are difficult to capture and account for, such as

    customer inconvenience and dissatisfaction, andtime and money spent by customers.

    As a result, the companys reputation will be

    damaged, and eventually the market share will be

    lost.

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    6/49

    Real growth comes from the market, cost, and

    customer satisfaction. The money the customer

    spends for a product and the perceived loss due to

    poor quality ultimately come back as long-term

    loss to the manufacturer.

    Taguchi defines qualityas the loss imparted by

    the product to the society from the time the

    product is shipped.

    The objective of the quality loss function is

    quantitative evaluation of

    loss caused by functional variation of a product.

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    7/49

    The loss function is calculated from the square of

    the reciprocal of the process capability index

    after multiplying a constant related to

    economy. It is an economic forecasting value

    that is imparted to the customer in the market.

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    8/49

    The Meaning of Quality

    Quality is related to the loss to society caused by aproduct during its life cycle

    The loss a customer sustains takes many forms, but isgenerally a loss of product function or properties.

    Quality is judged by one true evaluator, thecustomer

    According to Taguchi

    Note: Genichi Taguchi is a Japanese electrical engineer who studied design of

    experiments during the 50s and then wrote his own approach to

    experimentation.

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    9/49

    Traditional Taguchis

    There is Good or BadProducts only as per Limits.

    When a product moves fromits target will cause the loss

    even if the product lies ornot within Limits.

    Traditional and Taguchis Definition of

    Quality

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    10/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    11/49

    Taguchis U-shaped loss Function Curve

    Measured

    characteristic

    Taguchi loss Fn

    LTL Nominal UTL

    Scrap or Rework Cost.

    Loss

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    12/49

    Robust Design/Robustness

    the state where the technology, product, or

    process performance is minimally sensitive to

    factors causing variability and aging, at the

    lowest unit manufacturing cost.

    -Dr. Genichi Taguchi

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    13/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    14/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    15/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    16/49

    Quality LossFunction for

    Various Quality

    Characteristics

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    17/49

    Classification of Quality

    Characteristics

    1. Nominalis the best (NTB) -dimension = shaft

    2. Higher is the better (HTB)= efficiency, profit,yield

    3. Lower is the better(HTB) =shrinkage, defect,pollution, contamination

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    18/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    19/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    20/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    21/49

    Nominal -the-Best Case

    Control of aerosol flow from a spray can Boring an engine cylinder to an aim or target

    diameter.

    Controlling the diameter of a filament for a lightbulb.

    Controlling the texture of an ice cream product

    Controlling the gain of an op-amp

    Maintaining the part geometry of an injection

    molded part

    Creating a particular hue(color) in mixing paint

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    22/49

    Smaller -the-Better Case

    Microwave radiation leakage

    Time to first print in the copy or printer machine

    Paper jams in a copier,pack feed, printer defects

    Defects on an image

    Background density on a text image

    Automotive exhaust pollution

    Steering column vibration

    EMI from consumer electronics

    Corrosion of metals

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    23/49

    Taguchis Loss Function

    Taguchis Loss Functionrecognizes the customersdesire to have products thatare more consistent, part topart, and a producers desireto make a low-cost product.This is modeled three ways.

    As can be seen, the qualityloss function has three

    components:

    1) Cost coefficient, k2) Variance, S23) Bias squared, (y-m)2

    Nominal the Best

    (NB)

    Higher the Better

    (HB)

    Smaller the Better

    (SB)

    USLLSL

    Loss

    in$

    LSL

    Loss

    in$

    USL

    Loss

    in$

    h

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    24/49

    Type Of

    Characteristic

    Loss For

    An Individual Part

    Average Loss Per Part

    In a Distribution

    NB

    HB

    SB

    ])my(S[k)Y(L22

    )]y/S3(1][y/1[k)Y(L222

    )]y(S[k)Y(L22

    )y/1(k)Y(L2

    2

    )my(k)Y(L

    )y(k)Y(L2

    Taguchis Loss Function

    S2 = variance=2

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    25/49

    Loss in a Distribution

    (more than one piece)

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    26/49

    Nominal =115

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    27/49

    Example: NTB Nominal =115

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    28/49

    Compute for the average

    N data

    1 112

    2 113

    3 112

    4 1135 112

    6 113

    7 114

    8 115

    9 11210 113

    11 114

    12 112

    13 114

    average 113

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    29/49

    Calculate the variance,MSD

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    30/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    31/49

    Calculate for the Loss=k(MSD)

    L=0.25(4.92)=$1.23

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    32/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    33/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    34/49

    Example for Smaller the Better

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    35/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    36/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    37/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    38/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    39/49

    Specification

    Tolerancing

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    40/49

    In quality engineering, tolerance is not the

    deviation between products.

    Tolerance is defined as a deviation from target.

    Tolerance is determined so that the loss caused

    by the manufacturer and the one caused by the

    customer are balanced.

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    41/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    42/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    43/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    44/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    45/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    46/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    47/49

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    48/49

    Taguchis Loss FunctionApplying The Loss Function To

    Determine FactoryTolerances(Specification tolerances)

    Example:

    In automatic transmissions the shift pointsare supposed to occur at a certain throttle

    position. Heavy-duty truck users areparticularly sensitive to this characteristic.Usually, it takes the producer $100.00 toadjust a valve body under warranty when acustomer complains of the shift point. Fromthe information the engineers haveavailable, the average customer would askfor an adjustment if the shift point is off fromthe nominal by 40 rpm transmission outputspeed on the first-to-second gear shift.Determine the limits that would define whenan adjustment should be made at thefactory to avoid the complaints in the future.

    Here, the cost of adjustment is only $10.00.

    Solution:

    Loss = k (y-m)2

    $100.00 = k (40)2

    k = $0.0625 / rpm2

    At the factory level,

    Loss = k (y-m)2

    $10.00 = 0.0625 (y-m)2

    (y-m)2 = ($10.00 / 0.0625)= 160

    (y-m) = (160)

    = 13 rpm

  • 7/27/2019 PE-7221 2nd Week Quality Loss Function

    49/49

    The End